ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
|
|
- Albert Harrington
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes () No (X) 77 th Street 2/26/15 Officer(s) Involved in Use of Force Length of Service Officer A Officer B 9 years, 4 months 9 years Reason for Police Contact Officers were driving by a location of interest when Subject 1 exited the front yard and fired rounds at the officers vehicle. The officers exited their vehicle and an OIS ensued. Subject Deceased () Wounded () Non-Hit (X) Subject: Male, 22 years old. Board of Police Commissioners Review This is a brief summary designed only to enumerate salient points regarding this Categorical Use of Force incident and does not reflect the entirety of the extensive investigation by the Los Angeles Police Department (Department) or the deliberations by the Board of Police Commissioners (BOPC). In evaluating this matter, the BOPC considered the following: the complete Force Investigation Division investigation (including all of the transcribed statements of witnesses, pertinent subject criminal history, and addenda items); the relevant Training Evaluation and Management System materials of the involved officers; the Use of Force Review Board recommendations; the report and recommendations of the Chief of Police; and the report and recommendations of the Inspector General. The Department Command staff presented the matter to the BOPC and made itself available for any inquiries by the BOPC. Because state law prohibits divulging the identity of police officers in public reports, for ease of reference, the masculine pronouns (he, his, and him) will be used in this report to refer to male or female employees. The following incident was adjudicated by the BOPC on February 2, 2016.
2 Incident Summary Officers were conducting a narcotics enforcement operation. Officers A and B were attired in plainclothes and were in a plain vehicle. Officer B was the driver and Officer A was the rear driver side passenger. During the operation, officers observed a narcotics transaction from their vehicle; however, one subject had left the location on foot and the other on a bicycle. Officers A and B drove around the area to search for the outstanding subjects and observed a bicycle on the sidewalk area in front of a residence. The bicycle appeared to match the bicycle they were looking for. As they drove closer to the residence, they noticed several subjects standing in the area of the front porch. The porch light was off and front yard was dark. The officers slowed the vehicle down, but could not recognize the subject, due to the lighting conditions. Officer B continued driving, and Officers A and B saw the subject who had left the location on foot. Officer A broadcast the subject s location to the uniformed officers and she was taken into custody. Officer B then decided that he wanted to take another look at the individuals he saw at the residence where the bicycle was parked. Officer B did not believe they had drawn any suspicion from the group the first time they had driven past. As the officers vehicle approached the intersection, the subjects were still on the porch. However, a male, (Subject 1) walked off the porch toward the fence of the front yard. Officer B did not see anyone else come off the porch. As the officers vehicle entered the intersection, Subject 1 walked out of the front gate and into the street, raised a handgun with both his hands and fired at the officers vehicle. Officers A and B, who were not looking back at that moment, heard what they believed was one shot and were unaware where it had come from. Officer B continued to drive north and then looked back over his right shoulder through the rear window of the vehicle and saw a muzzle flash as he heard a second gunshot. Officer B indicated the muzzle flash was from the vicinity of one corner of the intersection. Officer A thought the second volley of gunshots sounded closer and thought one of the rounds might have struck the vehicle. Note: The officers vehicle sustained three impacts. Two of the impacts were to the passenger side rear bumper and one was to the right front tire. Officer B, believing the officers were being shot at, accelerated the vehicle. However, after Subject 1 fired a third volley of four to five gunshots, Officer B felt they were in the open and that their lives were in danger unless they stopped to engage the threat. Officer B believed the gunshots sounded as if they were getting louder and thought that the shooters might be coming after them. Officer B clarified that although he did not see multiple shooters, he believed the individuals from the house were gang members ambushing them and he had to stop the threat. Officer B stopped the vehicle approximately 150 feet north of the intersection. Officer B opened his door and drew his weapon with his right hand, and from a seated position, 2
3 looked over his left shoulder out the door, where he saw the silhouette of a male and muzzle flashes. Officer B turned his upper body to his left and fired approximately two rounds. As that occurred, Officer B noticed the vehicle start to move forward and placed his right foot on the brake to stop the vehicle. Officer B then went to re-engage Subject 1 and fired three additional rounds. However, as he fired the rounds, the driver s side rear door opened and two of the rounds impacted the window and the other one struck the door frame. Officer B then stood up, placing his left foot on the street while his right foot remained on the brake. He then canted his weapon to the right of the rear door, at which time he believed he fired an additional five rounds toward the threat. In all, Officer B fired a total of 10 rounds. According to Officer A, after the second volley of shots fired by Subject 1, Officer A slightly opened the driver s side rear door. When Officer B stopped the vehicle, Officer A turned counter-clockwise in his seat, placing his right foot on the ground. From a semi-seated position with his left leg on the rear seat, Officer A observed muzzle flashes south of his location. Officer A took a right barricaded position and fired six rounds. Officer A fired a total of eight rounds. As Officer A fired his last round, the driver s side rear window was shot out. Officer A believed he was taking gunfire and fell back into the car, lying down in the rear seat as Officer B fired at Subject 1. After Subject 1 stopped shooting, Officer B got back into the vehicle and said they were moving, at which time he continued driving and then stopped their vehicle. Officer A issued an officer needs help broadcast and provided the officers location, at which time Communications Division (CD) requested an Air Unit. The officers ensured each other that they were okay. Officer B then retrieved his vest and shotgun from the trunk and both he and Officer A took cover behind a vehicle and monitored the residence. Detective A and Sergeant A arrived within one minute of each other. Sergeant A was the first supervisor to make contact with Officers A and B and verified that an Officer- Involved Shooting (OIS) had occurred. Sergeant A became the Incident Commander (IC) and immediately began establishing a Command Post (CP). He directed responding units to start taking a position on the perimeter. Sergeant A tasked Detective A with monitoring Officers A and B and taking a Public Safety Statement (PSS.) Sergeant A requested that the officers stay at scene to give the CP information and possibly identify any suspects. The Air Unit and several officers arrived at the scene. The occupants of the residence were ordered to come out. After several minutes, the occupants exited and were detained. A search team was assembled to search the residence for any additional subjects. The search was conducted with negative results for additional suspects. The search revealed a rifle in the closet of the south bedroom. A pole camera was utilized by an officer to search the attic for subjects and it revealed a semiautomatic pistol. An article search was conducted of the front and back yards with negative results. No one was struck by gunfire in this incident. 3
4 Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners Findings The BOPC reviews each Categorical Use of Force incident based upon the totality of the circumstances, namely all of the facts, evidence, statements and all other pertinent material relating to the particular incident. In every case, the BOPC makes specific findings in three areas: Tactics of the involved officer(s); Drawing/Exhibiting of a weapon by any involved officer(s); and the Use of Force by any involved officer(s). All incidents are evaluated to identify areas where involved officers can benefit from a tactical debriefing to improve their response to future tactical situations. This is an effort to ensure that all officers benefit from the critical analysis that is applied to each incident as it is reviewed by various levels within the Department and by the BOPC. Based on the BOPC s review of the instant case, the BOPC made the following findings. A. Tactics The BOPC found Officers A and B s tactics to warrant an Administrative Disapproval. The BOPC found Sergeant A s tactics to warrant a Tactical Debrief. B. Drawing/Exhibiting The BOPC found Officers A and B s drawing and exhibiting of a firearm to be in policy. C. Lethal Use of Force The BOPC found Officers A and B s lethal use of force to be in policy. Basis for Findings A. Tactics In its analysis of this incident, the BOPC identified the following tactical considerations: 1. Equipment (Body Armor) Officers A and B did not don their Department approved body armor as required when conducting field related duties. The BOPC determined that Officers A and B s decision not to don their body armor was a substantial deviation, without justification, from approved Department tactical training. 2. Securing a Backup Firearm Officer B kept an unsecured holstered service pistol in between the front driver s seat and center console. The situation was compounded when Officers A and B left the weapon unattended inside the vehicle. 4
5 The BOPC determined that Officer B s decision to intentionally leave an unsecured firearm secreted in between the driver s seat and center console of the vehicle was a substantial deviation, without justification, from approved Department training. 3. Tactical Communications Officer B did not communicate to Officer A his intention to stop their vehicle. Additionally, neither officer communicated to one another their intention to exit the vehicle and engage the subject. Operational success is based on the ability of officers to effectively communicate during critical incidents. Officers, when faced with a tactical incident, improve their overall safety by their ability to recognize an unsafe situation and work collectively to ensure a successful resolution. A sound tactical plan should be implemented to ensure minimal exposure to the officers, while keeping in mind officer safety concerns. In this case, Officers A and B were forced to make a split-second decision during a rapidly unfolding tactical situation and made the decision to exit their vehicle and address the deadly threat of being fired upon. The BOPC determined Officers A and B s lack of effective communication was reasonable, and did not substantially deviate from approved Department tactical training because of the need to focus their attention on the immediate deadly threat. 4. Ambush Tactics Officer B identified that the source of the gunfire was coming from behind their vehicle. Consequently, he stopped their vehicle in the middle of the roadway, opened his door and both officers engaged the deadly threat. Officer B s decision to stop their vehicle was based on his belief that the subjects were coming after him Officer B and his partner, given that the shots were getting louder, and he feared for the safety of his partner and himself. The BOPC noted Officer B s decision to stop the vehicle placed both himself and his partner in a tactical disadvantage. However, the BOPC also noted driving away without engaging the deadly threat could have placed the officers in a tactical disadvantage of equal proportion. Based on the totality of the circumstances, the BOPC determined that Officer B s actions did not substantially deviate from approve Department tactical training. The evaluation of tactics requires that consideration be given to the fact that officers are forced to make split-second decisions under very stressful and dynamic circumstances. Tactics are conceptual and intended to be flexible and incident specific, which requires that each incident be looked at objectively and that the tactics be evaluated based on the totality of the circumstances. In conducting an objective assessment of this case, the BOPC found that the tactics utilized by Officers A and B substantially and unjustifiably deviated from approved 5
6 Department tactical training, thus requiring a finding of Administrative Disapproval. Additionally, the BOPC found that Sergeant A s tactics did not substantially deviate from approved Department tactical training and warrants a finding of Tactical Debrief. B. Drawing and Exhibiting As Officers A and B drove north, they heard shots coming from behind their vehicle. Officer B immediately stopped the vehicle in the middle of the street, at which time Officers A and B exited simultaneously on the driver s side of the vehicle and drew their service pistols. Based on the totality of the circumstances, the BOPC determined that an officer with similar training and experience as Officers A and B, while faced with similar circumstances would reasonably believe there was a substantial risk that the situation may escalate to the point where deadly force may be justified. In conclusion, the BOPC found Officers A and B s drawing and exhibiting of a firearm to be in policy. C. Lethal Use of Force Officer B (pistol, two rounds, two sequences of fire) First Sequence of Fire Officer B stopped their vehicle, opened his door, and as he looked rearward, he observed muzzle flash and the silhouette of man. Believing that he was being shot at and in fear of his life and the life of his partner, Officer B fired five rounds from his service pistol to stop the deadly threat. Second Sequence of Fire After observing that three of his initial five rounds impacted the open rear driver s side door frame and window, Officer B re-assessed, placed his left foot onto the roadway, canted his body to the right and fired five additional rounds from his service pistol toward the muzzle flash to stop the deadly threat. Officer A (pistol, eight rounds) As the officers drove north, Officer A heard gunfire emanating to the rear of their vehicle. When Officer B slammed on the brakes of their vehicle, Officer A partially exited the vehicle and fired eight rounds from his service pistol toward the muzzle flash to stop the deadly threat. Based on the totality of the circumstances, the BOPC determined that an officer with similar training and experience as Officers A and B would reasonably believe that 6
7 muzzle flash pointed in their direction presented an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury and therefore, the use of lethal force would be objectively reasonable. In conclusion, the BOPC found Officer A and B s lethal use of force to be in policy. 7
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 041-16 Division Date Duty-On () Off (X) Uniform-Yes () No (X)
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 057-13 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes (X) No
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS K-9 CONTACT REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION 036-15 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 022-12 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes (X) No
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS K-9 CONTACT REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION 050-15 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS HEAD STRIKE WITH AN IMPACT WEAPON - 017-05 Division Date Duty-On (x) Off( ) Uniform-Yes(x)
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 101-13 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes (X) No
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING AND K-9 CONTACT REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION 039-12 Division Date
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED INJURY 097-05 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off() Uniform-Yes(X)
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS K-9 CONTACT REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION 049-09 Division Date Duty-On(X) Off() Uniform-Yes(X)
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS K-9 CONTACT REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION 050-16 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off ( ) Uniform-Yes
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED INJURY -- 035-07 Division Date Duty-On(X) Off() Uniform-Yes(X)
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 095-13 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off ( ) Uniform-Yes (X) No
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS K-9 CONTACT REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION 040-15 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off ( ) Uniform-Yes
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 018-12 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes (X) No
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 041-10 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes (X) No
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 032-08 Division Date Duty-On(X) Off() Uniform-Yes(X) No() Hollywood
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 060-12 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes (X) No
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS K-9 CONTACT REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION 074-16 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off ( ) Uniform-Yes
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS IN-CUSTODY DEATH
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS IN-CUSTODY DEATH 048-12 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off ( ) Uniform-Yes (X) No ( ) Southeast
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED INJURY 024-17 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off ( ) Uniform-Yes (X)
Purpose: Synopsis of Event:
Purpose: The purpose of this report is to publish key conclusions, recommendations and outcomes of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department s internal review of this incident. There are a variety of
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: August 9, 2015 PHONE: (760) 243-8600 FROM: TO: Donna Kauffman, DDA Victorville Office Mary Ashley, Assistant Deputy District Attorney Clark Hansen, Chief Deputy District Attorney
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE December 6, 2012 1.13 TO: The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL OFFICIAL REPRIMANDS - SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT RECOMMENDED ACTION
SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS
580.03 DISCHARGE OF FIREARM 05-16-17 PURPOSE The purpose of this order is to establish procedures regarding the discharge of a firearm by Department employees. PREAMBLE The Sacramento Police Department
PATROL RIFLE PROGRAM
Policy 412 Subject PATROL RIFLE PROGRAM Date Published Page 1 July 2016 1 of 5 By Order of the Police Commissioner POLICY In order to more effectively and accurately address the increased firepower and
REPORT ON THE OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING OF MATTHEW JOSEPH HOFFMAN ON JANUARY 4, 2015
REPORT ON THE OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING OF MATTHEW JOSEPH HOFFMAN ON JANUARY 4, 2015 GEORGE GASCÓN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATIONS BUREAU CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO FEBRUARY 14, 2018
Model Policy. Active Shooter. Updated: April 2018 PURPOSE
Model Policy Active Shooter Updated: April 2018 I. PURPOSE Hot Zone: A geographic area, consisting of the immediate incident location, with a direct and immediate threat to personal safety or health. All
THIS ORDER CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING NUMBERED SECTIONS: 2. DEPUTY/COURT SECURITY ACTION (During Use Of Force/No Firearms) page 26
POLICY STATEMENT: The Baltimore City Sheriff s Office recognizes and respects the value and special integrity of each human life. In vesting its members with the authority to use force to achieve lawful
Tidewater Community College Crisis and Emergency Management Plan Appendix F Emergency Operations Plan. Annex 8 Active Threat Response
Tidewater Community College Crisis and Emergency Management Plan Appendix F Emergency Operations Plan A. Purpose Annex 8 Active Threat Response This Annex has been developed to direct actions in response
1. Officers carrying weapons on or off duty must meet the below listed requirements. 1) Be commissioned as a State Constable
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY AND PROCEDURE # 57 SUBJECT: Weapons EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 January 1999 PAGE 1 OF 12 REVIEW DATE: 30 November 2017 APPROVED: CHANGE DATE:
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING
ABRIDGED SUMMARY OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INCIDENT AND FINDINGS BY THE LOS ANGELES BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING 029-17 Division Date Duty-On (X) Off () Uniform-Yes (X) No
RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER
RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER This directive is for internal use only and does not enlarge this department's, governmental entity's and/or any of this department's employees' civil or criminal liability
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. March 10, 2016 BPC # TEN-YEAR OVERVIEW OF CATEGORICAL USE OF FORCE INVESTIGATIONS, POLICY, AND TRAINING
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE March 10, 2016 BPC #16-0077 TO: The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners FROM: Inspector General, Police Commission SUBJECT: TEN-YEAR OVERVIEW OF CATEGORICAL USE OF
Santa Ana Police Department
355 Procedures for the Use of the Special Weapons and Tactics Team Santa Ana Police Department Department Order #355 - Procedures for the Use of the Special Weapons and Tactics Team 355 Procedures for
**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE** RELEASE ON AKIEL DENKINS SHOOTING INVESTIGATION
State of North Carolina General Court of Justice Tenth Prosecutorial District N. LORRIN FREEMAN P.O. BOX 31 TELEPHONE: DISTRICT ATTORNEY RALEIGH, N.C. 27602-0031 (919) 792-5000 **FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO SUBJECT: CODE VIOLET VIOLENT SITUATION Procedure No: EP-08-015 PROCEDURE STATEMENT Code Violet will be initiated for serious situations involving any individual(s) exhibiting or threatening
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER VEHICLE PURSUIT SUBJECT
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER VEHICLE PURSUIT SUBJECT DATE: _June 30, 2017 NO: FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL INDEX: Vehicle Pursuit Law Considerations for the Initiation and Termination
ACTIVE SHOOTER GUIDEBOOK
ACTIVE SHOOTER GUIDEBOOK HOW TO RESPOND WHAT IS AN ACTIVE SHOOTER? An Active Shooter is an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area; in most
GREY NUNS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACTIVE ASSAILANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
GREY NUNS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ACTIVE ASSAILANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ACTIVE ASSAILANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ALGORITHM Staff Member Discovering the incident Staff in close proximity to the incident Recognizes
ACTIVE SHOOTER HOW TO RESPOND
ACTIVE SHOOTER HOW TO RESPOND October 2008 Emergency Numbers EMERGENCY SERVICES: 9-1 -1 LOCAL EMERGENCY INFORMATION LINE: LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENT: LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT: LOCAL HOSPITAL: LOCAL FBI FIELD
ALBUQUERQUE POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURAL ORDERS. SOP 2-8 Effective:6/2/17 Review Due: 6/2/18 Replaces: 4/28/16
2-8 USE OF ON-BODY RECORDING DEVICES Policy Index 2-8-1 Purpose 2-8-2 Policy 2-8-3 References 2-8-4 Definitions 2-8-5 Procedures A. Wearing the OBRD B. Using the OBRD C. Training Requirements D. Viewing,
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: June 7, 2010 PHONE: 760-243-8612 FROM: Shannon L. Faherty Deputy District Attorney Victorville Office TO: Dennis Christy Assistant District Attorney Gary Roth Chief Deputy
ACTIVE SHOOTER HOW TO RESPOND. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Washington, DC
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 cfsteam@hq.dhs.gov www.dhs.gov ACTIVE SHOOTER HOW TO RESPOND October 2008 MANAGING THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACTIVE SHOOTER SITUATION LESSONS LEARNED
OPD on the Beat Reports
OPD on the Beat Reports February 2017 Suspect Arrested In Assault With A Knife On Monday, February 27, 9:55 a.m. Oakland police officers were dispatched to 1900 block of Myrtle Street on a report of an
Office of the District Attorney
Office of the District Attorney Fourth Prosecutorial District Sampson County 910-596-6610 Duplin County 910-275-7010 Jones County Ernie Lee 201 East Main Street 910-478-3610 District Attorney Clinton,
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 January 1999 PAGE 1 OF 10
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY AND PROCEDURE # 70 SUBJECT: Searching and Transportation of Prisoners EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 January 1999 PAGE 1 OF 10 REVIEW DATE: 30
Signature: Signed by GNT Date Signed: 11/24/2013
Atlanta Police Department Policy Manual Standard Operating Procedure Effective Date: December 2, 2013 Applicable To: All employees Approval Authority: Chief George N. Turner Signature: Signed by GNT Date
Third Quarter Rank Recommended. Page 1 of 6
This report is based on the Department s Letters of Intent and does not reflect modifications to recommended discipline due to Grievances, Skelly Hearings, Arbitration Hearings, Civil Service Commission
UNC Charlotte Center City
2013 UNC Charlotte Center City Active Shooter Response Plan The UNC charlotte Police Department has authored this document to better prepare all students, faculty, staff, and visitors of the UNC Charlotte
1. This policy governs vehicle pursuits in order to protect the safety of involved officers, the public, fleeing violators, and property.
CHAPTER: 41.5 Page 1 of 14 NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS MANUAL CHAPTER: 41.5 TITLE: VEHICLE PURSUITS EFFECTIVE: 12/6/15 REVISED: Replaces Policy Procedure 314 PURPOSE 1. This policy governs
TOPEKA POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 4.11 VEHICLE OPERATIONS
c. The officer will not, under any circumstances, drive at speeds that are unreasonable given existing driving conditions. There may be circumstances (e.g., ice, traffic or pedestrian density, etc.), in
Active Shooter Guideline
1. Purpose: This procedure establishes guidelines for Monterey County Public Safety Personnel who respond to Active Shooter Incidents (ASI). The goal is to provide effective rescue and treatment procedures,
FBI/U.S. Attorney s Office 39ers Gang. In 2010, the FBI s New Orleans Gang Task Force (NOGTF)
FBI/U.S. Attorney s Office 39ers Gang In 2010, the FBI s New Orleans Gang Task Force (NOGTF) began investigating heroin trafficking in the Upper Ninth Ward of New Orleans. The FBI used a wide variety of
TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /17/ /19/2014
TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order 390.02 10/17/2014 10/19/2014 SUBJECT TITLE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DATES Restraint & Transport of Prisoners 11/21/2010, 9/16/2012, 7/18/2014
CANINE UNIT. C. Building Search: The utilization of the K-9 Unit to locate suspect(s) believed to be or known to be hiding in a building or structure.
CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE Cancels: GO 498.00 Index as: March 15, 2011 Assistance to other agencies Canine Off-duty Call-ins Search, Canine 498.00 PURPOSE CANINE UNIT The purpose
WASPC Model Policy Vehicle Pursuits
In response to Substitute Senate Bill (SSB) 5165 58 th Legislature 2003 Regular Session WASPC Model Policy Vehicle Pursuits Purpose In compliance with RCWs 43.101.225 and 43.101.226, this model policy
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. October 8, 2014 BPC #
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE October 8, 2014 BPC #14-0370 1.0 TO: The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners FROM: Inspector General, Police Commission SUBJECT: OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL S INVESTIGATION
Anaheim Police Department Policy Manual
Policy 314 Anaheim Police Department 314.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE Vehicle pursuits expose innocent citizens, law enforcement officers and fleeing violators to the risk of serious injury or death. The primary
NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH EMERGENCY RESPONSE Policy and Guidelines
NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH EMERGENCY RESPONSE Policy and Guidelines POLICY Recognizing the occasional need to provide for a safe environment for the church congregation regarding Emergency Security, Medical
The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MOHAMED MOHAMED NOOR DOB: 10/20/1985 7318 Bass Lake Rd New Hope, MN 55428 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
Santa Monica Police Department
FOOT PURSUITS PURPOSE AND SCOPE This policy provides guidelines to assist officers in making the decision to initiate or continue the pursuit of suspects on foot. DECISION TO PURSUE The safety of Department
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 10.7
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 10.7 Issued Date: 07-03-01 Effective Date: 07-03-01 Updated Date: SUBJECT: CRISIS RESPONSE / CRITICAL INCIDENT NEGOTIATIONS 1. PURPOSE A. To help identify a barricaded
TOTAL REVIEWS
Training Memorandum 18-023 DATE: February 28, 2018 TO: FROM: CC: SUBJECT: Chief Linda Stump-Kurnick Lieutenant Jake Pruitt and Lieutenant Kristy Sasser Deputy Chief Tony Dunn, Office of Professional Standards,
CITY OF MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. Police Weaponry
CITY OF MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Weaponry Eff. Date 12/21/2017 Purpose This procedure defines authorized handguns, holsters, allowable alterations to handguns and rifle use. Procedure HANDGUNS
State of North Carolina General Court of Justice Twenty-Sixth Prosecutorial District MECKLENBURG COUNTY
S P E N C E R B. M E R R I W E A T H E R II I D I S T R I C T A T T O R N E Y State of North Carolina General Court of Justice Twenty-Sixth Prosecutorial District MECKLENBURG COUNTY 7 0 0 E A S T T RAD
FORCE SCIENCE NEWS. Solo Officer Risks & Other Truths About Active Shooter Responses. Chuck Remsberg Editor-in-Chief.
FORCE SCIENCE NEWS Chuck Remsberg Editor-in-Chief In This Edition: I. Solo officer risks & other truths about active shooter responses II. Free report: What courts say about handling the mentally ill III.
STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINE Civil Disturbances
Purpose Fire Ground Safety Initiative STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINE Civil Disturbances This standard operating guideline has been developed to provide basic operating guidelines for the personnel responding
Active School Shooter Exercise. Presented by: Rodney Diggs Director Anson County Emergency Services
Active School Shooter Exercise Presented by: Rodney Diggs Director Anson County Emergency Services Participating Agencies Planning the Exercise The planning team consisted of representatives from: Anson
Burnsville Police Department Policy Manual
Policy 307 Burnsville Police Department 307.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE Vehicle pursuits expose innocent citizens, law enforcement officers and fleeing violators to the risk of serious injury or death. The primary
GAO. USE OF FORCE ATF Policy, Training and Review Process Are Comparable to DEA s and FBI s
GAO March 1996 United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives USE
Rank Recommended. Page 1 of 6
This report is based on the Department s Letters of Intent and does not reflect modifications to recommended discipline due to Grievances, Skelly Hearings, Arbitration Hearings, Civil Service Commission
SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURES
SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE DATE: JUNE 20, 2017 NUMBER: SUBJECT: 1.05 ADMIN FIREARMS PROCEDURES RELATED POLICY: 1.04, 1.05 ORIGINATING DIVISION: TRAINING AND EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT NEW PROCEDURE:
FIREARMS (APPROVALS/QUALIFICATIONS/LOANERS) REVIEWED: AS NEEDED
POLICY 114 FIREARMS (APPROVALS/QUALIFICATIONS/LOANERS) NEW: 07/14, 12/17 RELATED POLICIES: 117.1 CFA STANDARDS: 4.05, 4.06, 4.07, 4.08 REVIEWED: AS NEEDED A. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to describe
CITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT Policy: Emergency Vehicle Operations Policy # 12 Pages: 11 Approved by F & P Committee: 11/4/09 Approved by Common Council: 11/10/09 Original Issue Date: 01/15/97 Updates:
Page 1 of 7 YALE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT PURSUIT AND EMERGENCY DRIVING GENERAL ORDER JAN 2012 ANNUAL
Page 1 of 7 YALE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Integrity, Trust, Commitment and Courage Since 1894 ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW 402 EFFECTIVE DATE: REVIEW DATE: 25 JAN 2012 ANNUAL
BROOKLINE POLICE DEPARTMENT Brookline, Massachusetts
BROOKLINE POLICE DEPARTMENT Brookline, Massachusetts DANIEL C. O LEARY CHIEF OF POLICE May 20, 2014 Personnel Order 2014-31 Subject: Commendations Detective Julie McDonnell Detective Russell O Neill On
THE RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
THE RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1106-10 PURSUITS PURPOSE To provide regulations concerning the operation of Police Department vehicles under pursuit conditions and to establish policy and procedural guidelines
CODE OF MARYLAND REGULAITONS (COMAR)
CODE OF MARYLAND REGULAITONS (COMAR) Title 12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Subtitle 04 POLICE TRAINING COMMISSION Chapter 02 Firearms Training and Instructor Certification Authority:
Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department
Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department SECTION NUMBER CHIEF OF POLICE EFFECTIVE REVIEW DATE SUBJECT GENERAL 6 6 11/25/2013 1/25/2015 VEHICLE PURSUITS VCUPD officers shall make every reasonable
JOINT RESPONSE. Rapid Deployment / Negotiation/TSU exercise
JOINT RESPONSE Rapid Deployment / Negotiation/TSU exercise OVERVIEW: On 1/01/XX ABC Police in concert with the ABC Emergency Operations Group, Anywhere Police Department, and the Anystate State Police
Gainesville PD Special Weapons and Tactics Team SWAT
Gainesville PD Special Weapons and Tactics Team SWAT GPD Special Weapons and Tactics Team Objective The primary objective of the Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT) is to provide the Gainesville Police
National Resource and Technical Assistance Center for Improving Law Enforcement Investigations
Readers to Enhance Criminal Investigations Assistant Chief of Police Travis Martinez Redlands Police Department Introduction With the vast majority of crimes involving the use of motor vehicles, law enforcement
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS March 6, 2014 To: From: Subject: Richard W. Myers, Chief of Police Captain F. L. Hileman, Professional Standards Division Commander 2013 Professional Standards Division s Annual Report
Response to Stanislaus County Civil Grand Jury Report #04-39
August 15, 2004 Response to Stanislaus County Civil Grand Jury Report #04-39 In responding to the Grand Jury s Report, I am compelled to reflect on the 42 years I have been personally involved in the Criminal
Understanding An Officer s Use of Force (Ver. 3)
Understanding An Officer s Use of Force (Ver. 3) ADD YOUR DEPARTMENT LOGO AND RE TITLE IF DESIRED Prepared by California Training Institute: Instructions This presentation is intended to be a template.
Boise Police Department. Office of Internal Affairs
Boise Police Department Office of Internal Affairs Annual Statistical Report January 1, 216 December 31, 216 Introduction The Office of Internal Affairs (OIA) is established within the Professional Development
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. October 13, TO: The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners FROM: Chief of Police
INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE October 13, 2017 1.18 TO: The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: PROPOSED SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (suas) DEPLOYMENT GUIDELINES
Corporal James Browning
Corporal Jeremiah Waters Corporal James Browning How often are fire drills conducted? When was the last death due to a school or business fire? How often are active shooter or intruder drills conducted?
January 29, Guiding Principles
CRITICAL ISSUES IN POLICING SERIES Use of Force: Taking Policing to a Higher Standard January 29, 2016 30 Guiding Principles Note: A comprehensive approach will be required to implement the changes described
Second Quarter Rank Recommended
This report is based on the Department s Letters of Intent and does not reflect modifications to recommended discipline due to Grievances, Skelly Hearings, Arbitration Hearings, Civil Service Commission
4-223 BODY WORN CAMERAS (06/29/16) (07/29/17) (B-D) I. PURPOSE
MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT BY ORDER OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE SPECIAL ORDER DATE ISSUED: DATE EFFECTIVE: NUMBER: PAGE: July 26, 2017 July 29, 2017 SO17-010! 1 of! 14 TO: RETENTION DATE: Distribution A
CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR) As Amended through November 25, 2013
CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR) As Amended through November 25, 2013 Title 12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Subtitle 04 POLICE TRAINING COMMISSION Chapter 02 Firearms Training
Office of Inspector General
Office of Inspector General Audit of WMATA s Control and Accountability of Firearms and Ammunition OIG 18-01 August 3, 2017 All publicly available OIG reports (including this report) are accessible through
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 10.4
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 10.4 Issued Date: 9-18-15 Effective Date: 9-18-15 Updated Date: SUBJECT: USE OF FORCE REVIEW BOARD (UFRB) 1. POLICY A. Strict standards in the application of force
Respond to an Active Shooter
The Office of Infrastructure Protection presents: Respond to an Active Shooter Ron McPherson Protective Security Advisor U.S. Department of Homeland Security Austin, Texas Cell 210 380 7485 Ron.mcpherson@dhs.gov
IMHU-ES SUBJECT: Requirements for Transporting and Registering Privately Owned Weapons (POWs) on Fort Huachuca INFORMATION PAPER
INFORMATION PAPER IMHU-ES 29 December 2014 Purpose. To provide information on the process and requirements for registering privately owned firearms/weapons on Fort Huachuca. 1. References. a. Fort Huachuca
TITLE: LOCKDOWN (INTERNAL ACTIVE THREAT) Page 1 of 5 ST. CLOUD HOSPITAL/RIVER CAMPUS
TITLE: LOCKDOWN (INTERNAL ACTIVE THREAT) Page 1 of 5 CentraCare Health (CCH) adopts the following policy/procedure for: St. Cloud Hospital River Campus Original: 3/12 Minor Revisions: 10/13, 6/15 Full
Active Shooter Defense. Facility Tenant Brief
Facility Tenant Brief 2013 Active Shooter Defense Facility Tenant Brief January 2013 1 Introduction Nidal Hasan killed 13 people and wounded 30 others on November 5, 2009, at the Soldier Readiness Processing
TYPE OF DIRECTIVE LINE PROCEDURE SUBJECT VEHICULAR PURSUITS REFERENCE G-1, Code of Virginia ,
TYPE OF DIRECTIVE LINE PROCEDURE SUBJECT VEHICULAR PURSUITS REFERENCE G-1, Code of Virginia 46.2-817, 46.2-920 NUMBER LP-08-09 EFFECTIVE DATE 06/03/09 RESCINDS LP-08-08 POLICY The authority of a law enforcement