US Air Force Capital Investment Programs

Transcription

1 Headquarters U.S. Air Force US Air Force Capital Investment Programs Robert Gill, P.E. Office of the Air Force Civil Engineer Facility Management Division HQ USAF/A7CF 7 January,

2 Overview Strategic Landscape AF Priorities AF Civil Engineer Organization Funding Profiles FY12/13 MILCON MILCON Initiatives Construction Acquisition 2

3 Defense Strategic Guidance I do not believe that we have to choose between our national security and our fiscal security We have made America safer, but we must not rest until we have made America safe today and tomorrow. Prevail in today s wars Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, 20 Nov 12 Deter and defeat aggression Effectively operate in Cyberspace, Space, and across all domains Maintain a safe and effective nuclear deterrent Protect the homeland Preserve the force avoid hollowing out the force I n t e In g r i a t y Fiscally-Constrained - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e Environment n c e 3

4 Air Force Priorities Continue to Strengthen the Nuclear Enterprise Partner With the Joint & Coalition Team to Win Today s Fight Develop and Care for Airmen & Their Families Modernize Our Air and Space Inventories, Organizations and Training Recapture Acquisition Excellence Enduring Air Force Contributions Air & Space Superiority, Cyberspace Assurance Able to hold any target at risk Responsive intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance Able to rapidly move people and cargo anywhere in the world CSAF Focus Win the Fight Strengthen the Team Shape the Future Command & Control to conduct operations rapidly, effectively, and efficiently Installations Underpin These Priorities and Contributions 4

5 Installations Enable Enduring Air Force Contributions Installations Power projection platforms-- CONUS, OCONUS, expeditionary Enable air & space superiority Assure Cyberspace access Provide infrastructure necessary to hold targets at risk anywhere across the globe Facilitate ISR exploitation Host robust C2 networks Build partnerships with allies & developing nations by forward basing US forces Air bases are a determining factor in the success of air operations. The two-legged stool of men and planes would topple over without this equally important I n t e g r i third t y - S leg. e r v General i c e - E of x c the e l Air l e n Force c e Henry H. Hap Arnold 5

6 AF Civil Engineer Priorities Our Proud I n t e Heritage g r i t y - S to e a r v Promising i c e - E x Future c e l l e n c e Build Ready Engineers Provide more effective Civil Engineer expeditionary and emergency response and management capabilities to meet current and emerging Air Force and CCDR requirements. Build Great Leaders Organize, develop, enable, and retain a trained and capable Total Force Civil Engineer team ready to meet current and emergent mission requirements Build Sustainable Installations Develop sustainable installations by implementing asset management principles for built and natural assets.

7 AF Civil Engineers Primary Functions Installation Engineering Emergency Services CE Strategic Plan Expeditionary Engineering Environmental and Energy Integrity - Service - Excellence Housing 7

8 Family Housing Air Force Installations AF Civil Engineers Physical Plant Profile Airfields 75,800 Homes Arlington/Alexandria Combined 10M Acres of Land Twice the size of New Jersey 102 Million Square Yards Could pave a highway from Philadelphia to Boston Facilities Dormitories 626M Sq Ft of Buildings 88 Microsoft Corporations Plant Replacement Value $268B PRV Nearly the GDP of Peru The Air Force Installation is a Force Enabler 69,500 Dorm Rooms As of FY99/4 1 ½ times Doubletree Hotels 8

9 Major AF Installations CONUS JB Lewis McChord Fairchild AFB Malmstrom AFB Minot AFB Grand Forks AFB Beale AFB Travis AFB Vandenberg AFB Edwards AFB Los Angeles AFB March ARB Eielson AFB JB Elmendorf Richardson Creech AFB Mountain Home AFB Nellis AFB Hill AFB Buckley AFB USAF Academy Peterson AFB FE Warren AFB Ellsworth AFB Schriever AFB Offutt AFB McConnell AFB Whiteman AFB Grissom ARB Scott AFB Selfridge ANGB Wright Patterson AFB Westover ARB Seymour Johnson AFB Vance AFB Arnold AFB Kirtland AFB Luke AFB Pope AFB Tinker AFB Shaw AFB Cannon AFB Altus AFB Little Rock AFB Dobbins ARB McEntire JNGB Davis Monthan AFB Sheppard AFB Columbus AFB JB Charleston Holloman AFB Dyess AFB Robins AFB Barksdale AFB NAS JRB Fort Worth Maxwell AFB Moody AFB Goodfellow AFB Eglin AFB Keesler AFB Hurlburt Tyndall AFB Laughlin AFB Field Patrick AFB JB San Antonio JB San Antonio (Randolph) (Lackland) MacDill AFB JB Pearl Harbor Hickam Volk Field ANGB Stewart ANGB Rickenbacker ANGB Hanscom AFB JB McGuire Dix Lakehurst Dover AFB JB Andrews Otis ANGB JB Anacostia Bolling JB Langley Eustis Homestead ARB 9

10 Major AF Installatoins USAFE Locations Sigonella 10

11 Major AF Installations PACAF Locations 11

12 Operations & Maintenance Funding Profile $M (Total Force) $M (Total Force) 3,000 2,000 1, ,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1, Facility Operations 90% 96% 99% 91% 93% 83% 83% 83% 84% FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Facility Sustainment 90% 90% 90% 93% 80% 75% 77% 80% Funding 73% 73% FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 $M (Total Force) $M (Total Force) PB Focus Funds Migration In Migration Out 2,000 1,500 1, Environmental Quality FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Restoration & Modernization Funded to Compliance -Dorms & Energy Focus Funds: FY Airfield & Consolidation Focus Fund: FY12 only FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 12

13 MILCON Funding Profile (Total Force) $3,500M $3,000M $2,500M $2,000M $1,500M $1,000M $500M $0M Enacted + FY12 PB FY13 PB AF PB COCOM Support Congressional Adds Supp / OCO ARRA As of 21 Sept 2011; includes Blue TOA only 13

14 $M % 1% 47% 11% 32% Must Pay FY13 MILCON Requirements $394.5M P&D * $18.6M P-341 $18.2M Continue to Strengthen the Nuclear Enterprise B-52 Facilities $4.6M Partner with the Joint and Coalition Team to Win Today s Fight STRATCOM Replacement Fac - Incr 2 $161.0M MQ-9 Mission Facilities $25.0M Develop and Care for Airmen and Their Families Air Force Permanent Party Dorms $42.5M Modernize our Air, Space, & Cyberspace Inventories, Orgs &Trng $36.8M $4.6M $186.0M $42.5M $124.6M F-22 Mission Facilities $14.8M Operations / Training / Support $57.7M F-35 Mission Facilities $13.5M HC/C-130 Facilities $38.6M 14

15 FY13 MILCON Projects STATE BASE TITLE PROGRAM COST ($000) GEORGIA FORT STEWART AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER 7250 NORTH DAKOTA MINOT B 52 Add/Alter Munitions AGE Facility 4600 ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK C 130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR ADDITION 4178 ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK C 130J FUEL SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE HANGAR GREENLAND THULE DORMITORY (48 PN) TEXAS LACKLAND DORMITORY (96 RM) ITALY AVIANO F 16 MISSION TRAINING CENTER 9400 FLORIDA TYNDALL F 22 ADD/ALT HANGAR FOR LOW OBSERVABLE/COMPOSITE REPAIR UTAH HILL F 35 ADAL Building 118 for Flight Simulator 4000 UTAH HILL F 35 ADAL HANGAR 45W/AMU 7250 UTAH HILL F 35A Modular Storage Magazines 2280 GEORGIA MOODY HC 130J SIMULATOR FACILITY 8500 NEW MEXICO HOLLOMAN MQ 9 MAINTENANCE HANGAR UNKNOWN WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED SANITARY SEWER LIFT/PUMP STATION 2000 NEBRASKA OFFUTT STRATCOM Replacement Fac Incr GREENLAND THULE Thule Consolidation

16 Deliberate pause" in FY13 MILCON investment Force structure adjustments under review - awaiting final decisions Continued investment at minimum levels Prevents mission stoppage Places highest priority on new mission bed down (e.g., F-35, F-22, MQ-9) Maintains incrementally funded projects supporting COCOM priorities (e.g., STRATCOM, PACOM) Planning and Design scaled appropriately Mitigation measures FY13 MILCON Investment Strategy Sustainment maintained at 80% of FSM in FY13 Impacts to R&M accounts minimized 16

17 MILCON Initiatives Cost Reduction MILCON Process IPT (CM): Portfolio Approach to MILCON Planning & Programming Project Definition Acquisition Strategy Project Management Submittal Review & Approval Configuration Control MILCON Product IPT (TD): Govt vs. Commercial Costs Legal / Regulatory Cost Drivers AT/FP Cost Drivers UFC, Design Guide Review Weapon System FRD Development Type II vs. Type V Construction Elmendorf After Action Report Lessons Schedule 12 Aug Finalize IPT CONOPS Aug/Sep Meet w/ USACE, NAVFAC 30 Sep Draft Findings/Recommendations 15 Dec Brief POAM to AFCEE/CL 30 Dec Brief POAM to AF/A7C Nov/Dec Brief 2-Star Interface AF/A7C: I n t e g r i Achieve t y - S e r v 25% i c e Reduction - E x c e l l e in n c MILCON e Costs

18 MILCON Initiatives Process Improvement Project Control: Project Management Playbook HAF-AFCEE MILCON Management Plan AFCEE Change Control Plan A7C Cost Control Policy Memo NexGen IT Configuration (Tririga) AF-Agent Interfaces BIM-Tririga Interface Performance Measurement: Strategic Communication: Annual AFCEE, Agent & MAJCOM PMRs Leadership for Execution, Awards and Partnership (LEAP) Weekly Activity Report PDRI Tri-Service Ribbon Cutter Metrics Composite Balanced Scorecard Deliver Disciplined Execution Every Time

19 MILCON Initiatives Standardization Standard RFPs: Child Dev Centers Security Forces Operations Permanent Party Dorms Fire Stations Fitness Centers Medium Body Aircraft Hangar/Backshops Medium Body Aircraft Squad Ops/AMU Standard BIM Dynamic Prototypes: Building blocks for major facility types Developing in parallel with Std RFPs From D-B to Adapt-Build and BIM-Build Standardized Project Definition: Standard Design Instructions Emphasis on project definition Robust site characterization efforts Minimize surprises Reduce I n t e g r County i t y - S e Options Get r v i c e - E x c e the l l e Jump n c e on Projects

20 AFCEE Initiatives FY12/13 BIM-Build Projects FY Agent Base Project Title 2012 Seattle Fairchild 2013 Mobile Cape Canaveral Wing Headquarters Range Communications Facility PA ($000) per DD1391 Estimated Completion Date $13,600, Sep 12 Current Status Initial draft RFP review meeting complete $20,000, Sep 13 RFP design kick off meeting complete

21 AFCEC Initiatives FY12 Standardization Project Title Std RFP DP/ Criteria Std Dsgn* Doc AF Corporate Facilities Standards Mar 13 Security Forces Operations Facility Mar 13 Done Done Military Working Dog Kennel Dec 13 Jun 13 w/dp Dormitory Done Done DG Done Fitness Center Mar 13 Done Update Sep 13 Visiting Quarters Mar 13 Done UFC Done Fire Station Mar 13 Mar 13 UFC Done Child Development Center Done Done Sep 13 KC 46 Squad Ops / Life Support / AMU Mar 13 Done Done KC 46 Hangars (3 types: MX, Fuel, Corrosion) Mar 13 Done Done KC 46 Flight Simulator Mar 13 Done Done KC 46 Fuselage/Boom Operator Trainer Mar 13 Done Done 21

22 AFCEC Initiatives FY13 Standardization Project Title Std RFP DP/ Criteria Std Dsgn Doc Administrative Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 UFC Done Air Traffic Control Tower / RAPCON Sep 13 Sep 13 Mar 13 Civil Engineer Squadron Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 Consolidated Communications Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 UAS Squadron Operations Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 UAS Maintenance Hangar/Shops Sep 13 Sep 13 Fighter Maintenance Hangar/Shops Sep 13 Sep 13 Fighter Engine Maintenance Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 AGE Maintenance/Storage Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 Supply Operations & Warehouse Sep 13 Sep 13 Wing Intel / SCIF Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 Confinement Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 Visitor Control Center Sep 13 Sep 13 Vehicle Search Facility Sep 13 Sep 13 FY13 STATUS: All project SOWs complete, awaiting AE fee estimates 22

23 AFCEC Initiatives FY14 Standardization Projected Project Title Std RFP DP/ Criteria Std Dsgn Doc Vehicle Maintenance Facility Sep 14 Sep 14 GOV Fuel Station & POL Operations Sep 14 Sep 14 Consolidated Mission Support Facility Sep 14 Sep 14 Munitions Storage Facility Sep 14 Sep 14 Munitions Maintenance Facility Sep 14 Sep 14 AMC Passenger Terminal Sep 14 Sep 14 AMC Guide Done AMC Freight Terminal Sep 14 Sep 14 AETC Technical Training Facility Sep 14 Sep 14 AETC Flying Training Facility Sep 14 Sep 14 Chapel Facility Sep 14 Sep 14 Update FC Sep 14 Community Center Sep 14 Sep 14 Youth / Teen Center Sep 14 Sep 14 UFC Done 23

24 MILCON Energy Mandates: Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) 30% reduction over ASHRAE 90.1 (2007) Energy Independence & Security Act, % reduction in fossil fuel use by 2010 EO NetZero Buildings by 2030 New UFC consolidates Federal mandates and incorporates sections of ASHRAE MILCON Energy Studies: FY 12: Analysis to achieve 40% reduction 5 Studies Building Envelope, Orientation, Renewables FY13: Cost / Features to Achieve Net Zero 6 Studies Energy Generated = Energy Consumed Build on FY 12 Data; Rethink Building Process MILCON Initiatives Energy Leadership LEED Performance: FY09 LEED results AF goal = 5% certified 46 Silver certification, 4 Gold certification 65% - eligible projects (50/76 projects) FY10 LEED results AF goal = 10% certified 68 Silver certification, 5 Gold certification 100% - eligible projects (73/73 projects) FY11+ LEED results AF goal = 100% 100% - eligible projects Add Value to Projects Cost Effectively

25 EPAct Mandate: EPAct 05 Performance Assessment 30% more energy efficient than ASHRAE baseline Energy intensity redux where Life-Cycle Cost effective FY12 Performance met goal 100% compliant with a 10 CFR % of projects met /exceeded 30% 19% achieved less than 30%...but maximized reduction while meeting requirement to be Life Cycle Cost effective Most projects in this category are medical, industrial, or electronic intensive facilities (e.g., cyber, intel, C2) 40-50% I n t doable beyond e g r i t y - S e r v i c that e - E RE but x c e l l e n not c e yet LCC effective 25

26 EISA Mandate: EISA 07 Performance Assessment 55% fossil fuel reduction by 2010 (2003 baseline) 65% by 2015; 80% by 2020; 90% by 2025; 100% by 2030 DOE to provide implementing guidance none available yet FY12 Performance did not meet goal AF MILCON average = 32% reduction (ASHRAE 90.1) Likely will need plant-level RE generation vs. bybuilding RE Similar EO Mandate: Begin applying NetZero in 2020; fully NetZero by % I n t doable beyond e g r i t y - S e r v i c that e - E RE but x c e l l e n not c e yet LCC effective 26

27 100% of the FY10+ eligible projects seeking formal LEED certification 88 AF LEED certified facilities to date: 1 Platinum 31 Gold NDAA included prohibition on LEED Gold and Platinum certification of FY12 projects Future NDAAs may extend the prohibition AF will seek LEED Silver certification only LEED Performance Assessment 27

28 Construction Acquisition MILCON Agents FY12 MILCON 98% USACE and NAVFAC* 2% AFCEC* 75% Design-Build vs. 25% Design-Bid-Build *Based on dollar value including MFH, UK and CENTCOM Contingency Construction

29 Competition is still king Construction Acquisition Continued Acquisition Reform Increased emphasis on cost as driving factor More focus on Low-priced Technically-Acceptable end of Best Value continuum Increased emphasis on Small Business set asides 29

30 Construction Acquisition AFCEE Contract Toolbox Worldwide Planning, Program, & Design 08 (4PA-E08) 5 year IDIQ $3B capacity 22 Full Scope, 7 Reduced Scope Global Engr, Integration & Tech Assistance (GEITA Bridge) 1 yr A&AS 2-3 month options $200M capacity 3 F&O, 1 small firm Heavy Engineering, Repair, and Construction (HERC) 5 year IDIQ $6 - $15B capacity 15 (19) F&O, 4 (0)-8(a) firms Environmental, Construction, Operations & Services (ECOS09) 100% Small Business set-aside 5 year IDIQ $350M total $95M services 10 Small firms Worldwide Environ Restoration and Construction 09 (WERC09) 5 year IDIQ plus 3 years for PBC $3B capacity 23 F&O, 16 small, 3-8(a), 2 SDVOSB F&O = Full and Open 30

31 Headquarters U.S. Air Force 31