U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent
|
|
- Shannon Wood
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent icims Quarterly Report on Employer & Job Seeker Behaviors 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved.
2 Table of Contents Executive Summary...3 Key Findings...4 Industries With High Demand for Talent...5 Overall Trends...6 Trends in Retail...8 Trends in Healthcare...9 Trends in Transportation...10 Talent Demand...11 Industry Trends...12 Geography Trends...13 Company Size Trends...14 Use Of Mobile Devices for Job Applications...15 Industry Trends...16 Passive Job Interest and Company Connections...17 Industry Trends...18 Company Size Trends icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 2
3 Executive Summary The following report presents job creation and demand trends for industries, geographies, and company sizes within the United States based on icims' customer base data. Three industries stand out as having highest demand for talent when looking at 2014 and Q data: healthcare, transportation, and retail. Because the concentration of demand for talent varies across the country, certain regions or industries may require special focus on fostering a best-in-class recruitment strategy. For example, the West has the highest demand for talent (i.e., open positions) in the healthcare industry. jobs. The West has the largest demand for talent with the lowest ratio of applicants entering the hiring pipeline to the number of open positions. Applicants in the Midwest are more likely to be connected with the jobs they are passively interested in, compared with other regions. Consistent with demand for talent trends, retail and healthcare stand out as significant industries, and support more than half of all candidates passively interested in jobs. Regardless of industry or geography trends, the highest demand for talent is located within larger companies with more than 5,000 employees. Across the country and industries, there is a notable gap between talent demand and talent availability. The technology and construction industries have the largest gap between talent entering the hiring pipeline and the number of positions that need to be filled. This signals the need to develop qualified applicants to fill these types of 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 3
4 Key Findings The top three industries with the highest demand for talent in 2014 and Q are healthcare, transportation, and retail. The concentration of talent demand varies across the U.S. in top industries. The West has the highest concentration of talent demand for the healthcare industry. Transportation has the highest demand in the Midwest. Talent demand for retail is highest in the Northeast. There are notable differences in talent demand across industry, geography, and company size. Industry Trends: The pharmaceutical and construction industries have the most notable gap between talent demand and talent availability. Both have the lowest number of applicants entering the hiring pipeline based on the open positions that need to be filled. Geography Trends: The South has the highest demand for talent with the lowest number of applicants entering the hiring pipeline for open positions compared to all other regions. However, when company size is controlled, the West has the highest demand. Company Size Trends: All companies, regardless of size, have more applicants entering the hiring pipeline than the number of open positions, but the smallest companies (i.e., less than 100 employees) tend to have a lower ratio of open positions to applicants entering the hiring pipeline compared to larger companies. When we factor in the relative size of a company, small companies (i.e., less than 100 employees) post the most jobs relative to their size. There are notable differences in the use of mobile devices for job applications across industry. The hospitality and retail industries have the highest use of mobile devices for job applications at 11 and 10 percent, respectively. There are notable differences in passive job interest and job connections across industry, geography, and company size. Industry Trends: More than half of all passive candidates are interested in companies within retail and healthcare. Roughly half of passive candidates interested in education jobs are connected to a job, which is almost 30 percentage points higher than the next highest connection rate of 21 percent for the beverage and food industry. Geography Trends: The Northeast region has the highest concentration of passive candidates interested in jobs. The Midwest region has the highest rate of connecting passive applicants to jobs, though it has the lowest number of passive candidates. Company Size Trends: Larger companies (i.e., more than 5,000 employees) tend to have more applicants passively interested in jobs, and tend to connect more passive applicants to jobs than smaller companies (i.e., less than 500 employees) icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 4
5 Industries With High Demand for Talent 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 5
6 Industries With High Demand for Talent This section presents significant trends for the top three industries with high demand for talent across the United States, defined as those areas with the highest concentration of open jobs that need to be filled. Overall Trends Figure 1.1 shows the percentage of open jobs that need to be filled by industry. Figure 1.1: Industries with High Demand for Talent HEALTHCARE RETAIL BUSINESS SERVICES TRANSPORTATION FOOD & BEVERAGE 7 % 17 % 14 % 8 % 7 % The Top Three Industries With the Highest Concentration of Demand for Talent HEALTHCARE TRANSPORTATION RETAIL 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 6
7 In the healthcare, retail, and transportation industries, even though larger companies (those with more than 5,000 employees) had the highest number of available jobs, very small companies (those with less than 100 employees) in these industries actually posted more jobs relative to the size of the company. Figure 1.2 shows the demand for talent in the top three industries by relative company size. Figure 1.2: Industries With High Demand For Talent by Relative Company Size 429 2,095 LESS THAN 100 1, , ,000 5, MORE THAN 5,000 3 Retail Jobs Posted per Employee Healthcare Jobs Posted per Employee Transportation Jobs Posted per Employee 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 7
8 Trends in Retail Figure 1.3 shows the geographic distribution of open jobs that need to be filled for the retail industry. RETAIL Figure 1.3: States with the Highest Demand for Talent in Retail 32 % 10 % 10 % 9 % 8 % 5 % 5 % 4 % 3 % 3 % 2 % PENNSYLVANIA FLORIDA ARIZONA NEW JERSEY GEORGIA TEXAS NEW YORK MINNESOTA SOUTH CAROLINA OHIO MONTANA 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 8
9 Trends in Healthcare Figure 1.4 shows the geographic distribution of open jobs that need to be filled for the healthcare industry. HEALTHCARE Figure 1.4: States with the Highest Demand for Talent in Healthcare 15 % 11 % 10 % 9 % 9 % 6 % 6 % 5 % 5 % 3 % 3 % ARIZONA NEW YORK TEXAS NEW JERSEY ILLINOIS PENNSYLVANIA MICHIGAN FLORIDA TENNESSEE CALIFORNIA OHIO 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 9
10 Trends in Transportation Figure 1.5 shows the geographic distribution of open jobs that need to be filled for the transportation industry. TRANSPORTATION Figure 1.5: States with the Highest Demand for Talent in Transportation 35 % 30 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 3 % 2 % 2 % MISSOURI FLORIDA KANSAS OREGON CALIFORNIA TEXAS TENNESSEE ARIZONA VIRGINA ILLINOIS 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 10
11 Talent Demand 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 11
12 Talent Demand This section presents significant trends for U.S. based talent demands, comparing the ratio of new applicants entering the hiring pipeline to open positions that need to be filled. Trends are examined for where talent needs are most prevalent in top industries and states, as well as significant company size trends. Figure 2.1: Talent Demand by Industry PHARMACEUTICALS MEDIA CONSTRUCTION 16,107 7,205 33,005 29,439 11,177 10,506 RATIO Industry Trends HEALTHCARE 105, , Figure 2.1 ranks industries by the ratio of applicants entering the hiring pipeline to the number of open positions. The pharmaceutical, media, and construction industries experienced a shortage of applicants in 2014 and Q1 2015, where the pharmaceutical industry had over twice as many open positions than applicants entering the hiring pipeline during the same time period. In contrast, the hospitality and energy industries experienced a surplus of applicants entering the hiring pipeline compared to open positions. OTHER FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION TRANSPORTATION 144, ,714 34,344 41,618 44,510 59,915 15,392 21,528 73, , Note: Industries are sorted by the ratio of the number of applicants entering the hiring pipeline over open positions. RETAIL BEVERAGE & FOOD 68,049 96,642 28,248 44, ENERGY 9,226 16, HOSPITALITY 16,729 37, Open Positions Applicants Entering the Hiring Pipeline 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 12
13 Geography Trends Figure 2.2 highlights the top 10 states with the lowest ratio of applicants entering the hiring pipeline to the number of open positions. Figure 2.2: Talent Demands by State HAWAII RATIO 0.60 VIRGINIA 1, SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTH CAROLINA ,911 2, DELAWARE ALABAMA MONTANA ,788 6,580 3,233 2, NEBRASKA OREGON ,534 6, NORTH DAKOTA Open Positions Applicants Entering the Hiring Pipeline Note: Some states with a low ratio (e.g. Hawaii and South Dakota) have very few new jobs posted. Note: States are sorted by the ratio of the number of applicants entering the hiring pipeline over open positions icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 13
14 Company Size Trends Figure 2.3 ranks the ratio of applicants entering the hiring pipeline to the number of open positions by company size. All companies, regardless of size, have more applicants entering the hiring pipeline than the number of open positions, but smaller companies (i.e., less than 100 employees) tend to have a lower ratio of open positions to applicants entering the hiring pipeline than larger companies (i.e., more than 5,000 employees). Figure 2.3: Talent Demand by Company Size RATIO ,939 66,686 64,872 55,769 51,581 40, , , , ,526 LESS THAN ,000 1,000 5,000 MORE THAN 5,000 Open Positions Applicants Entering the Hiring Pipeline 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 14
15 APPLY Use of Mobile Devices for Job Applications 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 15
16 Use Of Mobile Devices for Job Applications This section presents significant trends for candidates applying for jobs via mobile devices. Trends in mobile device use are examined for the top industries and states, along with significant company size trends. Industry Trends Figure 3.1 ranks industries by the percentage of all applications submitted via a mobile device. Figure 3.1: Top Industries that Use Mobile Devices for Job Applications HOSPITALITY RETAIL BEVERAGE & FOOD PHARMACEUTICALS TRANSPORTATION 11 % 10 % 10 % 7 % 7 % The hospitality and retail industries have the highest percentage of mobile applicants. ENERGY HEALTHCARE 6 % 5 % TECHNOLOGY 5 % MEDIA 4 % FINANCIAL 4 % CONSTRUCTION 4 % EDUCATION 3 % 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 16
17 Passive Job Interest and Company Connections 2017iCIMS Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 17
18 Passive Job Interest and Company Connections This section presents significant trends regarding passive candidates. First, we examined candidates across industry that have expressed passive job interest and are registered in talent pools. We then tracked passive interest in jobs to how many people eventually became applicants for specific jobs, examining the ratio of passive job interest to job applicants within companies. In addition, we explored these trends with respect to company size. Industry Trends Figure 4.1 presents the percentage of candidates in top industries passively interested in a job and registered in a talent pool. Retail and healthcare constitute almost half of all passive job interest. Figure 4.1: Top Industries with Passive Job Interest HEALTHCARE RETAIL TECHNOLOGY OTHER FINANCIAL EDUCATION HOSPITALITY MEDIA 30 % 16 % 11 % 10 % 7 % 7 % 5 % 4 % PHARMACEUTICALS 3 % TRANSPORTATION 2 % BEVERAGE & FOOD 2 % CONSTRUCTION 2 % ENERGY 1 % 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 18
19 Figure 4.2 ranks top industries by the percentage of total passive candidates in talent pools that are eventually connected to specific jobs. The top industries for connecting passive applicants to jobs include education and beverage and food. Top Industries for Connecting Passive Applicants to Jobs Figure 4.2: Top Industries with Passive Job Connections EDUCATION BEVERAGE & FOOD ENERGY RETAIL 132, % 66,178 34,042 7,024 20,208 3, ,012 49,722 Percentage 20.6 % 17.1 % 16.0 % HEALTHCARE 606,493 67, % MEDIA 86,950 7, % EDUCATION BEVERAGE AND FOOD TRANSPORTATION 43,529 3, % OTHER 191,506 15, % Almost 50 percent of passive applicants in the education CONSTRUCTION 33,819 2, % industry were connected to a job, and 21 percent were connected for beverage and food. Note: Industries are sorted by the percentage of passive candidates connected to jobs. PHARMACEUTICALS TECHNOLOGY HOSPITALITY 64,034 4, ,327 13, ,011 5, % 6.0 % 5.2 % FINANCIAL 141,313 7, % Total Passive Candidates New Candidates Connected 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 19
20 Company Size Trends Figure 4.3 presents company trends for the percentage of candidates passively interested in jobs and registered in talent pools. Companies with more than 5,000 employees and companies with 500 to 1,000 employees have the highest concentration of passive interest. Figure 4.3: Passive Job Interest by Company Size 4 % 8 % 32 % 21 % 35 % LESS THAN ,000 1,000 5,000 MORE THAN 5, icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 20
21 Figure 4.4 presents company size trends for the percentage of passive candidates in talent pools Figure 4.4: Passive Job Connections by Company Size that became connected to jobs. Percentage Larger companies with more than 5,000 employees tend to have the highest percentage of passive company MORE THAN 5, , ,902 19% connections (19 percent). 1,000 5, ,373 20,624 6 % 500 1, ,680 71, % ,147 10,989 8 % LESS THAN ,196 5,391 7 % Total Passive Candidates New Candidates Connected 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 21
22 Methodology This report was compiled using icims' customer base data from 2014 and Q (across approximately 2,700 customers). icims worked with Hanover Research, a third-party data analyst firm, to arrive at the data conclusions reflected within. Within the report, Hanover Research presents the concentration of new jobs posted and passive job interest across industry, geography, and company size. In absolute terms, larger companies tend to post more jobs and have more applicants, which can skew results when analyzing talent demand trends, for example. To account for this issue, data is analyzed using both the absolute size of the company and controlling for the size of the company. Hanover compares the results of absolute versus relative company size, and any impacts on the trends throughout the report. Hanover also presents the number of new jobs posted and passive interest per employee (i.e., the number of new jobs posted over the number of employees), across industry, geography, and company size 1. Controlling for company size in these cases does not address the issue of small sample size. For example, four transportation companies in the Midwest posted jobs regardless of the absolute or relative size of the company. Yet, the adjustment provides useful information on talent demand relative to the size of the company. To measure the relative talent demand, Hanover defines a ratio that is equal to the number of applicants entering the hiring pipeline over the total number of open positions. It measures the relative talent supply over talent demand. A larger than one ratio indicates a surplus of talent supply, or a relatively low talent demand, and a smaller than one ratio indicates a shortage of talent supply, or a relatively high talent demand. To measure the usage of mobile devices for job applications, Hanover calculates the percentage of applications through mobile devices over the total number of applications. A higher percentage indicates a more prevalent usage of mobile devices. To measure how applicants are connected to a company, Hanover calculates the percentage of passive candidates connected to a job over the total number of candidates passively interested in the job. icims, through its partnership with Hanover, will continue to analyze its data on a quarterly basis. Through this partnership, icims will continue to discover and share new trends and insights in the U.S. talent acquisition landscape. 1 Such adjustment should not change the relative talent demand, the percentage of mobile device usage, and the percentage of passive job connection at the company level, as both the numerator and denominator are adjusted by the same factor, i.e., the number of employees. However, due to missing data in company size, the aggregated percentage at industry and regional level can be slightly different icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 22
23 Disclaimer Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this report is provided on an as is and as available basis. Neither icims nor Hanover make any representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy, quality, reliability, or completeness of the contents of this report, and expressly disclaims all warranties, express or implied, including all implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability, accuracy, and/or non-infringement. The accuracy and completeness of the information provided herein and the opinions stated herein are not guaranteed or warranted to produce any particular results, and the advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for every client. Any use of this report is entirely at your own risk. In no event will icims or Hanover be liable for any incidental, indirect, special, punitive, consequential, or other damages (including lost profits), arising out of or in connection with this report. Neither icims or Hanover are engaged in the rendering of legal or accounting advice, and nothing herein should be construed or interpreted as either party providing any legal advice in regards to compliance with any employment or other applicable state, federal, or international laws icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 23
24 HIRING INSIGHTS About icims Hiring Insights icims Hiring Insights is an online resource for labor market insights and hiring trends. Our team of researchers and writers uses icims exclusive data, as well as proprietary and secondary research, to create reports and articles that cover the most recent developments in the workforce. Featuring icims Chief Economist, Josh Wright, icims Hiring Insights helps its readers stay well-informed about the latest in recruiting, technology, and the labor market. To learn more visit: icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. U.S. Hiring Trends: Available Positions vs. Available Talent 24
U.S. Hiring Trends Q3 2015:
U.S. Hiring Trends Q3 2015: icims Quarterly Report on Employer & Job Seeker Behaviors 2017 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents The following report presents job creation and talent supply
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by February 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Alabama 3.7 33 Ohio 4.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Missouri 3.7 33 Rhode Island 4.5
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by November 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Indiana 4.4 37 Georgia 5.6 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Ohio 4.5 37 Tennessee 5.6
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by April 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Colorado 2.3 17 Virginia 3.8 37 California 4.8 2 Hawaii 2.7 20 Massachusetts 3.9 37 West Virginia
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by August 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.3 18 Maryland 3.9 36 New York 4.8 2 Colorado 2.4 18 Michigan 3.9 38 Delaware 4.9
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by March 2016 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 South Dakota 2.5 19 Delaware 4.4 37 Georgia 5.5 2 New Hampshire 2.6 19 Massachusetts 4.4 37 North
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by September 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.4 17 Indiana 3.8 36 New Jersey 4.7 2 Colorado 2.5 17 Kansas 3.8 38 Pennsylvania
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by December 2017 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.0 16 South Dakota 3.5 37 Connecticut 4.6 2 New Hampshire 2.6 20 Arkansas 3.7 37 Delaware
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by September 2015 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.8 17 Oklahoma 4.4 37 South Carolina 5.7 2 Nebraska 2.9 20 Indiana 4.5 37 Tennessee
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by November 2014 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 North Dakota 2.7 19 Pennsylvania 5.1 35 New Mexico 6.4 2 Nebraska 3.1 20 Wisconsin 5.2 38 Connecticut
More informationUnemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment
States Ranked by July 2018 Unemployment Rate Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Unemployment Unemployment 1 Hawaii 2.1 19 Massachusetts 3.6 37 Kentucky 4.3 2 Iowa 2.6 19 South Carolina 3.6 37 Maryland 4.3
More informationTABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**
living Alaska 00 47,808 21,213 44.4 Alabama 01 20,661 3,288 15.9 Alabama 02 23,949 6,614 27.6 Alabama 03 20,225 3,247 16.1 Alabama 04 41,412 7,933 19.2 Alabama 05 34,388 11,863 34.5 Alabama 06 34,849 4,074
More informationTABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**
Rank State District Count (HTC) 1 New York 05 150,499 141,567 94.1 2 New York 08 133,453 109,629 82.1 3 Massachusetts 07 158,518 120,827 76.2 4 Michigan 13 47,921 36,145 75.4 5 Illinois 04 508,677 379,527
More information3+ 3+ N = 155, 442 3+ R 2 =.32 < < < 3+ N = 149, 685 3+ R 2 =.27 < < < 3+ N = 99, 752 3+ R 2 =.4 < < < 3+ N = 98, 887 3+ R 2 =.6 < < < 3+ N = 52, 624 3+ R 2 =.28 < < < 3+ N = 36, 281 3+ R 2 =.5 < < < 7+
More informationIndex of religiosity, by state
Index of religiosity, by state Low Medium High Total United States 19 26 55=100 Alabama 7 16 77 Alaska 28 27 45 Arizona 21 26 53 Arkansas 12 19 70 California 24 27 49 Colorado 24 29 47 Connecticut 25 32
More informationRankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018
Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018 NEA RESEARCH April 2018 Reproduction: No part of this report may be reproduced in any form without permission from NEA Research, except
More informationThe American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD
The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD www.legion.org 2016 The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD 1920-1929 Department 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 Alabama 4,474 3,246
More informationSTATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Business in Nebraska Bureau of Business Research 12-2013 STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX Eric Thompson University of Nebraska-Lincoln,
More informationInterstate Pay Differential
Interstate Pay Differential APPENDIX IV Adjustments for differences in interstate pay in various locations are computed using the state average weekly pay. This appendix provides a table for the second
More informationAcm769 AG U.S. WATER BAPTISMS, 2017¹ Page 1
Acm769 AG U.S. WATER BAPTISMS, 2017¹ Page 1 Baptisms Baptisms Pct Baptisms Pct Baptisms Pct Alabama 2,552 2,944-392 -13.3 3,146-594 -18.9 2,501 51 2.0 Alaska 511 392 119 30.4 443 68 15.3 505 6 1.2 Appalachian
More informationTHE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET
1 THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET ORG ANIZATIONAL COMPARISO N BY C ENSUS DIV ISION S PRING 2013 The State of Grantseeking Spring 2013 is the sixth semi-annual informal survey of nonprofits conducted
More information5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12
5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12 Magnets 2½ 3½ Magnet $1.75 - MOQ - 5 - Add $0.25 for packaging Die Cut Acrylic Magnet $2.00 - MOQ - 24 - Add $0.25 for packaging 2535-22225 California AM-22225
More informationREGIONAL AND STATE EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT JUNE 2010
For release 10:00 a.m. (EDT) Tuesday, July 20, USDL-10-0992 Technical information: Employment: Unemployment: Media contact: (202) 691-6559 sminfo@bls.gov www.bls.gov/sae (202) 691-6392 lausinfo@bls.gov
More informationAnnex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources
Annex A: State Level Analysis: Selection of Indicators, Frontier Estimation, Setting of Xmin, Xp, and Yp Values, and Data Sources Right to Food: Whereas in the international assessment the percentage of
More informationWeekly Market Demand Index (MDI)
VOL. 8 NO. 28 JULY 13, 2015 LOAD AVAILABILITY Up 7% compared to the Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI) Note: MDI Measures Relative Truck Demand LOAD SEARCHING Up 18.3% compared to the TRUCK AVAILABILITY
More informationPage 1 of 11 NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS SR-193, Section 4 Section 4 Table of Contents: 4. Variations by State Weighted by Population A. Death and Injury (Casualty) Rate per Population B. Death Rate
More informationMAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008
MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008 Seriously Delinquent Rate Greater than 6.93% 5.18% 6.93% 0 5.17% Source: MBA s National Deliquency Survey MAP 2: Foreclosure Inventory Rate by State
More information2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15
2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15 www.hospiceanalytics.com 2 2013 Demographics & Hospice Utilization National Population 316,022,508 Total Deaths 2,529,792 Medicare Beneficiaries
More informationAcm762 AG U.S. VITAL STATISTICS BY SECTION, 2017 Page 1
Acm762 AG U.S. VITAL STATISTICS BY SECTION, 2017 Page 1 District Summary Major Worship Total Total -------------------- Adherents -------------------- Service District Churches Membership Boys Girls Men
More informationArizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies
Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies Key findings 1. Student outcomes in Arizona lag behind
More informationEstimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report
Regional Economic Models, Inc. Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report Prepared by Frederick Treyz, CEO June 2012 The following is a summary of the Estimated
More informationCurrent Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations
Current Advantage Enrollment : State and County-Level Tabulations 5 Slide Series, Volume 40 September 2016 Summary of Tabulations and Findings As of September 2016, 17.9 million of the nation s 56.1 million
More informationTENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS
ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA
More informationNURSING HOME STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 2015
NURSING HOME STATISTICAL YEARBOOK, 2015 C. MCKEEN COWLES COWLES RESEARCH GROUP Acknowledgments We extend our appreciation to Craig Dickstein of Tamarack Professional Services, LLC for optimizing the SAS
More informationPRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;
PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, 585.327.7075; jstefko@cgr.org Highest Paid State Workers in New Jersey & New York in 2010; Lowest Paid in Dakotas and West Virginia
More informationFY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic
Special Analysis 15-03, June 18, 2015 FY 2014 Per Capita Federal Spending on Major Grant Programs Curtis Smith, Nick Jacobs, and Trinity Tomsic 202-624-8577 ttomsic@ffis.org Summary Per capita federal
More informationREGIONAL AND STATE EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT MAY 2013
For release 10:00 a.m. (EDT) Friday, June 21, USDL-13-1180 Technical information: Employment: Unemployment: Media contact: (202) 691-6559 sminfo@bls.gov www.bls.gov/sae (202) 691-6392 lausinfo@bls.gov
More informationStates Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted
States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) Change (Jobs) 1 Texas 316,100 19 Nevada 36,600 37 Hawaii 7,100 2 California 256,800 20 Tennessee 34,800 38 Mississippi
More informationSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016 Food and Nutrition Service Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Program Accountability and Administration Division September
More informationChild & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2017 February 2018 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) is the leading national organization working for more effective public and
More informationWeights and Measures Training Registration
Weights and Measures Training Registration Please fill out the form below to register for Weights and Measures training and testing dates. NIST Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances and other Technical
More informationIntroduction. Current Law Distribution of Funds. MEMORANDUM May 8, Subject:
MEMORANDUM May 8, 2018 Subject: TANF Family Assistance Grant Allocations Under the Ways and Means Committee (Majority) Proposal From: Gene Falk, Specialist in Social Policy, gfalk@crs.loc.gov, 7-7344 Jameson
More informationEXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project
EXHIBIT A List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project Alabama Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce
More informationColorado River Basin. Source: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation
The Colorado River supports a quarter million jobs and produces $26 billion in economic output from recreational activities alone, drawing revenue from the 5.36 million adults who use the Colorado River
More informationengineering salary guide
engineering salary guide At a time when lean practices and agile teams create the expectation of doing more with less, employers need to develop new strategies to attract and retain the best employees
More informationDate: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis
1 Date: 5/25/2012 To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia From: Christos Siderelis Chuck Wyatt with the DCR in Virginia inquired about the classification of state parks having resort type characteristics and, if
More information2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION
BY STATE INFORMATION This information is being provided to assist in your 2016 tax preparations. The information is also mailed to applicable Columbia fund non-corporate shareholders with their year-end
More informationTable 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017
Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 State Applications Can be Submitted Online at the State Level 1 < 25% 25% -
More informationHow North Carolina Compares
How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics March 2017 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Preface The Program Evaluation Division of the North Carolina General
More informationNielsen ICD-9. Healthcare Data
Nielsen ICD-9 Healthcare Data Healthcare Utilization Model The Nielsen healthcare utilization model has three primary components: demographic cohort population counts, cohort-specific healthcare utilization
More informationPercentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016
Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016 Doctorate 4% PN/VN 3% MSN 15% ADN 28% BSRN 22% Diploma 2% BSN 26% n = 279,770 Percentage of Graduations by Program Type, 2016 MSN 12% Doctorate 1%
More informationThe Regional Economic Outlook
The Regional Economic Outlook Presented by: Mark McMullen, Director of Government Svcs Prepared for: FTA Revenue Estimating Conference September 15, 2008 Recent Economic Performance 2 1 The Job Market
More informationVOLUME 35 ISSUE 6 MARCH 2017
VOLUME 35 ISSUE 6 MARCH 2017 IN THIS ISSUE Index of State Economic Momentum The Index of State Economic Momentum, developed by Reports founding editor Hal Hovey, ranks states based on their most recent
More informationSTATE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS $ - LISTED NEXT PAGE. TOTAL $ 88,000 * for each contribution of $500 for Board Meeting sponsorship
Exhibit D -- TRIP 2017 FUNDING SOURCES -- February 3, 2017 CORPORATE $ 12,000 Construction Companies $ 5,500 Consulting Engineers Equipment Distributors Manufacturer/Supplier/Producer 6,500 Surety Bond
More informationHOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 - Repayment
More informationHOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014
HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014 Table of Contents Page Definitions 2 Data Overview 3 Table 1 - Delinquencies 4 Table 2 - Foreclosure Starts 7 Table 3 - Foreclosure Sales 8 Table 4 -
More informationRunning head: NURSING SHORTAGE 1
Running head: NURSING SHORTAGE 1 Nursing Shortage: The Current Crisis Evett M. Pugh Kent State University College of Nursing Running head: NURSING SHORTAGE 2 Abstract This paper is aimed to explain the
More informationChild & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2016 March 2017 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) is the leading national organization working for more effective public and private
More informationVoter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: Tuesday, November 6. Saturday, Oct 27 (postal ballot)
Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Deadlines by State 2018 General Election: All dates in 2018 unless otherwise noted STATE REG DEADLINE ABSENTEE BALLOT REQUEST DEADLINE Alabama November 1 ABSENTEE
More informationHOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016
BACKGROUND HOME HEALTH AIDE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, DECEMBER 2016 Federal legislation (42 CFR 484.36) requires that Medicare-certified home health agencies employ home health aides who are trained and evaluated
More information2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS
2014 ACEP URGENT CARE POLL RESULTS PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: 2014 Marketing General Incorporated 625 North Washington Street, Suite 450 Alexandria, VA 22314 800.644.6646 toll free 703.739.1000 telephone
More informationChild & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014
Child & Adult Care Food Program: Participation Trends 2014 1200 18th St NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 986-2200 / www.frac.org February 2016 About FRAC The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC)
More informationNMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update
NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2016 Q1 Update Released June 10, 2016 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Mortgage Industry Report: 2016Q1
More informationLetters.org. SCHOLARSHIP RECOMMENDATION LETTER. Included: Scholarship Recommendation letter
Letters.org SCHOLARSHIP RECOMMENDATION LETTER Included: Introduction Tips Sample Template 1 Introduction The scholarship recommendation is generally written to recommend the name of a student for the purpose
More informationNMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q2 Update
NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q2 Update Released September 18, 2017 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Mortgage Industry Report:
More informationInterstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC)
Interstate Turbine Advisory Council (CESA-ITAC) Mark Mayhew NYSERDA for Val Stori Clean Energy States Alliance SWAT 4/25/12 Today CESA ITAC, LLC - What, who and why The Unified List - What, why, how and
More informationHow North Carolina Compares
How North Carolina Compares A Compendium of State Statistics January 2013 Prepared by the N.C. General Assembly Program Evaluation Division Program Evaluation Division North Carolina General Assembly Legislative
More informationFiscal Research Center
January 2016 Georgia s Rankings Among the States: Budget, Taxes and Other Indicators ABOUT THE FISCAL RESEARCH CENTER Established in 1995, the (FRC) provides nonpartisan research, technical assistance
More informationRutgers Revenue Sources
Rutgers Revenue Sources 31.2% Tuition and Fees 27.3% State Appropriations with Fringes 1.0% Endowment and Investments.5% Federal Appropriations 17.8% Federal, State, and Municipal Grants and Contracts
More informationNMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q4 Update
NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2017Q4 Update Released March 9, 2018 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Mortgage Industry Report: 2017Q4
More informationNMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2018Q1 Update
NMLS Mortgage Industry Report 2018Q1 Update Released July 5, 2018 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Mortgage Industry Report: 2018Q1
More informationTable 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations
Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017 Able to Make Share of Determinations System determines eligibility for: 2 State Real-Time
More informationSentinel Event Data. General Information Copyright, The Joint Commission
Sentinel Event Data General Information 1995 2015 Data Limitations The reporting of most sentinel events to The Joint Commission is voluntary and represents only a small proportion of actual events. Therefore,
More informationTHE METHODIST CHURCH (U.S.)
THE METHODIST LIBRARY CONFERENCE JOURNALS COLLECTION PAGE: 1 ALABAMA 1939-58 ALABAMA WEST FLORIDA 1959-1967 ALASKA MISSION 1941, 1949-1967 ATLANTA 1939-1951 BALTIMORE CALIFORNIA ORIENTAL MISSION 1939-1952
More informationStatutory change to name availability standard. Jurisdiction. Date: April 8, [Statutory change to name availability standard] [April 8, 2015]
Topic: Question by: : Statutory change to name availability standard Michael Powell Texas Date: April 8, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
More informationAll Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties
United States Department of Agriculture Farm Production and Conservation Risk Management Agency Beacon Facility Mail Stop 080 P.O. Box 49205 Kansas City, MO 644-6205, 207 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM: PM-7-06
More informationACEP EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VIOLENCE POLL RESEARCH RESULTS
ACEP EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VIOLENCE POLL RESEARCH RESULTS Prepared For: American College of Emergency Physicians September 2018 2018 Marketing General Incorporated 625 North Washington Street, Suite 450
More informationIs this consistent with other jurisdictions or do you allow some mechanism to reinstate?
Topic: Question by: : Forfeiture for failure to appoint a resident agent Kathy M. Sachs Kansas Date: January 8, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
More informationSentinel Event Data. General Information Q Copyright, The Joint Commission
Sentinel Event Data General Information 1995 2Q 2014 Data Limitations The reporting of most sentinel events to The Joint Commission is voluntary and represents only a small proportion of actual events.
More informationFOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT
FOOD STAMP PROGRAM ACTIVITY REPORT Federal Fiscal Year 2004 Food Stamps Make America Stronger United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Program Accountability Division February
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
The National Guard Bureau Critical Infrastructure Program in Conjunction with the Joint Interagency Training and Education Center Brigadier General James A. Hoyer Director Joint Staff West Virginia National
More informationThe Job Market Experiences of Gulf War II Era Veterans
The Job Market Experiences of Gulf War II Era Veterans Paul E. Harrington Center for Labor Markets and Policy Drexel University Jan 2001 May 2001 Sep 2001 Jan 2002 May 2002 Sep 2002 Jan 2003 May 2003 Sep
More informationYOUTH MENTAL HEALTH IS WORSENING AND ACCESS TO CARE IS LIMITED THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF PROVIDERS HEALTHCARE REFORM IS HELPING
2 3 4 MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE CONDITIONS ARE COMMON MOST AMERICANS LACK ACCESS TO CARE OF AMERICAN ADULTS WITH A MENTAL ILLNESS DID NOT RECEIVE TREATMENT ONE IN FIVE REPORT AN UNMET NEED NEARLY
More informationCRMRI White Paper #3 August 2017 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing?
CRMRI White Paper #3 August 7 State Refugee Services Indicators of Integration: How are the states doing? Marci Harris, Julia Greene, Kilee Jorgensen, Caren J. Frost, & Lisa H. Gren State Refugee Services
More informationCooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee August 2015
Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts August 2015 Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Current Current $ Change % Change Month Month from from Contribution Sources 2014-2015 2013-2014 Prior Year
More informationCooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee March 2018
Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts March 2018 Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Current Current $ Change % Change Month Month from from Contribution Sources 2017-2018 2016-2017 Prior Year
More informationSenior American Access to Care Grant
Senior American Access to Care Grant Grant Guidelines SENIOR AMERICAN (age 62 plus) ACCESS TO CARE GRANT GUIDELINES: The (ADAF) is committed to supporting U.S. based organizations exempt from taxation
More informationCooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee January 2014
Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts January 2014 Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Current Current $ Change % Change Month Month from from Contribution Sources 2013-2014 2012-2013 Prior
More informationCooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee April 2015
Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts April 2015 Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Current Current $ Change % Change Month Month from from Contribution Sources 2014-2015 2013-2014 Prior Year
More informationCooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee March 2015
Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts March 2015 Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Current Current $ Change % Change Month Month from from Contribution Sources 2014-2015 2013-2014 Prior Year
More informationCooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee May 2016
Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts May 2016 Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Current Current $ Change % Change Month Month from from Contribution Sources 2015-2016 2014-2015 Prior Year
More informationCooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee December 2015
Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Receipts December 2015 Cooperative Program Allocation Budget Current Current $ Change % Change Month Month from from Contribution Sources 2015-2016 2014-2015 Prior
More informationStudents Serving on Local School Boards February 2009 (39 Responding State Associations)
Students Serving on Local School Boards February 2009 (39 Responding State Associations) Does your state have students serving on local school boards? State Yes How are the student board members selected/elected?
More informationNovember 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org November 24, 2008 TANF BENEFITS ARE LOW AND HAVE NOT KEPT PACE WITH INFLATION But Most
More informationCritical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS
Critical Access Hospitals and HCAHPS Michelle Casey, MS Senior Research Fellow and Deputy Director University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center June 12, 2012 Overview of Presentation Why is HCAHPS
More informationLetters.org. SCHOLARSHIP CONSIDERATION LETTER. Included: Scholarship Consideration Letter
Letters.org SCHOLARSHIP CONSIDERATION LETTER Included: Introduction Tips Sample Template 1 Introduction Any scholarship issuing authority receives thousands of application from students applying for scholarships
More informationPercent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 2013, 2014, and 2015
Exhiit 1 Percent of Population Under Age 65 Uninsured, 13, 14, and 15 13 14 15
More informationThe Candidate Experience Report:
The Candidate Experience Report: The Hiring Process Unveiled A behind-the-scenes look at what it s like to be a job seeker in today s job market 2018 icims Inc. All Rights Reserved. Today s available jobs
More informationBenefits by Service: Outpatient Hospital Services (October 2006)
Page 1 of 8 Benefits by Service: Outpatient Hospital Services (October 2006) Definition/Notes Note: Totals include 50 states and D.C. "Benefits Covered" Totals "Benefits Not Covered" Totals Is the benefit
More informationFiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only
Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only January 2002 1 2 published annually by: The Minnesota Taxpayers Association
More information