HCAHPS Update Training
|
|
- Julianna Dickerson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HCAHPS Update Training
2 Welcome! In the Update Training sessions, we will present: HCAHPS Program Updates Updates on HCAHPS Quality Assurance Guidelines V 6.0 Calculation of HCAHPS Scores: From Raw Data to Publicly Reported Results Exploring the HCAHPS Summary Tables and Charts Key Findings From Published HCAHPS Research HCAHPS and Proposed Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) 2
3 Program Updates 3
4 Overview Hospital Compare Updates Changes to the Quality Assurance Guidelines V 6.0 New charts that include HCAHPS Hospital Characteristics Comparisons available on New Research article 4
5 Hospital Compare: New Look and Feel 5
6 Hospital Compare: New Look and Feel (cont d) 6
7 Hospital Compare: New Hospital Profile Page 7
8 Timing of Hospital Compare Refreshes Anticipated Public Reporting Dates: April 2011 (patient discharges from July 2009 June 2010) July 2011 (patient discharges from October 2009 September 2010) October 2011 (patient discharges from January 2010 December 2010) January 2012 (patient discharges from April 2010 March 2011) 8
9 Revised Footnotes for July 2011 Public Reporting New Footnote 12 Very few patients were eligible for the HCAHPS survey. The scores shown reflect fewer than 50 completed surveys. Use these scores with caution, as the number of surveys may be too low to reliably assess hospital performance Revised Footnote 9 No or very few patients were eligible for the HCAHPS survey 9
10 Updates to QAG New exclusion category Patients discharged to Nursing Homes or Skilled Nursing Facilities Lag time required for all HCAHPS Final Survey Status codes Number of survey attempts is now a required field Changes to Question 27 in the HCAHPS Survey Minor telephone script changes 10
11 HCAHPS Hospital Characteristics Comparison Charts Introduced in December 2010 on HCAHPS Executive Insight Presents hospital performance on the ten publicly reported HCAHPS measures by: Region Bed Size Teaching Status Ownership and Control Location 11
12 New HCAHPS Research Hospital Survey Shows Improvements in Patient Experience. M.N. Elliott, W.G. Lehrman, E.H. Goldstein, L.A.Giordano, M.K. Beckett, C.W. Cohea and P.D. Cleary. Health Affairs, 29 (11):
13 Updates HCAHPS Quality Assurance Guidelines (QAG) V6.0 13
14 Updates Survey Management Customer support line Telephone staffed live during core business hours Voice mail is acceptable after hours, but must be regularly monitored and replied to within one business day Voice mail recording must specify that the caller can leave a message about the survey Hospitals/Survey vendors must document questions and responses Safeguarding Patient Confidentiality Establish protocols for secure file transmission ing of PHI via unsecure is prohibited 14
15 Survey Management (cont d) Clarifications Data Storage All HCAHPS-related data files, including patient discharge files, must be retained for a minimum of three years All data files must be easily retrievable 15
16 Updates Sampling Sampling section content has been reorganized New sampling examples have been added The lower precision of scores based on less than 100 and less than 50 completed surveys will be noted in public reporting 16
17 Sampling (cont d) Update New Exclusion Category Patients discharged to nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities (beginning with July 1, 2011 and forward patient discharges) This applies only to patients with a Discharge Status (UB-04 field location 17) of: 03 (Skilled nursing facility) 64 (Certified Medicaid nursing facility) 17
18 Sampling (cont d) Updates MS-DRG Codes Updated to MS-DRG V.28 Strongly recommend use of MS-DRG codes to assign Service Line Validate that Service Line is assigned appropriately 18
19 Clarifications Sampling (cont d) Patients may voluntarily sign a no publicity request while in the hospital Sampling rates should be consistent among the months in a given quarter PSRS and DSRS methodologies further defined 19
20 Survey Administration Updates All modes of survey administration: Mail Only, Telephone Only, Mixed Mode, Active IVR Q27 (Language Speak): Chinese, Russian & Vietnamese response options added Lag time must be recorded for all HCAHPS Final Survey Status codes Interim Disposition Codes Hospitals/Survey vendors must maintain and provide a crosswalk of their interim disposition codes to the HCAHPS Final Survey Status codes 20
21 Survey Administration (cont d) Clarifications All modes of survey administration: Mail Only, Telephone Only, Mixed Mode, Active IVR Cannot show the HCAHPS survey or cover letter to patients prior to discharge from the hospital Do not mail any pre-notification letters or postcards informing patient about the HCAHPS survey Supplemental questions cannot ask the patient to explain why he or she chose their specific response Example: It is not acceptable to ask patients why they would or would not recommend the hospital to friends and family 21
22 Survey Administration Update Copyright language In the event an organization copyrights their survey materials, then the following language must be included: The Core HCAHPS questions (Questions 1-22) and About You HCAHPS questions (Questions 23-27) are works of the U.S. Government. These HCAHPS questions are in the public domain and therefore are NOT subject to U.S. copyright laws. 22
23 Survey Administration (cont d) Update Mail Only New Field: Number Survey Attempts Mail Capture the mail wave in which the final disposition of the survey is determined 23
24 Survey Administration (cont d) Update Mail Only Chinese instrument Added underlining to Q3, Q5, Q6, and Q7 24
25 Survey Administration (cont d) Update Mail Only (cont d) Vietnamese instrument Q27. Quý vị dùng ngôn ngữ nào chính trong nhà? 25
26 Survey Administration (cont d) Update Mail Only & Mixed Mode Spanish instrument Intro before Q1 Las siguientes preguntas se refieren sólo a la vez que estuvo en el hospital cuyo nombre aparece en la carta de presentación de esta encuesta. No incluya información sobre otras veces que estuvo en otro hospital. 26
27 Survey Administration (cont d) Update Mail Only & Mixed Mode Spanish instrument (cont d) Intro before Q21 Por favor conteste las siguientes preguntas sobre la vez que estuvo en el hospital cuyo nombre aparece en la carta de presentación de esta encuesta. No incluya información sobre otras veces que estuvo en otro hospital. 27
28 Survey Administration (cont d) Clarifications Mail Only & Mixed Mode Cover letter survey responses will be shared with the hospital for quality improvement purposes (add this phrase, if applicable) Seeded mailings must be part of the survey process 28
29 Survey Administration (cont d) Clarifications Mail Only & Mixed Mode (cont d) Guidelines for patients who request an additional survey to be sent Mail Only: acceptable to mail a replacement survey at the patient s request within the 42-day survey administration period Mixed Mode: acceptable to mail a replacement survey at the patient s request within the first 21 days of the 42-day survey administration period. After 21 days from the mailing, a replacement HCAHPS survey must NOT be mailed-out as the telephone portion of the mixed mode protocol must be initiated 29
30 Survey Administration (cont d) Updates Telephone Only, Mixed Mode, and Active IVR New Field: Number Survey Attempts Telephone Capture the telephone attempt in which the final disposition of the survey is determined Caller ID may be programmed to display on behalf of [HOSPITAL NAME] (with permission of hospital s HIPAA compliance officer) 30
31 Survey Administration (cont d) Updates Telephone Only, Mixed Mode, and Active IVR (cont d) Calls that are inadvertently dropped must be re-contacted immediately Do not program a specific response category as a default option Guidelines for monitoring/recording telephone calls in QAG, Pages 75, 94 and
32 Survey Administration (cont d) Updates Telephone Only, Mixed Mode, and Active IVR (cont d) Telephone script Initiating Contact Updated response to IF ASKED WHO IS CALLING Q26 Added I am required to read all five categories. Q27 Added programming and additional language response options (i.e., Chinese, Russian & Vietnamese) 32
33 Survey Administration (cont d) Clarifications Telephone Only, Mixed Mode, and Active IVR All underlined content must be emphasized and no other script content is to be emphasized Reaching an answering machine/voic is considered an attempt If it is determined that the patient may be available in the latter part of the 42-day data collection time period, then hospitals/survey vendors must use the entire data collection time period to schedule telephone calls Strongly encouraged to provide visual oversight of the interviewing staff in addition to required silent monitoring 33
34 Data Specifications & Coding Updates File Specifications Version 3.3 (beginning with July 1, 2011 and forward patient discharges) New Patient Administrative Data Fields Number Survey Attempts Telephone Number Survey Attempts Mail Update Lag Time assignments for all HCAHPS Final Survey Status codes 34
35 Data Specifications & Coding (cont d) Update Number Survey Attempts Telephone Required when: Survey Mode is 2 Telephone Only or 4 - IVR Survey Mode is 3 Mixed mode and Survey Completion Mode is 2 Mixed mode-phone Not Required when: Survey Mode is 1 Mail Only If this field ( Survey Attempts Telephone ) is included with Survey Mode of 1 Mail Only, then code Survey Attempts Telephone, as 8 Not applicable 35
36 Data Specifications & Coding (cont d) Update Number Survey Attempts Mail Required when: Survey Mode is 1 Mail Only Not Required when: Survey Mode is 2 Telephone Only, 3 Mixed mode, or 4 IVR If this field ( Survey Attempts Mail ) is included with Survey Mode of 2 Telephone Only, 3 Mixed mode, or 4 IVR, then code Survey Attempts Mail, as 8 Not applicable 36
37 Data Specifications & Coding (cont d) Update Lag Time Calculated for each patient in the sample Defined as the number of days between the patient s discharge date from the hospital and the date that data collection activities ended for the patient All HCAHPS Final Survey Status codes for each patient in the sample must contain the actual lag time Do NOT use code 888 Not Applicable 37
38 Data Specifications & Coding Clarifications (cont d) Zero cases and five or fewer eligible HCAHPS patient discharges for data submission Must not be used for hospitals/survey vendors that missed surveying eligible patients for the entire month (e.g., when hospitals do not submit the entire month discharge list to their survey vendor in a timely manner, etc.) Do not submit a Header Record, rather a Discrepancy Report is submitted online Enter all of the race categories that the patient has selected 38
39 Data Specifications & Coding Clarifications (cont d) If screener questions are not answered and coded as M Missing/Don t Know, then the dependent questions that are not answered must also be coded as M Missing/Don t Know 12. During this hospital stay, did you need medicine for pain? Yes No If no, Go to Question During this hospital stay, how often was your pain well controlled? Never Sometimes Usually Always Example Code as: M - Missing/Don t Know Code as: M - Missing/Don t Know 39
40 Updates Oversight Activities Quality Assurance Plan Free of extraneous information Concise explanations of required HCAHPS processes Include a crosswalk of interim disposition codes to HCAHPS Final Survey Status codes Due date April 15, 2011 On-site Visits Project Director/Project Manager must be physically present during the on-site visit 40
41 Questions? 41
42 Calculation of HCAHPS Scores: From Raw Data to Publicly Reported Results 42
43 Overview of Presentation Process Submitted HCAHPS Data Calculate HCAHPS Scores w/example HCAHPS Composite Measure Calculation Patient-Mix Variables Final HCAHPS scores 43
44 Process Submitted HCAHPS Data Remove surveys determined to be ineligible for HCAHPS Exclude surveys that do not meet HCAHPS criteria for survey completeness HCAHPS scores are calculated from eligible and completed surveys 44
45 HCAHPS Boxes Top-Box : most positive response category Always for 5 HCAHPS Composites, Yes for Discharge Information, 9 or 10 for Hospital Rating, and Definitely for Recommend the Hospital Middle-Box : in-between response category Usually for 5 HCAHPS Composites, does not exist for Discharge Information, 7 or 8 for Hospital Rating, and Probably Yes for Recommend the Hospital Bottom-Box : least positive response category Sometimes or Never for 5 HCAHPS Composites, No for Discharge Information, 0 through 6 for Hospital Rating, and Definitely No or Probably No for Recommend the Hospital 45
46 HCAHPS Composite Example Nurse Communication, Top-Box Always is the most positive response category for all 3 questions that comprise Nurse Communication Q1: Nurse courtesy and respect Q2: Nurse listen Q3: Nurse explain 46
47 HCAHPS Composite Example (cont d) 1. During this hospital stay, how often did nurses treat you with courtesy and respect? 1 Never 2 Sometimes 3 Usually 4 Always 47
48 HCAHPS Composite Example (cont d) Hospital A has 7 completed surveys Survey ID Q1 Response Nurse1 Top- Box Q2 Response Nurse2 Top- Box Q3 Response Nurse3 Top- Box 1 Always 1 Always 1 Always 1 2 Sometimes 0 Never 0 Sometimes 0 3 Always 1 Always 1 Always 1 4 Usually 0 Always 1 Always 1 5 Always 1 Always 1 Always 1 6 Always 1 Usually 0 Always 1 7 Always 1 Always 1 Always 1 48
49 HCAHPS Composite Example (cont d) Calculate mean for each of Nurse1 Top-Box, Nurse2 Top-Box, and Nurse3 Top-Box: Nurse1 Top-Box mean = ( ) / 7 = 5/7 Nurse2 Top-Box mean = ( ) / 7 = 5/7 Nurse3 Top-Box mean = ( ) / 7 = 6/7 49
50 HCAHPS Composite Example (cont d) Nurse Communication composite score for Hospital A Calculate the Nurse Communication composite mean (Y) as follows: Y = (Nurse1 Top-Box mean + Nurse2 Top-Box mean + Nurse3 Top-Box mean) / 3 = (5/7 + 5/7 +6/7) / 3 =
51 Patient-Mix Variables: Education 24. What is the highest grade or level of school that you have completed? 1 8 th grade or less 2 Some high school, but did not graduate 3 High school graduate or GED 4 Some college or 2-year degree 5 4-year college graduate 6 More than 4-year college degree 51
52 Patient-Mix Variables: Education (cont d) Question 24 for Hospital A Education: Derived from HCAHPS survey (values range from 1 to 6) Calculate the Education mean for Hospital A: H EDUC = ( ) / 7 = 22/7 = 3.14 Survey ID Education
53 Patient-Mix Variables: Overall Health 23. In general, how would you rate your overall health? 1 Excellent 2 Very Good 3 Good 4 Fair 5 Poor 53
54 Patient-Mix Variables: Overall Health (cont d) Question 23 for Hospital A Self-Rated Health: Derived from HCAHPS survey (values range from 1 to 5) Calculate the Self-Rated Health mean for Hospital A: H HLTH = ( ) / 7 = 24/7 = 3.43 Survey ID Self-Rated Health
55 Patient-Mix Variables: Non-English Language 27. What language do you mainly speak at home? 1 English 2 Spanish 3 Some other language (please print) 55
56 Patient-Mix Variables: Non-English Language (cont d) Question 27 for Hospital A Non-English Language If Q27 answer value is Spanish or Some other language then let indicator variable Non-English = 1, otherwise Non-English = 0 Calculate the Non-English mean for Hospital A: H NENG = ( ) / 7 = 2/7 = 0.29 Survey ID Question 27 Non- English 1 English 0 2 Spanish 1 3 Some other 1 4 English 0 5 English 0 6 English 0 7 English 0 56
57 Patient-Mix Variables: Age Range Age Ranges for Hospital A Create 7 indicator (0 or 1) age variables for each of the 8 age range groups (Age 85+ is the reference category): Survey ID Age Age Age Age Age Age Age
58 Patient-Mix Variables: Age Range (cont d) For Hospital A, calculate mean of each of the 7 age range variables H = ( ) / 7 = 1/7 = 0.14 H = ( ) / 7 = 1/7 = 0.14 H = ( ) / 7 = 1/7 = 0.14 H = ( ) / 7 = 0/7 = 0.00 H = ( ) / 7 = 1/7 = 0.14 H = ( ) / 7 = 2/7 = 0.29 H = ( ) / 7 = 0/7 =
59 Patient-Mix Variables: Service Line Hospital A s Service Line Create an indicator (0 or 1) variable for Maternity and Surgical (Medical is reference category): Survey ID Service Line Maternity Surgical 1 Surgical Medical Maternity Medical Maternity Medical Medical
60 Patient-Mix Variables: Service Line (cont d) Calculate Hospital A s mean for Maternity and Surgical variables H MAT = ( ) / 7 = 2/7 = 0.29 H SURG = ( ) / 7 = 1/7 =
61 Patient-Mix Variables: Service Line x Age Service Line x Age Interaction Variables Create single variable called Age that takes on values 1 through 8, to indicate a patient s age range Age Range: Age:
62 Patient-Mix Variables: Service Line x Age (cont d) Use variables Surgical, Maternity, and Age to create the following interaction variables: Surgical*Age = (Surgical) x (Age) Maternity*Age = (Maternity) x (Age) 62
63 Patient-Mix Variables: Service Line x Age (cont d) Service Line x Age Interaction for Hospital A Survey ID Age Maternity Surgical Maternity* Age Surgical* Age *6 = 0 1*6 = *5 = 0 0*5 = *2 = 2 0*2 = *8 = 0 0*8 = *1 = 1 0*8 = *3 = 0 0*3 = *6 = 0 0*6 = 0 63
64 Patient-Mix Variables: Service Line x Age (cont d) For Hospital A, calculate the mean for Maternity x Age and Surgical x Age variables: H MAT*AGE = ( ) / 7 = 3/7 = 0.43 H SURG*AGE = ( ) / 7 = 6/7 =
65 Patient-Mix Variables: Response Percentile
66 Patient-Mix Variables: Response Percentile (cont d) Response Percentile for Hospital A Response Percentile = Lag Time Rank / Monthly Sample Size Survey ID Month Lag Time (in days) Lag Time Rank (by month) Monthly Sample Size Response Percentile 1 January /9 2 January /9 3 February /11 4 February /11 5 March /8 6 March /8 7 March /8
67 Patient-Mix Variables: Response Percentile (cont d) Calculate Hospital A s mean Response Percentile for the quarter H RPCT = [(1/9)+(2/9)+(1/11)+(2/11)+(2/8) +(1/8)+(3/8)] / 7 =
68 3 Components needed for Hospital PMA Hospital means for each patient-mix variable (just calculated) National means for each patient mix variable found on Patient-level Adjustments for each patient-mix variable found on 68
69 PMA Means for Hospital A H EDUC = 3.14 H = 0.14 H MAT = 0.29 H = 0.14 H SURG = 0.14 H HLTH = 3.43 H = 0.14 H = 0.00 H MAT*AGE = 0.43 H NENG = 0.29 H = 0.14 H SURG*AGE = 0.86 H = 0.29 H RPCT = 0.19 H =
70 National Means for Patient-Mix Variables: Table 3 from 70
71 National Means for Patient-Mix Variables (from Table 3) (cont d) M EDUC = 3.65 M = 0.05 M MAT = 0.15 M = 0.11 M SURG = 0.34 M HLTH = 2.82 M = 0.08 M = 0.12 M MAT*AGE = 0.38 M NENG = 0.06 M = 0.18 M SURG*AGE = 1.81 M = 0.21 M RPCT = 0.16 M =
72 Patient-Level Adjustments for Patient-Mix Variables: Table 1 from 72
73 Patient-Level Adjustments for Patient- Mix Variables (from Table 1) (cont d) For Nurse Communication: A EDUC = 2.12% A = 4.18% A MAT = -6.27% A HLTH = 5.28% A = -1.08% A = 1.21% A SURG = 1.64% A = -3.24% A MAT*AGE = 1.06% A NENG = -0.04% A = -5.14% A SURG*AGE = -0.07% A = -5.06% A RPCT = 0.20% A = -3.04% 73
74 Using PMA Equation PMA Equation: PMA = A EDUC *(H EDUC M EDUC ) + A HLTH *(H HLTH M HLTH ) + A NENG *(H NENG M NENG ) + A RPCT *(H RPCT - M RPCT ) + A 1824 *(H 1824 M 1824 ) + A 2534 *(H 2534 M 2534 ) + A 3544 *(H 3544 M 3544 ) + A 4554 *(H 4554 M 4554 ) + A 5564 *(H 5564 M 5564 ) + A 6574 *(H 6574 M 6574 ) + A 7584 *(H 7584 M 7584 ) + A MAT *(H MAT M MAT ) + A SURG *(H SURG M SURG ) + A MAT*AGE *(H MAT*AGE M MAT*AGE ) + A SURG*AGE *(H SURG*AGE M SURG*AGE ) Net Adjustment for Hospital A: PMA = 0.021*( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) *( ) =
75 Survey Mode Adjustment Mode Adjustment for Nurse Communication Top-Box : Hospital A utilizes the Telephone mode for HCAHPS HCAHPS Composite or Item: Top-Box Communication with Nurses ( Always ) Communication with Doctors ( Always ) Telephone Mixed Active IVR -4.0% -0.3% -1.8% -1.3% 1.0% -0.3% Hospital Rating ( 9 or 10 ) -2.8% -1.8% -1.6% 75
76 Quarterly HCAHPS Adjusted Score The sum of the unadjusted composite score (Y), hospital PMA, and survey mode adjustment comprise a hospital s quarterly adjusted HCAHPS score (Y ) Nurse Communication Top-Box for Hospital A: Y = Y + PMA + Mode Adjustment = = (or 74.4%) 76
77 Publicly Reported HCAHPS Scores Publicly reported HCAHPS scores are the average of the adjusted scores from 4 consecutive quarters For Hospital A: Adjusted Top-Box scores for Nurse Communication for 3 previous quarters equal 71.5%, 78.8%, and 79.9% Thus, the rounded publicly reported Top-Box score for Nurse Communication is as follows: (71.5% % % %) / 4 = 76% 77
78 Publicly Reported HCAHPS Scores (cont d) Nurse Communication for Hospital A Adjusted Top-Box Adjusted Middle-Box Adjusted Bottom- Box Quarter % 21.6% 6.9% Quarter % 16.4% 4.8% Quarter % 15.7% 4.4% Quarter % 19.9% 5.7% Q1-Q4 Avg. 76.2% 18.3% 5.5% Rounded* 76% 18% 6% *HCAHPS score publicly reported on Hospital Compare 78
79 Review of Score Calculation Identify eligible and completed surveys Calculate un-adjusted quarterly scores for each HCAHPS measure Calculate hospital-level patient-mix adjustment (PMA) Requires calculation of means for all patient-mix variables and utilization of HCAHPS PMA Tables Application of survey mode adjustment Publicly reported HCAHPS scores = Average of the adjusted scores from 4 consecutive quarters 79
80 Questions? 80
81 BREAK 81
82 Exploring HCAHPS Summary Tables & Charts 82
83 Overview Walk through Tables and Charts included on Summary of Survey Results National and State means HCAHPS Percentiles Top-box and Bottom-box Comparison of Scores by Hospital Characteristics New Charts Correlations among HCAHPS Measures 83
84 Summary Analyses on 84
85 Summary of Survey Results Summary of HCAHPS Survey Results Table Top-box scores Roll-up of four quarters Current table from Updated quarterly Includes Archive of past Summary tables 85
86 86
87 Summary of HCAHPS Survey Results April 2009 to March
88 Top-box and Bottom-box Percentiles Table Drill down further to understand better Your hospital s HCAHPS scores: Both Top-box and Bottom-box How much above/below other hospitals? 88
89 HCAHPS Percentiles December 2010 Public Reporting 89
90 HCAHPS Percentiles: Top-box Most positive survey response The higher, the better Used in Summary Table, etc. 90
91 HCAHPS Percentiles: Bottom-box Least positive survey response How often patients responded negatively The lower, the better 91
92 Comparison of Scores by Hospital Characteristics HCAHPS Hospital Characteristics Comparison Charts Newest addition to Summary Analyses page Region (Census division) Location (Urban/Rural) Bed Size Teaching Status Ownership and Control 92
93 Communication with Nurses Patients discharged between July 2008 and June
94 Communication with Nurses Region Patients discharged between July 2008 and June
95 Communication with Nurses Location Patients discharged between July 2008 and June
96 Communication with Nurses Bed Size Patients discharged between July 2008 and June
97 Communication with Nurses Teaching Status Patients discharged between July 2008 and June
98 Communication with Nurses Ownership & Control Patients discharged between July 2008 and June
99 HCAHPS Correlations Table Drill down further to understand better How are HCAHPS measures related to each other? 99
100 HCAHPS Correlations July 2008 June 2009 Discharges 100
101 Questions? 101
102 Key Findings From HCAHPS Research 102
103 Overview of Research Reliability of HCAHPS Measures Improvement in HCAHPS Scores Hospital-Level Factors Associated with HCAHPS Scores Racial/Ethnic Variation in HCAHPS Scores 103
104 Reliability of HCAHPS Measures [see Elliott et al. Do Hospitals Rank Differently on HCAHPS for Different Patient Subgroups? Medical Care Research and Review 2010 Feb;67(1):56-73.] 104
105 Objective Describe the reliability of reported HCAHPS measures at the hospital level-is hospital performance measured well at the recommended sample sizes? Here reliability is the proportion of the variance in reported hospital scores that is due to true variation between hospitals, rather than within-hospital variation that reflects limited sample size. At 0.0 reliability, there are no true differences between hospitals If hospitals truly differed and sample sizes were infinite, reliability would be 1.0 At reliability 0.7, 70% of the variance of reported hospital scores would be attributable to true variation in hospital performancethe part we d see with limitless sample sizes 105
106 Data and Measures Used all 10 HCAHPS measures but combined Cleanliness & Quietness Data from 1.2 million patients discharged October 2006-June 2007 from 2,684 hospitals in March 2008 public reporting 106
107 Methods HCAHPS measures are adjusted for survey mode MIXED linear models of HCAHPS measures Hospital-level variance components are random effects Patient-mix adjustment variables are fixed effects These models assess the hospital-level reliability of reported scores 107
108 Reported Hospital Scores are Highly Reliable at Recommended Sample Sizes Large hospital-level variance components produced hospital-level reliabilities of adjusted scores at n=300 survey completes per item At least 0.92 for 5/9 HCAHPS measures (Overall Rating, Recommendation, Nurse Communication, Staff Responsiveness and Clean/Quiet) At least 0.82 for all HCAHPS measures 108
109 Reported Hospital Scores are Adequately Reliable at Smaller Sample Sizes At 100 survey completes, reliabilities are at least 0.70 for 7/9 HCAHPS measures Exceptions are Communication about Medicines (0.67) and Pain Management (0.61) On average, these measures are applicable to only 72% and 61% of patients, respectively 109
110 Improvement in HCAHPS Scores over the First Two Years of Public Reporting [See Elliott et al., Hospital survey shows improvements in patient experience. Health Affairs 2010 Nov;29(11):2061-7] 110
111 Objective Assess the extent and uniformity of improvement in HCAHPS scores in the first 2 years of public reporting among initially participating hospitals 111
112 Study Design The study was designed to examine changes in HCAHPS scores in the year following initial public reporting among original participants HCAHPS results were first publicly reported in March 2008 Discharges from October June 2007 The 5 th quarterly public reporting update in March 2009 Discharges from July June 2008 Mutually exclusive of March
113 Data Data come from 3.4 million patients from the 2,774 hospitals that collected data and qualified for both March 2008 and March 2009 public reporting Here we do not consider data from the >1000 hospitals added after 3/08 public reporting 113
114 Approach Used 9 measures- all but Rating of Hospital Analyses performed for this research are based on top box (most positive response option) hospital scores 114
115 Top Box Means of Hospitals Participating in Both March 2008 & March 2009 (*p<0.01) March 2008 March 2009 Difference Nurse Communication * Doctor Communication Responsiveness of Hosp. Staff * Pain Management * Communication about Meds * Cleanliness * Quietness * Discharge Information * Willingness to Recommend * 115
116 Improvement in HCAHPS Measures (3/08 to 3/09) Significant improvement in 8 of 9 measures (p<0.01) Exception was Doctor Communication (p=0.25) Magnitude of improvement was relatively uniform across items Total improvement did not vary significantly by hospital size, region, or ownership 116
117 Most and Least Improved HCAHPS Measures Greatest improvements for Discharge Information and Staff Responsiveness Discharge Information improved by 5 percentile points of rank (e.g. going from the 50 th to 55 th percentile) Staff Responsiveness improved by 4 percentile points of rank (e.g. going from the 50 th to 54 th percentile) Smallest gain for Hospital Recommendation (1 percentile point increase) No significant change in Doctor Communication 117
118 Observations on Most Improved Measures Improvement seen in concrete, actionable domains E.g., Quietness and Discharge Information These items may have been early targets of QI efforts Improvement also seen in more diffuse domains E.g., Nurse Communication and Staff Responsiveness May reflect staffing changes 118
119 Observations on Least Improved Measures Less improvement seen in overall patient impressions (e.g. would Recommend the Hospital) Improving overall patient impressions may take more time May consider reputational factors Previous research suggests that performance on physician-related measures (e.g. Doctor Communication) can be difficult to change 119
120 Looking Ahead Improvements may continue and even accelerate in the future Incentives for improvement could become even stronger (proposed HVBP) Hospitals now have access to comparative information on HCAHPS performance Hospitals have had more time for QI projects HCAHPS scores are now used in various hospital rating and selection tools that are highly visible to consumers, such as Consumer Reports Increased visibility of HCAHPS scores may further increase selection into hospitals that report better patient experiences 120
121 Hospital Characteristics Associated with HCAHPS Scores [see Lehrman et al. Characteristics of Hospitals Demonstrating Superior Performance in Patient Experience and Clinical Process Measures of Care. Medical Care Research and Review 2010 Feb; 67(1): ] 121
122 Hospital Factors Examined Region (Census Division) Urban/Rural Location Bed size Ownership 122
123 Data Data from 2.2 million patients discharged July 2007-June 2008 from 3,844 hospitals in March 2009 public reporting 123
124 Analytic Approach Multi-level multiple regression was used to predict the 10 HCAHPS hospital-level measures from Hospital characteristics Individual patient-mix adjustor variables Prior to regression analysis, individual-level scores for each HCAHPS measure were adjusted for mode of survey administration 124
125 March 2009 Parameter Estimates for Responsiveness of Hospital Staff - Table 1 Beta Rural 1-99 beds 5.0* Rural beds 3.0* Rural 200+ beds 1.7* Urban 1-99 beds 3.8* Urban beds 1.1* [compared to Urban 200+ beds] (0) Government 2.8* Non-Profit other than Church operated 2.3* Church operated -0.3* [compared to For Profit] (0) *p<
126 March 2009 Parameter Estimates for Responsiveness of Hospital Staff - Table 2 Beta [compared to New England] (0) Mid Atlantic (NY/NJ/PA) -1.6* South Atlantic (VA to FL) -0.2 East North Central (e.g. IL,MI,OH) 0.1 East South Central (AL/MS/TN/KY) 1.8* West North Central ( Farm Belt ) 0.6* West South Central (TX/OK/AR/LA) 2.1* Mountain (Rocky Mtns and Southwest) -0.3 Pacific (CA/OR/WA/AK/HI) 0.1 *p<
127 HCAHPS Scores Varied by Bed Size & Ownership Bed size <100 was associated with significantly higher scores on all 10 HCAHPS measures (p<.001) for both relative to 200+ beds These effects particularly large for Staff Responsiveness, Cleanliness, and Quietness Clinical process measures show the opposite pattern Government hospitals had significantly higher scores on all 10 HCAHPS measures than For-Profit hospitals Other Non-Profit hospitals showed significantly higher scores for all HCAHPS measures except Quietness relative to For-Profit hospitals Clinical process measures show a similar pattern 127
128 HCAHPS Scores Varied by Region Lower HCAHPS scores were associated with hospitals in Mid-Atlantic (all 10 measures), Mountain (8 measures), and Pacific (8 measures) regions relative to reference category New England West South Central hospitals showed significantly higher scores than New England for 8 measures, largest for Quietness and Responsiveness of Staff Regional patterns are persistent and similar for Medicare Advantage (Plan) CAHPS Surveys 128
129 Racial/Ethnic Variation in HCAHPS Scores [see Goldstein et al. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Patients Perceptions of Inpatient Care Using the HCAHPS Survey. Medical Care Research and Review 2010 Feb; 67(1): ] 129
130 Objectives Compare inpatient experiences of Hispanic, African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native, and multiracial inpatients to non-hispanic White inpatients Seek to understand role of between- and within-hospital differences in patient perspectives of hospital care 130
131 Data Data from 1.2million patients discharged October 2006-June 2007 from 2,684 hospitals in March 2008 public reporting 131
132 Racial/Ethnic Distribution 1% 1% 2% 3% 7% 7% Race/Ethnicity Distribution 79% non-hispanic White Hispanic African American American Indian/Alaska Native Asian/Pacific Islander Multi-racial Unknown 132
133 Patient Characteristics Overall N=1,203,229 Non-Hispanic White N=953,987 Hispanic N=83,283 African American N=85,564 American Indian N = 7,641 Male 37% 38% 28% 29% 37% 29% Age: % 48% 73% 67% 66% 66% Age: % 21% 13% 17% 19% 18% Age: % 31% 14% 16% 15% 16% Emergency Room Admission 38% 39% 30% 43% 38% 27% Maternity 13% 12% 31% 13% 32% 14% Surgical 35% 37% 28% 29% 32% 28% Medical 51% 52% 41% 58% 54% 40% Health: fair or poor 8 th grade or less More than 4 year college degree 28% 29% 22% 30% 34% 18% 7% 5% 18% 8% 9% 7% 12% 12% 7% 8% 7% 24% Asian/Pacific Islander N=22,
134 Methods Used 8 HCAHPS Measures (all but Rating and Recommendation) First model predicted HCAHPS measures from race/ethnicity, controlling for survey mode and patient mix Estimated overall racial/ethnic differences HCAHPS patient-mix-adjustment does not adjust for race/ethnicity Second model added hospital fixed effects to measure racial/ethnic differences within the same hospitals 134
135 Hispanics: Total Differences from Whites Hispanics reported generally less positive experiences than non-hispanic Whites Nurse Communication: points Staff Responsiveness: Discharge Information: Cleanliness: Quietness: +.84 (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 135
136 Hispanics: Within-Hospital Differences However, within the same hospitals, Hispanics consistently reported more positive experiences than non-hispanic Whites Nurse Communication: points Doctor Communication: Staff Responsiveness: Pain Management: Communication about New Medicines: Quietness: (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 136
137 African Americans: Total Differences from Whites Findings for African Americans were mixed compared to non-hispanic Whites Nurse Communication: points Doctor Communication: Staff Responsiveness: Pain Management: Communication about Medicines: Discharge Information: Cleanliness: Quietness: (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 137
138 African Americans: Within-Hospital Differences African Americans reported consistently more positive experiences than non-hispanic Whites within the same hospitals Nurse Communication: points Doctor Communication: Staff Responsiveness: Pain Management: Communication about Medicines: Cleanliness: Quietness: (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 138
139 Asians/Pacific Islanders: Total Differences from Whites Asians reported consistently less positive experiences than non-hispanic Whites Nurse Communication: points Doctor Communication: Staff Responsiveness: Pain Management: Discharge Information: Cleanliness: Quietness: (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 139
140 Asians/Pacific Islanders: Within-Hospital Differences Within-hospital findings for Asians were mixed compared to non-hispanic Whites Nurse Communication: Staff Responsiveness: Pain Management: Communication about Medicines: Cleanliness: Quietness: (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 140
141 American Indians: Total Differences from Whites Findings for American Indians/Alaska Natives were mixed compared to non-hispanic Whites Nurse Communication: points Doctor Communication: Communication about Medicines: Quietness: (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 141
142 American Indians: Within-Hospital Differences Within-hospital differences were similar to the overall differences for American Indians/Alaska Natives Nurse Communication: points Doctor Communication: Communication about Medicines: Quietness: (p<0.001 for all differences noted) 142
143 Summary of Racial/Ethnic Variation in HCAHPS Scores Overall, Hispanics and Asians reported generally less positive experiences than non-hispanic Whites Non-Hispanic Whites received care at hospitals that delivered better average patient experiences to all patients, compared to hospitals at which African American, Hispanic, and Asian patients received care Within the same hospitals Patients reported generally similar experiences with African Americans and Hispanics often reporting better experiences than non-hispanic Whites Asians generally reported poorer experiences than non-hispanic Whites 143
144 Questions? 144
145 HCAHPS and Proposed Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) 145
146 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP) Required by the Affordable Care Act Applies to Medicare payments under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) for inpatient stays Dramatically changes how Medicare pays hospitals Proposed rule published on January 7, 2011 Comment period closes on March 8,
147 Timing Begins in FY 2013 for acute care hospitals Applies to payment for discharges occurring on or after October 1,
148 Based on: Incentive Payments How well hospitals perform on certain quality measures (achievement) and How much the hospitals performance improves (improvement) 148
149 Proposed Performance Period Baseline Period for FY 2013: July 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 Performance Period for FY 2013: July 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012 Performance Period for future years: based on 4 quarters of data 149
150 Initial Measures Proposed to be Included HCAHPS Clinical Measures Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Pneumonia Surgical Care Improvement Project 150
151 HCAHPS Scoring Proposing that a hospital needs to report at least 100 HCAHPS completed surveys to be included in Hospital VBP 151
152 Eight Proposed HCAHPS Dimensions Nurse Communication Doctor Communication Cleanliness and Quietness Responsiveness of Hospital Staff Pain Management Communication about Medications Discharge Information Overall Rating 152
153 Proposed HCAHPS Scoring Methodology Achievement points Improvement points Consistency points 153
154 Achievement Thresholds Achievement threshold is proposed to be set at the 50 th percentile of hospital performance on the dimension during the baseline period Hospitals will have to score at or above this threshold to earn achievement points Benchmark corresponds to excellent performance in the baseline period A hospital will be awarded maximum achievement points if the hospital performed at least at the 95 th percentile of performance during the baseline period 154
155 Achievement Points Propose to assign 0 to 10 points for each of the 8 HCAHPS dimensions as follows: Hospital s score on a dimension is = or > than benchmark, hospital receives 10 points Hospital s score is within achievement range, the hospital would receive a score of 1 to 9 using the following formula: ((Hospital HCAHPS performance period dimension score (percentile) 50)/5) Hospital s score is less than the achievement threshold (50 th percentile), hospital receives 0 points 155
156 Improvement Points A hospital can earn from 0 to 9 improvement points for each HCAHPS dimension as follows: If a hospital s score is greater than its baseline period score but below the benchmark, the hospital would receive a score of 0 to 9 using the following formula: [10*((Hospital performance period score Hospital baseline period score)/(benchmark Hospital baseline period score))] 0.5 If a hospital s score is lower than its baseline period score, there is no improvement, or if the baseline period score was already at the benchmark, the improvement score is 0 156
157 HVBP: Consistency Points Consistency score recognizes consistent achievement across dimensions Propose a maximum of 20 consistency points that would be awarded proportionately based on the lowest of a hospital s 8 HCAHPS dimension scores during the performance period compared to the median baseline period score for each HCAHPS dimension assigned according to the following formula: (2*(lowest percentile/5))
158 Overall HCAHPS Performance Score For each of the 8 dimensions, determine the larger of the 0 to 10 achievement score and the 0 to 9 improvement score to create 8 dimension scores Sum the 8 dimension scores to arrive at a 0 to 80 HCAHPS base score Calculate the 0 to 20 consistency score Total overall score = base score + consistency score 158
159 HVBP: Total Performance Score HCAHPS performance score proposed to account for 30% of the total Hospital VBP performance score 159
160 Questions? 160
161 Contact Us HCAHPS Information and Technical Support Web site: Telephone:
HCAHPS Quality Assurance Guidelines V6.0 Summary of Updates and Emphasis
This document is a reference tool that highlights the major changes from the HCAHPS Quality Assurance Guidelines V5.0 to V6.0. This document is not a substitute for reviewing the HCAHPS Quality Assurance
More informationPatient-mix Coefficients for December 2017 (2Q16 through 1Q17 Discharges) Publicly Reported HCAHPS Results
Patient-mix Coefficients for December 2017 (2Q16 through 1Q17 Discharges) Publicly Reported HCAHPS Results As noted in the HCAHPS Quality Assurance Guidelines, V12.0, prior to public reporting, hospitals
More informationPatient-mix Coefficients for July 2017 (4Q15 through 3Q16 Discharges) Publicly Reported HCAHPS Results
Patient-mix Coefficients for July 2017 (4Q15 through 3Q16 Discharges) Publicly Reported HCAHPS Results As noted in the HCAHPS Quality Assurance Guidelines, V11.0, prior to public reporting, hospitals HCAHPS
More informationHospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) MBQIP Educational Session One Phase Two, January 2013
Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) MBQIP Educational Session One Phase Two, January 2013 Overview HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and
More informationPRC EasyView Training HCAHPS Application. By Denise Rabalais, Director Service Measurement & Improvement
PRC EasyView Training HCAHPS Application By Denise Rabalais, Director Service Measurement & Improvement PRCEasyView Web Address: https://www.prceasyview.com/vanderbilt Go to: My Studies HCAHPS C Master
More informationCancer Hospital Workgroup
Cancer Hospital Workgroup William G. Lehrman, PhD Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) August 28, 2014 2:00 3:00 PM ET Agenda Roll Call PCHQR Program Updates HCAHPS Updates 2 PPS-Exempt Cancer
More informationCancer Hospital Workgroup. Agenda. PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting Program. Roll Call PCHQR Program Updates HCAHPS Updates
Cancer Hospital Workgroup William G. Lehrman, PhD Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) August 28, 2014 2:00 3:00 PM ET Agenda Roll Call PCHQR Program Updates HCAHPS Updates 2 PPS-Exempt Cancer
More informationCAHPS Hospital Survey Podcast Series Transcript
CAHPS Hospital Survey Podcast Series Transcript HCAHPS Score Calculations Part II: Patient-Mix Adjustment Slide 1-HCAHPS Score Calculations Part II: Patient-Mix Adjustment (PMA) Welcome to the CAHPS Hospital
More information2/5/2014. Patient Satisfaction. Objectives. Topics of discussion. Quality for the non-quality Manager Session 3 of 4
Patient Satisfaction Quality for the non-quality Manager Session 3 of 4 Presented by Paul E. Frigoli, Ph.D.(c), R.N., C.P.H.Q., C.S.S.B.B. Certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt Objectives At the end
More informationTechnical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings (Revised for October 2017 Public Reporting)
Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings (Revised for October 2017 Public Reporting) Overview of HCAHPS Star Ratings As part of the initiative to add five-star quality ratings to its Compare Web sites,
More informationTechnical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings (Revised for April 2018 Public Reporting)
Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings (Revised for April 2018 Public Reporting) Overview of HCAHPS Star Ratings As part of the initiative to add five-star quality ratings to its Compare Web sites, the
More informationSupporting Statement for the National Implementation of the Hospital CAHPS Survey A 1.0 CIRCUMSTANCES OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
Supporting Statement for the National Implementation of the Hospital CAHPS Survey A.0 CIRCUMSTANCES OF INFORMATION COLLECTION A. Background This Paperwork Reduction Act submission is for national implementation
More informationHCAHPS. Active Interactive Voice Response Script (English) Effective January 1, 2018 Discharges and Forward
HCAHPS Active Interactive Voice Response Script (English) Effective January 1, 2018 Discharges and Forward Overview This active interactive voice response (IVR) interview script is provided to assist operators
More informationValue based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges
Value based Purchasing Legislation, Methodology, and Challenges Maryland Association for Healthcare Quality Fall Education Conference 29 October 2009 Nikolas Matthes, MD, PhD, MPH, MSc Vice President for
More information2017 CAHPS Child Medicaid Survey Summary Report
2017 CAHPS Child Medicaid Survey Summary Report June 2017 Morpace research is completed in compliance with ISO 20252 Table of Contents Executive Highlights........................................ Background,
More informationProgram Summary. Understanding the Fiscal Year 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Page 1 of 8 July Overview
Overview This program summary highlights the major elements of the fiscal year (FY) 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
More informationTroubleshooting Audio
Welcome! Audio for this event is available via ReadyTalk Internet Streaming. No telephone line is required. Computer speakers or headphones are necessary to listen to streaming audio. Limited dial-in lines
More informationSpecial Open Door Forum Participation Instructions: Dial: Reference Conference ID#:
Page 1 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program Special Open Door Forum: FY 2013 Program Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. ET The Centers for Medicare
More informationHCAHPS. Telephone Script (English) Effective January 1, 2018 Discharges and Forward
HCAHPS Telephone Script (English) Effective January 1, 2018 Discharges and Forward Overview This telephone interview script is provided to assist interviewers while attempting to reach the patient. The
More informationMedicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs
Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs Presenter: Daniel J. Hettich King & Spalding; Washington, DC dhettich@kslaw.com 1 I. Introduction Evolution of Medicare as a Purchaser
More informationUnderstand the current status of OAS CAHPS related to
August 25, 2017 Kathy Wilson, RN, MHA, LHRM Vice President, Quality AmSurg Objectives Understand the current status of OAS CAHPS related to the ASC Quality Reporting Program Describe the potential benefits
More informationStep-by-Step Calculations for Value-Based Purchasing
Overview Hospitals participating in the Hospital VBP Program have the opportunity to review their FY 2019 PPSR. This quick reference guide offers an overview of how CMS calculates scores and awards points
More informationHCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS
HCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS You should only fill out this survey if you were the patient during the hospital stay named in the cover letter. Do not fill out this survey if you were not the patient.
More informationPATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units MARCH DATA - Final Report 2
JAN FEB MAR 201-01 201-02 201-03 n=123 n=113 n=119 PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units MARCH DATA - Final Report 2 MONTHLY % Top Box FY % Top Box FY %ile Rank 3 12-month* % Top
More informationPATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units APRIL DATA - Final Report 2
FEB MAR APR 201-02 201-03 201-04 n=113 n=119 n=89 PATIENT SATISFACTION REPORT HCAHPS 1 - Inpatient Adult Units APRIL DATA - Final Report 2 MONTHLY % Top Box FY % Top Box FY %ile Rank 3 12-month* % Top
More informationPatient Experience & Satisfaction
Patient Experience & Satisfaction Inpatient Satisfaction Inpatient Experience Hancock Regional Hospital conducts phone surveys from patients who have received care from us. Find out what they are saying
More informationHCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS
HCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS You should only fill out this survey if you were the patient during the hospital stay named in the cover letter. Do not fill out this survey if you were not the patient.
More informationIntroduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Webinar Training Session. Session II. January 2018
Introduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Webinar Training Session Session II January 2018 Introduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Welcome and Introductions Overview of This Session Review
More informationCAHPS Focus on Improvement The Changing Landscape of Health Care. Ann H. Corba Patient Experience Advisor Press Ganey Associates
CAHPS Focus on Improvement The Changing Landscape of Health Care Ann H. Corba Patient Experience Advisor Press Ganey Associates How we will spend our time together Current CAHPS Surveys New CAHPS Surveys
More informationHospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program
Improving the Patient Experience of Care Questions and Answers Speakers Rita J. Bowling, RN, MSN, MBA, CPHQ Project Director KEPRO BFCC-QIO Allison Fields, RN, BSN Clinical Educator Jennings American Legion
More informationMedicare Value Based Purchasing Overview
Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview Washington State Hospital Association Apprise Health Insights / Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems DataGen Susan McDonough Lauren Davis Bill Shyne
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING HCAHPS SCORES AND THEIR IMPACT ON MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT TO ACUTE CARE HOSPITALS THESIS
AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING HCAHPS SCORES AND THEIR IMPACT ON MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT TO ACUTE CARE HOSPITALS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University-San Marcos in Partial
More informationIntroduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Webinar Training Session. Session I. January 2018
Introduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Webinar Training Session Session I January 2018 Session I 2 Introduction to the Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Welcome This training session will cover
More informationThe Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program
The Role of Analytics in the Development of a Successful Readmissions Program Pierre Yong, MD, MPH Director, Quality Measurement & Value-Based Incentives Group Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
More informationUnderstanding Hospital Value-Based Purchasing
VBP Understanding Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Updated 12/2017 Starting in October 2012, Medicare began rewarding hospitals that provide high-quality care for their patients through the new Hospital
More informationHospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program: Overview of the Fiscal Year 2020 Baseline Measures Report Presentation Transcript Moderator Gugliuzza, MBA Project Manager, Hospital VBP Program Hospital
More informationHospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Quality Reporting Program
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Quality Reporting Program HCAHPS and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Questions & Answers Moderator: Bethany Wheeler, BS Hospital VBP Program Support Contract Lead,
More informationMental Health Community Service User Survey 2017 Management Report
Quality Health Mental Health Community Service User Survey 2017 Management Report Produced 1 August 2017 by Quality Health Ltd Table of Contents Background 3 Introduction 4 Observations and Recommendations
More informationHCAHPS, HSOPS, HACs and HIQRP Connecting the Dots
HCAHPS, HSOPS, HACs and HIQRP Connecting the Dots Sharon Burnett, R.N., BSN, MBA Vice President of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs Missouri Hospital Association Objectives Discuss how the results of the
More informationMedicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment
Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment Daniel J. Hettich March, 2012 I. Introduction: Evolution of Medicare as a Purchaser Cost reimbursement rewards furnishing more services
More informationHospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals
Hospital Compare Quality Measures: National and Results for Critical Access Hospitals Michelle Casey, MS, Michele Burlew, MS, Ira Moscovice, PhD University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center Introduction
More informationPatient-Mix Adjustment Factors for Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Results Publicly Reported on Home Health Compare in July 2017
Patient-Mix Adjustment Factors for Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Results Publicly Reported on Home Health Compare in July 2017 Home Health Care CAHPS (HHCAHPS) Survey results will be refreshed or updated
More informationHospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide
Hospital Compare Preview Report Help Guide PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting Program The target audience for this publication is hospitals participating in the PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality
More informationAPPENDIX O: XML DATA FILE LAYOUT FOR DISPROPORTIONATE STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLING
APPENDIX O: XML DATA FILE LAYOUT FOR DISPROPORTIONATE STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLING Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Appendix O: XML File Layout for Disproportionate Stratified Random Sampling January
More informationP: E: P: E:
Making HHCAHPS Easy! Understanding HHCAHPS and Using it to Your Advantage Home Care Alliance of Massachusetts 2010 Spring Conference Cathy King National Director of Business Development Today s Agenda
More informationIncentives and Penalties
Incentives and Penalties CAUTI & Value Based Purchasing and Hospital Associated Conditions Penalties: How Your Hospital s CAUTI Rate Affects Payment Linda R. Greene, RN, MPS,CIC UR Highland Hospital Rochester,
More informationValue-based incentive payment percentage 3
Report Run Date: 07/12/2013 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Value-Based Percentage Payment Summary Report Page 1 of 5 Percentage Summary Report Data as of 1 : 07/08/2013 Total Score Facility State National
More informationNorth Carolina. CAHPS 3.0 Adult Medicaid ECHO Report. December Research Park Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48108
North Carolina CAHPS 3.0 Adult Medicaid ECHO Report December 2016 3975 Research Park Drive Ann Arbor, MI 48108 Table of Contents Using This Report 1 Executive Summary 3 Key Strengths and Opportunities
More informationNational Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing
National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Fiscal Year 2015 Overview for Beneficiaries, Providers, and Stakeholders Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 1 March 14, 2013 Medicare Learning
More informationThe Prior Service Recruiting Pool for National Guard and Reserve Selected Reserve (SelRes) Enlisted Personnel
Issue Paper #61 National Guard & Reserve MLDC Research Areas The Prior Service Recruiting Pool for National Guard and Reserve Selected Reserve (SelRes) Enlisted Personnel Definition of Diversity Legal
More informationHOSPITAL COMPARE PREVIEW REPORT HELP GUIDE
HOSPITAL COMPARE PREVIEW REPORT HELP GUIDE PPS-EXEMPT CANCER HOSPITAL QUALITY REPORTING PROGRAM THE TARGET AUDIENCE FOR THIS PUBLICATION IS HOSPITALS PARTICIPATING IN THE PPS-EXEMPT CANCER HOSPITAL (PCH)
More informationHospital Strength INDEX Methodology
2017 Hospital Strength INDEX 2017 The Chartis Group, LLC. Table of Contents Research and Analytic Team... 2 Hospital Strength INDEX Summary... 3 Figure 1. Summary... 3 Summary... 4 Hospitals in the Study
More informationHalcyon Hospice and Palliative Care 4th Quarter, 2012
Family Evaluation of Hospice Care Quarterly Summary of Results and Comparisons Halcyon Hospice and Palliative Care 4th Quarter, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... i Executive Summary...1 Overall Performance
More informationThe Current State of CMS Payfor-Performance. HFMA FL Annual Spring Conference May 22, 2017
The Current State of CMS Payfor-Performance Programs HFMA FL Annual Spring Conference May 22, 2017 1 AGENDA CMS Hospital P4P Programs Hospital Acquired Conditions (HAC) Hospital Readmissions Reduction
More informationHospital Value-Based Purchasing Program
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Percentage Payment Summary Report (PPSR) Overview Presentation Transcript Moderator/Speaker: Bethany Wheeler-Bunch, MSHA Project Lead,
More informationIntroduction to Patient Experience Surveys
Introduction to Patient Experience Surveys Dale Shaller, MPA Shaller Consulting Group September 30, 2011 Outline Environmental Context Overview of CAHPS Hospital CAHPS (H-CAHPS) Clinician & Group CAHPS
More informationInpatient Quality Reporting Program
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program: Overview of FY 2017 Questions & Answers Moderator: Deb Price, PhD, MEd Educational Coordinator, Inpatient Program SC, HSAG Speaker(s): Bethany Wheeler, BS HVBP
More informationDemographic Profile of the Active-Duty Warrant Officer Corps September 2008 Snapshot
Issue Paper #44 Implementation & Accountability MLDC Research Areas Definition of Diversity Legal Implications Outreach & Recruiting Leadership & Training Branching & Assignments Promotion Retention Implementation
More informationMedicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings
Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings Executive Summary The Alliance for Home Health Quality and
More informationSummary Report of Findings and Recommendations
Patient Experience Survey Study of Equivalency: Comparison of CG- CAHPS Visit Questions Added to the CG-CAHPS PCMH Survey Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations Submitted to: Minnesota Department
More informationPopulation and Sampling Specifications
Mat erial inside brac ket s ( [ and ] ) is new to t his Specific ati ons Manual versi on. Introduction Population Population and Sampling Specifications Defining the population is the first step to estimate
More informationMBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016
MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, 2011-2016 Data Summary Report #20 November 2016 Tami Swenson, PhD Michelle Casey, MS University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center ABOUT This project was supported
More informationCME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.
CME Disclosure Accreditation Statement Studer Group is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Designation
More informationDemographic Profile of the Officer, Enlisted, and Warrant Officer Populations of the National Guard September 2008 Snapshot
Issue Paper #55 National Guard & Reserve MLDC Research Areas Definition of Diversity Legal Implications Outreach & Recruiting Leadership & Training Branching & Assignments Promotion Retention Implementation
More informationPrepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012
Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID 000001 August 06, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: Benchmarking Your Hospital 3 Section 1: Hospital Operating Costs 5 Section 2: Margins 10 Section 3:
More informationModel VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide
Model VBP FY2014 Worksheet Instructions and Reference Guide This material was prepared by Qualis Health, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Idaho and Washington, under a contract with the
More informationMinnesota health care price transparency laws and rules
Minnesota health care price transparency laws and rules Minnesota Statutes 2013 62J.81 DISCLOSURE OF PAYMENTS FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES. Subdivision 1.Required disclosure of estimated payment. (a) A health
More informationExecutive Summary. This Project
Executive Summary The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has had a long-term commitment to work towards implementation of a per-episode prospective payment approach for Medicare home health services,
More informationRegulatory Advisor Volume Eight
Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight 2018 Final Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Rule Focused on Quality by Steve Kowske WEALTH ADVISORY OUTSOURCING AUDIT, TAX, AND CONSULTING 2017 CliftonLarsonAllen
More informationResearch Brief IUPUI Staff Survey. June 2000 Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Vol. 7, No. 1
Research Brief 1999 IUPUI Staff Survey June 2000 Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Vol. 7, No. 1 Introduction This edition of Research Brief summarizes the results of the second IUPUI Staff
More informationHospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance)
Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (At a Glance) Healthcare Financial Management Association South Carolina Chapter March 20, 2012 Presenters: Linda Moore, RN, Manager of Federal Programs and Services, CCME
More informationDobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC Vienna, VA
Analysis of Patient Characteristics among Medicare Recipients of Separately Billable Part B Drugs from 340B DSH Hospitals and Non-340B Hospitals and Physician Offices Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC Vienna,
More informationAnalysis of 340B Disproportionate Share Hospital Services to Low- Income Patients
Analysis of 340B Disproportionate Share Hospital Services to Low- Income Patients March 12, 2018 Prepared for: 340B Health Prepared by: L&M Policy Research, LLC 1743 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 200 Washington,
More informationMETHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR SELECTION AND EVALUATION
CHAPTER VIII METHODOLOGY FOR INDICATOR SELECTION AND EVALUATION The Report Card is designed to present an accurate, broad assessment of women s health and the challenges that the country must meet to improve
More informationDriving Quality Improvement in Managed Care. Toby Douglas, Director California Department of Health Care Services
1 Driving Quality Improvement in Managed Care Toby Douglas, Director 2 Presentation Overview 1. Background on California s Medicaid Program (Medi-Cal) 2. California s Quality Improvement Focuses 3. Challenges
More informationMedicare Value Based Purchasing Overview
Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview South Carolina Hospital Association DataGen Susan McDonough Bill Shyne October 29, 2015 Today s Objectives Overview of Medicare Value Based Purchasing Program Review
More informationMedicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012
Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012 Wes Champion Senior Vice President Premier Performance Partners Copyright 2012 PREMIER INC, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Premier is the nation s largest healthcare
More information2016 FULL GRANTMAKER SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT
206 FULL GRANTMAKER SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT June 207 An active philanthropic network, the Council on Foundations (www.cof.org), founded in 949, is a nonprofit leadership association of grantmaking foundations
More informationTroubleshooting Audio
Welcome! Audio for this event is available via ReadyTalk Internet Streaming. No telephone line is required. Computer speakers or headphones are necessary to listen to streaming audio. Limited dial-in lines
More informationHome Health Value-Based Purchasing Series: HHVBP Model 101. Wednesday, February 3, 2016
Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Series: HHVBP Model 101 Wednesday, February 3, 2016 About the Alliance 501(c)(3) non-profit research foundation Mission: To support research and education on the value
More informationPopulation Representation in the Military Services
Population Representation in the Military Services Fiscal Year 2008 Report Summary Prepared by CNA for OUSD (Accession Policy) Population Representation in the Military Services Fiscal Year 2008 Report
More informationPG snapshot Nursing Special Report. The Role of Workplace Safety and Surveillance Capacity in Driving Nurse and Patient Outcomes
PG snapshot news, views & ideas from the leader in healthcare experience & satisfaction measurement The Press Ganey snapshot is a monthly electronic bulletin freely available to all those involved or interested
More informationTC911 SERVICE COORDINATION PROGRAM
TC911 SERVICE COORDINATION PROGRAM ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM IMPACTS & SUSTAINABILITY CONDUCTED BY: Bill Wright, PhD Sarah Tran, MPH Jennifer Matson, MPH The Center for Outcomes Research & Education Providence
More informationFinal Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017
Final Rule Summary Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017 August 2016 Table of Contents Overview and Resources... 2 Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Payment Rates...
More informationCritical Access Hospital Quality
Critical Access Hospital Quality Current Performance and the Development of Relevant Measures Ira Moscovice, PhD Mayo Professor & Head Division of Health Policy & Management School of Public Health, University
More informationCALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION. Medi-Cal Versus Employer- Based Coverage: Comparing Access to Care JULY 2015 (REVISED JANUARY 2016)
CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION Medi-Cal Versus Employer- Based Coverage: Comparing Access to Care JULY 2015 (REVISED JANUARY 2016) Contents About the Authors Tara Becker, PhD, is a statistician at the
More informationScoring Methodology SPRING 2018
Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018 CONTENTS What is the Hospital Safety Grade?... 4 Eligible Hospitals... 4 Measures... 6 Measure Descriptions... 9 Process/Structural Measures... 9 Computerized Physician
More informationCER Module ACCESS TO CARE January 14, AM 12:30 PM
CER Module ACCESS TO CARE January 14, 2014. 830 AM 12:30 PM Topics 1. Definition, Model & equity of Access Ron Andersen (8:30 10:30) 2. Effectiveness, Efficiency & future of Access Martin Shapiro (10:30
More informations n a p s h o t Medi-Cal at a Crossroads: What Enrollees Say About the Program
s n a p s h o t Medi-Cal at a Crossroads: What Enrollees Say About the Program May 2012 Introduction Medi-Cal, which currently provides health and long term care coverage for more than 7.5 million Californians,
More informationScoring Methodology FALL 2017
Scoring Methodology FALL 2017 CONTENTS What is the Hospital Safety Grade?... 4 Eligible Hospitals... 4 Measures... 5 Measure Descriptions... 9 Process/Structural Measures... 9 Computerized Physician Order
More informationMedicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings
Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings May 11, 2009 Avalere Health LLC Avalere Health LLC The intersection
More informationSNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives
SNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives Lindsay Holland, MHA Associate Director, Care Transitions Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG)
More informationpaymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality
Hospital ACUTE inpatient services system basics Revised: October 2015 This document does not reflect proposed legislation or regulatory actions. 425 I Street, NW Suite 701 Washington, DC 20001 ph: 202-220-3700
More informationCMS in the 21 st Century
CMS in the 21 st Century ICE 2013 ANNUAL CONFERENCE David Saÿen, MBA Regional Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services San Francisco November 15, 2013 The strategy is to concurrently pursue
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Updated September 2007 This document answers the most frequently asked questions posed by participating organizations since the first HSMR reports were sent. The questions
More informationState of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Department on Aging Kansas Health Policy Authority
State of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Department on Aging Kansas Health Policy Authority Notice of Proposed Nursing Facility Medicaid Rates for State Fiscal Year 2010; Methodology
More informationMinnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System
Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System JUNE 2015 DIVISION OF HEALTH POLICY/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement
More informationWorking Paper Series
The Financial Benefits of Critical Access Hospital Conversion for FY 1999 and FY 2000 Converters Working Paper Series Jeffrey Stensland, Ph.D. Project HOPE (and currently MedPAC) Gestur Davidson, Ph.D.
More informationThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) strives to make information available to all. Nevertheless, portions of our files including
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) strives to make information available to all. Nevertheless, portions of our files including charts, tables, and graphics may be difficult to read using
More informationThe Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in the United States
The Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in the United States Nikhil Porecha The College of New Jersey 5 April 2016 Dr. Donka Mirtcheva Abstract Hospitals and other healthcare facilities face a problem
More information