Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies"

Transcription

1 Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies

2 Key findings 1. Student outcomes in Arizona lag behind the rest of the nation. 2. Arizona struggles to attract and retain a strong and effective teacher workforce. 3. Low teacher salaries are a primary challenge leading to this unhealthy teacher labor market. 4. Arizona per pupil funding and state commitment to K-12 funding is low and declining. 5. Addressing the teacher workforce challenge will require new and strategic investments. 6. Arizona districts may have some limited opportunities to shift current spending, but the state will need to generate additional revenue for teacher salary investments. 2

3 Student outcomes in Arizona lag behind the rest of the nation Key Findings

4 Arizona students have made some recent gains on the NAEP assessment in reading Source: Funding PreK-12 Education, 110 th Arizona Town Hall Final Report 4

5 But overall Arizona performance remains at the bottom end of all states on the recent NAEP assessment NAEP Average Scale Score, 4th Grade Reading 235 Average Scale Score National average = New Mexico Alaska California Nevada Mississippi Arizona Hawaii West Virginia Louisiana Michigan Alabama South Carolina Arkansas Texas Tennessee South Dakota Oregon Kansas Illinois Idaho Georgia Oklahoma Maryland Minnesota Wisconsin Missouri New York Delaware Maine Colorado Iowa Ohio North Dakota Montana Rhode Island Utah North Carolina Washington Pennsylvania Nebraska Indiana Florida Wyoming Kentucky Connecticut New Jersey Virginia Vermont New Hampshire Massachusetts Source: ERS analysis based on NAEP Data Explorer 5

6 where it has been for over a decade 2015 NAEP Average Scale Score, 4th Grade Reading, Arizona vs. U.S., Arizona U.S. Average scale score Arizona NAEP 4 th grade reading rank 43/50 47/50 47/50 47/50 45/50 45/50 44/50 Source: ERS analysis based on NAEP Data Explorer; NAEP reading rank based on average scale score 6

7 Arizona struggles to attract and retain a strong and effective teacher workforce Key Findings

8 However, as a result of high turnover and attrition, Arizona students are unlikely to have a highly effective teacher three years in a row Research shows that teachers become more effective in producing student achievement gains after the first two years of teaching, with continued increases in gains as experience increases. Student Year 1 Likelihood of student assignment to a novice or uncredentialled teacher in Arizona A B C E G H I D F J Additionally, research shows that teachers without certification are significantly less likely to produce gains in student achievement. Year 2 Year 3 Novice/uncredentialled teacher or long-term sub Source: ERS analysis using data from A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S., Learning Policy Institute; NCES Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers [State] ; Finding and Keeping Educators for Arizona s Classrooms, Morrison Institute for Public Policy 2017; Superintendent Annual Financial Report FY17; Does Teacher Preparation Matter? Evidence about Teacher Certification, Teach for America, and Teacher Effectiveness, Linda Darling Hammond, Deborah J. Holtzman, Su Jin Gatlin & Julian Vasquez Heilig, 2005; Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of the research, Learning Policy Institute

9 Arizona teachers leave the teaching profession at the highest rate in the country, nearly 3x higher than the national median 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% Rate of Teacher Attrition (Leavers) % 8% 6% National median = 7% 4% 3% 2% 0% Massachusetts Ohio Pennsylvania Arkansas California Illinois Georgia North Carolina Oklahoma Missouri Connecticut Colorado Florida Alabama Iowa Washington Virginia Kansas New York New Jersey Indiana Louisiana Michigan Minnesota Wisconsin South Carolina Kentucky Texas Arizona Source: ERS analysis using data from A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S., Learning Policy Institute Note: data is only available for 29 states 9

10 Considering all teachers who leave their schools, AZ has the highest turnover in the U.S., with close to a quarter of teachers leaving their schools annually, nearly double the national median of 14% 30% Rate of Teacher Turnover (Movers & Leavers) % 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 7% National median = 14% Rhode Island Utah West Virginia New Jersey Pennsylvania Illinois New Hampshire Washington Vermont Maine Nebraska Wyoming California Connecticut New York Maryland Oregon South Dakota Michigan Georgia Ohio Idaho Tennessee Iowa Massachusetts Arkansas Alabama Missouri Florida North Dakota Virginia Colorado Kansas Indiana Kentucky Minnesota Wisconsin Alaska South Carolina Delaware Mississippi North Carolina Oklahoma Montana Nevada Hawaii Texas Louisiana New Mexico Arizona 24% Data from the Arizona Department of Education shows that since 2013, 42% of Arizona teachers left within 3 years of being hired. 22% of the teachers hired from lasted only one year. Source: ERS analysis using data from A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S., Learning Policy Institute 2016; Finding and Keeping Educators for Arizona s Classrooms, Morrison Institute for Public Policy

11 Arizona is in the bottom five of all states for percent of teachers within their first two years in the classroom 35% 30% 25% 20% 29% Percent Novice Teachers, High turnover and attrition means more inexperienced teachers. But research shows that teachers become more effective in producing student achievement gains after the first two years of teaching, with continued increases in gains as experience increases. 15% 15% National median = 12% 10% 5% 6% 0% Florida Colorado Utah Indiana Arizona Wisconsin Hawaii Idaho Nevada New Mexico Texas Maryland Massachusetts Nebraska Wyoming Mississippi Oklahoma Louisiana Kansas North Dakota North Carolina Arkansas Illinois South Dakota Missouri South Carolina Alabama West Virginia Montana Delaware Minnesota New Jersey Alaska Virginia Kentucky Ohio Tennessee Oregon Iowa Michigan Maine California Vermont Connecticut New York Pennsylvania Washington Rhode Island New Hampshire Georgia Source: ERS analysis using data from A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S., Learning Policy Institute 2016; Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of the research, Learning Policy Institute

12 High turnover and attrition in Arizona contributes to the impact of the ongoing (national) teacher shortage 6 Count of Statewide Teacher Shortages in Easiest to Staff Areas ( ) National median = Arizona reports more teacher shortages in easy to staff areas than all but four states. In a recent survey, 81% of administrators reported difficulty hiring new teachers. 0 Washington Vermont Utah Texas Pennsylvania Oregon North Carolina New York New Jersey Mississippi Michigan Maine Kansas Iowa Indiana Illinois Georgia Connecticut New Mexico New Hampshire Massachusetts Kentucky Hawaii Florida Delaware Colorado Arkansas Alaska Wisconsin Tennessee Montana Missouri Minnesota California Alabama Wyoming Virginia South Dakota South Carolina Rhode Island Ohio North Dakota Nebraska Maryland West Virginia Arizona Oklahoma Nevada Louisiana Idaho Source: ERS analysis using data from U.S. Department of Education Teacher Shortage Areas Nationwide Listing June 2017; Finding and Keeping Educators for Arizona s Classrooms, Morrison Institute for Public Policy 2017; Easiest to staff areas are defined here as the arts, early childhood, elementary education (general), English language arts, Social studies/humanities; For AK is most recent year of data 12

13 Low teacher salaries are a primary challenge leading to this unhealthy teacher labor market Key Findings

14 Just since the 2008 recession, real inflation-adjusted teacher salaries in Arizona have declined 10%, more than in all but 5 states 15% Percent Change in Inflation-Adjusted Teacher Salaries, to % 10% 5% 0% -5% National median = -6% -10% -15% -20% -16% -10% Mississippi Colorado Oklahoma Illinois West Virginia Arizona Indiana Ohio Virginia Washington Louisiana South Carolina Idaho New Mexico Alabama Georgia Kansas Utah Arkansas Maryland Tennessee Hawaii Wyoming Delaware Kentucky Florida North Carolina Missouri New Jersey Wisconsin Michigan Texas Minnesota South Dakota Maine New York New Hampshire Pennsylvania Nevada Rhode Island Oregon Iowa Massachusetts Montana Connecticut Nebraska Alaska California North Dakota Vermont Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Table Estimated average annual salary of teachers in public elementary and secondary schools, by state: Selected years, through

15 Reaching the point where Arizona now has the sixth-lowest teacher salary in the U.S. $80, Average Teacher Salary, , Adjusted for Geography $70, $60, $50, $43K $40, $30, $20, $10, $- $47K National median = $55K Virginia Colorado Mississippi Texas Utah Arizona Oklahoma New Mexico Washington North Carolina Tennessee West Virginia Florida South Dakota Alabama South Carolina Louisiana Missouri Georgia Kansas North Dakota Nevada Idaho Arkansas Indiana Kentucky Wisconsin Delaware Illinois Hawaii Maine Ohio Minnesota New Hampshire Maryland New Jersey Nebraska Montana Wyoming Rhode Island Iowa Pennsylvania Oregon Connecticut Vermont Michigan New York Alaska California Massachusetts $65K In a recent survey, more than 80% of AZ teachers reported increased pay as the top way to attract new teachers, with a similar percentage reporting low pay as the main reason teachers leave the profession Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Table Estimated average annual salary of teachers in public elementary and secondary schools, by state: Selected years, through ; NCES Comparable Wage Index 15

16 The average teacher salary in Arizona is 19% less than what is required for a family living wage in the state, the third largest gap in the nation 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% -25% -19% Gap From Average Teacher Salary to Family Living Wage, 2017 National median = -3.9% To reach the family living wage in the state, average teacher salaries in AZ would need to increase by 23% Colorado Virginia Arizona South Dakota Hawaii Utah Mississippi Oklahoma New Mexico Idaho Florida Missouri West Virginia Washington Montana Kansas South Carolina Maine North Carolina Alabama Louisiana Arkansas Indiana Tennessee North Dakota Nebraska Texas Kentucky Minnesota Georgia New Hampshire Wisconsin Oregon Nevada Maryland Delaware Vermont Illinois Iowa Wyoming New Jersey Ohio Alaska California Rhode Island Michigan Connecticut New York Pennsylvania Massachusetts 25% Based on the MIT Living Wage calculator, the family living wage is defined here as the minimum income needed to cover the basic needs and all relevant taxes for a family with one working adult, based on local costs. Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Table Estimated average annual salary of teachers in public elementary and secondary schools, by state: Selected years, through ; MIT Living Wage Calculator; Analysis compares average teacher salary for each state in to family living wage 16

17 Teachers in Arizona with 10 years of experience who head families of four qualify for the most public assistance programs of all states 8 7 The Number of Benefit Programs For Which Teachers With Bachelor s Plus 10 Years Experience Qualify If They Head a Family of Four, National median = 5 Louisiana California Delaware Alaska Wyoming Michigan Rhode Island North Carolina New Mexico New Hampshire Nevada New Jersey Illinois Pennsylvania Maryland Oregon Vermont Kentucky Connecticut Ohio Massachusetts Texas Mississippi Tennessee Wisconsin Indiana Virginia West Virginia Idaho Kansas Nebraska Missouri Alabama South Carolina Iowa Georgia Arkansas Utah Washington New York Florida Oklahoma South Dakota Montana Maine Colorado North Dakota Minnesota Arizona If they head four-person households, more than half of teachers in Arizona would qualify for The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP). Source: ERS analysis based on data from Mid- and Late-Career Teachers Struggle With Paltry Incomes, Center for American Progress (July 2014); NCES Table Average base salary for full-time public elementary and secondary school teachers with a master's degree as their highest degree, by years of full-time teaching experience and state: Selected years, through ; Arizona Department of Economic Security; Arizona Department of Education School District Employee Report. Data not available for Hawaii; Analysis of TEFAP eligibility based on AZ DoE School District Employee Report of statewide distribution of teacher experience and uses average teacher salaries from (adjusted for inflation to dollars) for teachers with Master s degrees and experience ranges of 5 years, 6-10 years, and years 17

18 Arizona teachers cite pay as the main reason for leaving the profession in far greater rates than the national average In a recent survey, more than 80% of Arizona teachers reported low pay as the main reason they leave the profession, with a similar percentage reporting increased pay as the top way to attract new teachers. In contrast, in a national survey, less than 10% of teachers who voluntarily left the profession cited salary or other benefits as their reason for leaving. United States <10% Arizona 80% Source: ERS analysis based on data from Finding and Keeping Educators for Arizona s Classrooms, Morrison Institute for Public Policy 2017 ; NCES Table 5. Percentage distribution of public school teacher leavers who left teaching involuntarily or who rated various reasons as the most important in their decision to leave the position of a K 12 teacher: , (based on data from U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Teacher Follow-up Survey (TFS), "Former Teacher Data File," ) 18

19 Arizona per pupil funding and state commitment to K-12 funding is low and declining Key Findings

20 While Arizona per-pupil funding was once close to the national median, the gap has grown significantly in recent years $14,000 Arizona Per-Pupil Revenue Compared to National Median, Selected Years to National median Arizona Per pupil revenue in dollars $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $ AZ funding rank 33/50 24/50 44/50 36/50 43/50 44/50 47/50 Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Revenue per pupil by source through ; NCES Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year (Fiscal Year 2015) ; NCES Comparable Wage Index, Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Index 20

21 Arizona students are funded at 71% of the national median and only 42% of the highest funded state $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 Total K12 Per-Pupil Revenue, , Adjusted for Geography This includes funds raised from Prop 301, passed in 2000 to increase education revenue, which contributed $492M ($453 per pupil) in FY15 and $547M (or $495 per pupil) in FY17. National median = $12,651 $21,589 $10,000 $8,094 $8,995 $5,000 $0 Utah North Carolina Idaho Arizona Nevada Texas Tennessee Oklahoma Florida California Mississippi Georgia Alabama Virginia Colorado Kentucky Washington New Mexico Arkansas Illinois South Carolina Indiana Missouri South Dakota Louisiana Oregon Wisconsin Michigan Kansas West Virginia Iowa Minnesota Ohio Maryland Delaware Hawaii Montana Nebraska North Dakota Massachusetts Rhode Island Pennsylvania New Hampshire Maine New Jersey Connecticut New York Alaska Wyoming Vermont Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year (Fiscal Year 2015); NCES Comparable Wage Index; Funding PreK-12 Education, 110 th Arizona Town Hall Final Report; Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Non-Capital Funding Report August

22 Inflation-adjusted per-pupil funding in Arizona has actually declined 12% in recent years, more so than all but one state 20% 15% 10% 5% Percent Change in Real Inflation-Adjusted Dollar Per Pupil Revenue, to % 0% -5% National median = -2% -10% -15% -20% -25% -19% -12% Indiana Arizona Idaho Nevada Florida Illinois Wisconsin Arkansas North Carolina Georgia South Dakota Utah Nebraska Mississippi Colorado Alabama Virginia West Virginia Texas Hawaii New Mexico Oklahoma Louisiana Maryland Wyoming Kentucky Michigan Missouri Tennessee Maine Kansas South Carolina Montana Delaware New Jersey Ohio Rhode Island Washington Massachusetts New York Minnesota North Dakota Vermont Pennsylvania Iowa New Hampshire California Oregon Connecticut Alaska Source: ERS analysis using data from NCES Revenue per pupil by source through ; NCES Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year (Fiscal Year 2015); Bureau of Labor Statistics 22

23 Prop 123 and Results-Based Funding together result in an additional $330M annually, or $298 per pupil, which still leaves Arizona investing less per pupil than most states $25,000 Total K12 Per Pupil Revenue, , Adjusted for Geography $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 Additional per-pupil revenue generated from Prop 123 and Results-Based Funding National median = $12,651 Utah North Carolina Idaho Nevada Arizona Texas Tennessee Oklahoma Florida California Mississippi Georgia Alabama Virginia Colorado Kentucky Washington New Mexico Arkansas Illinois South Carolina Indiana Missouri South Dakota Louisiana Oregon Wisconsin Michigan Kansas West Virginia Iowa Minnesota Ohio Maryland Delaware Hawaii Montana Nebraska North Dakota Massachusetts Rhode Island Pennsylvania New Hampshire Maine New Jersey Connecticut New York Alaska Wyoming Vermont While some of this additional revenue has been targeted for teacher compensation, this amount isn t enough to address the labor market challenge. Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year (Fiscal Year 2015); NCES Comparable Wage Index; Funding PreK-12 Education, 110 th Arizona Town Hall Final Report; Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Non-Capital Funding Report August 2017.; Arizona Department of Education FY 2018 Results-Based Funding Allocation File; Uses estimated FY17 student enrollment from JLBC report of 1,104,753 23

24 State effort for K-12 in Arizona is low, even when compared with a group of conservative states with similar wealth 5% State and Local K-12 Revenue as Percent of State GDP, % 3% National median = 3.3% 2% 1% 2.7% 2.9% 3.3% 3.4% 3.5% 4.0% 0% Florida Arizona Alabama Kentucky Montana South Carolina Per-pupil revenue (adjusted for geography) $9,857 $8,995 $10,293 $11,373 $14,497 $12,207 K-12 revenue per taxpayer $2,451 $2,975 $3,214 $3,454 $3,181 $3,704 Per capita GDP 2016 $39,543 $38,590 $37,261 $37,261 $38,985 $37,063 Change in per capita GDP % 2.0% 5.7% 7.5% 8.4% 6.1% Source: ERS analysis based on data from NCES Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year (Fiscal Year 2015); NCES Comparable Wage Index; Internal Revenue Service; Bureau of Economic Analysis, Gallup Ideology by State

25 Every state that is poorer, invests more and spends more of their GDP on K-12 education 5% State and Local K-12 Revenue as Percent of State GDP, % National median = 3.3% 3% 2% 1% 2.9% 3.1% 3.3% 3.6% 3.9% 4.0% 4.3% 0% Arizona Idaho Alabama Mississippi Arkansas South Carolina West Virginia Per-pupil revenue (adjusted for geography) $8,995 $8,870 $10,293 $10,036 $12,015 $12,207 $13,531 K-12 revenue per taxpayer $2,975 $2,825 $3,214 $3,116 $3,803 $3,704 $4,050 Per capita GDP 2016 $38,590 $35,466 $37,261 $31,881 $36,368 $37,063 $36,315 Change in per capita GDP % 4.0% 5.7% 1.4% 7.9% 6.1% 4.9% Source: ERS analysis based on data from NCES Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year (Fiscal Year 2015); NCES Comparable Wage Index; Internal Revenue Service; Bureau of Economic Analysis, Gallup Ideology by State

26 State commitment to education funding in Arizona has lagged the nation since 1990 and is at one of the lowest points of the last three decades State and Local K-12 Revenue as Percent of State GDP, to % 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 3.2% 2.7% 3.8% National median Arizona 3.6% 3.5% 3.6% 3.5% 3.4% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 3.1% 3.2% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% Source: ERS analysis using data from NCES Revenue per pupil by source through ; NCES Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year (Fiscal Year 2015); Bureau of Economic Analysis 26

27 Addressing the teacher workforce challenge will require new and strategic investments Key Findings

28 Currently, it takes the average Arizona teacher more than 25 years just to earn a family living wage Calculated Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience, $80,000 $60,000 $57.1K $40,000 $35.5K $20,000 Family living wage 2017: $58.2K National median teacher salary 2017: $54.7K Calculated AZ teacher salary trajectory 2017 Gov. Ducey proposed 20% salary increase 2018 $ Teacher Years of Experience Maximum salary Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Schools and Staffing Survey Public Teachers and District Data Files ; Arizona Department of Education Teacher Experience Report FY17; Superintendent Annual Financial Report FY17; Expect More Arizona Progress Meter; Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Index; MIT Living Wage Calculator; US Census Bureau; Pew Research Center. This analysis uses average salaries based on teacher experience from , adjusted for inflation to dollars. Due to data availability, salary data beyond year 14 is estimated based on the reported 15+ year average and reported maximum salary. 28

29 Enabling teachers to reach the family living wage by mid-career would cost about $900M-$1.1B annually $80,000 $60,000 Calculated Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience, $77.5K Improving compensation should lead to improved retention, which will add additional costs over time as more teachers stay in the system. $48.2K $57.1K $40,000 $20,000 $35.5K Family living wage 2017: $58.2K National median teacher salary 2017: $54.7K Calculated AZ teacher salary trajectory 2017 Proposed increase to reach family living wage in years Gov. Ducey proposed 20% salary increase 2018 $ Teacher Years of Experience Maximum salary Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Schools and Staffing Survey Public Teachers and District Data Files ; Arizona Department of Education Teacher Experience Report FY17; Superintendent Annual Financial Report FY17; Expect More Arizona Progress Meter; Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Index; MIT Living Wage Calculator; US Census Bureau; Pew Research Center. This analysis uses average salaries based on teacher experience from , adjusted for inflation to dollars. Due to data availability, salary data beyond year 14 is estimated based on the reported 15+ year average and reported maximum salary. Total investment based on teacher FTE for both district and charter; includes estimated teacher salary investment of ~$745M-$893M and benefits investment of ~$149M-$179M (assumes 20% benefits rate excluding fixed costs of health, dental, and life insurance, based on data from Arizona School Boards Association) 29

30 But Arizona cannot afford to funnel so many resources into an outdated system that does not attract and retain the best teachers or incentivize teachers to improve and contribute Goals and Principles of a Strategic Teacher Compensation System Source: Misfit Structures & Lost Opportunities, Education Resource Strategies (2013) 30

31 Arizona districts could use that $900M-$1.1B investment to frontload pay raises to help teachers reach the family living wage sooner and minimize the high rates of attrition for new teachers $80,000 Calculated Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience, $77.5K $60,000 $63.9K $57.1K $48.2K $40,000 $40.8K $20,000 $35.5K Family living wage 2017: $58.2K National median teacher salary 2017: $54.7K Calculated AZ teacher salary trajectory 2017 Proposed increase to reach family living wage in years Proposed increase to reach family living wage in 5-6 years $ Teacher Years of Experience Maximum salary Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Schools and Staffing Survey, Public Teachers and District Data Files ; Arizona Department of Education Teacher Experience Report FY17; Superintendent Annual Financial Report FY17; Expect More Arizona Progress Meter; Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Index; MIT Living Wage Calculator; US Census Bureau; Pew Research Center. This analysis uses average salaries based on teacher experience from , adjusted for inflation to dollars. Due to data availability, salary data beyond year 14 is estimated based on the reported 15+ year average and reported maximum salary. Total investment based on teacher FTE for both district and charter; includes estimated teacher salary investment of ~$745M-$893M and benefits investment of ~$149M-$179M (assumes 20% benefits rate excluding fixed costs of health, dental, and life insurance, based on data from Arizona School Boards Association) 31

32 Alternately, districts could use that $900M-$1.1B investment to differentiate salary based on contribution to improve recruitment and retention of the most effective teachers $80,000 Calculated Average Teacher Salary by Years of Experience, $71.0K $60,000 $63.9K $59.6K $57.1K $42.3K $40.8K $40,000$39.8K $36.4K $35.5K $20,000 $46.0K Family living wage 2017: $58.2K National median teacher salary 2017: $54.7K Calculated AZ teacher salary trajectory 2017 Proposed increase for highly effective teachers Proposed increase for effective teachers Proposed increase for minimally effective teachers Proposed increase for ineffective teachers $ Teacher Years of Experience Maximum salary Source: ERS analysis based on NCES Schools and Staffing Survey, Public Teachers and District Data Files ; Arizona Department of Education Teacher Experience Report FY17; Superintendent Annual Financial Report FY17; Expect More Arizona Progress Meter; Education Sector Inside IMPACT: D.C. s Model Teacher Evaluation System; Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Index; MIT Living Wage Calculator; US Census Bureau; Pew Research Center. This analysis uses average salaries based on teacher experience from , adjusted for inflation to dollars. Due to data availability, salary data beyond year 14 is estimated based on the reported 15+ year average and reported maximum salary. Due to lack of AZ effectiveness data, analysis uses effectiveness breakdown from DCPS (selected because of history of strong teacher evaluation system and aligned compensation model) of 2% ineffective, 16% minimally effective, 67% effective, and 15% highly effective. Total investment based on teacher FTE for both district and charter; includes estimated teacher salary investment of ~$745M-$893M and benefits investment of ~$149M-$179M (assumes 20% benefits rate excluding fixed costs of health, dental, and life insurance, based on data from Arizona School Boards Association) 32

33 Arizona districts may have some limited opportunities to shift current spending, but the state will need to generate additional revenue for teacher salary investments Key Findings

34 To effectively improve the teacher workforce, Arizona would need to invest about $900M-$1.1B annually, or ~$970 per pupil Estimated Average Per-Pupil Revenue Required for Teacher Salary Investment Federal revenue $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $1,215 $970 This equals a total increase of 11.6% per pupil on average, and an 13.6% increase in state/local funds only. State and local $5,000 revenue $4,000 $8,361 $8,361 $7,145 $3,000 $9,331 $2,000 $1,000 $ average per-pupil revenue (non-capital) Additional average per-pupil investment for teacher salary increase Source: ERS analysis of data from Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Non-Capital Funding Report 2017; ERS analysis of teacher salary investments. Uses estimated FY17 student enrollment from JLBC report of 1,104,753; Analysis assumes high end of teacher compensation investment, $1.1B 34

35 Compared to the lowest-spend conservative states, Arizona districts spend slightly more on support services Per-Pupil Expenditure by Use, , Adjusted for Geography $12,000 $10,000 $484 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $3,932 $6,319 $458 $2,907 $5,031 $394 $3,026 $4,037 Non- Instruction Support Services Instruction $0 United States median Median of lowest spend conservative states Arizona Source: ERS analysis of data from NCES Instruction Expenditures per pupil [State Finance] , Support Services Expenditures per pupil [State Finance] , Non- Instruction Expenditures per pupil [State Finance] ; NCES Comparable Wage Index; Gallup Ideology by State 2016; Lowest spend conservative states are (excluding AZ): CO, FL, GA, ID, MS, NC, NV, OK, TN, TX, UT, VA 35

36 There may be an opportunity to reallocate some resources from student support and O&M to help fund this teacher salary investment Compared to the median of the other lowest spend conservative states: Within student support services, Arizona spends an additional 0.8% per pupil on purchased services and 0.8% per pupil for compensation (due to low student support staffing ratios) Within operations and maintenance, Arizona spends an additional 2.0% per pupil on purchased services and 0.4% per pupil on supplies Source: ERS analysis of data from NCES Student Support Services Subtotal [State Finance] , Instruction Support Services Subtotal [State Finance] , General Administration - Subtotal [State Finance] , School Administration - Subtotal [State Finance] , Operations & Maintenance - Subtotal [State Finance] , Student Transportation - Subtotal [State Finance] , Other Support Services - Subtotal (STE28) [State Finance] ; Fall Membership (MEMBR) [State Finance] ; Gallup Ideology by State 2016; NCES Comparable Wage Index; Lowest spend conservative states are (excluding AZ): CO, FL, GA, ID, MS, NC, NV, OK, TN, TX, UT, VA 36

37 Together, these savings opportunities are not enough to meet the teacher investment revenue gap $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 Estimated Average Per-Pupil Revenue Required for Teacher Salary Investment $9,331 $8,997 $970 $636 $334 Remaining gap to fund teacher salary investment Potential savings opportunities from existing resource reallocation $4,000 $8,361 $8,361 $8,026 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Average per-pupil revenue (non-capital) Additional average per-pupil investment for teacher salary increase Average per-pupil revenue accounting for potential savings and reinvestments Source: ERS analysis based on data from NCES Student Support Services Subtotal [State Finance] , Instruction Support Services Subtotal [State Finance] , General Administration - Subtotal [State Finance] , School Administration - Subtotal [State Finance] , Operations & Maintenance - Subtotal [State Finance] , Student Transportation - Subtotal [State Finance] , Other Support Services - Subtotal (STE28) [State Finance] ; Fall Membership (MEMBR) [State Finance] ; NCES Comparable Wage Index; Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Non-Capital Funding Report 2017; ERS analysis of teacher salary investments; $334 per pupil savings based on previous savings calculations totaling 4% of total expenditure in , and applying that 4% savings to a per pupil revenue of $8,361 in ; Analysis assumes high end of teacher compensation investment, $1.1B 37

38 After reallocating half of these resources, Arizona could fund the remaining teacher salary investment by increasing state effort for education to 3.2% $9,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000 $7,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $5,000,000,000 AZ Total State and Local Revenue (Non-Capital) and Projected, Based on Effort State and local revenue Savings from reallocation shifts Additional revenue required $1.1B $887M $703M $184M $369M $4,000,000,000 $7.9B $7.9B $7.7B $7.5B $3,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $0 Current AZ effort (2.9%) Raising effort to generate increased teacher compensation investment (3.3%) Raising effort to generate increased teacher compensation investment after making 50% of reallocation shifts (3.2%) Raising effort to generate increased teacher compensation investment after making 100% of reallocation shifts (3.1%) Source: ERS analysis based on Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee Non-Capital Funding Report 2017; Bureau of Economic Analysis; ERS analysis of teacher salary investments; Savings estimates based on previous per pupil calculations totaling 4% of total expenditure in , and applying that 4% savings to a per pupil revenue of $8,361 in ; total estimated saving shown here based on applying those per pupil savings to estimated FY17 student enrollment from JLBC report of 1,104,753; additional revenue required based on estimate of $1.1B investment for increasing teacher salaries 38

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts** living Alaska 00 47,808 21,213 44.4 Alabama 01 20,661 3,288 15.9 Alabama 02 23,949 6,614 27.6 Alabama 03 20,225 3,247 16.1 Alabama 04 41,412 7,933 19.2 Alabama 05 34,388 11,863 34.5 Alabama 06 34,849 4,074

More information

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts** Rank State District Count (HTC) 1 New York 05 150,499 141,567 94.1 2 New York 08 133,453 109,629 82.1 3 Massachusetts 07 158,518 120,827 76.2 4 Michigan 13 47,921 36,145 75.4 5 Illinois 04 508,677 379,527

More information

3+ 3+ N = 155, 442 3+ R 2 =.32 < < < 3+ N = 149, 685 3+ R 2 =.27 < < < 3+ N = 99, 752 3+ R 2 =.4 < < < 3+ N = 98, 887 3+ R 2 =.6 < < < 3+ N = 52, 624 3+ R 2 =.28 < < < 3+ N = 36, 281 3+ R 2 =.5 < < < 7+

More information

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018 Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018 NEA RESEARCH April 2018 Reproduction: No part of this report may be reproduced in any form without permission from NEA Research, except

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by February 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Alabama 3.7 33 Ohio 4.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Missouri 3.7 33 Rhode Island 4.5

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by November 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Indiana 4.4 37 Georgia 5.6 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Ohio 4.5 37 Tennessee 5.6

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by April 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Colorado 2.3 17 Virginia 3.8 37 California 4.8 2 Hawaii 2.7 20 Massachusetts 3.9 37 West Virginia

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by August 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.3 18 Maryland 3.9 36 New York 4.8 2 Colorado 2.4 18 Michigan 3.9 38 Delaware 4.9

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by March 2016 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 South Dakota 2.5 19 Delaware 4.4 37 Georgia 5.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Massachusetts 4.4 37 North

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by September 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.4 17 Indiana 3.8 36 New Jersey 4.7 2 Colorado 2.5 17 Kansas 3.8 38 Pennsylvania

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by December 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.0 16 South Dakota 3.5 37 Connecticut 4.6 2 New Hampshire 2.6 20 Arkansas 3.7 37 Delaware

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by September 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.8 17 Oklahoma 4.4 37 South Carolina 5.7 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Indiana 4.5 37 Tennessee

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by November 2014 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Pennsylvania 5.1 35 New Mexico 6.4 2 Nebraska 3.1 20 Wisconsin 5.2 38 Connecticut

More information

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment States Ranked by July 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Massachusetts 3.6 37 Kentucky 4.3 2 Iowa 2.6 19 South Carolina 3.6 37 Maryland 4.3

More information

Rutgers Revenue Sources

Rutgers Revenue Sources Rutgers Revenue Sources 31.2% Tuition and Fees 27.3% State Appropriations with Fringes 1.0% Endowment and Investments.5% Federal Appropriations 17.8% Federal, State, and Municipal Grants and Contracts

More information

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD www.legion.org 2016 The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD 1920-1929 Department 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 Alabama 4,474 3,246

More information

Fiscal Research Center

Fiscal Research Center January 2016 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance

More information

How North Carolina Compares

How North Carolina Compares How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics March 2017 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Preface The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina General

More information

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations Current Advantage Enrollment : State and County-Level Tabulations 5 Slide Series, Volume 40 September 2016 Summary of Tabulations and Findings As of September 2016, 17.9 million of the nation s 56.1 million

More information

Interstate Pay Differential

Interstate Pay Differential Interstate Pay Differential APPENDIX IV Adjustments for differences in interstate pay in various locations are computed using the state average weekly pay. This appendix provides a table for the second

More information

Fiscal Research Center

Fiscal Research Center January 2017 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance

More information

Fiscal Research Center

Fiscal Research Center January 2018 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance

More information

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ; PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, 585.327.7075; jstefko@cgr.org Highest Paid State Workers in New Jersey & New York in 2010; Lowest Paid in Dakotas and West Virginia

More information

Index of religiosity, by state

Index of religiosity, by state Index of religiosity, by state Low Medium High Total United States 19 26 55=100 Alabama 7 16 77 Alaska 28 27 45 Arizona 21 26 53 Arkansas 12 19 70 California 24 27 49 Colorado 24 29 47 Connecticut 25 32

More information

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12 5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12 Magnets 2½ 3½ Magnet $1.75 - MOQ - 5 - Add $0.25 for packaging Die Cut Acrylic Magnet $2.00 - MOQ - 24 - Add $0.25 for packaging 2535-22225 California AM-22225

More information

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM This file contains detailed projections and information from the article: Eric A. Hanushek, Jens Ruhose, and Ludger Woessmann, It pays to improve school

More information

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

Colorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation The Colorado River supports a quarter million jobs and produces $26 billion in economic output from recreational activities alone, drawing revenue from the 5.36 million adults who use the Colorado River

More information

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15 2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15 www.hospiceanalytics.com 2 2013 Demographics & Hospice Utilization National Population 316,022,508 Total Deaths 2,529,792 Medicare Beneficiaries

More information

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only January 2002 1 2 published annually by: The Minnesota Taxpayers Association

More information

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008 MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008 Seriously Delinquent Rate Greater than 6.93% 5.18% 6.93% 0 5.17% Source: MBA s National Deliquency Survey MAP 2: Foreclosure Inventory Rate by State

More information

FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic

FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic Special Analysis 15-03, June 18, 2015 FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic 202-624-8577 ttomsic@ffis.org Summary Per capita federal

More information

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, , 26 Reason Foundation Part 3 Spending As with state revenue, there are various ways to look at state spending. Total state expenditures, obviously, encompass every dollar spent by state government, irrespective

More information

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017 Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017 February 2018 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) is the leading national organization working for more effective public and

More information

How North Carolina Compares

How North Carolina Compares How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics January 2013 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Program Evaluation Division North Carolina General Assembly Legislative

More information

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report Regional Economic Models, Inc. Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report Prepared by Frederick Treyz, CEO June 2012 The following is a summary of the Estimated

More information

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION BY STATE INFORMATION This information is being provided to assist in your 2016 tax preparations. The information is also mailed to applicable Columbia fund non-corporate shareholders with their year-end

More information

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing: Welcome to the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action Dashboard About This Dashboard: These graphs and charts show goals by which the Campaign evaluates its efforts to implement recommendations in the

More information

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:

Introduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject: MEMORANDUM May 8, 2018 Subject: TANF Family Assistance Grant Allocations Under the Ways and Means Committee (Majority) Proposal From: Gene Falk, Specialist in Social Policy, gfalk@crs.loc.gov, 7-7344 Jameson

More information

Nicole Galloway, CPA

Nicole Galloway, CPA Office of State Auditor Nicole Galloway, CPA Statewide Performance Indicators: A National Comparison Report No. 2017-050 June 2017 auditor.mo.gov Statewide Performance Indicators: A National Comparison

More information

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016 Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016 March 2017 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) is the leading national organization working for more effective public and private

More information

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) 1 Texas 316,100 19 Nevada 36,600 37 Hawaii 7,100 2 California 256,800 20 Tennessee 34,800 38 Mississippi

More information

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI) VOL. 8 NO. 28 JULY 13, 2015 LOAD AVAILABILITY Up 7% compared to the Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI) Note: MDI Measures Relative Truck Demand LOAD SEARCHING Up 18.3% compared to the TRUCK AVAILABILITY

More information

TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS

TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA

More information

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship

STATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship Exhibit D -- TRIP 2017 FUNDING SOURCES -- February 3, 2017 CORPORATE $ 12,000 Construction Companies $ 5,500 Consulting Engineers Equipment Distributors Manufacturer/Supplier/Producer 6,500 Surety Bond

More information

STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX

STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Business in Nebraska Bureau of Business Research 12-2013 STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX Eric Thompson University of Nebraska-Lincoln,

More information

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014

Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014 Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014 1200 18th St NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 986-2200 / www.frac.org February 2016 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC)

More information

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)

Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot) Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: All dates in 2018 unless otherwise noted STATE REG DEADLINE ABSENTEE BALLOT REQUEST DEADLINE Alabama November 1 ABSENTEE

More information

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project EXHIBIT A List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project Alabama Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce

More information

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016

HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016 BACKGROUND HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016 Federal legislation (42 CFR 484.36) requires that Medicare-certified home health agencies employ home health aides who are trained and evaluated

More information

Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources

Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources Right to Food: Whereas in the international assessment the percentage of

More information

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities State-by-state listing of Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities AL Alabama Agency http://ema.alabama.gov/ Alabama Portal http://www.alabamapa.org/ AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL Alaska Division of Homeland

More information

Fiscal Year 2005 Comparisons. Includes Fiscal Year 2006 Rankings for State Taxes Only

Fiscal Year 2005 Comparisons. Includes Fiscal Year 2006 Rankings for State Taxes Only Fiscal Year 2005 Comparisons Includes Fiscal Year 2006 Rankings for State Taxes Only October 2007 Published annually since 1969 (except FY2001 and FY2003) by: The Minnesota Taxpayers Association 85 East

More information

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission Sentinel Event Data General Information 1995 2015 Data Limitations The reporting of most sentinel events to The Joint Commission is voluntary and represents only a small proportion of actual events. Therefore,

More information

50 STATE COMPARISONS

50 STATE COMPARISONS 50 STATE COMPARISONS 2014 Edition DEMOGRAPHICS TAXES & REVENUES GAMING ECONOMIC DATA BUSINESS HOUSING HEALTH & WELFARE EDUCATION NATURAL RESOURCES TRANSPORTATION STATE ELECTION DATA Published by: The Taxpayers

More information

Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)

Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions) Revised February 22, 2005 WHERE WOULD THE CUTS BE MADE UNDER THE PRESIDENT S BUDGET? Data Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education Includes Education for the Disadvantaged, Impact Aid, School Improvement

More information

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org November 24, 2008 TANF BENEFITS ARE LOW AND HAVE NOT KEPT PACE WITH INFLATION But Most

More information

Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 2013, 2014, and 2015

Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 2013, 2014, and 2015 Exhiit 1 Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 13, 14, and 15 13 14 15

More information

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016 Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016 Doctorate 4% PN/VN 3% MSN 15% ADN 28% BSRN 22% Diploma 2% BSN 26% n = 279,770 Percentage of Graduations by Program Type, 2016 MSN 12% Doctorate 1%

More information

Weights and Measures Training Registration

Weights and Measures Training Registration Weights and Measures Training Registration Please fill out the form below to register for Weights and Measures training and testing dates. NIST Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances and other Technical

More information

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission

Sentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission Sentinel Event Data General Information 1995 2Q 2014 Data Limitations The reporting of most sentinel events to The Joint Commission is voluntary and represents only a small proportion of actual events.

More information

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 Able to Make Share of Determinations System determines eligibility for: 2 State Real-Time

More information

ANCHOR INSTITUTION STRATEGIES IN THE SOUTHEAST

ANCHOR INSTITUTION STRATEGIES IN THE SOUTHEAST ANCHOR INSTITUTION STRATEGIES IN THE SOUTHEAST Presentation for: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Policy Summit on Housing, Human Capital, and Inequality Sameera Fazili, Senior Visiting CED Advisor, Federal

More information

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments Introduction FFIS has been in the federal grant reporting business for a long time about 30 years. The main thing we ve learned

More information

State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation

State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation Appendixes Appendix A State Authority for Hazardous Materials Transportation Hazardous Materials Transportation: Regulatory, Enforcement, and Emergency Response* Alabama E Public Service Commission ER

More information

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]

Statutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015] Topic: Question by: : Statutory change to name availability standard Michael Powell Texas Date: April 8, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut

More information

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?

Is this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate? Topic: Question by: : Forfeiture for failure to appoint a resident agent Kathy M. Sachs Kansas Date: January 8, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut

More information

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)

Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC) Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC) Mark Mayhew NYSERDA for Val Stori Clean Energy States Alliance SWAT 4/25/12 Today CESA ITAC, LLC - What, who and why The Unified List - What, why, how and

More information

Senior American Access to Care Grant

Senior American Access to Care Grant Senior American Access to Care Grant Grant Guidelines SENIOR AMERICAN (age 62 plus) ACCESS TO CARE GRANT GUIDELINES: The (ADAF) is committed to supporting U.S. based organizations exempt from taxation

More information

Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS

Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS Michelle Casey, MS Senior Research Fellow and Deputy Director University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center June 12, 2012 Overview of Presentation Why is HCAHPS

More information

The Regional Economic Outlook

The Regional Economic Outlook The Regional Economic Outlook Presented by: Mark McMullen, Director of Government Svcs Prepared for: FTA Revenue Estimating Conference September 15, 2008 Recent Economic Performance 2 1 The Job Market

More information

FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY

FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY FORTIETH TRIENNIAL ASSEMBLY MOST PUISSANT GENERAL GRAND MASTER GENERAL GRAND COUNCIL OF CRYPTIC MASONS INTERNATIONAL 1996-1999 -

More information

Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth

Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth Larry DeBoer Purdue University September 2011 Real GDP Growth Real Consumption Spending Growth 1 Index of Consumer Sentiment 57.8 Sept 11 Savings Rate (percent of disposable income) Real Investment Spending

More information

N A S S G A P Academic Year. 43rd Annual Survey Report on State-Sponsored Student Financial Aid

N A S S G A P Academic Year. 43rd Annual Survey Report on State-Sponsored Student Financial Aid N A S 43rd Annual Survey Report on State-Sponsored Student Financial Aid 2011-2012 Academic Year National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs S G A P About NASSGAP and this Report The National

More information

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis 1 Date: 5/25/2012 To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia From: Christos Siderelis Chuck Wyatt with the DCR in Virginia inquired about the classification of state parks having resort type characteristics and, if

More information

Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 2016

Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 2016 Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 5 Slide Series September, 2015 Summary of Findings This edition projects Medicaid spending in each state and the percentage of spending paid via

More information

Table of Contents Introduction... 2

Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Snapshot Missouri: A National Comparison Report 9-212 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Economy 3 Median Household Income 21... 4 Unemployment Rate 211... 5 Job Growth Rate 29.. 6 Cigarette Tax per Pack

More information

How. January. Prepared by

How. January. Prepared by How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statisticss January 2011 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Prefacee The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina

More information

YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING

YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING 2 3 4 MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE CONDITIONS ARE COMMON MOST AMERICANS LACK ACCESS TO CARE OF AMERICAN ADULTS WITH A MENTAL ILLNESS DID NOT RECEIVE TREATMENT ONE IN FIVE REPORT AN UNMET NEED NEARLY

More information

2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS

2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS 2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: 2014 Marketing General Incorporated 625 North Washington Street, Suite 450 Alexandria, VA 22314 800.644.6646 toll free 703.739.1000 telephone

More information

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016 HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 - Repayment

More information

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 State Applications Can be Submitted Online at the State Level 1 < 25% 25% -

More information

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014 HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 -

More information

Washburn University. Faculty Salary Analysis

Washburn University. Faculty Salary Analysis Washburn University Faculty Salary Analysis 2012-13 Office of Institutional Research Washburn University May 15, 2013 Washburn University Faculty Salary Analysis 2012-13 This report provides an overview

More information

FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT

FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT FOOD STAMP PROGRAM ACTIVITY REPORT Federal Fiscal Year 2004 Food Stamps Make America Stronger United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Program Accountability Division February

More information

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016 Food and Nutrition Service Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Program Accountability and Administration Division September

More information

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties United States Department of Agriculture Farm Production and Conservation Risk Management Agency Beacon Facility Mail Stop 080 P.O. Box 49205 Kansas City, MO 644-6205, 207 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM: PM-7-06

More information

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY

HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY 2011-12 HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS PARTICIPATION SURVEY Conducted By THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF STATE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATIONS Based on Competition at the High School Level in the 2011-12 School Year BOYS GIRLS

More information

2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK. Key Indicators of North Carolina s Business Climate

2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK. Key Indicators of North Carolina s Business Climate 2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK Key Indicators of North Carolina s Business Climate 2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK The North Carolina Chamber Foundation works to promote the social welfare of North Carolina

More information

national assembly of state arts agencies

national assembly of state arts agencies STATE ARTS AGENCY GRANT MAKING AND FUNDING Each of America's 50 states and six jurisdictions has a government that works to make the cultural, civic, economic and educational benefits of the available

More information

National Collegiate Soils Contest Rules

National Collegiate Soils Contest Rules National Collegiate Soils Contest Rules Students of Agronomy, Soils, and Environmental Sciences (SASES) Revised September 30, 2008 I. NAME The contest shall be known as the National Collegiate Soils Contest

More information

In the District of Columbia we have also adopted the latest Model business Corporation Act.

In the District of Columbia we have also adopted the latest Model business Corporation Act. Topic: Question by: : Reinstatement after Admin. Dissolution question Dave Nichols West Virginia Date: March 14, 2014 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut

More information

Maine s Economic Outlook: 2009 and Beyond

Maine s Economic Outlook: 2009 and Beyond Maine s Economic Outlook: 2009 and Beyond January 2009 James Breece, Ph.D. University of Maine System Outline 1. External Economic Drivers 2. Current Conditions 3. Economic Projections 4. Long-term Trends

More information

engineering salary guide

engineering salary guide engineering salary guide At a time when lean practices and agile teams create the expectation of doing more with less, employers need to develop new strategies to attract and retain the best employees

More information

CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?

CRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing? CRMRI White Paper #3 August 7 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing? Marci Harris, Julia Greene, Kilee Jorgensen, Caren J. Frost, & Lisa H. Gren State Refugee Services

More information

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET 1 THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET ORG ANIZATIONAL COMPARISO N BY C ENSUS DIV ISION S PRING 2013 The State of Grantseeking Spring 2013 is the sixth semi-annual informal survey of nonprofits conducted

More information

Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, FY 2002

Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, FY 2002 Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, APPENDIX A Table A.1: Lottery Sales Excluding Sales From Video Lottery Terminals, Table A.2: Sales from Video Lottery Terminals Table A.3:

More information

*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT

*ALWAYS KEEP A COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE FOR YOUR RECORDS IN CASE OF AUDIT State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLE ATTENDANCE REPORTING AT IADC 2012 TRIAL ACADEMY Attorney Reporting Method After the CLE activity, fill out the Certificate of Attendance

More information

Published on 2014 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Collegiate Challenge (

Published on 2014 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Collegiate Challenge ( 014 MLK Day of Service Collegiate Challenge Application http://www.wicampuscompact.org/mlkday2014/print/eform/submit/2014-... 1 of 7 8/28/2013 4:52 PM Published on 2014 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day

More information

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update

NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update Released June 10, 2016 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Mortgage Industry Report: 2016Q1

More information

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency Army Regulation 10 89 Organizations and Functions U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 December 1989 Unclassified SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 10

More information