Hammersmith & Fulham CCG Performance & Quality Report August Month 5

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Hammersmith & Fulham CCG Performance & Quality Report August Month 5"

Transcription

1 Hammersmith & Fulham CCG Performance & Quality Report August 2013 Month 5

2 Section 1: Table of contents Executive Summary & Key Messages Section 2 CCG Operating Framework CCG Outcomes framework Quality premium NHSE Assurance provider quality Shaping a Healthier Future Provider issues 111 Pilot Services Action log Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Sections 10 Recommendations and next steps Sections 11 1

3 Section 2: Executive Summary CCG Operating Framework - The CCG is currently meeting constitutional performance measures with the exception of RTT performance standards at specialty level and 52 week standards. The CCG performance was largely impacted by Imperial College Hospitals Trust (ICHT) and Chelsea & Westminster hospital (CW). Cancer: H&F CCG did not meet the 62 day to treatment standard in M5 or the year to date, with performance in M5 driven by ICHT. Health Care Acquired Infection (HCAI) H&F CCG reported 17 C.Diff cases against a tolerance of 13 cases with no hospital acquired cases in M5. Performance year to date driven by ICHT with all 11 hospital acquired cases for H&F CCG. No patient tested positive for MRSA bacteraemia in M5 with 4 cases reported year to date. Quality Premium H&F CCG is not meeting the cancer 62 days to treatment standard a gateway metric to receiving quality premium funding. In addition, the CCG is not meeting HCAI and MMR immunisation standards and the MRSA tolerance has been exceeded for 2013/14. Under current DH guidance the HCAI Quality Premium is awarded only where both HCAI tolerances are met. Information on other metrics is not currently available as these are annual or quarterly measures. Areas where provider performance (trust-wide across all CCGs) is below standard: CW, ICHT and RBH are meeting RTT standards overall but not at a speciality level. ICHT also reported 3 breaches of the 52 week standard and has confirmed that all 3 were treated in M5 and there are no patients waiting over 52 weeks at month end. Cancer: ICHT did not meet the 62 days to treatment standard following urgent referral in M5 achieving 65.6%. RBH did not meet the 62 day consultant upgrade standard with 1 breach due to a complex pathway. ICHT is not meeting the 31 days to treatment standard year to date achieving 95.2% against a 96% standard. HCAI: 1 MRSA was reported in M5 by CW and ICHT. CW, ICHT and RBH will not meet the zero tolerance MRSA requirement for 2013/14 reporting 2, 5, and 2 cases respectively. ICHT met C.Diff tolerance in M5 but not year to date and RBH has exceeded its C.Diff tolerance year to date but is within the Monitor de-minimis tolerance. LAS arrival to handover waits greater than 30mins : 4 and 26 patient breaches reported at CW and ICHT respectively in M5. ICHT reported that 5.4% of operations cancelled on the day for non clinical reasons were not rebooked within 28 days in M5. WLMHT did not meet the 11% target for DNA Follow Up and 8.1% target for Readmission Within 30 days with 12.3% and 9.6% respectively CLCH achieved 96.0% at M5 against 98.0% target for LAC Initial Health Assessments conducted within 20 operational days Actions being taken or in place by individual providers are outlined in Section 11 of this report. 2

4 Section 2: Executive Summary (contd) The CCG, supported by CSU, is taking the following actions to address these performance concerns: Contract penalties will be applied to all Trusts breaching national standards, for example 5000 for each 18 week 52 week wait, 1000 for a 60 minute handover breach, and 200 for a 30 minute handover breach. Root cause analyses, exception reports and action plans are required where providers have breached quality standards which are discussed at relevant contractual meetings. Where required the CSU performance and quality teams undertakes critical analysis of exception reports, demand and capacity assessments, and action plans submitted by providers. The CSU also monitors action plans on a weekly / month basis and A&E pressures on a daily basis. Where necessary the CSU meet with providers to agree additional actions required. Recovery actions for individual providers are detailed in Section 11 3

5 Section 2: Key Messages NHS CCG Operating Framework Outcomes Framework Quality Premium NHSE Assurance Key Messages The CCG currently assessed green for 18 indicators, and red on 2 indicators. A further 19 indicators are not assessed as data is either not yet available or the indicator is in development. The CCG currently assessed as improving for 11 indicators with a fall in performance for 9 indicators. A further 10 indicators are not assessed as data is either not yet available or the indicator is in development. 1 national domain measure is assessed as not met 3 national domain measures are currently not assessed. The CGG is not meeting 1 local measure and is not assessed on 2 local measures The CCG currently assessed green for 20 indicators, and red on 5 indicators. A further 26 indicators are not assessed as data is either not yet available or the indicator is in development. Further Detail Please see section 3 Please see section 4 Please see section 5 Please see section 6 4

6 Section 3: NHS CCG Operating Framework H&F CCG is meeting RTT performance standards overall but not specialty or 52 week standards. The admitted patient that waited longer than 52 week wait was reported by ICHT and has been treated in M5. The Trust has confirmed that no further patients are waiting over 52 weeks at month end. H&F CCG specialty performance has been impacted by ICHT reducing its backlog within General Surgery, T&O and Urology. Plastic Surgery and General Medicine did not meet non admitted RTT standards due to a small number of breaches at CW. CW, ICHT and RBH are meeting RTT standards overall but not at a speciality level. Action plans are in place to improve the management of 18 week RTT at both ICHT and CW. CW has reviewed waiting list management processes after reporting a number of surgical specialties did not meet RTT standards in M5 and has reported an improved position in M6. ICHT has reported that it is on plan to meet T&O admitted standard by the end of October 2013 but not the non-admitted General Surgery standard by the end of September An update to the Trust planned trajectory has been requested. ICHT reported 5.4% of operations cancelled on the day for non-clinical reasons were not rebooked within 28 days in M5. ICHT has provided an action plan and is on trajectory to meet standard in Q2. Performance Measure Description Reporting Frequency Reporting Period Threshold NHS Hammersmith & Fulham CCG In mth/qtr YTD Variance Chelsea and Westminister Hospital NHS Foundation Trust In mth/qtr YTD Variance Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust In mth/qtr YTD Variance Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust In mth/qtr YTD Variance 18 weeks RTT - admitted performance within 18 weeks 91.6% 90.7% 91.0% 90.7% 93.6% 92.8% 94.7% 93.1% 18 weeks RTT - admitted performance within 18 weeks: specialties that failed to achieve the threshold 90% General Surgery 88.1% Urology 85.1% T&O 84.7% Urology 84.9% T&O 87.5% Ophthalmology 88.5% Plastic Surgery 85.7% T&O 71.4% Other Specialties 88.9% 18 weeks RTT - non-admitted performance within 18 weeks 97.1% 97.2% 98.0% 97.6% 96.8% 97.0% 97.1% 97.9% 18 weeks RTT performance within 18 weeks 18 weeks RTT - non-admitted performance within 18 weeks: specialties that failed to achieve the threshold 18 weeks RTT - incomplete pathways performance within 18 weeks Monthly M5 95% General Surgery 91.6% Urology 86.8% Plastic Surgery 91.9% General Medicine 92.3% Gastroenterology 92.9% Rheumatology 93.0% General Surgery 85.6% Urology 82.8% 95.1% 95.5% 92.3% 93.1% 95.6% 96.0% 94.8% 95.1% Cardiology 94.9% 18 weeks RTT - incomplete pathways within 18 weeks: specialties that failed to achieve the threshold 92% General Surgery 91.5% Urology 90.6% T&O 89.8% Cardiothoracic Surg 85.0% General Surgery 88.6% Urology 91.9% T&O 89.1% Plastic Surgery 87.0% Number of 52 week RTT pathways - admitted Number of 52 week RTT pathways - non-admitted Other Specialties 90.7% Number of 52 week RTT pathways - incomplete pathways Diagnostic Waits Patients waiting more than 6 weeks for a diagnostic test Monthly M5 1% 0.5% 0.2% 0.00% 0.03% 0.29% 0.16% 0.00% 0.00% Cancelled Operations Urgent operations cancelled for a second time Cancelled ops - breaches of 28 days readmission guarantee as % of cancelled ops Number of urgent operations that are cancelled by the trust for non-clinical reasons, which have already been previously cancelled once for non-clinical reasons Monthly M5 5% Data not available by CCG 0.0% 0.0% 5.4% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% Monthly M5 0 Data not available by CCG Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 5

7 Section 3: NHS CCG Operating Framework (contd.) Cancer: H&F CCG did not meet the 62 day to treatment standard in M5 or the year to date. All three 62 days to treatment breaches were reported by ICHT, 1 patient choice, 1 due to poor administrative processes and 1 is being investigated. RCA s are being provided by all providers not meeting cancer standards and these will be reviewed by the CSU cancer commissioning team. ICHT did not meet the 62 days to treatment standard in M5 or the year to date achieving 72.7%, a total of 24 breaches (4 shared). Although full RCA s are awaited initial findings indicate a number of breaches were due to poor administrative processes and capacity issues particularly in Urology. A new consultant Urologist and CNS have started in October and improvement is expected from M7. The CSU contracting team is meeting with the Trusts cancer lead to review progress against ICHT s revised cancer plan and agree an improvement trajectory. RBH did not meet the 62 day consultant upgrade standard with 1 breach due to a complex pathway. LAS arrival to handover waits greater than 30mins : 4 and 26 patient breaches reported at CW and ICHT respectively in M5 an improving position on M4. Recovery and improvement plans are in place. Performance Measure Description Reporting Frequency Reporting Period Threshold NHS Hammersmith & Fulham CCG In mth/qtr YTD Variance Chelsea and Westminister Hospital NHS Foundation Trust In mth/qtr YTD Variance Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust In mth/qtr YTD Variance Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust In mth/qtr YTD Variance A&E Total time spent in A & E < 4 hours (all activity types) Monthly M5 95% Data not available by CCG 98.3% 98.6% 96.5% 96.4% N/A N/A Trolley Waits in A&E Ambulance Handover Patients who have waited over 12 hours in A&E from decision to admit to admission Monthly M5 0 Data not available by CCG N/A N/A Number of LAS arrival to handover > 30mins Monthly M5 0 Data not available by CCG N/A N/A Number of LAS arrival to handover > 60mins Monthly M5 0 Data not available by CCG N/A N/A Percentage of patients seen within two weeks of an urgent GP referral for suspected cancer Cancer 2 Week Percentage of patients seen within two weeks of an Waits urgent referral for breast symptoms where cancer is not initially suspected Cancer 31 Day Waits Cancer 62 Day Waits Percentage of patients receiving first definitive treatment within one month of a cancer diagnosis Percentage of patients receiving subsequent treatment for cancer within 31-days where that treatment is Surgery Percentage of patients receiving subsequent treatment for cancer within 31-days where that treatment is an Anti-Cancer Drug Regime Percentage of patients receiving subsequent treatment for cancer within 31-days where that treatment is a Radiotherapy Treatment Course Percentage of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer within 62-days of an urgent GP referral for suspected cancer Percentage of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer within 62-days of referral from an NHS Cancer Screening Service Percentage of patients receiving first definitive treatment for cancer within 62-days of a consultant decision to upgrade their priority status Monthly Monthly Monthly M5 93% 98.9% 97.7% 98.4% 96.1% 98.6% 98.3% 100.0% 100.0% M5 93% 98.8% 98.4% No Patients Treated No Patients Treated 98.0% 97.6% No Patients Treated No Patients Treated M5 96% 100.0% 96.4% 100.0% 98.2% 97.7% 95.2% 100.0% 98.8% M5 94% 100.0% 96.1% M5 98% 100.0% 100.0% M5 94% 100.0% 100.0% No Patients Treated No Patients Treated No Patients Treated 100.0% 96.0% 95.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% No Patients Treated 100.0% 97.9% No Patients Treated No Patients Treated No Patients Treated No Patients Treated M5 85% 75.0% 75.3% 100.0% 91.2% 65.6% 72.7% 90.9% 72.2% M5 90% 100.0% 100.0% No Patients Treated No Patients Treated 91.2% 93.1% N/A N/A M5 85% 100.0% 94.4% 100.0% 100.0% 92.3% 92.0% 50.0% 90.0% Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 6

8 Section 3: NHS CCG Operating Framework (contd.) Infection control: H&F CCG met the C.Diff standard in M5 with 1 case but not for the year to date with 17 cases (11 apportioned to acute providers) reported against a tolerance of 13 cases. The CDiff case in M5 was assessed as not hospital acquired. All 11 acute provider apportioned cases were reported by ICHT. H&F CCG met the zero tolerance MRSA standard in M5, but not year to date with 4 cases, of which 2 were assessed as hospital acquired with CW and ICHT both reporting 1 case. An additional case is expected to be allocated to ICHT in M 4 following post infection review. CW, ICHT and RBH are not meeting the zero tolerance MRSA bacteraemia standard, reporting 2, 5 and 2 cases year to date respectively, with 1 case reported by both CW and ICHT in M5. A post infection review has been undertaken for the ICHT case and this has been assessed as not hospital acquired therefore the HPA has been asked to reallocate. ICHT and RBH reported 3 and 1 C.Diff cases in M5 respectively with both Trusts in excess of their year to date tolerance. ICHT has now been within tolerance for the second consecutive month and is currently reporting a similar position for M6. RBH has reported 5 C.Diff cases year to date, which is in line with its Monitor de-minimis tolerance. Performance Measure EMSA MSA breaches Monthly M5 MSA breach rate Unplanned hospitalisation for chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions , Unplanned (adults)* M5 Rolling 12 Monthly hospitalisation Unplanned hospitalisation for asthma, months Reduction hypertension, diabetes and epilepsy in under 19s* Emergency Admissions Emergency admissions for acute conditions that should not usually require hospital admission* Monthly M5 Reduction ,529 N/A N/A PROMs Friends & Family Test Patient Experience HCAI Description Patient reported outcomes measures for elective procedures - hip replacement Patient reported outcomes measures for elective procedures - knee replacement Patient reported outcomes measures for elective procedures - groin hernia Patient reported outcomes measures for elective procedures - varicose veins Net promoter score of recommendations to friends and family by people receiving Inpatient NHS Treatment Net promoter score of recommendations to friends and family by people receiving A&E NHS Treatment Net promoter score of recommendations to friends and family by people receiving Inpatient/A&E NHS Treatment Patient Experience: Overall score across 5 domains (inpatient survey) Reporting Frequency Annual Reporting Period Provisional Apr-Dec 2012 In mth/qtr YTD Variance In mth/qtr YTD Variance In mth/qtr YTD Variance In mth/qtr N/A N/A YTD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Monthly M5 Improvement Data not available by CCG Monthly M5 Improvement Data not available by CCG N/A N/A Monthly M5 Improvement Data not available by CCG Annual passes out of 5 themes Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers MRSA Monthly M C.Diff Monthly M5 Threshold Increase NHS Hammersmith & Fulham CCG Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers Data suppressed due to small numbers Data not available by CCG Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust Monthly Target Annual Target Actual Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance Variance 7

9 Section 3: NHS CCG Operating Framework (Dementia and IAPT) IAPT - Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 11. IAPT Figures below are reported locally to M5 13/14 because national reporting has been ceased in 13/14. Performance Measure Description Reporting Frequency Reporting Period Threshold West London Mental Health Trust In mth/qtr YTD Proportion of people with depression and/or anxiety disorders referred for and receiving psychological therapies Quarterly M5 Local Target 0.80% 3.92% Actual 1.12% 5.24% Mental Health - IAPT Proportion of people with depression and/or anxiety disorders receiving psychological therapies who are moving to recovery Quarterly M5 Local Target 46.3% 46.3% Actual 46.4% 46.3% Mental Health- CPA 7 day follow up The proportion of patients on Care Programme Approach (CPA) discharged from in patient care who are followed up within 7 days Quarterly Q1 Target 95.0% 95.0% Actual 95.1% 95.1% People with dementia Diagnosis rate for people with dementia, expressed as a percentage of the estimated prevalence Annual N/A Improvement Data not available Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 8

10 Section 3: Out of Area (M5 performance) Please note: the dashboard shows the position for local Out of Area (OOA) Trusts. Only measure where data is available from validated published data sources are included. The M5 dashboard will include all mandated and constitutional standards and year to date position. Where out of area providers have impacted on CCG performance, commentary is included in Section 3. Performance Measure Ashford & St Peters UCLH Guy s & St Thomas Royal Free In month YTD In month YTD In month YTD In month YTD 18 weeks admitted 92.3% (M5) Data not available 90.3% (M4) 91.2% (M4) 93.0% (M5) Data not available 92.6% (M4) 91.8% (M4) 18 weeks - non-admitted 97.8% (M5) Data not available 96.2% (M4) 96.9% (M4) 96.6% (M5) Data not available 96.5% (M4) 97.3% (M4) 18 weeks - incomplete 98.3% (M5) Data not available 92.1% (M4) 92.1% (M4) 93.5% (M5) Data not available 92.1% (M4) 92.1% (M4) 6 week diagnostic test waiters 0.0% (M5) Data not available 0.5% (M4) 0.9% (M4) 5.1% (M5) Data not available 0.7% (M4) 0.6% (M4) A&E 4hr waits all types 97.7% (M5) Data not available 96.3% (M5) 95.6% (M5) 95.4% (M5) 95.7% (M5) 96.5% (M5) 95.7% (M5) Trolley waits in A&E 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) LAS handovers >30mins 13 (M5) 244 (M5) 7 (M5) 51 (M5) 8 (M5) 139 (M5) 4 (M5) 51 (M5) LAS handovers >60mins 3 (M5) 18 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 11 (M5) 0 (M5) 1 (M5) Cancer 2 week wait 96.6% (M5) Data not available 94.2% (M4) 93.8% (M4) 94.1% (M5) Data not available 97.7% (M4) 97.7% (M4) Cancer 2 week wait breast 93.2% (M5) Data not available 83.4% (M4) 88.4% (M4) 96.8% (M5) Data not available 96.5% (M4) 96.6% (M4) Cancer 31 day standard 100% (M5) Data not available 97.4% (M4) 97.3% (M4) 96.9% (M5) Data not available 100% (M4) 99.0% (M4) Cancer 31 day treatment surgery 100% (M5) Data not available 89.2% (M4) 95.3% (M4) 98.7% (M5) Data not available 100% (M4) 98.9% (M4) Cancer 31 day treatment drugs 100% (M5) Data not available 100% (M4) 100% (M4) 99.3% (M5) Data not available 100% (M4) 100% (M4) No patients Cancer 31 day treatment radiotherapy treated Data not available 100% (M4) 100% (M4) 94.0% (M5) Data not available 100% (M4) 100% (M4) Cancer 62 day standard 91.0% (M5) Data not available 76.5% (M4) 82.6% (M4) 80.0% (M5) Data not available 87.2% (M4) 89.5% (M4) Cancer 62 day treatment screening 100% (M5) Data not available 83.3% (M4) 93.3% (M4) 71.4% (M5) Data not available 100% (M4) 100% (M4) Cancer 62 day consultant upgrade 100% (M5) Data not available 78.6% (M4) 73.3% (M4) 89.8% (M5) Data not available 77.8% (M4) 78.9% (M4) Mixed sex accommodation breaches 0 (M5) 1 (M5) 1 (M5) 9 (M5) 0 (M5) 9 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) Mixed sex accommodation breach rate 0.0 (M5) Data not available 0.1 (M5) Data not available 0.0 (M5) Data not available 0.0 (M5) 0.0 (M5) Cancelled operations 28 day standard 0.0% (M5) 0.0% (M5) 19.2% (Q1) 1.0% (Q1) 0.0% (Q1) Urgent operations cancelled for a second time 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) 0 (M5) Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 9

11 Section 3: Out of Area (M5 performance) (contd.) Please note: the dashboard shows the position for local Out of Area (OOA) Trusts. Only measure where data is available from validated published data sources are included. The M5 dashboard will include all mandated and constitutional standards and year to date position. Where out of area providers have impacted on CCG performance, commentary is included in section 3. Performance Measure Ashford & St Peters UCLH Guy s & St Thomas Royal Free PROMS hip replacement PROMS knee replacement PROMS groin hernia PROMS varicose veins Data not available due to low numbers Friends & family test score A&E 50 (M5) 45 (M5) 52 (M5) 39 (M5) Friends & family test score Inpatient 74 (M5) 70 (M5) 79 (M5) 45 (M5) Friends & family test score Combined 59 (M5) 58 (M5) 71 (M5) 41 (M5) Patient experience of hospital care MRSA cases 0 (M5 YTD) 3 (M5 YTD) 3 (M5 YTD) 0 (M5 YTD) C.Diff cases 2 (M5 YTD) Annual target = (M5 YTD) YTD target = (M5 YTD) Annual target = (M5 YTD) YTD target = 12 Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 10

12 Enhancing the quality of life of people with long term conditions Preventing people from dying prematurely Section 4: CCG Outcomes Framework This section is a performance dashboard that gives the CCG an overview of its position in relation to the indicators listed in the CCG Outcomes Framework. All indicators have an improvement threshold. HCAI is reported monthly and related comments have been provided in Section 14 of this report. Domain Description Period Baseline Target Previous Current Performance Reporting Date next Performance Performance assessment Frequency available Potential years of life lost (PYLL) from causes considered reduction amendable to healthcare - MALE (2011) (2012) Annual TBC Potential years of life lost (PYLL) from causes considered reduction amendable to healthcare - FEMALE (2011) (2012) Annual TBC Potential years of life lost (PYLL) from causes considered reduction amendable to healthcare - ALL PERSONS (2011) (2012) Annual TBC Under 75 mortality rate from cardiovascular disease reduction (2011) (2012) Annual TBC Under 75 mortality from respiratory disease reduction (2011) (2012) Annual TBC Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease reduction (2011) (2012) Annual TBC Emergency admissions for alcohol-related liver disease /12 reduction (10/11) (11/12) Annual TBC Under 75 mortality rate from cancer reduction (2011) (2012) Annual TBC Antenatal assessments <13 weeks Q4 2012/13 increase (Q3 12/13) (Q4 12/13) Quarterly TBC Maternal smoking at delivery 4.0% 3.3% Q4 2012/13 reduction (Q3 12/13) (Q4 12/13) Quarterly Nov-13 Breast feeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks 77.4% 74.1% Q4 2012/13 increase (Q3 12/13) (Q4 12/13) Quarterly TBC People suffering from a long term condition feeling 80.7% 74.9% 2012/13 increase supported (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Mar) Six monthly not known Unplanned hospitalisation for chronic ambulatory care /12 reduction sensitive (ACS) conditions (adults) (10/11) (11/12) Annual TBC Unplanned hospitalisation for asthma, diabetes and /12 reduction epilepsy (under 19s) (10/11) (11/12) Annual TBC Estimated diagnosis rate for people with dementia no data no data no data no data no data no data no data Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 11

13 Treating for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm Ensuring that people have a positive experience of care Helping people to recover from ill health or following injury Section 4: CCG Outcomes Framework (contd.) Domain Description Period Baseline Target Previous Performance Emergency admissions for acute conditions that should not /12 reduction usually require hospital admission (10/11) Emergency readmissions within 30 days of discharge from hospital 2010/11 reduction not available Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective /12 increase procedures - hip replacement (10/11) Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective data supressed procedures - knee replacement 2011/12 increase due to small numbers Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective data supressed procedures - groin hernia 2011/12 increase due to small numbers Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective procedures - varicose veins. 2011/12 increase Emergency admissions for children with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) Patient experience of GP out of hours services Patient experience of hospital care (CCG weighted average) Patient experience of outpatient services Improvement in hospitals responsiveness to personal needs Patient experience of accident and emergency (A&E) services. Patient safety incidents reported Incidence of healthcare associated infection (HCAI): MRSA Incidence of healthcare associated infection (HCAI): Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) 2011/12 reduction 2012/13 improvement data supressed due to small numbers (10/11) 65.7% (Apr-Jun) 2011 improvement not available 2011 improvement not available 2011 improvement not available 2011 improvement not available Apr-12 to Oct-12 0 not available Apr-Aug 13 1 Apr-Aug (2012/13) 36 (2012/13) Current Performance (11/12) 13.3 (10/11) (11/12) (11/12) (11/12) data supressed due to small numbers (11/12) 60.1% (Jul-Mar) 75 (2011) 78 (2011) 66 (2011) 78 (2011) 4 (Apr-Sep) 4 (Apr-Aug) 17 (Apr-Aug) Performance assessment Reporting Frequency Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Six monthly Annual Date next available TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC not known TBC Annual Autumn 13 Annual Annual Six monthly Monthly Monthly TBC TBC Oct-13 Nov-13 Nov-13 Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 12

14 Section 5: Quality premium H&F CCG reported a total of 17 C.Diff YTD cases which is 4 cases above its year to date tolerance of tolerance of 13 cases. All hospital acquired cases (11 out of 17) were reported by ICHT. H&F CCG is above the zero tolerance for MRSA bacteremia with 4 cases reported YTD (1 case reported by ICHT, 1 by CW and 2 cases which was assessed as not hospital acquired). Both providers have undertaken Root Cause Analysis with action Plans in place. Under current DH guidance the HCAI Quality Premium is awarded only where the number of cases are at or below both C.Diff and MRSA tolerances. Gateway measures Actual Target Max. Value ( ) Potential loss of income ( ) Frequency 18 week RTT (incomplete pathway) 95.5% (M5 YTD) 92% N/A N/A Monthly A&E waits (CCG mapped from HES provider data) 97.7% (M5 YTD) 95% N/A N/A Monthly Cancer waits - 62 days (urgent GP referral) Cat A red 1 ambulance calls (LAS performance) 75.3% (M5 YTD) 85% N/A N/A Monthly 77.7% (M5 YTD) 75% N/A N/A Monthly Domain measures Reducing potential years of lives lost through amenable mortality Reducing avoidable emergency admissions (composite measure) Patient experience of acute inpatient care and A&E using the Friends and Family Test Preventing healthcare associated infections 1,998 (2012) Available later in ,417 TBD Annual Not yet available Not yet available 222,834 TBD Annual Not yet available Not yet available 111,417 TBD Annual 4 MRSA (M5 YTD) 17 C.Difficile (M5 YTD) 0 MRSA (M5 YTD) 13 C.Difficile (M5 YTD) 111, ,417 Monthly Local measures Year 2 first dose Immunisation MMR 81.3% (Q4 12/13) 84.90% 111, ,417 Quarterly Care Planning: X-PERT Programme for Diabetes Physical health checks for people with severe and enduring mental illness Not yet available 18% 111,417 TBD TBD Not yet available 86% 111,417 TBD TBD Please see Appendix 1 for Quality Premium calculation guidance Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 13

15 Section 6: NHSE Assurance provider quality of care No provider has been subject to a local enforcement action by the Care Quality Commission and no provider has been flagged as a quality compliance risk by Monitor Chelsea and Westminster Friends & Family Test improvement action plans in place; CQUIN target is for a minimum of 15% response rate. Similarly all providers that have reported single sex accommodation breaches and or MRSA cases have action plans in place. Domain 1: Are local people getting good quality care? Providers Provider 1 Provider 2 Provider 3 Provider 4 CENTRAL LONDON COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Provider Name WEST LONDON MENTAL IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTH NHS TRUST HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST Please identify the percentage of provider income for CCG: Is this CCG the lead or associate commissioner? Associate Associate Lead Associate Has local provider been subject to local enforcement action by the CQC? No No No No Has local provider been flagged as a 'quality compliance risk' by Monitor and/or are requirements in place around breaches of provider licence conditions? Has local provider been subject to enforcement action by the NHS TDA based on 'quality' risk? Does feedback from the Friends and Family test (or any other patient feedback) indicate any causes for concern? No No No No No No No No No No No No Has the provider been identified as a 'negative outlier' on SMHI or HSMR? No No No No Do provider level indicators from the National Quality Dashboard show that No MRSA cases are above zero? No Yes Action plan in place Yes Action plan in place Do provider level indicators from the National Quality Dashboard show that No the provider has reported more C difficile cases than trajectory? No Yes Action plan in place No Do provider level indicators from the National Quality Dashboard show that No MSA breaches are above zero? No No No Does provider currently have any unclosed Serious Untoward Incidents (SUIs)? Yes Action plan in place Yes Action plan in place Yes Action plan in place Yes Action plan in place Has the provider experienced any 'Never Events' during the last quarter? No No Yes Action plan in place No Is provider meeting the 15% response rates on FFT? (Domain 3) Further development required Further development required Yes No action plan in place Yes No action plan in place 14

16 Section 6: NHSE Assurance provider quality of care (contd.) RTT performance 52 week standard with 1 breach reported by ICHT. The patient was treated in M5. H&F CCG did not meet the 62 day to treatment standard in M5 or the year to date, with performance in M5 driven by ICHT. H&F CCG met Health Care Acquired Infection in M5 but not year to date. National CPA Target is reported quarterly. The Trust was not meeting the target for Q1, however local Trust reporting indicates that the M5 target has been met Domain 2: Are patient rights under the NHS Constitution being promoted? 15

17 Section 7: Shaping a Healthier Future tracker information: UCC and A&E attendances, non-elective admissions and community events Key message The Shaping a Healthier Future programme requires Out of Hospital strategies to reduce unnecessary attendances and non-elective admissions. They do this by (i) providing improved care in the community to prevent emergency attendances; (ii) diverting minor A&E attendances away from A&E departments to Urgent Care Centres and primary care. The graphs show trends in Hammersmith & Fulham for UCC and A&E attendances and non-elective admissions. For Hammersmith & Fulham UCC & A&E attendances are increasing and non-elective admissions are decreasing. Investigations are planned into the completeness and quality of Rapid Response data hence its absence from this month s report. Note: Rapid response data subject to review Note: Activity being verified and subject to change 16

18 Section 8: Acute provider operational performance exceptions and early warnings ICHT Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 10 & 11 Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend No. 52 week waiters admitted pathways No. 52 week waiters non-admitted pathways No. 52 week waiters incomplete pathways LAS arrival to handover > 30mins 26 (Hammersmith Hosp. 6) (Charing Cross 7) (St Mary s 13)* LAS arrival to handover > 60mins 0 Cancelled operations breaches of 28 days readmission standard 168 (Hammersmith Hosp. 33) (Charing Cross 31) (St Mary s 104)* 1 (Hammersmith Hosp. 1) 5.4% 14.3% 5.0% 0 0 Note: site specific data subject to futher validation Please see Appendix 2 for further report Definitions guidance 17

19 Section 8: Acute provider operational performance exceptions and early warnings ICHT (contd.) Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 10 & 11 Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend First definitive treatment for cancer within 31 days of diagnosis 97.7% 95.2% 96% First definitive treatment for cancer within 62 days of an urgent GP referral for suspected cancer 65.6% 72.7% 85% No. of MRSA cases No. of C.Diff Cases (M5) 26 (YTD) A&E 4hr wait type % 92.7% 95% Please see Appendix 2 for further report Definitions guidance 18

20 Section 8: Acute provider operational performance exceptions and early warnings ICHT (contd.) Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 10 & 11 Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend CMS Compliance (KPI 1): updating of ED status page outside of the hours 01:00-06:00 CMS Provider Compliance KPI 2: Updating of Bed Status page between the hours of 06:00-22:00 within 4 hours 54.6% 53.0% 75.6% 79.6% 80% within 2 hours 80% within 2 hours Choose & Book: slot availability 18.8% 16.8% 2% Breastfeeding initiation rate 89.4% 88.2% 90% Newborn blood spot screening tests 76.7% 79.9% 100% Midwife to birth ratio 1:33 (SMH) 1:31 (QCCH) Not applicable 1:30 Not Applicable Home births 1.35% 0.8% 1.35% NRLS System Uploads in the past 6 months Not applicable 5/6 months uploaded (Apr-Sep12) 6/6 months Not Applicable Please see Appendix 2 for further report Definitions guidance 19

21 Section 8: Acute provider operational performance exceptions and early warnings CW Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 10 & 11 Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend No. 52 week waiters admitted pathways No. 52 week waiters non-admitted pathways No. 52 week waiters incomplete pathways LAS arrival to handover > 30mins No. of MRSA cases Home births 0.5% 1.2% 2.0% Percentage of elective c-sections 12.3% 15.5% 15% Percentage of non-elective c-sections 15.4% 18.2% 12% Please see Appendix 2 for further report Definitions guidance 20

22 Section 8: Acute provider operational performance exceptions and early warnings CW (contd.) Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 10 & 11 Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Midwife to birth ratio 1:36 Not Applicable 1:30 Not Applicable CMS Compliance (KPI 1): updating of ED status page outside of the hours 01:00-06: % 64.9% 80% within 2 hours Choose & Book: slot availability 2.1% 2.1% 2% Delayed transfers of care 2.5% 1.5% 2% Stroke TIA - % of people referred with a suspected TIA, who are at high risk of stroke, who are assessed and treated within 24 hours 66.7% 80.8% 75% Please see Appendix 2 for further report Definitions guidance 21

23 Section 8: Acute provider operational performance exceptions and early warnings RBH Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 10 & 11 Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend No. 52 week waiters incomplete pathways First definitive treatment for cancer within 62 days of an urgent GP referral for suspected cancer First definitive treatment for cancer within 62 days of a consultant decision to upgrade 90.9% 72.2% 85% 50.0% 90.0% 85% Urgent operations cancelled for the second time No. of MRSA cases No. of C.Diff Cases (M5) 2 (YTD) Choose & Book: slot availability 0.7% 2.1% 2% Please see Appendix 2 for further report Definitions guidance 22

24 Section 9: Acute provider quality performance exceptions and early warnings ICHT The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births over a 12 month period. The actual number of maternal deaths is specified in brackets after the Maternal Mortality Ratio. It is a pathway measure across a number of providers. Serious Incidents Reported: YTD SI data does not take into account de-escalations. Average Delay (in days) of Reporting Serious Incidents from date identified: 12% (8) of reported Serious Incidents did not have the date of identification available and are not included in the indicator Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) < 42 days 0 (0) Not Applicable Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) > 42 days (2) Not Applicable Standardised Hospital Mortality Indicator (SHMI) Jan 12 - Dec Serious Incidents Reported Never Events Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting from date identified New metric Number of Serious Incident RCA Reports Overdue New metric Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (All) 3.18% 3.25% National avg 5.07% Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 23

25 Section 9: Acute provider quality performance exceptions and early warnings ICHT Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) are new and replace the Patient Environment Action Team (PEAT) programme. This new process and assessment is a collaboration between hospital staff and patient assessors, focusing on the four key areas: (1) Cleanliness including hand hygiene (2) Buildings and facilities condition, appearance and maintenance of the building, fixtures and fittings (3) Privacy and Dignity (4) Food and hydration The RAG rating for the PLACE indicators is based upon the national averages Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) Q1 2013/14 Cleanliness 99.03% National avg 95.74% Food and Hydration 80.91% National avg 88.75% Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing 88.61% National avg 88.87% Condition, Appearance and Maintenance 89.22% National avg 84.98% Friends and Family Test (FFT) FFT Response Rate A&E 16.3% 17.9% 15% FFT Score A&E FFT Response Rate - Inpatient 31.6% 26.0% 15% FFT Score - Inpatient New metric New metric New metric New metric Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 24

26 Section 9: Provider Serious Incidents and Complaints Categories ICHT (contd.) Remedial Complaints and category improvement data is not actions in contract are specification detailed in section 14 Complaints indicators are one month behind Serious Incidents Categories Complaints Indicators Target Jul-13 YTD % of complaints acknowledged within 3 days of receipt % of complaints responded to within the agreed target Aug-13 C.Diff & Health Care Acquired Infections 1 Delayed diagnosis 1 Maternity Services - Maternal unplanned admission to ITU 1 Maternity Services - Unexpected admission to NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) Pressure ulcer Grade 3 3 Radiology/Scanning incident 1 Screening Issues 1 Unexpected Death (general) 1 Unexpected Death of Outpatient (not in receipt) 1 TOTAL % 100% 100% 100% 95% 95.5% 1 Complaints Categories Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 YTD Admission, transfer and discharge arrangements Delay or cancellation of an inpatient appointment Delay or cancellation of outpatient Attitude of staff All aspects of clinical care Communication to patients or relatives Patient s property or expenses Policy or commercial decisions of the Trust Hotel services 1 1 Transport Pt. Status / Discrimination Personal Records 1 1 Privacy & Dignity Aids & Appliances 1 1 TOTAL Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 25

27 Section 8: Acute provider quality performance exceptions and early warnings CW The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births over a 12 month period. The actual number of maternal deaths is specified in brackets after the Maternal Mortality Ratio. It is a pathway measure across a number of providers. YTD SI data does not take into account de-escalations. 8% (3) of reported SIs do not have date identified available and are not included in the average delay in days of serious incident reporting indicator we are currently chasing up the missing information Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) < 42 days (1) Not Applicable Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) > 42 days 0 (0) Not Applicable Standardised Hospital Mortality Indicator (SHMI) Jan 12 - Dec Serious Incidents Reported 8 36 Never Events Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting from date identified New metric Number of Serious Incident RCA Reports Overdue New metric Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (All) 4.73% 3.59% National avg 5.07% Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 11 26

28 Section 9: Acute provider quality performance exceptions and early warnings CW The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births over a 12 month period. The actual number of maternal deaths is specified in brackets after the Maternal Mortality Ratio. It is a pathway measure across a number of providers. Serious incidents Reported: YTD SI data does not take into account de-escalations. Average Delay (in days) of Serious incidents Reporting from date identified: 8% (3) of reported SIs do not have date identified available and are not included in the average delay in days of serious incident reporting indicator we are currently chasing up the missing information Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) < 42 days (1) Not Applicable Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) > 42 days 0 (0) Not Applicable Standardised Hospital Mortality Indicator (SHMI) Jan 12 - Dec Serious Incidents Reported 8 36 Never Events Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting from date identified New metric Number of Serious Incident RCA Reports Overdue New metric Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (All) 4.73% 3.59% National avg 5.07% Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 27

29 Section 9: Provider Serious Incidents and Complaints Categories CW (contd.) Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) are new and replace the Patient Environment Action Team (PEAT) programme. This new process and assessment is a collaboration between hospital staff and patient assessors, focusing on the four key areas: (1) Cleanliness including hand hygiene (2) Buildings and facilities condition, appearance and maintenance of the building, fixtures and fittings (3) Privacy and Dignity (4) Food and hydration Overdue NPSA alerts involve Safer spinal (intrathecal), epidural and regional devices (Part A and B) and Minimising risk of mismatching spinal, epidural and regional devices with incompatible connectors alerts overdue because no suitable replacements are available. Alerts are being monitored by the trust through the risk register and the Governance and Quality Committee as per advice from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI). Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Central Alerting System overdue NPSA alerts 3 3 Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) Q1 2013/14 Cleanliness 95.36% Food and Hydration 82.92% Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing 90.72% Condition, Appearance and Maintenance 88.27% Friends and Family Test (FFT) National avg 95.74% National avg 88.75% National avg 88.87% National avg 84.98% New metric New metric New metric New metric FFT Response Rate A&E 11.9% 11.8% 15% FFT Score A&E FFT Response Rate Inpatient 33.8% 36% 15% FFT Score Inpatient Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 28

30 Section 9: Provider Serious Incidents and Complaints Categories CW (contd.) Complaints categories data is not in contract specification. Complaints indicators are one month behind. Complaints Categories Admission, transfer and discharge arrangements Failure to follow agreed procedure 2 Jul-13 Aug Attitude of staff 8 3 All aspects of clinical care Communication to patients or relatives 5 Information/Communication 2 Delay/Cancellation 1 Other 1 5 TOTAL Complaints Indicators Target Jul-13 YTD % of complaints acknowledged within 3 days of receipt % of complaints responded to within the agreed target Serious Incidents Categories 100% 100% 100% 100% 85.7% 82.9% Aug-13 Allegation Against HC Professional 2 Communicable Disease and Infection Issue 2 Pressure ulcer Grade 3 3 Safeguarding Vulnerable Adult 1 TOTAL 8 Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 29

31 Section 9: Acute provider quality performance exceptions and early warnings RBH Serious Incidents Reported: YTD SI data does not take into account de-escalations. Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incident Reporting: 33% (3) of reported Serious Incidents did not have the date of identification available and are not included in the indicator Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Serious Incidents Reported 2 9 Never Events Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting from date identified New metric Number of Serious Incident RCA Reports Overdue New metric Pressure Ulcer (All) 1.92% 1.84% National avg 5.07% NRLS System Uploads in the past 6 months 6/6 Not Applicable Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 30

32 Section 9: Acute provider quality performance exceptions and early warnings RBH Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) are new and replaces the Patient Environment Action Team (PEAT) programme. This new process and assessment is a collaboration between hospital staff and patient assessors, focusing on the four key areas: (1) Cleanliness including hand hygiene (2) Buildings and facilities condition, appearance and maintenance of the building, fixtures and fittings (3) Privacy and Dignity (4) Food and hydration The RAG rating for the PLACE indicators is based upon the national averages. Overdue NPSA alerts involve Safer spinal (intrathecal), epidural and regional devices (Part A and B) and Minimising risk of mismatching spinal, epidural and regional devices with incompatible connectors alerts overdue because no suitable replacements are available. Alerts are being monitored by the trust through the risk register and the Governance and Quality Committee as per advice from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI). Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Central Alerting System overdue NPSA alerts 3 3 NRLS uploading 5/6 6/6 Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) Q1 2013/14 Cleanliness 95.82% Food and Hydration 83.54% Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing 83.87% Condition, Appearance and Maintenance 85.47% Friends and Family Test (FFT) National avg 95.74% National avg 88.75% National avg 88.87% National avg 84.98% New metric New metric New metric New metric FFT Response Rate A&E n/a n/a Not Applicable FFT Score A&E n/a n/a Not Applicable FFT Response Rate - Inpatient 20.4% 23.0% FFT Score - Inpatient Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 31

33 Section 9: Provider Serious Incidents and Complaints Categories RBH (contd.) Complaints categories data is not in contract specification; NWL CSU will be obtaining complaints categories data from NHS England. Complaints indicators are one month behind Serious Incidents Categories Aug-13 C.Diff & Health Care Acquired Infections 1 Pressure ulcer Grade 3 1 TOTAL 2 Complaints Categories Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Total Admission, transfer and discharge arrangements Delay or cancellation of an inpatient appointment Delay or cancellation of outpatient Attitude of staff Complaints Indicators Target Jul-13 YTD % of complaints acknowledged within 3 days of receipt % of complaints responded to within the agreed target 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% All aspects of clinical care Communication to patients or relatives Patient s property or expenses Hotel services Other TOTAL Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 32

34 Section 9: Community provider performance exceptions and early warnings Central London Community Healthcare (H&F) Serious Incidents Reported: YTD SI data does not take into account de-escalations. Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting from date identified: 20% (2) of reported Serious Incidents did not have the date of identification available and are not included in the indicator Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) are new and replaces the Patient Environment Action Team (PEAT) programme. This new process and assessment is a collaboration between hospital staff and patient assessors, focusing on the four key areas: (1) Cleanliness including hand hygiene (2) Buildings and facilities condition, appearance and maintenance of the building, fixtures and fittings (3) Privacy and Dignity (4) Food and hydration The RAG rating for the PLACE assessment is based upon the national averages Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Serious Incidents Reported 1 10 Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting from date identified New metric Number of Serious Incident RCA Reports Overdue New metric Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (All) 6.22% 5.87% Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) Q1 2013/14 Cleanliness 99.42% Food and Hydration 92.06% Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing 94.08% Condition, Appearance and Maintenance 87.39% National avg 5.07% National avg 95.74% National avg 88.75% National avg 88.87% National avg 84.98% New metric New metric New metric New metric Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 33

35 Section 9: Provider Serious Incidents and Complaints Categories Central London Community Healthcare (H&F) Complaints categories data is not in contract specification. The category of the complaints received in month was requested from the provider but was not received in time to be included in this report. Serious Incidents Categories Aug-13 Pressure ulcer Grade 3 1 TOTAL 1 Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 34

36 Section 8: Mental provider performance exceptions and early warnings WLMHT (H&F CCG Performance) 10 &11 Remedial and improvement actions are detailed in section 10 &11 Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend % of CPA follow up 7 days after discharge 89.2% (Q1) Not available 95% Not Available % of DNA for follow up 11.6% % of Patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge 13.2% Not available Not available 11.0% (by end Q4) 8.1% (by end Q4) Not Available Not Available % of complaints resolved within timescale 33.3% Not available 100% Not Available Please see Appendix 2 for further report definitions guidance 35

37 Section 9: Mental Health provider performance exceptions and early warnings - West London Mental Health Trust (H&F) Serious Incidents Reporting: YTD SI data does not take into account de-escalations. Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting: 14% (1) of reported Serious Incidents did not have the date of identification available and are not included in the indicator Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) are new and replace the Patient Environment Action Team (PEAT) programme. This new process and assessment is a collaboration between hospital staff and patient assessors, focusing on the four key areas: (1) Cleanliness including hand hygiene (2) Buildings and facilities condition, appearance and maintenance of the building, fixtures and fittings (3) Privacy and Dignity (4) Food and hydration. The RAG rating for the PLACE indicators is based upon the national averages. Red/amber indicators In month YTD Threshold Trend Serious Incidents Reported 1 7 Average Delay (in days) of Serious Incidents Reporting from date identified New metric Number of Serious Incident RCA Reports Overdue New metric Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (All) 2.63% 5.18% Patient-Led Assessments of the Care Environment (PLACE) Q1 2013/14 Cleanliness 90.41% Food and Hydration 85.82% Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing 87.81% Condition, Appearance and Maintenance 83.61% National avg 5.07% National avg 95.74% National avg 88.75% National avg 88.87% National avg 84.98% New metric New metric New metric New metric Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 36

38 Section 9: Provider Serious Incidents and Complaints Categories West London Mental Health Trust (H&F) Complaints categories data is not in contract specification. Complaints data relate to H&F only. Serious Incidents Categories Aug-13 Complaints Categories Jul-13 Attempted Suicide by Outpatient (in receipt) 1 TOTAL 1 All aspects of clinical care 1 Other 1 TOTAL 2 Please see Appendix 2 for further report definition guidance Actions detailed in section 12 37

39 Section 9: 111 Pilot Services Recovery plans are in place with both providers and will begin to address the longer waits in CWLH The CSU are monitoring providers work force plans to address the level of clinical call backs across NWL. 04-Aug 11-Aug 18-Aug 25-Aug Call Standards *BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng *BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng *BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng *BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng Percentage of calls answered in 60 seconds 97.7% 98.3% 96.2% 97.7% 98.4% 98.9% 95.4% 98.2% 98.8% 98.9% 97.1% 98.3% 97.7% 98.6% 95.7% 97.5% Percentage of calls abandoned after 30 seconds 1.6% 1.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.2% 0.1% 0.6% 0.5% 0.1% 0.2% 0.6% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% Percentage of calls triaged 92.6% 117.6% 100.0% 78.1% 81.6% 92.6% 100.0% 86.1% 80.7% 82.2% 100.0% 86.0% 74.4% 84.5% 100.0% 85.7% % of calls requiring clinical advice offered call back *** Percentage of clinical call backs within 10 minutes 14.5% 16.4% 9.3% 8.3% 7.1% 8.0% 9.2% 8.0% 5.4% 4.8% 8.4% 6.9% 2.2% 4.2% 6.2% 7.0% 57.6% 57.7% 73.0% 45.2% 66.3% 62.0% 69.4% 44.0% 72.6% 61.0% 68.3% 45.4% 69.0% 58.9% 65.5% 61.3% Dispositions BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng BEHH Hillingdon **CLWH Eng Led to ambulance dispatches 11.2% 14.3% 10.5% 8.4% 10.8% 13.4% 9.1% 9.3% 11.3% 10.2% 10.5% 9.3% 10.1% 11.9% 10.5% 8.6% Recommended to attend A&E 8.5% 9.9% 7.8% 9.2% 6.0% 7.6% 7.8% 6.9% 7.8% 6.6.% 8.5% 6.8% 7.2% 7.4% 8.4% 6.4% Recommended to attend primary and community care 56.8% 72.1% 74.5% 45.4% 49.1% 56.5% 72.8% 53.9% 47.7% 52.6% 59.3% 53.5% 45.9% 50.6% 63.4% 54.8% Recommended to attend other service 2.3% 3.0% 4.3% 3.6% 2.2% 1.4% 6.3% 4.0% 2.5% 1.6% 6.8% 3.9% 1.5% 1.9% 4.8% 4.1% Did not recommend to attend other service 13.6% 18.1% 2.9% 11.4% 13.5% 13.8% 3.9% 12.4% 11.4% 11.1% 15.0% 12.4% 9.8% 12.6% 12.9% 11.8% *BEHH = Brent, Ealing, Harrow, Hounslow ** CLWH = Central London, West London, Hammersmith & Fulham *** It is expected that call backs are an Exception Source: Unify 2, a query has been raised about the calculations used for the disposition data with NHSE 38

40 Section 9: 111 Governance Name of service NHS 111 Live Site Report to Pan London Clinical Leads Group 111 INWL 111 Service Report for the month of August 2013 Audit Update No. of local/internal CG audits carried out Audit Update No. of End to End Call Reviews (include review of full NHS Pathway) Nil 2 nd August 4 call reviews undertaken Governance Activity Attendance at Pan London 111 CGG. Call review meeting with LAS in relation to Serious Incident SI RCA panel meeting and investigation process, LAS call reviews undertaken in relation to case, independent call reviews organised of LAS calls. Safeguarding audit in progress Total number of calls this month 6558 Serious Incidents SIs opened this month 0 SIs this calendar year 1 Of the total for this calendar year Closed and actual 0 Closed and NOT SI 0 Still open 1 39

41 Section 10: Action Log: provider performance Key lines of enquiry Issue Provider Root Cause Action Closed Risk None Actions for CSU Not meeting specialty or 52 week standards RBH did not meet M3 C.Diff tolerance RBHT Poor waiting list management Critical review of action plan and reasons for the 52 week wait RBH Poor infection control processes Review tolerance for 13/14 with DH No (Due to be Lack of assurance on mitigating actions in place NHSE contacted reviewed at and requested to review as lead Oct. CQG) commissioner. Not applicable No Not meeting 31day to treatment, and 62 days to treatment cancer standards. Not meeting 18 week RTT specialty standards ICHT RBH Currently under review -A detailed review of the root cause analysis of M4 breaches to identify additional actions required. -Update of ICHT cancer action plan at CQG ICHT Poor waiting list management -Review updated action plan and trajectories Yes LAS handover breaches ICHT & CW A&E processes -Daily monitoring of A&E pressures and provider actions in place -Submission of winter assurance and demand and capacity plans to NHS England Yes Last minute cancelled operations ICHT Poor escalation processes Monitor progress against action plan Yes Yes ICHT did not meet YTD C.Diff tolerance and MRSA tolerance ICHT Poor infection control processes Update to action plan to be reviewed at CQG. No Lack of assurance on mitigating actions in place to reduce Choose and Book Compliance ICHT Outpatient capacity and administrative processes Review of ICHT action plan (due for submission at the end of September) No Not applicable 40

42 Section 10: Action log: provider performance (contd.) Key lines of enquiry Actions for CSU Issue Provider Root Cause Action Owner Closed Risk CPA 7 day follow up WLMHT National CPA Target is reported quarterly. The Trust were not meeting the target for Q1, however local Trust reporting indicates that the M5 target has been met WLMHT Yes Not applicable Percentage of DNA for follow up Percentage Readmissions within 30 days Percentage of complaints resolved within timescale WLMHT WLMHT High number of patients on holiday during August Patients that were discharged had relapse and returned to inpatient unit within 30 days. E-referral has been rolled out to some GP practices across the WLMHT boroughs which has helped to reduce the DNA rate. E-referral s currently being rolled out to all GP practices. For patients with a readmission within 30 days, a review by the whole clinical team will take place to ascertain reasons and lessons WLMHT learnt WLMHT Staffing Recruitment drive completed and month on month improvement although below target. CSU to monitor. WLMHT No No No Patients may continue to DNA appointments due to reasons out of the control of the service Patients may continue to be discharged appropriately but there is a risk that the reasons for relapse and consequent readmission may be out of control of the service Not applicable 41

43 Section 10: Action log: provider performance (contd.) Key lines of enquiry Issue CCG Root Cause Action Closed Risk Actions for CCG CSU does not have access to HCAI database at a CCG level CCG Unknown CCG need to approve CSU access to HCAI database Not meeting specialty or 52 week ICHT Poor waiting list management - CCG to approve plan. Yes standards No CSU unable to review individual infections leading to lack of detail within reports. Referrals responded to during the CLCH day, twilight or night service periods within 4 hours Referrals responded to during the day, twilight or night service periods within 24 hours Finalised KPI definitions were circulated at Care Quality Group on The provider is still putting procedures in place to collect the data appropriately. Provider to commence data collection by M6 reporting. CSU to ensure this issue is addressed at Data Quality and Reporting Improvement Group with CLCH to be will be held on No Risk that data collection may not commence in time of M6 reporting LAC Initial Health Assessments CLCH The new changes introduced in the spring of 2013 have meant that a cohort of children under 18 are now classed as Looked after Children (LAC). The acute paediatrician has arranged a visit to Feltham Young Offenders Prison to undertake the assessments there. 12 outstanding referrals have caused the dip in performance. The Associate Director for Safeguarding in CWHH will clarify the reporting position with regards to referrals from Feltham Young Offender Prison at CQG on 30 th October The 12 outstanding cases are being reviewed by the Designated Nurse for LAC and the an update will be provided by the Associate Director for Safeguarding in CWHH at CQG on 30 th October 2013 No Impact on performance may be affected by inclusion of new cohort of children 42

44 Section 10: Action log: provider quality Key lines of enquiry Actions for CSU Issue Provider Root Cause Action Owner Closed Risk The trust has now submitted data on complaints. 99% are responded to within the agreed time frame. ICHT Trust not responding within agreed time frames Discussed at CQG. CSU to monitor performance. ICHT Yes 43

45 Section 11: Recommendations and next steps Key lines of enquiry Actions for CSU Issue Provider Root Cause Action Accountable Officer Not meeting 31day to treatment, and 62 days to treatment cancer standards. Not meeting 18 week RTT specialty standards Not meeting 18 week RTT specialty standards ICHT RBH ICHT CW Poor administrative processes and capacity issues at ICHT RBH reported complex pathway Poor waiting list management Poor waiting list management A detailed review of the root cause analysis of M5 breaches to identify additional actions required. Review of progress against cancer action plan and agree trajectory with ICHT. Contract penalty to be applied Review updated action plan, reasons for 52 week breaches and trajectories Contract penalty to be applied CSU performance team CSU Contract team CSU performance team Date October 2013 October 2013 October 2013 CSU Contract team Monitor plan CSU performance team October 2013 LAS handover breaches ICHT & CW A&E processes Daily monitoring of A&E CSU performance team October 2013 pressures and provider actions in place Last minute cancelled operations ICHT Poor escalation processes Monitor progress against action plan CSU performance team October MRSA bacteraemia CW Unknown Review post infection review Contract penalty to be applied 1 MRSA bacteraemia ICHT Complex case Review post infection review Contract penalty to be applied CSU quality team CSU Contract team CSU quality team CSU Contract team October 2013 Completed 44

46 Section 11: Recommendations and next steps Key lines of enquiry Actions for CSU Issue Provider Root Cause Action Accountable Officer Delay in reporting SI's Chelsea and Westminister, ICHT, RBH, WLMHT Trust not reporting onto StEIS within the NPSA timeline. Delay in reporting SI's ChelWest Trust not reporting onto StEIS within the NPSA timeline. Delay in reporting SI's ICHT Trust not reporting onto StEIS within the NPSA timeline. Delay in reporting SI's RBH Trust not reporting onto StEIS within the NPSA timeline. Delay in reporting SI's WLMHT Trust not reporting onto StEIS within the NPSA timeline. SI reports overdue Chelsea and Trust not completing reports Westminister, ICHT, within the NPSA timeline. WLMHT, CLCH SI reporting RBH Trust delay in completing all SI actions NWL CSU have written to trusts to highlight these delays. Delay in reporting has been reducing, when looking across all trusts, from 22 days in M1 to 12 days in M5. Suggest monthly monitoring at individual trusts level until NPSA target achieved. NWL CSU have previously written to trusts to highlight these delays. Chelwest has seen a reduction in delays, from 16 days average delay in M1 to 6 days average delay in M5, however, it is still significantly above the NPSA guidance of 2 days NWL CSU have previously written to trusts to highlight these delays. ICHT has seen a slight decrease in delays, from 6 days average delay in M1 to 3 days average delay in M5, which is slightly above the NPSA guidance of 2 days. NWL CSU have previously written to trusts to highlight these delays. RBH has seen a slight decrease in delays, from 8 days average delay in M1 to 3 days average delay in M5, which is slightly above the NPSA guidance of 2 days. THH has seen a slight decreased in delays, from 11 days average delay in M1 to 7 days average delay in M5, which is significantly above the NPSA guidance of 2 days. Please note that the data is not borough specific NWL CSU have written to each trust to highlight all cases still open and request resolution. There has been an improvement when looking across all trusts. In M3 30% of reports were received on time, whereas in M5 57% of reports were received on time There has been a decrease in numbers of SI reports overdue. The main issue is one RCA; the CSU is following this up before hand over to NHS England. Chelsea and Westminister, ICHT, RBH, WLMHT ChelWest ICHT RBH WLMHT Chelsea and Westminister, ICHT, WLMHT NWL CSU Date Closed On-going On-going On-going October October October 45

47 Section 11: Recommendations and next steps Key lines of enquiry Actions for CSU Issue Provider Root Cause Action Accountable Officer FFT Inpatient score ChelWest A decrease in M5 compared with M4 FFT A&E Response Rate ChelWest A decrease in M5 compared with M4 Slight drop in Inpatient score in M5 compared to M4, which was a decrease compared to M3. However the response rate has increased whilst the score has decreased. Drop in A&E response rate in M5 compared to M4, which was a decrease compared to M3. n/a n/a Date Not applicable Not applicable FFT Inpatient score ICHT A decrease in M5 compared with M4 % of complaints responded to within time frame % of complaints responded to within the agreed target New-born blood spot screening tests ICHT ChelWest Trust not responding within time scale Trust not responding within time scale Slight drop in Inpatient score in M5 compared to M4, which was a decrease compared to M3. However the response rate has increased whilst the score has decreased. Nil. Has been discussed at CQG and Improving trajectory Nil. Has been discussed at CQG and Improving trajectory n/a Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable ICHT Difficulty with Data collection New metric that requires liaison with community teams to capture ICHT October accurate data. To raise at next CQG To discuss at CQG ICHT October Home births ICHT Low numbers of home births being reported by the trust Never Event / Surgical Error Chelsea and Westminster TBD - RCA due 8th October 2013 Review of RCA once received and monitoring of action plans NRLS uploading RBH Upload missed in M3 Discuss at CQG and monthly monitoring Chelsea and Westminster NWL CSU November October 46

48 Section 11: Recommendations and next steps Key lines of enquiry Actions for CSU Issue Provider Root Cause Action Accountable Officer Percentage of DNA for follow up Percentage Readmissions within 30 days WLMHT WLMHT High number of patients on holiday during August Patients that were discharged had relapse and returned to inpatient unit within 30 days. Persistent offenders (patients that have DNA d more than once) will be identified, contacted and reviewed SMS text reminders have been trialled across the borough, whereby patients are called 7 days before their appointment. This is planned to be rolled out to the whole service as standard practice. Discharged patients to receive regular weekly contact for four weeks after discharge. CSU Contracting & Performance Teams to continue to monitor progress against action plan WLMHT WLMHT WLMHT NWL CSU Contracting & Performance Team Date October 2013 October 2013 November 2013 October

49 Appendix 1:Quality Premium Calculation Guidance 48

50 Helping people to recover from ill health or following injury Treating for people in a safe environment and protecting them Preventing people from dying prematurely Enhancing the quality of life of people with long term conditions Ensuring that people have a positive experience of care Appendix 2: Report Guidance & Definitions Slide 5 A&E 4hr waits. Please note that the formal measure for this indicator is reported at provider level only. Performance at CCG level is not yet available. Slide 7 HCAI data is reported at CCG level, provider Trust data is provided at Trust-wide level (i.e not at CCG level) Slides 5-8, 18-34, Where provider Trust data is provided this figure is at Trust level (i.e not at CCG level) Slides 5-7, 27,30 Variance arrows indicate change from previous period Slide 13 (Quality Premium). N/A = not applicable, TBD = to be determined Slide 13 (Quality Premium). CCG performance data for A&E 4hrs waits is calculated using provider HES data mapped by the DH to commissioner level Slides 9-10 CCG Outcomes Framework. Where the current RAG status is greyed out this indicates data for the previous period is not yet available Slide 9-10 CCG Outcomes Framework. Indicators have been excluded from the dashboard where data is currently not yet available (data sources are shown in the table below) Slide 22 maternity mortality indicator definition is taken from the Organisation Health Intelligence Reports produced by NHS London in 12/13, as below: NHS London has developed the following RAG rating: GREEN is below the London maternal death rate (deaths/100,000 deliveries) and no two deaths occurring within 31 days of each other. AMBER is equal to or more than London Maternal Death Rate but less than twice the London Maternal Death Rate. RED is if there have been two death within 31 days of each other and/or greater than twice the London Maternal Death Rate. (Trusts that have <4000 deliveries/year will show as red even though they may have only one maternal death in the reporting period due to the way that the maternal death rate is calculated). Domain In 13/14 the same Description definition is used however Data Source this also Domain broken down by Description the number of deaths Data with Source 42 days of Domain birth and those Description after. Data Source Potential years of life lost (PYLL) from causes Health and Social Care considered amendable to healthcare - MALE Information Centre Portal Potential years of life lost (PYLL) from causes Health and Social Care considered amendable to healthcare - FEMALE Information Centre Portal Under 75 mortality rate from cardiovascular disease Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Under 75 mortality from respiratory disease Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal People suffering from a long term condition feeling supported GP Patient Survey Patient experience of GP out of hours services GP Patient Survey Unplanned hospitalisation for chronic ambulatory Health and Social Care Patient experience of hospital care (CCG CQC Inpatient Survey care sensitive (ACS) conditions (adults) Information Centre Portal weighted average) Unplanned hospitalisation for asthma, diabetes and Health and Social Care Patient experience of outpatient services CQC Outpatient Survey epilepsy (under 19s) Information Centre Portal Estimated diagnosis rate for people with dementia QOF & Health and Social Improvement in hospitals responsiveness to CQC Inpatient Survey Care Information Centre personal needs Portal Emergency admissions for acute conditions that should not usually require hospital admission Emergency admissions for alcohol-related liver disease Emergency readmissions within 30 days of discharge from hospital Under 75 mortality rate from cancer Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective procedures - hip replacement Antenatal assessments <13 weeks Unify2 (IPMR return) Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective procedures - knee replacement Maternal smoking at delivery OMNIBUS Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective procedures - groin hernia Breast feeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks Unify2 (IPMR return) Increased health gain as assessed by patients for elective procedures - varicose veins. Emergency admissions for children with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Health and Social Care Information Centre Portal Patient experience of accident and emergency (A&E) services. Patient safety incidents reported Incidence of healthcare associated infection (HCAI): MRSA Incidence of healthcare associated infection (HCAI): Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) CQC A&E Survey National Reporting and Learning System NRLS Health Protection Agency - HCAI Data Capture System Health Protection Agency - HCAI Data Capture System 49

51 Q1 Balanced score-care report 28/10/2013

52 Summary of the balanced score-cared for CWHH in Q1 Central West H&F Hounslow Domain 1 AMBER-GREEN AMBER-GREEN AMBER-GREEN AMBER-GREEN - A number of indicators re quality - A number of indicators re quality - A number of indicators re quality - A number of indicators re quality Domain 2 AMBER-RED AMBER-RED RED RED - Maximum two month (62 day) wait from urgent GP referral to first definitive treatment for cancer - Maximum two month (62 day) wait from urgent GP referral to first definitive treatment for cancer - Maximum two month (62 day) wait from urgent GP referral to first definitive treatment for cancer - Mental illness specialities on CPA followed up within 7 days of discharge - Maximum two month (62 day) wait from urgent GP referral to first definitive treatment for cancer - Maximum 62 day wait from referral from an NHS screening service to first definitive treatment for all cancers Domain 3 AMBER-RED AMBER-RED RED AMBER-RED - Incidence of healthcare associated infection (MRSA) - Are providers meeting the 15% response rates on FFT - Incidence of healthcare associated infection (MRSA) - Are providers meeting the 15% response rates on FFT - Incidence of healthcare associated infection (MRSA) - Incidence of healthcare associated infection (cdiff) - Are providers meeting the 15% response rates on FFT - Incidence of healthcare associated infection (MRSA) - Are providers meeting the 15% response rates on FFT Domain 4 AMBER-RED AMBER-RED GREEN AMBER-GREEN Domain 5 - Surplus YTD - Surplus YTD Fully authorised Fully authorised Fully authorised Fully authorised

53 Domain 1: Are local people getting good quality care? This domain includes: 8 performance indicators for our main providers (WLMHT, Imperial, Chel West, CLCH) 1. Has local provider been subject to local enforcement action by the CQC? 2. Has local provider been flagged as a 'quality compliance risk' by Monitor and/or are requirements in place around breaches of provider licence conditions? 3. Has local provider been subject to enforcement action by the NHS TDA based on 'quality' risk? 4. Does feedback from the Friends and Family test (or any other patient feedback) indicate any causes for concern? 5. Has the provider been identified as a 'negative outlier' on SMHI or HSMR? 6. Do provider level indicators from the National Quality Dashboard show that MRSA cases are above zero? 7. Do provider level indicators from the National Quality Dashboard show that the provider has reported more C difficile cases than trajectory? 8. Do provider level indicators from the National Quality Dashboard show that MSA breaches are above zero? 6 clinical governance indicators: Are there Concerns about quality issues being discussed regularly by the CCG governing body? Concerns about the arrangements in place to proactively identify early warnings of a failing service? Concerns around the arrangements in place to deal with and learn from serious untoward incidents and never events? Concerns around being an active participant in its Quality Surveillance Group? If there was an emergency event in the last quarter, has the CCG self assessed and identified any areas of concern on the arrangements in place for dealing with such an event? Has the CCG self assessed and identified any risk to progress against its Winterbourne View action plan? Domain 1 Status AMBER-GREEN

54 Domain 2: Are patients rights under the NHS constitution being promoted? This domain includes: Referral to treatment times for non-urgent treatments Diagnostic test waiting times A&E waits Cancer patients 2 week waits Cancer waits 31 days Cancer waits 62 days Category A ambulance calls Mixed sex accommodation breaches Mental Health Care Programme Approach Domain Status RED This is the result of the issues below: Indicator Maximum on month (31day) wait from diagnosis to first definitive treatment for all cancers Maximum two month (62 day) wait from urgent GP referral to first definitive treatment for cancer Operationa l Standard 96% 85% Perfor mance % % Action plan Q1 performance against the 62 day and 31 days waits is driven by capacity constraints in Urology and Lower GI as specialities. The Trust has undertaken a redesign of both pathways with the following actions: Across LGI the Trust has implemented direct access for the 1 st OPD clinic into the endoscopy service. This has reduced the DNA rate from 42% to 2% Across Urology an additional Nurse Practitioner is in post and Consultant cover is being increased by 1wte from October 2013 The Trust has moved from Consultant led follow up clinic to Nurse led clinics where clinically appropriate to maximise OPD capacity. A one stop Urology diagnostic clinic will be in place from October 2013 to facilitate timely assessment and treatment and improve patient experience The Trust expects to start recovering the position from October when all these actions have been fully implemented Care Programme Approach (CPA): The proportion of people under mental illness specialties on Care Programme Approach (CPA) who are followed up within 7 days of discharge from psychiatric in patient care 95% % There 6 breaches in May A local investigation is being carried out to understand this issue. In addition: Internal processes will be improved by the compilation of a 'Daily Notification' form by Ward Admin highlighting all discharges from the wards. This form will then be sent to the CMHTs on a daily basis. The updating of patient's contact details will be prioritised prior to them being discharged from the ward. This will give the community teams a better chance of completing the 7 day follow up. H&F Inpatient managers will work with their community colleagues to implement the Hounslow system whereby the CMHTs have a NHS.net 'Duty' address that is checked regularly though out the day by the Duty Clinician. The 'Duty' NHS.net address will be a safe and consistent place for Ward staff to send all discharge notifications. Manual validations are to be phased out

55 Domain 3: Are health outcomes improving for local people This domain includes: Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm Friends and family response rate IAPT Delivery of operating plan local priorities (Year 2 first dose MMR, X-PERT Programme for diabetes, Physical health checks for people with severe and enduring mental illness) Domain Status RED This is the result of the issues below: Indicator Incidence of healthcare associated infections: MRSA Incidence of healthcare associated infections: C difficile Baseline position Performance Friends & Family rates 0 Analysis Action plan: ICHT continue to provide post infection review of C.Diff cases to CQG with analysis of patients fed through into CQG ICHT have developed a new management reporting algorithm and control mechanisms are in place which are being integrated with an external mandated review process. C-Diff forensic examination of the C-Diff patients has taken place. The patients who acquired C-Diff were largely on antibiotics. Antibiotic exposure was therefore being examined. Have introduced the isolation of patients with infectious diarrhoea within 2 hours,. Continue to work closely with bed management teams and regularly reviewing plans. ICH is working with other teaching hospitals and working on best practice MRSA all cases were complex and centred around tertiary in-patients with long LoS. After investigating, the source of the risk was deemed to be around devices, therefore extra care was being taken around devices and a letter had been sent to all doctors and ward managers identifying the extra review processes to be put in place. 11 cases reported by ICHT and 4 cases occurred in a non acute setting Both ICHT and CW have provided post infection reviews and action plans which are monitored via CQG All providers are above 15% in the combined score using NHSE guidance, so RAG rating should be green

56 Domain 4: Are CCGs delivering services within their financial plans? This domain includes: Underlying recurrent surplus Activity trends year to date Activity trends full year forecast Financial management Domain 4 Status AMBER-GREEN

57 Appendix RAG criteria

Operational Focus: Performance

Operational Focus: Performance Operational Focus: Performance Sandra Iskander Changes for 2015/16 Change of focus of 18-weeks and A&E 4-hour wait targets as recommended by Sir Bruce Keogh, Medical Director, NHS England. 18-weeks to

More information

SUPPORTING PLANNING 2013/14 FOR CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUPs

SUPPORTING PLANNING 2013/14 FOR CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUPs SUPPORTING PLANNING 2013/14 FOR CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUPs December 2012 SUPPORTING PLANNING 2013/14 FOR CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUPS First published: 21 December 2012 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

NHS England London Southside 4th Floor 105 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QT. 24 th July Dear Daniel, Fiona and Louise. Re: CCG Annual Assurance

NHS England London Southside 4th Floor 105 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QT. 24 th July Dear Daniel, Fiona and Louise. Re: CCG Annual Assurance NHS England London Southside 4th Floor 105 Victoria Street London SW1E 6QT 24 th July 2014 Dear Daniel, Fiona and Louise Re: CCG Annual Assurance Many thanks for meeting with us on 6 th June 2014 to discuss

More information

BSUH INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT. 1) Responsive Domain 2) Safe Domain 3) Effective Domain 4) Caring Domain 5) Well Led Domain

BSUH INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT. 1) Responsive Domain 2) Safe Domain 3) Effective Domain 4) Caring Domain 5) Well Led Domain BSUH INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT 1) Responsive Domain 2) Safe Domain 3) Effective Domain 4) Caring Domain 5) Well ed Domain RESPONSIVE DOMAIN RESPONSIVE DOMAIN Metric Defined by Standard Apr-16 May-16

More information

WEST HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Based on performance data available as at 11 th January 2018

WEST HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE REPORT. Based on performance data available as at 11 th January 2018 WEST HAMPSHIRE PERFORMANCE REPORT Based on performance data available as at 11 th January 2018 1 CCG Quality and Performance Executive Summary Introduction: The purpose of this report is to provide an

More information

Report to the Merton Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body

Report to the Merton Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body MCCG GB 19.09.1 Pt1 Att 09 Report to the Merton Clinical oning Group Governing Body Date of Meeting: 16 th September 01 Agenda No: 8.1 Attachment: 09 Title of Document: Performance Framework and Balanced

More information

Sheet. Discussion. For: Decision. Noting. title: Author: Lead Director. Quality t Office. Director: and - 1 -

Sheet. Discussion. For: Decision. Noting. title: Author: Lead Director. Quality t Office. Director: and - 1 - Governing Body Paper Summary Sheet Date of Meeting: 23 April 2013 For: Decision Discussion Noting Agenda item and title: Author: GOV/13/04b/08 Operational Targets 2013/14 John Dudgeon Head of Information

More information

Quality & Performance Report. Public Board

Quality & Performance Report. Public Board Agenda Item 12.1 Quality & Performance Report Public Board 27 th November 2014 Presented for: Presented by: Author: Previous Committees: Governance Professor Suzanne Hinchliffe CBE Chief Nurse / Interim

More information

NHS Ashford Clinical Commissioning Group. Integrated Performance Report. November 2013

NHS Ashford Clinical Commissioning Group. Integrated Performance Report. November 2013 NHS Ashford Clinical Commissioning Group Integrated Performance Report November 2013 Page 1 Contents Executive Summary... 6 Assurance Framework Overview... 10 Are local people getting good quality care?...

More information

Section 1 - Key Performance Indicators

Section 1 - Key Performance Indicators Clinical Quality Report Month 6 2016/17 period ending 30th September 2016 Section 1 - Key Performance Indicators 1.1 NHS Improvement; Risk Assessment Framework Clostridium difficile Indicator M6 2 YTD

More information

NHS performance statistics

NHS performance statistics NHS performance statistics Published: 8 th February 218 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official

More information

SUMMARY OF INDICATOR CHANGES FOR VERSION 3 INTELLIGENT MONITORING REPORTS Acute and Specialist NHS Trusts 23 June Final Draft, Subject to Change

SUMMARY OF INDICATOR CHANGES FOR VERSION 3 INTELLIGENT MONITORING REPORTS Acute and Specialist NHS Trusts 23 June Final Draft, Subject to Change Never Event incidence Yes: 01 May 2013-30 Apr 2014 Incidence of Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) Incidence of Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Dr Foster Intelligence: Mortality rates

More information

NHS Fylde and Wyre CCG Performance Dashboard

NHS Fylde and Wyre CCG Performance Dashboard Governing Body January 2016 NHS Fylde and Wyre CCG Performance Dashboard October 2015 (Month 7) Governing Body This report provides a high level summary of performance and activity and across Fylde and

More information

Outcomes benchmarking support packs: CCG level

Outcomes benchmarking support packs: CCG level Outcomes benchmarking support packs: CCG level NHS South Devon and Torbay CCG Produced with input from: Public Health England Forward and Introduction Local decision making is at the heart of the NHS,

More information

NHS performance statistics

NHS performance statistics NHS performance statistics Published: 14 th December 217 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official

More information

Quality and Leadership: Improving outcomes

Quality and Leadership: Improving outcomes Quality and Leadership: Improving outcomes Podiatry Managers/Allied Health Managers and Leaders 5 March 2014 Shelagh Morris OBE Acting Chief Allied Health Professions Officer 2 http://www.nhsemployers.org/aboutus/latest-news/pages/the-new-nhs-in-2013-infographic.aspx

More information

NHS Performance Statistics

NHS Performance Statistics NHS Performance Statistics Published: 8 th March 218 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official

More information

Integrated Quality and Performance Report

Integrated Quality and Performance Report Item 6 Integrated Quality and Performance Report Herts Valleys CCG Board 1 st August 2013 Period of {MONTH HERE} 1 Introduction to the Integrated Performance Report 1. Purpose of this Report 1.1 This report

More information

National Clinical Audit programme

National Clinical Audit programme National Clinical Audit programme Danny Keenan Medical Director www.hqip.org.uk Who are HQIP? HQIP is a not-for profit, professional/patient partnership, aiming to change and improve health and social

More information

Newham Borough Summary report

Newham Borough Summary report Newham Borough Summary report Item K1 September 2013 Prepared on 30/09/2013 by Support team GREEN Finance and Activity Millions AMBER RED Headlines M5 Financial position M4 activity data The QIPP net savings

More information

Item E1 - Bart s Health Quality Indicators

Item E1 - Bart s Health Quality Indicators Item E1 - Bart s Health Quality Indicators 1.0 Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide the CCG Board with an update on quality matters across pertaining to our main local Provider organisations.

More information

Governing Body. TITLE OF REPORT: Performance Report for period ending 31st December 2012

Governing Body. TITLE OF REPORT: Performance Report for period ending 31st December 2012 - Governing Body DATE OF MEETING: TITLE OF REPORT: Performance Report for period ending 31st December 2012 KEY MESSAGES: We are responsible for securing improvements in the quality of care and health outcomes.

More information

Newham Borough Summary report

Newham Borough Summary report Newham Borough Summary report April 2013 Prepared on 17/04/13 by Commissioning Support team Apr-11 Jun-11 Aug-11 Oct-11 Dec-11 Feb-12 Apr-12 Jun-12 Aug-12 Oct-12 Dec-12 Feb-13 GREE N Finance and Activity

More information

NHS BOLTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Public Board Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO: 10. Date of Meeting:.24 th March 2017.

NHS BOLTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Public Board Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO: 10. Date of Meeting:.24 th March 2017. NHS BOLTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Public Board Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO: 10 Date of Meeting:.24 th March 2017. TITLE OF REPORT: CCG Corporate Performance Report AUTHOR: Melissa Laskey Director of Service

More information

Integrated Performance Report

Integrated Performance Report ENC Bi Integrated Performance Report M1 2014/15 26 June 2014 Contents 1. Structure of the Document... 3 2. Southwark CCG and Providers Performance Summary Dashboard... 4 3. Southwark CCG Dashboard... 5

More information

Integrated Performance Report

Integrated Performance Report Integrated Performance Report M06 September 2014 Presented by: Paul Bostock (Chief Operating Officer) Des Holden (Medical Director) Fiona Allsop (Chief Nurse) Paul Simpson (Chief Financial Officer) An

More information

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust Meeting Date: 3 th June 214 Trust Board Report Title: Executive Summary: Action Requested: Report of: Author: Contact Details: Resource Implications: Public or Private:

More information

Performance and Delivery/ Chief Nurse

Performance and Delivery/ Chief Nurse Governing Body 26th May 2017 Quality and Performance Report 22nd May 2017 Author: Other contributors: Executive Lead Audience Eileen Clark - Acting Director of Clinical Performance and Delivery/ Chief

More information

Integrated Performance & Quality Report

Integrated Performance & Quality Report Integrated Performance & Quality Report March 2015 (Month 12) FINAL Introduction The Central London Integrated Performance & Quality Report is aimed at providing a monthly update on the performance of

More information

Integrated Performance Report

Integrated Performance Report Integrated Performance Report January 2015 1 Patient focused, Providing quality, improving outcomes Contents: Page: Executive Summary 3 Assurance Framework Scorecard 4 NHS Outcomes Domains are health outcomes

More information

Newham Borough Summary report

Newham Borough Summary report Newham Borough Summary report March 2013 Prepared on 18/03/13 by Commissioning Support team Finance and Activity Millions Apr-11 Jun-11 Aug-11 Oct-11 Dec-11 Newham Headlines March 2013 Feb-12 Apr-12 Jun-12

More information

COVENTRY AND RUGBY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP

COVENTRY AND RUGBY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COVENTRY AND RUGBY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Report To: Governing Body 11 September 2013 Report From: Title of Report: Purpose of the Report: Jacqueline Barnes, Executive Nurse The Nursing and Quality

More information

RTT Recovery Planning and Trajectory Development: A Cambridge Tale

RTT Recovery Planning and Trajectory Development: A Cambridge Tale RTT Recovery Planning and Trajectory Development: A Cambridge Tale Linda Clarke Head of Operational Performance Addenbrooke s Hospital I Rosie Hospital Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep

More information

Integrated Performance Report

Integrated Performance Report Integrated Performance Report M12 March 2015 Presented by: Paul Bostock (Chief Operating Officer) Des Holden (Medical Director) Fiona Alsop (Chief Nurse) Paul Simpson (Chief Financial Officer) An Associated

More information

Performance, Quality and Outcomes Report: Position Statement

Performance, Quality and Outcomes Report: Position Statement Performance, Quality and Outcomes Report: Position Statement Update to Governing Body 5 April 2018 Item 1 Author(s) Sponsor Directors Purpose of Paper Jane Howcroft Programme and Performance Assurance

More information

Executive Summary: This report focuses on month 10 data of the 2017/18 financial year, January 2018, unless otherwise indicated.

Executive Summary: This report focuses on month 10 data of the 2017/18 financial year, January 2018, unless otherwise indicated. Agenda item: 3.1 Paper No: 8 Committee: Venue: Governing Body The Boardroom, Dominion House : 27/03/2018 Status: FOR REVIEW AND DISCUSSION Title of Report Performance Report: Month 10, January 2018 Presented

More information

Performance and Quality Report Sean Morgan Director of Performance and Delivery Mary Hopper Director of Quality Dino Pardhanani, Clinical Director

Performance and Quality Report Sean Morgan Director of Performance and Delivery Mary Hopper Director of Quality Dino Pardhanani, Clinical Director Sutton CCG Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Date Thursday, 06 September 2018 Document Title Lead Director (Name and Role) Clinical Sponsor (Name and Role) Performance and Quality Report Sean

More information

Quality Framework Healthier, Happier, Longer

Quality Framework Healthier, Happier, Longer Quality Framework 2015-2016 Healthier, Happier, Longer Telford & Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) makes quality everyone s business. Our working processes are designed to ensure we all have the

More information

INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 20 September 2017

INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 20 September 2017 INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 20 September 2017 1 S Section Page Executive Summary 4 Trust Performance Overview 7 Trust Performance Report by Exception 9 MSSA Bacteraemia - Actual numbers

More information

Whittington Health Quality Strategy

Whittington Health Quality Strategy Whittington Health Quality Strategy 2012-2017 Safe care Effective care Excellent patient experience...caring for you Quality Strategy for Whittington Health Introduction The purpose of this quality strategy

More information

Strategic KPI Report Performance to December 2017

Strategic KPI Report Performance to December 2017 Strategic KPI Report Performance to December 2017 Trust Board 25 th January 2018 Strategic KPI summary SROs: All Directors Objective KPI SRO Target Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Success Is Deliver A

More information

Board of Director s Meeting

Board of Director s Meeting Board of Director s Meeting Meeting Date: 15 November 212 Agenda item: 6.1 Title: Purpose: Summary: Recommendation: Author: Presented by: QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY ASSURANCE COMMITTEE To provide an exception

More information

Integrated Performance Report

Integrated Performance Report ENC Bi Integrated Performance Report M6 2013/14 28 November 2013 Contents 1. Structure of the Document... 3 2. Southwark CCG and Providers Performance Summary Dashboard... 4 3. Southwark CCG Dashboard...

More information

Haringey CCG MDT Integrated Contract Monitoring Report July 2015

Haringey CCG MDT Integrated Contract Monitoring Report July 2015 Haringey CCG MDT Integrated Contract Monitoring Report July 2015 Executive Summary 2 Executive Summary Contents Title page Executive Summary: Finance 4 Executive Summary: Performance 9 Executive Summary:

More information

SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE TRUST BOARD HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2015

SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE TRUST BOARD HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2015 SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE TRUST BOARD HELD ON 18 NOVEMBER 2015 Subject: Supporting TEG Member: Authors: Status 1 Data Quality Baseline Assessment

More information

Quarter /13 Quality Account (Quality and Safety)

Quarter /13 Quality Account (Quality and Safety) Airedale NHS Foundation Trust Board of Directors:23 rd January 213 Title: Quarter 2 212/13 Quality Account (Quality and Safety) Author: Alison Fuller, Assistant Director Healthcare Quarter 2 212/13 Quality

More information

Quality & Performance Report Author: John Adler Sponsor: Chief Executive Date: FIC, PPP + QAC 28 th September Executive Summary from CEO

Quality & Performance Report Author: John Adler Sponsor: Chief Executive Date: FIC, PPP + QAC 28 th September Executive Summary from CEO UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST PAGE 1 OF 2 Quality & Performance Report Author: John Adler Sponsor: Chief Executive Date: FIC, PPP + QAC 28 th September 2017 Executive Summary from CEO Paper

More information

Nottingham University Hospitals Emergency Department Quality Issues Related to Performance

Nottingham University Hospitals Emergency Department Quality Issues Related to Performance RCCG/GB/14/123 Nottingham University Hospitals Emergency Department Quality Issues Related to Performance Introduction NUH have failed to meet the 95% 4 hour wait standard for a number of consecutive months.

More information

Integrated Performance & Quality Report

Integrated Performance & Quality Report Integrated Performance & Quality Report October 2014 (Month 7) Introduction The Hounslow Integrated Performance & Quality Report is aimed at providing a monthly update on the performance of the based on

More information

NHS Milton Keynes CCG Board Meeting

NHS Milton Keynes CCG Board Meeting Subject: Meeting: Quality & Performance Report NHS Milton Keynes CCG Board Meeting Date of Meeting: Tuesday 28 th November 2017 Report of: Neve Patel Head of Performance Is this document: Commercially

More information

Appendix 1. Quality Update Report for Salford CCG Open Board. Salford Royal, Oaklands and other providers of clinical services November 2013

Appendix 1. Quality Update Report for Salford CCG Open Board. Salford Royal, Oaklands and other providers of clinical services November 2013 Appendix 1 Quality Update Report for Salford CCG Open Board. Salford Royal, Oaklands and other providers of clinical services November 201 Contents Purpose of Paper... Ошибка! Закладка не определена. Greater

More information

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Performance Indicators May Regular report to Trust Board

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Performance Indicators May Regular report to Trust Board SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Performance Indicators May 20 Report to: Trust Board July 20 Report from: Sponsoring Executive: Aim of Report/Principle Topic: Review History to date:

More information

Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting In-Common

Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting In-Common Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting In-Common Date: Tuesday 7 th November Time: 13.30 Location: Cleve Rugby Club, The Hayfields, Mangotsfield,

More information

N/A N/A. 60% No data No data No data 40.0% 81.3% No data No data No data No data

N/A N/A. 60% No data No data No data 40.0% 81.3% No data No data No data No data Acute Quality and Performance Metrics For the period ending 31st May 2013 APPENDIX 1 Measures Target M1 M2 YTD Weston UHB NBT Exception RAG / DoT M1 M2 YTD RAG / DoT M1 M2 YTD RAG / DoT Reference RTT:

More information

Report to: Trust Board 25 th April Enclosure 4. Title Integrated Performance Report March Sponsoring Executive Director

Report to: Trust Board 25 th April Enclosure 4. Title Integrated Performance Report March Sponsoring Executive Director Report to: Trust Board 25 th April 2013 Title Integrated Performance Report March 2013 Enclosure 4 Sponsoring Executive Director Author(s) Purpose Previously considered by Peter Herring Chief Executive

More information

2017/18 Trust Balanced Scorecard

2017/18 Trust Balanced Scorecard ITEM 8b ENC 9 2017/18 Trust Balanced Scorecard Author: Performance Management Team March 2017 The purpose of this paper is to provide an update on the development of the 2017/18 Balanced Scorecard for

More information

Mortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter

Mortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter Mortality Report Learning from Deaths Quarter 3 2017 Introduction In December 2016 the CQC report Learning, Candour and accountability: A review of the way NHS Trusts review and investigate the deaths

More information

Integrated Performance Dashboard: Published February Contents

Integrated Performance Dashboard: Published February Contents Integrated Performance Dashboard: Published February 214 Contents No. Section Page No. 1 Key Messages 2 2 Performance Dashboard 3 3 Analytics 4 4 Mental Health 5 5 Quality & Safety 6 6 Glossary 8 The Month

More information

NHS Leeds West CCG Clinical Commissioning Strategy. 2013/14 to 2015/16

NHS Leeds West CCG Clinical Commissioning Strategy. 2013/14 to 2015/16 NHS Leeds West CCG Clinical Commissioning Strategy 2013/14 to 2015/16 Working together locally to achieve the best health and care in all our communities 1 Contents Section 1: Summary Page 3 Section 2:

More information

Integrated Performance Report

Integrated Performance Report Integrated Performance Report M04 July 2016 Presented by: Angela Stevenson (Chief Operating Officer) Des Holden (Medical Director) Fiona Allsop (Chief Nurse) Paul Simpson (Chief Financial Officer) An Associated

More information

Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) Schemes for 2015/16

Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) Schemes for 2015/16 Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) Schemes for 2015/16 Goal No. Indicator Name Contract 1 Acute Kidney Injury CWS CCG Contract - National CQUIN 2a Sepsis Screening CWS CCG Contract - National

More information

Integrated Performance Report. NHS Rotherham Board 6 July 2011

Integrated Performance Report. NHS Rotherham Board 6 July 2011 Integrated Performance Report NHS Rotherham Board 6 July 2 CONTENTS Introduction Pg 2 Efficiency Pg 3-6 Rotherham Outcomes Pg 7- Contract Performance Pg -13 Finance Pg 14-15 1 INTRODUCTION Report format..

More information

Improvement and Assessment Framework Q1 performance and six clinical priority areas

Improvement and Assessment Framework Q1 performance and six clinical priority areas Governing Body 30 th September 2016 Improvement and Assessment Framework Q1 performance and six clinical priority areas Agenda item 16 Paper 10 Summariser: Authors and contributors: Executive Lead(s):

More information

Integrated Performance Report August 2017

Integrated Performance Report August 2017 Integrated Performance Report Contents Section Page High Level Dashboard Balanced scorecard 3 Domain Scorecards and Director Commentaries Operational Performance 4 Quality and Patient Safety 9 Workforce

More information

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Performance Indicators April Regular report to Trust Board

SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Performance Indicators April Regular report to Trust Board SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST Trust Key Indicators April 2011 Report to: Trust Board 24 May 2011 Report from: Sponsoring Executive: Aim of Report / Principle Topic: Review History to date:

More information

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board

Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board Paper 12 Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board Monday 9 October 2017 Planned Care Performance Report Author: Fraser Doris, Performance Information Analyst Sponsoring Director: Liz Moore, Director for Acute Services

More information

Annual General Meeting 17 September 2014

Annual General Meeting 17 September 2014 Annual General Meeting 17 September 2014 Quality Accounts Mike Wright Executive Director of Nursing & Patient Experience Director of Infection Prevention and Control Quality Account 2013/14 2013/14 in

More information

2016/17 Activity Report April August/September 2016

2016/17 Activity Report April August/September 2016 Due to a change in national hospital data flows (SUS) and also a delay in processing September 2016 Practice-level finance data, the latest information on hospital activity and spend is still up to August

More information

July (Month 4) Integrated Performance Report. John Grinnell, Director of Finance. Executive Directors. For Information For Discussion For Approval

July (Month 4) Integrated Performance Report. John Grinnell, Director of Finance. Executive Directors. For Information For Discussion For Approval BOARD OF DIRECTORS Subject/Title July (Month 4) Integrated Performance Report Executive Responsible Paper prepared by (if different from above) John Grinnell, Director of Finance Executive Directors Nature

More information

RTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning

RTT Assurance Paper. 1. Introduction. 2. Background. 3. Waiting List Management for Elective Care. a. Planning RTT Assurance Paper 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide assurance to Trust Board in relation to the robust management of waiting lists and timely delivery of elective patient care within

More information

Haringey CCG Performance and Quality Summary March 2017

Haringey CCG Performance and Quality Summary March 2017 Haringey CCG Performance and Quality Summary March 2017 Contents Item Haringey CCG Quality and Performance Dashboard Haringey CCG Performance Summary North Middlesex University Hospital Performance Dashboard

More information

Appendix A: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Draft Action Plan in Response to CQC Recommendations

Appendix A: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Draft Action Plan in Response to CQC Recommendations No. Domain CQC Recommendation Lead Operational Lead Current Status 1 Appendix A: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Draft Action Plan in Response to CQC Recommendations Wording in long

More information

Richard Wilson, Quality Insight and Intelligence Director

Richard Wilson, Quality Insight and Intelligence Director To: Board For meeting: 24 May 2018 Agenda item: 8 Report by: Richard Wilson, Quality Insight and Intelligence Director Report on: Quality Dashboard Purpose 1. This paper highlights the key observations

More information

We plan. We achieve.

We plan. We achieve. We plan. We achieve. Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust has a lot to tell you... l Achievements of 2008/09 l Our plans for 2009/10 l Our commitments for the next five years. We are committed to providing

More information

Report. Integrated Performance and Quality Report Report Author Presented By Responsible Director Carol Davies Head of Performance

Report. Integrated Performance and Quality Report Report Author Presented By Responsible Director Carol Davies Head of Performance Governing Body Meeting held in public Report Agenda Item: 10.0 Date of Meeting: 6 th September 2018 Report Title Integrated Performance and Quality Report Report Author Presented By Responsible Director

More information

Chief Executive s Statement. I am pleased to welcome you to our Quality Accounts 2015.

Chief Executive s Statement. I am pleased to welcome you to our Quality Accounts 2015. Chief Executive s Statement I am pleased to welcome you to our Quality Accounts 2015. Now in their sixth year, Quality Accounts continue to provide a truly objective metric for us, and others, to gauge

More information

QUALITY REPORT. Part A Patient Experience

QUALITY REPORT. Part A Patient Experience QUALITY REPORT Part A Patient Experience 1 Number of complaints Complaints and Patient Advice and Liaison Report 40 Total number of complaints received 30 20 10 Number of complaints received Trendline

More information

Integrated Quality and Performance Report (IQPR)

Integrated Quality and Performance Report (IQPR) Management Board 28 th November 2012 Trust Public Board 29 th November 2012 Integrated Quality and Performance Report (IQPR) M07 October 2012 Presented by: Bernie Bluhm (Chief Operating Officer) Author:

More information

SCHEDULE 2 THE SERVICES Service Specifications

SCHEDULE 2 THE SERVICES Service Specifications SCHEDULE 2 THE SERVICES Service Specifications Service Specification No Service ParaDoc Commissioner City and Hackney CCG Commissioner Lead Leah Herridge Provider CHUHSE Provider Lead Date of Review September

More information

WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE

WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE Agenda Item Meeting of Lanarkshire NHS Board 28 April 2010 Lanarkshire NHS board 14 Beckford Street Hamilton ML3 0TA Telephone 01698 281313 Fax 01698 423134 www.nhslanarkshire.org.uk WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE

More information

BMI The Priory Hospital Quality Accounts

BMI The Priory Hospital Quality Accounts BMI The Priory Hospital Quality Accounts 2014-2015 Chief Executive s Statement I am pleased to welcome you to our Quality Accounts 2015. Now in their sixth year, Quality Accounts continue to provide a

More information

Waiting Times Report Strategic. Thematic Goals

Waiting Times Report Strategic. Thematic Goals Strategic Improved Quality of Care Transformation - Prevention & Wellbeing Thematic Goals Waiting Times Report 2016-17 Transformation through Integration Improved Access to Services Improved Value This

More information

Agenda Item: 08 Pam Fenner NHS Norwich CCG Governing Body Tuesday 22 March 2016

Agenda Item: 08 Pam Fenner NHS Norwich CCG Governing Body Tuesday 22 March 2016 Agenda Item: 08 Pam Fenner NHS Norwich CCG Governing Body Tuesday 22 March 2016 Subject Presented By Submitted To Purpose of Paper Quality and Patient Safety Committee Executive Harvest Summary Pam Fenner

More information

INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT

INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT APPENDIX 1 INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 17 FEBRUARY 2016 1 Contents Section Page Executive Summary 3 Trust Performance Overview 7 Trust Performance Report by Exception 9 MSSA bacteraemia

More information

Governing Body meeting on 13th September 2018

Governing Body meeting on 13th September 2018 Governing Body meeting on 13th September 2018 Report from the Chair of the Integrated Governance Committee (IGC) Date of Meetings Reported: 9 th August 2018 Key achievements Author: Martin Wilkinson, Chair

More information

21 March NHS Providers ON THE DAY BRIEFING Page 1

21 March NHS Providers ON THE DAY BRIEFING Page 1 21 March 2018 NHS Providers ON THE DAY BRIEFING Page 1 2016-17 (Revised) 2017-18 (Revised) 2018-19 2019-20 (Indicative budget) 2020-21 (Indicative budget) Total revenue budget ( m) 106,528 110,002 114,269

More information

Paper 5.0 SHAPING A HEALTHIER FUTURE PAEDIATRIC TRANSITION: ANTICIPATED BENEFITS OF THE TRANSITION AND PROPOSED MODEL OF CARE.

Paper 5.0 SHAPING A HEALTHIER FUTURE PAEDIATRIC TRANSITION: ANTICIPATED BENEFITS OF THE TRANSITION AND PROPOSED MODEL OF CARE. SHAPING A HEALTHIER FUTURE PAEDIATRIC TRANSITION: ANTICIPATED BENEFITS OF THE TRANSITION AND PROPOSED MODEL OF CARE December 2015 Version 2.2 Paper 5.0 1 Purpose This document sets out the proposed new

More information

Quality Report. July 2018 data Presented in September City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust. South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust

Quality Report. July 2018 data Presented in September City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust. South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust Quality Report Primary Goals: Reduce avoidable harm Achieve the best clinical outcomes Provide the best patient experience

More information

Improve, Inspire, Innovate Quality Improvement Plan

Improve, Inspire, Innovate Quality Improvement Plan Improve, Inspire, Innovate Quality Improvement Plan 1 QIP Final version 20170706 Contents Background & Summary Page 3 Who is Responsible? Page 4 How will we communicate our progress to you? Page 4 Chair

More information

London CCG Neurology Profile

London CCG Neurology Profile CCG Neurology Profile November 214 Summary NHS Hammersmith And Fulham CCG Difference from Details Comments Admissions Neurology admissions per 1, 2,13 1,94 227 p.1 Emergency admissions per 1, 1,661 1,258

More information

WAITING TIMES AND ACCESS TARGETS

WAITING TIMES AND ACCESS TARGETS NHS Board Meeting Tuesday 17 December 2013 Lead Director (Acute Services Division) Board Paper No 13/60 Recommendation: WAITING TIMES AND ACCESS TARGETS The NHS Board is asked to note progress against

More information

Quality Improvement Scorecard November 2017

Quality Improvement Scorecard November 2017 Mortality: HSMR Performance remained below target in July Nat NB: Each month is a 12 month rolling value. I.e. Mar-16 reports the monthly average of Apr-15 to Mar-16. Mortality: HSMR (weekday) vs. HSMR

More information

NHS Wales Delivery Framework 2011/12 1

NHS Wales Delivery Framework 2011/12 1 1. Introduction NHS Wales Delivery Framework for 2011/12 NHS Wales has made significant improvements in targeted performance areas over recent years. This must continue and be associated with a greater

More information

Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Quality Report

Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Quality Report Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Quality Report 2016-2017 Contents Part 1 Statement of Quality from the Chief Executive 7 Part 2 Improvement Priorities & Statement of Assurance from

More information

Integrated Performance Report

Integrated Performance Report Mid Essex, Southend and Basildon Hospitals Joint Working Board 05/04/2017, 2pm Integrated Performance Report February 2017 Mid Essex, Southend and Basildon Hospitals Introduction by CEO February 2017 The

More information

Quality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups. Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre - Corroborative Statement

Quality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups. Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre - Corroborative Statement Quality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups Quality Accounts are annual reports to the public from providers of NHS healthcare about the quality of services they deliver. The primary

More information

SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST CHIEF EXECUTIVE S REPORT. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 21 st March 2012

SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST CHIEF EXECUTIVE S REPORT. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 21 st March 2012 SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST I CHIEF EXECUTIVE S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 21 st 212 1. PERFORMANCE In overall terms, the Trust continues to perform well against both regulatory and

More information

TRUST BOARD MEETING 24 JULY 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT MONTH 3 DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS

TRUST BOARD MEETING 24 JULY 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT MONTH 3 DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS TRUST BOARD MEETING 24 JULY 2013 PERFORMANCE REPORT MONTH 3 def Agenda Item: 10c PURPOSE PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED BY Objective(s) to which issue relates * Risk Issues (Quality, safety, financial, HR, legal

More information

NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report October 2011 (Data available as at end August 2011)

NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report October 2011 (Data available as at end August 2011) NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report October 2011 (Data available as at end August 2011) INTRODUCTION This paper provides a monthly quality dashboard for NHS Lanarkshire. This is in line with

More information

Quality Improvement Scorecard December 2017

Quality Improvement Scorecard December 2017 Mortality: HSMR Performance improved in August Nat NB: Each month is a 12 month rolling value. I.e. Mar-16 reports the monthly average of Apr-15 to Mar-16. Mortality: HSMR (weekday) vs. HSMR (weekend)

More information