Reinvigorating Squad Level Units for U.S. Marine Corps Dismounted Combat Capabilities
|
|
- Gwen Norris
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Reinvigorating Squad Level Units for U.S. Marine Corps Dismounted Combat Capabilities Mark Richter Director, Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico VA 13 March 2017 Brief for Future Soldier Technology
2 MERS Mission Manage the Marine Rifle Squad as a System. Revised MERS Initial Capability Document approved 13 Aug Coordinate the integration and modernization of everything worn, carried, used, or consumed by the rifle squad including integration of equipped Marines in mobility platforms. Provide the ability to conduct systems engineering, human factors, integration assessments, and spiral development in a reduced time cycle by operating the Gruntworks Squad Integration Facility as a Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) provided resource. 2
3 Operating Concept What makes MERS and Gruntworks effective is the Triad: The MERS Team Sponsor: Infantry Advocate from DC, PP&O Requirements: MERS Capability Integration Officer, DC, CD&I Acquisition Office: MERS, MCSC Other Stakeholders MERS is aligned within MCSC under the Chief Engineer of the Marine Corps: Systems Engineering, Human Factors, and Interoperability focused Responsible for Human Systems Integration (HSI) across the Command Support for the Programs - works with the programs to make their products better and an integrated solution Actively engage many of the other soldier modernization programs (Joint, International) to leverage technology opportunities and ensure coalition interoperability. 3
4 MERS FY17 Goals and Objectives Establish and fund Partnership Intermediary Agreement (PIA) in order to support Commander s Intent for Innovation focused primarily on the Infantry community. Mobility assessments utilizing Marine Corps Load Effects Assessment Program (MC-LEAP) in Okinawa and CONUS. Execute integration projects and tasks as required in order to support requirements and programs. Identify priority projects through the CD&I Infantry Working Group. Provide and improve Gruntworks as a capability for the Command and the Marine Corps. Provide Human Systems Integration and Human Research Protection Program expertise to the Command. 4
5 MERS FY17 Tasks and Actions Conduct mobility metric assessments of equipment and equipment configurations and develop designs that improve mobility. Conduct integration of infantry squad and days of supply into mobility platforms to include seating and seat restraint systems. Conduct Design Tight initiative and support vehicle loadout trials. Develop a USMC Anthropometry database, use Anthropometry to support vehicle platforms, and identify MOS discriminators. Develop strength database relative to gender and anthropometry. Smart Adaptations. Determine successful candidate technologies for usability assessments from Infantry Equipping Challenge and evaluate. Human Systems Integration reviews with programs and collaborate on solution optimization. Validate new instrumentation received into the trial processes and develop trial plans. Jungle thermal strain study. CD&I Infantry Working Group Charter influence on PIA initiatives. Collaborate with internal and external organizations on innovation efforts. Work with and leverage similar organizations- SOFWERX, Diggerworks, WinSite, and other similar establishments. 5
6 Innovation and Technology Establish a Partnership Intermediary Agreement (PIA) for the Command in order to provide a mechanism to rapidly engage industry and academia to include the ability to rapidly acquire COTS items in small quantities for evaluation and integration. Diversify the capabilities within the Gruntworks Squad Integration Facility by using a PIA as a technology scouting and market research mechanism. Utilize Gruntworks as the core location for engaging industry and leveraging the PIA as the mechanism for rapid response. The Command s own PIA will allow us to place Collaborative Project Orders and will reduce the cycle time and improve responsiveness. Authority to execute PIAs is in SecNavInst and the responsibility for Science and Technology development and readiness is in SecNavInst C (see page 6 para C). PIAs are established under 15 USC
7 Experimentation Third Battalion Fifth Marines has been designated as the experimentation unit in order to determine the optimal size rifle squad with technology insertions that have been provided to the Battalion. The Marine Corps Warfighting Lab is leading the experimentation and analysis process. Each of the three Rifle Companies have a unique squad size and a variety of technologies to utilize during pre-deployment training and during deployment. 10 Marine squad, 12 Marine squad and 14 Marine squad sizes are in the experiment. The current rifle squad size is 13 Marines Currently, the battalion s initial recommendation is for a 15 man squad. This is based upon the insertion of Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (SUAS), ground robotics, small unit command and control systems, information technologies, and a variety of other technologies. Rationale is manpower is required to effectively operate and exploit the technologies while maintaining effective combat power and preventing cognitive burden on small unit leaders. Assistant Squad Leader or Assistant to the Squad Leader? 7
8 Experimentation Third Battalion Fifth Marines will deploy as the Ground Combat Element of the 31 st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU). This provides an opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of the rifle squad in a Naval expeditionary environment Major exercises provide the environment to assess the advantages and disadvantages that new technologies bring to the rifle squad. It allows the Marines the opportunity to improvise how they can utilize the technology for a tactical advantage. Data collection and assessments will provide the information required for analysis and recommendations In 2017 it is anticipated that a final decision will be made on the size and composition of the Marine Rifle Squad. Integration of new technologies to the Marines will be a critical step in order to achieve success. Ergonomics, load carriage, accessibility, usability, training, and human performance will all be critical factors for material solutions. This is actually the beginning as the Marine Operating Concept is injected into the Marine Rifle Squad. 8
9 Marine Operating Concept 5 Critical Task and Issue Areas 1. Integrate the Naval force to fight at and from the sea. 2. Evolve the MAGTF. 3. Operate with resilience in a contested network environment. 4. Enhance our ability to maneuver. 5. Exploit the competency of the individual Marine. All five areas apply to the Marine Rifle Squad! 9
10 Marine Operating Concept Exploit the Competence of the Individual Marine The Marine Corps is a personnel-centric military organization. As such, we must ensure our ability to exploit our asymmetric advantage: the U.S. Marine. We must modernize our personnel policies in order to seek high-quality human capital and better train and educate Marines for the integrated naval force. Training and education must be focused on developing Marines for complexity and developing leaders at every echelon. We must continue our efforts towards cultural learning and emphasize quality in leadership positions. This also means managing talent to improve the return on this training and education investment in terms of managing individual talent across the Total Force regardless of MOS and improving retention. Even as we pursue greater networking of the force, we must resist the temptation to use the connectivity to centralize decision-making, and in so doing undercut our ability to take full advantage of the qualified, trained, experienced, and capable Marine. 10
11 Marine Operating Concept Key Drivers of Change Complex Terrain- Physical, informational, and human aspects of conflict are adding significant complexity and compression to the three-block war. Technology Proliferation- Proliferation across information, S&T, cyber, EW, automation, and Anti Access/Area Denial (A2AD) at a pace far faster than our military acquisition. Information as a Weapon- We must vie for the sentiment of the society local to the conflict and simultaneously the opinion of the world at large. Battle of Signatures- Being detected is to be targeted.we must raise and detect enemy signatures, assign meaning, and take action first. Contested Maritime Domain- Previously unmatched sea control.now air, surface, and subsurface U.S. naval capabilities are being contested. The Problem: The Marine Corps is not organized, trained and equipped to meet the demands of a future operating environment. 11
12 Marine Operating Concept The 21st century MAGTF conducts maneuver warfare in the physical and cognitive dimensions of conflict to generate and exploit psychological, technological, temporal, and spatial advantages over the adversary. The 21st century MAGTF executes maneuver warfare through a combined arms approach that embraces information warfare as indispensable for achieving complementary effects across five domains air, land, sea, space, and cyberspace. The 21st century MAGTF avoids linear, sequential, and phased approaches to operations and blends maneuver warfare and combined arms to generate the combat power needed for simultaneity of action in its full range of missions. The 21st century MAGTF operates and fights at sea, from the sea, and ashore as an integrated part of the Naval force and the larger Combined/Joint force. 12
13 Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad Facilitating the Marine Operating Concept into the Marine Rifle Squad will require novel methods for integration and assessments at the Gruntworks Squad Integration Facility. It requires a coordinated effort reliant on the Infantry Advocate, Requirements, Acquisition, and other stakeholders. Policies supporting integration in the Requirements Generation Phase of new initiatives. Instrumentation investments and innovative methodologies to support Acquisition decision making. Evaluations utilizing the right user populations Training burden assessments for new technologies Resourcing and prioritizing solutions Reduce the cycle time from concept to fielding by providing solid information for better informed requirements attributes and providing disciplined systems engineering and human systems integration in the acquisition process. 13
14 Infantry Working Group The Infantry Working Group Provide a forum to share lessons learned, after action reports, intelligence reports, injury data, research and development findings, materiel developments, technologies, and test methodologies among all key organizations involved in infantry capabilities development. Develop sound, achievable requirements defined in terms of operational capabilities and gaps, and link these requirements to the Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) dated 13 August Leverage the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity to reassess current and future threats. Review the status of materiel and non-materiel solutions currently planned and/or underway to fulfill approved capability gaps. Identify the status of technology initiatives in all stages of development as potential fulfillment of approved capability gaps. Develop a Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad roadmap that captures the nonmateriel and materiel efforts focused on the squad and individual infantry military occupational specialties (MOS) across DOTmLPF-P through the Future Years Defense Program. Establish priorities and forward capability gaps for inclusion in the Marine Corps Gap List beginning with Program Objective Memorandum - 19 (POM-19). Advise Commandant of the Marine Corps, Deputy Commandant for Combat Development and Integration, and other Marine Corps senior leaders on infantry modernization initiatives that can be implemented immediately to improve current warfighting capabilities and over the longer term to support Marine Corps Force 2025 goals and the Marine Corps Operating Concept. 14
15 Infantry Working Group Core Members Fires and Maneuver Integration Division (FMID), Capabilities Development Directorate (CDD), Combat Development and Integration, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps Ground Combat Element (POG)-30, Plans, Policies, and Operations (PP&O), Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps Program Manager, Infantry Weapon Systems (IWS), Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) Director, Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad (MERS), MCSC Training and Education Command (TECOM), CD&I Marine Corps Operational Test and Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA) Other Members Program Managers (PM), Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) / Installations and Logistics (I&L) / Marine Corps Forces Command (MARFORCOM) / Marine Corps Forces Pacific (MARFORPAC) / Marine Corps Logistics Command (MARCORLOGCOM) / Integration Divisions (ID), CDD, CD&I / Operations Analysis Division (OAD), CD&I / Futures, CD&I (MCWL) / Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA) / Expeditionary Energy Office (E2O), Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps / Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD) / Code 30, Office of Naval Research (ONR) / Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) / Marine Corps Forces Reserve (MARFORRES) / Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE), U.S. Army / Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier, U.S. Army / Defense Logistics Agency, (Troop Support and Marine Team) / Prepositioning Programs Section (POE-40), Expeditionary Policies Branch (POE), PP&O, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps / G-8, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command (MARSOC) 15
16 Marine Mobility Policy 2. Background. Reference (a) The MERS ICD, paragraph 7.3(1) requires the establishment of a mobility metric. Mobility, as it pertains to requirements for the individual Marine with a standard combat load, is defined as the relative ability to move efficiently and to effectively accomplish combat related tasks while wearing and carrying assigned weapons and mission essential equipment. Reference (a), paragraph 7.3(1) also identifies an integration requirement for all systems fielded to the infantry to reduce the weight, bulk, and stiffness of issued weapons and equipment, thus improving individual Marine mobility. Reference (a), paragraph 7.3(3) requires the development of thermal strain performance parameters to also be considered when developing items to be worn next to the body. 16
17 Marine Mobility Policy 7.3. (U) Materiel Recommendations Required System Integration to Close Material Gaps. Inherent to all materiel development solutions for the Rifle Squad is a materiel solutions integration requirement for existing systems at the squad level. To this end, the Infantry CIO and Marine Corps System Command must: (1) Establish a mobility metric for equipment/weapons development worn/carried by dismounted forces through integration testing with the MERS program; (2) Conduct integration testing on all fielded equipment/weapons worn/carried by dismounted forces and forecasted to remain in the inventory for the foreseeable future to investigate potential equipment modifications to improve overall mobility in accordance with the established mobility metrics; (3) Develop thermal strain performance parameters to be considered during development or modification of all future equipment worn next to the body; (4) Develop energy consumption / harvesting / distribution performance parameters for use in future powered equipment / weapon development to ensure that appropriate trade-offs are made when powered systems are worn / carried and subsequently affect dismounted mobility; (5) Conduct integration testing with all mobility platforms employed by infantry forces to ensure mobility platforms design personnel carriage systems facilitate timely debarkation/embarkation and account for combat equipment space constraints. 17
18 Marine Mobility Policy 3. Action. Effective immediately, all new Capability Development Documents (CDDs), Capability Production Documents (CPDs), Capability Requirement Change (CRC) and updates to existing CDDs and CPDs for weapons and combat equipment that is to be worn or carried by the individual Marine shall include a mobility attribute. The mobility attribute may be designated a Key Performance Parameter (KPP) / Key System Attribute (KSA), or Additional Performance Attribute (for a CRC), as appropriate for the system. There is no requirement to update previous documents unless they are undergoing changes or updates. The Marine Corps Load Effects Assessment Program (MC-LEAP) will be used to evaluate the mobility attribute, per enclosure (1). The results of the MC-LEAP evaluation characterizing the equipment s impact on mobility will be forwarded to Director, CDD for consideration. 18
19 Summary The Marine Rifle Squad is evolving quickly. Much more going on than a 30 minute presentation allows. Gruntworks, the Partnership Intermediary Agreement, and Infantry Working Group will be key elements as the Squad modernizes with the Marine Operating Concept. The modernization of our requirements, policies, processes, instrumentation, and capabilities have created a solid foundation for modernizing the rifle squad We are enhancing our ability to engage industry and academia by this summer. Contact and engage us. We are open to continuing collaboration with our international partners. If there are questions since I am not there in person, please send an to mark.richter@usmc.mil and I will try to answer it. Enjoy the conference! 19
20 MC-LEAP - Questions? 20
The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century
September How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21st Century Key Points Our ability to execute the Marine Corps Operating Concept in the future operating environment will require a force that has:
More informationSubj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3502.9 POG 15 Jul 2014 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3502.9 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps
More informationREQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
More informationMarine Corps Warfighting Laboratory
Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory 25 October 2017 22d Expeditionary Warfare Conference The overall classification level of this brief is: Strategic Transition Point We are turning the corner from over
More informationForce 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 2 Introduction Force 2025 Maneuvers provides the means to evaluate and validate expeditionary capabilities for
More informationR Z SEP 17 FM CMC CDI MEXWID WASHINGTON DC TO RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G FOUR RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G THREE G FIVE G SEVEN
R 121434Z SEP 17 FM CMC CDI MEXWID WASHINGTON DC TO RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G FOUR RUJIAAA/COMMARFORCOM G THREE G FIVE G SEVEN RUJDAAA/COMMARFORPAC RUJDAAA/COMMARFORPAC G FIVE RUJDAAA/COMMARFORPAC
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3430.2C PLI MARINE CORPS ORDER 3430.2C From: To: Subj: Ref: Commandant of the Marine
More informationFuture Force Capabilities
Future Force Capabilities Presented by: Mr. Rickey Smith US Army Training and Doctrine Command Win in a Complex World Unified Land Operations Seize, retain, and exploit the initiative throughout the range
More informationSubj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3400.10G N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3400.10G From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: CHEMICAL,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-3000 Canc: Jan 2018 MCBul 3900 CD&I (CDD) MARINE CORPS BULLETIN 3900 From: Commandant of the
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C ` MCO 3502.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C. 20350-3000 ` MCO 3502.7A PPO MARINE CORPS ORDER 3502.7A From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To:
More informationArmy Vision - Force 2025 White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.
Army Vision - Force 2025 White Paper 23 January 2014 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release. Enclosure 1 Problem Statement Force 2025 The future global security environment points to further
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3120.10A PLI MARINE CORPS ORDER 3120.10A From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To:
More information2017 CMC Institutional-Level Task List for Deputy Commandants (DCs) and Commanders
2017 CMC Institutional-Level Task List for UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS General Robert B. Neller 37 th Commandant of the Marine Corps Effective: 7 February 2017 The institutional-level tasks listed in this
More informationAUSA Army Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy Symposium and Exposition November 2018 Cobo Center, Detroit, MI. Panel Topic Descriptions
AUSA Army Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy Symposium and Exposition 28-29 November 2018 Cobo Center, Detroit, MI Panel Topic Descriptions Introduction: The AUSA A/AI symposium panel topics are framed
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1
1 Strategic Environment WE ARE A MARITIME NATION Freedom of movement and freedom of access are key to our national security and economic stability. THE LITTORALS CONTAIN KEY GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT POINTS The
More informationForce 2025 and Beyond
Force 2025 and Beyond Unified Land Operations Win in a Complex World U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command October 2014 Table of Contents Setting the Course...II From the Commander...III-IV Force 2025
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3100.4 PLI MARINE CORPS ORDER 3100.4 From: To: Subj: Commandant of the Marine Corps
More informationTWV Conference Autonomous Vehicle Technology Panel
TWV Conference Autonomous Vehicle Technology Panel Home of the Army s Sustainment Think Tank! Combined Arms Support Command and the Sustainment Center of Excellence Fort Lee, Virginia and Fort Jackson,
More informationMCWP Aviation Logistics. U.S. Marine Corps PCN
MCWP 3-21.2 Aviation Logistics U.S. Marine Corps PCN 143 000102 00 To Our Readers Changes: Readers of this publication are encouraged to submit suggestions and changes that will improve it. Recommendations
More informationUSMC Small Arms Modernization Brief
USMC Small Arms Modernization Brief Mr. Chris Woodburn Deputy, Maneuver Branch Marine Corps Capabilities Development Directorate Approved for Public Release - Distribution Unlimited 1 Summary CMC emphasis
More informationMCO C059 APR Subj: MARINE CORPS MODELING & SIMULATION MANAGEMENT
MARINE CORPS ORDER 5200.28 MCO 5200.28 C059 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MARINE CORPS MODELING & SIMULATION MANAGEMENT Ref: (a) DODD 5000.59, DOD Modeling & Simulation
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3090.1 N2 JM6 OCT 5 2009 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3090.1 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: COMKWD, CONTROL,
More informationWinning in Close Combat Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle
Training and Doctrine Command 2017 Global Force Symposium and Exposition Winning in Close Combat: Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle Innovation for Complex World Winning in Close Combat Ground Forces
More informationCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM
Section 6.3 PEO LS Program COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM CAC2S Program Background The Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S) is a modernization effort to replace the existing aviation
More informationMCO B C March Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS)
C 061 10 March 2008 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3900.15B From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS) Ref: (a) MROC Decision Memorandum
More informationTactical Technology Office
Tactical Technology Office Dr. Bradford Tousley, Director DARPA Tactical Technology Office Briefing prepared for NDIA s 2017 Ground Robotics Capabilities Conference & Exhibition March 22, 2017 1 Breakthrough
More informationOPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 1500.84 N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 1500.84 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: CHIEF OF
More informationJames T. Conway General, U.S. Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps
MISSION To serve as the Commandant's agent for acquisition and sustainment of systems and equipment used to accomplish the Marine Corps' warfighting mission. 1 It is our obligation to subsequent generations
More informationMarine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL)
Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL) 3 Dec 2009 BGen R. F. Fuzzy Hedelund Commanding General 1 Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) CG, MCCDC DCG, MCCDC Marine Corps Warfighting Lab Capabilities
More informationSubj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3430.23C N2/N6 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3430.23C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: ELECTRONIC
More informationFuture Expeditionary Armor Force Needs
Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs Chris Yunker MEFFV JCIDS Team Lead Marine Corps Combat Development Command 703-432-4042 (MCSC) 703-784-4915 (MCCDC) Yunkerc@mcsc.usmc.mil Chris.Yunker@usmc.mil This
More informationSTRATEGIC PLAN. Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division. Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
STRATEGIC PLAN Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. From the Commanding Officer and Technical Director In
More information... from the air, land, and sea and in every clime and place!
Department of the Navy Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, D.C. 20380-1775 3 November 2000 Marine Corps Strategy 21 is our axis of advance into the 21st century and focuses our efforts
More informationUS Marine Corps Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Strategy Update Briefing to NDIA Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Conference 2 February 2009
US Marine Corps Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Strategy Update Briefing to NDIA Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Conference 2 February 2009 Chris Yunker Fires and Maneuver Integration Division Capability Development
More informationHQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES
HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M TO MCO 4000.56 dtd MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES 1. Please insert enclosure (1) pages 1 thru 7, pages were inadvertently left out during the printing
More informationCommon Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)
Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4) 1 CSA s Principles, Characteristics and Requirements Principles (Why) Mission: The Army must fight and
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationORGANIZATION AND FUNDAMENTALS
Chapter 1 ORGANIZATION AND FUNDAMENTALS The nature of modern warfare demands that we fight as a team... Effectively integrated joint forces expose no weak points or seams to enemy action, while they rapidly
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Army DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 125.44 31.649 4.876-4.876 25.655
More informationA Perspective from the Corps. Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003
A Perspective from the Corps Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003 EXPEDITIONARY WHAT S IN A WORD? AGILITY AGILITY FLEXIBILITY FLEXIBILITY FORCIBLE FORCIBLE ENTRY ENTRY EXPEDITIONARY SPEED SPEED VERSATILITY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
More informationThe Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational
The Fifth Element and the Operating Forces are vitally linked providing the foundation that supports the MAGTF, from training through Operational Readiness to Deployment to Reconstitution Department of
More informationGlobal EOD Symposium & Exhibition
Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition Technology and Training Enablers for EOD 2025 Capt. Vincent Martinez, USN DOD Deputy Manager, EOD Technology Commanding Officer, NSWC Indian Head EOD Technology Division
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC MCO C 45 7 Feb 97
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775 MARINE CORPS ORDER 8000.7 MCO 8000.7 C 45 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List
More informationS E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2015-42 (Army Contingency Basing Policy) 1. References. A complete list of references is
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY
More informationCybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama
Cybersecurity As the birthplace of the Internet, the United States has a special responsibility to lead a networked world. Prosperity and security increasingly depend on an open, interoperable, secure,
More informationMARINE CORPS ORDER C. From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List. Subj: AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY (AIT)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 IN REPLY REFER TO: MCO 4000.51C LPV-2 MARINE CORPS ORDER 4000.51C From: Commandant of
More informationReport to Congress on Recommendations and Actions Taken to Advance the Role of the Chief of Naval Operations in the Development of Requirements, Acquisition Processes and Associated Budget Practices. The
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationAir-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Air-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation Maj Gen Holmes Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Plans and Requirements AF/A3/5 16 Oct 12 1 Guidance 28 July 09 GDF
More informationPROGRAM MANAGER TRAINING SYSTEMS
PROGRAM MANAGER TRAINING SYSTEMS Mission: To improve the warfighting effectiveness of the MAGTF and globally deployed Marine Corps expeditionary forces by designing, developing, fielding and sustaining
More informationJ. L. Jones General, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps
Department of the Navy Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, D.C. 20380-1775 3 November 2000 Marine Corps Strategy 21 is our axis of advance into the 21st century and focuses our efforts
More informationSTATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE STATEMENT OF MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C
` `` `` DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C. 20350-3000 MCO 3900.20 C 111 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3900.20 From: Commandant of the Marine
More informationLOE 1 - Unified Network
LOE 1 - Unified Network COL Denise Brown and COL Mark Parker UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO//PRE-DECISIONAL//DRAFT 1 CSA s Principles, Characteristics and Requirements Principles (Why) Warfighting Requirements Characteristics
More informationSECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1000 March 16, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES OF DEFENSE
More informationCD&I and CDD Organization Expeditionary Force 21 MEB CONOPS Combat and Tactical Vehicle Strategy & ACV Video Seabasing and Non-Standard Platforms
Expeditionary Warfare Conference November 17, 2014 CD&I and CDD Organization Expeditionary Force 21 MEB CONOPS Combat and Tactical Vehicle Strategy & ACV Video Seabasing and Non-Standard Platforms MajGen
More informationMC Network Modernization Implementation Plan
MC Network Modernization Implementation Plan Mission Command Center of Excellence 1 Principles (Why) Warfighting Requirements CSA s Mission, Principles, Characteristics of the Network & Requirements Network
More informationOPNAVINST C N43 18 Jun Subj: NAVY EXPEDITIONARY TABLE OF ALLOWANCE AND ADVANCED BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT POLICY
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 4040.39C N43 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 4040.39C From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
More informationAFCEA Mission Command Industry Engagement Symposium
UNCLASSIFIED/ AFCEA Mission Command Industry Engagement Symposium MG Pete Gallagher Director, Network CFT 3 April 2018 Network CFT Collaboration, Fusion & Transparency WARFIGHTING REQUIREMENTS Army Warfighters
More informationAir-Sea Battle & Technology Development
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Air-Sea Battle & Technology Development Col Gantt AF/A5XS 20 Mar 12 1 Agenda Background & Scope Definitions ASB Concept Overview ASB Central Idea: Networked, Integrated, Attack-in-Depth
More informationHigher Fidelity Operational Metrics. LTC Tom Henthorn Chief, Small Arms Branch SRD, USAIC
Higher Fidelity Operational Metrics LTC Tom Henthorn Chief, Small Arms Branch SRD, USAIC 1 35 = 35 35 =?? Small Arms CBA Priority Findings Requirements for improving small arms analyses Adopt an effects
More informationStrategic Vision. Rapidly Delivering Cyber Warfighting Capability From Seabed to Space. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Strategic Vision 2018 2027 Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command 4301 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92110-3127 www.spawar.navy.mil DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved
More informationExpeditionary Energy. David P. Karcher Director, Energy Systems SIAT, MCSC
Expeditionary Energy David P. Karcher Director, Energy Systems SIAT, MCSC Advanced Planning Briefing to Industry 5-7 April 2010 1 Expeditionary Energy Challenges An every day challenge in our operations
More informationNavy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces
Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February 2016 1030 RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces It s All About Warfighting 2 IDC Reserve Command July 2012 Information Dominance Forces TYCOM October
More informationnavy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance Foreword
Foreword The global spread of sophisticated information technology is changing the speed at which warfare is conducted. Through the early adoption of high-tech data links, worldwide communication networks,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3224.03 October 1, 2007 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) References: (a) DoD Directive 3224.3,
More informationTactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm
Tactical Edge Command and Control On-The-Move A New Paradigm 16 th ICCRTS 22 June 2011 Paper ID 149 Mr. Ken Teske and Mr. Mike Tisdel FGM, Inc. C2OTM Focused Integration Team (FIT) 1 Agenda Define C2OTM
More informationExpeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head
DCN #: 43-2882-17 Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head 2 ONR 30: Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare N091 Principal Deputy for P&R NRL ONRG Chief of Naval Research
More informationSoldier Division Director David Libersat June 2, 2015
Soldier Division Director David Libersat June 2, 2015 Soldier Division Maneuver Center of Excellence Soldier Division develops future requirements and manages Soldier capabilities for all Soldiers across
More informationSubj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.221E N3/N5 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.221E From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: MISSION,
More informationNext Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements. - Brief to Industry-
Next Gen Armored Reconnaissance: ARV Introduction and Requirements - Brief to Industry- 09 January 2018 HQMC, CD&I, Capabilities Development Directorate Fires & Maneuver Integration Division 1 LAV Investment
More informationConducting. Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation. in a. Distributive Environment
Conducting Joint, Inter-Organizational and Multi-National (JIM) Training, Testing, Experimentation in a Distributive Environment Colonel (USA, Ret) Michael R. Gonzales President and Chief Executive Officer
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
More informationDirectorate of Training and Doctrine Industry Day Break out Session
Directorate of Training and Doctrine Industry Day 2018 Break out Session Mr. Chris K. Jaques Chief, Individual and Systems Training Division, DOTD (706) 545-5209 Mr. Richard C. Bell Chief, Simulations
More informationOverview of Expeditionary Power Systems Marine Corps Systems Command Warren Clare Joint Service Power Expo August 25, 2015
Overview of Expeditionary Power Systems Marine Corps Systems Command Warren Clare Joint Service Power Expo August 25, 2015 DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. 1 Introduction
More informationChapter 1. Introduction
MCWP -. (CD) 0 0 0 0 Chapter Introduction The Marine-Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) is the Marine Corps principle organization for the conduct of all missions across the range of military operations. MAGTFs
More informationSUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) 1. References. A complete
More informationThe best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,
The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Civilians who serve each day and are either involved in war, preparing for war, or executing
More informationSupporting the Army Warfighters Science and Technology Needs
Supporting the Army Warfighters Science and Technology Needs ARL Open Campus Open House 19 October 2017 COL Lee Dunlap Science, Technology, Research, and Accelerated Capabilities Division (STRACD) Army
More information2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps Logistics Chain Management Increment 1 (GCSS-MC LCM Inc 1) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
More informationSubj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3401.3B N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3401.3B From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NUCLEAR
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 The Joint Staff DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 for the Warrior (C4IFTW) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete
More informationTask Force Innovation Working Groups
Task Force Innovation Working Groups Emerging Operational Capabilities Adaptive Workforce Information EMERGING OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES (EOC) WORKING GROUP VISION Accelerate Delivery of Emerging Operational
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3900.30 N4 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.30 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY CAPABILITY
More information5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium
Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum: 5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium Advancing Counter-IED Capabilities & Decision Support at Home and Abroad November 14-15, 2017 Mary
More informationExpeditionary Force 21 Attributes
Expeditionary Force 21 Attributes Expeditionary Force In Readiness - 1/3 of operating forces deployed forward for deterrence and proximity to crises - Self-sustaining under austere conditions Middleweight
More informationUS Army Combined Arms Center SOLDIERS AND LEADERS - OUR ASYMMETRIC ADVANTAGE. Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT
Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT Forward to STE As Is 1980s technology limits ability to train Combined Arms operations 47 terrain formats Concurrency challenges and not designed
More informationWe acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan
The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team 1999-2004 Strategic Plan Surface Ships Aircraft Submarines Marine Corps Materiel Surveillance Systems Weapon Systems Command Control & Communications
More informationJCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition
JCIDS: The New Language of Defense Planning, Programming and Acquisition By Gregory P. Cook Colonel, USAF (Ret) INTRODUCTION The past decade has seen significant change in the way the Department of Defense
More informationHow Can the Army Improve Rapid-Reaction Capability?
Chapter Six How Can the Army Improve Rapid-Reaction Capability? IN CHAPTER TWO WE SHOWED THAT CURRENT LIGHT FORCES have inadequate firepower, mobility, and protection for many missions, particularly for
More informationMarine Corps. Functional Concept for Marine Air. Ground Task Force Fires
Marine Corps Functional Concept for Marine Air Ground Task Force Fires 28 September 2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank i Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM... 2 CENTRAL IDEA...
More informationSense And Respond: A Paradigm for Future Integration of Information Technology into Command and Control Operations
Sense And Respond: A Paradigm for Future Integration of Information Technology into Command and Control Operations Colonel Art Corbett, USMC Marine Corps Combat Development Command Director, Futures Warfighting
More informationPOLICIES CONCERNING THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
SECNAV INSTRUCTION 1524.2C DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGO N WASHINGTON DC 20350 1 000 SECNAVINST 1524.2C ASN (M&RA) October 21, 2014 From: Subj: Ref: Encl: Secretary of
More informationBALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY
BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY 9 TRANSFORMATION Managing risk is a central element of both the Defense Strategy and the Army program. The Army manages risk using the Defense Risk Framework. This risk management
More informationMANAGEMENT OF PROPERTY IN THE POSSESSION OF THE MARINE CORPS
VOLUME 12 MARINE CORPS CLASS VIII MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINMENT SUMMARY OF VOLUME 12 CHANGES Hyperlinks are denoted by bold, italic, blue and underlined font. The original publication date of this Marine
More information