Medi-Cal s Most Costly FFS Populations

Transcription

1 Medi-Cal s Most Costly FFS Populations A Look At The Population, Costs, And Diseases Prepared by DHCS Research and Analytical Studies Section 1

2 Which Populations Drive Medi-Cal FFS Provider Payments? The Aged, Blind, Disabled, LTC, and children eligible for California Children's Services (CCS) are among the greatest cost drivers of any Medi-Cal subpopulations and when the costs of other departments are included, these subpopulations are significant drivers of publically funded health care expenditures During calendar year 2007, Medi-Cal provider payments totaled $15.9 billion. Eighty-two percent of this total was associated with the FFS Medi-Cal program relative to payments made on behalf of beneficiaries enrolled in the FFS program, managed care carve-outs, and other special programs such as Family PACT, presumptive eligibles, etc. 2

3 How Were Total Medi-Cal Funds Distributed Among Specific Program Elements? State Hosp./Dvlp Cntrs 1% Medicare Payments 10% EPSDT Scrrens 0.21% Misc. Services 8% Recoveries 1% Forty-nine percent of the total Medi- Cal expenditures were associated with FFS provider payments. Audits/Lawsuits 0.04% Mental Health 4% Dental 2% Managed Care 17% FFS Policy Changes /Timing Issues 8% 2007 DOS FFS Payments $15.95 Billion 49% Total = $32.4 Billion For purposes of this presentation, FFS provider payments refers to those payments made by DHCS through their fiscal intermediary EDS. Source: Created by the DHCS Research and Analytics Studies Section using the RDS2007 analytic file. Data reflects a 9-month lag. Totals for all categories except for FFS provider payments were derived from the May 2007 Medi-Cal Estimate. Values derived from the Estimate reflect the estimates. 3

4 How Were Medi-Cal FFS Provider Payments Distributed Among The FFS, Managed Care, and CCS Eligibles? Medi-Cal FFS Payments While Enrolled In FFS Medi-Cal (CCS Athorized Services), $878,950,049, 6% Medi-Cal FFS Payments While Enrolled In A Managed Care Plan (CCS Authorized Services), $609,754,013, 4% Source: Created by the DHCS Research and Analytics Studies Section using the RDS2007 analytic file. Data is based on calendar year 2007 dates-of-service. Family PACT (Beneficiaries Not Enrolled In MC), $436,549,578, 3% Total = $15,954,511,294 Presumptive Eligibles (Beneficiaries Not Enrolled In MC), $153,621,377, 1% Medi-Cal FFS Payments While Enrolled In A Managed Care Plan (No CCS ), $709,688,020, 4% Medi-Cal FFS Payments While Enrolled in FFS Medi-Cal (No CCS ), $13,165,948,258, 82% Eighty-two percent of the FFS provider payments were associated with beneficiaries enrolled in Medi-Cal s FFS program. The remaining 18 percent of the FFS provider payments were associated with beneficiaries enrolled in Medi-Cal managed care plans for services that the contracting plans did not assume risk for, and programs such as Family PACT and the Presumptive Eligible Program. 4

5 How Were Member Months And PMPM Costs Distributed Among Groups Within The Medi-Cal FFS Program? Aid Code Category Total FFS Member Months % Total FFS Member Months Authorized Services) Services) Services) Aged, Blind, Disabled, LTC - Adults 15,288,395 39% $ 9,503,112,335 72% $ 622 All Other Aid Codes - Adults 10,191,265 26% $ 2,199,795,601 17% $ 216 Aged, Blind, Disabled, LTC - Children 958,000 2% $ 437,714,475 3% $ 457 All Other Aid Codes - Children 12,824,346 33% $ 1,025,325,846 8% $ 79 Total 39,262, % $ 13,165,948, % $ 335 PMPM Cost $4,500 $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- Source: Created by the DHCS Research and Analytics Studies Section using the RDS2007 analytic file. Data reflects a 9-month lag. CCS Children PMPM costs represent total expenditures (CCS and NON-CCS). Roughly 60% of the CCS PMPM cost was associated with CCS services and 40% with non-ccs Services. Note, CCS children may be enrolled in any aid code. $3,824 CCS Children Enrolled In FFS Total FFS Payments While Enrolled In FFS (No CCS % Of Total FFS Payments While Enrolled In FFS (No CCS Authorized $79 Non-CCS Children Enrolled In FFS PMPM Costs For Beneficiariares Enrolled In FFS (No CCS Authorized Medi-Cal s Aged, Blind, Disabled, and LTC populations generated 39 percent of the total FFS member months, yet accounted for 72 percent of all Medi-Cal FFS payments made on behalf of beneficiaries enrolled in FFS. The adult Aged, Blind, Disabled, and LTC populations generated a PMPM cost of $622, while the child Aged, Blind, Disabled, and LTC groups generated a PMPM cost of $457. Children not enrolled in a Blind, Disabled, or LTC aid code displayed the lowest PMPM cost ($79). Children eligible for FFS Medi-Cal with a CCS condition generated the highest cost PMPM ($3,824). 5

6 Aged, Blind, Disabled, and LTC Populations 6

7 How Were The Aged, Blind, and Disabled Distributed By Aid Code Category? PA Disabled 887, % MN Aged 195, % PA Blind 24, % MN Blind % MN Disabled 93, % PA Aged 389, % There were 1,754,343 beneficiaries who were enrolled in an ABD aid code for at least one month during On average, there were 1,590,652 ABD beneficiaries enrolled monthly. The Disabled accounted for 62% of all ABD beneficiaries. The Aged accounted for 37%. Source: Prepared by RASS using the CINByMOE Lagged table for 2006 extracted from MEDS system. 7

8 What Percentage Of The Total ABD Population Was Eligible For Medicare? Not Medicare Eligible, 652,451, 41% Distribution By Medicare Status Medicare Status Medicare Eligible Medicare Eligible, 938,201, 59% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Unduplicated Beneficiaries 1,043,752 Distribution By Aid Category and Medicare Status 88% 12% 56% 44% 42% 58% Aged Blind Disabled Not Medicare Eligible Medicare Eligible Average Monthly Eligibles 938,201 In 2006, 59 percent of the ABD beneficiaries were eligible for Medicare. The Aged population had the highest proportion of Medicare eligible beneficiaries (88%), while the Disabled had the lowest proportion (42%). Not Medicare Eligible 755, ,451 Source: Prepared by RASS using CINByMOE Lagged table for 2006 extracted from MEDS system. 8

9 How Were Non-Medicare Eligible, FFS, ABD Beneficiaries Distributed By Age Group? Non Medicare Eligible FFS Beneficiaries by Age Group (Average Monthly Eligibles, excludes those with Other Health Coverage) Age 19-64, 335,211, 74% Age 65 or Older, 60,511, 14% Age 0-18, 52,169, 12% Of the 447,891 average monthly FFS ABD eligibles not eligible for Medicare and having no other health care coverage, 74 percent were adults between the ages of 19 and 64. Twelve percent were children 18 and younger, while 14 percent were seniors 65 years of age or older. Source: Prepared by RASS using CINByMOE Lagged table for 2006 extracted from MEDS system. 9

10 PMPM Cost How Expensive Were Members of The Population Eligible For Medi-Cal Only? $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $1,805 $563 $231 $273 $185 $98 $58 $1,364 $864 $721 $786 $753 $1,050 $492 The most expensive populations received services from specific service providers. For purposes of this analysis, these included beneficiaries that received services from the below provider types and were grouped into the waiver category. Certified Hospice, Intermediate Care Facility, State Developmental Center, State Mental Hospital, Disabled Adults Disabled Children Blind Adults Blind Children DHCS Administered Services Aged Waiver Adults Waiver Children Other Programs or Payers AIDS Waiver, Developmental Services Waiver, MSSP, Medi-Cal Targeted Care Management Source: Prepared by RASS using RDS2006 Analytic File. DDS Targeted Care Management. 10

11 How Were Medi-cal FFS Expenditures Distributed Among the Adult Disabled Population In CY 2006? Top One Percent Top Five Percent Top Ten Percent Top Fifty Percent Bottom Fifty Percent Total Number of Beneficiaries 3,585 17,928 35, , , ,568 Member Months 38, , ,630 1,989,177 1,615,584 3,604,761 Total Amount Paid $ 547,767, $ 1,349,084, $ 1,814,456, $ 2,963,495, $ 151,586, ,115,082,031 Percent of Total Beneficiaries 17.6% 43.3% 58.2% 95.1% 4.9% 100.0% Cost per Beneficiary $ 152, $ 75, $ 50, $ 16, $ $ 8, PMPM $ 14, $ 6, $ 4, $ 1, $ $ Percent of Expenditures 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 17.6% Most Expensive One Percent Disabled Adults 43.3% Most Expensive Five Percent 58.2% Most Expensive Ten Percent 95.1% Most Expensive Fifty Percent 4.9% Bottom Fifty Percent A relatively small percentage of the adult disabled population generated a large percentage of their total Medi-Cal FFS expenditures. One percent of the adult disabled population generated roughly 18 percent of the total FFS Medi-Cal expenditures associated with this population. The most expensive ten percent of the adult disabled population accounted for 58 percent their total Medi- Cal FFS expenditures. Source: Created by the DHCS Research and Analytics Studies Section using paid claims data, CY 2006 data. 11

12 DX for Disease During the Year High Rates of Hypertension Were Found Among Study Population beneficiaries Suffering From Multiple Chronic Conditions Concurrent Hypertension Among Aged, Blind, and Disabled Beneficiaries With Major Chronic Disease Conditions Renal Failure Coronary Atherosclerosis Diabetes and Hyperlipidemia Acute Cererebovascular Disease Hyperlipidemia Diabetes Asthma Percent With Hypertension 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 34.6% 58.8% 54.5% 52.9% 49.1% 45.8% 44.6% Source: Prepared by the RASS using MEDS, Paid Claims, and AHRQ Clinical Classification software. Data reflects a 6-month lag. Uncontrolled Hypertension is a precursor for stroke, heart and kidney failure. High rates of hypertension were found among beneficiaries in the study population with chronic renal failure, atherosclerosis and acute cerebrovascular Disease. 12

13 Aged, Blind, Disabled, and LTC populations eligible for both Medi-Cal and Medicare or dually eligible 13

14 Dual Eligible Beneficiaries Enrolled In Medi-Cal During CY 2007, there were 1.1 million Medi-Cal beneficiaries, enrolled for at Medi-Cal Only Medicare Only least one month who were eligible for both Medi-Cal 7.0 million 2.9 million and Medicare. Dual Eligibles 1.1 million Source: Prepared by RASS using RDS Analytic file and Medicare eligibles in California from Kaiser Foundation for

15 Why Focus On Medi-Cal s Dual Eligible Population? Percent of Beneficiaries Distribution of FFS Beneficiaries by Cost Percentile and Medicare Eligibility Status; CY % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 34% 35% 66% 65% Top One Percent Top Five Percent 25% 23% 75% 77% Top Ten Percent Cost Percentile Top Fifty Percent 10% 90% Bottom Fifty Percent Dual eligible beneficiaries were well represented among the most costly Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Over one-third of the most expensive one percent of Medi-Cal s FFS population were eligible for Medicare. Not Medicare Eligible Medicare Eligible Source: Prepared by RASS using RDS2007 Analytic File. 15

16 How Were DHCS Administered FFS Expenditures Distributed Between The Medi- Cal Only And The Dual Eligible Populations and By Aid Category? In Billions of Dollars Medi-Cal Only, $10.39, 65.1% Total = $15,954,511,294 F-PACT, $0.44, 2.7% Dual Eligible, $4.98, 31% Presumptive Eligibles, $0.15, 1.0% LTC, $2.38, 14.9% Aged, $1.43, 9.0% 13 Other Categories, $0.03, 0.2% Disabled, $1.08, 6.8% Blind, $0.06, 0.4% Medi-Cal s dual eligible population generated roughly 31 percent of the total Medi-Cal FFS provider payments during CY The Long Term Care Aid Category accounted for $2.38 Billion, and represented almost 50% of the payments made on behalf of the Dual Eligible population. Source: Prepared by RASS using RDS2007 Analytic File. 16

17 How Was Medi-Cal s Dual Eligible Population Divided For The Analysis of Expenditures? Grouping Unduplicated Beneficiaries % of Dual Eligible Population Total Paid (DHCS Administered and Other Departments) % of $ Paid FFS 958,329 82% $ 8,487,216, % FFS HCP Mix 28,545 2% $ 129,831, % HCP 185,625 16% $ 776,080, % Total 1,172, % $ 9,393,128, % Three primary groups were evaluated. Dually eligible beneficiaries enrolled in Medi-Cal Feefor-service (FFS) for the entire year, dually eligible beneficiaries enrolled in FFS Medi-Cal and a health plan for part of the year, and dually eligible beneficiaries enrolled in managed care health plans for the entire year. The majority of beneficiaries enrolled in health care plans for the entire year were members of County Organized Health Systems (COHS). Source: Prepared by RASS using RDS2007 Analytic File. 17

18 How Were Medi-Cal FFS PMPM Expenditures Associated With Medi-Cal s Dual Eligible Population Enrolled In FFS The Entire Year Distributed By Service Category? Service Cat. Aged Blind Disabled LTC Member Months 5,341, ,013 4,271, ,920 Hospital Inpatient $ $ $ $ Hospital Other $ 5.37 $ 6.72 $ 8.56 $ 2.41 Phys/Clinical $ $ $ $ 7.19 Home Health $ 0.03 $ 0.33 $ 0.26 $ 0.01 Pharmacy $ $ $ $ Nursing Facility $ $ $ $ 3, FQHC $ 3.21 $ 3.32 $ 5.84 $ 0.82 Other $ $ $ $ Subtotal DHCS $ $ $ $ 3, Dental $ 8.05 $ 7.88 $ 9.75 $ 9.58 DDS Waiver $ 2.13 $ $ $ 0.96 DSS IHSS $ $ $ $ 2.87 DDS Target Case Mgt $ 0.20 $ 9.63 $ $ 0.51 MC Target Case Mgt. $ 0.24 $ 0.58 $ 0.87 $ 1.03 EPSDT $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ - DDS Devlp Center $ 0.23 $ - $ 2.69 $ State Mental Hospital $ - $ - $ 0.02 $ 4.25 SD Comm Hospital $ 0.14 $ 0.74 $ 3.90 $ 1.51 Short Doyle Clinic $ 0.36 $ 1.36 $ 5.00 $ 0.13 SD MH Rehab $ 1.82 $ 6.27 $ $ 3.17 Mental Health Inpatient $ 0.07 $ 0.23 $ 1.01 $ 0.72 Subtotal Other Depts. $ $ $ $ Total $ $ 1, $ $ 4, Source: Prepared by RASS using RDS2007 Analytic File. Nursing facility costs, hospital inpatient, and durable medical equipment (included in Other) were significant cost drivers among the expenditures associated with DHCS administered services. Among the services administered by other departments, IHSS was by far the greatest cost driver. 18

19 How Were The PMPM FFS Expenditures Associated With Medi-Cal s Dually Eligible Population Enrolled In A Health Plan For The Entire Year Distributed By Service Category? Service Cat. Aged Blind Disabled LTC Member Months 973,085 25, ,194 89,324 Hospital Inpatient $ 3.10 $ 6.03 $ 5.23 $ 6.78 Hospital Other $ 1.08 $ 0.72 $ 0.70 $ 0.61 Phys/Clinical $ 3.85 $ 7.34 $ 4.61 $ 1.06 Home Health $ 0.00 $ - $ 0.12 $ - Pharmacy $ 0.65 $ 1.67 $ 4.75 $ 0.98 Nursing Facility $ $ 6.08 $ $ FQHC $ 3.44 $ 3.31 $ 8.00 $ 0.58 Other $ $ $ $ 7.56 Subtotal DHCS $ $ $ $ Dental $ 7.19 $ 6.01 $ 8.80 $ 9.53 DDS Waiver $ 2.16 $ $ $ 0.34 DSS IHSS $ $ $ $ 1.49 DDS Target Case Mgt $ 0.23 $ 8.53 $ $ 0.23 MC Target Case Mgt. $ 0.33 $ 0.35 $ 1.13 $ 0.83 EPSDT $ - $ - $ 0.00 $ - DDS Devlp Center $ - $ - $ 1.39 $ State Mental Hospital $ 0.00 $ - $ 0.20 $ 1.09 SD Comm Hospital $ 0.09 $ 0.01 $ 1.46 $ 0.41 Short Doyle Clinic $ 0.17 $ 1.32 $ 3.43 $ - SD MH Rehab $ 2.04 $ 5.90 $ $ 2.30 Mental Health Inpatient $ 0.03 $ - $ 1.13 $ 1.40 Subtotal Other Depts. $ $ $ $ Total $ $ $ $ 1, Source: Prepared by RASS using RDS2007 Analytic File. These payments were in addition to capitation payments associated with enrollment in a Medi-Cal managed care plan. Generally, DHCS administered expenditures represent services that have been carved-out of the managed care contract. For the services not administered by DHCS, these services were paid and administered by departments other than DHCS and its contracting Health Plans. The Services reflected were not part of the contract. 19

20 Medi-Cal s CCS Population 20

21 Program Intent: What Is The Purpose of The CCS Program? The primary purpose of the CCS program is to provide necessary medical services to physically handicapped persons under the age of 21 whose parents are unable to pay for such services. Basic goals of the program are: Locate handicapped children in need of medical care. Encourage families to obtain services for maximum physical, mental, social and educational development of the child. Provide needed financial assistance for families unable to pay. 21

22 What Are the Medical Eligibility Criteria for CCS Enrollment? The medical eligibility criterion is outlined in regulation and includes a variety of medical conditions and treatment criteria. Examples of CCS-eligible Conditions: Certain Endocrine, Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Rheumatoid Arthritis Chronic Lung Diseases Congenital Anomalies Diseases of Blood or Blood-forming organs such as Hemophilia Neonates and Infants in a CCSapproved Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and require specific services Neoplasms which constitute a significant disability Cerebral Palsy Uncontrolled Idiopathic Epilepsy Enrollment into the CCS program is dependent on a review of records by a CCS program consultant or designee to ensure that the individual meets the medical eligibility criteria. CCS also provides medical therapy services (22 CCR ) Source: California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 2, Subdivision 7, Chapter 3, Article 2 22

23 Other CCS Program Enrollment Requirements Must be a resident of California; and Be under the age of 21; and Have a family income under $40,000 based on the adjusted gross income. The Family Income Rule may be waived under certain conditions including fullscope Medi-Cal or Healthy Families enrollment. Source: Health and Safety Code, Section and

24 Relationship Between CCS and Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans Most Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans do not cover CCS-authorized services, but remain responsible for providing primary care and prevention services not related to the CCS-eligible condition. Expenditures for CCS-enrollees in Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans included both FFS and managed care capitation payments. Distribution of CCS Expenditures Paid Under Fee-for-Service by Plan Enrollment Indicator CCS-authorized services are paid through the Medi-Cal fee-for-service (FFS) program. Source: Welfare and Institutions Code, Section (b) Fee-for- Service Enrolled 58% Health Plan Enrolled 42% 24

25 Medi-Cal FFS Payments for CCS- Authorized Services Have Risen Sharply. Trend in Fee-For-Service Payments for CCS-Related Services (Beneficiaries 0-20 Years of Age) Fee-for-Service payments for CCSauthorized Services were 125% greater in 2007 than in Amount Paid $1,600,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $800,000,000 $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $200,000,000 $ Fee-for-Service Enrolled Health Plan Enrolled In 2007, FFSenrolled children generated over $878 million in CCS authorized payments, while those enrolled in health plans generated $617 million in CCSrelated carve-out payments. Source: Prepared by RASS using EDS-paid claim detail month of payment files. Data reflects a 6-month claims processing lag. 25

26 The Average Cost Per User In 2007 Was 65% Greater Than In 1999, While Health Plan Enrolled Users Were Significantly Less Expensive Average Cost Average Cost of CCS Services Per CCS User; (Users with FFS-Paid services only) $14,000 $13,273 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $7,695 $5,830 $9,212 In 2007, health plan enrolled users of CCSauthorized services were 31% less expensive than their FFS-enrolled counterparts. $2,000 $ Fee-for-Service Enrolled Health Plan Enrolled Source: Prepared by RASS using the EDS-paid claim detail month of payment files. Data reflects a 6- month claims processing lag. Data has been arrayed by date-of-service. 26

27 Children Receiving CCS Services Were Among The Most Expensive Within The Population Of FFS Enrolled Child Medi-Cal Beneficiaries Expenditures $1,400,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,000,000,000 Distribution of $2.275 Billion in FFS Expenditures Generated by Children with at Least One Month of FFS Enrollment $800,000,000 $600,000,000 $400,000,000 $200,000,000 $- The distribution of costs among children is extremely skewed with the most expensive one percent of children enrolled in FFS generating fifty-six percent of FFS costs. Source: Prepared by RASS using the RDS Research file for Data reflects a 6-month claims processing lag Population (One Centile, or 1/100th = 23,780 beneficiaries, 100 = Most expensive) Not Receiving CCS Services Receiving CCS Services In 2007, there were 2,378,033 beneficiaries, age 0 to 20, with at least one month of FFS enrollment, who generated $2,275 bil. in FFS payments. Sorting the beneficiaries in descending order by cost and dividing them into percentiles of 100, (23,780 beneficiaries), we can see that the most expensive centile, or one, one-percent, generated $1.27 bil. (56%) of the total FFS expenditures. Within the most expensive one percent were 16,649 children receiving CCSservices who generated $1.07 bil. in expenditures. 27

28 What Types of Services Were Provided Under CCS? Other / Ancillary 5% CCS-Related Services Physician and Clinic 5% Hospital Inpatient 69.8% Prescription Drugs 16% FQHC 2% Home Health Care 23% Other Hospital Care 3.7% Nursing Home Care 0.0% FQHC 0.0% Other / Ancillary 5.0% Physician and Clinic 10.0% Prescription Drugs 11.5% Home Health Care 0.1% For FFS enrolled beneficiaries with CCS-authorized services in the study population, CCS services comprised 61% of total costs on average with nearly 70% of CCS costs related to the Hospital Inpatient acute setting. Nursing Home Care 29% Hospital Inpatient 18% Other Hospital Care 2% Services Not Covered Under CCS Source: Prepared by RASS using the EDS-paid claim detail month of payment files with 2007 dates of service. Data reflects a 6-month claims processing lag. Selection criteria for Study Population: The Study Population contains both fee-for-service and health-plan enrolled beneficiaries, 0 to 20 years of age, eligible for Medi-Cal benefits under aid code 9N ( CCS Case Management ) and residing in the one of the following seven counties (Riverside, San Bernardino, Contra Costa, Alameda, Sonoma, Shasta, Fresno). 28

29 How Did The Cost of Children with CCS-Authorized Services Differ By Age Group? Per Member-Mer-Month Cost - CCS-Authorized Services $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $- Under 1 Year 01 to 05 Years 06 to 10 Years Age Group The PMPM Costs Reflect Only CCS Authorized Services 11 to 15 Years 16 to 20 Years Within the study population, newborns and infants with CCSconditions were clearly far more expensive than older children with CCS-conditions. Fee-for-Service Health Plan Source: Prepared by RASS using the EDS-paid claim detail month of payment files with 2007 dates of service. Data reflects a 6-month claims processing lag. Selection criteria for Study Population: The Study Population contains both fee-for-service and health-plan enrolled beneficiaries, 0 to 20 years of age, eligible for Medi-Cal benefits under aid code 9N ( CCS Case Management ) and residing in the one of the following seven counties (Riverside, San Bernardino, Contra Costa, Alameda, Sonoma, Shasta, Fresno). 29

30 How Did The Costs of Children Receiving CCS Services Compare To Other Children Not Receiving CCS Authorized Services? Per-Member Per-Month Cost, CY 2007 Age Cohort Under 1 Year 01 to 05 Years 06 to 10 Years 11 to 15 Years 16 to 20 Years Overall PMPM CCS-Children (FFS Enrolled) $10,269 $2,783 $2,444 $2,406 $2,972 $3,824 Non-CCS Children (FFS Enrolled) $106 $51 $43 $55 $156 $79 Children receiving CCS-authorized services in the study population were many times more expensive than other children enrolled in Medi- Cal not receiving CCS authorized services. Source: Prepared by RASS using the EDS-paid claim detail month of payment files and RDS analytic files with 2007 dates of service. Data reflects a 6-month claims processing lag. The PMPM costs reflected in the table above represent total Medi-Cal costs (i.e., both CCS authorized services and services not authorized by CCS). Selection criteria for Study Population: The Study Population contains both feefor-service and health-plan enrolled beneficiaries, 0 to 20 years of age, eligible for Medi-Cal benefits under aid code 9N ( CCS Case Management ) and residing in the one of the following seven counties (Riverside, San Bernardino, Contra Costa, Alameda, Sonoma, Shasta, Fresno). 30