DECISION AND REASONS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "DECISION AND REASONS"

Transcription

1 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: BETWEEN: Lindsay Hyslop, NP Jim Attwood, RN Karen Laforet, RN Linda Bracken Margaret Tuomi Chairperson Member Member Public Member Public Member COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO ) BONNI ELLIS for ) the College of Nurses of Ontario ) - and - ) ) ) TANYA GEORGE ) NO REPRESENTATION for Registration No ) Tanya George ) ) ) JOHANNA BRADEN ) Independent Legal Counsel ) ) ) Heard: May 8, 9 and 15, 2014 DECISION AND REASONS This matter came on for hearing before a panel of the Discipline Committee on May 8, 9 & 15, 2014, at the College of Nurses of Ontario ( the College ) at Toronto. The hearing commenced at 9:35 a.m. As Tanya George (the Member ) was not present, the hearing recessed for 15 minutes to allow time for the Member to attend. Upon reconvening, the panel noted that the Member was still not in attendance. Counsel for the College provided the panel with evidence that the Member had been sent the Notice of Hearing on February 24, 2014 [ ]. The panel was satisfied that the Member had received adequate notice of the time, date, place and nature of the hearing, and therefore proceeded with the hearing in the Member s absence. The Allegations

2 The allegations against the Member as stated in the Notice of Hearing dated February 20, 2014, are as follows. 1. You have committed an act or acts of professional misconduct as provided by subsection 51(1)(c) of the Health Professions Procedural Code of the Nursing Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 32, and defined in paragraph 1.1 of Ontario Regulation 799/93 as amended, in that you contravened or failed to meet the professional standards of the profession while working as a nurse at [the Facility] on or about May 2 3, 2011, and, in particular, you: a) Communicated with the family members of [the Client] in a manner that would reasonably be regarded as rude and/or condescending; b) Communicated with the family members of [the Client] in a manner that would reasonably be regarded as expressing impatience and frustration; c) Argued with a family member of [the Client], who was palliative, as to whether she was dying; d) Interrupted family members of [the Client] when they tried to express concerns to you regarding [the Client]; e) Initiated an IV for [the Client] and/or administered a 1000 cc bolus dose of saline to [the Client], without a physician s order; f) Administered a 1000 cc bolus dose of saline to [the Client] in circumstances where the administration was not clinically appropriate; g) Administered Dilaudid to [the Client] without having first obtained a physician s order or, alternatively, you accepted a verbal order for Dilaudid for [the Client] in circumstances that did not warrant a verbal order; h) Failed to appropriately document a verbal order for Dilaudid for [the Client] when you failed to record the prescriber s name and designation; i) Failed to assess the appropriateness of the verbal order for Dilaudid that you recorded in [the Client] s chart; j) Failed to properly monitor and/or assess [the Client] s reaction to the Dilaudid that you administered between approximately 22:30 and 07:00, including but not limited to [the Client] s: (i) level of consciousness; (ii) vital signs; and/or (iii) level of pain; and/or

3 k) Administered 2 mg of Dilaudid to [the Client] at approximately 23:30, 00:30, 01:30, 02:30, 04:00, 06:00 and/or 07:00 without first assessing whether each administration was clinically appropriate. 2. You have committed an act or acts of professional misconduct as provided by subsection 51(1)(c) of the Health Professions Procedural Code of the Nursing Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 32, as amended, and defined in paragraph 1.7 of Ontario Regulation 799/93, in that you abused a client physically or emotionally while working as a nurse at [the Facility] on or about May 2 3, 2011, when you: a) Communicated with the family members of [the Client] in a manner that would reasonably be regarded as rude and/or condescending; b) Communicated with the family members of [the Client] in a manner that would reasonably be regarded as expressing impatience and frustration; c) Argued with a family member of [the Client], who was palliative, as to whether she was dying; and/or d) Interrupted family members of [the Client] when they tried to express concerns to you regarding [the Client]. 3. You have committed an act or acts of professional misconduct as provided by subsection 51(1)(c) of the Health Professions Procedural Code of the Nursing Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 32, as amended, and defined in paragraph 1.37 of Ontario Regulation 799/93, in that you engaged in conduct or performed an act, relevant to the practice of nursing, that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional and, in particular, while working as a nurse at [the Facility] on or about May 2 3, 2011, you: a) Communicated with the family members of [the Client] in a manner that would reasonably be regarded as rude and/or condescending; b) Communicated with the family members of [the Client] in a manner that would reasonably be regarded as expressing impatience and frustration; c) Argued with a family member of [the Client], who was palliative, as to whether she was dying; d) Interrupted family members of [the Client] when they tried to express concerns to you regarding [the Client]; e) Initiated an IV for [the Client] and/or administered a 1000 cc bolus dose of saline to [the Client], without a physician s order;

4 f) Administered a 1000 cc bolus dose of saline to [the Client] in circumstances where the administration was not clinically appropriate; Publication Ban g) Administered Dilaudid to [the Client] without having first obtained a physician s order or, alternatively, you accepted a verbal order for Dilaudid for [the Client] in circumstances that did not warrant a verbal order; h) Failed to appropriately document a verbal order for Dilaudid for [the Client] when you failed to record the prescriber s name and designation; i) Failed to assess the appropriateness of the verbal order for Dilaudid that you recorded in [the Client] s chart; j) Failed to properly monitor and/or assess [the Client] s reaction to the Dilaudid that you administered between approximately 22:30 and 07:00, including but not limited to [the Client] s: (i) level of consciousness; (ii) vital signs; and/or (iii) level of pain; and/or k) Administered 2 mg of Dilaudid to [the Client] at approximately 23:30, 00:30, 01:30, 02:30, 04:00, 06:00 and/or 07:00 without first assessing whether each administration was clinically appropriate. At the request of College Counsel, the panel made an order pursuant to s.45(3) of the Health Professions Procedural Code of the Nursing Act, 1991 that no person shall publish, broadcast or otherwise disclose the name of [the Client] or any information that would disclose the identity of [the Client] as referred to during the hearing or in any other document or exhibit filed at the hearing. Member s Plea Given that the Member was not present nor represented, she was deemed to have denied the allegations in the Notice of Hearing. The hearing proceeded on the basis that the College bore the onus of proving the allegations in the Notice of Hearing against the Member. Overview The Member was registered with the College on May 29, 2009, her registration was suspended for non-payment of fees as of February 15, 2012, and her registration was administratively revoked on February 1, 2013, for non-payment of fees. These allegations relate to when the Member s certificate of registration was active and she was working at [the Facility]. The allegations are concerned with her conduct with respect to [the

5 Client] and [the Client] s family during the night shift of May 2-3, The panel determined there were five main issues: 1. Did the Member contravene or fail to meet the standards of the profession in her communications with her client s family members? 2. Were the Member s communications physically and/or emotionally abusive of the client? 3. Did the Member contravene or fail to meet the standards of the profession in the administering of a saline bolus to the client? 4. Did the Member contravene or fail to meet the standards of the profession in the administering of Dilaudid to the client? 5. Would some or all of this conduct reasonably be perceived by members as disgraceful, dishonourable and/ or unprofessional? The Evidence The panel received testimony from six witnesses, one of whom was an expert on the standards of practice of the profession, and received 16 exhibits. Witness # 1: The witness was the director of operations of [the Facility] where the Member was working at the time of the allegations. She identified the medical records of the client [ ] and the written policies for the hospital [ ]. She also described the operations of the hospital, training and other relevant procedures. This evidence indicated that the Member was not following the procedures of the emergency department with respect [to] her care of the client. Witness # 2: The son of the client testified that at the time of the allegations, his mother was a 90-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with colorectal cancer in February of He and his sisters had not left her alone in her home since the diagnosis, as they were a very close-knit family. On the evening of May 2, 2011, his mother experienced severe abdominal pain so they took her by ambulance to the hospital. The wait was exceptionally long but finally she was admitted into the emergency department and given over to the care of the Member. The Member told the witness and his sisters to behave, not to look at other [clients], not to be overly demanding, and to leave the area when she was providing care. She talked a lot but did not listen to them. She would sigh and by her body language, he knew she felt he was in her way. She showed a lack of empathy, impatience [and] indifference and was more interested in them than caring for their mother. The panel agreed the son s testimony and his observations were consistent with the other evidence in the case and he seemed genuine. The panel believed his evidence. Witness # 3: This witness was one of the client s daughters and a retired nurse. She testified her mother was living on her own until her cancer diagnosis, after which, she, her sister and her brother would take turns staying with her. The client had several mild heart attacks, had been losing weight and was palliative. She still made her own personal care decisions and did not take her prescribed codeine pills unless necessary for pain. The witness testified to the same facts as

6 her brother concerning the care given by the Member, and her evidence was generally consistent with his. In addition, this witness testified that [ ] the Member was hopeless to talk to and made them feel like they were 5-year-old children. In terms of her mother s care, the witness testified that she fell asleep and when she woke up, she could see her mother s pulse was racing and she could not wake her mother up. The witness was very scared and upset, and she called her brother to come back to hospital. The panel agreed the daughter s testimony and observations were consistent with her brother s and with the medical evidence. The panel accepted her as a credible witness. Witness # 4: The College s fourth witness was the day nurse, who took over the client s care from the Member. She testified the dosage of Dilaudid given to the client by the Member was a significant amount for a 90- year old woman who weighed less than 100 pounds. She herself would have questioned such an order. Witness # 5: This witness was a palliative care physician at the hospital and was involved in the care of the client. He testified he saw the client14 hours after her arrival at the hospital and she was profoundly sedated. She finally woke up that evening when she was transferred to the floor. It was 24 hours later before she required any more pain medications. Witness # 6: This witness was tendered by the College and accepted by the panel as an expert witness qualified to give opinion evidence in the area of nursing standards in acute care settings. She was given a set of hypothetical facts that matched the evidence given in this case. She testified that based upon those hypothetical facts, the Member contravened the published standards of practice of the profession, particularly the Professional Standards [ ], the Therapeutic Nurse-Client Relationship Standard [ ] and the Medication Standard [ ]. The Member, by being rude to the family members, showing no empathy and not involving the family, contravened the Therapeutic Nurse-Client Relationship Standard [ ] and the Professional Standards [ ]. The Member s conduct was also emotionally abusive of the client s family, as supported by the Professional Standards [ ]. In terms of the medication breaches, the expert opined that the Member should have had a written physician s order for the Dilaudid as set out in [ ] the Medication Standard. The expert referred to the client s chart [ ], which showed orders that were missing the time, date and name of the physician who ordered the medication. In her opinion, the Member should have evaluated the appropriateness of the verbal order based on the client s age, weight and previous medications and the Member should have monitored the client. It appears from the record that no vitals [were] taken and no evaluation of the client s response to the medications [was] recorded. The Member did not assess the appropriateness of the medications nor did she monitor the situation as required by the Medication Standard [ ]. As to the saline bolus, the expert testified that according to the standard, the administration of a saline bolus requires a physician s order and that in the case of this [client], the administration of an intravenous bolus would be contraindicated. Final Submissions

7 College counsel submitted the panel would need to determine on a balance of probabilities whether it was more likely than not that the Member had breached the standards of practice of the profession, had been abusive to the client and had acted in [a] way that members of the profession would find to be disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional. Counsel reviewed the evidence, consisting of the family members testimonies, the professional witnesses testimonies on the appropriateness of administering the saline bolus and the Dilaudid dosages, the expert evidence, and the evidence contained in the exhibits, including the medical records, hospital policies, incident report and the relevant published College standards. Decision The College bears the onus of proving the allegations in accordance with the standard of proof, that being the balance of probabilities and based upon clear, cogent and convincing evidence. Having considered the evidence and the onus and standard of proof, the panel finds that the Member committed acts of professional misconduct as alleged in paragraphs 1(a), (b), (d), (e), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k); 2 (a), (b) and (d); and 3 (a), (b), (d), (e), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k) in the Notice of Hearing. With respect to allegation number 2, the panel found that the Member emotionally abused the client. As to allegation 3, the panel finds that the Member engaged in conduct that would reasonably be regarded by members of the profession as unprofessional with respect to allegations 3 (a), (b), (d), (e), (g), (h) and (i).the panel finds that the Member engaged in conduct that would reasonably be regarded by members of the profession as disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional with respect to allegations 3 (j) and (k). The panel made no findings with respect to allegations 1(c), 1(f), 2(c), 3(c) and 3(f). Those allegations are dismissed. Reasons for Decision The panel considered each of the five issues in arriving at its decision. 1. Did the Member contravene or fail to meet the standards of practice of the profession in her communications with the client s family members? The panel accepted the opinion of the College s expert witness as to the standards of practice of the profession with respect to communication with family members of clients. For the factual basis of that opinion, the panel considered the testimony of the two family members and found their evidence to be consistent and direct concerning the Member s attitude, body language, sighing and treatment of the family members. There was no evidence to contradict the family members. The evidence they gave is sufficiently clear, cogent and convincing to support the allegations at paragraphs 1(a), (b) and (d). With regard to allegation 1(c), the family members testified that the Member did disagree with them as to whether their mother was dying. However, in their testimony they also stated that

8 they understood that the Member was referring to an imminent death which they agreed was not likely. In this respect the panel makes no finding of professional misconduct. 2. Did the Member abuse a client physically or emotionally? The panel heard from an expert witness who testified that the actions of the Member were emotionally abusive to the family in that she showed a lack of empathy and caring and exercised excessive power. The expert referred to the Therapeutic Nurse Client Relationship Standard (Revised 2006) and the Professional Standards (Revised 2002). There was no evidence presented to counter this opinion, the opinion was supported by the facts, and the panel finds the opinion reasonable in the circumstances. The panel found the Member showed no empathy or caring in her relationship with the client or the client s family, as stated in the Therapeutic Nurse Client Relationship, Revised 2006 [ ]. It is the nurse s responsibility to establish and maintain the therapeutic relationship. Accordingly, the panel finds that the Member abused a client emotionally as alleged in paragraphs 2 (a), (b) and (d) of the Notice of Hearing. As indicated above, the evidence did not prove on a balance of probabilities that the Member argued with a family member of the client as to whether the client was dying, and the panel makes no finding on this allegation. 3. Did the Member contravene or fail to meet the standards of the profession in the administering of a saline bolus to the client? The evidence established that the Member administered a 1000 cc bolus dose of saline to the client without a physician s order, and that this was a breach of the Medication Standard, as alleged at paragraph 1(e) of the Notice of Hearing. Regarding allegation 1(f), the panel relied on the evidence from the client s medical charts [ ] and the evidence from the palliative care doctor to come to a decision as to whether the Member contravened a standard of the profession in that the she administered such a 1000 cc bolus dose of saline to the client in circumstances where administration was not clinically appropriate. The expert testified that this fluid bolus was contraindicated and should not have been given to this client, however, the testimony from a physician directly involved in this client s care included evidence that the client was clinically dehydrated and that in this case the administration of saline may be appropriate. The panel preferred the evidence of the physician witness over the expert, as the physician was directly involved in the client s care and able to speak to the condition of the [client]. Accordingly, the panel makes no finding of professional misconduct with respect to allegation 1(f). 4. Did the Member contravene or fail to meet the standards of the profession in the administering of Dilaudid to the client? The panel considered the testimony of the expert witness, the medical charts, the palliative care doctor and the published College standard on Medication (Revised 2008) [ ]. The panel found from the evidence presented that the Member administered Dilaudid without having first obtained a proper physician s order, failed to properly monitor and assess the client s reaction to the Dilaudid, failed to assess the appropriateness of the verbal order for Dilaudid, failed to

9 document the verbal order properly, and administered 2 mg of Dilaudid on seven occasions without first assessing whether each administration was clinically appropriate. 5. Was some or all of the Member s conduct disgraceful, dishonourable and/or unprofessional? For the reasons given above, the allegations at 3(c) and 3(f) were not proven on the balance of probabilities. The panel finds that allegations 3 (a), (b), (d), (e), (g), (h), and (i) would reasonably be regarded by members of the profession to be unprofessional. With respect to allegations 3 (j) and (k), the panel found that members of the profession would reasonably regard this to be disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional. The panel found [ ] allegations [ ] 3(j) and (k) concerning the administration and monitoring of Dilaudid to be [of] an extremely serious nature as the client was put at considerable risk due to the carelessness of the Member. Penalty The College requested that this panel make an order as follows: 1. Requiring the Member to appear before the Panel to be reprimanded within three months of the date that this Order becomes final. 2. Directing the Executive Director to suspend the Member s certificate of registration for six months. This suspension shall take effect from the date the Member obtains an active certificate of registration and shall continue to run without interruption as long as the Member remains in the practising class. 3. Directing the Executive Director to impose the following terms, conditions and limitations on the Member s certificate of registration: a) The Member will attend two meetings with a Nursing Expert (the Expert ), at her own expense and within six months of the date the Member obtain an active certificate of registration. To comply, the Member is required to ensure that: i. The Expert has expertise in nursing regulation and has been approved by the Director of Professional Conduct (the Director ) in advance of the meetings; ii. At least seven days before the first meeting, the Member provides the Expert with a copy of: 1. the Panel s Order, 2. the Notice of Hearing, and

10 3. if available, a copy of the Panel s Decision and Reasons; iii. Before the first meeting, the Member reviews the following College publications and completes the associated Reflective Questionnaires and online learning modules: 1. Professional Standards 2. Therapeutic Nurse-Client Relationship 3. Documentation 4. Medication; iv. Before the first meeting, the Member reviews and completes the College s self-directed learning package, One is One Too Many, at her own expense, including the self-directed Nurses Workbook; v. At least seven days before the first meeting, the Member provides the Expert with a copy of the completed Reflective Questionnaires, online participation forms and Nurses Workbook; vi. The subject of the sessions with the Expert will include: 1. the acts or omissions for which the Member was found to have committed professional misconduct, 2. the potential consequences of the misconduct to the Member s clients, colleagues, profession and self, 3. strategies for preventing the misconduct from recurring, 4. the publications, questionnaires and modules set out above, and 5. the development of a learning plan in collaboration with the Expert; vii. Within 30 days after the Member has completed the last session, the Member will confirm that the Expert forwards his/her report to the Director, in which the Expert will confirm: 1. the dates the Member attended the sessions, 2. that the Expert received the required documents from the Member, 3. that the Expert reviewed the required documents and subjects with the Member, and 4. the Expert s assessment of the Member s insight into her behaviour; viii. If the Member does not comply with any [one or more] of the requirements above, the Expert may cancel any session scheduled,

11 even if that results in the Member breaching a term, condition or limitation on her certificate of registration; b) For a period of 18 months from the date the Member obtain an active certificate of registration and returns to clinical nursing practice, the Member will notify her employers of the decision. To comply, the Member is required to: i. Ensure that the Director is notified of the name, address, and telephone number of all employer(s) within 14 days of commencing or resuming employment in any nursing position; ii. Provide her employer(s) with a copy of: 1. the Panel s Order, 2. the Notice of Hearing, and 3. a copy of the Panel s Decision and Reasons, once available; iii. Ensure that within 14 days of the commencement or resumption of the Member s employment in any nursing position, the employer(s) forward(s) a report to the Director, in which it will confirm: 1. that they received a copy of the required documents, and 2. that they agree to notify the Director immediately upon receipt of any information that the Member has breached the standards of practice of the profession; and 4. All documents delivered by the Member to the College, the Expert or the employer(s) will be delivered by verifiable method, the proof of which the Member will retain. Penalty Submissions College counsel submitted the panel should take into account the seriousness of [the] charges, the aggravating and mitigating factors, the circumstances of the Member, the views of other members of the profession, and the public. The penalty should address the need for general and specific deterrence, public protection and preservation of public confidence in the College s ability to self-regulate. College counsel submitted that the Member s treatment through her comments and her body language to the client s three adult children was rude, impatient, frustrating, and condescending. Counsel referred back to the evidence from the expert witness and the physician witness concerning the seriousness of the allegations. Penalty Decision 1. The Member is required to appear before the Panel to be reprimanded within three months of the date that this Order becomes final.

12 2. The Executive Director is directed to suspend the Member s certificate of registration for six months. This suspension shall take effect from the date the Member obtains an active certificate of registration and shall continue to run without interruption as long as the Member remains in the practising class. 3. The Executive Director is directed to impose the following terms, conditions and limitations on the Member s certificate of registration: a. The Member will attend two meetings with a Nursing Expert (the Expert ), at her own expense and within six months of the date the Member obtain[s] an active certificate of registration. To comply, the Member is required to ensure that: i. The Expert has expertise in nursing regulation and has been approved by the Director of Professional Conduct (the Director ) in advance of the meetings; ii. At least seven days before the first meeting, the Member provides the Expert with a copy of: 1. the Panel s Order, 2. the Notice of Hearing, and 3. if available, a copy of the Panel s Decision and Reasons; iii. Before the first meeting, the Member reviews the following College publications and completes the associated Reflective Questionnaires and online learning modules: 1. Professional Standards 2. Therapeutic Nurse-Client Relationship 3. Documentation 4. Medication; iv. Before the first meeting, the Member reviews and completes the College s self-directed learning package, One is One Too Many, at her own expense, including the self-directed Nurses Workbook; v. At least seven days before the first meeting, the Member provides the Expert with a copy of the completed Reflective Questionnaires, online participation forms and Nurses Workbook; vi. The subject of the sessions with the Expert will include: 1. the acts or omissions for which the Member was found to have committed professional misconduct,

13 2. the potential consequences of the misconduct to the Member s clients, colleagues, profession and self, 3. strategies for preventing the misconduct from recurring, 4. the publications, questionnaires and modules set out above, and 5. the development of a learning plan in collaboration with the Expert; vii. Within 30 days after the Member has completed the last session, the Member will confirm that the Expert forwards his/her report to the Director, in which the Expert will confirm: 1. the dates the Member attended the sessions, 2. that the Expert received the required documents from the Member, 3. that the Expert reviewed the required documents and subjects with the Member, and 4. the Expert s assessment of the Member s insight into her behaviour; viii. If the Member does not comply with any [one or more] of the requirements above, the Expert may cancel any session scheduled, even if that results in the Member breaching a term, condition or limitation on her certificate of registration; b. For a period of 18 months from the date the Member obtain[s] an active certificate of registration and returns to clinical nursing practice, the Member will notify her employers of the decision. To comply, the Member is required to: i. Ensure that the Director is notified of the name, address, and telephone number of all employer(s) within 14 days of commencing or resuming employment in any nursing position; ii. Provide her employer(s) with a copy of: 1. the Panel s Order, 2. the Notice of Hearing, and 3. a copy of the Panel s Decision and Reasons, once available; iii. Ensure that within 14 days of the commencement or resumption of the Member s employment in any nursing position, the employer(s) forward(s) a report to the Director, in which it will confirm: 1. that they received a copy of the required documents, and 2. that they agree to notify the Director immediately upon receipt of any information that the Member has breached the standards of practice of the profession; and

14 4. All documents delivered by the Member to the College, the Expert or the employer(s) will be delivered by verifiable method, the proof of which the Member will retain. Reasons for Penalty Decision The panel deliberated and determined that the College s submission on order was reasonable and appropriate, taking into consideration the protection of the public, the general and specific deterren[ce] to the Member and the members of the profession and the rehabilitation and remediation of the Member. The panel found that the penalty was within the range of similar previous decisions of panels of this Discipline Committee. The reprimand and the suspension of six months are a message to the Member and the membership that these actions will not be tolerated by the profession. The meetings with the Nursing Expert and the review of the standards will give the Member an opportunity to improve her practice, care of clients and treatment of family members, and allow her to reflect upon the importance of proper drug administration and the necessity for good, clear documentation. These provisions, combined with the employer notification requirements, will protect the public and ensure public confidence in the nursing profession. I, Lindsay Hyslop, NP, sign this decision and reasons for the decision as Chairperson of this Discipline panel and on behalf of the members of the Discipline panel as listed below: Chairperson Date Panel Members: Jim Attwood, RN Karen Laforet, RN Linda Bracken, Public Member Margaret Tuomi, Public Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member Chuck Williams Public Member Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby,

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN Member BETWEEN: COLLEGE

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Grace Fox, NP Member Barbara Titley, RPN Member Catherine Egerton Public Member Mary MacMillan-Gilkinson

More information

DECISION AND REASONS

DECISION AND REASONS DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Carl Balcom, RN Chairperson Michael Hogard, RN Member Karen Laforet, RN Member Abdul Patel Public Member Gino Cucchi Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Public Member Chairperson. Deborah Graystone, NP

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Public Member Chairperson. Deborah Graystone, NP DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Public Member Chairperson Tanya Dion, RN Member Deborah Graystone, NP Member Devinder Walia Public Member BETWEEN: COLLEGE

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Chairperson Zahir Hirji, RN Angela Verrier, RPN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Chairperson Zahir Hirji, RN Angela Verrier, RPN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Chairperson Zahir Hirji, RN Member Angela Verrier, RPN Member Lindsay Hyslop, NP Public Member Gino Cucchi Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Samantha Diceman, RPN Member George Rudanycz, RN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Samantha Diceman, RPN Member George Rudanycz, RN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Samantha Diceman, RPN Member George Rudanycz, RN Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member Catherine Ward Public

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. Terry Holland, RPN. Susan Roger, RN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. Terry Holland, RPN. Susan Roger, RN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Tanya Dion, RN Catherine Egerton Terry Holland, RPN Ashleigh Molloy Susan Roger, RN Chairperson Public Member Member Public Member Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN Chairperson Laura Caravaggio, RPN Member Mary MacMillan-Gilkinson Public Member George Rudanycz, RN Member Devinder

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Grace Isgro-Topping Chairperson Spencer Dickson, RN Member Megan Sloan, RPN Member Angela Verrier, RPN Member John Bald Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: INGRID WILTSHIRE-STOBY, RN Chairperson LAURA CARAVAGGIO, RPN Member KAREN LAFORET, RN Member MARY MACMILLAN-GILKINSON Public Member ASHLEIGH

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Margaret Tuomi Public Member, Chairperson Donna Rothwell, RN Member Andrea Vidovic, RN Member Mary MacMillan-Gilkinson Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson Dawn Cutler, RN Member Cathy Egerton Public Member Cheryl Evans, RN Member Ashleigh Molloy Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson Ashley Friest, RPN Member Susannah McGeachy, RN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson Ashley Friest, RPN Member Susannah McGeachy, RN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson Ashley Friest, RPN Member Susannah McGeachy, RN Member Abdul Patel Public Member Devinder Walia Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Miranda Huang, RN Member Susan Roger, RN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Miranda Huang, RN Member Susan Roger, RN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Michael Hogard, RPN Chairperson Miranda Huang, RN Member Susan Roger, RN Member Debra Mattina Public Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Robert MacKay, Chairperson Dawn Cutler, RN David Edwards, RPN Shiraz Irani, RN Mary MacMillan-Gilkinson Public Member Member Member Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Angela Verrier, RPN Nancy Sears, RN Kim Jinkerson, RPN John Bald Abdul Patel Chairperson Member Member Public Member Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Kendra O Bryan, RPN Chairperson Cheryl McMaster, RPN Member Grace Isgro-Topping Public Member Bill Dowson Public Member BETWEEN: NICK COLEMAN

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Dennis Curry, RN Chairperson Claudette Drapeau, RPN Member Rosalie Woods, RPN Member Grace Isgro-Topping Public Member Faira Bari Public

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Karen Breen-Reid, RN Chairperson Margaret McGinn, RN Member Cheryl McMaster, RPN Member Gino Cucchi Public Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Chairperson

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Chairperson DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Chairperson Renate Davidson Samantha Diceman, RPN Carly Gilchrist, RPN George Rudanycz, RN Public Member Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Carly Gilchrist, RPN Member Deborah Graystone, NP Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member Devinder Walia Public

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Nancy Sears, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Nancy Sears, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Nancy Sears, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member Linda Bracken Public Member Gino Cucchi Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Public Member, Chairperson Dawn Cutler, RN Member David Edwards, RN Member Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN Member Devinder

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Lori McInerney, RN Member Monica Seawright, RPN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Lori McInerney, RN Member Monica Seawright, RPN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Lori McInerney, RN Member Monica Seawright, RPN Member Betty Hill Public Member David Bishop Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: BETWEEN: Robert MacKay, Chairperson Catherine Egerton Karen Laforet, RN Winsome Plummer, RN Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN Public Member Public

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Deanne Barber, RPN Chairperson Agnese Bianchi, RN Member Sandra Trubyk, RN Member Linda Bracken Public Member Joan King Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. Desiree Ann Prillo, RPN George Rudanycz, RN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. Desiree Ann Prillo, RPN George Rudanycz, RN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Renate Davidson Desiree Ann Prillo, RPN George Rudanycz, RN Devinder Walia Chairperson Public Member Member Member Public

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Angela Verrier, RPN Chairperson Spencer Dickson, RN Member Miranda Huang, RN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Angela Verrier, RPN Chairperson Spencer Dickson, RN Member Miranda Huang, RN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Angela Verrier, RPN Chairperson Spencer Dickson, RN Member Miranda Huang, RN Member Linda Bracken Public Member Gino Cucchi Public Member

More information

AND IN THE MATTER OF discipline proceedings against GEORGINA MARIE GUYETT, a current member of the College of Early Childhood Educators.

AND IN THE MATTER OF discipline proceedings against GEORGINA MARIE GUYETT, a current member of the College of Early Childhood Educators. DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS Citation: College of Early Childhood Educators vs Georgina Marie Guyett, 2017 ONCECE 3 Date: 2017-02-27 IN THE MATTER OF the Early Childhood

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: MICHAEL HOGARD, RPN Chairperson DAWN CUTLER, RN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: MICHAEL HOGARD, RPN Chairperson DAWN CUTLER, RN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: MICHAEL HOGARD, RPN Chairperson DAWN CUTLER, RN Member GRACE FOX, NP Member CATHERINE WARD Public Member DEVINDER WALIA Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Spencer Dickson, RN Chairperson Cheryl Beemer, RN Member Tammy Hedge, RPN Member Linda Bracken Public Member Abdul Patel Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Lori McInerney, RN Chairperson April Cheese, RPN Member Deirdre Armstrong, RN Member Sharanjit Singh Padda Public Member Lyn Harrington Public

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Catherine Egerton, Chairperson Laura Caravaggio, RPN Terry Holland, RPN Heather Stevanka, RN Margaret Tuomi Public Member Member Member Member

More information

Indexed as: Valencia (Re) THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO

Indexed as: Valencia (Re) THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO Indexed as: Valencia (Re) THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing directed by the Complaints Committee of the College of Physicians and

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Grace Fox, NP Chairperson

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Grace Fox, NP Chairperson DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Grace Fox, NP Chairperson Renate Davidson Public Member George Rudanycz, RN Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member Ingrid Wiltshire-Stoby, RN

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson Sarah Corkey, RN Member Barbara Titley, RPN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson Sarah Corkey, RN Member Barbara Titley, RPN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Tammy Hedge, RPN Chairperson Sarah Corkey, RN Member Barbara Titley, RPN Member Margaret Tuomi Public Member Cathy Egerton Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Grace Isgro-Topping, Public Member Karen Breen-Reid, RN Member Rosalie Woods, RPN Member Sandra Trubyk, RN Member John Bald Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: TANYA DION, RN Chairperson

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: TANYA DION, RN Chairperson DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: TANYA DION, RN Chairperson RENATE DAVIDSON Public Member MARY MACMILLAN-GILKINSON Public Member GEORGE RUDANYCZ, RN Member TERAH WHITE, RPN

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Joanne Furletti, RN Chairperson Denise Dietrich, RPN Member Dennis Curry, RN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Joanne Furletti, RN Chairperson Denise Dietrich, RPN Member Dennis Curry, RN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Joanne Furletti, RN Chairperson Denise Dietrich, RPN Member Dennis Curry, RN Member David Bishop Public Member Betty Hill Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO 1 DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO PANEL: Grace King - Public Member, Chair Jim Daley - Public Member Peter Guy Professional Member Tony Merendino Professional Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Joanne Furletti, RN Chairperson Rosalie Woods, RPN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Joanne Furletti, RN Chairperson Rosalie Woods, RPN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Joanne Furletti, RN Chairperson Rosalie Woods, RPN Member Gino Cucchi Public Member John Bald Public Member BETWEEN: COLLEGE OF NURSES OF

More information

THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO.

THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. Indexed as: Makerewich, L. (Re) THE DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing directed by the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee of the

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and - PETER ROTHBART

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and - PETER ROTHBART B E T W E E N: DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO - and - PETER ROTHBART NOTICE OF HEARING THE INQUIRIES, COMPLAINTS

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and -

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and - B E T W E E N: DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO - and - RODION ANDREW KUNYNETZ NOTICE OF HEARING THE INQUIRIES, COMPLAINTS

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Cheryl McMaster, RPN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Cheryl McMaster, RPN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Cheryl McMaster, RPN Member Kris Guty, RN Member David Bishop Public Member Faira Bari Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO PANEL: Cesar Mendez, Chair Donna Coyne Anne Marie McLaren Grace King Professional Member Professional Member Professional Member Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Karen Breen-Reid, RN Member Anne McKenzie, RPN Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Karen Breen-Reid, RN Member Anne McKenzie, RPN Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Jim Attwood, RN Chairperson Karen Breen-Reid, RN Member Anne McKenzie, RPN Member Shamsul Islam Public Member David Bishop Public Member

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Denise Dietrich, RPN Chairperson Anne McKenzie, RPN Member Susan Silver, RN

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Denise Dietrich, RPN Chairperson Anne McKenzie, RPN Member Susan Silver, RN DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO PANEL: Denise Dietrich, RPN Chairperson Anne McKenzie, RPN Member Susan Silver, RN Member Joan King Public Member Faira Bari Public Member BETWEEN:

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and -

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO. - and - B E T W E E N: DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO - and - JAMES SCOTT BRADLEY MARTIN NOTICE OF HEARING THE INQUIRIES,

More information

This summary of the Discipline Committee s Decision and Reason for Decision is published pursuant to the Discipline Committee s penalty order.

This summary of the Discipline Committee s Decision and Reason for Decision is published pursuant to the Discipline Committee s penalty order. Discipline Decision Summary This summary of the Discipline Committee s Decision and Reason for Decision is published pursuant to the Discipline Committee s penalty order. By publishing this summary, the

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS PANEL: Judy Gardner, RSSW (chair) Angele Desormeau, RSSW Rick Lamb, Public Member BETWEEN: ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL

More information

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF MANITOBA INQUIRY PANEL DECISION

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF MANITOBA INQUIRY PANEL DECISION COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF MANITOBA INQUIRY PANEL DECISION INQUIRY: IC1246 & IC1284 DR. ANTHONY HLYNKA On February 25, 2010, a hearing was convened before an Inquiry Panel (the Panel) of the College

More information

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Held at Nursing and Midwifery Council, 13a Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9HA On 30 January 2017

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Held at Nursing and Midwifery Council, 13a Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9HA On 30 January 2017 Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Held at Nursing and Midwifery Council, 13a Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9HA On 30 January 2017 Registrant: NMC PIN: Peter Greaves 99I0868E Part(s)

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 27 November 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of Registrant

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 4 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Patricia

More information

IN THE MATTER OF THE COLLEGE OF LICENSED PRACTICAL. N URSES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (The "College")

IN THE MATTER OF THE COLLEGE OF LICENSED PRACTICAL. N URSES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (The College) IN THE MATTER OF THE COLLEGE OF LICENSED PRACTICAL N URSES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (The "College") AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 33 OF THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS ACT (THE"ACT") INTO THE CONDUCT

More information

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D. Dr. Eugene Ignacio License Number

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D. Dr. Eugene Ignacio License Number COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D Dr. Eugene Ignacio License Number 006894 Investigation Committee D of the College of Physicians and Surgeons

More information

Conduct and Competence Committee. Substantive Hearing. 22 May Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London, E20 1EJ

Conduct and Competence Committee. Substantive Hearing. 22 May Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London, E20 1EJ Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 22 May 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant: NMC PIN: Rodney Lowther-Harris 06B0283E Part(s) of

More information

Conduct & Competence Committee Substantive Meeting

Conduct & Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Conduct & Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Date: 18-19 June 2012 Held at NMC, 61 Aldwych London WC2B 4AE Registrant: NMC PIN: Margaret Bridget Rickard 80Y1638E Part(s) of the register: Registered

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 28 November 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of Registrant

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 1-2 August 2017

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 1-2 August 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 1-2 August 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC

More information

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Adrian Dobrowsky, Professional Member

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO. PANEL: Adrian Dobrowsky, Professional Member DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO PANEL: Adrian Dobrowsky, Professional Member BETWEEN: ) JORDAN GLICK for the College COLLEGE OF CHIROPODISTS OF ONTARIO ) (the College ) )

More information

Allegations of insufficient knowledge of English

Allegations of insufficient knowledge of English Page 1 of 6 Information for nurses and midwives Allegations of insufficient knowledge of English Introduction 1 The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) can investigate an allegation that a nurse or midwife

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 1 March 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mrs Christine

More information

Healthcare Professions Registration and Standards Act 2007

Healthcare Professions Registration and Standards Act 2007 You are here: PacLII >> Databases >> Consolidated Acts of Samoa 2015 >> Healthcare Professions Registration and Standards Act 2007 Database Search Name Search Noteup Download Help Healthcare Professions

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 11 May 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, Temple Court 13a Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9HA Name of registrant:

More information

PROPOSED REGULATION - FOR CONSULTATION. Pharmacy Act, 1991 Loi de 1991 sur les pharmaciens ONTARIO REGULATION 202/94 GENERAL DRAFT

PROPOSED REGULATION - FOR CONSULTATION. Pharmacy Act, 1991 Loi de 1991 sur les pharmaciens ONTARIO REGULATION 202/94 GENERAL DRAFT PROPOSED REGULATION - FOR CONSULTATION Pharmacy Act, 1991 Loi de 1991 sur les pharmaciens ONTARIO REGULATION 202/94 GENERAL Consolidation Period: From July 19, 2013 to the e-laws currency date. Last amendment:

More information

Mandatory Reporting A process

Mandatory Reporting A process Mandatory Reporting A process guide for employers, facility operators and nurses Table of Contents Introduction.... 3 What is the purpose of mandatory reporting?... 3 What does the College do when it receives

More information

HEALTH PRACTITIONERS COMPETENCE ASSURANCE ACT 2003 COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION PROCESS

HEALTH PRACTITIONERS COMPETENCE ASSURANCE ACT 2003 COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION PROCESS HEALTH PRACTITIONERS COMPETENCE ASSURANCE ACT 2003 COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION PROCESS Introduction This booklet explains the investigation process for complaints made under the Health Practitioners Competence

More information

Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Meeting 3 October Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE. (29 November 1978)

Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Meeting 3 October Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE. (29 November 1978) Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Meeting 3 October 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register: Area of Registered

More information

Conduct and Competence Committee

Conduct and Competence Committee Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Consensual Panel Determination 7 January 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant Nurse:

More information

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 02/07/ /07/2018. GMC reference number:

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 02/07/ /07/2018. GMC reference number: PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 02/07/2018 05/07/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Magdalene Idu Ekpiken GMC reference number: 6161395 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct MB BS 2005 University

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing January 2018

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 10-11 January 2018 Pharmaceutical Society, 73 University Street, Belfast BT7 1HL Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Sara Cartin

More information

REGISTERED NURSES ACT

REGISTERED NURSES ACT c t REGISTERED NURSES ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 15, 2016. It is intended for information and

More information

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Date: 07/11/2017. Medical practitioner s name: Dr Umashankar VELLAIAH DURAI

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Date: 07/11/2017. Medical practitioner s name: Dr Umashankar VELLAIAH DURAI PUBLIC RECORD Date: 07/11/2017 Medical practitioner s name: Dr Umashankar VELLAIAH DURAI GMC reference number: 5195355 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Non-compliance with a performance

More information

Conduct and Competence. Substantive Order Review Hearing. 9 February Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE

Conduct and Competence. Substantive Order Review Hearing. 9 February Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Conduct and Competence Substantive Order Review Hearing 9 February 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Simon Christopher Watts 99I1488E Part(s)

More information

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing. 14 July Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing. 14 July Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 14 July 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Mrs Oluwadola Olubunmi Mercy

More information

Northern Ireland Social Care Council. NISCC (Registration) Rules 2017

Northern Ireland Social Care Council. NISCC (Registration) Rules 2017 Northern Ireland Social Care Council NISCC (Registration) Rules 2017 April 2017 Produced by: Northern Ireland Social Care Council 7 th Floor, Millennium House 19-25 Great Victoria Street Belfast BT2 7AQ

More information

BETWEEN: Complainant COMPLAINANT. AND: College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia COLLEGE. AND: Nurse REGISTRANT

BETWEEN: Complainant COMPLAINANT. AND: College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia COLLEGE. AND: Nurse REGISTRANT Health Professions Review Board Suite 900, 747 Fort Street, Victoria, BC V8W 3E9 Complainant v. College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia DECISION NO. 2018-HPA-026(a) August 1, 2018 In the matter

More information

18 Month Interim Suspension Order

18 Month Interim Suspension Order Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 14 February 2013 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 20 Old Bailey, London Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register: Area of Registered

More information

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY PUBLIC INFRACTIONS DECISION APRIL 24, 2015 I. INTRODUCTION The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions is an independent administrative body of the NCAA comprised of individuals

More information

Public Minutes of the Investigation Committee

Public Minutes of the Investigation Committee Public Minutes of the Investigation Committee Date of hearing: Name of Doctor Mr Vinay Aggarwal Doctor s UID 7303856 Committee Members Mr Pradeep Agarwal (Lay Chair) Professor Jennifer Adgey (Medical)

More information

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D. Dr. Courtney Mazeroll

COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D. Dr. Courtney Mazeroll COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D Dr. Courtney Mazeroll OVERVIEW Dr. Courtney Mazeroll is a family physician, licensed to practise medicine

More information

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 6 9 March 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 6 9 March 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 6 9 March 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant Nurse: Gofaone Makuku NMC PIN:

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee

Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Meeting 23 August 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: Emma

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 6 7 September 2018

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 6 7 September 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 6 7 September 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, Temple Court 13a Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9HA Name of registrant:

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing. 12 January 2018

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing. 12 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 12 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN:

More information

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 28/02/ /03/2018

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 28/02/ /03/2018 PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 28/02/2018 01/03/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Stefania COSTA ZACCARELLI GMC reference number: 4296920 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Deficient professional

More information

Reasons for the substantive hearing of the Conduct and Competence Committee panel held at NMC, 61 Aldwych, London on March 2011

Reasons for the substantive hearing of the Conduct and Competence Committee panel held at NMC, 61 Aldwych, London on March 2011 Reasons for the substantive hearing of the Conduct and Competence Committee panel held at NMC, 61 Aldwych, London on 21 23 March 2011 Name: Alison Victoria Marie Barlow PIN: 05A1558E Part (s) of register:

More information

Part(s) of the register: Registered nurse sub part 2 Adult nursing L2 October 1980 Registered nurse sub part 1 Adult nursing L1 Sept 1998

Part(s) of the register: Registered nurse sub part 2 Adult nursing L2 October 1980 Registered nurse sub part 1 Adult nursing L1 Sept 1998 Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive order review meeting 23 May 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Joanna Roma Bryans 77B0369E Part(s) of

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 27 September 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mr

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 5 7 December 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Meeting 20 March 2018

Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Meeting 20 March 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Meeting 20 March 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, Temple Court 13a Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9HA Name of registrant: NMC PIN:

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 10 November 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of

More information

Part(s) of the register: RN1: Registered Nurse (sub part 1) Adult (24 February 1975)

Part(s) of the register: RN1: Registered Nurse (sub part 1) Adult (24 February 1975) Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Wednesday 24 February 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114 116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of Nurse: NMC PIN: Mrs Nicola Clare Koller

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 4 October 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London Name of registrant:

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee

Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Meeting 5 September 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of registrant: Muhammad Ilyas

More information

SUBCHAPTER 32M - APPROVAL OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS

SUBCHAPTER 32M - APPROVAL OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS SUBCHAPTER 32M - APPROVAL OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS 21 NCAC 32M.0101 DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to this Subchapter: (1) "Approval to Practice" means authorization by the Medical Board and

More information

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Order Review Hearing Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Order Review Hearing 21 March 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s)

More information