Department of the Army *ATEC Regulation United States Army Test and Evaluation Command 4501 Ford Avenue Alexandria, VA August 2004
|
|
- Megan Welch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Department of the Army *ATEC Regulation United States Army Test and Evaluation Command 4501 Ford Avenue Alexandria, VA August 2004 Test and Evaluation ACCREDITATION OF MODELS AND SIMULATIONS FOR TEST AND EVALUATION *History. This is a new ATEC regulation. Summary. This regulation provides policy and guidance regarding the verification, validation, and accreditation of models and simulations for use by the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command. Applicability. This regulation applies to all personnel attached to ATEC Headquarters (HQ) and its subordinate command activities. Supplementation. Supplementation of this regulation is prohibited without the prior approval of ATEC HQ (CSTE-TT). When supplements are approved and issued, ensure one copy of each supplement is furnished to ATEC HQ (CSTE-TT). Suggested improvements. The proponent for this regulation is the Director of Test Technology, ATEC. Users are invited to send comments and suggested improvements on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) through the chain of command to Commander, ATEC, ATTN: CSTE-TT-PMD, 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA Distribution: BE FOR THE COMMANDER: OFFICIAL: RICK A. DORSEY COL, GS Chief of Staff CYNTHIA A. CASSIL Deputy Chief of Staff for Information Management *This regulation supersedes OPTEC Memorandum 73-21, dated 15 February
2 Contents 1. Purpose References Explanation of abbreviations and terms Scope Definitions Policy Responsibilities Procedures Accreditation process... 7 Appendix A References... 9 Appendix B Sample Accreditation Plan Memorandum Appendix C Sample Accreditation Request Memorandum Glossary Purpose This regulation provides policy and guidance regarding the verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A) of models and simulations (M&S) for use by the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC). 2. References References are listed in appendix A. 3. Explanation of abbreviations and terms Abbreviations and terms used in this regulation are explained in the glossary. 4. Scope a. This policy applies to M&S used to support test and evaluation (T&E), whether provided to, sponsored by, or developed within ATEC. Models and simulations include, but are not limited to, hardware-in-the-loop facilities, digital simulations, system stimulators, emulators, and synthetic environments. b. This policy does not apply to (1) Training simulations used by test personnel before testing, when competent authority has certified the training. (2) Threat simulators that are surrogates for live threat equipment (see DA Pam 73-1, Appendix Z). (3) Simulations that are the systems/items under acquisition T&E. 2
3 (4) Chemical and biological agent simulants (see Code of Federal Regulations, Title 32, Chapter V, Part 626, Subpart B--Biological Defense Safety Program). (5) Analytical tools used only to study results and not used to produce those results. Analytical tools include commercially available and well-documented analytical products such as linear programming solvers, spreadsheet, or database applications. 5. Definitions a. Verification is the process of determining that the M&S accurately represents the developer s conceptual description and specifications. Verification evaluates the extent to which the M&S has been developed using sound and established software engineering techniques. b. Validation is the process of determining the extent to which the M&S is an accurate representation of the real-world from the perspective of the intended use of the M&S. Validation methods include expert consensus, comparison with historical results, comparison with test data, peer review, and independent review. c. Accreditation is the official determination that a model, simulation, or federation of M&S is acceptable for use for a specific purpose. 6. Policy a. ATEC will integrate M&S into system test and evaluation to support requirements definition, system design and development, and system assessment. M&S can assist in predicting performance throughout the mission space; support test planning and control; support range safety; enhance the operational realism of the test environment; support more economical, timely, and controlled test execution; add to understanding in interpreting collected data; or demonstrate the significance of conclusions. By law, operational T&E of major programs may not be based exclusively on modeling, simulation, or analysis. b. ATEC will accredit models and simulators when their use may affect the evaluation of the performance or military utility of the system under test. An ATEC accreditation authorizes M&S implementation in test and evaluation. c. The proposed use of M&S for T&E is developed early in the program life cycle and briefed in conjunction with the system concept in-process review (CIPR). Approval of the M&S use begins the accreditation process. d. Accreditation of M&S that support the T&E mission (e.g., M&S for test planning, range safety, and test visualization) but do not support a specific system acquisition evaluation is the responsibility of the M&S Sponsor. e. For multi-service operational test and evaluation, M&S accreditation is the responsibility of the lead operational test agency. 3
4 7. Responsibilities a. Commander, ATEC. The ATEC Commander accredits the M&S selected for T&E and may delegate the accreditation authority (AA) to a designee. b. Accreditation Authority (AA). The AA is the approval authority for accreditation of models and simulations. The ATEC Commander or his/her designee serves as the AA. In general, the ATEC Technical Director (TD) accredits M&S in support of evaluation for Acquisition Category (ACAT) I and Department of Defense (DOD) oversight programs, and the Director, Army Evaluation Center (AEC) accredits M&S in support of evaluation for other programs. The AA reviews and approves the accreditation plan prior to execution and the accreditation request prior to use of the M&S to support T&E. c. Accreditation Action Officer (AAO). The AAO oversees the development and implementation of an independent ATEC accreditation. The ATEC System Team (AST) identifies the appropriate subordinate command activity (SCA) AAO to lead the accreditation for each model and simulation supporting a T&E program. In general, the Developmental Test Command (DTC) or Operational Test Command (OTC) will provide the AAO when the primary use of the M&S is test support, and AEC will provide the AAO when the primary use of the M&S is evaluation. The AAO will (1) Develop, with the AST/SCAs/proponent organization, coordinated accreditation plans and acceptability criteria. (2) Prepare and submit documentation (accreditation plan, report, and request) for AA approval. (3) Coordinate accreditation efforts and provide oversight of verification and validation (V&V) activities as required. (4) In the case of instrumentation-simulation hybrids, ensure that requirements for accreditation of M&S and for certification of instrumentation are satisfied. d. ATEC Test Technology Directorate (TTD). The ATEC TTD provides support to and assists the ASTs. Once a decision is made to incorporate M&S as an element of the T&E strategy, ATEC TTD assists in developing accreditation plans and requests. The ATEC TTD will (1) Provide ATEC policy and guidance regarding the selection, use, and accreditation of M&S supporting T&E. For instrumentation having an M&S component, ensures that ATEC VV&A concerns are addressed (e.g., in the requirements for items being developed for ATEC by the Project Manager Instrumentation Targets and Threat Simulators). (2) Provide and update document examples (found at ATEC TTD intranet web page) for accreditation requirements to assist the ASTs in planning, conducting, and reporting results of VV&A activities. (3) Advise on threat representation in M&S. (4) Review accreditation plans and requests for ACAT I and DOD oversight programs. 4
5 (5) Maintain a library of approved VV&A plans, accreditation requests, and lessons learned. e. Subordinate Command Activities. The SCAs will (1) Provide AAO as required. (2) Review accreditation plans and reports as part of the document staffing process. For M&S in support of ACAT I and DOD oversight programs, submit accreditation plans and reports (signed by the Commander/Director of the AAO) to the ATEC CG with a short memorandum requesting approval. (3) Resource, or identify for customer reimbursement, requirements for VV&A activities and M&S implementation. (4) Develop implementation policy and guidance as appropriate and manage the support infrastructure necessary to ensure successful employment of M&S in support of T&E. (5) Support the AST efforts to resource and verify, validate, and accredit M&S internally or through customer reimbursement as appropriate to support T&E. (6) Plan, develop, sponsor, and implement test stimulation, including the preparation of resourcing estimates for the required test stimulation. (7) Review formal support packages to ensure adequacy for use in support of system T&E and document findings in the appropriate test report. f. Test and Evaluation Working-level Integrated Product Team (T&E WIPT). The T&E WIPT will (1) Relate the planned use of the M&S to system requirements and evaluation issues and criteria. (2) Identify the T&E goals and limitations that prompt the use of M&S. (3) Identify the M&S resources required. Resources include software, hardware, labor, temporary duty (TDY), contract costs, facilities, VV&A, and any other projected requirements. 8. Procedures a. Accreditation. (1) M&S developed or sponsored within ATEC that directly or indirectly influences evaluation must undergo formal accreditation. Formal accreditation addresses intended uses, acceptability criteria, and other requirements with adequate documentation upon which to base an accreditation decision. The AAO leads the process of determining the accreditation requirements, and execution of accreditation activities and reporting. (2) M&S developed or sponsored outside ATEC is accredited by ATEC HQ before the M&S is used to support test and/or evaluation. Simulations that are embedded in the system under test must undergo formal accreditation before they are used as a source of data for T&E. Adequate V&V documentation is obtained from the model developer (whether conducted by 5
6 that developer or an independent V&V agent) to support accreditation. ATEC will not accredit the simulation for use in support of T&E without documented V&V. (3) When the AA is the ATEC TD or CG, the accreditation plan and request are submitted through the appropriate SCAs and the ATEC Test Technology Directorate to the AA for approval. (4) For M&S applications used in other than T&E, the proponent will conduct V&V, and the primary user (M&S Sponsor) will accredit the M&S. (5) For simulations used in post-test analysis and evaluation, pre-test simulation results are compared to field test results to validate the simulation application. If significant differences are found, the model is calibrated (adjusted), but only after careful analysis discloses clear reasons why, and what calibration is appropriate; e.g., the atmospheric and environmental test conditions accounted for differences in test performance. In cases where model results fall outside of acceptable tolerances for the output, the M&S proponent must provide ATEC with details of the planned modifications of the M&S. b. Documentation. (1) Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) and Simulation Support Plan (SSP). Planned M&S applications and projected resource requirements (including VV&A) are documented in the system TEMP and SSP. The M&S requirements and applications, and the accreditation timeline are updated in each SSP and TEMP update. (2) System Evaluation Plan (SEP). The overall concept for employment of M&S to enhance system evaluation is described in the SEP. Through the SEP, the AST identifies each measure of performance, and to what degree it is likely to be affected by the use of the simulation. (3) Event Design Plan (EDP). A detailed description of the M&S environment and implementation in the test is provided in the EDP. (4) System Evaluation Report (SER). When M&S is used to address the specific measures of effectiveness or measures of performance, the details are documented in the SER. (5) Support Packages. Simulation results may be part of formal support packages officially approved and provided to ATEC by another command for test planning, in accordance with its normal mission functions. Examples of formal support packages that might be based on simulation include probability of kill (P(k)) tables from Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA), doctrinal and organizational training support packages (DOTSP), threat test support packages (TTSP), and training support packages. SCAs will review formal support packages to ensure adequacy for use in support of system T&E. The review must be documented. When formal support package is accepted by ATEC, any M&S results obtained are considered accredited. (6) Accreditation Plan. The accreditation plan will identify the evaluation issues driving the requirement for the M&S, describe the planned M&S application, and identify data requirements and acceptability criteria for accreditation of the M&S. 6
7 (7) Accreditation Request. The accreditation request will provide an accreditation report that includes documentation identifying whether or not the acceptability criteria were met and a short accreditation request memorandum requesting approval. 9. Accreditation process The critical documents required in accrediting M&S for use in support of system T&E are the accreditation plan and the accreditation request. a. Accreditation Plan. (1) The acceptability criteria identify quantitative and qualitative metrics based on the intended use. Qualitative and quantitative acceptability criteria are based on evaluation criteria, intended uses of M&S, and an understanding of M&S outputs. (2) V&V planning and execution can be conducted either within ATEC or by an outside V&V agent, in which case the AAO should designate a V&V agent to monitor the V&V planning and execution. In either case, the accreditation plan may be used to describe fully the V&V event, to verify the simulation functionality, and to determine its degree of validity prior to its use in testing or evaluation. Such events may include testing, scientific or statistical analysis, search of information on previous VV&A results, subject matter expert review, and review of prior use. At the discretion of the AAO, the V&V plan and accreditation plan are consolidated into a single document. (3) The AAO, in conjunction with the AST, will determine when to submit the accreditation plan to support the planning and development of V&V activities. The SCA Commander/Director of the AAO signs the accreditation plan and submits to the AA with a short accreditation plan memorandum requesting approval. The AA initials the memorandum to approve. (Note: The AA does not sign the plan.) A sample memorandum is provided in appendix B. (4) The accreditation plan is approved prior to conducting each V&V event(s). b. Accreditation Request. (1) The request will recommend accreditation with any limitations on the use of the M&S in testing or in the subsequent evaluation. (2) The AAO will submit the accreditation request through the ATEC SCAs. For ACAT I and DOD oversight programs, the AAO will forward the SCA-coordinated accreditation request through ATEC TTD to the ATEC CG for approval. The AAO will forward other programs V&V and accreditation planning documents to the appropriate SCA to the Director, AEC for approval. (3) The accreditation request is submitted no later than 30 days prior to M&S test event or other events that may produce data for the evaluation. The SCA Commander/Director of the AAO signs the accreditation report and submits to the AA with a short accreditation request memorandum requesting approval. The AA initials the memorandum to approve. (Note: The AA does not sign the report.) A sample memorandum is provided in appendix C. 7
8 (4) An accreditation is required before the M&S is used to support T&E. Pending accreditation is sufficient cause to delay entry into testing. c. The accreditation steps and decision process diagram are shown in figures 1 and 2. Documentation Development Steps Responsible Agent Approval Agent Step 1. Accreditation Plan AAO AA - defines accreditation criteria - describes V&V event(s) Step 2. Accreditation Request AAO AA - results of V&V event(s) - criteria assessment Figure 1. VV&A Steps M&S Concept Approved at ESR Develop Accreditation Plan (AAO) Submit Accreditation Plan (AAO) Plan Approved? No Yes V&V Results and Written Report Yes Add Testing No Submit Accreditation Request Request Approved? No M&S Discontinued or Terminated Yes M&S Accredited Figure 2. Accreditation Decision Process Diagram 8
9 Appendix A References AR 5-11 Management of Army Models and Simulations AR 70-1 Army Acquisition Policy AR 73-1 Test and Evaluation Policy ATEC Regulation 37-3 Unfinanced Requirement (UFR) Process ATEC Regulation 73-1 System Test and Evaluation Policy DA Pam 5-11 Verification, Validation, and Accreditation of Army Models and Simulations DA Pam 73-1 Test and Evaluation in Support of Systems Acquisition Simulation and Modeling for Acquisition, Requirements and Training (SMART) Execution Plan, 6 November 2000 Memorandum, Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, subject: Modeling and Simulation, 4 June 2002 Memorandum, Deputy Secretary of Defense, subject: Defense Acquisition, 30 October
10 Appendix B Sample Accreditation Plan Memorandum For ACAT I and DOD oversight programs, the signed accreditation plan is submitted with the accreditation plan memorandum to the ATEC CG for approval. Figure B-1 is a sample format. (Office Symbol) (Date) MEMORANDUM THRU Director, Test Technology Directorate, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (CSTE-TT), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (CSTE), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA SUBJECT: Accreditation Plan for the (name o f M&S) in Support of the (name of test) 1. Request approval of the enclosed Accreditation Plan for the (name of M&S) in support of (test name, test type, & test dates). 2. The (name of directorate) will use the (name of M&S) to (describe requirement for use of the M&S). Acceptability criteria have been established for this specific use of the M&S and are provided (either list on memorandum or make reference to location in plan). The (name of directorate) will conduct an accreditation event (provide dates or time frame) to validate this requirement. 3. The point of contact at (name of subordinate command/activity) is (name/title/phone number/ address). Encl Accreditation Plan Signature Block of Requesting Director/Commander Figure B-1. Sample Accreditation Plan Memorandum 10
11 Appendix C Sample Accreditation Request Memorandum The accreditation request consists of the accreditation report and the accreditation request memorandum. Figure C-1 is a sample format. (Office Symbol) (Date) MEMORANDUM THRU Director, Test Technology Directorate, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (CSTE-TT), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (CSTE), 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA SUBJECT: Accreditation Request for the (name of M&S) in Support of the (name of test) 1. Request approval of the enclosed Accreditation Report for the (name of M&S) in support of (test name, test type, & test dates). 2. The enclosed report publishes the findings o f the Verification and Validation (V&V) of the (name of M&S) completed on (date). The system has no limitations on the specific use of the M&S for this test or in the subsequent evaluation. All criteria set forth in the accreditation plan were met during V&V. (NOTE: If there are limitations and/or criteria were not met, then briefly describe). 3. The point of contact at (name of subordinate command/activity) is (name/title/phone number/ address). Encl Signature Block of Requesting Accreditation Report Director/Commander Figure C-1. Sample Accreditation Request Memorandum 11
12 Glossary Section I Acronyms AA Accreditation Authority AAO Accreditation Action Officer ACAT Acquisition Category AEC Army Evaluation Center AMSAA Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity AST ATEC System Team ATEC Army Test and Evaluation Command CIPR Concept In Process Review DOD Department of Defense DOTSP Doctrinal and Organizational Training Support Packages DTC Developmental Test Command EDP Event Design Plan ESR Early Strategy Review HQ Headquarters 12
13 M&S Models and Simulations OTC Operational Test Command P(k) Probability of Kill SCA Subordinate Command Activity SEP System Evaluation Plan SER System Evaluation Report SSP Simulation Support Plan T&E Test and Evaluation T&E WIPT Test and Evaluation Working-level Integrated Product Team TD Technical Director TDY Temporary Duty TEMP Test and Evaluation Master Plan TTD Test Technology Directorate TTSP Threat Test Support Packages V&V Verification and Validation 13
14 VV&A Verification, Validation, and Accreditation Section II Terms Accreditation The official certification that a model, simulation, or federation of models and simulations is acceptable for use for a specific purpose. M&S Sponsor Owner or operator of the subject model or simulation. Model A physical, mathematical, or otherwise logical representation of a system, entity, phenomenon, or process. Modeling and Simulation The development and use of live, virtual, and constructive models including simulators, stimulators, emulators, and prototypes to investigate, understand, or provide experiential stimulus to either (1) conceptual systems that do not exist or (2) real life systems that cannot accept experimentation or observation because of resource, range, security, or safety limitations. Simulation A method for implementing a model over time. Validation The process of determining the degree to which M&S is an accurate representation of the real world from the perspective of the intended use of the M&S. Verification The process of determining that the M&S implementation accurately represents the developer s conceptual description and specifications. 14
System Test and Evaluation Policy
ATEC Regulation 73-1 Test and Evaluation System Test and Evaluation Policy Headquarters U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command Alexandria, VA 16 March 2006 This page intentionally left blank. SUMMARY of
More informationSUBJECT: U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Interim Policy Guidance (IPG) 08-1, Test and Evaluation Document Name Changes
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION COMMAND 4501 FORD AVENUE ALEXANDRIA VA 22302-1458 CSTE-TTP 4 April 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION 1. References: a. ATEC Regulation 73-1,
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5000.59 January 4, 1994 Certified Current as of December 1, 2003 SUBJECT: DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management Incorporating Change 1, January 20, 1998 USD(A&T)
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 16-1002 1 JUNE 2000 Operations Support MODELING AND SIMULATION (M&S) SUPPORT TO ACQUISITION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
More informationInstallation Status Report Program
Army Regulation 210 14 Installations Installation Status Report Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 19 July 2012 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 210 14 Installation Status Report
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5000.59 August 8, 2007 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management References: (a) DoD Directive 5000.59, DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management,
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 90-16 31 AUGUST 2011 Special Management STUDIES AND ANALYSES, ASSESSMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNED COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
More informationCHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-8 CJCSI 8510.01C DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S MANAGEMENT OF MODELING AND SIMULATION References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose. This instruction: a. Implements
More informationChemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability Committee
Army Regulation 15 41 Boards, Commissions, and Committees Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Survivability Committee UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 8 May 2018
More informationTest and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems
Guest Editorial ITEA Journal 2009; 30: 3 6 Copyright 2009 by the International Test and Evaluation Association Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems James J. Streilein, Ph.D. U.S. Army Test and
More informationSUBJECT: Army Directive (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2) 1. References. A complete
More informationArmy Equipment Safety and Maintenance Notification System
Army Regulation 750 6 Maintenance of Supplies and Equipment Army Equipment Safety and Maintenance Notification System UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 12 January 2018 SUMMARY
More informationCommand Logistics Review Program
Army Regulation 11 1 Army Programs Command Logistics Review Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 27 November 2012 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 11 1 Command Logistics Review Program
More informationArmy Regulation Management. RAND Arroyo Center. Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 25 May 2012 UNCLASSIFIED
Army Regulation 5 21 Management RAND Arroyo Center Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 25 May 2012 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 5 21 RAND Arroyo Center This major revision, dated 25
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AIR FORCE WEATHER AGENCY AIR FORCE WEATHER AGENCY INSTRUCTION 63-1 7 MAY 2010 Acquisition CONFIGURATION CONTROL COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 16-1005 23 JUNE 2016 Operations Support MODELING & SIMULATION MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
More informationDepartment of the Army. Intergovernmental and Intragovernmental Committee Management Program UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation 15 39
Army Regulation 15 39 Boards, Commissions, and Committees Department of the Army Intergovernmental and Intragovernmental Committee Management Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC
More informationTest and Evaluation Policy
Army Regulation 73 1 Test and Evaluation Test and Evaluation Policy UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 16 November 2016 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 73 1 Test and Evaluation Policy
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5141.02 February 2, 2009 DA&M SUBJECT: Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Reissues DoD
More informationDepartment of the Army *TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, Virginia
Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 690-4 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, Virginia 23651-1047 17 May 2011 Civilian Personnel RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
More informationDepartment of Defense Executive Agent Responsibilities of the Secretary of the Army
Army Regulation 10 90 Organization and Functions Department of Defense Executive Agent Responsibilities of the Secretary of the Army UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 9 February
More informationReporting of Product Quality Deficiencies Within the U.S. Army
Army Regulation 702 7 1 Product Assurance Reporting of Product Quality Deficiencies Within the U.S. Army Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 July 2009 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY (AFRL) AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY INSTRUCTION 25-201 7 MAY 2014 Logistics Staff FORMULATION AND OVERSIGHT OF DOMESTIC ALLIANCES COMPLIANCE WITH
More informationPersonnel General RETIREMENT CEREMONIES. COL, GS Chief of Staff
Department of the Army *FLW Regulation 600-8-7 Headquarters, United States Army Maneuver Support Center of Excellence Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 65473-8929 24 August 2010 Personnel General RETIREMENT
More informationDepartment of the Army *TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, VA
Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 11-19 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, VA 23651-1047 31 January 2008 Army Programs Assignment of Planning, Programming,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS U.S. ARMY MANEUVER SUPPORT CENTER AND FORT LEONARD WOOD FORT LEONARD WOOD, MISSOURI
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS U.S. ARMY MANEUVER SUPPORT CENTER AND FORT LEONARD WOOD FORT LEONARD WOOD, MISSOURI 65473-5000 FLW Civilian Personnel Regulation 8 June 2007 No 690-34 Decorations, Awards,
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5101.12E January 9, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, July 26, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Executive Agent (EA) for Construction and Barrier Materiel References: See Enclosure
More informationThe Army Force Modernization Proponent System
Army Regulation 5 22 Management The Army Force Modernization Proponent System Rapid Action Revision (RAR) Issue Date: 25 March 2011 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 6 February 2009 UNCLASSIFIED
More informationAR Security Assistance Teams. 15 June 1998 (Effective 15 July 1998)
Security Assistance Teams 15 June 1998 (Effective 15 July 1998) Security Assistance and International Logistics PIN: 038152-000 This revision -- Unclassified Change Summary Incorporates various U.S. law
More informationChemical Biological Defense Materiel Reliability Program
Army Regulation 702 16 Product Assurance Chemical Biological Defense Materiel Reliability Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 2 May 2016 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 702 16
More informationThe Army Civilian Police and Security Guard Program
Army Regulation 190 56 Military Police The Army Civilian Police and Security Guard Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 21 June 1995 Unclassified SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 190 56 The Army
More informationArmy Needs to Improve Contract Oversight for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program s Task Orders
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-004 OCTOBER 28, 2015 Army Needs to Improve Contract Oversight for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program s Task Orders INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY SIGNAL CENTER AND FORT GORDON Fort Gordon, Georgia
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY SIGNAL CENTER AND FORT GORDON Fort Gordon, Georgia 30905-5735 USASC&FG Regulation 24 March 2003 No. 672-7 Decorations, Awards, and Honors FORT GORDON VOLUNTEER
More informationQuality Assurance Specialist (Ammunition Surveillance)
Army Regulation 702 12 Product Assurance Quality Assurance Specialist (Ammunition Surveillance) Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 20 March 2002 UNCLASSIFIED Report Documentation Page Report
More informationManagement of Army Modeling and Simulation
Army Regulation 5 11 Management Management of Army Modeling and Simulation Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 30 May 2014 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 5 11 Management of Army Modeling
More informationArmy Participation in the Defense Logistics Agency Weapon System Support Program
Army Regulation 711 6 Supply Chain Integration Army Participation in the Defense Logistics Agency Weapon System Support Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 17 July 2017 UNCLASSIFIED
More informationDEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20301-1010 April 9, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF UNDER SECRETARIES OF
More informationAward and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement
Report No. DODIG-2012-033 December 21, 2011 Award and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement Report Documentation Page
More informationDepartment of the Army *USAFCOEFS Regulation Headquarters, USAFCOEFS 455 McNair Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Sill, Oklahoma June 2015
Department of the Army *USAFCOEFS Regulation 25-11 Headquarters, USAFCOEFS 455 McNair Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Sill, Oklahoma 73503 5 June 2015 Information Management Wireless Mobile Device Management (MDM),
More informationU.S. Army Audit Agency
DCN 9345 Cost of Base Realignment Action (COBRA) Model The Army Basing Study 2005 30 September 2004 Audit Report: A-2004-0544-IMT U.S. Army Audit Agency DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1100.23 September 26, 2012 DA&M SUBJECT: Detail of Personnel to OSD References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This Instruction: a. Reissues Administrative Instruction
More informationof Communications-Electronic s AFI , Requirements Development and Processing AFI , Planning Logistics Support
[ ] AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 10-901 1 MARCH 1996 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE Operations LEAD OPERATING COMMAND-- COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS, AND INTELLIGENCE (C4I) SYSTEMS
More informationDepartment of the Army. Federal Advisory Committee Management Program UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation Boards, Commissions, and Committees
Army Regulation 15 1 Boards, Commissions, and Committees Department of the Army Federal Advisory Committee Management Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 29 May 2015 UNCLASSIFIED
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 99-1 3 JUNE 2014 Test and Evaluation TEST AND EVALUATION COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications
More informationForeign Government Employment
Army Regulation 600 291 Personnel-General Foreign Government Employment UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 19 December 2016 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 600 291 Foreign Government
More informationArmy Congressional Fellowship Program
Army Regulation 1 202 Administrative Army Congressional Fellowship Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 26 May 2000 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 1 202 Army Congressional Fellowship
More informationAmmunition Peculiar Equipment
Army Regulation 700 20 Logistics Ammunition Peculiar Equipment Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 17 March 2015 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 700 20 Ammunition Peculiar Equipment This
More informationU.S. Army Command and Control Support Agency
Army Regulation 10 47 Organization and Functions U.S. Army Command and Control Support Agency Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 26 October 2010 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 10 47
More informationDOD INSTRUCTION JOINT TRAUMA SYSTEM (JTS)
DOD INSTRUCTION 6040.47 JOINT TRAUMA SYSTEM (JTS) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Effective: September 28, 2016 Releasability: Approved by: Cleared
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE E ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM (CBDP)
DOD DIRECTIVE 5160.05E ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM (CBDP) Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology,
More informationBoard of Directors, Army and Air Force Exchange Service
Army Regulation 15 110 AFI 34 203(I) Boards, Commissions, and Committees Board of Directors, Army and Air Force Exchange Service Headquarters Departments of the Army, Department of the Air Force Washington,
More informationTest and Evaluation Policy
Army Regulation 73 1 Test and Evaluation Test and Evaluation Policy Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 1 August 2006 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 73 1 Test and Evaluation Policy This
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 4205.01 June 8, 2016 Incorporating Change 1, September 13, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: DoD Small Business Programs (SBP) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. In
More informationRelease of U.S. Army Audit Agency Audit Reports
*DA Memo 36 1 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 7 November 2014 Audit Release of U.S. Army Audit Agency Audit Reports Applicability. This memorandum applies to Headquarters, Department
More informationArmy Participation in the Defense Logistics Agency Weapon System Support Program
Army Regulation 711 6 Supply Chain Integration Army Participation in the Defense Logistics Agency Weapon System Support Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 May 2009 UNCLASSIFIED
More informationLogistics Civil Augmentation Program
Army Regulation 700 137 Logistics Logistics Civil Augmentation Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 28 December 2012 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 700 137 Logistics Civil Augmentation
More informationArmy Regulation Field Organizations. Duty Rosters UNCLASSIFIED
Army Regulation 220 45 Field Organizations Duty Rosters UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 28 November 2017 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 220 45 Duty Rosters This regulation is certified
More informationArmy Participation in National Crime Information Center
Army Regulation 190 27 Military Police Army Participation in National Crime Information Center Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 28 May 1993 Unclassified SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 190 27 Army
More informationTRADOC Reg DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Monroe, Virginia
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Monroe, Virginia 23651-5000 TRADOC Reg 11-5 TRADOC Regulation 31 August 1984 No 11-5 Army Programs COST ANALYSIS
More informationGUARDING THE INTENT OF THE REQUIREMENT. Stephen J Scukanec. Eric N Kaplan
GUARDING THE INTENT OF THE REQUIREMENT 13th Annual Systems Engineering Conference Hyatt Regency Mission Bay San Diego October 25-28, 2010 Stephen J Scukanec Flight Test and Evaluation Aerospace Systems
More informationUSAREC Regulation Personnel General. U.S. Army Recruiting. for Junior Reserve. Training Corps UNCLASSIFIED
USAREC Regulation 600-31 Personnel General U.S. Army Recruiting Command Award for Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters United States Army Recruiting Command 1307 3rd Avenue
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION. Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Human Effects Characterization
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3200.19 May 17, 2012 Incorporating Change 1, September 13, 2017 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Non-Lethal Weapons (NLW) Human Effects Characterization References: See Enclosure
More informationStaffing and Implementing Department of Defense Directives and Related DOD Publications
*DA Memo 1-20 Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 17 May 1990 Administration Staffing and Implementing Department of Defense Directives and Related DOD Publications Applicability. This memorandum
More information1. Definitions. See AFI , Air Force Nuclear Weapons Surety Program (formerly AFR 122-1).
Template modified: 27 May 1997 14:30 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 91-103 11 FEBRUARY 1994 Safety AIR FORCE NUCLEAR SAFETY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
More informationReport No. D May 14, Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Report No. D-2010-058 May 14, 2010 Selected Controls for Information Assurance at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
More informationMunitions Support for Joint Operations
Army Regulation 700 100 MCO 8012.1 Logistics Munitions Support for Joint Operations Headquarters Departments of the Army, and the Marines Washington, DC 26 March 2014 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR
More informationHost Nation Support UNCLASSIFIED. Army Regulation Manpower and Equipment Control
Army Regulation 570 9 Manpower and Equipment Control Host Nation Support Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 29 March 2006 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 570 9 Host Nation Support This
More informationDepartment of Defense
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5105.84 May 11, 2012 DA&M SUBJECT: Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (DCAPE) References: See Enclosure 1. PURPOSE. This Directive: a. Assigns the
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5105.58 April 22, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, Effective May 18, 2018 USD(I) SUBJECT: Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) References: See Enclosure
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE E DOD PERSONNEL SUPPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS
DOD DIRECTIVE 2065.01E DOD PERSONNEL SUPPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Effective: March 17, 2017 Releasability: Reissues and Cancels:
More informationSUBJECT: Army Directive (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the Contracting Process)
S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E A R M Y W A S H I N G T O N MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Army Directive 2017-32 (Acquisition Reform Initiative #6: Streamlining the 1. References. A complete list
More informationCERD-M Regulation No. 70-3-9 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U s Army Corps of Engineers Washington, D.C. 20314 ER 70-3-9 31 March 1989 Research and Development MANAGEMENT AND EXECUTION OF THE US ARMY CORPS OF
More informationArmy Regulation Information Management: Records Management. Office Symbols UNCLASSIFIED
Army Regulation 25 59 Information Management: Records Management Office Symbols UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 10 April 2018 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 25 59 Office Symbols This
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 5111.19 July 26, 2011 Incorporating Change 1, May 8, 2017 USD(P) SUBJECT: Section 1206 2282 Global Train-and-Equip Authority References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE.
More informationUnit #15259 Regulation APO AP Unit #15255 Regulation APO AP Unit #15237 Regulation APO AP
United Nations Command United Nations Command Unit #15259 Regulation 735-5 APO AP 96205-5259 Combined Forces Command Combined Forces Command Unit #15255 Regulation 735-5 APO AP 96205-5255 United States
More informationNaval Sea Systems Command Did Not Properly Apply Guidance Regarding Contracting Officer s Representatives
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-063 MARCH 18, 2016 Naval Sea Systems Command Did Not Properly Apply Guidance Regarding Contracting Officer s Representatives Mission Our
More informationChaplain Training Strategy
Headquarters United States Army, Europe, and Seventh Army United States Army Installation Management Agency Europe Region Office Heidelberg, Germany Army in Europe Pamphlet 165-3* 21 July 2003 Religious
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent (EA) for the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3)
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5505.13E March 1, 2010 Incorporating Change 1, July 27, 2017 ASD(NII)/DoD CIO SUBJECT: DoD Executive Agent (EA) for the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3) References: See
More informationReal Property Category Codes
Army Regulation 415 28 Construction Real Property Category Codes Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 April 2014 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 415 28 Real Property Category Codes This
More informationHomeowners Assistance Program
Army Regulation 405 16 Real Estate Homeowners Assistance Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 29 September 2016 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 405 16 Homeowners Assistance Program
More informationTHE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3010 ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY AND LOGISTICS DEC 0 it 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS CHAIRMAN OF THE
More informationDepartment of the Army *TRADOC Memorandum 36-2 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, Virginia
Department of the Army *TRADOC Memorandum 36-2 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, Virginia 23651-1047 19 December 2007 Audit Staff Procedures for Audits Conducted
More informationOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1950 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1950 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-1950 ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT April 24, 2012 Incorporating Change 2, October 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR SECRETARIES OF THE
More informationInterservice Transfer of Army Commissioned Officers on the Active Duty List
Army Regulation 614 120 Personnel General Interservice Transfer of Army Commissioned Officers on the Active Duty List Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 11 June 2007 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY
More informationDepartment of the Army *TRADOC Regulation Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Eustis, Virginia
Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 672-7 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Eustis, Virginia 23604-5700 16 September 2016 Decorations, Awards, and Honors BRIGADIER
More informationArmy Regulation Army Programs. Department of the Army. Functional Review. Headquarters. Washington, DC 12 September 1991.
Army Regulation 11 3 Army Programs Department of the Army Functional Review Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 12 September 1991 Unclassified Report Documentation Page Report Date 12 Sep
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND 5001 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND 5001 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22333-0001 AMC REGULATION 8 August 1995 NO. 10-101 Organization and Functions MISSION AND
More informationQuality Management Plan
for Submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 April 2, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Heading Page Table of Contents Approval Page
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC MCO C C2I 15 Jun 89
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON, DC 20380-0001 MCO 3093.1C C2I MARINE CORPS ORDER 3093.1C From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: INTRAOPERABILITY
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND 5001 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA
*AMC Suppl 1 to AR 530-1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND 5001 EISENHOWER AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22333-0001 AMC Supplement 1 20 February 1996 to AR 530-1 Operations
More informationMASSACHUSETTS STATE DEFENSE FORCE
The Adjutant General Massachusetts Pamphlet 10-6 Organization and Functions MASSACHUSETTS STATE DEFENSE FORCE Joint Forces Headquarters Departments of the Army and the Air Force Massachusetts National
More informationTesting in a Joint Environment. Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army
Testing in a Joint Environment Value Added and Considerations Janet Garber Director Test and Evaluation Office Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army June 2008 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Why do we test?
More informationCHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION
CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF INSTRUCTION J-6 CJCSI 5127.01 DISTRIBUTION: A, B, C, S JOINT FIRE SUPPORT EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT References: See Enclosure C. 1. Purpose.
More informationAdvanced Simulation Course for Army Simulation Management Professionals
Advanced Simulation Course for Army Simulation Management Professionals Gene Paulo Department of Systems Engineering Naval Postgraduate School eppaulo@nps.edu (831)656-3452 Introduction In 2009 NPS was
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 5240.02 March 17, 2015 USD(I) SUBJECT: Counterintelligence (CI) References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive: a. Reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) O-5240.02
More informationRESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM Human Research Protection Program RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT 5/23/2011 The following special considerations apply to research involving
More informationArmy Publishing Program
Army Regulation 25 30 Information Management: Publishing and Printing Army Publishing Program UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 13 June 2018 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 25 30 Army
More informationThe Army Force Modernization Proponent System
Army Regulation 5 22 Management The Army Force Modernization Proponent System Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 28 October 2015 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 5 22 The Army Force Modernization
More informationArmy Competition Advocacy Program
Army Regulation 715 31 Procurement Army Competition Advocacy Program UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 28 November 2016 SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 715 31 Army Competition Advocacy
More informationDepartment of Defense
'.v.'.v.v.w.*.v: OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR A JOINT ACCOUNTING SYSTEM INITIATIVE m
More information