COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Transcription

1 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION FEBRUARY 2011 Personnel INSPECTOR GENERAL AWARDS COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available on the e-publishing website at for downloading or ordering. RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication. OPR: SAF/IGQ Supersedes: AFI , 12 February 2007 Certified by: SAF/IG (Lt Gen Marc E. Rogers) Pages: 15 This instruction implements Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 36-28, Awards and Decorations. It describes the annual John P. Flynn and Howard W. Leaf Inspector General Awards, as well as the Air Force Office of Special Investigations individual and unit awards. It explains eligibility requirements, the selection process, and the Secretary of the Air Force Inspector General s (SAF/IG) award presentation. It also outlines procedures for presenting Performance Recognition Coins. This publication applies to all major command (MAJCOM), field operating agency (FOA), and direct reporting unit (DRU) activities authorized an inspector general (IG). This instruction applies to the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard personnel. Ensure that all records created as a result of processes described in this publication are maintained in accordance with (IAW) AFMAN , Management of Records, and disposed of IAW the Air Force Records Disposition Schedule located at Refer recommended changes and questions about this publication to the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) using the AF IMT 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication; route AF IMT 847 from the field through the appropriate MAJCOM IG. This publication requires the collection and or maintenance of information protected by the Privacy Act (PA) of The authorities to collect and or maintain the records prescribed in this publication are Title 10 United States Code, Chapter 857. Forms affected by the PA have an appropriate PA statement. The applicable Privacy Act System of Record Notice(s) F036 AF PC V, Awards and Decorations apply.

2 2 AFI FEBRUARY 2011 SUMMARY OF CHANGES This document is substantially revised and must be reviewed in its entirety. This instruction has administrative and reference updates. A new category (Category V) has been added to the Flynn Award. This category is for National Guard State Joint Force Headquarters and that group has been removed from Category III. For the Leaf Award, points have been assigned to the three selection criteria and headings identified for the AF IMT The Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) individual special agent and unit awards program are added. Procedures for presenting Inspector General Performance Recognition Coins were added. 1. John P. Flynn Inspector General Awards Award Description. The John P. Flynn Inspector General awards recognize the Inspector General Complaints Resolution Program Office that best embodies the six fundamental characteristics of Lieutenant General Flynn s leadership model: integrity, justice, compassion, loyalty, courage, and spirit. Consideration will be given to the IG offices whose performance is proactive as well as above and beyond the completion of day-to-day mission requirements Award Categories Category I. Installation-level complaints resolution program office Category II. Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) and Air National Guard (ANG) wing-level complaints resolution program office Category III. Numbered Air Force (NAF) / DRU / FOA or equivalent-level complaints resolution program office Category IV. MAJCOM-level complaints resolution program office Category V. Joint Force Headquarters State (JFHQ-St) Award Eligibility. IG offices in the above categories are eligible regardless of rank/grade structure or number of personnel Selection Criteria. Criteria are based solely on complaints resolution activities. Other activities, such as inspections, exercise evaluation, etc., will not be considered Leadership and Job Performance (50 points). Examples may include (but are not limited to) noteworthy management achievements, significantly improving processes or dealing with complex problems Initiative (25 points). Examples may include (but are not limited to) synopsis of the innovation or unique organizational achievement that positively contributes to the Air Force Complaints Resolution Program Training (25 points). Examples may include (but are not limited to) originality of training initiatives, quality of development, importance to the organization, and degree of completion.

3 AFI FEBRUARY The Howard W. Leaf Inspector General Awards Award Description. The Howard W. Leaf Inspector General awards recognize the outstanding enlisted and officer (or civilian equivalent) inspectors in the United States Air Force assigned to a MAJCOM, FOA, or DRU IG team Award Categories Category I. Enlisted/Civilian Equivalent. Nominees will be inspectors in the grade of senior master sergeant and below or civilian equivalent Category II. Officer/Civilian Equivalent. Nominees will be inspectors in the grade of second lieutenant through lieutenant colonel or civilian equivalent. NOTE: Civilian equivalency will be at the submitter s discretion, as determined by level of responsibility and/or duty position Award Eligibility. Each MAJCOM, FOA, and DRU authorized an IG by AFPD 90-2, Inspector General--The Inspection System, may submit one nomination for each award category. Nominees must have been assigned to an IG team as an inspector for a minimum of one year Selection Criteria Job Performance (60 points). Significant inspection findings, positive mission impact or any other area that improves inspection quality Initiative (20 points). Improved inspection techniques, guidelines, etc. emphasizing what was done, why it was important and actual results achieved Professional Qualities (20 points). Examples may include military/professional bearing, self-improvement, efforts to share experience with inspected units and representation of the AF in community activities. 3. AFOSI Individual Awards Program Award Description. The Special Investigations Functional Awards program recognizes credentialed AFOSI special agents (SAs) in AFOSI, sister law enforcement organizations, and from the counterintelligence community who have excelled in performance and made outstanding contributions to the Air Force and/or Department of Defense (DoD) special investigations and counterintelligence missions Award Categories Field Grade Officer Special Agent of the Year. This award, sponsored by the Association of Former AFOSI Special Agents (AFOSISA), recognizes an active duty officer special agent (SA) in the grades of major or lieutenant colonel Lee C. Hitchcock Award. This award, sponsored by AFOSISA, is in honor of Special Agent (Captain) Hitchcock who was killed in the line of duty on 10 September 1967 while serving in Pleiku, Vietnam. This award recognizes an active duty officer SA in the grades of second lieutenant through captain.

4 4 AFI FEBRUARY Rudolph M. Schellhammer Award. This award, sponsored by AFOSISA, is in honor of Special Agent (Lt Col retired) Schellhammer who selflessly dedicated over 35 years to AFOSI. This award recognizes a civilian SA in the grade of GS 14 or GS Civilian Special Agent of the Year. This award, sponsored by AFOSISA, recognizes a civilian SA in the grades of GS 7 through GS Bert L. Hall Senior Enlisted Special Agent of the Year. This award, sponsored by AFOSISA, is in honor of Special Agent (Chief Master Sergeant) Hall who was one of three finalists for the first Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force. This award recognizes an active duty enlisted SA in the grades of master sergeant (MSgt) through chief master sergeant (CMSgt). Refer to Attachment 6 for a biography of CMSgt Hall Enlisted Special Agent of the Year. This award, sponsored by AFOSISA, recognizes an active duty enlisted SA in the grades of senior airman through technical sergeant Individual Mobilization Augmentee Officer Special Agent of the Year. This award recognizes an Air Force reserve officer SA regardless of grade Individual Mobilization Augmentee Noncommissioned Officer Special Agent of the Year. This award recognizes an Air Force reserve enlisted SA regardless of grade Host Nation Investigative Assistant of the Year. This award recognizes the accomplishments and professional contributions of a host nation investigative assistant, special investigator, or other foreign national employee ineligible for recognition in another category Award Eligibility. Awards are reserved for credentialed SAs assigned to AFOSI, AFOSI SAs assigned to out-of-command assignments, and to host nation employees who assisted in the accomplishment of the AFOSI mission. The performance and accomplishments being recognized must have occurred predominately between 1 January and 31 December of the previous year Selection Criteria Innovation: The act or beginning or introduction of something new or renewing something; to be creative. Specify if nominee developed any unique or innovative approach to resolving a problem or situation and describe any pre-existing elements that led to the development or innovation Performance: The ability to begin and carry through to completion; to take action in accordance with requirement of; fulfill a duty, etc. Identify the tasks confronted, describe the degree of challenge and demonstrate how results were achieved through the use of quality tools and principles Consider appropriateness of methods; use of systematic approach; and use of reliable, quantitative, and objective information.

5 AFI FEBRUARY Leadership: The capacity to lead and/or guide others; one who is in charge or command of others; one who has influential voice. Specify concrete details of how the nominee developed, coached, or influenced others to improve their performance and describe how the individual demonstrated the dynamic balance between creative leadership, empowerment, and accountability Detail how the nominee is viewed as a leader by subordinates, peers, and supervisors Results: To occur or exist as a consequence of a particular cause. The consequences of a particular action, operation, or course; outcome. Show how the results are clearly aligned with a specific AFOSI strategic objective; show how the results exceeded the customer s requirements and expectations and provide detailed results and explain why the achievements are noteworthy. 4. AFOSI Unit Awards Award Description. These awards recognize units whose cumulative investigative accomplishments and professional contributions warrant such recognition Award Categories Small Unit of the Year. This award honors a small unit for demonstrated performance and specific achievements. Units with fewer than seven manpower authorizations as of 30 September are eligible to compete for this award Medium Unit of the Year. This award honors a medium unit for demonstrated performance and specific achievements. Units with between seven and 15 manpower authorizations as of 30 September are eligible to compete for this award Large Unit of the Year. This award honors a large unit for demonstrated performance and specific achievements. Units with 16 or more manpower authorizations as of 30 September are eligible to compete for this award Field Investigations Squadron of the Year. This award honors a field investigations squadron (FIS) for demonstrated performance and specific achievements. Units with the designation of FIS are eligible to compete for this award Award Eligibility. New units active for less than six months are ineligible to compete for unit awards. Operating locations (OLs) are not eligible to compete independently for awards, and are considered as a component of the parent unit. Refer to Attachment 5 for instructions on how to complete AF IMT 1206, Nomination for Award Selection Criteria Innovation: The act or beginning or introduction of something new or renewing something; to be creative. Identify specific internal and external customer requirements and how they were met Performance: The ability to begin and carry through to completion; to take action in accordance with requirement of; fulfill a duty, etc. Demonstrate how results were achieved through the use of quality tools and principles and consider appropriateness of methods; use of systematic approach; and use of reliable, quantitative, and objective information.

6 6 AFI FEBRUARY Results: To occur or exist as a consequence of a particular cause. The consequences of a particular action, operation, or course; outcome. Clearly specify the unit s successes and identify measurable improvements in exceeding customer requirements. 5. Submittal of Nominations General. Use the AF IMT 1206, Nomination for Award. Nominations will be one page, single-spaced, 12 pitch, Times New Roman font, bullet format, using specifics from the applicable calendar year only. Do not include classified information in the nomination. See Attachments 2 through 4 for more specific guidance Submission Timeline for the IG Awards. Both the Flynn and Leaf award nominations for the previous calendar year must be submitted to the award point of contact by 1 March. Submission instructions will be outlined in a call for nominations message released by SAF/IG Submission Timeline for the AFOSI Awards. Nominations are due annually to HQ AFOSI/DPE by 15 February for the previous calendar year (CY) achievements. An award nomination submission by a commander or director certifies that the nomination is correct and true as written. 6. Awards Selection Board Inspector General Awards Selection Board. The Deputy Inspector General chairs the Flynn and Leaf Award Selection Boards, which include three colonels selected by the board chair. The Inspector General may decide not to make an award in any category if he/she finds no suitable nominees AFOSI Awards Selection Process. The AFOSI award selection board (ASB) will convene and each board member will grade each award nomination package using a scale of , with 0.5 increments. Board membership will be determined by AFOSI/CC. The AFOSI ASB President will submit recommendations to the AFOSI/CC through HQ AFOSI/DPE. AFOSI/CC selects award recipients for each category of individual and unit awards and announces award winner selections to SAF/IG, Headquarters AFOSI and subordinate units. 7. The Inspector General s Performance Recognition Coins Award Criteria. The Inspector General, or those designated by the IG, may present performance recognition coins to personnel of the Department of the Air Force, including the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve, and to personnel of other military departments and Executive Branch agencies for outstanding contributions or service rendered in furtherance of the Air Force mission. Presentation of a coin recognizes either continuing contributions or a single achievement. The purpose of a coin is to provide the Inspector General or his designee with an informal means to show recognition of and appreciation for superior job performance. Non-appropriated fund employees are ineligible to receive this award if the coin was purchased with appropriated funds.

7 AFI FEBRUARY Description of Awards Flynn Award. Category award recipients receive an engraved eagle statue trophy. Names of winning organizations are also engraved on plaques permanently displayed in the Pentagon. Flynn award winners are eligible to wear the Air Force Recognition Ribbon IAW AFI , Special Trophies and Awards Leaf Award. Award recipients receive an engraved plaque. Names of winning individuals are also engraved on plaques permanently displayed in the Pentagon. Leaf award winners are eligible for the Air Force Recognition Ribbon IAW AFI AFOSI Individual Functional Awards. Each individual award recipient will receive a trophy or other suitable award. Award winners are eligible for the Air Force Recognition Ribbon IAW AFI AFOSI Unit Awards. Award winners will receive a trophy or other suitable award. Award winners are not eligible for the Air Force Recognition Ribbon IAW AFI , para Inspector General s Performance Recognition Coins. Coins purchased with appropriated funds will be IAW AFI , Vol. 1, Budget Guidance and Procedures, Para The coins are to be presented as cast from the die without further embellishment, and will not be personalized. 9. Award Announcement and Presentation Flynn Award. SAF/IG will announce and present John P. Flynn award winners at the annual Worldwide Inspector General Conference or by 15 May. In addition, all nominees will receive letters of recognition signed by The Inspector General Leaf Award. SAF/IG will announce Howard W. Leaf award winners at the annual Worldwide Inspector General Conference or by 15 May. SAF/IG or a designated representative will notify the commander and recipients of the winner and plan for presentation. In addition, all nominees will receive letters of recognition signed by The Inspector General AFOSI Functional Awards. All individual and unit award winners will be recognized at the AFOSI Annual Command Awards Banquet AFOSI Unit Awards. All individual and unit award winners will be recognized at the AFOSI Annual Command Awards Banquet Inspector General s Performance Recognition Coins. Individuals and groups may be recognized on the spot or at an appropriate meeting, such as an inspection outbrief or commander s call.

8 8 AFI FEBRUARY Forms Adopted. AF IMT 1206, Nomination for Award, current version AF IMT 837, Recommendation for Change of Publication, current version DARRELL D. JONES, Lt General, USAF DC S, Manpower, Personnel and Services

9 AFI FEBRUARY Attachment 1 GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION References AFPD 36-28, Awards and Decorations Programs, 1 Aug 97 AFPD 90-2, Inspector General--The Inspection System, 26 Apr 06 AFI , Special Trophies and Awards, 29 Jun 01 AFMAN , Management of Records, 1 Mar 08 Abbreviations and Acronyms AFI Air Force Instruction AFMAN Air Force Manual AFPD Air Force Policy Directive AFOSI Air Force Office of Special Investigations AFOSISA Association of Former OSI Special Agents AFOSI/CC Commander, Air Force Office of Special Investigations AFOSI/CV Vice Commander, AFOSI AFOSI/CX Executive Director, AFOSI AFRC Air Force Reserve Command ANG Air National Guard ASB Awards Selection Board DoD Department of Defense DRU Direct Reporting Unit FIS Field Investigations Squadron FOA Field Operating Agencies GS General Schedule [Federal Employee] HQ AFOSI/PA Public Affairs, Headquarters AFOSI IAW in accordance with IG Inspector General IMA Individual Mobilization Augmentee JFHQ St Joint Forces Headquarters-State JFTR Joint Federal Travel Regulations JTR Joint Travel Regulation MAJCOM Major Command

10 10 AFI FEBRUARY 2011 NAF Numbered Air Force OLs Operating Locations OPR Office of Primary Responsibility POC Point of Contact SA Special Agent SAF/IG Secretary of the Air Force, Office of the Inspector General SAF/IGI Secretary of the Air Force, Inspections Directorate SAF/IGQ Secretary of the Air Force, Complaints Resolution Directorate SAF/PA Public Affairs, Headquarters AF

11 AFI FEBRUARY Attachment 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR JOHN P. FLYNN INSPECTOR GENERAL AWARD NOMINATION PACKAGE A2.1. Part I Letter of Transmittal (One Original). A Include organization title, command and location. A Do not include laudatory comments or endorsements. A Have MAJCOM (to include wing submissions), JFHQ, FOA, or DRU commander/vice commander sign the letter. A2.2. Part II Narrative Justification (One Original). A Provide justification in bullet format, front side only, AF IMT 1206, Nomination for Award. Information submitted on back page of AF IMT 1206 will not be considered. Headers for the three subcategories (Leadership and Job Performance; Initiative; and Training) should be included. Category is either I, II, III, IV, or V; commander is the IG s commander. A The nomination should emphasize specific, tangible achievements which benefited the unit, MAJCOM, or equivalent, and the Air Force. Include quantifiable achievements in both day-to-day activities and initiatives that go above and beyond expectations. This information should be drawn from any management indicators used to evaluate complaint resolution programs. Use the headings indicated in paragraphs Avoid inflated terms and generalities.

12 12 AFI FEBRUARY 2011 Attachment 3 REQUIREMENTS FOR HOWARD W. LEAF INSPECTOR GENERAL AWARD NOMINATION PACKAGE A3.1. Part I Letter of Transmittal (One Original). A Include nominee s name, grade, duty title, organization, command, and location. A Do not include laudatory comments or endorsements. A Have MAJCOM, FOA, or DRU commander/vice commander sign the letter. A3.2. Part II Narrative Justification (One Original). A Provide justification in bullet format, front side only, AF IMT 1206, Nomination for Award. Information submitted on back page of AF IMT 1206 will not be considered. Category is either I or II; commander is either MAJCOM, FOA, or DRU IG. A Use the headings indicated in paragraphs Cite specific actions and results. Avoid inflated terms and generalities.

13 AFI FEBRUARY Attachment 4 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AFOSI INDIVIDUAL AWARDS PROGRAM A4.1. Narrative Justification (One Original). A Individual award nominations are limited to the first page of an AF IMT Use the headings Innovation, Performance, Leadership, and Results. In bullet format, illustrate the nominee's achievements under each of the headings. A Use the headings indicated in paragraphs Cite specific actions and results. Avoid inflated terms and generalities.

14 14 AFI FEBRUARY 2011 Attachment 5 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AFOSI UNIT AWARDS A5.1. Part II Narrative Justification (One Original). A Unit award nominations are limited to the first page of an AF IMT Use the headings Innovation, Performance, and Results. In bullet format, illustrate the unit's achievements under each of the headings. List the unit members by grade, name, and current unit of assignment on the second page of the AF IMT A Use the headings indicated in paragraphs Cite specific actions and results. Avoid inflated terms and generalities.

15 AFI FEBRUARY Attachment 6 SPECIAL AGENT (CHIEF MASTER SERGEANT) BERT HALL Special Agent (Chief Master Sergeant) Bert Hall, after surviving a POW death march in 1945, applied for OSI duty in An overwhelming portion of his career was devoted to uncovering and defeating the offensive efforts of the former Soviet bloc, communist China, and Cuba. Chief Hall led investigative and counterintelligence operations that succeeded in repairing faults in national security, one which involved debriefing and processing numerous POWs returning from the Korean War. Before retiring from active duty, Chief Hall was considered as one of three finalists for the position of Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force. Returning to special agent duty as a supervisory civilian agent, he oversaw a very large fraud investigations program in Southern California, which sought to uncover white collar crimes that silently yet seriously damaged American war fighting and peace keeping capability.