BALTIMORE CITY S INTEGRATED DUAL DISORDERS TREATMENT (IDDT) INITIATIVE FISCAL YEAR 2013 ANNUAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2013
|
|
- Amie Franklin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BALTIMORE CITY S INTEGRATED DUAL DISORDERS TREATMENT (IDDT) INITIATIVE FISCAL YEAR 2013 ANNUAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2013 Behavioral Health System Baltimore was created on October 1, 2013 by the merger of Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems, Inc. (BSAS) and Baltimore Mental Health Systems, Inc. (BMHS) One N. Charles St., Suite 1600 Baltimore, MD
2 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Background... 4 Data Sources... 5 Goals and Targets... 5 Accomplishments... 6 Team Formation... 6 Training... 6 Marketing... 7 Data Collection and Reporting... 8 Pooling and matching data across multiple databases... 8 Establishing Baseline Parameters... 9 Process Measures:... 9 Outcome Measures: IDDT Initiative Participant Voices IDDT FY13 Annual Report
3 Executive Summary Baltimore City s Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment (IDDT) Initiative began its initial full year on July 1, 2012 after a long planning period between Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems, Inc. (BSAS) and its partner agency, Baltimore Mental Health System, Inc. (BMHS). Focused on criminal-justice involved, dually diagnosed individuals in Baltimore City and Baltimore County, the Initiative aims to provide necessary support to this population by establishing integrated, community-based treatment services at both high- and lower-intensity levels. The Initiative selected three providers across Baltimore City to provide these two levels of service: the Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team serves individuals meeting medical necessity criteria for Assertive Community Treatment (ACT); and two IDDT Clinic Teams at Maryland Treatment Centers and Family Health Centers of Baltimore, respectively, serve lower severity individuals. Activities in this first year centered on training, marketing, development of valid data collection and reporting systems, and establishment of baseline process and outcome measures for subsequent years. In its first year, the Initiative referred 188 eligible individuals to the three providers, of whom 133 (85%) were subsequently admitted for treatment. Referral sources included many parts of the criminal justice system as well as within the IDDT providers themselves, reflecting the nature of behavioral health treatment populations in Baltimore City. Having an alternative plan pursued was the primary reason why an eligible individual was not admitted to an IDDT provider. The demographic characteristics of the 133 admitted individuals reflect the geographic locations of the three IDDT providers, the criminal justice involved population in Baltimore City, and baseline expertise of each provider. Each IDDT provider experienced higher than expected increases in their first year fidelity score for implementation of the IDDT model. The reincarceration rate of 18% is well below Maryland s overall rate of offenders returning to prison/jail. The majority of emergency department visits and hospitalizations were mental health related and will serve as a baseline for future years. At the end of year 1, 82% of participants remained in care, 19% of those who were unstably housed had achieved permanent housing, and 8% of those who were unemployed on admission had become gainfully employed at some point during the year. In focus groups, participants expressed satisfaction with their IDDT provider and saw tangible benefits from the integrated treatment. 3 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
4 Background Individuals diagnosed with dual disorders 1 often experience higher rates of negative outcomes such as relapse, hospitalization, homelessness and incarceration. Treating both disorders in a coordinated manner and in an integrated setting has been shown to be the most effective approach for helping individuals manage both illnesses. However, historically separate funding streams and regulatory oversight have been significant barriers to integrated care. One consequence of these disparate service systems has been increased lengths of stay in courtordered ( 8-507) residential addiction treatment programs in Baltimore City, due in part to a lack of integrated treatment services available upon discharge. As a result, individuals with dual disorders stay in residential treatment longer, which in turn lengthens jail time for individuals waiting for residential care. Based on a random chart review of 329 individuals assessed in Baltimore City in Fiscal Year 2009 under the legal process, 43% had both substance abuse and mental health disorders, representing a significant population who could benefit from better integrated care. To address this gap, the Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems, Inc. (BSAS) and the Baltimore Mental Health System, Inc. (BMHS) began an intensive joint planning and development process in 2009 for the Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment Initiative (IDDT) which was launched in April 2012 with three Baltimore City behavioral health providers. The Initiative aims to provide the support individuals with co-occurring disorders and criminal justice system involvement need by establishing integrated, community-based treatment services using the evidence-based treatment model, Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment (IDDT). To meet the varying needs of individuals with co-occurring disorders, the Initiative includes two levels of service of different intensities. Individuals with high-level needs have access to a community-based IDDT Team that provides mobile, intensive, wrap-around mental health and substance use disorder treatment, and support services. Individuals with lower level needs have access to two IDDT outpatient clinics (IDDT Clinics), one originating in the public mental health system and one coming from the publicly funded substance use disorder treatment system. These clinics provide less intensive, integrated, co-occurring services in an outpatient setting. To oversee and manage the Initiative at a local systems level, BSAS and BMHS formed the IDDT Operations Team consisting of key senior leaders from both organizations who meet regularly to plan, monitor, and oversee the implementation of the project. The Operations Team is supported by work of the IDDT Evaluation Team and the IDDT Advisory Workgroup that includes key stakeholders from criminal justice, social services, and the IDDT providers. This report presents outcome results and lessons learned from the first full fiscal year of the Initiative, July 1, 2012 through June 30, In this document, dual disorders refer to co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders. 4 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
5 Data Sources Data sources for this report include: 1. BSAS Criminal Justice database 2. Statewide Maryland Automated Record Tracking (SMART) system 3. Mobile Treatment Outcomes (MTO) system 4. The online version of the Maryland Victim Notification and Notification Every day (VINELink) system 5. The online version of the Maryland Judiciary Case Search In addition, we draw from baseline and annual fidelity reviews conducted by the Case Western University Center for Excellence that has served as a consultant to the Initiative. Baltimore City Department of Parole and Probation provided courtesy work to identify the number of individuals on probation or parole. To develop a richer picture of the Initiative, its impact and ongoing areas for focus, we also include results from focus groups with Initiative participants and themes from interviews with key administrators across the three IDDT providers. All focus groups and interviews were held in July and August of IDDT participant focus groups with a total of 25 participants a. 10 participants from the IDDT Intensive Team b. 15 participants from the two IDDT Clinic Teams 2. Interviews with 3 IDDT administrators Goals and Targets The target number of individuals admitted to each of the IDDT providers during the first year of the Initiative is 55. With implementation of a new service delivery model and an expected rampup period, the focus of the Initiative s initial year has been on the adequacy of referrals and admissions. This focus has guided the majority of the activities completed over the past year. 5 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
6 Accomplishments Team Formation By July 1, 2012, three Baltimore City providers had received IDDT grant awards and formed IDDT teams. Bon Secours Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) team in central West Baltimore used funds to transform their existing ACT team into the IDDT Intensive Team. The two IDDT Clinic teams originated in the Outpatient Mental Health Clinic (OMHC) at Maryland Treatment Centers (MTC) in West Baltimore and the outpatient substance use disorder treatment program at Family Health Centers (FHC), a federally qualified community health center in South Baltimore. In identifying members for their respective teams, each provider organization built on existing staff and used grant funds to fill in where they each identified a need. For example, MTC identified needing a full-time team leader while FHC sought a mental health therapist. Bon Secours initially identified existing staff but increased the hours of several positions and then added a second team leader. Training In planning Baltimore City s IDDT Initiative, the IDDT Operations Team recognized that training would be an on-going area for focus throughout the three year pilot project, and would change depending on individual provider need and stage of the Initiative. In this first year, the IDDT providers have completed key trainings in areas common to all three with focus on those that would allow for initiation of services. July 10-13, 2012: All IDDT providers completed intensive in-depth IDDT training with Case Western Reserve University. August 2012: All three IDDT providers completed SMART database training. November 7, 2012: Forensic Alternative Services Team (FAST) provided training to the IDDT providers to familiarize them with the judiciary and treating forensic involved patients. FAST provided follow-up training on February 8, January 22-24, 2012: Case Western Reserve University provided on-site technical assistance (TA) for each IDDT provider, with a follow-up conference call with each provider on February 6, The Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team received an additional TA session with Case Western on April 26, Case Western has continued to provide regular TA to each IDDT provider by phone and electronic media. October and December 2012 and February 2013: All-IDDT Provider Roundtable meetings 6 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
7 Marketing As a new service delivery model for criminally justice involved individuals with dual-diagnoses, the IDDT Operations team and the providers identified marketing and education of key stakeholders and potential referral sources as a critical area for focus in the initial stages of the Initiative. The initial marketing and education strategy involved having the IDDT Operations Team take on a larger role in this area than the IDDT providers, for several reasons: The criminal justice component of the target population required involvement of BSAS as the local entity responsible for monitoring many of the Initiative s participants. A centralized referral mechanism was felt necessary to ensure appropriate triage to the two different levels of service intensity. With oversight of the entire initiative, the IDDT Operations Team could speak to the project at both a systems and service delivery level. The IDDT Operations Team served as a conduit for introducing the IDDT providers to the various criminal justice stakeholders, allowing them to then move forward with building relationships with referral sources as appropriate to their geographic locations. Over the course of FY13, the IDDT Operations Team and individual IDDT providers developed fact sheets, pamphlets, and held numerous meetings to disseminate the availability of IDDT services. Some key meetings include: July through October 2012: The IDDT Operations Team (both with and without the IDDT providers) met with the District and Circuit court specialty mental health and drug courts, District and Circuit judiciary, the state hospitals, Parole and Probation, and residential substance use disorder treatment providers. October 2012 and April 2013: IDDT Operations Team met with leadership from ADAA, MHA, and the Deputy Secretary for Behavioral Health. January through March 2013: IDDT Operations Staff met in follow-up with state hospitals and residential substance use disorder treatment providers, and met with leadership and case managers from ValueOptions, the Administrative Services Organization for Maryland s Public Mental Health System. March through May 2013: IDDT Operations Team and providers met with District Drug Court, and Parole and Probation, to problem solve systemic communication issues between the criminal justice system and providers and further promote IDDT services. 7 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
8 Data Collection and Reporting The focus of this year for data collection has been two-fold: 1) develop an effective method for pooling and matching data collected across multiple databases; and 2) establishing baseline parameters for a number of process and outcome measures in order to assess the Initiative s impact as change over time. Pooling and matching data across multiple databases The IDDT Evaluation Team, composed of key staff and leadership from BSAS and BMHS, met almost weekly during the year to: develop an evaluation plan review and learn about the three main databases (BSAS Criminal Justice database, SMART, and MTO) problem solve data linking processes and discrepancies in data outputs The team proceeded through several different steps and learned key lessons as part of its work: Initial review of each database revealed several overlapping variables, particularly between SMART and MTO. However, each database defined many of these variables, such as housing and employment, differently. The IDDT Evaluation Team compared each of these variables in detail, with final consensus reached on which definition to use for evaluation purposes. The team documented all the variables, their definitions, and their database of origin in a written evaluation plan that serves as the basis for each type of report generated. Although attempts were made to minimize the amount of double data entry required by the IDDT providers, some was unavoidable because of both the unique and overlapping variables within each database. The Evaluation Team needed to add several variables specific to the IDDT initiative to each of the databases in order to identify and track IDDT participants apart from the larger population of individuals in each system. These changes were made in collaboration with the Maryland Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration for SMART and the Mental Hygiene Administration for MTO. Because of both unique and overlapping variables, a need for a linked, centralized repository for all the data across the three databases was identified. As there was no common variable to match data across the three databases, the team created a common unique identifier. While this unique identifier enabled matching, it revealed a significant number of data entry errors that initially limited the percentage of records effectively linked. With significant data cleaning in conjunction with the IDDT providers and using regular, standardized data error reports, the percentage of matched records dramatically increased. 8 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
9 Establishing Baseline Parameters The IDDT Evaluation Team considered several options for a control population to compare with the IDDT participant group. Given the challenges of data collection across different systems, the pilot project approach to implementation, and the differences between the providers at baseline, the team opted to use a prospective, intra-group approach to the evaluation, with change over time in key process and outcome measures as the comparison. This first year of the Initiative thus serves as the baseline. Process Measures: a. Flow of individuals into the Initiative Figure 1 describes the flow of individuals into the Initiative and corresponding referral sources. District Court Drug Court 1 District Court Mental Health Court 3 Diversion Programs 5 Parole and Probation Sate Hospitals 2 Circuit Court Drug Court 23 Other SUD treatment providers 2 Circuit Court Medical Services and FAST 3 IDDT Intensive Team 30 Circuit Court FDI 1 IDDT eligible individuals 188* IDDT Clinic Teams 91 *Referral source missing for one individual Figure 1: Referral Sources and Number of Referrals for July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 Several points are important to note regarding the flow of individuals into the Initiative: Given the diversity of referral sources and the complexity of tracking people through the criminal justice system, at this point it is impossible to identify the total universe of people from whom these 188 IDDT eligible individuals emerge. Since assessments for potential dual diagnoses occur at multiple different points in the system by different entities using different tools, it is impossible to describe the total pool of individuals with co-occurring disorders that may be eligible for IDDT services. 9 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
10 We can identify the total number of individuals who were court mandated to treatment through the legal process since BSAS is required to track and monitor this. o For FY13, a total of 78 individuals received such an order. o Of these, 13% met eligibility criteria for an assessment for IDDT services after BSAS reviewed its database (Figure 1). This likely represents an underestimate of potentially eligible individuals for IDDT services who are involved in the legal process since other areas that are represented in the figure can have involved individuals that are not identified as such. To minimize duplication of data, we elected to categorize referrals according to the most immediate referral source, acknowledging that this might mask individuals court mandated to treatment by an order. A large proportion of referrals originated within the IDDT providers themselves. o This reflects the nature of individuals receiving treatment services in Baltimore City but also includes individuals who were referred directly to the IDDT providers from criminal justice sources. o This latter referral mechanism illustrates the work the IDDT providers have done over the past year to cultivate strong collaborations with their referral sources and will foster sustainability. b. Distribution of referrals and admissions Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of referrals and admission rates across the IDDT providers. Figure 2: Distribution of IDDT eligible individuals assigned to IDDT providers for assessment and subsequent admission, July 1, 2012 through June 30, IDDT FY13 Annual Report
11 Overall, 86% of the 185 eligible IDDT individuals referred to IDDT providers were admitted during this initial year of the project. None of the providers met the target goal of 55 admissions for the year, but all of them surpassed the 50% mark. MTC IDDT Clinic Team at 94.5% of target FHC IDDT Clinic Team at 85% of target Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team at 62% of target It is important to note that the medical necessity criteria for admission to the IDDT Intensive Team requires higher severity of psychiatric symptoms than for the two IDDT Clinic Teams. This may explain the lower admission rate to the IDDT Intensive Team. c. Description of referral sources for individuals admitted to the Initiative To better understand the flow from assessment through admission, and shed light on the different admission rates across providers, we analyzed the referral sources for those individuals admitted to the Initiative (Table 1) and reasons why eligible individuals were not admitted (Table 2). Table 1: Referral Sources for Individuals Admitted to IDDT From July 1, 2012 Through June 30, 2013, By Provider (N=133) Referral Source Circuit Court Medical Services and FAST Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team MTC IDDT Clinic Team Family Health Centers IDDT Clinic Team Circuit Court Drug Court District Court Mental Health Court Diversion Programs Parole and Probation State Hospitals IDDT Intensive Team IDDT Clinic Teams Total Admissions 34 52* 47 *One admission had a missing referral source 11 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
12 Although the fewer than anticipated participants entered through this mechanism population received preference in referral and admission to the Initiative, This analysis also highlights the difference between the IDDT Intensive Team and the two IDDT Clinic Teams in their connections to the criminal justice system. To some extent, this likely reflects the differences in psychiatric severity for people involved in state hospitals, for example. Again, note is made of the large number of individuals identified internally by each IDDT provider as meeting eligibility for services. Table 2: Reasons for Individuals Not Being Admitted to IDDT From July 1, 2012 Through June 30, 2013, By Provider (N=133) Reasons for No Admission Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team MTC IDDT Clinic Team Family Health Centers IDDT Clinic Team Refused IDDT Services Absconded/No show for treatment Different Plan Pursued Already in treatment with non-iddt provider Not assessed Missing outcome Total Admissions Total Assigned The reasons for referred individuals not receiving an IDDT assessment vary depending on the referral source. For example, early in the Initiative, the Initiative experienced challenges for people referred from Drug Court. Primarily, this was related to challenging in coordinating timely and effective connections between jailed individuals and the IDDT providers. For people referred from Parole and Probation, the reasons individuals did not receive an IDDT assessment relate more to them either not showing up for several assessment appointments or not being at home when an IDDT provider staff member came to conduct the assessment. 12 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
13 Outcome Measures: a. Fidelity Reviews One of the key outcome measures to implementing an evidence-based practice like IDDT is how close to maximal fidelity to the model a new initiative or provider comes. In behavioral health service delivery, it is expected that providers and systems need several years before high fidelity is reached. Prior to that, the outcome measure of interest is how much change has occurred from year to year as providers and systems learn and modify their practices. According to the Case Western Reserve University Center for Evidence-Based Practices, an expected amount of change for the IDDT model from one year to the next is an increase of 0.5 on the total IDDT fidelity scale. An overall total score of 4.0 reflects moderate implementation of the model while 5.0 indicates full implementation of IDDT. For the three IDDT providers in Baltimore City, their baseline to first annual fidelity scores ranged as follows: 1. Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team: Increase of 0.8 Baseline fidelity score = 2.2 First annual fidelity score = Maryland Treatment Centers IDDT Clinic Team: Increase of 1.9 Baseline fidelity score = 1.3 First annual fidelity score = Family Health Centers IDDT Clinic Team: Increase of 1.5 Baseline fidelity score = 1.5 First annual fidelity score = 3.0 b. Demographic Characteristics and Other Outcome Measures Because of the complexity of the data collection and matching processes required across multiple data systems, outcome measures, including descriptive statistics, for the Initiative focus only on the group of 133 admitted individuals. Table 3 describes the demographic profile of those admitted to any of the three IDDT providers. 13 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
14 Table 3: Demographic Characteristics of Individuals Admitted to the IDDT Initiative From July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 Characteristic Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team (N=34) MTC IDDT Clinic Team (N=52) Family Health Centers IDDT Clinic Team (N=47) Total Initiative (N=133) Age, mean (range) 38 (19-60) 39 (21-61) 39 (20-64) 39 (19-64) Male Gender, n (%) 26 (76%) 36 (69%) 37 (79%) 99 (74%) Race/ethnicity, n (%) Black 24 (71) 31 (60) 24 (51) 79 (59) White/Caucasian 9 (26) 19 (36) 21 (45) 49 (37) Asian/Pacific Islander 0 (0) 1 (2) 1 (2) 2 (2) Other 1 (3) 1 (2) 1 (2) 3 (2) Marital Status, n (%)* Married 1 (3) 8 (15) 3 (6) 12 (9) Never married 27 (79) 29 (56) 28 (60) 84 (63) Divorced/separated 4 (12) 4 (8) 14 (30) 22 (17) Widowed 2 (6) 1 (2) 0 (0) 3 (7) Income Level, n (%)* <$5, (65) 22 (42) 34 (72) 78 (59) $5,000 - $9, (35) 11 (21) 3 (6) 26 (19.5) $10,000 - $19,999 0 (0) 9 (17) 5 (11) 14 (10.5) $20,000 - $39,999 0 (0) 8 (15) 4 (9) 12 (9) $40,000 - $50,000 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2) 1 (0.5) >$50,000 0 (0) 2 (4) 0 (0) 2 (1.5) SUD Disorders, n (%)** Alcohol 14 (41) 8 (15) 4 (9) 26 (19.5) Cannabis 9 (26) 5 (10) 6 (13) 20 (15) Cocaine 7 (21) 3 (6) 3 (6) 13 (10) Opioid 3 (9) 34 (65) 34 (72) 71 (53) Other 1 (3) 1 (2) 0 (0) 2 (1.5) MH Disorders, n (%) & Major Depressive Disorder 6 (18) 32 (62) 20 (43) 58 (44) Depression/Dysthymic Disorder 4 (12) 5 (10) 8 (17) 17 (13) Bipolar Disorder 11 (32) 9 (17) 11 (23) 31 (23) Anxiety/Panic Disorder 0 (0) 2 (4) 2 (4) 4 (3) PTSD 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (6.5) 3 (2) Schizophrenia/schizoaffective Disorder 13 (38) 3 (6) 3 (6.5) 17 (13) *Total of 12 individuals with missing data: 10 from MTC and 2 from FHC **Total of 1 individual with missing data admitted to MTC & Total of 1 individual with missing data admitted to MTC 14 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
15 Several demographic characteristics are worth noting specifically: The majority of the individuals admitted to the IDDT Initiative are men in their late 30 s. Overall, there was a preponderance of African-Americans admitted to the overall project, but the racial distribution varied across the three providers, with Family Health Centers in Cherry Hill having the narrowest gap between Black and Caucasian. Very few other minorities were represented by any provider. Over three-quarters of participants fall below the federal poverty level for a single person, which in 2013 was $11, With the exception of the Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team, the most common substance use disorder diagnosed was opioid use disorder, followed by alcohol and cannabis. Individuals admitted to the Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team had a wider range of SUDs, including alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine, rather than opioid use disorders. While the reasons for this are not entirely clear, it may be related to the longer experience the two IDDT clinic teams have had with treating opioid use disorders with buprenorphine/naloxone. Both FHC and MTC have integrated medication-assisted treatment into their clinical processes and protocols which the Bon Secours team has not had. As would be expected given the differences in medical necessity criteria between the IDDT Intensive Team and the Clinic Teams, a higher percentage of individuals with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were admitted to Bon Secours than either MTC or FHC. Interestingly, the two IDDT Clinic Teams admitted higher percentages of people with major depression than Bon Secours. The latter team admitted a higher percentage of individuals with bipolar disorder. The percentage of individuals with an anxiety disorder admitted to any of the IDDT providers was low, likely reflecting that Maryland s Public Mental Health System priority population excludes PTSD and anxiety disorders. Table 4 details the identified outcome measures for the Initiative IDDT FY13 Annual Report
16 Table 4: Outcome Measures for Individuals Admitted to the IDDT Initiative From July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013 Outcome Measure Criminal Justice Outcomes Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team (N=34) MTC IDDT Clinic Team (N=52) Family Health Centers IDDT Clinic Team (N=47) Total Initiative (N=133) Participants on parole or probation 7 (20.5) 10 (19) 4 (8.5) 21 (16%) Participants re-arrested after admission, n (%) 7 (20.5) 11 (21) 0 (0) 18 (13.5) Participants incarcerated after admission, n (%) 8 (23.5) 5 (10) 11 (23) 24 (18) Hospital Utilization Outcomes Emergency Department Visits, N SUD-related visits 1/26 (4%) 6/27 (22%) 0/34 (0%) 7/87 (8%) Mental health-related visits 17/26 (65%) 7/27 (26%) 29/34 (85%) 53/87 (61%) Somatic care-related visits 8/26 (31%) 14/27 (52%) 5/34 (15%) 2787 (31%) Hospitalizations, N SUD-related hospitalizations 0/19 (0%) 11/29 (38%) 0/16 (0%) 11/64 (17%) Mental health-related hospitalizations 19/19 (100%) 9/29 (31%) 4/16 (25%) 32/64 (50%) Somatic care-related hospitalizations 0/19 (0%) 9/29 (31%) 12/16 (75%) 21/64 (33%) Recovery-related Outcomes Unemployed at admission, n (%)* 33 (97) 44 (85) 43 (91) 120 (90) Unemployed at admission who became 2/33 (6%) 4/44 (9%) 4/43 (9%) 10/120 (8%) employed at some point during the year Unstable housing at admission, n (%)** 29 (85) 2 (4) 5 (11) 36 (27) Unstable housing at admission who 6/29 (21%) 1/2 (50%) 0/5 (0%) 7/36 (19%) obtained permanent housing at some point during the year Number of participants still in treatment as 34 (100) 52 (100) 23 (49) 109 (82) of June 30, 2013, n (%) & Length of stay for participants in treatment as of June 30, 2013, mean days (range) 140 (5-311) 181 (4-314) 87 (4-353) 148 (4-353) *Total of 2 individuals with missing data: 1 from FHC and 1 from Bon Secours **Total of 2 individuals with missing data: 1 from FHC and 1 from Bon Secours & A total of 24 participants were discharged from MTC between July 1, 2012 and June 30, IDDT FY13 Annual Report
17 While many of these outcomes will serve as baseline measures for the IDDT Initiative, several of them deserve specific note and comment: The 18% re-incarceration rate overall stands well below the 40.5% return to prison or probation rate reported by the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional services. 3 Twenty-six (26) participants, or 19.5% of all IDDT clients, accounted for the 87 total Emergency Department (ED) visits. o This averages to about 3 ED visits per person in the 12 month reporting period. o Of the 26 individuals visiting the ED, 19 (73%) had more than one visit. Participants in the FHC Clinic Team had the highest percentage of ED visits for mental health reasons (85%) among the three IDDT providers but the lowest percentage of substance use (0%) and somatic-related visits (15%). This team also saw the highest percentage of somatic-related hospitalizations (75%) and the lowest percentage of mental-health related hospital admissions (25%) of the Initiative. This likely reflects the background of the FHC clinic team as an original substance use disorder treatment provider integrated into a federally qualified community health center. The clinical expertise of the team that includes a family medicine physician specializing in addiction medicine probably allows for effective identification, triage, and intervention of substance use or somatic health concerns such that participants are steered towards hospitals for admission, not just an ED visit, when their symptoms are such that they cannot be managed in an ambulatory setting. However, because mental health care is the newest component for this team, it may rely on the ED more heavily at this point to assist in addressing challenging psychiatric symptoms. The Bon Secours IDDT Intensive Team also experienced a high utilization of hospital resources, both ED and inpatient, for mental health-related issues. Rather than reflecting the composition and expertise of the clinical team, these statistics likely primarily reflect the severity of the mental illnesses of IDDT Intensive Team participants with recognition by an experienced staff as to when hospital admission is needed. Not surprisingly, a higher percentage of IDDT Intensive Team participants were unstably housed at admission compared with participants in either of the IDDT Clinic Teams. The only discharges from the Initiative came from the FHC clinic team. This likely reflects the different regulations and cultures underlying treatment that have historically viewed mental health care from a time-unlimited, chronic illness perspective versus the acute disease approach of substance use disorder treatment where non-adherence to care results in discharge from treatment rather than intensification of care. 3 George J. State s recidivism rate drops in a decade. The Baltimore Sun, Tuesday, October 1, P IDDT FY13 Annual Report
18 IDDT Initiative Participant Voices Here are a few snapshots of what IDDT participants have said about their experience so far, from a July 2013 focus group Perspectives on their health conditions: I no longer look at mental health as a stigma I have a better understanding of my mental illness and have better insight. I am more peaceful and balanced. Satisfaction with their IDDT service provider: I have a good counselor that helps me. Supportive. Surprisingly interesting. I love this place! Their general outlook: I m alive again. A life changing gift. I m no longer afraid. 18 IDDT FY13 Annual Report
Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment: New York County Alternative to Incarceration Program. May 13, 2011 ACT Roundtable Meeting
Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment: New York County Alternative to Incarceration Program May 13, 2011 ACT Roundtable Meeting Consumer Characteristics Average Age 43 Male 84% African American 60% Latino
More informationDefining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program
Nathaniel ACT ATI Program: ACT or FACT? Over the past 10 years, the Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services (CASES) has received national recognition for the Nathaniel Project 1. Initially
More informationALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS
ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS Annual Report January December 007 Table of Contents I. Introduction II. III. IV. Outcomes reduce recidivism and incarceration stabilize housing reduce acute care
More informationSTATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES
STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD JANUARY 2009 COVER PHOTO COURTESY OF SENATE PHOTOGRAPHY Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team Michele Connolly, Manager
More informationJune 25, Shamis Mohamoud, David Idala, Parker James, Laura Humber. AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting
Evaluation of the Maryland Health Home Program for Medicaid Enrollees with Severe Mental Illnesses or Opioid Substance Use Disorder and Risk of Additional Chronic Conditions June 25, 2018 Shamis Mohamoud,
More informationBorder Region Mental Health & Mental Retardation Community Center Adult Jail Diversion Action Plan FY
ATTACHMENT 3 b Border Region Mental Health & Mental Retardation Community Center Adult Jail Diversion Action Plan FY 2010086 The Border Region MHMR Community Center developed a Jail Diversion Plan for
More informationSacramento County Community Corrections Partnership
Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership AB 109 Mental Health & Substance Abuse Work Group Proposal Mental Health & Alcohol / Drug Service Gaps: County Jail Prison ( N3 ), Parole, and Flash
More informationHarris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model
Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model 12/31/2015 1 Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Sequential Intercept Model The Sequential Intercept
More informationALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS. Annual Report Revised 05/07/09
ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS Annual Report 8 Revised /7/9 Revised /7/9 Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Demographics III. Outcomes reduce recidivism and incarceration stabilize housing
More informationBehavioral Health Services. San Francisco Department of Public Health
Behavioral Health Services San Francisco Department of Public Health Slide 2 Agenda Behavioral Health Services in San Francisco Mental Health Services Substance Use Disorder Services Levels of Care Behavioral
More informationForensic Assertive Community Treatment Team (FACT) A bridge back to the community for people with severe mental illness
Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Team (FACT) A bridge back to the community for people with severe mental illness Gary Morse, Ph.D. Katie Thumann, L.C.S.W. Places for People: Community Alternatives
More information(c) A small client to staff caseload, typically 10:1, to consistently provide necessary staffing diversity and coverage;
309-019-0225 Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Overview (1) The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) characterizes ACT as an evidence-based practice for individuals with
More informationProgram of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT) BHD/MH
Program of Assertive Community Treatment () BHD/MH Luis Marcano, x5343 Alan Orenstein, x0927 Program Purpose Program Information Help individuals with serious mental illness achieve and maintain community
More informationDRUG MEDI-CAL ORGANIZED DELIVERY SYSTEM (DMC-ODS) PERFORMANCE METRICS. (version 6/23/17)
1 Access Enrollment information to include the number of DMC-ODS beneficiaries served in the DMC-ODS program Clients Served: 1. Number of DMC-ODS beneficiaries served (admissions) by the DMC- ODS County
More informationStatewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates
Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates SUBMITTED TO THE 82ND TEXAS LEGISLATURE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF JANUARY 2011 STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES
More informationHamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide Updated May 2017 PREVENTION ASSESSMENT TREATMENT REINTEGRATION MUNICIPAL & COMMON PLEAS COURT GUIDE Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Municipal
More informationAssertive Community Treatment (ACT)
Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) services are therapeutic interventions that address the functional problems of individuals who have the most complex and/or pervasive
More informationCommunity Care of North Carolina
Community Care of North Carolina 2007 Community Care of North Carolina Mail Service Center 2009 Raleigh, NC 27699-2009 (919) 715-1453 www.communitycarenc.com Background Several networks in the Community
More informationQuality Management and Improvement 2016 Year-end Report
Quality Management and Improvement Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Scope of Activities...5 Patient Safety...6 Utilization Management Quality Activities Clinical Activities... 7 Timeliness of Utilization
More informationCommunity Treatment Teams in Allegheny County: Service Use and Outcomes
Community Treatment Teams in Allegheny County: Service Use and Outcomes Presented by Allegheny HealthChoices, Inc. 444 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Phone: 412/325-1100 Fax 412/325-1111 October
More informationJustice-Involved Veterans
Justice-Involved Veterans Jessica Blue-Howells, LCSW National Coordinator, Health Care for Reentry Veterans National Program Manager, Project CHALENG May 2014 Agenda Who are justice involved Veterans Why
More informationConsumer Perception of Care Survey 2015
Maryland s Public Behavioral Health System Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MARYLAND S PUBLIC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2015 CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF CARE SURVEY ~TABLE OF CONTENTS~
More informationAnnual Report
2016 2017 Annual Report BACKGROUND 1 Strategic Plan available at http://www. alleghenycountyanalytics.us/ wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ Allegheny-County-Jail- Collaborative-2016-2019- Strategic-Plan.pdf
More informationDivision of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities & Substance Abuse Services NC Mental Health and Substance Use Service Array Survey
Table 1 Service Name Include any subcategories of service on a separate line In Table 2, please add service description and key terms Outpatient Treatment Behavioral Health Urgent Care (a type of outpatient)
More informationALL MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER PROGRAMS MUST INCLUDE PSYCHOSOCIAL AND PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATIONS
COUNTY of NASSAU DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Office of Mental Health, Chemical Dependency and Developmental Disabilities Services 60 Charles Lindbergh Boulevard, Suite 200, Uniondale, New York 11553-3687
More informationSuicide Among Veterans and Other Americans Office of Suicide Prevention
Suicide Among Veterans and Other Americans 21 214 Office of Suicide Prevention 3 August 216 Contents I. Introduction... 3 II. Executive Summary... 4 III. Background... 5 IV. Methodology... 5 V. Results
More informationDallas County s Role in Behavioral Health and Supportive Services. Briefing to Dallas City Council Housing Committee
Dallas County s Role in Behavioral Health and Supportive Services Briefing to Dallas City Council Housing Committee 9 19 2016 Overview Dallas County Funding for Behavioral Health and Supportive Services
More informationSeptember 2011 Report No
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on The Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Report No. 12-002 An Audit Report
More informationCharacteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report December 1997, NCJ-164267 Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995 By Thomas P. Bonczar BJS Statistician
More informationConsumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary
Maryland s Public Behavioral Health System Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary MARYLAND S PUBLIC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2016 CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF CARE SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationProgram of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT) BHD/MH
Program of Assertive Community Treatment () BHD/MH Luis Marcano, x5343 Alan Orenstein, x0927 Program Purpose Help individuals with serious mental illness achieve and maintain community integration through
More informationClosing the Gap. Using Criminal Justice and Public Health Data to Improve the Identification of Mental Illness JULY 2012
Closing the Gap Using Criminal Justice and Public Health Data to Improve the Identification of Mental Illness JULY 2012 SUBSTANCE USE AND MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM Executive Summary This report describes findings
More informationAn Analysis of Medicaid Costs for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury While Residing in Maryland Nursing Facilities
An Analysis of Medicaid for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury While Residing in Maryland Nursing Facilities December 19, 2008 Table of Contents An Analysis of Medicaid for Persons with Traumatic Brain
More informationSpeaker: Ruby Qazilbash. Ruby Qazilbash Associate Deputy Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice
1 2 Speaker: Ruby Qazilbash Ruby Qazilbash Associate Deputy Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice 3 Today s Webinar Council of State Governments Justice
More informationBeaver County Sequential Intercept Model and System of Care. Forensic Rights Conference December 1, 2011
Beaver County Sequential Intercept Model and System of Care Forensic Rights Conference December 1, 2011 1 Agenda Overview of Beaver County Progression of Forensic / Behavioral Health Initiatives The Sequential
More informationTARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES
TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES Texas Council June 2015 Ramey C. Heddins, CCHP Director Mental Health Support Services Kathleen Carr Rae, Public Policy Specialist WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? Prison 3-year
More informationQuality Management Plan
Quality Management Plan Lackawanna-Susquehanna Behavioral Health / Intellectual Disabilities / Early Intervention Program Calendar Year- Lackawanna-Susquehanna Behavioral Health / Intellectual Disabilities
More informationADULT SERVICE COORDINATION PROVIDERS IN ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Allegheny County Department of Human Services Service Coordination Referral Form ADULT SERVICES FORM INSTRUCTIONS 1. Only one service provider can be requested at a time. 2. All sections of this document
More informationVeterans Court. 2 nd Judicial District Court Reno, Nevada Legislative Committee on Senior Citizens, Veterans, and Adults with Special Needs May, 2012
Veterans Court 2 nd Judicial District Court Reno, Nevada Legislative Committee on Senior Citizens, Veterans, and Adults with Special Needs May, 2012 Veterans Court in NV Statute approved by 2009 Legislature
More informationCALL FOR PRESENTERS TRAINING INSTITUTE THEME
CALL FOR PRESENTERS The American Probation and Parole Association is pleased to issue a Call for Presenters for the 43rd Annual Training Institute, July 29 August 1, 2018. This enriching training event
More informationMinnesota s Plan for the Prevention, Treatment and Recovery of Addiction
Minnesota s Plan for the Prevention, Treatment and Recovery of Addiction Background Beginning in June 2016, the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division (ADAD) of the Minnesota Department of Human Services convened
More informationIntroduction. Jail Transition: Challenges and Opportunities. National Institute
Urban Institute National Institute Of Corrections The Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Initiative August 2008 Introduction Roughly nine million individuals cycle through the nations jails each year,
More informationImproving Service Delivery for Medicaid Clients Through Data Integration and Predictive Modeling
Improving Service Delivery for Medicaid Clients Through Data Integration and Predictive Modeling Getty Images David Mancuso, PhD July 28, 2015 1 The Medicaid Environment Program costs are often driven
More informationCommunity Support Team
Community Support Team Fidelity Scale Instructions Purpose: to Shape Mental Health Services Toward Recovery Revised: 4/16/08 The purpose of this tool is to assess the degree to which a Community Support
More informationEVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.
University of Oklahoma College of Continuing Education EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT June 30, 2011 Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A. Funding
More informationARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2012 to FY 2016 Charles L. Ryan Director TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... i Strategic Plan.. 1 Agency Vision 1 Agency Mission 1 Agency
More informationFresno County, Department of Behavioral Health Full Service Partnership Program Outcomes Reporting Period Fiscal Year (FY)
The Fresno County, Department of Behavioral Health strives to evaluate Contract Providers and In-House programs on an ongoing basis to measure cost effectiveness, need for service, program success, and
More informationDRUG MEDI-CAL ORGANIZED DELIVERY SYSTEM (DMC-ODS) YEAR 1 PERFORMANCE METRICS (version 10/24/17)
1 Access Enrollment information to include the number of DMC- ODS beneficiaries served in the DMC-ODS program Clients Served: 1. Number of DMC-ODS beneficiaries served (admissions) by the DMC- ODS County
More informationRegion 1 South Crisis Care System
Region 1 South Crisis Care System Region 1 South Crisis Care System Presenters: Lee Ann Reinert, LCSW Clinical Policy Specialist, DHS/DMH Patricia Palmer, LCSW, CADC Clinical Director, Collaborative Author:
More informationDRAFT. An Introduction to The ASAM Criteria for Patients and Families. What is The ASAM Criteria?
An Introduction to The ASAM Criteria for Patients and Families This document has been created to provide you information about how some of the decisions regarding your available treatment or service options
More informationMajor Dimensions of Managed Behavioral Health Care Arrangements Level 3: MCO/BHO and Provider Contract
Introduction To understand how managed care operates in a state or locality it may be necessary to collect organizational, financial and clinical management information at multiple levels. For instance,
More informationModel of Care Scoring Guidelines CY October 8, 2015
Model of Care Guidelines CY 2017 October 8, 2015 Table of Contents Model of Care Guidelines Table of Contents MOC 1: Description of SNP Population (General Population)... 1 MOC 2: Care Coordination...
More informationContemporary Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing. Deinstitutionalization. Deinstitutionalization - continued
Contemporary Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing Chapter 12 Creating Hospital and Community-Based Therapeutic Environments Deinstitutionalization Began in the post World War II period Large public mental
More informationINTEGRATED CASE MANAGEMENT ANNEX A
INTEGRATED CASE MANAGEMENT ANNEX A NAME OF AGENCY: CONTRACT NUMBER: CONTRACT TERM: TO BUDGET MATRIX CODE: 32 This Annex A specifies the Integrated Case Management services that the Provider Agency is authorized
More informationAttachment A INYO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH. Annual Quality Improvement Work Plan
Attachment A INYO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Annual Quality Improvement Work Plan 1 Table of Contents Inyo County I. Introduction and Program Characteristics...3 A. Quality Improvement Committees (QIC)...4
More informationBiennial Report of the Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or
Biennial the Texas Office on Presented to: Texas Board of Criminal Justice Submitted to: The Honorable Rick Perry, Governor The Honorable David Dewhurst, Lieutenant Governor The Honorable Joe Straus, Speaker
More informationNETWORK180 PROVIDER MANUAL SECTION 1: SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TARGETED CASE MANAGEMENT
NETWORK180 PROVIDER MANUAL SECTION 1: SERVICE REQUIREMENTS TARGETED CASE MANAGEMENT Provider will comply with regulations and requirements as outlined in the Michigan Medicaid Provider Manual, Behavioral
More informationMarin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment
Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment Ron Patton E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y The Marin County STAR (Support and Treatment After Release) Program
More informationAPPA 2019 WINTER TRAINING INSTITUTE CALL FOR PRESENTERS
APPA 2019 WINTER TRAINING INSTITUTE CALL FOR PRESENTERS CALL FOR PRESENTERS APPA 2019 WINTER TRAINING INSTITUTE March 10-13, 2019 A Nation in Crisis: Addressing Substance Abuse and Behavioral Health in
More informationI. Description. Getting Started Intake Case Management is an individual level intervention for HIV+ individuals. Currently/Formally Incarcerated
18 Currently/Formally Incarcerated Getting Started Intake Case Management Getting Started Intake Case Management is an individual level intervention for HIV+ individuals to help ease their transition from
More informationButte County Department of Behavioral Health
Butte County Department of Behavioral Health Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Work Plan FY 17-18 Introduction As required by the California State Department of Health Care Services and the
More informationWINDSOR COUNTY, VERMONT DUI TREATMENT DOCKET (WCDTD) FOR REPEAT OFFENSE IMPAIRED DRIVING CASES
WCDTD Policy Manual, Revised 5.4.15 WINDSOR COUNTY, VERMONT DUI TREATMENT DOCKET (WCDTD) FOR REPEAT OFFENSE IMPAIRED DRIVING CASES POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL The Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket has
More informationCCBHCs 101: Opportunities and Strategic Decisions Ahead
CCBHCs 101: Opportunities and Strategic Decisions Ahead Rebecca C. Farley, MPH National Council for Behavioral Health Speaker Name Title Organization It Passed! The largest federal investment in mental
More informationMacon County Mental Health Court. Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement
Macon County Mental Health Court Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement 1 Table of Contents Introduction...3 Program Description.3 Assessment and Enrollment Process....4 Confidentiality..4 Team
More informationPlanned Respite Referral Application
Planned Respite Referral Application White Plains, NY 10605 (914) 948-4993 or (914) 564-3749 FAX: (914) 813-4364 Dear Applicant: Thank you for your interest in Planned Respite. Planned Respite is a short-term
More informationKing County Criminal Justice Initiative
King County Criminal Justice Initiative Interim Progress Report December 2004 Prepared by Debra Srebnik, Ph.D. King County Department of Community and Human Services Mental Health and Chemical Abuse and
More informationBehavioral Wellness. Garden Fountain by Bridget Hochman RECOMMENDED BUDGET & STAFFING SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART
Garden Fountain by Bridget Hochman RECOMMENDED BUDGET & STAFFING SUMMARY & BUDGET PROGRAMS CHART Operating $ 133,861,700 Capital $ 0 FTEs 384.4 Alice Gleghorn, PhD Director Administration & Support Mental
More informationQuality Improvement Work Plan
NEVADA County Behavioral Health Quality Improvement Work Plan Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Table of Contents I. Quality Improvement Program Overview...1 A. QI
More informationConnecting Inpatient and Residential Treatment to Systems of Care
0th Annual RTC Conference Presented in Tampa, March 007 Connecting Inpatient and Residential Treatment to Systems of Care Mary Armstrong, Ph.D., Norín Dollard, Ph.D., Stephanie Romney, Ph.D., Keren S.
More informationRandomized Controlled Trials to Test Interventions for Frequent Utilizers of Multiple Health, Criminal Justice, and Social Service Systems
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: Randomized Controlled Trials to Test Interventions for Frequent Utilizers of Multiple Health, Criminal Justice, and Social Service Systems August 2017 PROJECT OVERVIEW AND REQUEST
More informationGOB Project 193 Mental Health Diversion Facility Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact Estimates June 9, 2016
GOB Project 193 Mental Health Diversion Facility Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact Estimates June 9, 2016 I. SUMMARY The purpose of the Mental Health Diversion Facility (Facility) is to create a comprehensive
More informationMiami-Dade County Mental Health Diversion Facility July 2016
Miami-Dade County Mental Health Diversion Facility July 2016 I. SUMMARY The purpose of the Mental Health Diversion Facility is to create a comprehensive and coordinated system of care for individuals with
More informationHealing America s Communities: Best Practices in Mental Health. Kevin Young, FACHE President
Healing America s Communities: Best Practices in Mental Health Kevin Young, FACHE President Why is Behavioral Health Treatment Important? In the treatment of the sick the effect of mental influence should
More informationA new mindset: the Five Year Forward View for mental health
A new mindset: the Five Year Forward View for mental health Paul Farmer Chief Executive mind.org.uk Five Year Forward View for Mental Health Simon Stevens: Putting mental and physical health on an equal
More informationI. General Instructions
Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services Request for Proposals (RFP) Outpatient Mental Health Services September 30, 2015 I. General Instructions Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services (CCBHS, or the County)
More informationSecond Year Report. Prepared for Sarasota County Community Alternative Residential Treatment (CART)
Prepared for Sarasota County Community Alternative Residential Treatment (CART) Eva l ua t i o n o f t h e S a rasota County Community A l t e r n a t i ve Re s i d e n t i a l Tr e a t m e n t (C A RT
More informationTeam Building Storyboard Template
Team Building Storyboard Template Storyboard purpose: To assist teams in telling their team members and organization s story. Behavioral Health Discharge Management Team Motto: We provide quality patient
More informationExecutive Summary: Utilization Management for Adult Members
Executive Summary: Utilization Management for Adult Members On at least a quarterly basis, the reports mutually agreed upon in Exhibit E of the CT BHP contract are submitted to the state for review. This
More informationCHILDREN S MENTAL HEALTH BENCHMARKING PROJECT SECOND YEAR REPORT
CHILDREN S MENTAL HEALTH BENCHMARKING PROJECT SECOND YEAR REPORT APPENDICES APPENDI I DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT APPENDI II YEAR 2 DATA SPECIFICATIONS APPENDI III RESPONDENT LIST PREPARED BY: Dougherty
More informationProposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program
Proposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program PROPOSAL OVERVIEW The Prosecutor s Diversion Program is a voluntary alternative to adjudication whereby a prosecutor agrees to hold off pressing
More informationA REVIEW OF NURSING HOME RESIDENT CHARACTERISTICS IN OHIO: TRACKING CHANGES FROM
A REVIEW OF NURSING HOME RESIDENT CHARACTERISTICS IN OHIO: TRACKING CHANGES FROM 1994-2004 Shahla Mehdizadeh Robert Applebaum Scripps Gerontology Center Miami University March 2005 This report was funded
More informationDrug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System
Drug Medi-Cal Organized Delivery System Presented by Elizabeth Stanley-Salazar, MPH CMS Approval of DMC-ODS Waiver under ACA August 13, 2015 Pathway to Parity 2010 President Obama Signs the Affordable
More informationEVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT. June 30, 2011 Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A.
University of Oklahoma College of Continuing Education EVALUATION OF THE CARE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECT June 30, 2011 Prepared By: Geneva Strech, M. Ed., MHR Betty Harris, M. A. John Vetter, M. A. Funding
More information2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION
2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION CSG reserves the right to use or publish in other CSG products and services the information provided in this Innovations Awards Program Application. If your
More informationDelaware's Care Transitions Program. Home and Community Based Services Conference September 11, 2013
Delaware's Care Transitions Program Home and Community Based Services Conference September 11, 2013 Today s Topics Overview the picture in Delaware The need for change Initiatives underway Care Transitions
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapter 5: Information Technology 121. Chapter 6: Quality Improvement / Performance Management 127
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Strategic Summary 1 Chapter 1: Organizational Profile 5 Programs and Delivery Mechanisms 5 Staffing 8 Information Technology 9 Regulatory Environment 9 Organizational Structure 10
More informationCommon ACTT Referral Form
Common ACTT Referral Form WELCOME! Please ensure that you have completed the accompanying screening tool to ensure that the applicant qualifies for this service. We want to process this application as
More informationNational Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute
Goal: 100% of Consumers have access without delay to the most appropriate 24/7 emergency, crisis stabilization, inpatient or recovery bed: Lessons Learned from States with On-Line Registries of Available
More informationLong-Stay Alternate Level of Care in Ontario Mental Health Beds
Health System Reconfiguration Long-Stay Alternate Level of Care in Ontario Mental Health Beds PREPARED BY: Jerrica Little, BA John P. Hirdes, PhD FCAHS School of Public Health and Health Systems University
More informationInteragency Council on Intermediate Sanctions
Interagency Council on Intermediate Sanctions October 2011 Timothy Wong, ICIS Research Analyst Maria Sadaya, Judiciary Research Aide Hawaii State Validation Report on the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument
More informationLeaving No Veteran Behind: The Policy Implications Identified at the 5th Annual Justice Involved Veterans Conference. Andrew Keller, PhD May 14, 2014
Leaving No Veteran Behind: The Policy Implications Identified at the 5th Annual Justice Involved Veterans Conference Andrew Keller, PhD May 14, 2014 About the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute Our
More informationThe CCBHC: An Innovative Model of Care for Behavioral Health
The CCBHC: An Innovative Model of Care for Behavioral Health B R E N D A G O G G I N S, J D V I C E P R E S I D E N T O A K S I N T E G R A T E D C A R E M I C H A E L D A M I C O, L C S W D I R E C T
More informationDeputy Probation Officer I/II
Santa Cruz County Probation September 2013 Duty Statement page 1 Deputy Probation Officer I/II 1. Conduct dispositional or pre-sentence investigations of adults and juveniles by interviewing offenders,
More informationILLINOIS 1115 WAIVER BRIEF
ILLINOIS 1115 WAIVER BRIEF STATE TESTING FOR THE FOLLOWING ACHIEVED RESULTS: 1. Increased rates of identification, initiation, and engagement in treatment 2. Increased adherence to and retention in treatment
More informationYOUR Recovery Residences
Resident Entry Form Resident Information Date of Entry Resident Name (First) (M) (Last) City State Zip Is your plan to return to this address following completion of your stay here? Y N If you go on overnight
More informationAn Overview of Ohio s In-Home Service Program For Older People (PASSPORT)
An Overview of Ohio s In-Home Service Program For Older People (PASSPORT) Shahla Mehdizadeh Robert Applebaum Scripps Gerontology Center Miami University May 2005 This report was produced by Lisa Grant
More informationQuality Management Plan Fiscal Year
Quality Management Plan Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Mental Health and Substance Abuse Division Contractor Services Section Quality Management and Compliance Unit Contents Introduction... 3 Purpose... 4 QM Committee...
More informationNevada County Health and Human Services FY14 Rural Health Care Services Outreach Grant Project Evaluation Report June 30, 2015
Nevada County Health and Human Services FY14 Rural Health Care Services Outreach Grant Project Evaluation Report June 30, 2015 I. Executive Summary The vision of Nevada County Behavioral Health (NCBH)
More informationOKLAHOMA COLLABORATIVE MENTAL HEALTH & SUBSTANCE ABUSE REENTRY PROGRAMS Dr. Janna Morgan Ph.D. Department of Corrections Donna Bond LPC Department of
OKLAHOMA COLLABORATIVE MENTAL HEALTH & SUBSTANCE ABUSE REENTRY PROGRAMS Dr. Janna Morgan Ph.D. Department of Corrections Donna Bond LPC Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services HISTORY
More informationCONNECTING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE POPULATION TO CARE
CONNECTING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE POPULATION TO CARE The majority of incarcerated individuals will be released at some point in time. An offender s ability to access physical health and behavioral health
More information