ICBM MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT TO THE COMMITTEES ON ARMED SERVICES OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
|
|
- Candice Cooper
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ICBM MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT TO THE COMMITTEES ON ARMED SERVICES OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 5 JANUARY 986 UNCLASSIFIED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2 INTRODUCTION In January 983, President Reagan established the Commission on Strategic Forces (Scowcroft Commission) to review the Strategic Modernization Program, particularly ICBM modernization. The Commission issued a report that both the President and the Congress endorsed. The Commission's basic premise was that "...by trying to solve all ICBM tasks with a single weapon and a single basing mode in the face of the trends in technology, we have made the problem of modernizing the ICBM force so complex as to be virtually insoluble." With this in mind, the Commission recommended a. Deploying 00 M-X missiles in existing Minuteman silos. The throwweight and megatonnage carried by the 00 M-X missiles is about the same as that of the 54 large Titan missiles being retired plus that of the 00 Minuteman III missiles that the M-Xs would replace. b. Commencing engineering design of a single-warhead ICBM weighing about 5 tons, leading to full-scale development in 987 and an initial operational capability (IOC) in the early 990s. c. Initiating a program to resolve the uncertainties regarding silo or shelter hardness, leading to later decisions about hardening M-X in silos and deploying a single-warhead ICBM in hardened silos or shelters. Vigorous investigation should proceed on different types of land-based vehicles and launchers, particularly hardened vehicles. Following the Commission's report, the Congress approved the ICBM Modernization Program in May 983, and released the FY 83 funds that it had withheld pending presentation of an acceptable Peacekeeper basing mode. The FY 84 DOD Authorization Act [Sec. 23(c)] included the requirement that the Secretary of Defense, not later than 5 January each year from 984 through 988, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on progress in developing and deploying the Peacekeeper missile system, and progress in silo-hardening technology. This is the third of these annual reports.
3 PEACEKEEPER According to the FY 86 DOD Authorization Act, "the number of M-X missiles deployed at any time in existing Minuteman silos may not exceed 50...unless a basing mode for the M-X missile other than existing Minuteman silos is specifically authorized by legislation..." Congressional action limiting FY 85 and FY 86 Peacekeeper procurement significantly increased missile procurement unit costs. The program to deploy 50 Peacekeepers at F.E. Warren AFB in Wyoming remains on schedule for the December 986 IOC, although some schedule revisions were made as a consequence of the congressionally mandated limit of 50 missiles. The Secretary of Defense has directed the Air Force to develop a research effort to examine other basing modes for a second 50 Peacekeeper missiles. FIGURE PEACEKEEPER DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE PROGRAM MILESTONES TEST FLIGHTS FY CY A ST FLIGHT A A A A A INITIAL DIRECTION FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ST SILO START ASSEMBLY OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY IMPACT STATEMENT FILED FLIGHT AND CHECKOUT (EXISTING MM SILOS) I I I I I I I II I MISSILE PRODUCTION BASING (EXISTING MM SILOS) PRODUCTION START A A PRODUCTION READINESS REVIEWS A. ^ PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEWS A ST MISSILE HARDWARE DELIVERED PRODUCTION A ASTART A A A A INITIAL CRITICAL START ASSEMBLY OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY DESIGN REVIEWS AND CHECKOUT (EXISTING MM SILOS) Ten of the 20 planned Peacekeeper Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) launches have
4 been successfully completed, including flight tests 7 through 0 in 985. Testing continues to provide high confidence that the Peacekeeper will meet the required weapon system performance and accuracy by IOC. Phase II of the RDT&E testing (flight tests 6-3) continued successfully in 985, measuring missile and reentry vehicle (RV) capabilities, and testing silo, missile, and ground support equipment integration. Flight tests 9 (August 985) and 0 (November 985) were both launched from a modified Minuteman silo at Vandenberg AFB. Other major accomplishments in 985 included the award of contracts for the production of the Peacekeeper missile and its related support equipment, and for RDT&E activities, including missile guidance and propulsion tests and Peacekeeper basing system tests. Significant progress was also made in developing command, control, and communications (C 3 ) systems to support Peacekeeper, including an airborne launch control capability common to both Peacekeeper and Minuteman. FIGURE 2 PEACEKEEPER SILO LAUNCH
5 Construction of roads, utilities, and support facilities at F. E. Warren AFB continued in 985 and is over 70 percent complete. The contract for Peacekeeper Assembly and Checkout (A&CO), which will support silo modifications and missile assembly, was awarded in February 985. Operational silo modifications will begin in January 986. leading to an IOC of 0 missiles in December 986. Deployment of the first 50 missiles is scheduled to be completed by December 988. SMALL ICBM AND HARD MOBILE LAUNCHER The Small ICBM and Hard Mobile Launcher (HML) program made significant progress during the past year. The Air Force completed Phase I of the acquisition process and began Phase II: pre-full-scale development (pre-fsd). Contracts have been awarded for weapon system assembly, test, and system support (AT&SS), missile ordnance, propulsion development, weapon control systems concepts, HML concepts, and guidance and control systems, including Alternate Inertial Navigation Systems (AINS). A 6,000-nautical mile range,,000-pound throwweight missile FIGURE 3 SMALL ICBM PROGRAM SCHEDULE CY FY CONCEPT DEFINITION/ PRE-FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT FSD, BASING. & AREA SELECTION DECISION o o MINUTEMAN TEST FLIGHTS FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT SMALL ICBM FIRST FLIGHT SYSTEM FIRST FLIGHT DEVELOPMENT TESTING AND EVALUATION LAST FLIGHT PRODUCTION/DEPLOYMENT IOC
6 that weighs no more than 30,000 pounds is feasible. Initial tests of high-energy propellants, high-strength motor cases, and accurate guidance and control subsystems have demonstrated that the required performance is achievable with low to moderate risk. The Small ICBM propulsion concept-definition phase ended in February 985 with the award of contracts to two competing contractors for each of the three stages. Each contractor continued to validate the technologies needed to meet the baseline requirements for the Small ICBM. During 985, successful full-scale motor firings demonstrated the performance feasibility of high-energy propellants, and burst tests demonstrated the feasibility of lightweight, high-strength motor cases. To further demonstrate their specific concepts, each contractor will test three full-size prototype Small ICBM motors and burst-test three to eight motor cases in 986. Two of the four HML concept-definition competitors were selected in January 985 to continue competition during the pre-fsd phase. Their studies and tests confirmed that an FIGURE 4 MOBILITY TEST VEHICLES BOEING MARTIN
7 HML design hardened to 30 pounds per square inch (psi) or greater is feasible. This is based on concept evaluations using scale models in blast tube tests and in nuclear blast simulation tests above ground. Both HML contractors constructed full-size HML mobility test vehicles that completed field tests at the contractors facilities. Air Force field-testing of the mobility test vehicles began in January 986. The Air Force Nuclear Criteria Group and the Defense Nuclear Agency (DNA) have continued to define the nuclear environment for HML development. The Air Force and DNA have also developed simulators to generate airblast environments for testing HML designs. Small ICBM pre-fsd is characterized by industry competition on the HML, the weapon control system, and the ordnance, guidance, and propulsion stages, which will lead to a firm system baseline design and basing mode alternatives to support an FSD and basing mode selection decision. Full-scale development is scheduled to begin in the first quarter of FY 87, leading to missile flighttesting in early 989 and IOC in December 992, in accordance with Sec.23(a) and (b) of the FY 84 DOD Authorization Act (the Price Amendment). In order to assist the area selection and basing mode decisions associated with entering FSD, efforts are underway to prepare a Legislative Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS). The LEIS will address potentially significant environmental impacts that may be created as a result of stationing the Small ICBM at candidate deployment installations around the country. To date 4,200 installations have been screened, and 5 remain as candidates, including 6 existing Minuteman facilities. The 5 candidates will be further narrowed in early 986. The LEIS is to be completed by September 986. FOLLOW-ON BASING TECHNOLOGY Follow-on basing technology efforts continued in 985 with encouraging results in the areas of silo hardening and deep basing. Four major silo hardness tests using scale models were successfully conducted in 985 at the Luke Air Force Bombing and Gunnery Range near Yuma, Arizona. Results from these tests indicate that it may be possible to harden silos to levels over 50 times greater than existing silo
8 hardness. Testing and analysis of silo designs continue with focus on reducing costs, risk, and lead time to support an alternative basing decision for Peacekeeper and/or the Small ICBM in FY Reevaluation of high-yield nuclear craters in the Pacific, coupled with results of a May 985 simulated nuclear cratering test, indicate that contrary to earlier theories, smaller craters and reduced ground motions can be expected for dry continental U.S. geologies. An October 985 DNA test in an underground cavity further supported this downward revision of crater-related effects. Conceptual studies and supporting technology activities for deep basing continued at a relatively low level of effort. In 985, a plan for a 5-year advanced R&D program to support a late-990s deep basing option, including program objectives and milestones, was submitted to the Congress. Also in 985, new contracts were initiated toward developing and demonstrating pre-prototype subsystem designs and analyzing critical cost and survivability issues. The U.S. ICBM Modernization Program Peacekeeper, Small ICBM and Hard Mobile Launcher, and Follow-on Basing Technologies is making significant progress. These diverse technical efforts organized, managed, and executed to attain national objectives set forth by the Scowcroft Commission, approved by the President, and endorsed by the Congress will ensure a high level of strategic security for the United States into the foreseeable future.
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #37
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 493
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years PE 0605230F / Ground d Strategic Deterrent FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Prompt Global Strike Capability Development. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 To Program Element 65.370 76.553 59.826 142.551-142.551 190.973 180.205
More informationEdited extract from: Department of the Army Historical Summary, FY 1979 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1982, pp
Edited extract from: Department of the Army Historical Summary, FY 1979 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1982, pp. 179-186.) Ballistic Missile Defense The Ballistic Missile Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
More informationMOTORS CORPORATION MILWAUKEE. WISCONSIN Currently building the spacecraft guidance and navigation systems for
I PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT PHONE 762-7000 AREA CODE 414 MOTORS CORPORATION MILWAUKEE. WISCONSIN 53201 FOR RELEASE AC'S ROLE IN THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY In less than two decades since its organization,
More informationCRS Report for Con. The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber
CRS Report for Con The Bush Administration's Proposal For ICBM Modernization, SDI, and the B-2 Bomber Approved {,i. c, nt y,,. r r'ii^i7" Jonathan Medalia Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete Total Total
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 49.457 65.370 118.411 59.826-59.826
More informationOSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0604165D8Z Prompt Global Strike Program OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 COST ($ in Millions) Actual Estimate Estimate 96.391 74.163 166.913 A. Mission
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy January 20, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #47
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy July 14, 2009 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy June 14, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy March 10, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for
More informationLadies and gentlemen, it is a pleasure to once again six years for me now to
062416 Air Force Association, Reserve Officers Association and National Defense Industrial Association Capitol Hill Forum Prepared Remarks by Admiral Terry Benedict, Director of the Navy s Strategic Systems
More informationEdited extract from: Department of the Army Historical Summary, FY 1982 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1988, pp
Edited extract from: Department of the Army Historical Summary, FY 1982 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History, 1988, pp. 175-181.) Ballistic Missile Defense The Ballistic Missile Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: KC-10S. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 Air Force Page 1 of 12 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Program Element
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 23 R-1 Line #126
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total
More informationDifferences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions
Differences Between House and Senate FY 2019 NDAA on Major Nuclear Provisions Topline President s Request House Approved Senate Approved Department of Defense base budget $617.1 billion $616.7 billion
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy May 15, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33640 Summary Even
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy November 3, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33640 Summary
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy September 27, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33640 Summary
More informationKC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Air Force
KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017 RDT&E U.S. Air Force Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 Cost To COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011
More informationOperational Testing of New Field Artillery Systems by LTC(P) B. H. Ellis and LTC R. F. Bell
Operational Testing of New Field Artillery Systems by LTC(P) B. H. Ellis and LTC R. F. Bell From January 1982 to April 1983, four new field artillery systems The Battery Computer System (BCS), the fire
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Amy F. Woolf Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy January 14, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Budget Item Justif ication Exhibit R-2 0603460A Joint A ir-to-ground Missile (JAGM) ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) Actual Estimate Estimate to JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND
More informationPrepared for Milestone A Decision
Test and Evaluation Master Plan For the Self-Propelled Artillery Weapon (SPAW) Prepared for Milestone A Decision Approval Authority: ATEC, TACOM, DASD(DT&E), DOT&E Milestone Decision Authority: US Army
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - - 93.867-93.867 158.218 315.238 397.880
More informationSOVIET STRATEGIC FORCE DEVELOPMENTS
SOVIET STRATEGIC FORCE DEVELOPMENTS TESTIMONY BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC AND THEATER NUCLEAR FORCES OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE AND THE DEFENSE SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #44
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
More informationChapter 9 DEEP UNDERGROUND BASING
Chapter 9 DEEP UNDERGROUND BASING Chapter 9. DEEP UNDERGROUND BASING figure No. L stof figures 116 Postattack Egress 117, Mesa/Tunnel Concept Section View 11 Tunnel Boring Machine 119. Aerial View of Mesa-[
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 92.713 23.188 31.064 46.007-46.007
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #124
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 216 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 217 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 215 FY 216 R1 Program
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
Order Code RL33640 U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Updated August 5, 2008 Amy F. Woolf Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division U.S.
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #176
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element - 24.963 76.760 30.948 0.000 30.948 20.563
More informationSALT I TEXT. The United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, hereinafter referred to as the Parties,
INTERIM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON CERTAIN MEASURES WITH RESPECT TO THE LIMITATION OF STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS (SALT I) The United States
More informationHigh Velocity Penetrating Weapon Program Overview
High Velocity Penetrating Weapon Program Overview 13 Apr 2011 Leo Rose, AFRL/RW Program Manager 850-883-2188 Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited HDBT Weapons Roadmap (Notional)
More informationOHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence
OHIO Replacement Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence 1 Why Recapitalize Our SSBN Force? As long as these weapons exist, the United States will maintain a safe, secure,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 91-107 11 DECEMBER 2012 Incorporating Change 1, 7 April 2014 Safety DESIGN, EVALUATION, TROUBLESHOOTING, AND MAINTENANCE CRITERIA FOR NUCLEAR
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #92
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element JA6: Joint Air-To-Ground Missile (JAGM)
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army : February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Title: Contract Work Breakdown Structure DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Number: DI-MGMT-81334A Approval Date: 20031031 AMSC Number: D7515 DTIC Applicable: Limitation: Office of Primary Responsibility: (D) OSD/PA&E/CAIG
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total Program Element 752.328 704.475 722.071-722.071 701.000 702.979 716.873 725.979
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Unmanned Combat Air Veh(UCAV) Adv Cp/Proto Dev. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Navy DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual Navy Page 1 of 19 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Program Element 266.469 304.907 266.368
More informationPhased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council
Phased Adaptive Approach Overview For The Atlantic Council Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 12 OCT 10 LTG Patrick J. O Reilly, USA Director Missile Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 6.321 5.000 0.400-0.400 66.100 69.800 11.800
More informationGAO. PRECISION-GUIDED MUNITIONS Acquisition Plans for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile. Report to Congressional Committees.
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Committees June 1996 PRECISION-GUIDED MUNITIONS Acquisition Plans for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile GAO/NSIAD-96-144 G A
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 11.801 10.862
More informationModernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective
LLNL-TR-732241 Modernization of US Nuclear Forces: Costs in Perspective D. Tapia-Jimenez May 31, 2017 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 468
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #85 To Program
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Army DATE: February 211 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 6545A: Joint AirtoGround Missile Total
More informationBallistic Missiles and Reentry Systems: The Critical Years
Ballistic Missiles and Reentry Systems: The Critical Years Richard A. Hartunian For nearly 20 years, Aerospace played a vital role in advancing the nation's strategic ballistic missile and reentry system
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 32.797 23.511
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Air Traffic Control/Approach/Landing System (ATCALS) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 26.209 20.644 43.187-43.187 28.526 19.802 7.405 5.225 Continuing Continuing
More informationA udit R eport. Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense. Report No. D October 31, 2001
A udit R eport ACQUISITION OF THE FIREFINDER (AN/TPQ-47) RADAR Report No. D-2002-012 October 31, 2001 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense Report Documentation Page Report Date 31Oct2001
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY
More informationThis Protocol is organized into ten Parts.
PROTOCOL TO THE TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON MEASURES FOR THE FURTHER REDUCTION AND LIMITATION OF STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS Pursuant to Article I of the Treaty
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
Order Code RL33640 U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Updated April 3, 2007 Amy F. Woolf Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division U.S.
More information2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective
2011 Munitions Executive Summit OSD Perspective Jose M. Gonzalez OUSD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Deputy Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions Secretary of Defense
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 26 Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 27 2: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY 25 FY 26 R Program Element
More informationBMDO RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
COST (In Thousands) FY2000 Actual FY 2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 to Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) 81614 540998 A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Theater High Altitude
More informationCRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS21059 Updated May 31, 2005 Navy DD(X) and CG(X) Programs: Background and Issues for Congress Summary Ronald O Rourke Specialist in National
More informationNATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE (NMD)
NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE (NMD) DoD ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Interceptors: 20 (Capability 1) LSI: - Boeing North American Total Life Cycle Cost (TY$): $26,600M* Pro Rata Interceptor
More informationPrepared for Members and Committees of Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Œ œ Ÿ During the Cold War, the U.S. nuclear arsenal contained many types of delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons. The longer range systems, which included
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 5 - Engineering and manufacturing development 0604854A - Artillery Systems - EMD COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002
More informationU.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
Order Code RL33640 U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Updated January 24, 2008 Amy F. Woolf Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
More informationJAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE
JAVELIN ANTITANK MISSILE Army ACAT ID Program Total Number of Systems: Total Program Cost (TY$): Average CLU Cost (TY$): Average Missile Cost (TY$): Full-rate production: 4,348 CLUs 28,453 missiles $3618M
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force Date: February 2016 3020F: Missile Procurement, Air Force / BA 03: Modification of Inservice Missiles / BSA 1: Class IV ID Code (A=Service
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #76
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) COST (In Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Total Cost Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationCRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code IB10062 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Defense Research: DOD s Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Program Updated October 1, 2003 John D. Moteff Resources,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 23.729 9.423 21.175-21.175
More informationTriad, Dyad, Monad? Shaping U.S. Nuclear Forces for the Future. Presentation to the Air Force Association Mitchell Institute for Airpower Studies
Triad, Dyad, onad? Shaping U.S. Nuclear Forces for the Future Presentation to the Air Force Association itchell Institute for Airpower Studies Dana J. Johnson, Christopher J. Bowie, and Robert P. affa
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 24: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 213 Base PE 6531A: ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL
More informationTHE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200DEFENSEPENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1200DEFENSEPENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1200 HEALTH AFFAIRS JUL 1 8 2005 The Honorable John W. Warner Chairman, Committee on Armed Services United States Senate Washington,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #227 To Program
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 212 Navy DATE: February 211 COST ($ in Millions) FY 21 FY 211 PE 6454N: Air Control FY 213 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 To Complete Program Element 6.373 5.665
More informationB-1B CONVENTIONAL MISSION UPGRADE PROGRAM (CMUP)
B-1B CONVENTIONAL MISSION UPGRADE PROGRAM (CMUP) Air Force ACAT IC Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 93 Boeing North American Aviation Total Program Cost (TY$): $2,599M Average Unit Cost
More informationRDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001
PE NUMBER: 0604222F PE TITLE: Nuclear Weapons Support BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001 PE NUMBER AND TITLE 05 - Engineering and Manufacturing Development 0604222F
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 214 Army DATE: April 213 24: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 212 FY 213 # PE 64746A:
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004
PE NUMBER: 11122F PE TITLE: AIR LAUNCHED CRUISE Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Cost ($ in Millions) 4797 Total Program Element (PE) Cost Flight Testing & Navigation 23 Actual 19.4 24 25 26
More informationHILL AFB : UTAH. Military Asset List 2016 FAST FACTS
2016 U.S. Air Force: HILL AFB : UTAH Hill Air Force Base is an Air Force Materiel Command base located in northern Utah. Hill is the Air Force's third largest base by population and size. The base is home
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 United States Special Operations Command : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #71
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force Date: March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Logistics Modernization Program Increment 2 (LMP Inc 2) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents
More informationSEEKING A RESPONSIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND STOCKPILE TRANSFORMATION. John R. Harvey National Nuclear Security Administration
SEEKING A RESPONSIVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND STOCKPILE TRANSFORMATION John R. Harvey National Nuclear Security Administration Presented to the National Academy of Sciences Symposium on: Post-Cold
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0604261F PE TITLE: Personnel Recovery Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) # FY
More information