Navy JCTD Workshop. Building a Competitive Proposal and. the U.S. Navy Service Selection Process. OPNAV N8F S&T (Science & Technology Branch)
|
|
|
- Scott Watson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Navy JCTD Workshop Building a Competitive Proposal and the U.S. Navy Service Selection Process OPNAV N8F S&T (Science & Technology Branch)
2 Building A Competitive Proposal Must Haves: Valid Requirements Not Duplicative Technology Programmatics Funding Meet JCTD Goals - 1 to 3 year Program - Leave-behind with COCOM Sponsor - Meet Jointness criteria - Transition How: Meet the Need Complement vs. Duplicate Work the Processes and People Obtain Resource Sponsor (RS) support Collaborate Be Joint 2
3 Meet the Need Integrated Priority Lists (IPL - from CoComs & JCS/J8) Urgent Needs Statements (UNS - from CoComs) Programs of Record (POR - emerging or unmet capability requirements from Acquisition Programs) Capability Gaps (from Services) Most Pressing Military Issues (MPMI -from JCS) US Fleet Forces will address this further US Fleet Forces will address this further 3
4 Compliment vs. Duplicate Know the Acquisition Community Know the Programs of Record (PoRs) Show where the effort fits in the existing Programmatic Architecture Identify what capabilities will be met that existing and planned systems will not Convince the PoR Managers and their Resource Sponsors of the value 4
5 Processes and People Acquisition Process Technology Transition Processes JCTD RTT, RDD, INP, TIPS, FNC TTI, DAC, FCT Others People Team Time dependencies 5
6 Navy Resource Sponsor Support OPNAV ( Not ONR, PEO, PMA, PMW, etc,) Funding (Talk and s of support do not suffice) OPNAV Resource Sponsors are responsible for the Navy s Investment Strategy 6
7 Collaborate Be Joint Collaborate Warfare Centers Industry Academia Everyone Joint Services Agencies Coalition Partners Each JCTD must have at least one COCOM Sponsor Each JCTD must have at least one COCOM Sponsor The more COCOM Sponsors the better The more COCOM Sponsors the better 7
8 JCTD Processes OSD Services COCOMs JCB/JROC OSD executes AC/JCTD program, COCOM is is the customer, Services provide funds 8
9 Navy JCTD Roles OSD controls the process Dr. Perkins, OSD (Complex Systems) JROC validates the requirements for OSD JCTD selections OPNAV is the Resource Sponsor NXX codes offset existing programs to fund JCTDs ASN (RDA) is Navy lead for JCTDs Endorses Navy-led JCTD selections Monitors executing JCTDs ONR is executive agent for JCTDs CNR validates candidates for technology readiness USFFC and NWDC coordinate CONOPS and Sea Trial efforts N8F S&T is OPNAV lead for JCTDs N8F S&T is OPNAV lead for JCTDs 9
10 Naval JCTD Development/Selection Process OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP IPR ONR ONR Strongest proposals submitted to OSD JCTD WG & RO/SME White Paper Review Aug-Dec ERG/ERG WG ACCEPT OSD CRB USN/USMC Prioritization ERG ASN-RDA Ranking Ltr to OSD ACCEPT REJECT DEFER FCB/JCB/ JROC JCTD WG & RO/SME Review/Mentoring OSD (Selection Decision) REJECT 10
11 JCTD Naval Execution & Transition OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP Monthly Services Meeting (USN, USMC, USAF, USA) TRB TRB (If required) ERG Status Reports Navy Navy Execution Execution Review Review ERG Status Reports TOG (status) Realignment Decisions Feedback to DUSD AS&C Interface with OSD Oversight Executives, JCTD performers and execution agents, as required. Report to TOG at least yearly or as required. 10 COCOM JCTD/S&T Reviews 11
12 OPNAV S&T Coordination Structure DUSD (AS&C) DUSD (AS&C) PDASN RDA PDASN RDA USFF USFF N8F S&T Integration N8F S&T Integration MCWL MCWL OPNAV N81 OPNAV N81 OPNAV S&T Advisors OPNAV S&T Advisors ONR ONR N2 Mr. Gary Fagan N4 CDR Michael Kondracki N3/5 Vacant N6 Mr. Ryan Gunst N85 Mr. Tom Schiller N86 Mr. Marc Stockbauer N87 Mr. R. Thad Carmean N88 Mr. Bill McGregor 12
13 OPNAV Responsibilities Establish/Validate Navy Operational Requirements and Priorities Budget for all Navy Acquisition Programs (FYDP Planning and Programming) Ensure No Duplication of Effort Provide trained and and equipped Naval Naval Forces Forces to to the the Combatant Commanders 13
14 OPNAV Questions Is there a requirement for it? What capability does it provide? Is it duplicative? Will it transition and to where? If successful, will it be used, purchased, supported when fielded, or become a Program Of Record (POR) or part of a POR? Are the funds programmed to support both the effort and the tail? Is Is a Resource Sponsor committed to to providing the the required life-cycle funding? 14
15 N8F Coordinates OPNAV JCTD Program N8F ensures OPNAV requirements and resources are identified N8F socializes all JCTD submissions N80 Pillar concurrence and assessment required Flag endorsement of PEs required (or offset identified) OPNAV interfaces (OSD, Services, DASN) Coordinates with FCB Navy POCs JROC validates OSD JCTD selections N81 staffs 15
16 Navy Selection Process Ranking Considerations Process Timeline FY09 Ranking Results 16
17 Ranking Considerations FCB/JCB/JROC Fills joint/coalition gap Technical maturity No parallel efforts Navy Military utility Technology readiness OPNAV and Fleet priorities Transition potential Funding requirements COCOM and service priorities 17
18 Strongly Agree (5) Agree (4) Somewhat Agree (3) Disagree (2) Strongly Disagree (1) JCTD ASSESSMENT FACTORS 1. THE JCTD SUPPORTS JOINT CAPABILITY NEEDS a. Are COCOM(s) Sponsors lined up? b. Are at least two Services/Agencies, Coalition Partners supporting? c. Does the JCTD address Joint and Naval Needs (JCIDS, JUONS, CNO, CMC Guicdance, etc.) 2. FUNDING IS IDENTIFIED, AVAILABLE AND COMMITTED a. Have Naval (and other) Program Elements been identified and committed? b. Are Program Costs Realistic? 3. TECHNOLOGY IS SUITABLE FOR NEAR-TERM APPLICATION a. Is Technology mature and available (TRL 6+)? b. Is Technology 'new' and unique (i.e., does NOT duplicate existing systems)? c. Does the JCTD technology build on FNC Enabling Capabilities? d. Is the Technical Plan and schedule realistic? 4. CONCEPT IS OPERATIONALLY FEASIBLE AND SUITABLE a. Is the JCTD consistent with future CONOPS? b. Does the JCTD support future equipment development and employment plans? c. Does the JCTD map to the Sea Trial CD&E Plan? 5. THE JCTD HAS A STRONG TRANSITION PLAN a. Is the JCTD Transition Strategy clear and in support of joint objectives? b. If this is a new technology, has a PEO or Program Manger been established? 6, RESIDUALS HAVE BEEN PLANNED AND FUNDED a. Is the EUE laid out well, with and residual systems planned? b. Is training and logistics support provided for? 7. THIS JCTD IS A POTENTIAL CANDIDATE FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR a. Is Naval support Confirmed, Probable (TBD), or Uncommitted? b. Are Issues identified likely to be resolved? 18
19 Navy JCTD Timeline of Events EVENT PERFORMER DATE Develop/Issue Navy Call-For-Proposals letter ONR/ASN (RDA) Aug Initial assessment of Navy-lead candidates ONR/OPNAV/ PDASN (RDA)/ USFF Aug-Sep RS Review and Candidate down select JCTD ERG WG Sep Early COCOM assessment COCOMs Sep-Nov Navy In Process Review (IPR) ONR/OPNAV/ PDASN (RDA)/ USFF Secondary Resource Sponsor review OPNAV Nov-Dec ERG recommendation and submittal to OSD JCTD ERG WG Dec ERG inputs submitted to OSD ASN(RDA) Jan Candidate Review Board (CRB) DUSD(AS&C) Feb-Mar Validate candidates FCB/JCB/JROC May-Jun Develop prioritized list of candidates OPNAV/USFF May-Jun Nov Develop final ranking/ ERG approval JCTD ERG Jun 19
20 FY10 JCTD Proposals Solicitation and Selection Results ASN(RDA) call letter (Jul 08) 24 new proposals/concepts received 1 selected for Navy endorsement (FW APKWS) 1 later submission by SOUTHCOM also endorsed (RIO) OSD call letter to COCOMs and services (Sep 08) 33 proposals received 24 proposals briefed to the Mar 09 Candidate Review Board OSD letter of Jun 08 requested Service and COCOM ranking 12 selected for prioritization, 3 Navy endorsed proposals included ERG WG developed proposed Navy ranking ASN (RDA) combined Navy Marine Corps Response to OSD 1 Jul 09 Anticipate 6-8 FY10 JCTDs Will Be Approved 20
21 Selection of Navy JCTD Candidates FY11 Process ASN(RDA) call letter issued July 09 Provides additional time to develop proposals Electronic submittal process thru KIMS Proposal assessment based on CoCom endorsement Relative importance of the Joint problem being addressed Technology Readiness Funding Posture Planned CONOPS Strength of Transition Plan Utility of Planned Residuals Strongest proposals are submitted to OSD draft 21
22 FY11 Navy JCTD White Paper Call Letter 2 Sep - White Papers and Quad Charts Due 18 Sep - Selection for Proposal Development 14 Oct - Proposals & Briefs Due Nov - Naval Proposers Brief Early Dec - Full Proposal Evaluation Jan 15 - Naval-Supported, ASN(RDA) endorsed proposals forwarded to DUSD(AS&C) Any Time - Innovative JCTD Ideas 22
23 Building a Competitive Proposal Summary State the physical nature of the product Clarify programmatics Contain specific POCs Address Funding and Transition 23
24 Lessons Learned Technology is a given Where it fits in the existing programmatic architecture is not Decisions matter Informational briefs do not You must make the case No one else can 24
Subj: RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS REVIEW BOARD CHARTER
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAC;ON WASHINC;TON DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser N09/8U103035 25 Jul 08 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION Subj: RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS
a. To promulgate policy on cost analysis throughout the Department of the Navy (DON).
SECNAV INSTRUCTION 5223.2A THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DC 20350 1000 SECNAVINST 5223.2A ASN(FM&C): NCCA ij E ~~ (W -~ 20/12 From: Subj: Ref: Encl: Secretary of the Navy DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
JOINT RAPID ACQUISITION CELL
Presentation to the 39 th Annual DoD Cost Analysis Symposium Dr. Robert L. Buhrkuhl, Director February 15, 2006 1 The Challenge We Face Smother Smother Innovation Innovation Resist Change Embrace Status
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 3224.03 October 1, 2007 USD(AT&L) SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) References: (a) DoD Directive 3224.3,
Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 8010.13E N96 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 8010.13E From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: DEPARTMENT
Enlisted Professional Military Education FY 18 Academic Calendar. Table of Contents COLLEGE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING (CDET):
Enlisted Professional Military Education FY 18 Academic Calendar Table of Contents STAFF NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER ACADEMIES: SNCO Academy Quantico SNCO Academy Camp Pendleton SNCO Academy Camp Lejeune
Total Ownership Cost. CAPT Tom Ryan OPNAV N414
Total Ownership Cost CAPT Tom Ryan OPNAV N414 1 Quotes Increased fiscal pressures mandate that we scrupulously examine all activities and accounts and ensure that our limited resources are appropriately
Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL)
Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL) 3 Dec 2009 BGen R. F. Fuzzy Hedelund Commanding General 1 Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) CG, MCCDC DCG, MCCDC Marine Corps Warfighting Lab Capabilities
Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM FOR SECURITY AND INDEPENDENCE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY OF FICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 N AVY PENTAG ON WASHINGTON D C 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 4101.3 ASN(EI&E) SECNAV INSTRUCTION 4101.3 From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: DEPARTMENT
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium
NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium Mr. Tom Dee DASN ELM 703-614-4794 Pentagon 4C746 1 Agenda Context Current environment Robotics Way Ahead AAV MRAP Family of Vehicles 2 ELM Portfolio U.S. Marine Corps ground
Report to Congress on Recommendations and Actions Taken to Advance the Role of the Chief of Naval Operations in the Development of Requirements, Acquisition Processes and Associated Budget Practices. The
Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED ACQUISITION FOR THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT, DEMONSTRATION, AND FIELDING OF CAPABILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5000.53 N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5000.53 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVY ACCELERATED
Joint Unmanned Aircraft System Center of Excellence
Joint Unmanned Aircraft System Center of Excellence NDIA CONFERENCE 26 Oct 06 1 Background Jun 05 JROC directs creation of two organizations: JUAV COE and JUAV MRB Sep 05 JROC approves JUAS COE re-stated
Navy ManTech Program. ManTech Update. Tom Hite CTC 15 October 2014
Navy ManTech Program ManTech Update Tom Hite CTC 15 October 2014 Navy ManTech Overview Agenda CNST Recompete Update Navy ManTech Support Recompete FY16 Investment Strategy Affordability Assessment Update
Systems Engineering & LRASM
Systems Engineering & LRASM FOR 19 TH ANNUAL NDIA SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 25 October 2016 LRASM Deployment Office (LDO) CAPT Tim Octa Hill, Former Director DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603860F PE TITLE: Joint Precision Approach Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013
Compliance Division Staff Report
Compliance Division Staff Report Polygraph Advisory Board Meeting Tuesday, September 26, 2017 Public Outreach Compliance Division routinely attends annual industry meetings held by TALEPI (Texas Association
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 1.613 1.418 1.56-1.56
SECNAVINST E OUSN 17 May 12 SECNAV INSTRUCTION E. From: Secretary of the Navy
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 5000.34E SECNAV INSTRUCTION 5000.34E From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT OF
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C
` `` `` DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C. 20350-3000 MCO 3900.20 C 111 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3900.20 From: Commandant of the Marine
Future of Logistics Civil Augmentation Program
Future of Logistics Civil Augmentation Program Mr. Jay T. Carr LOGCAP Executive Director U.S. Army Sustainment Command Background Program Consistency For 28 years the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program
TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION (TPI) FOR DINFOS - CCLC COMBAT CAMERA LEADERSHIP COURSE
TRAINING PROGRAM OF INSTRUCTION (TPI) FOR DINFOS - CCLC COMBAT CAMERA LEADERSHIP COURSE Approved by: Commandant Defense Information School Supersedes TPI Dated: May 2008 COMBAT CAMERA LEADERSHIP COURSE
Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE TEST AND EVALUATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
D E PAR TME NT OF THE N A VY OFFICE OF T HE SECRET ARY 1000 NAVY PENT AGON WASHINGT ON D C 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 3900.44 ASN(RD&A) SECNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.44 From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: NAVY ENTERPRISE
A Perspective from the Corps. Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003
A Perspective from the Corps Col Mike Boyd, USMC HQMC/LPE 3 Dec 2003 EXPEDITIONARY WHAT S IN A WORD? AGILITY AGILITY FLEXIBILITY FLEXIBILITY FORCIBLE FORCIBLE ENTRY ENTRY EXPEDITIONARY SPEED SPEED VERSATILITY
BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. December 12, 2003
BRAC 2005 Issues Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group December 12, 2003 12 Purpose Process Overview JCSG Update Data Call Communication Plan Cost of Base Realignment Action Update 23 Process Overview
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-3000 MCO 3100.4 PLI MARINE CORPS ORDER 3100.4 From: To: Subj: Commandant of the Marine Corps
Corporate Services Employment Report: January Employment by Staff Group. Jan 2018 (Jan 2017 figure: 1,462) Overall 1,
Corporate Services Employment Report: January Employment by Staff Group Jan (Jan 20 figure: 1,462) Jan % Overall 1,520 +58 +4.0% 8 Management (VIII+) 403 +52 4.8% Clerical & Supervisory (III to VII) 907
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
This is definitely another document that needs to have lots of HSI language in it!
1 The Capability Production Document (or CPD) is one of the most important things to come out of the Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase. It defines an increment of militarily useful, logistically
OPNAVINST A N2/N6 19 Dec Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5430.56A From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: NAVAL OCEANOGRAPHY POLICY, RELATIONSHIPS,
The DoD Strategic Plan for Test and Evaluation Resources
The DoD Strategic Plan for Test and Evaluation Resources Mr. Jason Coker Mr. Christopher Paust March 4, 2009 Test Resource Management Center 1225 South Clark Street, Arlington VA 22202 Outline TRMC Background
Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NUCLEAR WEAPONS RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE NAVY OF FICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 N AVY PENTAG ON WASHINGTON D C 2 0350-1000 SECNAVINST 8120.1A DNS SECNAV INSTRUCTION 8120.1A From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: DEPARTMENT
Commandant Education Boards. Major Jerry A. Godfrey Combat Service Support Majors Monitor Manpower Management Officer Assignments
Commandant Education Boards Major Jerry A. Godfrey Combat Service Support Majors Monitor Manpower Management Officer Assignments 24 January 2018 Purpose / Agenda Purpose: provide an overview of the Commandant
Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Top 15 Science and Technology Objectives
Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Top 15 Science and Technology Objectives 1. Improved Protection for Individuals [P/Mit 7.2-1] [pg 36] 2. RPG Defense for Watercraft and Vehicles [P/Mit 7.2-2] [pg 37]
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION. CAPT Norbert Doerry, USN and Howard Fireman Fleet Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA) Approved for Public Release 1
CAPT Norbert Doerry, USN and Howard Fireman Fleet Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA) ABSTRACT Several recent Analyses of Alternatives (AOAs) have demonstrated issues with the AOA process that have limited
ONR Command Overview. Mr. Craig A. Hughes Deputy Director of Research September Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release
ONR Command Overview Mr. Craig A. Hughes Deputy Director of Research September 2016 Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release The Office of Naval Research The S&T Provider for the Navy and
MCO B C March Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS)
C 061 10 March 2008 MARINE CORPS ORDER 3900.15B From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: MARINE CORPS EXPEDITIONARY FORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (EFDS) Ref: (a) MROC Decision Memorandum
OPNAVINST DNS-3/NAVAIR 24 Apr Subj: MISSIONS, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5450.350 DNS-3/NAVAIR OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.350 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj:
STATISTICAL PRESS NOTICE MONTHLY CRITICAL CARE BEDS AND CANCELLED URGENT OPERATIONS DATA, ENGLAND March 2018
STATISTICAL PRESS NOTICE MONTHLY CRITICAL CARE BEDS AND CANCELLED URGENT OPERATIONS DATA, ENGLAND March 2018 Main Findings March 2018: Critical Care Beds There were 4,064 adult critical care beds available
JANUARY 2018 (21 work days) FEBRUARY 2018 (19 work days)
AND CORRESPONDING DATES FOR JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2018 JANUARY 2018 ( work days) Deadline* 12-27 12-28 12-29 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-8 1-9 1-10 Benefit Hold ** 12-28 12-29 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-8 1-9 1-10 1-11 Mailing
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
JCIDS Overview. Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System. Joint Staff, J-8 Capabilities and Acquisition Division UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System 1 JCIDS Overview Joint Staff, J-8 Capabilities and Acquisition Division 2 Previous Requirements and Acquisition Process Frequently produced stovepiped
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION SUBJECT: DoD Munitions Requirements Process (MRP) References: See Enclosure 1 NUMBER 3000.04 September 24, 2009 Incorporating Change 1, November 21, 2017 USD(AT&L) 1.
NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference
NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference Mr. Tom Dee DASN ELM 703-614-4794 Pentagon 4C746 1 Agenda Expeditionary context Current environment Way Ahead AAV Cobra Gold 2012 EOD 2 ELM Portfolio U.S. Marine Corps
BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PUBLIC NOTICE ANNUAL NOTICE OF CALENDAR YEAR 2018 WORKSHOP SESSIONS, PRE-AGENDA MEETINGS AND REGULAR MEETINGS
BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PUBLIC NOTICE ANNUAL NOTICE OF CALENDAR YEAR 2018 WORKSHOP SESSIONS, PRE-AGENDA MEETINGS AND REGULAR MEETINGS BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Borough Council of the Borough of Roselle,
Quality Management Report 2017 Q2
Quality Management Report 2017 Q2 Quality Management Program CMS STAR Ratings Member Satisfaction (CAHPS & HOS) HEDIS Risk Adjustment DHS Member Incident Reporting Member Satisfaction Surveys Pay for Performance
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program Cyber Security Workshop January 2015 Dan Cundiff Deputy Director, Comparative Technology Office OASD (R&E) Emerging Capabilities & Prototyping E-mail: thomas.d.cundiff.civ@mail.mil
Unmanned Systems Interoperability Conference 2011 Integration of Autonomous UxS into USN Experiments
Unmanned Systems Interoperability Conference 2011 Integration of Autonomous UxS into USN Experiments CAPT Michael Carter, Project Officer for Naval Unmanned Systems, SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific Report
OPNAVINST N46 21 Apr Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF COMMANDER, NAVY INSTALLATIONS COMMAND
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO OPNAVINST 5450.339 N46 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5450.339 From: Chief of Naval Operations
Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting (ISAR) Sustainability Reporting
Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting (ISAR) 29th SESSION 31 October 2 November 2012 Room XIX, Palais des Nations, Geneva Friday, 2 November
DEPLOYMENT HEALTH ASSESSMENT (DHA) PROGRAM TRAINING
Welcome to US Fleet Forces Command DEPLOYMENT HEALTH ASSESSMENT (DHA) PROGRAM TRAINING Conference Dial-in: (866) 623-5860 Access Code: 6695964# Please MUTE your phone. If you have to step away from the
Calendar of Key Deadlines for Apportionments July 18, 2016
Mary Jane Burke Marin County Superintendent of Schools Business Services Department Business Bulletin 17 04 Calendar of Key Deadlines for 2016 2017 Apportionments July 18, 2016 Please find the Calendars
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Fires Integration & Interoperability FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
NAVAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS POLICY AND COORDINATION
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350 1000 SECNAVINST 3900.45 CNR (ONR 03R) SECNAV INSTRUCTION 3900. 45 From : Subj : Ref : Encl: Secretary of the Navy NAVAL
Oregon Community Development Block Grant Program 2018 Annual Action Development September 22, 2017
Oregon Community Development Block Grant Program 2018 Annual Action Development September 22, 2017 Becky Baxter and Fumi Schaadt Program Policy Coordinator Economic Development Division Updates Topic of
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element - 75.7 122.481-122.481
AFGHANISTAN & MIDDLE EAST A total of 22 Unit midshipmen were commissioned during 2007
AFGHANISTAN & MIDDLE EAST 2007 A total of 22 Unit midshipmen were commissioned during 2007 24 FEB 2007 Basketball tourney, Notre Dame, IN 9-10 FEB 2007 Drill team competed in Chicagoland meet, Wheeling,
The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation
1 The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated
Product Support Manager Workshop. Rapid Capabilities. Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell
Product Support Manager Workshop Rapid Capabilities Mr. Chris O Donnell Director, Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell June 8, 2017 17-S-1832 Deliberate Requirements vs. Urgent / Rapid Requirements Lanes Urgent
Capabilities Overview
This briefing is UNCLASSIFIED JO Capabilities Overview National Defense Industrial Association 18 February 2004 Brigadier General Ken Hunzeker Vice Director, J-8, Force Structure, Resources and Assessment
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Implementation of Data Collection, Development, and Management for Strategic Analyses
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 8260.2 January 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Implementation of Data Collection, Development, and Management for Strategic Analyses PA&E References: (a) DoD Directive 8260.1,
Joint IETM INTEROPERABILITY
Joint IETM INTEROPERABILITY CALS EXPO INTERNATIONAL 1998 26 October 1998 Joseph Fuller (Chairman) Tri-Service IETM Technology Working Group Outline Background and Sponsorship Objective, Scope, and Approach
Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) Overview 2017 World Wide Energy Conference
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ENERGY AMERICA S COMBAT FUEL SUPPORT LOGISTICS AGENCY Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM) Overview 2017 World Wide Energy Conference AGENDA Mission Organization Processes
ASN (RDA) Chief Engineer
ASN (RDA) Chief Engineer Naval Power 21 Integration & Interoperability Improvement 21 October 2008 Mr. Carl Siel ASN(RDA) Chief Engineer carl.siel@navy.mil Unclassified Mr. J. Kevin Smith Technical Director
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps Logistics Chain Management Increment 1 (GCSS-MC LCM Inc 1) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES
Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES The U.S. naval services the Navy/Marine Corps Team and their Reserve components possess three characteristics that differentiate us from America s other military
Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 3400.10G N9 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3400.10G From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: CHEMICAL,
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FFIC EN AGON C Q
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FFIC EN AGON 2 35-10C Q 13 May 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (NAVY) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (MARINE
USMC Sports Medicine Injury Prevention Program (SMIP) Information Brief
USMC Sports Medicine Injury Prevention Program (SMIP) Information Brief Purpose/End State BLUF Purpose To provide an overview on the USMC SMIP program and CMC intent End State Understanding of the role
Dr. Ray Buettner Director 2016 Year End Brief Jan 2017
http://cruser.nps.edu Dr. Ray Buettner Director 2016 Year End Brief Jan 2017 In support of SECNAV s unmanned systems goals CRUSER is established to shape generations of naval officers through education,
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
Management Emphasis and Organizational Culture; Compliance; and Process and Workforce Development.
---------------------------------------------------------------- The United States Navy on the World Wide Web A service of the Navy Office of Information, Washington DC send feedback/questions to comments@chinfo.navy.mil
DoD Biometrics Identity Management (BIdM)
DoD Biometrics Identity Management (BIdM) Shawn Elliott Futures Branch, Biometric Task Force shawn.elliott@hqda.army.mil 28 Feb 2008 1 Purpose & Content Purpose: Share Biometric Task Force, Biometric Identity
Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense
o0t DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING PROGRAM Report No. 98-133 May 13, 1998 Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense
2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference. OSD Perspective
2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference OSD Perspective Jose M. Gonzalez OUSD (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) Deputy Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions Discussion
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report
2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report Tactical Mission Command (TMC) Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR) UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations
Joint Coordinated Implementation of Digitally-Aided CAS Capability
Joint Coordinated Implementation of Digitally-Aided CAS Capability International Data Link Symposium 2009 DISTRIBUTION A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Marsha Mullins J89 Capability
ERAU - FDM Workshop Daytona Beach FL 8 January 2007 Dick Healing, Sr. Partner, R³ Consulting LLC
MILITARY Flight Operations Quality Assurance - MFOQA ERAU - FDM Workshop Daytona Beach FL 8 January 2007 Dick Healing, Sr. Partner, R³ Consulting LLC Sharing Information Commercial Military CVFDR CRM TCAS
Joint & Coalition Operational Analysis Division Update
Joint & Coalition Operational Analysis Division Update 19 Sep 2012 (U) JCOA Analytic Program of Work ISO the JLLP 1 of 2 Decade of War I JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC LL GOSC LL GOSC J7 & JS Strategy Dev WWJTSC
OPNAVINST F N4 5 Jun 2012
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 4440.19F N4 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 4440.19F From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: POLICIES
DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY COMMANDER, REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTERS 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA
DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY COMMANDER, REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTERS 9170 SECOND STREET, SUITE 245 NORFOLK, VA 23511-2393 REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER INSTRUCTION 4700.1 CRMCINST 4700.1 Code 00 JAN 8 2008 Subj:
Possible Business Opportunities Within The SOF Weapons Program
Possible Business Opportunities Within The SOF Weapons Program 8 May 2007 Briefing Objectives Provide Information Relative To USSOCOM (PEO-SW) Product Areas Discuss Typical Acquisition Approach For SOF
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #90
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED FY Due to the number of efforts in this PE, the programs described herein are representative of the work included in this PE.
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
Counter-IED RESPONSE IN THE GWOT Technology Transition for the Current War
Counter-IED RESPONSE IN THE GWOT Technology Transition for the Current War RDML Archer M. Macy, USN Commander, Naval Surface Warfare Center 23 October 2006 1 Historical Context Vietnam Korea WWII % Artillery
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST
DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World
Session C: Past and Present T&E Lessons Learned 40 Years of Excellence in Analysis DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World 2 March 2010 Dr. Wm. Forrest Crain Director, U.S. Army Materiel
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM Total PE 92.490 32.552 63.244 64.668
THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DC
THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON DC 20350-1 000 July 6, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT: Department of.the Navy (DON) Safety Safety is a key tenet of success Department-wide. Continual improvement
Naval Audit Service Audit Report Followup of Naval Audit Service Recommendations for Management of Special Tooling and Special Test Equipment Audits
Naval Audit Service Audit Report Followup of Naval Audit Service Recommendations for Management of Special Tooling and Special Test Equipment Audits This report contains information exempt from release
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 5 of 10 P-1 Line #11
Exhibit P-27, Ship Production Schedule: PB 2017 Navy Date: February 2016 Ship Shipbuilder Fiscal Year Contract Award Start of Construction Delivery Date LCS 7 LOCKHEED MARTIN 2011 Mar 2011 Apr 2012 Jun
USTRANSCOM. USTRANSCOM Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise. 15 April Mr.
Public Release Certified USTRANSCOM USTRANSCOM Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise 15 April 2010 Mr. Lou Bernstein Public Release Certified 1 Content
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2006 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE Joint Command and Control /PE 0303158K COST (in Millions) FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Joint Command and Control
DIME-GAFSP First Quarterly Progress Report
DIME-GAFSP First Quarterly Progress Report Feburary 24, 2012 The World Bank s Development Impact Evaluation Initiative (DIME) has been contracted to lead in-depth impact evaluations on a subset of GAFSP
Implementing the Joint Battle Management Command & Control Roadmap Panel
JO INT CH I E FS OF S TA FF The Joint Staff C4 Systems Directorate Implementing the Joint Battle Management Command & Control Roadmap Panel Colonel Rob Gearhart, USMC Joint Staff J6I, Integration & Information
1. Purpose. To prescribe policy and publish guidance governing Department of the Navy (DON) support to the Defense Attache System ( DAS).
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350 1 000 SECNAVINST 1300.16 DUSN ( PPOI) SECNAV INSTRUCTION 1300. 16 From : Subj : Secretary of the Navy DEFENSE ATTACHE
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 19 R-1 Line #71
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy : March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018