CGS Administrators, LLC Clinical Hospice Documentation from CGS Missouri Hospice & Palliative Care Assoc. October 3, 2016

Transcription

1 Missouri Hospice & Palliative Care Conference Reviewer s decision is reliant upon documentation Results in a full denial for the submission Documentation must be legible Medical necessity is always based on the patient s condition Is it the patient or the documentation? Make the reviewer see the patient The reviewer isn t allowed to read between the lines 3 1

2 Documentation is expected to show significant changes in the beneficiary s condition and plan of care Always include admission assessment Decline must be evident in documentation Chart or graph may be helpful 4 uidelines/hospice_documentation.html 5 _documentation_tool_h _ pdf?wb =c9fa6dfa 6 2

3 spice_clinical_factors_recert_tool_h _ pdf 7 Documentation must make the reviewer see the patient, especially for long-term hospice patients, or those with chronic illness and general decline Use quantifiable values and measurements to show changes Graphs can show trends, even though the visit to visit changes may seem minimal 8 3

4 10 Weight Document patient s weight at least monthly and more often if possible Take weights in consistent fashion Time of day Clothing Consistency in relation to meal time Show prior and current weights Don t - loss of 4 pounds in since last weighing Do in last 4 weeks, patient has gone from 140 pounds to 136 pounds Measurements Upper arm/girth/leg measurements starting at admission Even if able to weigh patient Shows trend if suddenly unable to weigh Include policy in documentation that shows how and where measurements are taken Be consistent! 11 Pain Level of pain 0-10 scale is preferable, but may not be workable Consistent method of pain measurement is key Expressed in the way patient/caregiver understands Colors Small, Medium, Big Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale 12 4

5 Pain Type of pain Document any extenuating circumstances Examples: Wound care just completed, ready for pain meds, etc. 13 Responsiveness Does the patient react to your presence? Is the patient frightened of you? Does the patient remember you from last visit? Does the patient remember why you re there? Unresponsive Respond to touch? Smell? Light? Fades in and out of alertness? 14 Levels of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) dependence What can they do SAFELY? Examples getting in/out of shower, ambulate while carrying food Are they impulsive? 15 5

6 Vital signs Respiration rate, blood pressure, pulse, temperature Graph easily shows change Does patient have a response to the procedure? 16 Strength Ask the patient to squeeze your hands Is there a difference from last visit? Can the patient raise their hands to yours? Is the patient able to stand? Assisted or unassisted How long? Safely? 17 Lucidity Can the patient carry on a lucid conversation? If you change the subject abruptly can they still follow along? Can the patient make decisions? Simple or complex Current events Inside or outside their world 18 6

7 Intake/output Make sure the serving size is appropriate and consistent Check for dehydration Is there a system in place to measure output that is workable for the patient/family? Is the patient offered food that they like and is appropriate for them? Appetite persistent or changing? 19 Aspiration Observed? By whom? Recurrent? Mild choking vs. aspiration Aspiration pneumonia must be confirmed by physician 20 Fatigue Meet you at the door? Too tired to get out of chair? Recurrent? Too tired for self grooming? Too tired to prepare food or eat? No longer does favorite tasks? 21 7

8 Agitation New Variable levels Unable to participate in conversation New? Increased? 22 GI Concerns Diarrhea Constipation Nausea Vomiting Persistent/changing 23 Skin condition Broken skin vs. fragile skin Stage wounds whenever possible Redness? Itching? Pale or flushed? Diaphoretic? 24 8

9 Pitfalls in terminal prognosis documentation: Paradigm shift for medical professionals Have been trained to show improvement not decline Amount and detail dependent upon situation Chronic, deteriorating condition vs. rapid progression Chronic, deteriorating condition may depend upon small details Rapid progression may be focused on only one symptom instead of overall picture 25 Failing to show big picture Send in relevant documentation outside of period requested Always send in admission assessments Remember the reviewer can t see the person Chart the obvious Decrease in appetite may mean the patient s dentures no longer fit or they don t like what is being served Should be able to identify beneficiary from the documentation without seeing the name 26 Obtain history and physical (H&P) information May come from more than one source Different sources may have different focus Dietician, emergency room Recent hospital stay? Lives or lived at facility?

10 Use functional scale, as appropriate and always tell what changed to make change in status Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) 30%, 40%, 50%, etc. Don t average numbers Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) 30%, 40%, 50%, etc. Don t average numbers Use functional scale, as appropriate and always tell what changed to make change in status Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) New York Heart Association (NYHA) Must be determined by physician Don t forget documentation from the interdisciplinary group (IDG) meetings Information from other staff members May have different perspectives Different staff members see patient at different times and in different circumstances Example nurse vs. social worker or chaplain Aides have valuable information. See patient at most vulnerable

11 Refer to Local Coverage Determination (LCD) for guidance Use numbers Use observations and data, not conclusions Clinical indicators of decline Weight loss, infections, changes in mobility, etc. Review terminal admitting diagnosis still appropriate? Reassessment is ongoing 31 Remember quality versus quantity Local Coverage Determination (LCD) information from CMS website The LCD is intended to provide guidance to both the medical community and CMS contractors 32 LCD consists of 3 parts plus an appendix Part I: Decline in clinical status guidelines Part II: Non-disease specific baseline guidelines Both of these should be met Part III: Co-morbidities Appendices Section I: Cancer Diagnoses Section II: Non-Cancer Diagnoses

12 LCD Part I Decline in clinical status guidelines Applies to patients whose decline is not considered to be reversible Listed in order of their likelihood to predict poor survival No specific number of variables must be met Progression of disease as evidenced by worsening: Clinical status Symptoms Signs Laboratory results Call attention to lab results in your documentation, if relevant Decline in KPS or PPS scores Increasing emergency room visits, hospitalizations or physician s visits related to hospice primary diagnosis Progressive decline in FAST for dementia Progression to dependence with ADLs Progressive stage 3-4 pressure ulcers LCD Part II Non-disease specific baseline guidelines Physiologic impairment of functional status as demonstrated by: KPS or PPS 70% HIV disease is 50% Stroke and coma are 40% Dependence on assistance for two or more ADLs Feeding, ambulation, continence, transfer, bathing and dressing Keep SAFETY in mind 36 12

13 37 Co-morbidities: LCD Part III The severity of these diseases may contribute to a shortened life expectancy: CHF COPD Ischemic heart disease DM Neurological disease (CVA, ALS, MS, Parkinson s) Renal failure Liver disease Neoplastic disease AIDS Dementia LCD Appendix Section I Cancer Diagnosis Disease with distant metastases at presentation Progression from an earlier stage of disease to metastatic disease with either: OR A continued decline in spite of therapy Patient declines further disease directed therapy LCD Appendix Section II Non Cancer diagnosis Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Dementia Heart disease HIV disease Liver disease Pulmonary disease Renal disease Stroke and coma 13

14 Terminal diagnosis documentation opportunities Admission Course of care (every visit) IDG meetings Change in level of care or plan of care Recertification 40 CGS HHH Medicare Bulletins Published monthly Compilation of news for hospice and home health providers 42 14

15 CGS ListServ messages Recent News webpage Timely access to current news and publications 43 Join/Update Listserv 44 CMS Medicare Benefit Policy Manual (CMS Publication ) Chapter 9 - Hospice Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/bp102c09.pdf 45 15

16 CGS Hospice Coverage Guidelines webpage _Guidelines.html 46 CGS Hospice Quick Resource Tools spice_qrt.html 47 CGS Frequently Asked Questions ml 48 16

17 Provide staff with the rules - Information is Power!! Guide decisions and empower clinicians with coverage criteria Education on coverage and documentation standards Oversight of documentation Ensure the technical pieces are covered CGS Provider Contact Center (Option 1) Twitter: Facebook: 17