Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS"

Transcription

1 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) JOHN BRADLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 1:13-cv RGS v. ) ) TIMOTHY J. CRUZ, MICHAEL HORAN ) FRANK J. MIDDLETON, ) and OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ) ATTORNEY FOR PLYMOUTH ) COUNTY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) DEFENDANTS ANSWER TO COUNTS I, II, III, V, and VI OF COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Introduction Contrary to what Plaintiff, John Bradley ( Mr. Bradley ), states in his Complaint and Jury Demand ( Complaint ) brought against Timothy Cruz ( Mr. Cruz ), Michael Horan ( Mr. Horan ), Frank Middleton ( Mr. Middleton ) and the Office of the District Attorney for Plymouth County ( District Attorney s Office ) (collectively Defendants ), his termination from the District Attorney s Office has nothing to do with his alleged political activities and everything to do with his systematic and gross insubordination, unprofessional behavior and declining job performance. Despite serving, by statute, at the pleasure of Mr. Cruz, Mr. Bradley routinely disparaged and attempted to undermine his boss to other members of the District Attorney s office. Moreover, Mr. Bradley estranged himself from his colleagues to such a

2 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 2 of 18 degree that he rarely left his office and would not speak to or even work with Mr. Middleton from July 2006 until September Mr. Bradley s insubordination included being untruthful to Mr. Cruz about cases, referring to Mr. Cruz in disparaging terms to other staff members, and refusing to carry out his required duties as the Chief District Court Prosecutor. This insubordination reached its apex when he refused a specific instruction, issued via a November 17, from Mr. Cruz, to stop talking to the press on behalf of the District Attorney s Office pursuant to longstanding office policy. Instead of following Mr. Cruz s order, Mr. Bradley responded to the and rejected the mandate, ing Mr. Cruz (his boss) the following, I am not your child. I have done a lot of important work in this office both before and after you became DA. You can start showing me a little more respect in the future. After this , Mr. Cruz met with Mr. Bradley on November 21, 2011, and in light of Mr. Bradley s insubordination, petulance, and reclusiveness, it was mutually agreed that it was time for Mr. Bradley to move on from the District Attorney s Office. At Mr. Bradley s request and with Mr. Cruz s acquiescence, Mr. Bradley was allowed to complete two homicide cases, because despite his insubordination, it was unfair to the victims and their families to start over with a new prosecutor on cases that had been pending for so long. Once these two trials were completed, Mr. Bradley was terminated when he failed to resign as previously agreed. The facts as developed through this case will demonstrate that Mr. Bradley s claims are without merit. To the extent any allegations are made in the introduction to the Complaint, Defendants deny such allegations. 2

3 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 3 of 18 Parties 1. Defendants admit that Mr. Bradley is an adult male. Defendants are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to Mr. Bradley s current residence. Defendants deny that at all relevant times Mr. Bradley was an employee of the District Attorney s Office. Defendants are without sufficient information to form a belief as to the remaining allegations in Paragraph Admitted. 3. Defendants admit that Mr. Horan is an adult male who resides in Marshfield, Plymouth County, Massachusetts. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Defendants admit that Mr. Middleton is an adult male who resides in Marshfield, Plymouth County, Massachusetts. Defendants deny that remaining allegations in Paragraph Admitted. Jurisdiction 6. Defendants state that the allegations in Paragraph 6 are conclusions of law for which no responsive pleading is required. Facts 7. Defendants deny that Mr. Bradley began his legal career as an Assistant District Attorney ( ADA ) in October By way of further response, the District Attorney s Office hired Mr. Bradley in October 1991 as a legal intern. Because Mr. Bradley failed the Massachusetts bar exam in November 1991, he did not become a licensed attorney and an ADA until June Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph 7. 3

4 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 4 of Defendants admit that Mr. Bradley left the District Attorney s Office in October 2001 to serve as an Assistant United States Attorney. Upon information and belief, Mr. Bradley left the United States Attorney s Office because, inter alia, he was dissatisfied with what he considered to be low-level assignments at that office. Further, Mr. Bradley stated that he left the United States Attorney s Office due to policy disputes with the United States Attorney, despite the fact that the United States Attorney had been Mr. Bradley s prior boss at the Plymouth County District Attorney s Office. Defendants deny that Mr. Bradley returned to the District Attorney s Office as the Deputy First Assistant ADA in April By way of further response, Mr. Bradley was not named Deputy First Assistant ADA until several months after his return to the District Attorney s Office. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Admitted. 10. Admitted. 11. Defendants deny Mr. Bradley reported directly to Mr. Middleton. In fact after July 2006, Mr. Bradley refused to speak to or work with Mr. Middleton at all. In 2005 Bradley became Chief District Court Prosecutor and his duties were primarily supervising the district court staff. Mr. Bradley had no superior court supervisory duties and no supervisory role in homicides or homicide investigations. Defendants deny all remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. 13. Denied. By way of further response, Mr. Bradley estranged himself from Mr. Cruz and Mr. Middleton long before the fall of Mr. Bradley expressed professional jealousy when Mr. Middleton was named statewide prosecutor of the year in From July 4

5 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 5 of until September 2012, Mr. Bradley refused to speak to or work with Mr. Middleton at all and would walk by him in the halls of the District Attorney s Office without acknowledging his presence. During this time, Mr. Bradley also ed a series of disparaging, inappropriate, and unprofessional s about Mr. Cruz, Mr. Middleton, fellow prosecutors, judges, defendants and defense attorneys. Defendants deny all remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. 15. Denied. 16. Defendants are without information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to Mr. Bradley s exercise of his legal right to make political contributions to candidates for public office. By way of further response, in 2008 Mr. Bradley did not contribute to Mr. Cruz s political fund. Defendants deny all remaining allegations in Paragraph Defendants admit so much of Paragraph 17 as it alleges Mr. Bradley did not make a financial contribution to Mr. Cruz in Defendants deny all remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. 19. Denied. 20. Denied. 21. Denied. 22. Defendants are without information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to what Mr. Bradley s understanding was with respect to the allegations in Paragraph 22. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied, including the allegations made by a third party in the first affidavit attached to the Complaint. 5

6 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 6 of Denied. By way of further response, political activity played no role whatsoever in decision-making and personnel decisions were made based upon job performance alone. ADAs and other staff members who did not provide support for Mr. Cruz s political campaigns (monetary or otherwise) were promoted to important positions at the District Attorney s Office. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph 24, including those made by the affidavits attached to the Complaint. 25. Denied. By way of further response, Mr. Bradley s increasingly insubordinate conduct, poor job performance, and reclusive behavior led to issues with the District Attorney s Office long before Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. 27. Denied. 28. Denied. 29. Denied. By way of further response, in 2007 Mr. Bradley complained to Mr. Cruz about his workload and requested that several murder cases be reassigned to other ADAs. At that time Mr. Bradley had six pending cases. Cruz granted his request and two cases were reassigned. From mid-2008 until he was terminated in September of 2012, Mr. Bradley carried a total of only four cases in that entire four year period. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. 31. Denied. 32. Denied. 33. Denied. 6

7 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 7 of Denied. By way of further response, the housing and living expenses for the witness to multiple homicides referenced in Paragraph 34 were paid by the Witness Protection Board. Mr. Bradley himself signed the Witness Protection Petition Memorandum of Understanding to get the funds for this witness. The Witness Protection Board approved and paid for housing and living expenses for this witness, aside from $1,700 from the hotel bill for this witness, which was billed above the government rate. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. By way of further response, days after testifying in open court, this cooperating witness was shot in the head. Mr. Middleton received repeated s from staff members regarding the witness safety as well as verbal concerns that certain members of the District Attorney s Office were not being discreet about this witness. Accordingly, Mr. Middleton held a meeting in March 2012 to remind the staff members of the District Attorney s Office that this witness life was in danger and to therefore exercise discretion when discussing his cooperation and location. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. 37. Defendants deny so much of Paragraph 37 as it alleges that Mr. Bradley had a strained relationship with Mr. Cruz, Mr. Horan, and Mr. Middleton because of Mr. Bradley s alleged unwillingness to support Mr. Cruz s campaign or his alleged attempts to speak out about issues concerning informants. Defendants also deny so much of Paragraph 37 as it alleges that Mr. Cruz, Mr. Horan, and Mr. Middleton harbored resentment towards Mr. Bradley because of his alleged unwillingness to support Mr. Cruz s campaign or his alleged attempts to speak out about issues concerning informants. Defendants admit that the Boston Globe s Spotlight Team published a series of articles concerning OUI rates in the Commonwealth in Defendants 7

8 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 8 of 18 state that these articles are documents that speak for themselves and therefore no responsive pleading is required as to their contents. To the extent Paragraph 37 alleges that the Boston Globe articles strained Mr. Cruz, Mr. Horan, or Mr. Middleton s relationship with Mr. Bradley or that Mr. Cruz, Mr. Horan, or Mr. Middleton harbored resentment towards Mr. Bradley because of the Boston Globe articles, Defendants also deny these allegations. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. By way of further response, it was Mr. Cruz, not Mr. Bradley, who identified the OUI issue, spearheaded an effort to address this problem, and had corrective legislation filed in early 2011 before ever being contacted by the Boston Globe. Once the Boston Globe contacted the office in the spring of 2011, it was Mr. Cruz s press office that provided the requested information and set up interviews with staff. Mr. Bradley was not interviewed by the Boston Globe until months later at a meeting suggested by and scheduled by the press office. In addition, by way of further example in 2009, long before the Boston Globe articles, Mr. Cruz worked with the Massachusetts Legislature to try to close loop holes in existing OUI law. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. By way of further response, it became apparent that Mr. Bradley harbored a personal animus against certain judges and defense counsel and was intent on directing the story towards alleged personal issues of judges and defense counsel. Without consulting the press office or Mr. Cruz, Mr. Bradley subsequently advised the press that they could have privileged work product regarding this issue that Mr. Bradley had solicited from District Court ADAs in his role as Chief District Court Supervisor. When contacted by the press for these memorandums, the press office declined this request. Mr. Cruz felt that Mr. Bradley was acting unprofessionally and in violation of longstanding office policy. Mr. Cruz 8

9 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 9 of 18 had an exchange with Mr. Bradley on November 17, 2011 and instructed Mr. Bradley to have no more contact with the Boston Globe until directed by Mr. Cruz. See Exhibit 1, attached hereto. Mr. Bradley refused Mr. Cruz s directive and stated to him that, I am not your child. I have done a lot of important work in this office both before and after you became DA. You can start showing me a little more respect in the future. (Hereinafter, the Insubordinate .) Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. By way of further response, Mr. Cruz received the Insubordinate when he was at a legal conference in West Virginia. On November 21, 2011, Mr. Cruz addressed this with Mr. Bradley in a meeting with Mr. Bradley, which Mr. Cruz conducted on his first day back from this conference. Mr. Cruz was shocked to receive the Insubordinate from one of his ADAs in response to a specific instruction. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. By way of further response, after receiving the Insubordinate , it became clear to Mr. Cruz that that Mr. Bradley s insubordination, petulance, and reclusive behavior had reached their apogee. When confronted, Mr. Bradley was unapologetic about the . Accordingly, during the November 21, 2011 meeting it was mutually agreed that it was time for Mr. Bradley to move on from the District Attorney s Office. During this meeting, Mr. Bradley agreed to leave but requested that he be allowed to finish two homicide cases. Mr. Cruz asked Mr. Bradley when these cases would go to trial and Mr. Bradley told Mr. Cruz that these cases would go to trial in December 2011 (the December 2011 Trial ) and February 2012 (the February 2012 Trial ) respectively. Mr. Cruz believed, given the considerable length of time the cases had been waiting to go to trial, that it would be unfair to the victims and their families to delay the cases any further by assigning a new prosecutor. Therefore, he acquiesced 9

10 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 10 of 18 to Mr. Bradley s request to finish the two homicide cases and Mr. Bradley agreed to leave the District Attorney s Office upon completion of the cases. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. By way of further response, as described in Defendants response to Paragraph 41, Mr. Bradley and Mr. Cruz mutually agreed in the November 21, 2011 meeting that Mr. Bradley would be moving on from the District Attorney s Office after his completion of the two homicide trials. During this meeting, Mr. Bradley never mentioned retirement, his pension, nor wanting to stay for his 20 year work anniversary. Upon information and belief, Mr. Bradley would not have reached his 20 year work anniversary in April He did not become an ADA until June 1992 due to his initial failure to pass the Massachusetts bar exam. During the November 21, 2011 meeting, Mr. Cruz also told Mr. Bradley that he would be happy to talk further with him in the future. Mr. Bradley never sought to speak to Mr. Cruz after this meeting. In the following months Mr. Bradley continued his insubordinate behavior. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Defendants admit so much of Paragraph 43 as it alleges that in January 2012, Mr. Bradley was removed as the Chief District Court Prosecutor. By way of further response, Mr. Bradley was informed during the November 21, 2011 meeting that a new ADA would be appointed as Chief District Court Prosecutor effective January Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Defendants admit so much of Paragraph 44 as it alleges that the February 2012 Trial for first degree murder was completed on September 25, 2012 with a guilty verdict for the lesser charge of second degree murder. By way of further response, although the December 2011 Trial progressed on the schedule Mr. Bradley provided to Mr. Cruz during the November 10

11 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 11 of 18 21, 2011 meeting, the February 2012 Trial was continued a number of times, all without Mr. Bradley informing Mr. Cruz of said continuances. The case had been pending for approximately five years by the time it was tried in September of Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Defendants admit so much of Paragraph 45 as it alleges that Mr. Horan suggested to Mr. Bradley on September 28, 2012, that he resign from the District Attorney s Office. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Defendants admit so much of Paragraph 46 as it alleges that Mr. Bradley refused to resign on September 28, By way of further response, in advance of this meeting Mr. Cruz had begun to undertake efforts to attempt to secure Mr. Bradley with another ADA position at another district attorney s office. When Mr. Horan told Mr. Bradley about this potential opportunity, Mr. Bradley told Mr. Horan to instruct Mr. Cruz to not contact any other district attorneys on Mr. Bradley s behalf. Mr. Bradley further instructed Mr. Horan to tell Mr. Cruz that he would regret firing Mr. Bradley, that Mr. Bradley would be suing, and that his goal in life was to destroy Cruz s career. Upon information and belief, another district attorney s office approached Mr. Bradley about a position shortly thereafter but he refused this opportunity as well. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. Based on his conversation and agreement with Mr. Cruz on November 21, 2011, Mr. Bradley was well aware of the reasons for and imminence of his termination when he completed his last murder trial. Defendants deny the remaining allegations in Paragraph Denied. 49. Denied. 11

12 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 12 of 18 COUNT I Violations of 42 U.S.C 1983 (Against Cruz, Horan, and Middleton, Individually) 50. Defendants hereby incorporate their answers to Paragraphs 1 through 49 above, as if fully set forth herein. 51. The allegations contained in Paragraph 51 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph The allegations contained in Paragraph 52 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph The allegations contained in Paragraph 53 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph The allegations contained in Paragraph 54 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph 54. COUNT II Violations of the MCRA, M.G.L. c. 12, 1142 U.S.C 1983 (Against Cruz, Horan, and Middleton, Individually) 55. Defendants hereby incorporate their answers to Paragraphs 1 through 54 above, as if fully set forth herein. 12

13 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 13 of The allegations contained in Paragraph 56 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph The allegations contained in Paragraph 57 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph The allegations contained in Paragraph 58 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph The allegations contained in Paragraph 59 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph 59. COUNT III Tortious Interference with Contractual/Business/Employment/Advantageous Relationship (Against Cruz, Horan, and Middleton, Individually) 60. Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton hereby incorporate their answers to Paragraphs 1 through 59 above, as if fully set forth herein. Mr. Cruz has moved to dismiss Count III of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 60 is required on his behalf at this time. 61. Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton hereby respond that allegations contained in Paragraph 61 are conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required. To the extent a response is required, Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 61. Mr. Cruz has moved to dismiss Count III of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 61 is required on his behalf at this time. 13

14 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 14 of Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton hereby respond that the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 are conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required. To the extent a response is required, Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 62. Mr. Cruz has moved to dismiss Count III of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 62 is required on his behalf at this time. 63. Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton hereby respond that the allegations contained in Paragraph 63 are conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required. To the extent a response is required, Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 63. Mr. Cruz has moved to dismiss Count III of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 63 is required on his behalf at this time. 64. Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton hereby respond that the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 are conclusions of law to which no responsive pleading is required. To the extent a response is required, Mr. Horan and Mr. Middleton deny the allegations contained in Paragraph 64. Mr. Cruz has moved to dismiss Count III of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 64 is required on his behalf at this time. COUNT IV Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Fortune Claim (Against the District Attorney s Office) 65. Defendants have moved to dismiss Count IV of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 65 is required at this time. 66. Defendants have moved to dismiss Count IV of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 66 is required at this time. 67. Defendants have moved to dismiss Count IV of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 67 is required at this time. 14

15 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 15 of Defendants have moved to dismiss Count IV of the Complaint. Accordingly, no response to the allegations contained in Paragraph 68 is required at this time. COUNT V Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy (Against the District Attorney s Office) 69. Defendants hereby incorporate their answers to Paragraphs 1 through 68 above, as if fully set forth herein 70. The allegations contained in Paragraph 70 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph The allegations contained in Paragraph 71 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph 71. COUNT VI Violations of the Massachusetts Whistleblower Statute, M.G.L. c. 149, 185 (Against the District Attorney s Office) 72. Defendants hereby incorporate their answers to Paragraphs 1 through 71 above, as if fully set forth herein. 73. The allegations contained in Paragraph 73 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph Denied. 15

16 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 16 of The allegations contained in Paragraph 75 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph Denied. 77. The allegations contained in Paragraph 77 are conclusions of law to which no allegations contained in Paragraph 77. Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(c), Defendants, by and through their attorneys, hereby set forth the following affirmative defenses. Defendants have not knowingly or intentionally waived any applicable defenses and reserve the right to raise additional affirmative defenses based on information learned through discovery. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Mr. Bradley is barred from relief because his Complaint fails, in whole or in part, to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Complaint is barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of laches. THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Complaint is barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of waiver. FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Complaint is barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of estoppel. FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 16

17 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 17 of 18 The Complaint is barred, in whole or in part, because of Mr. Bradley s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE The Complaint is barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of unclean hands. SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Mr. Bradley is barred from relief because, to the extent he has suffered any harm or damages, such harm or damages were the result of his own conduct. EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE Recovery on the Complaint and each purported cause of action therein, is barred in whole or in part, by Mr. Bradley s failure to mitigate his alleged damages, if any. Prayer for Relief WHEREFORE, Defendants pray this Court: (i) enter judgment dismissing this Complaint and (ii) award it all reasonable costs, fees and other relief this Court deems necessary and proper. Jury Trial Claim Defendants hereby request a trial by jury on all claims so triable. Respectfully submitted, TIMOTHY J. CRUZ, MICHAEL HORAN, FRANK J. MIDDLETON, and the OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PLYMOUTH COUNTY Defendants By their attorney, MARTHA COAKLEY 17

18 Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 12 Filed 04/04/14 Page 18 of 18 ATTORNEY GENERAL By: /s/ Bret A. Cohen Bret A. Cohen Special Assistant Attorney General BBO # MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. One Financial Center Boston, MA (617) bacohen@mintz.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 4, 2014 a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically through the CM/ECF System and will be sent electronically to counsel of record. /s/ Bret A. Cohen Bret A. Cohen 18

Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 14 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv RGS Document 14 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:13-cv-12927-RGS Document 14 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) JOHN BRADLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-12927-RGS v. )

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. EVAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION Case 1:17-cv-00646-TDS-JEP Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, ADVANCED

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Civil

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Jury Trial Demanded COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Jury Trial Demanded COMPLAINT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, vs. Plaintiff, Case No. Jury Trial Demanded

More information

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF INTRODUCTION

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR TERMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND A PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTION AND DECLARATORY RELIEF INTRODUCTION HEARING DATE: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT CHRISTINE L. EGAN; : RICK RICHARDS; and : EDWARD BENSON; : Plaintiffs : : vs. : C.A. No.: : RHODE ISLAND BOARD OF EDUCATION : and EVA-MARIE

More information

9/21/2017 4:16:26 PM 17CV41502 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

9/21/2017 4:16:26 PM 17CV41502 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) /1/0 :: PM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH GARY WEITZEL, Personal Representative of the Estate of JUDITH KAY WEITZEL, plaintiff, vs. Plaintiff, KAISER FOUNDATION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARK WOODALL, MICHAEL P. McMAHON, PAULl MADSON, Individually and on behalf of a class of all similarly situated persons,

More information

CHAPTER 18 INFORMAL HEARINGS

CHAPTER 18 INFORMAL HEARINGS CHAPTER 18 INFORMAL HEARINGS I. INTRODUCTION Informal administrative hearings are one of the types of hearing authorized by the Florida Administrative Procedure Act. They are available for disciplinary

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GREGORY ROLAND, as Plenary Guardian of PHYLLIS J. ROLAND, CIRCUIT CIVIL Case No.: Plaintiff, vs. AVANTÉ AT BOCA

More information

An Introduction to The Uniform Code of Military Justice

An Introduction to The Uniform Code of Military Justice An Introduction to The Uniform Code of Military Justice The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is essentially a complete set of criminal laws. It includes many crimes punished under civilian law (e.g.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TARA BRADY, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action : v. : No. : SACRED HEART : UNIVERSITY and EDWARD : SWANSON, : : Defendants. : COMPLAINT Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case :0-cv-0-LDG-PAL Document Filed /0/0 Page of JACOB L. HAFTER, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 0 MICHAEL NAETHE, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. LAW OFFICE OF JACOB L. HAFTER, P.C. W. Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ELECTRONICALLY FILED 11/30/2016 3:49 PM 03-CV-2016-901610.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA TIFFANY B. MCCORD, CLERK MELISSA S. BAGWELL-SEIFERT,

More information

ADVANCED MANUFACTURING FUTURES PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Massachusetts Development Finance Agency.

ADVANCED MANUFACTURING FUTURES PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Massachusetts Development Finance Agency. ADVANCED MANUFACTURING FUTURES PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Massachusetts Development Finance Agency 99 High Street, 11 th Floor, Boston, MA 02110 www.massdevelopment.com RFP Issued: September 25, 2013

More information

Index No. Petitioner, : -against- : VERIFIED PETITION. Petitioner Scott McConnell, by his counsel undersigned, alleges as follows:

Index No. Petitioner, : -against- : VERIFIED PETITION. Petitioner Scott McConnell, by his counsel undersigned, alleges as follows: NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT ONONDAGA COUNTY ------------------------------------------------------------- x SCOTT McCONNELL, : Petitioner, : -against- : LE MOYNE COLLEGE, : Index No. VERIFIED PETITION

More information

- vs - Index No.I Assigned Justice John M. Curran. Respondents. Upon the annexed petition of Mary Holl, verified October 12,

- vs - Index No.I Assigned Justice John M. Curran. Respondents. Upon the annexed petition of Mary Holl, verified October 12, STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT : COUNTY OF ERIE MARY HOLL, as President of Teamsters Local 264 35 Tyrol Drive Cheektowaga, NY 14227, RICHARD CARR 35 Tyrol Drive Cheektowaga, NY 14227, Petitioners, NOTICE

More information

Case 3:14-cv JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:14-cv JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 3:14-cv-00525-JWD-RLB Document 1 08/22/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC d/b/a HOPE MEDICAL GROUP FOR WOMEN, on behalf

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MAYOR FRANK JACKSON 601 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, OH 44114 And CITY OF CLEVELAND, OHIO c/o MAYOR FRANK G. JACKSON 601 Lakeside

More information

Case 1:14-cv WMS Document 8 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:14-cv WMS Document 8 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13 Case 1:14-cv-00762-WMS Document 8 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAROLETTE MEADOWS, on behalf of her MINOR CHILD, VM, Plaintiffs, vs. AMENDED COMPLAINT

More information

to South Dakota law for breach of contract damages against the above-named Defendant. NATURE OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION

to South Dakota law for breach of contract damages against the above-named Defendant. NATURE OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA ) :ss COUNTY OF CHARLES MIX ) Alyssa Black Bear, IN CIRCUIT COURT FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CIV. #16- Plaintiff, v. COMPLAINT MID-CENTRAL EDUCATIONAL COOPERATIVE, a Cooperative Educational

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 19

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 19 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 19 THE BOEING COMPANY and Case 19-CA-32431 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS DISTRICT LODGE 751, affiliated

More information

In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia Case 1:15-cv-00615 Document 1 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 12 In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia Save Jobs USA 31300 Arabasca Circle Temecula CA 92592 Plaintiff, v. U.S. Dep t

More information

Case 4:10-cv Document 33 Filed in TXSD on 02/07/11 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv Document 33 Filed in TXSD on 02/07/11 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:10-cv-02559 Document 33 Filed in TXSD on 02/07/11 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION THALIA VOUCHIDES Plaintiff, JANIS THOMPSON Intervenor,

More information

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 50 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 50 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:15-cv-02115-EGS Document 50 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-02115

More information

Case 8:09-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 07/22/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (GREENBELT DIVISION)

Case 8:09-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 07/22/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (GREENBELT DIVISION) Case 8:09-cv-01922-PJM Document 1 Filed 07/22/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (GREENBELT DIVISION) PAUL ZELL 6012 Hortons Mill Court Haymarket, VA 20169 v. MICHAEL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No: COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No: COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BONNIE JONES, Plaintiff, v. OSS ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL, LLC, d/b/a OSS HEALTH, DRAYER PHYSICAL THERAPY INSTITUTE, and TIMOTHY BURCH,

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,-,,, :. ~ ~ ;.,. L.i.\: ::,;~j-~- i;:; :_~ r c;: ; > ~r BAYFRONT HMA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC d/b/a Bayfront HEALTH- ST. PETERSBURG, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO.. STATE OF

More information

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :08:22 AM

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :08:22 AM Filing # 61863148 E-Filed 09/22/2017 11:08:22 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: MARGARITA NAVARRO, as Personal Representative

More information

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 Case 4:17-cv-00520 Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION First Liberty Institute, Plaintiff, v. Department

More information

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 1 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION.

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 1 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Case 3:16-cv-00995-SI Document 1 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION TENREC, INC., SERGII SINIENOK, WALKER MACY LLC, XIAOYANG ZHU, and all others

More information

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 1. Plaintiff, United Nurses & Allied Professionals, Local 5082 ( UNAP ) is a nonprofit

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 1. Plaintiff, United Nurses & Allied Professionals, Local 5082 ( UNAP ) is a nonprofit STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC SUPERIOR COURT UNITED NURSES & ALLIED PROFESSIONALS : PLAINTIFF : : VS. : C.A. NO. PC-2017- : RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; : RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF : ATTORNEY

More information

P.O. Box 5735, Arlington, Virginia Tel: (Fax)

P.O. Box 5735, Arlington, Virginia Tel: (Fax) Colonel David M. Rohrer Chief of Police Fairfax County Police Department 4100 Chain Bridge Road Fairfax, Virginia 22030 April 24, 2008 Dear Chief Rohrer: I am writing to request that you rectify a serious

More information

EEOC v. ABM Industries Inc.

EEOC v. ABM Industries Inc. Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program July 2013 EEOC v. ABM Industries Inc. Judge Bernard Zimmerman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec

More information

Case 1:15-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:15-cv-01015-ABJ Document 19 Filed 07/29/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, 80 F Street, NW Washington,

More information

TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF ORIGINAL

TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF ORIGINAL MAY-13-ZJll 14:04 FROM-WEBER LAW OFFICE 612-825-6304 BEFORE THE MINNESOTA T-960 P.003 F-462 TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF ORIGINAL BOARD OF MEDICAL PRACTICE In the Matter of the Medical License of Todd A. Leonard,

More information

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF NURSING ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE PROGRAMS

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF NURSING ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE PROGRAMS Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF NURSING ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE AND GRADUATE PROGRAMS TITLE OF POLICY: ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: STUDENT OBLIGATIONS ORIGINAL DATE: SEPTEMBER

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAR3 FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 S AEG Docket No: 4591-99 20 September 2001 Dear Mr.-: This is in reference to your application for correction

More information

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer the Third-Party Complaint

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer the Third-Party Complaint STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF OCONEE City of Seneca, South Carolina, City of Westminster, South Carolina, and County of Oconee, South Carolina vs. Plaintiffs, Pioneer Rural Water District of Oconee

More information

Nidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No Curtis Witters, on Behalf of Themselves and Their RJI No.: ST8123 Children,

Nidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No Curtis Witters, on Behalf of Themselves and Their RJI No.: ST8123 Children, SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: THIRD DEPARTMENT In the Matter of an Article 78 Proceeding Nidia Cortes, Virgil Dantes, AnneMarie Heslop, Index No. 5102-16 Curtis Witters, on

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. v. 4:15cv456-WS/CAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. v. 4:15cv456-WS/CAS Case 4:15-cv-00456-WS-CAS Document 34 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION Page 1 of 10 PATRICE P. CHOICE, Plaintiff, v. 4:15cv456-WS/CAS

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-17401 ANGEL LANIER MOORE, L.P.N., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health,

More information

Case 3:06-cv DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:06-cv DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 3:06-cv-01431-DAK Document 24 Filed 04/06/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION HOWARD A. MICHEL, -vs- AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE

More information

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx BCMR Docket No. 2004-101

More information

Implementing Patient & Family Engagement: Legal Perspectives. April 9, 2014

Implementing Patient & Family Engagement: Legal Perspectives. April 9, 2014 Implementing Patient & Family Engagement: Legal Perspectives April 9, 2014 1 Webinar Agenda Welcome & Introductions Kathy Wallace What are the legal considerations and best practices when incorporating

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 602 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 13-10200-GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

More information

Macon County Mental Health Court. Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement

Macon County Mental Health Court. Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement Macon County Mental Health Court Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement 1 Table of Contents Introduction...3 Program Description.3 Assessment and Enrollment Process....4 Confidentiality..4 Team

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Mental Health Evaluations of Members of the Armed Forces

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Mental Health Evaluations of Members of the Armed Forces Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 6490.1 October 1, 1997 Certified Current as of November 24, 2003 SUBJECT: Mental Health Evaluations of Members of the Armed Forces ASD(HA) References: (a) DoD Directive

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK, MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY AND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK, MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY AND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK, MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY AND MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-19397 KEITH L. HERBERT, L.C.S.W. RESPONDENT.

More information

4:11-cv RBH Date Filed 05/27/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION COMPLAINT

4:11-cv RBH Date Filed 05/27/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION COMPLAINT 4:11-cv-01295-RBH Date Filed 05/27/11 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2018-02527 SYLVIA S. PETERS, C.N.A., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, Department of Health, files this

More information

Plaintiff, Bernard Woodruff ("Woodruff), by the undersigned attorneys, makes the

Plaintiff, Bernard Woodruff (Woodruff), by the undersigned attorneys, makes the FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ZC31 J ' ' h\u-->l J! /,... Ji">.Ai Yi!\gI.i:

More information

Chapter 14 COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCES. [24 CFR Part 966 Subpart B]

Chapter 14 COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCES. [24 CFR Part 966 Subpart B] Chapter 14 COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCES [24 CFR Part 966 Subpart B] INTRODUCTION The informal hearing requirements defined in HUD regulations are applicable to participating families who disagree with an

More information

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:17-cv-00144-APM Document 29 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES MADISON PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:17-cv-00144-APM DEPARTMENT OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA HIGHMARK INC., and KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN WEST, INC., v. Plaintiffs, UPMC, UPMC BEDFORD, UPMC EAST, UPMC HORIZON, UPMC MCKEESPORT, UPMC NORTHWEST,

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:15-cv-00785 Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ) 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 ) Washington, DC 20024,

More information

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 51-904 6 MARCH 2018 Law COMPLAINTS OF WRONGS UNDER ARTICLE 138, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT

ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, V. CASE NO. 2018-12774 KIMBERLY ANN BARLOITA, L.P.N., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2011-13753 RUBEN JOSE NUNEZ, M.D., RESPONDENT. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, Department of Health, files this

More information

[LICENSED AND ACCREDITED ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL/CLINIC/OTHER]

[LICENSED AND ACCREDITED ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL/CLINIC/OTHER] AFFILIATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN [Facility Name] AND VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM This Affiliation Agreement (hereinafter Agreement

More information

PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL. Washington, D.C. SAMPLE RESIDENT CONTRACT FOR FAMILY MEDICINE

PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL. Washington, D.C. SAMPLE RESIDENT CONTRACT FOR FAMILY MEDICINE PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL Washington, D.C. SAMPLE RESIDENT CONTRACT FOR FAMILY MEDICINE AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of,, between Providence Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the Hospital) and

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 LORETTA E. LYNCH Attorney General VANITA GUPTA Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General SAMEENA SHINA MAJEED Chief, Housing and Civil Enforcement

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:16-cv-00765 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION HOWARD S. NEFT, on behalf of himself and all others

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, INC., on Behalf of its Clients and Constituents, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. MICHAEL D. CREWS, Secretary,

More information

(4) "Health care power of attorney" means a durable power of attorney executed in accordance with this section.

(4) Health care power of attorney means a durable power of attorney executed in accordance with this section. SOUTH CAROLINA STATUTES SECTION 62-5-504. Definitions. (A) As used in this section: (1) "Agent" or "health care agent" means an individual designated in a health care power of attorney to make health care

More information

JURISDICTION. 4. This Court has jurisdiction of this action under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f), 42 U.S.C. THE PARTIES

JURISDICTION. 4. This Court has jurisdiction of this action under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f), 42 U.S.C. THE PARTIES JURISDICTION 4. This Court has jurisdiction of this action under 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f), 42 U.S.C. 2000e-6(b), 28 U.S.C. 1343(a)(3), and 28 U.S.C. 1345. THE PARTIES 5. Plaintiff United States of America

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5405.2 July 23, 1985 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Release of Official Information in Litigation and Testimony by DoD Personnel as Witnesses

More information

Volunteer Policies & Procedures Manual

Volunteer Policies & Procedures Manual CASA of East Tennessee, Inc. Volunteer Policies & Procedures Manual Revised 2016 Funded Partner Agency This project is partially funded under an agreement with the State of Tennessee. Welcome The CASA

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D01-501

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D01-501 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2002 CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST, ETC., Appellants, v. CASE NO. 5D01-501 FLORIDA SOCIETY OF PATHOLOGISTS, ETC.,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF NURSING FINAL ORDER. This matter appeared before the Board of Nursing at a dulynoticed

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF NURSING FINAL ORDER. This matter appeared before the Board of Nursing at a dulynoticed DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF NURSING Final Order No. DOH-17-1013-RD I -MQA FILED DATE - MAY 1 0 2017 Department ealth *It 0 NI a ) eputy Agency Clerk vs. MALIK BRUNSON, Case

More information

5. Name: Last First MI. Street Number and Name or P.O Box. City State ZIPCODE. City State ZIPCODE

5. Name: Last First MI. Street Number and Name or P.O Box. City State ZIPCODE. City State ZIPCODE 508 - ILLINOIS CERTIFIED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT IN INK 1. Exam Date Applying For: 2. Exam Location 3. Fee: $175.00 February Chicago Area Certified

More information

Case 1:15-cv NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:15-cv-11583-NMG Document 21 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES

More information

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00079-CV Doctors Data, Inc., Appellant v. Ronald Stemp and Carrie Stemp, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

Last updated on April 23, 2017 by Chris Krummey - Managing Attorney-Transactions

Last updated on April 23, 2017 by Chris Krummey - Managing Attorney-Transactions Physician Assistant Supervision Agreement Instructions Sheet Outlined in this document the instructions for completing the Physician Assistant Supervision Agreement and forming a supervision agreement

More information

GUIDELINES FOR BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM BY THE COLUMBUS COMMUNITY & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

GUIDELINES FOR BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM BY THE COLUMBUS COMMUNITY & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION GUIDELINES FOR BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM BY THE COLUMBUS COMMUNITY & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this program is to promote the development and expansion

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5525.1 August 7, 1979 Certified Current as of November 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Status of Forces Policy and Information Incorporating Through Change 2, July 2, 1997 GC,

More information

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 7050.06 July 23, 2007 IG DoD SUBJECT: Military Whistleblower Protection References: (a) DoD Directive 7050.6, subject as above, June 23, 2000 (hereby canceled) (b)

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2011-CA-00578-COA SANTANU SOM, D.O. APPELLANT v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NATCHEZ REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND THE NATCHEZ REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

More information

AND IN THE MATTER OF discipline proceedings against GEORGINA MARIE GUYETT, a current member of the College of Early Childhood Educators.

AND IN THE MATTER OF discipline proceedings against GEORGINA MARIE GUYETT, a current member of the College of Early Childhood Educators. DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS Citation: College of Early Childhood Educators vs Georgina Marie Guyett, 2017 ONCECE 3 Date: 2017-02-27 IN THE MATTER OF the Early Childhood

More information

STEVEN HARDY and MARY LOUISE HARDY, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, No. 1 CA-CV

STEVEN HARDY and MARY LOUISE HARDY, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, No. 1 CA-CV NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION NO.

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION NO. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION NO. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Office of Governor Matthew G. Bevin, Plaintiff/Appellant v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky Defendant/Appellee

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI GREG HALDERMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CITY OF STURGEON, MISSOURI, a municipal Corporation; Serve: Mayor or City Clerk City Hall 303 Station Dr.,

More information

APPEARANCES. Pro Se Golden Apple Court Charlotte, NC 28215

APPEARANCES. Pro Se Golden Apple Court Charlotte, NC 28215 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG James Thomas Stephens, Petitioner, v. Division of Community Corrections, Respondent. IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 12OSP01288 FINAL DECISION This

More information

Case 3:10-cv AWT Document 14 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:10-cv AWT Document 14 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Case 3:10-cv-01972-AWT Document 14 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA ) CONNECTICUT GREATER HARTFORD ) CHAPTER 120 and

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH :0: PM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 1 ERIC FRANCK, M.D., an individual, v. Plaintiff, NORTHWEST PERMANENTE, P.C., a professional corporation, Defendant.

More information

Community Dispute Resolution Programs Grant Agreement

Community Dispute Resolution Programs Grant Agreement Community Dispute Resolution Programs 2013-2015 Grant Agreement I. PARTIES 1. State Board of Higher Education acting by and through the University of Oregon on behalf of the University of Oregon School

More information

SOUTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY

SOUTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY SOUTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL DOCUMENT. BEFORE SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT, YOU SHOULD KNOW THESE IMPORTANT FACTS: 1. THIS DOCUMENT GIVES

More information

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. 2017-21655 JODI LYNN LEVINS, A.R.N.P., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner Department of Health (Department)

More information

104 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH 104 CMR 27.00: LICENSING AND OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES

104 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH 104 CMR 27.00: LICENSING AND OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES Unofficial Copy of 104 CMR 27.00 104 CMR - 331 104 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH 104 CMR 27.00: LICENSING AND OPERATIONAL STANDARDS FOR MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES Section 27.01: Legal Authority to Issue

More information

Case 4:10-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 4:10-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT Case 4:10-cv-00327-JLH Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 10 FILED us. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICf:'COURT FOR THE MAY 06 2010 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN

More information

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. In re: ) ) Daniel Tesfaye, M.D., ) CONSENT ORDER ) Respondent. )

BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD. In re: ) ) Daniel Tesfaye, M.D., ) CONSENT ORDER ) Respondent. ) BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD In re: ) ) Daniel Tesfaye, M.D., ) CONSENT ORDER ) Respondent. ) This matter is before the North Carolina Medical Board ( Board ) regarding information provided

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member Linda Bracken Public Member Abdul Patel Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

RE: NLADA Comments to Draft 2015 Compliance Supplement (80 Fed. Reg ) (December 4, 2015)

RE: NLADA Comments to Draft 2015 Compliance Supplement (80 Fed. Reg ) (December 4, 2015) Sent by email to: aramirez@oig.lsc.gov January 14, 2016 Anthony M. Ramirez Office of the Inspector General, Legal Services Corporation 3333 K Street NW Washington, D.C. 20007 RE: NLADA Comments to Draft

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health (Department), files this

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health (Department), files this DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PETITIONER, v. CASE NO. TERESA LYNN WERNER, R.N., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, Department of Health (Department), files this

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH i" ON Final Order No. DOH-18-0626- CKV-MQA FILED DATE - APR 1 1 2018 Department of Health By: Deputy ency Clerk STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN RE: The Emergency Restriction of the License of

More information

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS FINAL DECISION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. 1998-116 ANDREWS, Attorney-Advisor: FINAL DECISION This

More information

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1100.16 August 14, 1989 ASD(FM&P) SUBJECT: Equal Opportunity in Off-Base Housing References: (a) DoD Instruction 1100.16, "Equal Opportunity in Off-Base Housing,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:17-cv-00541-ELR Document 12 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JEREMY SORENSON, an individual, RANDAL REEP, an individual, RANDAL

More information

ATTORNEY COUNTY OF. Page 1 of 5

ATTORNEY COUNTY OF. Page 1 of 5 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY COUNTY OF (Notice: This document gives the person you designate your health care agent broad powers to make health care decisions, including mental

More information