Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Broward County, Florida. Prepared for: Broward County Aviation Department.
|
|
|
- Florence Strickland
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION Written Re-Evaluation Of the Proposed Changes to the Development and Expansion of Runway 10~-28L (formerly known as Runway 9R-27L) and Other Associated Airport Projects Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Broward County, Florida Prepared for: Broward County Aviation Department December 2013 December 2013 Page i
2 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN~ December 2013 Page li
3 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Need for a Written Re-Evaluation Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES... ~ Environmental Categories Where No Changes Occur Environmental Categories Where a Change in Impacts May Occur CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Cumulative Impact Comparison CONCLUSION APPENDICES Appendix A Coordination with Applicable Regulatory Agencies LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Direct and Secondary Wetland Impacts and UMAM Scores for the Previously Approved Action... 7 Direct and Secondary Wetland Impacts and UMAM Scores with the Proposed Changes... 8 December 2013 Page iii
4 - FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTE~NATIONAL AIRPOfl,T WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK December 2013 Page iv
5 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In December 2008, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Final Environmental Impact Statement that evaluated the proposed expansion of Runway 9R-27L and other associated airport projects at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL). 1 The FAA's ROD was based on the information and analysis contained in the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Development and Expansion of Runway 9R-27L and Other Associated Airport Projects at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Broward County, Florida, June 2008 (2008 FEIS). Runway 9R-27L is now referred to as Runway 10R-28L due to a change in magnetic declination. In January 2009, the FAA approved an Airport Layout Plan submitted by the Broward County Aviation Department (BCAD) that depicted the proposed expansion. 2 In May 2011, 3 BCAD submitted to the FAA an update to the 2009 approved ALP depicting further refinements to the runway expansion project that resulted from a 60-percent design study. The FAA approved a Written Re-Evaluation in July 2011 for those changes to the project (identified in this Written Re-Evaluation as the Previously Approved Action). FAA approved the update to the ALP in August Since the FAA's approval of the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation and August 2011 ALP, further design changes and refinements associated with engineering the new runway and taxiway system have been made. Those design changes are the subject of this Written Re-evaluation. 1.1 Need for a Written Re-Evaluation FAA, with input from Broward County, has prepared this Written Re-evaluation in accordance with FAA Order B, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Projects, paragraph 1401 c.(2) and FAA Order E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures. The design changes (identified in this Written Re-evaluation as the Proposed Changes) are analyzed herein "to determine whether the Proposed Changes are substantial and whether the resulting environmental impacts present significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns that have a bearing on the proposed action or its impacts. " 4 The runway expansion and other associated airport projects are identified in the FAA's Record of Decision dated December 19, 2008; Section 1, Description of the Airport Sponsor's Proposed Action and Purpose and Need. 2 Letter to Kent George, Director, Broward County Aviation Department, from Bart Vernace, Assistant Manager, FAA Orlando Airports District Office, Airport Layout Plan Approval, January 22, The Broward County Commission approved the updated 2011 proposed ALP on April 5, 2011, and it was submitted to the FAA May 4, FAA Order 50S0.4B, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions, Effective Date: April 28, Chapter 1. Order Objectives and Definitions, paragraph 9.v.(l). December 2013 Page 1
6 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION Per FAA Order E, paragraph 515a, "The preparation of a new EIS is not necessary when it can be documented that the: (1) Proposed action conforms to plans or projects.for which a prior EIS has been filed and there are no substantial changes in the proposed action that are relevant to environmental concerns; (2) Data and analyses contained in the previous EIS are still substantially valid and there are no significant new circumstances or information relevant_ to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts; and (3) Pertinent conditions and requirements (all) of the prior approval have, or will be, met in the current action." If the proposed changes do not meet the above criteria, then further analysis is necessary. (See FAA Order E, Paragraph Si6a.) 1.2 Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action A variety of design changes associated with engineering the new runway and ta?<iway system have been made as construction of the project is underway. The Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action that are the subject of this Written Re-evaluation include the realignment of the Airport Perimeter Road on the southwest side of FLL, modification of an emergency navigational aid (NAVAID) access road on the east side of the Airport, and the design to the NAVAID runway approach lighting system and the associated maintenance bridge Realignment of Airport Perimeter Road In the 2008 FEIS, a western segment of the Airport Perimeter Road was identified for relocation and termination due to its location in the projected future Runway Object Free Area (OFA) of Runway 10R-28L. 5 Based on the need to maintain the functionality of this segment of Airport Perimeter Road for vehicular access and connectivity to the west side of the airfield, BCAD is currently pursuing an FAA approval for a Modification of Design Standard to operate this segment of the Airport Perimeter Road located within the OFA. (A graphic exhibit of this proposed chang-e is provided in Appendix A.) The Airport Perimeter Road proviqes Airport personnel with access to conduct perimeter checks for maintenance operations and security. The Proposed Changes assessed in this Written Re-evaluation include the realignment of a portion of Airport Perimeter Road. This element of the Proposed Changes is expected to result in a change in wetland impacts from the Previously Approved Action. 5 This action for the Airport Perimeter Road was identified In the 2008 FEIS as a connected action. December 2013 Page2
7 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION Emergency NAVAID Access Road In the 2008 FEIS, the proposed project included the construction of a mechanically stabilized earth retaining wall to support the elevated runway end along with NAVAIDS placed near the Runway 28L end. A modification of the NAVAID Access Road, as requested by the County Fire Marshall, is needed to provide emergency vehicles with access to these NAVAIDs. With this proposed modification in the roadway, a change in wetland impacts from the Previously Approved Action is expected. (A graphic exhibit of this element of the Proposed Changes. is provided in Appendix A.) MALSF NAVAID The 2008 FEIS identified an approach light system for Runway 10R-28L that included a 2,400 foot Medium Intensity Approach Light System (MALS) with runway alignment indicator lights (MALSR), localizer, and glideslope for the Runway lor end and a 1,400 foot MALS for the Runway 28L end. 6 Based on consultation with the FAA/ the approach light system for Runway 10R-28L was changed to a 1,400 foot MALS with sequenced flashing lights (MALSF). 8 The FAA evaluated the MALSF system in Sections 1 and 3 of the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation and determined that it did not constitute a substantial change from the FEIS. Since the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation, the FAA has been performing construction design and preparing this particular element to go out for public procurement for a contractor to construct. Slight design modifications have bee.n needed from the conceptual plans such as the orientation of the lighting pads and the design changes to the maintenance bridge. Implementation of these changes would have a similar environmental impact to those previously approved including impacts to wetlands as approved by the FAA in the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation. Broward County has already obtained adequate mitigation credits for this slight change in design as approved in the FLL U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Runway Expansion Permit SAJ (IP-MJW). No permit modifications would be needed. Therefore, all mitigation requirements that were conditions of the prior approval have been met for the MALSF NAVAID. 2.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT The 2008 FEIS Affected Environment chapter provided a description of the existing environmental conditions in and around the vicinity of FLL. The data collected for 6 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Development and Expansion of Runway 9R/27L and Other Associated Aii port Projects at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Broward County, Florida. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, February Chapter Two, The Proposal, Section 2.0, Airport Sponsor's Proposed Project. 7 FAA National Airspace System Planning & Integration Team and the FAA Air Traffic Organization Eastern Service Center.. 8 According to FAA AC 150/ , a MALSF is a medium Intensity ALS identical to a MALS except that sequenced flashing lights are added to the outer three light bars. The sequenced flashing lights improve pilot recc_>gnition of the ALS when there are distracting lights in the airport vicinity. December 2013 Page3
8 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION the 2008 FEIS baseline is still relevant and representative of existing conditions at the time of this Written Re-evaluation because conditions have not changed substantially in and around the vicinity of FLL. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Pursuant to the requirements of FAA Orders , National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions, and E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, the environmental consequences of the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action have been reviewed to determine if the data and the analysis in the 2008 FEIS are still substantially valid and to determine whether there are any new significant circumstances or information from those disclosed in the 2008 FEIS and July 2011 Written Re Evaluation requiring additional NEPA. analysis. This Written Re-evaluation also determines whether pertinent conditions and requirements of the prior approval have been, or will be, met with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action. 3.1 Environmental Categories Where No Changes Occur The study areas and the limits of disturbance are the same as in the 2008 FEIS and July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation and the types of construction and development are similar in type and character to those for the Previously Approved Action. Based on this review, there is no change in environmental impacts associated with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action for the following resource categories. Air Quality. Coastal Resources Compatible Land Use Department of Transportation Act Section 303(c) (Formerly Section 4(f) Resources) Farmlands Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Floodplains Hazardous Materials, Pollution Prevention, and Solid waste Historical, Architectural, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources Light Emissions and Visual Impacts Natural Resources and Energy Supply Noise Secondary (Induced) Impacts Socioeconomic Impacts, Environmental Justice, and Children's Environmental Health and Safety Risks Wild and Scenic Rivers 3.2 Environmental Categories Where a Change in Impacts May Occur The resource categories where environmental consequences could potentially differ from those disclosed in the 2008 FEIS and the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation are addressed in the following sections. December 2013 Page4
9 FORTLAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRirrEN RE-EVALUATION Construction Impacts Construction impacts associated with the Proposed Changes would occur within the limits of disturbance disclosed in the 2008 FEIS. Construction of both the realigned Airport Perimeter Road and the Emergency NAVAID Access Road is expected to be substantially similar to the estimated construction impacts disclosed in the 2008 FEIS and the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation. As noted in Section 1.2.3, slight design modifications have been needed for the MALSF from the conceptual plans. Implementation of these changes would have a similar environmental impact to those previously approved including impacts to wetlands as approved by the FAA in the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation. Therefore, no substantial changes in environmental impacts with.respect to construction impacts would occur with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action. Data and analysis contained in the 2008 FEIS remain substantially valid. The Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action would not result in any changes to the 2008 FEIS conclusions regarding construction impacts Water Quality The FAA determined in the 2008 FEIS ROD and the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation that the Previously Approved Action would not result in significant adverse water quality impacts for either surface or ground waters. This determination was based on analyses included in the 2008 FEIS. With the Proposed Changes it is anticipated that existing permits obtained by Broward County will need to be modified. Broward County is still responsible for assuring that all required permitting requirements are met. Broward County has initiated the process of modifying the existing permits with the applicable regulatory agencies (USACE, SFWMD, and Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department. (The documentation of agency coordination activities is provided in Appendix A.) Through the permit process Broward County will meet the requirements of the State of Florida's Public Interest Test (See F.S.A (1)(a)). Therefore, the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action would not result in any substantial changes to the 2008 FEIS or July 2011 Written Re Evaluation conclusions regarding water quality impacts. Data and analysis contained in the 2008 FEIS remain substantially valid. All permit and mitigation requirements that were conditions of the prior approval have been, or will be, met by Broward County Wetlands As discussed. in the 2008 FEIS, the Previously Approved Action was developed to avoid and minimize direct impacts to wetlands to the extent practicable. However, the Previously Approved Action disclosed that direct impacts to acres of December 2013 PageS
10 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION wetlands would result from fill, erosion, sedimentation, and the clearing of vegetation associated witli the expansion of Runway 10R-28L, the installation of the runway approach lights, and the associated access roads. In addition to direct impacts, the 2008 FEIS and July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation disclosed potential secondary impacts of acres to wetlands. Wetland mitigation from the project's anticipated impacts was developed based on Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) functional loss (FL) units and.the functional gain (FG) units required to compensate for both direct and secondary impacts. 9 The UMAM FG units provided a conservative estimate oftotal m,itigation required for the project. UMAM scores were calculated based on input from, and in coordination with, the USACE, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A total of 7.97 functional units was needed for mitigation for the proposed project. The direct and secondary impacts and associated UMAM scores developed in the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation are provided in Table 1, Dirt;!ct and Secondary Wetland Impacts and UMAM Scores for the Previously Approved Action. It was Broward County's intent to use mitigation credits at West Lake Park to mitigate the project's potential wetland impacts. As stated in the 2008 FEIS ROD, it is Broward County's responsibility as the Airport Sponsor to apply for and obtain permits required by these regulatory agencies. Broward County obtained the required permits that allow for habitat restoration and enhancement within West Lake Park. 10 Based on the amount of mitiga~ion credits available to Broward County in the SFWMD and USACE permits for West Lake Park, there are sufficient mitigation credits available to accommodate the 7.97 functional units. Proposed Changes Due to changes in design associated with Airport Perimeter Road, additional wetlands that rim the entire bank of two storm water ponds (GB Pond West and GB Pond East) on the southwest side of the Airport would now be impacted. The direct wetland impact to both these areas totals 0.25 acres. On the east side of FLL, direct impacts to wetland W-N3a would increase from those disclosed in the 2011 Written Re-Evaluation due to the need expressed by the County Fire Marshall to provide emergency access to the NAVAID. The direct impacts to W-N3a would increase from 1.51 acres to 1.59 acres with the Proposed C.hanges. 9 FL units refer to the impacts from the Project. FG units refer to the amount of mitigation required. 10 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USACOE Permit SAJ (IP-MJW) and SAJ , issued March 2, 2006 and South Florida Water Management District, SFWMD P, issued April 22, December 2013 Page6
11 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION Table 1 DIRECT AND SECON.DARY WETLAND IMPACTS and UMAM SCORES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ACTION Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport '::. Wetland ID Design Direct Impacts (Acres) Design Proposed Secondary All Zones (Acres) Design Direct UMAM FG Credits Design Proposed Secondary UMAM FG Credits All Zones W-N2a W-N2b ::c. ' W-N3a.. 1.si.. ;,1.68 ' 0.45'' 0.10 W-N3b W-N W W W-17a W-17b W-17c W-25a W-25b W ,GB Pond.:West ~02'. >; GB Pond East o:o o~oo:: W9 Peninsula Total Source: Broward County Aviation Department and Miller Legg, Note: Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding. The revised direct and secondary impacts and associated UMAM scores are provided in Table 2, Direct and Secondary Wetland Impacts and UMAM Scores Pr~posed Changes. With the Proposed Changes, the UMAM FG units needed for mitigation have been revised to 8.05 FG units (6.64 direct FG units and 1.41 secondary FG units) as compared to 7.97 FG units disclosed in the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation. Based on the amount of mitigation credits available to Broward County in the SFWMD and USACE permits for West Lake Park, there are sufficient mitigation credits available to accommodate this increase in total FG units. (The documentation of agency coordination activities is provided in Appendix A.) December 2013 Page7
12 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD international AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION The functional value of the wetland resources will be offset with mitigation that replaces the wetland functions to be lost. Therefore, no n et adverse impact to the functional values of the wetland resources and water quality is anticipated as the result of the proposed activities. Table 2. DIRECT AND SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS and UMAM SCORES PROPOSED CHANGES.. Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Wetland ID Design Direct I inpacts (Acres) Design Proposed Secondary All Zones (Acres) Design Direct UMAM FG Credits Design Proposed Secondary UMAM FG Credits All Zones W-N2a W-N2b : :... w~n3cl L ,.. O;iO W-N3b W-N W W W-17a W-17b: W-17c W-25a W-25b W " GB Pond west :::, r.... GB Pohd East o.o2: 0.06 i!.-:: o;oo W9 Peninsula Total Source: Broward County Aviation Department and Miller Legg, Note: Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding... Although overall the acreage for direct impacts to wetlands has increased and UMAM FG units have increased, there is adequate mitigation for project impacts with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action. Broward County has proposed mitigation at West Lake Park to replace wetland loss at the proposed project site. December 2013 PageB
13 Data and analysis contained in the 2008 FEIS and the July 2011 Written Re Evaluation remains substantially valid and all mitigation requirements that were conditions of the prior approval have been, or will be, met with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action. The Airport Sponsor is in the process ofsecuring all required permits from the regulatory agencies. FORT LAUDERDALE-NOLL YWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION 4.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The potential cumulative impacts of the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action, in combination with other related or independent actions in the vicinity of FLL, are presented in this section. 11 The analysis of potential cumulative impacts recognizes that while the impacts of many actions may be individually. small, when combined with the impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions on populations or resources, the impacts could be potentially significant from a cumulative perspective. 4.1 CUMULATIVE IMPACT COMPARISON FAA has determined in this Written Re-evaluation that there are no changes in environmental impacts with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action for the following environmental categories: air, noise, coastal resources, D.OT 4(f) resources, farmlands, fish, wildlife, and. plants, floodplains, historical, architectural, archeological, and cultural resources,. light emissions and visual impacts, natural resou.rces and energy supply, compatible land use, hazardous waste, secondary (induced) impacts, socioeconomic impacts, environmental justice and children's health and safety issues, and wild and scenic rivers. Because there is no change in environmental impact, there is also no change in cumulative effect associated with these resource categories for the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action when combined with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. Therefore, there is no change in the 2008 FEIS or July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation conclusion of no significant cumulative impacts with regard to air, noise, coastal resources, fish, wildlife, and plants, light emissions and visual impacts, natural resources and energy supply, compatible land use, hazardous waste, secondary (induced) impacts, socioeconomic impacts, environmental justice and children's health and safety issues. FAA has determined in this Written Re-evaluation that there are no significant changes in environmental impacts with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action for the following environmental categories: construction, water quality, and wetlands. 11 Cumulative impacts are those impacts that can be reasonably expected to occur as a result of implementing the Proposed Changes, in combination with the impacts from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future activities, development, and/or projects that may be connected by geography or time. Considering Cumulative Impacts Under the National Environmental Policy Act, Council on Environmental Quality, Executive Office of the President. Dated: January December 2013 Page9
14 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION For these categories, additional environmental impacts due to the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action were minor or insignificant. All mitigation requirements that were conditions of the prior approval have been, or will be, m et with the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action. Additipnally, all permitting and mitigation requirements have been or will be met for past, present, and reasonably future actions. Therefore, there would be no cumulative effect associated with these resource categories for the Proposed Changes to the Previously Approved Action when combined with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. Therefore, this Written Re-evaluation of the Proposed Changes does not demonstrate a change in the conclusions reached in the 2008 FEIS or July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation. The Proposed Changes do not cause significant cumulative impacts with regard to construction impacts, water quality, or wetlands. * * * * * Cumulative effects are not expected to be substantially different from those disclosed in the 2008 FEIS and the July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation. Because the additional impacts are minor, and mitigation is provided, it is reasonable to expect that the Previously Approved Action with the Proposed Changes combined with other identified actions, would not result in significant cumulative effects. All of the identified actions would be required to comply with regulatory. requirements and mitigation in accordance with local, state, and Federal regulations. 5.0 CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis the Proposed Changes conform to plans for which a prior EIS has been filed, and involve no substantial changes that are relevant to environmental concerns. Data and analyses contained in the 2008 FEIS and July 2011 Written Re-Evaluation are still substantially valid, and there are no significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the Proposed Changes or their impacts. Finally, the Proposed Changes meet pertinent conditions and requirements of the prior approval. Therefore, as discussed above and in accordance with FAA Order E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, and FAA Order , National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions, the preparation of a new EIS is not necessary. December 2013 Page 10
15 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION APPENDIX A COORDINATION WITH APPLICABLE REGULATORY AGENCIES A.l United States Army Corps of Engineers A.2 South Florida Water Management District A.3 Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department December 2013 Page 11
16 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK December 2013 Page 12
17 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION A.l United States Army Corps of Engineers December 2013 Page 13
18 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK December 2013 Page 14
19 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 4400 PGA BOULEVARD, SUITE 500 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA REPLY TO ATTENTION OF May 15,2013 Regulatory Division South Permits Branch Palm Beach Gardens Permits Section SAJ (MOD-MJW) Modification #1 Broward County Aviation Department c/o Kent George,.Director 100 Aviation Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida Dear Mr. George: The U.S. Army Corps ofengineers (Corps) has completed the review and evaluation ofyour modification request, received on April22, 2013, in which you asked to revise the plans authorized by Department ofthe Army permit number SAJ (IP-MJW), issued to Broward County, and dated November 8, The project is located wetlands and other waters ofthe United States adjacent to the Dania Cutoff Canal near South Perimeter Road at the southwest corner of the Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport and north and south of Taylor Road, north ofne 1Oth Street, to the east ofne 7th Street. The project is located at 1 qo Aviation Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale (Sections 26, 27, and 28, Township 50S, Range 42 E), Broward County, Florida. The proposed modification would result in the direct impact an additional 0.08 acres of wetland N3a for the installation ofan access ramp on the south side ofthe runway to access the emergency navigational aids. The modification would result in an additional 0.02 functional gain units to be deducted from the balance of Segment 1 at West Lake Park. The modification must be completed in accordance with the three (3) enclosed construction drawings and revised mitigation summary. The revised pages include: Updated plan and section sheets for page replacement of stamped drawing sheets 5, 6, and 14. Updated acreage and fill summary to replace stamped drawing sheet 21. Updated UMAM summary sheet to replace Attachment F: Page 1 of 1. The impact of your proposal on navigation and the environment has been reviewed and found to be insignificant. The permit is hereby modified in accordance with your request. You should attach this letter to the permit. All other conditions ofthe permit remain in full force and effect. Ifyou have any questions concerning this permit modification, please contact the project manager Melody White at the letterhead address, by telephone at or by electronic mail at Melody.J.White@usace.army.mil.
20 -2 Thank you for your cooperation with our permit program. The Corps Jacksonville District Regulatory Division is committed to improving service to our customers. We strive to perform our duty in a friendly and timely manner while working to preserve our environment. We invite you to take a few minutes to visit andcomplete our automated Customer Service Survey. Your input is appreciated - favorable or otherwise. Please be aware this Internet address is case sensitive and should be entered as it appears above. BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: ~~ ~/{. fl"~lan M. Dodd Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander Enclosure Updated plan and section sheets for page replacement of stamped drawing sheets 5, 6, and 14. Updated acreage and fill summary to replace stamped drawing sheet 21. Updated UMAM summary sheet to replace Attachment F: Page 1 of1. Copies Furnished: MillerLegg 5747 N. Andrews Way Fort Lauderdale, Florida CESAJ-RD-PE
21 0 PROP06 D MODIFICA110NSASSOCIA1CDWIIII HAYAIDSI:OOESS ROAD REQUIRED FOR FIRE MARSHALL EMERGENCY ACCfSS. ~ 0 CJ I s:: ~ PROJECT I.D. No.: RLI# R07291 OR1 COUNTY: BROWARD PROJECT DESCRIPllON: EXPANSION OF RUNWAY 9R-27L TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 s 42 E , NAME: SIGNATURE: FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON, P.E CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1/13 EPD X CG COE X I ~ II feeel mm g tjd DREDGE AND WMD DIRECT IMI'AI:IS X LEGEND S I:IINDARY WEilAND ZONE 1 (0' sm»>iiar'i WEilAND ZONE 2 (50' - 2.!!0') RPZ S I:IINDARY WEilAND IMPACTS SURFACE!IAIER WEIIAIIDS 75 0 ~--.~ 0 NORTH 75 I GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) FILL PERMIT SKETCHES SHEET No.: 5 DATE: 4/1/ I
22 0 PROPOS DMODIRCA'IIONSASSOCIATEDWI1H NAYAJDSACCESS ROAD REQUIRED FOR FIRE MARSIIALL EMERGENCY ACCESS. LEGEND PROPOSED DRY DETENllON POND US 1-25 \_... SS:ONDAR'I' Y 1lAND ZONE 1 (0' - 50') ss:ondar'i' wmanj) ZONE 2 (50' - 2BO') RPZ S1!CONilAR'f WEtlAND IIIPACIS ~ s::: 0 0 I ~ CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1/13 SIJRFMlE IYKIER WEIIANDS DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES EPD X CG SHEET.No.: CDE X WMD X DATE: 0 NORTH ~ I GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 6 4/1/13
23 I sy Y "Y Y Y Y Y Y ll. PROPOSED GROUND f l--1--l h ! t :=-ii--- PROPOSED MSE WALL 40 --~--- 36~~---1--~ H I I\ 28 ' \ \ f--~ t l~-+--~-~ \ I I \ -- \ ' 16 HORIZONTAL SCALE: VERTICAL SCALE: t.-.. J til-. J GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) I I I I 12 \ - PROPOSED MSE WALl. ---\\---f ,~--"""f' l l--1 8 \ \ 1 EXIS lng GR UND 12 \ 41--~4\-~ /~-4--~--~~ ----~--~~ f1--4~t~---+--v= r o~4--f~~~==~~~~*=~ 0-4L-~L-~L---L- L L L L ~--~ NO FILL BELOW SHWf 0 PROI'OSEDMODIFICATIONSASSOCIAlEDWilli NAVAlOS ACCESS ROAD REQUIRED FOR FIRE MARSHAU EMERGENCY ACCESS. S ON -D PROJECT 1.0. No.: RLI# R072910R1 COUNTY: BROWARD NAME: FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON, P.E. DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXPANSION. OF RUNWAY 9R-27L TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 s 42 E 28 SIGNATURE: CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1 /13 EPD COE X X CG WMD X SHEET No.: 14 DATE: 4/1/13
24 @) 00 0 iil lll )> :E~.'1:1: :; CR... en cn<.n )> ::rs:... T CDlll!!l-'< CD I\.) I\.) CD...>.0... w ~ DJ: WETLAND# 0>... s: 0 0 I s: '. i ' ; I!! i I i N2a N2b N3a N3b! N4 I 6 I 8 [9 (PENNINSULA PONDS) : 17a! 17b i 17c a 25b 33 GREENBELT PONDS: WEST GREENBELT PONDS: EAST TOTAL AREA(Ac.) DIRECTLY IMPACTED AREA(Ac.} SECONDARY SECONDARY SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTED IMPACTED IMPACTED FILL VOLUME AREA (Ac.) AREA(Ac.) AREA(Ac.) BELOWMHW/ [0' TO 50' ZONE] [SO' TO 250' ZONE] [RPZZONE] SHGWT(CY.) , TOTALS: , PROJECT I.D. No.: RLI# R07291 OR1 COUNTY: BROWARD NAME: FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON, P.E. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXPANSION OF RUNWAY 9R-27L SIGNATURE: EPD X CG SHEET No.: 21 TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 s 42 E 28 CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4[1[13 COE X WMD X DAlE: 4/1/13
25 ACRES"" Secondary Secondary Direct Zone 1 (acres) ZOne 2 (acres) Zone 3 (acres) WeUandiD Acraaae Exlstino UMAM lmoact Cacrasl ( RPZ W N3o W N3b I 5.40 I I 2.78 UMAM WITH PROJECT RAW SCORE Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted UMAM.Zone 1 UMAM..Zone2 UMAM-Zono3 - (0-60 II) ft) RPZ FUNCTONAL LOSS Direct Impact Secondary Zona 1 Secondary Zona 2 Secondary Zone 3 FL FL FL FL (0-S!l'J. _( ') RPZ Notes: -surface water area not Included In the above UMAM cala.dation -secondary Zone out 250': FL calculated using an adjusled UMAM value. Two secondary zones proposed: 0-50 ft, S0.250 fl Mtiiliiiliiiweuands with mangrove impacts!total FL ] &' I ~00 i Q)Ql)> g. co.. "* i 3 CD-'(/) aol)> "Tls:cr.. Ql _. ""0 '< co rul\lco co 0 <j'1 ro->-0 _.w.~>o 01 (J) Q, _. _. s: 0 ~ biects\ ().() FLL South Runway Expansion\Permits\USACOE\mod 1 n3o\usacoe Summary UMAM / i ~!
26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 4400 PGA BOULEVARD, SUITE 500 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA REPLY TO MAY ATTENTION OF Regulatory Division South Permits Branch Palm Beach Gardens Permits Section SAJ (NW-MJW) Broward County Board ofcounty Commissioners c/o Kent George, Director ofaviation 2200 SW 45 1 h Street, Suite 101 Dania Beach, Florida Dear Mr. George: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) assigned your application for a Department of the Army permit, which the Corps received on April 22, 2013, the file number SAJ (NW-MJW). A review ofthe information and drawings provided indicates that the proposed work is to install 273 linear feet ofretaining wall within Greenbelt Pond West and 131 linear feet ofretaining wall within Greenbelt Pond East and backfilling with 984 cubic yards ofmaterial for the rerouting of Perimeter Road and utility infi astructure. The project will impact approximately 0.13 acres ofmangrove wetlands. The project is located within the Greenbelt Ponds East and West between Griffin Road and the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airpmt, Dania Beach (Section 33, Township 50 south, Range 42 east), Broward County, Florida. Latitude: N, Latitude: W. Your project, as depicted on the enclosed drawings, is authorized by Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number 14 (Linear Transportation Projects). In addition, project specific conditions have been enclosed. This verification is valid until March 18, Fmthennore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have 12 months fi:om the date ofthe modification or revocation ofthe NWP to complete the activity under the present tenns and conditions of this nationwide pe1mit. Please access the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Jacksonville District's Regulatory Internet page to access Internet links to view the Final Nationwide Pennits, Federal Register Vol. 77, dated February 21, 2012, specifically pages , the Corrections to the Final Nationwide Permits, Federal Register 77, March 19,2012, and the List ofregional Conditions. The Internet page address is: usace.anny.mil/missions/regulatory.aspx Please be aware this Internet address is case sensitive and should be entered as it appears above. Once there you will need to click on "Source Book"; and, then click on "Nationwide Permits." These files contain the description of the Nationwide Pennit authorization, the Nationwide Permit general conditions, and the regional conditions, which apply specifically to this verification for NWP 14. Enclosed is a list of the six General Conditions, which apply to all
27 -2 Department ofthe Army authorizations. You must comply with all ofthe special and general conditions and any project specific condition ofthis authorization or you may be subject to enforcement action. In the event you have not completed construction ofyour project within the specified time limit, a separate application or re-verification may be required. The following special conditions are included with this verification: 1. Commencement Notification: Within 10 days from the date ofinitiating the authorized work, the Permittee shall provide to the Corps a written notification ofthe date of commencement ofwork authorized by this permit. Notification will be provided to the Regulatory Division, Special Projects and Enforcement Branch, 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410, or by to Jose.J.Rivera@usace.am}1.mil. 2. The Permittee understands and agrees that, iffuture operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, ofthe structures or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion ofthe Secretary ofthe Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation ofthe navigable waters, the Permittee will be required, upon due notice from the U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. 3. Cultural Resources/Historic Properties: a. No structure or work shall adversely affect impact or disturb properties listed in the National Register ofhistoric Places (NRHP) or those eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. b. Ifduring the ground disturbing activities and construction work within the permit area, there are archaeological/cultural materials encountered which were not the subject of a previous cultural resources assessment survey (and which shall include, but not be limited to: pottery, modified shell, flora, fauna, human remains, ceramics, stone tools or metal implements, dugout canoes, evidence of structures or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American cultures or early colonial or American settlement), the Permittee shall immediately stop all work and ground-disturbing activities within a 1 00-meter diameter ofthe discovery and notify the Corps within the same business day (8 hours). The Corps shall then notify the Florida State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the appropriate Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(s) (THPO(s)) to assess the significance ofthe discovery and devise appropriate actions. c. Additional cultural resources assessments may be required ofthe permit area in the case of unanticipated discoveries as referenced in accordance with the above Special Condition ; and if deemed necessary by the SHPO, THPO(s), or Corps, in accordance with 36 CFR 800 or 33 CFR 325, Appendix C (5). Based, on the circumstances ofthe discovery, equity to all parties, and considerations ofthe public interest, the Corps may modify, suspend or revoke the permit in
28 -3 accordance with 33 CFR Part Such activity shall not resume on non-federal lands without written authorization from the SHPO for finds under his or her jurisdiction, and from the Corps. d. In the unlikely event that unmarked human remains are identified on non-federal lands, they will be treated in accordance with Section Florida Statutes. All work and ground disturbing activities wit~in a 1 00-meter diameter ofthe unmarked human remains shall immediately cease and the Permittee shall immediately notify the medical examiner, Corps, and State Archeologist within the same business day (8-hours). The Corps shall then notify the appropriate SHPO and THPO(s). Based, on the circumstances ofthe discovery, equity to all parties, and considerations ofthe public interest, the Corps may modify, suspend or revoke the permit in accordance with 33 CFR Part Such activity shall not resume without written authorization from the State Archeologist and from the Corps. 4. Erosion Control: Prior to the initiation ofany work authorized by this permit, the Permittee shall install erosion control measures along the perimeter ofall work areas to prevent the displacement offill material outside the work area. Immediately after completion ofthe final grading ofthe land surface, all slopes, land surfaces, and filled areas shall be stabilized using sod, degradable mats, barriers, or a combination of similar stabilizing materials to prevent erosion. The erosion control measures shall remain in place and be maintained until all authorized work has been completed and the site has been stabilized. 5. Turbidity Barriers: Prior to the initiation ofany ofthe work authorized by this permit the Permittee shall install floating turbidity baniers with weighted skirts that extend to within one foot ofthe bottom around all work areas that are in, or adjacent to, surface waters. The turbidity barriers shall remain in place and be maintained until the authorizeq work has been completed and all erodible materials have been stabilized. 6. Mitigation Credit Transfer: Within 30 days from the date ofinitiating the authorized work the Permittee shall provide verification to the Corps that 0.05 functional units will be debited from the West Lake Park Mitigation Area (SAJ ). The required verification shall reference this project's permit number (SAJ ). A functional loss summary is provided in Attachment B. 7. As-Builts: Within 60 days ofcompletion ofthe authorized work or at the expiration ofthe construction authorization ofthis pennit, whichever occurs first, the Permittee shall submit asbuilt drawings ofthe authorized work and a completed As-Built Certification Form (Attachment A) to the Corps. The drawings shall be signed and sealed by a registered professional engineer and include the following: a. A plan view drawing ofthe location ofthe authorized work footprint (as shown on the permit drawings) with an overlay ofthe work as constructed in the same scale as the attached
29 -4 permit drawings (8Vl-inch by 11-inch). The drawing should show all "earth disturbance," including wetland impacts, water management structures, and any on-site mitigation areas. b. List any deviations between the work authorized by this permit and the work as constructed. In the event that the completed work deviates, in any manner, from the authorized work, describe on the As-Built Certification Form the deviations between the work authorized by this permit and the work as constructed. Clearly indicate on the as-built drawings any deviations that have been listed. Please note that the depiction and/or description ofany deviations on the drawings and/or As-Built Certification Form does not constitute approval ofany deviations by the U.S. Army Corps ofengineers. c. The Department ofthe Army Permit number. d. Include pre- and post-construction aerial photographs ofthe project site, ifavailable. 8. Fill Material: The Permittee shall use only clean fill material for this project. The fill material shall be free from items such as trash, debris, automotive parts, asphalt, construction materials, concrete block with exposed reinforcement bars, and soils contaminated with any toxic substance, in toxic amounts in accordance with Section 307 ofthe Clean Water Act. 9. Endangered Species: a. Eastern Indigo Snake Protection Measures: The Permittee shall comply with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's "Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake" dated February 12,2004 and provided in Attachment C ofthis permit." b. All gopher tortoise burrows, active or inactive, will be evacuated prior to site manipulation in the vicinity ofthe burrow. Ifan indigos snake is encountered, the snake must be allowed to vacate the area prior to additional site manipulation in the vicinity. All holes, cavities, and snake refugia other than gopher tortoise burrows will be inspected each morning before planned site manipulation ofa particular area, and, ifoccupied by an indigo snake, no work will conunence until the snake has vacated the vicinity ofthe proposed work. 10. Regulatory Agency Changes: Should any other regulatory agency require changes to the work authorized or obligated by this permit, the Permittee is advised that a modification to this permit instrument is required prior to initiation ofthose changes. It is the Permittee's responsibility to request a modification ofthis permit from the Palm Beach Gardens Regulatory Office. This letter ofauthorization does not obviate the necessity to obtain any other Federal, State, or local permits, which may be required. Prior to the initiation of any construction, projects qualifying for this Nationwide permit must qualify for an exemption under section (1),
30 -5 Florida Statutes or , Florida Statutes, or otherwise be authorized by the applicable permit required under Part IV of Chapter 3 73, Florida Statutes, by the Department ofenvironmental Protection, a water management district under section , Florida Statutes, or a local government with delegated authority under section , Florida Statutes, and receive Water Quality Certification and applicable Coastal Zone Consistency ConcmTence or waiver thereto, as well as any authorizations required for the use ofstate-owned submerged lands under Chapter 253, Florida Statutes, and, as applicable, Chapter 258, Florida Statutes. You should check Statepermitting requirements with the Florida Department ofenvironmental Protection or the appropriate water management district. This letter ofauthorization does not include conditions that would prevent the 'take' ofa statelisted fish or wildlife species. These species are protected under sec , Florida Statutes, and listed under Rule 68A-27, Florida Administrative Code. With regard to fish and wildlife species designated as species of special concern or threatened by the State offlorida, you are responsible for coordinating directly with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). You can visit the FWC license and permitting webpage ( for more information, including a list ofthose fish and wildlife species designated as species ofspecial concern or threatened. The Florida Natural Areas Inventory ( also maintains updated lists, by county, ofdocumented occurrences ofthose species. This letter ofauthorization does not give absolute Federal authority to perform the work as specified on your application. The proposed work may be subject to local building restrictions mandated by the National Flood Insurance Program. You should contact your local office that issues building permits to determine ifyom site is located in a flood-prone area, and ifyou must comply with the local building requirements mandated by the National Flood Insurance Program. If you are unable to access the internet or require a hardcopy of any ofthe conditions, limitations, or expiration date for the above referenced NWP, please contact me by telephone at Thank you for your cooperation with our permit program. The Corps Jacksonville District Regulatory Division is committed to improving service to our customers. We strive to perform our duty in a friendly and timely manner while working to preserve our environment. We invite you to visit and complete our automated Customer
31 -6 Service Survey. Your input is appreciated- favorable or otherwise. Again, please be aware this Internet address is case sensitive and should be entered as it appears above. Sincerely,,. \\(Q_HYL\\.:~_)\AA~-c Melody White Project Manager EnClosures: o Drawings Attachment A - As Built Certification o Attachment B - Functional Loss Summary Attachment C - Eastern Indigo Snake Conditions Copies Furnished: Miller!,egg 5747 N. Andrews Way Fort Lauderdale, Florida CESAJ-RD-PE
32 RUNWAYi'L EMAS ~,a---~ AIRPORT-PROGRAM j ""7\lrm:Ii. f 'I 1~v:=~ I NOTES - I FORTLAUDERDALE,FI.OR\DA.m ~~[-- RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA : 1JaPUNZ5PIIE:DICm'DOIIDGRtR!IIIDASA CfW«l)la:B l'q tilt DI5I1HO ~ ccrmw:r. '\I ~ -r~--- /,..,.,.,.. I~ I IS -UR'IfM.... li,...:h ~PPE ON' ;t'a-!_- Dr-4- - a"a - OUI.-- on" - - WORICIJIII!rSJ m--"~ - c.-a CIJ'A--!!1QSt1H9 I&".,, -~~ f!. r... - '6 ~~ ';.~II ;t. lf- -:... - ~-.;, ill! r~ms.,h;: _;;~:;;._~-~-~:... 1i;'rt_.;:::~ - ::,. ;, ~,- ;~~ -~ '': --~-;" ;,:-~ ::<::.,-..-:.' LEGEND 'C! % ~, b:: :~tj == == ~ PROPO!'DASPKIU'ROAD. ~stdimiu.mdmasa US Army Corps D M?" )') J" ofenglneers. ate: ay _.J, :.._\.J File#SAJ (NW-MJW) Drawing 1 of 7 B.WamiHSTNJ.OIW«lE~~~~ PER r.wnficmi R'S ~ (n'p.) 0 PERIMETER ROAD AND MUTUAL AID ST.6.GING AREA ~ 0 ll'..vj ~. 1~ ' """"' LAYOUT PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE {IN FBET)... ~ """"""' ---CQ,LCII'-
33 -PLOIISI'REJiaii!DCIIaaiSBIDMA CIWaOIIIR'ID"'I EIIISIICWP-o:lllctiiiiM2', ~ RSA RSA R$. RSA r-.. I_... : ~ / "'"'...""\. / / --/,. /.' '~> \~ i;!,, "::.c.., '.~ ~~-~~ ~.'.,, l j: i j t... \. - o~rt..-o!'io-of'll.- 01".,-;-- OtA.-OPA -: I.'K"'tl!.li:.~O'!:):t:>;!io"l.tl,'I ' U~ I I. ~""hw~~g I =:f=:&di. ~!!!!!!CRIMI.... ~~-... R..REGII1RA'nONNO.IIIZII 0 so d - $0 1~ bo *. I GRAPH I'll' a..-~~~oa.~ (IN PIBT) PERIMETER ROAD AND MUTUAL AID STAGING AREA LAYOUT PLAN PR02.13 ':e*:.,."r..r:" Date: May 23, 2013 File# SAT (NW-MJW) Drawing 2 of 7
34 AJRPORTEXPANSJCH PROBRAM AVIA110H DEPARnaeil' 100A~110H BOUUWARD FORI' LAUDBUtAl.S. Fl.CHUDA. 33) GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FBET)...,_ ~ =:w ~...-CAll.~- t- d 'j PERIMETER ROAD AND MUTUAL AID STAGING AREA LAYOUT PLAN US Army COrps ofenglneers. Date: May 23, 2013 File# SAJ (NW-MJW) Drawing 3 of 7
35 I~l... ~:=~==-====~~==~=-=~== ~~=;~==;=j ~.-~===~==-;==~~=;~==~==;/T}\-~~ / "'I I ;; ': ~ ', 1HE ASDE-l SI'ID'Dt WI. HaMil IN PW:E lind ~ ~;!ll.leepriiik:iedb'i"n!ecxintricrir ~.:....;~::; RUNWAY 10R..z&L. ; ~ sratdf I&DS 1D 1 CXIORIIIW!D 'lllih 'OlE I'M. I 'I ~ :::"!.':':'"IFl!IE...-X ATKINS --=...::=-==-=----=-=-=---= ~---====:-_-~--~_:- -- _ l. RfflN4l IISruRBED Br'IKEc:aernw:JOR IS 1D =a-:r~~ifd.:; =--~---=---=---=-~ I :: i {! 1 ~~MOl~~~ '==-~~~~~~--! I ~~ OIWW«PIPE: 2: I ~ ~ riot mde» FUR DiWMACE PFE B'l" \W' ;. I : :.y.,.,._, r-~ i~ I ' I 1--; ' I f. I _:: J : : ;.~:_ :.. I :L~~~~~ 7, ~1DFN::IU'IIU'E11 lii!csjdi ;i: I =:acumw:r UIIIIS WIJ/fM. msmc : I e. DISfUIIIS~OIIBEIMCAIWIDASA ~ ' 1...""""""'_""_ -1 ::jl _,, 11 -;~~ rtcc~~:" ;~,:-:;-;;;;::~~ ~?c-,cc ---:-:::' ~;::,::; ~ ::.-.:~ ~. _:.-... ~_:: ~:- =~- -:c ~~~::.~.~-~- : RELOCATE ~ ~! I i1w!x:i:y.1';0'! :-~~ i 'to'... ~,.t'';&;' ',.,fw: ~ l1---~-~ ~ ~ < I~ 'f...,...,. ft.reuisira110xno. =uti WP-306 PERIMETER ROAD AND MUTUAL AID STAGING AREA 'a ~ aad(c;ginrac'fiio.:'izid REVISID!i9 ~ LEGEND ~f'roposs)aspiwj'roiil). ~ SICAUC. NQ IUt&f. l ~~: :::~ sj ~==- AIRPORT'EXPAHSON PROGRAM AVIA.noN D~ARt'MENT 100 AvtAnONDOUI..EVARD PORT LAUDERDAL..I'l.ORIDA llotrqi1,zdq ;;;;:- PR02.01'8.111Lfl I I L USA...,eorps D t M 2~' 201'"' ol Engineers- a e: ay.),.) File# SAJ (NW -MJW) Drawing 4 of 7 0 _,. STAGING AREA so 0 so 1Gt) LAYOUT PLAN IJo.. J, I GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) """"""'... """""""'..., ""'''"""' ~ _..,._OIU,CI'_IIICI. C.W.CIIHCIURIIBERIRI!I:IDIIB FMfWllJIEII...-4D PERIMETER ROAD AND MUTUAL AID PR WP-30$ 100% SUBMITTAL.,,_
36 r-r : r------:----~ : r-:--.l I \' ~J ~ ~ ;....-:~~~ ~,~~~:~~=~======~~===l~~~~=~==~i~~=====~~~==~~-=t======r=:>j ~ -"'':!"~ ~.:e:.~- 1 0; 11. ~ ; " ':"_., " =.r-x...=~~pu 1!:- CICIMSILTMttl :f ~,. if _;-_~"" IL~~CIP1HEASD1i-X r... ~ :;; RUHWAY1DR-28L ;:..:..--:"' 1 srniixiieed!ildeccxiiiiiiim1ed111hlll ~----~===-==-=-=~-----~~ ~ =---...=-- ; _-:... ~-~J t:r ~1 :flarddisi\mejbt111ecdm&icidiis1'd I I -~ ~ [~.:: I -~~ ~.- I ~ B'f'... ~ ;fj 8'(... ~-!... ~-_:-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_:-_-_-_:-_:-_-_-_:-_-:_-_r_-_:-_-_-_-_-_:-_-:_--r----_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_:-_:-;_-_i------~~~,-:~}-:_-_-_-1:....._... ft..iiiidiiiraii01jicq...,,!;_, ~.: ROAD AND MUTUAL AID STAGING AREA I '.. ~...~ I~ ~ CU!:.IroiO. :cni V ~ / 2 concu ar"~ '- 2 11PIUL ""' -~!.. ~l=t...!i\.'.:ug -~~ ~-:(f, ~ '::.U"'{l..C.:" Date: May 23, 2013 ~.ile # SAJ (NW-MJW) r5rawing ~ of 7 -- ~ _,;,..;"; -r.: ~-1" u ~ ~~~!lim Plii"IJ5IED MPIWl' RIMD. ~~~~~~ SDDIIUC NG alb l ~:: ~~sl =='=' 110 ~ - -- PERIMETER ROAD 0 AND MUTUAL AID STAGING AREA 101 LAYOUT PLAN SCI ,... b-+«, I GRAPHI110 a (IN FB&T)
37 0 PROPOSED MOOtACAnONS ASSOCIATED wml PERIMETER ROAD REALIGNMENT ADJACENT TO GREENBELT LAKES. 131 LF =- PROPOSED RETAINING WALL -...c. 273 LF PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ;> PROJECT I.D. No.: RLI# R072910Rl COUNTY: BROWARD FO OD. Pb- I ~ a 933 ~ ~ rn WETlANDS DIRECT lldpacts LEGEND SEI:ONOARY WETlANil ZONE 1 (0' - 50') SECONDA!l'f WETlAND ZONE 2 (50' - 250') RPZ S!'CONDARY we:rtand IMI'AC1S SURFACE WAm! Iii- ~ 0 NORTH I GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES I I i CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1/13 EPD X CG SHEET No.: 4 COE X WMD X DATE: 4/1/13
38 HORIZONTAL SCALE: la=.. J GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) I I ~----~----~----~--~ GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 6 I -8~----~----~-----L-----L~---i----~ BOO 0 PROPOSED MOO!RCAl10NS ASSOCIATED WITH PERIMETER ROAD REAUGNMENT ADJACENT TO GREENBB.T lakes. FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES COUNTY: BROWARD NAME: CHRISTIAN 8. JACKSON P.E. ~~~~~~~ ~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXPANSION OF RUNWAY 9R-27L SIGNATURE: EPD X CG SHEEr No.: 13 TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 s 42 E 28 CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1 /13 COE X WMD X DATE: 4/1/13
39 AS-BUILT CERTIFICATION BY PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Submit this form and one set ofas-built engineering drawings to the U.S. Army Corps ofengineers, Enforcement Section, 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Ifyou have questions regarding this requirement, please contact the Enforcement Branch at Department ofthe Army Permit Number: SAJ (NW-MJW) 2. Permittee Information: Name: Address: 3. Project Site Identification (physical location/address): 4. As-Built Certification: I hereby certify that the authorized work, including any mitigation required by Special Conditions to the permit, has been accomplished in accordance with the Department ofthe Army permit with any deviations noted below. This detennination is based upon on-site observation, scheduled, and conducted by me or by a project representative under my direct supervision. I have enclosed one set of as-built engineering drawings. Signature ofengineer Name (Please type) (FL, PR, or VI) Reg. Number Company Name City State ZIP (Affix Seal) Date Telephone Number
40 -2 Identify any deviations from the approved permit drawings and/or special conditions (attach additional pages ifnecessary): lf.ji.il IYiiiJ us Annv Corps or~eers. Date: May 23, 20 I 3 File# SAJ !085 (NW-M.TW) Attachment A. Page 2 of 2
41 UMAM Calculations Functional L.oss summary Perimeter Road Wetland ID Acreaaa Exlstlna UMAM Direct lmoact lacresl Secondary zon1~1~a~;"l ACRES Secondary zo1~';;~~c:;s) secondary Zone 3 {acres) RPZ UMAM WITH PROJECT RAW SCORE Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted u~~~e1 u~2!~~2 UMAM Zone3 RPZ FUNCTO LOSS Direct Impact Sacondary Zone 1 secondary Zone 2 Secondary Zone 3 FL FL FL FL (0-60'1 (50.250') RPZ GBPond GBPond e O.Q TOTALS Notes: Direct Impact FL =Acreage x Existing condttlon UMAM score: secondary Zone FL; Acreage x UMAM DeHa (difference between the Existing UMAM and the Adjusted UMAM) Surface water Impacts not included in the above UMAM calculation, acreages and UMAMs utilized from pennit SAJ o ,00 rtotal FL 0.12 I FL mitigated seg balance to mitigate 0.05 Calculates cfdference of previously mitigated areas including secondary Impacts that were assessed and mitigated on these wetlands under permtt SAJ )>"Tj cg FICC tji!) ::r:j:i: :.., 3 (J) ;;;~ ('1) > '1 ::::: ' o;n~ 0 v ""0;:;;~ Ill I ('1) cr.; o ('1) ~$: ou.p'...,_«~zn ~-w IN ~c ~~ V:\Projeds'\2010\ ~ FLL South Runway Expansion\Permtls\USACOE\perimeter road nw app\gb Pond perimeter road umam ca.lcs /17/2013
42 STANDARD PROTECTION MEASURES FOR THE EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE 1. :An eastern indigo snake protection/education plan shall be developed by the applicant or requestor for all construction personnel to follow. The plan shall be provided to the Service for review and approval at least 30 days prior to any clearing activities. The educational materials for the plan may consist ofa combination of posters, videos, pamphlets, and lectures (e.g., an observer trained to identify eastern indigo snakes could use the protection/education plan to instruct construction personnel before any clearing activities occur). Informational signs should be posted throughout the construction site and along any proposed access road to contain the following information: a. a description ofthe eastern indigo snake, its habits, and protection under Federal Law; b. instructions not to injure, harm, harass or kill this species; c. directions to cease clearing activities and allow the eastern indigo snake sufficient time to move away from the site on its own before resuming clearing; and, d. telephone numbers ofpertinent agencies to be contacted ifa dead eastern indigo snake is encountered. The dead specimen should be thoroughly soaked in water and then frozen. 2. Ifnot currently authorized through an Incidental Take Statement in association with a Biological Opinion, only individuals who have been either authorized by a section IO(a){l)(A) permit issued by the Service, or by the State offiorida through the Florida Fish Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for such activities, are permitted to come in contact with.an eastern indigo snake. 3. An eastern indigo snake monitoring report must be submitted to the appropriate Florida Field Office within 60 days ofthe conclusion ofclearing phases. The report should be. submitted whether or not eastern indigo snakes are observed. The report should contain the following information: a. any sightings ofeastern indigo snakes and b. other obligations required by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, as stipulated in the permit. Revised February 12, 2004 m USArmJCol'fiS oteautnaora. Date: May 23, 2013 File # SAJ (NW-MJW) 1\ttachment C, Page 1 of 1
43 GENERAL CONDITIONS 33 CFR PART PUBLISHED FEDERAL REGISTER DATED 13 NOVEMBER The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on March 18,2017. If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved ofthis requirement ifyou abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification ofthis permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort ofifthe site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. Ifyou sell the property associated with this permit you must obtain the signature ofthe new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer ofthis authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy ofthe certification is attached ifit contains such conditions. 6. You must allow a representative from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit.
44 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT TRANSFER REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER: SAJ (NW-MJW) When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the tenns and conditions ofthis permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) ofthe property. Although the construction period for works authorized by Department ofthe Army permits is finite, the permit itself, with its limitations, does not expire. To validate the transfer ofthis permit and the associated responsibilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below and mail to the U.S. Army Corps ofengineers, Enforcement Section, Post Office Box 4970, Jacksonville, FL (TRANSFEREE-SIGNATURE) (SUBDIVISION) (DATE) (LOT) (BLOCK) (NAME-PRINTED) (STREET ADDRESS) (MAILING ADDRESS) (CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE)
45 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION A.2 South Florida Water Management District December 2013 Page 1
46 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK December 2013 Page2
47 Form# /95 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE STANDARD PERMIT NO DATE ISSUED:May 31,2013 PERMITTEE: BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 100 AVIATION BLVD FORT LAUDERDALE, FL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modification of a surface water management system (SWMS) to serve the addition of approximately acres of roadway development and to reflect changes to the surface water management system design for a project known as FLL Perimeter Road and System Modifications. PROJECT LOCATION: BROWARD COUNTY, SEC TWP 50S RGE 42E PERMIT DURATION: See Special Condition No: 1. Pursuant to Rule 40E-4.321, Florida Administrative Code. This is to notify you of the District's agency action concerning Notice of Intent for Permit Application No , dated April 19, This action is taken pursuant to Rule 40E and Chapter 40E-40 Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Based on the information provided, District rules have been adhered to and an Environmental Resource Permit is in effect for this project subject to: 1. Not receiving a filed request for a Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, administrative hearing. 2. the attached 19 General Conditions (See Pages : 2-4 of 7),!_.. 3. the attached 21 Special Conditions (See Pages : 5-7 of 7) and.,..., 4. the attached 3 Exhibit(s) Li Should you object to these conditions, please refer to the attached "Notice of Rights" which addresses the procedures to be followed if you desire a public hearing or other review of the proposed agency action. Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning this matter. If we do not hear from you in accordance with the "Notice of Rights," we will assume that you concur with the Districfs action. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a "Notice of Rights" has been mailed to the Permittee (and the persons listed in the attached distribution list) no later than 5:00 p.m. on this 31st day of May, 2013, in accordance with Section 12~.6~~~Fio:~? _ BY. L/.tuZ~o...,. Anita R. Bain Bureau Chief- Environmental Resource Permitting Regulation Division Page 1 of7 '. (o". lj j
48 Application No.: Page2of7 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. All activities authorized by this permit shall be implemented as set forth in the plans, specifications and performance criteria as approved by this permit. Any deviation from the permitted activity and the conditions for undertaking that activity shall constitute a violation of this permit and Part IV, Chapter 373. F.S. 2. This permit or a copy thereof, complete with all conditions, attachments, exhibits, and modifications shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity. The complete permit shall be available for review at the work site upon request by District staff. The permittee shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this permit. 3. Activities approved by this permit shall be conducted in a manner which does not cause violations of State water quality standards. The permittee shall implement best management practices for erosion and pollution control to prevent violation of State water quality standards. Temporary erosion control shall be implemented prior to and during construction, and permanent control measures shall be completed within 7 days of any construction activity. Turbidity barriers shall be installed and maintained at all locations where the possibility of transferring suspended solids Into the receiving waterbody exists due to the permitted work. Turbidity barriers shall remain in place at all locations until construction is completed and soils are stabilized and vegetation has been established. All practices shall be in accordance with the guidelines and specifications described in Chapter 6 of the Florida Land Development Manual; A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management (Department of Environmental Regulation, 1988), incorporated by reference in Rule 40E-4.091, F.A.C. unless a project-specific erosion and sediment control plan is approved as part of the permit. Thereafter the permittee shall be responsible for the removal of the barriers. The permittee shall correct any erosion or shoaling that causes adverse Impacts to the water resources. 4. The permittee shall notify the District of the anticipated construction start date within 30 days of the date that this permit is issued. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of activity authorized by this permit, the permittee shall submit to the District an Environmental Resource Permit Construction Commencement Notice Form Number 0960 indicating the actual start date and the expected construction completion date.,... L.t. 5. When the duration of construction will exceed one year, the permittee shall submit construction status reports to the District on an annual basis utilizing an annual status report form. Status report forms shall be submitted the following June of each year. 6. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the permitee shall submit a written statement of completion and certification by a professional engineer or other individual authorized by law, utilizing the supplied Environmental Resource/Surface Water Management Permit Construction Completion/Certification Form Number 0881A, or Environmental Resource/Surface Water Management Permit Construction Completion Certification - For Projects Permitted prior to October 3, 1995 Form No , incorporated by reference in Rule 40E-1.659, F.A.C. The statement of completion and certification shall be based on onsite observation of construction or review of as-built drawings for the purpose of determining if the work was completed in compliance with permitted plans and specifications. This submittal shall serve to notify the District that the system Is ready for inspection. Additionally, if deviation from the approved drawings are discovered during the certification process, the certification must be accompanied by a copy of the approved permit drawings with deviations noted. Both the original and revised specifications must be clearly shown. The plans must be clearly labeled as "as-built" or "record" drawings. All surveyed dimensions and elevations shall be certified by a registered surveyor. 7. The operation phase of this permit shall not become effective: until the permittee has complied with the ri requirements of condition (6) above, and submitted a request for conversion of Environmental Resource Permitfrom Construction Phase to Operation Phase, Form No. 0920; the District determines the system to.. t.c: 0) 1;'-i., c:
49 Application No.: Page3 of7 GENERAL CONDITIONS be in compliance with the permitted plans and specifications; and the entity approved by the District in accordance with Sections 9.0 and 10.0 of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, accepts responsibility for operation and maintenance of the system. The permit shall not be transferred to such C!pproved operation and maintenance entity until the operation phase of the permit becomes effective. Following inspection and approval of the permitted system by the District, the permittee shall initiate transfer of the permit to the approved responsible operating entity if different from the permittee. Until the permit is transferred pursuant to Section 40E , F.A.C., the permittee shall be liable for compliance with the terms of the permit. 8. Each phase or independent portion of the permitted system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to the initiation of the permitted use of site infrastructure located within the area served by that portion or phase of the system. Each phase or independent portion of the system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to transfer of responsibility for operation and maintenance of the phase or portion of the system to a local government or other responsible entity. 9. For those systems that will be operated or maintained by an entity that will require an easement or deed restriction in order to enable that entity to operate or maintain the system in conformance with this permit, such easement or deed restriction must be recorded in the public records and submitted to the District along with any other final operation and maintenance documents required by Sections 9.0 and 10.0 of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit applications within the South Florida Water Management District, prior to lot or units sales or prior to the completion of the system, whichever comes first. Other documents concerning the establishment and authority of the operating entity must be filed with the Secretary of State, county or municipal entities. Final operation and maintenance documents must be received by the District when maintenance and operation of the system is accepted by the local government entity. Failure to submit the appropriate final documents will result in the permittee remaining liable for carrying out maintenance and operation of the permitted system and any other permit conditions. 10. Should any other regulatory agency require changes to the permitted system, the permittee shall notify the District in writing of the changes prior to implementation so that a determination can be made whether a permit modification is required. 11. This permit does not eliminate the necessity to obtain any required federal, state, local and special district authorizations prior to the start of any activity approved by this permit. This permit does not convey to the permittee or create in the permittee any property right, or any interest in real property, nor does it authorize any entrance upon or activities on property which is not owned or controlled by the permittee, or convey any rights or privileges other than those specified in the permit and Chapter 40E-4 or Chapter 40E-40, F.A.C The permittee is hereby advised that Section , F.S. states that a person may not commence any excavation, construction, or other activity involving the use of sovereign or other lands of the State, the title to which is vested in the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund without obtaining the required lease, license, easement, or other form of consent authorizing the proposed use. Therefore, the permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary authorizations from the Board of Trustees prior to..-! commencing activity on sovereignty lands or other state-owned lands. 13. The permittee must obtain a Water Use permit prior to construction dewatering, unless the work qualifies for a general permit pursuant to Subsection 40E (3), F.A.C., also known as the "No Notice" Rule. 14. The permittee shall hold and save the District harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities "~ : ' ~J il!,-...
50 Application No.: Page4 of7 GENERAL CONDITIONS which may arise by reason of the construction, alteration, operation, maintenance, removal, abandonment or use of any system authorized by the permit. 15. Any delineation of the extent of a wetland or other surface water submitted as part of the permit application, including plans or other supporting documentation, shall not be considered binding, unless a specific condition of this permit or a formal determination under Section (2), F.S., provides otherwise. 16. The permittee shall notify the District in writing within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other transfer of ownership or control of a permitted system or the real property on which the permitted system is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of a permit are subject to the requirements of Rules 40E and 40E , F.A.C.. The permittee transferring the permit shall remain liable for corrective actions that may be required as a result of any violations prior to the sale, conveyance or other transfer of the system. 17. Upon reasonable notice to the permittee, District authorized staff with proper identification shall have permission to enter, inspect, sample and test the system to insure conformity with the plans and specifications approved by the permit. 18. If historical or archaeological artifacts are discovered at any time on the project site, the permittee shall immediately notify the appropriate District service center. 19. The permittee shall immediately notify the District in writing of any previously submitted information that is later discovered to be inaccurate.
51 Application No.: PageS of7 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The construction phase of this permit shall expire on May 31, Operation of the surface water management system shall be the responsibility of the permittee. 3. Discharge Facilities: Basin: Western I System 1-B, Structure: CS-AV1 2-X 35.5 deg. V-NOTCHES with invert at elev..42' NAVD ' W X 8.75' L drop inlets with crest at elev. 2.25' NAVD 88. Receiving body : Dania Cut-Off Canal Control elev :.42 feet NAVD 88. Basin: Western I System 1-B, Structure: CS-AV2 2-X 35.5 deg. V-NOTCHES with invert at elev..42' NAVD ' W X 8.75' L drop inlets with crest at elev. 2.25' NAVD 88. Receiving body : Dania Cut-Off Canal Control elev:.42 feet NAVD 88. Basin: Western I System 1-B, Structure: Pond AM ' WIDE SHARP CRESTED weir with crest at elev. 2.25' NAVD ' W X 1.83' H RECTANGULAR NOTCH with invert at elev..42' NAVD 88. Receiving body : Dania Cut-Off Canal Control elev :.42 feet NAVD 88. Basin: Western I System 1-B, Structure: S-1 1-X 20 deg. V-NOTCH with invert at elev..42' NAVD ' W X 3.1' L drop inlet with crest at elev. 3' NAVD 88. Receiving body : Dania Cut-Off Canal Control elev :.42 feet NAVD 88. 0)
54 NOTICE OF RIGHTS As required by Sections (1), and (3), Fla. Stat., following is notice of the opportunities which may be available for administrative hearing or judicial review when the substantial interests of a party are determined by an agency. Please note that this Notice of Rights is not intended to provide legal advice. Not all the legal proceedings detailed below may be an applicable or appropriate remedy. You may wish to consult an attorney regarding your legal rights. RIGHT TO REQUEST ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING A person whose substantial interests are or may be affected by the South Florida Water Management Districfs (SFWMD or District) action has the right to request an administrative hearing on that action pursuant to Sections and , Fla. Stat. Persons seeking a hearing on a District decision which does or may determine their substantial interests shall file a petition for hearing with the District Clerk within 21 days of receipt of written notice of the decision, unless one of the following shorter time periods apply: 1) within 14 days of the notice of consolidated intent to grant or deny concurrently reviewed applications for environmental resource permits and use of sovereign submerged lands pursuant to Section , Fla. Stat.; or 2) within 14 days of service of an Administrative Order pursuant to Subsection (1 ), Fla. Stat. "Receipt of written notice of agency decision means receipt of either written notice through mail, or electronic mail, or posting that the District has or intends to take final agency action, or publication of notice that the District has or intends to take final agency action. Any person who receives written notice of a SFWMD decision and fails to file a written request for hearing within the timeframe described above waives the right to request ahearing on that decision. Filing Instructions The Petition must be filed with the Office of the District Clerk of the SFWMD. Filings with the District Clerk may be made by mail, hand-delivery or facsimile. Filings by will not be accepted. Any person wishing to receive a clerked copy with the date and time stamped must provide an additional copy. A petition for administrative hearing is deemed filed upon receipt during normal business hours by the District Clerk at SFWMD headquarters in West Palm Beach, Florida. Any document received by the office of the 0:) SFWMD Clerk after 5:00 p.m. shall be filed as of 8:00 a.m. on the next regular business day. Additional filing instructions are as follows: Filings by mail must be addressed to the Office of the SFWMD Clerk, P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, Florida Filings by hand-delivery must be delivered to the Office of the SFWMD Clerk. Delivery of a petition to the SFWMD's security desk does not constitute filing. To ensure proper filing, it will be necessary to request the SFWMD's security officer to contact the Clerk's office. An employee of the SFWMD's Clerk's office will receive and file the petition. Filings by facsimile must be transmitted to the SFWMD Clerk's Office at (561) Pursuant to Subsections (7), (8) and (9), Fla. Admin. Code, a party who files a document by facsimile represents that the original physically signed document will be retained by that party for the duration of that proceeding and of any subsequent appeal or subsequent proceeding in that cause. Any party who elects to file any document by facsimile shall be responsible for any delay, disruption, or interruption of the electronic signals and accepts the full risk that the document may not be properly filed with the clerk as a result. The filing date for a document filed by facsimile shall be the date the SFWMD Clerk receives the complete document w:.. Rev. 07/01/2009 " -
55 Initiation of an Administrative Hearing Pursuant to Rules and , Fla. Admin. Code, initiation of an administrative hearing shall be made by written petition to the SFWMD in legible form and on 8 and 1/2 by 11 inch white paper. All petitions shall contain: 1. Identification of the action being contested, including the permit number, application number, District file number or any other SFWMD identification number, if known. 2. The name, address and telephone number of the petitioner and petitioner's representative, if any. 3. An explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination. 4. A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the SFWMD's decision. 5. A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate. 6. A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the SFWMD's proposed action. 7. Astatement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the SFWMD's proposed action. 8. If disputed issues of material fact exist, the statement must also include an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes. 9. A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action the petitioner wishes the SFWMD to take with respect to the SFWMD's proposed action. Aperson may file a request for an extension of time for filing a petition. The SFWMD may, for good cause, grant the request. Requests for extension of time must be filed with the SFWMD prior to the deadline for filing a petition for hearing. Such requests for extension shall contain a certificate that the moving party has consulted with all other parties concerning the extension and that the SFWMD and any other parties agree to or oppose the extension. Atimely request for extension of time shall toll the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. If the District takes action with substantially different impacts on water resources from the notice of intended 0:) agency decision, the persons who may be substantially affected shall have an additional point of entry pursuantto Rule , Fla. Admin. Code, unless otherwise provided by law. Mediation The procedures for pursuing mediation are set forth in Section , Fla. Stat., and Rules and , Fla. Admin. Code. The SFWMD is not proposing mediation for this agency action under Section , Fla. Stat., at this time. RIGHT TO SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW Pursuant to Sections (3} and , Fla. Stat., a party who is adversely affected by final SFWMD action may seek judicial review of the SFWMD's final decision by filing a notice of appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure in the Fourth District Court of Appeal or in the appellate district where a party resides and filing a second copy of the notice with the SFWMD Clerk within 30 days of rendering of the final SFWMD action. Rev. 07/01/ \/.l
56 erp_staff_report.rdf Last Date For Agency Action: June 18,2013 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT STAFF REPORT Project Name: Permit No.: F L L Perimeter Road And System Modifications S Application No.: Associated File: ERP Concurrent Application Type: Environmental Resource (General Permit Modification) Location: Permittee : Operating Entity : Broward County, S26-28/T50S/R42E Broward County Board Of County Commissioners Permittee Project Area: acres Project Land Use: Airport Related Facilities Roadway Drainage Basin: INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Receiving Body: Dania Cut-Off Canal Class: CLASS Ill Special Drainage District: NA Total Acres Wetland Onsite: 1.84 Total Acres Impacted Onsite: 1.84 Total Acres Presv/Mit Compensation Offslte: 1.39 Conservation Easement To District: Sovereign Submerged Lands: No No This application is a request to modify Permit No S for the construction and operation of a surface water management system (SWMS) to serve the addition of approximately acres of roadway development and to reflect changes to the surface water management system design for a project known as FLL Perimeter Road and System Modifications. App.no. : Page 1 of9 f.f;
57 erp_staff_report.rdf PROJECT EVALUATION: The Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport Is located in central Broward County. The project area is bordered on the west by 1-95, on the north by 1-595, on the east by Port Everglades and on the south by Griffin Road. The site contains a variety of airport related facilities and associated runways. The Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport was originally permitted on March 12, 1981, under Application No D, Permit No S. Many applications for construction and operation have been issued since, all of which reside under Permit No S. On August 8, 2011, a permit modification under Application No granted authorization for construction and operation of a surface water management system to serve a acre drainage area and a acre construction area of airport development associated with the expansion of Runway 9R-27L. Under said application, major drainage basins within the airport were merged and modeled to accurately represent existing and proposed stormwater conditions. Proposed is the modification of Permit No S for the construction and operation of a surface water management system (SWMS) to serve the addition of approximately acres of roadway development (Perimeter Road) and to reflect changes to the design of the SWMS of the airport. The proposed surface water management system will consist of inlets, culverts, dry detention areas and wet detention areas which will provide water quality treatment and attenuation prior to discharge into the Dania Cut-Off Canal through six (6) control structures (see Discharge Structures). This application modifies the scope of Application No as follows: -Under Application No , Perimeter Road was proposed to be severed and decommissioned at the southwest comer of the FLL Airport. Broward County now desires to reconstruct and realign Perimeter Road thereby increasing the contributory drainage area from acres to acres and the proposed construction area from to acres. - The French Drain basin and the associated control structure (Structure FD-4) have been eliminated from the proposed site plan. No exfiltration trench is proposed in this application. -Detention Areas R1 and W1 have been Increased in size in order to mitigate for the removal of the French Drain System. -Pond AV has been split into two (2) separate dry detention areas (AV East & AV West). - Basins AV2 & B27 have been eliminated as separate basins and incorporated Into Basin AV as a result of the Perimeter Road construction. Also, modifications have been made to said basins in the Existing Conditions model to more accurately represent current conditions. - Control Structures CS-AV1 & CS-AV2 have been modified to increase the size of the drop-inlet wiers from 6.58-feet to 8.75-feet In legnth. All future proposed modifications within the Western I System 1-B basin, the Southeast System basin or the FOOT US 1 I System 2.basin should consult this application (Application No ) for reference. "Ci App.no.: Page 2 of9 ru
58 erp_staff_report.rdf As a result of this application, the French Drain System, previously permitted under Application No has been eliminated from the surface water management system design. The area that encompassed said system will now be incorporated into the Western I System 1-B basin. Construction Basin: FOOT US-11 System 2 Total Basin Building Coverage Dry Detention Areas Lake Pavement Pervious Total: acres acres acres acres acres Basin: SE System Total Basin Pavement Pervious Total: acres acres c:.! Basin: Western I System 1-B Total Basin Building Coverage Dry Detention Areas Lake Pavement Pervious Total: acres acres acres acres acres IIIIIIIIIDBIIIIIBB'~Ilfl~l!lillillliiiHlRffi~ Under the section titled Discharge Structures, please note the following as it relates to Application No : -The Drop Inlet length of Structures CS-AV1 &CS-AV2 has increased from 6.58-feet to 8.75-feet. -Structure FD-4 has been removed from the project design. - The remaining Discharge Structures remain consistent with the previous approval. --,.. Discharge Rate : The applicant has submitted an analysis which demonstrates that the post-development peak discharge rate for the 25-year 3-day design storm event will not exceed the existing condition. App.no.: Page 3 of9 u I.~. Ill
59 erp_staff_report.rdf Control Elevation : Basin Area Ctrl Elev wswr Ctrl Elev Method Of (Acres) ( ft, NAVD 88) ( ft, NAVD 88) Determination Western I System 1-B Previously Permitted FOOT US-1 I System Previously Permitted 2 SE System Previously Permitted Receiving Body : Basin Str.# Receiving Body Western I System 1-B CS-AV1 Dania Cut-Off Canal Western I System 1-B CS-AV2 Dania Cut-Off Canal Western I System 1-B PondAM-1 Dania Cut-Off Canal Western I System 1-B S-1 Dania Cut-Off Canal Fdot Us-11 System 2 US1-10B Dania Cut-Off Canal Fdot Us-1 I System 2 US1-14 Dania Cut-Off Canal Discharge Structures: Note: The units for all the elevation values of structures are ( ft, NAVD 88) Bleeders: Basin Str# Count Type Width Height Length Dia. Invert Invert Elev. FDOTUS-1 US1-10B 1 V-Notch An~ ' i::! I System2 deg. I~ FOOT U5-1 US V-Notch 2.08' (l;' I System2 deg. t:i Western/ CS-AV1 2 V-Notch 1.83' System 1-B deg. Western I CS-AV2 2 V-Notch 1.83' System 1-B deg. Western I PondAM-1 1 Rectangular Notch.5' 1.83'.42 System 1-B Western/ S-1 1 V-Notch 2.58' 20 deg..42 System 1-B Inlets: Basin Str# Count Type Width Length Dia. CrestEiev. Western I System 1-B C5-AV1 2 Drop Inlet 3' 8.75' 2.25 Western I System 1-B CS-AV2 2 Drop Inlet 3' 8.75' 2.25 Western I System 1-B S-1 1 Drop Inlet 2' 3.1' 3 f(l Weirs: Basin Str# Count Type Width Height Length Dla. Elev. (\j --~~ FOOT US-11 US1-10B 1 Sharp Crested 8' 2.5 (crest) System 2 FOOT U5-11 US Sharp Crested 8' 2.5 (crest) ~~!'(} -... System2 t.ct Western I PondAM-1 1 Sharp Crested 275' 2.25 (crest)!:: System 1-B..,., -~. tt"l ::-! r-1.-!.-. ~-; App.no. : Page4of9 Q; c: c: u ' r. I ) ~
60 erp_staff_report.rdf The required water quality treatment (2.5" times percent impervious) will be provided in numerous dry and wet detention areas which will discharge through six (6) control structures and ultimately into the Dania Cut-Off Canal. In addition, the applicant has submitted nutrient loading analysis which demonstrates that the postdevelopment nutrient loads will be reduced when compared to the existing condition. Basin Treatment Method Vol Req.d Vol (ae-ft) Prov'd Western I System 1 Treatment Dry And Wet B Detention FOOT US-1/ Treatment Dry And Wet System 2 Detention f ~.. '; 1 1.~ f.f~!,', '. I!..~ ~ :,~;A ~~.~~.. ),"_, l! Impacts to the onslte Greenbelt Lakes wetlands and Wetland N3a (Exhibit 3) were previously permitted as part of Application No , Permit No S, issued on August, The prior construction permit for the Fort Lauderdale International Airport expansion authorized a total of 0.12 acre of direct wetland impacts, 0.09 acre of secondary impacts (0'-50' zone), and 0.32 acre of secondary Impacts (50'-250' zone) to the Greenbelt Lakes. The current Perimeter Road modifications would result in a total of 0.25 acre of direct wetland impacts, 0.15 acre of secondary impacts (0'-50' zone), and 0.15 acre of secondary impacts (50'-250' zone) to the Greenbelt Lakes. c [J::: In addition, minor design changes are required adjacent to Wetland N3a due to emergency access concerns. The previous ERP authorized a total of 1.51 acres of direct wetland impacts, 0.72 acre of secondary Impacts (0'-50' zone), and 0.96 acre of secondary impacts (50'-250' zone) to Wetland N3a. The current design modifications would result in a total of 1.59 acres of direct wetland impacts, 0.67 acre of secondary impacts (0'-50' zone), and 0.93 acre of secondary Impacts (50'-250' zone) to Wetland N3a. However, a portion of these wetland impacts have already been offset as part of Application No , Permit No S. While 0.69 functional unit is calculated in the summary table below, a total of 0.62 functional units of this requirement have already been provided through prior project permits. Therefore, only an additional mitigation balance of 0.07 functional unit at Segment 3 of the West Lake Park Restoration project (SFWMD ERP No P) is required for the current modification. Concurrent Application No has been submitted to utilize 0.07 offsite functional unit at Segment 3 of the Westlake Park Restoration project for the proposed modified wetland impacts (Exhibit 3). () App.no.: Page5of9 u
61 erp_staff_report.rdf Wetland Inventory : CONSTRUCTION MOD -FLL PERIMETER ROAD Site ld Pre-Development Post-Development Pre Flue cs AA Type Acreage (Acres) Current Wo Pres With Project Time Lag (Yrs) Risk Factor Pres. Adj. Post Factor Fluccs Adj Delta Functional Gain I Loss GBE1 OFF 642 Secondary.02 GBE2 GBW1 OFF 642 OFF 642 Secondary Secondary GBW2 OFF 642 Secondary N3A1 OFF 642 Secondary N3A2 OFF 642 Secondary GBE ON 642 Direct GBW ON 642 Direct N3A ON 642 Direct Total: Wetland Inventory : Pre AA Flue Acreage Type cs (Acres) A OFF 743 Restoration/Creation CONSTRUCTION MOD -WESTLAKE PARK INCREMENT 3 --~ Site Site ~--Ty _ Pre-Development Post-Develop~e~ Total: 1.39 Current Wo Pres Pres. With Time Risk Adj. Post Adj Functional Project Lag (Yrs) Factor Factor Fluccs Delta Gain I Loss 426 Fluccs Code Descrletion 170 Institutional 426 Tropical Hardwoods 642 Saltwater Marshes 743 Spoil Areas It is suggested that the permittee retain the services of a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida for periodic observation of construction of the surface water management (SWM) system. This will facilitate the completion of construction completion certification Form #0881 which is required pursuant to Section 10 of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, and Rule 40E-4.361(2), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Pursuant to Chapter 40E-4 F.A.C., this permit may not be converted from the construction phase to the operation phase until certification of the SWM system is submitted to and accepted by this District. Rule 40E-4.321(7) F.A.C. states that failure to complete construction of the SWM system and obtain operation phase approval from the District within the permit duration shall require a new permit authorization unless ;""-: (\j () App.no.: Page6of9 ij.)
62 erp_staff_report.rdf a permit extension is granted. The permittee is advised that the efficiency of a SWM system will normally decrease over time unless the system is periodically maintained. A significant reduction in flow capacity can usually be attributed to partial blockages of the conveyance system. Once flow capacity is compromised, flooding of the project may result. Maintenance of the SWM system is required to protect the public health, safety and the natural resources of the state. Therefore, the permittee must have periodic inspections of the SWM system performed to ensure performance for flood protection and water quality purposes. If deficiencies are found, it is the responsibility of the permittee to correct these deficiencies in a timely manner.... r-. r ; - u: C: -~ \-' App.no. : Page7of9 ::::
63 erp_staff_report.rdf RELATED CONCERNS: Water Use Permit Status: Water Use Permit No W (dewatering) has been issued for this project. No landscape irrigation is proposed that would require modification of existing consumptive use permits. This permit does not release the permittee from obtaining all necessary Water Use authorization(s) prior to the commencement of activities which will require such authorization, including irrigation. CERP: The proposed project is not located within or adjacent to a Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Project component. Potable Water Supplier: Not Applicable Waste Water System/Supplier: Not Applicable Right Of Way Permit Status: A District Right-of-Way Permit is not required for this project. Historical/Archeological Resources: c:~ No information has been received that indicates the presence of archaeological or historical resources in the project area or indicating that the project will have any effect upon significant historic properties listed, or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Third Party Interest: No third party has contacted the District with concerns about this application. Enforcement: There has been no enforcement activity associated with this application. STAFF REVIEW: DIVISION APPROVAL: (\i DATE:._~=~r...::bo~~'~3 tc:,-. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT: App.no.: Page 8of9 :::: rq,. ' -
64 erp_staff_report.rdf Carlos A. de Rojas, P.E. DATE:._ s/t?/j.!..._.!... -= ! (\j App.no. : Page9of9 c: f.f;
65 Table of Contents for Staff Report Exhibits FLL Perimeter Road and System Modifications Application No Permit No S 1.0 Location Map 2.0 Paving, Grading and Drainage Plans I Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 3.0 Wetland Information -. Page 1 of 1
66 .I BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Legend ' lzzj Application Application Number: Sec 26-28/ Twp 50 I Rge 42 Project Name: F L L PERIMETER ROAD AND SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS r._.: l:: ~ r.: 1 Map Date: ;,28 Permit Number: !a::.S 0 1,850 3,700 Feet Exhibit ~:::
67 APPLICATION No PERMIT No S FLL Perimeter Road and System Modifications EXHIBIT NUMBER 2 PLAN SET TITLED: The Expansion of Runway 9R-27L Project ID INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
68 m >< I OJ ~ w 0...., AVIATION ~PARTIItiNT 100 AVIATIOM DEPARtMENT FcmT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA. Wt5 ~t.un'iociigkdi )> "'U "'U r E 0 z --3. w 0 _.::: CD I --3. THE EXPANSION OF RUNWAY 9R-27L WETLAND EXHIBIT 1 NEW AIRFIELD PAVEMENT m FEISsnJOY UMJT$ WCTLANDS TO REMAIH STORMWATERMANAGEMENTFACIUTII!S - FElS STUDY LIMITS SECONDARY IMPACTED WETLANDS (0-50' ZONE) NEW RUNWAY AND TAXIWAY STRUClUR 5 cc C GUDE SLOPE CRITJCALAREA ~ STORMWATER MGMT. AREAS PER SFWMD ERP [J'T1] WCTLANOS IDENTIFIED OUTSIDE OF FEJS STUOV UMITS w ~ DIREcnYIMPAClEDSURFACEWATERS FEIS STUDY UMITS SECONDARY IMPACTED WETLANDS (50'450' ZONE) "'U ~ ~~:.=~':!;..~~~~:..AREA NEW MECHANICALLY STABlLIZED EARTH (MSE) WALL r---1 PROJECT UMR'S (TOTAL AREA Ac.l ~~~~~~~ FEIS STUDY limits SECONDARY IMPACTED WETLANDS (RPZ) Ill FEIS STUDY LIMITS WETLANDS LOCATED WITHIN P RMmEO ~ IMPERVIOUS AREA ( Ac.) APPUCATION NO A CD EXISTING RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ) [_] NE 10TH STREET PROJECT (BY OTHERS) - PERVIOUS AREA ( Ac.1 iifill!flj FEI$ STUDY UMITS DIREcnY IMPACTED WETLANDS --3. C::: PROPOSED RUNWAY PROTEcnDN ZONE (RPZ) 0 0
69 UMAM Calculations Functional Loss Summary FLL South Runway Expansion ~ Modification for N3a and perimeter road relocation ACRES Secondary Secondwy Secondary m Direct Zone 1 (acres) Zone 2 (acres) Zone 3 (acres) Wetland to Acreaae ExistlnaUMAM lmaact lacresl ftl RPZ >< :::c W N3a OJ GBPond w f GBPond e w 0 TOTALS L_~] Notes: UMAM WITH PROJECT RAW SCORE Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted UMAM.Zone 1 UMAM-Zone2 UMAM Zone ftl ftl RPZ Direct Impact FL =Acreage x Existing Cond~ion UMAM score: Secondary Zone FL =Acreage x UMAM Delta (difference between the Existing UMAM and the Adjusted UMAM) Surface water impacts not included in the above UMAM calculation Direct Impact FL Secondary Zone 1 FL 10-50~ FUNCTONAL LOSS Secondary Zone 2 FL '1 Secondary Zone 3 FL RPZ [ToiiifFL U9 I FL miligakld pnwious/y In segment 1 miligalion 0.62 FL balance to be mitigated in Segment 3 mitigation 0.07 """Secondary Zone out 250': FL calculated using an adjusted UMAM value. Two secondary zones proposed: o-50 It, 5().250 It )> ij ij r E 0 z ~ w 0 ~ ~ c:o I ~ calculates addftjonal mitigation difference required for modil'ications associated with n3a ancl perimeter road ij Ill co CD 1\.) 0-w V:\Projects\2010\ FLL South Runway Expansion\Permits\Perimeter Road Apptication\Orah package from RSH \ML comments and revised tables \mod 1 wauand umam perimater road n3a
70 OFFSITE MITIGATION AREA BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Legend N A I/ J Application Map Date: Application Number: Permit Number: P Sec 35,36 I Twp 50 I Rge 42 Project Name: WEST LAKE PARK MITIGATION PROJECT EXHIBIT3.0 APPLICATION Page 3 of3 Miles
71 STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST F L L PERIMETER ROAD AND SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS Application No: Permit No: S INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION X Joseph D. Santangelo X Robert F. Hopper X Permittee - Broward County Board Of County X Carlos A. de Rojas, P.E. Commissioners X Barbara J. Conmy X Agent - Broward County Aviation Department X ERC Engineering X Engr Consultant - Reynolds Smith And Hills Inc X ERC Environmental X J. Gronberg GOVERNMENT AGENCIES X X X Broward County - Director, Water Mgmt Div Broward County Engineer Div of Recreation and Park - District 5 - FDEP OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES X Audubon of Florida - Charles Lee -.. Ui ::: (/~
72 STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST ADDRESSES Broward County Aviation Department 100 Aviation Blvd Fort Lauderdale FL Broward County Board Of County Commissioners 100 Aviation Blvd Fort Lauderdale FL Reynolds Smith And Hills Inc 3125 W Commercial Blvd Suite 130 Fort Lauderdale FL chris.jackson@rsandh.com Broward County - Director, Water Mgmt Div 2555 W Copans Rd Pompano FL jcrouse@broward.org Div of Recreation and Park - District 5 - FDEP Se Federal Highway Hobe Sound FL miranda.cunningham@dep.state.fl.us Audubon of Florida - Charles Lee 1101 Audubon Way Maitland FL chlee2@earthlink.net Broward County Engineer 115 S. Andrews Avenue Room 321 Fort Lauderdale FL amalcolm@broward.org er:...-.~... d...~. (\j ~.,, Application No: Page2 of2 '1! ~... u
73 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION A.3 Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department December 2013 Page 1
74 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK December 2013 Page 2
75 IMWo*UIIII M4J Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department ENVIRONMENTAL LICENSING and BUILDING PERMITTING DtVISION 1 North University Drive, Suite 201A, Plantation, Florida FAX May 28,2013 Broward County Aviation Department c/o Mr. Kent G. George 100 Aviation Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida Re: Modification to Environmental!Resource License No. DFl0-1174: Perimeter Road Realignment & Reconstruction mnd Design Cbamges for Emergency Access Dear Mr. George: Pursuant to the request submitted by Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc., this letter is to certify that Environmental Resource License No. DF is hereby modified. The modification authorizes the realignment and reconstruction of Perimeter Road which shall impact additional wetlands in the Greenbelt Lakes. In addition, design changes to accommodate emergency access shall result in additional wetland impacts to Wetland N3a. These modifications shall result in 0.21 acre ofadditional direct wetland impacts (total direct impacts increased to acres by filling with approximately 993,320 cubic yards (6,062 cubic yards of fill below SHWT/MHWL) of clean material), 0.01 acre of additional secondary wetland impacts (0'-50' zone) and 0.20 acre of reduced secondary wetland impacts (50'-250' zone) requiring 0.07 functional units of mitigation to offset additional wetland impacts which increases the total functional units required from 7.97 to A modification to Environmental Resource License No. DF03-lll7 shall be required to debit these units. This modification does not relieve the applicant from obtaining additional authorizations from other agencies. The modification is contingent upon the following revisions to these Specific Conditions: A Standard 6. This license authorizes acres of direct wetland impacts by filling with approximately 993,320 cubic yards (6,062 cubic yards of ftll below SHWT/MHWL) of clean material to accommodate the expansion of runway 9R-27L within the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. The proposed construction will include the expansion of runway 9R-27L by creating a 150 foot wide by 8,000 foot long impervious area, a new taxiway system, navigational aide (NAV AIDS) lighting system and 4,019.6 linear feet of mechanically stabilized earthen (MSE) wall. B. Off-Site Compensatory Mitigation (Area) I. Compensatory mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts is located within Broward County's West Lake Park and authorized by Environmental Resource License No. DF The acres of direct impacts shall require 6.64 functional units of mitigation; however, secondary impacts were evaluated by other agencies resulting in a total of 8.04 functional units of mitigation required to offset all wetland impacts. Broward County Board of County Commissioners Sue Gunzburger Dale V.C. Holness Kristin Jacobs Martin David Klar Chip LaMarca Stacy Ritter Tim Ryan Barbara Sharief Lois Wexler
76 The attached drawings, showing details of a portion of the work, shall replace sheets stamped and numbered 4, 5, 6, 13, 14, 21, 63 and 64 by the County. The original scope of work and au conditionsofthe license shall remain the same except for the changes indicated above. Attach this letter and drawings to the original license as they become a part thereof. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Marisa Magrino at (954) Sincerely, ~(;-~~A-1~ Linda Sunderland, NRS IV Aquatic & Wetland Resources Program ENC: I. One (1) set ofstamped drawings ('7 pages) 2. Copy ofvariance and Administrative Review Procedures CC: 1. Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc.- Chris Jackson, P.E. (via e--mail) 2. Miller l..egg, Inc. - Dylan Larson (via ) 3. Broward County Aviation Department- Dave Roepnack (via ) 4. South Florida Water Management Department - Rob Hopper (via ) 5. Army Corps ofengineers- Melody White (via )
77 Sec Administrative review ofepd determinations. (a) A ~erson with a substantial interest may file a petition to request review of or to intervene in a review ofa final administrative determination made pursuant to this chapter concerning: (1) The requirement that a facility or activity obtain a license or environmental review approval. (2) Interpretations oflicense or environmental review approval conditions. (3) Interpretations ofvariance conditions. (4) The decision to suspend or revoke a license or environmental review approval. (5) The requirement ofcertain license conditions. (6) The issuance ofa license or environmental review approval. (7) The denial ofa license or environmental review approval. (8) The scope ofa license or environmental review approval, geographic or otherwise. (9) The scope ofa variance, geographic or otherwise. (10) The issuance ofa stop work order. (11) Similar final administrative determinations. This administrative review procedure shall be the only means of review available for the above final administrative determinations by either the petitioner or the intervenor (the parties). (b) person may not obtain review by this procedure of: (1) The issuance or adjudication of or other matters involving a notice of violation or a citation. (2) Internal policy decisions (c) A person desiring a review of a staff determination made pursuant to this Chapter shall first bring the determination to the attention of the appropriate section supervisor to attempt to resolve the matter. If a resolution cannot be reached, then the decision shall be reviewed by successive supervisozy levels until the issue is resolved or reaches the level of the director or his or her designee for the final deteimination. (d) A person desiring administrative review of a final determination made by the director or the designee shall file a petition with the director for review by the hearing examiner. The petition shall be filed within ten (1 0) days from the rendition of the action taken or ofthe decision made by the director. An entity whose license or approval is being challenged shall be a party to the action. (e) The review shall not be heard until the provisions ofsubsection (f) are met. Upon motion to the hearing examiner, an insufficient petition shall be dismissed with or without leave to refile. Ifa petition is determined to be insufficient by the hearing examiner and the petitioner has been given leave to refile by the hearing examiner, unless otherwise ordered by the hearing examiner, the petitioner must refile within ten (1 0) days of the rendition of the order of dismissal or the petition will be dismissed with prejudice. (f) A sufficient petition for review or petition for intervention in the review shall, at a minimum, contain the following information: (1) The nature ofthe determination sought to be reviewed.
78 (2) A short, plain statement of the facts which form the subject matter upon which the determination was made as asserted by all parties of record at the time that the petition is filed; a statement of the material facts in dispute, if any. If any party is unable to state the matters in sufficient detail at the time initial petition is filed, the petition may be limited to a statement of the issues involved; and thereafter, upon timely written motion. a more definite and detailed statement shall be furnished not less than seven (7) days prior to the date set for the hearing. (3) The specific determination for which the review is sought. (4) The specific legal grounds upon which the parties seek review of the determination. (5) A short statement of the petitioner's or the intervenor's substantial interest in the matter to be reviewed. (6) The specific section of this chapter on which the decision is based, if known. and the specific section that the parties allege should control the decision. ifknown. (7) A copy of the director's or the designee's written final determination. (8) A statement of the relief requested stating precisely the action that the petitioner wants EPD to take with respect to the final determination. (g) All pleadings or other documents filed in the proceeding must be signed by a party, the party's attorney, or the party's qualified representative. The signatui:e of a party, the party's attorney or a party's qualified representative constitutes a certificate that he or she has read the pleading or other document and that to the best of his or her knowledge, infomiation. and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, it is not brought for any improper purposes, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay ar for frivolous purpose or needless increase in the cost of litigation. If a pleading or other d09ument is signed in violation of these requirements, the hearing examiner, upon motion or his oi her own initiative, shall dismiss the matter. (h) A petitioner or intervenor may request an emergency hearing to stay all activities or work conducted pursuant to the challenged license or approval. Such petitioner or intervenor has the burden of proof to show by a prepo~derance of ~e evidence that the continued activities would cause substantial pollution or degradation to the environment. An emergency hearing sball be scheduled by EPD and be held within five (5) days of said request or as soon thereafter as possible Sl,ibject to 1;he availability of the hearing examiner. The petitione~; or interv~or shall comply With the notice provisions of section 27-~4(j)(2)a. and c. and section 27-14(j)(3) and (4) ofthis chapter. (i) (j) The petition for review will not stay environmental protection activities required for the remediation or mitigation. of a site or facility, the protection of the environment or the health,. safety and welfare ofthe citizens ofbroward County, or the prevention of fijrther environmental degradation. The person responsible for these activities must take all necessaiy steps to prevent environmental degradation and must conduct the remediation or mitigati~ activities required by this chapter. The director may allow these activities to be delayed until after the hearing examiner's decis"ion by certlfying to the hearing examiner that, by reason of facts stated in the certificate, a delay in the initiation or completion. of these ac::tivities would not cause substantial environmental degradation or peru to life or property. The delay for conducting these activities may be subject to appropriate terms to ensure protection of the environment. The person responsible for these activities shall be responsible for any environmental damage or any violation ofthis chap~er caused by the delay. Notice and Schedulirig Reqv.irements:
79 (1) The hearing on the review shall be scheduled within a reasonable time. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to request through EPD that the hearing date be scheduled It shall also be the responsibility ofthe petitioner to give notice in accordance with this section at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. (2) The petitioner shall give notice ofthe hearing by: a. Giving personal notice to all proper parties; and b. Publishing notice on two (2) days in a newspaper of general circulation in the county; and c. Posting notice at a location determined by the Broward County Administrator's Office. (3) The petitioner shall bear the cost of giving notice. (4) The notice shall contain, at a minimum: a. A description and location of the facility or the activity to be conducted by the petitioner; and b. The time and place ofthe hearing. (k) The petitioner shall bear the cost of accurately and completely preserving all testimony and providing full or partial transcripts to all parties. (1) The hearing shall be a quasi-judicial hearing. (1) The applicant/petitioner requesting the administrative review, any intervenor/petitioner and EPD shall have an opportunity to respond to and to present witnesses, other evidence and argument on all issues involved, to conduct cross-examination and submit rebuttal evidence, to submit proposed findings offacts and orders, and to be represented by counsel. Members of the general public who are not intervenors as set forth in Section of this chapter are not parties to the proceeding. (2) When appropriate, the general public may be given an opportunity to present oral or written communications. If the hearing examiner proposes to consider such material, then all parties shall be given an opportunity to cross-examine, challenge or rebut it. (m) Denial, protest ot: revocation, or suspension ofa license, environmental review approval, or any other approval: (1) In regard to denial or protest of approval of a license and any other review of an administrative decision, notwithstanding (2) below, the petitioner shall have the burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the determination of the director was an arbit:raiy and/or capricious abuse of discretion, not supported by competent, substantial evidence or not in conformance with the essential requirements of this chapter. The hearing examiner shall not substitute his or her judgment for that ofepd on an issue ofdiscretion even though the hearing examiner may have reached a different conclusion based on the same facts. (2) In an action to revoke or suspend a valid license or approval, the burden shall be upon EPD to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence in an administrative hearing, the grounds for revocation or suspension. The license holder or approval recipient shall be provided notice of the hearing and a copy of the petition stating the grounds for revocation or suspension as provided in section of this chapter. The petition shall state with specificity the acts complained of in order to allow the license holder or
80 approval recipient an opportunity to prepare a defense. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions ofsection of this chapter. (n) Findings of fact shall be based exclusively on the evidence of record and on matters officially recognized. (o) Ifthe hearing examiner finds that the director or his or her ~ignee has erroneously interpreted a provision and that a correct interpretation compels a particular action, he or she sbal1 remand the case to. the director or his or her designee for further action under a correct interpretation of the provision. (p) The hearing examiner shall complete and submit to the director and all parties a final order consisting ofhis or her findings of fact and conclusions oflaw. (q) A party to the hearing may obtain appellate review of the final order as provided by section ofthis chapter. (r) A petitioner or ~tervenor shall pay afiling fee at the time the application for review is filed. The amount of the filing fee shall be set by resolution of the Board. (Ord. No , 1, ; Ord. No , 2.03, ) Sees Reserved.
81 EXIS'IlNG GREENBELT PIPE OUTFALL Ra..OCATED OUTFALL TO GREE:NB LT I..AI<E ir ; ~ ~ 131 u: PROPOS!). RETAINING WALL 273 II PROPostO RETAINING WALL C EXISllNG PROPERlY Gtui'FINflO. --~~ 1 BOUNOARPIELS PL -----! J BHOWARD COUN1 Y PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT. \L REGULA.TION DIVISION ENV180NMENT.II.L RESOURCE LICENSE BROWA~ COUNTi GOOf 2/-331 TO ~#~g!jr:d I Jlk~f;t. 1\C. ~l-0.""-~-'-~'-l f,:( r:rj... -:Jl:;t - ~ Lllllllll8> - li 1ING) ZONE 1 (It - 10') PROJECT!.D. No.: RLI# R07291 OR 1 COUNTY: BROWARD NAME:.~~~~~~~~~_w~ ~~~~~~~~~==~~~~~~~ 1=:-,,.-----;:;=---;::= SIGNATURE: OD CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1 /13 0 NORTH re o re 1110 tifj\j"jjj I I GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES EPD X CG SHEET No.: 4 COE X WMD X DATE: 4/1/13
82 RUNWAY 101M& BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION DIVISION RESOURCE LICENSE TO NO.~&l:H LE8IINII -~- (tf-80') PROJECT 1.0. No.: RU# R072910Rl FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COUNTY: BROWARD NAME: CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON, P.E. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXPANSION TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 S 42 E 28 OF RUNWAY 9R-27L SIGNATURE: CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1/13 EPD COE 0 NORTH 7t 0 Tl ,.. GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES X CG SHEET No.: 5 X WMD X DATE: 4/1/13
83 ---- Q 1 ", / -~. ~ U\1<"' r.-;t~~~~}~'r''?,.,a -.-.-_,_ -.~-.. RUHWAY10Ra8L '~ I ~x.~x~ ~ ')C')C..._._ fet ~ ~ _, ~~:;~~~~r:: jc:-1 / 9' /~..... :'1> --.., i~'\;9;-!:;-<c!'. /:_ _, -., - I "-. '~~~ ~ I A~AREA ~ ~/.,...,.1.:, X,_ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 1' AVAlOS ] 1 l~"~~""~~""""~"~~~~j ~ :>< >1f. ACCESS ROAD ~) ~ -X \. ~ o..ai.roo "" PJt(J)(IS 0 NC()tftCAtlOHS ASSOOATED WITH '" - -., _... -E tl.o ~~. )(~~-,... I., y Y)(YYY"'ffio I ~--.: )0000< >< ::X ><N X XXX "" ( ~ <"""III'CAL AREA..w>s-.. E>II:R"..t. cr ACCESS ~ I ~WAIJ. _j ~ X)< ::X Xf I =fp!...,." -1''-. 1,370 LF '"--~ ::X W~ YY ~ '.. (THIS SHEET) l y 1\.... ". i y I! I, '.w ~ " -~..._ ~ : ~~ \fl't!-n31ji :Jij~EXISnNG PROPERlY --2.; _..:JC L BOUNDARIES ' --4 t'_l.j.=_j_j ~ _L_L_L E X X y X -~ Xx -~ ~ ~ _t1 ~. w _L L ~ ~~ X'>< X ~ti:~j PROJECT 1.0. No.: COUNTY: BROWARD r.. ~,-~ 17 " ""--EXISlJNG PRO!lY _ ld BOUNDARIES 1d. "'kld '' "'...:--.:. 'I.IC. '. <>A:,,.. : rpl --.._ '<:::~ '>~. ~ RU# R07291 OR 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXPANSION OF TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 S 42 E 28 Mat... tmllt NAME: FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON P.E. RUNWAY 9R-27L SIGNATURE: IPI1II CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4Ll.L13 0 ~YAIOS IUIYIIAP ACCESS RC:W) 'U:QUtR 0 roq FIR( X BROWARD COUNTY >< )< PLANNING &ENVIRONMENTAL REGUlATION DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE LICENSE xt<x >< BROWARD COUNTY CODE TO , EXHIBIT 1 ~ ~ 9o~ ~. YlX1 -- ~rc='- - )('f<f' ATIACHEiiTOI..ltm'SE NO.~!::-.:r-+..1:2 I ~ a DIET 1IONCI'S LEOIIIID PROPOSED DRY - I>E1INI) %ONE, (a' - ao') DETENnON POND US I!E1IAIIII ZGN 2 (BG' - 2!0'1 EPD COE ' m3 E ~ 'lllllllllis rn RPZ SB:OIIOIIII' lle'iinc ewas svma; IIAIUI 0 NORTH ld ra 1110 I I lir' ~ GRAPHIC SCALI (IN FEET) DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES X X CG WMD X SHEET No.: 6 DATE: 4/1/13 I
84 12~ ~----~ HORIZONTAL SCALE: t,..,....,.j j GRAPHIC &CAI.E C IN PUT) S D I II Lr""*WI l I..,.HAPHIC &OAU CIN PEETf 8 f EXIS11NG GROUND 0 BAOWARD GOuN1 y -- --~-.~~ - - PLANNING & ENVIRONMeNTAL / REGULATION DIVISION BR3':IRONMENTAL RESOURCE LICENSE EXHIBITAR~~o:~gODE TO 27'-341 ATTACHEDTt.iTIC!D~'SE NO ~ H..,c{. ~ -8L ~ ~ PROJECT LD. No.: RLI# R072910R1 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COUNTY:BROWARD NAME: CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON. P.E. ~~~~~-= ~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXPANSION OF RUNWAY 9R-27L SIGNATURE: TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 S 42 E 28 CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4/1 /13 EPD COE DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES X CG SHEET No.: 13 X WMD X DATE: 4/1/13
85 441 l I 40! I l j\ 281\ i -\ 24t _L - - i \ , \ \ L 161 \ I \ 12 i \ I \ \ 8 \ 41 \ - r EXISTING GROUND ~ ~ 12& 0 12& :t80 HORIZONTAL SCALE: We'*\/ Mj J GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) a 10 VERTICAL SCALE: I ;J ORAPHIC SCALI! (IN FEET) :--::::-~-::: BROWM~C',::t: Ul~' Jt \NNING & t~nvh~onment.li.l ' " REGULATION DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL RE~()U~C~ LlCENS~, 1 BROWAf1C~OUNrsCODI: 2r 3.)1 T027-3 _, EXHIBIT _I; JL. N'' ~-::::.}'... r ATTACHE!:\ ll J~:St: ~. ~u;3- _:1' NO AU. BELOW SHWT PROJECT I. D. No.: RU# R07291 OR1 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD international AiRPORT DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT SKETCHES COUNTY: BROWARD NAME: CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON P.E. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXPANSION OF RUNWAY 9R-27L SIGNATURE: ':\'-JP: RNG: s::c s 42 E 28 CERTIFICATE No.: DATE:~13 COE X EPD X CG ISHEET No.: 14 WMD X IDATE: 4/1/i3
86 WETLAND#.. - RROWARD COUNTY PlANNINO & ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE LICENSE BROWARD COUNTY CODE TO EXHIBIT.~\ ~~~ ~ ATIM-;HEO 0 ljc, S~ NO. --~~. ~;L -- ~ ~-- " SECONDARY SECONDARY SECONDARY WETLAND DIRECTLY TOTAL IMPAcrED IMPAcrED IMPACTED FILL VOLUME IMPAcrED AREA{Ac.) AREA (At.} AREA (Ac:.) AREA(Ac:.) BELOWMHW/ AREA (Ac:.) [0' TO SO' ZONE] (SO' TO 250' ZONE) [RPZZONE] SHGWT(CY.) N2a N2b N3a 3.20 (1.s9j (o.67j ( N3b N (FRINGE) a b c , (SW) (SW) a b o.ss ,.)Sl O.JlQ...Q..QQ GREENBELT PONDS: WEST 0.46 j 0~23 "' ~ Q13 ~l ~ ' f'll ) 0.00 ~""' ~ V"''B GREENBELT PONDS: EAST ~ 0.02 ~ TOTALS: J.7.67 ~...<.3.87 l. ~ ~ ~ - ~ m 0.00 l~ ~ - ~.s.s7 } '-.f. 6,0~1 \5, 0 CHANGES IN IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH PERIMETER ROAD REAUGNMENT ADJACENT TO GREENBELT IJIKES AND NAVAIDS ACCESS ROAD ADJACENT TO WETlAND N3a PROJECT 1.0. No.: RU# R07291 OR1 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COUNTY: BROWARD NAME: CHRISTIAN B. JACKSON P.E. DREDGE AND F!LL PERMIT SKETCHES PROJECT DESCRIPnON: EXPANSION OF RUNWAY 9R-27L SIGNATURE: EPD X Tee SHEET No.: 21 TWP: RNG: SEC: 50 s 42 E 28 CERTIFICATE No.: DATE: 4L1L13 COE X lwmd X DATE: 4/1/13
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1002 WEST 23 RD STREET, SUITE 350 PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1002 WEST 23 RD STREET, SUITE 350 PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA 32405 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF July 31, 2015 Regulatory Division North Permits Branch
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY MAINTENANCE DREDGING ST. LUCIE COUNTY REACH I, FLORIDA. APPENDIX C USACE Permit No. SAJ (GP-SAW)
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY MAINTENANCE DREDGING ST. LUCIE COUNTY REACH I, FLORIDA APPENDIX C USACE Permit No. SAJ-2014-03657 (GP-SAW) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 4400 PGA
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY GENERAL PERMIT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington A venue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343 http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/index.html General Permit No. 198000291
Programmatic General Permit (18-PGP-01) Effective Date: XXXXXX Expiration Date: XXXXXXX
Programmatic General Permit (18-PGP-01) Effective Date: XXXXXX Expiration Date: XXXXXXX DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NASHVLLE DISTRICT PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT (18-PGP-01) FOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 100 W. OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA JANUARY 25, 2017
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 100 W. OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3604 JANUARY 25, 2017 Regulatory Division SAS-2003-23580 PUBLIC NOTICE ISSUANCE OF PROGRAMMATIC
* Airport, *, Ohio AlP Project No * Grant Offer
u.s. Depa1ment of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Detroit Airports District Office 11677 South Wayne Road Suite 107 Romulus, MI 48174 September 3, 2008 Dear *: * Airport, *, Ohio AlP Project
Public Notice NOTICE ANNOUNCING MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE LETTER OF PERMISSION AUTHORIZING TRANSPORATION PROJECTS
Public Notice US Army Corps of Engineers Louisville, Huntington, Memphis, Nashville Districts Public Notice No. Date: Closing Date: LRL-2006-259-pgj 28 Oct 10 N/A Please address all comments and inquiries
APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES
APPENDIX 1 BROWARD COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES Broward County Land Use Plan Amendment Requirements Amendments which are not within the rules of flexibility or more
Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Public Notice U.S. Army Corps Permit Application No: SWG-2012-00381 Of Engineers Date Issued: April 27, 2016 Galveston District Comments Due: May 30, 2017 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT
Corps Regulatory Program Update
Corps Regulatory Program Update Presentation for the National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies David Olson Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers August 25, 2016 1 BUILDING STRONG
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PORTLAND DISTRICT P.O. BOX 2946 PORTLAND, OREGON August 9, 2016
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PORTLAND DISTRICT P.O. BOX 2946 PORTLAND, OREGON 97208-2946 August 9, 2016 Regulatory Branch Corps No.: NWP-2012-361-3 Mr. Kevin Greenwood Port of Newport 600
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 100 W. OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA September 21, 2018
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 100 W. OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3604 September 21, 2018 Regulatory Branch SAS-2012-00797 EXTENSION REGIONAL PERMIT
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit 30-Day Notice Issue Date: April 19, 2016 Expiration Date: May 19, 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers No: NWP-2014-37/2 Oregon Department of State Lands No: 56882-RF Interested
Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Public Notice U.S. Army Corps Permit Application No: SWG-2015-00306 Of Engineers Date Issued: 14 January 2016 Galveston District Comments Due: 16 February 2016 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3640 REPLY TO ATIENTlON OF APRIL 1 1 ZOlL Regulatory Division SAS-1998-03830 JOINT PUBLIC
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO ALTER A U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECT PURSUANT TO 33 U.S.C. SECTION 408
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT P.O. BOX 60267 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70160-0267 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regional Planning and Environmental Division South Environmental Compliance
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 100 W. OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA September 21, 2018
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 100 W. OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3604 September 21, 2018 Regulatory Branch SAS-2013-00077 EXTENSION REGIONAL PERMIT
2017 Nationwide Permit Reissuance
2017 Nationwide Permit Reissuance Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14 December 2015 Tribal Coordination Meeting 1 Seattle District s Limits of Regulatory Jurisdiction Northwest Field Office
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District, Phoenix Office 3636 N. Central Ave., Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85012
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Los Angeles District, Phoenix Office 3636 N. Central Ave., Suite 900 Phoenix, AZ 85012 January 21, 2014 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Office of the Chief Roderick Lane, P.E. ADOT Tucson
November 20, 2017 PUBLIC NOTICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 7400 LEAKE AVENUE NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70118 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Operations Division Central Evaluation Section November 20, 2017 Project
JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1520 ROYAL PALM SQUARE BOULEVARD FORT MYERS, FLORIDA September 11, 2012
CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1520 ROYAL PALM SQUARE BOULEVARD FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33919 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regulatory Division
PUBLIC NOTICE. Attn: Mr. Christopher Layton 1200 Duck Road Duck, North Carolina CB&I 4038 Masonboro Loop Road Wilmington, North Carolina 28409
US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: January 15, 2015 Comment Deadline: February 16, 2015 Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2014-02202 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Public Notice. In Reply Refer To: Corps File No. LRE S18 Date: September 4, 2018 Expires: September 24, 2018
US Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District Public Notice Applicant: John Green In Reply Refer To: Corps File No. LRE-2018-00194-16-S18 Date: September 4, 2018 Expires: September 24, 2018 Proposed Groin
JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE. October 1, 2018
JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE United States Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District Attn: Regulatory Branch 7400 Leake Ave. New Orleans, Louisiana 70118-3651 October 1, 2018 Project Manager: Sara B. Fortuna
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1104 NORTH WESTOVER BOULEVARD, UNIT 9 ALBANY, GEORGIA SEPT 1ER
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1104 NORTH WESTOVER BOULEVARD, UNIT 9 ALBANY, GEORGIA 31707 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF SEPT 1ER 1 1 2815 Regulatory Division SAS-2013-00942 JOINT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 7400 LEAKE AVE NEW ORLEANS LA September 17, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT 7400 LEAKE AVE NEW ORLEANS LA 70118-3651 Operations Division Central Evaluation Section Project Manager Patricia Clune (504) 862-1577 Patricia.R.Clune@usace.army.mil
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permittee: Broward County Board of County Commissioners Nicole Sharp, Natural Resource Administrator 115 South Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Permit No: SAJ-1999-05545(SP-GGL)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA FEB O
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA 30260-1777 FEB O 2 2018 Regulatory Branch SAS-2002-03090 JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah
PUBLIC NOTICE. Michael Baker International Mr. Edward Smail 4425 Belle Oaks Drive North Charleston, South Carolina 29405
US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: October 3, 2018 Comment Deadline: October 17, 2018 Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2009-01114 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Regional General Permit: US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WORK ON THE McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM IN ARKANSAS AND ON US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LAKES WITHIN
City of Jacksonville Beach, Property & Procurement Invitation to Bid #: Date: 09/13/2017. ADDENDUM No. 1
City of Jacksonville Beach, Property & Procurement Invitation to Bid #: 1617-16 Date: 09/13/2017 Kings Road Transmission Relocation ADDENDUM No. 1 Bid No.: 1617-16 Title: Kings Road Transmission Relocation
Public Notice of Re-Authorization for General Permit
U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Honolulu District Public Notice of Re-Authorization for General Permit Regulatory Branch Building 230, Ft. Shafter Honolulu, HI 96858-5440 PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: August 25, 2005
REGIONAL PERMIT. Effective date: August 15, 2013 Expiration Date: August 15, 2018
U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Norfolk District Fort Norfolk, 803 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096 CENAO-REG 13-RP-15 REGIONAL PERMIT Effective date: August 15, 2013 Expiration Date: August 15,
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit 30-Day Notice Issue Date: February 17, 2017 Expiration Date: March 20, 2017 US Army Corps of Engineers No: NWP-2017-53 Oregon Department of State Lands No: APP0059783
PUBLIC NOTICE. Town of Ocean Isle Beach Attn: Ms. Debbie Smith, Mayor 3 West Third Street Ocean Isle Beach, North Carolina 28469
US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: January 23, 2015 Comment Deadline: February 23, 2015 Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2011-01241 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
PUBLIC NOTICE.
US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: January 19, 2017 Comment Deadline: February 17, 2017 Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2011-01243 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. Regulatory Division
l.. J- 1ft l DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Regulatory Division Ventura Field Office 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 110 Ventura, California 93001 JUN 2 z:~ zona
JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE. July 16, Leake Avenue Post Office Box 4313 New Orleans, Louisiana Baton Rouge, Louisiana
JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE July 16, 2018 United States Army Corps of Engineers State of Louisiana New Orleans District Department of Environmental Quality Regulatory Branch Water Permits Division 7400 Leake Avenue
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program
A STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority & Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
The purpose of the presentation is to provide an overview of the changes that occurred between the Pennsylvania State Programmatic General Permit-4
The purpose of the presentation is to provide an overview of the changes that occurred between the Pennsylvania State Programmatic General Permit-4 and the Pennsylvania State Programmatic General Permit-5
PUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.
US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: March 1, 2018 Comment Deadline: April 2, 2018 Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2011-02228 The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Scope of Services for Environmental Assessment for Projects
Scope of Services for Environmental Assessment for Projects The Consultant shall submit a Scope and Fee for completion of all required studies, and final documentation in compliance with the National Environmental
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS HENDRY COUNTY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS HENDRY COUNTY The Council staff has reviewed proposed changes to the Hendry County Growth Management Plan (DEO 13-1ESR). A synopsis of the requirements of
Stationing and Training of Increased Aviation Assets within U.S. Army Alaska Environmental Impact Statement
Final Stationing and Training of Increased Aviation Assets within U.S. Army Alaska Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for U.S. Army Alaska August 2009 How to Read This Environmental Impact Statement
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit 30-Day Notice Issue Date: January 24, 2017 Expiration Date: February 22, 2017 US Army Corps of Engineers No: NWP-2007-5/2 Oregon Department of State Lands No: N/A Interested
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Rick Scott Governor Jennirer Carroll Lt. Governor Herschel T.
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMITTING ARTIFICIAL REEFS
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMITTING ARTIFICIAL REEFS Gletys Guardia-Montoya Jacksonville District February 17, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) REGULATORY AUTHORITY
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
***DRAFT DELIBERATIVE. DO NOT RELEASE UNDER FOIA. NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS CREATING ANY RIGHTS OR BINDING EITHER PARTY*** MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota
Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota This joint application form is the accepted means for initiating review of proposals that may affect a water resource (wetland,
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA JUN 2 S 2017
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA 30260-1777 JUN 2 S 2017 Regulatory Branch SAS-2016-00782 JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah
FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC
Page 1 of 39 Information on how to comment is available online at http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/planningrule/directives. FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC CHAPTER 1920 LAND
Public Notice No. PUBLIC NOTICE ANNOUNCING REGIONAL CONDITIONS AND WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS
Public Notice US Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District Public Notice No. Expiration Date: LRL-2011-6-pgj 18 Mar 2017 Please address all comments and inquiries to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville
City of Oakland Park
Funded Through: DEP AGREEMENT NO. CM238 Working Towards Resilient Coastal Communities City of Oakland Park Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise Assessment Report Prepared on: May 14 This page has been left
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA FEB-f
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SAVANNAH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA 30260 Regulatory Division SAS-2008-00488 FEB-f 0 2017 JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State
Attachment A Guidance on Pre-award Cost Associated with HMGP Projects Pre-award costs are costs incurred by a sub-grantee before the grant was awarded. Any and all pre-award costs associated with an HMGP
APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
APPENDIX A PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR MINOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 484
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW 2013-51 HOUSE BILL 484 AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A PERMITTING PROGRAM FOR THE SITING AND OPERATION OF WIND ENERGY FACILITIES. The General Assembly
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA PUBLIC NOTICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95814-2922 Operations and Readiness Branch PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO ALTER A US ARMY CORPS
DIVISION 15. ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR BEACH AND DUNE PROTECTION*
DIVISION 15. ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS FOR BEACH AND DUNE PROTECTION* *Editor's note: Section I of Ord. No. 92-18, adopted June 18, 1992, added art. XV, 1500--1510. Section III renumbered former art. XV
Guidance and Instructions for the Implementation of Land Disturbing Activities on Fort Jackson
Guidance and Instructions for the Implementation of Land Disturbing Activities on Fort Jackson 1. Purpose: This document is to provide a summary of regulations that Fort Jackson and associated consultants,
Proposal for Land Acquisition and Airspace Establishment in Support of Large-Scale MAGTF Live Fire and Maneuver Training
Proposal for Land Acquisition and Airspace Establishment in Support of Large-Scale MAGTF Live Fire and Maneuver Training Public Information Brief June, 2015 Marine Air Ground Task Force Training Command/
MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6k
South Florida Regional Planning Council MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6k DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COUNCIL MEMBERS STAFF TOWN OF MEDLEY PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Introduction On
THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS
THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS Introduction Oklahoma State Historic Preservation Office Workshop May 4, 2016 OKLAHOMA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE (OK SHPO) National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
S One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION
An Act S.1438 One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for
Proposal for Land Acquisition and Airspace Establishment in Support of Large-Scale MAGTF Live Fire and Maneuver Training
Proposal for Land Acquisition and Airspace Establishment in Support of Large-Scale MAGTF Live Fire and Maneuver Training Public Information Brief February 14, 2013 Marine Air Ground Task Force Training
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH STREET SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GA
CESAD-RBT REPLY TO ATTENTION OF DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH STREET SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GA 30303-8801 1 3 JUN 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER,
EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR DISTRICT WIDE NPDES CONSULTANT SERVICES FINANCIAL PROJECT NO
EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR DISTRICT WIDE NPDES CONSULTANT SERVICES FINANCIAL PROJECT NO. 259401 1 72 11 Revised: 07/10/18 07/09/18 i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE... A-1 II. SERVICES... A-1 A. Facilities
TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE MODERNIZATION
Frequently Asked Questions August 2011 BACKGROUND... 3 Who owns, operates, and uses Townsend Bombing Range?... 3 What is the primary purpose of TBR?... 3 Where is TBR located?... 3 When did TBR begin its
Page 1 of NATIONWIDE PERMIT (NWP) PROGRAM - SUMMARY - ALABAMA CERTIFICATION & PRE-CONSTRUCTION INFOMATION
Page 1 of 19 NWP 1 - Aids to Navigation. No additional CZM conditions. NWP 1 - No PCN requirements. NWP 2 - Structures in Artificial Canals. Prior to commencement of activities that would NWP 2 - No PCN
USACE: An Overview of Alternate Permitting Procedures
USACE: An Overview of Alternate Permitting Procedures Ingrid Gilbert Chief, Miami Permits Section Miami Field Office Jacksonville District March 16, 2018 Trusted Partners Delivering Value, Today and Tomorrow
PASPGP-5 REPORTING CRITERIA CHECKLIST
3150-PM-BWEW0051 8/2016 Rev. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATERWAYS ENGINEERING AND WETLANDS DEP USE ONLY Non-Reporting Reporting PASPGP-5 REPORTING CRITERIA
AUG JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State of Georgia
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 1590 ADAMSON PARKWAY, SUITE 200 MORROW, GEORGIA 30260-1777 AUG 1 6 2018 Regulatory Division SAS-2017-00407 JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. BOX NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA August 25, 2014 PUBLIC NOTICE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 60267 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70160-0267 August 25, 2014 Operations Division Central Evaluation Section Project Manager Doris Terrell
Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT LAND DIVISION - SOLID WASTE PROGRAM
Environmental Management Chapter 335-13-14 ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT LAND DIVISION - SOLID WASTE PROGRAM CHAPTER 335-13-14 COMPOSITING FACILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS 335-13-14-.01 Purpose
General Permit Registration Form for the Discharge of Stormwater and Dewatering Wastewaters from Construction Activities
General Permit Registration Form for the Discharge of Stormwater and Dewatering Wastewaters from Construction Activities Please complete this form in accordance with the general permit (DEP-PERD- GP-015)
VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Issuing Department: Community Development Department Village of Fox Crossing 2000 Municipal Dr. Project Officer: George L. Dearborn Jr.,
Conservation Appendix C: Conservation Budget Overview
The Department of Defense (DoD) is a major user of land, sea, and air spaces and manages 30 million acres of land on more than 425 major military installations and is the third largest federal land management
DEP has three main regulatory chapters that relate to pipeline construction.
Testimony of Patrick McDonnell, Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Hearing on Pipeline Safety and Development House Majority Policy Committee July 17, 2018 Good morning, Chairman
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT:
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT: Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 1: To give the Town the maximum amount of input, control, and advisory power with other public agencies for the protection of
Lisa Mangione is a Senior Regulatory Project Manager with the Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. She has over 25 years of professional
Lisa Mangione is a Senior Regulatory Project Manager with the Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. She has over 25 years of professional experience in environmental permitting in California and
PINELLAS COUNTY DEO#12-1ESR
Agenda Item #3.H.11 02/13/12 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AMENDMENT REPORT PINELLAS COUNTY DEO#12-1ESR 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 PINELLAS COUNTY LPA 22-10-11 Expedited State
NEPA AND PRIVATE AIDS TO NAVIGATION
NEPA AND PRIVATE AIDS TO NAVIGATION By Andrew Engle United States Coast Guard Miami, Florida September 26, 2012 Capstone paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Certificate in
Welcome Scoping Meeting U.S. Navy Environmental Impact Statement for the EA-18G Growler Airfield Operations at Naval Air Station (NAS) Whidbey Island
Welcome Scoping Meeting U.S. Navy Environmental Impact Statement for the EA-18G Growler Airfield Operations at Naval Air Station (NAS) Whidbey Island Open House Public Scoping Meetings 4:00 pm to 8:00
PONCE DE LEON INLET MANAGEMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION
PONCE DE LEON INLET MANAGEMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION WHEREAS the Department of Environmental Protection, in partnership with the Ponce DeLeon Port Authority, has conducted a
TEX Rail Corridor Memorandum of Agreement 1
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION THE TEXAS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND THE FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS REGARDING THE TEX RAIL
July 20, JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah District/State of Georgia
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SAVANNAH DISTRICT 1104 NORTH WESTOVER BOULEVARD, UNIT 9 ALBANY, GEORGIA 31707 July 20, 2018 Regulatory Branch SAS201600348 JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE Savannah
Guidance for Locally Administered Projects. Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange. August 27, Revised September 15, 2014
1 Guidance for Locally Administered Projects Funded Through the NJDOT/MPO Program Funds Exchange August 27, 2013 Revised September 15, 2014 This document establishes guidelines for administering the program
SPD Emergency Procedures and SPK Regional General Permit 8 for Emergency Actions
SPD Emergency Procedures and SPK Regional General Permit 8 for Emergency Actions Regulatory Program Workshop November 6, 2015 Zachary Fancher Project Manager, California North Branch Sacramento District
The DEP has four main regulations that relate to pipeline construction.
Testimony of Domenic Rocco, Acting Environmental Program Manager, Regional Permit Coordination Office Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Joint Hearing on Pipeline Safety Senate Environmental
Archeological Sites and Cemeteries
Environmental Handbook Archeological Sites and Cemeteries This handbook outlines the process steps necessary to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the Antiquities Code of Texas,
STATUS OF REVIEW: ENGINEER ACKNOWLEDGED INFO COMMENT
PROJECT NAME: SOUTHERN PIG AND CATTLE COMPANY PROJECT NUMBER: 2011050008 APPLICATION: MAJOR SITE PLAN #14999 Met with staff 12/11/14, DRC on 12/15/14 1. DEPARTMENT: ENGDRN - STORMWATER REVIEW REVIEW ITEM:
Planning Commission Public Hearing Exhibits. Powers Ready Mix Plant Oldcastle SW Group, Inc.
Planning Commission Public Hearing Exhibits Powers Ready Mix Plant Oldcastle SW Group, Inc. Substantial Amendment to a Land Use Change Permit, Major Impact Review (File MPAA-02-16-8424) Applicant is CRC,
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT
PUBLIC NOTICE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG LOS ANGELES DISTRICT NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) For FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) and DRAFT GENERAL CONFORMITY DETERMINATION (GCD)
South Sacramento HCP Regional General Permit
South Sacramento HCP Regional General Permit MINIMAL IMPACT COVERED ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED UNDER THE SOUTH SACRAMENTO HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM EFFECTIVE: EXPIRES: (5 years from effective
REGIONAL PERMIT. Effective Date: August 14, 2013 Expiration Date: August 14, 2018
U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers Norfolk District Fort Norfolk, 803 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096 CENAO-REG 13-RP-18 REGIONAL PERMIT Effective Date: August 14, 2013 Expiration Date: August 14,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Adelphia Gateway, LLC Docket No. CP18-46-000 NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ADELPHIA GATEWAY PROJECT,
HUD Environmental Review Online System
HUD Environmental Review Online System HEROS Training for Tribes and Partners JULY 18, 2018 Purpose of Conducting Environmental Reviews Assurance that HUD projects are decent, safe, and sanitary Analysis
REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO MODIFY A U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECT UNDER SECTION 408
US ARMY CORPS Reply To: Permission No. OF ENGINEERS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OD-R-15-009 St. Louis District Attn: CEMVS-OD-R Public Notice Date Gateway to Excellence 1 Spruce Street January 05, 016
Instructions for the JOINT FEDERAL/STATE APPLICATION FOR THE ALTERATION OF ANY FLOODPLAIN, WATERWAY, TIDAL OR NONTIDAL WETLAND IN MARYLAND
Instructions for the JOINT FEDERAL/STATE APPLICATION FOR THE ALTERATION OF ANY FLOODPLAIN, WATERWAY, TIDAL OR NONTIDAL WETLAND IN MARYLAND NOTE: A new question has been added to the application form. Please
SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)
10 Joint Development This chapter describes potential long-term direct and indirect and short-term (construction) direct and indirect effects that would result from the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT)