The State of Texas Title IV-B Child and Family Services Plan Child and Family Services Plan Fiscal Years
|
|
- Wesley McDowell
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The State of Texas Title IV-B Child and Family Services Plan Child and Family Services Plan Fiscal Years III-A. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services ACYF-CB-PI-14-03
2 Child and Family Services Plan A. DFPS recognizes that unexpected disruptive events may bring significant risks to essential public health service delivery and business processes. The DFPS Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) provides a framework for building organizational resilience to mitigate, minimize, or recover business processes essential to restore mission essential functions within targeted time frames. Strategies include leveraging of shared HHS Enterprise resources and working cooperatively and collaboratively with the HHS Enterprise Emergency Management Council. Introduction The Comprehensive Preparedness Guide 101, "Developing and Maintaining State, Territorial, Tribal, and Local Government Emergency Plans" defines the purpose of the planning as: "Planning has a proven ability to influence events before they occur and is an indispensable contribution to unity of effort Accomplished properly, planning provides a methodical way to think through the entire life cycle of a potential crisis, determine required capabilities, and help stakeholders learn and practice their roles. It directs how a community envisions and shares a desired outcome, selects effective ways to achieve it, and communicates expected results." The DFPS plan describes the processes required to continue or restore the function of DFPS Mission-Essential Functions (MEFs). The desired outcome is to enable preparation processes that lead to continuation or rapid return of vital services provided to our vulnerable stakeholders. Planning for the business continuity of DFPS in the aftermath of a disaster is a complex task. Preparation for, response to, and recovery from a disaster affecting the administrative functions of the agency requires the cooperative efforts and partnership of other functional areas supporting the "business" of DFPS. Purpose The primary purpose of this document is to ensure that DFPS continues or restores normal business operations under emergency and/or disaster conditions and within targeted timeframes. Throughout the recovery effort, this plan establishes clear lines of authority and prioritizes work efforts. Mitigate future injury and property damage through planning and prevention. Ensure that the DFPS can deliver mission-essential services to its clients/customers. Provide for the safety of people on the premises at the time of a disaster. Continue or restore essential support functions (ESFs) and critical support systems (CSSs) for business operations. Designate an appropriate incident management structure. Page 2 of 27
3 Minimize the duration of a serious disruption to operations and resources (both information processing and other resources). Minimize immediate damage and losses. Establish management succession and emergency powers. Facilitate effective coordination of recovery tasks. Identify strategies for preparedness for, response to, and recovery from emergency incidents and disasters. Applicability and Scope This document describes the actions and processes required to maintain essential functions. The DFPS COOP is developed to ensure that the capabilities exists to continue mission critical activities a wide range of potential emergencies, including localized acts of nature, accidents, and technological or attack-related emergencies. Elements of a standardized continuity plan include: 1. Identification of Mission Essential Functions (MEFs); 2. Orders of Succession; 3. Delegations of Authority; 4. Continuity Facilities; 5. Continuity Communications; 6. Mission-Essential (Vital) Resource Management, 7. Human Capital; 8. Testing Training and Exercising; 9. Devolution of Control and Operations; and, 10. Reconstitution. This Plan contains these elements as well as describing prioritized mission essential functions (MEFs); personnel and resources; incident management organizational structure and procedures; strategic partnerships, relationships and dependencies; system failure alternatives; continuity risk factors; mitigation strategies; and, concepts of operations. Mission-Essential Functions/Personnel/Resources The focus of the DFPS Business Continuity Program and Plan are mission-driven; that is, each of the elements of the Plan support accomplishment of our mission and clientele. The mission of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) is To protect children, the elderly, and people with disabilities from abuse, neglect, and exploitation by involving clients, families and communities. Besides being mission-based, the DFPS Continuity Program has established the following criteria: A multi-hazard plan that anticipates response requirements of a variety of possible incident types; A plan that addresses each of the 10 recognized components of a comprehensive COOP program; A realistic plan enabling business activities to be reinstated w/in target times frames; Department-wide participation to ensure gap coverage and accounts for the contribution of all programs; Page 3 of 27
4 Tested/Trained/Exercised annually; AARs conducted, and implement improvement plans w/in 90 days; Plan that is National Incident Management System (NIMS) compliant and ICSbased. Initiate the COOP Process Distribute, Maintain & Update the Plan Test, Train & Exercise the Plan COOP Planning Process Design and Build the Plan Determine Mission- Essential Functions Conduct Risk & Vulnerability Analysis The Department s functions are divided into four main programs: Child Protective Services, Adult Protective Services, Child Care Licensing, and Prevention and Early Intervention. The programs serve different populations, but share many administrative functions. DFPS MEFs are prioritized according to a tiered system that provides the ability for the Department to restore critical services within targeted timeframes. The prioritization system also identifies where Department resources must be committed should circumstances or lack of resources necessitate hard choices. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Mission-Essential Functions (MEFs) (Programs): Those activities for which the Department exists or was created; Functions that are required by statute, standardized practice, and/or recognized authority. (Example: Child/Adult abuse investigations, licensing childcare facilities, etc.) Essential Support Functions (ESFs) (Support Services): Tasks (and personnel performing them) and knowledge bases that do not constitute a MEF, but materially contribute to DFPS ability to perform them. (Example: SWI, IT personnel) Page 4 of 27
5 Critical Support Systems (CSSs) (Tools): Technology, procedures and/or data sets that enable and/or facilitate the efficient and timely performance of the DFPS MEFs. (Example: IMPACT, CLASS) Other Associated Activities (OAA): Activities and tasks that contribute to efficiency and effectiveness of the Department, but are not part of the missionessential core. (Example: CLOE, CPI) Mission-Essential Functions Performance Target Timelines Tier 1 MEFs/ESFs shall be uninterrupted as much as practical, and in all cases shall be restored to function within 8 hours of the passing of the immediate emergency. Tier 2 MEFs/ESFs/CSSs shall be uninterrupted as much as practical, and in all cases shall be restored to function within 24 hours of the passing of the immediate emergency. Tier 3 Support and Systems shall be uninterrupted as much as practical, and shall be restored to function within 10 days of the passing of the immediate emergency when possible. Other Associated Activities shall be restored as time and resources permit. Priority of Mission Essential Functions Tier 1 MEFs (Core Services & Support) o Receive APS, CPS, CCL and RCCL Priority 1 referrals and transmit to the appropriate local office for screening (ESF); o Investigate/take appropriate action where there is immediate danger regarding abuse or neglect of children (MEF); o Investigate/take appropriate action where there is immediate danger regarding abuse or neglect of older adults and persons with disabilities (MEF); o Initiate a welfare check of children in DFPS Conservatorship and FBSS following an emergency (MEF); o Investigate/take appropriate action where there is immediate danger regarding child or adult facility-based complaints (MEF); o Provide financial resources to support Tier 1 MEFs (ESF). Tier 2 MEFs (Semi-Core Services & Support) o Ensure SWI referral and subsequent investigation for all other (non-priority 1) activities for all programs (ESF); o Ensure activation of the Public Communication for Disasters Plan, and initiate follow-up communication with caregivers of children in DFPS Conservatorship (ESF); o Follow-up and track facility evacuation sites and emergency contact numbers for facilities with open MHMR investigations (MEF); o Initiate after-event Childcare Licensing Inspection functions to ensure the safety of childcare facilities (MEF); o Ensure the availability of information technology in support of normal operations, with priority to IMPACT and CLASS systems (ESF); Page 5 of 27
6 o Ensure DFPS compliance with Strategic National Stockpile agreement (ESF). Tier 3 MEFs (Important Support, Not Urgent) o Restore routine inspection child care licensing facilities for hazards and compliance with agency requirements (MEF); o Ensure Runaway Hotline/Youth Hotline operation & referrals (MEF); o Restore/Perform purchasing and procurement and accounting functions except as urgently needed to support Tier 1 MEFs (ESF); o Perform other administrative and support functions that enable routine operations (ESF); o Restore Other Associated Activities as time/resources permit (ESF). Mission-Essential Personnel/Non-Essential Personnel Defined Tier 1 Essential personnel o All personnel whose responsibilities include supervision and delivery of Tier 1 MEFs/ESFs to clients/customers; o All personnel whose responsibilities include receiving and routing initial reports for delivery of Tier 1 MEFs/ESFs to clients/customers; o All personnel with designated duties in the Incident Management Structure of the Department, when activated. o All personnel providing ESF or CSS maintenance of Tiers 1 and 2 MEFs when/as designated by their supervisor; Note: All personnel that have been issued State-owned equipment or software license(s) to enable off-site working (e.g., laptop, tablet, GoToMyPC) must comply with the DFPS Work from Home policy regardless of Essential/Non-Essential Status. Note: Standard delivery of services may be modified at any time by the Commissioner through the Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Commissioners. Tier 2 Essential Personnel o All personnel whose responsibilities include only delivery of Tier 2 MEFs/ESFs/CSSs; o All personnel whose responsibilities include routine administrative support when/as designated by management personnel; o All personnel must remain available for immediate call-back during regular business hours, their regular work shift hours, and/or as designated by his/her immediate supervisor during emergencies or other extraordinary circumstances. Non-Essential Personnel o All personnel so designated by management and not involved in delivery or indirect support of Tiers 1 and 2 MEFs/ESFs; and, o Personnel whose routine job functions may be suspended for a period of time without loss of mission-essential services; Page 6 of 27
7 o All N/E personnel must remain available for call-back during regular business hours, their regular work shift hours, and/or as designated by management personnel during emergencies or extraordinary circumstances. Note: Any employee's essential status designation may be changed at any time upon notification. Duties may also be modified to perform tasks not routinely part of his/her job description, according to the needs of the Department. Mission-Essential Resources Mission-Essential Resources are divided into four broad categories (people, circumstances, tools and performance factors) that define what inputs and considerations are needed for DFPS to perform its mission. The value of this exercise is that it assists Incident Commanders to identify missing resources and prioritize efforts to restore essential services. The following provides details for considerations in each category: People o Number sufficiency to meet performance requirements o Appropriate certifications/licenses/authority to accomplish mission o Appropriate training to accomplish mission Circumstances o Safety of DFPS personnel o Mobility/Transportation Availability/Access safety o Functioning communications o Administrative support available o Task volume/number of calls for service within the disaster area Tools o Computer/Internet/Paper records o Communication equipment o Vehicle appropriate for the circumstances o Appropriate safety shields/barriers o Facilities/Office space o Records systems access o Stocked resources (diapers, formula, car seats, walking canes, etc.) Performance factors ("How well?" or "To what degree?") o Federal and State statutory mandate o MEF/BCP performance objectives o Necessary to "safeguard life and health" o Necessary to maintain a favorable public opinion PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS The DFPS Mission remains the central value that drives plans and actions even during extraordinary circumstances as often occur during emergency incidents and disasters. Many DFPS clients meet the FEMA definition of a "Special Needs" population: Populations whose members may have additional needs before, during, and after an incident in functional areas, including but not limited to: o Maintaining independence Page 7 of 27
8 o Communication o Transportation o Supervision o Medical care Individuals in need of additional response assistance may include those that have disabilities; who live in institutionalized settings; who are elderly; who are children; who are from diverse cultures; who have limited English proficiency; or who are non-english speaking; or who are transportation disadvantaged. This Plan details the DFPS mission-essential portion of the State's primary goal and its recovery efforts following a disaster. DFPS is responsible for a missionspecific piece of the State of Texas disaster response, but may be called upon under extraordinary circumstances to exceed its traditional role. DFPS plans are based on industry standards and best practices, where applicable, and include (at least) the ten elements of continuity planning. Not all extraordinary circumstances can be anticipated in advance, but preparation for those that can be anticipated is the responsibility of all personnel. "Risk" is the juxtaposition of the three factors of hazard, impact and vulnerability. Once risk is determined, senior leadership decides to what degree it must be accepted or mitigated, and what resource commitment is appropriate to the risk. Emergency incidents and disasters can be either/both narrowly local, widely diffuse, or any range in between the two in their impact; the incident impact will determine the nature and size of the incident management structure. Preparedness, in the context of all-hazards homeland security, entails: o Understanding the Department's business processes and prioritizing client services. o Planning for all hazards events. o Organizing prevention, protection, response, and recovery assets. o Equipping with tools and technology for those assets. o Training the organization. o Exercising the Department s ability to prevent, protect, respond, and recover. o Assessing preparedness throughout the process to adjust the plan as required. RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITY Jurisdictional/Organizational Responsibilities The Continuity Planning Guide for State, Local, Territorial, Tribal and Private Sector Organizations defines the scope of jurisdictional/organizational responsibilities as "[The] development of strategic COOP vision and overarching policy, the appointment of key COOP personnel, and the development of a program budget that provides for adequate facilities, equipment and training." The Continuity Guidance Circular 1, published by the Federal government delineates the following responsibilities for state, local and tribal government organizations: "Continuity requirements must be incorporated into the daily operations of all Page 8 of 27
9 agencies to ensure seamless and immediate continuation of Mission Essential Function (MEF)/Primary Mission Essential Function (PMEF) capabilities so that critical government functions and services remain available to the Nation s citizens Responsibility for continuity planning resides with the highest level of management of the organization involved. The senior Elected Official or the administrative head of a State or local organization is ultimately responsible for the continuation of essential services during an emergency and for the related planning Effective implementation of continuity plans and programs requires the support of senior leaders and decision makers who have the authority to commit the organization and the necessary resources to support the programs." The Commissioner of the DFPS (or his/her designee) shall: Maintain overall responsibility for Plan preparation, approval and oversight. Activate the Plan (or any portion thereof) and the Departmental Operations Center (DOC) at his/her discretion. The DFPS Chief Operating Officer (COO) shall: Serve as the DOC Area Commander for supervision of Regional Command structures; Designate a scalable incident management structure (consistent with the National Incident Management System [NIMS]) according to the incident requirements to ensure continuity/restoration of MEFs; Declare when the immediate hazard is past for the purpose of beginning of the restoration period for interrupted MEFs (for performance objective purposes); Define the operational period length for the incident/event, and define a personnel relief strategy as needed; Determine the Department's strategic objectives for each operational period and cause an Incident Action Plan (IAP) to be prepared for large/major incidents; Cause all incidents/events to be fully documented; Modify the organizational structure as required by the incident, and determine when the Department shall stand down to resume normal or reconstituted operations. The Business Continuity Planner shall: Be the primary action officer responsible for updating and training this plan; Act as advisor and subject matter expert (SME) for business continuity and incident management matters; Coordinate and lead the development of the Department s homeland security and all-hazards implementation strategies and preparedness; Ensure that the DFPS Plan is consistent and in compliance with Federal and State mandates; Maintain the COOP Plan annually, or as appropriate; Maintain a program of After Action Reporting and track progress on improvement recommendations; Coordinate with other agency's activities and plans. Page 9 of 27
10 Regional Incident Commanders shall: Report to the DOC Area Commander; Designate an appropriate and responsive incident management team for each incident; Be responsible for results in restoring normal operations within their region; Establish Incident Objectives for each operational period; Cause their portion of the incident activities to be documented; Integrate strategic partners into the DFPS response to facilitate return to normal operations. Other Personnel Responsibilities All personnel are expected to be responsible to assist as needed to respond to recovery and program continuity operations; Personnel are expected to remain flexible in extraordinary circumstances to perform, as needed, other-than-usual duties, work non-standard hours, or report to a different work location when called upon to do so. Continuity Risk Factors Risk Assessment and Mitigation Planning This Plan adopts and incorporates by reference the State of Texas Mitigation Plan ( ) that details specific events/incidents to which the various geographic regions of the state are vulnerable. Additionally, this plan incorporates by reference the Texas Health and Human Services Commission Hazard Mitigation Plan. Risk and Impact Analysis In addition to the State and HHSC Mitigation Plans, DFPS supplements with a nontraditional Risk and Impact Analysis for All Hazards directed at key functional vulnerabilities of the Department. DFPS defines risk in terms of threats to certain factors essential for business continuity. Thus, the planning object is not any event in particular, but the effects of any incident, event or condition on mission-essential resources: Facility damage Power/Other utility loss Hazardous environment Loss of staff Communication/IT Outage Destruction of/damage to Records Mobility/Transportation impairments Mandatory evacuations of citizens and workers System over-stress due to large client influx Page 10 of 27
11 MITIGATION STRATEGIES Introduction In support of the State's overall recovery strategy to "reduce vulnerability and quickly recover," the Department employs a four-fold approach to reducing risk in the foregoing areas of functional vulnerability: Organize incident management efforts according to accepted and standard Incident Command System principles and practices; Prepare and maintain comprehensive plans to ensure continuity of business operations and/or the return to delivery of the Department's MEFs as quickly as practical to meet performance objectives; Train and exercise DFPS employees (in accordance with the Federal Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program [HSEEP]) in potential homeland security and all-hazard disaster scenarios to ensure preparedness; Support statewide efforts toward response, mitigation and recovery through participation as a cooperating/assisting agency in the State Operations Center (SOC) and the State Multi-Agency Coordination Center (MACC). Pre-Incident Preparation Strategies Define mission-essential functions (MEFs) and produce plans to ensure their continuation/restoration within targeted restoration time and level objectives. Identify critical service nodes and single points of failure, and build redundancy into systems and processes where they are cost-effective and make sense. Identify facility needs (number of persons and workstations, square footage requirements, computer drops/connections required, etc.) for each office prior to an emergency to facilitate selection of devolution facilities as quickly as practical. Train Department personnel to an appropriate level of specialty in NIMS structure and practices. Ensure event/incident organizational structures and practices are NIMS compliant. Implement a Family Support Planning process to encourage employees to make pre-incident preparations to arrange for the needs of their personal family. Test plans through a regimen of formal exercises in all regions at least annually; Ensure clear lines of authority and communication for Plan implementation. Define a Departmental incident management organizational structure appropriate for ensuring MEF continuation/restoration and supporting state-wide efforts through the SOC and SMOC. Designate positional roles for personnel within the incident management organizational structure, and provide training on role responsibilities. Anticipate needs and engage in prudent precautionary activities for those incidents and emergencies where advance notice can be obtained (e.g., hurricanes, rising flood waters, raised terrorism threat level). Formalize strategic partnerships and mutual aid relationships prior to the need for their activation. Page 11 of 27
12 Conduct periodic and formal Business Analysis and Environmental Scans to ensure the appropriateness of plans with respect to MEFs, and determine gaps in Plan coverage. Post-Incident Continuity Strategies Program Operations shall maintain or reestablish conditions necessary for MEF accomplishment; Enable MEFs to continue even when facilities are damaged or destroyed by activating work from home or mobile workplace methods (laptops, tablets, GoToMyPC); Activate interim facilities plans to maintain staff contact with temporary facilities; Activate strategic relationships, partnerships for internal mutual aid, and/or external mutual aid with law enforcement for temporary devolution of responsibilities as needed; Activate redundant communication systems, including the ability to connect intakes with investigators and case workers in the field. Post-Incident Recovery Strategies Recovery Operations shall initiate tactics to solve incident problems. Branch operations could include facilities repair/relocation, information technology, records, and/or security, as appropriate; Work closely with Regional Administrative Services/Texas Facilities Commission for facilities and records issues; Identify the need continuity facilities (temporary, long-term, "synchronization bases"); Communicate to mobile staff times and places for regular supervisor/worker contact and check-in; Safeguard/secure State-owned equipment; Post-Incident Command Considerations Establish contact with staff and obtain a report of their safety and status. (Program Ops) Consider the major problems, and devise an appropriate command structure using a standard ICS structure. (Command) Initiate reinstatement of Tier 1 Mission Essential Functions within eight hours. (Program Ops) Ensure a communications link with State Office; communicate with all local offices affected by the incident. (Command, Program & Recovery Ops) Work with Regional Administrative Services (RAS) to initiate a damage assessment of all local offices and obtain an "all-clear" before entering a damaged structure. (Recovery Ops) Initiate telephone or other contact of DFPS clients in state Conservatorship to verify their safety. (Program Ops) Evaluate damage to computer network equipment. (Recovery Ops) Page 12 of 27
13 Provide for means of securing buildings if possible; if a building cannot be secured, provide for the removal of state property to a secure location. (Recovery Ops) Secure all electronic and paper records; begin the records recovery process within 72 hours for damaged records. (Recovery Ops) Concept of Operations Incident Management and Planning Philosophy The incident management philosophy of DFPS is mission-based; that is, all postincident activities and appropriate resources should be directed toward the goal of restoring mission essential functions within targeted timeframes, and reconstituting normal operations, subsequently. Toward this end, "local and regional management with state office support" best describes the strategic structure of incident management teams. DFPS leadership recognizes that most emergency incidents are best managed locally, with local response resources and local/regional incident command structures. State Office personnel empowers local and regional incident command teams, working within resource constraints and in the context of strategic partnerships, to restore normal functions and enable the resumption of services as quickly as practical. DFPS leadership also recognizes that emergency response and operations constitute a very fluid environment requiring a high tolerance of ambiguity. The appropriate decision environment for staff is well-stated in the Federal Comprehensive Preparedness Guide 101: "Planning helps [an organization] know the means it has at its disposal to achieve desired outcomes by performing critical tasks, under specified conditions, to target levels of performance. Rather than concentrate on every detail of how to achieve the objective, an effective plan structures thinking that supports insight, creativity and initiative in the face of an uncertain and fluid environment." Bifurcated Mission The DFPS efforts during disaster response are divided along two parallel-yetinterrelated paths: 1) Continuity of mission essential functions; and, 2) Recovery operations that deal with the effects of the incident. This distinction is a major one in contrast to a first responder mission. Social services agencies with vulnerable clientele cannot statutorily or ethically/morally abandon its safety net role, and must take affirmative steps to restore services when they are interrupted by urgent circumstances. Recovery operations refer to those activities that enable reconstitution of normal operations. In DFPS context, these most frequently will involve facilities, information technology, records recovery and management, devolution of facilities, and security issues (including access and safeguarding state-owned assets). To support parallel missions, DFPS has designed a flexible management structure that addresses both strategic needs at the Operations Section Chief (SC) level. The structure designates a Program Operations SC to lead continuity activities for clientele, Page 13 of 27
14 and a Recovery Operations SC to lead efforts to deal with the physical effects of an incident. Incident Management Teams: Qualifications and Training Each DFPS Region has appointed members to a Regional Incident Management Team. These teams are led by one or more of the Regional/District Directors from the DFPS Programs (CPS, APS, CCL). In order to qualify to serve in a regular capacity on an IMT, personnel must be trained to the advanced ICS level (through ICS 300/400 for Social Services). Prior to enrolling in ICS 300/400, Team members must have taken appropriate introductory independent study courses through FEMA/Emergency Management institute Web site (IS 100, 200, 700, 800). The BCP has conducted initial training of all personnel; additional offerings of ICS 300/400 for SS will be made as needed as team member turnover occurs. Additionally, as part of the Training, Testing, Exercising and Maintenance program (TTE&M), IMT members will receive semi-annual refresher training and exercises. Additionally, DFPS will track and follow all recommended training requirements through the National Incident Management System: Five Year Training Plan. Activation of Incident Management Teams The National Response Framework (NRF) states that Incidents must be managed at the lowest possible jurisdictional level and supported by additional capabilities when needed. Within DFPS the lowest practical jurisdictional level is within a region. Activation of IMTs may also be a local decision by the Regional Incident Commander or Unified Command Team. There may also be times when a team or multiple teams are activated from State Office. Teams are said to be stood up when activated. Incident Commanders should keep in mind that it may be appropriate to activate the team in advance of the emergency if it can be reasonably anticipated (e.g., in advance of a hurricane, or a planned event). Area Command Structure and Organization In terms of recognized National Incident Management System (NIMS) structure and doctrine, DFPS will, for major incidents, employ an Area Command (AC) centralized oversight with Regional Command structures and Branch Tactical Planning. Incident management structures may be further subdivided (at Regional Unified Command level) into geographic or functional branches. Regional ICs/UCs are empowered to activate the incident management structure within their region as necessary; during major incidents, Area Command may designate specified regions for activation of teams. The Chief Operations Officer (COO) is designated as DFPS Area Commander, and will coordinate state-wide emergency response efforts from the Department Operations Center (DOC). Unified Command While Incident Command structure within regional offices remains discretionary, State Office recommends that regional leadership consider a unified command approach that Page 14 of 27
15 incorporates multiple program interests in the formulation of operational period strategic objectives. Management by Objectives (MBO)/ICS 202 Management by Objectives is an established model of business and incident management, and shall be the management approach by which efforts to recover and restore services will be coordinated. The Incident Commander/Unified Command Team shall be responsible for determining and approving objectives for each operational period. Command may be assisted by the General and Command Staffs in formulating objectives. The Plans Section Chief shall be responsible to draft an Incident Action Plan for Incident Commander approval. Objectives should be drafted according to the SMART format: Specific, Measurable, Action-oriented, Realistic, and Timely/time-sensitive. Operational period objectives shall form the basis of strategies and tactics developed and employed by the Operations Section Chief(s). The Ops Section chiefs shall work with the logistics section chief to order resources to accomplish the objectives. Incident Documentation Each incident requiring the activation of an incident management team shall be documented as follows: The RC/UC shall ensure that incident objectives are recorded on an ICS Form for every operational period. The forms shall be the responsibility of the Plans Section Chief. The Plans Section shall also keep a historical log documenting major events, such as completion of milestones/objectives, news inputs, Command and General Staff decisions, staff meetings, etc. The Historical Log shall be ed or faxed to the Assistant Area Commander for Plans at State Office at the end of each operational period. Other documentation may be required due to the nature of the incident. The Plans Section Chief is responsible for all documentation efforts on the regional level. Strategic Relationships and Dependencies Strategic relationships, partnerships and dependencies are those that are vital to continuity of mission for DFPS, and typically involve interaction to supply material, tools or expertise not contained within the Department; and, cooperation with agencies that have essential responsibilities on which DFPS has an affirmative dependence (e.g., facilities repair, generator supply, etc.). Some examples of strategic relationships and partnerships are: Local law enforcement for temporary devolution of investigation responsibilities; Regional Administrative Services and Texas Facilities Commission for repair of facilities or relocation to temporary or new permanent facilities for damaged or destroyed offices; "Sister Regions" as designated for internal mutual aid; Page 15 of 27
16 Texas Department of Emergency Management for resource allocation and coordination; Other Enterprise Departments, particularly those sharing facilities; Conservatorship families. Unplanned Outage of Call Receipt/Routing Processes The pre-investigation phase of DFPS call processing can be divided into the subphases of call-receipt, information recording, and transmission to the appropriate office. Each of these three sub-phases has an important technology component that expedites our delivery of service. Two of the three phases occur primarily within the State Wide Intake (SWI) section, and the third involves the "handshake" between SWI and field offices. Unplanned outages of information technology equipment can potentially delay service delivery to DFPS clients. For this reason, DFPS strives to maintain redundancy in systems and procedures. A matrix describing the call receipt/transcribing/transmitting process is contained in Appendix D, as well as procedures in the event of unplanned loss of any important component. SCAN (Statewide Communication Access Network) Calls Content and Structure During major events and incidents, a SCAN call will typically be scheduled daily at 12:00 noon, unless otherwise designated. Other calls may be added as necessary, particularly for complex incidents, incidents requiring 24-hour staffing attention, or incidents developing rapidly. SCAN calls will be hosted by the Assistant AC for Planning, and will typically include the following information: Updated weather and other information from the SOC Concise incident briefings (including IAPs and other documentation) Area Command roles and responsibilities Policy, direction, and priorities Conflict resolution procedures Communication procedures, meeting schedules, etc. Resource ordering process Critical resource needs After Action Reporting (AAR) DFPS has initiated an After-Action Review process with a view toward organizational learning from incidents, as well as recognizing and reinforcing best practices in the aftermath of incidents and events. The Business Continuity and Emergency Management Coordinator will be responsible for the After Action Reporting program. Scope The following event/incident types will trigger an After-Action Review Significant damage or destruction of DFPS-managed facilities, or where DFPS is an occupant (any mechanism); Significant denial of service or closing of facilities due to unforeseeable circumstances; Page 16 of 27
17 Significant events/incidents affecting a group of staff or clients; Any interruption of Tier 1 & 2 Mission-Essential Functions; Incidents requiring the activation of one or more Incident Management Teams; Planned tests of critical Support Systems when unexpected problems occur; Unplanned downtime of more than one hour for Critical Support Systems; Any other event/incident where an AAR in desirable. Format All AARs shall address at least the following topics: Incident time, date and type; Narrative of significant events/chronology; What went well; Opportunities for improvement; Recommendations. Follow-up The BCP will maintain a folder on the Share Drive that tracks progress on implementation of all improvements that arise out of the AAR. An AAR Improvement Matrix will contain the improvement proposed/accepted, the responsible party, and a due date for completion. The BCP will gather an appropriate group of SMEs to write the AAR and to implement follow-up improvement recommendations. Page 17 of 27
18 CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN ELEMENTS Mission-Essential Functions Mission-Essential Functions are identified and discussed in section Mission Essential Functions/Personnel/Resources. Order of Succession Authority Succession to office is critical in the event DFPS leadership is debilitated or incapable of performing their legal authorized duties, roles, and responsibilities. The following pre-determined orders of succession are designed to allow for an orderly, and pre-defined, transition of leadership within DFPS. Successors to the DFPS Commissioner will serve only until the Executive Commissioner of the HHSC designates a replacement. Successors of Authority 1. Commissioner, DFPS 2. Chief Operating Officer 3. Chief Financial Officer 4. Assistant Commissioner, Child Protective Services 5. Assistant Commissioner, Adult Protective Services 6. Assistant Commissioner, Child Care Licensing 7. CPS Regional Director, Region 8 Successors to positions other than the Commissioner will be made by the Commissioner or his/her designee. Delegations of Authority The pre-determined delegations of authority specify the positions that will have the authority for making policy determinations and key decisions in an emergency within the areas of responsibility. Delegations of authority take effect when normal channels of direction are disrupted and end when these channels have resumed. The following table identifies, by position, the authorities for making policy determinations and decisions at DFPS state office and other locations. These delegations of authority address specific competency requirements in program and administrative areas needed for effective operations in the event or aftermath of a disaster. The successor identified in the table below has the authority to assume responsibility for the assumption of the area of responsibility in the event of the absence or incapacitation of the lead position title until a permanent successor is named. Page 18 of 27
19 DFPS personnel, commensurate with their positional and incident management responsibilities, maintain discretion when discharging their duties under this plan. Lead Position Title Area of Responsibility Successor Chief Operating Commissioner Administration Officer Director of Chief Operating Officer Operations Program Support Chief Financial Officer Budget and Finance Budget Director Assistant Child Protective Regional Director, Commissioner Services Region 8 Assistant Adult Protective Regional Director, Commissioner Services Region 8 District Director, Assistant Child Care Licensing South Texas Commissioner District SWI Operations Division Director Statewide Intake Manager Devolution Devolution planning addresses DFPS' capability to transfer statutory authority and responsibility for essential functions from primary operating staff and/or facilities to other employees or facilities. It also identifies external dependencies for making the transfer of location or responsibility. Devolution typically embraces four potential scenarios: Allows the agency to transfer all of its essential functions and responsibilities to personnel at a different location. Provides for devolving statutory authority temporarily to an outside agency (e.g., law enforcement). Allows for decentralization of Department authority to 11 regional offices under extreme conditions. Anticipates relocation of offices following damage to or destruction of facilities. The following procedures apply to devolution in major incidents: There may be circumstances where, in association with an emergency, personnel are evacuated from one area of the state to another to avoid danger (e.g., hurricanes with mandatory evacuations). In these instances, alternative arrangements for coverage of Priority 1 and Priority 2 calls may be made by cooperating regional offices until workers are able to return. This application of internal mutual aid by "sister regions" is an example of when responsibilities for coverage are devolved from one group of personnel to another in a different location. Typically, this arrangement would be made necessary only when workers suffer personal damage to their homes and are not able to timely return from evacuation. In the event it is necessary to evacuate workers from one part of the state to another and conditions are such that internal mutual aid is impractical or will be Page 19 of 27
20 substantially delayed, DFPS may devolve its responsibilities to investigate high priority calls where there are reports of neglect or abuse to law enforcement for initial investigation. o The Regional Directors/District Director acting as the Unified Command Team shall be responsible for ensuring that the law enforcement jurisdiction(s) in the evacuated county are made aware through official notification that DFPS is devolving call response/investigation, including the time and date of the beginning of devolution of responsibilities. o The Unified Command Team shall notify the on-duty supervisor at Statewide Intake of the devolution of responsibilities and the counties affected. The onduty supervisor shall ensure notification of the Director of Statewide Intake and the Chief Operations Officer. o DFPS shall reinstate normal response when sufficient personnel have returned, or emergency conditions improve to the degree that personnel may respond in safety. Under extreme conditions and the loss of State Office, State Office authority may be decentralized and devolved to the Regional and District Directors statewide. Regional Directors will be responsible for continuing or re-establishing missionessential functions in coordination with other regions until such time as reconstitution of State Office can occur. The most common form of devolution occurs when a local office suffers major damage or destruction. Devolution to new facilities may be temporary or permanent. Devolving facilities will typically involve cooperation with Regional Administrative Services and/or the Texas Facilities Commission. It may involve moving to a newly-acquired facility, or temporarily sharing a facility with another location until repairs can be effected. Continuity Facilities/Alternate Facility Operations When/If a need arises to devolve operations from one location to another due to damage or destruction of a facility, DFPS Regional Command and State Office will coordinate with the office of the Director of Program Logistics, the Texas Facilities Commission, and HHSC Regional Administrative Services to develop alternatives temporarily and long-term. Vital Files, Records, and Databases DFPS will maintain vital files, records, and databases necessary to perform essential functions and activities and to reconstitute normal operations after the emergency ceases. Vital records have been identified on the agency approved Records Retention Schedule. There are three categories of records to be reviewed and prioritized, then transferred (either hard copy or electronic media) to an alternate location: Clients case files; Legal/financial records; and, Any other vital files, records, and databases deemed to be necessary to be used to perform mission critical activities. Page 20 of 27
21 Procedures for caring for wet/damaged paper records may be found at on the Records Management Web site. Note: It is important to remember that restoration of wet paper records MUST begin within 72 hours if at all possible. Also, paper records, including case files, should NEVER be left on the floor; and, in the event of a foreseeable emergency (e.g., approaching hurricane or strong storm) records stored in individual offices/cubicles should be kept in a manner that best protects them from damage and exposure. Human Capital There are many emergency incidents that may affect the availability of DFPS to maintain MEFs due to the shortage of personnel, including: Multiple incidents or a single incident with multiple sites requiring many resources; An incident that affects local personnel so that extra-local personnel must be brought in to backfill or assist with the workload (e.g., a weather event that damages local workers personal property); A major incident that necessitates mandatory evacuation of a county or other political jurisdiction (e.g., major hurricane); A diffuse incident that affects personnel regionally or state-wide to cause widespread shortages (e.g., pandemic flu); A complex single site incident requiring many resources (e.g., mass child removal operation). Human capital shortages are generally handled on a case-by-case basis, and often with the activation of internal mutual aid. Some potential DFPS actions to meet human capital shortages are: Sister region coverage Temporary reassignment Temporary transfer Permanent transfer Inter-regional coverage of human capital shortages including travel logistics will generally be coordinated by/through the Area Command Team at State Office. When personnel are ordered to evacuate by the County Judge, or other official having jurisdiction, the Regional Commander/Unified Command (RC/UC) shall designate postincident contact procedures. The RC/UC shall designate when, where, and/or how staff should check in following the passing of the emergency to receive further instructions. If possible, the RC/UC should compile a roster of personnel evacuating, their planned evacuation destination, and a contact phone number(s). Interoperable Communications The success of DFPS operations at an alternate facility is dependent upon the available and redundancy of critical communication systems to support connectivity to internal organizations, other state and federal entities, critical stakeholders and the public. DFPS interoperable communication objectives are to provide: Capability commensurate with DFPS mission critical activities; Page 21 of 27
22 Ability to communicate with essential agency personnel, obtain critical data, and access other organizational components; Ability to communicate with other agencies and emergency personnel; and, Access to other data and systems necessary to conduct mission critical activities. The following communication options have been identified and developed to allow DFPS to take maximum advantage of the spectrum of communications media likely to be available in any emergency situation. These services may include, but are not limited to the following: GotoMyPC services Blackberries Cellular phone communications Message One Capability Laptops, with or without soft phones Internet and intranet webpages Test, Training, and Exercises The objectives for the tests are to undertake a thorough and rigorous testing of the business recovery process, including the simulation of a disruptive event, which produces results which can be measured and evaluated together with feedback to allow the COOP to be enhanced and streamlined. The scope of the tests is to be carried out in a comprehensive and exhaustive manner so that all aspects of the plan may be tested. The tests should be contributed to, in a significant manner, by all business and support units within the organization. The tests will include recovery of all aspects of the Business Recovery Activities section of the COOP including IT systems recovery. In order to ensure consistency of the testing process throughout the organization, members of the Continuity of Operations Team should assist in coordinating the testing process within each business unit across the agency. Each business process should be thoroughly tested and the coordinator should ensure that each business unit observes the necessary rules associated with ensuring that the testing process is carried out within a realistic environment. At the completion of each test feedback will be provided to each participating business unit. All persons serving on regional or state office incident management teams will have complete Incident Command System Training through (at least) the ICS 300/400 level. The BCP will be responsible for conducting periodic refresher training for teams, as well as ensuring training when new members are appointed. Training and exercises in Incident Command procedures will be provided semi-annually to regional teams. Generally, training and exercises will be conducted in early spring (prior to hurricane season) and again in the fall. The Business Continuity Planner will design and lead training and exercise sessions for regional teams. Reconstitution Page 22 of 27
Miami-Dade County, Florida Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Template
Miami-Dade County, Florida Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Template Miami-Dade County Department of Emergency Management 9300 NW 41 st Street Miami, FL 33178-2414
More informationBusiness Continuity Plan
San Francisco VA Health Care System (SFVAHCS) San Francisco, California Business Continuity Plan Service/Department Name Version Date: Version: Date 29 Contents Business Continuity Plan Overview... 3 BCP
More informationDRCOG Business Continuity Plan
Enter Date Here IT Manager Ext 6722 DRCOG Business Continuity Plan Date Created: 10/28/2015 Category: Procedure Revision: 0.02 Last Modified: 01/07/2016 Author: Tim Feld IT Manager Modified by: Tim Feld
More informationHANDBOOK DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) APRIL 2005 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APRIL 2005 U.S. Department of Housing And Urban Development 451 7 th Street SW Washington DC 20410 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) HANDBOOK
More informationContinuity of Operations (COOP) Planning Workshop. Division of Emergency Management Department of Military Affairs
Continuity of Operations (COOP) Planning Workshop Division of Emergency Management Department of Military Affairs What is Continuity of Operations? Continuity of Operations (COOP) is an effort within individual
More informationNational Incident Management System (NIMS) & the Incident Command System (ICS)
CITY OF LEWES EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ANNEX D National Incident Management System (NIMS) & the Incident Command System (ICS) On February 28, 2003, President Bush issued Homeland Security Presidential
More informationDOD DIRECTIVE DOD CONTINUITY POLICY
DOD DIRECTIVE 3020.26 DOD CONTINUITY POLICY Originating Component: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Effective: February 14, 2018 Releasability: Reissues and Cancels: Approved by: Cleared
More informationMARTIN METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN (COOP)
MARTIN METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN (COOP) MARTIN METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN Prepared for Prepared by Martin Metropolitan Planning
More informationChild Protective Investigations Division Continuity of Operations Plan
Child Protective Investigations Division Continuity of Operations Plan Rev 05/08 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 The Child Protective Investigations Division, Emergency Continuity of Operations
More informationComprehensive Emergency Management Plan
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Section 5-Continuity Of Operations Plan HC Emergency Management Department 5-1 COOP HC Emergency Management Dept Blank Intentionally 2 CEMP 5-1 COOP HC Emergency
More informationThe Basics of Disaster Response
The Basics of Disaster Response Thomas D. Kirsch, MD, MPH, FACEP Center for Refugee and Disaster Response Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Office of Critical Event Preparedness and Response
More informationPart 1.3 PHASES OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Part 1.3 PHASES OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Four primary phases of emergency management are outlined below, relating to campus mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery activities occurring before, during,
More informationESF 5. Emergency Management
1. Purpose and Scope Emergency Support Function (ESF) 5 provides information for coordinating management, direction, and control of emergency operations in Coos County for all hazards. This ESF 5 describes
More informationThe 2018 edition is under review and will be available in the near future. G.M. Janowski Associate Provost 21-Mar-18
The 2010 University of Alabama at Birmingham Emergency Operations Plan is not current but is maintained as part of the Compliance Certification for historical purposes. The 2018 edition is under review
More informationTable 1: Types of Emergencies Potentially Affecting Urgent Care Centers o Chemical Emergency
Developing an Emergency Preparedness Plan Alan A. Ayers, MBA, MAcc Content Advisor, Urgent Care Association of America Associate Editor, Journal of Urgent Care Medicine Vice President, Concentra Urgent
More informationPublic Safety and Security
Public Safety and Security ESF #13 GRAYSON COLLEGE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Table of Contents Table of contents..1 Approval and Implementation.3 Recorded of Change.4 Emergency Support Function 13- Public Safety..5
More informationChapter 3: Business Continuity Management
Chapter 3: Business Continuity Management GAO Why we did this audit: Nova Scotians rely on critical government programs and services Plans needed so critical services can continue Effective management
More informationUnit 2: Requirements for Continuity Planning
: Requirements for Continuity Planning Objectives At the end of this unit, you should be able to: 1. Describe the requirements of National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD) 51/Homeland Security Presidential
More informationEmergency Management. 1 of 8 Updated: June 20, 2014 Hospice with Residential Facilities
CEMP Criteria for Hospice Lee County Emergency Management The following criteria are to be used when developing Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans (CEMP) for all hospices. The criteria also serve
More informationIS-700.a National Incident Management System (NIMS) An Introduction Final Exam
1. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 (HSPD-5) requires all Federal departments and agencies to: a. Establish a panel that will evaluate activities at the State, tribal, and local levels to ensure
More informationNAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PROGRAM AND POLICY
OPNAV INSTRUCTION 3030.5B DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350 2000 IN REPLY REFER TO: OPNAVINST 3030.5B N3/N5 From: Subj: Chief of Naval
More informationOn February 28, 2003, President Bush issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 (HSPD 5). HSPD 5 directed the Secretary of Homeland Security
On February 28, 2003, President Bush issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 (HSPD 5). HSPD 5 directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop and administer a National Incident Management
More informationEOP/SUPPORT ANNEX F/APPENDIX 14 EOC FINANCE SECTION APPENDIX 14 EOC FINANCE SECTION
APPENDIX 14 APPENDIX 14-1 JUNE 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK APPENDIX 14-2 JUNE 2015 OVERVIEW The Finance Section is responsible for providing accounting functions, including maintaining an audit
More informationANNEX F. Firefighting. City of Jonestown. F-i. Ver 2.0 Rev 6/13 MP
ANNEX F Firefighting City of Jonestown F-i RECORD OF CHANGES CHANGE # DATE OF CHANGE DESCRIPTION CHANGED BY F-ii APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION Annex F Firefighting Fire Chief Date EMC Date. F-iii ANNEX F FIREFIGHTING
More informationContinuity of Operations Plan for the. Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study. Approved: October 28, Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study
Approved: October 28, 2015 Continuity of Operations Plan for the Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study Primary Contact: Jonathan R. Start Executive Director 5220 Lovers
More informationManatee County Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) Animal Services. for
Manatee County Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) for Animal Services 2008 Note: Under State Statute 281.301, this document is exempt from public access and disclosure requirements of State Statute 119.07(1)
More informationNational Incident Management System (NIMS) Implementation Plan
INDIAN LAKE BOROUGH National Incident Management System (NIMS) Implementation Plan DATE Due to the compilation of potentially sensitive data, this NIMS Implementation Plan is marked FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
More informationUNIT 2: ICS FUNDAMENTALS REVIEW
UNIT 2: ICS FUNDAMENTALS REVIEW This page intentionally left blank. Visuals October 2013 Student Manual Page 2.1 Activity: Defining ICS Incident Command System (ICS) ICS Review Materials: ICS History and
More informationICS-200: ICS for Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents
1) means that each individual involved in incident operations will be assigned to only one supervisor. (a) Span of Control (b) Unity of Command (c) Supervisor Authority (d) Unified Command 2) Select the
More informationThis page is intentionally blank
This page is intentionally blank 3 CONTENTS Introduction... 6 Emergency Management Organization... 6 Standardized Emergency Management System Organization... 6 The Operational Area EMO... 6 Concept of
More informationEmergency Support Function 5. Emergency Management. Iowa County Emergency Management Agency. Iowa County Emergency Management Agency
Emergency Support Function 5 Emergency Management ESF Coordinator: Primary Agency: Iowa County Emergency Management Agency Iowa County Emergency Management Agency Support Agencies: Iowa County Departments
More informationNG-J3/7 CNGBI DISTRIBUTION: A 31 October 2014 CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) PROGRAM POLICY
CHIEF NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU INSTRUCTION NG-J3/7 CNGBI 3302.01 DISTRIBUTION: A CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (COOP) PROGRAM POLICY References: See Enclosure B. 1. Purpose. This instruction establishes National
More informationEvCC Emergency Management Plan ANNEX #02 Emergency Operations Center
1. INTRODUCTION The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is the pre-established, central location where designated leaders converge to coordinate emergency response, recovery, communication, and documentation
More informationEmergency Operations Plan
Emergency Operations Plan Public Version Effective Date: July 1, 2016 Emergency Management Division Police & Public Safety Department Phone: (336)750-2900 E-mail: campussafety@wssu.edu Public Records Exemption
More informationJohn R. Harrald, Ph.D. Director, Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and Risk Management The George Washington University.
John R. Harrald, Ph.D. Director, Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and Risk Management The George Washington University Testimony for the Senate Homeland Security Government Affairs Committee Hurricane Katrina:
More informationNEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT 2014 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ANNEX Version 2 RECORD OF CHANGES Changes listed below have been made to the New Jersey Transit Police Department Emergency Operations Annex
More informationCONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN (COOP) Early Learning Coalition of Broward County, Inc NW 5 th Way, Suite 3400 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN (COOP) Early Learning Coalition of Broward County, Inc. 6301 NW 5 th Way, Suite 3400 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Renee Jaffe, Chief Executive Officer (954) 377-2188 FAX (954)
More informationOffice of the City Auditor. Committed to increasing government efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and transparency
Office of the City Auditor Committed to increasing government efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and transparency Issue Date: August 9, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... ii Comprehensive
More informationBLINN COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS MANUAL
BLINN COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS MANUAL SUBJECT: Emergency Response Plan EFFECTIVE DATE: November 1, 2014 BOARD POLICY REFERENCE: CGC PURPOSE To prepare Blinn College for three classifications
More informationDraft 2016 Emergency Management Standard Release for Public Comment March 2015
Draft 2016 Emergency Management Standard Release for Public Comment March 2015 Emergency Management Accreditation Program Publication Note The Emergency Management Standard by the Emergency Management
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 10-25 26 SEPTEMBER 2007 Operations EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ACCESSIBILITY: COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY Publications and
More informationMike Chard Paul Eller
Why Should I have or be involved in an Emergency Management Program? Bruce Holloman Mike Chard Paul Eller www.dhsem.state.co.us Why As Political Subdivisions of Government and elected officials you have
More informationBuilding a Disaster Resilient Community. City of Yakima Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP)
City of Yakima Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) 2015 This page blank intentionally 2015 CEMP Page 2 City of Yakima Promulgation With this notice, I am pleased to officially promulgate the
More informationUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Plan Fundamentals In accordance with Homeland Security Presidential Directive [HSPD] 5, all department heads, work units and agencies of the University having
More informationMission. Directions. Objectives
Incident Response Guide: Information Technology (IT) Failure Mission To provide for business continuity and availability of essential automated systems for the hospital in the event of a massive or sustained
More informationC O O P. Exhibit A CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN (COOP)
C O O P Exhibit A CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN (COOP) CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD COMPREHENSIVE COOP As adopted November 2014 Outcome City and County of Broomfield Continuity of Operations Plan DRAFT
More informationCOWARN OPERATIONAL PLAN
COWARN OPERATIONAL PLAN 2012 Colorado s Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network DISCLAIMER This document does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, States, or Colorado s Water/Wastewater Agency
More informationNIMS/ICS Study Guide
NIMS/ICS Study Guide The FEMA Website This guide was developed to be used in conjunction with the online NIMS and ICS classes. To attend each class, navigate to the FEMA website (you can use the links
More informationEmergency Support Function #5 Emergency Management
Floyd County Emergency Operations Plan ESF # 5-1 Emergency Support Function #5 Emergency Management ESF Coordinator Emergency Management Coordinator Primary Agency Emergency Management Secondary/Support
More informationMultiAgency Mass Care Task Force Standard Operating Guide September 2017
MultiAgency Mass Care Task Force Standard Operating Guide September 2017 September 2017 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 MISSION OF THE MCTF... 3 DIRECTION AND CONTROL... 3 STATE ORGANIZATION... 3
More informationCourse: IS ICS for Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents
Course: IS-200 - ICS for Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents Lesson 1: Course Overview Lesson 2: Leadership and Management Lesson 3: Delegation of Authority and Management by Objectives Lesson
More informationState Emergency Management and Homeland Security: A Changing Dynamic By Trina R. Sheets
State Emergency Management and Homeland Security: A Changing Dynamic By Trina R. Sheets The discipline of emergency management is at a critical juncture in history. Even before the horrific events of September
More informationTornado Tabletop Exercise Template
Tornado Tabletop Exercise Template GHCA Emergency Preparedness Committee August 13, 2014 1 PREFACE The Tornado Tabletop Exercise Template was developed by the Georgia Health Care Association (GHCA) Emergency
More informationUnit 6: NIMS Command and Management
Unit 6: NIMS Command and Management This page intentionally left blank. Objectives At the end of this unit, you should be able to define the concepts and principles related to the following Command and
More informationDRAFT 10/08/2010 VERSION
DRAFT 10/08/2010 VERSION 2 06-01-14 BLANK Table of Contents COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN I. PURPOSE... 1 II. SCOPE... 1 III. MISSION... 2 IV. PLAN DISTRIBUTION... 2 V. GEOGRAPHIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC
More informationTo address this need, President Bush issued the following Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPDs):
Lesson Summary Course: IS-200 - ICS for Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents Lesson 1: Welcome/Course Overview Lesson Overview The Welcome/Course Overview lesson reviews the Incident Command System
More informationEMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION #6 MASS CARE
COORDINATING AGENCIES: Guernsey County Emergency Management Agency Department of Job & Family Services PRIMARY AGENCIES: Salvation Army American Red Cross Department of Job & Family Services SUPPORT AGENCIES:
More informationBUSINESS SERVICES VP EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CHAPTER #2 Board of Trustees Approval: 8/13/2014 POLICY Page 1 of 1
CHAPTER #2 Board of Trustees Approval: 8/13/2014 POLICY 13.01 Page 1 of 1 I. POLICY The purpose of this policy is to provide the framework for Salt Lake Community College to protect the lives and property
More informationEmergency Management Element. CMS Rule for. HRSA Form 10 HRSA PIN Joint Commission NIMS OSHA Best Practices. Emergency
Community Health Center Crosswalk The following resource includes references from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Joint Commission
More informationThis Annex describes the emergency medical service protocol to guide and coordinate actions during initial mass casualty medical response activities.
A N N E X C : M A S S C A S U A L T Y E M S P R O T O C O L This Annex describes the emergency medical service protocol to guide and coordinate actions during initial mass casualty medical response activities.
More informationTexas Type 3 All-Hazard Incident Management Team (AHIMT) Qualification and Credentialing Guide
Texas Type 3 All-Hazard Incident Management Team (AHIMT) Qualification and Credentialing Guide Revision 2 March 1, 2010 March 1, 2010 1 Record of Changes Change # 1 2 3 Date of Entered By Change 01/29/2010
More informationMultiple Patient Management Plan
2018 [NAME OF PLAN] Multiple Patient Management Plan Marin County Health & Human Services Emergency Medical Services Agency Supports the Marin County Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan and Medical
More informationComprehensive Emergency Management Program
Comprehensive Emergency Management Program April 2017 P a g e 1 Comprehensive Emergency Management Program P a g e 2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. This document was prepared by the Arlington County, Virginia
More informationUniversity of Maryland Baltimore Emergency Management Plan Version 1.7
University of Maryland Baltimore Updated June 13, 2011 Page 1 University of Maryland Baltimore TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... 1 Section 1: Plan Fundamentals... 2 Introduction... 2 Purpose... 2
More informationPediatric Medical Surge
Pediatric Medical Surge Exercise Evaluation Guide Final Published Version 1.0 Capability Description: Pediatric Medical Surge is the capability to rapidly expand the capacity of the existing healthcare
More informationContinuity of Operations
May 13-14, 2014 Walter E. Washington Convention Center Washington, DC Continuity of Operations Eric Kretz, Director Continuity of Operations Division National Continuity Programs Federal Emergency Management
More informationEmergency Operations Plan
SADDLEBACK COLLEGE Emergency Operations Plan Prepared by Saddleback College Police Department Reviewed for SEMS/NIMS/ICS Compliance May 2009 This document was adapted from the California State Emergency
More informationEmergency Operations Plan
Emergency Operations Plan 1 I. General Information A. Purpose The purpose of the Ursinus College Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) is to provide a management structure, key responsibility, assignments and
More informationA Comprehensive Emergency Management Program
A Comprehensive Emergency Management Program A Model for State & Territorial Courts 2007 NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS COURT CONSULTING SERVICES 707 SEVENTEENTH STREET, SUITE 2900 DENVER, CO 80202 TABLE
More informationIntro to - IS700 National Incident Management System Aka - NIMS
Intro to - IS700 National Incident Management System Aka - NIMS What is N.I.M.S.? N.I.M.S is a comprehensive, national approach to incident management that is applicable at all jurisdictional levels. Its
More informationPMA Business Continuity Plan
1 PMA Business Continuity Plan Emergency notification contacts Name Address Home Mobile phone Ian Jones ian@delegatecentral.com ian@practicemanagersuk.org ian.ljones@tiscali.co.uk 01606 44945 07880 788985
More informationUniversity of California San Francisco Emergency Response Management Plan PART 5 COMMAND STAFF (ERP) Table of Contents
COMMAND STAFF (ERP) Table of Contents Chancellor...5-3 EOC Director...5-5 Policy Group...5-11 Legal Counsel...5-13 Academic Coordinator...5-15 Critical Programs...5-19 Recovery Team...5-23 Deans...5-27
More information[This Page Intentionally Left Blank]
NRT JOINT INFORMATION CENTER MODEL Collaborative Communications During Emergency Response October 2009 [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] Table of Contents Acknowledgements vii How To Use This Model
More informationUniversity of San Francisco EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
University of San Francisco EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN University of San Francisco Emergency Operations Plan Plan Contact Eric Giardini Director of Campus Resilience 415-422-4222 This plan complies with
More informationCONTINUITY EVALUATION TOOL: VERSION 6
CONTINUITY EVALUATION TOOL: VERSION 6 The Continuity Evaluation Tool is designed to assess elements of continuity outlined in the annexes of Federal Continuity Directive 1 (FCD 1). The purpose of the Continuity
More informationLarimer County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan 2015
Section 3.4: PROCEDURAL and OPERATIONAL ANNEXES Introduction and Purpose Procedural and Operational Annexes provide for a detailed view of many of the key response actions that are necessary for the successful
More informationMississippi Emergency Support Function #4 Firefighting Annex
ESF #4 Coordinator Mississippi Fire Marshal s Office Primary Agency Mississippi Insurance Department Federal ESF Coordinator Department of Agriculture/U.S. Forest Federal Primary Agency Department of Agriculture/U.S.
More informationCity of Santa Monica SEMS/NIMS Multi Hazard Functional Emergency Plan 2013
City of Santa Monica SEMS/NIMS Multi Hazard Functional Emergency Plan 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 2 City Disclaimer: This Multi Hazard Functional Emergency Plan is written in compliance with
More information3 ESF 3 Public Works and. Engineering
3 ESF 3 Public Works and Engineering THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY ESF 3 Public Works and Engineering Table of Contents 1 Purpose and Scope... ESF 3-1 2 Policies and Agreements... ESF 3-1 3 Situation
More information5 ESF 5 Emergency Management
5 ESF 5 Emergency Management THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY ESF 5 Emergency Management Table of Contents 1 Purpose and Scope... ESF 5-1 2 Policies and Agreements... ESF 5-1 3 Situation and Assumptions...
More informationTHE STATE OF FLORIDA WILDFIRE OPERATIONS ANNEX
FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014 THE STATE OF FLORIDA WILDFIRE OPERATIONS ANNEX To The State of Florida Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
More informationEmergency Response Plan Appendix A, ICS Position Checklist
Emergency Response Plan Appendix A, ICS Position Checklist Allen County Preparedness System Planning Frameworks - Response Support Annex Allen County Office of Homeland Security 1 East Main Street, Room
More informationUrban Search and Rescue Standard by EMAP
The Urban Search and Rescue Standard by EMAP has been developed through a series of working group meetings with stakeholders from government, business and other sectors. Scalable yet rigorous, the Urban
More informationICS-200.b: ICS for Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents Final Exam
1) These levels of the ICS organization may have Deputy positions: Branch Incident Commander (a) Staging Area (b) Group (c) Division (d) Section 2) Resources within the Staging Areas: (a) Are managed by
More informationE S F 8 : Public Health and Medical Servi c e s
E S F 8 : Public Health and Medical Servi c e s Primary Agency Fire Agencies Pacific County Public Health & Human Services Pacific County Prosecutor s Office Pacific County Department of Community Development
More informationPrepublication Requirements
Prepublication Requirements Standards Revisions for Emergency Management Final Rule in Home Care The Joint Commission has approved the following revisions for prepublication. While revised requirements
More informationCity and County of San Francisco Emergency Support Function #5 Emergency Management Annex
Contents FOREWORD Process Flowchart Anticipated Event... iii Process Flowchart Unanticipated Event... v SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Coordinating and Supporting Departments... 1 1.2 ESF Responsibilities...
More informationCHATHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
CHATHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ESF ANNEX 15-2 DISASTER AWARENESS AND PREPAREDNESS STRATEGY SEPTEMBER 2011 SEPTEMBER 2011 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK SEPTEMBER 2011 ACRONYMS CEMA CCPIOA DAPS
More informationM. APPENDIX XIII: EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 13 - MILITARY SUPPORT
M. APPENDIX XIII: EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 13 - MILITARY SUPPORT PRIMARY AGENCY: SUPPORT AGENCY: Department of Military Affairs, Florida National Guard None I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of Emergency Support
More informationKENTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN RESOURCE SUPPORT ESF-7
KENTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN RESOURCE SUPPORT ESF-7 Coordinates and organizes resource support in preparing for, responding to and recovering from emergency/disaster incidents which
More informationNATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) BASIC GUIDANCE FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICERS (PIOs) 20 August 2007
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) BASIC GUIDANCE FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICERS (PIOs) 20 August 2007 Pre-Decisional Material. Not for Reproduction, Citation, or Distribution without Incident
More informationHome Health Agency Requirements CMS Emergency Preparedness Final Rule
Home Health Agency Requirements CMS Emergency Preparedness Final Rule The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating
More informationTHE SOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN BASIC PLAN. February 2008 Reference Number 1-200
THE SOUTHERN NEVADA HEALTH DISTRICT EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN BASIC PLAN February 2008 Reference Number 1-200 This page left blank intentionally. 2 1-200 SECTION: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN TITLE: SIGNATURE
More information6 ESF 6 Mass Care, Emergency. Assistance, Housing, and Human Services
6 ESF 6 Mass Care, Emergency Assistance, Housing, and Human Services THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY ESF 6 Mass Care, Emergency Assistance, Housing and Human Services Table of Contents 1 Purpose and
More informationSan Joaquin Operational Area. Emergency Operations Center MEDICAL HEALTH BRANCH PLAN
San Joaquin Operational Area Emergency Operations Center MEDICAL HEALTH BRANCH PLAN December 23, 2014 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY... 2 III. PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS...
More informationRevising the National Strategy for Homeland Security
Revising the National Strategy for Homeland Security September 2007 The Need for a Revised Strategy Reflect the evolution of the homeland security enterprise since the National Strategy for Homeland Security
More informationCobb County Emergency Management Agency
COBB COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Revised August 13, 2013 Cobb County Emergency Management Agency BLANK PAGE BLANK PAGE Cobb County, Georgia EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Local Resolution TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationResource Information and Checklists for Executives/Senior Officials
Incident Command System (ICS) ICS was developed in the 1970s following a series of catastrophic fires in California's urban interface. Property damage ran into the millions, and many people died or were
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 10-25 28 APRIL 2014 Operations AIR FORCE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY:
More informationNational Preparedness Goal Project
CITY OF CALABASAS OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT National Preparedness Goal Project National Incident Management System (NIMS) Implementation Plan WORKING DRAFT February 1, 2006 / State of California Office
More information