Final Accreditation Report
|
|
- Martin Stephens
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Guidance producer: Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations Guidance product: Clinical Commissioning Guides Date: 28 February 2013 Version: 1.3 Final Accreditation Report Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations Clinical Commissioning Guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 20
2 Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation... 3 Background to the producer... 3 Implementation... 5 Appendix A: NICE Accreditation analysis... 6 Appendix B: Bibliography Appendix C: NICE Accreditation Advisory Committee, external advisers and NICE Accreditation team Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 2 of 20
3 Introduction The NICE Accreditation Programme recognises organisations that demonstrate high standards in producing health or social care. Users of the accredited can therefore have high confidence in the quality of the information. Organisations may publicly display a seal of approval called an Accreditation Mark for 5 years after their processes have been accredited. The process for accrediting producers of and recommendations for practice is described in the process manual. Accreditation recommendation NICE has accredited the process used by the Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations to produce clinical Commissioning Guides. Accreditation is valid for 5 years from February 2013 and is applicable to produced using the processes described in the Commissioning process manual (2012). Background to the producer The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) aims to enable surgeons to achieve and maintain the highest standards of surgical practice and patient care. The College is made up of 10 directorates, known as the Surgical Specialty Associations (SSA). Each of these 10 directorates is responsible for a different surgical area. The commissioning programme was established in 2011 as an outcome of the Department of Health s Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) Right Care Elective Surgery Report, which proposed that the NHS Commissioning Board support the development of Value Based Clinical Commissioning Guidance for elective surgical care pathways. Each Clinical Commissioning Guide describes how to commission a service for a particular specialty. From April 2013 funding will come from the NHS Commissioning Board. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 3 of 20
4 Summary The Accreditation Advisory Committee considered that the processes used by the Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations to produce Clinical Commissioning Guides demonstrated compliance with all of the 25 criteria for accreditation. The Clinical Commissioning Guides are clear in their scope and purpose and the development process includes a variety of professional stakeholders and target users, with lay input at all stages of development. The Clinical Commissioning Guides result from a systematic process that considers the risks and benefits of recommendations. The guides show consideration of the likely impact of the recommendation from a clinical and patient perspective, the population affected, and resource implications and the potential organisational, economic, cultural and political barriers to implementation. Suggestions to improve the process used to produce the Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations Clinical Commissioning Guides include: ensuring the conflicts of interest declarations are publicly available strengthening the process for how peer reviewers are selected. Professor David Haslam, CBE Chair, Accreditation Advisory Committee February 2013 Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 4 of 20
5 Implementation Following accreditation, from the accredited producer will be identified on NHS Evidence by the Accreditation Mark. The accredited producer is also granted a royalty-free, worldwide licence to use the NICE Accreditation Mark in accordance with the Conditions and Terms of Use. Providing these conditions are met, a producer s accreditation will last for 5 years from the date accreditation was awarded. Accredited producers must take reasonable steps to ensure the accredited processes are followed when generating the type of evidence for which they are accredited. Accredited producers should have quality assurance mechanisms in place and must inform NICE Accreditation within 30 days if any significant change is made to a process. Figure 1: The Accreditation Mark Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 5 of 20
6 Appendix A: NICE Accreditation analysis The Accreditation Advisory Committee considered the following analysis of the producer s compliance with NICE Accreditation criteria, which covers 6 discrete domains. The full analysis leading to the accreditation decision is shown below. Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision Does the producer have a policy in place and adhered to that requires them to explicitly detail: 1.1 Overall objective Section 1 of the process manual a specifies the overall aims of the commissioning guides and the commissioning guide programme, describing what is within and outside the scope for the commissioning guide programme. Scope and purpose 1.2 The clinical, healthcare or social questions covered Section 2 of the process manual a states that the development of Clinical Commissioning Guides is prioritised against criteria such as the burden of disease, clinical priority or NHS Commissioning Board priority area. In addition, the manual states that commissioning covers care pathways for patients with conditions amenable to surgical intervention. The questions are generic commissioning questions aligned with the pathway for a surgical speciality. The clinical Commissioning guide examples b g reviewed give the pathway in section 1 High value care pathway along with the context for commissioners in the Introduction. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations Clinical Commissioning Guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 6 of 20
7 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision 1.3 Population and/or target audience to whom the applies 1.4 Guidance includes clear recommendations in reference to specific clinical, healthcare or social circumstances Section 2 of the process manual a explains that the intended audience is primarily commissioning staff in primary care organisations, local health authorities and clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) across a care pathway for a surgical intervention. The examples b g reviewed all indicate the target audience and population covered by the in the titles and this population is further subdivided within the guide in specific circumstances. Section 6 of the process manual a describes the process for structuring recommendations and what should be considered when formulating the recommendations. Appendix 3 is the template for commissioning, which demonstrates the format for the Clinical Commissioning Guides. Does the producer have a policy in place and adhered to that means it includes: Stakeholder involvement 2.1 Individuals from all relevant stakeholder groups, including patient groups, in developing Section 3 of the process manual a describes the roles and composition of the Guideline Development Group (GDG). A terms of reference template for GDGs is provided in Appendix 1. The process states that 2 lay members will be part of each GDG. In all examples b g reviewed, section 7.4 Guideline Development Group contains a table with the headings Name, Job title and Affiliation, which demonstrates evidence of the process in practice. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 7 of 20
8 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision 2.2 Patient and service user representatives and seeks patient views and preferences in developing 2.3 Representative intended users in developing Section 3 of the process manual a states that at least 2 patient representatives form part of the GDG. Patient involvement is secured through contact with patient representative groups linked to the relevant surgical specialty association or through a patient organisation linked to the topic under consideration. Patient representatives are afforded equal standing to their clinical counterparts. Section 8 describes the peer reviewers, one of whom must be a patient. Section 3 of the process manual a describes the proposed composition of the GDG, which includes commissioners. Section 8 indicates that a CCG commissioner is essential for the composition of the peer reviewers. Evidence of commissioner involvement was provided for the examples b g reviewed. Does the producer have a clear policy in place that: Rigour of development 3.1 Requires the producer to use systematic methods to search for evidence and provide details of the search strategy Section 4 of the process manual a describes the steps that need to be taken by the information specialists performing the systematic literature search on a topic. The information specialists provide details of the systematic literature search, including the search strategy, databases and dates searched. In addition, section 4 describes the use of the questions in informing the search. If the search retrieves only a small number of relevant results, the GDG will widen the search to include grey literature. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 8 of 20
9 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision 3.2 Requires the producers to state the criteria and reasons for inclusion or exclusion of evidence identified by the evidence review 3.3 Describes the strengths and limitations of the body of evidence and acknowledges any areas of uncertainty 3.4 Describes the method used to arrive at recommendations (for example, a voting system or formal consensus techniques like Delphi consensus) The process manual a states that evidence should be selected according to defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All evidence is appraised and included or excluded in accordance with the relevance to the questions and search strategy. In addition, section 5 of the manual explains how evidence is graded according to its strength and any specific exclusions arising from this grading should be recorded. Section 5 of the process manual a describes the producer s approach to grading the strength of the evidence. The SIGN 50 criteria are documented for use as well as the need for critical appraisal of evidence. A number of checklists have been provided covering a range of studies, such as case control studies, cohort studies and economic evaluation studies. Examples of completed critical appraisal checklists and evidence tables were provided to demonstrate compliance with the documented process. Sections 5 and 6 of the process manual a describe the process followed to arrive at recommendations, namely informal consensus based on the evidence. In circumstances when consensus cannot be achieved, the GDG may proceed to a vote. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 9 of 20
10 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision 3.5 Requires the producers to consider the health benefits against the side effects and risks in formulating recommendations 3.6 Describes the processes of external peer review 3.7 Describes the process of updating and maintaining and improving quality Section 7 of the process manual a verifies the submission by the producer above. In addition, Appendix 3 of the manual indicates where the risks and benefits will be presented in the clinical Commissioning guides. In all examples b g reviewed, section 6 documents any benefits and risks found under the headings: patient outcome, patient safety, patient experience, equity of access and resource impact. Section 8 of the process manual a states that formal peer review is required for each guide by at least 3 independent referees who have had no prior involvement in the development process. Reviewers are appointed by the sponsoring organisation and will include 1 patient, 1 commissioner and 1 clinician, and piloting. Draft is made available for comment for at least 4 weeks, inviting comments from key stakeholders. The manual also describes the circumstances under which piloting occurs. Clinical Commissioning Guides are reviewed every 3 years from the date of publication, although interim updates within this period may be required. At the time of preparing this accreditation report (February 2013), no guide has been updated because the guides have only recently been produced, however the process for updating is in place and is given consideration during development. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 10 of 20
11 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision Does the producer ensure that: 4.1 Recommendations are specific, unambiguous and clearly identifiable Section 6 of the process manual a describes how the recommendations should be structured. It also states that the language used in the clinical Commissioning guides should be clear and unambiguous, using clearly defined terms to ensure shared understanding by all users. Appendix 3 of the manual clarifies the format for recommendations. All examples b g reviewed demonstrate implementation of this process and all recommendations made by the are specific and identifiable. Clarity and presentation 4.2 Different options for the management of the condition or options for intervention are clearly presented 4.3 The date of search, the date of publication or last update and the proposed date for review are clearly stated 4.4 The content of the is suitable for the specified target audience. If patients or service users are part of this audience, the language should be appropriate Section 6 of the process manual a describes how the options for treatment or intervention should be documented in the guides. Clinical Commissioning guide examples b g suggest more than 1 approach to treatment or management of a condition, if relevant. The front page of Clinical Commissioning Guides gives the date of the evidence search, date of publication and proposed date for review, as documented in Appendix 3 of the process manual a. Sections 3 and 8 of the process manual a state that CCG commissioners are core members of the GDG and peer reviewers. The intended audience is primarily commissioning staff in primary care organisations, local health authorities and clinical commissioning groups across a care pathway for a surgical intervention. All examples b g reviewed are written using language suitable for all these professionals. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 11 of 20
12 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision Does the producer routinely consider: 5.1 Publishing support tools to aid implementation of Section 6 of the process manual a states that support tools to aid implementation of high-value care pathways should be included. In addition, section 9 of the manual describes the dissemination strategy of the guides and shows how the producer encourages implementation of the guides through initiatives such as speaking at conferences, writing articles for journals, supporting workshops and other events. All examples b g reviewed contain topic-specific information in sections such as: procedures explorer, quality dashboard and levers for implementation. Applicability 5.2 Discussion of potential organisational and financial barriers in applying its recommendations Section 6 of the process manual a documents the information described by the producer above. Discussion of potential financial and organisational barriers to implementation is critical for to be effective. The GDG considers the likely impact of the recommendations from a clinical and patient perspective, the population affected, resource implications and the potential organisational, economic, cultural and political barriers to implementation. All examples b g include information about the evidence and recommendations in relation to QIPP when possible. 5.3 Review criteria for monitoring and/or audit purposes within each product Section 6 of the process manual a explains how the interventions are linked with the procedures explorer, quality dashboards and levers for implementation in order to provide CCG commissioners with the means to monitor and/or audit progress against specific clinical Commissioning guides recommendations. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 12 of 20
13 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision Does the producer: 6.1 Ensure editorial independence from the funding body The Department of Health provided the RCSEng with funding for this project and has no influence over the content of the clinical Commissioning guides. From April 2013 the funding will come from the NHS Commissioning Board. The RCSEng provides project management and coordination support to the SSA, but again does not influence the content of the clinical Commissioning guides because this is entirely the responsibility of the SSA. Editorial independence 6.2 Demonstrate transparency about the funding mechanisms for its Section 11 of the process manual a states that any sources of funding received towards the development of Clinical Commissioning Guides will be explicitly mentioned in the published clinical Commissioning guide. Accountability arrangements include a governance framework that handles potential conflicts of interest. 6.3 Record and state any potential conflicts of interest of individuals involved in developing the recommendations Sections 3 and 8 of the process manual a describe the conflict of interest policy, and give the Conflicts of interest form in Appendix 2. The declaration of interests process does not preclude the individual from taking part in the development process and does not imply that they have been influenced by their interest. This approach allows the GDG to see any potential conflicts of interest and take this into account when considering an individual s contribution The conflicts of interest process used by the SSA is specific to its development process, inclusive of all involved in guideline development, divided into categories, up to date and clear in how conflicts are taken into account. Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 13 of 20
14 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation decision 6.4 Take account of any potential for bias in the conclusions or recommendations of the The funding source is transparent. The process manual requires a systematic evidence search and recommendations are reached by a multidisciplinary group before consultation and peer review by a large number of specialists, which helps to reduce the potential for bias from any individual. a Commissioning process manual (2012) b Clinical Commissioning guide for foreskin conditions c Clinical Commissioning guide for inguinal hernia d Clinical Commissioning guide for lower urinary tract symptoms e Clinical Commissioning guide for obesity f Clinical Commissioning guide for scrotal swelling g Clinical Commissioning guide for rectal bleeding Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 14 of 20
15 Appendix B: Bibliography Appendix B lists the additional information taken into account in the analysis and considered by the Committee. Document name Description Location Commissioning Guidance Process Manual Process manual Clinical Commissioning guide for foreskin conditions Draft commissioning Clinical Commissioning guide for inguinal hernia Draft commissioning Clinical Commissioning guide for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Draft commissioning Clinical Commissioning guide for obesity Draft commissioning Clinical Commissioning guide for rectal bleeding Draft commissioning Clinical Commissioning guide for scrotal swelling Draft commissioning Conflict of Interest Declaration Supporting process document Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations Clinical Commissioning Guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 15 of 20
16 Document name Description Location Feedback Form Supporting process document Peer Review Form 2 Supporting process document CASP_Case- Control_Appraisal_Che cklist_14oct10 Checklist used for evidence assessment CASP_Cohort_Apprais al_checklist_14oct10 Checklist used for evidence assessment CASP_Diagnostic_Appr aisal_checklist_14oct1 0 Checklist used for evidence assessment CASP_Economic_Evalu ation_checklist_14oct1 0 Checklist used for evidence assessment CASP_Qualitative_Appr aisal_checklist_14oct1 0 Checklist used for evidence assessment CASP_RCT_Appraisal_ Checklist_14oct10 Checklist used for evidence assessment CASP_Systematic_Revi ew_appraisal_checklist _14oct10 Checklist used for evidence assessment Clinical-Prediction-Rule- Checklist used for evidence Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 16 of 20
17 Document name Description Location CASP-checklist assessment LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS doc Workshop findings for evidence searching LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS ppt Presentation of the evidence Three peer review feedback form Complete peer review form Four feedback requests requesting feedback Three conflict of interest declaration forms Completed conflict of interest form Feedback and actions_draft_lower URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS Comments and actions on feedback Final draft_lower URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS Draft for signoff Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 17 of 20
18 Appendix C: NICE Accreditation Advisory Committee, external advisers and NICE Accreditation team NICE Accreditation Advisory Committee The NICE Accreditation Advisory Committee operates as a standing advisory committee of the Board of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The Committee provides advice to NICE on a framework for accrediting sources of evidence that should be recognised as trusted sources of information for the NHS. The Chair of the Committee is appointed by the NICE Board and the meetings are conducted by the chair or in his/her absence the vice chair. The current Chair is David Haslam. A full list of the Accreditation Advisory Committee membership is available on the NICE website. Members are appointed for a period of 3 years. This may be extended by mutual agreement for a further 3 years, up to a maximum term of office of 10 years. The decisions of the Committee are arrived at by a consensus of the members present. The quorum is set at 50% of committee membership. The Committee submits its recommendations to the NICE Publications executive which acts under delegated powers of the NICE Board in considering and approving its recommendations. Committee members are asked to declare any interests in the producer to be accredited. If it is considered that there is a conflict of interest, the member(s) is excluded from participating further in the discussions. Committee members who took part in the discussions for this accreditation decision are listed below. Title Name Surname Role Organisation Mr Jim Blair Consultant Nurse Learning Disabilities Dr Adrian Brown Consultant in Public Health Medicine Professor Ann Caress Professor of Nursing/Director of Postgraduate Research Programmes St. George s Healthcare NHS Trust Inner North West London PCTs University of Manchester Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 18 of 20
19 Ms Ailsa Donnelly Lay member Ms Amanda Edwards Deputy Chief Executive Ms Joyce Epstein Lay member Social Care Institute for Excellence Professor David Haslam National Clinical Adviser Care Quality Commission Dr Bobbie Jacobson Director of London Health Observatory and Vice Chair of London Health Observatory PH Observatories Professor Monica Lakhanpaul Consultant Community Paediatrician/Senior Lecturer Leicestershire Partnership Trust in Child Health Dr Edward Ng General Practitioner Ley Hill Surgery Dr Donal O Donoghue National Clinical Director for Kidney Care and Consultant Renal Physician Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust Professor Sandy Oliver Professor of Public Policy, Deputy Director, Social Science Research Unit, Cochrane Consumers and University of London Communications Review Group Dr Carl Parker Primary Care Medical Adviser North Tees and Hartlepool Foundation Trust Dr Mahendra Patel Research Fellow, Senior Lecturer and Community Pharmacist Dr Karen Ritchie Head of Knowledge Management Professor Sasha Shepperd Professor of Health Services Research Universities of Huddersfield and Bradford Healthcare Improvement Scotland University of Oxford Dr Mark Strong MRC Fellow Section of Public Health, SCHARR Ms Gill Swash Head of Knowledge and Library Services NHS Western Cheshire Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 19 of 20
20 External Advisers for The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Surgical Specialty Associations Clinical Commissioning Guides accreditation application Helen Crisp, Assistant Director Research and Evaluation, The Health Foundation, London, UK Karen Macpherson, Lead Health Services Researcher, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Edinburgh, UK Adrian Reyes-Hughes, Clinical Consultant (Clinical Strategy & Health Information Services), Hampshire, UK Victoria Wilkinson, Primary Care Research Network NW Manager, NHS Halton & St Helens, Newton Le Willows, UK NICE Accreditation team for The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Surgical Specialty Associations Clinical Commissioning Guides accreditation application Stephanie Birtles, Accreditation Technical Analyst, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Manchester, UK Paul Chrisp, Associate Director, Accreditation, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Manchester, UK Royal College of Surgeons of England: Surgical Specialty Associations commissioning guides: Final Accreditation Report Page 20 of 20
Final Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: Resuscitation Council (UK) Guidance product: 2010 resuscitation guidelines Date: 2 August 2012 Version: 1.4 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 19 Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation
More informationMedicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Guidance producer subject to accreditation. Process subject to accreditation
Guidance producer subject to accreditation Process subject to accreditation Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Device Bulletins Date: 18 June 2010 Draft Accreditation Report for
More informationFinal Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Guidance product: Device Bulletins Date: 20 September 2010 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 21 Contents Introduction...
More informationMedicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Guidance producer subject to accreditation. Process subject to accreditation
Guidance producer subject to accreditation Process subject to accreditation Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Pharmacovigilance Public Assessment Reports Date: 18 June 2010 Draft
More informationMedicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Public Assessment Reports
Guidance producer: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Guidance product: Public Assessment Reports Date: 18 June 2010 Version: 1.4 Draft Accreditation Report for consultation Medicines
More informationFinal Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: Healthcare Infection Society Guidance product: Clinical Guidelines Date: 23 March 2015 Version: 1.6 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 19 Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation...
More informationClinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Guidance producer: National Osteoporosis Guideline Group Guidance product: Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis Date: 9 March 2017 Version: 1.3 Final Accreditation Report
More informationEgton Medical Information Systems Limited (EMIS) Clinical Immediate Reference articles
Guidance producer: Egton Medical Information Systems Limited (EMIS) Guidance product: Clinical Immediate Reference articles Date: 17 August 2010 Final Accreditation Report Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation
More informationFinal Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: The Royal College of Physicians of London Guidance product: National Clinical Guideline for Stroke Date: 19 September 2016 Version: 1.2 Final Accreditation Report Report Page 1 of 21
More informationBritish Association of Dermatologists
Guidance producer: British Association of Dermatologists Guidance product: Service Guidance and Standards Date: 13 March 2017 Version: 1.2 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 26 Contents Introduction...
More informationThe Renal Association
Guidance producer: The Renal Association Guidance product: Clinical Practice Guidelines Date: 11 January 2017 Version: 1.4 Final Accreditation Report Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation...
More informationFinal Accreditation Report - for guidance and advice for use in decision support systems
Guidance producer: NHS Direct Guidance product: The content of the Call Streaming Prioritisation Tool and Teleguides Date: 2 January 2013 Version: 1.4 Final Accreditation Report - for guidance and advice
More informationDraft Accreditation Report for consultation
Guidance producer: Guidance product: NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP) UK National Screening Committee (NSC) NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme Screening for Down s syndrome: UK NSC Policy
More informationFinal Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: British National Formulary Publications Guidance product: Nurse Prescribers Formulary Date: 10 March 2014 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 28 Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation
More informationAccreditation Decision Report for consultation
Guidance producer: British National Formulary Publications Guidance product: British National Formulary, British National Formulary for Children Date: 29 August 2013 Version: 1.4 Accreditation Decision
More informationBritish Society for Surgery of the Hand. (BSSH) Evidence for Surgical
British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) Evidence for Surgical Treatment (B.E.S.T.) Process Manual 1 st Edition (12 th version, November 2016) Review Date: November 2019 BSSH Evidence for Surgical
More informationCOMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME. Standard operating procedure
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT PROGRAMME Standard operating procedure April 2018 1. Introduction The Commissioning Support Programme (CSP) at NICE supports the
More informationClinical Practice Guideline Development Manual
Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual Publication Date: September 2016 Review Date: September 2021 Table of Contents 1. Background... 3 2. NICE accreditation... 3 3. Patient Involvement... 3 4.
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide December 2014 Quality standards process guide Page 1 of 44 About this guide This guide
More informationHow NICE clinical guidelines are developed
Issue date: January 2009 How NICE clinical guidelines are developed: an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS Fourth edition : an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS Fourth edition
More informationProcess and methods Published: 23 January 2017 nice.org.uk/process/pmg31
Evidence summaries: process guide Process and methods Published: 23 January 2017 nice.org.uk/process/pmg31 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationNHS. The guideline development process: an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Issue date: April 2007 The guideline development process: an overview for stakeholders, the public and the NHS Third edition The guideline development
More informationProcess and methods Published: 30 November 2012 nice.org.uk/process/pmg6
The guidelines manual Process and methods Published: 30 November 2012 nice.org.uk/process/pmg6 NICE 2017. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationDraft National Quality Assurance Criteria for Clinical Guidelines
Draft National Quality Assurance Criteria for Clinical Guidelines Consultation document July 2011 1 About the The is the independent Authority established to drive continuous improvement in Ireland s health
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Interim Process and Methods of the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Principles Interim Process and Methods of the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme 1. Our guidance production processes are based on key principles,
More informationNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence The guidelines manual January 2009 The guidelines manual About this document This document describes the methods used in the development of NICE guidelines.
More informationDocument Details Clinical Audit Policy
Title Document Details Clinical Audit Policy Trust Ref No 1538-31104 Main points this document covers This policy details the responsibilities and processes associated with the Clinical Audit process within
More informationClinical Audit Strategy 2015/ /18
Audit Strategy 2015/16 2017/18 Audit Strategy v8 Head of Integrated Governance Oct 2014 1 CLINICAL AUDIT STRATEGY, 2015/16 to 2017/18 Executive East Cheshire NHS Trust sees clinical audit as a cornerstone
More informationSPONSORSHIP AND JOINT WORKING WITH THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
SPONSORSHIP AND JOINT WORKING WITH THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY 1 SUMMARY This document sets out Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group policy and advice to employees on sponsorship and joint working with
More informationMethods: National Clinical Policies
Methods: National Clinical Policies Choose an item. NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Operations and Information Specialised Commissioning Nursing Trans. & Corp. Ops. Commissioning
More informationIssue date: October Guide to the multiple technology appraisal process
Issue date: October 2009 Guide to the multiple technology appraisal process Guide to the multiple technology appraisal process Issued: October 2009 This document is one of a series describing the processes
More informationCCG Policy for Working with the Pharmaceutical Industry
CCG Policy for Working with the Pharmaceutical Industry 1. Introduction Medicines are the most frequently and widely used NHS treatment and account for over 12% of NHS expenditure. The Pharmaceutical Industry
More informationPublic Health Skills and Career Framework Multidisciplinary/multi-agency/multi-professional. April 2008 (updated March 2009)
Public Health Skills and Multidisciplinary/multi-agency/multi-professional April 2008 (updated March 2009) Welcome to the Public Health Skills and I am delighted to launch the UK-wide Public Health Skills
More informationInitial education and training of pharmacy technicians: draft evidence framework
Initial education and training of pharmacy technicians: draft evidence framework October 2017 About this document This document should be read alongside the standards for the initial education and training
More informationRemoval of Annual Declaration and new Triennial Review Form. Originated / Modified By: Professional Development and Education Team
Review Circulation Application Ratificatio n Author Minor Amendment Supersedes Title DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE Title: Mentorship in Nursing and Midwifery Policy Version: 14.1 Reference Number: Supersedes:.14.0
More informationEuropean network of paediatric research (EnprEMA)
17 February 2012 EMA/77450/2012 Human Medicines Development and Evaluation Recognition criteria for self assessment The European Medicines Agency is tasked with developing a European paediatric network
More informationWORKING WITH THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY POLICY Version 1.0
WORKING WITH THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY POLICY Version 1.0 1 Standard Operating Procedure St Helens CCG Working with The Pharmaceutical Industry Policy Version 1.0 Implementation Date May 2017 Review
More informationGUIDANCE ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR REVALIDATION FOR SURGERY
ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR REVALIDATION FOR SURGERY Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core Guidance for all doctors GENERAL INTRODUCTION JUNE 2012 The purpose of revalidation
More informationOut of tariff high cost drug / technology business case template
Out of tariff high cost drug / technology business case template Out of tariff high cost drug / technology business case template Please read all the criteria before completing any of the template For
More informationPOLICY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NICE GUID ANCE
POLICY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NICE GUID ANCE Document Type Corporate Policy Unique Identifier CO-019 Document Purpose To outline the process for the implementation and compliance with NICE guidance and
More informationCODE OF CONDUCT WHERE GP PRACTICES OR CONSORTIA ARE POTENTIAL PROVIDERS OF CCG COMMISISONED SERVICES
CODE OF CONDUCT WHERE GP PRACTICES OR CONSORTIA ARE POTENTIAL 1. Introduction PROVIDERS OF CCG COMMISISONED SERVICES 1.1. Managing potential conflicts of interest appropriately is needed to protect the
More informationContinuing professional development: a summary guide for surgery
Continuing professional development: a summary guide for surgery Introduction Definition CPD is the engagement in a continuing learning process, outside formal undergraduate and postgraduate training,
More informationTHE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND Strategic priorities
THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND Strategic priorities 2015 2019 FOREWORD Our vision is Advancing Surgical Care. It is now supported by the College s top three strategic priorities developed after
More informationThe Yorkshire & Humber Improvement Academy Clinical Leadership Training Programme
The Yorkshire & Humber Improvement Academy Clinical Leadership Training Programme The Improvement Academy (IA) is one of the leading quality and safety improvement networks in the UK. The IA works across
More informationContinuing Professional Development Supporting the Delivery of Quality Healthcare
714 CPD Supporting Delivery of Quality Healthcare I Starke & W Wade Continuing Professional Development Supporting the Delivery of Quality Healthcare I Starke, 1 MD, MSc, FRCP, W Wade, 2 BSc (Hons), MA
More informationCollaborative Agreement for CCGs and NHS England
RCCG/GB/15/164 Collaborative Agreement for CCGs and NHS England East Midlands Collaborative Commissioning Oversight Group (EMCCOG) 1. Particulars 1.1. This Agreement records the particulars of the agreement
More informationNICE Charter Who we are and what we do
NICE Charter 2017 Who we are and what we do 1. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is the independent organisation responsible for providing evidence-based guidance on health and
More informationTaking informed consent for Doctors in Training Policy. Including marking of an operating site
Taking informed consent for Doctors in Training Policy Including marking of an operating site Approved by the Oxford Deanery Executive Team 29 July 2009 Review date: July 2010 Introduction In the 12 key
More informationNorth Central London Medicines Optimisation Network. Terms of Reference. North Central London Medicines Optimisation Network 1 of 8
North Central London Medicines Optimisation Network Medicines Optimisation Committee Terms of Reference North Central London Medicines Optimisation Network 1 of 8 Document control Date Version Amendments
More informationNHS England (Wessex) Clinical Senate and Strategic Networks. Accountability and Governance Arrangements
NHS England (Wessex) Clinical Senate and Strategic Networks Accountability and Governance Arrangements Version 6.0 Document Location: This document is only valid on the day it was printed. Location/Path
More informationQUALITY COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference
QUALITY COMMITTEE Terms of Reference CONSTITUTION 1. The Board of Directors approved the establishment of the Quality Committee (known as the Committee in these terms of reference) for the purpose of:
More informationPrimary Care Quality Assurance Framework (Medical Services)
PCC/15/021 Primary Care Quality Assurance Framework (Medical Services) 1.0 Introduction: From the 1 April 2015 the responsibility for monitoring quality and responding to concerns arising from General
More informationTrust Board Meeting: Wednesday 12 March 2014 TB Peer Review Programme Implementation Update
Trust Board Meeting: Wednesday 12 March 2014 Title Peer Review Programme Implementation Update Status History For discussion Papers providing updates on the process and outcomes of the Peer Review Programme
More informationQuality and Safety Committee Terms of Reference
Approved May 2016 Quality and Safety Committee Terms of Reference 1. Constitution The Quality and Safety Committee is established as a sub-committee of The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (THH)
More informationabcdefghijklmnopqrstu
Healthcare Policy and Strategy Directorate Quality Division Dear Colleague INTRODUCTION AND AVAILABILITY OF NEWLY LICENSED MEDICINES IN THE NHS IN SCOTLAND Dear Colleague This guidance sets out the policy
More informationNHS North West London
NHS North West London Shaping a Healthier Future Pre-Consultation Business Case Volume 6 Appendices A1 & A2 Edition: 1 20 June 2012 Page 1 of 29 APPENDIX A1 Programme Governance A.1.1 Key governance principles
More informationHow to use NICE guidance to commission high-quality services
How to use NICE guidance to commission high-quality services Acknowledgement We are grateful to the many organisations and individuals who have contributed to the development of this guide. A list of these
More informationCLINICAL GOVERNANCE AND QUALITY COMMITTEE. Final - Terms of Reference - Final
CLINICAL GOVERNANCE AND QUALITY COMMITTEE Final - Terms of Reference - Final CONSTITUTION 1. The Board of Directors approved the establishment of the Clinical Governance and Quality Committee (known as
More informationMembership of Oral health for adults in care homes public health advisory committee
Committee membership list Oral health for adults in care homes guideline Committee Membership of Oral health for adults in care homes public health advisory committee The Committee will operate as an advisory
More informationMedical Revalidation and Commercial Support for CPD Ian Starke. Medical Director, Revalidation, Royal College of Physicians. Licence to Practise Decide by 14 th August Issued November 2009 http://www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/licensing/faq/faq_licence_to_practise.asp
More informationNHS ISLE OF WIGHT CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP CLINICAL FUNDING AUTHORISATION POLICY
NHS ISLE OF WIGHT CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP CLINICAL FUNDING AUTHORISATION POLICY AUTHOR/ APPROVAL DETAILS & VERSION CONTROL Author Version Reason for Change Date Status IW CCG Acute V1 New policy Sept
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, April 2013
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, April 2013 Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction
More informationTHAMES VALLEY PRIORITIES COMMITTEE ETHICAL FRAMEWORK
NHS Aylesbury Vale Clinical Commissioning Group NHS Bracknell and Ascot Clinical Commissioning Group NHS Chiltern Clinical Commissioning Group NHS Newbury and District Clinical Commissioning Group NHS
More informationEuropean Reference Networks. Guidance on the recognition of Healthcare Providers and UK Oversight of Applications
European Reference Networks Guidance on the recognition of Healthcare Providers and UK Oversight of Applications NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Commissioning Operations Patients
More informationUtilisation Management
Utilisation Management The Utilisation Management team has developed a reputation over a number of years as an authentic and clinically credible support team assisting providers and commissioners in generating
More informationSetting up a Managed Clinical Network in Children s Palliative Care. December Page 1 of 8
Setting up a Managed Clinical Network in Children s Palliative Care December 2017 Page 1 of 8 Introduction This guidance is written for local services and networks who are considering establishing Managed
More informationQuality standard Published: 17 February 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs15
Patient experience in adult NHS services Quality standard Published: 17 February 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs15 NICE 2012. All rights reserved. Contents Introduction and overview... 6 Introduction... 6
More informationMaximising the impact of nursing research. RCN research conference 5-7 April 2017, Oxford, UK
Maximising the impact of nursing research RCN research conference 5-7 April 2017, Oxford, UK Paper 1 Maximising the Impact of nursing research through collaboration Professor Daniel Kelly, RCN Professor
More informationEstablishment of clinical criteria: Best practice, clinical guidelines and patient pathways
Establishment of clinical criteria: Best practice, clinical guidelines and patient pathways European Reference Networks, Brussels, June 23 rd 2014 Dr Judith Richardson, Associate Director Pathways, Health
More informationTOPIC 9 - THE SPECIALIST PALLIATIVE CARE TEAM (MDT)
TOPIC 9 - THE SPECIALIST PALLIATIVE CARE TEAM (MDT) Introduction The National Institute for Clinical Excellence has developed Guidance on Supportive and Palliative Care for patients with cancer. The standards
More informationIndependent prescribing conversion programme. De Montfort University Report of a reaccreditation event May 2017
Independent prescribing conversion programme De Montfort University Report of a reaccreditation event May 2017 GPhC, independent prescribing conversion programme reaccreditation report Page 1 of 10 Event
More informationMethods: Commissioning through Evaluation
Methods: Commissioning through Evaluation NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Operations and Information Specialised Commissioning Nursing Trans. & Corp. Ops. Commissioning Strategy
More informationClinical Advisory Forum DRAFT Terms of Reference
Clinical Advisory Forum DRAFT Terms of Reference 1. Constitution 1.1. The Trust Executive Committee (TEC) hereby resolves to establish a Forum to be known as the Clinical Advisory Forum (the Forum). The
More informationADVANCED NURSE PRACTITIONER STRATEGY
ADVANCED NURSE PRACTITIONER STRATEGY 2016-2020 Lead Manager: Chair, GG&C Advanced Practice Group Responsible Director: Board Nurse Director Approved by: NMAHP Group Date approved Date for review: September
More informationNHS SERVICE DELIVERY AND ORGANISATION R&D PROGRAMME
NHS SERVICE DELIVERY AND ORGANISATION R&D PROGRAMME PROGRAMME OF RESEARCH ON ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE A Empirical studies to evaluate innovations to improve access repeat call B Empirical study of priority
More informationPolicy for the Sponsorship of Activities and Joint Working with the Pharmaceutical Industry
Policy for the Sponsorship of Activities and Joint Working with the Pharmaceutical Industry March 2017 NOTE: This policy will be subject to review in 2017/18 as part of the partnership work between North
More informationCONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD)
CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (CPD) www.fph.org.uk CPD POLICIES, PROCESSES AND STRATEGIC DIRECTION CPD Policy 01 CONTENTS Prelude CPD in 2007 and beyond 02 1. Context, definitions and aim of continuing
More informationYorkhill Children s Charity Research Strategy
Yorkhill Children s Charity Research Strategy 1. Objectives Yorkhill Children s Charity provides and supports excellence in paediatric, obstetric and neonatal healthcare enhancing the treatment, care and
More informationImproving the prevention, early detection and management of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Wessex
Improving the prevention, early detection and management of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Wessex The case for change AKI is recognised as a major public health and patient safety concern nationally and
More informationCOMMISSIONING FOR QUALITY FRAMEWORK
This document is uncontrolled once printed. Please check on the CCG s Intranet site for the most up to date version COMMISSIONING FOR QUALITY FRAMEWORK Document Title: Commissioning for Quality Framework
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for ophthalmology
FOREWORD As part of revalidation, doctors will need to collect and bring to their appraisal six types of supporting information to show how they are keeping up to date and fit to practise. The GMC has
More informationQuality standard Published: 14 January 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs107
Preventing enting unintentional injury in under 15s Quality standard Published: 14 January 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs107 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationDefining the Boundaries between NHS and Private Healthcare. MECCG Policy Reference: MECCG142
Defining the Boundaries between NHS and Private Healthcare MECCG Policy Reference: MECCG142 Target Audience Brief Description (max 50 words) Action Required Equality Impact Assessment Providers of private
More information25 June 2018 Conference Programme
North West Stroke Conference 2018 25 June 2018 Conference Programme North West Stroke Conference 2018 Sponsored by Conference Chairs Dr Liz Lightbody Liz is a Reader in Health Services Research in the
More informationReview of Terms of Reference of Quality Assurance Committee
Review of Terms of Reference of Quality Assurance Committee Governing Body meeting 3 May 2018 H Author(s) Sponsor Director Purpose of Paper Sue Laing, Corporate Services Risk and Governance Manager Mandy
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for pharmaceutical medicine
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for pharmaceutical medicine Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction The purpose
More informationSpecialised Commissioning Oversight Group. Terms of Reference
Specialised Commissioning Oversight Group Terms of Reference Specialised commissioning oversight group terms of reference 1 1.1 Purpose NHS England is responsible for commissioning specialised services
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, June 2014
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, June 2014 Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction
More informationGUIDANCE ON PROPOSING NATIONAL COMMISSIONING OF SERVICES
National Specialist Services Committee NSSC GUIDANCE ON PROPOSING NATIONAL COMMISSIONING OF SERVICES The National Specialised Services Committee (NSSC) is responsible for recommendations to the NHS Board
More informationThe Duke of Edinburgh s International Award Association Memorandum of Understanding
The Duke of Edinburgh s International Award Memorandum of Understanding 1. This Memorandum sets out the understanding of all the parties concerned relating to the formation and purpose of The Duke of Edinburgh
More information8th National Scottish Medical Education Conference
8th National Scottish Medical Education Conference Thursday 26 April Programme Thursday 26 & Friday 27 April 2018 Edinburgh International Conference Centre 12.30-13.30 Registration Strathblane Hall 13.30-15.00
More informationEvidence on the quality of medical note keeping: Guidance for use at appraisal and revalidation
Health Informatics Unit Evidence on the quality of medical note keeping: Guidance for use at appraisal and revalidation April 2011 Funded by: Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Academy of
More informationGUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF SENIOR ACADEMIC GPs (ENGLAND) August 2005
GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF SENIOR ACADEMIC GPs (ENGLAND) August 2005 Guidance Notes for the Employment of Senior Academic GPs (England) Preamble i) A senior academic GP is defined as a clinical
More informationLeeds West CCG Governing Body Meeting
Agenda Item: LW2015/115 FOI Exempt: N Leeds West CCG Governing Body Meeting Date of meeting: 4 vember 2015 Title: Delegated Commissioning of Primary Medical Services Lead Governing Body Member: Dr Simon
More informationTissue Viability Society. Strategy A future plan for the Tissue Viability Society (TVS) where we are going and how we will get there...
Tissue Viability Society Tissue Viability Society Strategy 2017 2019 A future plan for the Tissue Viability Society (TVS) where we are going and how we will get there... 1 CONTENTS OBJECTIVES 2 MISSION
More informationGOVERNING BODY REPORT
GOVERNING BODY REPORT 1. Date of Governing Body Meeting: 2. Title of Report: Finance, Performance and Commissioning Committee Report 3. Key Messages: At the end of March 2017 the clinical commissioning
More informationRegional Medicines Optimisation Committees
Regional Medicines Optimisation Committees Operating Model First Edition, April 2017 NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Commissioning Operations Patients and Information Nursing Trans.
More informationVaccine uptake in under 19s (quality standard) Stakeholders Action on Smoking & Health (ASH) Advertising Standards Authority Advertising Standards
Vaccine uptake in under 19s (quality standard) Stakeholders Action on Smoking & Health (ASH) Advertising Standards Authority Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) Alcohol Concern Anglian Community Enterprise
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for psychiatry
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for psychiatry Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction The purpose of revalidation
More informationNorth West COPD Report Nov 2011
North West COPD Report Nov 2011 Working together to improve respiratory care in the North West 1 Contents Introduction foreword by NW Respiratory Leads... 3 4 reasons why COPD is important in the North
More information