Re: Health Care Innovation Caucus RFI on value-based provider payment reform, value-based arrangements, and technology integration.
|
|
- Maximillian Reed
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 August 15, 2018 The Honorable Mike Kelly The Honorable Ron Kind U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives 1707 Longworth House Office Building 1502 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C Washington, D.C The Honorable Markwayne Mullin The Honorable Ami Bera, MD U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives 1113 Longworth House Office Building 1431 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C Washington, D.C Re: Health Care Innovation Caucus RFI on value-based provider payment reform, value-based arrangements, and technology integration. Dear Representatives Kelly, Kind, Mullin and Bera: On behalf of the more than 80,000 members of the American College of Surgeons (ACS), I would like to thank you for the opportunity to provide information on innovative solutions to increase the value of health care. As you may know, the ACS was founded in 1913 to improve the quality of care for the surgical patient by setting high standards for surgical education and practice, and we look forward to working with the Health Care Innovation Caucus ( Caucus ) to find novel solutions to many of these issues. ACS has been at the forefront of surgical quality measurement and improvement for more than 100 years. When the ACS journey began many decades ago, we had as many hospitals as we have today in America. The early hospitals, however, had fewer beds and lacked consistency in surgical care and quality. Our answer was to develop care standards for every surgical facility. The result of these efforts greatly improved surgical care. Ultimately, our program spread throughout medicine and became the independent accrediting body known today as the Joint Commission. The ACS commitment to clinical standards did not end there. Over the last half century we have created the national ACS Trauma verification program. All too often people are critically injured and immediately seek care at a Level I trauma center because of their proven quality. In the last three decades we have developed new additions including the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), Bariatric, and Cancer accreditation programs.
2 In the last year, the ACS published a new manual, entitled Optimal Resources for Surgical Quality and Safety, which describes key concepts for developing standards in quality, safety, and reliability, and explores the essential elements that all hospitals should have in place to ensure patient-centered care. Publication of this manual (commonly referred to as the Red Book ) further reinforces ACS commitment to high-quality and coordinated care. The ACS supported the legislative counterpart to these efforts: Congress passage of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), which promoted innovative quality and cost measures as well as the development of alternative payment models. We welcomed the legislative intent to improve care and have been hopeful the implementation of the law would promote meaningful surgical quality over the burdensome, insignificant measures used in many of the previous payment programs. Without real meaningful quality measurement, the aspirations of MACRA will fall short of achieving patient-centered quality care. For reasons we highlight below, we have concerns that the implementation of MACRA deviates from congressional intent and the ACS encourages Congress to work with key stakeholders to ensure the intent of MACRA is upheld. How can we develop better outcomes measures that accurately reflect quality, safety, and value without burdening innovation? Based on our extensive history in quality of care, the ACS has come to rely on several key principles. First, care has gotten far more complicated over the years and except for the simplest of medical problems, patients are rarely cared for by a single provider. Care involves various conditions or diseases and relies on coordinated teams of physicians and other providers in order to implement a care plan; establish short and long term goals; and actually deliver care as a team. Second, optimal care delivery requires setting standards for the cultural and structural elements of the care delivery system. Trauma standards, bariatric standards, and cancer care standards are three such examples and widely used accreditation programs exist in each of these areas. Measuring key performance indicators across the care continuum is essential. The third aspect of building optimal care relies on using data to create meaningful knowledge in the care journey. Building data systems which can support quality is a core element of the ACS infrastructure. Data must be standardized and have automated data flows from the digital health
3 information systems. Data must also be aggregated with intense rigor and cleaned or normalized before applying the rules engines for enriching and informing data analytics. The data provided are run through analytics with outcomes representations to the providers which can be trusted for reliability, validity and risk adjustment. These are highly technical processes in data science common to all other industries but applied only by a few medical specialties due to their costs. Yet, the knowledge gained from these efforts is incomparable. When highly reliable and valid data are used to help inform knowledge to a care team, it is never looked upon as burdensome; it is extremely important and helpful to optimizing care. The fourth principle requires digesting the knowledge gained from the data and applying improvement cycles and, where necessary, conducting research. The improvement projects used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and other payers are not patient-centric and lack team-based, improvement activities. A true quality program should use the key performance indicators within the organizational structure of team meetings to both define activities, such as a failure mode analysis, as well as apply improvement cycles. The current CMS and other payer quality measurement and improvement activities are payment systems which piggy-back on quality for a brief moment. We believe this is the inverse of a true patient-centered quality program. The quality program should be robust and complete, with a payment program fit to incentivize the value created by continuous quality improvement cycles. The current CMS and commercial payer claims-based measures are only useful when untoward events are uncommon or rare. The administrative claims measures used by payers otherwise are untrusted, lack usefulness and therefore, become burdensome. As the Caucus considers the issue of better measuring the quality and value of care provided, it is vital to incorporate the perspective of surgeons and surgical patients. We are best positioned to understand what elements of care are important to measure in order to evaluate quality of care and provide the information needed for improvement. MACRA, which was passed by Congress and signed into law in 2015, and is currently being implemented by CMS, created new opportunities to modernize the way we measure quality and value. However, surgical quality measurement as currently implemented in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) continues to suffer from the deficiencies noted
4 above. Furthermore, measures reported by large groups are typically related to primary care or are population-based and are not at all related to the care surgeons provide. These measures can be complex, burdensome, and frustrating as it takes time and resources away from other efforts that could have a greater impact for patients. Unfortunately, payments are adjusted in MIPS based on performance on these measures. This means that what affects payment is not directly related to what affects quality, contrary to what Congress intended upon the passage of MACRA. This is precisely why many surgeons find those measures burdensome. The right measures for quality and improvement, no matter how complex, are seen as beneficial to the patient and are therefore not a burden. While the Caucus has requested information on outcomes measures specifically, there is little variation in outcomes for many surgical procedures as judged by existing outcome measures due to decades of continuous quality improvement efforts. Therefore, outcome measures alone are not sufficient to verify that the highest quality care is made available to patients. For that reason, ACS has proposed to CMS that surgical quality measurement should include a combination of three elements: Standards-based facility-level verification programs, Patient reported experience and outcomes measures, and Traditional quality measures including registry and claimsbased measures. Combining these three elements will provide a much clearer picture of the quality of care provided to the patient, including not just the surgeon, but the entire care team. Standards-based facility- level verification programs: The importance of setting standards at the facility level to achieve quality outcomes cannot be overstated. Our experience tells us, if you put a surgeon with the highest technical skill level into an underperforming care team environment where the resources needed are not available and systems are not in place to protect the patient, that surgeon will struggle to provide the highest quality care. Conversely, if you put an average surgeon in a great care team delivery system, their outcomes are likely to improve and patients will receive better, more coordinated care. The aforementioned ACS Red Book describes key concepts for developing standards in quality, safety, and reliability, and explores the essential elements that all hospitals should have
5 in place to ensure patient-centered care. Publication of the Optimal Resources for Surgical Quality and Safety further reinforces ACS commitment to high-quality and coordinated care. Patient reported outcomes, or PROs : PROs are important to validate from the patient directly to ensure that their personal goals for their surgical care were met. PROs represent the views and perceptions of patients and can be extremely useful in improving patient care. These measures are the mainstay in the promotion of patient-centered care. Traditional quality measures: The ACS quality model includes traditional, claims-based or registry reported measures, primarily as an additional check to verify that quality care is being delivered. As noted above, there is so little variation in certain outcomes measures that their use may not be statistically valid due to the number of procedures performed annually vs. the large sample size that would be needed. Instead, attaining high quality care through a combination of ensuring that standards are being achieved and validating outcomes through measuring the patient s perspective on whether goals of care and other milestones are being achieved may be more reliable. However, if the correct measures are selected, and aggregated with limited effort on the part of the provider, they can be seen as informative and meaningful to physicians; and not burdensome. It is important to ensure that collection of these data enhances patient care rather than taking the focus away from what is important. Congress built into the MACRA program opportunities to improve the science of measuring physician quality. However, CMS currently has difficulty achieving the dual goal of making quality both more meaningful and less burdensome. This might be an opportunity for the Caucus and Congress as a whole to use its oversight role and work with CMS in order to meet the original intent of the law. How have population health, capitation, and direct provider contracting improved patients health? Earlier this year, ACS responded to a CMS request for information on Direct Provider Contracting (DPC). ACS noted in our response that DPC can become extremely complicated and requires safeguards to ensure quality and appropriate care is being
6 delivered. There are several important factors to consider for participation, for both physicians and patients, before such models should be tested. If properly structured and implemented with sufficient safeguards, DPC could be beneficial for patients who would receive more coordinated, team-based care. For providers and payers, the potential benefits of DPC would be to free up physicians and groups to practice medicine in the most efficient way possible, while providing additional opportunities for savings due to administrative burden reduction and a shift away from the incentives of a fee-for-service (FFS) based payment system. There is also a great deal of opportunity for the development of fully capitated models, although current models lack sufficient, granular information for them to work well for many specialties other than primary care. With additional development, including episode-based resource use and quality measurement, these models could work well and be a game changer for payment in health care. In developing the ACS-Brandeis Advanced Alternative Payment Model (A-APM), the ACS has learned much that could be applied to a specialty or condition specific DPC or capitated models. For example, when broken into coherent episodes of care that look at the entirety of the services received by the patient, wide variations in cost, services, number of providers involved, and other factors exist in CMS claims data. These variations may be due to multiple factors including patient differences, geographic practice patterns, variations in care models or even errors in coding. The ACS views DPC as a form of an APM. In DPC, various functions of the insurer are transferred to the physicians in signing a provider contract agreement. In traditional FFS agreements, insurers use vehicles such as prior authorization to restrict unnecessary services and assure patients that they will receive the right care at the right moment for the right reason, to the greatest extent possible. With DPC, processes would need to be developed to assure that patients continue to receive appropriate care. As the Caucus considers this issue, it will be important to understand how CMS will replace the current care authorization models with new models under DPC. A robust quality assessment framework, such as the one mentioned above, would also be necessary to enable patients to make informed decisions about who to contract with. Tools such as the Episode Grouper for Medicare or EGM which was developed by Brandeis University under contract with CMS and utilized in the ACS-Brandeis A-APM, allows claims to be grouped into meaningful, patient-specific episodes for comparison and analysis. This type of tool could be useful in both MIPS and APMs including DPC or capitated models, to provide insights into opportunities for improving the value of care and reducing unwarranted variation. As an example, the
7 EGM logic portrays physicians according to one of several categories, inspired by how CMS attributes care, but based on the provider s specific role for that patient. For patients, all services contribute to their overall care as well as the overall episode cost. The figure below demonstrates how a colon resection for cancer has large variations in the sheer number of physicians providing services to the patient, from as low as 1 service to as many as 63 different tax IDs. Providing this level of transparency in variation creates opportunities for improvement. ACS is currently working with several partners to explore options to provide the EGM as a public utility to create a standard for cost measurement across payers. We would welcome the opportunity to further discuss steps needed to make this tool available with members of the Caucus. How can Congress help the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Center achieve its purpose of developing and testing innovative payment and delivery models? Congress has now made the transition from its legislative role to one of oversight to ensure that the MACRA law is being implemented in the best interest of Medicare patients, and as the law was intended. This is important because, unfortunately, actions taken by CMS and Health and Human Services (HHS) since the passage of MACRA may not be sufficient to take us to
8 our shared end goals. While some of these actions may have been well intentioned and taken in the name of reducing reporting requirements or reducing overall burdens of participation, others seem counter to the very spirit of the law, such as the failure to move forward on any of the APMs reviewed by the Physician-focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC). Congress attention and guidance are needed to ensure the law is implemented correctly so that physicians who are providing high quality, high value care to their patients are able to succeed. Specifically, CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Center (CMMI) needs additional guidance from Congress at this point to ensure that the intent of moving the physician payment system toward quality and value through APMs is upheld. While APMs hold great promise in transferring patient care from a fee-forservice model to one of team-based, patient-focused, quality care, CMMI has shown a reluctance to be truly innovative. The health care community has rallied to meet Congress challenge to develop new physician-focused models. As of August, the PTAC has received 27 proposed new models for consideration. Fifteen of these models have been reviewed by the PTAC with recommendations sent to the Secretary of HHS. Ten of these were recommended favorably for testing or implementation, including the ACS- Brandeis A-APM which was the first submitted to the PTAC. However, no action has been taken to test or implement any of them. In fact, Secretary Azar, in a single letter, recently declined to move forward on the testing of eight of these PTAC-recommended models. Instead, CMMI seems focused on creating new versions of preexisting CMS models such as the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI) or the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Track 1+. MACRA payment incentives and the establishment of PTAC clearly incentivize the development of and participation in APMs. ACS and others have recognized the value of creating such models and have expended significant time, effort and resources in doing so. Our experience with the PTAC was a positive one and has helped greatly in refining the ACS-Brandeis A-APM, and our thinking on A-APMs, as well as informing our positions on quality and cost measurement in team-based health care. However, the disconnect between the PTAC recommendation process and the testing of new models by CMMI is a significant barrier to innovation. While we believe there is great merit in the move toward A-APMs and plan to continue work on developing core concepts of the ACS-Brandeis A-APM, it is unfortunate that the input from the broader health care community has not led to the implementation of
9 physician-built APMs by CMMI. As this process continues, additional guidance may be necessary in order to achieve the move to episodic and, ultimately, capitated APMs. How can Congress and other policy-makers move beyond EHRs to the promise of digital health information? Health Information Technology (HIT) could have a significant impact on value-based payment models and the overall quality and efficiency of care if it were implemented in such a way as to create a truly interoperable patient digital health information environment where data could flow freely to where it is most needed to inform care decisions. Past congressional efforts have been successful in spreading the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) technology among providers but have been too focused on this single tool. We need to look beyond EHRs to fully attain the promise of digital health information. Patients do not commonly exist in a single EHR. Oftentimes a patient will see different clinicians for outpatient care, visit an ambulatory care center, be admitted to skilled nursing, seek care at home or require hospitalization. All of those sites of service have their own digital records. Personal health devices on smart phones and smart watches represent some of the other repositories containing valuable health information. It is important to move the conversation from talking about EHRs to considering a patient s individual digital health information in a patient cloud. The technology is available; the patients and clinical community are working toward this effort. However, the EHR community and many different government agencies such as HHS, CMS, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Agency for Healthcare Research Quality (AHRQ), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), among others, each have their own idea about who should set standards and how those standards should be implemented. It is only through a single set of standards that we will fully achieve the ultimate patient cloud for optimal care. These interoperability standards would assist in the development of patient and clinical care application programming interfaces (APIs). They would facilitate clinical analytics from registries and move the nation closer to machine learning and artificial intelligence.
10 It is vitally important that we move our focus on digital health information to interoperable digital services through standards and technology rather than overly focusing on EHRs. In conclusion, the ACS appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on innovative solutions to increase the value of health care. In the years since the passage of MACRA, we have sought to leverage our decades of experience to inform the rule making process. While some of our suggestions have been adopted, much is left to be accomplished and Congress attention to this matter is welcome and extremely important. If the promise of MACRA in moving physicians to more streamlined, value focused payment models in MIPS and ultimately in A-APMs is to be accomplished, continued effort on the part of both Congress and the provider community will be needed. If you would like to further discuss any of the concepts included in this letter, please contact Mark Lukaszewski, at or at (202) Sincerely, David B. Hoyt, MD, FACS Executive Director
Statement of the American College of Surgeons. Presented by. Frank Opelka, MD, FACS
Statement of the American College of Surgeons Presented by Frank Opelka, MD, FACS Before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives RE: MACRA
More informationCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Innovation Center New Direction
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Innovation Center New Direction I. Background One of the most important goals at CMS is fostering an affordable, accessible healthcare system that puts patients
More informationQUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM Executive Summary On April 27, 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a Notice
More informationMACRA, MIPS, and APMs What to Expect from all these Acronyms?!
MACRA, MIPS, and APMs What to Expect from all these Acronyms?! ACP Pennsylvania Council Meeting Saturday, December 5, 2015 Shari M. Erickson, MPH Vice President, Governmental Affairs & Medical Practice
More informationRE: Next steps for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)
October 24, 2017 Chairman Francis J. Crosson, MD Medicare Payment Advisory Commission 425 I Street, Suite 701 Washington, DC 20001 RE: Next steps for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Dear
More informationAlternative Payment Models and Health IT
Alternative Payment Models and Health IT Health DataPalooza Preconference May 8, 2016 Kelly Cronin, MS, MPH, Director, Office of Care Transformation, ONC/HHS HHS Goals for Medicare Payment Reform In January
More informationHow CME is Changing: The Influence of Population Health, MACRA, and MIPS
How CME is Changing: The Influence of Population Health, MACRA, and MIPS Table of Contents Population Health: Definition and Use Case The Future of Population Health and Performance Improvement MACRA and
More informationJuly 30, Re: Health Care Innovation Caucus Request for Information
July 30, 2018 The Honorable Mike Kelly Co-Chair, Health Care Innovation Caucus U.S. House of Representatives 1707 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Markwayne Mullin Co-Chair,
More informationStatement of the American College of Surgeons. Presented by David Hoyt, MD, FACS
Statement of the American College of Surgeons Presented by David Hoyt, MD, FACS before the Subcommittee on Health Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives RE: Using Innovation
More informationWhat s Next for CMS Innovation Center?
What s Next for CMS Innovation Center? A Guide to Building Successful Value-Based Payment Models Given CMMI s New Focus on Voluntary, Home-Grown Initiatives W W W. H E A L T H M A N A G E M E N T. C O
More informationAre physicians ready for macra/qpp?
Are physicians ready for macra/qpp? Results from a KPMG-AMA Survey kpmg.com ama-assn.org Contents Summary Executive Summary 2 Background and Survey Objectives 5 What is MACRA? 5 AMA and KPMG collaboration
More informationThe Influence of Health Policy on Clinical Practice. Dr. Kim Kuebler, DNP, APRN, ANP-BC Multiple Chronic Conditions Resource Center
The Influence of Health Policy on Clinical Practice Dr. Kim Kuebler, DNP, APRN, ANP-BC Multiple Chronic Conditions Resource Center Disclaimer Director: Multiple Chronic Conditions Resource Center www.multiplechronicconditions.org
More informationApril 26, Ms. Seema Verma, MPH Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dear Secretary Price and Administrator Verma:
April 26, 2017 Thomas E. Price, MD Secretary Department of Health and Human Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Ms. Seema Verma, MPH Administrator Centers
More informationThe Quality Payment Program Overview Fact Sheet
Quality Payment Program The Quality Payment Program Overview Background On October 14, 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued its final rule with comment period implementing the
More informationDRIVING VALUE-BASED POST-ACUTE COLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS. Amy Hancock, CEO Presented to: CPERI April 16, 2018
DRIVING VALUE-BASED POST-ACUTE COLLABORATIVE SOLUTIONS Amy Hancock, CEO Presented to: CPERI April 16, 2018 Cross-Continuum Road-Mapping Post-acute partners are beginning to utilize tools to identify new
More informationDecember 19, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:
December 19, 2016 Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-5517-FC Submitted electronically via http://www.regulations.gov
More informationQuality Measures and Federal Policy: Increasingly Important and A Work in Progress. American Health Quality Association Policy Forum Washington, D.C.
Quality Measures and Federal Policy: Increasingly Important and A Work in Progress American Health Quality Association Policy Forum Washington, D.C. February 9, 2016 Quality Journey NCQA Develops Health
More informationPopulation Health Management. Ashley Rhude RHIA, CHTS-IM HIT Practice Advisor
Population Health Management Ashley Rhude RHIA, CHTS-IM HIT Practice Advisor Mission of OFMQ OFMQ is a not-for-profit, consulting company dedicated to advancing healthcare quality. Since 1972, we ve been
More informationHere is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.
With the repeal of the sustainable growth rate (SGR) behind us, we are moving into a new era of Medicare physician payment under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Introducing the
More informationMarch 28, Dear Dr. Yong:
March 28, 2018 Pierre Yong, MD Director Quality Measurement and Value-Based Incentives Group Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 Dear Dr. Yong: The American
More informationICD-10 Advantages to Providers Looking beyond the isolated patient provider encounter
A Health Data Consulting White Paper 1056 6th Ave S Edmonds, WA 98020-4035 206-478-8227 www.healthdataconsulting.com ICD-10 Advantages to Providers Looking beyond the isolated patient provider encounter
More informationLeverage Information and Technology, Now and in the Future
June 25, 2018 Ms. Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services US Department of Health and Human Services Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Donald Rucker, MD National Coordinator for Health
More informationCMS-3310-P & CMS-3311-FC,
Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Ave., S.W., Room 445-G Washington, DC 20201 Re: CMS-3310-P & CMS-3311-FC, Medicare
More informationRE: Request for Information: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Direct Provider Contracting Models
Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 445-G Washington, DC 20201 RE: Request for Information: Centers for Medicare
More informationPrimary Care Transformation in the Era of Value
Primary Care Transformation in the Era of Value CMS Innovation Center & Primary Care Bruce Finke, MD Janel Jin, MSPH Gabrielle Schechter, MPH Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation Centers for Medicare
More informationMedicare Physician Fee Schedule. September 10, 2018
September 10, 2018 Ms. Seema Verma, MPH Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-1694-P P.O. Box 8011 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Submitted
More informationPrior to implementation of the episode groups for use in resource measurement under MACRA, CMS should:
Via Electronic Submission (www.regulations.gov) March 1, 2016 Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD episodegroups@cms.hhs.gov
More informationHere is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.
With the repeal of the sustainable growth rate (SGR) behind us, we are moving into a new era of Medicare physician payment under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Introducing the
More informationRE: CMS-1677-P; Medicare Program; Request for Information on CMS Flexibilities and Efficiencies
June 13, 2017 Ms. Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-1677-P P.O. Box 8011 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 RE: CMS-1677-P;
More informationHealth System Transformation, CMS Priorities, and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act
Health System Transformation, CMS Priorities, and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act Ashby Wolfe, MD, MPP, MPH Chief Medical Officer, Region IX Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
More informationMACRA Quality Payment Program
The American College of Surgeons Resources for the New Medicare Physician System Table of Contents Understanding the... 3 Navigating MIPS in 2017... 4 MIPS Reporting: Individuals or Groups... 6 2017: The
More informationMarch 6, Dear Administrator Verma,
March 6, 2018 Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Room 445 G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue SW Washington,
More informationCMS Priorities, MACRA and The Quality Payment Program
CMS Priorities, MACRA and The Quality Payment Program Ashby Wolfe, MD, MPP, MPH Chief Medical Officer, Region IX Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Presentation on behalf of HSAG November 16, 2016
More informationNov. 17, Dear Mr. Slavitt:
Nov. 17, 2015 Mr. Andrew Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20201 Re: NAMD
More informationJune 27, Dear Secretary Burwell and Acting Administrator Slavitt,
June 27, 2016 The Honorable Sylvia Matthews Burwell Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20201 Mr. Andy Slavitt Acting Administrator, Centers
More informationStatement for the Record. American College of Physicians. U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health
Statement for the Record American College of Physicians U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health Hearing on Implementation of MACRA s Physician Payment Policies March 21, 2018 The
More informationMACRA Frequently Asked Questions
Following the release of the Quality Payment Program Interim Final Rule, the American Medical Association (AMA) conducted numerous informational and training sessions for physicians and medical societies.
More informationPerson-Centered Accountable Care
Person-Centered Accountable Care Nelly Ganesan, MPH, Senior Director, Avalere s Evidence, Translation and Implementation Practice October 12, 2017 avalere.com @NGanesanAvalere @avalerehealth Despite Potential
More information2016 Activities and Accomplishments
FACT SHEET 2016 Activities and Accomplishments JANUARY 2017 Year in Review Health information technology (health IT) can enable the access, engagement and partnership that individuals and families need
More informationKate Goodrich, MD MHS. Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 6, 2016
Kate Goodrich, MD MHS Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 6, 2016 THE MEDICARE ACCESS & CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2015 Quality Payment
More information2017 Oncology Insights
Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions 2017 Oncology Insights Views on Reimbursement, Access and Data from Specialty Physicians Nationwide A message from the President Joe DePinto On behalf of our team at
More informationMidmark White Paper The Connected Point of Care Ecosystem: A Solid Foundation for Value-Based Care
Midmark White Paper The Connected Point of Care Ecosystem: A Solid Foundation for Value-Based Care Introduction This white paper examines how new technologies are creating a fully connected point of care
More informationVALUE BASED ORTHOPEDIC CARE
VALUE BASED ORTHOPEDIC CARE Becker's 14th Annual Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management- Driven ASC Conference + The Future of Spine June 9-11, 2016 Swissotel, Chicago, IL LES JEBSON Administrator, Adjunct
More informationMACRA Quality Payment Program
The American College of Surgeons Resources for the New Medicare Physician System Table of Contents Simple Steps to Determine If MIPS Applies to Your Practice Situation... 3 5 Understanding the... 6 7 Big
More informationSubmitted electronically:
Mr. Andy Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-5517-FC P.O. Box 8013 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-8013
More informationCMS-0044-P; Proposed Rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 2
May 7, 2012 Submitted Electronically Ms. Marilyn Tavenner Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building
More informationThe Role of Pharmacy in Alternative Payment Models
The Role of Pharmacy in Alternative Payment Models July 15, 2015 Disclaimer Organizations may not re use material presented at this AMCP webinar for commercial purposes without the written consent of the
More informationRe: Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare
September 25, 2006 Institute of Medicine 500 Fifth Street NW Washington DC 20001 Re: Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare The American College of Physicians (ACP), representing
More informationSummary and Analysis of CMS Proposed and Final Rules versus AAOS Comments: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR)
Summary and Analysis of CMS Proposed and Final Rules versus AAOS Comments: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR) The table below summarizes the specific provisions noted in the Medicare
More informationWELCOME. Kate Gainer, PharmD Executive Vice President and CEO Iowa Pharmacy Association
WHAT IS MACRA? WELCOME Kate Gainer, PharmD Executive Vice President and CEO Iowa Pharmacy Association WELCOME Anthony Pudlo, PharmD, MBA, BCACP Vice President of Professional Affairs Iowa Pharmacy Association
More informationThe National ACO, Bundled Payment and MACRA Summit. Success in Physician Led Bundles
The National ACO, Bundled Payment and MACRA Summit Success in Physician Led Bundles Disclaimer This material and/or presentation is provided for guidance and/or illustrative purposes only and should not
More informationCMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements
CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements Session #QU1, February 19, 2017 Kristine Martin Anderson, Executive Vice President, Booz Allen Hamilton Colleen Bruce, Lead Associate,
More informationCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Innovation Center New Direction Request for Information
November 20, 2017 Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Room 445 G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue SW Washington,
More informationWHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component
Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know Table of Contents Introduction 1 1. ACI Versus Meaningful Use 2 EHR Certification 2 Reporting Periods 2 Reporting Methods 3 Group Reporting
More informationAAWC ALERT Call for Action from Physicians
AAWC ALERT Call for Action from Physicians The 2019 CMS Proposed Rule for the Physician Fee Schedule has multiple changes to payment & documentation requirements. See Attachment A for summary of major
More informationFrom Surviving to Thriving in the QPP World
From Surviving to Thriving in the QPP World Today s Objectives Brief MACRA Overview Where are we going?: Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs) Where are we now? Merit Incentive-Based Payment System
More informationPayment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness
Payment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness Discussion Draft March 2017 Payment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness Page 2 PAYMENT REFORMS TO IMPROVE CARE FOR
More informationRodney M. Wiseman, DO, FACOFP dist. ACOFP President
November 20, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION (CMMI_NewDirection@cms.hhs.gov) Seema Verma, Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMMI Request
More informationRequest for Information Regarding Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and Medicare Shared Savings Programs (CMS-1345-NC)
Via Electronic Submission Donald Berwick, MD, MPP Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ATTN: CMS-1345-NC 7500 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21244-8013 Re: Request for Information Regarding
More informationMACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program
MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program Neal Logue, Kirk Sadur Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Region IX, September 15, 2017 Disclaimer This presentation was prepared
More informationJune 3, Dear Acting Assistant Secretary DeSalvo:
June 3, 2016 Karen B. DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc. Acting Assistant Secretary Department of Health and Human Services Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Attention: RFI
More informationMay 31, Ms. Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Baltimore, MD
May 31, 2018 Ms. Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Dear Ms. Verma: On behalf of the Healthcare Information
More informationJune 25, Barriers exist to widespread interoperability
June 25, 2018 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-1694-P P.O. Box 8011 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 RE: Docket ID: CMS-1694-P, Medicare Program;
More informationThe Connected Point of Care Ecosystem: A Solid Foundation for Value-Based Care
Includes Suggestions for Leveraging Improved BP Measurements to Achieve Quality Metrics Midmark White Paper The Connected Point of Care Ecosystem: A Solid Foundation for Value-Based Care Introduction This
More informationSubject: DRAFT CMS Quality Measure Development Plan (MDP): Supporting the Transition to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and
February 24, 2016 Attention: Eric Gilbertson Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services MACRA Team Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. 3133 East Camelback Road Suite 240 Phoenix, AZ 85016-4545 Submitted
More informationPayer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care
Payer s Perspective on Clinical Pathways and Value-based Care Faculty Stephen Perkins, MD Chief Medical Officer Commercial & Medicare Services UPMC Health Plan Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania perkinss@upmc.edu
More informationMoving the Dial on Quality
Moving the Dial on Quality Washington State Medical Oncology Society November 1, 2013 Nancy L. Fisher, MD, MPH CMO, Region X Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Serving Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington
More informationComments to the CMS Request for Information, Merit-based Incentive Payment System and Promotion of Alternative Payment Models
November 16, 2015 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20201 Attention: CMS 3321- NC Comments
More informationValue-Based Payments 101: Moving from Volume to Value in Behavioral Health Care
Value-Based Payments 101: Moving from Volume to Value in Behavioral Health Care Nina Marshall, MSW Senior Director, Policy and Practice Improvement NinaM@TheNationalCouncil.org Bill Hudock Senior Public
More informationof Program Success and
PCMH Evaluations: Key Drivers of Program Success and Measurement Development Robert Phillips, MD, MSPH, American Board of Family Medicine Deborah Peikes, PhD, MPA, Mathematica Michael Bailit, MBA, Bailit
More informationSWAN Alerts and Best Practices for Improved Care Coordination
SWAN Alerts and Best Practices for Improved Care Coordination IHIN and SWAN Course Overview Our Goal: To educate healthcare providers in how to manage SWAN alerts for meaningful impact at the point of
More informationStatement for the Record. American College of Physicians. Hearing before the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health
Statement for the Record American College of Physicians Hearing before the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health A Permanent Solution to the SGR: The Time Is Now January 21-22, 2015 The American
More informationBackground and Context:
Session Objectives: Practice Transformation: Preparing for a Value Based Purchasing Environment Susan Brown, MPH, CPHIMS May 2, 2016 Understand the timeline and impact of MACRA/MIPS on health care payment
More informationFuture of Patient Safety and Healthcare Quality
Future of Patient Safety and Healthcare Quality Patrick Conway, M.D., MSc CMS Chief Medical Officer Director, Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Acting Director, Center for Medicare and Medicaid
More informationCIO Legislative Brief
CIO Legislative Brief Comparison of Health IT Provisions in the Committee Print of the 21 st Century Cures Act (dated November 25, 2016), H.R. 6 (21 st Century Cures Act) and S. 2511 (Improving Health
More information2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.
2017/2018 KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc. 214-591-6990 info@kpnhealth.com www.kpnhealth.com 2017/2018
More informationRe: CMS Patient Relationship Categories and Codes Second Request for Information
January 6, 2017 Andrew Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 Re: CMS Patient Relationship Categories and Codes Second Request
More informationUPDATED WITH FINAL RULE NOVEMBER 11, Preparing for Success With MACRA
UPDATED WITH FINAL RULE NOVEMBER 11, 2016 G A M E C H A N G E R : Preparing for Success With MACRA Overview The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) dramatically impacts the way
More informationMedicare Physician Payment Reform:
Medicare Physician Payment Reform: Implications and Options for Physicians and Hospitals Background The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) was signed into law on April 14, 2015.
More informationJune 25, Dear Administrator Verma,
June 25, 2018 Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Room 445 G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue SW Washington,
More informationSpecialty Payment Model Opportunities Assessment and Design
Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited.14.2286. CMS Alliance to Modernize Healthcare (CAMH) Specialty Model Opportunities Assessment and Design Cardiology Technical Expert Panel April 8, 2014
More informationFeb. 10, The Honorable Thomas Price Secretary Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201
Feb. 10, 2017 The Honorable Thomas Price Secretary Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Dear Secretary Price, On behalf of the nation s medical group
More informationMay 25, SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY VIA Adam Boehler Deputy Administrator and Director
May 25, 2018 SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY VIA DPC@cms.hhs.gov Adam Boehler Deputy Administrator and Director Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation ATTN: CMMI RFI on Direct Provider Contracting Models
More information10/20/2016. Working within the Value-Based World
Working within the Value-Based World MGMA Annual Conference Roundtable Discussion Orthopedics Urology Surgery Monday, October 31, 2016 1 Learning Objectives Summarize key solutions used by other specialty
More informationConnected Care Partners
Connected Care Partners Our Discussion Today Introducing the Connected Care Partners CIN What is a Clinically Integrated Network (CIN) and why is the time right to join the Connected Care Partners CIN?
More informationMACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition
MACRA and the Quality Payment Program Frequently Asked Questions 2018 Edition What is MACRA?...3 What is the Quality Payment Program?...3 How do payments work under the QPP?...3 What is at risk under
More informationDescribe the process for implementing an OP CDI program
1 Outpatient CDI: The Marriage of MACRA and HCCs Marion Kruse, RN, MBA Founding Partner LYM Consulting Columbus, OH Learning Objectives At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will
More informationTHE BUSINESS OF PEDIATRICS: BETTER CARE = BETTER PAYMENT. 19 th CNHN Pediatric Practice Management Seminar Thursday, December 6, 2016
THE BUSINESS OF PEDIATRICS: BETTER CARE = BETTER PAYMENT 19 th CNHN Pediatric Practice Management Seminar Thursday, December 6, 2016 SMALLER VS BIGGER? WHAT PRACTICE SIZE IS JUST RIGHT? Mark Weissman,
More informationSeptember 11, RE: CY 2018 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems Proposed Rule
September 11, 2017 VIA E-MAIL FILING Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-1678-P P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 RE: CY 2018 Hospital Outpatient
More informationBundled Payments. AMGA September 25, 2013 AGENDA. Who Are We. Our Business Challenge. Episode Process. Experience
Bundled Payments AMGA September 25, 2013 Who Are We AGENDA Our Business Challenge Episode Process Experience 1 Cleveland Clinic is transforming Fee for service Fee for value 3 Fast Facts 41,200 employees
More informationMedicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians
Medicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians This document supplements the AMA s MIPS Action Plan 10 Key Steps for 2017 and provides additional
More information1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 650 P Washington, DC F
June 27, 2016 The Honorable Sylvia Matthews Burwell Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20201 Mr. Andy Slavitt Acting Administrator, Centers
More informationMIPS, MACRA, & CJR: Medicare Payment Transformation. Presenter: Thomas Barber, M.D. May 31, 2016
MIPS, MACRA, & CJR: Medicare Payment Transformation Presenter: Thomas Barber, M.D. May 31, 2016 Michael Porter- Value Based Care Delivery, Annals of Surgery 2008 Principals: Define Value as a Goal Care
More informationThank You to Our Sponsor!
AMCP Webinar Emerging Physician Payment Models: What Does it Mean for AMCP Members and Medication Management? April 19, 2017 Thank You to Our Sponsor! 1 Disclaimer Organizations may not re use material
More informationWashington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC Washington, DC 20515
August 15, 2018 The Honorable Mike Kelly The Honorable Ron Kind U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Markwayne Mullin The
More informationJune 27, Dear Acting Administrator Slavitt:
June 27, 2016 Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Attention: CMS 5517 P 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Re: Medicare Program; Merit-Based
More informationTomorrow s Healthcare: Better Quality, More Affordable, More Accessible
Tomorrow s Healthcare: Better Quality, More Affordable, More Accessible Victor J Dzau, MD President, National Academy of Medicine September 23, 2016 Fung Healthcare Leadership Summit Global Challenges
More informationCenters for Medicare and Medicaid CMS Updates. Christol Green, Anthem Inc.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid CMS 2016-2017 Updates Christol Green, Anthem Inc. Agenda Topic Page Payment Models - BPCI 3 Sequestration 5 CPC+ Initiative 7 What is MACRA? 12 CMS Social Security Number
More informationWHITE PAPER. The Shift to Value-Based Care: 9 Steps to Readiness.
The Shift to Value-Based Care: Table of Contents Overview 1 Value Based Care Is it here to stay? 1 1. Determine your risk tolerance 2 2. Know your cost structure 3 3. Establish your care delivery network
More informationReinventing Health Care: Health System Transformation
Reinventing Health Care: Health System Transformation Aspen Institute Patrick Conway, M.D., MSc CMS Chief Medical Officer Director, Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Acting Director, Center for
More information