Fig. I European Security Organization (as of May 31, 2006) OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) (55 countries)

Transcription

1 Section 8. Europe 1. General Situation Many European countries recognize that the threat of a large scale invasion by another nation has disappeared. At the same time, new security issues potentially affecting Europe have been identified, including regional conflicts, the rise of international terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Following the end of the Cold War, European countries have been striving to stabilize the security situation through efforts to enhance and expand the frameworks of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO: 26 member states) and the European Union (EU: 27 member states). In addition, many European countries have been making efforts to improve the capabilities to respond to aforementioned new issues, while reducing and rationalizing their armed forces. (See Fig. I-2-8-1) Fig. I European Security Organization (as of May 31, 2006) Andorra San Marino Lichtenstein Monaco Macedonia Switzerland Croatia Albania Serbia and Montenegro Bosnia-Herzegovina OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) (55 countries) The Council of Europe (46 countries) EAPC (Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council) (49 countries) Austria Finland Sweden Ireland Greece United Kingdom France Germany Italy Belgium Netherlands Luxemburg Spain Portugal Western European Union (WEU) (10 countries) EU (27 countries) Malta Cyprus NATO (26 countries) Slovakia Lithuania Estonia Latvia Rumania Bulgaria Czech Republic Hungary Poland Slovenia Denmark Former Warsaw Pact Organization (Former WPO) Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) (12 countries) Norway Iceland Turkey Azerbaijan Armenia Russia Ukraine Moldova Georgia Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Belarus Uzbekistan Turkmenistan Kazakhstan The Holy See United States, Canada Legends : PfP members (23 countries) : WEU associate members : Countries that maintain a cooperative partnership with the WEU : WEU observers Note: The Warsaw Pact Military Organization was dissolved in April The Warsaw Pact was dissolved as a political organization after the signing of the dissolution agreement on July 1, 1991 and ratification of the agreement by the parliaments of the member states. 86

2 Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan 2. Enhancement and Enlargement of Security Frameworks 1. Enhancement of Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management, and Peacekeeping Functions (1) Commitment to a New Role Founded for the primary purpose of collective defense among member countries, NATO has shifted the focus of its activities to conflict prevention and crisis management since the end of the Cold War. This shift is reflected in the Strategic Concept of the Alliance, reviewed in 1999, in which missions such as conflict prevention and crisis management 131 are added to its primary task of collective defense, based on the view that various dangers difficult to forecast, such as ethnic and religious conflicts, territorial disputes, human rights suppression, and the dissolution of a state, still remain in Europe and surrounding regions. NATO has led the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan since Japanese Prime Minister Abe at the NATO Council [Cabinet Public Relations Office] August 2003, which is the first operation outside Europe, and expanded the area of its operations to the entire Afghanistan in October The NATO Summit held in Riga, Latvia in November 2006 adopted the joint statement that the contribution to the peace and stability of Afghanistan is its first priority 132. For Iraq, NATO has provided assistance for the training of Iraqi security forces in accordance with an agreement reached at the NATO Istanbul Summit Meeting held in June As NATO thus expands and prolongs its operations, problems are pointed out, including shortage in force and tight financial conditions of NATO. On the other hand, the EU, enhancing its own commitment to security issues, adopted its first document on security strategy, A Secure Europe in a Better World-European Security Strategy, in December This document regarded terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, regional conflicts, state failure, and organized crimes as serious threats and showed the policies to be taken to deal with these challenges by stabilizing the surrounding area s situation and based on multinational cooperation. The EU, in 2003, for the first time led a military operation to maintain public order in Macedonia using NATO equipment and capabilities 133. In the same year, the EU carried out its first peacekeeping operation (PKO) outside Europe and its first operation without using NATO equipment and capabilities in Democratic Republic of Congo. In recent years, the EU has engaged in activities in the areas of crisis management and security maintenance 134, such as taking over in December 2004 the activities of the Stabilization Force (SFOR) deployed to Bosnia-Herzegovina under NATO leadership. (2) Pursuit of Military Capabilities Required for New Roles NATO s bombing campaign conducted against Yugoslavia in 1999 revealed a capability gap between the United States and European countries. Given this, and based on the agreement reached at the NATO Prague Summit Meeting held in November 2002, NATO has moved forward with reforms of its military capabilities, including organizational transformation

3 As the core of NATO transforms to improve its capability, the launching of the NATO Response Force (NRF), designed to respond swiftly to various types of crisis scenarios across the world, had started since The Force was declared to be at full operational capability in November 2006 and performs operations utilizing its special capabilities. For example, it transported relief materials when a large earthquake occurred in Pakistan in October The EU has tried to become capable of conducting peacekeeping and other military operations independently in cases where NATO does not involve itself. The EU adopted Headline Goal 2010, and positioned the Battle groups concept as the core of its future military approaches in (See Fig. I-2-8-2) Fig. I Trend of Capability Build-up of NATO and EU NATO Response Force (NRF) EU Battle Groups (Combat Groups) Missions Swiftly responding every situation worldwide Responding EU-led missions, such as peacekeeping operations, in the case where there is no intervention by NATO. Organization Capabilities Standing joint task forces formed by mainly brigade-scale ground units (approx. 4,000 troops), plus maritime, air and specialized units Size of force: approx. 25,000 troops Deployment begins within five days of an order. Capability of 30-day operations Thirteen units of 1,500 troops will be formed. Of these, two units can be emergency deployed simultaneously. Deployment begins within five days of an order and is completed within 15 days. Capability of 30-day operations Operations Force building One year rotation (in the case of ground units, six months training and six months on standby) Basic operational concept: to be dispatched as an initial response unit Segmentation of units is possible according to the mission Initiative was formulated in November Prototype force was formed in October Possession of initial operational capability in October 2004 Complete operational capability was achieved in November Units will be formed and on standby by rotation within the unilateral or multinational framework. Initiative was formulated in June Complete operational capability was achieved in January The EU also set up the European Defense Agency in July 2004 with the goal of improving the defense capabilities of individual countries within a European-wide security defense policy. At the meeting of Ministers of Defense held in March 2006, the ministers agreed that European Defense Agency will examine the establishment of a fund for research and development. It is, however, pointed out that, due to such a fact that seven countries expressed their intention not to participate, there is friction with member states that lead this concept. 2. Stability by the Geographical Expansion of Security Frameworks Since the end of the Cold War, efforts have been made to secure the stability of the so-called security vacuum in Central and Eastern Europe by enlarging the NATO framework. 88

4 Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan NATO adopted the Partnership for Peace (PfP) in , under which training exercises for PKOs and response to refugee problems have been conducted. In 1994, the Organization initiated the Mediterranean Dialogue to contribute to stability in the Mediterranean region by provision of information and participation of Dialogue countries in NATO activities. In addition, the 9/11 attacks in the United States promoted NATO and Russia to take steps to build a new relationship from the need to address common security issues. Accordingly, it was decided to establish the NATO-Russia council at the NATO-Russia Summit held in May With seven countries (Rumania, Slovenia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Bulgaria, and Slovakia) becoming new members in March 2004, nearly all countries of Central and Eastern Europe have now joined NATO. In a parallel development, 10 countries from Central and Eastern Europe (Poland, Hungary, Czech, Slovakia, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, and Cyprus) joined the EU in May 2004, and Bulgaria and Rumania in January (See Fig. I-2-8-3) Fig. I Enlargement of NATO and EU Membership Original EU member countries Original NATO member countries Joined EU by 1995 Joined NATO by 1982 Joined EU in May 2004 Joined NATO in 1999 Joined EU in January 2007 Joined NATO in March Efforts by Individual Countries to Maintain the Capability to Respond to Various Conditions European nations attract more importance to military missions other than home defense, baring terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other new threats in mind. In defense build-up, they emphasize transport capability for overseas deployment given their roles in NATO. 1. The United Kingdom The defense policy of the United Kingdom is based on the 1998 Strategic Defense Review (SDR). In this document, the United Kingdom defined the tasks of its military forces such as peacetime security (support against terrorism of all kinds); security of the overseas territories; responses to crises both inside and 89

5 outside the NATO area, and has been committed specifically to reductions of nuclear forces, enhancement of joint combat capabilities, improvements in NBC protection, increase of mobility and striking power, improvements in service life, and greater efficiency in weapons/equipment procurement and others. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, A New Chapter was added to the SDR in July 2002, which provides guidelines for dealing with international terrorism. In December 2003, the United Kingdom released a defense white paper, Delivering Security in a Changing World. It attracts attention that this white paper names international terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and failed states as major threats, and at the same time, emphasizes the need to strengthen overseas deployment capabilities, to improve readiness, and to make further reforms, based on lessons from military operations in Iraq 137. According to the report on specific future military capabilities released in July 2004, even while pursuing force reduction and consolidating its major military and naval facilities, the United Kingdom plans to enhance its ability to carry out target acquisition and attacks swiftly and accurately, to improve its ground fighting capabilities so that it can more effectively conduct small- to medium-scale operations, and to advance its anti-surface strike capabilities by upgrading its aircraft carriers and landing ships. In the aftermath of the terrorist bombings in London in July 2005, the United Kingdom formed the Special Forces Support Group (SFSG) against the terrorism. In December 2006, the British government published a white paper titled The Future of the United Kingdom s Nuclear Deterrent to indicate the policy to maintain nuclear deterrent based on the submarinelaunched ballistic missile system beyond the 2020s 138. The white paper also describes efforts for nuclear disarmament, including the decision to reduce operational nuclear warheads from 200 or less to 160 or less. 2. Germany The German White Paper of Defense was published after the interval of 12 years in October It states that the main mission of the German Federal Armed Forces continues to be home defense and the collective defense in traditional terms; however, that the mission most likely to come next will be conflict prevention and crisis management, including the combat against international terrorism, considering the current situation that new threats, such as international terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, are expanding. Germany is committed to using resources focusing on the enhancement of such capabilities as strategic transportation, global-scale reconnaissance, and efficient and highly interoperable command in order for the capabilities of Federal Armed Forces to meet the above mission, and moves ahead with concrete plans to introduce A-400M transport aircraft and the synthetic aperture radar satellite SAR-LUPE. Also, Germany is promoting the plan to restructure its military into integrated forces with the three functions of intervention, stabilization, and assistance 139. In addition, efforts are made to reduce the total number of personnel and to relocate bases and facilities within Germany. 3. France Nuclear deterrence, conflict prevention, overseas deployment of forces, and home defense (e.g. counterterrorism) are the core elements in France s defense strategy under its recognition that mass terror and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are a direct threat to French people. France is building up its military capabilities based on the Model of the Army in 2015 which was released in February Conscription was abolished and the military forces were reduced in accordance with the Military Program Law for Now, based on the Military Program Law for , France plans to focus investments on the enhancement and improvement of command and intelligence functions, deployment and mobility capabilities, action and striking capabilities in depth, defensive means, and others. To 90

6 Part I Security Environment Surrounding Japan be specific, the plan includes the order of unmanned reconnaissance aircraft and the acquisition of A-400M transport aircraft, Rafale fighter aircraft, and Leclerc tanks as well as the construction of a conventionally powered aircraft carrier in cooperation with the United Kingdom Efforts toward Stabilization in Europe 1. Arms Control and Disarmament The Treaty of Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE), which formally entered into force in 1992, set upper limits for five categories of weapons tanks, wheeled armored combat vehicles, artillery, fighters, and attack helicopters for both East and West 141, and stipulates that weapons in excess to these limits should be eliminated. Under the treaty, more than 70,000 weapons of various types have already been eliminated. Subsequently, given the changed strategic environment in Europe, the CFE application treaty was signed at the OSCE summit meeting in 1999, which transformed the earlier limits for the East and West as groups into limits for individual countries and territories Confidence Building Measures (CBM) 143 Talks on Confidence and Security-Building Measures (CSBM) have been held in Europe since 1989, and a plenary meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) in 1992 adopted the Vienna Document 1992, which deals with annual exchanges of military intelligence as well as the notification, inspection, and regulation of military exercises above the prescribed scale 144. The Open Skies Treaty 145, designed to improve the openness and transparency of military activities carried out by signatory countries and to supplement arms control verification measures by allowing reciprocal aerial inspections, was signed by 25 countries in 1992 and entered into force in January