LONG-TERM CARE DATA: PROGRESS AND PROPOSED NEXT STEPS. Meeting of OECD Health Data National Correspondents Paris, October 2012

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "LONG-TERM CARE DATA: PROGRESS AND PROPOSED NEXT STEPS. Meeting of OECD Health Data National Correspondents Paris, October 2012"

Pauline Matthews
5 years ago
Views:

1 LONG-TERM CARE DATA: PROGRESS AND PROPOSED NEXT STEPS Meeting of OECD Health Data National Correspondents Paris, October 2012

2 Purpose Review progress in data collection on long-term care (LTC) over past few years: LTC beds (in nursing homes and hospitals) LTC recipients (in institutions and at home) LTC workers (formal and informal) Proposed change to data collection One modification only: discontinue the data collection on informal carers

3 2012 Data collection on LTC Chapter Specification Unit Beds Beds in nursing homes LTC beds in hospitals Total Total Recipients In institutions Total, by gender and age groups (all, 0-64, 65 and over, 80 and over) At home Total, by gender and age groups (all, 0-64, 65 and over, 80 and over) Workers Formal Head counts: Total, by gender, occupation (nurses, personal carers), care setting (at home, in institutions) FTE: Total, care setting (at home, in institutions) Informal Head counts: Total, by gender Note: data collection on beds included in OECD/Eurostat/WHO joint questionnaire

4 LTC beds: Definitions Chapter Specification Definition Beds Beds in nursing homes Inclusion: Beds in all nursing and residential care facilities Beds used for palliative care in all types of nursing and residential care facilities Exclusion: Beds in nursing and residential care facilities which do not provide ongoing health and nursing care together with accommodation Beds available in hospitals LTC beds in hospitals Inclusion: Beds in LTC departments of general hospitals Beds for long-term care in specialty hospitals Beds for palliative care Exclusion: Beds in mental health and substance abuse hospitals Beds for rehabilitation

5 Total number of beds: Data availability Beds in nursing homes LTC beds in hospitals 25 Number of countries available 27 (out of 34) (up from 17 out of 30 since 2008) Countries not reported data, (CAN, CHL, GRC, MEX, PRT, SVN, TUR) 9 (AUS, DEU, GRC, MEX, NZL, NOR, PRT, CHE)

6 Number of beds in nursing homes per pop aged 65+, 2010 (or nearest year) Source: OECD Health Data 2012 Large variation: lowest (POL, ITA), highest (SWE, LUX) Average: 49 beds per pop aged 65 and over

7 The number of LTC beds in hospitals per pop aged 65+, 2010 (or nearest year) Source: OECD Health Data 2012 Much fewer beds for LTC in hospitals than nursing homes in nearly all countries, except for Korea No LTC beds in hospitals in some countries, may give an explanation why some countries have a relatively high number of beds in nursing homes (LUX, NLD)

8 Definitional issues: LTC beds Nursing homes varies across countries Excluding beds in retirement homes that are not for nursing care (Iceland) Different classification of geriatric hospitals (e.g. Geriatric care beds excluded in Iceland) Inclusion of beds for palliative care Data source not including beds in private nursing homes Separating out LTC beds from other hospitals beds not possible

9 LTC recipients: Definitions Chapter Specification Definition Recipients In institutions At home Inclusion: Persons who receive LTC by paid LTC providers including non-professionals receiving cash payments under a social programmes Recipients of cash benefits (ex. Care allowances) which are granted with the primary goal of supporting individuals with LTC needs based on an assessment of needs Exclusion: Persons receiving LTC in hospitals Disabled persons of working age who receive income benefits or benefits for labour market integration without LTC servivces Persons who need help only with IADL help, that is, receiving only long-term social care as defined under the Health Accounts questionnaire

10 LTC recipients: Data availability Recipients Number of countries available In institutions 28 (up from 26 in 2008) At home 23 (up from 21 in 2008) Number of countries available by age group Five countries not able to provide any data on LTC recipients in institutions or at home (BEL, CHL, GRC, MEX, TUR) No breakdown available by setting in one country (AUS)

11 LTC recipients in institutions, per pop 65+, Source: OECD Health Data 2012 Large variations: lowest (POL, PRT), highest (AUS, BEL NLD)

12 LTC recipients at home, per pop 65+, Source: OECD Health Data 2012 Variations: lowest (PRT, SVN), highest (ISR,CHE)

13 Different interpretation of LTC institutions and nursing homes Which facilities should be included as LTC institutions (or nursing homes) When a home becomes an institution (e.g. sheltered housing for elderly people) Inclusion of hospitals as LTC institutions Data source may not include LTC recipients without any public support or if included, not possible to distinguish public and private

14 LTC workers: Definitions Chapter (formal) LTC workers Definition (1) Nurses: defined by the ISCO-08 classification, providing LTC at home or in LTC institutions (other than hospitals) Inclusion: Salaried and self-employed nurses delivering services at home or in LTC institutions Nurses providing LTC to patients affected by dementia and/or Alzheimer s disease Exclusion: Nursing aids/assistants and care workers who do not have any recognised qualification/certification as a nurse (2) Personal care workers (caregivers) Inclusion: Nursing aids/assistants and care workers providing LTC services, who do not have any recognised qualification/certification in nursing Family members, neighbours or friends employed by care recipient or agency to provide care Exclusion: Caregivers in assessment teams employed to evaluate care needs and other persons employed in administrative positions Social workers/community workers

15 LTC workers: Data availability In institutions Number of countries available, Headcounts by setting Headcounts by occupation At home Total FTE Some countries only able to provide data in headcounts (DEN, HUN, MEX, SVN, ESP, GBR), while two countries reported only FTE data (BEL, LUX) Some countries only able to provide total number of breakdown by setting (ESP, SWE)

16 LTC workers, headcounts, per pop (or nearest year) Institutions Home Total Source: OECD Health Data 2012 Substantial variations Institutions: lowest (EST, ISR, KOR, SVK), highest (NLD, USA) Home: lowest (CZE), highest (ISR) Total: lowest (SVK, HUN), highest (USA, NOR, SWE)

17 Data sources vary across countries Data sources on LTC workers in institutions based on facility surveys, statistics on social services or registry Data sources on LTC workers at home come from administrative records or household/community surveys Labour force survey is rare but limited in comparability

18 LTC Informal caregivers: Definitions Specification Definition Informal caregivers Informal caregivers include individuals providing LTC services on a regular basis, typically at home, for example spouses/partners, family members, neighbours and friends. Inclusion: Uncompensated informal caregivers Informal caregivers who receive cash benefits/allowances, i.e. caregivers providing LTC services on a regular basis and who receive benefits, cash payments or allowances as part of cash programmes and/or consumer-choice programmes, providing some compensation for their caring activities. Undeclared/illegal informal caregivers Exclusion: Formally employed caregivers, including family members and friends on contract with the care receiver and/or registered as caregivers to relevant social security offices

19 LTC informal caregivers: Data availability and proposal Only 9 countries provided recent data from national surveys on disability and carers at more or less regular intervals Data available for more countries in 2004 and 2006 because of the cross-country Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) conducted, but new waves of data not released Proposal: to discontinue the data collection on informal carers given these data are usually based on ad hoc or irregular surveys.

20 Issues for discussion COMMENT on progress made in data collection on long-term care resources and utilisation, and any challenge face in responding to OECD data collection; COMMENT on proposal to discontinue data collection on informal carers, given limited data availability and irregular data updates.

Towards more comparable data to assess the performance of health systems: Past, present and future work at OECD

Towards more comparable data to assess the performance of health systems: Past, present and future work at OECD Gaetan LAFORTUNE, OECD Health Division EUPHA Conference, Helsinki, 12 October 2007 1 1 Overview