PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES (PSOW) ANNUAL LETTER 2011/12. Paper prepared by: Assistant Director of Patient Safety & Quality

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES (PSOW) ANNUAL LETTER 2011/12. Paper prepared by: Assistant Director of Patient Safety & Quality"

Transcription

1 FOR INFORMATION AGENDA ITEM September 212 PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES (PSOW) ANNUAL LETTER 211/12 Report of: Executive Nurse Director Paper prepared by: Assistant Director of Patient Safety & Quality Executive Summary Following the publication of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales (PSOW) Annual Report, an organisational letter has been issued to the UHB which provides a clear and concise breakdown of all complaints relating to the UHB, received and investigated by the Ombudsman during 211/12. The letter which is attached outlines time taken in responding to requests for information, as well as summaries of all reports issued. Health complaints continue to be the most numerous types of complaint and account for almost a third of all complaints received. There was also an overall increase in the number of complaints taken into investigation by the PSOW (13% increase on 21/11). Whilst this trend will have been influenced by the NHS Redress Measure which came into force on 1 April 211, the PSOW is of the view that people are increasingly inclined to complain about poor service in the NHS. In relation to responding to PSOW requests for information, the UHB has raised concern with the PSOW office, as whilst performance is better than most Health Boards in Wales, many of the UHB responses whilst in excess of 4 weeks were within the timescale set by the PSOW in their letter requesting information. Public Services Ombudsman Wales Page 1 of 4 Quality and Safety Committee Annual Letter 211/12 18 September 212

2 FOR INFORMATION A greater than average number of cases were resolved using Quick Fixes and Voluntary Settlements. However, it should also be noted that the number of Upheld reports also exceeds the figure which could be expected for the Health Board. The UHB continue to respond positively to the work of the PSOW, with an increased focus on related learning to address recurring trends. This report is being shared with Board of Directors, in order that Divisional Directors ensure that clinical staff recognise the importance of the PSOW s work and the relevance of their engagement in the concerns management process to help resolve concerns raised by patients and or their carers. The work associated with this letter is considered routinely by the Concerns/Claims Review Group which is chaired by the UHB Chair. Related issues will also be discussed when the Chair and the Executive Nurse Director meet with the Ombudsman in September. The Quality and Safety Committee is requested to: Note the Public Services Ombudsman Wales (PSOW) Annual Letter for 211/12. The report has financial consequences: No Board Assurance Framework: The Report provides assurances against Healthcare Standard 23 Dealing with concerns and managing incidents and mitigates against risks identified with the Patient Safety (2) and Patient Experience (4) domains of the Board Assurance Framework. Public Services Ombudsman Wales Page 2 of 4 Quality and Safety Committee Annual Letter 211/12 18 September 212

3 FOR INFORMATION INTRODUCTION PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES (PSOW) ANNUAL LETTER 211/12 The Public Services Ombudsman for Wales (PSOW) aligned with publication of his Annual Report, also issues an organisational Annual Letter for 211/212. The Annual letter to the Accountable officer outlines PSOW related activity of concerns emanating in this Health Board which have been referred to his office for independent review. Since the introduction of Putting Things Right / NHS Redress (April 211), the second stage independent review process was removed, with independent review of concerns being directed to the Ombudsman s office. Prior to April 211, there was an NHS Independent Review process, prior to escalation to the Ombudsman. PSOW LETTER Attached as Appendix 1, is the PSOW Annual letter to the Chief Executive and is also available via the PSOW web site on the attached link; letters/~/media/files/annual%2letters% %2- %2English/ %2Cardiff%2and%2Vale%2appendix.ashx The letter outlines time taken in responding to requests for information, as well as summaries of all reports issued. Health complaints continue to be the most numerous types of complaint and account for almost a third of all complaints received by the PSOW. There was also an overall increase in the number of complaints taken into investigation by the PSOW (13% increase on 21/11). Whilst this trend will have been influenced by the NHS Redress Measure which came into force on 1 April 211, the PSOW is of the view that people are increasingly inclined to complain about poor service in the NHS. In relation to responding to PSOW requests for information, the UHB has raised concern with the PSOW office, as whilst performance is better than most Health Boards in Wales, many of the UHB responses whilst in Public Services Ombudsman Wales Page 3 of 4 Quality and Safety Committee Annual Letter 211/12 18 September 212

4 FOR INFORMATION excess of 4 weeks were within the timescale set by the PSOW in their letter requesting information. A greater than average number of cases were resolved using Quick Fixes and Voluntary Settlements. However, it should also be noted that the number of Upheld reports also exceeds the figure which could be expected for the Health Board. LEARNING AND IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS Each of the cases investigated and upheld by the Ombudsman is considered by the UHB and any actions for improvement are taken and outlined within the letter of apology to the complainant and if appropriate, a copy of the relevant action plan is also included. Other than the general trend of clinical treatment in hospital which represents greater than 2/3 rd of all complaints directed to the Ombudsman s office, there is no specific trend within the UHB. However, a theme relating to the time it has taken to respond to concerns, is apparent within a number of cases referred to and investigated by the Ombudsman. CONCLUSION The UHB continue to respond positively to the work of the PSOW, with an increased focus on related learning to address recurring trends. This report is being shared with Board of Directors, in order that Divisional Directors ensure that clinical staff recognise the importance of the PSOW work and the relevance of their engagement in the concerns management process to help resolve concerns raised by patients and or their carers. The work associated with this letter is considered routinely by the Concerns/Claims Review Group which is chaired by the UHB Chair. Related issues will also be discussed when the Chair and the Executive Nurse Director meet with the Ombudsman in September. RECOMMENDATION The Quality and Safety Committee is asked to: NOTE the Report Public Services Ombudsman Wales Page 4 of 4 Quality and Safety Committee Annual Letter 211/12 18 September 212

5 Our ref: PT/jm Ask for: James Merrifield Your ref: Date: 13 July 212 James.Merrifield@ombudsman-wales.org.uk Mr Adam Cairns Chief Executive Cardiff and Vale University LHB Cardigan House University Hospital of Wales Heath Park Cardiff CF14 4XW Dear Mr Cairns Annual Letter 211/12 Following the recent publication of my Annual Report, I am pleased to enclose the Annual Letter (211/12) for Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. The Annual Letter provides you with a clear and concise breakdown of all complaints received and investigated by my office during 211/12 in relation to your Health Board. You will also find details of the time taken by your Health Board in responding to requests for information from my office, as well as summaries of all reports issued in relation to your Health Board. As outlined in my Annual Report, the total number of maladministration and service failure complaints received by my office increased by 13% compared with 21/11. Health complaints continue to be the most numerous type of complaint and account for almost a third of all complaints received. There was also an overall increase in the number of complaints taken into investigation by my office. Whilst this trend will have been influenced by the NHS Redress Measure which came into force on 1 April 211, I also believe that people are increasingly inclined to complain about poor service in the NHS. It is pleasing to note the increased levels of Quick Fixes and Voluntary Settlements which would not be possible without the cooperation of public bodies. This means that it has been possible to increase the number of complaints closed at earlier stages without the need for a full investigation (where it is clear that there are no systemic issues associated with the complaint). Nevertheless, my office has had reason to issue a number of Public Interest Reports during 211/12 which raised serious concerns and failings. Many of these relate to health complaints, and I would encourage all health boards to

6 revisit these reports, which are available on my website, to ensure that the lessons are learnt. The other public interest reports could also have general learning opportunities for health bodies. I raised concerns in last year s Annual Letters regarding the amount of time taken by public bodies in Wales in responding to requests for information from my office and it is disappointing that this situation has not improved. The statistics for 211/12 show that average response times for health bodies, as well as other bodies, in Wales has worsened to the extent that roughly three quarters of responses are received more than four weeks after they were requested. I continue to urge all Welsh public bodies to assist my staff in progressing their investigations by providing responses in a timely manner, and the figures indicate that there is scope for your Health Board to improve in this area. In reference to the performance of your Health Board, there has been a clear increase in the number of complaints received by my office, which has led to a slight increase in the number of complaints taken into investigation. Both of these figures are greater than the number of complaints which could be expected for your Health Board. As with the figures for 21/11, the majority of complaints continue to relate to Clinical treatment in hospital. In reference to the outcomes of complaints relating to your Health Board, it is pleasing to note that my office was able to close a greater than average number using Quick Fixes and Voluntary Settlements. However, it should also be noted that the number of Upheld reports also exceeds the figure which could be expected for your Health Board. I have copied this correspondence to the Chair of your Health Board with the intention that it be considered by the Board. Finally, a copy of this letter will also be published on our website. Yours sincerely Peter Tyndall Ombudsman Copy: Chair, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

7 Appendix Explanatory Notes Sections A and B provide a breakdown of the number of complaints against Cardiff and Vale UHB which were received and taken into investigation by my office during Section C compares the number of complaints against Cardiff and Vale UHB which were received by my office during , with the average for health bodies during this period. The figures are broken down into subject categories. Sections D and E compare the number of complaints against Cardiff and Vale UHB which were received and taken into investigation by my office in , with the average for health bodies (adjusted for population distribution 1 ) during the same period. Section F compares the complaint outcomes for Cardiff and Vale UHB during , with the average outcome for health bodies during the same period. Public Interest reports issued under section 16 of the Public Services Ombudsman (Wales) Act 25 are recorded as Section 16. Section G compares Cardiff and Vale UHB s response times during , with the average response times for health bodies, and the average for all public bodies in Wales during the same period. Graph G measures the time between the date my office issues an investigation commencement letter, and the date my office receives a full response to that letter from the public body. Finally, Section H contains the summaries of all reports issued in relation to Cardiff and Vale UHB during In order to assist in measuring performance during , sections A-G also contain the relevant figures for , adjusted for population distribution. 1

8 A: Complaints received by my office Subject Appointments/ Admissions/ Discharge and transfer procedures 3 8 Clinical treatment in hospital 4 21 Clinical treatment outside hospital 7 4 Continuing care 2 6 Medical records/ standards of recordkeeping 1 2 Non-medical services 1 1 Services for vulnerable adults 1 Patient list issues 2 Complaint-handling 2 Other 1 13 TOTAL B: Complaints taken into investigation by my office Number of complaints taken into investigation 22 2

9 No. of complaints No. of complaints C: Comparison of complaints by subject category with average for health bodies Cardiff and Vale UHB Health body average Appointments / admissions / discharge & transfer procedures Clinical treatment in hospital 7 3 Clinical treatment outside hospital Continuing care Medical records / standards of record-keeping Subject category Non-medical services Services for vulnerable adults Patient list issues Complaint handling 1 8 Other Cardiff and Vale UHB Health body average Appointments/ admissions/ discharge and transfer procedures Clinical treatment in hospital 4 3 Clinical treatment outside hospital 6 6 Continuing care Subject category Medical records/ standards of recordkeeping Non-medical services Other 5

10 No. of complaints No. of complaints D: Comparison of complaints received by my office with average for health bodies 1 Cardiff & Vale UHB Health body average Complaints received E: Comparison of complaints taken into investigation by my office with average for health bodies 5 Cardiff & Vale UHB Health body average Complaints investigated

11 No. of outcomes No. of outcomes F: Comparison of complaint outcomes with average outcomes for health bodies, adjusted for population distribution Out of jurisdiction Premature 'Other' cases closed after initial consideration 1 Discontinued 1 9 Quick fix/ Voluntary settlement Complaint outcome Cardiff and Vale UHB 1 12 Section 16 - Other Report - Upheld - in whole Upheld - in whole or in part or in part 7 Health body average 6 5 Other Report - Not Upheld 1 1 Withdrawn Out of jurisdiction Premature 13 9 Investigation not merited Quick fix/ Voluntary settlement 1 Discontinued Section 21 - upheld Complaint outcome 8 Cardiff and Vale UHB Section 21 - partially upheld Health body average 5 4 Section 21 - not upheld 3 1 Section 16 - upheld

12 % of responses G: Comparison of Cardiff and Vale UHB s times for responding to requests for information with average for health bodies and All Wales response times, Cardiff and Vale UHB 8 Average HB response time 6 Average All Wales response time <1 week 1 to 2 weeks 2 to 3 weeks 3 to 4 weeks 4 to 5 weeks 5 to 6 weeks Over 6 weeks Response time

13 H: Report summaries Other reports - Upheld March 212 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mrs A complained about the Surgeon s lack of experience in carrying out a surgical procedure to treat her haemorrhoids. She said that during the procedure he had telephoned a friend for advice and had failed to inform her that this was the first time he had carried out the haemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure. Mrs A also complained about the Health Board s five months delay in responding to her complaint. The Ombudsman s investigation concluded that whilst the Surgeon had relevant experience and expertise to carry out the procedure he had failed to follow guidelines the Health Board had in place when undertaking any new procedures. In relation to the Health Board s delay in responding to Mrs A s complaint the Ombudsman concluded that a delay of five months to address Mrs A s concerns was excessive and amounted to a service failing. Mrs A s complaint was upheld. Amongst the recommendations the Ombudsman made were that the Health Board should provide Mrs A with a fulsome apology for the failings identified in her care and make a redress payment of 25. He also recommended that the shortcomings identified in the report should, as a part of a wider learning exercise, be discussed at an appropriate consultant s forum. Case reference February 212 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Miss E complained that both the Dental Hospital and the GP Practice had failed to refer her late father, Mr E, for further investigations in a timely manner. When he was referred, he was diagnosed with oral cancer and sadly died soon after. The Ombudsman sought clinical advice on the complaint. The GP complaint: The Ombudsman found shortcomings in the standard of record keeping and also that a hospital referral was not made as planned. The adviser felt that there were sufficient factors to raise the level of suspicion in this case, though, having taken account of the relevant guidance, he was not able to pinpoint an exact date at which a referral should definitely have been made, given the lack of specific detail in the GP notes. The Ombudsman therefore partly upheld this complaint. The Dental Hospital complaint: The clinical advice indicated that whilst the initial diagnosis reached had been reasonable, a referral should have been triggered at the follow-up appointment when the Consultant recognised that the nature of the pain was not consistent with the initial diagnosis. In addition, there had been a delay in arranging the follow-up appointment. The Ombudsman partly upheld this complaint. It was acknowledged that the eventual sad outcome would not have been different.

14 However, in relation to both the GP and Dental Hospital complaints, the advisers stressed the importance of taking account of both current and past tobacco and alcohol use in considering cases where there were suspicious oral symptoms. Both current and past uses are significant risk factors for oral cancer. Case references & January 212 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mr Y complains about delay by the Health Board in recognising the recurrence of his wife s illness shortly before her death. Mrs Y was diagnosed in 27 with multiple myeloma and suffered complications with renal failure. He was also unhappy about her medical and nursing care following her admission to hospital in January 29. The Ombudsman found that there should have been closer monitoring and more heightened clinical awareness of Mrs Y s vulnerability and signs that the disease was progressing. A number of signs of Mrs Y s deterioration should have alerted clinicians but opportunities to carry out further tests or to assess her condition were missed. In particular an abnormally high test result was missed. Mrs Y was admitted to hospital in 29 with renal failure and improved initially after treatment. Although she did not require dialysis she still had significant renal failure which needed appropriate management. The Ombudsman found that there was insufficient consultation with renal specialists following Mrs A s move to a haematology ward. On the nursing side, the care was less than reasonable in the administration of medicine, nutrition (poor documentation of intake) and pain assessment. There were also complaint-handling delays. The Health Board agreed to make a number of changes in response to the shortcomings identified. It also agreed to make Mr Y a payment of 25 for his time and trouble in making the complaint. Case reference January 212 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mr A s and Ms A s complaints concerned the care provided for Mrs B, Mr A s late sister and Ms A s late mother. They complained about the way in which Swansea NHS Trust ( the First Trust ) and Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust ( the Second Trust ) managed Mrs B s blood stem cell transplant ( the transplant ). They expressed concern about Mrs B s pre-transplant assessment, her treatment plan and her consent to treatment. They contended that Mrs B s pre-transplant assessment was inadequate and that this compromised her treatment plan and her ability to give informed consent to it. The Ombudsman partly upheld the pre-transplant assessment aspect of Mr A s and Ms A s complaint, against the Second Trust, because he considered that it should have ensured that a CT scan, in respect of Mrs B, was completed shortly before her transplant. He also partly upheld the consent element of their complaint, against the Second Trust, because he was of the view that the absence of an up-to-date CT scan adversely affected Mrs B s capacity to give informed consent to her transplant. He did not uphold the pre-transplant assessment or consent aspects of Mr A s and Ms A s complaint, against the First Trust, because he considered that the Second Trust, as the Trust undertaking the transplant, was responsible for these matters. He

15 did not uphold the treatment plan part of Mr A s and Ms A s complaint against either the First Trust or the Second Trust. The Ombudsman recommended that Cardiff and Vale University Health Board should acknowledge, in writing to Mr A and Ms A, that the Second Trust s completion of a CT scan, shortly before the transplant, would have promoted Mrs B s ability to give informed consent to it. He asked it to apologise to Mr A and Ms A for the Second Trust s failure to complete such a scan and to recognise this failing. He recommended that it should prepare and use a pre-transplant investigation checklist. He asked it to give copies of the patient transplant counselling checklists to the transplant patients concerned. He recommended that it should revisit the issue of informed consent if the period between the original pre-transplant counselling session and the anticipated transplant date exceeds eight weeks. He asked it to ensure that this report is shared with relevant clinicians and that the issues that it raises are discussed in an appropriate forum. Cardiff and Vale University Health Board agreed to comply with all of these recommendations. Case reference December 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mrs A s main complaint was that she was in much more pain since a procedure to remove varicose veins had been performed. She also complained that the procedure carried out differed from what she had been told would happen. In particular, although the varicose veins in her legs had been removed, the vulval varices (varicose veins in the groin area) had not. Mrs A felt that the failure to do this was a contributory factor in her increased pain. Clinical advice was sought from the Ombudsman s clinical adviser. On the basis of the evidence considered, the Ombudsman concluded that whilst it could not be discounted that a small element of Mrs A s post operative pain might be due to the presence of vulval varices, a much more likely cause of Mrs A s pain was damage to the nerves which can sometimes occur as a result of surgery. The Ombudsman s investigation also found that communication within the Health Board was not as effective as it should have been. This was compounded by inadequacies in clinical record keeping and the way that the Health Board dealt with Mrs A s complaints. The Ombudsman recommended that the Health Board should: offer Mrs A redress of 25 in recognition of the inadequacies in the Health Board s complaints handling which had caused uncertainty and inconvenience to her; and, detail the measures it intended to take to address the shortcomings identified in the report. It should then communicate the steps to be taken to both this office and the complainant. Case reference

16 November 211 Other Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board & Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee Ms A was diagnosed as having Gender Dysphoria. At the end of 26 Ms A "transitioned" and started to live and present herself as a woman. Ms A began hormone treatment as a private patient. Ms A also planned to have surgery carried out privately but by early 21 she opted for NHS funding for her treatment and surgery as this became an option and was more appropriate to her circumstances at that time. The local Consultant Psychiatrist made a funding application in April 21 for treatment for Ms A as required under the Gender Dysphoria Commissioning Policy operated by Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee (WHSSC). On 18 June 21 Ms A s application was considered by a Panel of Advisers to WHSSC who assess applications for appropriateness and robustness. Ms A s application was declined with a request for more information and a second opinion. On 9 September a further Panel decision was made and it was agreed to proceed with the application with a request for further information from Ms A s private doctor. Ms A did not consent to this request and an exceptional decision was then made by WHSSC on 16 September for onward referral. Ms A s complaint was against both Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and WHSSC. She complained that the refusal / delay in funding her treatment for gender dysphoria was not in line with the existing Commissioning Policy. The Ombudsman partially upheld this complaint as the Commissioning Policy was unclear but he considered that the WHSSC Panel were justified in requesting further information and this was provided for in the Policy. Ms A also complained that there had been a failure to correctly investigate her complaint about the administration of hormone treatment and Ms A referred to a lack of clarity in responsibility for prescribing hormone medication on the NHS pathway. Ms A had to pay privately for her hormone medication. The Ombudsman found that there was a failure to respond to Ms A s concern and request for a continuation of her hormone treatment on the NHS and Ms A was treated as if she was presenting for the first time. The Ombudsman upheld this aspect of the complaint. Ms A also complained about a staff member / team at WHSSC and she believed the complaint had not been addressed by WHSSC. The Ombudsman did not uphold this element as the complaint had in fact been investigated. WHSSC was however invited to review its complaints procedure to ensure that its role and responsibilities were clearly identified and communicated. The Ombudsman recommended that WHSSC and the Health Board apologise to Ms A for the distress caused by the ambiguity of the Commissioning Policy and for the failure to adequately address her hormone treatment. He also recommended that WHSSC reviewed and developed the Commissioning Policy for Gender Dysphoria so that it is fit for purpose. Finally he recommended that the Health Board / WHSSC provide a redress payment to Ms A for the relevant hormone treatment that she purchased privately during 21 and a payment of 35 for the time and effort incurred in making the complaint.

17 Case reference & October 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mrs C complained about the care and treatment that she received as a patient at a gynaecology clinic in 29 and 21. Mrs C complained that the registrar and gynaecologist at the clinic failed to carry out a thorough examination, correctly diagnose the cause of her symptoms and recommend appropriate treatment. Mrs C also complained about the delay in receiving a second opinion on her condition and was concerned that this delay in commencing treatment impacted on the severity of her condition and increased the likelihood of future surgery. The Ombudsman partly upheld the complaint. Having sought clinical advice, the investigation found that the clinical assessment carried out was inadequate. However, there was no evidence that had a physical examination been undertaken, it would have lead to an earlier diagnosis of Mrs C s condition. Although the investigation found that there was an unreasonable delay in the referral for a second gynaecology opinion, the evidence confirmed that a correct diagnosis of Mrs C s symptoms had been made, that the treatments recommended were appropriate and that if the original treatment plan had been followed by Mrs C this might have resulted in the resolution of her symptoms. Case reference September 211 Continuing Care Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mrs A implied that the Independent Review Panel ( the Panel ), which considered the eligibility of her mother, Mrs B, for continuing NHS health care, did not take its eligibility decision properly. She questioned the Panel s independence. She suggested that it did not pay sufficient regard to Mrs B s health needs. She said that it adopted an input-related, as opposed to a needs-related, approach. She suggested that it did not take the quantity of care that Mrs B received into account. The Ombudsman was not persuaded that the Panel s independence was compromised. However, he was concerned that the Panel report and associated decision letters did not demonstrate that the Panel took its eligibility decision properly. As a result, he partly upheld Mrs A s complaint. He recommended that the Health Board should arrange for a new Panel to consider Mrs B s eligibility for continuing NHS health care. He asked it to write to Mrs A to apologise for its failings and to confirm the new Panel arrangements. He recommended that it should ensure that detailed minutes of the new Panel hearing are taken. He asked it to ensure that the decision letter sent to Mrs A, following this hearing, addresses the failings identified. The Health Board agreed to comply with all of these recommendations. It also arranged for another Health Board to undertake the agreed independent review on its behalf. Case reference July 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board The complaint was made by Mr A s family about the care and treatment that the late Mr A received following his admission on two occasions to University Hospital of Wales.

18 During his first admission Mr A was prescribed Metolazone as a diuretic agent. Mr A was discharged home from hospital on the day he started taking the medication and due to an error he was not monitored as planned. The Ombudsman found that the prescription and administration of Metolazone was not properly supervised and monitored and he upheld the family s complaint. Mr A s family also complained that Mr A s Warfarin medication had been ceased on his second admission and he had not been tested for Aspirin resistance. The Ombudsman did not uphold this element as it was not unreasonable for this action to have occurred in Mr A s circumstances. The investigation identified that there was a joint cardiology/nephrology strategy in place in respect of Mr A and the Ombudsman also did not uphold the complaint that Mr A received a lack of cardiac monitoring following his second discharge from hospital. Mr A s family also complained about the complaint handling by the Health Board. The Ombudsman upheld the complaint that there was a significant delay in responding to the complaint and found that the answers the Health Board provided to Mr A and his family could have been more accurate and complete. Mr A s family also complained about being told to take the complaint elsewhere. The Ombudsman considered that in addition to recommending referral on there were still some points of clarity and a confirmation of apology which could have been provided by the Health Board and to that extent the Ombudsman upheld the complaint. Finally, the Ombudsman upheld the complaint that the Health Board failed to respond to the request for information on what had been done to prevent a reoccurrence of the error in medication monitoring. The Ombudsman recommended that the Health Board apologise to Mr A s family in relation to the management of Metolazone and provide a redress payment of 5 for the additional distress caused. He recommended that the Health Board ensures it has procedures in place for the proper monitoring of such drugs. He also recommended that the Health Board confirms that it has processes in place to ensure complaints are dealt with in a satisfactory manner and recommended a redress payment of 25 be paid to Mr A s family in recognition of the time and trouble associated with pursuing the complaints. Case reference 2147 June 211 Clinical treatment outside hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and GP in Health Board area Miss A, aged 4 and a smoker, has adult onset diabetes. On 5 August 29, she went to the former Trust s Accident and Emergency Department ( the A&E ), accompanied by her parents, complaining of pain in her left leg. She was examined by a Specialist Registrar who concluded that Miss A had vitamin B deficiency. Miss A was advised to see her GP the following day. Miss A saw a GP at the Practice on 6 August and he prescribed her a painkiller for pain management and arranged for Miss A to have blood tests. Miss A telephoned the GP on 7 August and told him that her leg was turning a funny colour and that she was still in pain. Miss A said that the GP told her to continue with the painkiller and exercise her leg. Miss A said that she suffers from an arterial disease and the

19 restricted blood supply causes an ischaemic leg (where the blood supply is compromised and in severe cases, without treatment, can lead to the loss of the limb). Miss A complained that she had to undergo an amputation of her leg above the knee as a result of poor care provided to her by both the Hospital and the GP. The Ombudsman s investigation concluded that Miss A s condition and her symptoms were not fully explored on 5 August by the Specialist Registrar in the A&E and her complaint was upheld. The Health Board was asked to apologise for this failing. In relation to the complaint against the GP, the Ombudsman concluded that his failure to record a telephone consultation with Miss A on 7 August was a breach of the standard of recording expected by the professional body that regulates doctors. He was also critical that the GP had failed to examine Miss A, or, at the very least, refer her to an A&E department given the symptoms that Miss A described to him. The Ombudsman concluded that the failure to respond to Miss A s descriptions of her symptoms meant that the GP was unable to make an informed decision on the management of her care. Miss A s complaint was upheld and the Ombudsman recommended that the GP pay Miss A the sum of 15 for the distress and the uncertainty of not knowing whether a prompt referral may have made a difference to her prognosis. Case reference & May 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (UHB) Mrs P complained about the post-operative care provided to her husband, Mr P, following surgery for bowel cancer. In particular, she complained about the standard of infection control measures employed and the antibiotic treatment he received. Mrs P also complained about the standard of dietetic input Mr P received whilst in hospital. Mr P sadly died in January 29. The Ombudsman found that the overall standard of care in respect of infection control and treatment was reasonable. However, the Ombudsman concluded that there was an abject failure to assess, react to and implement solutions for Mr P s dietary problems. The Ombudsman recommended that the Health Board should apologise to Mrs P for the failings identified in this report and should implement both audits and new procedures to address those failings. Case reference May 211 Appointments, admissions, appeals and discharge procedures Cardiff and Vale University Health Board In 27 Mr Y underwent an operation for the removal of bowel cancer. From September 28 onwards, Mr Y suffered a series of urinary tract infections. A cystoscopy in February 29 showed possible cancer spread into the urinary bladder. Mr Y was then referred urgently to see the Consultant who had performed the surgery in 27. Mrs Y complained that Mr Y had to endure a six week wait to be seen by the Consultant, despite his condition and medical history. Mrs Y considered

20 that the unreasonable delay in seeing the Consultant contributed to the overall delay in Mr Y s treatment which eventually led to him being too weak to undergo surgery. Sadly, he subsequently died. Mrs Y also complained about poor communication on the part of the LHB s staff. Having sought clinical advice from two of the Ombudsman s professional advisers, the investigation found that, in view of Mr Y s condition and medical history, a six week wait to see the Consultant following an urgent referral was not acceptable. It was impossible to say what clinical effect the delay had but it caused considerable distress to Mr Y and his family. The complaint was upheld. The Ombudsman recommended that the LHB apologise to Mrs Y for the delay and demonstrate to her the action it said it has since taken to ensure that such delays do not recur. With respect to the complaint about poor communication, the investigation found that the LHB had taken an unduly long time to provide the test results to Mr Y, and this caused additional uncertainty and distress to Mr Y and his family. There was otherwise insufficient evidence to conclude that communication on the part of the LHB s staff had been maladministratively poor. This complaint was therefore upheld in part. The Ombudsman recommended that the LHB apologise to Mrs Y for the time taken to provide the test results. The LHB agreed to implement the recommendations. Case reference 2115 Other reports - Not Upheld February 212 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mrs W complained that she was unnecessarily prescribed an antibiotic, which she said reacted with other medication she was taking. She said that the reaction triggered a heart problem which caused her to collapse, hitting her head, resulting in a significant cut to her scalp and knocking her unconscious. Mrs W complained that she had been given conflicting reasons for her collapse by clinicians. The Ombudsman found that clinicians involved in her care could have been more cautious in their diagnosis of what caused her collapse and should have explained more clearly the ambiguities which prevented a definitive conclusion being reached. However, the Ombudsman found that there was limited and questionable evidence in support of her having suffered from a heart problem at all and, in any event, any irregularity was minimal and not sufficient to have caused her collapse. The Ombudsman found that the most likely cause for Mrs W s collapse was low blood pressure, which was wholly unrelated to either the antibiotic she was prescribed or any minimal heart irregularity which might have briefly been present. Case reference January 212 Other Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mr G complained about how the UHB had dealt with his daughter Z (an adult) who was being seen by its mental health services. In particular, Mr G said that a complaint made by him (acting as Z s advocate) was brought up by a consultant during a clinical appointment with Z. It was suggested the complaint was being

21 pursued without Z s consent. Consequently, Z had been unnecessarily upset. A request by Mr G for her to see a different psychiatrist had, he complained, been unreasonably declined. The investigation found that whilst Z had signed the form authorising Mr G to act in the complaint, the boxes about the release of medical information were left blank and the signatory at the foot of the form was not that of Z. The form s signatory section lacked clarity. It was reasonable for the UHB to query it, given it was dealing with a vulnerable patient and Z had previously instructed it not to disclose details from her medical records to her parents. It had already apologised for any distress felt by Z, indicating there had been no intention to upset her, and the Ombudsman could not know what exactly had been said. The Ombudsman s adviser concluded that it was not unreasonable for the consultant to ask Z about the complaint, as long as that did not form the focus of what was otherwise a clinical consultation. It was the first opportunity of directly asking Z about it. He also felt that it was not unreasonable in the circumstances to decline to change consultant. Z had been seen by many clinicians. It was not felt to be in her best interests to change again. Appointments had continued to be offered, and she could still access her GP, so the UHB s actions were reasonable. The complaint was not upheld. Case reference October 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mrs H complained on behalf of her son, Mr A, that when he attended the Emergency Department at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, he was sent home after being assessed by a triage nurse. Mr A was admitted to hospital later the same day after being seen by an out of hours GP, and was subsequently diagnosed with severe ulcerative colitis. The Ombudsman found that it was reasonable for the triage nurse to have sent Mr A home as, although he was unwell, his symptoms were not such as to require an emergency admission. In addition, Mr A had a pre-arranged out of hours GP appointment later that afternoon, and it was reasonable in the circumstances for the triage nurse to have advised him to attend that appointment. The Ombudsman did not uphold Mrs H s complaint, but he did make some observations about the standard of the triage records, which the Health Board agreed to share with the triage nurse. Case reference August 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mrs H complained that her third cycle of IVF had not been managed well by the IVF clinic of Cardiff and Vale University LHB. She said that given her responses to medication designed to stimulate ovulation during a previous cycle of IVF, she should have been given scans more frequently which may have resulted in her medication merely being reduced rather than stopped, a process known as coasting. She believed these factors had contributed to a low fertilisation rate in her third cycle and that the LHB should therefore fund a further cycle of IVF.

22 The complaint, together the medical records for Mrs H s treatment, were considered by the Ombudsman s specialist clinical adviser. The outcome was that the Ombudsman did not uphold the complaint as he was satisfied that the treatment Mrs H had received was reasonable and in line with current medical evidence. He did however note some shortcomings in record keeping which he brought to the attention of the LHB. Case reference May 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (UHB) Mr DE and his son, Mr TE, complained that Mrs E (Mr DE s wife and Mr TE s mother) was inappropriately sent home from A&E on 31 May 29. She suffered from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD obstruction to the airflow). She retunred to A&E the following day and was admitted to intensive care (ITU). She sadly died there in July 29. Mr DE and Mr TE also complained that a meeting to discuss the withdrawal of life support was brought forward from Monday 6 July to Sunday 5 July. This did not give the family a chance to come to terms with what was happening, and Mr TE was upset to find his mother fully conscious when he went in to see her for the last time. Having taken clinical advice from two independent clinicians, the Ombudsman did not uphold either complaint. He found that the decision to discharge Mrs E from A&E was soundly based after tests and examinations had been carried out. He further found that, while the family were understandably distressed about the events surrounding the withdrawal of life support from Mrs E, it had been reasonable to bring the meeting forward, and it was reasonable not to sedate Mrs E as that was not clinically necessary at that time. Case reference April 211 Clinical treatment in hospital Cardiff and Vale University Health Board Mr T complained that A & E staff at a hospital under the management of the LHB, asked him to leave the premises without offering treatment during an evening in 21. He said that staff were generally unsympathetic and over reacted to his behaviour, which he admitted involved shouting and swearing. He stated that he had a very severe headache that explained his presentation. Mr T added that staff did not help him and then made him leave with security staff after he lost it. Mr T added that the LHB s complaint response amounted to blackmail as it insisted that he was welcome to future services but only if he behaved properly. The Ombudsman found that there was no evidence that staff acted unreasonably or outside of LHB policy, despite the obvious distress that Mr T had experienced concerning the event. He also concluded that the complaint response letter was appropriate. The Ombudsman did not uphold Mr T s complaints. Case reference

The investigation of a complaint by Mr D against Cwm Taf University Health Board. A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case:

The investigation of a complaint by Mr D against Cwm Taf University Health Board. A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case: The investigation of a complaint by Mr D against Cwm Taf University Health Board A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case: 201604327 Contents Page Introduction 1 Summary 2 The complaint

More information

PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES PROGRESS WITH CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS. Assistant Director of Patient Safety & Quality

PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES PROGRESS WITH CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS. Assistant Director of Patient Safety & Quality PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN WALES PROGRESS WITH CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS AGENDA ITEM 2.2 21 June 2011 Report of Paper prepared by Nurse Director Assistant Director of Patient Safety & Quality Executive Summary

More information

The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Act 2002

The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Act 2002 Scottish Public Services Ombudsman The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Act 2002 Investigation Report UNDER SECTION 15(1)(a) SPSO 4 Melville Street Edinburgh EH3 7NS Tel 0800 377 7330 SPSO Information

More information

The investigation of a complaint by Ms A against Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

The investigation of a complaint by Ms A against Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board The investigation of a complaint by Ms A against Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case: 201504223 Contents Page Introduction 3 Summary 4 The complaint

More information

A concern means any complaint, claim or reported patient safety incident.

A concern means any complaint, claim or reported patient safety incident. PUTTING THINGS RIGHT ANNUAL REPORT -2017 Introduction The Putting Things Right Annual Report provides information on the progress and performance of Powys Teaching Local Health Board (hereafter, the health

More information

Ending Groundhog Day. Lessons from Poor Complaint Handling

Ending Groundhog Day. Lessons from Poor Complaint Handling Contents Foreword 3 Introduction 4 Analysis 6 Future considerations 10 Case studies 12 Appendix 26 References 27 www.ombudsman-wales.org.uk communications@ombudsman-wales.org.uk @OmbudsmanWales This report

More information

Putting Things Right Policy. Procedure for the Management Of Public Service Ombudsman for Wales Investigations

Putting Things Right Policy. Procedure for the Management Of Public Service Ombudsman for Wales Investigations Aneurin Bevan Health Board Putting Things Right Policy Procedure for the Management Of Public Service Ombudsman for Wales Investigations N.B. Staff should be discouraged from printing this document. This

More information

Serious Incident Report Public Board Meeting 28 July 2016

Serious Incident Report Public Board Meeting 28 July 2016 Serious Incident Report Public Board Meeting 28 July 2016 Presented for: Presented by: Author Previous Committees Governance Dr Yvette Oade, Chief Medical Officer Louise Povey, Serious Incidents Investigations

More information

During 2015/16 we received 906 complaints against local authorities, down from 938 from the previous year.

During 2015/16 we received 906 complaints against local authorities, down from 938 from the previous year. Our ref: NB/LG/MM lucy.geen@ombudsman-wales.org.uk matthew.aplin@ombudsman-wales.org.uk 28 July 2016 Sent by email Dear Mr Burns Annual Letter Following the recent publication of my Annual Report I am

More information

The investigation of a complaint by Ms X against Cwm Taf University Health Board

The investigation of a complaint by Ms X against Cwm Taf University Health Board The investigation of a complaint by Ms X against Cwm Taf University Health Board A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case: 201700714 [Type text] Contents Page Introduction 1 Summary 2 The

More information

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. Complaints about the NHS in England: Quarter

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. Complaints about the NHS in England: Quarter Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Complaints about the NHS in England: Quarter 1 2018-19 Contents Our role 3 The purpose of this report 3 Our data 3 Our process 3 Step one: initial checks 4 Step

More information

Local Government Ombudsman Service Complaint Review. February Executive Summary

Local Government Ombudsman Service Complaint Review. February Executive Summary Local Government Ombudsman Service Complaint Review February 2017 Executive Summary 1. This review of service complaints covers the period from August 2016 to February 2017. I have examined 10 service

More information

Northamptonshire County Council

Northamptonshire County Council The Local Government Ombudsman s Annual Review Northamptonshire County Council for the year ended 3 March 2009 The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) provides a free, independent and impartial service. We

More information

Specialised Services Service Specification. Adult Congenital Heart Disease

Specialised Services Service Specification. Adult Congenital Heart Disease Specialised Services Service Specification Adult Congenital Heart Disease Document Author: Executive Lead: Approved by: Issue Date: Review Date: Document No: Specialised Planner Director of Planning Insert

More information

UoA: Academic Quality Handbook

UoA: Academic Quality Handbook UoA: Academic Quality Handbook UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCEDURE 1 POLICY The University is committed to providing a high level of service to students, applicants, graduates, and members

More information

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. Investigation into a complaint against Liverpool City Council (reference number: )

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. Investigation into a complaint against Liverpool City Council (reference number: ) Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Investigation into a complaint against Liverpool City Council (reference number: 16 010 110) 26 February 2018 Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

More information

Complaints and Suggestions for Improvement Handling Procedure

Complaints and Suggestions for Improvement Handling Procedure Complaints and Suggestions for Improvement Handling Procedure Date of most recent review: 20 June 2013 Date of next review: August 2016 Responsibility: Quality Officer Approved by: Learning, Teaching and

More information

The London Borough of Greenwich

The London Borough of Greenwich The Local Government Ombudsman s Annual Review The London Borough of Greenwich for the year ended 3 March 2 Local Government Ombudsmen (LGOs) provide a free, independent and impartial service. We consider

More information

Raising Concerns or Complaints about NHS services

Raising Concerns or Complaints about NHS services Raising Concerns or Complaints about NHS services Raising concerns and complaints A step by step guide Raising concerns and complaints Questions to ask yourself: 1. What am I concerned or dissatisfied

More information

This matter was initiated by a letter from the complainant received on March 20, A response from Dr. Justin Clark was received on May 11, 2017.

This matter was initiated by a letter from the complainant received on March 20, A response from Dr. Justin Clark was received on May 11, 2017. COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE C Dr. Justin Clark License Number: 016409 Investigations Committee C of the College of Physicians and Surgeons

More information

Ref SDU Team Site Details Of Complaint Outcome Upheld 15/16/0156 Children, Young People And Families. Vale of Evesham School. Isaac Maddox House CYPF

Ref SDU Team Site Details Of Complaint Outcome Upheld 15/16/0156 Children, Young People And Families. Vale of Evesham School. Isaac Maddox House CYPF Complaints closed in March 2016 Ref SDU Team Site Details Of Complaint Outcome 15/16/0156 Children, Young People And Families Special School Nursing Vale of Evesham Vale of Evesham School 15/16/0537 Children,

More information

Adult Practice Review Report

Adult Practice Review Report Adult Practice Review Report North Wales Safeguarding Adults Board (NWSAB) Concise Adult Practice Review Re: APR2/2016/Conwy 1. Brief outline of circumstances resulting in the Review 1.1 Patient A died

More information

Section 3: Handover record headings

Section 3: Handover record headings Section 3: Handover record headings Handover record standards: standard headings for the clinical information that should be recorded and used for handover of patient care from one professional or team

More information

NHS HIGHLAND. Significant Event Report

NHS HIGHLAND. Significant Event Report ` NHS HIGHLAND Significant Event Report Report to - Quality & Patient Safety Raigmore Management Team of Findings from Significant Event Review Meeting QPS040 26/10/2011 1.0 Outline of Significant Event

More information

The Ombudsman s Nursing Home

The Ombudsman s Nursing Home The Ombudsman s Nursing Home CASEBOOK Office of the Ombudsman, Ireland. INSIDE Statistics...4 Private Nursing Homes...6 HSE Nursing Homes... 11 Nursing Homes Support Scheme... 12 FACTSHEET... 16 Nursing

More information

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Investigation into a complaint against Lancashire County Council (reference number: 16 015 248) 7 November 2017 Local Government and Social Care

More information

The investigation of a complaint by Dr A against Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

The investigation of a complaint by Dr A against Cardiff and Vale University Health Board The investigation of a complaint by Dr A against Cardiff and Vale University Health Board A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case: 201401302 Contents Page Introduction 3 Summary 4 The

More information

WELSH RENAL CLINICAL NETWORK TERMS OF REFERENCE

WELSH RENAL CLINICAL NETWORK TERMS OF REFERENCE INTRODUCTION WELSH RENAL CLINICAL NETWORK TERMS OF REFERENCE In accordance with WHSSC Standing Order 3, the Joint Committee may and, where directed by the LHBs jointly or the Welsh Government must, appoint

More information

Can I Help You? V3.0 December 2013

Can I Help You? V3.0 December 2013 Can I help you? Policy for the provision and management of patient feedback: comments, concerns or compliments, or complaints about NHS 24 and its services. Author: Patient Affairs Manager/ ADoN Clinical

More information

Complaints Handling. 27/08/2013 Version 1.0. Version No. Description Author Approval Effective Date. 1.0 Complaints. J Meredith/ D Thompson

Complaints Handling. 27/08/2013 Version 1.0. Version No. Description Author Approval Effective Date. 1.0 Complaints. J Meredith/ D Thompson Complaints Handling Procedure Version No. Description Author Approval Effective Date 1.0 Complaints Procedure J Meredith/ D Thompson Court (Jun 2013) 27 Aug 2013 27/08/2013 Version 1.0 Procedure for handling

More information

AGENDA ITEM 17b Annex (i)

AGENDA ITEM 17b Annex (i) QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting held on 10 th April 2014 Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee Offices Unit 3a, Van Road Caerphilly Business Park Caerphilly CF83 3ED Present

More information

The investigation of a complaint by Mrs X against Aneurin Bevan Health Board. A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case:

The investigation of a complaint by Mrs X against Aneurin Bevan Health Board. A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case: The investigation of a complaint by Mrs X against Aneurin Bevan Health Board A report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales Case: 201302660 Contents Page Introduction 3 Summary 4 The complaint 6 Investigation

More information

Independent investigation into the death of Mr John Fraser a prisoner at HMP Littlehey on 10 March 2016

Independent investigation into the death of Mr John Fraser a prisoner at HMP Littlehey on 10 March 2016 Independent investigation into the death of Mr John Fraser a prisoner at HMP Littlehey on 10 March 2016 Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence

More information

Mental Health (Wales) Measure Implementing the Mental Health (Wales) Measure Guidance for Local Health Boards and Local Authorities

Mental Health (Wales) Measure Implementing the Mental Health (Wales) Measure Guidance for Local Health Boards and Local Authorities Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 Implementing the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 Guidance for Local Health Boards and Local Authorities Januar y 2011 Crown copyright 2011 WAG 10-11316 F6651011 Implementing

More information

CYFARFOD BWRDD IECHYD PRIFYSGOL UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD MEETING. Ombudsman Annual Letter

CYFARFOD BWRDD IECHYD PRIFYSGOL UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD MEETING. Ombudsman Annual Letter CYFARFOD BWRDD IECHYD PRIFYSGOL UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD MEETING DYDDIAD Y CYFARFOD: DATE OF MEETING: TEITL YR ADRODDIAD: TITLE OF REPORT: CYFARWYDDWR ARWEINIOL: LEAD DIRECTOR: SWYDDOG ADRODD: REPORTING

More information

Compliments, Concerns and Complaints policy

Compliments, Concerns and Complaints policy Compliments, Concerns and Complaints policy Document information Document title Classification Compliments, Concerns and Complaints policy Open Document/Reference Number: 71229 Document Custodian: Other

More information

Serious Incident Report Public Board Meeting 26 November 2015

Serious Incident Report Public Board Meeting 26 November 2015 Serious Incident Report Public Board Meeting 26 November 2015 Presented for: Presented by: Author Previous Committees Governance Yvette Oade, Chief Medical Officer Craig Brigg, Director of Quality None

More information

NEWS. Monthly news from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman

NEWS. Monthly news from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman NEWS SEPTEMBER 2013 Monthly news from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman The SPSO laid four investigation reports before the Scottish Parliament today. We also laid a report on 88 decisions about all

More information

Independent investigation into the death of Mr Stephen Woods a prisoner at HMP Liverpool on 29 April 2016

Independent investigation into the death of Mr Stephen Woods a prisoner at HMP Liverpool on 29 April 2016 Independent investigation into the death of Mr Stephen Woods a prisoner at HMP Liverpool on 29 April 2016 Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence

More information

The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Act 2002

The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Act 2002 Scottish Public Services Ombudsman The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Act 2002 Investigation Report UNDER SECTION 15(1)(a) SPSO 4 Melville Street Edinburgh EH3 7NS Tel 0800 377 7330 SPSO Information

More information

COMPLAINTS /PALS MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONGING GROUP

COMPLAINTS /PALS MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONGING GROUP COMPLAINTS /PALS MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONGING GROUP Annual Report 2016/17 1 Date Version Author Notes August 2017 One Chris Baker COMPLAINTS REPORT... 3 DEFINITION OF SERVICES... 3 COMPLAINTS AND PALS

More information

The Primary Care Trigger Tool: Practical Guidance

The Primary Care Trigger Tool: Practical Guidance The Primary Care Trigger Tool: Practical Guidance Reviewing clinical records to detect and reduce patient safety incidents Index Content Page Introduction 2 What is a Trigger Tool Review? 2 What types

More information

Section 6: Referral record headings

Section 6: Referral record headings Section 6: Referral record headings Referral record standards: the referral headings are primarily intended for recording the clinical information in referral communication between general practitioners

More information

Standards of Practice for Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians

Standards of Practice for Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians Standards of Practice for Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians effective from April 2016 Standards of Practice for Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians Standards of Practice Our Standards of Practice

More information

Independent investigation into the death of Mr Dewi Evans a prisoner at HMP Gartree on 30 May 2016

Independent investigation into the death of Mr Dewi Evans a prisoner at HMP Gartree on 30 May 2016 Independent investigation into the death of Mr Dewi Evans a prisoner at HMP Gartree on 30 May 2016 Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0

More information

An avoidable death of a three-year-old child from sepsis

An avoidable death of a three-year-old child from sepsis An avoidable death of a three-year-old child from sepsis A report by the Health Service Ombudsman for England on an investigation into a complaint from Mr and Mrs Morrish about The Cricketfield Surgery,

More information

Manchester City Council

Manchester City Council The Local Government Ombudsman s Annual Review Manchester City Council for the year ended 3 March 2009 The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) provides a free, independent and impartial service. We consider

More information

The NHS Scotland Complaints Handling Procedure. NHS Highland

The NHS Scotland Complaints Handling Procedure. NHS Highland The NHS Scotland Complaints Handling Procedure NHS Highland April 2017 National Health Service Scotland Complaints Handling Procedure Foreword Our complaints handling procedure reflects NHS Highland commitment

More information

Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board. Audit year: Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015

Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board. Audit year: Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015 Review of Follow-up Outpatient Appointments Hywel Dda University Health Board Audit year: 2014-15 Issued: October 2015 Document reference: 491A2015 Status of report This document has been prepared as part

More information

PATIENT ACCESS POLICY (ELECTIVE CARE) UHB 033 Version No: 1 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: Senior Manager, Performance and Compliance.

PATIENT ACCESS POLICY (ELECTIVE CARE) UHB 033 Version No: 1 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: Senior Manager, Performance and Compliance. Reference No: PATIENT ACCESS POLICY (ELECTIVE CARE) UHB 033 Version No: 1 Previous Trust / LHB Ref No: Trust 364 Documents to read alongside this Policy. Ministerial Letter EH/ML/004/09 WAG Rules for Managing

More information

Surrey County Council

Surrey County Council The Local Government Ombudsman s Annual Review Surrey County Council for the year ended 31 March 2010 Local Government Ombudsmen (LGOs) provide a free, independent and impartial service. We consider complaints

More information

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council The Local Government Ombudsman s Annual Review Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council for the year ended 3 March 2 Local Government Ombudsmen (LGOs) provide a free, independent and impartial service. We consider

More information

South Powys Cluster Plan

South Powys Cluster Plan South Powys Cluster Plan 2016-17 The Cluster Network Development Domain with the Quality & Outcomes Framework supports medical practices to work collaboratively to: Understand local health needs and priorities

More information

Independent investigation into the death of Mr David Adkins a prisoner at HMP Whatton on 14 September 2016

Independent investigation into the death of Mr David Adkins a prisoner at HMP Whatton on 14 September 2016 Independent investigation into the death of Mr David Adkins a prisoner at HMP Whatton on 14 September 2016 Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence

More information

Independent investigation into the death of Mr Jeffrey Rookes a prisoner at HMP Erlestoke on 14 June 2017

Independent investigation into the death of Mr Jeffrey Rookes a prisoner at HMP Erlestoke on 14 June 2017 Independent investigation into the death of Mr Jeffrey Rookes a prisoner at HMP Erlestoke on 14 June 2017 Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence

More information

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. Investigation into a complaint against North Somerset Council (reference number: )

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman. Investigation into a complaint against North Somerset Council (reference number: ) Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Investigation into a complaint against North Somerset Council (reference number: 16 018 163) 16 March 2018 Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

More information

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman Investigation into a complaint against London Borough of Croydon (reference number: 16 013 606) 5 October 2017 Local Government and Social Care

More information

Policy for Patient Access

Policy for Patient Access Policy for Patient Access DOCUMENT CONTROL Revision Date Old Version 10/12/2014 1.0 01/07/2016 1.1 30/04/17 1.2 Amendment General Management Review General Management Review General Management Review Authored

More information

What is this Guide for?

What is this Guide for? Continuing NHS Healthcare (CHC) is a package of services that is arranged and funded solely by the NHS, for those people who have been assessed as having a primary health need. The issue is one of need.

More information

Specialised Services Commissioning Policy: CP160 Specialised Paediatric Neurological Rehabilitation

Specialised Services Commissioning Policy: CP160 Specialised Paediatric Neurological Rehabilitation Specialised Services Commissioning Policy: CP160 Specialised Paediatric Neurological Rehabilitation April 2018 Version 4.0 Document information Document purpose Document name Author Policy Specialised

More information

Investigation into the death of Mr Adam Willmott, a prisoner at HMP Whitemoor in April 2015

Investigation into the death of Mr Adam Willmott, a prisoner at HMP Whitemoor in April 2015 Investigation into the death of Mr Adam Willmott, a prisoner at HMP Whitemoor in April 2015 Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except

More information

Health and care services in Herefordshire & Worcestershire are changing

Health and care services in Herefordshire & Worcestershire are changing Health and care services in Herefordshire & Worcestershire are changing An update on a five year plan to provide safe, effective and sustainable care in our area www.yourconversationhw.nhs.uk Your Health

More information

London Borough of Southwark

London Borough of Southwark The Local Government Ombudsman s Annual Review London Borough of Southwark for the year ended 31 March 1 Local Government Ombudsmen (LGOs) provide a free, independent and impartial service. We consider

More information

Specialised Services Service Specification: Inherited Bleeding Disorders

Specialised Services Service Specification: Inherited Bleeding Disorders Specialised Services Service Specification: Inherited Bleeding Disorders Document Author: Assistant Specialised Services Planner Cardiac and Cancer Specialised Services Planner Cancer and Blood Executive

More information

Ethical Challenges in Advance Care Planning

Ethical Challenges in Advance Care Planning Ethical Challenges in Advance Care Planning June 2014 Citation: National Ethics Advisory Committee. 2014. Ethical Challenges in Advance Care Planning. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Published in June

More information

Kent and Medway Ambulance Mental Health Referral Pathway Protocol

Kent and Medway Ambulance Mental Health Referral Pathway Protocol Kent and Medway Ambulance Mental Health Referral Pathway Protocol Introduction This protocol has been developed jointly by Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust (KMPT) and South East Coast

More information

Minor Oral Surgery Service Reconfiguration

Minor Oral Surgery Service Reconfiguration Minor Oral Surgery Service Reconfiguration 1 Introduction The purpose of this report is to inform the Board on the status of the Minor Oral Surgery Service Reconfiguration programme and request approval

More information

Independent investigation into the death of Mr George Dennis a prisoner at HMP Bullingdon on 6 February 2017

Independent investigation into the death of Mr George Dennis a prisoner at HMP Bullingdon on 6 February 2017 Independent investigation into the death of Mr George Dennis a prisoner at HMP Bullingdon on 6 February 2017 Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence

More information

Replacement. Supersedes: Complaints Procedure ( ) and the Patient Advice and Liaison Service Policy ( )

Replacement. Supersedes: Complaints Procedure ( ) and the Patient Advice and Liaison Service Policy ( ) Corporate Complaints: Standard Operating Procedure Document Control Summary Status: Replacement. Supersedes: Complaints Procedure (28.10.10) and the Patient Advice and Liaison Service Policy (28.07.11)

More information

Board Meeting Tuesday, 12 October 2004 Board Paper No. 04/62 QUARTERLY REPORTS ON COMPLAINTS : APRIL JUNE 2004

Board Meeting Tuesday, 12 October 2004 Board Paper No. 04/62 QUARTERLY REPORTS ON COMPLAINTS : APRIL JUNE 2004 Greater Glasgow NHS Board Board Meeting Tuesday, 12 October 24 Board Paper No. 4/62 HEAD OF BOARD ADMINISTRATION AND DIVISIONAL CHIEF EXECUTIVES QUARTERLY REPORTS ON COMPLAINTS : APRIL JUNE 24 Recommendation

More information

The NHS Constitution

The NHS Constitution 2 The NHS Constitution The NHS belongs to the people. It is there to improve our health and wellbeing, supporting us to keep mentally and physically well, to get better when we are ill and, when we cannot

More information

The University of Edinburgh Complaint Handling Procedure

The University of Edinburgh Complaint Handling Procedure University of Edinburgh Complaint Handling Procedure April 2016 P a g e 1 The University of Edinburgh Complaint Handling Procedure April 2016 University of Edinburgh Complaint Handling Procedure April

More information

NHS England Complaints Policy

NHS England Complaints Policy NHS England Complaints Policy 1 NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Operations Patients and Information Nursing Policy Commissioning Development Finance Human Resources Publications

More information

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital

Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital The Open and Honest Care: Driving Improvement programme aims to support organisations to become more transparent and consistent in publishing safety, experience

More information

DRAFT - NHS CHC and Complex Care Commissioning Policy.

DRAFT - NHS CHC and Complex Care Commissioning Policy. DRAFT - NHS CHC and Complex Care Commissioning Policy. 1. Introduction 1.1 This policy describes the way the following Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) NHS Wirral Clinical Commissioning Group, NHS

More information

Report by the Local Government Ombudsman

Report by the Local Government Ombudsman Report by the Local Government Ombudsman Investigation into a complaint against Central Bedfordshire Council (reference number: 13 014 946) 15 January 2016 Local Government Ombudsman I PO Box 4771 I Coventry

More information

sharing findings justice

sharing findings justice S P S O A N N UAL R E P O RT 2 0 1 4 1 5 Scottish Public Services Ombudsman sharing findings justice efficiency best practice guidance impact clarity Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish

More information

Ref SDU Team Site Details Of Complaint Outcome Upheld 15/16/0290 Adult Mental. Not Health. Newtown Hospital - Aconbury North AMH

Ref SDU Team Site Details Of Complaint Outcome Upheld 15/16/0290 Adult Mental. Not Health. Newtown Hospital - Aconbury North AMH Complaints closed in April 2016 Ref SDU Team Site Details Of Complaint Outcome 15/16/0290 Adult Mental 15/16/0537 Children, Young People And Families 15/16/0638 Adult Mental 15/16/0778 Adult Mental Home

More information

The interface between primary and secondary care Key messages for NHS clinicians and managers

The interface between primary and secondary care Key messages for NHS clinicians and managers The interface between primary and secondary care Key messages for NHS clinicians and managers In partnership with: NHS England and NHS Improvement 2 Good organisation of care across the interface between

More information

Thresholds for initiating Adult Safeguarding Referrals or Care Concerns

Thresholds for initiating Adult Safeguarding Referrals or Care Concerns September 2012 Thresholds for initiating Adult Safeguarding Referrals or Care Concerns Establishing whether or not abuse of a vulnerable adult has taken place is not always straightforward. In some cases,

More information

Protocol for Cross-Border Healthcare Services. April 2013

Protocol for Cross-Border Healthcare Services. April 2013 Protocol for Cross-Border Healthcare Services April 2013 1 Department for Health and Social Services of the Welsh Government and the NHS Commissioning Board Protocol for Cross-Border Healthcare Services

More information

Post-operative and Discharge Pathways for PBM Claire L J Atterbury CNS Transfusion and Haematology

Post-operative and Discharge Pathways for PBM Claire L J Atterbury CNS Transfusion and Haematology Post-operative and Discharge Pathways for PBM Claire L J Atterbury CNS Transfusion and Haematology 1 Plan for the worst and hope for the best claire.atterbury@qehkl.nhs.uk 2 Where were we? What year? The

More information

Supporting Self Care Choose Pharmacy Common Ailments Service GP Practice Guide

Supporting Self Care Choose Pharmacy Common Ailments Service GP Practice Guide Supporting Self Care Choose Pharmacy Common Ailments Service GP Practice Guide Contents Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Service Information Section 3: Conditions to be Treated Section 4: Referrals &

More information

Annual Report Executive Summary. A summary of the 2016/17 Annual Report of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales INNOVATION IMPROVEMENT INFLUENCE

Annual Report Executive Summary. A summary of the 2016/17 Annual Report of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales INNOVATION IMPROVEMENT INFLUENCE Annual Report Executive Summary A summary of the Annual Report of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales INNOVATION IMPROVEMENT INFLUENCE I am delighted to be able to report substantial progress in the

More information

PACES Station 2: HISTORY TAKING

PACES Station 2: HISTORY TAKING INFORMATION FOR THE CANDIDATE Patient details: Your role: Presenting complaint: Ms Donna Jones, a 47-year-old woman You are the doctor in the general medical outpatient clinic Fatigue Please read the letter

More information

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS The British Association of Urological Surgeons 35-43 Lincoln s Inn Fields London WC2A 3PE Phone: Fax: Website: E- mail: +44 (0)20 7869 6950 +44 (0)20 7404 5048 www.baus.org.uk admin@baus.org.uk INFORMATION

More information

Executive Summary. The overall complaint rate against overall activity for the Trust has reduced from in 2013/14 to a rate of in 2014/15.

Executive Summary. The overall complaint rate against overall activity for the Trust has reduced from in 2013/14 to a rate of in 2014/15. Executive Summary The Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust had a total of 542,195 patient attendances in 2014/15 which is an increase in activity of 13% from 2013/14. Patient attendances include

More information

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS NHS CONSULTANTS CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS SCHEME (WALES) 2008 AWARDS ROUND

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS NHS CONSULTANTS CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS SCHEME (WALES) 2008 AWARDS ROUND ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS NHS CONSULTANTS CLINICAL EXCELLENCE AWARDS SCHEME (WALES) 2008 AWARDS ROUND Guide for applicants employed by NHS organisations in Wales This guide is available

More information

Managed Practices. A Useful Guide for Local Health Boards.

Managed Practices. A Useful Guide for Local Health Boards. Managed Practices A Useful Guide for Local Health Boards 1 Contents 1. Managed Practices 2. The Beginning 2.1 Handover Strategy 2.1.1 There are several very real scenarios that could result in Managed

More information

EAST CALDER & RATHO MEDICAL PRACTICE YOUR INFORMATION

EAST CALDER & RATHO MEDICAL PRACTICE YOUR INFORMATION EAST CALDER & RATHO MEDICAL PRACTICE YOUR INFORMATION East Calder & Ratho Medical Practice aims to ensure the highest standard of medical care for our patients. To do this we keep records about you, your

More information

My Discharge a proactive case management for discharging patients with dementia

My Discharge a proactive case management for discharging patients with dementia Shine 2013 final report Project title My Discharge a proactive case management for discharging patients with dementia Organisation name Royal Free London NHS foundation rust Project completion: March 2014

More information

Complaints Sanctuary Students Procedure SS/LW0315/CP. Sanctuary Group:

Complaints Sanctuary Students Procedure SS/LW0315/CP. Sanctuary Group: Subject/Title: Complaints Procedure Sanctuary Students Business Function: Complaints Procedure Sanctuary Students Author(s): Operations/Accommodation Manager Other Contributors: Director of Operational

More information

DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION

DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Code of Practice for Pastoral Care of International Contents Part 1 Introduction Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Commencement 3 3 Previous version revoked replaced 3 4 Code is legislative

More information

Evoke Home Care. Mr Roger Henry Pickford. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Inadequate

Evoke Home Care. Mr Roger Henry Pickford. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Inadequate Mr Roger Henry Pickford Evoke Home Care Inspection report 7 Passage Road Westbury-on-Trym Bristol BS9 3HN Tel: 01173774225 Website: www.surecarebristol.co.uk Date of inspection visit: 21 September 2017

More information

CYSTOSCOPY AND URETHRAL BULKING INJECTIONS

CYSTOSCOPY AND URETHRAL BULKING INJECTIONS CYSTOSCOPY AND URETHRAL BULKING INJECTIONS Procedure Specific Information What is the evidence base for this information? This publication includes advice from consensus panels, the British Association

More information

NHS Shetland Summary of General Feedback received in 2016/17

NHS Shetland Summary of General Feedback received in 2016/17 1 Patient not notified of appointment cancellation (St Olaf Street) 2 Patient unable to get appointment within the next month 3 Patient rec d as DNA, but had not received appt letter. He had not understood

More information

INSPECTION/EXAMINATION OF THE URETER ± BIOPSY

INSPECTION/EXAMINATION OF THE URETER ± BIOPSY Procedure Specific Information What is the evidence base for this information? This publication includes advice from consensus panels, the British Association of Urological Surgeons, the Department of

More information

We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.

We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. Inspection Report We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. Crook Log Surgery 19 Crook Log, Bexleyheath, DA6 8DZ Tel: 08444773340

More information

We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.

We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. Inspection Report We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. The St Aubyn Centre The St Aubyn Centre, Severalls Hospital,

More information

Parkbury House Surgery

Parkbury House Surgery Parkbury House Surgery Complaint Policy and Procedures St Peters Street, St Albans, Hertfordshire, AL1 3HD Tel: 01727 851589 Fax: 01727 854372 parkburyhouse.info@nhs.net; www.parkburyhouse.nhs.uk Version

More information