Best Care Always Summary of General Ward Measures (November 2013)
|
|
- Berniece Richard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Best Care Always Summary of General Ward Measures (November 2013) Introduction This document provides a summary of the core measures and operational definitions used in the Hamad Medical Corporation s Best Care Always Campaign General Ward work stream. The document is laid out as follows: The first column on each page provides the Measure Name The second column provides the Extranet Identifier for each measure The third column provides the Operational Definition for each measure The fourth column provides Data Collection Guidance The Extranet Identifier contains the following information: The first two letters of the Extranet Identifier indicate the work stream: o Critical Care (CC), o General Ward (GW) or o Peri-operative (PO) The third letter in the Extranet Identifier indicates if the measures is an: o Outcome measure (O) o Process measure (P) Finally the fourth item in the Extranet Identifier is the sequential number for each measure. Note that the measures are sequentially numbered within the Outcome and Process list of measures. For example, consider the following Extranet Identifier, GWO1. This is referring to General Ward (GW), outcome (O) measure number 1 (GWO1). Similarly GWP1 refers to General Ward (GW) process (P) measure number 1. This labeling convention applies to all the measures listed in this document. Page 0
2 Finally, note that: Not all the measures listed in this document will be required at the outset of the campaign. Some of the measures will be phased in over time as a hospital moves from the initial testing in a pilot ward or department to the whole hospital. If a hospital does not provide a service related to a particular measure, this measure can be ignored. Questions about these measures should be directed to: Dr. Robert Lloyd, Executive Director Performance Improvement, Institute for Healthcare Improvement (rlloyd@ihi.org), and Ms. Kate Jones, AED Patient Safety, Medical, Academic and Research Affairs, Hamad Medical Corporation (CJones@hmc.org.qa) Page 1
3 General Ward Measures: This document identifies the high level measures for the general ward work stream. For each measure the following pieces of information are presented: Measure Name o Outcome Measures GWO1 GWO7 o Process Measures GWP1 GWP9 Operational Definition (which provides the specific details on the components of the measure, e.g., numerator and denominator) Data Collection Guidance (which provides suggestions on how to obtain the data (including sampling recommendations)) Outcome Measures Measure Name Extranet Identifier Operational Definition Data Collection Guidance Incidence (rate) of inpatient hospitalonset Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) GWO1 Numerator: the number of all incident laboratory-identified (LabID) events identified >3 days after admission to the facility Denominator: Patient days Include: All Laboratory-Identified (LabID) Events: All non-duplicate C. difficile toxin-positive laboratory results Duplicate C. difficile-positive test: Any C. difficile toxin-positive laboratory result from the same patient and location, following a previous C. difficile toxin-positive laboratory result within the past two weeks (14 days) (even across calendar months). There should be a full 14 days with no C. difficile toxin-positive laboratory result for the patient and location, before another C. difficile LabID Event is counted in the Numerator for the patient and location. The date of specimen collection is considered Day 1. Exclude: Tests related to active surveillance testing Community-onset CDI laboratory-identified (LabID) events identified <3 days after admission to the facility (i.e., day 1, 2, or 3) Data from patients who are not assigned to an inpatient bed. These include outpatient clinic and emergency department visits Note: This measure follows the operational definition published in Qatar Health Service Performance Agreements (HSPA) Project 2.1.6, Procedures Manual for Hospitals, August 20, Page 2
4 Days between a C. difficile associated disease occurrence GWO2 This measure is a cumulative count of the number of days that have gone by with no C. difficile associated disease being reported. Every time a C. difficile associated disease occurs the count is started over again. The longer the run of cumulative successes (days with no C. difficile associated disease occurring) the better the outcome. Whenever events occur that are relatively rare in nature or when a ward or pilot area has sufficiently small numbers of events, the preferred way to analyze the data is to plot: (1) successful cases between the occurrence of a C. difficile event, or (2) the days between C. difficile events. Both of these techniques (i.e., calculating a rate as well as days between events) may be used. Typically the C. difficile rate will serve as the starting point. When events become low or rare then the measure will change to be a count of the days between a C. difficile episode. Incidence (rate) of inpatient hospitalonset Methicillinresistant Staph. aureus GWO3 Numerator: Number of all unique blood source laboratory-identified (LabID) events identified >3 days after admission to the facility. Denominator: Patient days Ask someone to conduct a data entry audit on a random set of 20% of all cases entered after entering 100 cases. If errors exceed 50%, it is advisable to repeat data entry for the 100 cases. Note: This measure follows the operational definition published in Qatar Health Service Performance Agreements (HSPA) Project 2.1.6, Procedures Manual for Hospitals, August 20, 2013.See pages in the SCH Procedures Manual for details on what is to be included and excluded when submitting data for this measure. Days between Staph. aureus Bacteraemias GWO4 This measure is a cumulative count of the number of days that have gone by with no SABs being reported. Every time a SAB occurs the count is started over again. The longer the run of cumulative successes (days with no SABs occurring) the better the outcome. Whenever events occur that are relatively rare in nature or when a ward or pilot area has sufficiently small numbers of events, the preferred way to analyze the data is to plot: (1) successes between failures, or (2) time between failures. Page 3
5 Urinary catheterassociated urinary tract infections rate GWO5 Numerator: the number of patients with a urinary catheter who are being treated for a UTI arising from their current inpatient stay Include all patients with a urinary catheter who have a newly diagnosed UTI where the definition for a CAUTI is met per local guidelines. Denominator: the total number of indwelling urinary catheter days The CAUTI rate is calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the result by 1000 to create the CAUTI rate per 1000 catheter days Number of patients with a Venous Thromboembolism arising from a current inpatient stay or a new Venous Thromboembolism arising where there is a history of admission to hospital within the last 3 months GWO6. Note: the development of the final set of VTE measures and operational definitions is presently underway. These measures will be included as soon as they are made available. Pressure ulcer count GWO7 This is a cumulative count of the number of pressure ulcers acquired within the general ward setting. Patients should be assessed for pressure ulcers on a daily basis. Each time a patient has acquired a pressure ulcer (a new case), it should be recorded. All patients in the pilot unit should be assessed for pressure ulcers. No sampling is needed. Page 4
6 Process Measures Percent compliance with hand hygiene GWP1 Numerator: the total number of opportunities in the sample where appropriate hand hygiene was conducted Denominator: the total number of opportunities in the sample for appropriate hand hygiene compliance Calculate the percent compliance with hand hygiene by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 The sample of patients for this measure will come from monthly observations of patient care encounters. Data will be reported monthly, however it is collected weekly. Each week the designated observer(s) should observe five different providers during an opportunity for hand hygiene. The observer task can be rotated among staff in order to reduce the likelihood that individuals may increase compliance because they knew that a designated individual was conducting the observations. The sample should produce a total of 5 opportunities (the denominator) for hand hygiene per week or 20 per month. The sampling approach is to select a random day each week to conduct the observation of clinicians and other employees who actually touch a patient. This can be done ahead of time in order to set up observers on the designated days. For example, the opportunities may be based on the World Health Organization s (WHO) 5 Moments: o Before patient contact o Before aseptic task o After body fluid exposure risk o o After patient contact After contact with patient surrounding In this case "appropriate" hand hygiene is defined as the observer witnessing that the health care provider (e.g., consultant, nurse, technician, etc) properly cleaned their hands (soap and water or alcohol gel) before contacting the patient and after contact with the patient was made. Page 5
7 Percent compliance with the urinary catheter insertion bundle Percent compliance of patients deemed at risk receiving the full pressure ulcer prevention bundle GWP2 Numerator: the number of patients with urinary catheters inserted during the month receiving all bundle components at the designated time Denominator: the number of patients with urinary catheters reviewed during the month The percent compliance is calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 GWP3 Numerator: the number of patients deemed at risk receiving full pressure ulcer prevention Denominator: the number of at risk patients with pressure ulcers Calculate the percentage by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 There should be no sampling for this measure. All patients who have a urinary catheter inserted should be reviewed for compliance. All elements of the bundle must be met. If your percent compliance is low, measure each element of the bundle individually o The numerator would be the number of eligible patients who received the element of the bundle o The denominator would be the total number of eligible patients o The percent would be calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100 Use local guidelines for at risk criteria. There should be no sampling for this measure. All patients deemed at risk should be reviewed for compliance. All elements of the bundle must be met. If your percent compliance is low, measure each element of the bundle individually. o The numerator would be the total number of at risk patients who received the element of the bundle o The denominator would be the number of at risk patients o The percentage would be calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100 Page 6
8 Percent of patients receiving daily pressure ulcer risk reassessment GWP4 Numerator: the number of patients receiving daily pressure ulcer risk reassessment Randomly select 5 patients per week and record the information weekly. Tally up the total at the end of the month and enter the aggregate number into the Extranet. Percent of eligible patients receiving VTE prophylaxis GWP5 Denominator: the number of patients with pressure ulcers reviewed Calculate the percentage by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 Note: the development of the final set of VTE measures and operational definitions is presently underway. These measures will be included as soon as they are made available. Percent achievement of multi-disciplinary rounds(mdrs) GWP6 Numerator: the total number of patients on the ward who had MDRs on the day of the study Randomly select one day per week to select a sample of patients eligible for MDRs. Look for documented evidence in the patient s chart of a completed MDR. Denominator: the total number of patients on the ward on the day of the study The percent achievement of multi-disciplinary rounds is calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying the result by 100 Each week a minimum sample of 5 patients should be selected for a total of 20 patients for the month. Enter data into the IHI Extranet with appropriate annotations to document issues related to data collection (e.g., how you randomly select the day of the week for the study). While you will collect the data weekly (and use that data for improvement within your team), you will aggregate it and the report monthly on the IHI Extranet. Page 7
9 Percent achievement of multi-disciplinary rounds and daily goals (DG) Percent compliance with using daily safety briefings GWP7 Determine the numerator: the total number of patients with MDRs who also had DGs documented Determine the denominator: the total number of patients who had MDRs The percent achievement of daily goals is calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying the result by 100 GWP8 Numerator: the total number of days in the month in which at least one safety briefing was conducted in the pilot unit Denominator: the total number of days in the month The percent compliance with using daily safety briefings is calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 One day per week (the same day as the MDRs sample collection), conduct a review of the patients you pulled for the MDRs sample. Look for documented evidence of DGs in this sample. Rotate data collection days of the week and shifts in order to avoid "data collection" fatigue and the possibility of having staff change their behaviors because they know the day of the week that will be used to observe this measure. Remember that the denominator for this measure is the number of patients who had MDRs. If you sampled appropriately the denominator should be 20 patients. Enter data into the IHI Extranet with appropriate annotations to document issues related to data collection (e.g., how you randomly select the day of the week for the study). While you will collect the data weekly (and use that data for improvement within your team), you will aggregate it and the report monthly on the IHI Extranet. Safety briefings are an integral part of developing a culture of safety. They are used to help increase staff awareness of patient safety issues, create an environment in which staff share information without fear of reprisal, and integrate the reporting of medication safety issues into daily work. It is recommended to start with one safety briefing a day and then continue to add safety briefings at other points throughout the day as appropriate. One of the keys to successful safety briefings is to make sure that the information generated in the briefing session is passed along to the next shift. If, for example, the safety briefing is held at the start of the day shift then the information gathered during this session should be passed along to the second shift and then after adding their findings they should pass the briefing on to the next shift and so on. This cascading approach to information transfer is a central part of knowledge management and creating a culture of safety. Page 8
10 Percent of RN-doctor exchanges about patients with a change in condition that were based on an SBAR format GWP9 Numerator: the number of RNdoctor exchanges about patients with a change in condition that were based on an SBAR format Denominator: the number of patients with a change in condition that required a RNdoctor consult All patients with a change in condition should be included in the denominator. There should be no sampling for this measure. A change in condition can include but not be limited to: fluctuating vital signs, a dramatic increase or decrease in vital signs, a report by a family member or care giver that the patient does not seem right or any other assessment that even suggests that the patient is not in a stable and predictable state. The percent of exchanges in which an SBAR format was used is calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 Percent compliance with Early Warning Score Assessment This measure will be phased in Numerator: the total number of observations with an Early Warning Score documented Denominator: the total number of observations Calculate the percent compliance with the Early Warning Score Assessment by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100 Inclusion Criterion: Patients admitted > 24 hours (excluding midwifery, pediatric /neonatal and non-acute areas such as continuing care). The Early Warning Score (EWS) is a tool for bedside evaluation based on five physiological parameters: systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, temperature and AVPU score. The ability of a modified EWS, including relative deviation from patients normal blood pressures and urine output, to identify patients at risk from deterioration and who would potentially benefit from more intensive monitoring from nursing and medical staff has been recently demonstrated. Use a random sample of 20 patients per month per unit (sample 5 patients per week). The review should be conducted for the previous three days of the patient s stay. Page 9
11 Percent of observations identified as at risk that have appropriate interventions undertaken in terms of their management as categorized by the Early Warning Score This measure will be phased in Numerator: the number of observations with appropriate interventions undertaken as indicated by their early warning score in the sample Denominator: the number of observations with an at risk early warning score Calculate the percent of observations identified as at risk that had appropriate interventions undertaken by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100 Inclusion Criterion: Patients admitted > 24 hours (excluding midwifery, pediatric /neonatal and non acute areas such as continuing care). Use the sample of 20 patients from process measure 1. Failure of clinical staff to respond to deterioration of respiratory or cerebral function and increase levels of medical intervention will put patients at risk of cardio-respiratory arrest. Inappropriate action in response to observed abnormal physiological and biochemical variables might lead to avoidable death. Suboptimal care prior to admission to a critical care unit can lead to increased mortality. Number of calls to the Outreach or Rapid Response Team This measure will be phased in The total number of calls placed each month to the Outreach or Rapid Response Team This measure is the total number of calls to the Outreach or Rapid Response Team each month. It is recommended that a process is established to record the calls registered each day. These can then be tallied each week and combined to produce an aggregate number for the month which can be entered into the Extranet. Percent compliance with Severe Sepsis 3- Hour Resuscitation Bundle This measure will be phased in Numerator: the number of patients with sepsis during the month receiving all components Denominator: the number of patients with sepsis reviewed during the month Calculate the percent compliance by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 There should be no sampling for this measure. All patients with sepsis should be reviewed for compliance. All elements of the bundle must be met. If your percent compliance is low, measure each element of the bundle individually o The numerator would be the total number of eligible patients who received the element of the bundle o The denominator would be the number of eligible patients o The percentage would be calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100 Page 10
12 Percent compliance with 6-Hour Septic Shock Bundle This measure will be phased in Numerator: the number of patients with septic shock during the month receiving all components at the appropriate time Denominator: the number of patients with septic shock reviewed during the month Calculate the percent compliance by dividing the numerator by the denominator and then multiplying the resulting proportion by 100 There should be no sampling for this measure. All patients with septic shock should be reviewed for compliance. All elements of the bundle must be met. If your percent compliance is low, measure each element of the bundle individually o The numerator would be the total number of eligible patients who received the element of the bundle o The denominator would be the number of eligible patients o The percentage would be calculated by dividing the numerator by the denominator and multiplying by 100 Page 11
This is a high level overview report to update the Board on the Acute Adult Safety Programme consisting of the following sections:
Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board Board Meeting June 2014 Board Paper No. 14/34 Board Medical Director Scottish Patient Safety Programme Update 1. Background The Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP)
More informationWelcome and Instructions
Welcome and Instructions For audio, join by telephone at 877-594-8353, participant code 56350822# Your line is OPEN. Please do not use the hold feature on your phone but do mute your line by dialing *6.
More informationLABORATORY-IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)
LABORATORY-IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) CMS PARTICIPATION Acute care hospitals, Long Term Acute Care (LTACs),IP Rehabilitation
More informationRecognising a Deteriorating Patient. Study guide
Recognising a Deteriorating Patient Study guide Recognising a deteriorating patient Recognising and responding to clinical deterioration Background Clinical deterioration can occur at any time in a patient
More informationCMS and NHSN: What s New for Infection Preventionists in 2013
CMS and NHSN: What s New for Infection Preventionists in 2013 Joan Hebden RN, MS, CIC Clinical Program Manager Sentri7 Wolters Kluwer Health - Clinical Solutions Objectives Define the current status of
More informationThese slides are to explain why the Trust is adopting the National Early Warning Score which is being adopted across all sectors of health care in
These slides are to explain why the Trust is adopting the National Early Warning Score which is being adopted across all sectors of health care in the UK and beyond. 1 The first EWS was devised in 1997
More informationHealthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina
2018 Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina Reference Document Revised June 2018 NC Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated and Resistant Pathogens Patient Safety Program NC Department of Health
More informationSAFE CARE. Scottish Patient Safety Programme. SPSP Adult Acute
SAFE CARE NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC) is committed to providing safe high quality care that our staff and patients can be proud of. Over recent years the Scottish Patient Safety Programme has
More informationStaphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Australian public hospitals Australian hospital statistics
Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Australian public hospitals 2013 14 Australian hospital statistics Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) in Australian public hospitals 2013 14 SAB is a serious bloodstream
More informationLABORATORY IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)
LABORATORY IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) CMS PARTICIPATION Acute care hospitals, Long Term Acute Care (LTACs),IP Rehabilitation
More informationNHS LOTHIAN Standard Operating Procedure: EHSCP Physiological Observations of Patients in the Community Setting
NHS LOTHIAN Standard Operating Procedure: EHSCP Physiological Observations of Patients in the Community Setting 1. Introduction To standardise the type and frequency of observations to be taken on adult
More informationPrevention and Control of Infection in Care Homes. Infection Prevention and Control Team Public Health Norfolk County Council January 2015
Prevention and Control of Infection in Care Homes Infection Prevention and Control Team Public Health Norfolk County Council January 2015 Content for today Importance of IPAC -refresher IPAC audits in
More informationSaving Lives: EWS & CODE SEPSIS. Kim McDonough RN and Margaret Currie-Coyoy MBA Last Revision: August 2013
Saving Lives: EWS & CODE SEPSIS Kim McDonough RN and Margaret Currie-Coyoy MBA Last Revision: August 2013 Course Objectives At the conclusion of this training, you will be able to Explain the importance
More informationOHA HEN 2.0 Partnership for Patients Letter of Commitment
OHA HEN 2.0 Partnership for Patients Letter of Commitment To: Re: Request to Participate in the Ohio Hospital Association Hospital Engagement Contract Date: September 24, 2015 We have reviewed the information
More informationSession 5: C. difficile LabID Event Analysis for Long-term Care Facilities Using NHSN
Session 5: C. difficile LabID Event Analysis for Long-term Care Facilities Using NHSN QIN-QIO Nursing Home C. difficile Reporting and Reduction Project Presenter: Elisabeth Mungai, MS, MPH Presentation
More informationModified Early Warning Score Policy.
Trust Policy and Procedure Modified Early Warning Score Policy. Document ref. no: PP(15)271 For use in (clinical areas): For use by (staff groups): For use for (patients): Document owner: Status: All clinical
More informationInpatient Quality Reporting Program for Hospitals
Inpatient Quality Reporting Program for Hospitals Candace Jackson, RN Project Lead, Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Hospital Inpatient Value, Incentives, and Quality Reporting (VIQR)
More informationAntimicrobial stewardship in Scotland: quality improvement agenda
Antimicrobial stewardship in Scotland: quality improvement agenda Dr Jacqueline Sneddon Project Lead Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group Background Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group (SAPG)
More informationAdvanced Measurement for Improvement Prework
Advanced Measurement for Improvement Prework IHI Training Seminar Boston, MA March 20-21, 2017 Faculty: Richard Scoville PhD; Gareth Parry PhD Thank you for enrolling in IHI s upcoming seminar on designing
More informationHospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Quality Reporting Program
Hospital VBP Program: NHSN Mapping and Monitoring Questions and Answers Moderator: Bethany Wheeler, BS Hospital VBP Team Lead Hospital Inpatient Value, Incentives, Quality, and Reporting (VIQR) Outreach
More informationQUALIS HEALTH HONORS WASHINGTON HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
LEADERSHIP IN IMPROVING HEALTHCARE Harborview Medical Center Code Sepsis: Improving Survival in Sepsis with Early Identification and Activation of a Critical Care Team Sepsis, one of the highest causes
More informationQuality and Safety Committee. Prevention and Control of Healthcare Acquired Infections performance to February 2012
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board Committee Paper 05.04.12 Item QS12/37.5 Name of Committee: Subject: Summary or Issues of Significance National / Local Objectives Addressed: Legislation or Healthcare
More informationRapid Response Team and Patient Safety Terrence Shenfield BS, RRT-RPFT-NPS Education Coordinator A & T respiratory Lectures LLC
Rapid Response Team and Patient Safety Terrence Shenfield BS, RRT-RPFT-NPS Education Coordinator A & T respiratory Lectures LLC Objectives History of the RRT/ERT teams National Statistics Criteria of activating
More informationNHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report June 2011 (Data available as at end April 2011)
NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report June 2011 (Data available as at end April 2011) INTRODUCTION This paper provides a monthly quality dashboard for NHS Lanarkshire. This is in line with the
More informationMEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)
MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP) Began in September 2011 Key quality improvement activity within the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility grant program Goal of MBQIP: to improve
More informationTHE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER
Agenda item A5(vi) THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The NHS Safety Thermometer is a point of care survey, which is a local improvement tool
More informationThe Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms. Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2017 Leapfrog Hospital Survey
The Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2017 Leapfrog Hospital Survey 2017 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms Table of Contents 2017 Leapfrog Hospital
More informationAppendix A: Encyclopedia of Measures (EOM)
Appendix A: Encyclopedia of Measures (EOM) Great Lakes Partners for Patients HIIN Hospital Improvement Innovation Network (HIIN) Program Evaluation Measures Adapted from Version 1.0 AHA/HRET HEN 2.0 HIIN
More informationThis paper provides an update on the the recent national SPSP conference the programme of work for Tissue Viability Acute Adult Care SPSP
Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board Board Meeting December 2016 Board Paper No. 16/81 Scottish Patient Safety Programme Update 1. Background The Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) is one of the family
More informationScoring Methodology SPRING 2018
Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018 CONTENTS What is the Hospital Safety Grade?... 4 Eligible Hospitals... 4 Measures... 6 Measure Descriptions... 9 Process/Structural Measures... 9 Computerized Physician
More informationScoring Methodology FALL 2016
Scoring Methodology FALL 2016 CONTENTS What is the Hospital Safety Grade?... 4 Eligible Hospitals... 4 Measures... 5 Measure Descriptions... 7 Process/Structural Measures... 7 Computerized Physician Order
More informationMedicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012
Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012 Wes Champion Senior Vice President Premier Performance Partners Copyright 2012 PREMIER INC, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Premier is the nation s largest healthcare
More information2016 HCPro, a division of BLR. All rights reserved. These materials may not be duplicated without express written permission.
Surviving Sepsis: How CDI Can Improve Sepsis Core Measure Compliance Sarah Jackson, RN, BSN Clinical Documentation Specialist II Rush Oak Park Hospital Oak Park, IL 1 Learning Objectives At the completion
More informationCLINICAL PROTOCOL National Early Warning Score (NEWS) Observation Chart
CLINICAL PROTOCOL National Early Warning Score (NEWS) Observation Chart November 2014 1 Document Profile Type i.e. Strategy, Policy, Procedure, Guideline, Protocol Title Category i.e. organisational, clinical,
More informationRuchika D. Husa, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Cardiovascular Medicine The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Early Response Teams Ruchika D. Husa, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Cardiovascular Medicine The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center OBJECTIVES Provide an overview of an Early
More informationRuchika D. Husa, MD, MS
Early Response Teams Ruchika D. Husa, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Medicine Division i i of Cardiovascular Medicine i The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center OBJECTIVES Provide an overview of
More informationCMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018
CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018 Philosophy The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is changing
More information2018 Press Ganey Award Criteria
2018 Press Ganey Award Criteria Guardian of Excellence Award SM This award honors clients who have reached the 95th percentile for patient experience, engagement or clinical quality performance. Guardian
More informationPerioperative management of the higher risk surgical patient with an acute surgical abdomen undergoing emergency surgery
CLINICAL GUIDELINE Perioperative management of the higher risk surgical patient with an acute surgical abdomen undergoing emergency surgery CG10214-2 For use in (clinical areas): For use by (staff groups):
More informationNHS Highland Infection Prevention & Control Annual Work Plan End of Year
NHS Highland Board 5 April Item 5.7 NHS Highland & Control Annual Work Plan End of Year Update for COIC Prepared by Catherine Stokoe and Jonty Mills (as of 01/03/) Objective Activity Time Scale Lead Officer
More informationScoring Methodology FALL 2017
Scoring Methodology FALL 2017 CONTENTS What is the Hospital Safety Grade?... 4 Eligible Hospitals... 4 Measures... 5 Measure Descriptions... 9 Process/Structural Measures... 9 Computerized Physician Order
More informationIowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN 2.0 Measures
Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN 2.0 Measures Yellow Pink Purple Green Blue Legend Readmissions and Care Transitions Healthcare-associated Infections Hospital Acquired Conditions Safety Across the Board
More informationC. difficile Infection and C. difficile Lab ID Reporting in NHSN
C. difficile Infection and C. difficile Lab ID Reporting in NHSN MARY ANDRUS, BA, RN, CIC Infection Preventionist Consultant Learning Objectives Review the structure and of the MDRO/CDAD Module within
More informationThe Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN Measure Descriptions
The Iowa Healthcare Collaborative - HEN Measure Descriptions Yellow Pink Purple Green Blue Legend Readmissions and Care Transitions Healthcare-associated Infections Hospital Acquired Conditions Safety
More informationChapter 01: Professional Nursing Practice Lewis: Medical-Surgical Nursing, 10th Edition
Chapter 01: Professional Nursing Practice Lewis: Medical-Surgical Nursing, 10th Edition MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. The nurse completes an admission database and explains that the plan of care and discharge goals
More informationHAI Learning and Action Network January 8, 2015 Monthly Call
HAI Learning and Action Network January 8, 2015 Monthly Call GPQIN Website greatplainsqin.org PATH: Website Initiatives Reducing HAI in Hospitals 2 HAI Page 3 4 5 Patient and Family Engagement Why should
More informationHospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. Hospital-Specific Report User Guide Fiscal Year 2017
Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program Hospital-Specific Report User Guide Fiscal Year 2017 Contents Overview... 4 September 2016 Error Notice... 4 Background and Resources... 6 Updates for FY 2017...
More informationBest Practice Guidelines BPG 5 Catheter Care
Best Practice Guidelines BPG 5 Catheter Care BGP 5 1 DOCUMENT STATUS: Reviewed DATE ISSUED: March 2014 DATE TO BE REVIEWED: 13.10.17 AMENDMENT HISTORY VERSION DATE AMENDMENT HISTORY V1 March 2014 New Guideline
More informationHealthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina
2012 Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina Reference Document Revised May 2016 N.C. Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated and Resistant Pathogens Patient Safety Program N.C. Department of
More informationClinical Intervention Overview: Objectives
AHRQ Safety Program for Long-term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Clinical Intervention Overview: Preventing Infections to Enhance Resident Safety Cohort 5 Learning Session #1 Steven J. Schweon RN, CIC APIC Infection
More informationSepsis The Silent Killer in the NHS
Sepsis The Silent Killer in the NHS Kate Beaumont, Trustee, UK Sepsis Trust Nurse Director The Learning Clinic Director QGi Ltd Former Head of Patient Safety and lead for deterioration, National Patient
More informationNHSN: An Update on the Risk Adjustment of HAI Data
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases NHSN: An Update on the Risk Adjustment of HAI Data Maggie Dudeck, MPH Zuleika Aponte, MPH Rashad Arcement, MSPH Prachi Patel, MPH Wednesday,
More informationHealth Care Associated Infections in 2015 Acute Care Hospitals
Health Care Associated Infections in 2015 Acute Care Hospitals Alfred DeMaria, M.D. State Epidemiologist Bureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences Katherine T. Fillo, Ph.D, RN-BC Quality Improvement
More informationHAI Learning and Action Network February 11, 2015 Monthly Call. Overview of HAI LAN
HAI Learning and Action Network February 11, 2015 Monthly Call 1 Overview of HAI LAN CLABSI, CAUTI, CDI, VAE Conferred Rights through NHSN Monthly meetings/webex/teleconferences Antimicrobial Stewardship
More informationCompass Hospital Improvement Innovation Network (HIIN) Measure Set
Compass Hospital Improvement Innovation Network (HIIN) Measure Set * Statewide s National Safety Healthcare Network () * Self- f Focus Area Adverse Drug Event Rate Adverse Drug Events riginating During
More informationRemove catheters as soon as possible, care for catheters individually
CAUTI Remove catheters as soon as possible, care for catheters individually The Bundle 1. Perform a daily review of the need for the urinary catheter. 2. Check the catheter has been continuously connected
More informationHEALTHCARE ASSOCIATED INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL REPORT JUNE 2016
Appendix--75 Borders NHS Board HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATED INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL REPORT JUNE Aim The purpose of this paper is to update Board members of the current status of Healthcare Associated
More informationLearning Session 4: Required Infection Reporting for Minnesota CAH
Learning Session 4: Required Infection Reporting for Minnesota CAH Presenters: Vicki Tang Olson Program Manager, Stratis Health Janet Lilleberg Quality Data Specialist, Stratis Health Marilyn Grafstrom,
More informationSCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014
SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014 HOSPITAL SAFETY SCORE Contents What is the Hospital Safety Score?... 4 Who is The Leapfrog Group?... 4 Eligible and Excluded Hospitals... 4 Scoring Methodology... 5 Measures...
More informationTRUST BOARD. Date of Meeting: 05/10/2010
TRUST BOARD Date of Meeting: 05//20 Enclosure: 7 Agenda Item No: 8.3 Title of Report: Interim Report for Infection Prevention and Control 20-2011 Aims: To inform the Board of the work of the Trust in controlling
More informationInpatient Quality Reporting Program
NHSN: Transition to the Rebaseline Guidance for Acute Care Facilities Questions and Answers Moderator: Candace Jackson, RN Project Lead, Hospital IQR Program Hospital Inpatient Value, Incentives, and Quality
More informationAPIC NHSN Webinar. Kathy Allen-Bridson, Janet Brooks, Cindy Gross, Denise Leaptrot, Susan Morabit, & Eileen Scalise Subject Matter Experts
APIC NHSN Webinar Kathy Allen-Bridson, Janet Brooks, Cindy Gross, Denise Leaptrot, Susan Morabit, & Eileen Scalise Subject Matter Experts April 27, 2015 National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious
More informationHIMSS 2013 Davies Enterprise Award Application Texas Health Resources. Core Case Study Clinical Value
HIMSS 2013 Davies Enterprise Award Application Texas Health Resources Core Case Study Clinical Value Applicant Organization: Texas Health Resources Organization s Address: 612 E. Lamar, Arlington, Texas
More informationAyrshire and Arran NHS Board
Paper 6 Ayrshire and Arran NHS Board Monday 11 December 2017 SPSP Update: Acute Adult Programme Author: Laura Harvey, QI Lead for Acute Services, Person Centred & Customer Care Sponsoring Director: Liz
More informationNational Early Warning Score (ViEWS) System. Recommendations for Audit. February 2012
National Early Warning Score (ViEWS) System Recommendations for Audit February 2012 Version 3 Acknowledgement: The National Early Warning Score and associated Education Programme Audit and Evaluation sub-group
More informationPRACTICE GUIDELINE EM014 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN TRIAGE SCALE
PRACTICE GUIDELINE EM014 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN TRIAGE SCALE This Practice Guideline sets out a method for implementing triage in the Emergency Centre. Excluding the cover page, this Practice
More informationMedicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years
julian.coomes@flhosp.orgjulian.coomes@flhosp.org Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years 2018-2020 October 2017 Table of Contents Value Based Purchasing (VBP)
More informationStaffing and Scheduling
Staffing and Scheduling 1 One of the most critical issues confronting nurse executives today is nurse staffing. The major goal of staffing and scheduling systems is to identify the need for and provide
More informationCritical Care What Makes this so Difficult
Critical Care What Makes this so Difficult Presented by Angela Jordan, CPC Senior Managing Consultant AAPC National Advisory Board, Southwest September 2016 Disclaimer The speaker has no financial relationship
More informationHospital Acquired Conditions. Tracy Blair MSN, RN
Hospital Acquired Conditions Tracy Blair MSN, RN A hospitalacquired infection (HAI), also known as a nosocomial infection, is an infection that is acquired in a hospital or other health care facility Hospital
More informationK-HEN Acute Care/Critical Access Hospitals Measures Alignment with PfP 40/20 Goals AEA Minimum Participation Full Participation 1, 2
Outcome Measure for Any One of the Following: Outcome Measures Meeting Either A or B: Adverse Drug Events (ADE) All measures are surveillance data Hospital Collected Anticoagulant (ADE-12) Opioid (ADE-111)
More informationJoint Commission NPSG 7: 2011 Update and 2012 Preview
Joint Commission NPSG 7: 2011 Update and 2012 Preview Pharmacy OneSource Webinar June 1, 2011 Louise M. Kuhny, RN, MPH, MBA, CIC The Joint Commission Objectives Upon completion of this program, participants
More informationUnless this copy has been taken directly from the Trust intranet site (Pandora) there is no assurance that this is the most up to date version
Policy No: RM64 Version: 5.0 Name of Policy: Use of the National Early Warning Score System in Adult Patients Policy Effective From: 21/07/2016 Date Ratified 22/06/2016 Ratified Resuscitation and Deterioration
More information4/28/17. New Jersey Antimicrobial Stewardship Learning Action Collaborative. Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts in New Jersey. Update May 10, 2017
New Jersey Antimicrobial Stewardship Learning Action Collaborative Update May 10, 2017 Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts in New Jersey Acute Care Hospitals Outpatient Settings (ED, physician practices)
More informationBetter to Best Quality Excellence Achievement Awards. Recognizing Illinois Hospitals Leading in Quality and Innovation COMPENDIUM
Better to Best 2011 Quality Excellence Achievement Awards COMPENDIUM Recognizing Illinois Hospitals Leading in Quality and Innovation 2011 Quality Excellence Achievement Awards Overview IHA s Quality Care
More informationReducing CAUTI by Decreasing Inappropriate Catheter Utilization
Reducing CAUTI by Decreasing Inappropriate Catheter Utilization Reducing HAIs in Hospitals E. Eve Esslinger Jane Ehrhardt Heather Banker Debby Fosson Roddy Summers QIN-QIO Map HAIs Central Line-Associated
More informationMaking the Stars Align When Time Matters: Leveraging Actionable Data to Combat Sepsis
Making the Stars Align When Time Matters: Leveraging Actionable Data to Combat Sepsis Licking Memorial Health Systems Patient Impact Where did we begin? EDUCATION EDUCATION EDUCATION EDUCATION EDUCATION
More informationOverview of Revised LTC Surveillance Definitions
Surveillance in Long-Term Care Facilities: Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) and Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO) Wisconsin Division of Public Health May-June 2014 Overview of Revised LTC Surveillance
More informationTransforming Care at the Bedside: Climbing the Clinical Ladder
Transforming Care at the Bedside: Climbing the Clinical Ladder Rebecca Springer, MSN, RN Chief Nursing Officer, Nurse Executive Temiela Blackman, MA Quality Manager Hendry Regional Medical Center April
More informationSEPSIS RESEARCH WSHFT: THE IMPACT OF PREHOSPITAL SEPSIS SCREENING
SEPSIS RESEARCH WSHFT: THE IMPACT OF PREHOSPITAL SEPSIS SCREENING Dr. Duncan Hargreaves QI Fellow Worthing Hospital Allied Health Sciences Network 2017 SEPSIS IMPROVEMENT AT WSHFT QUESTcollaboration ->
More informationWRIGHTINGTON, WIGAN AND LEIGH HEALTH SERVICES NHS TRUST DIRECTOR OF INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL ANNUAL REPORT
WRIGHTINGTON, WIGAN AND LEIGH HEALTH SERVICES NHS TRUST DIRECTOR OF INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL ANNUAL REPORT 2006-2007 Author(s) Gill Harris, Director of Infection Prevention and Control EXECUTIVE
More informationPreventing Hospital Acquired Infections: Clostridium difficile
Washington State Hospital Association Safe Table Preventing Hospital Acquired Infections: Clostridium difficile January 31, 2017 Lucia Austin-Gil, RN Jessica Symank, RN 2017 Infections Catheter Associated
More informationHealthInsight HIIN Onboarding Event: DATA, DATA, DATA. April 12, a.m. to noon PT Noon to 1 p.m. MT
HealthInsight HIIN Onboarding Event: DATA, DATA, DATA April 12, 2017 11 a.m. to noon PT Noon to 1 p.m. MT Welcome So glad you are able to join us! This session is being recorded and a copy of the slides
More informationSepsis Kills: The challenges & solutions to reducing mortality
Sepsis Kills: The challenges & solutions to reducing mortality Kevin Rooney, Ahmed Labib & Brent Foreman Who are we? Declaration of Conflict of Interest We have no financial conflict of interest in presenting
More informationPractical Skills Building Session: Control Charts Worksheets
2018 frican Forum on Quality and Safety in Healthcare Practical Skills Building Session: Control Charts Worksheets Faculty Robert Lloyd, PhD, Vice President Institute for Healthcare Improvement 20 February
More informationHealthcare Acquired Infections
Healthcare Acquired Infections Emerging Trends in Hospital Administration 9 th & 10 th May 2014 Prof. Hannah Priya HICC In charge What is healthcare acquired infection? An infection occurring in a patient
More informationCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update
ID Me asure Name NQF # Value- (VBP) - (HACRP) (HRRP) ID Me asure Name NQF # Value- (VBP) - (HACRP) (HRRP) CMS s - Fiscal Year 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Improvement s for Acute
More informationPatient Safety Overview
Patient Safety Overview Muhammad H. Islam, MBBS, MS, MCH, LSSBB Director of Patient Safety & Patient Safety Officer SUNY Downstate Medical Center, UHB www.downstate.edu/patientsafety Definitions Patient
More informationNEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES
NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES New Jersey Department of Health Health Care Quality Assessment
More informationGoal Elements of Performance APIC Comments APIC Recommendations
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Comments on the Joint Commission s Proposed 2012 National Patient Safety Goals The Joint Commission Practice Guidance Team Accreditation
More informationClostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Intervention Kick-Off Webinar
Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Intervention Kick-Off Webinar Wednesday, January 17, 2018 National Nursing Home Quality Care Collaborative (NNHQCC) Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG) Introduction
More informationThe Joint Commission Standards and the Patients
The Joint Commission Standards and the Patients 23 rd Annual National Forum on Quality Improvement in Health Care December 7, 2011 Orlando, Florida Pat Adamski, RN, MS, MBA Director, Standards Interpretation
More informationTo Dip or Not To Dip
To Dip or Not To Dip a patient centred approach to improve the management of UTI in the Care Home environment FIS 30 th November 2017 #ToDipOrNotToDip #FIS17 Elizabeth Beech on behalf of colleagues National
More informationNEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES
NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES New Jersey Department of Health Health Care Quality Assessment
More informationApril Clinical Governance Corporate Report Narrative
April 14 - Clinical Governance Corporate Report Narrative ITEM 7B Narrative has been provided where there is something of note in relation to a specific metric; this could be positive improvement, decline
More informationInfection Prevention, Control & Immunizations
Infection Control: This facility task must be used to investigate compliance at F880, F881, and F883. For the purpose of this task, staff includes employees, consultants, contractors, volunteers, and others
More informationClinical Guidance on the Identification and Evaluation of Possible SARS-CoV Disease among Persons Presenting with Community-Acquired Illness Version 2
GUIDANCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS Clinical Guidance on the Identification and Evaluation of Possible SARS-CoV Disease among Persons Presenting with Community-Acquired Illness Version 2 This document provides
More informationCNA SEPSIS EDUCATION 2017
CNA SEPSIS EDUCATION 2017 WHAT CAUSES SEPSIS? Sepsis occurs when the body has a severe immune response to an infection Anyone who has an infection is at risk for developing sepsis Sepsis occurs when the
More informationQuality Management Building Blocks
Quality Management Building Blocks Quality Management A way of doing business that ensures continuous improvement of products and services to achieve better performance. (General Definition) Quality Management
More informationConsumers Union/Safe Patient Project Page 1 of 7
Improving Hospital and Patient Safety: An overview of recently passed legislation and requirements towards improving the safety of California s hospital patients June 2009 Background Since 2006 several
More information