Counter-Man-Portable Air Defense Systems. James Tuttle Program Manager U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology
|
|
|
- Brooke Simmons
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Counter-Man-Portable Air Defense Systems James Tuttle Program Manager U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology
2 Threat Background C-MANPADS National Strategy Program Overview Briefing Outline Status C-MANPADS Technologies Selected Objectives Strategy Key Challenges and External Factors Government and Stakeholder Participation Contractors C-MANPADS Technical Solution Summary 2
3 MANPADS Threat to Commercial Aviation 40 non-terrorist attacks against commercial aircraft (mostly propeller aircraft) in war zones since 1975 Nov 28, SA-7 attack on Israeli jetliner flying from Mombasa first MANPADS attack on commercial aircraft outside of war zone Nov 22, 2003 MANPADS Attack DHL Airbus A300 Aircraft in Iraq Potential for terrorist attack grows as we increase measures to counter onboard bombings and hijackings No specific, credible information about planned MANPADS attacks against U.S. commercial interests particularly within CONUS but remains a concern for the foreseeable future 3
4 National Strategy A Multi-Layered Approach Counter-MANPADS Non-Proliferation Department of State Global weapons stockpile Global export controls Buy-back program Technical Countermeasures DHS S&T Re-engineer and demonstrate technologies to counter threat National Airspace System FAA Tactical Operations DHS TSA Airport vulnerability assessments and mitigation plans Guidelines for identifying and reporting threats Elevated alert guidelines Intelligence CIA - DIA - TSA - FBI 4
5 Initial Solicitation ( ) Industry Day ( ) Program Status 24 White Papers received ( ) 5 selected to submit full proposals ( ) Proposals and oral presentations (12-3 thru 7-03) 3 contractors awarded OTP Agreements for Phase I (1-6-04) BAE Systems Northrop Grumman United Airlines System Requirement & Interim Design Reviews Completed Preliminary Design Reviews - PDR (July 04) Phase II Down Select (August 04) 5
6 Selected Contractor Designs Provide Mature Technologies Laser-based Technologies Expendable-based Technologies 6
7 Program Objectives Evaluate mature technologies that will best protect commercial airliners from MANPADS Balance Life Cycle Cost, Schedule, and Performance Clarify needs and requirements of the aviation community stakeholders Provide analysis and data to support decision process Effectiveness FAA Certification Life Cycle Costs (LCC) Aircraft Integration Issues Flight Safety Supportability (reliability/maintainability) 7
8 C-MANPADS Program Acquisition Strategy May 2003, DHS/S&T submitted program plan to Congress Establish Special Program Office to manage program and supporting technology efforts Maximize industry participation and innovation in evaluating mature technologies Use Other Transaction Prototype Agreements Encourage participation of non-traditional contractors 2-year, Two Phase Program Phase 1-6 month effort Downselect Phase 2 18 month effort 8
9 Phase I Activities System Requirements Review System concept and concept of operations System-level requirements analysis Interim Design Review Long-lead Items Identification Preliminary Design Review Concludes Phase I System design to meet commercial aviation protection requirements Airframe & avionics integration analysis and FAA certification issues Reliability and failure rate analysis Operating and maintenance analysis and trade-off approaches Lifecycle cost analysis [acquisition, integration, operating, and support costs] 9
10 Phase II Activities Critical Design Review Finalize designs and software development Finalize operations and supportability plans and activities Analysis of recurring Operation & Support costs Finalize maintenance approach Test Article Design and Development Aircraft Integration FAA Certification Analysis and assessment System performance Reliability, failure rates, and supportability Life-cycle Support Costs Test and Evaluation Wind Tunnel Testing Hardware-in-the-loop testing and reliability & maintainability testing Developmental Testing / Flight Testing / Operational Testing Finalize training requirements and development of training materials 10
11 Key Challenges Being Addressed by SPO System Performance Requirements False Alarm Rates Missile Warning Systems Countermeasure Effectiveness Operations Concepts Aircraft Integration and FAA Certification Multiple aircraft types, models, and configurations Cost-benefit Weight / Space / Power Drag and performance Safety of flight / personnel safety System reliability Supportability Reliability Maintainability Training Test and Evaluation Modeling & Simulation Hardware in the Loop Flight Testing Operational Testing Wind Tunnel Security Management Concerns Anti-tamper coatings Anti-tamper hardware Zeroizing Software NAS integration for emergency notification system Criteria for potential deployment options (Civil Reserve Air Fleet; overseas; regional; all) Life Cycle Cost analysis 11
12 External Factors Play a Large Role White House and Congressional Interest Media Interest Economic Issues and Requirements Geo-political Issues and Requirements Aviation Certifications (Aircraft and NAS Integration) Radio Frequency Authorizations (Domestic and International) Export Compliance Buy-in from Aviation Community Stakeholders 12
13 Other Government Agencies Play Key Roles DoD Current technology and programs Science & Technology Laboratories T&E Facilities Intelligence DoS Export Control and ITAR Compliance FAA Aircraft integration and certification National Airspace System integration FCC Frequency allocation / authorization TSA Intelligence Airport Security Operations 13
14 Aviation Community Stakeholders Aviation Associations ATA (Air Transport Association) ATCA (Air Traffic Control Association) RTCA (Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics) NCAS (National Center for Aviation Security) ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) IATA (International Air Transport Association) Maintainers IBT (International Brotherhood of Teamsters) IAM (International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers) AMFA (Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association) TWU (Transport Workers Union) Unions ALPA (Airline Pilots Association) NATCA (National Air Traffic Controllers Association) Government NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) Commercial Airlines and Cargo Carriers Commercial Aircraft Owners (Leasers) Airport Operators and Authorities Aircraft Manufacturers Boeing Airbus 3rd Party Maintainers and Integrators Financial Industry Lenders Wall Street Insurance Companies / Adjusters Legal Profession / Courts 14
15 Contractors C-MANPADS Technical Solution Northrop Grumman BAE Systems United Airlines 15
16 Northrop Grumman Viper TM Solid State PPLN Laser Missile Detection 4 UV MWS (AN/AAR-54 AN/AAQ-24(V) Key Technologies Missile Sensor (AN/AAQ-54 AN/AAQ-24(V)) Pointer/Tracker Viper laser Fine-Track Sensor 4 Aods Strap-Down Stabilized LITENING AT/Indigo InSb 640x512 FTS Laser IR Jamming Energy Source System Processor Resource Manager (AN/AAQ-24(V) Key Technology Is Software 16 Legacy Sensor : 1500 built and fielded Point & Track: 267 units built and fielded Laser: Viper laser 74 built and fielded DIRCM Processor: 267 built and fielded Jamming S/W mature techniques Currently Fielded on Military & Special Purpose Large, Transport Aircraft
17 Common Pod Counter-MANPADS System Aircraft Specific Adapter BAE Systems Pointer/ Tracker High-Power Laser Power Jam Code Laser Controller Power CMD Sensor Data Power CMD Controller Power CMD/Data Power Sensor Sensor data Weight on Wheels LASER Safety Processor Message & Data UV Sensor Point & Track Multi- Band Laser Key Technologies 17 Legacy UV Sensor : Missile warning production system for US/UK military aviation (AN/AAR-57) Point & Track: First generation in production for Army and Special Ops aviation (ATIRCM/AN/ALQ-212(V)) Counter-MANPADS version previously developed for F/A-18 (TADIRCM) Multi-Band Laser: Production-ready for large aircraft protection
18 United Airlines United Airlines AVISYS, Inc. ARINC L-3 Com ATK Thales ARMTEC SAAB BAE Systems Symetrics NAWCWD GTRI ATK Thoikol Alloy Surfaces Vaisala AirDat Key Technologies Dual-spectrum Missile Warning w/data Fusion UV Passive MWS (AAR-47) RF Active MWS (MWS-20) Electronic Warfare Control System Expendable Countermeasures Countermeasure Dispenser ALE-47 Advanced Decoys (MJU 7/10, 51, 53) o Low temperature short burn time 18 Legacy Sensors: AAR-47 Multiple installations on commercial and military transport aircraft over 1000 produced MWS-20 in service on military C130 and commercial A340 aircraft Dispensers: Over 2500 installations Expendables: Advanced decoys developed for USAF and USN aircraft. Deployed on Head of State aircraft.
19 Summary Aggressive 2-year Program FAA Certified Prototype for Integration and Test Provides data on: Performance Cost-Benefit Trade-offs Supportability Plan Total Ownership Cost Provides for Stakeholder Input Provides for informed decision process 19
Subject: The Department of Homeland Security Needs to Fully Adopt a Knowledge-based Approach to Its Counter-MANPADS Development Program
United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 January 30, 2004 The Honorable Duncan Hunter Chairman The Honorable Ike Skelton Ranking Minority Member Committee on Armed Services House of
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2003 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E,D BA4 R-1 Item Nomenclature: 0604618D8Z, Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) Cost ($ in millions)
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007
SPS-TA THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT.
THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS SPS-TA INTEGRATED SELF-PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT AND WIDE-BODY AIRCRAFT www.thales-airbornesystems.com THALES AIRBORNE SYSTEMS ELECTRONIC WARFARE
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008 RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-4 0604272N, TADIRCM Total PE 92.490 32.552 63.244 64.668
AMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System
AMPS - Airborne Missile Protection System AMPS Where Innovation Meets Performance The Threat Military aircraft, VIP aircraft and commercial airliners are all exposed to the growing threat of Surface to
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
First Announcement/Call For Papers
AIAA Strategic and Tactical Missile Systems Conference AIAA Missile Sciences Conference Abstract Deadline 30 June 2011 SECRET/U.S. ONLY 24 26 January 2012 Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force Date: February 2015 3600: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014
MANPADS. Scale & Nature of the Threat
MANPADS Scale & Nature of the Threat Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D. Chief Operating Officer / Lexington Institute Adjunct Professor of Emerging Technology / Georgetown University November 12, 2003 Man-Portable
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #121
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army : March 2014 2040: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019
United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC)
United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command (USASOAC) AAAA Aircraft Survivability Equipment Symposium BG John R. Evans, Jr. USASOAC Commanding General 14 November 2017 Overall Classification:
CASAM. Civil Aircraft Security Against Manpads. 30th March 2011
CASAM Civil Aircraft Security Against Manpads Aeronautics Specific Targeted Research Project (STREP) of the European Sixth Framework Program (FP6) 30th March 2011 Presentation Plan Introduction The threat
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040:, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) FY
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 To Complete Program Element 11.801 10.862
Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats. Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success
Detect, Deny, Disrupt, Degrade and Evade Lethal Threats Advanced Survivability Suite Solutions for Mission Success Countering Smart and Adaptive Threats Military pilots and aircrews must be prepared to
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603500F PE TITLE: MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ADV Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 143.612 160.959 162.286 0.000 162.286 165.007 158.842 156.055 157.994 Continuing Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #91
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) # FY
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element - 16.397 1.975 1.971-1.971 1.990 1.989 2.023
aselsan EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT
EW SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT November 2014 CONTENTS What Is The Problem? Common Picture? (EW Spectrum) Area of Interest Preemptive Operations EW Spectrum Management Steps For EW Spectrum Management Planning,
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: ASW Systems Development
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Navy Page 1 of 17 R-1 Line Item #30 To Program Element 25.144
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit P-40, BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Aircraft Procurement, Navy/APN-5 Aircraft Modifications Program Element for Code B Items: P-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE 051100, EA-6 SERIES
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years R1 Program Element
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
Request for Solutions: Distributed Live Virtual Constructive (dlvc) Prototype
1.0 Purpose Request for Solutions: Distributed Live Virtual Constructive (dlvc) Prototype This Request for Solutions is seeking a demonstratable system that balances computer processing for modeling and
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-6 0604759N Major T & E Investment Prior Total COST ($
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Landmine Warfare and Barrier Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
GAO ELECTRONIC WARFARE. The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System. Report to the Secretary of Defense
GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Secretary of Defense April 2001 ELECTRONIC WARFARE The Army Can Reduce Its Risks in Developing New Radar Countermeasures System GAO-01-448 Contents
AMRDEC. Core Technical Competencies (CTC)
AMRDEC Core Technical Competencies (CTC) AMRDEC PAMPHLET 10-01 15 May 2015 The Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center The U. S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
Fundamentals of Electro-Optics and Infrared Sensors
Fundamentals of Electro-Optics and Infrared Sensors Make Your Career Soar WELCOME MESSAGE Welcome Thank you very much for your interest in White Eagle Aerospace. Since our founding in 2006, we have become
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Army DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element - 14.114 15.018-15.018 15.357 15.125
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 35.208 38.447
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #45
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Army DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY GOALS. NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER TACTICAL AIRCRAFT PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY GOALS NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference Rear Admiral David J. Venlet 29 November 2006 Discussion Outline Program Executive
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 To Program Element 966.537 66.374 29.083 54.838 0.000 54.838 47.369
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Missile Defense Agency Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements FY15 FY17 Distribution Statement A Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. File: NAVAIR Brief 1 Weapons Systems Integration and
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.
NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. 1 Weapons Systems Integration and Software Support (WSISS)
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
Armed Unmanned Systems
Armed Unmanned Systems A Perspective on Navy Needs, Initiatives and Vision Rear Admiral Tim Heely, USN Program Executive Officer Strike Weapons and Unmanned Aviation 10 July 2007 Armed UASs A first time
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 22.63 3.676 32.789-32.789 35.932
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #147 Cost To Complete Total
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Army Date: February 2015 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 United States Special Operations Command DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Complete
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 Base FY 2012 OCO FY 2012 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 160.351 162.286 140.231-140.231 151.521 147.426
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #147
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)
PE NUMBER: 0604256F PE TITLE: Threat Simulator Development RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1998 Actual FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior
ASSEMBLY 36TH SESSION
International Civil Aviation Organization WORKING PAPER A36-WP/26 03/07/07 ASSEMBLY 36TH SESSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Agenda Item 15: Aviation Security Programme THREAT TO CIVIL AVIATION POSED BY MAN-PORTABLE
EW Modeling and Simulation: Meeting the Challenge
EW Modeling and Simulation: Meeting the Challenge Dr. George Kailiwai III Director, Resources and Assessment (J8) United States Pacific Command July 2009 Rio Hotel, Las Vegas, Nevada Today s EW Threat
UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 3.350 3.874 - - - 1.977 - - - Continuing Continuing 645121: Physical
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Air Traffic Control/Approach/Landing System (ATCALS) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 26.209 20.644 43.187-43.187 28.526 19.802 7.405 5.225 Continuing Continuing
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle
Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Advanced Technology Program TTO Tactical Technology Office Dr. William Scheuren DARPA/TTO wscheuren@darpa.mil (703) 696-2321 UCAV-N Vision ❶ Revolutionary New Ship-based
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 19.165 18.599 22.654-22.654 24.342 24.422 24.571 25.715 Continuing
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Program Element 25.229.872.863 7.6 8.463.874.876.891.96
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #77
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Navy Date: March 2014 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: Advanced Component Development & Prototypes (ACD&P) COST ($ in Millions)
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element.96 8.765 21.17-21.17
NAVY AREA THEATER BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (NATBMD)
NAVY AREA THEATER BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (NATBMD) Navy ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 1500 missiles Raytheon Missile Systems Company Total Program Cost (TY$): $6710M Lockheed
UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 157.971 156.297 144.109-144.109 140.097 141.038
USAF Tankers: Critical Assumptions for Comparing Competitive Dual Procurement with Sole Source Award
USAF Tankers: Critical Assumptions for Comparing Competitive Dual Procurement with Sole Source Award The Congress has expressed interest in better understanding the costs associated with competitive dual
GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:
Keynote by Dr. Thomas A. Kennedy Chairman and CEO of Raytheon Association of Old Crows Symposium Marriott Marquis Hotel Washington, D.C. 12.2.15 AS DELIVERED GOOD MORNING THANK YOU, GENERAL ISRAEL FOR
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 0.051-3.926-3.926 4.036 4.155 4.236 4.316 Continuing Continuing
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)
BUDGET ACTIVITY ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit) PE NUMBER AND TITLE 5 - ENG MANUFACTURING DEV 0604768A - BAT COST (In Thousands) FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Army Date: March 2014 2040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2006 Actual FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call
Electronic Systems Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 Outlook Forecast International projects that the
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #79
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Air Force : March 2014 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2013 FY 2014 # FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 To Program Element 49.457 65.370 118.411 59.826-59.826
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0207134F PE TITLE: F-15E SQUADRONS Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE 07 Operational System Development 0207134F F-15E SQUADRONS Cost ($ in Millions)
KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Air Force
KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017 RDT&E U.S. Air Force Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2013 Cost To COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS)
Common Range Integrated Instrumentation System (CRIIS) National Defense Industrial Association 50 th Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition CRIIS Program Overview October 2012 Ms.
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Army DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 42.067 6.509 5.000-5.000 41.500 30.000
Army Ground-Based Sense and Avoid for Unmanned Aircraft
Army Ground-Based Sense and Avoid for Unmanned Aircraft Dr. Rodney E. Cole 27 October, 2015 This work is sponsored by the Army under Air Force Contract #FA8721-05-C-0002. Opinions, interpretations, recommendations
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Navy DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 To Program Element 92.713 23.188 31.064 46.007-46.007
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003
COST ($ in Thousands) FY 2002 Actual FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 Cost to Complete Total Cost 2865 Manufacturing Technology 55,694 44,381 39,396 40,112 39,505 40,157 40,787 41,336
F-35 Lightning II A New Generation of Fighter
F-35 Lightning II A New Generation of Fighter 1 The Next Generation in Fighter Aircraft A Quantum Leap in Capability LO Treatments Advanced Avionics Guided Weapons First Jets Supersonic First Radar Multirole
TECHNICAL SUPPORT WORKING GROUP. Perry Pederson Infrastructure Protection Subgroup
TECHNICAL SUPPORT WORKING GROUP Perry Pederson Infrastructure Protection Subgroup TSWG Mission and Objectives Mission: Conduct interagency research and development programs for Combating Terrorism through
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Air Force Page 1 of 14 R-1 Line #216 To Program Element
Sweden s Multirole Fighter Spreads Its Wings
Sweden s Multirole Fighter Spreads Its Wings Defense-Update Tamir Eshel SAAB rolled out the newest member of the Gripen family of fighter jets the Gripen E. SAAB defines the new fighter as revolutionary
Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association
Advanced Technology Overview for the Huntsville Aerospace Marketing Association DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited May 13, 2016 Mr. Richard Matlock Program
Engaging U.S. Markets: Strategy and Programs
Engaging U.S. Markets: Strategy and Programs Ralph D. Crosby, Jr. CEO North America North America Investor Forum New York 7 th October 2003 1 EADS Accessing the U.S. Aerospace and Defense Market Executing
AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance
AGI Technology for EW and AD Dominance Singapore 2015 Content Overview of Air Defense Overview of Electronic Warfare A practical example Value proposition Summary AMD - a multidisciplinary challenge Geography
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2
Exhibit R-2 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605155N PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: FLEET TACTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION COST: (Dollars in Thousands) Project Number & Title FY 2007 Actual FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
The Post-Afghanistan IED Threat Assessment: Executive Summary
The Post-Afghanistan IED Threat Assessment: Executive Summary DSI-2013-U-004754-1Rev May 2013 Approved for distribution: May 2013 Dr. Jeffrey B. Miers Director, Operations Tactics Analysis This document
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 Program Element 16.104 48.666 19.004-19.004 19.950 31.056 31.181 31.730 Continuing Continuing 633150: Advanced Optics
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base
Exhibit P-40, Budget Line Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3011F: Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force / BA 01: Ammunition / BSA 16: Flares ID Code (A=Service Ready, B=Not Service
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION & CONTRIBUTION TO JOINT VISION
F-22 RAPTOR (ATF) Air Force ACAT ID Program Prime Contractor Total Number of Systems: 339 Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Pratt &Whitney Total Program Cost (TY$): $62.5B Average Flyaway Cost (TY$): $97.9M Full-rate
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 213 Navy DATE: February 212 COST ($ in Millions) FY 211 FY 212 Base OCO Total FY 214 FY 215 FY 216 FY 217 To Complete Total Total Program Element 168.157
UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2017 Air Force : February 2016 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions)