ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTERS 2016 END-OF-YEAR SLIDES

Transcription

1 ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTERS 2016 END-OF-YEAR SLIDES

2 i. 19 ERCs Referenced in Slides 1 5 ERC for Integrated Access Networks at the University of Arizona (CIAN) NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST) Engineering Research Center for Bio-mediated and Bioinspired Geotechnics (CBBG) Center for Biorenewable Chemicals at Iowa State University (IOWA) Lighting Enabled Systems & Applications at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (LESA) Engineering Research Center for Compact and Efficient Fluid Power at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanomanufacturing Systems for Mobile Computing and Mobile Energy Technologies (NASCENT) ERC for Revolutionizing Metallic Biomaterials at North Carolina A&T State University (NCAT) Future Renewable Electric Energy and Management Systems Center at North Carolina State University (FREEDM) ERC on Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment at Princeton University (MIRTHE) NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology Enabled Water Treatment Systems (NEWT) Power Optimization for Electro-Thermal Systems (POETS) ERC for Quantum Energy and Sustainable Solar Technologies (QESST) ERC for Re-inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure Engineering Research Center for Structured Organic Particulate Systems (C-SOPS) Synthetic Biology ERC at the University of California, Berkeley (SynBERC) NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Translational Applications of Nanoscale Multiferroic Systems (TANMS) ERC for Ultra-wide-area Resilient Electric Energy Transmission Network (CURENT) Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering (CSNE)

3 ii. Annualized ERCs on slides 1 5 include the 19 ERCs from the previous slide and the following additional 5 ERCs Quality of Life Technology Engineering Research Center at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Northeastern University Subsurface Sensing and Imaging Systems (CenSSIS) ERC for Biomimetic MicroElectronic Systems at the University of Southern California (USC-BMES) ERC for Extreme Ultraviolet Science and Technology (EUV) ERC for Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere at the University of Massachusetts (UMass)

4 1 ERC Products of Innovation, FY * FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY Annualized FY (61 ERCs) Intellectual Property Transaction Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Inventions Disclosed ,305 Patent Applications Filed (Provisional and Full) ,909 Patents Awarded Licenses Issued 6 < ,345 Economic Development Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Spinoff Companies Spinoff Employees ,333 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

5 2 ERC Influence on Curriculum, FY * FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY Annualized FY (61 ERCs) Degrees Total Per Center Total Per Center Total New Full-Degree Programs Based on ERC Research 5 < 1 3 < 1 51 New Degree Minors Based on ERC Research 0 < 1 1 < 1 31 New Certificate Programs Based on ERC Research 6 < 1 3 < 1 38 Courses Total Per Center Total Per Center Total New Courses Based on ERC Research Ongoing Courses with ERC Content ,504 Course Modules Based on ERC Research Textbooks Total Per Center Total Per Center Total New Textbooks Based on ERC Research 4 < 1 5 < New Textbook Chapters Based on ERC Research * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

6 3 ERC Information Dissemination, FY * FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY Annualized FY (61 ERCs) Peer-Reviewed Publications (Total) Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Journals** 1, ,628 Conference Proceedings** ,728 Trade Journals 8 < Coauthored with ERC Students ,115 Education and Outreach Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Education and Colloquia ,271 Workshops, Short Courses and Webina ,462 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Includes publications that result from center support, associated projects, and sponsored projects

7 4 Curricular Impact of ERCs, FY * FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY Annualized FY ** (35 ERCs) New and Ongoing Courses, Workshops, Short Courses, Webinars, and Textbooks Based on ERC Research Total Per Center Total Per Center Total With Engineered System Focus ,896 With Multidisciplinary Content ,541 Offered at Undergraduate Level ,693 Offered at Graduate Level ,317 Used at More than One ERC Institution Team Taught by Faculty in More Than One Department * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Data collection of curricular impacts started in 2007.

8 5 ERC Student Degrees, FY * FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY Annualized FY (61 ERCs) Degree Type Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Bachelors ,171 Master's ,064 Doctoral ,644 Total ,879 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

9 6 Degrees Granted to ERC Students vs. All U.S. Engineering Graduates, FY Degrees Granted to ERC Students* (Domestic and Foreign Students) Degrees Granted From All U.S. Engineering Schools (Domestic and Foreign Students) Doctoral Degrees 40% 47% 56% 41% 45% 50% 42% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 33% 34% 34% 32% 32% 32% 32% Master s Degrees 28% 32% 24% 32% 30% 23% 33% 60% 59% 60% 61% 61% 61% 61% Bachelor s Degrees 31% 21% 20% 27% 25% 27% 24% Total Degrees Granted , , , , , , ,590 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector Data Source: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) (

10 7 ERC Graduate Employment (19 Centers), FY 2016 Where are ERC Graduates Employed? U.S. Government 5% Other U.S. Firms Academia 34% Industry 61% Total: 289 Foreign Firms 1 1% ERC Member Firms 38 13%

11 8 ERC Research and Education Personnel, by Underrepresented Group and Citizenship Status, FY 2016 Faculty Personnel Category Total Total U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents Women* Underrepresented Racial Minorities* Hispanic* Foreign Number % Number % Number % Number % Total % 56 9% 44 7% 99 12% Graduate Students Postdocs % 8 7% 4 4% % Graduate Students % 47 7% 69 10% % Doctoral % 31 6% 53 10% % Master's % 16 10% 16 10% % Total** % 55 7% 73 9% % Undergraduate Students ERC Undergraduate Students (Research Assistants, Non-REU Students) % 95 15% % 47 4% NSF REU Site Award Students % 11 39% 8 29% 0 0% ERC's Own REU Student % 45 24% 48 26% 3 1% Total** % % % 50 4% Community College Participants in RET Program % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% K 12 Teachers K-12 RET % 19 13% 18 13% 0 0% K-12 Non-RET % 2 2% 3 3% 0 0% Total % 21 9% 21 9% 0 0% Young Scholars Total 194 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Grand Total*** 4,576 2, % % % 1,017 23% * U.S. citizens and permanent residents only ** The sum of the number of personnel for each row may exceed the total because personnel may belong to multiple categories. *** Leadership/Administration Directors, Thrust Leaders, and Education Program Leaders are included in the Grand Total. For the Grand Total row, all columns exclude Young Scholars, except the Total column. NOTE: For years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person, data are not included.

12 9 Participants Impacted by ERC Engineering Education Activities, FY 2016 Outreach Participants Total Community College Events Faculty who attended ERC-Sponsored Educational outreach events Students who attended ERC-Sponsored Educational outreach events 355 1,473 Total 1,828 K-12 Events Pre-college K-12 Teachers 4,008 K-12 Students 57,481 Total 61,489 Grand Total 63,317

13 10 Women in ERCs, FY Percentage of Women Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of Women in Engineering Programs Generally 50% Percentage of Women 40% 30% 20% 10% 21% 23% 27% 26% 25% 25% 21% 24% 20% 21% 32% 37% 30% 27% 27% 27% 27% 35% 19% 32% 33% 31% 35% 37% 39% 40% 38% 37% 38% 42% 0% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of women in ERCs Percentage of women in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Both ERC data and national statistics are for U.S. citizens and permanent residents only. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of women are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report gender. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for postdoctoral for 2011, 2013, or The percentages of personnel who did not report gender are as follows: 2011: 7.54%, 2012: 7.55%, 2013: 7.66%, 2014: 7.34%, 2015: 8.12%, 2016: 9.74%.

14 11 Hispanics and Latinos in ERCs, FY % Percentage of Hispanic and Latino Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos in Engineering Programs Generally Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 9% 8% 7% 5% 5% 7% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 4% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 15% 11% 13% 10% 7% 10% 13% 13% 17% 18% 19% 19% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos in ERCs Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Both ERC data and national statistics are for U.S. citizens and permanent residents only. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of Hispanics and Latinos are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report ethnicity. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for postdoctoral for The percentages of personnel who did not report ethnicity are as follows: 2011: 18.53%, 2012: 18.87%, 2013: 18.22%, 2014: 18.61%, 2015: 17.59%, 2016: 21.07%.

15 12 Underrepresented Racial Minorities in ERCs, FY % Percentage of Underrepresented Racial Minority Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of Underrepresented Racial Minorities in Engineering Programs Generally Percentage of Underrepresented Racial Minorities 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 9% 8% 8% 8% 8% 9% 0% 4% 3% 3% 5% 7% 14% 10% 10% 8% 6% 6% 13% 14% 17% 16% 20% 10% 25% 26% 22% 19% 17% 16% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of underrepresented racial minorities in ERCs Percentage of underrepresented racial minorities in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Both ERC data and national statistics are for U.S. citizens and permanent residents only. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of underrepresented racial minorities are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report race. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for postdoctoral for The percentages of personnel who did not report race are as follows: 2011: 15.21%, 2012: 17.60%, 2013: 18.89%, 2014: 19.07%, 2015: 19.24%, 2016: 22.30%.

16 13 Persons With Disabilities in ERCs, FY % Percentage of Persons With Disabilities in ERCs vs. Percentage of Persons With Disabilities in Engineering Programs Generally 40% Percentage of Persons With Disabilities 30% 20% 10% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 4% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of persons with disabilities in ERCs Percentage of persons with disabilities in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of persons with disabilities are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report disability status. The national percentages for persons with disabilities are for all persons, regardless of citizenship. The national percentages for doctoral students with disabilities and master s students with disabilities are from the national percentages for graduate students (master s and doctoral students combined). ASEE data are only available for faculty for 2013 and for doctorate, master's, and undergraduate for The percentages of personnel who did not report disability status are as follows: 2011: 22.92%, 2012: 24.72%, 2013: 16.15%, 2014: 20.67%, 2015: 21.86%, 2016: 24.00%.

17 14 U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents in ERCs, FY Percentage of U.S. Citizen and Permanent Resident Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents in Engineering Programs Generally 100% Percentage of U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 84% 82% 80% 81% 81% 78% 27% 37% 47% 44% 36% 37% 43% 46% 47% 45% 43% 42% 52% 54% 58% 47% 44% 42% 80% 72% 75% 75% 71% 63% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of U.S. citizens and permanent residents in ERCs Percentage of U.S. citizens and permanent residents in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of U.S. citizens and permanent residents are calculated out of the total number of personnel, including personnel who did not report citizenship. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for faculty for or for postdoctoral for 2011, 2013, or The percentages of personnel who did not report citizenship are as follows: 2011: 10.51%, 2012: 11.93%, 2013: 10.58%, 2014: 11.00%, 2015: 13.49%, 2016: 18.65%.

18 15 Personnel Conducting ERC Research, FY 2016 REU Students (219 total; 1% foreign) Undgergraduates (614 total; 7% foreign) Faculty (696 total; 14% foreign) Postdoctoral Students (258 total; 59% foreign) Master's Students (268 total; 46% foreign) Doctoral Students (1094 total; 53% foreign) Domestic Personnel: 2,155 Foreign Personnel: 994 NOTES: The sum of the number of personnel for each category may exceed the total number of personnel because personnel may belong to multiple categories. Percentage of foreign personnel is calculated out of domestic and foreign personnel, excluding personnel who did not report citizenship.

19 Citizenship in ERCs, FY , 84% 40, 9% 30, 7% 495, 82% 61, 10% 50, 8% 652, 80% 91, 11% 75, 9% 609, 81% 91, 12% 56, 7% 605, 81% 111, 15% 30, 4% Faculty 28, 27% 63, 60% 14, 13% 71, 37% 101, 53% 18, 10% 133, 47% 133, 47% 15, 6% 134, 44% 146, 47% 28, 9% 101, 36% 154, 55% 24, 9% Postdoctoral 273, 43% 309, 48% 56, 9% 424, 46% 440, 48% 59, 6% 542, 47% 531, 46% 80, 7% 575, 45% 601, 47% 97, 8% 536, 43% 595, 48% 108, 9% Doctorate 99, 52% 73, 38% 19, 10% 111, 55% 78, 38% 15, 7% 203, 57% 127, 36% 23, 7% 163, 47% 150, 44% 32, 9% 137, 44% 133, 42% 44, 14% Master s 456, 80% 24, 4% 88, 16% 551, 72% 47, 6% 166, 22% 875, 75% 88, 8% 203, 17% 885, 75% 78, 6% 222, 19% 886, 71% 58, 5% 307, 24% Undergraduate , 78% 99, 12% 80, 10% , 37% 151, 50% 39, 13% 541, 42% 585, 46% 151, 12% 161, 42% 130, 34% 90, 24% 800, 63% 50, 4% 415, 33% U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents Foreign Citizens Citizenship Not Reported

20 17 ERC Industrial/Practitioner Members and Supporting Organizations, FY * 100% Contributing Organizations 75% 50% Funders of Associated Projects Funders of Sponsored Projects 25% Foreign Industrial/Practitioner Members U.S. Industrial/Practitioner Members 0% (Totals) (431) (522) (561) (648) (684) (660) (631) * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

21 18 ERC Industrial/Practitioner Members and Supporting Organizations, FY * FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Organization Type Contributing Organizations Funders of Associated Projects Funders of Sponsored Projects Foreign Industrial/Practitioner Members U.S. Industrial/Practitioner Members Total Number of Organizations Total Number of Centers Average Number of Organizations per Center * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

22 19 Industrial/Practitioner Member Support by Year, FY * Type of Support FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016** Total Membership Fees $3,990,050 $4,261,082 $4,542,049 $4,942,433 $4,747,675 $4,309,666 $4,422,334 Member-Sponsored Projects Total Dollar Amount Member-Associated Projects Total Dollar Amount Member In-Kind Total Dollar Amount*** Total Dollar Amount, Industrial/Practitioner Member Support to Center $728,000 $462,911 $1,018,645 $311,757 $285,000 $182,000 $538,019 $3,579,699 $4,560,092 $6,877,611 $8,239,885 $4,508,750 $8,308,585 $4,033,479 $1,493,709 $2,477,725 $2,155,791 $3,284,191 $2,685,819 $2,954,553 $2,628,437 $9,791,458 $11,761,810 $14,594,096 $16,778,266 $12,227,244 $15,754,804 $11,622,269 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support received by the end of the current reporting year. Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE). *** Data for this row are from the In-Kind Support reported in the Organizations section.

23 20 Industrial/Practitioner Member Support by Year, FY * $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016** Total Membership Fees Member-Sponsored Projects Total Dollar Amount Member-Associated Projects Total Dollar Amount Member In-Kind Total Dollar Amount*** * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support received by the end of the current reporting year. Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE). *** Data for this line are from the In-Kind Support reported in the Organizations section.

24 21 Distribution of Industrial/Practitioner Members by Industry Size, FY Small Medium Large 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 48% 48% 48% 44% 46% 42% 42% 44% 47% 46% 9% 9% 8% 9% 8% Large Medium Small NOTES: The total number of firms is as follows: 2012: 306, 2013: 337, 2014: 364, 2015: 342, 2016: 322. Industry sizes are as follows: Small = <500 employees, Medium = 500 1,000 employees, Large = >1,000 employees.

25 22 Total ERC New Cash Support, FY 2016 (19 ERCs) University 7% Other Sources 4% Industry 7% ERC Awards 43% Non-NSF Government 25% Other NSF 13% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $159.1 million NOTES: Percentages shown are Direct and Associated Support combined. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

26 23 Functional Budgets of ERCs in the Aggregate, FY 2016* Indirect Cost 12.8% New Facilities/ New Construction 0.1% General and Shared Equipment 1.0% Leadership/ Administration/ Management 7.7% Center-Related Travel 1.2% Industrial Collaborations/ Innovation Programs 2.6% Research 67.5% Education Programs 7.0% Direct Support total: $165,516,303 * Includes in-kind support but not residuals

27 24 Industrial/Practitioner New Support to 19 ERCs, FY 2016 Visiting Personnel, 3.9% 2015 = 2.8% Other Assets, 14.1% 2015 = 13.1% New Facilities in Existing Buildings, 0% 2015 = 0% Equipment, 15.8% 2015 = 23.7% New Construction, 0.8% 2015 = 0% Cash Support, 65.4% 2015 = 60.3% Total value of support: $7.6 million

28 25 Government Support by ERC Technology Sector, FY *, **, *** Advanced Manufacturing Biotechnology and Healthcare $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $750,000 $750,000 $ $ $3,000,000 $2,250,000 Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure $3,000,000 $2,250,000 Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $750,000 $750,000 $ $ * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support includes Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, and In-Kind Support. *** Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE)

29 26 Industry Support by ERC Technology Sector, FY *, **, *** Advanced Manufacturing Biotechnology and Healthcare $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $ $ Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $ $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support includes Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, and In-Kind Support. *** Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE)

30 27 FY 2016 Sources of Support to 19 ERCs, by Technology Sector Advanced Manufacturing 30% Biotechnology and Healthcare 12% Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology Direct Support Associated Support Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure 33% Total value of support: $168.3 million NOTE: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included.

31 28 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Advanced Manufacturing Sector: 5 Centers (Iowa, Minnesota, NASCENT, Rutgers, SynBERC) Other Sources University 8% 6% ERC Awards 29% Industry 9% Non-NSF Government 32% Other NSF 16% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $50.9 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

32 29 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Biotechnology and Healthcare Sector: 3 Centers (ASSIST, NCAT, WashSNE) University 16% Other Sources 5% Industry 4% Non-NSF Government 7% Other NSF 3% ERC Awards 65% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $20.1 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

33 30 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure Sector: 6 Centers (CBBG, NCSU, QESST, NEWT, ReNUWIt, CURENT) University 8% Other Sources 11% Industry 7% ERC Awards 41% Non-NSF Government 21% Direct Support Other NSF 12% Associated Support Total value of support: $55.2 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

34 31 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology Sector: 5 Centers (CIAN, LESA, POETS, MIRTHE, TANMS) Non-NSF Government 27% Industry 9% University 6% Other Sources 3% Other NSF 11% ERC Awards 44% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $42.1 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

35 32 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: All ERCs 100% $426,681 $491,206* All ERC Expenditures 75% $15,657,325 50% $52,471, 641 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects 25% $8,473,683 $28,921,307 0% Translational Research (21%) Non-Translational Research (79%) Total value of support: $112 million * $491,206 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

36 33 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Advanced Manufacturing 100% $53,914* $161,225** Advanced Manufacturing Expenditures 75% 50% 25% $7,064,347 $19,738,887 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects $9,325,170 0% $1,164,984 Translational Research (22%) Non-Translational Research (78%) Total value of support: $38 million * $53,914 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size. ** $161,225 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

37 34 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Biotechnology and Healthcare 100% $56,559 $0 Biotechnology and Healthcare Expenditures 75% 50% 25% $813,599 $1,221,974 $2,282,314 $5,925,605 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects 0% Translational Research (20%) Non-Translational Research (80%) Total value of support: $10 million

38 35 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure 100% $0 $158,007* Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure Expenditures 75% 50% 25% $6,689,994 $3,812,904 $13,662,963 $6,689,994 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects 0% Translational Research (26%) Non-Translational Research (74%) Total value of support: $33 million * $158,007 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

39 36 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology 100% $316,208 $171,974* Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology Expenditures $1,089,385 75% 50% 25% 0% $2,273,821 $16,787,477 $10,207,699 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects Translational Research (13%) Non-Translational Research (87%) Total value of support: $31 million * $171,974 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

40 37 All ERC Disciplines, FY 2016 Social Sciences 1% Other Engineering 13% Other 7% Mechanical Engineering 9% Agriculture 1% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 15% Chemical Engineering 6% Civil Engineering 3% Computer Science 4% Education 1% Mathematics and Physical Sciences 7% Health 2% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 31% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 690

41 38 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Advanced Manufacturing, FY 2016 Mathematics and Physical Sciences 1% Health 1% Mechanical Engineering 18% Other 9% Other Engineering 4% Social Sciences 1% Agriculture 1% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 6% Education 0% Computer Science 0% Civil Engineering 0% Chemical Engineering 23% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 36% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 146

42 39 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Biotechnology and Healthcare, FY 2016 Mathematics and Physical Sciences 0.5% Health 6% Mechanical Engineering 16% Other 4% Other Engineering 6% Social Sciences 1% Agriculture 0% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 30% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 29% Education 2% Chemical Engineering 2% Civil Engineering 0% Computer Science 4% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 133

43 40 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure, FY 2016 Other Engineering 30% Social Sciences 1% Agriculture 2% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 4% Chemical Engineering 3% Other 11% Civil Engineering 10% Mechanical Engineering 1% Mathematics and Physical Sciences 4% Health 0% Computer Science 3% Education 1% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 30% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 194

44 41 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology, FY 2016 Mathematics and Physical Sciences 18% Health 3% Mechanical Engineering 6% Other Other Engineering Social Sciences 4% 7% 0% Agriculture 1% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 0% Chemical Engineering 1% Civil Engineering 0% Computer Science 9% Education 1% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 50% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 217

45 42 Country of Citizenship of ERC Foreign Personnel, FY 2016

46 43 Locations of the Active ERCs, FY 2016

47 44 Locations of Foreign Participating Organizations, FY 2016

48 45 Locations of Foreign Participating Institutions, FY 2016

49 46 Number of Institutions and Organizations With Financial Headquarters Abroad Collaborating With ERCs, by Country of Origin, FY 2016*, ** United Arab Emirates Taiwan Spain South American Countries, Other Poland Norway New Zealand Mexico Malawi Israel Hong Kong Greece Belgium Austria Ireland Georgia Turkey Sweden Denmark Brazil Australia Singapore Netherlands Italy India Finland Canada Switzerland France South Korea United Kingdom Japan Germany China * Displays counts of Industrial/Practitioner members, Funders of Associated Projects, Funders of Sponsored Projects, Contributing Organizations, Collaborating Institutions, Non-ERC Institutions Providing REU Students, and Foreign Partner Institutions ** Community college and Pre-college institutions are excluded.

50 47 Comparisons by Member Firms of the Performance of ERC Hires vs. Non-ERC Hires*