Bringing the Issues Posed by the DFARS PGI to Light
|
|
- Sydney Allen
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bringing the Issues Posed by the DFARS PGI to Light Created as a means to simplify and streamline the Department of Defense's DFARS, the "Procedures, Guidance and Information" publication (PGI) accomplishes neither; only adding additional complexity to an already complex process. 42 Contract Management July 2008
2 BY charles r. thompson Contract Management July
3 In 2004, the Department o f D e f e n s e ( D O D ) b e g a n t o r e d u c e t h e content of its D e f e n s e Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement ( DFARS) by moving some of it into a new p u b l i c a t i o n c a l l e d t h e P r o c e d u r e s, G u i d a n c e, and Information (PGI). T h e o r i g i n a l c o n t e n t o f t h e P G I w a s p u b l i s h e d serially in the Federal Register for public comment. According to United States Code (U.S.C.), Title 41 U.S.C b r e q u i r e s p u b l i c a t i o n of contracting rules in the Federal Register i f t h e y w i l l h a v e a significant effect b e y o n d a g e n c y i n t e r n a l o p e r a t i n g p r o c e d u r e s o r w i l l h a v e a s i g n i f i c a n t c o s t o r a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i m p a c t o n c o n t r a c t o r s o r o f f e r o r s. B u t d o e s t h e c o n t e n t o f t h e P G I h a v e n o s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t o u t s i d e o f D O D, and no significant a d m i n i s t r a t i v e i m p a c t o n contractors or offerors? Is DOD obeying the law? In February 2004, DOD issued DFARS Case 2003-D090, titled DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information. DOD proposed to add the PGI to the DFARS as follows: DOD is proposing to amend DFARS to define a companion resource to the DFARS that will contain mandatory and non-mandatory internal DOD procedures, non-mandatory guidance, and supplemental information. This new resource, titled Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI), is a result of a transformation initiative undertaken by DOD to dramatically change the purpose and content of the DFARS. 1 The proposed policy regarding the content of the DFARS and the PGI is: DOD implementation and supplementation of the [Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)] is issued in the [DFARS] under authorization and subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense. The DFARS contains i. ii. iii. iv. v. Requirements of law, DOD-wide policies, Delegations of FAR authorities, Deviations from FAR requirements, and Policies/procedures that have a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DOD or a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. Relevant procedures, guidance, and information that do not meet the [above] criteria are issued in the DFARS [PGI]. 2 In April 2003 nearly a year before DFARS Case 2003-D090 was issued DOD officials announced a project to reduce the DFARS by 40 percent. The honorable Michael Wynne, the acting under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology, and logistics (USD (AT&L)) endorsed this initiative. The question then was: How can we do this? One idea was to create a nonmandatory procedures and information document that would contain the material removed from the DFARS, thus achieving the directed 40 percent reduction of the DFARS. 3 DOD decided that the DFARS should focus only on requirements of law, DOD-wide policies, delegations of FAR authorities, deviations from FAR requirements and policies, and procedures that have significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DOD or that have a significant impact on the public. This decision also meant that a significant portion of the DFARS that did not meet those criteria should then be removed from the DFARS and placed in the PGI. The PGI is described as an online resource to help acquisition professionals more effectively and efficiently do their jobs. The PGI exists as a Web site that enables DOD policymakers to more rapidly communicate internal administrative and procedural information to the acquisition workforce. In February 2004, a Defense Acquisition University seminar discussed DOD s plans to reduce the DFARS by creating a subset of the DFARS the PGI. Two significant requirements of the PGI were stipulated. The new PGI must: 1 2 Have no significant impact on the public, and Not be a codified federal regulation. The first requirement is a suitable one, as long as it is truly maintained. However, as this article will attempt to show, this standard has not been maintained and the public is likely being adversely impacted by PGI changes. The second requirement can be seen as a euphemism for making policy changes that DOD wants, but cannot afford the delay or the risk of public challenge. Since the PGI is not a codified federal regulation, a new or revised policy posted in the PGI need not be disclosed to the public prior to implementation. The PGI, and thus DOD policy, can therefore be changed at will; sometimes retroactively. 44 Contract Management July 2008
4 In November 2004, DOD issued a final rule and adopted the PGI without change from the proposed version. Only one comment was received on the proposed rule; it was deemed to be outside the scope of the case and was therefore not considered further. In announcing the final rule, DOD certified that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 4 because the new DFARS companion resource will contain only procedures, guidance, and information that have no significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DOD and no significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. 5 The PGI site was actually born out of an initiative to redefine and better focus the content of DFARS, according to DOD Deputy Director of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP) Ron Poussard. 6 Also, as stated in a DOD press release on November 1, 2004, the PGI site has really evolved into a solution for rapidly communicating DOD policy and guidance. 7 How the PGI Really Works In practice, the PGI s evolution has become more than a method of communicating internal administrative and procedural information. In fact, it has become a new channel of DOD acquisition policy that affects all contractors (i.e., the public, as well as government contracting personnel). For example, a PGI case titled Economic Price Adjustment Provisions (PGI Case 0000-P074) updates guidance on the use of economic price adjustment (EPA) provisions in DOD contracts. 8 The newly added PGI , Fixed-Price Contracts With Economic Price Adjustment, provides more than four pages of guidance on the use of EPA clauses. This PGI section was revised January 10, 2008, and was made effective that same date. However, no prior public notice of the change was provided. Since this PGI information affects the pricing of DOD contracts, DOD contractors would likely have an interest in the formulation of this guidance. Further, contractors and offerors are usually expected to provide rationale to support their proposals. An offeror proposing an EPA provision would likely base its rationale on the regulatory requirements of that clause, including the guidance at PGI Thus, the PGI becomes not only guidance for the contracting officer (CO), but also for a contractor/offeror. Since this PGI revision was not subject to the usual process of proposal in draft form and published for public comment, industry had no opportunity to provide its endorsement, opinions, or objections. In another case, the USD (AT&L) issued a memorandum on June 8, 2007, that informed the U.S. military departments and defense agencies that PGI had been revised on May 31, The DOD memo cited revised, retroactive guidance regarding the application of existing FAR/ DFARS requirements for determining fair and reasonable contract prices for commercial Contract Management July
5 items, especially those being procured in a sole-source situation. The memo also explained that the changed PGI pricing guidance was in response to several oversight reports, including a DOD inspector general (DODIG) report that found errors in the government s pricing of a commercial items contract. 9 We note that the DODIG found that the government negotiating team used questionable commercial item determinations, yet the corrective action and the onus of the revised PGI is ultimately on the contractor to provide more pricing data. 10 A final DFARS change was published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2007, and was made effective that same date. 11 The final rule amending the DFARS was billed as Technical Amendments, and only made reference to the revised PGI (the text of which was not provided in the Federal Register notice). No public comment was sought for these revised PGI pricing procedures that do, in fact, have a significant impact on the public. For example, refer to DFARS PGI , Requiring Information Other Than Cost or Pricing Data. In this particular section, the procedural changes and policy clarifications list four kinds of data the CO may require of offerors when justifying price reasonableness. These changed requirements can be viewed as DOD s de facto repeal of features of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) that authorized and encouraged commercial item procurement without reliance on detailed cost or pricing information. Contractors who entered the DOD market under the rubric of the commercial item purchasing concepts legislated in FASA now find themselves without those statutory and policy features that were adopted by Congress to encourage their participation. This policy reversal by DOD may come as a surprise to Congress and the general public, including contractors. Concerning this pricing PGI revision, one professional article states: By eliminating the requirement for submission of cost or pricing data in commercial item acquisitions, Congress clearly intended to encourage greater participation by commercial vendors in government 46 Contract Management July 2008
6 procurements. The revised PGI requirements that include obtaining detailed cost information from commercial vendors will once again make it difficult for many commercial companies to compete in the government market. 12 Another article analyzes this PGI pricing guidance revision and offers this summary: DOD s revised PGI signals a shift away from reliance on the protections inherent in the commercial marketplace and towards reliance on the verification of pricing. While [t]he request for additional information shall be limited to only that needed to determine prices to be fair and reasonable, the policies and procedures outlined in DOD s revised PGI place an increased burden on the contracting officer to obtain additional data, even for items that are clearly commercial. DOD s requirements provide for little of the simplification and streamlining the procurement community has come to expect from commercial item procurement. Contractors should anticipate increased requests for cost information other than DOD has interpreted statute and FAR policy to publish DOD policy using the PGI that does, in fact, affect contractors, and the use of the PGI to do so avoids advance public notice. cost or pricing data to support their prices on modifications. 13 A third example is derived from a commenter on The comments specifically address PGI This proposed contract is being considered as a 100 percent set-aside for historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and minority institutions (MIs), as defined by the clause at of the [DFARS]. Interested HBCUs and MIs should provide the contracting office as early as possible, but not later than 15 days after this notice, evidence of their capability to perform the contract, and a positive statement of their eligibility as an HBCU or MI. If adequate response is not received from HBCUs and MIs, the solicitation will instead be issued, without further notice, as: (indicate if unrestricted, or restricted for small business or small disadvantaged business, etc.). Therefore, replies to this notice are also requested from (enter the types of firms to be solicited in the event an HBCU or MI set-aside is not made). The Wifcon.com commenter cites this section, then asks, Why is that in PGI and not Contract Management July
7 DFARS? How does that constitute internal agency guidance such as designations, workflow procedures, etc.? It seems to me that the notice could have a significant effect beyond internal operating procedures. 14 These three examples clearly show that the PGI impacts the public, and that stated requirements of PGI have been abrogated in practice. There are likely other PGI sections that impact contractors as well. So now, industry has at least three levels of regulation it must be aware of and review before engaging in the defense market the FAR, the DFARS, and the PGI. These three levels of policy and procedure must be consulted to obtain all the federal and DOD policy that may apply to an acquisition. In an effort to streamline and simplify, DOD has managed to achieve neither; only adding a layer of complexity for itself and for contractors or offerors. As a policy vehicle, there is a lack of an audit trail of policy requirements for the PGI. There is no record when a PGI section becomes effective, nor what the preceding language, if any, states. A contractor/offeror (and a government CO, for that matter) must be very careful to monitor PGI policy at the outset of an acquisition and at all times during the life cycle of the acquisition. While it is entirely possible that a PGI section could establish a baseline of requirements, in the course of a protracted negotiation, or even during contract performance, that PGI could change, leaving the contractor without the basis for its position, even though the basis may have existed previously. Public Comment to be Sought for Proposed Procurement Policies Current statute states: [T]he head of the agency shall cause to be published in the Federal Register a notice of the proposed procurement policy, regulation, procedure, or form and provide for a public comment period for receiving and considering the views of all interested parties on such proposal. The length of such comment period may not be less than 30 days. 15 The FAR implements this statute when it states: Views of agencies and nongovernmental parties or organizations will be considered in formulating acquisition policies and procedures. The opportunity to submit written comments on proposed significant revisions shall be provided by placing a notice in the Federal Register. 16 Therefore, the very existence of the PGI violates this FAR policy when the PGI is used to issue policy that affects the public but is not publicized before it is made effective. The FAR Allows Internal Agency Acquisition Regulations FAR 1.303, regarding agency supplemental regulations, states that issuances under 1.301(a)(2) need not be published in the Federal Register. 17 According to FAR 1.301(a) (2), an agency head may issue or authorize the issuance of internal agency guidance at any organizational level (e.g., designations and delegations of authority, assignments of responsibilities, work-flow procedures, and internal reporting requirements). 18 The FAR requires that views of agencies and nongovernmental parties or organizations will be considered in formulating acquisition policies and procedures. 19 The opportunity to submit written comments on proposed significant revisions shall be provided by placing a notice in the Federal Register. 20 The FAR defines significant revisions as those that alter the substantive meaning of any coverage in the FAR system, including the DFARS, having a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors, or significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the issuing agency. 21 The PGI examples previously cited clearly demonstrate that some of DOD s PGI are, in fact, significant revisions because in at least the three instances cited, DOD has used the PGI to announce or amend policies that affect the public. Since the DFARS does not supplement FAR regarding opportunity for public comment, we can assume that DOD supports that FAR policy and the 48 Contract Management July 2008
8 law requiring public comment on its acquisition rules. As was proposed and adopted without change, the DFARS and the PGI are consistent with FAR policy, but the PGI is not consistent with practice (as shown in the cited PGI examples). It is logical and fair to equate DOD s significant effect with the FAR definition of significant revisions. Conclusions It is clear from this evidence that the PGI is being used for more than internal agency guidance. DOD has interpreted statute and FAR policy to publish DOD policy using the PGI that does in fact affect contractors, and the use of the PGI to do so avoids advance public notice. Some PGI sections and revisions are significant revisions and should be offered for public review and comment before adoption. Recommendations Action is needed to bring the issues posed by the PGI to light. Contractors and their advisors and associations should: Gather additional evidence to support the thesis that DOD uses the PGI to publish acquisition policy without public comment, Publicize any evidence obtained, and Advocate reform of the PGI to avoid publishing acquisition policy that affects the public. About the Author CHARLES R. THOMPSON, CPCM, Fellow, is a former U.S. Army contracting officer. He is now a contracts management consultant supporting COGP, Inc., a small consulting firm with large and small clients. He has been a member of NCMA since Mr. Thompson gratefully acknowledges comments and assistance by Vernon J. Edwards and RADM Joseph S. Sansone, SC, USN (Ret.), the principal of COGP, Inc. Send comments about this article to cm@ncmahq.org. Endnotes Federal Register 8145, 2/23/ Ibid. 3. Defense Task Force on DFARS Transformation, Briefing Slides. Mr. Ron Poussard, deputy director, defense acquisition regulation system, defense procurement and acquisition policy, April 2, 2003 briefing at Defense Supply Center Columbus 2003 Supplier Conference U.S.C. 601, et seq Federal Register , 11/1/ DFARS Transformation Briefing by Ron Poussard, deputy director, DPAP, February 19, 2004, at Defense Acquisition University Annual Conference. 7. DOD Press Release: Newly-Launched DFARS Companion Guide to Serve as Powerful Resource for DOD Contracting Professional. Arlington, Virginia, November 1, This change to the PGI is part of the DFARS Change Notice , and was made available on DOD s Web site for defense procurement and acquisition policy on January 17, DODIG Report D , Commercial Contract for Noncompetitive Spare Parts with Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation. September 29, Office of the USD (AT&L) memorandum, Determining Fair and Reasonable Contract Prices Revised Procedures, Guidance, and Instruction (PGI), June 8, Federal Register 30278, 5/31/ Vacura, Richard J. and Keric Chin, Commercial Item Pricing Changes Will Impact Government Sales, October Morrison & Foerster, LLP. Pearson, Rebecca and Jackson Reams, Government Contracts Update Price Reasonableness: DOD Revises Procurement Policy to More Closely Scrutinize Commercial Prices, Venable. No , July Wifcon.com forum comment posted Friday, January 25, 2008 at 07:49am. Vern Edwards, # U.S.C. 418b(b). FAR , Opportunity for Public Comments. FAR 1.303(b), Publication and Codification (Agency Acquisition Regulations). FAR 1.301(a)(2), Policy (Agency Acquisition Regulations). FAR , Opportunity for Public Comments. Ibid, Section (b). FAR , Definition (Solicitation of Agency and Public Views; Agency and Public Participation). One solution is to merge the PGI back into the DFARS and eliminate the PGI altogether. However, this may require admission that attempting to reduce a regulation by some arbitrary amount was an unrealistic goal. But perhaps others have better solutions. CM Contract Management July
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5000.35 October 21, 2008 Incorporating Change 1, November 17, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR) System References: See Enclosure 1 1.
More informationThe Other Transaction Authority Basic Legal Principles*
GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPRIETARY This document in printed form may not be the latest issue. Verify latest issue online. The Other Transaction Authority Basic Legal Principles* Presented by: Benjamin McMartin,
More informationSUBPART ORGANIZATIONAL AND CONSULTANT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (Revised December 29, 2010)
SUBPART 209.5 ORGANIZATIONAL AND CONSULTANT CONFLICTS OF INTEREST (Revised December 29, 2010) 209.570 Limitations on contractors acting as lead system integrators. 209.570-1 Definitions. Lead system integrator,
More informationWorld-Wide Satellite Systems Program
Report No. D-2007-112 July 23, 2007 World-Wide Satellite Systems Program Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated
More informationDFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information
(Revised December 8, 2017) PGI 201.1 PURPOSE, AUTHORITY, ISSUANCE 201.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The information collection and recordkeeping requirements contained in the Defense
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4205.01 June 8, 2016 Incorporating Change 1, September 13, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Small Business Programs (SBP) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. In
More informationDOD Anti-Counterfeit Rule Requires Immediate Action --By Craig Holman, Evelina Norwinski and Dana Peterson, Arnold & Porter LLP
Published by Government Contracts Law360 on May 19, 2014. Also ran in Aerospace & Defense Law360 and Public Policy Law360. DOD Anti-Counterfeit Rule Requires Immediate Action --By Craig Holman, Evelina
More informationDOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES. Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees November 2015 DOD INVENTORY OF CONTRACTED SERVICES Actions Needed to Help Ensure Inventory Data Are Complete and Accurate
More informationTHE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS DEC 0 it 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE
More informationOpen FAR Cases as of 2/9/ :56:25AM
Open FAR Cases as of 11:56:25AM 2018-010 (S) Use of Products and Services of Kaspersky Lab Implements section 1634 of the NDAA for FY 2018. Section 1634 prohibits the use of products and services developed
More informationOpen DFARS Cases as of 12/22/2017 3:45:53PM
Open DFARS Cases as of 3:45:53PM 2018-D004 252.225-7049, 52.225-7050 State Sponsor of Terrorism-- North Korea 2018-D003 252.222-7007 (R) Repeal of DFARS Provision "Representation Regarding Combating Trafficking
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION DIRECTOR OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS (SBP)
DOD INSTRUCTION 5134.04 DIRECTOR OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS (SBP) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Effective: December 4, 2017
More informationDFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information
PGI 209 Contractor Qualifications (Revised January 30, 2012) PGI 209.1--RESPONSIBLE PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS PGI 209.105-1 Obtaining Information. GSA's Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), which is available
More informationOpen DFARS Cases as of 5/10/2018 2:29:59PM
Open DFARS Cases as of 2:29:59PM 2018-D032 215 (R) Repeal of DFARS clause "Pricing Adjustments" 2018-D031 231 (R) Repeal of DFARS clause "Supplemental Cost Principles" 2018-D030 216 (R) Repeal of DFARS
More informationApril 17, The Honorable Mac Thornberry Chairman. The Honorable Adam Smith Ranking Member
April 17, 2015 The Honorable Mac Thornberry Chairman The Honorable Adam Smith Ranking Member Armed Services Committee 2126 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Thornberry
More informationAward and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement
Report No. DODIG-2012-033 December 21, 2011 Award and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement Report Documentation Page
More informationDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Micro- AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/30/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-11349, and on FDsys.gov 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense
More informationACTION: Notice of Proposed Amendments to SBIR and STTR Policy Directives.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/07/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-07817, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 8025-01 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
More informationArmy Competition Advocacy Program
Army Regulation 715 31 Procurement Army Competition Advocacy Program UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 28 November 2016 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 715 31 Army Competition Advocacy
More informationDARS: The Rule-Making Process.
0 DARS: The Rule-Making Process http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/ 1 Agenda DoD & DARS: Supporting the Warfighter FAR & DFARS Introducing PGI FAR/DFARS Changes How They Happen Your Role in the Process Pertinent
More informationPart 1: Employment Restrictions After Leaving DoD: Personal Lifetime Ban
POST-GOVERNMENT SERVICE EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIONS (RULES AFFECTING YOUR NEW JOB AFTER DoD) For Military Personnel E-1 through O-6 and Civilian Personnel who are not members of the Senior Executive Service
More informationEvaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Contracting Officer Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Estimating System Deficiencies
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-139 JUNE 29, 2015 Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Contracting Officer Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Estimating System
More informationThe OMB Super Circular: What the New Rules Mean for Nonprofit Recipients of Federal Awards
The OMB Super Circular: What the New Rules Mean for Nonprofit Recipients of Federal Awards Thursday, March 20, 2014, 12:30 p.m. 2:00 p.m. ET Venable LLP, Washington, DC Moderator: Jeffrey S. Tenenbaum,
More informationAugust 23, Congressional Committees
United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 August 23, 2012 Congressional Committees Subject: Department of Defense s Waiver of Competitive Prototyping Requirement for Enhanced
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 7600.2 March 20, 2004 IG, DoD SUBJECT: Audit Policies References: (a) DoD Directive 7600.2, "Audit Policies," February 2, 1991 (hereby canceled) (b) DoD 7600.7-M,
More informationReport No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Report No. D-2010-058 May 14, 2010 Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
More informationpotential unfair competitive advantage conferred to technical advisors to acquisition programs.
rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING 230 potential unfair competitive advantage conferred to technical advisors to acquisition programs. SEC. 896. SURVEY ON THE COSTS OF REGULATORY COMPLIANCE. (a)
More information(Billing Code ) Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Defense. Contractors Performing Private Security Functions (DFARS Case
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/29/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-01433, and on FDsys.gov (Billing Code 5001-06) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
More informationFact Sheet: FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) DOD Reform Proposals
Fact Sheet: FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) DOD Reform Proposals Kathleen J. McInnis Analyst in International Security May 25, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44508
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Utilization Programs
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 4205.1 September 11, 1996 SADBU, OSD SUBJECT: Department of Defense Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Utilization Programs References: (a) DoD Directive
More information30 10 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 30 10 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 2030 1-30 10 ACQUISITION. TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS MEMORANDUM FOR : SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts Thank
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RADM WILLIAM A. MOFFETT BUILDING BUSE ROAD, BLDG 2272 PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND
NAVAIR INSTRUCTION 4200.33E DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RADM WILLIAM A. MOFFETT BUILDING 47123 BUSE ROAD, BLDG 2272 PATUXENT RIVER, MARYLAND 20670-1547 IN REPLY REFER TO NAVAIRINST
More informationDARPA. Doing Business with
Doing Business with DARPA The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is the central research and development agency within the Department of Defense. DARPA s mission is to maintain the technological
More informationThe Contract Manager's Role
The Contract Manager's Role As a contractor, receiving the required law of war training before serving with the U.S. Armed Forces 40 Contract Management June 2010 BY Robert S. Wells in Ensuring Ethical
More informationSOURCE SELECTION AND BID PROTESTS: PRE- AND POST-AWARD CONSIDERATIONS. Daniel Forman Amy O Sullivan Olivia Lynch Robert Sneckenberg
SOURCE SELECTION AND BID PROTESTS: PRE- AND POST-AWARD CONSIDERATIONS Daniel Forman Amy O Sullivan Olivia Lynch Robert Sneckenberg 37 The Procurement Cycle Continuous cycle: Source selection Bid protest
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5025.1 July 14, 2004 DA&M SUBJECT: DoD Directives System References: (a) DoD Directive 5025.1, subject as above, July 27, 2000 (hereby canceled) (b) DoD 5025.1-M,
More informationDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Amendments. Related to Sources of Electronic Parts (DFARS Case 2016-D013)
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/04/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-09491, and on FDsys.gov 5001-06-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense
More informationGAO DEFENSE CONTRACTING. Improved Policies and Tools Could Help Increase Competition on DOD s National Security Exception Procurements
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees January 2012 DEFENSE CONTRACTING Improved Policies and Tools Could Help Increase Competition on DOD s National Security
More informationEvolution. Revolution. By Marcia E. Richard. The New and Improved Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of Small Business Programs
Evolution Revolution The New and Improved Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of Small Business Programs The OSD OSBP is moving DOD small business utilization forward at an unprecedented, accelerated
More informationAcquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006
March 3, 2006 Acquisition Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D-2006-059) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability Report
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L))
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5134.1 April 21, 2000 SUBJECT: Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) DA&M References: (a) Title 10, United States Code
More informationValue and Innovation in Acquisition and Contracting
2011 Military Health System Conference Value and Innovation in Acquisition and Contracting The Quadruple Aim: Working Together, Achieving Success The Quadruple Aim: Working Together, Achieving Success
More informationUniform Guidance Overview. Why did the federal government implement the Uniform Guidance?
Uniform Guidance Overview Why did the federal government implement the Uniform Guidance? To harmonize (align) procurement rules and simplify the grant management process previously codified in 8 different
More informationOther Transactions Authorities
PROCURE-TO-PAY TRAINING SYMPOSIUM 2018 Other Transactions Authorities Presented by: Larry McLaury OUSD (A&S)/DPAP 1 Market Changes in the Science and Technology Community PAST PRESENT Innovation fueled
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release January 17, January 17, 2014
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release January 17, 2014 January 17, 2014 PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE/PPD-28 SUBJECT: Signals Intelligence Activities The United States, like
More informationReport No. DODIG U.S. Department of Defense SEPTEMBER 28, 2016
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-137 SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 The Defense Logistics Agency Properly Awarded Power Purchase Agreements and the Army Obtained Fair Market Value
More informationDefense Health Agency PROCEDURAL INSTRUCTION
Defense Health Agency PROCEDURAL INSTRUCTION NUMBER 6025.05 Procurement SUBJECT: Personal Services Contracts (PSCs) for Health Care Providers (HCPs) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Defense
More informationa GAO GAO WEAPONS ACQUISITION DOD Should Strengthen Policies for Assessing Technical Data Needs to Support Weapon Systems
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2006 WEAPONS ACQUISITION DOD Should Strengthen Policies for Assessing Technical Data Needs to Support Weapon Systems
More informationPART 21 DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS GENERAL MATTERS. Subpart A-Introduction. This part of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations:
PART 21 DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS GENERAL MATTERS Subpart A-Introduction 21.100 What are the purposes of this part? This part of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations: (a) Provides general information
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5134.04 September 27, 2005 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization References: (a) DoD Directive 5134.4, Director of Small and
More informationPART 21-DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS--GENERAL MATTERS. Subpart A-Defense Grant and Agreement Regulatory System
PART 21-DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS--GENERAL MATTERS Subpart A-Defense Grant and Agreement Regulatory System 21.100 Scope. The purposes of this part, which is one portion of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations
More information10 Government Contracting Trends To Watch This Year
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 10 Government Contracting Trends To Watch
More informationComplaint Regarding the Use of Audit Results on a $1 Billion Missile Defense Agency Contract
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2014-115 SEPTEMBER 12, 2014 Complaint Regarding the Use of Audit Results on a $1 Billion Missile Defense Agency Contract INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20301-1010 April 9, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES OF
More informationTEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & REVITALIZATION PROCUREMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUBRECIPIENTS UNDER 2 CFR PART 200 (UNIFORM RULES)
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & REVITALIZATION PROCUREMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUBRECIPIENTS UNDER 2 CFR PART 200 (UNIFORM RULES) The Texas General Land Office Community Development & Revitalization
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4245.14 October 26, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, October 31, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Value Engineering (VE) Program References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE.
More informationSPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE TASK ORDERS FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS SIIGIIR--06--028 OCTTOBER 23,, 2006 SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR
More informationNECA Update The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200
NECA Update The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 September 23, 2014 Increase in Federal Grants Activity The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance lists over 2,000 Federal grant programs $600B $200B $7B
More informationFDA Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services Overview
FDA Office of Acquisitions and Grants Services Overview Presentation to the Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) February 3, 2016 1 Contents Who We Are/What We Do Contract vs. Grant Grant Flexibilities
More informationGeneral Procurement Requirements
Effective Date: July 1, 2018 Applicability: Grant Purchasing and Procurement Policy Related Policies: Moravian College Purchasing Policy and Business Travel Policy Policy: This policy provides guidelines
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5210.50 October 27, 2014 Incorporating Change 1, Effective February 16, 2018 USD(I) SUBJECT: Management of Serious Security Incidents Involving Classified Information
More informationChapter 2 Authorities and Structure
CHAPTER CONTENTS Key Points...28 Introduction...28 Contracting Authority and Command Authority...28 Contingency Contracting Officer s Authority...30 Contracting Structure...31 Joint Staff and the Joint
More informationCONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS & SYMPOSIA
DIRECTOR, DEFENSE PROCUREMENT AND ACQUISITION POLICY HOLDS PROCUREMENT CONFERENCE Evelyn Layton The biennial Department of Defense Procurement Conference was held in May 2004 in Orlando, Fla. Sponsored
More informationSubj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY OF FICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 N AVY PENTAG ON WASHINGTON D C 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 4380.8C UNSECNAV SECNAV INSTRUCTION 4380.8C From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: IMPLEMENTATION
More informationDoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System
Report No. DODIG-2012-005 October 28, 2011 DoD Countermine and Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Systems Contracts for the Vehicle Optics Sensor System Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No.
More informationApril 17, 2004 Regulatory Update Volume Nine, Fifth Issue MMIV Charles E. Rumbaugh
Los Angeles San Francisco ADR Offices of CHARLES E. RUMBAUGH Arbitrator/Private Judge/Mediator 310.373.1981 // 310.373.4182 (fax) 888.ADROffice (toll free) ADROffice@Rumbaugh.net (e-mail) www.rumbaugh.net
More informationSBA SMALL BUSINESS PROCUREMENT AWARDS ARE NOT ALWAYS GOING TO SMALL BUSINESSES REPORT NUMBER 5-14 FEBRUARY 24, 2005
SBA SMALL BUSINESS PROCUREMENT AWARDS ARE NOT ALWAYS GOING TO SMALL BUSINESSES REPORT NUMBER 5-14 FEBRUARY 24, 2005 This report may contain proprietary information subject to the provisions of 18 USC 1905
More informationGAO INTERAGENCY CONTRACTING. Franchise Funds Provide Convenience, but Value to DOD is Not Demonstrated. Report to Congressional Committees
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees July 2005 INTERAGENCY CONTRACTING Franchise Funds Provide Convenience, but Value to DOD is Not Demonstrated GAO-05-456
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1010 October 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES
More informationOffice of the Inspector General Department of Defense
o0t DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING PROGRAM Report No. 98-133 May 13, 1998 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense
More informationDOD MANUAL ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT)
DOD MANUAL 8400.01 ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT) Originating Component: Office of the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: November 14, 2017
More informationDEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 5101 FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA
DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 5101 FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22042-5101 DHA-IPM 18-008 MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS) ASSISTANT SECRETARY
More informationUpdates: Subcontracting Program TRIAD
Updates: Subcontracting Program TRIAD Janice Buffler, Associate Director Subcontracting Policy and Regional Councils DoD Office of Small Business Programs January 30, 2018 Agenda Goals and Achievements
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3020.50 July, 22, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, August 1, 2011 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Private Security Contractors (PSCs) Operating in Contingency Operations, Humanitarian
More informationMEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
***DRAFT DELIBERATIVE. DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA. NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS CREATING ANY RIGHTS OR BINDING EITHER PARTY*** MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
More informationAcquisition Reform in the FY2016-FY2018 National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs)
Acquisition Reform in the FY2016-FY2018 National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs) Moshe Schwartz Specialist in Defense Acquisition January 4, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45068
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS (ATSD(PA))
DOD DIRECTIVE 5122.05 ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS (ATSD(PA)) Originating Component: Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: August
More informationSubj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON) SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 4380.7B ONR 364 SECNAV INSTRUCTION 4380.7B From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
More informationOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1950 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1950 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-1950 ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT April 24, 2012 Incorporating Change 2, October 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE
More informationReport No. D August 12, Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions Could be Improved
Report No. D-2011-097 August 12, 2011 Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions Could be Improved Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
More informationSummary Report on DoD's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions
Report No. DODIG-2012-039 January 13, 2012 Summary Report on DoD's Management of Undefinitized Contractual Actions Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
More informationInformation Technology
September 24, 2004 Information Technology Defense Hotline Allegations Concerning the Collaborative Force- Building, Analysis, Sustainment, and Transportation System (D-2004-117) Department of Defense Office
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5525.07 June 18, 2007 GC, DoD/IG DoD SUBJECT: Implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the Departments of Justice (DoJ) and Defense Relating
More informationDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUMMARY: This document implements a portion of the Veterans Benefits,
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/21/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-03331, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 8320-01
More informationFoundational Contracting Training - Intermediate
Foundational Contracting Training - Intermediate FAR Parts 6 and 8.7: A Simplified, Customer Focused Acquisition Strategy Breakout Session #: B12 Presented by: Wallace Neal Senior Program Manager National
More informationThe OmniCircular - 2 CFR 200
The OmniCircular - 2 CFR 200 Mary Karen Wills 202-480-2773 mkwills@brg-expert.com Tina Reynolds 703.760.7701 Treynolds@mofo.com September 16, 2014 OMB Final Rule and Applicability Office of Management
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3210.06 February 6, 2014 Incorporating Change 1, August 28, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Defense Grant and Agreement Regulatory System (DGARS) References: See Enclosure
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACQUISITION) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACQUISITION) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 SEP 2 8 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: DoDIG Contracting
More informationEnergy Efficiency Programs Process and Impact Evaluation
Energy Efficiency Programs Process and Impact Evaluation Issued: 4/3/2018 Questions Due: 4/17/2018 Responses Due: 5/18/2018 RFP Coordinator: Rob Ward *This RFP process will be conducted via Idaho Power
More informationANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FILERS
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION BY PUBLIC FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FILERS - 2017 With the below signature, I, (print name), hereby certify that I have read the enclosed summary and understand the negotiating employment,
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 65-402 19 JULY 1994 Financial Management RELATIONS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERALS FOR AUDITING,
More informationDoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2015-045 DECEMBER 4, 2014 DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5240.02 March 17, 2015 USD(I) SUBJECT: Counterintelligence (CI) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive: a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) O-5240.02
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 2030.08 February 19, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, May 24, 2017 USD(P) SUBJECT: Implementation of Trade Security Controls (TSCs) for Transfers of DoD Personal Property
More informationDefense Logistics Agency Instruction. Organic Manufacturing
References: Refer to Enclosure 1. Defense Logistics Agency Instruction Organic Manufacturing DLAI 3210 Effective August 20, 2003 Modified March 3, 2010 Logistics Operations and Readiness 1. PURPOSE. This
More informationDOD MANUAL DOD ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ELAP)
DOD MANUAL 4715.25 DOD ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (ELAP) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Effective: April
More informationCommercial Solutions Opening Innovation in Contracting
Commercial Solutions Opening Innovation in Contracting Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy) May 17, 2017 Introduction
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: DoD Contractor's Safety Requirements for Ammunition and Explosives
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4145.26 April 9, 2005 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Contractor's Safety Requirements for Ammunition and Explosives References: (a) DoD Instruction 4145.26, "DoD Contractors'
More informationREQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
CITY OF CASTLE HILLS TEXAS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PROPOSED AWARD SCHEDULE December 6, 2017 December 20, 2017 January 16, 2018 January 23, 2018 January 30, 2018 February
More informationPLA Determination Guide for DoD
PLA Determination Guide for DoD The decision to use a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) is made on a project-specific basis where its use will promote economy and efficiency in federal procurement. This guide
More information