Learning from deaths
|
|
- Anabel Warner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Learning from deaths Regional Mortality and Mortality Review Thursday 25 th May 2017 Durham Centre, Durham Mr Tony Roberts 1
2 Deputy Director (Clinical Effectiveness) South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Patient Safety Collaborative Programme Lead, Academic Health Science Network North East and North Cumbria, (AHSN NENC), Deputy Director North East Quality Observatory Service (NEQOS) Member of the Q Initiative 2
3 Overview brief overview of the CQC review into investigations of deaths in NHS Trusts and the new regulations for Trusts to estimate avoidable deaths findings and learning from our regional mortality review programme implementing the National Quality Board National Guidance on Learning from Deaths: Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care thoughts so far on how we might meet these requirements 3
4 New requirements from April
5 Seven Recommendations Recommendation 7: Provider organisations and commissioners must work together to review and improve their local approach following the death of people receiving care from their services. Provider boards should ensure that national guidance is implemented at a local level, so that deaths are identified, screened and investigated, when appropriate and that learning from deaths is shared and acted on. Emphasis must be given to engaging families and carers. 5
6 National Quality Board March 2017 NHS Anytown Foundation Trust: Learning from Deaths Dashboard - September Description: The suggested dashboard is a tool to aid the systematic recording of deaths and learning from care provided by NHS Trusts. Trusts are encouraged to use this to record relevant incidents of mortality, number of deaths reviewed and cases from which lessons can be learnt to improve care. Summary of total number of deaths and total number of cases reviewed under the Structured Judgement Review Methodology Total Number of Deaths, Deaths Reviewed and Deaths Deemed Avoidable (does not include patients with identified learning disabilities) Total Number of Deaths in Scope Total Deaths Reviewed This Month This Month This Month Last Month Last Month Last Month This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter This Quarter (QTD) Total Number of deaths considered to have been potentially avoidable (RCP<=3) Last Quarter This Year (YTD) This Year (YTD) This Year (YTD) Last Year Last Year Last Year Time Series: Start date Q1 End date Q2 Mortality over time, total deaths reviewed and deaths considered to have been potentially avoidable (Note: Changes in recording or review practice may make comparison over time invalid) Q Q2 Q3 Q4 Q Q2 Total deaths Deaths reviewed Deaths considered likely to have been avoidable Total Deaths Reviewed by RCP Methodology Score Score 5 Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Score 6 Definitely avoidable Strong evidence of avoidability Probably avoidable (more than 50:50) Probably avoidable but not very likely Definitely Slight evidence of avoidability not avoidable This Month 0 0.0% This Month 4 1.2% This Month % This Month % This Month % This Month % This Quarter (QTD) 5 0.5% This Quarter (QTD) % This Quarter (QTD) % This Quarter (QTD) % This Quarter (QTD) % This Quarter (QTD % This Year (YTD) % This Year (YTD) % This Year (YTD) % This Year (YTD) % This Year (YTD) % This Year (YTD) % Summary of total number of learning disability deaths and total number reviewed under the LeDeR methodology Total Number of Deaths, Deaths Reviewed and Deaths Deemed Avoidable for patients with identified learning disabilities Total Number of Deaths in scope Total Deaths Reviewed Through the LeDeR Methodology (or equivalent) Total Number of deaths considered to have been potentially avoidable This Month This Month This Month Last Month Last Month Last Month This Quarter (QTD) This Quarter (QTD) This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter Last Quarter Last Quarter This Year (YTD) This Year (YTD) This Year (YTD) Last Year Last Year Last Year Time Series: Start date Q1 End date Q1 Mortality over time, total deaths reviewed and deaths considered to have been potentially avoidable (Note: Changes in recording or review practice may make comparison over time invalid) Q Q2 Q3 Q4 Q Total deaths Deaths reviewed Deaths considered likely to have been avoidable wpcontent/uploads/2017/03/nqb -learning-from-deathsdashboard.xlsx 6
7 From April 2017 the NQB National Guidance on Learning from Deaths require: Acute, mental health and community NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts should ensure their governance arrangements and processes include, facilitate and give due focus to the review, investigation and reporting of deaths, including those deaths that are determined more likely than not to have resulted from problems in care. Trusts should also ensure that they share and act upon any learning derived from these processes. Non Executive Director and Executive Director Board responsibility Enhance skills and training A clear policy for engagement with bereaved families and carers Each Trust should publish an updated policy by September 2017 on how it responds to, and learns from, deaths of patients who die under its management and care. 7
8 From March the boards of all NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts will be required to: The policy should include how its process respond to the death of an individual with: - a learning disability - a mental health need - an infant or child death - a still birth or maternal death Undertaking case record reviews: selection of cases, method and reporting From April 2017, Trusts will be required to collect and publish on a quarterly basis specified information on deaths. This should be through a paper and an agenda item to a public Board meeting in each quarter to set out the Trust s policy and approach (by the end of Q2) and publication of the data and learning points (from Q3 onwards) Changes to the Quality Accounts regulations will require that the data providers publish be summarised in Quality Accounts from June
9 From March the boards of all NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts will be required to: In , further developments will include: The Care Quality Commission will strengthen its assessment of providers learning from deaths NHS England, led by the Chief Nursing Officer, will develop guidance for bereaved families and carers. Acute Trusts will receive training to use the Royal College of Physicians Structured Judgement Review case note methodology NHS Digital is assessing how to facilitate the development of provider systems and processes The Department of Health is exploring proposals to improve the way complaints involving serious incidents are handled 9
10 Medical Examiner reforms: In at least two Trusts in England, every death in hospital is discussed with a Medical Examiner; first to decide whether the coroner needs to be informed, then to agree how best to formulate the cause of death for the death certificate The medical examiner also examines the medical record, at least in relation to the terminal admission, and speaks to a member of the bereaved family, usually by telephone. The family member is offered an explanation of what is written on the death certificate as the cause of death, and is asked whether any aspect of healthcare could have been done better. If the ME views the body of the decease they can complete the confirmatory (Part 2) medical certificate for cremation if needed The service is funded from the fees. If any concerns are identified at any stage the case can be identified for more detailed review or investigation 10
11 National MCRRP for acute hospitals 11
12 Grading Deaths or Care Expected v unexpected death: A death can be said to be unexpected if: Avoidability Scale Descriptor The patient died of an unexpected illness not suspected by the managing team The diagnosis was suspected and the patient was treated but died despite not having bad prognostic features associated with that diagnosis The diagnosis was suspected and the patient was treated, however the treatment was sub-optimal. 1 Definitely not avoidable 2 Slight evidence of avoidability 3 Possibly avoidable (less than 50:50) 4 Probably avoidable (more than 50:50) 5 Strong evidence of avoidability 6 Definitely avoidable NCEPOD grade Descriptor PRISM Quality Scale 1 Good practice a Excellent 2 Room for improvement in clinical care b Good 3 Room for improvement in organisational care c Adequate 4 Room for improvement in clinical and organisational care d Poor 5 Less than satisfactory e Very poor Considering all that you know about this patient's admission, how would you rate the OVERALL quality of healthcare received by the patient from this trust? This question recognises that a problem in care can occur against a backdrop of overall good quality of care and the converse, a patient may experience poor overall quality of care w ithout obvious harm. For this question, do not consider healthcare prior to the admission that ended in the patient's death. 12
13 A brief history in the North East JUL 2012 PRISM 1 study Estimated avoidable mortality 5.2% 13
14 A brief history in the North East JUL 2012 PRISM 1 study Estimated avoidable mortality 5.2% NE Regional Mortality group collaborate to adopt locally adapted PRISM methods 14
15 A brief history in the North East JUL 2015 PRISM 2 study Estimated avoidable mortality 3.0% 3.6% 15
16 Mortality Review South Tees Centralised review system Commenced October REVIEWS 16
17 Mortality Review South Tees Centralised review system In the last 12 months 676 REVIEWS 0.2% >50/50 preventable 2.7% some preventability 16% NCEPOD room for improvement 86% excellent, good 12% adequate 2% poor 17
18 Mortality Review South Tees Centralised review system Key Lessons Documentation Delays and problems with end of life care and DNACPR Issues with tertiary referral or repatriation 18
19 Mortality Review South Tees Centralised review system Team Based on 2 consultants Each 1 PA / week Administrator and In-house database Support from Nurses & Other Specialties 19
20 Mortality Review South Tees CASES: RANDOM 25% of all deaths And selected groups of patients Patients with any incident or complaint recorded Following surgery or a procedure 4 or more medical triggers Adults aged <50 Learning disabilities Referred by clinical teams or at the request of the Medical Director 20
21 Mortality Review South Tees Currently we are looking at 40% of all deaths in our trust 21
22 Mortality Review South Tees JAN 2017 Moved to secure, on line system Improved security, reliability and functionality and offers the opportunity to share our reviews with specialty teams more easily and potentially with other parts of the system including GPs and mental health trusts 22
23 North East secure, on-line mortality review system Basic Information pre-populates form PAS Demographics Date of admission Date of death Specialty Consultant Coding 23
24 North East secure, on-line mortality review system A range of review forms included for centralised review Locally adapted PRISM NMCRRP SJR Specialty Mental Health GP 24
25 North East secure, on-line mortality review system Grading of Care: 1. Preventability (PRISM/SJR) 2. NCEPOD Quality of care 3. PRISM Overall Quality scale 4. Expected or unexpected 25
26 North East secure, on-line mortality review system A qualitative narrative Automated reporting of quantitative and qualitative information 26
27 JAN 2016 A brief history in the North East Trusts share aggregated data DEATHS 54% reviewed 0.4% preventable
28 A brief history in the North East MAR Trusts combine patient level review data Support of AHSN & NEQOS Single online database PAS data Case record review of process measures Grading of care Case narratives 28
29 A brief history in the North East 7370 REVIEWS 27 (0.4%) >50/50 chance of being preventable Single online database 20% judged to have room for improvement PAS in clinical, data organisational Case or both record aspects of care review of process measures Grading of care Case narratives 29
30 A brief history in the North East SEP 2016 Testing of on-line secure system commences 30
31 A brief history in the North East JAN 2017 Clarity Informatics Assure system is adopted in South Tees FEB 2017 IG discussions with Mental Health Trusts start in order to set up a pilot Second acute Trust adopts Assure system 31
32 Conclusions It is feasible to carry out large numbers of case record reviews and to link them locally to other governance processes including investigations of Serious Incidents. 32
33 Conclusions Case record review estimates of rates of avoidable death are subject to denominator effects. Internal reviewers, in our experience, report lower rates of preventable mortality than the published literature. 33
34 Conclusions Sharing information about deaths between providers means solving important IG issues. There are technical issues to overcome but the NHS Number could be used. Ideally we would use one system across a region. 34
35 Conclusions Medical Examiners are due to be introduced across England by April Some Trusts may implement interim arrangements to employ MEs as they offer major advantages including involving families in a timely manner. 35
36 PRISM 36
37 PRISM Results PRISM 1: Reviewers judged 5.2% (95% CI 3.8% to 6.6%) of deaths as having a 50% or greater chance of being preventable. PRISM 2: The proportion of avoidable deaths was 3.6% (95% confidence interval 3.0% to 4.3%). It was lower in 2012/13 (3.0%, 2.4% to 3.7%) than in 2009 (5.2%, 3.8% to 6.6%). There was a small but statistically non-significant association between HSMR and the proportion of avoidable deaths (regression coefficient 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.7). The regression coefficient was similar for both time periods (0.1 and 0.3). This implies that a difference in HSMR of between 105 and 115 would be associated with an increase of only 0.3% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 0.7%) in the proportion of avoidable deaths. A similar weak non-significant association was observed for SHMI (regression coefficient 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 1.0). 37
38 North East Quality Observatory Service (NEQOS) Ridley House Henry Street Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 1DQ +44 (0) Follow us NEQOS is jointly hosted by Northumberland, Tyne & Wear and South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts North East Quality Observatory Service (NEQOS)
Learning from Patient Deaths: Update on Implementation and Reporting of Data: 5 th January 2018
Learning from Patient Deaths: Update on Implementation and Reporting of Data: 5 th January 218 Purpose The purpose of this paper is to update the Trust Board on progress with implementing the mandatory
More informationMortality Report Learning from Deaths. Quarter
Mortality Report Learning from Deaths Quarter 3 2017 Introduction In December 2016 the CQC report Learning, Candour and accountability: A review of the way NHS Trusts review and investigate the deaths
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy
Learning from Deaths Policy Version: 3 Approved by: Board of Directors Date Approved: October 2017 Lead Manager: Associate Medical Director for Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Responsible Director: Medical
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy A Framework for Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care.
Learning from Deaths Policy A Framework for Identifying, Reporting, Investigating and Learning from Deaths in Care. Associated Policies Being Open and Duty of Candour policy CG10 Clinical incident / near-miss
More informationh. HULL AND EAST YORKSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY. Broad Recommendations / Summary
201 2017.473h. HULL AND EAST YORKSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY Broad Recommendations / Summary In-hospital death occurs. Patient 18 years of age or above. Yes Child Death Review
More informationSWH Mortality Review Policy
Corporate Governance SWH 01785 The Trust s Intranet holds the current approved guidance documents. Notice to staff using a paper copy of this document. Staff must ensure that they are using the most up-to-date
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy LISTEN LEARN ACT TO IMPROVE
Learning from Deaths Policy LISTEN LEARN ACT TO IMPROVE EQUALITY IMPACT The Trust strives to ensure equality and opportunity for all, both as a major employer and as a provider of health care. This policy
More informationLearning from Deaths; Mortality Review Policy
Learning from Deaths; Mortality Review Policy Version: 4.0 New or Replacement: Replacement Policy number: CESC/2012/066 (Version 4) Document author(s): Executive Sponsor: Non-Executive Sponsor: Title of
More informationLearning from the Deaths of Patients in our Care Policy
Learning from the Deaths of Patients in our Care Policy Approved By: Date of Original Approval: UHL Mortality Review Committee UHL Policies & Guidelines Committee September 2017 Trust Reference: B31/2017
More informationNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Clinical Governance Policies and Procedures
Clin Gov 108 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Clinical Governance Policies and Procedures Learning from Deaths Policy Version 1 Sub Committee & approval date Mortality and Outcomes Data Group
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy
Learning from Deaths Policy The Learning from Deaths Policy sets out the minimum acceptable standards of the national learning from deaths programme. Policy group General Document Detail Version 1 Approved
More informationPolicy on Learning from Deaths
Trust Policy Policy on Learning from Deaths Key Points Mortality review is an important part of our Safety and Quality Improvement Process. All patients who die in our trust have a review of their care.
More informationLEARNING FROM DEATHS (Mortality Policy)
LEARNING FROM DEATHS () Version: 1.0 Date issued: October 2017 Review date: September 2020 Applies to: All Clinical Staff Groups This document is available in other formats, including easy read summary
More informationDocument Title Investigating Deaths (Mortality Review) Policy
Document Title Investigating Deaths (Mortality Review) Policy Document Description Document Type Policy Service Application DWMH Trust wide Version 1.0 Policy Reference no. POL 351 Lead Author(s) Name
More informationMORTALITY REVIEW & LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY
MORTALITY REVIEW & LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY Document Reference Document status Target Audience MD25.MRLD.V1.1 Final All clinical staff involved in mortality case record reviews and investigations and
More informationLearning from Deaths Framework Policy
Learning from Deaths Framework Policy Profile Version: 1.0 Author: Dr Nigel Kennea, Associate Medical Director (Mortality) Executive/Divisional sponsor: Medical Director Applies to: All staff Date issued:
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy. This policy applies Trust wide
Learning from Deaths Policy This policy applies Trust wide Document control page Name of policy Learning from Deaths Policy Names of linked Learning from Deaths Procedure procedures Accountable Medical
More informationHospital Mortality Monitoring. May 2015
Hospital Mortality Monitoring Report 24: Oct 213 to Sep 214 May 215 undertaken by North East Quality Observatory System on behalf of All North East Subscribers to NEQOS Services NEQOS is jointly operated
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy
Policy Author: Owner: Publisher: Version: 1 Peter Wanklyn, Helen Noble Medical Director Medical Governance Date of version issue: September 2017 Approved by: Executive Board Date approved: September 2017
More informationMortality Report. 1. Introduction / Background
Mortality Report 1. Introduction / Background 1.1 The Board is reminded of the findings from the CQC review in December 2016, 'Learning, candour and accountability: a review of the way trusts review and
More informationMortality Policy. Learning from Deaths
Mortality Policy Learning from Deaths Name of Author and Job Title: Frank Jacobs, Datix project manager Ian Brandon, Head of governance and risk Name of Review/ Development Body: Ratification Body: Mortality
More informationAuthors: Head of Outcomes & Effectiveness, Quality Project Manager and Deputy MD, Sponsor: Medical Director
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST MORTALITY REVIEW COMMITTEE 7 TH NOVEMBER 2017 EXECUTIVE QUALITY BOARD 7 TH NOVEMBER 2017 QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMITTEE 30 TH NOVEMBER 2017 TRUST BOARD 7 TH DECEMBER
More informationTRUST CORPORATE POLICY RESPONDING TO DEATHS
SCOPE OF APPLICATION AND EXEMPTIONS CONSULT ATION COR/POL/224/2017-001 TRUST CORPORATE POLICY RESPONDING TO DEATHS APPROVING COMMITTEE(S) EFFECTIVE FROM DISTRIBUTION RELATED DOCUMENTS STANDARDS OWNER AUTHOR/FURTHER
More informationCRM012 - Identifying, Reporting, Investigating And Learning From Deaths In Care
CRM012 - Identifying, Reporting, Investigating And Learning From Deaths In Care 1 Table of Contents Why we need this Policy 3 What the Policy is trying to do..3 Which stakeholders have been involved in
More informationAppendix 1 MORTALITY GOVERNANCE POLICY
Appendix 1 MORTALITY GOVERNANCE POLICY 1 Policy Title: Executive Summary: Mortality Governance Policy For many people death under the care of the NHS is an inevitable outcome and they experience excellent
More informationDecision Discussion Information
To: National Quality Board For meeting on: 1 March 2017 Report author: Report for: Paul Stonebrook and Shaleel Kesavan (DH) Decision Discussion Information X X LEARNING FROM DEATHS A. Summary: This paper
More informationEvidence Search Completed by..joanne Phizacklea.Date
Document Type: Procedure Unique Identifier: CORP/PROC/073 Document Title: Mortality Review Process Scope: Consultants, Nursing Staff, Clinical Coding Staff, Clinical Audit & Effectiveness Staff, Quality
More informationMORTALITY REVIEW POLICY
MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY Version 1.3 Version Date July 2017 Policy Owner Medical Director Author Associate Director of Patient Safety & Quality First approval or date last reviewed July 2017 Staff/Groups
More informationLearning from Deaths - Mortality Report
Learning from Deaths - Mortality Report NHS Improvement and the National Quality Board have requested all NHS Trusts to publish a review of mortality by. This is our Trust report. 1. Background In line
More informationUsing the structured judgement review method
National Mortality Case Record Review Programme Using the structured judgement review method A clinical governance guide to mortality case record reviews Supported by: Commissioned by: Dr Andrew Gibson
More informationMortality Policy - Learning from Deaths (CG627)
Mortality Policy - Learning from Deaths (CG627) Approval Approval Group Job Title, Chair of Committee Date Policy Approval Group Chair, Policy Approval Group September 2017 Change History Version Date
More informationLEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY
Issue number: 1st Edition LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY Author with contact details Dr Neil Mercer, Associate Medical Director for Clinical Governance Neil.mercer@aintree.nhs.uk tel. 529-5152 Original Issue
More informationRM57 HOSPITAL MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY
RM57 HOSPITAL MORTALITY REVIEW POLICY Version: 1 Name of ratifying committee: Clinical Quality Assurance Committee Date ratified: 20 th September 2017 Name of originator/author: Julie Grice, Chair of Hospital
More informationPolicy on Learning from Deaths
Policy on Learning from Deaths Version number: 1 Consultation: Governance Committee Board Committee Director of Quality Assistant Director of Governance & Compliance Patient Safety Manager Ratified by:
More informationPower of PROMs Data to Support Commissioning of Varicose Vein Procedures
Power of PROMs Data to Support Commissioning of Varicose Vein Procedures Valerie Corris, Senior Health Information Analyst, NEQOS PROMs Summit 7 December 2016 Commissioning Principals Commissioning for
More informationNational Mortality Case Record Review Programme. Using the structured judgement review method A guide for reviewers (England)
National Mortality Case Record Review Programme Using the structured judgement review method A guide for reviewers (England) Supported by: Commissioned by: Dr Allen Hutchinson Emeritus professor in public
More informationLearning from Deaths Trust Board in public
Learning from Deaths Trust Board in public Date: 30 th August 2018 Agenda item: 2.4 Executive sponsor Professor Des Holden Medical Director Dr Richard Brown Director of Outcomes Report author(s) Jonathan
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy
Learning from Deaths Policy September 2017 To be reviewed by April 2018 Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Scope 4 3 Purpose 4 4 SHMI/HSMR data 5 5 Roles and responsibilities 6 6 Definitions 11 7 Deaths
More informationLearning From Deaths Policy
Learning From Deaths Policy The purpose of this policy is to provide a systematic approach to ensure that the Trust has robust governance arrangements in place to review, report and learn from patient
More informationLEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY
Summary LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY Learning from a review of the care provided to patients who die is integral to a provider s clinical governance and quality improvement work. To fulfil the standards
More informationIndicator 5c Mortality Survey
Indicator 5c Mortality Survey Undertaken by NCEPOD on behalf of NHS England Dr Neil Smith - Clinical Researcher and Deputy CEO Dr Hannah Shotton - Clinical Researcher Dr Marisa Mason - Chief Executive
More informationActive date: 25 th Sept Exclusions: None
Trust Policy Title: Mortality review Author(s): James Coulston - Mortality Lead, Stuart Walker - Medical Director, Lincoln Andrews - Compliance and Audit Manager, Charlie Davis - Palliative Care Lead Document
More informationLearning from Deaths, Mortality Review Policy
Learning from Deaths, Mortality Review Policy Policy Number: 981 Version: 1.0 Category Authorisation Committee/Group Clinical Patient Safety Committee Date of Authorisation: 29 th August 2017 Ratification
More informationQuality Strategy. CCG Executive, Quality Safety and Risk Committee Approved by Date Issued July Head of Clinical Quality & Patient Safety
Quality Strategy Document Document Status Equality Impact Assessment Draft None Document Ratified/ CCG Executive, Quality Safety and Risk Committee Approved by Date Issued July 2016 Review Date September
More informationCO119, Learning from Deaths policy
CO119, Learning from Deaths policy Consultation Draft v.1* September 2017 *Awaiting standardised Structured Judgement Review for Mental Health Trusts & wider consultation with workforce and stakeholder
More informationTRUST BOARD/DIRECTORS GROUP 2016 Key Performance Indicators
TRUST BOARD/DIRECTORS GROUP 2016 Key Performance Indicators Introduction This paper provides an update on our progress towards our vision to be England s best acute teaching trust in 2016 and beyond. The
More informationMonthly and Quarterly Activity Returns Statistics Consultation
Monthly and Quarterly Activity Returns Statistics Consultation Monthly and Quarterly Activity Returns Statistics Consultation Version number: 1 First published: 08/02/2018 Prepared by: Classification:
More informationLEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017
LEARNING FROM DEATHS POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017 Learning From Deaths Policy_RM09_V1 Policy title Learning from Deaths Policy Policy RM09 reference Policy category Corporate Relevant to Clinical Staff Date published
More informationMortality Monitoring Policy
Mortality Monitoring Policy Document Information Version: 3.0 Date: 25/07/2016 Ratified by: King s Executive Date ratified: 31 July 2017 Author(s): Responsible Director: Responsible committee: Date when
More informationCommissioning Policy
Commissioning Policy Consultant to Consultant Referrals Version 6.0 December 2017 Name of Responsible Board / Committee for Ratification: North Staffordshire CCG Stoke on Trent CCG Date Issued: November
More informationSafety Measurement, Monitoring & Strategies
Safety Measurement, Monitoring & Strategies Jonkoping Microsystem Festival Scientific Day March 2016 Charles Vincent Professor of Psychology University of Oxford Lead Oxford AHSN Patient Safety Collaborative
More informationPATIENT EXPERIENCE AND INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY
Affiliated Teaching Hospital PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY 2015 2018 Building on our We Will Together and I Will campaigns FOREWORD Patient Experience is the responsibility of everyone at
More informationQUALITY COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference
QUALITY COMMITTEE Terms of Reference This Committee will report to NHS Halton CCG Governing Body on the development, improvement and monitoring of all areas of quality. This will include clinical effectiveness,
More informationThe Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust Trust Board Report Meeting Date: 24 October 2011 Title: Executive Summary: Action Requested: Report of: Author: Contact Details: Resource Implications: Public
More informationUnique Identifier: Review Date: November Issue Status: Approved Version No: 1.4 Issue Date: November 2017
Policy Authors Name & Title: Dr Mark Jackson, Director of Research & Informatics Dr Raphael Perry, Medical Director Scope: Trust Wide Classification: Non Clinical Replaces: version 1.3 To be read in conjunction
More informationGUIDANCE ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR REVALIDATION FOR SURGERY
ON SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR REVALIDATION FOR SURGERY Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core Guidance for all doctors GENERAL INTRODUCTION JUNE 2012 The purpose of revalidation
More informationBereavement Policy. 1 Purpose of Policy 2. 2 Background 2. 3 Staff Responsibilities 3. 4 Operational Issues and Local Policies/Protocols/Guidelines 4
Trust Policy and Procedure Bereavement Policy Document Ref. No: PP(16)252 For use in: For use by: For use for: Document owner: Status: All areas of the Trust All Trust staff The dying, their relatives
More informationLearning from Deaths Policy
Learning from Deaths Policy Document Reference No. CLIN041v4 Version No. 4 Issue Date 16/11/2017 Review Date 1 st September 2020 Document Author Document Owner Accountable Executive Approved by Deputy
More informationQuality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups. Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre - Corroborative Statement
Quality Accounts: Corroborative Statements from Commissioning Groups Quality Accounts are annual reports to the public from providers of NHS healthcare about the quality of services they deliver. The primary
More informationScottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR)
` 2016 Scottish Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) Methodology & Specification Document Page 1 of 14 Document Control Version 0.1 Date Issued July 2016 Author(s) Quality Indicators Team Comments
More informationGuidance on supporting information for revalidation
Guidance on supporting information for revalidation Including specialty-specific information for medical examiners (of the cause of death) General introduction The purpose of revalidation is to assure
More informationQuality Surveillance Team. Neonatal Critical Care (NCC) Quality Indicators
Quality Surveillance Team Neonatal Critical Care (NCC) Quality Indicators Neonatal Critical Care Quality Indicators Introduction These neonatal critical care quality indicators have been developed using
More informationSurrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust. Learning from Deaths (Mortality Review) Policy
Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust Learning from Deaths (Mortality Review) Policy Status (Draft/ Ratified): Ratified Date ratified: 14/09/2017 Version: 1 Ratifying Board: Effectiveness Committee Approved
More informationOverview of a new study to assess the impact of hospice led interventions on acute use. Jonathan Ellis, Director of Policy & Advocacy
Overview of a new study to assess the impact of hospice led interventions on acute use Jonathan Ellis, Director of Policy & Advocacy The problem Almost 600,000 people die each year Half will die in a hospital
More informationImprovement and Assessment Framework Q1 performance and six clinical priority areas
Governing Body 30 th September 2016 Improvement and Assessment Framework Q1 performance and six clinical priority areas Agenda item 16 Paper 10 Summariser: Authors and contributors: Executive Lead(s):
More informationNovember NHS Rushcliffe CCG Assurance Framework
November 2015 NHS Rushcliffe CCG Assurance Framework ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK SUMMARY No. Lead & Sub Committee Date placed on Assurance Framework narrative Residual rating score L I rating in 19 March 2015
More informationNorth East MIG implementation Maria Williams, Business Development Manager, Healthcare Gateway
Connecting you to real-time patient data from any care setting North East MIG implementation Maria Williams, Business Development Manager, Healthcare Gateway North East MIG implementation Background /
More informationWAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE
Agenda Item Meeting of Lanarkshire NHS Board 28 April 2010 Lanarkshire NHS board 14 Beckford Street Hamilton ML3 0TA Telephone 01698 281313 Fax 01698 423134 www.nhslanarkshire.org.uk WAITING TIMES 1. PURPOSE
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide December 2014 Quality standards process guide Page 1 of 44 About this guide This guide
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for psychiatry
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for psychiatry Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction The purpose of revalidation
More informationNHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report October 2011 (Data available as at end August 2011)
NHS LANARKSHIRE QUALITY DASHBOARD Board Report October 2011 (Data available as at end August 2011) INTRODUCTION This paper provides a monthly quality dashboard for NHS Lanarkshire. This is in line with
More informationNHS Performance Statistics
NHS Performance Statistics Published: 8 th March 218 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official
More informationTHE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER
Agenda item A5(vi) THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST NHS SAFETY THERMOMETER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The NHS Safety Thermometer is a point of care survey, which is a local improvement tool
More informationSupporting all NHS Trusts to achieve NHS Foundation Trust status by April Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust NHS East of England Department of Health
TFA document Supporting all NHS Trusts to achieve NHS Foundation Trust status by April 2014 Tripartite Formal Agreement between: Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust NHS East of England Department of Health Introduction
More informationA. Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN)
A. Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) CQUIN Table 1: Summary of goals Total fund available: 3,039,000 (estimated, based on 2015/16 baseline) Goal Number 1 2 3 4 5 Goal Name Description of
More informationFT Keogh Plans. Medway NHS Foundation Trust
FT Keogh Plans Medway NHS Foundation Trust July 2014 KEY Delivered On Track to deliver Some issues narrative disclosure Not on track to deliver Medway - Our improvement plan & our progress What are we
More informationUtilisation Management
Utilisation Management The Utilisation Management team has developed a reputation over a number of years as an authentic and clinically credible support team assisting providers and commissioners in generating
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for ophthalmology
FOREWORD As part of revalidation, doctors will need to collect and bring to their appraisal six types of supporting information to show how they are keeping up to date and fit to practise. The GMC has
More informationCOVENTRY AND RUGBY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP
COVENTRY AND RUGBY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Report To: Governing Body 11 September 2013 Report From: Title of Report: Purpose of the Report: Jacqueline Barnes, Executive Nurse The Nursing and Quality
More informationStatus: Information Discussion Assurance Approval. Claire Gorzanski, Head of Clinical Effectiveness
Report to: Trust Board Agenda item: Date of Meeting: 2 October 2017 SFT3934 Report Title: Annual quality governance report 2016-2017 Status: Information Discussion Assurance Approval X Prepared by: Executive
More informationTrust Board Meeting: Wednesday 13 May 2015 TB
Trust Board Meeting: Wednesday 13 May 2015 Title Update on Quality Governance Framework Status History For information, discussion and decision This paper has been presented to Quality Committee in April
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, April 2013
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, April 2013 Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction
More informationSupporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, June 2014
Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for Occupational Medicine, June 2014 Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties Core for all doctors. General Introduction
More informationAcademic Health Science Network for the North East and North Cumbria Mental Health Programme. Elaine Readhead AHSN NENC Mental Health Programme Lead
Academic Health Science Network for the North East and North Cumbria Mental Health Programme Elaine Readhead AHSN NENC Mental Health Programme Lead Background No health without mental health Five Year
More informationQuality standard Published: 16 July 2013 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs36
Urinary tract infection in children and young people Quality standard Published: 16 July 2013 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs36 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationSafeguarding Children & Young People
Safeguarding Children & Young People Author: Responsibility: Helena Hughes, Designated Nurse Dr Wendy Kuriyan, Designated Doctor Dr Abdullah Khan, Named GP All Staff Effective Date: January 2014 Review
More informationFinalised Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England Data Quality Note
Finalised Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England Data Quality Note April 2015 to Published 10 August 2017 This data quality note accompanies the publication by NHS Digital of finalised data
More informationNHS performance statistics
NHS performance statistics Published: 8 th February 218 Geography: England Official Statistics This monthly release aims to provide users with an overview of NHS performance statistics in key areas. Official
More informationEvaluation of NHS111 pilot sites. Second Interim Report
Evaluation of NHS111 pilot sites Second Interim Report Janette Turner Claire Ginn Emma Knowles Alicia O Cathain Craig Irwin Lindsey Blank Joanne Coster October 2011 This is an independent report commissioned
More informationBoard of Director s Meeting
Board of Director s Meeting Meeting Date: 15 November 212 Agenda item: 6.1 Title: Purpose: Summary: Recommendation: Author: Presented by: QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY ASSURANCE COMMITTEE To provide an exception
More informationSection 1 - Key Performance Indicators
Clinical Quality Report Month 6 2016/17 period ending 30th September 2016 Section 1 - Key Performance Indicators 1.1 NHS Improvement; Risk Assessment Framework Clostridium difficile Indicator M6 2 YTD
More informationDocument Details Clinical Audit Policy
Title Document Details Clinical Audit Policy Trust Ref No 1538-31104 Main points this document covers This policy details the responsibilities and processes associated with the Clinical Audit process within
More informationPrimary Care Quality Assurance Framework (Medical Services)
PCC/15/021 Primary Care Quality Assurance Framework (Medical Services) 1.0 Introduction: From the 1 April 2015 the responsibility for monitoring quality and responding to concerns arising from General
More informationWe are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.
Inspection Report We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. Dr Abdel-Malek and Partner Sparkbrook Health Centre, 34 Grantham
More informationNorthumberland, Tyne and Wear Sustainability and Transformation Plan (NTW STP)
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear Sustainability and Transformation Plan (NTW STP) The Northumberland Tyne and Wear STP footprint is a new collaboration covering a total population of 1.5 million residents
More informationTRUST BOARD SAFETY AND QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2013
TRUST BOARD SAFETY AND QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2013 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As reported to the Board last month, the reporting on safety and quality to the Trust Board has changed. Each month a summary
More informationService Transformation Report. Resource and Performance
SUMMARY REPORT Meeting Date: 31 May 2018 Agenda Item: 9.1 Enclosure Number: 9 Meeting: Trust Board (Part 1) Title: Author: Accountable Director: Other meetings presented to or previously agreed at: Service
More informationNorthumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust. Board of Directors Meeting. Meeting Date: 25 October Executive Lead: Rajesh Nadkarni
Agenda item 9 ii) Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust Board of Directors Meeting Meeting Date: 25 October 2017 Title and Author of Paper: Clinical Effectiveness (CE) Strategy update Simon
More informationReducing In-hospital Mortality
Advancing Quality Alliance Reducing In-hospital Mortality Observations arising from AQuA s work May 2013 Contents Introduction and background Understanding mortality rates Mortality rates SMR methodologies
More informationQuality standard Published: 14 January 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs107
Preventing enting unintentional injury in under 15s Quality standard Published: 14 January 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/qs107 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More information