for Collegiate Business Education

Transcription

1 International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education 2017 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY MEETING Student Case-Study Competition April The Hilton Parc 55 Hotel San Francisco California USA Partnering with colleges, universities, and other higher education institutions in preparing today s business students for tomorrow's workplace

2 Partnering with colleges, universities, and other higher education institutions in preparing today s business students for tomorrow s workplace 2017 IACBE STUDENT CASE-STUDY COMPETITION FOCUS ON: BUSINESS ETHICS Wednesday-Thursday April San Francisco California USA This competition is open to students from all IACBE-member institutions and is scheduled in conjunction with the 2017 IACBE Annual Conference and Assembly Meeting. The IACBE is committed to partnering with colleges, universities, and other higher education institutions in preparing today s business students for tomorrow s workplace. In this spirit, the case-study competition focuses on business ethics and is intended to provide students with an opportunity to showcase their abilities to analyze a case, to identify and discuss recommendations for ethical action, and to think on their feet. The case-study competition will require their ability to (1) work as members of a team, (2) collect and analyze data, and (3) effectively present case information and answer questions in a clear, concise, and professional manner. Teams: Entry Fee: Teams are to include no fewer than two and no more than four members. Each team must be accompanied by a faculty advisor. The competition is limited to a maximum of eight teams, which will be selected on the basis of the first to register and pay the entry fee. The entry fee is $1,460 for two-member teams, $1,880 for three-member teams, and $2,300 for four-member teams, which covers the cost of certificates and awards; breakfast, lunch, and breaks on Wednesday and Thursday; and the Accreditation Banquet on Thursday evening. These fees also cover the costs for one faculty advisor per team. Other Costs: All other expenses (hotel, meals, transportation, activities) not specifically included in the entry fee are the responsibility of the respective teams. Judging: Winners: Judges will be drawn from IACBE member institutions and from the San Francisco business community (if possible). The scorecard containing the criteria used by judges in evaluating case presentations will be provided to student teams in February 2017 or upon registration after that date. A first-, second-, and third-place team will be selected, and each placing team will be awarded a plaque that can be displayed at their respective schools. The winning team will be awarded a $1,000 scholarship generously sponsored by Peregrine Academic Services. Deadline: The deadline for registration is March 31,

3 COMPETITION STRUCTURE AND RULES The competition will be held at the conference hotel on Wednesday and Thursday of the IACBE s Annual Conference and Assembly Meeting. Wednesday April 19 Rounds 1 and 2 Final Schedule 7:30 a.m. 8:30 a.m. Breakfast (included in entry fee) 9:30 a.m. Case Analyses Due (Davidson) 10:00 a.m. 10:20 a.m. Morning Break (included in entry fee) 10:00 a.m. 10:15 am Judges Check-In (Davidson) 10:30 a.m. 12:00 p.m. Case Presentations (Lombard, Hearst, Fillmore) 12:00 p.m. 1:30 p.m. Lunch (included in entry fee) 1:00 p.m. 1:20 p.m. Judges Check-In (Davidson) 1:30 p.m. 3:00 p.m. Case Presentations (Lombard, Hearst, Fillmore) Thursday April 20 Rounds 3 and 4 7:30 a.m. 8:30 a.m. Breakfast with Jen Kushell, CEO of YSN.com (Stockton) 8:45 a.m. 9:00 a.m. IACBE Final Case Distributed (Davidson) 10:00 a.m. 10:20 a.m. Morning Break (included in entry fee) 9:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Case-Study Preparation 12:00 p.m. 1:30 p.m. Lunch (included in entry fee) 1:00 p.m. Case Analyses Due (Davidson) 1:10 p.m. 1:20 p.m. Judges Check-In (Davidson) 1:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Case Presentations (Lombard, Hearst, Fillmore) 2:50 p.m. 3:00 p.m. Judges Check-In (Davidson) 3:10 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Case Presentations (Lombard, Hearst, Fillmore) 7:00 p.m. 9:00 p.m. Accreditation Banquet (included in entry fee; all teams will be introduced) 2

4 Case-Study Competition Rules All Rounds Teams are to include no fewer than two and no more than four members. Each team must be accompanied by one and only one faculty advisor. Multiple teams from a single institution may not transfer, switch, or change students once teams are registered. Teams may observe other teams presentations on the first day only. Once presentations have begun, no entry into the competition rooms will be permitted. No gifts or tokens of appreciation are allowed to be presented to judges prior to or during the case presentations. Violation of the Faculty and Student Code of Conduct can result in immediate dismissal from the case-study competition and possible suspension from future competition events. Faculty advisors and/or students who are dismissed due to a code violation will promptly leave the area of competition. Rules All communication regarding problems, concerns, or inquiries relating to the student case-study competition are to be directed to Ms. Rochelle Petway by registered faculty advisors. The IACBE has the authority to make final decisions on any situation not specifically covered by these rules. Wednesday April 19 Rounds 1 and 2 1. Prior to the competition, each team is to select and prepare a case for presentation that has ethical implications. 2. Prior to the beginning of the day s rounds, teams will deliver their case analyses on flash drives to the competition coordinator for loading on laptops in the presentation rooms. 3. Each team will present its chosen case twice during the day before different panels of judges. 4. The schedule of presentation times will be provided to teams upon delivery of their cases analyses to the competition coordinator. 5. Teams are expected to explain the relevant background information of the case, which may include legal, financial, economic, marketing, and management issues relevant to the case, and present the ethical issue that they have chosen to address. 6. After presenting the case, each team must make recommendations for action that are solidly grounded in ethics theory. 7. Each case presentation must be no more than 20 minutes in length, followed by up to 10 minutes of questions from the judges. 8. Internet access will not be available in the competition rooms. Consequently, teams must present their case analyses using PowerPoint slides. 3

5 Thursday April 20 Rounds 3 and 4 1. Each team will be supplied a case selected by the IACBE and will have four hours to prepare the case. Competition rooms will not be available for case preparations. This year s final-round case is graciously provided to the IACBE by the Eller Center for Leadership Ethics at the University of Arizona. 2. Each team will present the case twice during the day before different panels of judges. 3. Presentation times for each team in each round will be randomly selected. 4. Prior to the beginning of the day s rounds, teams will deliver their case analyses on flash drives to the competition coordinator for loading on laptops in the presentation rooms. 5. Teams are expected to explain the relevant background information of the case, which may include legal, financial, economic, marketing, and management issues relevant to the case, and present the ethical issue identified in the case. 6. After presenting the case, each team must make recommendations for action that are solidly grounded in ethics theory. 7. Each case presentation must be no more than 20 minutes in length, followed by up to 10 minutes of questions from judges. 8. Internet access will not be available in the competition rooms. Consequently, teams must present their case analyses using PowerPoint slides. Determination of Winning Teams 1. A first-, second-, and third-place team will be selected based on the total combined scores on the judging scorecards from all four case presentations. 2. In the case of any ties between the top three teams based on the total combined scores, the determining factor in breaking the ties will be the total sub-scores on the Case Analysis criteria of the judging scorecards from all four case presentations. 3. In the case of ties between the top three teams based on the Case Analysis criteria, the determining factor in breaking the ties will be the total sub-scores on the Recommendations criterion of the judging scorecards from all four case presentations. 4. The first-, second-, and third-place awards will be presented at the Accreditation Banquet on Thursday evening IACBE Student Case-Study Competition San Francisco California USA 4

6 2016 IACBE Student Case-Study Competition Winners First Place Team: St. Thomas Aquinas College (New York, USA) Second Place Team: Chaminade University of Honolulu (Hawaii, USA) Third Place Team: Ohio Valley University (West Virginia, USA) 5

7 SPONSORSHIP The IACBE Student Case-Study Competition is sponsored in part by: Bloomberg Businessweek B-School Connection Grantham University Peregrine Leadership Institute Academic Services 6

8 University of Arizona Eller Center for Leadership Ethics YSN.com 7