CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED. DATE February 2008 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION

Transcription

1 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RDTEN/BA N/MK-48 ADCAP COST (In Millions) Total PE Cost 0366 / MK 48 ADCAP 9999 / CONGRESSIONAL ADDS FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY A. MISSION DESCRIPTION: A. (U) Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: MK 48 ADCAP (Advanced Capability) Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) program executes spiral development of weapon performance improvements in three development product areas: (1) Common Broadband Advanced Sonar System (CBASS); (2) Advanced Processor Builds (APBs), and (3) Torpedo Technology Insertion. The budget enables Acquisition Category (ACAT) III development to address Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) defined capability-based requirements and mission needs. This PE ( N/0366) is tied to development programs that leverage a joint US/Australia, Armaments Cooperative Project to develop MK 48 ADCAP, and Future Naval Capability (FNC) technologies developed by Office of Naval Research (ONR). (U) Countermeasure (CM) sophistication and availability on the open market directly affects ADCAP kill proficiency and its ability to counter rapidly evolving threats. The focus of the MK 48 ADCAP torpedo Research and Development (R&D) program for FY01 and out shifted from being primarily concentrated on Software Block Upgrade efforts towards coordinated hardware upgrades, rapid Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS) insertion, and APBs to rapidly upgrade the ADCAP to counter evolving threats and maintain robust performance. The CBASS program developed and fielded a broadband sonar capable of identifying CMs and discriminating them from the target. CBASS developed 22 test articles (2 test vehicles and 20 Engineering Development Models (EDMs). CBASS met Milestone II requirements on 6 March 1998 and received Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) approval to proceed into Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase. CBASS Phase I received Full Rate Production (FRP) decision in June Initial Operational Capability (IOC) occurred duringfy06. The Commonwealth of Australia, Royal Australian Navy (RAN) is participating to jointly develop CBASS torpedo and signed an Armaments Cooperative Project (ACP) Agreement March The intent of the CBASS program was to achieve improvements in shallow water torpedo performance. (U) The MK 48 ADCAP torpedo R&D program focuses on two specific areas near term: Torpedo APBs and broadband sonar capability. The CNO continues to stress shallow water (less than 600 feet) as a critical operating area to counter third world diesel electric submarines. Torpedo testing in shallow water has demonstrated that in-service ADCAP has less than full capability in this difficult environment. However, this testing, in conjunction with laboratory simulation efforts, has shown that significant performance improvements can be made by implementing changes to weapon tactics and software algorithms. Development, implementation and testing of these changes is being accomplished under the Torpedo APB program. This program also leverages the RAN joint torpedo program and Future Naval Capability (FNC) technologies developed by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) in the areas of torpedo broadband signal processing, tactics processing, and alertment. The Torpedo APB program also will incorporate MK 54 Lightweight Torpedo algorithms and tactics software to create a Common Torpedo Development program. Future APB software builds will utilize the common torpedo software to deliver software and tactics to both the MK 48 ADCAP and MK 54 Lightweight torpedoes. R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-2 PAGE 1 of 9 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION

2 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (CONTINUATION) APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RDTEN/BA N/MK-48 ADCAP (U) The Torpedo Technology Insertion program will provide for evolutionary torpedo improvements and upgrades (including the transition and testing of advanced technologies from the Research and Development (R&D) community (6.2/6.3) and contractors). This approach will incorporate developmental testing of the Future Naval Capability (FNC) transitioning technologies for Advanced Capability (ADCAP) upgrades in the areas of torpedo sensors, weapon/platform connectivity, warhead lethality, speed and depth. These efforts will continue torpedo development investment at a lower cost and shorter term than traditional torpedo programs. (U) BothFNC technologies and MK 54 Lightweight torpedo developments will be transitioned into ADCAP through Tech Insertion packages. Priorities for Tech Insertion are a new array to improve torpedo effectiveness,advanced processing, and advanced counter-countermeasure capability. B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY: Funding: FY2008 President's Budget FY2009 President's Budget Controls Total Adjustments Summary of Adjustments Program Adjustment Undistributed General Reductions Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Pricing Adjustment Congressional Adds Subtotal Schedule: Technology Insertions: Technology Insertion is being delayed two years due to a reduction in CBASS Technology Insertion Funding in FY09 and FY10. Aggressive development efforts to resume in FY11 to support FY15 delivery C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Line Item No. and Name FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 To Complete Total Cost MK 48 ADCAP MODS WPN/PE N/BA-3/BLI 3225) R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-2 PAGE 2 of 9 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION

3 EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (CONTINUATION) APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE RDTEN/BA N/MK-48 ADCAP D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Sole Source Production Contract awarded in FY 2004 for MK 48 ADCAP MODS, Lightweight MK 54 and Common Broadband Advanced Sonar System (CBASS) kits, including Royal Australian Navy (RAN) units. Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Contract for CBASS units awarded in FY 2004 and to include RAN units. E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Division Newport, Newport, RI - System Integrator and Software Developer. Continued integration and development testing of CBASS hardware and software components and test equipment. Raytheon awarded Sole Source Production Contract for MK 48 ADCAP MODS, Lightweight MK 54 and CBASS kits, including RAN units. Commander Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COTF) - Test Planning, Independent Operational Evaluation. R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-2 PAGE 3 of 9 RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION

4 EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION COST (In Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Project Cost RDT&E Articles Qty A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Notes: Articles reflect: FY08: delivery of Advanced Processor Builds (APBs) Spiral 1; FY08:completion of APB Spiral 2/3 development; FY10: delivery of APB-1/Spiral 4 (Common); FY13: delivery of APB/Spiral 5. A. (U) Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: MK 48 ADCAP Research, Development,Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) program executes spiral development of weapon performance improvements in two development product areas: (1)Advanced Processor Builds (APBs), and (2) Torpedo Technology Insertion. The budget enables Acquisition Category (ACAT) III development to address Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) defined capability-based requirements and mission needs. This PE ( N/0366) is tied to development programs that leverage a joint US/Australia, Armaments Cooperative Project to develop MK 48 ADCAP, and Future Naval Capability (FNC) technologies being developed by Office of Naval Research (ONR). R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 4 of 9 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

5 EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM: TORPEDO APB RDT&E Articles Quantity FY07 - Efforts focused on Advance Processor Builds (APBs) Spiral 2/3 development. Tasking included software coding, modeling and simulation and engineering test in water. Steps in the APB process included 1) evaluation, 2) assessment, 3) implementation, and 4) system assessment. Completed operational testing for APB Spiral 1.Improves shallow water performance and increases the probability of kill. FY08 - Spiral 1 torpedo APB software build planned for release in FY08 which provides full Spiral 1 capability and torpedo effectiveness gain. Complete APB Spiral 2/3 development. Continue Spiral 4 development. Improves shallow water performance and increases the probability of kill. FY09 - Continue development of APB Spiral 4 in preparation for software release in FY10. Improves shallow water performance and increases the probability of kill. OPERATIONAL TEST SUPPORT RDT&E Articles Quantity FY07- Provided for accreditation requirements and conducted analysis relating to APB Spiral 1release planned in FY08.Improves shallow water performance and increases probability of kill. FY08 - Conduct analysis and prepare final report for test and evaluation efforts prior to APB Spiral 1 release. Improves shallow water performance and increases probability of kill. FY09 - Provide for accreditation requirements and conduct analysis relating to APB Spiral 4 software release planned in FY10.Improves shallow water performance and increases probability of kill. TECHNOLOGY INSERTIONS RDT&E Articles Quantity FY07- Conducted studies to support development of Heavyweight Torpedo Capability Development Document (CDD), Capability Production Document (CPD), and Technology Insertion Package. Began development of Technology Insertion #1 and support plan for Insensitive Munitions (IM) warhead documented in Strategic Plan. Improves shallow water performance and increases probability of kill. FY08 - Continue development of Technology Insertion #1 and support plan for an IM warhead. Improves shallow water performance and increases probability of kill. FY09 -No work being performed due to program adjustments. R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 5 of 9 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

6 EXHIBIT R-3, RDT&E PROJECT COST ANALYSIS Contract Performing Total PY FY 2007 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2009 Cost to Total Target Cost Categories Method Activity & Cost Cost Award Cost Award Cost Award Complete Cost Value of & Type Location ($000) ($000) Date ($000) Date ($000) Date ($000) ($000) Contract Primary Hardware Development WR NUWC NPT OCT OCT N/A CONT CONT Primary Hardware Development Various Various DEC JAN N/A CONT CONT Subtotal Product Development CONT CONT Remarks: Remarks: Various - TBD; Primary hardware development activity to be selected after evaluation of technologies from various vendors. Software Development WR NUWC NPT OCT OCT OCT-08 CONT CONT Software Development Various Various DEC DEC DEC-08 CONT CONT Integrated Logistics Support WR NUWC NPT N/A OCT OCT-08 CONT CONT Systems Engineering WR NUWC NPT OCT OCT OCT-08 CONT CONT Subtotal Support Costs Remarks: CONT CONT Test & Evaluation WR NUWC NPT OCT OCT OCT-08 CONT CONT Operational Test & Evaluation WR Operational Test Support NOV NOV NOV-08 CONT CONT Modeling & Simulation WR NUWC NPT OCT OCT OCT-08 CONT CONT Modeling & Simulation C,CPFF ARL / PSU DEC DEC DEC-08 CONT CONT Subtotal Test and Evaluation Remarks: CONT CONT Program Management Support Various Alion Science MAY OCT OCT-08 CONT CONT Travel WR NAVSEA MAY OCT OCT-08 CONT CONT Overhead N/A N/A N/A CONT CONT Subtotal Management Services Remarks: CONT CONT Total Cost CONT CONT R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-3 PAGE 6 of 9 RDT&E PROJECT COST ANALYSIS

7 EXHIBIT R-4, SCHEDULE PROFILE PROGRAM EFFORTS FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 ADCAP Performance Upgrades based on Fleet Priorities (DT/OT testing scheduled prior to each software Torpedo Advanced Processor Builds APB/Spiral 1 APB/ Spiral 2/3 APB Spiral 4 APB/Spiral 5 CBASS Development Torpedo Technology Insertion Technology Insertion #1 Development SDR R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-4 PAGE 7 of 9 SCHEDULE PROFILE

8 EXHIBIT R-4a, SCHEDULE DETAIL Schedule Profile Torpedo Advanced Processor Build Software Development Software Delivery FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 2Q-4Q 4Q 1Q Torpedo Technology Insertion Study Phase/System Development System Design Review (SDR) Developmental Testing Development/Operating Testing 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q-4Q 1Q 3Q-4Q 1Q-2Q 3Q-4Q R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-4a PAGE 8 of 9 SCHEDULE DETAIL

9 EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION RDTEN/BA N/MK-48 ADCAP 9999/CONGRESSIONAL ADDS B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM: 9999/Torpedo Post-Launch Communications System RDT&E Articles Quantity Torpedo Post-Launch Communications System Congressional add funds the MK-48 Heavyweight Torpedo (HWT) Post-Launch Communication System. This project will include evaluation of innovative flex-hose/guidance wire concepts using hydrodynamic computational simulation models, as well as fabrication, test and evaluation of prototype hardware to demonstrate compliance with Fleet requirements. higher bandwidth post-launch communication technologies will also be developed, tested and evaluated, and a new flex-hose will be designed. The new flex-hose concept is required to provide high reliability operation over the entire speed and depth operating envelope of the submarine including shallow water, near bottom engagements. 9999/Digital Data for Weapons System Readiness RDT&E Articles Quantity Digital Data for Weapons System Readiness Congressional add funds for the MK-48 ADCAP Heavyweight Torpedo (HWT). This program will develop secure data sharing, analysis, and collaboration methodologies and tools for Heavyweight Torpedo programs. These funds will be used to organize and facilitate collaborate projects between industry, governmental facilities, and academia in order to improve the use and sharing of digital data in order to increase overall weapon system readiness. R-1 Line Item No 176 EXHIBIT R-2a PAGE 9 of 9 RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION