Public Input for Changes to Reportable Events Policy
|
|
- Violet Underwood
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Public Input for Changes to Reportable Events Policy May 23, 2017 Richard Guido, MD, IRB Chair Jamie Zelazny, PhD, RN, Regulatory Affairs Specialist
2 Outline Regulatory basis for reporting policies Importance of consistency between IRBs Evaluation of Pitt IRB policies and IRBs across the country Proposed changes re: deviations Discussion
3 Regulatory Requirements for Reporting
4 HHS regulatory requirements Institutions engaged in human subjects research conducted or supported by HHS must have written procedures for ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB, appropriate institutional officials, and any supporting department or agency head of any unanticipated problem involving risks to subjects or others (45 CFR (b)(5)). 4
5 HHS regulatory requirements For research covered by an assurance approved for federalwide use by OHRP, HHS regulations at 45 CFR (a) require that institutions promptly report any unanticipated problems to OHRP. 5
6 OHRP Guidance (2007) Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk To Subjects or Others Any incident, experience or outcome that meets all of the following criteria: Unexpected (in terms of nature, severity, or frequency) Related or possibly related to participation in the research Suggests that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm (including physical, psychological, economic or social harm) than was previously known or recognized
7 OHRP s Venn Diagram
8 FDA Regulatory Requirements: Investigator to IRB Investigators are required to report promptly to the IRB all unanticipated problems involving risks to human subjects or others, including adverse events that should be considered unanticipated problems ( (b)(1), (c)(1)(vii), and ). 8
9 FDA Guidance (January 2009) AE should be considered an unanticipated problem involving risk to human subjects and reported to the HRPO, only if: unexpected and, serious and, would have implications for the conduct of the study (significant, and usually safety related change in the protocol like revising inclusion/exclusion criteria, new monitoring requirements, ICF or IB)
10 FDA Guidance January 2009 An individual AE occurrence ordinarily does not meet these criteria because, as an isolated event, its implications for the study cannot be understood. FDA provided specific examples of AE s that would meet the definition of an unanticipated problem involving risk to subjects.
11 FDA Guidance January 2009 Most AE s generally require an evaluation of their relevance and significance to the study Aggregate analysis of other occurrences of the same (or similar) event DSMB, DSMB, DSMB!!!!! 11
12 What about protocol deviations? 12
13 Noncompliance/Protocol Deviations Inconsistencies between HHS and FDA regulations Inconsistencies within FDA regulations for drugs and devices 13
14 HHS and FDA Regulations Prospective approval is required for changes to the research protocol except for deviations performed to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject in compliance with 45 CFR (b) (4) and 21 CFR (a)(4) 14
15 FDA Compliance Program Manual Ch 48 Protocol deviations: generally an unplanned excursion from the protocol that is not implemented or intended as a systematic change.like protocol amendments, deviations initiated by the clinical investigator must be reviewed and approved by the IRB and the sponsor prior to implementation, unless the change is necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the human subjects (21 CFR ), or to protect the life or physical well-being of the subject (21 CFR (a)(2)), and generally communicated to FDA. 15
16 Noncompliance/Deviations No real guidance from FDA or OHRP about what or how deviations should be reported to IRBs after they occur. 16
17 Need for consistency between IRBs Same regulatory basis for policies and procedures Single IRB review Need to follow reporting policies of the IRB of record for your study
18 Need for consistency between IRBs Move to more standardized IRB electronic submission systems Pitt s electronic IRB submission process currently being rewritten, which will change our Reportable Event Policy in 2018
19 National review of IRB policies Generally consistent regarding unanticipated problems involving risk to subject or others Wide variation in reporting of deviations
20 How does Pitt IRB s reporting policy UAPs compare to others? Fairly similar overall Separate reporting pathways for AEs and UAPs not always required Deviations that are UAPs need to be reported as UAPs
21 How does Pitt IRB s reporting policy Deviations compare? Pitt is more conservative overall National trend is to require 2 levels of reporting Reportable event deviations that affect the rights and welfare of human subjects or compromise the quality of the data Time of continuing review upload a log of minor deviations which occurred during the review period.
22 Types of Reportable Events Reportable Events Adverse Events that are Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others Other Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subject or Others Deviation or Non- Compliance
23 Protocol Deviation or Non Compliance Current Pitt IRB Policy Investigators must submit all incidents of non compliance/protocol deviations within 10 working days of the investigator becoming aware of the event
24 Definitions Current definition Non compliance: Failure on the part of the investigator or any member of the study team to follow the terms of University of Pittsburgh IRB approved protocol or to abide by applicable laws or regulations, or University of Pittsburgh IRB policies. This includes protocol deviations. Proposed definitions No change in the definition only in how these will be reported to the IRB Incidents of noncompliance on the part of research participants which do not involve risk need not be reported to the IRB.
25 Definitions Current definition All incidents require reporting N/A Proposed definitions Noncompliance requiring submission of a reportable event: Incidents of noncompliance or protocol deviations that adversely affect that rights and welfare of human subjects, or significantly compromises the quality of the research data. The IRB will determine whether reports meet the definition of serious or continuing non compliance. Noncompliance reportable at the time of continuing review: Incidents of noncompliance which do not meet the above definition should be logged by the study team in real time and then uploaded into the renewal application in OSIRIS at the time of continuing review. The IRB expects that the investigator and study team will regularly monitor the log for patterns of noncompliance that may represent serious or continuing noncompliance.
26 Example of log Date of Deviation Study ID Description of Deviation (attach extra pages, if needed) Reason for Deviation Corrective Action Plan Sponsor Notification Date (required for IND/IDE studies)
27 Examples Current policy Proposed policy Performing non exempt human subject research without obtaining prospective University IRB approval Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Conducting research during a lapse in IRB approval; Implementing protocol modifications without obtaining prospective IRB approval Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days
28 Examples Examples Current policy Proposed policy Obtaining consent using an outdated consent form, when the new consent form contained new information that may have caused the subject to change their mind about participating; Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Obtaining consent using an outdated consent form when there were no substantive differences between the consent form that was used and the consent form that should have been used (i.e., dates in the footer) Report within 10 working days Log and submit at time of continuing review
29 Examples Examples Current policy Proposed policy Not adhering to inclusion/exclusion criteria Enrolling more subjects that approved in the protocol in a greater than minimal risk study Enrolling more subjects than approved in a minimal risk study Performing non safety related research procedures outside the protocol specified window Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Report within 10 working days Log and submit at time of continuing review Log and submit at time of continuing review
30 Discussion How difficult will it be to log deviations throughout the year and report at the time of continuing review?
31 Discussion How comfortable would investigators feel about making the determination about what should be reported as a reportable event and what should be reported at the time of continuing review?
32 Discussion How much of a burden is our current system for reportable events?
33 Discussion What are your experiences with other IRBs and other common networks?
34 Comments?
35 Upcoming HRPO Seminar Using SMART IRB and Single IRB Review Find out the advantages of SMART IRB. Learn how Pitt can be the IRB of record or rely on another IRB June 6, :00pm BST S120
University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines
University of South Carolina Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines These guidelines define the procedures of USC for addressing unanticipated problems involving risks to research participants
More informationBiomedical IRB MS #
Department for Human Research Protections Institutional Review Boards Biomedical IRB MS # 1035 419-383-6796 IRB.Biomed@utoledo.edu Social, Behavioral and Educational IRB MS # 944 419-530-6167 IRB.SBE@utoledo.edu
More informationSTUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)
POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812) Purpose: Investigators who initiate and submit an IDE application to the FDA assume the responsibilities of both
More informationI. Scope This policy defines unanticipated problems and adverse events and establishes the reporting process and timeline.
Human Research Protection Program Policies & Procedures Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Version 3.0 Date Effective: 11.9.2012 Research Integrity Office Mail code L106-RI Portland, Oregon 97239-3098
More informationUNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS I. PURPOSE To specify the procedures for reporting unanticipated problems,
More informationResearch Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review
Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015 Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review Definitions Responsible Positions Equipment Needed Procedure Steps, Guidelines, Rules,
More informationPROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS
PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE To define the structure and responsibility for reporting unanticipated problems that occurs during the conduct of research. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Policy II.02
More information1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements
Information for Investigators: Headquarters, U.S. Special Operations Command Human Research Protection Office (HRPO) Human Research Protections Regulatory Requirements 1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human
More informationReporting to the IRB How to Report the Essentials and Improve the Protection of Human Subjects
Webinar Series Reporting to the IRB How to Report the Essentials and Improve the Protection of Human Subjects April 10, 2013 Presented by: James MacFarlane Director of Board Operations About the Webinar
More informationUSING SMART IRB AND SINGLE IRB REVIEW
USING SMART IRB AND SINGLE IRB REVIEW Jeannie Barone Director, HRPO ATTRIBUTES Special thanks to Nichelle Cobb, PhD from University of Wisconsin-Madison for her permission to utilize her slides on SMART
More informationSOP Problems and Adverse Events, Record and Report
Office of Research Integrity - Human Subjects SOP #: ORI(HS)- 1.0 Page #: Page 1 of 5 Approved By: ORI Executive Director *Signature on file Date: Date First Effective: 11/18/2013 Approved by: Biomedical
More informationUniversity of Colorado Denver Human Research Protection Program Investigator Responsibilities for the Protection of Human Subjects
Institutional Guidelines The Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) recently reviewed and approved your research. The COMIRB reviews research to ensure that the federal regulations for protecting
More informationGood Clinical Practice. Lisa de Blieck MPA CCRC Clinical Trials Coordination Center
Good Clinical Practice Lisa de Blieck MPA CCRC Clinical Trials Coordination Center Good Clinical Practice (GCP) An international standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording,
More informationTITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18
SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 1. POLICY STATEMENT: The research team is responsible for recognizing changes in subject health that may qualify as adverse events, classifying those results as defined in the
More informationSUNY Upstate Medical University GUIDELINES & POLICIES
SUNY Upstate Medical University Institutional Review Board For The Protection Of Human Subjects (IRB) GUIDELINES & POLICIES Table of Contents Table of Contents... i INTRODUCTION...1 THE IRB...2 DEFINITIONS...4
More informationYale University Institutional Review Boards
Yale University Institutional Review Boards 100 PR.4 Department of Defense Supported Research Date: 7/17/12, 9/26/12, 3/5/13 Overview...1 Definitions...1 Application Supplement...2 Contracts and Awards...2
More informationOffice of Human Research Office of Human Research Policy and Procedure Manual. Version: 4/4/18
Version: 4/4/18 Signatures on File for the Approval of Revisions to the Policy and Procedures Table of Contents 100 General Administration (GA)... 5 Policy GA 101: The Authority and Purpose of the Institutional
More informationHIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies
HIC Standard Operating Procedure For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies Background As part of the Wayne State University (WSU) Human Investigation Committee s (HIC) Human Research Protection Program,
More informationWhen a Single IRB Reviews for Multiple Sites:
When a Single IRB Reviews for Multiple Sites: The Complexities of Simplification John Ennever, MD, PhD Director Office of Human Research Affairs Boston Medical Center and Boston University Medical Campus
More informationOffice of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators Patricia Fischer, RN, CCRP Investigator Responsibilities FDA Draft Guidance May 2007 Clarifies FDA s expectations,
More informationHuman Subject Regulations Decision Charts
Human Subject Regulations Decision Charts September 24, 2004 The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) provides the following graphic aids as a guide for institutional review boards (IRBs), investigators,
More informationRESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM Human Research Protection Program RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT 5/23/2011 The following special considerations apply to research involving
More information1.2.1 It is the policy of the University of Alabama that qualifying research may be reviewed using an expedited procedure.
POLICY # RESEARCH POLICY & PROCEDURE EXPEDITED REVIEW Approval Date: 2-9-2012 CTM Review Cycle: 1 2 3 Revision Dates: AAHRPP DOC # 66 Responsible Office: Research Compliance 1.0 POLICY 1.1 Background 1.1.1
More information16 STUDY OVERSIGHT Clinical Quality Management Plans
16 STUDY OVERSIGHT... 1 16.1 Clinical Quality Management Plans... 1 16.2 Site Visits by the LOC, SDMC and LC... 2 16.3 Protocol Team Oversight... 3 16.4 Oversight of Reportable Protocol Deviations... 3
More informationThe SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board.... University of Missouri-Columbia.. Standard Operating Procedure Informed Consent Types and Elements Informed Consent Types and Elements Effective Date: December 12, 2005 Original
More informationSelf-Monitoring Tool
This form is designed for research personnel to use to assess their compliance with TTUHSC El Paso IRB policies and procedures, and federal regulations and guidance governing research with human subjects,
More informationStudy Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting
Study Management SM 306.00 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Adverse Event Reporting Approval: Nancy Paris, MS, FACHE President and CEO 24 May 2017 (Signature and Date) Approval: Frederick M. Schnell, MD,
More informationRisk-Benefit Ratio and Determinations. Sarah Mumford, Ammon Pate, Annie Risenmay IRB Operations Managers University of Utah
Risk-Benefit Ratio and Determinations Sarah Mumford, Ammon Pate, Annie Risenmay IRB Operations Managers University of Utah Risk-Benefit Ratio and Determinations Nuances of Risk Determinations Direct Benefit
More informationRegulatory Binder Checklist for FDA-Regulated Sponsor/Sponsor-Investigator Studies
Regulatory Binder Checklist for FDA-Regulated Sponsor/Sponsor-Investigator Studies DIRECTIONS: 1. The purpose of a regulatory binder is to assure that all essential elements are maintained in an organized
More informationA Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky
A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky I. Compliance with IRB and Applicable Federal Requirements A. Investigators
More informationTitle: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017
Previous Version Dates: Title: Investigator Responsibilities SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017 1 Purpose Investigators are ultimately responsible for the conduct of research. Investigators
More informationRESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM Human Research Protection Program RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT 2/19/2016 The following special considerations apply to research involving
More informationIRB 04. Research Supported by the Department of Defense
IRB 04 Research Supported by the Department of Defense Presented by IRB Compliance Program, Human Subjects Office May 9, 2016 1 Why a New IRB? Department of the Navy (DoN) research previously sent to WIRB
More informationDr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015
18 August 2015 Role & Responsibilities of Principal Dr. R. Sathianathan Professor of Psychiatry, SRMC, Porur & Former Director, Institute of Mental Health, Chennai Principal Investigators & GOOD CLINICAL
More informationWIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)
WIRBinar How to Survive an FDA Inspection 10-26-2011 Brought to you by WIRB Education and Consulting Services. Improve your ability to maintain compliance and protect human subjects with guidance from
More informationSECNAVINST E ONR Dec 2017 SECNAV INSTRUCTION E. From: Secretary of the Navy. Subj: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM
ONR 343 SECNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.39E From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM Encl: (1) Changes (2) References (3) Responsibilities (4) Procedures (5) Definitions (6) Reports
More informationIRBNet Instructions for Investigators
IRBNet Instructions for Investigators Lifespan s Research Protection Office (RPO) uses IRBNet for the electronic administration and management of its IRB s. Below is a How to tutorial on IRBNet. Departmental
More informationGeneral Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility
General Administration GA 102.01 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility Approval: Nancy Paris, MS, FACHE President and CEO (17 July 2014) (Signature and
More informationFDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155
Vol. 11, No. 9, September 2015 Happy Trials to You FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155 By Shawn Kennedy Medical device clinical trials must comply with 21 CFR Parts 11 (Electronic Records), 50
More informationVCU Clinical Research Quality Assurance Assessment
VCU Clinical Research Quality Assurance Assessment Principal Investigator Protocol Title Protocol IRB Number Name of Person Completing Assessment Date Assessment was Completed The goal of this assessment
More information12.0 Investigator Responsibilities
12.0 Investigator Responsibilities 12.1 Policy Investigators are ultimately responsible for the conduct of research. Research must be conducted according to the signed Investigator statement, the investigational
More informationCLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)
Date: Page: 1 of 8 CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR) Protocol: PI Name: PI Address: Date of Visit: Monitor(s): Other Sponsor Personnel Present: Site Personnel Present at Visit (include names and
More informationPurpose: To provide policy and guidelines and helpful information for conducting research at Brooks
[BRCRC 01] Research: Conducting Research at Brooks (Application for Research) Purpose: To provide policy and guidelines and helpful information for conducting research at Brooks Responsible Party: All
More informationMargaret Huber, RN, CHRC Compliance Consultant Office of Research Compliance
Margaret Huber, RN, CHRC Compliance Consultant Office of Research Compliance 4/20/2015 Objectives Define monitoring and explain why monitoring is important in clinical trials Provide an overview of the
More informationIRB Process for SURF April 21, 2015
IRB Process for SURF April 21, 2015 UNC-CH IRBs Biomedical (A,B,C,D): Expertise is focused on biomedical research (clinical trials, pharmacological research, etc) Oncology = B and D Dentistry = B and D
More informationDepartment of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)
Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR) General Instructions to Institutions and IRBs This form should be
More informationClinical Research Seminar
Clinical Research Seminar HOW TO DEVELOP A CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION PLAN (THAT EVEN THE IRB AND FDA WILL LOVE) April 11, 2018 Fiona Rice, MPH Human Research Quality Manager fionar@bu.edu Mary-Tara
More informationGenesis Health System. Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures
Genesis Health System Institutional Review Board Table of Contents 1. INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY... 6 2. PURPOSE... 6 3. THE SCOPE & AUTHORITY OF THE IRB... 7 Scope...7 Authority of the GHS-IRB...7 Authority
More informationINDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS This manual is believed to be in full compliance with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations.
More informationRequest to Use an External IRB as an IRB of Record
This form is to be used by investigators requesting use of an external IRB. Please submit this completed form, along with the required attachments, to the MHC IRB at hrpp@mclaren.org. (Please see SOP:
More informationSECNAVINST D BUMED-M00R 6 November 2006
SECNAV INSTRUCTION 3900.39D From: Secretary of the Navy DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 Subj: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM SECNAVINST 3900.39D
More informationUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Data and Safety Monitoring Plan
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Data and Safety Monitoring Plan Norman E. Sharpless, MD, Director P30CA-16086 Approved: September 29, 2014 Table of Contents Monitoring Progress of Trials and
More informationETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
CONSIDERATIONS Office for Office for Human Research Protections The Office for Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) is an administrative subdivision within the U.S. Department of Health and Human
More informationREGULATORY AND FUNDING CHANGES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH
REGULATORY AND FUNDING CHANGES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH Teri Reiche Director, IRB and IACUC Jessica Viglione OSP Research Administrator So many acronyms. DHHS = Department of Health and Human Services
More informationBIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST
Item AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATION FOR STUDIES INVOLVING HUMAN DRUGS, BIOLOGICS AND DEVICES 1. Compare the Investigator Agreement with the information provided by the assigning Center. Auditor will check
More informationGood Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View
Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View Jeanna Julo, BA, BA, CCRP Assistant Director, Clinical Data Management & Quality Controls, Auditing & Training Clinical Research Administration Research Institute,
More informationSPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS
SPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Office of Compliance Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Doreen Kezer,
More informationDocumenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA. Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC
Documenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC The regulations represent the floor while ethical thinking is the sky. Dr. Thomas Moore Boston University
More informationPreparing for Audits and Post Approval Monitoring April 29, 2015
Preparing for Audits and Post Approval Monitoring April 29, 2015 Presented By: Piper Hawkins Green, CIP Olga Jonas, CIP IRB Compliance Analyst IRB Compliance Analyst Presentation Agenda Regulatory background
More informationThe GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring
The GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring Heidi Judge, CCRP Sr. Clinical Trials Project Manager Clinical Trials Network and Institute Massachusetts General Hospital 1 Overview Monitoring Basics Who, What,
More informationDO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. March 2015 IRB Forum
DO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS March 2015 IRB Forum Topics Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement Projects Informed Consent- when is a waiver appropriate? Retrospective/Prospective
More informationHuman Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board
Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures Guidebook TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal, State and University Regulations Related to the IRB... Section 1.0 Definition of
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service
60-4 (v4 ( ~' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service. Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard el Rockville, Maryland 20850 MAY - 6 2008 VIA FEDERAL EXPRES S Merrill W.
More informationClinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings
Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings Objectives Identify common findings found in research study reviews conducted by the CTQA Program Understand what findings require an action plan vs. a
More informationWashington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures. April 20, 2015
Washington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures April 20, 2015 Table of Contents I. AUTHORITY AND INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT... 2 II. APPLICABILITY: ACTIVITIES SUBJECT TO IRB JURISDICTION...
More informationGeisinger IRB Member Orientation Session 2. Debra L. Henninger, MHS RN CCRC Associate Director, Research Compliance
Geisinger IRB Member Orientation Session 2 Debra L. Henninger, MHS RN CCRC Associate Director, Research Compliance 1 How does the IRB make decisions? Guiding Ethical Principles Regulatory Considerations
More informationIRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix
IRB 101 Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix Contents Brief discussion of regulations IRB Structure Levels of Approval Informed Consent HIPAA/HITECH
More informationHonorHealth Research Institute. Investigator Manual. July 27, Version 3.0
HonorHealth Research Institute Investigator Manual July 27, 2017 Version 3.0 VERSION 3.0 JULY 27, 2017 1 Table of Contents Scope... 5 Version History... 5 What is the purpose of this manual?... 5 Abbreviations...
More informationNational Cancer Institute. Central Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures
National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures CIRB Standard Operating Procedures Additional copies are available from the CIRB website (http://www.ncicirb.org)
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES
1 AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES Key Clinical Study Tasks and Activities 2 Discussion of Key Tasks and Activities 3 Development of the Clinical Protocol and Study Materials 3 Qualification
More information11/18/2016. UC Irvine s Clinical Research Coordinator Certification Preparation Series PI Roles and Responsibilities SESSION 4
UC Irvine s Clinical Research Coordinator Certification Preparation Series PI Roles and Responsibilities BEVERLY ALGER, CCRP, CHRC Research Compliance Officer Office of Research Compliance November 2016
More informationInvestigator Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policy for Human Subjects Research
Office for the Protection of Research Subjects Institutional Review Board Investigator Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policy for Human Subjects Research 203 AOB (MC 672) 1737 West Polk Street Chicago,
More information"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB"
"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB" Human Participant Research at University of Maryland, Baltimore Jon Mark Hirshon, MD, MPH, PhD Senior IRB Vice-Chair Nuremberg Code (1947) First Codification of
More information(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review
Page 1 of 5 IRB Reviewers 8-Point Analysis Form Based on Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, Criteria for IRB Approval of Research (45 CFR 46.111) Protocol ID #/Title: Date of Review:
More informationEssential Documents It s Not Just a Binder!
Essential Documents It s Not Just a Binder! Kelly Unsworth, MS, CCRC, CIP Director of Research Education & Training Office for Human Subject Protection SCORE June 5, 2014 But What percentage of 2014 (to
More informationIACUC Policy 09: Researcher Non-Compliance
IACUC Policy 09: Researcher Non-Compliance Policy Intent: The intent of this policy is to define the circumstances, classification, and consequences of research non-compliance with regards to the use of
More informationSAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board
SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board Date Effective: April 26, 2001 Index No. R 1217 Date Last Revised: 0 Date
More informationLoyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division Maywood, IL. Human Subject Research Project Start-Up Guide
Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division Maywood, IL Human Subject Research Project Start-Up Guide This Start-Up Guide is intended to guide you through the process of designing a research project
More informationCentral Michigan University Standard Operating Procedures Human Research Protection Program
Central Michigan University Standard Operating Procedures Human Research Protection Program Additional Guidance for Federal Agencies: ED, DoD, DoJ August 2010 September 2016 Edited for AAHRPP Response
More informationFINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY Public Health Services SECTION 1 OVERVIEW, APPLICABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES
FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY Public Health Services SECTION 1 OVERVIEW, APPLICABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 Statement of Background and Purposes The United States Department of Health and Human
More informationWARNING LETTER. an both of which were sponsored by. (formerly ). The products
g5~5s c Public Health Service ' SLRV7CLS r r f+ ~1Mr~la DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DEC 2 1 2005 Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Blvd. Rockville, Maryland 20850 WARNING LETTER Via
More informationInvestigator s Role and Responsibilities
Chapter 13: Investigator s Role and Responsibilities Chapter Contents 13.1 Definition and Role of Principal Investigator (PI) 13.2 Investigator-Initiated Research and Sponsor-Investigators 13.3 Educational
More informationKBEMS Pilot Programs- Adverse Event Notification
KBEMS Pilot Programs- Adverse Event tification Emergencies and Reporting of Adverse Events The responsible project coordinator must promptly notify the Kentucky Board of EMS & the KCTCS HSRB of any problems
More informationEffective Date: 11/09 Policy Chronicle:
Title: Investigational Drug Service Functions Policy Type: Clinical Operations Replaces (supersedes): Title: N/A Policy Chronicle: Date Original Version of Policy was Effective: 09/06 Reviewer Signature:
More informationIRB review of international research. Pre-conference P1 FCPA 3 rd Party Due Diligence for Health Entities. Today
John Heldens, CIP, CCRP Director, UCSF Health Care Compliance Association 2011 Compliance Conference IRB review of international research Pre-conference P1 FCPA 3 rd Party Due Diligence for Health Entities
More informationNOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES FOR RESEARCH AND SPONSORED PROGRAMS Vice President of Research & Technology Transfer: The responsibilities of the Vice President of Research &
More informationChanges to the Common Rule
Changes to the Common Rule November 21, 2017 S Joseph Austin, JD, LL.M Corey Zolondek, PhD, CIP Introduction: NOTE: Relative to the Common Rule changes, this presentation does not address requirements
More informationNew Study Submissions to the IRB
New Study Submissions to the IRB Tufts-New England Medical Center Tufts University Health Sciences IRB Education Series 2006 Presentation may only be reused or reprinted with written permission from the
More informationHow to Prepare for Federal Inspections and What to Expect
How to Prepare for Federal Inspections and What to Expect Jennifer A. Graf Tufts Medical Center Tufts University Health Sciences Director of IRB Operations Originally presented at the February 2011 Society
More informationImplementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review
Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review Introduction: Four of the exempt categories in the revised Common Rule include a provision for limited IRB review. This resource
More informationTufts Medical Center (Tufts MC) and Tufts University Health Sciences (TUHS) IRB Western IRB (WIRB) Submission Policy
Tufts Medical Center (Tufts MC) and Tufts University Health Sciences (TUHS) IRB Western IRB (WIRB) Submission Policy Policy/Procedure Phase II (IIa, IIb, or II), III, or IV protocols undertaken at Tufts
More informationStandard Operating Procedure IRB Review of Research Subject to the Revised Common Rule
HRP Consulting is providing this sample SOP addendum to assist organizations in the event that the revised Common Rule goes into effect on January 19, 2018. This sample SOP addendum does not address every
More informationIRBs IN THE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SETTING
Harry Shulman, Esq. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP and Cynthia G. Kenny, C.M.S.C., CP, CIM IRB Specialists, Inc. Present IRBs IN THE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SETTING Second Annual Medical Research Summit March 24-26,
More informationIRB Federal Regulations Comparison Table 4/24/01 as updated through 10/31/01
Legal Authority 45 CFR Part 46 21 USC 321-392; 21 CFR, Parts 50 and 56 Coverage All research involving human subjects conducted, All clinical investigations regulated by the FDA, including supported or
More informationIN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS INTERNATIONAL DEVICE STANDARD
COMPLIANCE WITH ISO 14155:2011 GUIDANCE FOR ENSURING YOUR CLINICAL STUDY IS BEING DESIGNED, EXECUTED, AND MONITORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS INTERNATIONAL DEVICE STANDARD Introduction: An increasing trend
More informationStrategies for Achieving Regulatory Compliance and Economies in DoD-Supported Research
Strategies for Achieving Regulatory Compliance and Economies in DoD-Supported Research University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 30 June 2016 Laura Ruse Brosch, RN, PhD Director, Office of Research
More informationmanaging or activities.
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Clinical Research Monitoring TITLE: Site Initiation Visit TITLE: Site Initiation Visit 1. PURPOSE SOP Number: Version: 1.0 MICHR CRM MON 002 Effective Date: 19Dec2013 1.1 This
More informationInvestigator-Initiated Studies: When you re the Sponsor. Cheri Robert & Tammy Mah-Fraser
Investigator-Initiated Studies: When you re the Sponsor Cheri Robert & Tammy Mah-Fraser ACRC Clinical Research Conference Edmonton, AB October 15, 2014 Session Objectives Define roles of the investigator,
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION OCT 2 0 2011 NUMBER 32 16.02 SUBJECT: Protection of Human Subjects and Adherence to Ethical Standards in 000- Supported Research References: See Enclosure I USD(AT&L)
More informationStandard Operating Procedures
Clinical Monitoring and Site Verification Procedure Overview To define the standard procedures for preparation and documentation of site visits for clinical monitoring and spoke verification for any NETT
More information