JAIL ALTERNATIVES ANNUAL REPORT
|
|
- Frank Gardner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 JAIL ALTERNATIVES ANNUAL REPORT The Santa Cruz County Probation Department maintains its commitment to public safety, research-based practices, stewardship, and reserving costly and limited jail space for higher risk offenders through alternatives to custody programs. Pretrial Services and other jail alternative programs, such as the Warrant Reduction Advocacy Project (WRAP) and postsentence custodial alternatives programs, are part of our continuing jail reduction strategies initiated by jail overcrowding and Public Safety Realignment. The Department s goal is to adhere to research-based principles by: 1) Applying actuarial risk tools to predict the likelihood of risk of flight and danger to the community; 2) Providing the least restrictive supervision necessary to effectively monitor compliance of release conditions; 3) Reminding defendants of their court appearance; 4) Reporting violations of release conditions which indicate an increased risk of pretrial failure to the court with a recommendation for modifications to mitigate risk; 5) Using evidence-based techniques to gain compliance and increase defendant engagement and motivation through strength based and motivational interviewing techniques; and 6) Using fidelity measures, data, and evaluation to ensure quality and effectiveness of services and guide decision-making. Pretrial Services serves the court by making fact-based release recommendations on defendants who are in-custody awaiting further disposition, taking in to account the risk the defendant poses to the community and the likelihood the defendant will appear at future court proceedings. Additionally, Pretrial Services supervises defendants who are out of custody awaiting trial. Pretrial supervision allows defendants the opportunity to remain engaged in their community while awaiting trial. Pretrial Services is also responsible for the collection, screening, and monitoring of all Probable Cause Declarations. [Recent studies by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation] demonstrate that pretrial decisions may impact whether or not a defendant gets sentenced to jail or prison, and for how long; that an increased length of pretrial detention for low- and moderate-risk defendants is associated with an increased likelihood that they will reoffend both during the pretrial period and two years after the conclusion of their case; and that supervision may reduce failure to appear rates and, when done for 180 days or more, new criminal activity. Laura and John Arnold Foundation Pretrial Criminal Justice Research November 2013 Pretrial Services currently consists of two (2) Deputy Probation Officers, two (2) Probation Aides and one (1) Supervisor (Deputy Probation Officer III). In order to more adequately staff Pretrial Services and to ensure coverage seven days per week, the Department added the second Probation Aide in February 2013 and realigned resources so the Supervisor could dedicate their time entirely to Pretrial Services. The goal is to add up to two additional positions to Pretrial so that we can further fulfill our mission to assess, release and supervise as many defendants that meet release criteria and to ensure compliance with best practices in the field of pretrial. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 1) In September 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved the Department s Pretrial Report Back thereby accepting the report as a blue print to move forward with continuous quality improvement and directing the Department to return in May 2014 to report on progress in 1 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
2 meeting technical assistance evaluation recommendations and piloting of the new risk assessment. 2) Through enhanced pretrial services, supervised release, the Warrant Reduction Advocacy Project and post-sentencing electronic monitoring, the department has reduced the jail population by approximately 47 plus beds per day during CY13. At $85/day jail bed cost, this equates to a cost avoidance of over $1,458, Supervised Pretrial 3) An 81% positive outcome rate was achieved in CY13-64% of defendants on pretrial supervision successfully completed pretrial and 17% were returned to custody pending disposition for violating release terms [demonstrates accountability]. Less than 10% of defendants failed to appear, and only 9% were arrested for new crimes. 4) Pretrial has implemented a majority of the best-practice recommendations from the June 2013 Technical Assistance evaluation from Luminosity, Inc. 5) In December 2013, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation formally selected Santa Cruz County as one of three sites in the nation to pilot their newly developed pretrial risk assessment (Public Safety Assessment-Court or PSA-Court). TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE [EVALUATION] RESULTS: Pre-Arraignment Releases Post-Sentence EMP WRAP Average Daily Population During 2013, as part of pretrial system improvement, technical assistance was received from Luminosity, Inc. to evaluate the fidelity of our pretrial program and whether or not the program was right-sized. There were two primary objectives for the evaluation. The first was to evaluate the current state and fidelity of our pretrial program with regard to its implementation of pretrial core concepts and legal and evidence-based practices. The second was to address whether or not the program was right-sized. Multiple strengths were noted during the evaluation which represent pretrial s solid foundation and its capacity to implement recommendations for continued growth and sustainability. Strengths identified include: Total Bed Days Saved 13, to ,004 2,260 17,115+ Criminal justice system stakeholder support Administering the VPRAI (Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument) Two supervision levels (Supervised Own Recognizance and Intensive Supervised Own Recognizance Pre-arraignment release recommendations made to court Short and Long Pretrial Reports Use of technology electronic monitoring, alcohol detection, tracking pretrial data Case management training (core correctional practices) Supervisory support Several program challenges were noted as well. These challenges primarily address issues of fidelity and long-term sustainability. With the strengths noted above, Pretrial is well-suited to 2 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
3 adopt ongoing improvements for continued growth and sustainability which are deemed necessary and crucial in the field of pretrial. Ongoing quality improvement recommendations and challenges include: Training and supervisory oversight of pretrial staff with respect to - o Administering the risk assessment to fidelity and risk principles ( Addressed); o Following policy regarding decision-making, recommendations to the court, supervision practices ( Addressed); and o Developing a long term plan for increasing the sustainability of these activities, improvement in increasing staff capacity is considered necessary (In progress). In order to maintain fidelity and for staff be available to perform supervision based on risk and supervision level, prioritizing of pretrial duties is required and additional support and additional staffing resources are needed. 1 Currently Pretrial Services is not able to assess all defendants booked into custody and there is the potential for a quantity of medium and high risk defendants to be released pretrial without supervision, neither of which is a best practice. Additional support and additional staffing resources to assess all defendants booked in the jail who meet the pretrial investigation criteria are needed. 2 Replacing the current data system which has been outgrown with an integrated data system that will adequately measure pretrial outcomes. (In progress - Short-term: Taking preliminary steps to address through improving current pretrial database; Long-term: Incorporating pretrial into the current probation case management system - comes with moderate cost to do so). Consideration for opportunity to relocate staff within a more central location to conduct the pretrial investigation and provide the necessary equipment and data sources for staff to fulfill their role. Adoption of a new generation pretrial risk assessment instrument based on the growing empirical research that includes training of all staff and a train-the-trainer component for fidelity and sustainability ( Began pilot process January 2014) Blanket approach to release conditions (to be addressed with Court and stakeholders.) Figure 1: Probation's Pretrial Staff are currently located in a small office within the main jail that does not accommodate all staff and is away from the booking area. Validation Results: As part of Luminosity s technical assistance, a validation analysis was conducted on the risk assessment implemented by the Department. Overall, the assessment was found to be a modest predictor of pretrial failures for our County s sample. Based on this finding and the subsequent opportunity to pilot a next generation risk assessment instrument that is more predictive and is predictive of violence, the Department made the decision (along 1 To satisfy the recommendations of additional staffing, funding to add a minimum of 2 additional staff would be needed. 2 Utilization of the PSA-Court which does not require an interview will assist in meeting this recommendation. 3 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
4 with the Presiding Superior Court Judge) to adopt a new pretrial risk assessment instrument that includes training of all staff and a train the trainer component for fidelity and sustainability. NEW OPPORTUNITY - PILOTING NEW PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT: Based on our technical assistance work with Luminosity, Inc., and our reputation within the State as being a leader in pretrial services, we were one of three national jurisdictions chosen to pilot a new generation pretrial risk assessment [PSA-Court] through the Laura and John Arnold Foundation beginning January As being part of being one of a limited number of pilot sites, the County would receive significant amounts of technical assistance and resources in order to pilot and subsequently implement the next generation assessment. REPORT BACK TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: At the request of the Board of Supervisors (BOS), a Pretrial Report Back was submitted and the BOS approved the report s recommendations: The Public Safety Assessment - Court (PSA-Court), a tool that reliably predicts the risk a given defendant will reoffend, commit violent acts, or fail to come back to court with just nine readily available data points. What this means is that there are no timeconsuming interviews, no extra staff, and very minimal expense. And it can be applied to every defendant in every case. Laura and John Arnold Foundation November ) Accept the Report Back as a blue print to move forward with continuous quality improvement. 2) Endorse the Department piloting of the Arnold Foundation s pretrial risk assessment. 3) Direct the Chief Probation to coordinate and meet with key county criminal justice stakeholders to develop a formal proposal of collaboration on piloting of the Arnold Foundation s pretrial risk assessment. 4) Have the Department return before the Board in May 2014 to report on progress in meeting the technical assistance evaluation recommendations and piloting of the new risk assessment. OUTCOMES MEASURES AND RESULTS: 3 The following Outcome Measures, Performance Measures and Mission Critical Data were adopted in 2012 so that we can more accurately track our program s effectiveness in meeting agency and justice system goals: 1. Appearance Rate: The percent of supervised defendants who make all scheduled court appearances. Supervised Pretrial Appearance Rate 91% 85.1% 89.0% 92.0% 90.3% Goal 85% 85% Analysis: The percentage of defendants released to pretrial supervision that failed to appear was at 9.7% in 2013 (24 of 247 participants). 3 In 2011, the National Institute of Corrections published, Measuring What Matters Outcome and Performance Measures for the Pretrial Services Field. The publication recommended measures and data for pretrial service programs that would enable agencies to gauge more accurately their program s effectiveness in meeting agency and justice system goals. The recommended outcomes measures and data elements are consistent with the mission and goals of our Department. 4 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
5 The percent of defendants released pre-arraignment that failed to appear at arraignment was 26%. 2. Safety Rate: The percent of supervised defendants who are not charged with a new offense during the pretrial supervision. Supervised Pretrial Safety Rate 96% 92.5% 97.4% 92.5% 90.7% Goal 95% Analysis: The rate of defendants released to pretrial supervision that have been arrested for new offenses during their pretrial supervision in 2013 was 9.3% (23 of 247 participants). 3. Success Rate: The percent of released defendants who are 1) not revoked for technical violations due to condition violations, 2) appear for all scheduled court appearances, and 3) remain arrest free during pretrial supervision. Supervised Pretrial Success Rate 71% 68.7% 76.1% 65.7% 63.6% Goal 70% Analysis: When examining success rates, you need to look at defendants that successfully completed pretrial supervision by appearing at all their court hearing and those defendants that were held accountable for not complying with the term of pretrial release and were returned to custody pending disposition. 17.4% of supervised pretrial defendants in 2013 had technical violations which resulted in their pretrial release being revoked and returned to custody (43 of 247 participants). Succcessful Completion / Technical Violation Return, 81.0% Failed - New Offense, 9.3% 2013 Pretrial Outcomes 4. Concurrence (Effectiveness) Rate: The ratio of released and detained defendants to the pretrial agency's release and detention recommendations Released Detained Follow Recommendation Recommended for Release % Recommended for Detention % Recommendation Followed (ALL) 69.7% GOAL 75% Analysis: Concurrence rate is an excellent measure of success in helping courts apply supervision levels [and release decisions] that match the defendant s identified risk level. This is a recognized best practice in the criminal justice field. The measure also complements appearance and safety rates by allowing pretrial programs to track subsequent failure by defendants originally recommended for detention. Failed to Appear, 9.7% 5 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
6 CY13 results were fairly consistent with CY12 results but the concurrence rate is still lower than the established goal even though the Court follows Pretrial s recommendation almost 70% of the time, over 30% of the time the recommendation is not followed in making release or detain decisions on pretrial defendants. 5. Recommendation Rate: The percent of time program follows its risk assessment criteria when recommending release or detention [The percentage of overrides to the risk assessment scheme (the percent of time Pretrial Staff follow the risk assessment criteria)]. Recommendation Rate Year Total Follows Risk Overrides Risk Follows Override Recommendations Assessment Criteria Assessment % Rate (%) % 39.4% % 42.0% Goal: The acceptable standard by Pretrial experts is considered to be between a 10-15% override rate. Lower scores on the risk assessment are indicative of lower risk to failure to appear or engage in new criminal activity during pretrial supervision and higher scores are indicative of higher risk. Thus, low risk defendants should be recommended for release without supervision; moderate risk defendants should be recommended for supervised release; and the highest risk defendants should be either detained or have more structured supervised release such as ISOR. 5 Discussion and Analysis: Pretrial continues to have high override rate 42% of the time the pretrial staff deviates from the risk level that is a significantly high override rate compared to the industry standard of no more than 10-15% override rate. Pretrial will continue to examine the use of overrides in order to reduce subjective versus objective overrides. This examination will be done in conjunction with the piloting and implementation of the new pretrial risk assessment tool. 6. Number of Defendants Released By Release type and Condition: The number of release types ordered during a specified time frame. Pre-arraignment Releases Pretrial assess appropriate cases for release, prior to a first court appearance (arraignment). With a judge's verbal permission, the detainee is released with a signed promise to appear at arraignment. These releases typically save a minimum of 2 to 5 days of jail. Pre-arraignment Releases Releases Bed Day Savings 754 to to 1265 Reduction in Average Daily Population (inmates per day) nd Half 2012 Results 5 Moderate & higher risk persons identified are the most suited for [supervised] pretrial release, both programmatically & economically, with conditions. Release conditions that include alternatives to pretrial detention generally decrease the likelihood of success pending trial for lower risk defendants and should be required sparingly. 6 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
7 Supervised Release and Intensive Supervision (SOR and ISOR): All offenders booked into the county jail are assessed by Pretrial staff using a validated risk instrument, with the exception of those that only have federal, out-of-state, out-of-county, probation or parole only holds. Results from this screening guide the Probation Officer s recommendation to the court regarding level of supervision needed to maximize the chance that the offender will appear for court and not recidivate prior to court. The levels of release vary and include: release on own-recognizance (OR), with no supervision; supervised release, which includes some monitoring of the offender at home and work by pretrial staff and often includes testing for drugs and/or alcohol; and intensive supervision for offenders needing a higher level of containment that adds electronic monitoring and a device that immediately detects the use of alcohol when needed. Some offenders move between these levels of supervision during the court process depending on their compliance. Supervised Pretrial Released Average Daily Population Bed Days Saved 11,621 10,831 11,110 11,532 13,468 Bed Days Saved (Supervised Pretrial) Average Daily Population (Supervised Pretrial) , Own- Recognizance Release (OR) In addition to the defendants interviewed and released by Pretrial staff, numerous other defendants are released annually. At the booking stage, the Sheriff s Office has a list of charges for which they can release defendants on, such as Drunk in Public, Petty Theft and non-violent misdemeanors [Sheriff s Office OR]. In addition, defendants may post bail to secure their release. Releases Bail 1, Sheriff's Office OR (Own Recognizance) 2, Court OR Data Source: Santa Cruz County Sheriff s Office 7 Includes 1132 Bail Bonds, 33 Cash Bail and 45 combined Bail/Own Recognizance. 7 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
8 POST-SENTENCE CUSTODIAL ALTERNATIVES PROGRAMS: Post Sentence Electronic Monitoring Program (EMP): In October 2009, the Department implemented an electronic monitoring home confinement program for suitable inmates sentenced to local custody. EMP s primary function is to provide a resource to decrease the use of jail custody sanctions for offenders where an alternative sanction is appropriate. Since the implementation of the Sheriff s Custody Alternative Program (CAP) in 2011, the number of inmates has steadily declined as CAP principally accomplishes, but to a much larger degree, what EMP was accomplishing. Even though EMP continues to serve inmates, referrals are primarily inmates that may be lower risk but do not meet CAP criteria due to the nature of the sentencing crime [Person-to Person Crime]. It is the Department s goal to remove itself as a post-sentence custody alternative given the success of CAP and with the hope that CAP moves to a more of a risk-based versus charge-based approach to release of appropriate inmates. Participant compliance is monitored by Pretrial staff and use of an electronic ankle bracelet. Participants are allowed to attend work or school and pay for the cost of the program. During FY 12/13, 30 participants were on Post-Sentence EMP 25 participants successfully completed the program, 4 participated successfully completed but with program rule violation(s), and 1 participant failed due to new offense. Post Sentence EMP Success Rates FY FY FY FY Successful Completion 91.7% 90.7% 100% 83.3% Failure-to-Appear 0% 0% 0% 0% Completion with program rule violation 5.6% 7.0% 0% 13.3% Failed-New Offense 2.8% 2.3% 0% 3.3% CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013 Average Daily Population Bed Days Saved 4,446 3,353 3,199 1,004 Custody Alternative Program (CAP): In order to mitigate the impact of Public Safety Realignment locally, the Santa Cruz County Sheriff s Office collaborated with our Department to develop and implement an additional electronic monitoring program for sentenced offenders 8 (implemented October The Custody Alternative Program 2011). The Sheriff s Office manages the program with the assistance of one Deputy Probation Officer. The program is designed for offenders who pose a lesser risk to the was recognized by the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) as a model of costeffective strategies to maintain community, have been convicted of less serious offenses or that may have special needs or problems that may be better public safety with a 2013 CSAC handled in their home environment. A validated risk Challenge Merit Award. assessment tool is used to assist in these release decisions. During the first two years of the program [October 2011 through September 2013], there have been a total of 581 participants, 9 including (h) inmates. Of those 581 participants, 51 participants ((9%) were returned to custody for program violations and only 3 participants (less 8 The Sheriff is authorized to determine how inmates in their jail serve a sentence under and of the California Penal Code. 9 A few inmates have been in CAP twice for different sentences and/or rolled up and placed back on CAP. 8 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
9 Sep-11 Nov-11 Jan-12 Mar-12 May-12 Jul-12 Sep-12 Nov-12 Jan-13 Mar-13 May-13 Jul-13 Sep-13 than 1%) absconded. Approximately 57 inmates per day are in the CAP program which translates into an annual bed day saving of over 20,000. Participants Returned to Custody, 51, 9% Custody Alternatives Program (CAP) Outcomes over 2 years of Implementation N = 581 Participants Abscond, 3, 0% Active or Successful Participants, 527, 91% CAP 1170h CAP Sheriff Parole Warrant Reduction Advocacy Project (WRAP): The WRAP program was implemented in December 2005 to reduce the jail impact of lower risk probationers who were arrested on abscond warrants [for failing to maintain contact with their probation officer] 10. The Department has contracted with Friends Outside (a non-profit agency that provides support to inmates and their families) to provide outreach to probationers who are failing to report to their probation officer and are on the verge of having a warrant requested. In addition to re-connecting the offender with probation, WRAP specialists assist the individual with peer and support groups and aftercare case management. The program has been successful in meeting established goals referrals are at or near established goals [on target to be well over 100 referrals for the current FY) and the percent of averted warrants are meeting or exceeding established goals (reference table below). Referrals Warrants Averted Number Goal 1 Goal 2 Met Goal Averted Percent Averted Goal Met Goal FY09/ % 33% FY10/ % 33% FY11/ % 30% FY12/ % 30% FY13/14 (1st Half) % 30% During the first half of FY13/14, WRAP averted 37 warrants - projected over a twelve month period, the estimated annual jail bed days saving would be 2,260 conservatively (using a 30-day average length of stay per absconder) or almost a reduction of 6 jail beds per day. 10 A study conducted by the Vera Institute of Justice in Santa Cruz County showed that, on average, probationers who were picked up on bench warrants issued for failing to maintain probation contact spent an average of 40 days in jail. 9 Jail Alternatives Annual Report 2013 Final Date: February 21, 2014
Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation
Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership Public Safety Realignment Plan Assembly Bill 109 and 117 FY 2013 14 Realignment Implementation April 4, 2013 Prepared By: Sacramento County Local Community
More informationOffice of Criminal Justice Services
Office of Criminal Justice Services Annual Report FY 2012 Manassas Office 9540 Center Street, Suite 301 Manassas, VA 20110 703-792-6065 Woodbridge Office 15941 Donald Curtis Drive, Suite 110 Woodbridge,
More informationNORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2013 to FISCAL YEAR 2022 Prepared in Conjunction with the North Carolina Department of Public Safety
More informationSacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act
Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership Public Safety Realignment Act Assembly Bill 109 and 117 Long-Term Realignment Implementation Plan May 2014 Prepared by: Sacramento County Community Corrections
More informationCircuit Court of Cook County Performance Metrics Department Adult Probation
Fee collection N/A Adult Probation collects restitution on behalf of the courts that is distributed to victims. Adult Probation also collects probation fees that go to support subsidized treatment for
More informationNORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021 Prepared in Conjunction with the North Carolina Department of Public Safety
More informationThe Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013
The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013 Review complete 2010 prison population (162 offenders to prison Conduct Risk Assessments for
More informationMentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department
Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department Introduction What is MIOCR? A competitive grant specifically for operators
More informationAgenda: Community Supervision Subgroup
Agenda: 9.15.15 Community Supervision Subgroup 1. Welcome 2. Member Introductions 3. Policy Discussion o Incentivizing Positive Behavior Earned Compliance Credits o Responding to Probation Violations:
More informationWashoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing
Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing Misdemeanor Probation 2012 Joe Ingraham, Chief 1 Mission Statement The mission of the Department of Alternative Sentencing (DAS) is to increase safety
More informationRIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEP ARTME Serving Courts Protecting Our Community Changing Lives
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEP ARTME Serving Courts Protecting Our Community Changing Lives MARKA.HAKE CHIEF PROBATION OFFICER August 6, 2014 Honorable Mark A. Cope, Presiding Judge Superior Court of California,
More informationCommunity Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, February 12, :30 pm
Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, February 12, 2018-3:30 pm Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers 168 West Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93901 ITEM AGENCY I. CALL TO ORDER
More informationDeputy Probation Officer I/II
Santa Cruz County Probation September 2013 Duty Statement page 1 Deputy Probation Officer I/II 1. Conduct dispositional or pre-sentence investigations of adults and juveniles by interviewing offenders,
More informationOverview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System
Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System Recommendations related specifically to the facilities issues are not included in this table. The categories used in
More informationHarris County - Jail Population September 2016 Report
Comparison of Jail Population 1st Mtg 1 Year Last Current Aug-09 Sep-15 Aug-16 of Ago Month Month Council - - - Category 1 Aug-09 Sep-15 Aug-16 Sep-16 Sep-16 Sep-16 Sep-16 Pretrial Detainees (By Highest
More informationCommunity Corrections Partnership (CCP) Action Minutes Monday, February 8, :30 p.m.
Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Action Minutes Monday, February 8, 2016-3:30 p.m. Monterey County Government Center Board Chambers 168 W. Alisal St. Salinas, CA 93901 I. Call to Order The meeting
More informationNorth Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission
North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission January 2015 Prison Population Projections: Fiscal Year 2015 to Fiscal Year 2024 Introduction North Carolina General Statute 164 40 sets forth the
More informationThe Role of Crime Victims and Advocates in Pretrial Justice Reform
The Role of Crime Victims and Advocates in Pretrial Justice Reform April 2, 2015 2:00-3:30 pm ET You have logged on successfully! - All attendees have been muted. - Slides and the webcast from this webinar
More informationTarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet
Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet For more information, contact Dr. Ana Yáñez- Correa at acorrea@texascjc.org, or (512) 587-7010. The Texas Criminal Justice Coalition seeks the implementation
More informationNorth Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission
North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission Prison Population Projections: Fiscal Year 2016 to Fiscal Year 2025 February 2016 Introduction North Carolina General Statute 164 40 sets forth
More informationRE: Grand Jury Report: AB109/AB117 Realignment: Is Santa Clara County Ready for Prison Reform?
County of Santa Clara Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County Government Center, East Wing 70 West Hedding Street San Jose, California 95110-1770 (408) 299-5001 FAX 298-8460 TDD 993-8272
More informationWRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION
WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION ON THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE & THE TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES TO HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
More informationINMATE CLASSIFICATION
DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL CD-6-4 L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: February 1, 2016 INMATE CLASSIFICATION POLICY. It is the policy of the Deschutes County Adult Jail (DCAJ) and Work
More informationMerced County. Public Safety Realignment & Post Release Community Supervision
Merced County Public Safety Realignment & Post Release Community Supervision 2016 / 2017 STRATEGIES YEAR 6 (Amended 9/9/16) Executive Committee of the Community Corrections Partnership Brian McCabe, Presiding
More informationJustice Reinvestment in Arkansas
Justice Reinvestment in Arkansas Fifth Presentation to the Legislative Criminal Justice Oversight Task Force June 22, 2016 Andy Barbee, Research Manager Jessica Gonzales, Senior Research Associate Mack
More informationSHASTA COUNTY MAIN JAIL Catch & Release. Section 919 of the California Penal Code requires the Grand Jury to inquire into the
SHASTA COUNTY MAIN JAIL Catch & Release REASON FOR INQUIRY: Shasta County Main Jail 1655 West Street Redding, Ca 96001 (530) 245.6100 Section 919 of the California Penal Code requires the Grand Jury to
More informationSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT. Data Collection Efforts
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Data Collection Efforts 2 Year 1 Planning Contracted with San Joaquin County Community Data Co-Op 10 year relationship with evaluation work Funds from one-time
More informationPublic Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)
Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee (CCPEC) Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) San Francisco Board of Supervisors Public Safety Committee Public Safety Realignment Hearing
More informationMonroe Detention and Leinberger Memorial Centers: Adapting Throughout Political and Physical Change
Monroe Detention and Leinberger Memorial Centers: Adapting Throughout Political and Physical Change SUMMARY The Monroe Detention Center and Leinberger Memorial Center, together commonly referred to as
More informationJustice Reinvestment in West Virginia
Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia Presentation to WV Behavioral Health Planning Council October 16, 2014 Joseph D. Garcia Deputy General Counsel Office of Governor Earl Ray Tomblin Outline of Presentation
More informationTestimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014
Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014 Good morning Chairman Adolph, Chairman Markosek and members of the
More informationSeptember 2011 Report No
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on The Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Report No. 12-002 An Audit Report
More informationAfter years of steady decline, Rhode Island s
Justice Reinvestment in Rhode Island Analysis and Policy Framework JUNE 2016 Overview After years of steady decline, Rhode Island s incarcerated population is projected to increase by 11 percent by FY2025.
More informationDuring 2011, for the third
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Probation and Parole in the United States, 2011 Laura M. Maruschak, BJS Statistician and Erika Parks, BJS Intern During
More informationWINDSOR COUNTY, VERMONT DUI TREATMENT DOCKET (WCDTD) FOR REPEAT OFFENSE IMPAIRED DRIVING CASES
WCDTD Policy Manual, Revised 5.4.15 WINDSOR COUNTY, VERMONT DUI TREATMENT DOCKET (WCDTD) FOR REPEAT OFFENSE IMPAIRED DRIVING CASES POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL The Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket has
More informationSteven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer
Mission Statement The mission of the Department is prevention, intervention, education, and suppression service delivery that enhances the future success of those individuals placed on probation, while
More informationJustice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework
Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework December 16, 2010 Council of State Governments Justice Center Marshall Clement, Project Director Anne Bettesworth, Policy Analyst Robert Coombs,
More informationSacramento County Community Corrections Partnership
Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership AB 109 Mental Health & Substance Abuse Work Group Proposal Mental Health & Alcohol / Drug Service Gaps: County Jail Prison ( N3 ), Parole, and Flash
More informationJustice Reinvestment in Kansas (House Bill 2170) Kansas BIDS Conference October 8 & 9, 2015
Justice Reinvestment in Kansas (House Bill 2170) Kansas BIDS Conference October 8 & 9, 2015 Carl Reynolds, Senior Legal Advisor Council of State Governments Justice Center & Ebo Browne, Research Analyst
More informationProbation Department BUDGET WORKSHOP. Alan M. Crogan, Chief Probation Officer
Riverside County Probation Department BUDGET WORKSHOP Alan M. Crogan, Chief Probation Officer March 28, 2012 1 Missioni Serving Courts Protecting our Community Changing Lives One Department - One Mission
More informationStatewide Misdemeanant Confinement Program Annual Report Fiscal Year North Carolina Sheriffs' Association
Statewide Misdemeanant Confinement Program Annual Report Fiscal Year 2013-14 North Carolina Sheriffs' Association October 1, 2014 NORTH CAROLINA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION Statewide Misdemeanant Confinement
More informationSection 6. Intermediate Sanctions
Intermediate sanctions and interventions in the criminal justice system vary greatly in the level of control and/or penalty imposed, the point in the criminal justice process at which they are imposed,
More informationREVIEW OF THE ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY OFFICE. Report to the Mayor and Commission OF PROBATION SERVICES. October Prepared by:
REVIEW OF THE ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY OFFICE OF PROBATION SERVICES Report to the Mayor and Commission October 2011 Prepared by: Auditor s Office Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County
More informationTARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES
TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES Texas Council June 2015 Ramey C. Heddins, CCHP Director Mental Health Support Services Kathleen Carr Rae, Public Policy Specialist WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? Prison 3-year
More informationDISTRICT COURT. Judges (not County positions) Court Administration POS/FTE 3/3. Family Court POS/FTE 39/36.5 CASA POS/FTE 20/12.38
DISTRICT COURT Judges (not County positions) Arbritration POS/FTE 3/3 Court Services POS/FTE 33/26.7 Court Administration POS/FTE 3/3 Probate POS/FTE 4/3.06 General Jurisdiction POS/FTE 38/35.31 Family
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Confinement of Military Prisoners and Administration of Military Correctional Programs and Facilities
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 1325.4 August 17, 2001 SUBJECT: Confinement of Military Prisoners and Administration of Military Correctional Programs and Facilities USD(P&R) References: (a) DoD
More informationCCP Executive Retreat May 29, 2014
I. Call to Order The CCP Executive Retreat was called to order at 10:05 a.m. in Room 310 of the Merced County Administration Building. II. Executive Committee Members Present Scott Ball (Chair), Chief
More informationMemorandum. Date: June 29, Honorable Rodney Melville Santa Barbara Superior Court
Memorandum Date: June 29, 2007 To: Honorable Rodney Melville Santa Barbara Superior Court Albert Mercado, Foreperson 2006-2007 Santa Barbara County Grand Jury From: Patricia J. Stewart, Chief Probation
More informationDOC & PRISONER REENTRY
DOC & PRISONER REENTRY Mission DOC provides secure confinement, reformative programs, and a process of supervised community reintegration to enhance the safety of our communities. 2 DOC At a Glance Alaska
More informationOver the past decade, the number of people in North
Justice Reinvestment in North Dakota Policy Framework JANUARY 2017 Overview Over the past decade, the number of people in North Dakota s prisons and jails, on probation, and on parole has increased, and
More informationFY18 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program
May 2, 2018 FY18 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program Solicitation Webinar 2018 The Council of State Governments Justice Center Speakers Maria Fryer, Policy Advisor for Substance Abuse and Mental
More informationFY 2015 Court Administration Seventh Judicial Circuit
Criminal Court Services Annual Report FY 2015 Court Administration Seventh Judicial Circuit Table of Contents Criminal Court Services... 1 Volusia County Pretrial Services... 2 Drug Screening Laboratories...
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note BILL NUMBER: House Bill 65 (First Edition) SHORT TITLE: Req Active Time Felony Death MV/Boat. SPONSOR(S): Representatives
More informationCriminal Justice Review & Status Report
Criminal Justice Review & Status Report September 2010 This report highlights significant events from the past year that pertain to Mecklenburg County s effort to coordinate the criminal justice system.
More informationKern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Pretrial Staffing Plan
Kern County Sheriff s Office Detentions Bureau 2016 Pretrial Staffing Plan The purpose of this staffing plan is to establish basic security staffing protocols to ensure a safe and secure environment for
More informationSt. Louis County Public Safety Innovation Fund Report
St. Louis County Public Safety Innovation Fund Report INTENSIVE PRE-TRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM Program Goal: Provide Intensive Community Supervision on Pre-Trial Defendants in lieu of incarceration at the St.
More informationInstructions for completion and submission
OMB No. 1121-0094 Approval Expires 01/31/2019 Form CJ-5A 2018 ANNUAL SURVEY OF JAILS PRIVATE AND MULTIJURISDICTIONAL JAILS FORM COMPLETED BY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS AND
More informationCharacteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report December 1997, NCJ-164267 Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995 By Thomas P. Bonczar BJS Statistician
More informationNevada County Mental Health Court. Policies and Procedures Table of Contents
Policies and Procedures Table of Contents Topic Page Purpose....................................................... 2 Eligibility....................................................... 2 Entry Procedure.................................................
More informationA Preliminary Review of the Metropolitan Detention Center s Community Custody Program
A Preliminary Review of the Metropolitan Detention Center s Community Custody Program Prepared by: Institute for Social Research, University of New Mexico Linda Freeman, M.A. June 2006 Introduction The
More informationSTATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES
STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD JANUARY 2009 COVER PHOTO COURTESY OF SENATE PHOTOGRAPHY Criminal Justice Data Analysis Team Michele Connolly, Manager
More informationSheriff-Coroner. Mission Statement
Kory Honea, Mission Statement The mission of the Butte County Sheriff s Office is to protect and serve the citizens of Butte County by providing vigorous, ethical, efficient law enforcement, and increasing
More informationInstructions for completion and submission
OMB No. 1121-0094 Approval Expires 01/31/2019 Form CJ-5 2017 ANNUAL SURVEY OF JAILS FORM COMPLETED BY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS AND ACTING AS COLLECTION AGENT: RTI INTERNATIONAL
More informationThe Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. May 2016 Report No.
An Audit Report on The Criminal Justice Information System at the Department of Public Safety and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Report No. 16-025 State Auditor s Office reports are available
More informationMy Family Member Has Been Arrested What Do I Do?
My Family Member Has Been Arrested What Do I Do? A step-by-step guide to help families cope with the criminal justice system in Kern County when a family member who suffers from a brain disorder (mental
More informationCounty Pretrial Release Programs: Calendar Year 2013
December 2014 Report No. 14-13 County Pretrial Release Programs: Calendar Year 2013 at a glance Pretrial release programs supervise defendants who have been released from jail while awaiting disposition
More informationHarris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model
Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model 12/31/2015 1 Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Sequential Intercept Model The Sequential Intercept
More informationPublic Safety Trends Report Year End Review
Public Safety Trends Report Year End Review 1 Page Public Safety Trend Report INTRODUCTION Dear Reader, Welcome to the Year End Public Safety Trends Report produced by Multnomah County s Local Public Safety
More informationRod Underhill, District Attorney
Rod Underhill, District Attorney 1021 SW Fourth Avenue, Room 600 Portland, OR 97204-1193 Phone: 503-988-3162 Fax: 503-988-3643 www.mcda.us MULTNOMAH LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTED DIVERSION (LEAD ) MISSION &
More informationSan Francisco Adult Probation Department. Fiscal Year Annual Report
San Francisco Adult Probation Department Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Annual Report City and County of San Francisco Adult Probation Department Hall of Justice WENDY S. STILL Chief Adult Probation Officer Protecting
More informationPretrial Analysis for Middlesex County, Massachusetts
Pretrial Analysis for Middlesex County, Massachusetts Technical Assistance Report By Don Trapp Edited by Stephanie J. Vetter December 29, 2014 National Institute of Corrections Technical Assistance No.
More informationDISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN PRISON. Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania
DISABILITY-RELATED INQUIRIES CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS INCARCERATED IN PRISON Prepared by the Disability Rights Network of Pennsylvania Jail and Prison: What Is the Difference? People often use the terms
More informationOffice of Criminal Justice System Improvements Pretrial Drug and Alcohol Initiative. Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Solicitation
Office of Criminal Justice System Improvements 2016 Pretrial Drug and Alcohol Initiative Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Solicitation Please Note: Allow adequate time to submit your Application. You will be unable
More information2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16
2 nd Circuit Court- District Division- Plymouth PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK 5/11/16 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I MISSION STATEMENT 3 II GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM 3 III PROGRAM INFORMATION What is the PMHC Program?
More informationOFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TO: FROM: Public Protection Committee Supervisor Candace Andersen, Chair Supervisor John Gioia, Vice Chair Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County Administrator
More informationStatewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates
Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates SUBMITTED TO THE 82ND TEXAS LEGISLATURE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF JANUARY 2011 STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES
More informationJustice Reinvestment in Massachusetts
Justice Reinvestment in Massachusetts Policy Framework FEBRUARY 2017 Overview assachusetts has achieved the second-lowest M incarceration rate in the nation, and state leaders now wish to address the challenge
More informationNO TALLAHASSEE, July 17, Mental Health/Substance Abuse
CFOP 155-22 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 155-22 TALLAHASSEE, July 17, 2017 Mental Health/Substance Abuse LEAVE OF ABSENCE AND DISCHARGE OF RESIDENTS COMMITTED
More informationResponding to Racial Disparities in Multnomah County s Probation Revocation Outcomes
Responding to Racial Disparities in Multnomah County s Probation Revocation Outcomes JUSTIN BREAUX, THE URBAN INSTITUTE KIMBERLY BERNARD, MULTNOMAH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY JUSTICE HELEN HO & JESSE
More informationThe Department of Juvenile Justice shall provide services for each Superior Court youth placed in a Youth Development Campus.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Applicability: { } All DJJ Staff { } Administration {x} Community Services {x} Secure Facilities Transmittal # 12-04 Policy # 18.22 Related Standards & References:
More informationPUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENTIN ORANGECOUNTY
PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENTIN ORANGECOUNTY 5 th AnnualReport 2016 Page 1 of 48 Page 2 of 48 Page 3 of 48 Executive Summary In an effort to address overcrowding in California s prisons and assist in alleviating
More informationPRE-RELEASE TERMINATION AND POST-RELEASE RECIDIVISM RATES OF COLORADO S PROBATIONERS: FY2014 RELEASES
PRE-RELEASE TERMINATION AND POST-RELEASE RECIDIVISM RATES OF COLORADO S PROBATIONERS: FY2014 RELEASES 10/12/2015 FY2014 RELEASES PREPARED BY: KRIS NASH EVALUATION UNIT DIVISION OF PROBATION SERVICES STATE
More information[CCP STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX]
2014/2015 Community Corrections Partnership Plan facilitated by the Crime and Justice Institute Proposed Project Leads : 12 Projects (7 Projects in FY 14/15) District Attorney: 7 Projects (6 Projects in
More information*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections
*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections I. The Development of Community-Based Corrections p57 A. The agencies of community-based corrections consist of diversion programs, probation, intermediate sanctions,
More informationDefining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program
Nathaniel ACT ATI Program: ACT or FACT? Over the past 10 years, the Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services (CASES) has received national recognition for the Nathaniel Project 1. Initially
More informationDomestic and Sexual Violence Resources for Henrico County Residents
Domestic and Sexual Violence Resources for Henrico County Residents Animal Protection Animal Protection Unit - (804-501-5000) - Answers all animal related calls for service and other animal involved concerns.
More informationOFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER Matthew Foley
Matthew Foley 2300 Clarendon Blvd #201, ARLINGTON, VA 22201 703-875-1111 MFOLEY@ARL.IDC.VIRGINIA.GOV Our Mission: The Office of the Public Defender provides holistic, client-centered representation to
More informationcomplex criminal activity. Detectives assigned to the Special Enforcement Unit (SEU) and Butte Interagency
Jerry W. Smith, Sheriff-Coroner Sheriff-Coroner Department Summary Mission Statement The mission of the Butte County Sheriff s Office is to protect and serve the citizens of Butte County by providing vigorous,
More informationChapter 5 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear
Chapter 5 COMMUNITY SUPERVISION Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear CHAPTER OBJECTIVES 5.1 Explain the key ways in which community supervision is beneficial to the offender, the community,
More informationNORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 to FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 to FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 Prepared in Conjunction with the Department of Correction s Office of
More informationHamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide Updated May 2017 PREVENTION ASSESSMENT TREATMENT REINTEGRATION MUNICIPAL & COMMON PLEAS COURT GUIDE Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Municipal
More informationCOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM GREG COX First District DIANNE JACOB Second District PAM SLATER-PRICE Third District RON ROBERTS Fourth District BILL HORN Fifth District DATE: October
More informationSUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee
SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION Texas Department of Criminal Justice Board of Pardons and Paroles Correctional Managed Health Care Committee Staff Report October 2006 Sunset Advisory Commission Senator Kim
More informationBiennial Report of the Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments Fiscal Year
Biennial Report of the Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Texas Department of Criminal Justice February 2017 [1] Texas Department of Criminal
More informationMacon County Mental Health Court. Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement
Macon County Mental Health Court Participant Handbook & Participation Agreement 1 Table of Contents Introduction...3 Program Description.3 Assessment and Enrollment Process....4 Confidentiality..4 Team
More informationRecent Criminal Justice Reform Initiatives
Minneapolis City Attorney s Office Recent Criminal Justice Reform Initiatives GOAL: Reform the Bail System, Reduce Unnecessary Use of Jail; Reduce Arrests for Bench Warrants Sign and Release Warrants in
More informationProposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program
Proposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program PROPOSAL OVERVIEW The Prosecutor s Diversion Program is a voluntary alternative to adjudication whereby a prosecutor agrees to hold off pressing
More informationResources for Pretrial Justice Reform
Resources for Pretrial Justice Reform Pretrial Justice Policy Forum Fostering State Court Leadership on Evidence-Based Pretrial Practices Friday, June 12, 2014 Lori Eville National Institute of Corrections
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2007 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note (G.S. 120-36.7) BILL NUMBER: SHORT TITLE: SPONSOR(S): House Bill 887 (Second Edition) Amend Criminal Offense of Stalking.
More informationCITY OF RICHMOND COMMUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE BOARD
CITY OF RICHMOND COMMUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE BOARD BIENNIAL PLAN FY2014-2015 RICHMOND COMMUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE BOARD 2013 MEMBERSHIP CITIZEN APPOINTEE Albertina R. Walker CCJB Chair COMMONWEALTH S ATTORNEY
More information