Looking Back and Looking Ahead A Sneak Peek at Home Care Quality Improvement Plans (QIP) for

Transcription

1 Looking Back and Looking Ahead A Sneak Peek at Home Care Quality Improvement Plans (QIP) for Lee Fairclough, Health Quality Ontario Laurie Dunn, Health Quality Ontario Danyal Martin, Health Quality Ontario October 25,

2

3 Learning objectives Provide some preliminary guidance regarding the 2017/18 QIP submissions for home care Share learnings from the QIPs Prepare organizations for QIP submission by offering advance notice of changes Provide an overview of HQO resources to support organizations in meeting their goals and supporting change across the system 2

4 HOME CARE QIP SUBMISSIONS FOR 2017/18 3

5 Home Care QIPs CCACs have been submitting QIPs since 2014/15 Changes proposed for CCACs as part of Patients First will result in changes to governance to the CCAC and the LHINs What does this mean for home care QIPs? How do we continue to focus on quality through the QIPs? 4

6 Recommendations Home Care QIPs CCACs to submit a QIP by April 1, 2017 CCACs will be encouraged to develop their QIP in collaboration with their LHIN Guidance to this effect was sent to CCACs and LHINs in early October As changes proposed through Patients First are confirmed formally, additional guidance will be provided regarding board sign-off and other issues Home care QIP priorities will remain essentially stable to ease this transition 5

7 DISCUSSION 12

8 REFLECTIONS ON THE QIPs: LOOKING BACK ACROSS SECTORS 7

9 Key Observations Overarching Reflecting back on their 2015/16 QIPs, of the 1042 submissions more than 85% of organizations reported progress on at least one priority or additional indicator, and more than half reported progress on three or more. There was a high uptake of priority issues in the 2016/17 QIPs, particularly patient experience and integration. More than three-quarters (78%) of organizations described working on at least one of the indicators related to integration. More than 80% of organizations described working on at least one of the indicators related to patient experience. Most organizations set targets to improve, but many of these targets are modest typically within 1 5% of their current performance. While this may be appropriate for some indicators, organizations are encouraged to reflect on their current performance and consider whether a stretch target might be appropriate. 8

10 Percent Percentage of organizations that reported engaging patient advisory councils and forums in development of 2015/16 QIPs and 2016/17 QIPs across all four sectors Hospital Primary care Home care Long-term care / /17

11 Percent Percentage of organizations that reported engaging patients and families in development of 2015/16 QIPs and 2016/17 QIPs across all four sectors Hospital Primary care Home care Long-term care / /17

12 Collaboration with each sector 11

13 Key observations: Equity indicators 1. Collecting and analysis of data, particularly surveys 2. Cultural competency training 3. Program planning 4. Access to Care Poverty Homelessness Rural/Northern communities 12

14 REFLECTIONS ON THE 2016/17 HOME CARE QIPs: LOOKING BACK 13

15 Reflections on the 2016/17 QIPs Looking Back 77% of CCACs reported progress in reducing ED visits 75% reported progress in reducing hospital readmissions Moving Forward 100% working on at least 2 priority indicators 7/14 CCACs chose to try out the palliative indicator last year and are collecting baseline data References to involving patients in design of QI initiatives woven throughout QIPs 14

16 CCAC Priority Indicators Looking Back: Percentage of Community Care Access Centres (CCACS) in Ontario that progressed, maintained or worsened in their performance between 2015/16 and 2016/17 QIP Progress report Unplanned Emergency Department Visits (n=13) 77% 23% Hospital Readmissions (n=12) 75% 8% 17% Clients' Experience (n=12) 50% 50% Five-Day Wait Time for Home Care: Personal Support for Complex Patients (n=13) 38% 62% Five-Day Wait Time for Home Care: Nursing Visits (n=14) 36% 7% 57% Falls for Long-Stay Clients (n=14) 21% 79% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent Progressed Maintained Worsened Progress was seen in performance for 50% or more Community Care Access Centres (CCACS) on indicators such as Unplanned Emergency Department Visits, Clients' Experience and Hospital Readmissions. Comparatively, a larger number of CCACs worsened in their performance between 2015/16 and 2016/17 for Five-Day Wait Time for Home Care: Nursing Visits, Five-Day Wait Time for Home Care: Personal Support for Complex Patients and Falls for Long-Stay Clients indicators.

17 Community Care Access Centre Priority Indicators Looking Forward: Percentage of Community Care Access Centres in Ontario that set a Target to improve, maintain or worsen performance in QIP 2016/17 QIP on priority indicators, as reported in 2016/17 Workplan Five-Day Wait Time for Home Care: Personal Five-Day Wait Time for Home Care: Nursing Clients' Experience (n=13) Falls for Long-Stay Clients (n=14) Unplanned Emergency Department Visits (n=13) Hospital Readmissions (n=13) 86% 7% 7% 86% 14% 77% 8% 15% 71% 14% 7% 7% 70% 15% 15% 62% 23% 8% 8% DRAFT - PLEASE DO NOT SHARE 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Improvement Maintainance Retrograde Target Invalid Target 2016/17 (0 or Collecting Baseline) More than 70% of community care access centres set an improvement target on all priority indicators for 2016/17. The highest number of CCACs with a target to maintain performance was seen for the Hospital Readmissions indicator at 23%, while Unplanned Emergency Department Visits and Clients' Experience indicators both saw 15% of CCACs selecting the indicators set a retrograde target in 2016/17.

18 ISSUES 17

19 EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS: PROGRESS AND CURRENT PERFORMANCE 18

20 CENTRAL WEST MISSISSAUGA HALTON TORONTO CENTRAL CENTRAL WW LHIN HNHB LHIN ESC LHIN CHAMPLAIN CENTRAL EAST NORTH SIMCOE MUSKOKA SOUTH WEST NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH EAST PERCENT Percentage of home care clients with an unplanned, less-urgent ED visit within the first 30 days of discharge from hospital (reporting period Q2 2013/14-Q2 2014/15) Better Performance Provincial Average (6.8) Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant did not select this indicator 0 19 Sources: Home Care database, CIHI DAD, CIHI NACRS, QIP Navigator (2016/17) Reporting period: July 2014 June 2015 Notes: Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant did not select the indicator. Current Performance (Associated with a Target) Target Performance CCAC (Not associated with a Target)

21 Issue: Effective transitions Better Performance Common change ideas Assess post discharge risk Refer complex patients to Health Links or Integrated funding models Use of specialized outreach teams like palliative care Technology enablers like OTN/e-notifications Current performance median and average values Reduce ED visits after discharge: median- 7.3% average- 6.8% Reduce hospital readmissions: median-18.4% average-17.2% 20

22 A story of QI achievement: CE CCAC The topic Reducing the number of unplanned Emergency Department visits and hospital readmissions Important. to ensure continuity of care and prevent readmissions and unplanned visits Results/lessons learned Currently reactive; want to move to a proactive approach Change ideas Electronic alerts Alerts trigger early engagement between CCAC and hospital staff Actions aimed towards successful discharge back to community Subsequent chart audits Next steps Focus on patient journey prior to hospital visit to better understand factors that increase likelihood of a hospital and/or emergency department visit, and may be responsive to proactive strategies; a critical shift in both strategy and approach

23 FALLS FOR LONG STAY PATIENTS: PROGRESS AND CURRENT PERFORMANCE 22

24 Percentage of CCAC Clients who had fallen, QIP 2016/17 Provincial Average (36.5) Better Performance Sources: Home Care database, inter-rai for home care via Long-Stay Assessment Software, QIP Navigator (2016/17) Reporting period: October 2014 September 2015 Current Performance (Associated with a Target) Target Performance

25 Common change ideas, Falls Staff education Develop falls prevention programs targeted towards higher needs clients (Compass) Audit and feedback Identifying those at risk for falls. Having had a fall or multiple falls best predictor of falling again. (Compass) Evaluating medications Patient education Reducing safety hazards like rugs, lighting (Compass) Evaluating those with recent functional decline Considering impact of recent delirium, infections, other conditions, and acting proactively Progress report- implemented change ideas Work plan -proposed change ideas

26 Spotlight: CW CCAC: Promoting Falls Prevention and Exercise Programs for Seniors Methods and Outputs Centralized dedicated physiotherapy hotline handles >1000 inbound and outbound calls monthly Local group programming: 149 classes across LHIN Partnerships with local community services and subject matter experts Specialty classes for subgroups like COPD and Stroke >90% class retention rate Program specific patient experience outcomes guide programming The extracted graphs from a recent presentation at the 2016 OACCAC conference tell the story.

27 LOOKING FORWARD 2017/18

28 The QIP consultation process PFPAC HQO QIP advisory Ontario Association of CCACs and other sector associations Ministry of Health and Long Term Care LHINs Initial issues and indicator matrix Ongoing consultations QIP Indicators 27

29 Advancing an Issue through the QIP Example: Right care, right time, right place Indicator: Dying in Preferred place of death (A) Important system quality issue? Can issue be Relevant indicator Y advanced through Y Y to advance issue? QIP? Advance through QIP Workplan Important as evidence shows majority of people prefer to die at home or in hospice (Health Quality Ontario. Palliative Care at the End of Life. Toronto: Queen s Printer for Ontario; 2016) N N N Apply to all sectors? Y Advance through QIP Narrative Data is available from the CHRIS database Can be advanced through QIP. Issue not included in QIP N From an issues perspective, important that people cared for in right place at right time. Adding this to the QIP promotes sharing of ideas that work. Can issue be advanced via other mechanisms? Y Consider Practice reports, ONSQIP, Quality Standards, etc.

30

31 QIP Indicators: CCAC Falls for long-stay clients Unplanned ED visits Hospital readmissions 5 day wait times for home care: Nursing 5 day wait times for home care: Personal support for complex patients Clients Experience Identify complex patients (health links) (A) End of life, preferred place of death (A) RETIRED MODIFIED NEW Identify complex patients (health links) (A) End of life, preferred place of death (A) 30

32 Determining the 2017/18 QIP priorities The Narrative Is an executive summary of your QIP and is intended to introduce specific context for your QIP Is a means for engaging your patients and staff in QI planning The Narrative is also a way to capture and understand emerging quality issues For example, equity and workplace violence 31

33 Determining QIP priorities in Narrative Example: Equity Priority: Embedding an equity lens into QI initiatives Important system quality issue? Important as vulnerable subpopulations may experience far different care than that demonstrated overall Can issue be Relevant indicator Y advanced through Y Y to advance issue? QIP? Advance through QIP Workplan X However there is no single indicator to advance this issue. N Apply to all sectors? Y Advance through QIP Narrative This issue is also important to all sectors. Can be advanced through QIP, through QIP narrative.

34 Narrative questions, 2017/18 Building on existing questions New questions Overview QI Achievements From the Past Year Integration and Continuity of Care Engagement of Leadership, Clinicians and Staff Engagement of Patients, Clients, and Residents Staff Safety and Workplace Violence Population Health Equity Alternate Level of Care Did you know you can now upload shareable charts and pictures in your narrative? 33

35 PLANNING FOR 2017/18 QIPs: NAVIGATOR 34

36 Navigator key dates and timelines Navigator will launch by November 30, 2016 Log in before March to ensure there are no surprises There will be Navigator training sessions this fall and winter to highlight the new functionalities Navigator closes briefly in February so that the indicator current performance values can be prepopulated Book your Board meetings now to ensure your submission is ready for April 1,

37 New this year: Highlight keyword + word count 36

38 New this year: Type of indicator identified The QIP Query Reports can be filtered by type of indicator 37

39 OTHER HQO SUPPORTS 38

40 What are HQO Quality Standards? Concise: five to 15 statements versus the hundreds that can appear in many practice guidelines Accessible: for clinicians to easily know what care they should be providing; and for patients to know what care to expect Measurable: each statement is accompanied by one or more quality measure Implementable: they come with quality improvement tools and resources targeted to each standard, to fuel adoption Example: Wound care (diabetic foot ulcers, venous/mixed ulcers, pressure injuries) (available spring 2017)

41 HQO public reporting indicator review I HQO currently reviewing publically reported home care indicators using pre-determined selection criteria Objectives of review Include patient/client voice in indicator selection (e.g. better measures of access, transitions, client/patient experience) Recommend indicators for public reporting at provincial, regional and/or service-provider level Identify potential areas for data advocacy and indicator development, recognizing numerous areas currently unreported (or underreported) due to limitations in indicator development or data availability Bringing Care Home,

42 HQO public reporting indicator review II New set of indicators will be selected by an expert panel using modified Delphi process Indicators of informal or community home care delivery will not be in scope Patient and sector engagement ongoing. This far, we have heard that the following are top priorities for measurement: Transitions Effectiveness Appropriateness Patient satisfaction Pain and pain management Aim: to report new/modified set of indicators in 2017/18 Bringing Care Home,

43 Innovative Practices Visit to learn how to implement innovative practices used by Health Links. Innovative Practices Evaluation Framework Coordinated Care Management Transitions between Hospital and Home (September 28 th ) Upcoming Areas of Focus: Mental Health & Addictions 42

44 Webinar: Transitions between Hospital to Home Part 1 Friday, October 14, 2016 from 12:00-1:00 pm Webinar: Transitions between Hospital to Home Community of Practice Part 2 Wednesday, November 16, 2016 from 12:00-1:00 pm. Upcoming Areas of Focus: Mental Health & Addictions To register For more information: HLhelp@hqontario.ca 43

45 For more information on Quality Improvement Plans:

46 APPENDICES 45

47 Planning for 2017/18 QIPs: Guidance Guidance materials launch November 30, 2016 Materials Package will include Annual Memo and What s New Supplementation Refreshed guidance documents Updated indicator technical specifications Please visit HQO s website for additional resources or contact qip@hqontario.ca for assistance 46

48 Online Resources Click on the hyperlinked pages or visit

49 Links to resources Audience Resources Integration with QIPS Programming supports Patient Engagement Providers, Organizations, and Patients Tools and resources to support patient engagement Hospitals required to demonstrate how they engage Patients in developing QIPS Practice Reports Physicians and Interprofessional Teams For LTC and Primary Care, a resource to collect data from the practice for use in quality improvement Clinicians access data and receive information about practice performance Quality Standards Community of Practice members collaborating to implement Quality Standards Toolkits and Guidance documents, Community of Practice for peer support There are three indicators in QIPS corresponding to Quality Standards. Equity All organizations interested in imbedding an equity lens in QI initiatives Frameworks and Guidelines Equity one of six quality dimensions measured in QIP (Narrative)