COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Transcription

1 BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER 59TH MEDICAL WING 59TH MEDICAL WING INSTRUCTION JANUARY 2017 Medical PATIENT SAFETY COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available on the e-publishing website at for downloading or ordering. RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication. OPR: 59 MDW/CMO Supersedes: 59 MDWI , 16 July 2013 Certified by: 59 MDW/SGH (Colonel Joseph Richards) Pages: 8 This instruction implements Air Force Policy Directive 44-1, Medical Operations. This medical wing instruction provides guidance on activities relative to Patient Safety. It outlines responsibilities and establishes procedures to comply with, implement, and sustain applicable to Department of Defense Patient Safety Program (PSP) standards and The Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG). The intent of this Medical Wing Instruction (MDWI) is to provide a centralized point of reference for all disciplines concerned. This instruction applies to all personnel assigned, attached, or on contract to the 59th Medical Wing (MDW). This instruction does not apply to personnel working at the 959th Medical Group-San Antonio Military Medical Center. This instruction does not apply to the Air National Guard or Air Reserve. Refer recommended changes and questions about this publication to the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) listed above using the AF Form 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication. Requests for waivers must be submitted to the OPR listed above for consideration and approval. Ensure that all records created as a result of processes prescribed in this publication are maintained in accordance with (IAW) Air Force Manual , Management of Records, and disposed of IAW Air Force Records Information Management System Records Disposition Schedule. SUMMARY OF CHANGES This publication has been revised. This rewrite of 59 MDWI includes defined roles and responsibilities for a centralized wing Patient Safety program with decentralized execution.

2 2 59MDWI JANUARY Overview 1.1. The 59 MDW, PSP exists as a centralized program to promote quality healthcare by leading systematic, coordinated approaches that support a culture of safety, evidence-based best practices, and policies that lead to improved clinical outcomes Establishes a mechanism of decentralized execution to ensure all components of the PSP are integrated into all 59 MDW facilities. Manages a system to assess and reduce errors to achieve zero harm Fosters a culture of safety. Errors occur due to a breakdown in systems and processes. The 59 MDW promotes an interdisciplinary, non-punitive approach without fear of reprisal to decrease adverse health care outcomes. The 59 MDW fosters and supports an organizational environment of transparency within a just culture. 2. Responsibilities 2.1. The 59 MDW Commander will: Support strategies and principles of Trusted Care/High Reliability Organization (HRO) Have system-wide responsibility for the implementation and sustainment of a centralized patient safety program with decentralized execution Lead a culture of safety and set the tone by encouraging an organizational shift from a reactive response to a proactive stance to patient safety Allocate the necessary resources to sustain a comprehensive and integrated PSP Designate the OPR to direct the 59 MDW PSP Ensure PSP activities receive support from 59 MDW Group Commanders The OPR for the 59 MDW PSP will: Support strategies and principles of Trusted Care/HRO Manage the implementation and sustainment of a centralized PSP with decentralized execution across 59 MDW Manage an effective marketing plan to promote a culture of safety and encourage an organizational shift from a reactive response to a proactive stance to patient safety Charter a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) team when indicated Manage the 59 MDW PSP Ensure all centralized patient safety (PS) training is conducted by the PSP Review and analyze data from PSP Manager and Data Analyst in order to reduce errors and serious patient harm Chair the Core Serious Safety Event Review Team meetings to ensure accuracy of Serious Safety Event Rate (SSER) reporting for the 59 MDW Chair the Patient Safety Working Group meetings.

3 59MDWI JANUARY Brief the Board of Directors on Patient Safety updates on a monthly basis or as needed MDW Group Commanders will: Ensure quality and continuity in the decentralized execution of the 59 MDW s centralized patient safety program Support strategies and principles of Trusted Care/HRO to keep patients safe and free from harm Ensure all staff attend Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) and Patient Safety Reporting (PSR) training within 90 days of arrival on station Promote use of the approved PSR system Identify and recognize individuals who through the practice of safe behaviors and the use of error prevention tools prevent harm Appoint in writing a primary and alternate Group Patient Safety Coordinator for clinical and non-clinical areas as appropriate by utilizing the approved template on the 59 MDW Patient Safety SharePoint Wing Patient Safety Program Manager will: Implement the 59 MDW centralized PSP under the direction of the OPR Track recent PSR trends and report data to OPR and all required regulatory entities and internal committees Process PSRs to include assigning an initial harm level, selects an investigator based on location of event, and performs quality checks of the investigative reports Identify and prioritize quality initiatives under the direction of the OPR based on data from the PSR system Analyze and extrapolate PSR data in order to advise OPR on most significant trends Monitor and provide guidance on the categorization of events conducted by the Patient Safety Data Analyst Coordinate and facilitate annual Patient Safety Proactive Risk Assessment Ensure reporting and compliance of NPSG Promote the decentralized execution of the PSP by providing guidance to group Patient Safety Coordinators Conduct TeamSTEPPS Train-the-Trainer course Coordinate and facilitate written requirements as outlined in AFI , Medical Quality Operations Coordinate and facilitate the completion of RCAs.

4 4 59MDWI JANUARY Process the required paperwork needed for all staff leadership to gain PSR investigator access Patient Safety Data Analyst will: Assist in the administration of the 59 MDW centralized PSP under the direction of the 59 MDW PSP OPR and the Patient Safety Manager Analyze and extrapolate PSR data in order to advise OPR on most significant trends Use reporting structure (Life of a PSR Algorithm) to classify and assign events entered into the PSR system. Refer to the 59 MDW Patient Safety SharePoint for Life of a PSR Algorithm Process PSRs to include assigning an initial harm level, select an investigator based on location of event, and perform quality checks of the investigative reports Assist Patient Safety Manager (PSM) with all components of the 59 MDW PSP Process the required paperwork needed for all staff leadership to gain PSR investigator access Group Patient Safety Coordinator/Manager will: Ensure compliance with 59 MDW PSP Ensure implementation and evaluation of the NPSG by submitting audits to the wing PSM on a monthly basis Maintain group PSR data. Use tools and metrics provided by the wing PSP. Report group PSR data to wing PSP on a monthly basis Provide group PSR top trending data, lessons learned and actions forward to wing PSP on a monthly basis Ensure information regarding patient safety priorities, activities, and error prevention is proactively disseminated via the group PS huddles to all assigned staff Chief of Department/Flight, Service or Clinic will: Promote the practice of safety behaviors and the use of error prevention tools to enhance a culture of safety and facilitate an organizational shift from a reactive response to a proactive stance to patient safety Support strategies and principles of Trusted Care/HRO Ensure orientation and ongoing education for all staff Ensure compliance with the wing PSP Ensure all personnel recognize that they are responsible for identifying and reporting events through the PSR system All 59 MDW personnel are encouraged to: Actively participate in creating a culture of safety by following organizational standards, evidence-based practices, and proactively intercept unsafe practices.

5 59MDWI JANUARY Utilize the PSR system to voluntarily report all PS events to include near-misses Report adverse incidents and sentinel events to the Wing PS office at (210) or OPR PSR Event reporting Staff members will immediately attend to the needs of the patient upon identification of PS event The staff member or the supervisor of the staff member who identified the event will preserve related materials Please refer to the 59 MDW Patient Safety SharePoint for detailed information and instructions on the PSR system.

6 6 59MDWI JANUARY 2017 Figure 2.1. Department of Defense Harm Scale. JOSEPH R. RICHARDS, Colonel, USAF, MC Chief of the Medical Staff, 59th Medical Wing

7 59MDWI JANUARY References Attachment 1 GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION AFPD 44-1, Medical Operations, 9 June 2016 AFI , Medical Quality Operations, 16 August 2011 Adopted Form AF Form 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication Abbreviations and Acronyms HRO High Reliability Organization IAW In Accordance With MDW Medical Wing MDWI Medical Wing Instruction NPSG National Patient Safety Goals OPR Office of Primary Responsibility PS Patient Safety PSM Patient Safety Manager PSP Patient Safety Program PSR Patient Safety Reporting RCA Root Cause Analysis SSER Serious Safety Event Rate TeamSTEPPS Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety Terms Adverse Drug Event An injury resulting from a medical intervention related to a medication, including harm from an adverse drug reaction or a medication error. Adverse Incident Events such as actual breaches in medical care, administrative procedures or other events resulting in an outcome that is not associated with the standard of care or acceptable risks associated with the provision of care and service for a patient. Circumstances or events that could have resulted in an adverse event. Contributing Factors Additional reasons, not necessarily the most basic reasons, for an event to be less than ideal, as planned, or as expected. Contributing factors may apply to individuals, systems operations, or the entire organization. Core Serious Safety Event Review Team Meeting to review and categorize level of harm to determine SSER for 59 MDW.

8 8 59MDWI JANUARY 2017 Data Material, facts or clinical observations that have not been interpreted. Evaluation Analysis of collected, compiled and organized data pertaining to important aspects of care. Data are compared with predetermined, clinically valid criteria; variations from criteria are determined to be acceptable or unacceptable; and problems or opportunities to improve care are identified. Harm Personal injury of a physical, emotional or psychological nature as a result of an event. Near Miss/Good Catch Any process variation, error or other circumstance that could have resulted in harm to a patient but through chance or timely intervention did not reach the patient. These events are also known as near miss or good catch. Patient Individual at the facility for treatment, either as an outpatient, or for radiology, pharmacy or laboratory activities. Includes period of time from arrival to departure, including time in parking area and waiting time anywhere in the facility, such as in the dining facility. Patient Safety Working Group Regular meeting for PSP stakeholders to promote the culture of safety and develop innovative ways to enhance Trusted Care/HRO. Risk Assessment A method used to proactively evaluate the probability of a patient safety event in order to minimize the risk of the event actually occurring. Root Cause The most basic reason that a situation did not turn out ideally, as planned or as expected. Root Cause Analysis A process for identifying the basic or contributing causal factor(s) associated with an adverse incident or good catch. The review is interdisciplinary and includes those who are closest to the process. It focuses on systems and processes, not individual performance. The analysis asks what and why until all aspects of the process are reviewed and all contributing factors have been determined. It identifies changes that could be made in systems and processes to improve performance and reduce the risk of adverse incidents or recurrence of good catches. Sentinel Event An unexpected occurrence during a health care encounter involving patient death or serious physical or psychological injury or illness, including loss of limb or function, not related to the natural course of the patient's illness or underlying condition. Any process variation for which a recurrence carries a significant chance of a serious adverse outcome. TeamSTEPPS An evidence-based teamwork system designed to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of patient care in an effort to optimize clinical outcomes by improving communication and other teamwork skills among healthcare professional. Trusted Care/HRO The Air Force Medical Service vision as a continuous learning and improving organization with a single-minded focus of safety and Zero Harm.