COMMUNITY MEETING NOTES UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study. Meeting Date: June 17, 2010 Genentech Hall Mission Bay campus Subject: Community Meeting 1
|
|
- Vernon May
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 COMMUNITY MEETING NOTES UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study Meeting Date: June 17, 2010 Location: Genentech Hall Mission Bay campus Subject: Community Meeting 1 Attendees: Neighbors UCSF staff San Francisco Redevelopment Agency staff Mission Bay Development Group staff BMS Design Group, UCSF Consultant Fehr + Peers, UCSF Consultant Welcome Barbara Bagot-López, UCSF Community & Government Relations, welcomed the community to the meeting and thanked them for attending. [PowerPoint presentation here] Context Kevin Beauchamp, UCSF Campus Planning, provided a brief history of the planning, development and construction of the Mission Bay campus site and explained that UCSF is taking the opportunity to pause in the development of the site to evaluate the status of the plan, the quality of implemented program and physical spaces and think about future work. UCSF recently completed the Physical Design Framework [adopted by the UC Regents in September] which outlines planning and design principles for all UCSF campus sites with more specific guidelines for the Parnassus and Mission Bay campuses. The alternatives that will be developed in this Mission Bay Phase 2 Study will inform the next Long Range Development Plan (LRDP), which is currently underway and will be a three year process. Purpose, Schedule, UCSF Mission Bay Today Barbara Maloney, BMS Design Group, described the purpose of the study, which is to develop three alternatives to the existing Mission Bay Campus Master Plan that: Enhance the campus pedestrian environment and outdoor recreation; Evaluate options for additional campus housing; Reassess parking supply, demand and locations; Evaluate land use locations, building footprints, massing and design; and Consider the potential for increasing development beyond the currently approved 2.65 million gross square feet. The study is anticipated to be completed by the end of the year with at least three community meetings throughout the process. 414 Jackson Street, Suite 404, San Francisco, CA T: F: urban design campus planning land planning landscape architecture
2 An overview of the campus site, its location within Mission Bay, and the status of the campus today (which includes the additional land acquired for the UCSF Medical Center at Mission Bay) were provided. The development status and building opportunity sites were discussed. A development summary was presented describing current and planned building square footages and parking demand and supply. Planning, Design Issues and Alternatives Issues that community and campus members have asked UCSF to address as part of this study were summarized. Areas of concern and planning principles established in March 2008 by the UCSF Mission Bay Community Task Force were also briefly presented. It was explained that some of the topics to be explored and evaluated during this study include: various land uses, building massing, open space, circulation and parking, campus character and development entitlement. Discussion The following questions and comments were raised, and answers were provided as appropriate. Answers in [brackets] are in addition to information supplied at the June 17 th meeting. Structures and Footprints Q/C: Why is the campus nearing its full square footage entitlement for facilities built at the site? A: The 1999 Mission Bay Master Plan established a range in size for all building footprints. In nearly all cases, facilities that have been built to date were developed to the upper end of those ranges. Also, on Block 20, housing was built instead of parking, which affects entitlement because housing counts towards building space whereas parking does not. Q/C: What is the anticipated form of future development? A: The study will explore potential development on the remaining undeveloped areas of the campus site and will consider various building locations, floor plate configurations, heights and square footages. Q/C: The structures and equipment on the roofs do not count towards the height limit and they are large and unsightly. A: This study will review and evaluate the design guidelines outlined in the 1999 Master Plan document and recommend changes to improve the quality of building design, including rooftops. The Physical Design Framework also addresses building design and provides a framework for future development. Q/C: The relocation of the Block 14 school site further east away from I-280 and the CalTrain tracks should be considered. Also, a site more internal to the campus would provide an opportunity to mentor young students in the sciences. A: The location for the school site was negotiated between UCSF and the City in Changing the location of the school site might require reopening various agreements. Block 14 is already in close proximity to existing and planned UCSF research buildings, so moving the site would not be likely to create stronger mentorship opportunities. UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study June 17, 2010 Community Meeting Notes 2
3 Q/C: Campus building footprints are too large. Denser and taller buildings with pedestrian-scaled alleys would help break down this massing and allow public cut-throughs. Q/C: Wind is a big issue here and the large, rectangular buildings and the large spaces between them, like Koret Quad, make this worse by channeling the wind. The Master Plan shows the quad and the proposed recreation fields and courts adjoining each other; this much contiguous open space could further exacerbate the issue. A: [Wind effects were analyzed for the campus master plan, and it will be studied again if there is a plan to construct buildings higher than 100 feet.] Q/C: Consider wind turbines on campus. Q/C: People should spend time in Mission Creek Park along the northern edge of Mission Creek because it is very popular and the design of the space mitigates the wind. You should study why this park is so successful. Q/C: At street level, the buildings are blank and lack any visual interest or activity. This makes the campus a very unattractive place to walk. Transportation Q/C: Are all the streets complete? Is there flexibility for changing the street layout? A: The street locations and dimensions were determined during planning for the overall Mission Bay Redevelopment Plan based on the San Francisco Vara Block easements that are designed to establish and protect view corridors, and these street locations and dimensions are reflected in UCSF s Mission Bay Master Plan. No campus streets will change, with the possible exception of the southern portion of Sixth Street between Nelson Rising Lane and Gene Friend Way, which is planned as a campus street in the 1999 Master Plan but is technically not a Vara Block easement. Options for the future configuration of this area will be studied during this process. Q/C: How will traffic issues be addressed? Will slowing of the economy and resultant decreases in traffic be taken into account? A: Traffic and parking issues will be evaluated during this study by the transportation consultant, Fehr & Peers, but a thorough technical analysis will be conducted when the LRDP and its Environmental Impact Report (EIR) are underway. Q/C: Connectivity between Mission Bay and the rest of San Francisco will be compromised if emerging plans for high-speed rail causes 16 th Street to be moved underground at 7 th Street. It is recommended that UCSF take a position on this issue by submitting a comment letter to the California High Speed Rail Authority. A: UCSF is in the process of preparing a comment letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority regarding this concern. [On June 21 st, 2010, UCSF s Vice Chancellor for Strategic Communications and University Relations, Barbara French, wrote a letter to the California High Speed Rail Authority opposing the current plan of undergrounding 16 th street.] UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study June 17, 2010 Community Meeting Notes 3
4 Q/C: Will the study evaluate and mitigate Giants game day parking and traffic through the neighborhoods? If the Giants get an arena, traffic impacts will increase. A: The focus of the parking analysis will be on demand and supply for the UCSF campus community, although it is recognized that Giants game days do affect traffic and parking in the area. Q/C: Can you study where the existing campus population is parking? A: UCSF is collecting this information based on observation estimates (not driver surveys); it will be considered in this study and will inform the LRDP EIR. Q/C: Connectivity is a big issue and it was recommended UCSF provide shuttle service for Mission Bay neighbors. A: There is a public shuttle program run by the Mission Bay Transportation Management Association that serves Mission Bay and China Basin. Q/C: How much does it cost to park at UCSF? A: Public parking is $3/hour and staff permit parking is $127/month. Q/C: Parking should be evaluated by population and occupancy and not just by square feet. A: We are evaluating actual parking usage and are using that information to inform planning of future parking needs. Process Q/C: Will this plan be flexible? A: Yes, this study will yield three alternatives which will be evaluated in more depth during the LRDP process. Q/C: What is the process for approving future development at UCSF Mission Bay that does not conform to the current Master Plan? A: This study will explore alternative strategies for the full development of the Mission Bay campus and will inform the next Long Range Development Plan (LRDP). An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be prepared on the LRDP. The LRDP and EIR would be submitted to The Regents for approval. Any increase in entitlement will require discussions with the Redevelopment Agency and the Mission Bay master developer, FOCIL. The specific steps needed are being confirmed. At this time it is not expected that additional entitlement will require the reopening of the Mission Bay Redevelopment Plan. Q/C: Will the City s Mission Bay Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) on the overall Mission Bay Redevelopment Plan area have to be amended? A: This issue will be reviewed by the City. It will likely be a function of how much growth UCSF proposes to pursue and the extent to which projected traffic volumes, planned infrastructure capacity, and other Mission Bay entitlements may be affected because of additional development not anticipated at the time that the SEIR was prepared. Q/C: Take overage (of existing entitlement) out of the picture until the process of approval is better defined. UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study June 17, 2010 Community Meeting Notes 4
5 Q/C: Is UCSF going through this process with its other campus sites? Does UCSF want to expand other sites? A: The future of all UCSF campus sites will be studied during the LRDP process, beginning later this year. Currently, UCSF is not planning to expand other campus sites, but no decisions have been made yet. Q/C: How will impacts be evaluated? A: When a specific proposal for the build-out of the Mission Bay campus is identified for inclusion in the next LRDP, the impacts of that proposal will be analyzed in the LRDP EIR. Housing Q/C: Will Block 7 be included in the housing evaluation and assumptions for the Phase 2 Study? A: This study will focus on assessing opportunities for additional housing only on the UCSF Mission Bay campus site. This does not include Block 7 to the north of the campus, property that UCSF has purchased to build housing for UCSF staff with low and moderate incomes. Block 7 will be considered in the larger context of overall UCSF demand for housing and its appropriate location a topic that will be addressed in the LRDP and EIR. [In September 2010, UCSF notified the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) that UCSF is unable to construct the proposed 160 units of affordable staff housing on Mission Bay s Block 7 East. UCSF paid the SFRA $5 million for the land and will now pay an additional $5 million in lieu of building the housing for a total of $10 million. SFRA also retains title to the land. It is UCSF s intention to build the proposed 77 units of affordable housing on Block 7 West, which is part of a separate agreement with the SFRA. That project is not triggered until Phase 2 of the hospital, so we remain hopeful that it will be economically feasible when we are ready to proceed.] Q/C: As Mission Bay grows, the campus will eventually be surrounded on the north by residential neighborhoods. Providing housing on campus would help UCSF avoid being a dark and inhospitable zone, especially at night. Q/C: What type of housing will be considered in phase two? A: Additional campus housing would likely include apartments, not dormitories, mostly for students, postdoctoral scholars and Medical Center residents, at rental rates slightly below market rate. Q/C: What is the occupancy rate of existing housing on the Mission Bay campus site? A: Existing housing on the Mission Bay campus is fully occupied. Population Density A/C: Will UCSF s historical growth rate of 3% continue? A: It is uncertain, but this will be assessed as part of the LRDP. Q/C: The experience at Parnassus is that the density of building occupancy increases over time. UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study June 17, 2010 Community Meeting Notes 5
6 Q/C: What is the density of employee population on site? A: There is a lower overall employee population on the campus than originally anticipated. Also, some buildings are not completely occupied yet. [Campus employee population as of June 2010 is approximately 2,000 persons]. Sustainability Q/C: What is UCSF s energy policy for Mission Bay and will this be part of the study? UCSF does not appear to have much of a sustainability policy. A: UCSF has been implementing many sustainable measures and will present those to the community in the near future. [UCSF has a robust sustainability program, and is aiming to be the UC leader in green design standards. The new UCSF Mission Bay Medical Center integrates cutting-edge sustainable and eco-effective design. In addition, UCSF has certified Rock Hall as a LEED (Leadership in Engineering and Environmental Design) Silver building. Since 1998, UCSF s diversion rate (the percentage of solid waste that does not go to landfill) increased from 7 percent to 51 percent. UCSF s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program conforms to the city s Transit First Policy to encourage the use of alternative transportation. For more information see ]. Other Q/C: I urge you to continue the planned pedestrian friendly and vibrant retail character of Fourth Street north of the campus into areas along Fourth Street within the campus site. Q/C: Where is the nearest fire station? A: A combined fire and police station is expected to be located on Mission Bay Block 8 (along Third Street slightly north of the UCSF campus near the old brick firehouse) within the next few years. Recently approved bond money has made the planning and design of the facility more of a reality. The old firehouse will be retained as part of the facility and is planned to contain training and community rooms. [The nearest existing fire station is located at 16 th and Vermont Streets, to the west of Mission Bay.] UCSF Mission Bay Phase 2 Study June 17, 2010 Community Meeting Notes 6
COMMUNITY MEETING 3 February 15, Mission Bay Phase Two
COMMUNITY MEETING 3 February 15, 2011 Mission Bay Phase Two Agenda Welcome, Study Scope and Schedule Feedback Received Campus Environment Concepts Active Zones, Pedestrian Environment and Vehicular Circulation
More informationUCSF Long Range Development Plan (LRDP)
UCSF Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) Further information: Lori Yamauchi Assistant Vice Chancellor Campus Planning Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure August 20, 2013 UCSF Overview
More informationMETHODOLOGY - Scope of Work
The scope of work for the Truckee West River Site Redevelopment Feasibility Study will be undertaken through a series of sequential steps or tasks and will comprise four major tasks as follows. TASK 1:
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS ACTION ITEM
GB3 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON For Meeting of ACTION ITEM APPROVAL OF DESIGN PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE STILES STUDENT RESIDENCE HALL PROJECT,
More informationMission Bay Master Plan File No M September 27, 1990
SAN FRANCISCO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12040 WHEREAS, Mission Bay is generally bounded by Third Street, Berry Street, Fourth Street, the China Basin Channel, China Basin Street, Mariposa
More informationDowntown Oakland Specific Plan Frequently Asked Questions
Downtown Oakland Specific Plan Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the Downtown Oakland Specific Plan? A Specific Plan is a regulatory tool that local governments can use to implement the general plan
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ BERKELEY DAVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES MERCED RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ PHYSICAL PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT & OPERATIONS UC SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA
More informationAddendum. Final Environmental Impact Report for North Campus Project. California State University Los Angeles SCH# March 2018.
Addendum Final Environmental Impact Report for North Campus Project to SCH#2016111038 California State University Los Angeles March 2018 Lead Agency The Board of Trustees of the California State University
More informationUniversity of San Francisco 2012 Institutional Master Plan. SUPPLEMENT A Proposed Student Residence Hall December 2013
123 a The purpose of this Institutional Master Plan (IMP) Supplement A is to provide (1) a summary of compliance with Planning Code Section 304.5(c) requirements regarding the required format and substance
More informationPlanning Commission Motion No HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2014
Subject to: (Select only if applicable) Affordable Housing (Sec. 415) Jobs Housing Linkage Program (Sec. 413) Downtown Park Fee (Sec. 412) First Source Hiring (Admin. Code) Child Care Requirement (Sec.
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM 1
F12(X) Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL : For Meeting of ACTION ITEM 1 AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A GROUND LEASE AND LEASE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOLLOWING ACTION
More informationNOTICE OF AVAILABILITY TIERED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY CREATIVE ARTS & HOLLOWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
PHYSICAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 1600 Holloway Avenue, CY 201 San Francisco, CA 94132 Tel: 415/405-3836 Fax: 415/405-3846 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY TIERED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO
More informationNORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CITY OF CEDAR HILL CITY CENTER TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN August 19, 2011 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
More informationMEMORANDUM. AGENDA ITEM #3D December 5, December 1, TO: County Council FROM:
AGENDA ITEM #3D December 5, 2017 MEMORANDUM December 1, 201 7 TO: FROM: County Council Marlene Michaels~~1ior Legislative Analyst Glenn Orlin, Deputy Council Administrator &O SUBJECT: Grosvenor-Strathmore
More information500 EL CAMINO REAL PROJECT. City Council Tuesday, April 16, 2013
500 EL CAMINO REAL PROJECT City Council Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Background Proposal Project Review Process Summary Background Vision Plan (2007-2008) 12 overarching goals Established foundation for the
More informationCity of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR
City of Lynwood MODIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR AN URBAN PLANNING FIRM TO PREPARE A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD TRANSIT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AND REQUIRED CEQA SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationAPWA Presentation. Public/Private Partnership Mission Bay San Francisco
APWA Presentation Public/Private Partnership Mission Bay San Francisco Presenters: Fred Abadi Director of Public Works Robert Beck Deputy Director of Engineering Ashur Yoseph Lead Project Manager Introduction
More informationREPORT. To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager. May 9, 2016
REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and City Council From the City Manager May 9, 2016 SUBJECT Study Session for Consideration of the Draft Inner Harbor Specific Plan, Draft Inner Harbor Specific Plan Environmental
More informationMaster Development Plan Written Report
Master Development Plan Written Report A master development plan must be accompanied by a written report, to be adopted as a part of the master development plan. The following information must be completed
More informationRequest for Redevelopment Proposal 102 N. Broadway, City of De Pere
Introduction and Summary The City of De Pere (City) is requesting redevelopment proposals for a development opportunity of a City owned parcel on the corner of Broadway and George Street in Downtown De
More informationREQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: MARCH 14, 2017 TITLE: SCOPING SESSION FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST REPRESENTING AN EXCHANGE OF NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL
More information1 Introduction. 1.1 Specific Plan Background
Introduction 1 Introduction This document is an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the Bay Fair Transit Oriented Development
More informationMr. George McNabb, Principal Paragon Real Estate 1400 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA January 23, 2015
95 Brady Street San Francisco, CA 94103 415 541 9001 info@sfhac.org www.sfhac.org Mr. George McNabb, Principal Paragon Real Estate 1400 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94109 Ref: 1700 Market Street Mixed-Use
More informationSAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SAN FRANCISCO Date received: Environmental Evaluation Application The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires public agencies to review the environmental impacts of proposed projects. In San
More informationCAIS Trustee Head Conference 2014 Developing a Successful Project Entitlements Team & Strategy
Todays Topics: Overview of Entitlement Components and Team Case Study: The Urban School Academic and Athletic Building Lessons Learned Questions and Answer Session What are project entitlements and why
More informationSenior Learning Community at Purchase College
Senior Learning Community at Purchase College What this Meeting is About Introducing our innovative idea for expanding Purchase College, Describing the benefits that the Senior Learning Community will
More informationSECTION 1: PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS
SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS I. PURPOSE The purpose of these rules and regulations is to set forth the procedures for administration of design review required by Article I, Chapter 30 (Landmark Preservation)
More informationSOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)
10 Joint Development This chapter describes potential long-term direct and indirect and short-term (construction) direct and indirect effects that would result from the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT)
More informationFive-Year Capital Program Non-State and State Funds to
C49822_FINAL_Nonstate 10/18/05 1:50 PM Page 1 Five-Year Capital Program Non-State and State Funds 2005-2006 to 2009-2010 Teaching Research Public Service University of California Office of the President
More information4. IMPLEMENTATION. 4.1 Implementation Matrix
4. IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 Implementation Matrix IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX The Implementation Matrix includes the implementation items, proposed time line, potential participating parties and potential funding
More informationEconomic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083
San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, 1/6/17 Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section 53083 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Background 1.3 Legal Requirements
More informationPUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING
9. Public Facilities Financing Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan 257 9 PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING 9.1 PURPOSE The Baylands is planned to accommodate a variety of uses including retail at a range of types
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Downtown Triangle Redevelopment 1 st Street North, East Jackson Street, and Market Street City of Wisconsin Rapids 444 West Grand Avenue, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 February 2017
More informationLong Range Campus Plan 3.0 December 4, 2015
Long Range Campus Plan 3.0 December 4, 2015 Campus Aerial View 2 Overview 3 333 Golden Gate Avenue Updates CEQA Project Delivery Student Housing Updates University of California San Francisco 198 McAllister/50
More informationSAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY ?/2W/(T. Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal
CITY OF 7 S3 SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 3/30/2017 Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal SUBJECT: DIRIDON STATION PLAN AND REGIONAL RAIL PROJECTS
More informationTO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: ACTION ITEM
F3 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: For Meeting of July 12, 2017 ACTION ITEM APPROVAL OF BUDGET AND EXTERNAL FINANCING, NUEVO EAST STUDENT HOUSING PROJECT,
More informationE-J Industrial Spine BOA Nomination Study
Section VII. Major Recommendations A. Introduction The E-J BOA Study Area provides a number of unique opportunities to develop large-scale properties in a highly accessible urban setting. Considering the
More informationCSU Dominguez Hills & DH Foundation University Village-Mixed-Use Development/Market Rate Housing LETTER OF INVITATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
CSU Dominguez Hills & DH Foundation University Village-Mixed-Use Development/Market Rate Housing Date: February 20, 2018 LETTER OF INVITATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Subject: Development Opportunity
More informationCity of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner
City of Edina, Minnesota GrandView Phase I Redevelopment, 5146 Eden Avenue Request for Interest for Development Partner The City of Edina has a rich history of innovative developments that have become
More informationBuilding our future, together. Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update November 12, 2013
Building our future, together Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update November 12, 2013 Introduction Welcome: Mayor Barbara Bass Prayer Business and Economy Update Susan Guthrie,
More information2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO
2018 State of County Transportation Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO What a difference a year makes. A year ago my report to the community focused on three themes: 1. The challenges facing San Mateo County
More informationCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER WEST TOWER PROJECT
A. PROPOSED PROJECT A. PROPOSED PROJECT The Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC or the Applicant ) proposes to develop a new inpatient/medical support facility on the approximately 24.1-acre CSMC Campus
More informationApendix A.2 PROJECT PLANNING GUIDE UC SAN DIEGO NORTH CAMPUS HOUSING PROJECT NUMBER: September 2006
Apendix A.2 PROJECT PLANNING GUIDE UC SAN DIEGO NORTH CAMPUS HOUSING PROJECT NUMBER: 966410 September 2006 PROJECT PLANNING GUIDE NORTH CAMPUS HOUSING TABLE OF CONTENTS Capital Improvement Budget...1
More informationAPPLICATION FOR PARCEL MAP
Public Works Number: - / 3- APPLICATION FOR PARCEL MAP Department of Public Works Development Services 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jose, California 95113 (408) 535-7802 Applicant Phone Number Fax Number
More informationREQUEST FOR DEVELOPER PROPOSALS (RFP)
REQUEST FOR DEVELOPER PROPOSALS (RFP) SEEKING A SENIOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STATEMENTS DUE TO TACOMA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM TOD SITE ALONG
More information2020 Project Update. Merced City Council August Chancellor Dorothy Leland
2020 Project Update Merced City Council August 2016 Chancellor Dorothy Leland UC Merced Today 1.4 million gross square feet, 2,000 beds and 6,700 students Academic Residential Student Life/Athletics Campus
More informationLong Beach Civic Center
Long Beach Civic Center Evaluation of Proposals & Recommended Actions December 9, 2014 Presentation Outline Background Proposal Overview Evaluation Process and Scoring Evaluation Results & Recommendation
More informationPlanning for the Future University of Denver Campus Plan. OPEN FORUM May 2017
Planning for the Future University of Denver Campus Plan OPEN FORUM May 2017 ENGAGING people and places to CREATE designs which ENRICH our world Ayers Saint Gross is exclusively focused on working with
More informationBCDC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUGUST 27, Emerson College Boston, MA august 27,
1-3 B O Y L S T O N P L A C E BCDC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUGUST 27, 2013 1 EMERSON COLLEGE- BOYLSTON PLACE 1-3 Project Site The Boylston Place residence hall site comprises parcels 1, 2 and 3 Boylston Place
More informationMassDOT Air Rights Parcels Citizens Advisory Committee Questions for Proponents
MassDOT Air Rights Parcels 12-15 Citizens Advisory Committee Questions for Proponents Trinity Financial, Inc. responses for Parcels 12 and 13 (responses in bold) 1. What stage are you at in the development
More informationFlorida International University
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Parkview II Housing project will provide 656 beds of student housing at the Modesto A. Maidique Campus as well as parking for 300 cars. It is expected to be completed for fall term
More informationREQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLASSROOMS, HOUSING AND PARKING TO REPLACE UPPER HEARST PARKING LOTS
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLASSROOMS, HOUSING AND PARKING TO REPLACE UPPER HEARST PARKING LOTS March 20, 2017 Goldman School of Public Policy and Office of the Vice Chancellor Real
More informationRequest for Developer Qualifications-John Deere Commons Development Opportunity
Request for Developer Qualifications-John Deere Commons Development Opportunity Moline, IL January 2012 Open Letter Inviting the Interest of Private Developers Attached please find a Request for Qualifications
More informationRequest for Proposals # P12-044A. Pre-Qualification - Purchase and. Development of Bloomfield Property
Request for Proposals # P12-044A Pre-Qualification - Purchase and Development of Bloomfield Property Bloomfield is a dynamic hub where community, cultural, social, and economic activities converge. Good
More informationSection F: Committee of Adjustment: Minor Variance and Consent Applications
Executive Summary Introduction The Development Review Process STAR Process Pre-application Consultation Submission of "Complete" Applications STAR Application Streams Section A: Official Plan and Zoning
More informationSouthern Dallas GO Bond Program Public/Private Partnership Amendment
Southern Dallas GO Bond Program Public/Private Partnership Amendment A Briefing to the Economic Development Committee Economic Development and Housing Department December 3, 2007 1 KEY FOCUS AREA: ECONOMIC
More informationDistinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan ( ) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION
Distinctly Boerne! Boerne Master Plan (2018-2028) JOINT MEETING OVERVIEW & PRIORITIZATION Halff Staff Matt Bucchin, AICP, LEED-GA Director of Planning Josh Donaldson, AICP Planner / Landscape Designer
More informationCITY OF ANN ARBOR ECONOMIC COLLABORATIVE TASK FORCE REPORT
CITY OF ANN ARBOR ECONOMIC COLLABORATIVE TASK FORCE REPORT Background Ann Arbor City Council has determined that economic health is one of its key priority areas. Economic sustainability and growth create
More informationRequest for Proposals For General Plan Update
Request for Proposals For General Plan Update Issued: Monday, December 18, 2017 Proposals Due: Tuesday, January 16, 2018, 5:00 pm PREPARED BY: 330 W. 20 th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 CONTACT: Planning
More informationEconomic Development and Employment Element
Economic Development and Employment Element Element Objectives The policies and actions of the Economic Development and Employment Element are intended to achieve the following nine objectives: 1. Provide
More informationA. Executive Summary...3. B. Initiatives and Status at a Glance...4
Quarterly Progress Report on Corporate Strategic Initiatives January to March 2011 Table of Contents A. Executive Summary...3 B. Initiatives and at a Glance...4 C. Initiative Summaries...5 1. Respond to
More informationMANAGING RISK v. REWARD HOW TO BALANCE CREATIVE DESIGN WITH THE REALITIES OF PROJECT BUDGETS, SCHEDULES & SCOPE. Panel
MANAGING RISK v. REWARD HOW TO BALANCE CREATIVE DESIGN WITH THE REALITIES OF PROJECT BUDGETS, SCHEDULES & SCOPE 38 th Annual Conference on School Facilities Panel Moderator: Brian Whitmore, AIA, LEED AP
More informationPinal County Comprehensive Plan. Visioning Workshop Summary Report
Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Visioning Workshop Summary Report Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Visioning Workshops Executive Summary In August 2007, seven Visioning Workshop events were held throughout
More informationFUNDING SOURCES. Appendix I. Funding Sources
Appendix I. Funding Sources FUNDING SOURCES planning and related efforts can be funded through a variety of local, state, and federal sources. However, these revenues have many guidelines in terms of how
More information07/01/2010 ACTUAL START
PAGE, 1/27/21 6:18:42PM Grant Number: SC2224 Activity: Municipal Facility Energy Conservation Program Quarter: 1/1/29-12/31/29 Metric Activity: Building Retrofits Status: Active % of Work Complete: Activity
More informationGeneral Plan Referral
APPLICATION PACKET FOR General Plan Referral Planning Department 1650 Mission Street Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103-9425 T: 415.558.6378 F: 415.558.6409 San Francisco Charter Section 4.105 and Sections
More informationBALBOA RESERVOIR PROJECT Recap: Project History & January CAC Meeting
BALBOA RESERVOIR PROJECT Recap: Project History & January CAC Meeting Balboa Reservoir Community Advisory Committee OVERVIEW 1. Project History & Next Steps 2. Recap of January CAC Meeting (Topic: Housing)
More informationDiridon Station Joint Policy Advisory Board MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Diridon Station Joint Policy Advisory Board Friday, December 17, 2010 MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the Diridon Station Joint Policy Advisory Board ( Committee ) was called to order at 3:06
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Former Fire Station 47 Site - 24,400 square feet
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS City of SeaTac Former Fire Station 47 Site - 24,400 square feet 3215 South 152 nd Street, SeaTac, WA 98188 ISSUE DATE: May 4, 2018 PROPOSALS DUE: June 15, 2018 1. OVERVIEW The City
More informationUC Merced Integrated Planning to Expand a Campus
UC Merced Integrated Planning to Expand a Campus Dan Feitelberg, Vice Chancellor for Planning and Budget Abigail Rider, Assistant Vice Chancellor, Real Estate Veronica Mendez, Assistant Vice Chancellor,
More informationFrom: Jim Nardi, San Pacifico HOA President, on behalf of the Ponto Beachfront Development Review Committee
August 17, 2015 Via email To: Oscar Uranga, Project Manager, Shopoff Realty Investment Brian Rupp, Vice President Shopoff Realty Investment Mike Howes, President, Howes Weiler Associates Laurie Madigan,
More informationProposed Project The selected consultant will work closely with the project management team and the appointed committee for:
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PRE-DESIGN, ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING AND FULL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR A 600 BED DUNDEE RESIDENCE HALLS PROJECT Updated 3-17-09 Introduction
More informationOrder of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR MEETING MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2018, 9:00 AM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NORTH CHAMBER 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Order of Business
More informationPublic Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report
Public Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report Solana Highlands Revitalization Project November 20, 2014 @ 5:30pm 1 Scoping Meeting Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of the Notice of
More informationMEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6k
South Florida Regional Planning Council MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6k DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COUNCIL MEMBERS STAFF TOWN OF MEDLEY PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Introduction On
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. The Project and the items that the Commission will be considering at the June 15 th, 2010 meeting are summarized below.
ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT MICHAEL COHEN, DIRECTOR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO GAVIN NEWSOM, MAYOR M E M O R A N D U M TO: Members of the Health Commission FROM: Michael Cohen CC: Mitch Katz,
More informationSt. Lucie County, Florida Land Development Code
4.05.08 SRA Designation. St. Lucie County, Florida Land Development Code 4.05.08 Lands within the RLSA Overlay Zone may be designated as an SRA pursuant to the requirements of this section. A. Lands within
More informationDISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
F4 Office of the President TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: For the Meeting of DISCUSSION ITEM UPDATE ON THE 2020 PROJECT, MERCED CAMPUS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Twenty years ago, the Regents of the
More informationDraft CRA Plan Amendment. Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board September 23, CRA Plan Amendment
Draft Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board September 23, 2013 1 Project Scope Feasibility Study Public Workshops/Stakeholder Interviews Market Study 2 Schedule to Date Feasibility Study Community
More informationCity Council / Planning Commission Joint Meeting #2
City Council / Planning Commission Joint Meeting #2 March 30, 2010 Meeting Agenda AIGM Introduction/Refresher 2009 AIGM Update How the AIGM and CompPlan 2030 work together Recent CompPlan activity Vision
More informationTitle SANTEE COURT PARKING FACILITY PROJECT / 636 MAPLE AVENUE INTER-MODAL PARKING STRUCTURE
***************************************************************************** Office of the City Clerk, City of Los Angeles This report was generated by the Council File Management System on 07/07/2018
More informationcoordination and collaboration between St. Mary s College and the Town of Moraga
Chapter Five Implementation The Campus Master Plan will be implemented in stages over the next 15 years (2015 2030). During this time coordination and collaboration between St. Mary s College and the Town
More informationBLUE HILLS MASTER PLAN RFP OUTLINE
BLUE HILLS MASTER PLAN RFP OUTLINE Introduction The City of Hartford is soliciting responses from qualified individuals/firms to provide professional services for creation of a Master Plan for the Blue
More informationProposals. For funding to create new affordable housing units in Westport, MA SEED HOUSING PROGRAM. 3/28/2018 Request for
3/28/2018 Request for Proposals For funding to create new affordable housing units in Westport, MA SEED HOUSING PROGRAM TOWN OF WESTPORT SEED HOUSING PROGRAM WESTPORT, MA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 General Information
More informationCalifornia Pacific Medical Center Hospital Rebuild
California Pacific Medical Center Hospital Rebuild Planning Commission Term Sheet Presentation Staff Presentation to Commission April 11, 2013 Presentation Outline Introduction Project Status Revised Project
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN COMMENT PERIOD
DATE: February 15, 2017 TO: FROM: RE: Interested Persons Tom Buford, Senior Planner Community Development Department NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SCOPING MEETING FOR THE
More informationCouncil History March 6, 2007 Council approved amendments to the Municipal Development Plan Bylaw
Priorities Committee Meeting_Sep29_2015 STRATEGIC INITIATIVE AND UPDATE Colchester Growth Management Strategy Update Report Purpose To provide the Priorities Committee with an update on the Colchester
More informationRequest for Qualifications
CSU, Channel Islands Site Authority Ground Sub-Lease for the Development of 31.5-Acres and the Town Center Request for Qualifications Contact Valerie Patscheck, Dir Procurement & Logistical Services, valerie.patscheck@csuci.edu
More informationLand Development Code Update
Land Development Code Update Advisory Committee Meeting #1 September 14, 2017 We Dream Big and Deliver Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Purpose and Objectives 3. Why Now? 4. Strategic Objectives
More informationCity of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,
City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814 www.cityofsacramento.org Meeting Date: 2/22/2011 Report Type: Public Hearing Title: Pell Circle Billboard Relocation (P10-065) Report
More informationFuture Land Use Supporting Data
4 Supporting Data The purpose of the Land Use Element is to describe the existing and future land use patterns to be developed on the University and to address how this land use pattern will be coordinated
More informationBAY MEADOWS PHASE II Development Agreement (Effective 12/21/05) Annual Review Matrix
BAY MEADOWS PHASE II (Effective 12/21/05) Annual Review Matrix Updated May 2013 for May 28, 2013 Planning Commission Meeting Review Period (7 th year): December 21, 2011 to December 20, 2012 This matrix
More informationObjective 1. Research current housing issues in Avon to gain a deeper understanding of the housing market Type: Program Priority: 1 Cost: Medium
Overall Comprehensive Plan Goals: Encourage growth in more suitable areas within town boundaries. These areas include sites close to existing residential, commercial, or industrial areas that are already
More informationNovember 12, Laura Kaminski, AICP City of Oakland 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 3315 Oakland, CA Dear Ms. Kaminski:
November 12, 2013 Laura Kaminski, AICP City of Oakland 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 3315 Oakland, CA 94612 Dear Ms. Kaminski: The Better Broadway Coalition comprises Greenbelt Alliance, East Bay Housing
More informationINSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN NOTIFICATION FORM / NOTICE OF PROJECT CHANGE
HARVARD university INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN NOTIFICATION FORM / NOTICE OF PROJECT CHANGE For the Third Amendment to the 2013 Institutional Master Plan for Harvard University s Campus in Allston Science
More informationSubject: Request for Proposal Route 99 Interchanges at Hammett Road and Kiernan Avenue
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Matt Machado Director 1010 10 th Street, Suite 3500, Modesto, CA 95354-0847 Phone: 209.525.6550 Date «FirstName» «LastName» «Company» «Address1» «City», «State» «PostalCode»
More informationLogan Square Corridor Development Initiative Final Report Appendix
Logan Square Corridor Development Initiative Final Report Appendix Appendix A: All development proposals Appendix B: Keypad and online polling Appendix C: Financial analysis assumptions Page 2 Page 11
More informationTown of the Blue Mountains Community Improvement Plan
Town of the Blue Mountains Community Improvement Plan Public Meeting Community Improvement Plan Thornbury February 14, 2011 Clarksburg Craigleith Topics Process Consultation Commercial Area Characteristics
More informationSpecial Use Area Guidelines and Procedures
University properties shall be used only in accordance with Federal, State, and local laws and shall not be used for the purpose of organizing or carrying out unlawful activity. All persons on University
More informationTransportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel. Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003
Transportation Demand Management Workshop Region of Peel Stuart M. Anderson David Ungemah Joddie Gray July 11, 2003 Why Transportation Demand Management (TDM)? Demand management measures support a sustainable
More information