Human Subjects Research Policy Update. Naomi Coll Director of Research Policy and Compliance
|
|
- Rosa Barton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Human Subjects Research Policy Update Naomi Coll Director of Research Policy and Compliance
2 Major Policy Updates 1. Continuing review (annual renewal) is no longer required for minimal risk research 2. New requirements for informed consent 3. Revised and new exempt review categories 4. Review by a single IRB is required for some federally-funded multisite studies 5. New definitions affecting the scope of activity and populations subject to regulation 6. Activities that meet the definition of human subjects research are subject to IRB oversight
3 There will be little to no change to policy on research involving: Greater than minimal risk to subjects Drugs/biologics/devices (FDA-regulated) Collection of biospecimens Prisoners Children General process for conducting IRB review/exemption
4 Why is the policy changing? The policy changes correspond to the revised Common Rule regulations. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and 15 other Federal Agencies are signatories to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the Common Rule ). All research supported by any of the Common Rule agencies is subject to the regulations. Lehigh University has adopted an equivalent policy that extends to all human subjects research, regardless of funding source, conducted by Lehigh University faculty, staff, and students.
5 When is the policy changing? The revised federal Common Rule is effective January 19, In order to ensure compliance with the correct set of applicable regulations, the corresponding institutional policy will also change effective January 19, 2018.
6 Continuing review (annual renewal) is no longer required for minimal risk research Current, open minimal risk studies (i.e. initially approved by expedited review) will transition at next renewal. The IRB may require CR for certain minimal risk studies, e.g. if they involve special populations. If so, this will be communicated to the researcher during the initial approval process. Projects initially approved by the full board (i.e. greater than minimal risk research) do not require annual renewals once subject interaction is complete.
7 Continuing review (annual renewal) is no longer required for minimal risk research Researchers are still required to submit all Amendments and Unanticipated Problems Reports (UPRs) to the IRB. When the researcher is not required to submit a continuing review, the Research Integrity office will initiate a check-in at one year and ask: Is the study still open? Have any amendments not submitted? Have any UPRs not reported?
8 Continuing review (annual renewal) is no longer required for minimal risk research: What do you have to do now?: Nothing differently: submit your next continuing review before your study expires. The IRB will transition it to the new rule and will notify you if it is approved without an expiration date. The new rule will be applied to new applications once it takes effect on January 19, The IRB will notify you if your research is approved without an expiration date. Once your new application or continuing review is approved, you must still submit amendments and UPRs, and the IRB will you to check-in about once per year.
9 New Requirements for Informed Consent Final consent forms that are over 4 pages long will require a concise summary of study activities, risks, and benefits presented first in the consent form. A revised template is available on the IRB website. Existing studies affected by the new requirement will transition at the next renewal or consent-related amendment after January 19, 2018.
10 There are several new elements of informed consent: Required: disclosure that de-identified data or biospecimens may be shared for future research (or not). As applicable: Biospecimens will be used for commercial profit and whether subjects will share in profit. Clinically relevant results will be returned. Research will involve whole genome sequencing. A revised template is available on the IRB website. Researchers may still request a waiver or alteration of the required elements of informed consent with their IRB application (process does not change).
11 New requirement for waiving/altering informed consent: In order to approve a request for a waiver or alteration of informed consent for research involving identifiable data or biospecimens, the IRB must find that it is impracticable for the research to be conducted with de-identified data or biospecimens. IRB application forms and approval criteria worksheets have been revised to include this requirement and IRB will begin applying it Jan. 19, 2018.
12 New requirement for waiving/altering requirement to document informed consent: The IRB may approve a request to waive or alter the requirement to document informed consent (i.e. a signed consent form) for minimal risk research in communities or with cultural groups where signing documents is not the norm. There must be an appropriate alternative mechanism or documenting that consent was obtained. IRB application forms and approval criteria worksheets have been revised to include this requirement and IRB will begin applying it Jan. 19, 2018.
13 Revised and new exempt review categories There are three different levels of IRB review: exempt, expedited, and full committee. The updates include revisions to existing exempt categories and a brand new exempt category for benign behavioral interventions. The full text of the new exempt categories and requirements are available on the IRB website.
14 Exemption 1 Educational New language added to existing exemption Now must consider the adverse impact on student learning of required content, or on assessment of educators.
15 Exemption 2 Surveys/Interviews/Educational Tests/Public Observation New language added to existing exemption The collection of sensitive and identifiable data may qualify for exempt review, if the IRB confirms that there are adequate privacy and confidentiality protections in place.
16 Exemption 2 Surveys/Interviews/Educational Tests/Public Observation continued Exempt category 2 will not apply for research involving any of the following: Interventions Collection of biospecimens Linking to additional personally identifiable data Children except for educational tests or some public observations
17 Exemption 3 Benign Behavioral Interventions Brand new exempt category! Research involving benign behavioral interventions and collecting and recording data from adults. Benign behavioral interventions are: Brief in duration Harmless and painless Not physically invasive Not likely to have significant adverse impact on subjects Not offensive or embarrassing
18 Exemption 3 Benign Behavioral Interventions continued Information collected in conjunction with a benign behavioral intervention may be collected via: Surveys or interviews (verbal or written responses) Data entry Observation (including audiovisual recording) Exempt category 3 is not applicable if data is collected via physical procedures, i.e. there can be no: Physical sensors (blood pressure monitors, EEG, FitBits, etc.) Minimally invasive procedures (blood draw, saliva collection)
19 Exemption 3 Benign Behavioral Interventions continued Examples of benign behavioral interventions: Solving puzzles under various noise conditions Playing an economic game Being exposed to stimuli such as color, light, or sound (at safe levels) Performing cognitive tasks
20 Exemption 3 Benign Behavioral Interventions continued Because researchers must obtain prospective agreement to participate from subjects, a consent process is required. Deception is not allowed, unless the subjects prospectively agrees to deception. Debriefing is strongly encouraged. Collecting sensitive and identifiable data may be exempt if the IRB confirms there are adequate privacy and confidentiality protections in place.
21 Exemption 4 Secondary Research with Identifiable Private Information or Identifiable Biospecimens Heavily modified version of the existing exemption 4 No longer limited to retrospective data review. Secondary research with identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, when consent is not required, if any of the following apply: Publicly available. Info is recorded by investigator so that identities cannot be ascertained directly or indirectly, and subjects will not be contacted or re-identified. Secondary use of identifiable protected health information is permitted if it is covered by HIPAA and does not leave the institution.
22 Revised Exemptions Broad Consent The revised Common Rule refers to Broad Consent - consent for storage and secondary research with identifiable private information or biospecimens. Lehigh University is not offering broad consent related exemptions (7 and 8) at this time: Broad consent requires institutional level tracking of individuals who decline. There is no federal guidance on applying broad consent. Investigators can continue to use identifiable private information or biospecimens either by following current practices, or opting to code them instead.
23 Revised Exemptions What do you have to do now? Revised application forms that include the new exempt categories were posted on January 10, The IRB is able to apply new exemptions on January 19, 2018 meaning that if your exempt application is reviewed on or after that date, we will apply the new rules. Exempt research approved prior to January 19, 2018 is subject to the current rules. The new exempt rules only effect new studies existing minimal risk studies that were approved via expedited review will not be converted to exempt.
24 Review by a single IRB is required for some federally-funded multisite studies Common Rule agency-sponsored research with multiinstitutional collaborators must be reviewed by only one IRB, which will serve as the IRB of record for all collaborators. Required January 25, 2018 for NIH; January 2020 for all other Common Rule agencies. LU already has a single IRB review process in place (IRB Authorization Agreements for Human Subjects Research under IRB Guidance ). There will be no change, other than to require an IAA when necessary.
25 Revised definition: vulnerable populations Revisions to the regulations and policy clarify that vulnerability to coercion or undue influence, and no other considerations related to vulnerability, are the focus of IRB review. Refers to one s ability to make an informed decision about participating in research. References to pregnant women and handicapped individuals have been removed. Subpart B of the federal regulations has not been updated to correspond, so research with pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates is still subject to the additional requirements in Subpart B. Term mentally disabled persons replaced with individuals with impaired decision making ability.
26 Revised definition: clinical trial Federally-sponsored research study in which one or more human subjects are prospectively assigned to one or more interventions (which may include placebo or other control) to evaluate the effects of those interventions on health-related biomedical or behavioral outcomes. Requires public posting of consent form (e.g. on clinicaltrials.gov). As of early 2017, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) training and clinicaltrials.gov registration and reporting is required for NIH-supported Clinical Trials. See GCP Training for NIH-Supported Clinical Trials
27 Revised definition: human subjects New language added Living individuals about whom an investigator obtains info or biospecimens through intervention or interaction, and uses, studies, or analyzes the info or biospecimens OR obtains, uses, studies, analyzes or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens
28 Definition: research Unchanged: Research is a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge New - the regulations specify what is not research: Scholarly or journalistic activities oral history, journalism, biography, literary criticism, legal research, historical scholarship when the collection of information is focused on the individual, and the activity does not otherwise qualify as a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
29 Activities that meet the definition of human subjects research are subject to IRB oversight Historically, LU policy required IRB review for work that does not meet federal definition of HSR, including: Institutional research, QA/QI collecting sensitive data Students undertaking a systematic investigation, producing a design or protocol for research, sampling a population, reporting findings Class projects involving research with people outside of class Activity that was not a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge, but the researcher had some intent to publish results
30 Activities that meet the definition of human subjects research are subject to IRB oversight Lehigh s new policy will apply to activities that meet the DHHS or FDA definition of human subjects research: Research: Systematic investigations designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Human subjects: Living individuals about whom an investigator obtains info or biospecimens through intervention or interaction, and uses, studies, or analyzes the info or biospecimens OR obtains, uses, studies, analyzes or generates identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens. FDA: the use of drugs or devices in human subjects, and/or the collection of data from humans for submission to FDA. Please contact Research Integrity if you believe your activity may HSR per the FDA.
31 Definition: systematic Systematic means that the activity involves a system, methodical procedure, design, or plan.
32 Definition: generalizable Generalizable means that conclusions, facts, or principles derived from particulars (individuals, medical records, etc.) that are applicable to or affect a whole category and enhance scientific or academic understanding. The information is broadly applicable or useful outside of the institution.
33 Definition: designed Designed in this context refers to the purpose of the activity: Activities that are exploratory or intended to train students are not designed to produce generalizable knowledge.
34 Definition of human subjects research Publication or intent to publish is not part of the definition of human subjects research. Intent to publish may signify that generalizable results are anticipated. Activities that do not otherwise meet the regulatory definition of research will not be considered subject to IRB oversight even if published or intended for publication.
35 Definition of human subjects research Typically HSR: doctoral dissertations, honors or graduate theses, pilot studies, clinical investigations, behavioral and social science studies, epidemiological studies, and human genetic research. Not typically HSR: class-related research activities involving research methodology and course-assigned data collection, quality assurance or quality improvement activities, repository research, tissue banking/databases with stored data or materials, case reports, and institutional, internal, or social process research.
36 Definition of human subjects research Review the IRB website What Types of Activities Require IRB Review Students should confer with faculty advisors when determining if their activity is subject to IRB oversight. Contact Research Integrity for help determining if IRB review is required. We will provide written determinations by request.
37 When student, class-related, or internal research activity is not subject to IRB oversight It is the responsibility of faculty and staff to ensure that research activity presents minimal risk to participants, is conducted ethically, and complies with all other institutional and departmental policies. When a proposed student activity presents greater than minimal risk, the faculty advisor is required to seek the advice of the Research Integrity office. Ethical Issues in Research provides guidance on incorporating human subjects protections into all research activities, regardless of whether they are subject to IRB review.
38 When student, class-related, or internal research activity is not subject to IRB oversight Unregulated greater than minimal risk activity: The Belmont Report is the ethical foundation for the federal regulations and Lehigh s institutional policy. The ethical principle of beneficence holds that the benefits of research must be maximized, and the risks minimized. Any activity that presents significant risks to subjects but little or no potential to benefit the individual and/or society at large is not ethical and may not be conducted by Lehigh faculty, staff, or students regardless of whether the activity meets the definition of research and is subject to IRB review.
39 Questions? Contact: Naomi Coll Director of Research Policy and Compliance
UA New Common Rule Implementation
The New Common Rule - What does it all mean? This guide serves to assist University of Arizona researchers to understandthe New Common Rule ( new rule ) and how it will be implemented at the University
More informationSummary of the Common Rule Changes
Summary of the Common Rule Changes Category Topic & Details UNC Charlotte Impact Scope Research definition revised (46.102) What is not research and thus does not require IRB review: Most scholarly and
More informationREGULATORY AND FUNDING CHANGES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH
REGULATORY AND FUNDING CHANGES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH Teri Reiche Director, IRB and IACUC Jessica Viglione OSP Research Administrator So many acronyms. DHHS = Department of Health and Human Services
More informationOverview of the Revised Common Rule
Overview of the Revised Common Rule Federal Demonstration Partnership May 12, 2017 Irene Stith-Coleman, Ph.D Director, OHRP Division of Policy and Assurances Department of Health and Human Services 1 Disclaimer
More informationThe Revised Common Rule
The Revised Common Rule Presented by Monique Hawkins, MS, CIP Office of Naval Research (ONR) Overview Brief background on the revised rule Implementation dates Proposals that were not adopted Summary of
More informationStandard Operating Procedure IRB Review of Research Subject to the Revised Common Rule
HRP Consulting is providing this sample SOP addendum to assist organizations in the event that the revised Common Rule goes into effect on January 19, 2018. This sample SOP addendum does not address every
More informationInstitutional Review Board Application for Exempt Status Determination
Application for Exempt Status Determination NOTE: ONLY the IRB is authorized to determine exemption requests. Exemption categories may NOT apply if (a) deception of subjects may be an element of the research;
More informationChanges to the Common Rule
Changes to the Common Rule November 21, 2017 S Joseph Austin, JD, LL.M Corey Zolondek, PhD, CIP Introduction: NOTE: Relative to the Common Rule changes, this presentation does not address requirements
More informationImplementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review
Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review Introduction: Four of the exempt categories in the revised Common Rule include a provision for limited IRB review. This resource
More informationCommon Rule Overview (Final Rule)
Effective Dates Common Rule Overview (Final Rule) Effective January 18, 2017 for additional requirements for updating clinical trials.gov. This will impact NIH funding if any researcher from Drexel University
More informationFinal Rule Material: Overview
Final Rule Material: Overview - 46.116-46.124 Gary L. Chadwick, PharmD, MPH, CIP University of Rochester (Emeritus) and HRP Consulting Group Biomedical Research Alliance of New York LLC CITI Program is
More informationOffice of Human Research Office of Human Research Policy and Procedure Manual. Version: 4/4/18
Version: 4/4/18 Signatures on File for the Approval of Revisions to the Policy and Procedures Table of Contents 100 General Administration (GA)... 5 Policy GA 101: The Authority and Purpose of the Institutional
More informationInstitutional Review Board Manual. University of the Incarnate Word
Institutional Review Board Manual University of the Incarnate Word Office of Research and Graduate Studies Spring 2018 Table of Contents Table of Tables... iv Short Guide to the UIW IRB Manual... v IRB
More informationIRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix
IRB 101 Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix Contents Brief discussion of regulations IRB Structure Levels of Approval Informed Consent HIPAA/HITECH
More informationSetting up a CITI account for users not enrolled at or employed by Georgia Tech. Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016
Setting up a CITI account for users not enrolled at or employed by Georgia Tech Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016 www.citiprogam.org Select REGISTER to establish an account. Affiliate with
More informationThe SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board.... University of Missouri-Columbia.. Standard Operating Procedure Informed Consent Types and Elements Informed Consent Types and Elements Effective Date: December 12, 2005 Original
More informationCentral Michigan University Standard Operating Procedures Human Research Protection Program
Central Michigan University Standard Operating Procedures Human Research Protection Program Additional Guidance for Federal Agencies: ED, DoD, DoJ August 2010 September 2016 Edited for AAHRPP Response
More information12.0 Investigator Responsibilities
12.0 Investigator Responsibilities 12.1 Policy Investigators are ultimately responsible for the conduct of research. Research must be conducted according to the signed Investigator statement, the investigational
More information(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review
Page 1 of 5 IRB Reviewers 8-Point Analysis Form Based on Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, Criteria for IRB Approval of Research (45 CFR 46.111) Protocol ID #/Title: Date of Review:
More informationUtilizing the NCI CIRB
Policy P15 Written By: B. Laurel Elder, Ph.D. Created: September 2, 2011 Edited Version P15.1 Utilizing the NCI CIRB PURPOSE - The purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is to outline the procedures
More informationDO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. March 2015 IRB Forum
DO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS March 2015 IRB Forum Topics Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement Projects Informed Consent- when is a waiver appropriate? Retrospective/Prospective
More informationETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
CONSIDERATIONS Office for Office for Human Research Protections The Office for Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) is an administrative subdivision within the U.S. Department of Health and Human
More informationWHAT IS AN IRB? WHAT IS AN IRB? 3/25/2015. Presentation Outline
Education &Training WHAT IS AN IRB? Introduction to the UofL Institutional Review Boards & Human Subjects Protection Program IRB Review Process Post Approval Monitoring March 2015 1 Presentation Outline
More informationINSPIRing Changes to the IRB Process: New templates and more
INSPIRing Changes to the IRB Process: New templates and more John F. Ennever, MD, PhD, CIP Director, Human Research Protection Program Office of Human Research Affairs Boston Medical Center and Boston
More informationUT Southwestern Medical Center Human Research Protection Program Policy, Procedure and Guidance Documents
UT Southwestern Medical Center Human Research Protection Program Policy, Procedure and Guidance Documents Updated July 1, 2018 Page 2 of 342 Table of Contents 1. HRPP Office Review 1.1. RECEIVING, ROUTING,
More informationResearch Involving Human Subjects NIH Regional Seminar
Research Involving Human Subjects NIH Regional Seminar Jaime O. Hernandez, J.D., M.Be. Public Health Advisor Division of Education and Development Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), HHS Petrice
More informationTitle: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
Previous Version Dates: Title: Investigator Responsibilities SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017 1 Purpose Investigators are ultimately responsible for the conduct of research. Investigators
More informationDemystifying the IRB
Demystifying the IRB Mariette Marsh, MPA, CIP Assistant Director Human Subjects Protection Program Ms. Marsh is the Assistant Director for Education and Outreach at the Human Subjects Protection Program.
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION OCT 2 0 2011 NUMBER 32 16.02 SUBJECT: Protection of Human Subjects and Adherence to Ethical Standards in 000- Supported Research References: See Enclosure I USD(AT&L)
More information"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB"
"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB" Human Participant Research at University of Maryland, Baltimore Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH, PhD Senior IRB Vice-Chair Nuremberg Code (1947) First Codification of
More informationEXEMPT RESEARCH. 1. Overview
EXEMPT RESEARCH 1. Overview Research involving human subjects may be exempt from federal regulations requiring IRB review. The Ohio State University (HRPP) is responsible for determining whether research
More informationThe University of Southern Maine Policies, Procedures and Guidance For Human Subjects Research
The University of Southern Maine Policies, Procedures and Guidance For Human Subjects Research Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs University of Southern Maine Institutional Review
More informationInstitutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures. Education and Training on Human Subject Research Date Last Revised: OVERVIEW
Page 1 of 6 Document Number: IRB-P106 Version Number: 1.3 Institutional Official: David Carlisle, MD, PhD Title: Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures Education and Training on Human
More informationWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE. Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Guidelines
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Guidelines Washington & Jefferson College Institutional Review Board Policies and Guidelines Contents IRB Authority... 4 Introduction... 4 Statement of Policy...
More informationSAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY ONE WASHINGTON SQUARE SAN JOSÉ, CA 95192
SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY ONE WASHINGTON SQUARE SAN JOSÉ, CA 95192 F17-1, University Policy, Protection of Human Research Subjects (includes Amendment A) Legislative History: On February 12, 2018, the
More informationUniversity of Virginia Standard Operating Procedures for the Human Research Protection Program
University of Virginia Standard Operating Procedures for the Human Research Protection Program University of Virginia IRB SOP Version Date: July 11, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Human Research Protection Program...
More informationSAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board
SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board Date Effective: April 26, 2001 Index No. R 1217 Date Last Revised: 0 Date
More informationINDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS This manual is believed to be in full compliance with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations.
More informationOffice of Human Research Ethics/IRB Standard Operating Procedures
Office of Human Research Ethics/IRB Standard Operating Procedures Effective June 2, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Office of Human Research Ethics/IRB Standard Operating Procedures 101 UNC-Chapel Hill Human Research
More informationPrivacy Rule Overview
Privacy Rule Overview Protected Health Information (PHI) is private information that is subject to special treatment under the HIPAA Privacy Regulations. PHI can only be used or disclosed in research if
More informationGuidelines for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects
Institutional Review Board Assumption College Guidelines for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects Table of Contents: Page General Guidelines........ 1 Scope and Purpose of IRB Review...... 1 Basis
More informationInvestigator s Role and Responsibilities
Chapter 13: Investigator s Role and Responsibilities Chapter Contents 13.1 Definition and Role of Principal Investigator (PI) 13.2 Investigator-Initiated Research and Sponsor-Investigators 13.3 Educational
More informationManaging Privacy Risk in Your Research and Development Enterprise. Sujata Dayal, Abbott Justin McCarthy, Pfizer
Managing Privacy Risk in Your Research and Development Enterprise Sujata Dayal, Abbott Justin McCarthy, Pfizer Why Privacy Matters Human subject data is extremely sensitive Access to data is critical to
More informationWashington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures. April 20, 2015
Washington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures April 20, 2015 Table of Contents I. AUTHORITY AND INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT... 2 II. APPLICABILITY: ACTIVITIES SUBJECT TO IRB JURISDICTION...
More informationRESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM Human Research Protection Program RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT 2/19/2016 The following special considerations apply to research involving
More informationHuman Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board
Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures Guidebook TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal, State and University Regulations Related to the IRB... Section 1.0 Definition of
More informationGenesis Health System. Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures
Genesis Health System Institutional Review Board Table of Contents 1. INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY... 6 2. PURPOSE... 6 3. THE SCOPE & AUTHORITY OF THE IRB... 7 Scope...7 Authority of the GHS-IRB...7 Authority
More informationPurpose: To provide policy and guidelines and helpful information for conducting research at Brooks
[BRCRC 01] Research: Conducting Research at Brooks (Application for Research) Purpose: To provide policy and guidelines and helpful information for conducting research at Brooks Responsible Party: All
More informationG U I D E L I N E S. for the. FGCU Institutional Review Board (IRB)
G U I D E L I N E S for the FGCU Institutional Review Board (IRB) Office of Research & Graduate Studies Florida Gulf Coast University 10501 FGCU Boulevard South Fort Myers, FL 33965-6565 Version 1.0 April,
More informationGUIDELINES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AND CONDUCT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AND CONDUCT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY Revised September 30, 2016 PREFACE Louisiana Tech is strongly committed to ethical research
More informationGeisinger IRB Member Orientation Session 2. Debra L. Henninger, MHS RN CCRC Associate Director, Research Compliance
Geisinger IRB Member Orientation Session 2 Debra L. Henninger, MHS RN CCRC Associate Director, Research Compliance 1 How does the IRB make decisions? Guiding Ethical Principles Regulatory Considerations
More information1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements
Information for Investigators: Headquarters, U.S. Special Operations Command Human Research Protection Office (HRPO) Human Research Protections Regulatory Requirements 1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human
More informationInstitutional Review Board for Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Manual for Faculty, Staff, and Student Researchers
Institutional Review Board for Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Manual for Faculty, Staff, and Student Researchers Office of Research and Economic Development University of Wyoming
More informationERB Submission Guidance
ERB Submission Guidance Dr. Nina Kupper, chair ERB Dr. Annemiek Karreman, vice-chair ERB Table of Contents Which research needs to be reviewed... 2 Level of review... 2 Exempt:... 2 Expedited:... 5 What
More informationBANKS ON BANKS. Clinical Research Seminar March 20, 2013 Mary A. Banks Director BUMC IRB
BANKS ON BANKS Clinical Research Seminar March 20, 2013 Mary A. Banks Director BUMC IRB TODAY Part II following up on last month s presentation by Patricia Bass, JD Today s presentation will focus specifically
More informationDepartment of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)
Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR) General Instructions to Institutions and IRBs This form should be
More informationIRB Process for SURF April 21, 2015
IRB Process for SURF April 21, 2015 UNC-CH IRBs Biomedical (A,B,C,D): Expertise is focused on biomedical research (clinical trials, pharmacological research, etc) Oncology = B and D Dentistry = B and D
More informationThe HIPAA Privacy Rule and Research: An Overview
The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Research: An Overview Joy Pritts, JD Research Associate Professor Health Policy Institute Georgetown University jlp@georgetown.edu 1 Topics HIPAA Background Overview of Privacy
More informationModule: Research and HIPAA Privacy Protections ( )
Module: Research and HIPAA Privacy Protections (7-18-11) HIPAA's protections focus on individually identifiable health information HIPAA defines identifiable health information as (1) any form or medium"
More informationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH LAST REVISION DATE 5/3/17
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH LAST REVISION DATE 5/3/17 Susan Metosky IRB Administrator Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Susan.Metosky@asu.edu
More informationStudy Responsibilities. Choose all that apply. f. Draw/collect laboratory specimens
Wichita State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) New Study Application Investigator Information Principal Investigator must be a WSU faculty member. Students and anyone outside of WSU are listed
More informationInstitutional Review Board (IRB) Operational Manual
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Operational Manual Adopted May 2010 Revised April 2012 This page intentionally left blank. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS respectfully acknowledges and thanks Sinclair Community College
More informationNational Cancer Institute. Central Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures
National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures CIRB Standard Operating Procedures Additional copies are available from the CIRB website (http://www.ncicirb.org)
More informationEMORY UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 7/01/2016
EMORY UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 7/01/2016 Emory University 1599 Clifton Road, 5th Floor - Atlanta, Georgia 30322 Tel: 404.712.0720 - Fax: 404.727.1358 - Email: irb@emory.edu
More informationFrequently Asked Questions. The CIRB is located at 168 Jalan Bukit Merah #06-08 Tower 3 Connection One Singapore
1. Where is the location of the CIRB? The CIRB is located at 168 Jalan Bukit Merah #06-08 Tower 3 Connection One Singapore 150168. 2. When is the submission deadline? The CIRB meets once a month. The submission
More informationUniversity of Illinois at Chicago Human Subjects Protection Program Plan
Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (OPRS) Institutional Review Board FWA# 00000083 University of Illinois at Chicago Human Subjects Protection Program Plan 203 AOB (MC 672) 1737 West Polk Street
More informationInstitutional Review Board Policies and Procedures
Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures Adu.Research.Office@adu.edu Room CC340 Contents Institutional Review Board... 1 Policies and Procedures... 1 Mission Statement... 1 Goals... 1 Projects
More informationSubmitting Requests for Exemption and Expedited Review to the IRB
Submitting Requests for Exemption and Expedited Review to the IRB Tufts-New England Medical Center Tufts University Health Sciences IRB Education Series 2006 Presentation may only be reused or reprinted
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Protection of Human Subjects and Adherence to Ethical Standards in DoD-Supported Research
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 3216.2 March 25, 2002 SUBJECT: Protection of Human Subjects and Adherence to Ethical Standards in DoD-Supported Research DDR&E References: (a) DoD Directive 3216.2,
More informationIRB Application the Basics GETTING STARTED
IRB Application the Basics GETTING STARTED Is my project Human Subjects Research? Research is defined as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to
More informationIRB Federal Regulations Comparison Table 4/24/01 as updated through 10/31/01
Legal Authority 45 CFR Part 46 21 USC 321-392; 21 CFR, Parts 50 and 56 Coverage All research involving human subjects conducted, All clinical investigations regulated by the FDA, including supported or
More informationIRB Survival Guide! Getting Approved
IRB Survival Guide! Getting Approved Developed by Lydia Furman, MD Chairperson Department of Pediatrics Clinical Research Review Committee Vice-Chairperson Institutional Review Board, University Hospitals
More informationThe Queen s Medical Center HIPAA Training Packet for Researchers
The Queen s Medical Center HIPAA Training Packet for Researchers 1 The Queen s Medical Center HIPAA Training Packet for Researchers Table of Contents Overview of HIPAA and Research 3 Penalties for violations
More informationFORM A APPLICATION FORM A TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY. Application for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects
FORM A APPLICATION RESEARCHERS: This form is to be used for all Research Proposals involving Human Subjects. Please discuss your proposed research project with your Department s Coordinator before preparing
More informationA Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky
A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky I. Compliance with IRB and Applicable Federal Requirements A. Investigators
More informationUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) Policies and Procedures for the Protection of Human Subjects
University of Colorado Denver Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) Policies and Procedures for the Protection of Human Subjects Revised March 2015 Effective Date: March 2015 Approved by
More informationMutual Recognition of Research Ethics Review between SingHealth CIRB and NHG DSRB
Mutual Recognition of Research Ethics Review between SingHealth CIRB and NHG DSRB Frequently Asked Questions General 1. What types of cross-cluster studies are eligible for single IRB reviews? All new
More informationExempt & Expedited Reviews. February 2017 IRB Member Training
Exempt & Expedited Reviews February 2017 IRB Member Training Introduction Studies that are minimal risk Meet certain criteria ( categories ) Extensive screening by ORA staff Reviewed by a designated member
More informationWaiver of Informed Consent when Using Medical Records or Other Secondary Data or Specimens UNC-CH OHRE Guidance Document
Waiver of Informed Consent when Using Medical Records or Other Secondary Data or Specimens UNC-CH OHRE Guidance Document External and Internal Use This guidance has been provided by the UNC-Chapel Hill
More informationGuide to Completing Medical University of South Carolina s Institutional Review Board (IRB) Continuing Review Application
Guide to Completing Medical University of South Carolina s Institutional Review Board (IRB) Continuing Review Application This guide has been developed to help researchers complete IRB continuing review
More information8/10/2011. Welcome. PRIM&R s Primer on the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. PRIM&R s Primer on the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PRIM&R s Primer on the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking August 10, 2011 1:00-2:00 PM ET 1 Welcome PRIM&R s Primer on the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Joan Rachlin, JD, MPH Executive Director
More informationAPPLICATION FOR RESEARCH REQUESTING AN IRB WAIVER OF CONSENT AND HIPAA AUTHORIZATION
FORM W/H-01 APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH REQUESTING AN IRB WAIVER OF CONSENT AND HIPAA AUTHORIZATION Research for which this form is appropriate generally involves only existing patient records or specimens.
More informationHuman Subject Regulations Decision Charts
Human Subject Regulations Decision Charts September 24, 2004 The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) provides the following graphic aids as a guide for institutional review boards (IRBs), investigators,
More informationNew Study Submissions to the IRB
New Study Submissions to the IRB Tufts-New England Medical Center Tufts University Health Sciences IRB Education Series 2006 Presentation may only be reused or reprinted with written permission from the
More informationUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM
Gilead Sciences, Inc. GS-US-248-0123, Amendment 1, 19-JUN-2012 A Long Term Follow-up Registry Study of Subjects Who Did Not Achieve Sustained Virologic Response in Gilead-Sponsored Trials in Subjects with
More informationMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES INVOLVING THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH
MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES INVOLVING THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH February 2006 Revised: 07/07, 02/08, 7/08 1 Misericordia University Institutional
More informationAuthorization and Waiver Frequently Asked Questions
Authorization and Waiver Frequently Asked Questions Q. I obtain databases (of blood chemistry levels) from the Monroe County Health Department (MCHD) that I use to identify potential subjects for my studies.
More informationHUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES
1 HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES http://www.sjsu.edu/gradstudies/irb The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a ten to fifteen member committee whose task is to review all research
More informationPolicy. Subject: Institutional Oversight of Assurance INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICY NUMBER:
Institutional Review Board Policy DEPARTMENT: POLICY NUMBER: SECTION: REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES: ORIGINAL CREATION DATE: INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD I.A IRB Authority and Institutional Commitment IRB Policy
More informationRESEARCH APPLICATION RESOURCE GUIDE
RESEARCH APPLICATION RESOURCE GUIDE Fulton County School District Department of Research and Program Evaluation Office of Accountability Please note that this document is subject to periodic updates. Revised
More informationHonorHealth Research Institute. Investigator Manual. July 27, Version 3.0
HonorHealth Research Institute Investigator Manual July 27, 2017 Version 3.0 VERSION 3.0 JULY 27, 2017 1 Table of Contents Scope... 5 Version History... 5 What is the purpose of this manual?... 5 Abbreviations...
More informationThe United States Army Combined Arms Center Education (CAC-E) BULLETIN 940. Research Review and Approval
Bulletin 940 Research Review and Approval The United States Army Combined Arms Center Education (CAC-E) BULLETIN 940 Research Review and Approval Institutions covered by this bulletin include: Command
More informationThe Clinical Investigation Policy and Procedure Manual
The Clinical Investigation Policy and Procedure Manual Guidance: What Quality Improvement and Education/Competency Evaluation Activities are Considered Research and Subject to Committee on Clinical Investigation
More informationSCREENING PROCEDURES: WHAT IS COVERED BY A
SCREENING PROCEDURES: WHAT IS COVERED BY A PARTIAL HIPAA WAIVER AND WHAT IS NOT? IRB Webinar March 12, 2015 BEFORE WE START Currently there is a lot of discussion at Emory on HIPAA and recruitment practices.
More informationUniversity of Colorado Denver Human Research Protection Program Investigator Responsibilities for the Protection of Human Subjects
Institutional Guidelines The Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) recently reviewed and approved your research. The COMIRB reviews research to ensure that the federal regulations for protecting
More informationLaverne Estañol, M.S., CHRC, CIP, CCRP Assistant Director Human Research Protections
Laverne Estañol, M.S., CHRC, CIP, CCRP Assistant Director Human Research Protections Quality Improvement Activities and Human Subjects Research September 7, 2016 TOPICS What is Quality Improvement (QI)?
More informationHIPAA Privacy Regulations Governing Research
HIPAA Privacy Regulations Governing Research HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act In a Nutshell The Privacy Regulations govern a provider s use and disclosure of health information
More information1. Contacts and Title
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2016 12:26:50 PM Print Close IRB_00071740 1. Contacts and Title 1. Principal Investigator: IRB Administrator Email Training CoI Date irb@hsc.utah.edu a. Position of Principal
More informationNew HIPAA Privacy Regulations Governing Research. Karen Blackwell, MS Director, HIPAA Compliance
New HIPAA Privacy Regulations Governing Research Karen Blackwell, MS Director, HIPAA Compliance kblackwe@kumc.edu 913-588 588-0942 HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act In a Nutshell
More informationI. HSC Review and Approval of Research Involving Children
9.0 Vulnerable Populations 9.1 Research Involving Children I. HSC Review and Approval of Research Involving Children A. The special vulnerability of children makes consideration of involving them as research
More information