Iraq: One Year Later
|
|
- Dora Sparks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 No. 825 Delivered March 17, 2004 March 23, 2004 Iraq: One Year Later James Phillips One year after the onset of the war in Iraq, I think it is safe to say that the United States is better off than it was before the war. Moreover, our allies are better off and the Iraqi people are certainly better off. For the United States, the ouster of Saddam Hussein s regime pays considerable strategic dividends that too often are glossed over or given short shrift by critics of the Bush Administration. True, these strategic gains have come at a considerable cost in blood and treasure: over 550 Americans killed and economic costs of about $120 billion. There are other troubling downsides to the war, which I will examine later, but on balance the war has enhanced U.S. national security interests in the volatile Middle East and has been a net plus in the war against international terrorism. No Longer a Menace First and foremost, Iraq has been transformed from a bitter foe into a potential ally. Saddam is no longer a menace to the United States or its allies. It is important to remember that he was a brutal dictator who invaded three of his neighbors, fired SCUD missiles at four of his neighbors, and used chemical weapons against Iran and even against his own people. It is worth noting that yesterday was the anniversary of the Iraqi chemical attack on the Kurdish village of Halabja, an atrocity that left at least 5,000 civilians dead. Saddam was defeated militarily in the 1991 Gulf War, but he remained a dangerous foe. He had a finely honed sense of vengeance, as evidenced by the Talking Points The U.S.-led war in Iraq has enhanced U.S. national security interests in the volatile Middle East and has been a net plus in the war against international terrorism. Other rogue regimes have gotten the message. Libya was induced to disarm because of the Iraq war. Iran decided to open up to more inspections of its nuclear program. Syria has suddenly found an interest in the Arab Israeli peace process. Post-war Iraq is doing relatively well. Progress has been fast, compared to the reconstruction efforts in post-war Germany and Japan. The security situation is slowly improving, and the oil industry is swiftly recovering. Free Iraqis increasingly are joining the fight against terrorism. This paper, in its entirety, can be found at: Produced by the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies Published by The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Ave., NE Washington, DC (202) heritage.org Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.
2 videos of the torture of political prisoners that he reportedly enjoyed watching. This is a man, after all, who tried to assassinate former President George H. W. Bush in Kuwait in April 1993, just two years after the 1991 Gulf War. Saddam also had a long record of supporting terrorism. His regime provided funds, sanctuary, or other support for a wide variety of terrorist groups, including the PLO, HAMAS, Palestine Islamic Jihad, the Abu Nidal Group, the Palestine Liberation Front, and the Arab Liberation Front. There is also mounting evidence of numerous contacts between Iraqi intelligence officials and al-qaeda. After 9/11, no prudent American President could have ignored the continuing threat posed by Saddam s clandestine programs to attain weapons of mass destruction and the regime s collusion with terrorism. There was a considerable risk that Saddam s regime would at some point pass the ultimate terrorist weapons to al-qaeda or other terrorists. As President George W. Bush said in his 2003 State of the Union Address: Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option. Banned Weapons True, weapons of mass destruction (WMD) have not yet been found, but that does not necessarily mean they are not there. The United States has found banned missiles and weapons programs with surge production capabilities for the rapid creation of chemical and biological weapons. Moreover, WMD could still be concealed. Iraq is as big as California, and the regime had considerable experience in hiding illegal materials from U.N. inspectors. Weapons of mass destruction were Saddam s crown jewels and were entrusted to his most loyal henchmen, such as the Special Republican Guard and other elite units who would be least likely to give them up. Some of the weapons in question could be hidden in a relatively small space. For example, biological weapons, capable of killing everyone in Washington, D.C., could easily fit into this room. In addition, WMD could have been moved out of country. In fact, in the run-up to the war, and during the war itself, hundreds of trucks were observed crossing the Syrian border. Some argue that Saddam would not have exported his crown jewels, but in 1991 there was a precedent. Prior to the 1991 Gulf War, Baghdad dispatched the most sophisticated warplanes in its air force to Iran to escape destruction, even though Iran was a bitter enemy that it had fought in a bloody eight-year war only a short time before. What became of Iraq s banned weapons remains a mystery. Kenneth Pollock probably has come up with the most coherent theory explaining what happened to them. He argues that Saddam downscaled his banned weapons programs to better hide them while retaining a just in time manufacturing capability. Others have speculated that Iraqi scientists misled Saddam by building scientific Potemkin villages to extract scarce funds. However, it is hard to believe that scientists would lie to Saddam and risk torture and death, not only for themselves, but also for their extended families. But if this assessment is accurate and Saddam s weapons programs were that much out of control, they still posed a danger of leakage similar to the Pakistani smuggling network that sold nuclear technology to Libya and North Korea. David Kay, who led the Iraq Survey Group that is searching for Saddam s weapons, provided this sobering view in January: I think we will paint a picture of Iraq that was far more dangerous than even we thought it was before the war. It was a system collapsing. It was a country that had the capability in weapons of mass destruction areas and, in which terrorists, like ants to honey, were going after it. There is one troubling problem with the theory that Saddam destroyed his weapons of mass destruction: If he did abandon this endeavor, why page 2
3 didn t he prove it to the inspectors? That would have led to the lifting of economic sanctions, and he could have set about rebuilding his programs again, free of international scrutiny. It is hard to believe that Saddam walked away from more than $100 billion in oil revenues if he was not hiding something. Connecting the Dots Some have leapt to the conclusion that the Administration distorted intelligence to make its case for war. This is a leap too far. Intelligence often is inherently subjective. It provides a perspective that sometimes looks more like a Rorschach test than a complete picture. The lesson of the intelligence failure of 9/11 was deemed by many critics to be that nobody connected the dots. Now some of these same critics are complaining about the ways that the dots were connected in Iraq. The intelligence may have been incomplete or misleading, but it was not purposefully distorted. It was grounded on a common-sense reading of U.S. intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. As the President said: Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors; he will make war on his own people. And mark my words he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them. These words were uttered by William Jefferson Clinton, not by George W. Bush, to explain why the U.S. launched air strikes against Saddam in But no one has accused President Clinton of distorting intelligence. It is not just the Bush and Clinton Administrations that believed Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. The intelligence services of Britain, France, Russia, Germany, and Israel, among many others, held similar opinions. Regardless of what happened to Iraq s weapons of mass destruction, I think at least we can now say that the U.S. and its allies no longer have to worry about Saddam threatening us with them. Positive Ripple Effects Another gain from the war was the demonstration effect that it had on other rogue regimes. Libya was induced to disarm because of the Iraq war. In fact, Colonel Qadhafi told Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi that he did so after seeing what happened to Saddam s regime. Iran, also pushed by international pressure, decided to open up to more inspections of its nuclear program. Syria, now the world s only remaining Ba athist regime, has suddenly found an interest in the Arab Israeli peace process. The liberation of Iraq, and Iraqi efforts to build a working democracy there, have had positive ripple effects in the Middle East. Iraqis now have a fighting chance to build a stable democracy that could become a model for the Middle East. The Iraqi example already has encouraged democratic reformers throughout the region. There has been a push for long-overdue reforms, even in Saudi Arabia. The liberation of Iraq also has liberated the U.S. and its allies from the need to contain Saddam s vengeful regime. This has freed the United States from an open-ended deployment of ground, naval, and air forces that cost the United States an estimated $19 billion per year. Moreover, the American troops in Saudi Arabia that conducted this containment effort became a lightning rod for terrorism that partly contributed to the rise of al-qaeda. Another often overlooked aspect of the war is its moral dimension. Saddam Hussein is no longer killing Iraqis. After the war, mass graves were found with an estimated 300,000 bodies in them. This humanitarian calamity greatly exceeded the death toll in Kosovo, where the Clinton Administration intervened in 1999 and, by the way, without the support of a U.N. Security Council resolution. Progress in Reconstruction Iraqis are much better off and they know it. An Oxford/ABC poll released earlier this week indicated that 56 percent of Iraqis believe they are better off now than they were one year ago and that 71 percent believe they will be better off one year from now. Another important gain from the war has been an improvement in global energy security. Saddam s page 3
4 regime was at the center of several oil crises: the 1973 Arab oil embargo; the 1980 invasion of Iran, which disrupted oil production in Iran s Khuzestan province; the 1987 Oil Tanker War, which disrupted oil exports after Iran tried to interdict Kuwaiti oil exports; and Saddam s pre-war threats to use oil as an economic weapon. With the help of the Coalition Provisional Authority, the Iraqi oil industry is swiftly recovering. At present, Iraq is producing approximately 2.5 million barrels per day, compared to the pre-war level of 2.8 million. If Saddam had remained in power, Iraqi oil production would have been suppressed for the indefinite future by sanctions and failure to maintain the oil fields. Now Iraq is free to expand production and is likely to attract considerable foreign investment for doing so. This will provide downward pressure on long-term oil prices that will benefit both the American economy and the economies of all other oilimporting countries. Post-war Iraq is doing relatively well. Progress has been fast, compared to the reconstruction efforts in post-war Germany and Japan. The security situation is slowly improving, although problems remain, particularly in the Sunni heartland. Coalition casualties have fallen from 158 in November December 2003 to 75 in January February of this year. But casualties are not an appropriate measurement of progress. The coalition will sustain casualties until troops finally withdraw, even in success. Finally, Iraq has switched sides in the war on terrorism. This is important because the United States cannot win the war on terrorism unless it eliminates or at least greatly reduces state support for terrorism. When it comes to terrorism, It s the regimes, stupid to paraphrase the mantra of the 1992 Clinton election campaign. Al-Qaeda, which often is held up as the premier example of stateless terrorism, actually was helped tremendously by the support of rogue states. The Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the radical Islamic regime in Sudan provided crucial help that allowed al-qaeda to develop into the global threat that it is today. Now Osama bin Laden has lost at least a potential ally, if not an actual ally, in Saddam s regime. And free Iraqis increasingly are joining the fight against terrorism. Osama bin Laden s associates in Iraq clearly are worried about the expansion of the Iraqi security forces. A recent message intercepted from Abu Mus ab al-zarqawi, a Jordanian terrorist affiliated with al-qaeda who is operating in Iraq, lamented that: Our enemy is growing stronger day after day and its intelligence information increases. By God, this is suffocation. The war to liberate Iraq, coming after the successful war to liberate Afghanistan from the Taliban, has disabused terrorists of the notion that the United States is a paper tiger. This perception unfortunately was created by American withdrawals due to terrorist attacks from peacekeeping operations in Lebanon and Somalia that did not involve vital American national interests. Like Colonel Qadhafi, Zarqawi has been impressed by the Bush Administration s firm resolution in Iraq. Finishing the Job from 1991 The Iraq war also has some notable drawbacks, aside from the continued losses of American troops. The failure to find weapons of mass destruction admittedly has hurt U.S. credibility and the Bush Administration s preemptive doctrine, but this problem is frequently overstated since the U.S. has always retained the right of self-defense under international law. I would argue that the Iraq war was not a preemptive war, but a continuation of the 1991 Gulf War an unfinished war that failed to defang Saddam. Another downside of the war is the possibility that Iraq could become another Afghanistan. Although Osama bin Laden has been deprived of a possible ally, he has been given a new issue to exploit: the occupation of Iraq. Many worry that Iraq could become a fertile seedbed for the incubation of terrorists. The U.S. must counteract this by turning responsibility over to Iraqis as soon as they prove to be capable. Another major worry is that Syria and Iran are in positions to support terrorism against the U.S. in Iraq as they once did in Lebanon during the 1980s, working through the Hezballah terrorist group. The coalition must remain vigilant and take strong measures to deter Syrian and Iranian-backed subversion. Some contend that Iraq was a detour in the war on terrorism and a distraction from the hunt for page 4
5 Osama bin Laden. This criticism is greatly overstated. The war in Iraq was a different type of struggle than the war against al-qaeda. It required different kinds of resources. Strategically, the U.S. is certainly capable of engaging in multiple operations on a global level. It can walk and chew gum at the same time. True, some intelligence assets were diverted from the search for bin Laden to Iraq. But bin Laden had already gone to ground, hunkering down on the Afghan Pakistan border 18 months before the Iraq war. And there is no evidence that bin Laden would have been caught if there had been no war in Iraq. In conclusion, it is often said that war is evil. In the case of Iraq, it was a lesser evil. War was forced on the U.S. by a brutal dictator who put himself in a technical state of war with America by violating the cease-fire that ended the 1991 war. I think that future historians will conclude that not only is the United States better off after the war in Iraq, but our allies are better off, particularly those in close proximity to Iraq, and the Iraqi people are better off. James Phillips is a Research Fellow in the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies at The Heritage Foundation. page 5
Threats to Peace and Prosperity
Lesson 2 Threats to Peace and Prosperity Airports have very strict rules about what you cannot carry onto airplanes. 1. The Twin Towers were among the tallest buildings in the world. Write why terrorists
More informationSSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W.
SSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama administrations. a. Analyze challenges faced by recent presidents
More informationChapter , McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 17 The Roots of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy The cold war era and its lessons Containment Vietnam Bipolar (power structure) 17-2 The Roots of U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy The post-cold war
More informationSHOWDOWN IN THE MIDDLE EAST
SHOWDOWN IN THE MIDDLE EAST IRAN IRAQ WAR (1980 1988) PERSIAN GULF WAR (1990 1991) WAR IN IRAQ (2003 Present) WAR IN AFGHANISTAN (2001 Present) Iran Iraq War Disputes over region since collapse of the
More informationMiddle Eastern Conflicts
Middle Eastern Conflicts Enduring Understanding: Since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the world s attention no longer focuses on the tension between superpowers. Although problems rooted in the
More informationActivity: Persian Gulf War. Warm Up: What do you already know about the Persian Gulf War? Who was involved? When did it occur?
Activity: Persian Gulf War Warm Up: What do you already know about the Persian Gulf War? Who was involved? When did it occur? DESERT STORM PERSIAN GULF WAR (1990-91) WHAT ABOUT KUWAIT S GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION
More informationPresident Obama and National Security
May 19, 2009 President Obama and National Security Democracy Corps The Survey Democracy Corps survey of 1,000 2008 voters 840 landline, 160 cell phone weighted Conducted May 10-12, 2009 Data shown reflects
More informationIntro. To the Gulf War
Intro. To the Gulf War Persian Gulf War, conflict beginning in August 1990, when Iraqi forces invaded and occupied Kuwait. The conflict culminated in fighting in January and February 1991 between Iraq
More informationCHAPTER 8. Key Issue Four: why has terrorism increased?
CHAPTER 8 Key Issue Four: why has terrorism increased? TERRORISM Terrorism by individuals and organizations State support for terrorism Libya Afghanistan Iraq Iran TERRORISM Terrorism is the systematic
More informationPREPARED TESTIMONY BY U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DONALD H. RUMSFELD SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE July 9, 2003
PREPARED TESTIMONY BY U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DONALD H. RUMSFELD SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE July 9, 2003 Mr. Chairman, thank you for this opportunity to meet with the Committee. Let me begin by
More informationSSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W.
SSUSH23 Assess the political, economic, and technological changes during the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama administrations. a. Analyze challenges faced by recent presidents
More information1 Nuclear Weapons. Chapter 1 Issues in the International Community. Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan
1 Nuclear Weapons 1 The United States, the former Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, and China. France and China signed the NPT in 1992. 2 Article 6 of the NPT sets out the obligation of signatory
More informationq14 Do you consider Saudi Arabia an ally of the United States, friendly but not an ally, unfriendly, or an enemy of the United States?
CBS NEWS POLL THE MIDDLE EAST, IRAQ AND IRAN May 27-28, 2003 q14 Do you consider Saudi Arabia an ally of the United States, friendly but not an ally, unfriendly, or an enemy of the United States? Total
More informationBush Faces Rising Public Doubts On Credibility and Casualties Alike
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: BUSH and IRAQ 7/10/03 EMBARGO: 6:30 P.M. BROADCAST, 8 P.M. PRINT/WEB, Friday, July 11, 2003 Bush Faces Rising Public Doubts On Credibility and Casualties Alike Americans
More informationHostile Interventions Against Iraq Try, try, try again then succeed and the trouble
Hostile Interventions Against Iraq 1991-2004 Try, try, try again then succeed and the trouble US Foreign policy toward Iraq from the end of the Gulf war to the Invasion in 2003 US policy was two fold --
More informationNuclear Physics 7. Current Issues
Nuclear Physics 7 Current Issues How close were we to nuclear weapons use? Examples (not all) Korean war (1950-1953) Eisenhower administration considers nuclear weapons to end stalemate Indochina war (1946-1954)
More informationRecent U.S. Foreign Policy. Two takes on Empire
Recent U.S. Foreign Policy Two takes on Empire Bacevich Take One American Empire from the End of the Cold War to 9/11 Globalization Is the international system that replaced the Cold War The desired NSC-68
More informationForeign Policy and Homeland Security
Foreign Policy and Homeland Security 1 Outline Background Marshall Plan and NATO United Nations Military build-up and nuclear weapons Intelligence agencies and the Iraq war Foreign aid Select issues in
More informationChapter 4 The Iranian Threat
Chapter 4 The Iranian Threat From supporting terrorism and the Assad regime in Syria to its pursuit of nuclear arms, Iran poses the greatest threat to American interests in the Middle East. Through a policy
More informationAnnounces End of Major Combat Operations in Iraq. delivered 1 May 2003 from the USS Abraham Lincoln, off the coast of San Diego, CA
George W. Bush Announces End of Major Combat Operations in Iraq delivered 1 May 2003 from the USS Abraham Lincoln, off the coast of San Diego, CA Be seated, please. Thank you. Thank you all very much.
More informationSS.7.C.4.3 International. Conflicts
SS.7.C.4.3 International Conflicts WORLD WAR I 1914-1918 (US JOINED IN 1915) BRAINPOP: HTTPS://WWW.BRAINPOP.COM/SOCIALSTUDIES/USHISTORY/WORLDWARI/ Why did the U.S. become involved? On May 7, 1915 the British
More informationAddress to the Nation on the Threat of Iraq. delivered 7 October 2002, Cincinnati Union Terminal, Cincinnati, Ohio
George W. Bush Address to the Nation on the Threat of Iraq delivered 7 October 2002, Cincinnati Union Terminal, Cincinnati, Ohio Thank you for that very gracious and warm Cincinnati welcome. I'm honored
More informationThe Global War on Terrorism
The Global War on Terrorism - Operation ENDURING FREEDOM - Operation IRAQI FREEDOM The Global War on Terrorism Almost every captain in the Air Force who flies airplanes has combat experience virtually
More informationCommitment to Restore Order in Iraq Balances Criticisms of Bush & the War
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: THE WAR IN IRAQ 6/26/05 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 5 p.m. Monday, June 27, 2005 Commitment to Restore Order in Iraq Balances Criticisms of Bush & the War A sense of obligation
More information2 Articles on Just Published State Department Country Reports on
2 Articles on Just Published State Department Country Reports on Terrorism 2017 Worldwide terrorist attacks decreased by 23 percent in 2017 THE HILL BY JOHN BOWDEN 09/19/18 N i l i l i a l k. a t h a Nathan
More informationSS.7.C.4.3 Describe examples of how the United States has dealt with international conflicts.
SS.7.C.4.3 Benchmark Clarification 1: Students will identify specific examples of international conflicts in which the United States has been involved. The United States Constitution grants specific powers
More information** INTRODUCTION ** SINCE THE ONSET OF THE PETROLEUM AGE IN THE 1860 s, WHAT NATION HAS BEEN THE LEADING CONSUMER OF OIL?
LIGHTHOUSE CPA SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT ECONOMICS VIDEO STUDY GUIDE # 3 - RECENT HISTORY OF OIL BLOOD AND OIL THIS VIDEO NOT ONLY COVERS THE CONTEMPORARY HISTORY OF OIL ( 1945 TO THE PRESENT ), BUT ALSO
More informationChapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 3
Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 3 Objectives 1. Summarize American foreign policy from independence through World War I. 2. Show how the two World Wars affected America s traditional
More informationGeneral Assembly First Committee. Topic A: Nuclear Non-Proliferation in the Middle East
General Assembly First Committee Topic A: Nuclear Non-Proliferation in the Middle East Above all else, we need a reaffirmation of political commitment at the highest levels to reducing the dangers that
More informationU.S. AIR STRIKE MISSIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST
U.S. AIR STRIKE MISSIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST THE QUANTITATIVE DIFFERENCES OF TODAY S AIR CAMPAIGNS IN CONTEXT AND THE IMPACT OF COMPETING PRIORITIES JUNE 2016 Operations to degrade, defeat, and destroy
More informationSummary statement by the Secretary-General on matters of which the Security Council is seized and on the stage reached in their consideration
United Nations S/2008/10 Security Council Distr.: General 11 January 2008 Original: English Summary statement by the Secretary-General on matters of which the Security Council is seized and on the stage
More informationq1 Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as President?
CBS NEWS POLL Rebuilding Iraq September 15-16, 2003 q1 Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as President? Approve 52 91 28 43 55 Disapprove 39 4 63 44 37 DK/NA 9 5
More informationU.S. is not losing Iraq war: Rumsfeld
www.breaking News English.com Ready-to-use ESL / EFL Lessons U.S. is not losing Iraq war: Rumsfeld URL: http://www.breakingnewsenglish.com/0506/050624-rumsfeld.html Today s contents The Article 2 Warm-ups
More informationBACKGROUNDER. A Framework for an Authorization for Use of Military Force Against ISIS. Key Points. Charles D. Stimson
BACKGROUNDER No. 2957 A Framework for an Authorization for Use of Military Force Against ISIS Charles D. Stimson Abstract For over a decade, the United States has been in armed conflict with Islamist terrorists.
More informationForeign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22
Foreign Policy and National Defense Chapter 22 Historical Perspective 1 st 150 years of U.S. existence Emphasis on Domestic Affairs vs. Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy The strategies and goals that guide
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21376 Updated March 25, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Capable Missiles and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Summary Andrew
More informationNukes: Who Will Have the Bomb in the Middle East? Dr. Gary Samore. WCFIA/CMES Middle East Seminar Harvard University October 4, 2018
Nukes: Who Will Have the Bomb in the Middle East? Dr. Gary Samore WCFIA/CMES Middle East Seminar Harvard University October 4, 2018 I d like to thank Lenore Martin and the WCFIA/CMES Middle East Seminar
More informationHOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction
[National Security Presidential Directives -17] HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4 Unclassified version December 2002 Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction "The gravest
More informationA/55/116. General Assembly. United Nations. General and complete disarmament: Missiles. Contents. Report of the Secretary-General
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 6 July 2000 Original: English A/55/116 Fifty-fifth session Item 74 (h) of the preliminary list* General and complete disarmament: Missiles Report of the
More informationSYRIA: Another Chemical Weapon False Flag on the Eve of Peace Talks in Brussels
SYRIA: Another Chemical Weapon False Flag on the Eve of Peace Talks in Brussels The NATO and Gulf State funded White Helmets, handling alleged Sarin gas attack victims with bare hands goes against all
More informationStatement by the Administrative Board of the United States Catholic Conference (1980).
"[W]e support the right of selective conscientious objection as a moral conclusion which can be validly drawn from the classical moral teaching of just-war theory." Statement by the Administrative Board
More informationOperational Security (OPSEC)
Operational Security (OPSEC) The success of military and intelligence operations depend upon secrecy; without secrecy, they generally fail. Paraphrase of Gen. George Washington, First President of the
More informationForeign Policy and National Defense. Chapter 22
Foreign Policy and National Defense Chapter 22 Historical Perspective 1 st 150 years of U.S. existence Emphasis on Domestic Affairs vs. Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy The strategies and goals that guide
More informationEnergy Security of the United States. Selected Issues
Energy Security of the United States Selected Issues Outline of the Lecture Foreign Policy and Energy Security Focus on the administrations from Nixon to Obama and their role in securing a supply of oil,
More informationImportance of Export Control & Japan s Export Control
Importance of Export Control & Japan s Export Control November 2014 Table of Contents 1. Importance of Export Control 2. International Export Control Regimes 3. Japan s Export Control 2 1. Importance of
More informationIRAQ STRATEGY REVIEW
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE IRAQ STRATEGY REVIEW NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL JANUARY 2007 Summary Briefing Slides Guiding Principles Success in Iraq remains critical to our national security and to success in the
More informationINSS Insight No. 459, August 29, 2013 US Military Intervention in Syria: The Broad Strategic Purpose, Beyond Punitive Action
, August 29, 2013 Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov Until the publication of reports that Bashar Assad s army carried out a large attack using chemical weapons in an eastern suburb of Damascus, Washington had
More informationRethinking the Nuclear Terrorism Threat from Iran and North Korea
Rethinking the Nuclear Terrorism Threat from Iran and North Korea A Presentation by Henry Sokolski Executive Director The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center 1718 M Street, NW, Suite 244 Washington,
More informationSenate Armed Services Committee Statement on Counter-ISIL Campaign. delivered 28 October 2015, Washington, D.C.
Ashton Carter Senate Armed Services Committee Statement on Counter-ISIL Campaign delivered 28 October 2015, Washington, D.C. AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text version below transcribed directly from audio Thank
More informationBiological and Chemical Weapons. Ballistic Missiles. Chapter 2
Section 2 Transfer and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Transfer and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, such as nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons, or of ballistic missiles
More informationSep. 11, 2001 Attacks are made against USA
10 Years Later Sep. 11, 2001 Attacks are made against USA Terrorist hijack four commercial aircraft making cross-country journeys and fly two into the World Trade Center in NYC, one into the Pentagon in
More informationTHE WAR IN IRAQ September 4 8, 2007
CBS NEWS/NY TIMES POLL For release: Sunday September 9, 2007 6:30 PM EDT THE WAR IN IRAQ September 4 8, 2007 The reports on Iraq from General David Petraeus, Ambassador Ryan Crocker and the Administration
More informationRemarks by President Bill Clinton On National Missile Defense
Remarks by President Bill Clinton On National Missile Defense Arms Control Today Remarks by President Bill Clinton On National Missile Defense President Bill Clinton announced September 1 that he would
More informationThe president received highly classified intelligence reports containing information at odds with his justifications for going to war.
ADMINISTRATION What Bush Was Told About Iraq By Murray Waas, National Journal National Journal Group Inc. Thursday, March 2, 2006 Two highly classified intelligence reports delivered directly to President
More informationWar in Yemen Congress Member s Wreck CDC Director Loses Job Ten-second Trivia
Assignment 35 Thursday February 1,2018 Story War in Yemen Congress Member s Wreck CDC Director Loses Job Ten-second Trivia Now Playing: Rock a Insert Bye by Clean Bandit Student Music 1 paragraph summary
More informationThe Executive Branch: Foreign Policy
The Executive Branch: Foreign Policy for eign pol i cy noun - a government's strategy in dealing with other nations. U.S. Foreign Policy is this country s actions, words, and beliefs towards other countries.
More informationTHE LESSONS OF MODERN WAR: VOLUME II THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR. By Anthony H. Cordesman and Abraham R. Wagner
THE LESSONS OF MODERN WAR: VOLUME II THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR By Anthony H. Cordesman and Abraham R. Wagner To David Boulton and Fred Praeger for their patient efforts and support. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTIONI
More informationWorld Wars Comparison Chart
World Wars Comparison Chart Topic Similarities Differences Start of Wars -Both wars began with an action that other countries could not ignore. -In World War I, the Austro-Hungarian empire thought it could
More informationMULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.
Exam Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) The realm of policy decisions concerned primarily with relations between the United States
More informationTestimony Prepared for Hearings on Iraq Policy Senate Foreign Relations Committee 31 July 2002 Phyllis Bennis, Institute for Policy Studies
"In such a world of conflict, a world of victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners." - Albert Camus, from The Little Book of Peace Ironically,
More informationIran Nuclear Deal: The Limits of Diplomatic Niceties
Iran Nuclear Deal: The Limits of Diplomatic Niceties Nov. 1, 2017 Public statements don t guarantee a change in policy. By Jacob L. Shapiro Though the rhetoric around the Iran nuclear deal has at times
More informationMontessori Model United Nations. First Committee Disarmament and International Security
Montessori Model United Nations A/C.1/11/BG-97.B General Assembly Eleventh Session Distr.: Upper Elementary XX September 2016 Original: English First Committee Disarmament and International Security This
More informationReleased under the Official Information Act 1982
New Zealand s Military Contributions to the Defeat-ISIS Coalition in Iraq Summary Points (Points in RED have NOT been released publicly) Scope: The Defeat-ISIS coalition is a general, not specific, frame
More informationNATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE. The Strategic Implications of Sensitive Site Exploitation
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY NATIONAL WAR COLLEGE The Strategic Implications of Sensitive Site Exploitation COL Thomas S. Vandal, USA 5605 Doing Military Strategy SEMINAR H PROFESSOR Dr. David Tretler ADVISOR
More informationSan Francisco Chronicle
San Francisco Chronicle How experts view a strike against Iran - Sunday, October 1, 2006 Abbas Milani Simple logic shows the fallacy of the military option. If Iran's nuclear program is peaceful, the United
More informationAs Americans continue to debate fervently the justification for
P e r s p e c t i v e s Saddam s Table Talk I nter view with Williamson Murray As Americans continue to debate fervently the justification for going to war against Saddam Hussein s Iraqi regime in 2003,
More informationUNDOING OBAMA S DAMAGE TO AMERICA
UNDOING OBAMA S DAMAGE TO AMERICA [This essay by former Vice-President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz Cheney, Republican candidate for the Wyoming Congressional seat, was published in the Wall Street
More informationImpact of Proliferation of WMD on Security
ECNDT 2006 - We.3.5.1 Impact of Proliferation of WMD on Security Zvonko OREHOVEC, Polytechnic College Velika Gorica, Croatia Abstract. There is almost no international scientific, expert, political or
More informationConflict and Change. Chapter 10
Conflict and Change Chapter 10 Lesson 1 Conflicts After WWII The United Nations was created in 1945 at the end of WWII. Countries joined the UN to work together for peace. The United States and the Soviet
More informationGLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM
Adjunct Professor of International Affairs United States Military Academy at West Point GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM BARRY R. McCAFFREY GENERAL, USA (RETIRED) ADJUNCT PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
More informationRemarks of Senator John Kerry on Iraq
print this page close this window Remarks of Senator John Kerry on Iraq October 09, 2002 US Senate With respect to Saddam Hussein and the threat he presents, we must ask ourselves a simple question: Why?
More informationPublic Backs Same Goals, Different Means In Dealing With Iraq and North Korea
ABC NEWS POLL: NORTH KOREA/IRAQ 1/5/03 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 6:30 P.M. Monday, Jan. 6, 2003 Public Backs Same Goals, Different Means In Dealing With Iraq and North Korea Eight in 10 Americans say
More informationSetting Foreign and Military Policy
Setting Foreign and Military Policy Approaches to International Relations Realism A theory of international relations that focuses on the tendency of nations to operate from self-interest. Idealism A theory
More informationInternational Nonproliferation Regimes after the Cold War
The Sixth Beijing ISODARCO Seminar on Arms Control October 29-Novermber 1, 1998 Shanghai, China International Nonproliferation Regimes after the Cold War China Institute for International Strategic Studies
More information1
Understanding Iran s Nuclear Issue Why has the Security Council ordered Iran to stop enrichment? Because the technology used to enrich uranium to the level needed for nuclear power can also be used to
More informationOffensive Operations: Crippling Al-Qaeda. MSG H.A. McVicker. United States Army Sergeants Major Academy. Class 58. SGM Feick.
Offensive Operations 1 Running head: OFFENSIVE OPERATIONS: CRIPPLING AL-QAEDA Offensive Operations: Crippling Al-Qaeda MSG H.A. McVicker United States Army Sergeants Major Academy Class 58 SGM Feick 26
More informationDoes President Trump have the authority to totally destroy North Korea?
Does President Trump have the authority to totally destroy North Korea? Prof. Robert F. Turner Distinguished Fellow Center for National Security Law University of Virginia School of Law Initial Thoughts
More informationGlobal Interventions From 1990
Global Interventions From 1990 Overview The significance of stealth aircraft The role of air power in the Gulf War (Operation Desert Storm) The role of air power in Operation Enduring Freedom The role
More information1. INSPECTIONS AND VERIFICATION Inspectors must be permitted unimpeded access to suspect sites.
As negotiators close in on a nuclear agreement Iran, Congress must press American diplomats to insist on a good deal that eliminates every Iranian pathway to a nuclear weapon. To accomplish this goal,
More informationTerrorism: The Target is You!
Terrorism: The Target is You! The War Against Radical Islam By Brigadier General Nick Halley (U.S. Army, Retired) Copyright 2004 by Brigadier General Nick Halley (U.S. Army, Retired) First Edition All
More informationChapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 1
Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 1 Isolationism to Internationalism For nearly 150 years U.S. foreign relations were based on isolationism, as U.S. leaders refused to get widely
More informationTestimony of Charles Duelfer Special Advisor to the DCI for Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction
1 Testimony of Charles Duelfer Special Advisor to the DCI for Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction Thank you for inviting me to discuss my report with your Committee. The relationship between Iraq and the
More informationCoalition Press Conference: Findings on Houthi Ballistic Missile Attacks on the. the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Coalition Press Conference: Findings on Houthi Ballistic Missile Attacks on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia On Monday, March 26, 2018, the Coalition Forces to Support the Legitimacy in Yemen Spokesperson,
More informationASSESSMENT REPORT. The Iranian Nuclear Program: a Final Agreement
ASSESSMENT REPORT The Iranian Nuclear Program: a Final Agreement Policy Analysis Unit - ACRPS July 2015 The Iranian Nuclear Program: a Final Agreement Series: Assessment Report Policy Analysis Unit ACRPS
More informationThe Military Option: The Conduct and Consequences of War in the Persian Gulf
1 AIR FORCE Magazine The Military Option: The Conduct and Consequences of War in the Persian Gulf By Rep. Les Aspin, Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives January 8, 1991 I. Introduction
More informationTHE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
APPROVED by the order No. V-252 of the Minister of National Defence of the Republic of Lithuania, 17 March 2016 THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I CHAPTER. General
More informationI. Description of Operations Financed:
I. Description of Operations Financed: Coalition Support Funds (CSF): CSF reimburses key cooperating nations for support to U.S. military operations and procurement and provision of specialized training,
More informationSection Preview. Terrorism at Home and Abroad. Section3
Section3 Terrorism at Home and Abroad In the 1990s, terrorism against the United States increased. Terrorism is acts of violence aimed at demoralizing or intimidating others. In 1993, a bomb exploded in
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release December 5, 2016 TEXT OF A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF
More informationMay 8, 2018 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM/NSPM-11
May 8, 2018 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM/NSPM-11 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY THE
More informationBARACK OBAMA: TURNING THE PAGE IN IRAQ OBAMA'S PLAN TO RESPONSIBLY END THE WAR IN IRAQ
BARACK OBAMA: TURNING THE PAGE IN IRAQ "My plan for ending the war would turn the page in Iraq by removing our combat troops from Iraq s civil war; by taking a new approach to press for a new accord on
More informationREMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT TO THE NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY S DISTINGUISHED LECTURE PROGRAM. As Prepared for Delivery on Tuesday, September 9, 2008
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT TO THE NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY S DISTINGUISHED LECTURE PROGRAM As Prepared for Delivery on Tuesday, September 9, 2008 It is a pleasure to be back at the National Defense University.
More informationThe Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going forward
The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going forward Frank von Hippel, Senior Research Physicist and Professor of Public and International Affairs emeritus Program on Science and Global Security,
More informationNuclear Terrorism: Threat Briefing How Serious is the Threat?
How Serious is the Threat? Nuclear Security Summit April 12-13, 2010 Nuclear terrorism is the most serious danger the world is facing. Mohamed ElBaradei, former director of the IAEA and winner of the 2005
More informationHouse Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Gerald F. Burke Major, Massachusetts State Police (Retired) Former Senior Advisor, Iraqi Ministry of Interior and Iraqi Police
More informationSACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER TRANSFORMATION SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries New York City, 18 Apr 2018 Général d armée aérienne
More informationMore Data From Desert
USAF has released additional information about the Persian Gulf War, which opened five years ago this month. More Data From Desert PERATION Desert Storm Obegan on January 17, 1991, led off by a ferocious
More informationI. The Pacific Front Introduction Read the following introductory passage and answer the questions that follow.
I. The Pacific Front Introduction Read the following introductory passage and answer the questions that follow. The United States entered World War II after the attack at Pearl Harbor. There were two theaters
More informationDisarmament and International Security: Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Disarmament and International Security: Nuclear Non-Proliferation JPHMUN 2014 Background Guide Introduction Nuclear weapons are universally accepted as the most devastating weapons in the world (van der
More information