MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 2009 ANNUAL PLAN, FISCAL
|
|
- Lambert Atkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL PLAN, FISCAL YEAR 2010 AUGUST, 2010
2 MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVALUATION: FISCAL YEAR I. INTRODUCTION The Macomb County Community Mental Health (MCCMH) maintains a comprehensive Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program (QAPIP) under the direction of the Board. In accordance with the QAPIP, MCCMH reviews the functioning of the Quality Improvement Program annually and assesses overall compliance with the Key Performance Indicators and Objectives established during that fiscal year for both Behavioral Health and Substance Abuse. MCCMH presents recommended Key Performance Indicators to the Board, which adopts these indicators in the areas of effectiveness, efficiency, access and customer satisfaction. MCCMH then monitors these indicators quarterly through Quality Council or Executive Staff to ensure that quality care is provided to persons with mental illness or developmental disabilities who receive care from the MCCMH provider network. Indicators may be derived from the Michigan Department of Community Health, national standards and/or results of activities conducted by the Organization during the prior period. In addition, MCCMH monitors the following areas through the Executive Staff and Quality Council Committees, the Behavior Treatment Plan Review Committee (BTPRC), the Clinical Risk Management Committee (CRMC) and the directlyoperated program Quality Assurance Committee: Sentinel Events Consumer Satisfaction Utilization Management Clinical Risk Management Concerns, including Recipient Rights (Behavioral Health and Substance Abuse) Grievances and Appeals Care Coordination Behavioral Treatment Plans/Challenging Behaviors Performance Improvement Projects II. AREAS ADDRESSED DURING FY A. PIHP Activities MCCMH continues to address the Performance Indicators where standards are not being met, or where compliance is variable. The Key Performance Indicators for Access (provision of a face-to-face assessment with a professional within 14 days of first request and receiving any needed service within 14 days of a face-to-face QAPIP ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 1
3 assessment) continue to be closely monitored for compliance with the Michigan Department of Community Health s standard for 95% within 14 days. During FY 2008, MCCMH began reviewing individual providers performance on the initial assessment access indicator and requiring corrective action plans where the standard of 95% had not been met. Subsequent quarterly data were monitored to ensure that the actions taken were sufficient to improve the provider s performance. As a result of the attention paid to this Indicator, MCCMH has been able to meet or exceed the standard in each quarter for all populations and fund sources since FY 2008 (see Attachment A, Performance Indicator Report, FY ). MCCMH has also experienced difficulty providing ongoing services following intake, particularly to children. MCCMH was able to achieve the standard for all populations and fund sources in the first two quarters of FY, and the first three quarters for the Medicaid population. For all funding sources, MCCMH exceeded the state average despite missing the standard; it is likely that the increasing pressure on General Fund resources may have contributed to the delay in receiving services. For the Medicaid population, the fourth quarter was below the state average as well as below the standard. One provider was largely responsible for the PIHP s failure to achieve the standard, and corrective action plans will be required from that provider. MCCMH now requires all Behavior Treatment Plans to be submitted through its MCO BTPRC to ensure plan quality and consistency across direct and contract provider programs. In other areas, the MCCMH Clinical Risk Management Committee (CRMC) continues to address the issues of consumer deaths and sentinel events through monitoring program s mortality reviews and root cause analyses. The Committee continues to take an active role in monitoring the activities undertaken by the provider network and proposing solutions to be implemented system-wide. As a result of the activities undertaken during FY 2008, the CRMC recommended that the system begin a clinical Performance Improvement Project to address how to better treat consumers with co-occurring disorders and/or at risk for self-harm. This project was begun in FY, and has included developing protocols for managing consumers at risk along with reviewing ways in which the electronic medical record (EMR) can provide automatic alerts for staff. Performance Improvement Projects MCCMH began two Performance Improvement Projects (PIP) in FY, in accordance with the Federal requirements for Pre-paid Inpatient Health Plans. The first project, chosen by the Michigan Department of Community Health for the PIHPs (targeting Medicaid consumers), addresses the PIHP s penetration rate for children. The second, chosen by MCCMH for all populations, addresses the identification of QAPIP ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 2
4 consumers at high risk for suicide and overdose (accidental or intentional). These Projects have continued into the current Fiscal Year. The Medicaid population Performance Improvement Project mandated by MDCH follows the contract requirement that PIHPs increase the penetration rate for Medicaid children served, with slight variations to enable the project to be reported within the EQR guidelines. MCCMH was able to exceed the target through actions taken as a result of the project; ongoing monitoring will determine if these actions are sufficient to maintain the increased penetration rate. MCCMH will continue to work with the HSCB s Children s Standing Committee and its sub-committees and work groups to improve county-wide services to children. The second PIP involved the identification of consumers at risk for premature death. In addition to reviewing the process for supervision and implementing risk protocols at the outpatient and case management sites, a cross-division team within MCCMH worked with the electronic medical record (EMR) to develop an algorithm which would trigger a more extensive assessment of suicide risk by the clinicians providing services for the consumer. This process is still under development; it is expected that it will be further tested during FY 2010 for implementation during FY Customer Satisfaction During FY, MCCMH participated in the Consumer Satisfaction process designed by the Quality Improvement Council of the Michigan Department of Community Health. All consumers in Assertive Community Treatment and children s Home Based programs were offered the Federally-developed MHSIP questionnaire assessing individual or family satisfaction with services during a two-week period in the summer of. The results were submitted to the MDCH, which provided state-wide compiled totals for these programs. It is expected that this process will be repeated in FY In addition to the satisfaction survey process required by MDCH, MCCMH completed its own concurrent satisfaction surveys with a sample of consumers who received services during the Spring,. Each program selected two consecutive weeks during March to survey consumers who received services during that time. Clinic-based providers handed the surveys to consumers as they came in for their appointments; community-based providers brought the surveys with them when they visited the consumers in the community. Consumers were able to mail the survey back to the Policy Management Division, or place the completed survey in a sealed envelope and return it to the staff member, who would forward it to PMD. The results of the survey were quite positive, with all sites receiving at least 95% positive ratings. Attachment B contains the survey results summary. QAPIP ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 3
5 B. Direct-Operated Service Unit Activities The Quality Assurance Committee met regularly during Fiscal Year. Activities focused on continuing to review risk areas for consumers (begun during FY 2006), and reviewing sentinel events and consumer mortality. The group discussed ways to improve system processes, including meeting KPIs and improving clinical record documentation and service delivery. III. QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROCESS A. PIHP Activities During the Fiscal Year, Quarterly Reports of KPI s were presented to the Executive Staff and discussed by the Deputy Director with the Supervisors. The Executive Staff reviewed areas where standards were not achieved during the quarter, and made recommendations for further review by other organizational bodies. These activities are summarized in this document. In addition, the KPI reports were reviewed twice during the year by the MCCMH Board, in response to concerns about the levels of compliance with the KPI standards. MCOSA also continues to monitor indicators for the network of substance use disorders providers; the annual report for this system, along with the goals for FY 2010 are included as Attachment C. B. Direct Operated Service Unit (DOSU) Activities During FY, the Quality Assurance Committee met nine times, reviewing quality concerns within the network, along with discussion and review of Root Cause Analyses and Mortality Reviews. In addition, the QA Committee continued addressing risk assessment processes, in particular reviewing consumers with cooccurring mental illness and substance use disorders. IV. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS Key Performance Indicators for MCCMH are included as Attachment A. As can be seen from the exhibits, MCCMH has improved its performance on all of the KPIs during FY. MCCMH continues to have difficulty meeting the ongoing service KPI for children (achieving 94% and 93% in the third and fourth quarters for the CMHSP, and 91% for the fourth quarter PIHP). MCCMH continues to review the KPIs quarterly, and require corrective action plans from providers who have failed to meet the standard. QAPIP ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 4
6 Of increasing concern to MCCMH is the number of hospital discharges who return within 30 days. MDCH has established a recidivism standard of 15%; MCCMH has exceeded that standard for two quarters in the Medicaid population (both children and adults); two quarters for the adult CMHSP population and one quarter for the CMHSP child population. As a result of these recidivism numbers, MCCMH is continuing intensive utilization review activities for high utilizers of hospital services. MCCMH began a Medicaid Performance Improvement Project to address the provision of services to children (penetration rate). This project involved working closely with the HSCB s Children and Youth Standing Committee and its workgroups, and addressing referral patterns from community partners. As a result of these activities, the penetration rate for children covered by Medicaid has increased. This PIP will continue into FY The second PIP, chosen by MCCMH, is also still underway, and involves the development of protocols and processes to address risk factors for premature death in the adult MI population. Following the initial stages of the project, MCCMH began exploring mechanisms to use the Electronic Medical Record to help in the identification of this population. This project is continuing into FY 2010, with implementation of revised procedures planned for FY The Quality Improvement Program continues to evolve to better meet the needs of the system and the stakeholders we serve. The Quality Assurance Program maintained by the direct-operated services has been a strong component in the quality system, as incidents, deaths, and sentinel events are reviewed and processed, with recommendations made for improving care for the entire system, rather than being limited to specific program sites. Systemic concerns are continuing to be addressed through the established Executive Staff Committee. It is recommended that the Executive Staff Committee continue its oversight function during FY 2010, with the Quality Council convened for those instances where peerreview activities are to occur. Input from consumers has been achieved through the Citizens Advisory Council (as well as through review of customer satisfaction surveys, Ombudsman information, case manager/access Center feedback, etc.). This group continues to provide valuable feedback to the quality improvement process. It is recommended that MCCMH continue to work with this group as additional satisfaction measures are identified for implementation across the system. QAPIP ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 5
7 ATTACHMENT A MCCMH Annual Report ATTACHMENTS PAGE 1 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 5: CMHSP Unduplicated Count of Consumers Served UNDUPLICATED COUNT: Served in the Quarter 1. MI Children 927 1,090 1, MI Adults 5,232 5,539 5,548 5, Children with Developmental Disabilities Adults with Developmental Disabilities 2,136 1, ,002 Total Served: 8,989 9,253 9,286 8,648 INDICATOR 1: CMHSP Inpatient Screening Timeliness ACCESS: Timeliness/Inpatient Screening (Standard = 95%) 1. Percent of Emergency Referrals of All Children completed in less than 3 hours N = % N = 2097 N = % N = 1,853 N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 1, Percent of Emergency Referrals of All Adults completed in less than 3 hours 98.5% N = 1, % N = 11,559 N = % N = 9, % N = % N = 11, % N = % N = 11,721 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 1 of 17
8 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 2 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 2: CMHSP Initial Call to Assessment ACCESS: Timeliness Initial Call to Assessment - All Consumers (Standard = 95%) 1. Percent of Children with SED receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request N= % N = 3,515 N = % N = 3,835 N = % N = 3, % N = % N = 2, Percent of Adults with MI receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request N = % N = 7,270 N = % N = 7, % N = % N = 7, % N = % N = 7, Percent of Children with DD receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request N = % N = 307 N = % N = 339 N = % N = 367 N = % N = Percent of Adults with DD receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request 97.8% N = % N = 436 N = % N = 437 N = % N = 515 N = % N = 439 Total 99.8% N = % N = 11,528 N = % N = 12, % N = % N = 12, % N = % N = 11,069 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 2 of 17
9 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 3 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 3: CMHSP Assessment to Start of Service ACCESS: Timeliness Assessment to Start of Service All Consumers (Standard = 95%) 1. Percent of Children with SED who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 97.4% N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 3, % N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2, Percent of Adults with MI who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 98.% N = % N = 5, % N = % N = 5, % N = % N = 4, % N = % N = 4, Percent of Children with DD who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional N = % N = 253 N = % N = 291 N = % N = 354 N = % N = Percent of Adults with DD Who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 97.0% N = % N = 379 N = % N = 358 N = % N = % N = % N = 391 Total 98.0% N = % N = 8, % N = % N = 8, % N = % N = 8, % N = % N = 7,715 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 3 of 17
10 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 4 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 4a: CMHSP Psychiatric Inpatient Discharge to 7 day follow up CONTINUITY OF CARE: Inpatient Discharge Follow Up 1. Percent of Children discharged from a psychiatric inpatient unit seen within 7 days N = % N = 526 N = % N = 593 N = % N = 655 N = % N = Percent of Adults discharged from a psychiatric inpatient unit seen within 7 days 97.0% N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 3, % N = % N = 3, % N = % N = 3,371 INDICATOR 6: CMHSP face to face Assessment - Denial/Appeal ACCESS - Denial/Appeal 1. Percent of Individuals Receiving an Initial Face-to-Face Non-Emergent Professional Assessment Denied CMHSP Service or Referred Elsewhere N = Number of Individuals Assessed 0.0% N = % N = 12,947.09% N = % N = % N = % N = 13, % N = % N = 12, Number of Consumers Assessed but Denied CMHSP Service or Referred Elsewhere 6 1, , , , Total Number of Consumers Requesting a Second Opinion Total Number of Consumers Receiving Service Following a Second Opinion Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 4 of 17
11 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 5 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 12: CMHSP Inpatient Recidivism OUTCOME: Inpatient Recidivism (Standard = Less than 15%) 1. Percent of Children re-admitted to inpatient psychiatric care within 30 days of discharge. N = Number discharged in period 10.1% N = % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = Percent of Adults re-admitted to inpatient psychiatric care within 30 days of discharge. N = Number discharged in period 13.5% N = % N = 5, % N = % N = 5, % N = % N = 5, % N = % N = 5,452 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 5 of 17
12 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 6 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 13: CMHSP Recipient Rights Complaints (Annual Reporting) OUTCOME: Recipient Rights Complaints- All Beneficiaries(Medicaid and Non-Medicaid) 1. Abuse I: Number of Complaints 6 Number of Complaints Substantiated 1 2. Abuse I I: Number of Complaints 45 Number of Complaints Substantiated Neglect I: Number of Complaints 4 Number of Complaints Substantiated 2 4. Neglect I I: Number of Complaints 12 Number of Complaints Substantiated 7 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 6 of 17
13 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 7 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 14a: CMHSP SENTINEL EVENTS: SED Waiver Consumers Death of Recipient Injuries requiring emergency visit/hospital admission Physical illness requiring hospital admission Arrest of recipient Conviction of recipient Serious challenging behaviors Medication errors INDICATOR 14b: CMHSP SENTINEL EVENTS: Children s Waiver Consumers Death of Recipient Injuries requiring emergency visit/hospital admission Physical illness requiring hospital admission Arrest of recipient Conviction of recipient Serious challenging behaviors Medication errors Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 7 of 17
14 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 8 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 15a: CMHSP NUMBER OF DEATHS: Consumers with Developmental Disabilities (Annual Reporting) NUMBER OF DEATHS: Consumers with Developmental Disabilities years and under 1 Suicide 0 2. Ages 19 to 35 years 9 Suicide 0 3. Ages 36 to 60 years 24 Suicide 0 4. Sixty-One years of age or Older 10 Suicide 0 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 8 of 17
15 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 9 Macomb County Community Mental Health CMHSP (All Consumers) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October-December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 15c: CMHSP NUMBER OF DEATHS: Consumers with Mental Illness (Annual Reporting) NUMBER OF DEATHS: Consumers with Mental Illness years and under 1 Suicide 0 2. Ages 19 to 35 years 10 Suicide 2 3. Ages 36 to 60 years 50 Suicide 8 4. Sixty-One years of age or Older 11 Suicide 0 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 9 of 17
16 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 10 Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE PIHP Unduplicated Count of Consumers Served 1. MI Children MI Adults 3,133 3, , Children with Developmental Disabilities Adults with Developmental Disabilities 1,996 1,880 1,913 1,948 Total Served: 6,558 6,713 6,807 6,418 INDICATOR 1: PIHP Inpatient Pre-Admission Screening Timeliness ACCESS: Timeliness/Inpatient Screening Medicaid-Eligible Consumers (Standard = 95%) 1. Percent of emergency referrals of Children completed in less than 3 hours N = % N = 1,456 N = % N = 1,516 N = % N = 1, % N = % N = 1, Percent of emergency referrals of Adults completed in less than 3 hours 98.7% N = % N = 5,598 N = % N = 5, % N = % N = 5,877 N = % N = 5,557 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 10 of 17
17 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 11 Objective INDICATOR 2: PIHP Initial Call to Assessment Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE ACCESS: Timeliness Initial Call to Assessment Medicaid-Eligible Consumers (Standard = 95%) 1. Percent of Children with SED receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request N = % N = 2,603 N = % N = 2,872 N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2, Percent of Adults with MI receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request N = % N = 2,638 N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2,785 N = % N = 2, Percent of Children with DD receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request N = % N = 218 N = % N = 256 N = % N = 286 N = % N = Percent of Adults with DD receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request 96.0% N = % N = 298 N = % N = 323 N = % N = 393 N = % N = Percent of Persons with Substance Use Disorders receiving an initial assessment within 14 calendar days of first request 99.4% N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2,885 Total 99.6% N = % N = 8, % N = % N = 8, % N = % N = 8, % N = % N = 8,493 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 11 of 17
18 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 12 Objective Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 3: PIHP Assessment to Start of Service ACCESS: Timeliness Assessment to Start of Service Medicaid-Eligible Consumers (Standard = 95%) 1. Percent of Children with SED who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 2. Percent of Adults with MI who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 3. Percent of Children with DD who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 4. Percent of Adults with DD Who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 5. Percent of Persons with Substance Use Disorders who started an ongoing service within 14 days of an assessment with a professional 98.3% N = % N = 121 N = % N = 24 N = % N = 2, % N = 1, % N = % N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 83 N = 19 N = 30 N = % N = 2, % N = 2, % N = % N = % N = 2,036 N = % N = 71 N = 31 N = 25 N = % N = 2, % N = 1, % N = % N = % N = 2, % N = 54 N = 52 N = % N = 31 N = % N = 1, % N = 1, % N = % N = % N = 2,305 Total 99.3% N = % N = % N = % N = 6, % N = % N = 7, % N = % N = 6,545 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 12 of 17
19 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 13 Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 4a: PIHP Psychiatric Inpatient Discharge to 7 day follow up CONTINUITY OF CARE: Inpatient Discharge Follow Up Medicaid-Eligible Consumers (Standard = 95%) 1. Percent of Children discharged from a psychiatric inpatient unit seen within 7 days 2. Percent of Adults discharged from a psychiatric inpatient unit seen within 7 days 3. Percent of Persons with Substance Use Disorders discharged from a substance abuse detox unit seen within 7 days N = % N = % N = % N = % N = 1, % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = 1, % N = 452 N = % N = % N = % N = % N = 1, % N = 523 N = % N = 116 N = % N = % N = 1, % N = 567 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 13 of 17
20 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 14 Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 5: PIHP Unduplicated and Medicaid service penetration 1. Percentage of area Medicaid recipients having received PIHP- Managed services 7.1% N = 6, % N = 100, % N = 6, % N = 100, % N = 6, % N = 101, % N = 6, % N = 96,653 Number of Area Medicaid Recipients 92,220 1,516, ,131 1,645, ,791 1,655,935 99,315 1,592,105 INDICATOR 12: PIHP Inpatient Recidivism OUTCOME: Inpatient Recidivism Medicaid-Eligible Consumers (Standard = Less than 15%) 1. Percent of Children re-admitted to inpatient psychiatric care within 30 days of discharge. N = Number discharged in period 11.0% N = % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = % N = Percent of Adults re-admitted to inpatient psychiatric care within 30 days of discharge. N = Number discharged in period 14.7% N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2, % N = % N = 2,678 Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 14 of 17
21 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 15 Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year Objective October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 13: PIHP Recipient Rights Complaints (annual reporting) OUTCOME: Recipient Rights Complaints - Medicaid 1. Abuse I: Number of Complaints 4 Number of Complaints Substantiated 1 2. Abuse I I: Number of Complaints 40 Number of Complaints Substantiated Neglect I: Number of Complaints 2 Number of Complaints Substantiated 2 4. Neglect I I: Number of Complaints 11 Number of Complaints Substantiated 6 INDICATOR 14a PIHP SENTINEL EVENTS: MI Adults Death of Recipient Injuries requiring emergency 1 visit/hospital admission 0 0 Physical illness requiring hospital 3 admission 0 6 Arrest of recipient Conviction of recipient Serious challenging behaviors Medication errors Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 15 of 17
22 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 16 Objective Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE INDICATOR 14b: PIHP SENTINEL EVENTS: MI Children Death of Recipient Injuries requiring emergency 0 visit/hospital admission 0 0 Physical illness requiring hospital 0 admission 0 0 Arrest of recipient Conviction of recipient Serious challenging behaviors Medication errors INDICATOR 14b: PIHP SENTINEL EVENTS: Persons with Developmental Disabilities, not Hab Waiver Death of Recipient Injuries requiring emergency 0 visit/hospital admission 0 0 Physical illness requiring hospital 0 admission 0 3 Arrest of recipient Conviction of recipient Serious challenging behaviors Medication errors INDICATOR 14b: PIHP SENTINEL EVENTS: Persons on Habilitation Supports Waiver Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 16 of 17
23 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 17 Objective Macomb County Community Mental Health PIHP (Medicaid) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Fiscal Year October - December, 2008 January - March, April - June, July - Sept. MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE MCCMH STATE Death of Recipient Injuries requiring emergency 0 visit/hospital admission 0 0 Physical illness requiring hospital 0 admission 0 4 Arrest of recipient Conviction of recipient Serious challenging behaviors Medication errors INDICATOR 14b: PIHP SENTINEL EVENTS: Persons Receiving Substance Abuse Death of Recipient Injuries requiring emergency 0 visit/hospital admission 0 0 Physical illness requiring hospital 0 admission 0 0 Arrest of recipient Conviction of recipient Serious challenging behaviors Medication errors Note: N = Total Number for each category on which a percentage is calculated. For example, the N in the access penetration indicator represents the total number served in each population group during the time period. Final June 1, 2010 Page 17 of 17
24 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 18 MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH UNDUPLICATED COUNT POPULATIONS SERVED FY TO FY FISCAL YEAR MI - C MI - A DD TOTALS ,415 3,647 1,015 6, ,427 4,500 1,163 7, ,114 5,952 1,017 8, ,292 5,717 1,863 8, ,084 5,182 1,922 8, ,464 1,747 6, ,669 1,837 7, ,974 2,103 7, ,127 5,848 2,050 9, ,164 6,305 2,290 9, ,286 5,681 2,127 9, ,390 6,145 2,207 9, ,374 6,648 2,415 10, ,361 7,266 2,830 11, ,625 7,719 3,002 12, ,668 7,843 3,113 12,624
25 APR-JUN JUL-SEP 120, ,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Medicaid Recipients by Quarter APR-JUN 2007 JUL-SEP 2007 OCT-DEC 2007 JAN-MAR 2008 APR-JUN 2008 JUL-SEP 2008 OCT-DEC 2008 JAN-MAR Quarter 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% JAN-MAR 2007 OCT-DEC 2006 OCT-DEC 2004 JUL-SEP 2006 Total Medicaid Eligibles Percent Medicaid Served MEDICAID RECIPIENTS % Medicaid Served ATTACHMENTS PAGE 19
26 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 20 Total Population Served Fiscal Year Children with SED Adults with MI Persons with DD Total Served Number Served
27 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 21 UNDUPLICATED COUNT OF CASES SERVED BY QUARTER 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 OCT-DEC 2004 JUL-SEP 2006 OCT-DEC 2006 JAN-MAR 2007 APR-JUN 2007 JUL-SEP 2007 OCT-DEC 2007 JAN-MAR 2008 APR-JUN 2008 JUL-SEP 2008 OCT-DEC 2008 JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP QUARTER CHILDREN W SED ADULTS W MI CHILDREN W DD ADULTS W DD TOTAL SERVED CASES SERVED TREND NUMBER SERVED
28 APR JUN JUL SEP 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% Timeliness: Initial Call to Assessment Totals FY 2005 FY Standard = 95% OCT DEC 2005 JAN MAR 2006 APR JUN 2006 JUL SEP 2006 OCT DEC 2006 JAN MAR 2007 APR JUN 2007 JUL SEP 2007 OCT DEC 2007 JAN MAR 2008 APR JUN 2008 JUL SEP 2008 OCT DEC 2008 JAN MAR Quarter MCCMH TOTALS STATE TOTALS STANDARD ATTACHMENTS PAGE 22 JUL SEP 2005 APR JUN 2005 JAN MAR 2005 OCT DEC 2004 % Seen within 14 Days
29 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% ATTACHMENTS PAGE 23 Timeliness: Initial Call to Assessment by Population FY FY Standard = 95% JUL-SEP 2006 OCT-DEC 2006 JAN-MAR 2007 APR-JUN 2007 JUL-SEP 2007 OCT-DEC 2007 JAN-MAR 2008 APR-JUN 2008 JUL-SEP 2008 OCT-DEC 2008 JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP Quarter Standard Children with SED Adults with MI Children with DD Adults with DD OCT-DEC 2004 % Completed in 14 Days
30 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% ATTACHMENTS PAGE 24 TIMELINESS: ASSESSMENT TO ONGOING SERVICE TOTALS FY FY Standard = 95% JAN-MAR 2005 APR-JUN 2005 JUL-SEP 2005 OCT-DEC 2005 JAN-MAR 2006 APR-JUN 2006 JUL-SEP 2006 OCT-DEC 2006 JAN-MAR 2007 APR-JUN 2007 JUL-SEP 2007 OCT-DEC 2007 JAN-MAR 2008 APR-JUN 2008 JUL-SEP 2008 OCT-DEC 2008 JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP QUARTER MCCMH TOTALS STATE TOTALS STANDARD OCT-DEC 2004 % STARTING SVCS WITHIN 14 DAYS OF ASSESSMENT
31 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% ATTACHMENTS PAGE 25 ACCESS TIMELINESS: ASSESSMENT TO ONGOING SERVICE: All Populations FY 2005 FY Standard = 95% JUL SEP 2005 OCT DEC 2005 JAN MAR 2006 APR JUN 2006 JUL SEP 2006 OCT DEC 2006 JAN MAR 2007 APR JUN 2007 JUL SEP 2007 OCT DEC 2007 JAN MAR 2008 APR JUN 2008 JUL SEP 2008 OCT DEC 2008 JAN MAR APR JUN JUL SEP QUARTER STANDARD Children with SED Adults with MI Children with DD Adults with DD JAN MAR 2005 APR JUN 2005 OCT DEC 2004 % Starting Ongoing Service within 14 Days of Assessment
32 100.0% 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% ATTACHMENTS PAGE 26 Percent of Hospital Discharges Seen within 7 Days of Discharge NOTE: Beginning in FY 2006, Standard = 95% JAN-MAR 2005 APR-JUN 2005 JUL-SEP 2005 OCT-DEC 2005 JAN-MAR 2006 APR-JUN 2006 JUL-SEP 2006 OCT-DEC 2006 JAN-MAR 2007 APR-JUN 2007 JUL-SEP 2007 OCT-DEC 2007 JAN-MAR 2008 APR-JUN 2008 JUL-SEP 2008 OCT-DEC 2008 JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP Quarters STANDARD Children with SED Adults with MI State Children with SED State Adults with MI OCT-DEC 2004 Percent Followed-Up within 7 Days
33 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 27 Consumers Placed in CARO JAN-MAR 2005 APR-JUN 2005 JUL-SEP 2005 OCT-DEC 2005 JAN-MAR 2006 APR-JUN 2006 JUL-SEP 2006 OCT-DEC 2006 JAN-MAR 2007 APR-JUN 2007 JUL-SEP 2007 OCT-DEC 2007 JAN-MAR 2008 APR-JUN 2008 JUL-SEP 2008 OCT-DEC 2008 JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP Quarter OCT-DEC 2004 Total Bed-Days Average Cases TOTAL BED-DAYS PER QUARTER AVERAGE CLIENTS PER MONTH Linear (AVERAGE CLIENTS PER MONTH)
34 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% ATTACHMENTS PAGE 28 INPATIENT RECIDIVISM: READMISSION WITHIN 30 DAYS OF DISCHARGE STANDARD: NO MORE THAN 15% WITHIN 30 DAYS JAN-MAR 2005 APR-JUN 2005 JUL-SEP 2005 OCT-DEC 2005 JAN-MAR 2006 APR-JUN 2006 JUL-SEP 2006 OCT-DEC 2006 JAN-MAR 2007 APR-JUN 2007 JUL-SEP 2007 OCT-DEC 2007 JAN-MAR 2008 APR-JUN 2008 JUL-SEP 2008 OCT-DEC 2008 JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP QUARTER Children with SED Adults with MI State Children with SED State Adults with MI OCT-DEC 2004 PERCENT READMITTED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF DISCHARGE
35 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 29 ATTACHMENT B Macomb County Community Mental Health Concurrent Satisfaction Survey: Fiscal Year Introduction In March,, Macomb County Community Mental Health (MCCMH) conducted a survey of recipients currently receiving services within our system. The process involved a convenience sample of consumers who came to MCCMH clinics or were seen in the community by their case managers for a two week time period. Consumers or parents/guardians were asked to complete the survey. They were informed that participation was voluntary and confidential. Consumers could add comments and request contact from the Ombudsman. The surveys were color-coded by program; however, there were no means to identify the consumer from the survey. The survey weeks were chose randomly with the intent being that the participants would represent a sample of the population of MCCMH consumers. This process also ensured that the sample not be associated with a particular occurrence or treatment event. There were a total of 4,361 cases open as the survey began. MCCMH received 806 questionnaires, for an overall sample of 18%. Results As evidenced by the percentage summary scores by program, all programs scored very well with a majority of the satisfied percentages ranging from 97%-. There were five outliers with a satisfaction score of 92%-93%. The corresponding questionnaire items were related to consumers choice of team members and treatment goals, as well as staff helping the consumer receive other needed services. The second grid represents the mean score for each questionnaire item. The scores are broken down by program as well as an overall (across all programs) mean score for each item. The scores are based on a Likert scale where 5 represents the highest level of satisfaction/agreement with the questionnaire item. The results are very positive. Majority of the scores are well above 4.5. The lowest score is Supervisors were provided the results for their programs for their review and for the implementation of program improvements. The MCCMH Ombudsman contacted all consumers who had requested it. Upon contact, most consumers reiterated their satisfaction with services. In cases where an issue/concern was identified by the consumer, the Ombudsman played a part in the resolution. CONCURRENT SATISFACTION PAGE 1 OF 2
36 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 30 Consumers were also able to identify areas that they found to be most helpful, least helpful, and what they would like to see changed/added at MCCMH. Positive comments made reference to specific staff members who the consumer felt was someone that they could tell anything to or was the best case manager. General or more global statements regarding MCCMH were also included by consumers, for example, It s there when you need it. There was a theme of consumers reporting that case managers/assigned staff listen to them in order to make sure the staff understand what the consumer needs. Overall, the consumers felt that MCCMH staff were genuinely concerned for their well-being and that this was reflected in the services provided. Staff were friendly and knowledgeable in the areas of consumer illness. Several consumers reported that staff saved my life. This appears to be the most profound statement that a consumer could write regarding the influence of MCCMH staff. Consumers expressed the desire to have more groups for consumers and family members, including children. Some ideas mentioned for these groups included assertive behavior and anger management. Another consumer suggested an interactive parent/teen group. Several consumers commented on the desire to obtain and/or maintain a job and felt that more resources could be identified in that area. The desire for less paperwork/assessments was noted by several consumers; although the desire to have more communication between MCCMH and primary care physicians was noted. Long waiting times for psychiatrist appointments was noted. Consumers would also like to see more free medications available. Overall, as is evidenced by the high level of satisfaction reported, as well as the volume of positive comments, consumers find services provided by MCCMH to be beneficial in their lives. MCCMH services are provided to many consumers with various diagnoses and disabilities. For MCCMH, improving the delivery of available services, as well as expanding services, is a dynamic process in which the input from consumers is vital. CONCURRENT SATISFACTION PAGE 2 OF 2
37 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 31 FY Consumer Satisfaction Survey Concurrent Questionnaire Items Total ACT CCM CrossRoads FRN FSE FSW IMH SRS VDPS % S % D %S %D % S % D % S % D % S % D % S % D % S % D % S % D % S % D % S % D Staff treat me with respect. 99.4%.6% 100.0%.0% 98.6% 1.4% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 98.4% 1.6% 100.0%.0% 98.1% 1.9% 100.0%.0% Staff answer my calls promptly. 99.0% 1.0% 99.0% 1.0% 98.6% 1.4% 100.0%.0% 98.6% 1.4% 100.0%.0% 98.4% 1.6% 100.0%.0% 98.1% 1.9% 99.3%.7% Staff treat me courteously on the phone. 99.4%.6% 100.0%.0% 95.7% 4.3% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 98.3% 1.7% 100.0%.0% 99.4%.6% 100.0%.0% Staff explain what to expect from services. 99.4%.6% 99.0% 1.0% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 99.3%.7% 96.7% 3.3% 100.0%.0% 99.4%.6% 100.0%.0% I was able to choose the treatment goals. 98.6% 1.4% 99.0% 1.0% 100.0%.0% 96.2% 3.8% 100.0%.0% 99.2%.8% 93.2% 6.8% 100.0%.0% 98.1% 1.9% 100.0%.0% Staff are available when I need to talk. 98.5% 1.5% 99.0% 1.0% 98.6% 1.4% 96.2% 3.8% 100.0%.0% 99.3%.7% 96.6% 3.4% 100.0%.0% 97.4% 2.6% 99.3%.7% I am comfortable asking questions about my services. 98.4% 1.6% 97.0% 3.0% 100.0%.0% 94.2% 5.8% 100.0%.0% 99.3%.7% 95.1% 4.9% 100.0%.0% 98.1% 1.9% 100.0%.0% Staff help me receive other services I need. 97.9% 2.1% 98.0% 2.0% 100.0%.0% 92.3% 7.7% 100.0%.0% 98.5% 1.5% 93.4% 6.6% 100.0%.0% 97.4% 2.6% 99.3%.7% I am able to invite people I want to service planning meetings. 98.0% 2.0% 96.9% 3.1% 97.2% 2.8% 94.0% 6.0% 100.0%.0% 98.5% 1.5% 98.3% 1.7% 100.0%.0% 96.8% 3.2% 100.0%.0% I am able to choose team members. 96.5% 3.5% 94.9% 5.1% 92.9% 7.1% 96.2% 3.8% 97.1% 2.9% 97.7% 2.3% 95.1% 4.9% 100.0%.0% 95.5% 4.5% 99.2%.8% MCCMH helps me make community connections. 97.2% 2.8% 98.0% 2.0% 98.5% 1.5% 95.9% 4.1% 100.0%.0% 97.7% 2.3% 93.2% 6.8% 100.0%.0% 94.8% 5.2% 98.5% 1.5% My life is better because of CMH Services. 97.9% 2.1% 99.0% 1.0% 98.6% 1.4% 94.2% 5.8% 98.6% 1.4% 98.5% 1.5% 95.1% 4.9% 100.0%.0% 96.2% 3.8% 100.0%.0% The services I'm receiving are helping. 98.2% 1.8% 99.0% 1.0% 97.1% 2.9% 96.2% 3.8% 98.6% 1.4% 97.8% 2.2% 96.7% 3.3% 100.0%.0% 98.1% 1.9% 100.0%.0% I would tell a friend to call MCCMH for a problem like mine. 97.9% 2.1% 97.0% 3.0% 95.7% 4.3% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 99.3%.7% 95.1% 4.9% 100.0%.0% 95.5% 4.5% 100.0%.0% I will continue to seek help from MCCMH. 98.8% 1.3% 99.0% 1.0% 95.7% 4.3% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 100.0%.0% 96.7% 3.3% 100.0%.0% 97.4% 2.6% 100.0%.0% TOTAL Questionnaires Returned S = Satisfied D = Dissatisfied ACT=Assertive Community Treatment CCM = Community Case Management FRN = First Resources North FSE = First Resources Southeast FSW = First Resources Southwest IMH = Infant Mental Health SRS = Specialized Residential Services VDPS = Vocational and Day Program Services
38 MCCMH Concurrent Satisfaction Survey FY ATTACHMENTS PAGE 32 Questionnaire Items Total ACT CCM XR FRN FSE FSW IMH SRS VDPS N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean N Mean Staff treat me with respect Staff answer my calls promptly Staff treat me courteously on the phone Staff explain what to expect from services I was able to choose the treatment goals Staff are available when I need to talk I am comfortable asking questions about my services. Staff help me receive other services I need. I am able to invite people I want to service planning meetings I am able to choose team members MCCMH helps me make community connections. My life is better because of CMH Services The services I'm receiving are helping I would tell a friend to call MCCMH for a problem like mine. I will continue to seek help from MCCMH. Valid N (listwise) Mean Scores by Program and Item
39 ATTACHMENTS PAGE 33 MACOMB COUNTY OFFICE OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE FY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OBJECTIVE Oct - Dec 2008 Jan-March April- June July - Sept Penetration Rates Person Age 18 & Older (Population=118,808) 1873 (1.58%) 1679 (1.41%) 1831 (1.54%) 1953 (1.64%) Persons Under 18 Years (Population=47,446) 92 (0.19%) 81 (0.17%) 57 (0.12%) 34 (0.07%) Women of Child-bearing Age (Population=192,443) 705 (0.37%) 629 (0.33%) 638 (0.33%) 664 (0.35%) Persons Injecting Drugs (Population=4,100) 544 (13.27%) 509 (12.41%) 583 (14.22%) 679 (16.56%) Native Americans (Population=2,478) 9 (0.36%) 7 (0.28%) 12 (0.48%) 15 (0.61%) Asian/Pacific Islander (Population=17,021) 4 (0.02%) 1 (0.01%) 2 (0.01%) 5 (0.03%) African American/Black (Population=21,326) 97 (0.45%) 92 (0.43%) 114 (0.53%) 108 (0.51%) Hispanic (Population=12,435) 24 (0.19%) 21 (0.17%) 18 (0.14%) 15 (0.12%) Age18 & Over Satisfied 403/416 (97%) 547/568 (96%) 544/555 (98%) 586/605 (97%) Under Age18 Satisfied 27/30 (90%) 15/16 (94%) 25/26 (96%) 10/10 ()
MICHIGAN MISSION-BASED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SYSTEM, VERSION 6.0
MICHIGAN MISSION-BASED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SYSTEM, VERSION 6.0 Note: Indicators that can be constructed from encounter or quality improvement data or cost reports are marked with an *. ACCESS DOMAIN
More informationCOPPER COUNTRY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ANNUAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORT FY Introduction
COPPER COUNTRY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ANNUAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT REPORT FY 2017 Introduction Copper Country Mental Health Services (CCMHS) focuses on improving the quality of our services and identifying
More informationMACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ANNUAL WORKPLAN October September 2014
Quality Assessment and Performance Program and Structure Goal # 1: Key Performance Indicator Reporting and Analysis to Support Access and Targeted Activities Key Measures/Objectives Division Responsible
More informationMedicaid Managed Specialty Supports and Services Concurrent 1915(b)/(c) Waiver Program FY 17 Attachment P7.9.1
QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS FOR SPECIALTY PRE-PAID INPATIENT HEALTH PLANS FY 2017 The State requires that each specialty Prepaid Inpatient Health Plan (PIHP) have a quality
More informationLifeWays Operating Procedures
02-04.07 ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING AND REVIEW PROCEDURE I. OVERVIEW A. PURPOSE: To detail the process for reviewing and reporting Adverse Events. II. DEFINITIONS A. Adverse Event: An untoward, undesirable,
More informationQUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2017 ANNUAL REPORT
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OVERVIEW Region 10 PIHP Quality Program FY2017 Annual Report The Region 10 PIHP has responsibility for oversight and management of the regional managed
More informationQuality Improvement Program Evaluation
Quality Improvement Program Evaluation 2013 Care Wisconsin 2013 Quality Improvement Program Evaluation INTRODUCTION Care Wisconsin s Quality Management Program uses the Home and Community-Based Quality
More informationQUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (QAPIP) FY18
QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (QAPIP) FY18 Quality Management Department NorthCare Network 200 W. Spring Street Marquette, MI 49855 Direct Line: 906-226-0043 Toll Free: 888-333-8030
More informationQuality Management Report 2017 Q2
Quality Management Report 2017 Q2 Quality Management Program CMS STAR Ratings Member Satisfaction (CAHPS & HOS) HEDIS Risk Adjustment DHS Member Incident Reporting Member Satisfaction Surveys Pay for Performance
More informationQuality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program. Annual Report
Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program Annual Report Prepared By: Sandra Gettel, QI Manager Date: April 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction... 2 II. Performance Improvement Projects...
More informationThis policy shall apply to all directly-operated and contract network providers of the MCCMH Board.
Chapter: Title: PROVIDER NETWORK MANAGEMENT Approved by: Executive Director Prior Approval Date: 7/30/02 Current Approval Date I. Abstract This policy establishes the standards and procedures of the Macomb
More informationA. Directly-Operated Provider New Employee Orientation
MCCMH MCO Policy 3-015 MANDATORY NETWORK TRAINING Date: 8/14/12 C. Child Mental Health Professional Child Mental Health Professional as defined in R 330.2105(b) means any of the following: 1. A person
More informationNC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS)
NC Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services (DMH/DD/SAS) Perception of Care Survey of Alliance Consumers Fiscal Year 2014 Background Information The Division
More informationState Fiscal Year 2017 Validation of Performance Measures for Region 7 Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services State Fiscal Year 2017 Validation of Performance Measures for egion 7 Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities
More informationAOPMHC STRATEGIC PLANNING 2018
SERVICE AREA AND OVERVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Anderson-Oconee-Pickens Mental Health Center (AOP), established in 1962, serves the following counties: Anderson, Oconee and Pickens. Its catchment area has
More informationHabilitation Supports Waiver(HSW) Focus on Quality and Compliance
Habilitation Supports Waiver(HSW) Focus on Quality and Compliance Home and Community Based Waiver Conference November 2017 Belinda Hawks Yingxu Zhang Agenda Welcome & Introductions Target Audience: HSW
More informationBAY-ARENAC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Page: 1 of 14 Policy It is the policy of Bay-Arenac Behavioral Health Authority (BABHA) that all adverse events, such as unusual events (including risk), critical incidents (including all deaths) and sentinel
More informationConsumer Perception of Care Survey 2015
Maryland s Public Behavioral Health System Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MARYLAND S PUBLIC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2015 CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF CARE SURVEY ~TABLE OF CONTENTS~
More informationmay request a second opinion from the MCCMH Executive Director.
may request a second opinion from the MCCMH Executive Director. D. Second opinion protocol for both denial of psychiatric hospitalization and access to mental health services shall be based upon eligibility
More informationSutter-Yuba Mental Health Plan
Sutter-Yuba Mental Health Plan Quality Improvement Work Plan Fiscal Year 2016/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page.....1 Table of Contents... 2 Description of Quality Improvement... 3 Quality Improvement
More informationBehavioral Health Division JPS Health Network
Behavioral Health Division JPS Health Network Macro Trends 1 in 5 Adults in America experience a mental illness Diversion of Behavioral Health patients from jail Federal Prisons Mental Illness State Prison
More informationQuality Management and Improvement 2016 Year-end Report
Quality Management and Improvement Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Scope of Activities...5 Patient Safety...6 Utilization Management Quality Activities Clinical Activities... 7 Timeliness of Utilization
More informationSouthwest Michigan Behavioral Health
Policy 3.1 Updated 1/1/2018 2018 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan Southwest Michigan Behavioral Health Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program All SWMBH Business Lines Year
More informationStanislaus County Behavioral Health and Recovery Services Annual Quality Management Work Plan FY
Stanislaus County Behavioral Health and Recovery Services Annual Quality Management Work Plan FY 2015-2016 INTRODUCTION The scope of this work plan is the overarching Quality Management aspects of the
More informationPERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT REPORT
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT REPORT First Quarter Fiscal Year 214 October-December, 213 Daniel Coffey, CEO 1 Executive Summary The Quarterly Performance Improvement Report summarizes the measures used to monitor
More informationQUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (QAPIP) 2016
QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (QAPIP) 2016 ANNUAL EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION 2015 Prepared By: MSHN Compliance Officer & Quality Improvement Council - Reviewed By: MSHN Operations
More information(c) A small client to staff caseload, typically 10:1, to consistently provide necessary staffing diversity and coverage;
309-019-0225 Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Overview (1) The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) characterizes ACT as an evidence-based practice for individuals with
More informationNHS Borders Feedback and Complaints Annual Report
NHS Borders Feedback and Complaints Annual Report 2016-17 1 Introduction NHS Borders Feedback and Complaints Annual Report 2016-17 is a summary of the feedback provided by the complaints, comments, concerns
More informationMICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NOTICE OF PROPOSED POLICY
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NOTICE OF PROPOSED POLICY Public Act 280 of 1939, as amended, and consultation guidelines for Medicaid policy provide an opportunity to review proposed
More informationNathaniel Assertive Community Treatment: New York County Alternative to Incarceration Program. May 13, 2011 ACT Roundtable Meeting
Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment: New York County Alternative to Incarceration Program May 13, 2011 ACT Roundtable Meeting Consumer Characteristics Average Age 43 Male 84% African American 60% Latino
More informationCOMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE BOARD
Item # 9 F i COMMITTEE REPORTS TO THE BOARD To From South East LHIN Board Members Quality Committee Reviewed by Quality Committee Committee Members of the Committee were given the opportunity to review
More informationThe Reduction of Seclusion & Restraint in the University of Michigan Psychiatric Emergency Services with the Introduction of 24/7 Nurse Staffing
The Reduction of Seclusion & Restraint in the University of Michigan Psychiatric Emergency Services with the Introduction of 24/7 Nurse Staffing Sharon P. Stetz MSN Marvella M. Muzik, MS PMHNP, BC Objectives
More informationSUBSTANCE ABUSE & HEALTH CARE SERVICES HEALTH SERVICES. Fiscal Year rd Quarter
HEALTH SERVICES To administer and manage contracted services to eligible persons in need of health care or related support services, and to promote health maintenance through education and intervention.
More informationProgram of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT) BHD/MH
Program of Assertive Community Treatment () BHD/MH Luis Marcano, x5343 Alan Orenstein, x0927 Program Purpose Program Information Help individuals with serious mental illness achieve and maintain community
More informationAnalysis of Incurred Claims Trend and Provider Payments
Analysis of Incurred Claims Trend and Provider Payments Board of Trustees Meeting May 24, 2013 Presentation Overview Trends in Incurred Claims Paid through March 31, 2013 Per Member Per Month (PMPM) By
More informationAnnual Quality Management Program Evaluation. Fiscal Year
Annual Quality Management Program Evaluation Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Page 2 of 13 Executive Summary FY Trillium Health Resources maintains a comprehensive, proactive quality management program that provides
More informationStanislaus County Behavioral Health and Recovery Services Annual Quality Management Work Plan FY
Stanislaus County Behavioral Health and Recovery Services Annual Quality Management Work Plan FY 2016-2017 INTRODUCTION The scope of this work plan is the overarching Quality Management aspects of the
More informationMacomb County Community Mental Health Level of Care Training Manual
1 Macomb County Community Mental Health Level of Care Training Manual Introduction Services to Medicaid recipients are based on medical necessity for the service and not specific diagnoses. Services may
More informationAttachment A INYO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH. Annual Quality Improvement Work Plan
Attachment A INYO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH Annual Quality Improvement Work Plan 1 Table of Contents Inyo County I. Introduction and Program Characteristics...3 A. Quality Improvement Committees (QIC)...4
More informationQuality Improvement Work Plan
NEVADA County Behavioral Health Quality Improvement Work Plan Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Table of Contents I. Quality Improvement Program Overview...1 A. Quality Improvement Program Characteristics...1 B. Annual
More informationOverview and History of the Community Mental Health Authority of Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties 2012
Overview and History of the Community Mental Health Authority of Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties 2012 I. Overview of CMH The Community Mental Health Authority of Clinton, Eaton, and Ingham Counties
More informationDATA SOURCES AND METHODS
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS In August 2006, the Department of Juvenile Justice s (DJJ) Quality Assurance, Technical Assistance and Research and Planning units were assigned to the Office of Program Accountability.
More informationQuality Improvement Work Plan
NEVADA County Behavioral Health Quality Improvement Work Plan Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Table of Contents I. Quality Improvement Program Overview...1 A. QI
More informationConsumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary
Maryland s Public Behavioral Health System Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary MARYLAND S PUBLIC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2016 CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF CARE SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSection V: To be completed by the PIHP contract manager as applicable. Section VI: To be completed by the PIHP Credentialing Committee as applicable.
Sections I-IV: To be completed by the organizational provider at the time of initial network application for enrollment and credentialing; or at the time of the biennial re-credentialing. Section I. Agency
More informationPennsylvania HealthChoices Behavioral Health Program
Pennsylvania HealthChoices Behavioral Health Program Early Warning Care Monitoring Program Lehigh/Capital Region First Quarter 2002 Report Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Office
More informationDriving Quality Improvement in Managed Care. Toby Douglas, Director California Department of Health Care Services
1 Driving Quality Improvement in Managed Care Toby Douglas, Director 2 Presentation Overview 1. Background on California s Medicaid Program (Medi-Cal) 2. California s Quality Improvement Focuses 3. Challenges
More informationDischarge and Follow-Up Planning. Presented by the Clinical and Quality Team
Discharge and Follow-Up Planning Presented by the Clinical and Quality Team After today s training you will be able to: Identify and summarize important information about discharge planning Have adequate
More informationTransforming Healthcare Delivery, the Challenges for Behavioral Health
Transforming Healthcare Delivery, the Challenges for Behavioral Health Presented by: M.T.M. Services, LLC P. O. Box 1027, Holly Springs, NC 27540 Phone: 919-434-3709 Fax: 919-773-8141 E-mail: mtmserve@aol.com
More informationProgram of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT) BHD/MH
Program of Assertive Community Treatment () BHD/MH Luis Marcano, x5343 Alan Orenstein, x0927 Program Purpose Help individuals with serious mental illness achieve and maintain community integration through
More informationOutcome and Process Evaluation Report County-wide Triage Teams
Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC) Personnel Grant (SB 82) Triage Personnel Grant Report Outcome and Process Evaluation Report County-wide Triage Teams Grant Years
More informationTehama County Health Services Agency Mental Health Division Quality Improvement Program
Tehama County Health Services Agency Mental Health Division Quality Improvement Program The Mental Health Plan (MHP) shall have a written Quality Improvement (QI) Program Description in which structure
More informationMacomb County Community Mental Health. Guide to MI Health Link Behavioral Health Ser vices. in Macomb County
Macomb County Community Mental Health Guide to MI Health Link Behavioral Health Ser vices in Macomb County Macomb County Community Mental Health, guided by the values, strengths, and informed choices of
More informationAssisted Outpatient Treatment
Assisted Outpatient Treatment Tracey Green MD Chief Medical Officer Division of Public and Behavioral Health EXHIBIT R Health Care Document consists of 17 pages. Entire exhibit provided. Meeting Date 5-07-14
More informationUTILIZATION MANAGEMENT FOR ADULT MEMBERS
UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT FOR ADULT MEMBERS Quarter 2: (April through June 2014) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & ANALYSIS BY LEVEL OF CARE Submitted: September 2, 2014 CONNECTICUT DCF CONNECTICUT Utilization Report
More informationWashington State LTSS System, History and Vision
Washington State LTSS System, History and Vision Bea Rector, Director, Home and Services Aging and Long Term Support Administration Washington State Department of Social and Health Services For Northwest
More informationUnderstanding the Grievances and Appeals Process for Medicaid Enrollees
Understanding the Grievances and Appeals Process for Medicaid Enrollees The Detroit Wayne Mental Health Authority (Authority) cares about you and the quality of services and supports that you receive.
More informationPOLICY TITLE: CONTINUED STAY REVIEWS EFFECTIVE DATE REVISED DATE. (Signature)
Policy 5.13 Page 1 of 2 POLICY TITLE: CONTINUED STAY REVIEWS EFFECTIVE DATE REVISED DATE CHAPTER: SYSTEMS OF CARE Approved by: LRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Approval Date: Maintained by: LRE Clinical Director,
More informationE. Guiding To show, indicate, or influence a course of action for an individual in order to promote independence.
D. Direct Assistance Hands-on physical care provided to an individual in need of assistance with Activities of Daily Living or Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. E. Guiding To show, indicate, or
More informationPERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MEETING. Health Department:
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MEETING Health Department: 5.20.14 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr EXHIBIT 1: Health Service Request Volume Month
More informationNHS performance statistics
NHS performance statistics Published: 8 th February 218 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official
More informationButte County Department of Behavioral Health
Butte County Department of Behavioral Health Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Work Plan FY 17-18 Introduction As required by the California State Department of Health Care Services and the
More informationExecutive Director s Report: Customer Experience Update
Executive Director s Report: Customer Experience Update Board of Directors Meeting, November 12, 215 Seconds Calls Service Center Performance 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, Calls Offered Jan 215 Sept
More informationAnnual Complaints Report 2014/15
Annual Complaints Report 2014/15 1.0 Introduction This report provides information in regard to complaints and concerns received by The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust between 01/04/2014 and 31/03/2015.
More informationAlaska Psychiatric Institute. Admissions & Demographic Annual Report
Alaska Psychiatric Institute Admissions & Demographic Annual Report (As of 8/2/27) 1 Total Admissions FY, FY4, FY, FY, FY7 18 1 Number Of 14 12 1 8 FY FY4 FY FY FY7 4 2 FY Admissions - 1,227 FY Admisions
More informationMichigan Health Link Integrated Care Dual Eligible Pilot. Nora Barkey MDCH Kyleen Gray SWMBH Roxanne Perry Audrey Smith DWMHA
Michigan Health Link Integrated Care Dual Eligible Pilot Nora Barkey MDCH Kyleen Gray SWMBH Roxanne Perry Audrey Smith DWMHA 1 Today s Agenda Welcome and Introductions Nora Barkey MI Health Link Overview
More informationEXHIBIT A Performance Matrix
EXHIBIT A Performance Matrix Contract Number: 07499 Agency Name: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health Project Name: Black Infant Health Program Project Length: 12 months Contract Period: July
More informationQuarterly Report on Agency Services to Floridians with Developmental Disabilities and Their Costs
Quarterly Report on Agency Services to Floridians with Developmental Disabilities and Their Costs Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2016-17 (April, May, June) Submitted August 1, 2017 Barbara Palmer Director
More informationEDS 2. Making sure that everyone counts Initial Self-Assessment
EDS 2 Making sure that everyone counts Initial Self-Assessment Equality Delivery System for the NHS EDS2 Summary Report Implementation of the Equality Delivery System EDS2 is a requirement on both NHS
More informationScioto Paint Valley Mental Health Center
Scioto Paint Valley Mental Health Center Quality Assurance FY 2016 Plan SCIOTO PAINT VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN OVERVIEW This document presents the comprehensive and systematic
More informationShasta County Health and Human Services Agency Mental Health Plan Quality Management Work Plan. Introduction
Introduction As required by the California State Department of Health Care Services and the Medi Cal Managed Care Plan, the Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency through its Mental Health Plan
More informationProposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program
Proposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program PROPOSAL OVERVIEW The Prosecutor s Diversion Program is a voluntary alternative to adjudication whereby a prosecutor agrees to hold off pressing
More informationMental Health Board Member Orientation & Training
1 Mental Health Board Member Orientation & Training See Tab 1 Mental Health Timeline 1957 Sources: California Legislative Analyst Office & California Department of Health Care Services to Prior to 1957
More informationC. HUMAN RESOURCES LIASON MCCMH administrative employee who communicates with the Macomb County Human Resource and Labor Relations Department.
IV. DEFINITIONS A. CLINICAL STRATEGIES AND CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT DIVISION The Clinical Strategies and Clinical Improvement ( CSI ) Division is the MCCMH administrative division responsible for the credentialing
More information-OPTUM PIERCE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION
-OPTUM PIERCE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION CARE MANAGEMENT AND SERVICE PLANNING POLICY Policy: CM-10 Section: Care Management and Service Planning Approved by Bea Dixon, Executive Director Effective
More informationCDDO HANDBOOK MISSION STATEMENT
Adopted 6-19-09 Revised 11-1-10 Revised 4-30-13 Revised 2-27-17 CDDO HANDBOOK MISSION STATEMENT Arrowhead West, Inc. is the Community Developmental Disabilities Organization (CDDO) for initial contact
More informationRyan White Part A Quality Management
Quality Management Mental Health Services Broward County/Fort Lauderdale Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA) The creation of this public document is fully funded by a federal Ryan White CARE Act Part A grant
More informationEmergency Department Boarding of Psychiatric Patients in Oregon
February 1, 2017 Emergency Department Boarding of Psychiatric Patients in Oregon Report Briefing PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Executive summary Across the country, individuals with mental illness are ending
More informationLearning from Deaths; Mortality Review Policy
Learning from Deaths; Mortality Review Policy Version: 4.0 New or Replacement: Replacement Policy number: CESC/2012/066 (Version 4) Document author(s): Executive Sponsor: Non-Executive Sponsor: Title of
More informationIdentifying Errors: A Case for Medication Reconciliation Technicians
Organization: Solution Title: Calvert Memorial Hospital Identifying Errors: A Case for Medication Reconciliation Technicians Program/Project Description and Goals: What was the problem to be solved? To
More informationQuarterly Report on Agency Services to Floridians with Developmental Disabilities and Their Costs
Quarterly Report on Agency Services to Floridians with Developmental Disabilities and Their Costs First Quarter Fiscal Year 2012/13 (July, August, September) Submitted November 2012 Barbara Palmer Director
More informationPerformance Improvement Projects (PIP) Clinic May 13, 2016
Behavioral Health Concepts, Inc. Performance Improvement Projects (PIP) Clinic May 13, 2016 Amy McCurry Schwartz, Esq., MHSA California EQRO Consultant OMB Approval No. 0938-0786 EQR PROTOCOL 3: VALIDATING
More informationEmergency Department Waiting Times
Publication Report Emergency Department Waiting Times (formerly Accident & Emergency Waiting Times) Quarter ending 30 June 2011 Publication date 30 August 2011 A National Statistics Publication for Scotland
More informationUtilization Management Plan FY AlleganCounty Community Mental Health
P Utilization Management Plan FY 2017 AlleganCounty Community Mental Health Utilization Management The process by which a mental health organization ensures that individuals receive timely, quality, cost-effective
More informationNHS performance statistics
NHS performance statistics Published: 14 th December 217 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official
More information(form found on Mercy Maricopa website/for Providers/Forms/Section 3.20 Credentialing & Privileging)
Network Credentialing Upon hire, at termination, and discipline change - Change/Add Form (form found on Mercy Maricopa website/for Providers/Forms/Section 3.20 Credentialing & Privileging) Individual Clinician
More informationThe benefits of the Affordable Care Act for persons with Developmental Disabilities
Tuesday, 2:30 2:00, B5 The benefits of the Affordable Care Act for persons with Developmental Disabilities Objectives: Notes: Audrey E. Smith, MPH 33-402-9608 Asmith2@waynecounty.com. Identify effective
More informationImplementing Medicaid Behavioral Health Reform in New York
Redesign Medicaid in New York State Implementing Medicaid Behavioral Health Reform in New York HIV Health and Human Services Planning Council of New York March 19, 2014 Agenda Goals Timeline BH Benefit
More informationNHS Performance Statistics
NHS Performance Statistics Published: 8 th March 218 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official
More informationCurrent Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Program (QAPIP) POLICY
Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: 3334530 Origination: 06/2017 Last Approved: 06/2017 Last Revised: 06/2017 Next Review: 06/2018 Owner: Mary Allix Policy Area: Quality Improvement References: NCQA
More informationQuarterly Report on Agency Services to Floridians with Developmental Disabilities and Their Costs
Quarterly Report on Agency Services to Floridians with Developmental Disabilities and Their Costs Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2015-16 (October, November, December) Submitted February, 2016 Barbara Palmer
More informationSTRATEGIES FOR INCORPORATING PACE INTO STATE INTEGRATED CARE INITIATIVES
NATIONAL PACE ASSOCIATION STRATEGIES FOR INCORPORATING PACE INTO STATE INTEGRATED CARE INITIATIVES A Toolkit for States MARCH, 2014 WWW.NPAONLINE.ORG 703-535-1565 STRATEGIES FOR INCORPORATING PACE INTO
More information4/9/2016. The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET. CPAs & ADVISORS
CPAs & ADVISORS experience support // ADVANCED PAYMENT MODELS: CJR Eric. M. Rogers MEd. RT(R) Managing Consultant The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET HHS goal of 30% of traditional
More informationAnnual Program Evaluation Management Report
Citizens for the Developmentally Disabled Outcome Based Measurement System Annual Program Evaluation Management Report September 23, 2013 (Report for fiscal year ending June 30, 2013) INTRODUCTION The
More informationCatherine Porto, MPA, RHIA, CHP Executive Director HIM. Madelyn Horn Noble 3M HIM Data Analyst
1 Catherine Porto, MPA, RHIA, CHP Executive Director HIM Madelyn Horn Noble 3M HIM Data Analyst University of New Mexico Hospitals» The state s only academic medical center» The primary teaching hospital
More informationWPCC Workgroup. 2/20/2018 Meeting
WPCC Workgroup 2/20/2018 Meeting Today s Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Medicaid Transformation Overview 3. WPCC in the Transformation 4. Change Plan Overview 5. Review of Supporting Data 6. Change Plan Deep
More informationHandling Organisational Complaints
Council meeting 12 January 2012 Public business Handling Organisational Complaints Purpose To report to the Council on the handling of organisational complaints for the period 27 September 2010 to 30 September
More informationNew Jersey State Legislature Office of Legislative Services Office of the State Auditor. July 1, 2011 to September 7, 2016
New Jersey State Legislature Office of Legislative Services Office of the State Auditor Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services Integrated Case Management Services,
More informationNETWORK180 PROVIDER MANUAL SECTION 1: SERVICE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORT AND SERVICE COORDINATION
NETWORK180 PROVIDER MANUAL SECTION 1: SERVICE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORT AND SERVICE COORDINATION Provider will comply with regulations and requirements as outlined in the Michigan Medicaid Provider Manual,
More informationUpton Surgery Local Patient Participation Report
Upton Surgery Local Patient Participation Report 2014-15 Introduction The Practice established an active Patient Participation Group in 2007. The current PPG chair was approached to help the Practice develop
More information