Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus
|
|
- Annabelle Stevens
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus Appendix E June 2007 Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services LLP
2 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. SURVEY RESPONSES (STATISTICS) Action 1 - European higher education institutions Action 1 - European higher education institutions (rejected applicants) 2.3 Action 2 - students from third countries 2.4 Action 2 - scholars from third countries 2.5 Action 3 - students from EU countries 2.6 Action 3 - scholars from EU countries 2.7 Action 3 - Partnerships (HEIs from EU countries) Action 3 - Partnerships (HEIs from third countries) 3. ASSESSMENT OF OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES TO SURVEY 32 28
3 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - 1. INTRODUCTION This appendix contains a complete list of statistical data for each of the surveys carried out by CSES in respect of the Interim Evaluation of the Erasmus Mundus programme. An important dimension of the evaluation involved carrying out survey work with programme beneficiaries. An overview of the survey structure across the different types of participants in the programme - higher education institutions, students and scholars - is provided below: Survey Questionnaire Response % of total targeted Action 1 co-ordinators/partners Action 1 non-selected applicants Action 2 students from third countries Action 2 scholars from third countries 84 NA Action 3 partner institutions Action 3 EU students 125 NA Action 3 EU scholars 27 NA Total 990 As can be seen, seven separate surveys were carried out, with a total of almost 1000 survey responses received. Separate surveys were conducted with higher education institutions, students and scholars. Additionally, surveys were differentiated depending on whether the beneficiary was from the EU or a third country, since there are key differences between the different Actions for these target groups such as the amount of financing, duration of mobility periods, etc. Given the wealth of useful findings that have emerged through the survey, the survey findings from each survey are set out in full in this paper, which has been designed as a standalone document. The survey findings are potentially of interest to a number of programme stakeholders, including policy makers and National Structures as well as those that have participated in Erasmus Mundus directly, including higher education institutions, students and scholars. In particular, those who have completed questionnaires may be interested in the views of other programme participants on a range of key issues. 1
4 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - 2. SURVEY RESPONSES (STATISTICS) Action 1 - European higher education institutions Higher education institutions participating in a consortium involved in delivering Erasmus Mundus Masters Courses were asked various questions concerning their views on the effectiveness of Action 1 and their experiences of participating in the programme. The statistical results are set out in full below (the most interesting responses have been analysed in detail in the main evaluation report): Is your institution a co-ordinating institution or a partner institution? Co-ordinating Institution Partner Institution Total In which academic year did you first receive funding to run an EM Masters Course? Academic Year No. % 2004/ / / Total How did you first become aware of the Erasmus Mundus programme? Please mark all that apply Website At a conference or exhibition Recommendation from an academic institution National contact point Personal recommendation Other advertisement
5 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - What were the main factors that Quite Small Not influenced your decision to apply to Important important importance important participate in Action 1? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhance course quality through joint working with other European universities Enhance teaching and learning practice within the EM course - through the involvement of students from other EU countries and third countries Increase staff development opportunities through transnational co-operation Enhance the international profile of your institution Attract more international students to this course Attract more international students to other courses in your institution Association with the brand image of Erasmus Mundus Develop a wider co-operation with higher education institutions outside Europe (through eventual participation in Action 3) Attract more funds to your institution through additional tuition fees In the process of preparing for participation in Erasmus Mundus Action 1, how easy or difficult did you find each Very easy Quite easy Quite difficult Very difficult of the following elements No. % No. % No. % No. % Putting together a consortium to participate in Erasmus Mundus? Obtaining funding for an Erasmus Mundus course? Completing the application form? Ensuring integration of the consortium and the course content? Developing appropriate course content for an Erasmus Mundus course? Identifying academic staff with appropriate skills (foreign language skills, other skills) to deliver course content? Degree recognition by partners and/or competent authorities? Setting a common tuition fee? Setting joint criteria for selection and examination?
6 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Please tell us about the extent of involvement of the National Contact Substantial Quite a lot Some Small Point in the process No. % No. % No. % No. % In making the application After the application In your opinion, is Erasmus Mundus Action 1 relevant to the needs of higher education institutions? Relevancy No. % Highly relevant Quite relevant Somewhat relevant Not relevant at all Total In your opinion, does Erasmus Mundus Action 1 add value to higher education institutions? A lot Quite a lot A little No value at all Total With regard to programme management, how well has the programme been managed by the European Commission and the Executive Agency for Education and Culture? Please rate the quality of the management of the programme Excellent Quite satisfactory Not very good Unsatisfactory Don't know Management No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Providing information Dealing with contracts Dealing with payments In dealing with the reporting procedures
7 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - With regard to impacts, how far has participation in Action 1 helped make Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree progress towards the following objectives No. % No. % No. % No. % Strengthened the European/international dimension of the activities of your institutions? Promoted academic excellence in your institutions? Developed intercultural understanding? Improved services to students in your institutions? Improved the quality of this course? Improved the quality of other Masters courses within participating institutions? Better prepared students for the challenges of competing in a global economy and an ever more internationalised work environment? How adequate do you feel the financial provision for the development of joint courses under Action 1 has been? Please rate the adequacy of financial provision Excellent Quite satisfactory Not very good Unsatisfactory Total How adequate do you feel the financial provision for the support of third-country scholars and students participating under Action 2 in Erasmus Mundus courses has been? Please rate the adequacy of financial provision Students Scholars No. % Excellent Quite satisfactory Not very good Unsatisfactory Total Do you think your Erasmus Mundus Masters Course will be financially sustainable once the Erasmus Mundus funding has ended Totally sustainable Somewhat sustainable Not very sustainable Not at all sustainable Total
8 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - How well has the Erasmus Mundus consortium functioned? Excellent Quite satisfactory Not very good Unsatisfactory Total In your view, have there been more benefits in the operation of an Erasmus Mundus course for the co-ordinating institution than for the partner institutions? Benefits co-ordinator more Benefits co-ordinator a little more Benefits partner a little more Benefits partner more Total What problems, if any, did you encounter during the process of the implementation Very easy Quite easy Quite difficult Very difficult of an Erasmus Mundus Action 1 course? No. % No. % No. % No. % Implementing the Commission s required integrated approach Attracting the right number of students from third countries Attracting the right quality of students from third countries Getting visas for students from third countries Attracting students from EU countries to participate in the EM course Identifying academic staff with appropriate skills (foreign language skills, other skills) to deliver course content? Clarity of information/guidance from National Contact Points or the European Commission or the Executive Agency Communication/negotiation with partner institutions Linguistic issues Issues relating to mutual recognition of qualifications Issues of course funding
9 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Do you think Erasmus Mundus Action 1 overlaps with actions under other Community programmes in the field of higher education? Yes No No response Total Is your consortium currently running an Action 3 partnership with higher education institutions outside the EU? Yes No Total Action 1 - European higher education institutions (rejected applicants) A survey of those higher education institutions that had applied for assistance but which had not been successful was also carried out. The results are set out below: What were the main factors that influenced your decision to apply to participate in Action 1 of Erasmus Important Quite important Small importance Not important Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhance course quality through joint working with other European universities Enhance teaching and learning practice within the EM course - through the involvement of students and scholars from other EU countries and third countries Increase staff development opportunities through transnational co-operation Enhance the international profile of your institution Attract more international students to other courses in your institution Association with the brand image of Erasmus Mundus Develop a wider co-operation with higher education institutions outside Europe (through eventual participation in Action 3) Attract more funds to your institution through additional tuition fees
10 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Please tell us what happened to the course when you heard you had not been accepted for Erasmus Mundus No. % It had little effect on the course and we continued as planned We changed the course and have reapplied or will reapply to Erasmus Mundus in a subsequent call for proposals We have reapplied or will reapply to Erasmus Mundus without changing the course in a subsequent call for proposals We continued the course at a reduced level We abandoned plans for the course Action 2 - students from third countries Students from third countries in receipt of an EM scholarship under Action 2 were also asked a range of questions with regard to their views and experiences of participating in the programme and whether their perceptions of European higher education had changed as a result of participation in the programme. The statistical results from this survey are set out in full below (again, the most interesting responses have been analysed in detail in the main evaluation report): In which academic year did you start your Erasmus Mundus programme (please tick all that apply)? Academic Year No. % 2004/ / / How did you first become aware of the Erasmus Mundus programme (please tick all that apply)? Website Recommendation from an academic institution Personal recommendation Advertisement In choosing a masters programme, what areas of the world did you Highly attractive Quite attractive Not very attractive Unattractive No response consider? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Europe North America South America Asia Australasia Africa
11 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - What were the main factors that Quite Small Not influenced your decision to apply Important important importance important to participate in Erasmus No response Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of European higher education Quality of Erasmus Mundus course Unique characteristics of Erasmus Mundus course Availability of grant Cost Did not obtain first choice elsewhere Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and studying in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Opportunity to study at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills Once you had been accepted, were there any barriers to participating in Erasmus Easy Quite easy Minor barrier Major barrier Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % Obtaining a visa or residence permit for a period of study in the European Union Accreditation of your existing qualification Translation of qualifications Linguistic barriers Cultural barriers Other What sort of help did you receive from your Masters programme before you Substantial Quite a lot A little None started the course? No. % No. % No. % No. % Languages Cultural Help with visas Help with accommodation, etc Help with residence permits Help with travel Introductory academic courses
12 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Please tell us about the course and study environment at the university you are studying at as part of EM. How would Excellent Quite good Not too good Low you rate the quality of the following? No. % No. % No. % No. % Course content Teaching Study environment Research services and facilities How would you rate the quality of the following student facilities at the university you are studying at (or most Excellent Quite good Not too good Low recently studied at) as part of EM? No. % No. % No. % No. % Accommodation Cultural facilities Sports facilities Placements Careers To what extent did you perceive the EM course as having been well integrated between the different European higher education institutions that run the course and deliver course content? Very well integrated Quite well integrated Not much integration Not integrated at all No response Total Looking back on your participation, what in your view were the main benefits of Substantial Quite a lot Some Not at all participating in the EM programme? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of European higher education Quality of Erasmus Mundus course Unique characteristics of Erasmus Mundus courses Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and studying in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Understanding of other cultures Opportunity to study at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills
13 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Do you think that an integrated course offered by a consortium of European universities has a clear added value over comparable national programmes? No. % Yes No No response Total It is an obligatory element of Erasmus Mundus masters programmes that students have to study in at least two institutions ( mobility ). How do you rate Excellent Quite good Not very good Bad this mobility? No. % No. % No. % No. % From the point of view of the academic benefit you derive from it From the point of view of transfer arrangements and organisation How useful do you perceive receiving a double or joint qualification as opposed to a Masters qualification from a single university from the perspective of the following? Future career Academic prestige No. % Very useful Quite useful Not very useful Not at all useful Total To what extent has participating in the Erasmus Mundus programme improved your perception of higher education in the European Union? Excellent Quite good Not too good Low Total Is the Masters qualification that you obtained from participating in an Erasmus Mundus course fully recognised in your country of origin? Yes No Don t know Total
14 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Was the scholarship funding provided sufficient to enable you to participate fully in the course and to live in the host country without undue hardship? Wholly sufficient Quite sufficient Not very sufficient Not at all sufficient No response Total Would you have participated without scholarship funding? No. % Yes No No response Total If you were choosing a masters course again, would you still choose to follow this Erasmus Mundus course? Yes No/ no response Total Action 2 - scholars from third countries Scholars from third countries were also asked for their views with regard to their participation in the EM programme and for suggestions on how the scholar dimension could be improved in future. The survey results are set out in full below: In which academic year did you participate in the EM programme (please tick all that apply)? Year No. % 2004/ / / How did you first become aware of the EM programme (please tick all that apply)? Website Recommendation from an academic institution Previous co-operation relations with the institution concerned Personal recommendation Advertisement
15 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - In deciding to work in a university abroad, what areas of the world Highly attractive Quite attractive Not very attractive Unattractive No response did you consider? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Europe North America South America Asia Australasia Africa What were the main factors that Quite Not very influenced your decision to apply Important important important to participate in Erasmus Unimportant No response Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of European higher education Unique characteristics of the Erasmus Mundus course Reputation of the academic department you have joined Availability of grant Cost Did not obtain first choice elsewhere Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and working in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Opportunity to work at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills Once you had been accepted, were there any barriers to participating Easy Fairly easy Minor barrier Major barrier No response in Erasmus Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Obtaining a visa for a period of work in the European Union Accreditation of your existing qualification Translation of qualifications Linguistic barriers Cultural barriers
16 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - What sort of preparation did you receive, if any, prior to going to Substantial Quite good Not a lot None No response your chosen university? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Languages Cultural Help with visas Help with accommodation, etc Help with residence permit Help with travel What was the quality of the facilities at the university you are working in (or most recently worked at) as part of Erasmus Excellent Quite good Not very good Low No response Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Teaching Research Accommodation Cultural To what extent did you perceive the Erasmus Mundus course as having been well integrated between the different European higher education institutions that run the course and deliver course content? Very well integrated Quite well integrated Not very well integrated Not integrated at all Total Do you think that an integrated course offered by a consortium of European universities has a clear added value over comparable national programmes? Yes No No response Total To what extent have you been involved in teaching and research activities during your period as an A lot Quite a lot Not a lot Very little No response Erasmus Mundus scholar? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Teaching Research
17 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - What was the length of your stay as a scholar in Erasmus Mundus? No. % More than 3 months About 3 months Less than 3 months No response Total The standard period of stay as an Erasmus Mundus scholar is 3 months. In your view, is this period: No. % Too long? About right? Too short? No response Total Looking back on your participation in Erasmus Mundus, what in your view were the main benefits of participating in the Substantial Quite good Not a lot Not at all No response programme? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of European higher education Reputation of the academic department you have joined Unique characteristics of Erasmus Mundus Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and working in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Understanding of other cultures Opportunity to work at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills To what extent has participating in the Erasmus Mundus programme improved your perception of higher education in the European Union? No. % Excellent Quite a lot Not a lot Low Total
18 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Is the experience and any qualification that you obtained from working for an Erasmus Mundus course fully recognised in your country of origin? No. % Yes No Don t know Total Was the scholarship funding provided sufficient to enable you to participate fully in the work and to live in the host country without undue hardship? No. % Wholly sufficient Somewhat sufficient Not very sufficient Not sufficient Total Would you have participated without scholarship funding? No. % Yes No No response Total If you were choosing to go to a foreign university again, would you still choose to work for this Erasmus Mundus course? No. % Yes No No response Total Action 3 - students from EU countries Another survey group was students from EU Member States participating in the programme. It should be noted that there are much fewer EU students compared with international students participating in the programme, hence the total response was much lower for European students. The results are presented in full below: In which academic year did you start your the Erasmus Mundus programme (please tick all that apply)? Academic Year No. % 2004/ / /
19 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - How did you first become aware of the Erasmus Mundus programme (please tick all that apply)? Website Recommendation from an academic institution Personal recommendation Advertisement What were the main factors that influenced your decision to apply to Important Quite important Small importance Not important participate in Erasmus Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of Erasmus Mundus course Unique characteristics of Erasmus Mundus course Availability of grant to study at an institution outside Europe Cost Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and studying in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Opportunity to study at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills Please tell us what obstacles you had in participating in an Erasmus Mundus Not important Little importance Quite important Very important course No. % No. % No. % No. % Costs Mobility requirements Lack of clarity of information about the integrated course and its requirements What sort of preparation did you receive, if any, prior to entering on your chosen course of study (please tick all that Substantial Quite a lot A little None apply)? No. % No. % No. % No. % Languages Cultural Help with accommodation, etc Help with travel Preparatory academic courses
20 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - To what extent did you perceive the Erasmus Mundus course as having been well integrated between the different higher education institutions that run the course and deliver course content? Very well integrated Quite well integrated Not much integration Not integrated at all No response Total How would you rate the quality of the following student facilities at the European institution you are studying at (or most recently studied at) as part of Erasmus Mundus? Options Excellent Quite good Not too good Low No. % No. % No. % No. % Accommodation Cultural facilities Sports facilities Placements Careers For the European university you are studying at (or most recently studied at), how would you rate the quality of the Excellent Quite good Not too good Low following? No. % No. % No. % No. % Course content Teaching Study environment Research services and facilities Have these features been of comparable quality across all the institutions you have visited throughout your Erasmus Mundus masters programme? No. % Yes No No response Total Do you think that an integrated course offered by a consortium of European universities has a clear added value over comparable national programmes? Yes No No response Total
21 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - It is an obligatory element of Erasmus Not very Mundus masters programmes that Excellent Quite good good students have to study in at least two Bad institutions in Europe ( mobility ). How do you rate this mobility? No. % No. % No. % No. % From the point of view of the academic benefit you derive from it From the point of view of transfer arrangements and organisation It is an optional element of Erasmus Mundus masters programmes that students can study in an institution outside Europe. How do you rate this Excellent Quite good Not very good Bad mobility? No. % No. % No. % No. % From the point of view of the academic benefit you derive from it From the point of view of transfer arrangements and organisation In respect of the integration of teaching or research modules with European universities Looking back on your participation in Erasmus Mundus, what in your view were the main benefits of participating in Substantial Quite a lot Some Not at all the programme? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of Erasmus Mundus course Unique characteristics of Erasmus Mundus course The possibility of studying at an institution outside Europe Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and studying in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Understanding of other cultures Opportunity to study at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills
22 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - How useful do you perceive receiving a double or joint qualification as opposed to a Masters qualification from a single university from the Future career Academic prestige perspective of the following? No. % No. % Very useful Quite useful Not very useful Not at all useful Total Is the Masters qualification that you obtained from participating in an Erasmus Mundus course fully recognised in your country of origin? No. % Yes No Don t know Total Did you receive an Erasmus Mundus scholarship to study at an institution outside Europe as part of this course? No. % Yes No Total What sort of preparation did you receive, if any, prior to entering on Substantial Quite a lot Some None No response your chosen course of study? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Languages Cultural Help with visas Help with residence permits Help with accommodation, etc Help with travel Preparatory academic courses How would you rate the quality of the following student facilities at the third-country institution you are studying at (or most recently studied at) as part of Erasmus Excellent Quite good Not very good Low No response Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Accommodation Cultural facilities Sports facilities Placements Careers
23 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Have these features been of comparable quality across all the institutions you have visited throughout your Erasmus Mundus Masters programme? No. % Yes No No response Total For the third-country university you are studying at (or most recently studied at, how would you Excellent Quite good Not too good Low No response rate the quality of the following? No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Course content Teaching Study environment Research services and facilities Was the scholarship funding provided for your study period in an institution outside Europe sufficient to enable you to participate fully in the course and to live in the host country without undue hardship? Wholly sufficient Quite sufficient Not very sufficient Not at all sufficient No response Total Would you have studied at an institution outside Europe without Erasmus Mundus scholarship funding? No. % Yes No No response Total If you were choosing a masters course again, would you still choose to follow this Erasmus Mundus course? No. % Yes No No response Total
24 2.6 Action 3 - scholars from EU countries Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - European scholars that have been accepted on the EM programme were also surveyed. Scholars supported through Action 3 have the opportunity to spend up to 3 months teaching and undertaking research in an academic institution in a third country outside the EU. The results are set out below in full: In which academic year did you receive a scholarship to go to a third-country institution in the context of the Erasmus Mundus programme (please tick all that apply)? Year No. % 2004/ / / What were the main factors that influenced your decision to work at an institution outside Europe as part of the Erasmus Mundus Important Quite important Not very important Unimportant programme? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of higher education in your chosen country Reputation of the academic department you have joined Availability of grant Cost Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and working in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Opportunity to work at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills Once you had been accepted for mobility towards the third-country institution, Easy Fairly easy Minor barrier Major barrier were there any barriers? No. % No. % No. % No. % Obtaining a visa for a period of work in your chosen country Accreditation of your existing qualification Translation of qualifications Linguistic barriers Cultural barriers
25 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - What sort of preparation did you receive, if any, prior to going to your chosen Substantial Quite good Not a lot None university? No. % No. % No. % No. % Languages Cultural Help with visas Help with accommodation, etc Help with residence permit Help with travel How would you rate the quality of the following facilities at the third-country university you worked at as part of Excellent Quite good Not very good Low Erasmus Mundus? No. % No. % No. % No. % Teaching Research Accommodation Cultural Looking back on your participation in Erasmus Mundus, what in your view were the main benefits of participating in the mobility period at the third-country Substantial Quite good Not a lot Not at all institution? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhancement of future career prospects Quality of higher education in your chosen country Reputation of the academic department you have joined Improvement of language skills The challenge of living and working in another country Opportunity to come into contact with another culture Understanding of other cultures Opportunity to work at a prestigious university abroad Development of personal skills Is the experience and any qualification that you obtained from participating in the mobility offered by Erasmus Mundus fully recognised in your country of origin? No. % Yes No Don t know Total
26 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - Was the scholarship funding provided sufficient to enable you to participate fully in the work and to live in the host country without undue hardship? Wholly sufficient Somewhat sufficient Not very sufficient Not sufficient Total Would you have participated without scholarship funding? No. % Yes No Total If you were planning to go to a foreign university again, would you still choose to follow this Erasmus Mundus course? Yes No Total Action 3 - Partnerships (HEIs from EU countries) European HEIs participating in Action 3 Partnerships were asked a number of supplementary questions to the Action 1 EM Masters Course questionnaire regarding their experiences of participating in an international partnership with other academic institutions in third countries. The results are presented below: In your opinion, how relevant is Erasmus Mundus Action 3 to the needs of higher education institutions? Relevant Somewhat relevant Not very relevant Irrelevant Total In your opinion, does the EM Action 3 add value to higher education institutions? Relevant Somewhat relevant Not very relevant Irrelevant Total
27 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - What were the main factors that influenced your decision to apply to Important Quite important Not very important Unimportant participate in Action 3? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhance course quality through joint working with other universities Increase the attractiveness of your own institution to students through the development of an international higher education partnership Increase the attractiveness of your own institution to students by offering opportunities to complete part of the course in a higher education institution outside Europe Increase staff development opportunities through transnational co-operation Enhance the international profile of your institution Attract more international students to your institution Attract more European students to your course How far has participation in Action 3 helped contribute to improvements in the quality of this Masters course? Important Quite important Not very important Unimportant Total With regard to programme management, how efficiently and effectively has the programme been managed? Well managed Quite well managed Not very well managed Not well managed at all Don t know Total
28 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - With regard to impacts, how far has Important Quite important Not very important Unimportant participation in Action 3: No. % No. % No. % No. % Strengthened the international dimension of activities in your higher education institution? Promoted academic excellence in your institution? Improved the quality of Masters courses within participating institutions? Better prepared students for the challenges of competing in a global economy and an ever more internationalised work environment? Developed intercultural understanding Attracted more European students to your course How adequate do you feel the financial provision for the development of joint courses under Action 3 has been? Please rate the adequacy of financial provision Excellent Quite good Not very satisfactory Unsatisfactory Total Do you think your Action 3 Erasmus Mundus masters course will be financially sustainable once the Erasmus Mundus funding has ended? Totally sustainable Somewhat sustainable Not very sustainable Not at all sustainable Total How well has the EM consortium functioned? No. % Excellent Quite good Not very satisfactory Unsatisfactory Total
29 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - What problems, if any, did you encounter during the process of implementation of an EM Action 3 course? Quite Very easy Quite easy difficult Very difficult Problems No. % No. % No. % No. % Finding partner institutions in third countries offering compatible courses Finding partner institutions in third countries interested in Action 3 Negotiating an agreement with the partner institutions in the third countries Administrative obstacles such as timing of semesters, credit definition, organisation of outgoing mobility for European students Finding European students interested in mobility to a third country Services for outgoing European students Tuition fees Linguistic issues Issues relating to mutual recognition of qualifications Has your consortium been able to reach the target numbers for students on mobility? Yes No No response Total Do you think Erasmus Mundus Action 3 overlaps with actions under other Community programmes in the field of higher education? Yes No No response Total Please let us know why you have not used Erasmus Mundus Action 3 (addressed to European HEIs involved in Action 1 but which have not yet participated in Action 3) No. % Not considered it Decided not to Plan to do so in future Tried to do so but was not able to put a course together Tried to do so, but the proposal was rejected No response Total
30 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus Action 3 - Partnerships (HEIs from third countries) Higher education institutions from third countries that participated in EM were also asked in a separate survey for their views on Action 3 Partnerships, in particular how they became aware of the programme, how effective they view the Action as being and ways in which it might be improved in future. The results are set out below: In which academic year did you first participate in an Action 3 Partnership? Academic Year No. % 2004/ / / Total How did you first become aware of the Erasmus Mundus programme? No. % Website At a conference or exhibition Recommendation from an academic institution National contact point Personal recommendation Other advertisement In the process of preparing for participation in Erasmus Mundus Action 3, how easy or difficult did you find each of the following elements: Very easy Quite easy Quite difficult Very difficult No. % No. % No. % No. % Completing the application form? Developing appropriate course content compatible with that delivered through the Erasmus Mundus course by European higher education institutions? Identifying academic staff with appropriate skills (foreign language skills, other skills) to deliver course content? Accreditation of study period in third country by partners and/or competent authorities in the European Union? Setting a tuition fee for European students? Setting criteria for the selection of students?
31 Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus - In your opinion, how relevant is Erasmus Mundus Action 3 to the needs of higher education institutions? Relevance No. % Highly relevant Quite relevant Somewhat relevant Not relevant at all Total Did co-operation with higher education institutions in EU countries already exist at the time of the Action 3 EM application? Yes No Total In your opinion, does Erasmus Mundus Action 3 add value to higher education institutions? A lot Quite a lot A little No value at all Total What were the main factors that influenced your decision to apply to Important Quite important Small importance Not important participate in Action 3? No. % No. % No. % No. % Enhance course quality through joint working with other universities Increase the attractiveness of your own institution to students through the development of an international higher education partnership Increase the attractiveness of your own institution to students by offering opportunities to complete part of the course in a higher education institutions in Europe Increase staff development opportunities through transnational co-operation Enhance the international profile of your institution Attract more European students to your course
Erasmus+ EU-funded scholarships to study in Europe. Erasmus+
EU-funded scholarships to study in Europe What is? The EU's programme to support education, training youth and sport Funding for programmes, projects and scholarships Fosters EU-EU and EU-international
More information(Announcements) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES COMMISSION. Call for proposals EACEA/29/09 for the implementation of Erasmus Mundus II (2009/C 294/08)
C 294/18 Official Journal of the European Union 3.12.2009 V (Announcements) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES COMMISSION Call for proposals EACEA/29/09 for the implementation of Erasmus Mundus II (2009/C 294/08)
More informationInterim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus
Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus Final Report June 2007 Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services LLP Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus Contents SECTION PAGE GLOSSARY I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i. 1.
More informationInterim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus II ( ) Executive summary
Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus II (2009-2013) Executive summary Introduction Programme description The 2009-2013 Erasmus Mundus programme was established by Decision (No 1298/2008/EC) of the European
More informationErasmus Mundus José Gutiérrez Fernández Erasmus Mundus Programme Coordinator EACEA
Erasmus Mundus 2009-2013 José Gutiérrez Fernández Erasmus Mundus Programme Coordinator EACEA Presentation Topics 1. What are we here for? Putting the Info Day in perspective 2. Key elements in the new
More informationErasmus Mundus Action 2 Scholarship Holders Impact Survey
Erasmus Mundus Action 2 Scholarship Holders Impact Survey Results Erasmus Mundus Erasmus Mundus Action 2 Scholarship Holders' Impact Survey Results Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
More informationErasmus Mundus Call for Proposals 2012 EACEA 42/11
Erasmus Mundus Call for Proposals 2012 EACEA 42/11 1 The Erasmus Mundus Programme 2 Erasmus Mundus aims Promote European higher education Improve and enhance students career prospects Promote intercultural
More information(Announcements) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES EUROPEAN COMMISSION
C 400/18 Official Journal of the European Union 28.12.2012 V (Announcements) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES EUROPEAN COMMISSION Call for proposals EACEA/38/12 Erasmus Mundus 2009-13 action programme Implementation
More informationErasmus+ Come to study or teach in Europe. Erasmus+
Come to study or teach in Europe What is? The EU's programme to support education, training youth and sport Funding for programmes, projects and scholarships Fosters EU-EU and EU-international cooperation
More informationErasmus+ and International Credit Mobility
Erasmus+ and International Credit Mobility UK Erasmus+ National Agency July 2018 Erasmus+ and Brexit (I) The UK Government has confirmed that it will underwrite grant agreements for Erasmus+ signed while
More informationDevelopment of Erasmus+ in the second half of the programme period and the design of the subsequent programme generation ( )
Development of Erasmus+ in the second half of the programme period and the design of the subsequent programme generation (2021 2027) Position paper of the National Erasmus+ Agency for EU Higher Education
More informationThe Erasmus Mundus programme Anila Troshani Head of Sector - EM Action 2 Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation, EACEA
The Erasmus Mundus programme Anila Troshani Head of Sector - EM Action 2 Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation, EACEA 1 Content The Agency: its mission The EM objectives and the programme Action 1 Action
More informationErasmus Charter for Higher Education Application eform Call for proposals EACEA/10/2015
General Information Erasmus Charter for Higher Education Application eform Call for proposals EACEA/10/2015 Note: The data of this application form will be used by the European Commission/ the Education,
More informationErasmus+ Cooperation possibilities
Erasmus+ Cooperation possibilities 13/10/2014 Rebecka Herdevall Swedish Council for Higher Education Who are we? About us Established 1 January 2013 225 employees Main office in Stockholm small office
More informationThe international dimension for higher education Education and Culture
The international dimension for higher education Education and Culture Date: in 12 pts What is Erasmus+? EU programme to support education, training youth and sport Funding for programmes, projects & scholarships
More informationErasmus+ Frequently Asked Questions
Erasmus+ Frequently Asked Questions October 2013 1. Why is there a need for a new programme? Why are the current programmes disappearing? 2. Why is Erasmus+ at proposal stage? What does this mean? 3. Why
More informationErasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees 1. Conditions relating to the design of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees An EMJMD must be fully developed at the time of the application and be ready to run for
More informationOne programme, three actions
One programme, three actions Action 1 Joint Master and Doctoral Programmes - implemented by EU and non EU universities - scholarships for non EU and EU students for the entire duration of the joint study
More informationErasmus Mundus. Call for Proposals 2013 EACEA/38/2012
Erasmus Mundus Call for Proposals 2013 EACEA/38/2012 Erasmus Mundus - objectives Enhance the quality of European HE through international co-operation Improve the development of human resources Promote
More informationSet of recommendations from Forum number 5 on Student mobility UNICA Student Conference 2017
Set of recommendations from Forum number 5 on Student mobility UNICA Student Conference 2017 Table of Contents Recommendations #1 on recognition of credits... 2 Recommendations #2 on lack of information...
More informationJoint Conference Tempus/Erasmus Mundus University of Stuttgart 8 10 November 2011
Erasmus Mundus Joint Conference Tempus/Erasmus Mundus University of Stuttgart 8 10 November 2011 Dimitris Kokkalis Programme Manager - Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation Education, Audiovisual & Culture
More informationJean Monnet Networks (policy debate with the academic world)
Jean Monnet Networks (policy debate with the academic world) What is a Jean Monnet Network? Jean Monnet Networks foster the creation and development of consortia of international players (HEIs, Centres
More informationGuidelines. Application template Call 2018 KA1 - Learning Mobility of Individuals KA110 - Accreditation of youth volunteering organisations.
DISCLAIMER This document represents a template of an application form. It must not be used for real applications to a National Agency. Please also note that the sections and questions presented below may
More informationInformation about Erasmus+ programme with the emphasis on the possibilities in the field of vocational education and training
Information about Erasmus+ programme with the emphasis on the possibilities in the field of vocational education and training Branka Radonić Choudhury, Agency for Mobility and EU Programmes, Department
More informationErasmus Mundus in 2010
1 Erasmus Mundus in 2010 Joachim FRONIA Head of Unit Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency 2 Erasmus Mundus in 2010 Context The new programme The 2010 Call for Proposals Other Calls for Proposal
More informationInternational dimension of Higher Education 27/06/2015
2014 2020 International dimension of Higher Education 27/06/2015 3 Key Actions of Erasmus+ EU Programmes (2007 2013) Single, integrated Erasmus+ (2014 2020) Lifelong Learning Programme: Grundtvig Erasmus
More informationCOME TO STUDY OR TEACH IN EUROPE
COME TO STUDY OR TEACH IN EUROPE Erasmus+ is the European Union programme for education, training, youth and sport for the period 2014-2020. It offers a range of opportunities for higher education students,
More informationErasmus+ and Horizon 2020 European Union Funded Programmes
Erasmus+ and Horizon 2020 European Union Funded Programmes Destriani Nugroho EU Delegation to Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam What is Erasmus+? The European Union s programme to support education, training
More information2017 Erasmus+ KA1 VET and Adult Education Handbook
2017 Erasmus+ KA1 VET and Adult Education Handbook Part 1: Introduction to Erasmus+ and KA1 VET and Adult Education Version 1.0 Overview of changes to the handbook This document is version 1.0 of the Introduction
More informationErasmus Plus
Erasmus Plus 2014-2020 Erasmus Plus 2014-2020 Erasmus Plus is the new EU programme for education, training, youth and sport proposed by the European Commission on 23 November 2011. It will start officially
More informationSuccessful Recognition Student Guidebook. Justyna Pisera, PRIME Project Coordinator. PRIME Project. Erasmus Student Network
Successful Recognition Student Guidebook Justyna Pisera, PRIME Project Coordinator PRIME Project. Erasmus Student Network PRIME Problems of Recognition in Making Erasmus Copyright 2011 by the Erasmus Student
More informationErasmus Charter for Higher Education LA IT-E4AKA1-ECHE-1
Erasmus Charter for Higher Education 2014-2020 Application Form Call: 2014 Note: The data of this application form will be used by the European Commission/ Executive Agency EACEA and National Agencies
More informationBritish Council Ukraine: Internationalising Higher Education Call for Grant Applications
As part of its Internationalising Higher Education programme, the British Council in Ukraine is pleased to announce a call for applications for grants for a range of mobility and partnership activities
More informationERASMUS MUNDUS Frequently-asked questions ACTION 2: Questions from higher education institutions Latest update: January 2011
CONTENTS I. Higher Education Institution (HEI) A) HEI Applicants HEI 1. Who can act as "coordinating institution"? 2. What is an Erasmus Charter? 3. How many proposals can be submitted by an applicant
More informationErasmus+ mid-term evaluation - the Swiss feedback 1 2 3
Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft Confédération suisse Confederazione Svizzera Confederaziun svizra Federai Department of Economie Affairs, Education and Research EAER State Secretariat for Education, Research
More informationInternational joint courses: the experience of Erasmus Mundus
International joint courses: the experience of Erasmus Mundus Manuela Costone PNC Italia Erasmus Mundus 2 novembre 2011 DoReMi/MELODI Training and Education Workshop Towards the integration of training
More informationOTHER EU PROGRAMMES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
OTHER EU PROGRAMMES IN HIGHER EDUCATION 1 OTHER EU PROGRAMMES RELATED TO HIGHER EDUCATION 1. Erasmus Mundus 2. Jean Monnet 3. Bilateral Cooperation with Industrialised Countries: US/Canada/ICI 1. Erasmus
More informationMobility project for VET learners and staff
Mobility project for VET learners and staff Organisations may apply for a VET learners and staff mobility projects in two ways: Any eligible organisation may apply for funding for Mobility projects for
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. CALL - EAC/A01/2015 Erasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter
EUROPEAN COMMISSION CALL - EAC/A01/2015 Erasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter 2016-2020 1. Introduction This specific Call is based on Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 of the European
More informationERASMUS+ Key Action 1 Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees EMJMD Call for proposals 2018 How to prepare a competitive EMJMD proposal
ERASMUS+ Key Action 1 Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees EMJMD Call for proposals 2018 How to prepare a competitive EMJMD proposal Erasmus+ Date: in 12 pts OUTLINE Preparing the application based on the
More informationThe ERASMUS MUNDUS Programme at FUB
Stefanie Böhler International Office The ERASMUS MUNDUS Programme at FUB ERASMUS MUNDUS Team Stefanie Böhler, Thomas Schad June 18th, 2012 Goals of Erasmus Mundus Promote European higher education Improve
More informationERASMUS+ Study Exchanges and Traineeships. Handbook for School/Departmental Exchange Co-ordinators
ERASMUS+ Study Exchanges and Traineeships Handbook for School/Departmental Exchange Co-ordinators March 2017 Version 5 Contents 1. Introduction 2. ERASMUS+ and the British Council Funding Cycle Operational
More informationMidterm Evaluation of Erasmus+ National Report Denmark
National Report Denmark CONTENTS Midterm Evaluation of Erasmus+ 1 Executive summary and conclusions 4 1.1 Main findings 4 2 Introduction 6 2.1 Objectives of Erasmus+ 6 2.2 Erasmus+ in Denmark 6 2.3 Purpose
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 12.7.2007 COM(2007) 395 final 2007/0145 (COD) Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing an action programme for
More informationErasmus+ International Credit Mobility
Erasmus+ International Credit Mobility 1 Contents Foreword... 3 1. Contract between Beneficiary and National Agency... 3 Structure and content of the Grant Agreement... 3 Amendments to the Grant Agreement...
More informationErasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter Specifications for call - EAC/A02/2016
Erasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter 2017-2020 Specifications for call - EAC/A02/2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Directorate B Modernisation
More informationEPP ES-EPPKA3-ECHE
ECHE Selection 2016 Erasmus Charter for Higher Education Application eform Call for proposals EACEA/10/2015 Note: The data of this application form will be used by the European Commission/ the Education,
More informationA European model for Joint Doctoral Programmes
A European model for Joint Doctoral Programmes José Gutiérrez Fernández Deputy Head of Unit, Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture (EACEA) 1 Policy
More informationCALL FOR APPLICATIONS ERASMUS+ SCHOLARSHIPS FOR INCOMING MOBILITY TO UPF FROM CHINA
CALL FOR APPLICATIONS 2018-2019 ERASMUS+ SCHOLARSHIPS FOR INCOMING MOBILITY TO UPF FROM CHINA Since its origins, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF) has woven cooperation ties with universities overseas and
More informationOpportunities for Palestinian students and academics Clivio Casali Programme Manager Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation, EACEA
European Scholarships. Worldwide Opportunities. Opportunities for Palestinian students and academics Clivio Casali Programme Manager Erasmus Mundus and External Cooperation, EACEA Why Erasmus Mundus? Erasmus
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. CALL - EAC/A06/2017 Erasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter
Ref. Ares(2017)5680072-21/11/2017 1. EUROPEAN COMMISSION CALL - EAC/A06/2017 Erasmus+ Vocational Education and Training Mobility Charter 1. Introduction This specific Call is based on Regulation (EU) No
More informationAPPLICATION FORM. Application deadline. Application for EM3E master admission with an Erasmus Mundus scholarship: December 15 th 2011 (mid-night CET)
APPLICATION FORM MASTER EDITION 2012 2014 Application deadline Application for EM3E master admission with an Erasmus Mundus scholarship: December 15 th 2011 (mid-night CET) Application for EM3E master
More informationERASMUS+ VOLUNTEERING CHARTER
ERASMUS+ VOLUNTEERING CHARTER The Erasmus+ volunteering Charter highlights the roles of the sending, receiving and coordinating organisations involved in an Erasmus+ volunteering project and the main principles
More informationEU policy and programme support to "European Higher Education in the world" Date: in 12 pts
EU policy and programme support to "European Higher Education in the world" The EU policy framework The European higher education in the world strategy launched in 2013 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?uri=celex:52013dc0499
More informationCESAER Position on ERASMUS for All June Erasmus for All. The position of CESAER June 2012
Erasmus for All The position of CESAER June 2012 Contents: Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Branding 3 3. General and specific objectives 4 4. Budget 5 5. New forms of financial provisions 5 6. The different
More informationErasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions. Piia Heinämäki Erasmus+ Info Day, Lviv Erasmus+
Work together with European higher education institutions Piia Heinämäki Info Day, Lviv 21.10.2016 What is? The EU's programme to support education, training youth and sport Funding for programmes, projects
More informationThe PIC code of Hasselt University is: The ECHE number of Hasselt University is: EPP BE-EPPKA3-ECHE.
If you plan to submit an application for an Action within Erasmus+, please inform the international office at least 4 weeks before the deadline (dios@uhasselt.be or erasmusplus@uhasselt.be). The international
More informationOnline Consultation on the Future of the Erasmus Mundus Programme. Summary of Results
Online Consultation on the Future of the Erasmus Mundus Programme Summary of Results This is a summary of the results of the open public online consultation which took place in the initial months of 2007
More informationJANUARY 2017 ERASMUS MUNDUS
JANUARY 2017 ERASMUS MUNDUS Graduate Impact Survey PRESENTED BY: icunet IN COOPERATION WITH: Umfragezentrum Bonn Prof. Rudinger GmbH (uzbonn GmbH) Gesellschaft für empirische Sozialforschung und Evaluation
More informationMobility for students: A key to greater competitiveness and to enhancing quality of higher education (Lessons from Erasmus Mundus)
Mobility for students: A key to greater competitiveness and to enhancing quality of higher education (Lessons from Erasmus Mundus) Ms. Shiella C. Balbutin President, Erasmus Mundus Students and Alumni
More informationErasmus Student Work Placement Guide
Erasmus Student Work Placement Guide Introduction This Guide is intended to provide general information for students who are considering an Erasmus work placement. It must be stressed that the advice is
More informationRichard Kelner Delegation of the European Union to Japan 20 th May 2013
The Delegation of the European Union to Japan Erasmus Mundus/Erasmus for All and ICI-ECP Richard Kelner Delegation of the European Union to Japan 20 th May 2013 1. Erasmus Mundus Erasmus Mundus is a cooperation
More informationJean Monnet support to associations
Jean Monnet support to associations Jean Monnet supports associations that have as their explicit purpose to contribute to the study of the European integration process. Such associations should be interdisciplinary
More informationSources of funding for A&A education to deliver the vision of Europe 2020
Sources of funding for A&A education to deliver the vision of Europe 2020 Vienna, January 17, 2014 Atanasko Atanasovski CFRR, consultant Horizon 2020 WHAT IS HORIZON 2020? Horizon 2020 is the biggest EU
More informationTREAT-NMD Partner Newsletter No March 2007
TREAT-NMD Partner Newsletter No. 2 16 March 2007 Welcome to the 2 nd weekly newsletter for all TREAT-NMD partners! Newsletter contents 1. About this newsletter and the mailing list 2. Latest News / Research
More informationThe Impact of the Erasmus+ Programme in Europe Elena Maddalena, Italian NA Erasmus+ INDIRE. The Future of Education Florence,11 June 2015
The Impact of the Erasmus+ Programme in Europe Elena Maddalena, Italian NA Erasmus+ INDIRE The Future of Education Florence,11 June 2015 In September 2014 the European Commission published the Impact Study
More informationCALL FOR APPLICATIONS 2015 ERASMUS+ KA107 SCHOLARSHIPS FOR INCOMING MOBILITY FROM ASSOCIATED COUNTRIES
CALL FOR APPLICATIONS 2015 ERASMUS+ KA107 SCHOLARSHIPS FOR INCOMING MOBILITY FROM ASSOCIATED COUNTRIES Since its origins, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF) has woven cooperation ties with universities overseas
More informationUniversity of Zagreb. Erasmus programme at the University of Zagreb
University of Zagreb Erasmus programme at the University of Zagreb Erasmus programme & University of Zagreb ERASMUS & CROATIA short look back The programme introduced in Europe in 1987 Croatia joined in
More informationErasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees What are the aims of an Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degree? Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees (EMJMD) aim to: foster quality improvements, innovation, excellence and
More informationErasmus Mundus Doctoral Programme in Sustainable Industrial Chemistry SINCHEM. APPLICATION FORM 2015/2016 Action 1 EMJD
Erasmus Mundus Doctoral Programme in Sustainable Industrial Chemistry SINCHEM APPLICATION FORM 2015/2016 Action 1 EMJD Please select one of category between the two available below: Category A: doctoral
More informationErasmus for All. The state of play. Jordi Curell European Commission. ACA Seminar What s new in Brussels. Brussels, 24 January 2013
Erasmus for All The state of play Jordi Curell European Commission ACA Seminar What s new in Brussels Brussels, 24 January 2013 A streamlined architecture : 3 Key actions Existing programmes A single integrated
More informationErasmus+ Application Form for Accreditation. Call: A. General Information. B. Context. B.1. National Agency of the Applicant Organisation
A. General Information This form is to be filled out by organisations wishing to be accredited under the Erasmus+ programme. Please see the Erasmus+ Programme Guide for more information about accreditation.
More informationKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCES WHAT ARE THE AIMS AND PRIORITIES OF A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE? WHAT IS A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE?
KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCES WHAT ARE THE AIMS AND PRIORITIES OF A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE? Knowledge Alliances aim at strengthening Europe's innovation capacity and at fostering innovation in higher education, business
More informationTips and advices for future EU beneficiaries 1
Worksheet 1 Tips and advices for future EU beneficiaries 1 Writing a good project seems often something easy to do. However, it s not sufficient to have an excellent idea but the key issue is to match
More informationMAIN FINDINGS INTRODUCTION
ERASMUS+ IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY RESULTS - 2017 INTRODUCTION Following the success of the 2014 broad public consultation and the 2015 and 2016 Erasmus+ implementation surveys, the Lifelong Learning Platform
More informationErasmus Mundus. Call for Proposals 2013 EACEA/38/2012. Giordana Bruno EACEA Paris, 24/01/2013
Erasmus Mundus Call for Proposals 2013 EACEA/38/2012 Giordana Bruno EACEA Paris, 24/01/2013 Erasmus Mundus - objectives Enhance the quality of European HE through international co-operation Improve the
More informationQuestions and Answers
Title: Call for proposals "Music Moves Europe: Online & Offline distribution" Version: 5 of 06/08/2018 Question 1: Answer 1: Is any form of transnational cooperation with institutions abroad (e.g. art
More informationThe EU programme for Education, Training, Youth and Sport. Date: in 12 pts
The EU programme for Education, Training, Youth and Sport WHY THE NEW APPROACH? Education, training and youth: a changing landscape Deep economic crisis and high youth unemployment Vacancies exist, but
More informationImproving the participation in the ERASMUS programme
Improving the participation in the ERASMUS programme Presentation for the European Parliament s Committee on Culture and Education Prof. dr. Hans Vossensteyn Brussels, 2 September 2010 02/09/2010 Improving
More informationPriorities for exit negotiations
February 2017 What should be the government s priorities for exit negotiations and policy development to maximise the contribution of British universities to a successful and global UK? As government looks
More informationErasmus+ The EU programme for Education, Training, Youth and Sport
Erasmus+ The EU programme for, Training, Youth and Sport 2014-2020 Erasmus+: Why a new approach?, training and youth: a changing landscape Deep economic crisis and high youth unemployment Vacancies exist,
More informationErasmus Exchange Application Policy
Erasmus Exchange Application Policy 1 Contents About the Erasmus Exchange Programme... 3 Is this programme available to me?... 3 Direct Entry Students... 3 Joint Honours... 3 Exchange Coordinator... 4
More informationERASMUS + INTERNATIONAL MOBILITY
ERASMUS + INTERNATIONAL MOBILITY UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA, SPAIN GUIDE FOR INTERNATIONAL APPLICANTS https://erasmusmi.um.es [Escrib ir texto] INDEX 1. ABOUT ERASMUS +......3 2. ERASMUS + University of Murcia
More informationErasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees
ERASMUS+ Centralised Actions - Infoday Utrecht, 14 November 2017 Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees Key features, Dutch participation and specifics of the call 2018 Bart Cosyns Erasmus+ EACEA, Unit A3
More informationErasmus + ( ) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka
Erasmus + (2014-2020) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka What is Erasmus+? The EU's programme to support education, training youth and sport Combines 7 EU education,
More informationThe Erasmus Impact Study Regional Analysis
The Erasmus Impact Study Regional Analysis A Comparative Analysis of the Eff of Erasmus on the Personality, Skills and Career of students of European Regions and Selected Countries Education and Culture
More informationERASMUS+ Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees EMJMDs. Key Action 1. Erasmus+
ERASMUS+ Key Action 1 Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees EMJMDs Erasmus+ A streamlined architecture: 3 Key Actions A single integrated programme KA1 Learning Mobility for Individuals Erasmus+ KA2 Co-operation
More informationErasmus+ Programme EVS INFO KIT January 2014
Erasmus+ Programme EVS INFO KIT January 2014 Dear volunteer! Congratulations for having been selected for participation in the European Voluntary Service (EVS). The next weeks and months might be a lifechanging
More informationIntroduction to International Student Mobility at FUB. International Student Mobility Welcome Services Gesa Heym-Halayqa June 2017
Introduction to International Student Mobility at FUB International Student Mobility Welcome Services Gesa Heym-Halayqa June 2017 University Organisational Structure Tasks International Affairs Director
More informationEuropean Solidarity Corps: Ensuring Quality, Impact and Inclusion
European Solidarity Corps: Ensuring Quality, Impact and Inclusion Eurodesk Position Paper addressing the European Commission s proposal to the Parliament and the Council for the legal framework of the
More informationCall for Applications Government of Ireland - International Education Scholarships
Call for Applications 2018 Government of Ireland - International Education Scholarships 1. Background & Objectives The internationalisation of Irish higher education is a key element in the delivery of
More informationReport Form. Call: 2014
General Information This report form generated from the Mobility Tool+ consists of the following main sections: - Context: this section resumes some general information about your project; - Project Summary:
More informationInternational Credit Mobility
International Credit Mobility Presentation outline The policy context of international credit mobility Indications on funding Mechanisms foreseen under Erasmus+ Running and upcoming calls The policy context
More informationSupporting you and your project
Supporting you and your project eacea.ec.europa.eu Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency European Union, 2017 For any use or reproduction of photos which are not under European Union copyright,
More informationSERBIA. Preparatory measures for full participation in Erasmus+ INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II)
INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II) 2014-2020 SERBIA Preparatory measures for full participation in Erasmus+ Action Summary This action will facilitate the Serbia s harmonisation with the
More informationErasmus Charter for Higher Education LA IT-E4AKA1-ECHE-1
Erasmus Charter for Higher Education 2014-2020 Application Form Call: 2014 Note: The data of this application form will be used by the European Commission/ Executive Agency EACEA and National Agencies
More informationEiffel Program VADE-MECCUM Master Section, which finances the master program, from 12 to 36 months
Eiffel Program VADE-MECCUM 2018 The Eiffel Scholarship program has two sections: -Master Section, which finances the master program, from 12 to 36 months -Doctoral Section, which finances the mobility
More informationErasmus+ expectations for the future. a contribution from the NA Directors Education & Training March 15, 2017
Erasmus+ expectations for the future a contribution from the NA Directors Education & Training March 15, 2017 This paper represents the opinions of the directors of National Agencies with activities in
More informationPart I. Project identification and summary
Application for Action 5 Support for European Cooperation in the youth field Sub-Action 5.1 - Meetings of young people and those responsible in the youth field Please fill in all relevant sections of this
More informationManaging Global Governance The New Advanced Training and Dialogue Programme for Highly-qualified Young Professionals from Selected Partner Countries
Managing Global Governance The New Advanced Training and Dialogue Programme for Highly-qualified Young Professionals from Selected Partner Countries Programme Description Making global governance work
More information