Use of Force Incidents Use of Force Incidents per 1,000 Arrests All Use of Force Incidents By District

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Use of Force Incidents Use of Force Incidents per 1,000 Arrests All Use of Force Incidents By District"

Katrina Montgomery
5 years ago
Views:

Force Incidents 2015 2018 1. Reasons for Force For each use of force, there must be a reason for why force was used.

1 Force Incidents Reasons for Force For each use of force, there must be a reason for why force was used. However, it is also department policy to document injuries which happened prior to and during custody on the same form (DPD Form 12), regardless of cause. Force Event Type Injury Prior To Arrest Injury While In Custody UOF During Arrest Force Incidents per 1,000 Arrests All Force Incidents By District District District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District 7 (DIA) Total , , , , These include all use of force incidents, including those marked as "injury prior to arrest" and "injury while in custody". Arrests only include those made in the City and County of Denver. Police Department/Department of Public Safety 1331 Cherokee Denver, CO p f

2 3. Force Incidents During Arrest per 1,000 Arrests All Force Incidents By District District Use of Use of District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District , , , , District (DIA) Total , , , , This table only includes those uses of force which were documented as effected during an arrest. Arrests only include those made in the City and County of Denver. 4. Force Incidents per Officer Force Incidents per officer >= Total DPD Officers Officers who were documented as using one or more types of force during a Force incident. Officers who were only witnesses to the incident or specifically documented not using force were not counted as having participated in the use of force event. This may include officers who were injured during the incident but did not use force themselves

3 5. Force Incidents captured on BWC Captured on Body Worn Camera BWC NO BWC % Captured on BWC 0% 15.2% 80.2% 66.6% This counts all Force Incidents, including those listed as Injury Prior to Arrest and Injury While In Custody. If there was no specific indication that the event was captured on BWC, it is marked as not captured, regardless of the officers having a BWC or not. 6. Force Incidents During Arrest captured on BWC Captured on Body Worn Camera BWC NO BWC % Captured on BWC 0% 20.3% 85.5% 89.7% This only includes those uses of force which were documented as effected during an arrest. If there was no specific indication that the event was captured on BWC, it is marked as not captured, regardless of the officers having a BWC or not

4 7. Officer Race/Ethnicity vs Subject Race/Ethnicity These tables capture all Force incidents, not just those that occurred while effecting an arrest. Each officer involved is counted. Each incident may have multiple officers and subjects, so numbers will not add up to the total count of Force incidents. Officer and subject race/ethnicity information is self reported Officer Race Subject Race Native American Asian Black Hispanic Unknown White Total Asian Black Hispanic Native American Unknown White Total Officer Race Subject Race Native American Asian Black Hispanic Unknown White Total Asian Black Hispanic Native American Unknown White Total Officer Race Subject Race Native American Asian Black Hispanic Unknown White Total Asian Black Hispanic Native American Unknown White Total Officer Race Subject Race Native American Asian Black Hispanic Unknown White Total Asian Black Hispanic Native American Unknown White Total Officer Force level vs Subject Race/Ethnicity - 4 -

5 Tier I level of force are those less likely to cause serious bodily injury or death, such as Takedown or strikes using hand, foot, etc., Pepper spray or other chemical agent, ECW (Taser), RIPP Restraint or other less lethal weapons such as Pepper Ball rounds or 40mm impact rounds. Tier II level of force includes lethal force or force likely to cause serious bodily injury such as Police Service Dog, Handgun, Rifle, or Shotgun Totals do not include incidents where no force was used by officers Tier I of Total Tier II of Total Total % % Asian % % Black % % Hispanic % % Native American % % Unknown % % White % % 2016 Tier I of Total Tier II of Total Total % % Asian % % Black % % Hispanic % % Native American % % Unknown % % White % % 2017 Tier I of Total Tier II of Total Total % % Asian % % Black % % Hispanic % % Native American % % Unknown % % White % % 2018 Tier I of Total Tier II of Total Total % % Asian % % Black % % Hispanic % % Native American % % Unknown % % White % % - 5 -

6 9. Force level used by officer vs subject resistance level These tables only include those use of force incidents occurring while effecting an arrest. Subjects may exhibit different levels of resistance during the encounter and afterward. Each use of force incident could have both tier I and tier II force used as the officers' response is escalated, or no Tier I nor Tier II force if no force was used. Tier I level of force are those less likely to cause serious bodily injury or death, such as Takedown or strikes using hand, foot, etc., Pepper spray or other chemical agent, ECW (Taser), RIPP Restraint or other less lethal weapons such as Pepper Ball rounds or 40mm impact rounds. Tier II level of force includes lethal force or force likely to cause serious bodily injury such as Police Service Dog, Handgun, Rifle, or Shotgun Total Incidents also includes those incidents where no force was used, however a report was mandated by policy Tier I Tier II Total Incidents with that level of Subject Resistance 45 Psych Intimidation % 0 0.0% 5 46 Verbal Non Compliance % 0 0.0% Defensive Resistance % 3 1.9% Active Aggression % 4 2.0% Agg Active Aggression % % No Resistance % 1 6.3% Passive Resistance % 1 3.3% Combative After Custody % 0 0.0% Foot Pursuit % % Vehicle Pursuit % % Attempt to Flee/Escape % % Actively % 0 0.0% Assault/Resisted Arrest % 2 8.7% Tier I Tier II Total Incidents with that level of Subject Resistance 45 Psych Intimidation % 0 0.0% 3 46 Verbal Non Compliance % % Defensive Resistance % 2 1.5% Active Aggression % 4 2.6% Agg Active Aggression % % No Resistance % % 6 51 Passive Resistance % % Combative After Custody % 0 0.0% Foot Pursuit % % Vehicle Pursuit % % Attempt to Flee/Escape % % Actively % % 8 57 Assault/Resisted Arrest % 1 3.2%

7 2017 Tier I Tier II Total Incidents with that level of Subject Resistance 45 Psych Intimidation % 0 0.0% Verbal Non Compliance % 0 0.0% Defensive Resistance % 1 0.6% Active Aggression % 5 2.9% Agg Active Aggression % % No Resistance % 0 0.0% 9 51 Passive Resistance % 2 7.7% Combative After Custody % 0 0.0% Foot Pursuit % % Vehicle Pursuit % % Attempt to Flee/Escape % % Actively % % 4 57 Assault/Resisted Arrest % 2 6.5% Tier I Tier II Total Incidents with that level of Subject Resistance 45 Psych Intimidation % 0 0.0% 2 46 Verbal Non Compliance % 0 0.0% Defensive Resistance % 0 0.0% Active Aggression % 3 1.5% Agg Active Aggression % % No Resistance % % 8 51 Passive Resistance % % Combative After Custody % 0 0.0% Foot Pursuit % % Vehicle Pursuit % % 7 55 Attempt to Flee/Escape % % Actively % % Assault/Resisted Arrest % 0 0.0%

8 10. Methodology Records were retrieved from the IA Pro database. These records include information copied over from paper forms which are filled out by officers according to the department's operations manual and training. In cases where information appeared to be inconsistent or incorrect, the IA department was notified and corrections, if needed, were made. Typically, these were cases where the information in two sections were swapped, such as gender and race, where a white male was listed as having race of male and sex of white. Once corrections were made, data was re pulled to ensure that the corrections were in the system. Each Force Incident may contain one or more suspects and one or more officers. Additionally, each suspect may exhibit multiple levels of resistance and officers may use multiple levels of force during the incident

University of Texas System Police Use of Force Report

217 University of Texas System Police Use of Force Report BY: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM POLICE ACADEMY STAFF INSPECTOR GEOFFREY MERRITT OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF POLICE 2 West 7th Street, Austin, Texas