Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855"

Leona Atkins
5 years ago
Views:

1 Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855 Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 20th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Springfield, VA October 25, 2017 Oct 25, 2017 Page-1

mission areas with options for additional areas Six Responsibility areas

2 NDAA FY17 Section 855 (1 of 3) (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017) Integration Management (MIM) Legislation Four recommended mission areas with options for additional areas Six Responsibility areas Oct 25, 2017 Page-2

3 NDAA FY17 Section 855 (2 of 3) 855 Scope, Funding, and Strategy Oct 25, 2017 Page-3

NDAA FY17 Section 855 (3 of 3) 10 USC 2446c is Put in place by the Acquisition Agility Act (NDAA FY17 Sections 805-809) A tasking to acquisition programs to employ a Modular

4 NDAA FY17 Section 855 (3 of 3) 10 USC 2446c is Put in place by the Acquisition Agility Act (NDAA FY17 Sections ) A tasking to acquisition programs to employ a Modular Open Systems Approach and Prototyping MIM responsibility (d)(3) in Section 855 regarding Management of Interfaces (e.g. overseeing implementation of Section 805) Oct 25, 2017 Page-4

5 lan d & Control manned Forces n Planning) attlespace / / irements re COAs / lans / Execute ( / Escort) Maneuver Observe Observe Battlespace Conduct Manned Maneuver ( / Escort) Battlespace / Threat Data Maneuver ( / Escort) Unmanned Maneuver ( / Escort) Maneuver ( / Escort) Conduct Manned Maneuver (ISR) Unmanned Plan (Engagement) ( Planning) Observe Observe Battlespace ( / Escort) Battlespace / Threat Data Battlespace / Threats / Engagement Maneuver Requirements Prepare COAs Detect / ID / Surface Threats Plans / Execute Plan ( Planning) Battlespace / Threats / Requirements Conduct Manned Engagement Maneuver Effects ( / Escort) Prepare COAs Maneuver ( / Escort) Conduct Manned Non-Lethal Conduct Plans Cooperative / Unmanned Maneuver ( / Escort) Non-Lethal Maneuver ( / Escort) Unmanned Conduct Non- Manned Maneuver (ISR) Lethal Manned- Unmanned Non-Lethal Engagement Unmanned of Conduct Manned Lethal Engagement of Lethal Unmanned Lethal Manned- Unmanned Lethal Sustain Execute Manned - Forces Manned ( - Unmanned / Escort) Forces (Recover Command / Reconstitute) & Control (Engagement) Maneuver Detect / ID / Surface Threats Conduct Manned Maneuver ( / Escort) Distribute Recovery / Maneuver / Reconstitution ( / Escort) Engagement Unmanned Maneuver ( / Escort) Conduct Manned Non-Lethal Maneuver Time-Sensitive ( / Escort) Surface Threats Non-Lethal Conduct Time-Sensitive Manned Maneuver Surface Threats (ISR) Unmanned Non- Maneuver Lethal (ISR) Unmanned Manned- Unmanned Non-Lethal Conduct Manned Lethal Engagement of Lethal Unmanned Lethal Manned- Unmanned Lethal Recover (Engagement) / Reconsitute Engagement Effects Detect / ID / Surface Threats Sustain (Recover / Reconstitute) Engagement Recovery / Reconstitution Conduct Manned Non-Lethal Engagement of Non-Lethal Unmanned Non- Lethal Manned- Unmanned Non-Lethal Conduct Manned Lethal Engagement of Lethal Unmanned Lethal Manned- Unmanned Lethal Recover / Reconsitute Engagement Effects Sustain (Recover / Reconstitute) GOPLAT(s) Craft#1 (Lead) Craft#2 TUSV#1 TUSV#2 TOC Recovery / Reconstitution Recover / Reconsitute Plan s Units / Platforms / Systems Craft#2 TOC Plan s Observe Observe Battlespace Battlespace / Threat Data Plan ( Planning) Battlespace / Threats / Requirements Execute ( / Escort) Maneuver Conduct Manned Maneuver ( / Escort) Craft#1 (Lead) (Engagement) TUSV#1 Unmanned Lethal Engagement NTA of Plan Tactical Operations Engagement Engagement Effects Sustain (Recover / Reconstitute) Recovery / Reconstitution Cooperative, Semi-Autonomous GOPLAT Defense Plan Phases Plan CONOPS: Craft patrol + Auto/Semi-Auto cooperative TUSV patrol Execute(/ISR) TUAV provides surveillance and combat ID Units / Platforms / Systems TUSVs extend sensors, provide combat ID and engagement Craft#2 Unmanned ROC 03 for NTA Conduct Defense Lethal NTA Conduct Maritime Law Enforcement NTA Protect/Secure Operationally Critical Installations, Facilities, and Systems Brief Forces: 2x Craft, standard loadout 2xTUSVs, sensors, non-lethal + lethal weapons payload in the AOO, operating 1xTUAV, sensors CONOPS: Craft patrol + Auto/Semi-Auto cooperative TUSV patrol TUAV provides surveillance and combat ID TUSVs extend sensors, provide combat ID and engagement TUSV#2 TUAV#1 (FireScout / ScanEagle / STUAS / MRUAS) CTF-56 (Constructive) JFMCC (C2F MOC) NTA Conduct Defense NTA Conduct Maritime Law Enforcement NTA Protect/Secure Operationally Critical Installations, Facilities, and Systems NTA Provide Harbor Defense and Port Security NTA? Plan Tactical Operations Plan Plan CONOPS: Craft patrol + Auto/Semi-Auto cooperative TUSV patrol TUAV provides surveillance and combat ID TUSVs extend sensors, provide combat Preflight ID and engagement Recover / Reconsitute Brief Forces: 2x Craft, standard loadout 2xTUSVs, sensors, non-lethal + lethal weapons payload in the AOO, operating 1xTUAV, sensors Cooperative, Semi-Autonomous GOPLAT Defense Phases Plan Execute(/ISR) GOPLAT(s) Craft#1 (Lead) TUSV#2 TUAV#1 (FireScout / ScanEagle / STUAS / MRUAS) CTF-56 (Constructive) JFMCC (C2F MOC) Plan Observe Observe Battlespace ( Distribute Planning) / Battlespace / Threat Data NTA Conduct Defense NTA Conduct Maritime Law Enforcement NTA Protect/Secure Operationally Critical Installations, Facilities, and Systems NTA Provide Harbor Defense and Port Security Brief Forces: 2x Craft, standard loadout 2xTUSVs, sensors, non-lethal + lethal weapons payload Plan in the AOO, operating 1xTUAV, sensors CONOPS: Craft patrol + Auto/Semi-Auto cooperative TUSV patrol TUAV provides surveillance and combat ID TUSVs extend sensors, provide combat ID and engagement Execute ROC 01 ROC 05 ROC 05 Recover / Reconsitute ROC 05 Maneuver ( / Escort) ( Planning) ( / Escort) (Engagement) (Recover / Reconstitute) Conduct Manned Non-Lethal Prepare COAs Detect / ID / Unmanned Maneuver Surface Threats ROC 02 Recover / Reconsitute ( / Escort) Non-Lethal Battlespace / ROC 05 ( / Escort) Conduct Manned Maneuver (Engagement) ROC 01 (Recover / Reconstitute) Threats / Conduct Engagement Cooperative Effects Recovery / Reconstitution Maneuver ( / Escort) Requirements Engagement Plans / Maneuver ( / Escort) Unmanned Non- ROC 03 Lethal ROC 05 ROC 05 ROC 05 Maneuver ( / Escort) Conduct Manned Non-Lethal Distribute Conduct Manned Maneuver Manned- Prepare COAs / Conduct Manned Maneuver (ISR) Engagement Effects Unmanned Non-Lethal Recovery Engagement / Reconstitution of Maneuver ( / Escort) Detect / ID / Engagement Time-Sensitive Surface Threats ROC 02 Unmanned Maneuver Surface Threats ( / Escort) Non-Lethal ROC 05 ROC 01 ROC 02 Conduct Manned Lethal Engagement ROC 05 Unmanned ROC 05 ROC 05 of Plans / Maneuver ( / Escort) Maneuver ( / Escort) Unmanned Conduct Non- Cooperative Conduct Manned Non-Lethal ROC 03 Lethal Lethal Engagement Maneuver of (ISR) Detect / ID / ROC 02 Unmanned Maneuver Conduct Manned Maneuver Surface Threats Manned- Unmanned ROC 03 (ISR) Unmanned Non-Lethal ( / Escort) Lethal Time-Sensitive Conduct Surface Unmanned Threats Non-Lethal ROC 05 ROC 01 Manned- Unmanned Lethal Conduct Manned Lethal Engagement ROC 02 Maneuver ( Unmanned / Escort) Conduct of Cooperative Unmanned Non- ROC 03 Lethal Conduct Time-Sensitive Unmanned Lethal Surface Threats Plan Plan GOPLAT(s) Craft#1 (Lead) TUSV#1 TOC? Preflight TUAV for Plan s for Preflight Plan Sustain Launch TUAV Brief Forces: 2x Craft, standard loadout 2xTUSVs, sensors, non-lethal + lethal weapons payload in the AOO, operating 1xTUAV, sensors CONOPS: Craft patrol + Auto/Semi-Auto cooperative TUSV patrol TUAV provides surveillance and combat NTA ID Plan Tactical Operations TUSVs extend sensors, provide combat ID and engagement Plan Launch Auto- Surveillance Area Cooperatively Semi-Auto- s s TUAV NTA Conduct Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance? NTA Maneuver in Formation Preflight TUAV Cooperatively Update / Preflight TUAV for Distribute TUAV NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture Preflight 2 Coop Coop NTA Provide Area Security NTA Conduct s Coord With Sensor Data Launch TUAV Launch TUAV Sensor Data Launch NTA Maneuver in Formation Cooperatively Craft#2 Coop for TUAV TOC Plan s USVs Cooperative, Semi-Autonomous GOPLAT Defense Phases Plan Execute(/ISR) TUSV#2 TUAV#1 (FireScout / ScanEagle / STUAS / MRUAS) Craft#2 TUSV#1 CTF-56 (Constructive) JFMCC (C2F MOC) NTA Provide Harbor Defense and Port Security TUAV#1 Auto- Semi-Auto- (FireScout / ScanEagle / STUAS Preflight Launch Surveillance Area Cooperative, Semi-Autonomous GOPLAT Defense / MRUAS) Phases Plan Execute(/ISR) Units / Platforms / Systems GOPLAT(s) Craft#1 (Lead) Craft#2 TUSV#1 TUSV#2 TOC TUAV#1 (FireScout / ScanEagle / STUAS / MRUAS) CTF-56 (Constructive) JFMCC (C2F MOC) NTA Conduct Defense NTA Conduct Maritime Law Enforcement NTA Protect/Secure Operationally Critical Installations, Facilities, and Systems NTA Provide Harbor Defense and Port Security Plan? Preflight TUAV for for Launch TUAV USVs s s Cooperative, Semi-Autonomous GOPLAT Defense Phases TUSV#1 Plan Execute(/ISR) JFMCC Units / Platforms / Systems (C2F MOC) NTA Conduct Defense NTA Conduct Maritime Law Enforcement NTA Protect/Secure Operationally Critical Installations, Facilities, and Systems CTF-56 (Constructive) JFMCC (C2F MOC) Plan s NTA Provide Harbor Defense and Port Security Plan Plan Observe Observe Battlespace Battlespace / Threat Data ROC 01 Brief Forces: 2x Craft, standard loadout Plan ROC 01 Battlespace / Threats / Requirements Prepare COAs Plans / 2xTUSVs, sensors, non-lethal + lethal weapons payload in the AOO, operating 1xTUAV, sensors CONOPS: Craft patrol + Auto/Semi-Auto cooperative TUSV patrol TUAV provides surveillance and combat ID TUSVs extend sensors, provide combat ID and engagement? Execute Preflight TUAV ROC 02 for for Preflight Conduct Manned Maneuver (ISR) Unmanned Units / Platforms / Systems GOPLAT(s) Craft#1 (Lead) TUSV#2 TOC TUAV#1 (FireScout / ScanEagle / STUAS / MRUAS) CTF-56 (Constructive) Launch TUAV NTA Conduct Defense NTA Conduct Maritime Law Enforcement Unmanned Lethal GOPLAT(s) Conduct Manned Lethal Engagement of Lethal NTA Protect/Secure Operationally Critical Installations, Facilities, and Systems NTA Provide Harbor Defense and Port Security Launch Plan s Plan Auto- Surveillance Area Sustain TUAV NTA Conduct Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance USVs Distribute TUAV? Brief NTA Maneuver in Formation USVs NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture Preflight TUAV for Forces: 2x Craft, standard loadout 2xTUSVs, sensors, non-lethal + lethal weapons payload in the AOO, operating 1xTUAV, sensors TUAV NTA Conduct Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance Semi-Auto- Semi-Auto- s s Distribute TUAV 2 Coop Coop NTA Provide Area Security NTA Conduct s NTA Maneuver in Formation Cooperatively NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture for Launch for Launch TUAV Preflight Auto- Surveillance Area USVs NTA Provide Area Security NTA Conduct s 2 Coop Coop Manned- Cooperative, Semi-Autonomous GOPLAT Defense Cooperative Non-Lethal Unmanned Engagement ROC 03 of Phases Plan Execute(/ISR) Lethal Time-Sensitive Surface Units / Platforms Threats / Systems Manned- Semi-Auto- s TUAV NTA Conduct Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance s Coord with GOPLATs Launch / Distribute TUAV Auto- Surveillance Area NTA Conduct Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance Semi-Auto- NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture Update TOC / Maneuver Update TUAV Auto- Surveillance Area USVs / s s Coord with GOPLATs NTA Provide Area Security NTA Conduct s 2 Coop Sensor Data Manned- s s / Distribute TUAV Update TUAV NTA Maneuver in Formation Update TOC / Maneuver Cooperatively NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture TUAV NTA Conduct Tactical Reconnaissance and Surveillance Coord with GOPLATs / Distribute TUAV / NTA Provide Area Security NTA Conduct s 2 Coop Coop Coord with GOPLATs NTA Maneuver in Formation Update TOC / Maneuver Update TUAV Cooperatively / NTA Maintain and Display Tactical Picture / Update TOC NTA Provide Area Coord Security With NTA Conduct s 2 / Maneuver Update TUAV Coop Coop / Coord with GOPLATs USV / Update TOC / Maneuver Update TUAV Coord / With Coord with GOPLATs / Update TOC / Maneuver Update TUAV / tem Acquisition System System Acquisition Acquisition Identify Identify Systems Systems Contributing Contributing to to Capability to Objectives Specify how current Specify systems Specify how current support how current systems the support capability the capability objectives systems support objectives the capability Each mission plan / CONOP / Lanes objectives COA describes a path through Nodes Each mission the various plan / steps CONOP in the / Lanes mission COA describes a path through Nodes Systems the various steps in the mission Lanes Systems SoS Identify and Architecture Nodes evaluate SoS /SoS Identify alternative and Architecture Systems Architecture/Engineering Identify specific evaluate approaches to /SoS systems supporting the alternative organizing and SoS Architecture/Engineering Identify capability specific augmenting systems objectives and approaches to Architecture align them to systems to meet supporting organizing and capability functionality SoS needs /SoS objectives needs augmenting and align them to systems to meet Architecture/Engineering Identify 20 specific functionality SoS needs needs systems mission plan / CONOP / describes a path through arious steps in the mission dentify and evaluate alternative pproaches to ganizing and ugmenting tems to meet SoS needs?? Identify Systems Contributing align them to Engineering functionality is the needs deliberate planning, analyzing, 20 organizing, and integrating of current and emerging operational and system capabilities to achieve desired warfighting mission effects Engineering (ME) supporting the capability 20 objectives and Operations Operations Operations engineering treats the end-to-endmission as the system Individual systems are components of the larger mission system Systems engineering is applied to the systems of systems (SoS) supporting operational mission outcomes engineering goes beyond data exchange among systems to address cross cutting functions, end to end control and trades across systems Technical trades exist at multiple levels; not just within individual systems or components Well-engineered composable mission architectures foster resilience, adaptability and rapid insertion of new technologies Oct 25, 2017 Page-5

6 Impacts of ME on the DoD Enterprise Defines mission outcomes to identify and frame the correct problem Develops an accepted end state for mission success with defined mission success factors to drive the performance requirements for individual systems Aligns the affected stakeholders Users, Operators, Acquirers, Testers, Sustainers with the desired mission and capability outcomes Develops an assessment framework to measure progress toward mission accomplishment through end-to-end system integration of test & evaluation of mission threads Oct 25, 2017 Page-6

7 ME Is Not the Same as SE Meta-Functions exist across the SoS al Awareness and Command/Control are more complex due to multiple ways to accomplish mission must evolve alongside military Concept of Operations (CONOPs) Technology issues aren t always obvious Resiliency and mission hardening requirements must be collectively assessed Testing will be expensive if not unaffordable Resource management techniques don t scale Engineers, development/test facilities etc. Emergent behaviors difficult to anticipate or assess Synchronization of budgets and implementation is difficult at best Oct 25, 2017 Page-7 Distribution Distribution Statement Statement A Approved A Approved for public for release public release by DOPSR by DOPSR. on 4/10/15, Case SR # 18-S-0064 Case # 15-S-1265 applies. applies. Distribution Distribution unlimited. is unlimited.

8 Challenges Faced Today (1 of 2) Limited corporate/leadership demand for ME Lack of integration of ME considerations and results into Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs), Milestone reviews, resourcing decisions Cost/benefit of conducting mission engineering and analysis Large scope and complexity of missions Cross multiple portfolios and organizations Multiple complex, system interdependencies Lack of dedicated ME resources (funding, people, tools, data) Availability and development of ME skills Development of effective ME processes and practice Methods, tools and data (next page) Oct 25, 2017 Page-8

9 Challenges Faced Today (2 of 2) Methods, tools and data Challenges of developing integrated analysis capabilities that bridge engineering and mission effects o Limits on the available analysis methods to address complexity and dynamics o Difficult to link changes in systems or SoS engineering models with impacts on missions in operational or mission simulations o Tools address only subset of issues, making complex analysis and engineering trades manpower intensive and time consuming, are difficult to use together Need for data on missions, systems, interfaces, interactions and interdependencies o Very distributed, maintained in various forms by different organizations o Focus on specific system needs and don t address interdependencies and interactions o Even when available, can be hard to locate or access o Current system models are developed for different purposes which can challenge their effective use in addressing mission level issues Oct 25, 2017 Page-9

MIM Key Activities Sponsorship & Oversight Decisions Characterization & Analysis Integration and Engineering are implemented in an ongoing iterative process Engineering System of Systems Engineering

10 MIM Key Activities Sponsorship & Oversight Decisions Characterization & Analysis Integration and Engineering are implemented in an ongoing iterative process Engineering System of Systems Engineering (SoSE) Life Cycle Coordinated Implementation Sustainment Source: Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 3 Systems Engineering, Section Systems of Systems ( Oct 25, 2017 Page-10

11 MIM Joint Patterns General reusable solutions of Joint patterns. Descriptions of formalized best practices. Joint Designation: Delegated to a Service Service already handling scope or well within their scope Joint Analysis: Service-Led Engineering USD(AT&L) & Joint Staff help set joint mission context Service does everything below that context, including managing requirements and acquisition Joint Analysis: Joint Engineering USD(AT&L) & Joint Staff facilitate system engineering and architecture Programs support development of mission capability fielding packages Joint Agency: Priority and Scope Merits Separate Agency Critical, joint mission area Largely independent Oversight & Context Eng & Analysis Program Execution Oct 25, 2017 Page-11

12 Outcomes of ME and MIM Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) informed by gaps created by dis-investment decisions or unfunded mission critical components Cross-cutting capabilities performing as required or desired Development and engineering synchronized Fielding expectations documented and promulgated Sustaining activities prepared to support fielding Stakeholders of capabilities are identified with greater potential to: Improve coordination of management actions Resolve or avoid system conflicts Opportunity for much greater and more effective savings when trades & analyses are performed at a mission or portfolio level Oct 25, 2017 Page-12

13 Systems Engineering: Critical to Defense Acquisition Defense Innovation Marketplace DASD, Systems Engineering Oct 25, 2017 Page-13

14 For Additional Information Mr. Robert Gold ODASD, Systems Engineering Oct 25, 2017 Page-14

Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855

Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855 Mr. Robert Gold Director, Engineering Enterprise Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 20th Annual NDIA Systems