BACKGROUND ON LOCAL AND NATIONAL EFFORTS RELATED TO PROVIDER PEER GROUPING
|
|
- Amie Hopkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BACKGROUND ON LOCAL AND NATIONAL EFFORTS RELATED TO PROVIDER PEER GROUPING Issue Paper Prepared for the Provider Peer Grouping Advisory Group By Minnesota Department of Health Staff June 11, 2009 INTRODUCTION In 2008, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty signed a comprehensive health care reform bill into law. One primary goal of the law is to promote health care payment system reforms that will slow the growth of health care costs and improve quality and value. Another priority is making better information on health care costs and quality available for more informed decision-making by health care consumers. One of several initiatives in the law to make progress toward these goals is the development of a system of publicly comparing provider performance on cost and quality, referred to as provider peer grouping. As required by law, this system will include a combined measure that incorporates both provider risk-adjusted cost and quality of care, in total and for select specific health conditions. In developing the provider peer grouping methodology, the Advisory Group will need to consider the following issues: What is the appropriate provider level for analysis for example, individual physicians, clinics/hospitals, medical groups, or health systems? Which types of health care services and medical conditions should be included? Which provider(s) is primarily responsible for coordinating an individual patient s care? How should information on cost and quality be combined into a composite measure? How should adjustments for variations in clinical risk across the patient populations of different providers be made? How should adjustments for outlier or catastrophic cases be made? What adjustments may be necessary to address variation in payment rates? How should adjustments for payer mix (variation across providers in the percentage of revenue received from commercial vs public payers) be made? CURRENT RELATED ACTIVITIES IN MINNESOTA Many of these issues have been considered in the context of similar efforts underway in Minnesota. Several payer organizations (primarily health plans and the state employee group insurance program) in Minnesota have developed their own systems to compare providers. The growth of these analytical efforts in recent years is indicative of a high level of interest in provider comparisons. Some of these organizations shared information about their approaches to comparing providers with MDH through their responses to a formal Request for Information and through individual interviews. As illustrated by the variations in current methodologies, there are multiple ways of approaching this task.
2 Although the outputs of these analyses aren t necessarily publicly reported or transparent about how calculations are made, these provider comparisons are evolving as tools for health insurance benefit design, provider network selection, and evaluation of health plan performance. Similar systems are emerging within some provider organizations in order to better negotiate with health plans, profile member providers performance, develop new clinical products, and participate in national clinical quality improvement initiatives. It is important to note that the peer grouping system is being developed for a different purpose compared to methodologies already in use at health plans and different results may emerge from the peer grouping initiative. Peer grouping, for example, will not result directly in tiered insurance products. In addition, the peer grouping system will have characteristics that are markedly different from existing health plan methodologies. For example, the peer grouping system must include a composite measure of cost and quality, and will include analysis of public programs as well as commercial populations. Using a transparent methodology, the peer grouping system will rely on cost data aggregated across multiple payers, thus allowing a community-wide view of performance and variations among providers. While the underlying purpose and key characteristics of the provider peer grouping system differ from health plan tiering practices, the experiences of those engaged in similar analytical work can significantly inform the development of the peer grouping methodology. The discussion that follows provides high-level examples of some of the activities currently under way. Health Plans Minnesota s health plans have been stratifying health care providers on the basis of cost for several years. Methods for performing this type of analysis are much more welldeveloped than methods that compare providers on both cost and quality. Although the methods used by different health plans have a great deal in common, there are significant differences in both methodology and results across plans. For example, there is substantial variation among Minnesota health plans in the way provider tiers are constructed. Tiering is done at the care system level for some products, or the primary care and multi-specialty clinic level for others. For primary care providers, analysis can be either at the person level (all care provided to a patient, by all providers, during the year) or at an episode level (primary care episodes only). Risk adjustment is frequently done using one of two patient classification systems: Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACGs), or the Episode Risk Group method within the Episode Treatment Groups (ETGs) product, both briefly described in the text box on the next page. In the past few years, health plans have begun to incorporate quality of care measures into their stratification processes, although the specific measures used and the ways in which the analysis is done vary significantly across plans. Many of the quality measures that are currently being used for this purpose are drawn from publicly available sources, such as MN Community Measurement or Hospital Compare. Minnesota health plans integrate quality measures into their tiering process in different ways. For example, one plan combines cost and quality scores to determine an overall score, while another places only providers that are better than average on both cost and quality into its preferred tier. Other details related to key methodological issues are summarized in Table 1. 2
3 Patient Case-Mix Methods In Minnesota, two primary methods of classifying patients by their clinical complexity, or burden of illness, are in use by private payers. These are: Adjusted Clinical Groups, or ACGs, are a population-based tool for describing the clinical case mix of a patient population developed by Johns Hopkins University. Using insurance claims data, the ACG system classifies patients into 93 homogenous health status categories defined by age, gender, and morbidity. Episode Treatment Groups, or ETGs, are an episode-based classification system developed by Ingenix Symmety. The ETG systems group patient health care claims from various types of providers into 574 clinically homogenous categories. Table 1: How Key Methodological Issues Are Currently Being Addressed in Minnesota Issue Adjustments for the variations in clinical risk across the patient populations of different providers Methods ACGs Episode Risk Groups within ETGs One plan uses ACGs within ETGs for some products Adjustments for outlier or catastrophic cases Exclude trauma Limit costs to a certain dollar threshold. Determining which providers are primarily responsible for an individual s care Specific types of providers that should be included in the calculation Specific types of health care services to be included or excluded in the calculation Appropriately adjusting for variation in payment rates The level for analysis clinic and/or hospital, medical group, or health system. Depending on scope of analysis, care is attributed to one or more providers who coordinates more than a given percentage of care. Primary care Select specialties, such as obstetrics, cardiology, and orthopedics. Primary care: all care for provider s patient population Specialty care: episode-based analysis Not addressed, because no multi-payer analyses to date. Care systems Medical groups Hospitals. Adjustments for payer mix Not addressed, as plans use only commercial data to develop tiered products for the commercial market. 3
4 State Employee Group Insurance Program The Minnesota Advantage Health Plan is a tiered provider network plan for Minnesota state employees and their dependents. It is based on a care system model that requires state employees to select a primary care clinic within a care system, with the expectation that most care will be coordinated through the clinic. The costs of all health services utilized by a member are attributed back to the primary care clinic selected. The plan places clinics into four tiers based on cost. Quality measures are not explicitly incorporated into the tiering process. Risk adjustment occurs at the provider group level using Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACGs). Average cost efficiency is the expected value utilized in comparing a clinic to others for inclusion in a tier. The analysis deals with outlier cases by capping costs for an individual enrollee at $200,000 for purposes of the tiering analysis. RELATED NATIONAL EFFORTS While no national organization has developed or implemented a system of provider peer grouping similar to the one envisioned in Minnesota, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has some projects are aimed at rewarding higher quality, more cost-efficient providers. Examples include: Medicare Value-Based Purchasing CMS is currently developing the concept of valuebased purchasing for hospital services, with the goal of linking payment more directly to quality of care. In this context, value is defined as quality relative to the cost of care in other words, value is determined by a combination of quality and cost. One proposed way of accomplishing this goal would be to first rank hospitals by quality, and then to establish differential payment levels based on hospitals relative cost efficiency. Physician Group Practice (PGP) Demonstration Medicare s PGP Demonstration project is another effort to move toward value-based payment strategies in Medicare. The PGP Demonstration project is a pay-for-performance program that separately rewards improvements in quality and cost efficiency. The project is focused on cost and quality of care for four clinical conditions: diabetes, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and preventive care. Ten physician groups, including Park Nicollet Health Services in Minnesota, were selected to participate in this four-year project. INITIATIVES IN OTHER STATES In many other states, there are efforts under way to compare health care providers based on cost and quality. Some of these efforts compare providers on cost alone, while others compare providers just on measures of quality. The scope of analysis also varies - some include primary care and specialty care providers, while others are limited to hospitals. A much smaller number of these comparative initiatives evaluate all providers on both cost and quality of services. Within this smaller group, the most common method of comparing quality and cost is to assess them separately, then present the results simultaneously. Users of the information need to scan the quality and cost measures at the same time to select health care providers that deliver higher 4
5 quality care at lower cost. Another popular approach is to plot cost against quality in scatter plots, allowing low-cost, high-quality providers to be readily identified. While we did not identify any comprehensive initiatives that use a composite measure of cost and quality, two examples of transparent measurement and reporting of provider cost and quality originate in Massachusetts and California: The Massachusetts Health Care Quality and Cost Council, created by Massachusetts 2006 health reform law, is charged with establishing goals for health care cost and quality improvement, and with measuring and reporting on progress toward achieving these goals. It publishes a website, MyHealthCareOptions, 1 that provides information to consumers on quality and cost of hospital care for a range of health conditions. Quality and cost information are presented separately, and are presented in three categories as below average, average, or above average. Hospital quality is assessed using several measures of patient safety, mortality, best practice, and patient experience ratings, and the hospital cost analysis is risk-adjusted. The Pacific Business Group on Health (PBGH), based in California, has been engaged in provider performance comparisons for many years. Through its partnership with the California Cooperative Healthcare Reporting Initiative and the California Physician Performance Initiative, PBGH has become a national leader in developing and reporting provider quality and efficiency measures, although most of these initiatives are still in the development stage. Developing Minnesota s provider peer grouping system will present many challenges, but it is also a unique opportunity to build on the strong foundations of techniques for comparing health care providers on cost and quality that have been under development in Minnesota and nationally for many years. For example, the combined measure of cost and quality that is required under the law has little precedent. In addition, very few analyses to date have needed to develop methods to accommodate the unique issues that arise when using data from multiple payers
3M Health Information Systems. 3M Clinical Risk Groups: Measuring risk, managing care
3M Health Information Systems 3M Clinical Risk Groups: Measuring risk, managing care 3M Clinical Risk Groups: Measuring risk, managing care Overview The 3M Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) are a population
More informationMinnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System
Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System JUNE 2015 DIVISION OF HEALTH POLICY/HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement
More informationMedicare Advantage PPO participation Termination - Practice Name (Tax ID #: <TaxID>)
July xx, 2013 INDIVDUAL PRACTICE VERSION RE: Medicare Advantage PPO participation Termination - Practice Name (Tax ID #: ) Dear :
More informationMinnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System Framework
Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System Framework AUGUST 2017 Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan SM
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan SM Plan Year: July 2010 June 2011 Background The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan was developed in 2006 for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
More informationMinnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System
Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive Payment System JUNE 2016 HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Quality Incentive
More informationMinnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System:
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Statewide
More informationMinnesota health care price transparency laws and rules
Minnesota health care price transparency laws and rules Minnesota Statutes 2013 62J.81 DISCLOSURE OF PAYMENTS FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES. Subdivision 1.Required disclosure of estimated payment. (a) A health
More informationProvider Peer Grouping Modification of Hospital Total Care Analysis Pre-Report Dissemination Meeting
Provider Peer Grouping Modification of Hospital Total Care Analysis Pre-Report Dissemination Meeting January 10, 2012 Stefan Gildemeister 1 Overview What is Provider Peer Grouping (PPG)? Why is MDH performing
More informationTotal Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015
Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015 This technical appendix supplements the Spring 2015 adult and pediatric Clinic Comparison Reports released by the Oregon Health Care Quality Corporation
More informationPrepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID August 06, 2012
Prepared for North Gunther Hospital Medicare ID 000001 August 06, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: Benchmarking Your Hospital 3 Section 1: Hospital Operating Costs 5 Section 2: Margins 10 Section 3:
More informationA physician s guide to Aexcel
Quality health plans & benefits Healthier living Financial well-being Intelligent solutions A physician s guide to Aexcel www.aetna.com For designations effective January 1, 2014 38.02.800.1 E (5/13) We
More informationSummary Report of Findings and Recommendations
Patient Experience Survey Study of Equivalency: Comparison of CG- CAHPS Visit Questions Added to the CG-CAHPS PCMH Survey Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations Submitted to: Minnesota Department
More informationMedicare Total Cost of Care Reporting
Issue Brief Medicare Total Cost of Care Reporting True health care transformation requires access to clear and consistent data. Three regions are working together to develop reporting that is as consistent
More informationDraft for the Medicare Performance Adjustment (MPA) Policy for Rate Year 2021
Draft for the Medicare Performance Adjustment (MPA) Policy for Rate Year 2021 October 2018 Health Services Cost Review Commission 4160 Patterson Avenue Baltimore, Maryland 21215 (410) 764-2605 FAX: (410)
More informationUnitedHealth Premium Program Frequently Asked Questions
UnitedHealth Premium Program Frequently Asked Questions Resources u Phone: 866-270-5588 u Website: UHCprovider.com/Premium u Mail: UnitedHealthcare - UnitedHealth Premium Program MN017-W700 9700 Health
More informationUnderstanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network
Quality health plans & benefits Healthier living Financial well-being Intelligent solutions Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network SM www.aetna.com Helping consumers gain
More informationAn Overview of NCQA Relative Resource Use Measures. Today s Agenda
An Overview of NCQA Relative Resource Use Measures Today s Agenda The need for measures of Resource Use Development and testing RRU measures Key features of NCQA RRU measures How NCQA calculates benchmarks
More informationFact Sheet: Stratifying Quality Measures BY RACE, ETHNICITY, PREFERRED LANGUAGE, AND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
MINNESOTA STATEWIDE QUALITY REPORTING AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEM Fact Sheet: Stratifying Quality Measures BY RACE, ETHNICITY, PREFERRED LANGUAGE, AND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN Overview Minnesota s 2008 Health Reform
More informationREPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE. Hospital-Based Physicians and the Value-Based Payment Modifier (Resolution 813-I-12)
REPORT OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE CMS Report -I- Subject: Presented by: Referred to: Hospital-Based Physicians and the Value-Based Payment Modifier (Resolution -I-) Charles F. Willson, MD, Chair
More informationLead the way Your guide to Aexcel
Lead the way Your guide to Aexcel For designations effective January 1, 2018 38.02.800.1 G (6/17) aetna.com We re helping build a better health care system one that is more transparent to you and to your
More informationThe Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System (SQRMS)
The Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System (SQRMS) Denise McCabe Quality Reform Implementation Supervisor Health Economics Program June 22, 2015 Overview Context Objectives and goals
More informationState Policy Report #47. October Health Center Payment Reform: State Initiatives to Meet the Triple Aim. Introduction
Health Center Payment Reform: State Initiatives to Meet the Triple Aim State Policy Report #47 October 2013 Introduction Policymakers at both the federal and state levels are focusing on how best to structure
More informationThe Alternative Quality Contract (AQC): Improving Quality While Slowing Spending Growth
The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC): Improving Quality While Slowing Spending Growth Dana Gelb Safran, ScD Senior Vice President, Performance Measurement and Improvement Presented at: MAHQ 16 April
More informationMedicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians
Medicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians This document supplements the AMA s MIPS Action Plan 10 Key Steps for 2017 and provides additional
More informationQUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM Executive Summary On April 27, 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a Notice
More informationMulti-Level Networks High Tech Diagnostic Imaging Management
Case Studies Multi-Level Networks High Tech Diagnostic Imaging Management National Institute for Care Management DAVID W. PLOCHER December 1, 2008 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota An independent
More informationAppendix #4. 3M Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) for Classification of Chronically Ill Children and Adults
Appendix #4 3M Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) for Classification of Chronically Ill Children and Adults Appendix #4, page 2 CMS Report 2002 3M Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) for Classification of Chronically
More informationOctober 3, Dear Dr. Conway:
October 3, 2016 Patrick Conway Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-5519-P P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Dear Dr. Conway: Thank you
More informationState Innovation Model
State Innovation Model April 20, 2016 healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1 SIM Overview Overview and Vision Goals and Objectives Strategic approach for roll out Patient
More informationMedicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration
Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration Disease Management Colloquium Philadelphia, Pennsylvania June 23, 2005 John Pilotte Senior Research Analyst Medicare Demonstrations Program Group Centers
More informationFrom Risk Scores to Impactability Scores:
From Risk Scores to Impactability Scores: Innovations in Care Management Carlos T. Jackson, Ph.D. September 14, 2015 Outline Population Health What is Impactability? Complex Care Management Transitional
More informationMeasuring Healthcare Resources Using Episodes of Care
Measuring Healthcare Resources Using Episodes of Care Mark C. Rattray, MD President and Executive Consultant, CareVariance LLC INTRODUCTION The past several years have brought intensive scrutiny to all
More information(For care delivered in 2008)
(For care delivered in 2008) Report Preparation Directed By: Anne M Snowden, MPH, CPHQ Director of Performance Measurement and Reporting, MNCM Key Contributors: Angeline Carlson, PhD Director of Research,
More informationEpisode Payment Models Final Rule & Analysis
Episode Payment Models Final Rule & Analysis February 15, 2017 Agenda Overview Changes from Proposed Rule Categorization of Episodes Episode Attribution Reconciliation Quality Performance Cardiac Rehab
More informationAnalysis of 340B Disproportionate Share Hospital Services to Low- Income Patients
Analysis of 340B Disproportionate Share Hospital Services to Low- Income Patients March 12, 2018 Prepared for: 340B Health Prepared by: L&M Policy Research, LLC 1743 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 200 Washington,
More informationAggregating Physician Performance Data Across Health Plans
Aggregating Physician Performance Data Across Health Plans March 2011 A project funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Measures Included in The Pilot: 1. Breast cancer screening 2. Colorectal cancer
More informationMedicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings
Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings May 11, 2009 Avalere Health LLC Avalere Health LLC The intersection
More informationComparison of Care in Hospital Outpatient Departments and Physician Offices
Comparison of Care in Hospital Outpatient Departments and Physician Offices Final Report Prepared for: American Hospital Association February 2015 Berna Demiralp, PhD Delia Belausteguigoitia Qian Zhang,
More informationProvider Peer Grouping Monthly Updates
Provider Peer Grouping Monthly Updates March 14, 2011 Katie Burns What is Provider Peer Grouping? A system for publicly comparing provider performance on cost and quality a uniform method of calculating
More informationThe influx of newly insured Californians through
January 2016 Managing Cost of Care: Lessons from Successful Organizations Issue Brief The influx of newly insured Californians through the public exchange and Medicaid expansion has renewed efforts by
More informationElizabeth Mitchell December 1, Transforming Healthcare in an Uncertain Environment
Transforming Healthcare in an Uncertain Environment Elizabeth Mitchell, President & CEO Network for Regional Healthcare Improvement 2017 We have a problem Health Spending as a Share of GDP United States,
More informationScottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)
` 2016 Scottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) Methodology & Specification Document Page 1 of 14 Document Control Version 0.1 Date Issued July 2016 Author(s) Quality Indicators Team Comments
More informationCriteria for Physician Performance Measurement, Reporting and Tiering Programs
Patient Charter for Physician Performance Measurement, Reporting and Tiering Programs: Ensuring Transparency, Fairness and Independent Review The Patient Charter for Physician Performance Measurement,
More informationWA STATE HEALTH CARE INNOVATION MODEL INITIATIVE Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) GRANT APPLICATION. Agenda
WA STATE HEALTH CARE INNOVATION MODEL INITIATIVE Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) GRANT APPLICATION For Bree Collaborative Monday, October 1, 2012 Jason T. McGill Executive Policy Advisory
More informationHOW BPCI EPISODE PRECEDENCE AFFECTS HEALTH SYSTEM STRATEGY WHY THIS ISSUE MATTERS
HOW BPCI EPISODE PRECEDENCE AFFECTS HEALTH SYSTEM STRATEGY Jonathan Pearce, CPA, FHFMA and Coleen Kivlahan, MD, MSPH Many participants in Phase I of the Medicare Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI)
More informationPress Release: CMS Office of Public Affairs, Monday, January 31, 2005 MEDICARE "PAY FOR PERFORMANCE (P4P)" INITIATIVES
Press Release: CMS Office of Public Affairs, 202-690-6145 Monday, January 31, 2005 MEDICARE "PAY FOR PERFORMANCE (P4P)" INITIATIVES Medicare has various initiatives to encourage improved quality of care
More informationWhat You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You. What we will cover: The Context 3/26/2013
What You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You Barbara J. Duffy Lane Powell PC duffyb@lanepowell.com Steven Lack HHS OIG Supervisory Special Agent Retired Steven Lack PhD C.F.E. (925) 938 4864 1 What we
More informationREPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES B of T Report 21-A-17 Subject: Presented by: Risk Adjustment Refinement in Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Settings and Medicare Shared Savings Programs (MSSP) Patrice
More informationMedicare Fee-For Service Provider Utilization & Payment Data Inpatient Public Use File: A Methodological Overview
Medicare Fee-For Service Provider Utilization & Payment Data Inpatient Public Use File: A Methodological Overview May 30, 2014 Prepared by: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Information
More informationExamples of Measure Selection Criteria From Six Different Programs
Examples of Measure Selection Criteria From Six Different Programs NQF Criteria to Assess Measures for Endorsement 1. Important to measure and report to keep focus on priority areas, where the evidence
More informationSeptember 25, Via Regulations.gov
September 25, 2017 Via Regulations.gov The Honorable Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 RE: Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
More informationTennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative
Tennessee Health Care Innovation Initiative More information available at: http://www.tn.gov/hcfa/strategic.shtml State Innovation Model grant 2 1 State Innovation Model (SIM) funding Last week the Centers
More informationState of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Department on Aging Kansas Health Policy Authority
State of Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services Department on Aging Kansas Health Policy Authority Notice of Proposed Nursing Facility Medicaid Rates for State Fiscal Year 2010; Methodology
More informationSkilled Nursing Facilities in Pennsylvania: Analysis of Total Profit Margins for Freestanding Facilities
Skilled Nursing Facilities in Pennsylvania: Analysis of Total Profit Margins for Freestanding Facilities Avalere Health March 2016 Avalere Health T 202.207.1300 avalere.com An Inovalon Company F 202.467.4455
More informationContracts and Grants between Nonprofits and Government
br I e f # 03 DeC. 2013 Government-Nonprofit Contracting Relationships www.urban.org INsIDe this IssUe In 2012, local, state, and federal governments worked with nearly 56,000 nonprofit organizations.
More informationHow to Win Under Bundled Payments
How to Win Under Bundled Payments Donald E. Fry, M.D., F.A.C.S. Executive Vice-President, Clinical Outcomes MPA Healthcare Solutions Chicago, Illinois Adjunct Professor of Surgery Northwestern University
More informationThe Pain or the Gain?
The Pain or the Gain? Comprehensive Care Joint Replacement (CJR) Model DRG 469 (Major joint replacement with major complications) DRG 470 (Major joint without major complications or comorbidities) Actual
More informationExhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013)
Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013) 24 percent (52 ACOs) earned shared savings bonus 27 percent (60 ACOs) reduced spending,
More informationAre physicians ready for macra/qpp?
Are physicians ready for macra/qpp? Results from a KPMG-AMA Survey kpmg.com ama-assn.org Contents Summary Executive Summary 2 Background and Survey Objectives 5 What is MACRA? 5 AMA and KPMG collaboration
More informationThe Minnesota Accountable Health Model STATE INNOVATION MODEL (SIM) GRANT OVERVIEW, GOALS, & ACTIVITIES
The Minnesota Accountable Health Model STATE INNOVATION MODEL (SIM) GRANT OVERVIEW, GOALS, & ACTIVITIES What is the? Funding awarded to Minnesota by the CMS Innovation Center In partnership under the Minnesota
More informationThe National ACO, Bundled Payment and MACRA Summit. Success in Physician Led Bundles
The National ACO, Bundled Payment and MACRA Summit Success in Physician Led Bundles Disclaimer This material and/or presentation is provided for guidance and/or illustrative purposes only and should not
More informationLong term commitment to a new vision. Medical Director February 9, 2011
ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION (ACO): Long term commitment to a new vision Michael Belman MD Michael Belman MD Medical Director February 9, 2011 Physician Reimbursement There are three ways to pay a physician,
More informationReport to the Greater Milwaukee Business Foundation on Health
Report to the Greater Milwaukee Business Foundation on Health Key Factors Influencing 2003 2012 Southeast Wisconsin Commercial Payer Hospital Payment Levels Presented by: Keith Kieffer, CPA, RPh Management
More informationProgram Selection Criteria: Bariatric Surgery
Program Selection Criteria: Bariatric Surgery Released June 2017 Blue Cross Blue Shield Association is an association of independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies. 2013 Benefit Design Capabilities
More informationCommunity Health Needs Assessment for Corning Hospital: Schuyler, NY and Steuben, NY:
Community Health Needs Assessment for Corning Hospital: Schuyler, NY and Steuben, NY: November 2012 Approved February 20, 2013 One Guthrie Square Sayre, PA 18840 www.guthrie.org Page 1 of 18 Table of Contents
More informationPaying for Outcomes not Performance
Paying for Outcomes not Performance 1 3M. All Rights Reserved. Norbert Goldfield, M.D. Medical Director 3M Health Information Systems, Inc. #Health Information Systems- Clinical Research Group Created
More informationPayment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness
Payment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness Discussion Draft March 2017 Payment Reforms to Improve Care for Patients with Serious Illness Page 2 PAYMENT REFORMS TO IMPROVE CARE FOR
More informationCovered California s Core Building Blocks for Improving Quality and Lowering Costs
Covered California s Core Building Blocks for Improving Quality and Lowering Costs Strengthen valuebased, patientcentered benefit design to improve access to primary care. Require providers to meet quality
More informationPreventable Readmissions
Preventable Readmissions Strategy to reduce readmissions and increase quality needs to have the following elements A tool to identify preventable readmissions Payment incentives Public reporting Quality
More information2014 MASTER PROJECT LIST
Promoting Integrated Care for Dual Eligibles (PRIDE) This project addressed a set of organizational challenges that high performing plans must resolve in order to scale up to serve larger numbers of dual
More informationAccelerating the Impact of Performance Measures: Role of Core Measures
Accelerating the Impact of Performance Measures: Role of Core Measures Mark McClellan, MD, PhD Director, Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform Senior Fellow, Economic Studies Leonard D. Schaeffer Chair
More informationSpecialty Payment Model Opportunities Assessment and Design
Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited.14.2286. CMS Alliance to Modernize Healthcare (CAMH) Specialty Model Opportunities Assessment and Design Cardiology Technical Expert Panel April 8, 2014
More informationBundled Payments Physician Engagement Issues
Bundled Payments Physician Engagement Issues George Isham, M.D., M.S. Chief Health Officer I tit t f M di i Institute of Medicine Washington, D.C. September 09, 2009 Many Policy Experts are Advocating
More informationEssentia Health. A View on Information Technology. ND HIMS Conference April 12, Tim Sayler, COO Essentia Health - West
Essentia Health A View on Information Technology ND HIMS Conference April 12, 2017 Tim Sayler, COO Essentia Health - West Me Discussing Information Technology Who is Essentia Overview Why: Information
More informationBundled Payments. AMGA September 25, 2013 AGENDA. Who Are We. Our Business Challenge. Episode Process. Experience
Bundled Payments AMGA September 25, 2013 Who Are We AGENDA Our Business Challenge Episode Process Experience 1 Cleveland Clinic is transforming Fee for service Fee for value 3 Fast Facts 41,200 employees
More informationAugust 25, Dear Ms. Verma:
Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. Room 445-G Washington, DC 20201 CMS 1686 ANPRM, Medicare Program; Prospective
More informationMedicaid HCBS/FE Home Telehealth Pilot Final Report for Study Years 1-3 (September 2007 June 2010)
Medicaid HCBS/FE Home Telehealth Pilot Final Report for Study Years 1-3 (September 2007 June 2010) Completed November 30, 2010 Ryan Spaulding, PhD Director Gordon Alloway Research Associate Center for
More informationDear Acting Administrator Slavitt,
June 27, 2016 Mr. Andy Slavitt, Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20201 Re: Merit-Based
More informationData-Driven Strategy for New Payment Models. Objectives. Common Acronyms
Data-Driven Strategy for New Payment Models Mark Sharp, CPA Partner msharp@bkd.com Objectives Understand new payment model reforms and bundling arrangements Learn how these new payment models can impact
More informationGuidance for Developing Payment Models for COMPASS Collaborative Care Management for Depression and Diabetes and/or Cardiovascular Disease
Guidance for Developing Payment Models for COMPASS Collaborative Care Management for Depression and Diabetes and/or Cardiovascular Disease Introduction Within the COMPASS (Care Of Mental, Physical, And
More informationDual Eligibles: Medicaid s Role in Filling Medicare s Gaps
I S S U E P A P E R kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured March 2004 Dual Eligibles: Medicaid s Role in Filling Medicare s Gaps In 2000, over 7 million people were dual eligibles, low-income
More informationDA: November 29, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National PACE Association
DA: November 29, 2017 TO: FR: RE: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National PACE Association NPA Comments to CMS on Development, Implementation, and Maintenance of Quality Measures for the Programs
More informationMedicare Physician Payment Reform:
Medicare Physician Payment Reform: Implications and Options for Physicians and Hospitals Background The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) was signed into law on April 14, 2015.
More informationMedi-Cal APR-DRG Updates. Medi-Cal Updates. Agenda. Medi-Cal APR-DRG Updates Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) Program
Medi-Cal Updates Amber Ott California Hospital Association Agenda Medi-Cal APR-DRG Updates Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) Program Current QAF Law (SB239) Prop 52 Medicaid Managed Care Final Rules QAF 5 Development
More informationUsing the patient s voice to measure quality of care
Using the patient s voice to measure quality of care Improving quality of care is one of the primary goals in U.S. care reform. Examples of steps taken to reach this goal include using insurance exchanges
More informationEvaluation of Health Care Homes:
Division of Health Policy PO Box 64882 St. Paul, MN 55164-0882 651-201-3626 www.health.state.mn.us Evaluation of Health Care Homes: 2010-2012 Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Human
More informationMinnesota Perspective: Fairview Health Services. National Accountable Care Organization Congress October 25, 2010
Minnesota Perspective: Fairview Health Services National Accountable Care Organization Congress October 25, 2010 Fairview Overview Not-for-profit organization established in 1906 Partner with the University
More informationPhysician Practice Acquisition Study: National and Regional Employment Changes. October 2016
Physician Practice Acquisition Study: National and Regional Employment Changes October 2016 About the Physicians Advocacy Institute The Physicians Advocacy Institute (PAI) is a not-for-profit organization
More informationSession 57 PD, Care Management in an Evolving Health Care World. Moderator/Presenter: David V. Axene, FSA, CERA, FCA, MAAA
Session 57 PD, Care Management in an Evolving Health Care World Moderator/Presenter: David V. Axene, FSA, CERA, FCA, MAAA Presenters: Craig Butler, MD, MBA Richard Fuller Timothy Willard Smith, ASA, MAAA
More informationPayment and Delivery System Reform in Vermont: 2016 and Beyond
Payment and Delivery System Reform in Vermont: 2016 and Beyond Richard Slusky, Director of Reform Green Mountain Care Board Presentation to GMCB August 13, 2015 Transition Year 2016 1. Medicare Waiver
More informationRe: Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare
September 25, 2006 Institute of Medicine 500 Fifth Street NW Washington DC 20001 Re: Rewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in Medicare The American College of Physicians (ACP), representing
More informationRisk Adjustment Methods in Value-Based Reimbursement Strategies
Paper 10621-2016 Risk Adjustment Methods in Value-Based Reimbursement Strategies ABSTRACT Daryl Wansink, PhD, Conifer Health Solutions, Inc. With the move to value-based benefit and reimbursement models,
More informationMedicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings
Medicare Spending and Rehospitalization for Chronically Ill Medicare Beneficiaries: Home Health Use Compared to Other Post-Acute Care Settings Executive Summary The Alliance for Home Health Quality and
More informationCommunity Performance Report
: Wenatchee Current Year: Q1 217 through Q4 217 Qualis Health Communities for Safer Transitions of Care Performance Report : Wenatchee Includes Data Through: Q4 217 Report Created: May 3, 218 Purpose of
More information5D QAPI from an Operational Approach. Christine M. Osterberg RN BSN Senior Nursing Consultant Pathway Health Pathway Health 2013
5D QAPI from an Operational Approach Christine M. Osterberg RN BSN Senior Nursing Consultant Pathway Health Objectives Review the post-acute care data agenda. Explain QAPI principles Describe leadership
More informationState advocacy roadmap: Medicaid access monitoring review plans
State advocacy roadmap: Medicaid access monitoring review plans Background Federal Medicaid law requires states to ensure Medicaid beneficiaries are able to access the healthcare providers they need through
More informationAlternative Payment Models and Health IT
Alternative Payment Models and Health IT Health DataPalooza Preconference May 8, 2016 Kelly Cronin, MS, MPH, Director, Office of Care Transformation, ONC/HHS HHS Goals for Medicare Payment Reform In January
More informationThe Home Health Groupings Model (HHGM)
The Home Health Groupings Model (HHGM) September 5, 017 PRESENTED BY: Al Dobson, Ph.D. PREPARED BY: Al Dobson, Ph.D., Alex Hartzman, M.P.A, M.P.H., Kimberly Rhodes, M.A., Sarmistha Pal, Ph.D., Sung Kim,
More informationSNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives
SNF * Readmissions Bootcamp The SNF Readmission Penalty, Post-Acute Networks, and Community Collaboratives Lindsay Holland, MHA Associate Director, Care Transitions Health Services Advisory Group (HSAG)
More information