DEPARTMENT or THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38O55~OOOO

Transcription

1 DEPARTMENT or THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38O55~OOOO 1640 Ser OOD/ Feb 18 From: Subj: Ref: Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS OOD) (a) U.S. Department of Justice Report and Recommendations Concerning the Use of Restrictive Housing, Final Report, January 2017 (b) Presidential Memorandum (Limiting the Use of Restrictive Housing by the Federal Government), I March 2016 (c) SECNAVINST C (d) BUPERSINST (e) BUPERSINST Purpose. To publish annual aggregate restrictive housing (RH) data per references (a) through (e) occurring at U.S. Navy shore confinement facilities within the U.S. and overseas. 2. Background a. National correctional reform led to the publication of reference (a) that established policy recommendations for the Department of Justice federal correctional system, including guiding principles for all U.S. correctional agencies. Reference (b) directed the flu implementation of reference (a) recommendations within six months of signature. b. Reference (a) provides the definition of RH as detention that involves three prisoner related core elements: (1) Removal of a prisoner from the general population, whether voluntary or involuntary; (2) Placement of a prisoner in a locked room or cell, whether alone or with another prisoner; and (3) Inability of a prisoner to leave the room or cell for the vast majority of the day, defined as 22 hours or more. c. Per references (c) and (d), prisoners confined in the Navy shore corrections system are housed within either the general population or special quarters (SQ). SQ encompasses administrative segregation (AS), disciplinary segregation (DS), and protective custody (PC). The categories of AS include, but are not limited to medical, suicide risk, escape risk, prevention of injury, pending investigation, loss of privileges, potentially violent and dangerous, and awaiting transfer or transport.

2 d. For alignment of terminology, RH or the RH unit as defined in reference (a) are considered synonymous with SQ as outlined in references (c) and (d) and include AS, DS, and PC (only when housed within SQ). e. Navy standard confinement practices result in a very limited percentage of the overall facility population being housed within SQ. Additionally, the SQ plan of the day routinely, unless for due cause, allows out of cell time for periods more than two hours (e.g., recreation, sunshine call, showering, programming, etc.). Effective 1 September 2016, the reference (a) guiding principles have been inàorporated into pre-existing Navy corrections SQ administration and operations to meet the intent of references (a) and (b). The implementation included the collection of RH data elements outlined in reference (a). f. RH data for the calendar year 2017 annual report was gathered from five Navy shore confinement facilities located within the U.S. and one overseas, to include: (1) Naval Consolidated Brig (NAVCONBRIG) Miramar, San Diego, California; (2) NAVCONBRIG Miramar Detachment, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; (3) NAVCONBRIG Charleston, South Carolina; (4) NAVCONBRIG Chesapeake, Virginia; (5) Pre-trial Confinement Facility (PCF), Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida; and, (6) PCF Yokosuka, Japan 3. General Information a. On 31 December 2017, 363 prisoners were confined within the five U.S. Navy shore confinement facilities located in the U.S. and one facility located overseas. Of this population, 351 prisoners were male and 12 were female. b. During calendar year 2017, there were a total of 724 new admissions into the U.S. Navy shore corrections system; encompassing 672 male and 52 female offenders. 4. Aggregate Data (1 January 31 December 2017) a. Total in each type of RH (22): (1) AS: (a) Medical: one 2

3 (b) Suicide Risk: five (c) Escape Risk: three (d) Prevention of Injury: two (e) Pending Investigation: one (I) Potentially Violent Dangerous (PVD): six (2) DS: four (3) PC: none b. RH recidivism rate: 11% (2 of 22 with repetitive RH periods) c. Average days in RH status: (1) Charleston: four (2) Chesapeake: seven (3) Jacksonville: none (4) Miramar: 26.7 (5) Pearl Harbor: 30.2 (6) Yokosuka: undetermined due to over-reporting d. Race: (1) Caucasian/white: seven (2) African American/black: nine (3) Unknown: one (4) Multi-racial: two e. Ethnicity: (1) Non-Hispanic: 21 3

4 (2) Hispanic: none (3) Unknown: one f. Religion: (1) Pentecostal: one (2) Baptist: one (3) Catholic: one (4) Christian Non-Denominational: nine (5) No Preference: six (6) Muslim: two (7) Other: one (8) Unknown: one g. Gender: Male: 22 h. Gender Identity: (1) Male: 19 (2) Unknown: three i. Sexual Orientation: (I) Heterosexual: 19 (2) Unknown: three j. Disability Status: (1) Yes: one (2)No: 18 (3) Unknown: three 4

5 CORRECTIONS SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT, CALENIJAR YEAR 2017 k. Age Groups: (1) 18 20: two (2) 21 30: 11 (3) 31 40: seven (4) 41 50: two 5. Point of Contact. Mr. John Pucciarelli, PERS OOD, at (901) , DSN , j ohn.pucciare1li~navy.mi1. ~ \ I PUCCIARELLI J Deputy Director Corrections and Programs Office (PERS OOD) Copy to: OUSD-P&R COMNAVPERSCOM (PERS OOJ, PERS OOP) NAVCONBRIG (Charleston, Chesapeake, Miramar, DET Pearl Harbor) PCF (Jacksonville, Yokosuka) ACC HQMC PSL Corrections AFSFC/FC 5