POLICY BOARD MEETING STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308 MODESTO, CA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, :00 PM

Transcription

1 City of Ceres City of Hughson City of Modesto City of Newman City of Oakdale City of Patterson City of Riverbank City of Turlock City of Waterford County of Stanislaus POLICY BOARD MEETING STANCOG BOARD ROOM 1111 I STREET, SUITE 308 MODESTO, CA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, :00 PM Board Agendas and Minutes: Policy Board agendas, minutes and copies of items to be considered by the StanCOG Policy Board are available at least 72 hours prior to the meeting at the StanCOG offices located at 1111 I Street, Suite 308, Modesto, CA during normal business hours. The documents are also available on StanCOG s website at Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Policy Board after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at the address listed above during normal business hours. These documents are also available on StanCOG s website, subject to staff s ability to post the documents before the meeting. Public Comment Period: Matters under the jurisdiction of the Policy Board, and not on the posted agenda, may be addressed by the general public at the beginning of the regular agenda and any off-agenda matters before the Policy Board for consideration. However, California law prohibits the Policy Board from taking action on any matter which is not on the posted agenda unless it is determined to be an emergency by the Policy Board. Any member of the public wishing to address the Policy Board during the Public Comment period will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chair of the Board grants a longer period of time. At a Special Meeting, members of the public may address the Board on any item on the Agenda at the time the item is considered by the Board. Public Participation on a Matter on the Agenda: Please step to the podium at the time the agenda item is announced by the Chairperson. In order to ensure that interested parties have an opportunity to speak, any person addressing the Policy Board will be limited to a maximum of 3 minutes unless the Chair of the Board grants a longer period of time. Reasonable Accommodations: This Agenda shall be made available upon request in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C ) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code ). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact Cindy Malekos at (209) during regular business hours at least 72 hours prior to the time of the meeting to enable StanCOG to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Notice Regarding Non-English Speakers: StanCOG Policy Board meetings are conducted in English and translations to other languages is not provided. Anyone wishing to address the Policy Board is advised to have an interpreter or to contact Cindy Malekos at (209) during regular business hours at least 72 hours prior to the time of the meeting so that StanCOG can provide an interpreter. Aviso con Respecto a Personas que no Hablan el Idioma de Inglés: Las reuniónes de la Mesa Directiva del Consejo de Gobiernos de Stanislaus son conducidas en Inglés y traducciones a otros idiomas no son disponibles. Cualquier persona que desea dirigirse a la Mesa Directiva se le aconseja que traiga su propio intérprete o llame a Cindy Malekos al (209) durante horas de oficina regulares o a lo menos 72 horas antes de la reunión de la Mesa Directiva del Consejo de Gobiernos de Stanislaus, para proporcionarle con un intérprete. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL AGENDA Page 1 of 3

2 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS These matters may be presented only by interested persons in the audience. Discussion is limited to three minutes or at the discretion of the Chair. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Policy Board Minutes of 9/20/17 B. Motion to Approve by Resolution the FY 2016/17 Local Transportation Fund Allocations for Other Purposes: City of Patterson C. Motion to Approve by Resolution the 2017 Statewide Active Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation MPO Call for Projects for FY 2017/18 and 2018/19 D. Motion to Authorize the Executive Director by Resolution to Execute a Contract for State Lobbying Services 6. PRESENTATIONS A. Recognition of Service on the StanCOG Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) by Constance Anderson B. Recognition of Service on the StanCOG Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) by Lennox Harris and Chuck Shoup C. Recognition of the Appointment of Paul Van Konynenburg to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. StanCOG Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) 30-Day Public Comment Period and Public Hearing 8. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS A. Measure L Funds Received 9. INFORMATION ITEMS The following items are for information only. A Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Monthly Project Status Report FFY 2016/17 B. Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Program Overview C. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Safety Performance Management D. Executive Committee Minutes of 10/2/17 Page 2 of 3

3 E. Management and Finance Committee Minutes of 9/25/ CALTRANS REPORT 11. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 12. MEMBER REPORTS 13. ADJOURNMENT Next Regularly Scheduled Policy Board Meeting: November 15, :00 pm StanCOG Board Room 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA Page 3 of 3

4 CONSENT CALENDAR

5 POLICY BOARD MEETING StanCOG Board Room 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA Minutes of September 20, 2017 (Wednesday) 6:00 pm PRESENT: ALSO PRESENT: Chair Bill Zoslocki, Ted Brandvold, Jenny Kenoyer (City of Modesto); Vito Chiesa, Jim DeMartini, Terry Withrow (Stanislaus County); Mike Kline (City of Ceres); Jeramy Young (City of Hughson); Nick Candea (City of Newman); Tom Dunlop (City of Oakdale); Deborah Novelli (City of Patterson); Richard O Brien (City of Riverbank); Gary Soiseth (arrived during Item 4) (City of Turlock); Mike Van Winkle (City of Waterford) Tom Dumas (Caltrans, District 10); Monica Streeter (Neumiller and Beardslee); Arthur Chen, Elisabeth Hahn, Stephen Hanamaikai, Karen Kincy, Cindy Malekos, Isael Ojeda, Rosa Park, Lakshmi Rajagopalan, Debbie Trujillo (StanCOG); Veronica Tobar (Catholic Charities- Environmental Justice Program); Scott Calkins, Julie Brughelli (Members of the Public); Lisa Donahue (Dibs); Phil McGuire (McGuireManagement Consultancy); Tiffani Fink (Paratransit, Inc.); Kendall Flint (RGS). 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bill Zoslocki called the meeting to order at 6:01 pm. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Scott Calkins inquired about ACE. Member Chiesa indicated that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) had been released, and Member Richard O Brien said that he would be attending the ACE Board meetings each month on behalf of the Policy Board. Veronica Tobar thanked Kendall Flint for working with her regarding setting up an RTP/SCS workshop. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Policy Board Minutes of 6/21/17 Page 1 of 5

6 B. Motion to Accept Designation of One Representative from each Member Agency for the Measure L Citizens Oversight Committee C. Motion to Adopt by Resolution Amendment 6 to the 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Type 2 & 3 Formal Amendment *By Motion (Member Jenny Kenoyer/Member Tom Dunlop), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board approved the Consent Calendar. 6. PRESENTATION A. Bike to Work Month 2017 Results Lisa Donahue provided a presentation on the events that took place in the jurisdictions for Bike to Work Month and the overall results of the activities. 7. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS A. Motion to Adopt by Resolution the FFY FTA 5310 Regional Project Priority List Stephen Hanamaikai provided an overview of the FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program. He said that StanCOG had reviewed and evaluated two project applications for vehicle and equipment purchases for this grant cycle, and provided project and funding request information. He noted that the Catholic Charities funding request was for $365,206 and not $265,206 as indicated in the staff report. *By Motion (Member Richard O Brien/Member Tom Dunlop), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board adopted by Resolution the FFY FTA 5310 Regional Project Priority List. B. Motion to Adopt by Resolution the FY 2017/18 Budget and Overall Work Program (OWP) Amendment 1 Karen Kincy provided a summary of the amendment to the budget which resulted in a net reduction of $307 to the budget. *By Motion (Member Richard O Brien/Member Tom Dunlop), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board adopted by Resolution the FY 2017/18 Budget and OWP Amendment 1. C. Motion to Adopt Resolution to Change the Designation of the Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA); and Adopt Resolution to Terminate Current Agreement with Paratransit, Inc. and Authorize the Executive Director to Enter into Contract with a Newly Designated Agency Rosa Park provided background information on the implementation of the CTSA by the Policy Board in She indicated that, with the passage of Measure L and the amount of local funding available to the CTSA/MOVE increasing, a locally-based organization was the more appropriate structure. She addressed some items that were raised in a letter to Policy Board members from Tiffani Fink, that was brought to her attention. Phil McGuire provided comments on the transition process. Tiffani Fink had comments about the short timeline involved in the transition. There was a discussion on the benefits and the steps involved in moving in a new direction, while also ensuring there was no interruption in Page 2 of 5

7 service to the community. Members Vito Chiesa and Terry Withrow offered their appreciation to Paratransit for the work it had done as the CTSA for Stanislaus County. *By Motion (Member Richard O Brien/Member Jenny Kenoyer), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board adopted Resolution to rescind the CTSA designation from Innovative Pardigm/Paratransit, Inc. effective October 31, 2017; and designate MOVE Stanislaus as the CTSA for the Stanislaus County Region effective November 1, *By Motion (Member Richard O Brien/Member Mike Van Winkle), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board adopted Resolution to terminate the Professional Services Agreement with Paratransit, Inc. for the operation of the CTSA effective October 31, 2017 and authorize the Executive Director to send a termination notice; and authorized the Executive Director to execute a three-year contract with MOVE Stanislaus for the operation of the Stanislaus Region s CTSA effective November 1, 2017, in an amount not to exceed $750,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds for year 1, an amount not to exceed $800,000 for year 2, and an amount not to exceed the annual amount claimed per Article 4.5 PUC of the TDA. D. Motion to Approve Recommended Projects for the 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) Lakshmi Rajagopalan explained that the newly-adopted 2018 STIP Estimate included $17 million in funding for Stanislaus County. She reminded members that in 2016 the Estimate had been reduced by the State which delayed funding for the McHenry Avenue Widening and State Route 132 West Freeway/Expressway projects. She said that based on the criteria, those two projects were suggested for funding with the 2018 STIP. Scott Calkins had questions about the SR 132 project in the RTIP. Rosa Park answered that the draft RTIP would be available for a public review and comment period from October 1-30, *By Motion (Member Vito Chiesa/Member Jenny Kenoyer), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board approved the recommended two projects (McHenry Avenue Widening and State Route 132 West Freeway/Expressway) for the 2018 RTIP. E. Motion to Approve the Demographic Forecast; Land Use Scenario Themes; Goals and Objectives, and Performance Measures for Development of the 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Elisabeth Hahn provided an overview of the elements that would be used in the development of the 2018 RTP/SCS that the Valley Vision Stanislaus (VVS) Steering Committee had been reviewing and discussing at their meetings. *By Motion (Member Richard O Brien/Member Tom Dunlop), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board approved the Demographic Forecast; Land Use Scenario Themes; Goals and Objectives, and Performance Measures for Development of the 2018 RTP/SCS. F. Motion to Recommend the Proposed Amendment Language to the Transportation Development (TDA) be Sent to Senator Anthony Cannella s Office for Consideration Stephen Hanamaikai provided an overview of the discussions that had been taking place regarding the challenges transit operators were having in meeting the current fare box ratio requirements, and a possible amendment to the TDA for the Stanislaus region. He said proposed language for an amendment was included in the staff report that staff and the transit operators had developed. Member Mike Kline suggested that broader Page 3 of 5

8 language be used. *By Motion (Member Richard O Brien/Member Tom Dunlop), and a vote (with Mike Kline abstaining), the Policy Board recommended the proposed amendment language to the TDA be sent to Senator Anthony Cannella s office for consideration. G. State Route (SR) 132 West Cooperative Agreement with the City of Modesto Monica Streeter reviewed the agreement that had been developed with the City of Modesto for the Plans, Specifications and Estimates Stage of Phase 1 of the State Route 132 Project with the City of Modesto. There was a discussion about the terms included in the agreement. Julie Brughelli cited health issues of residents near the project. Scott Calkins expressed concerns about the project. *By Motion (Member Tom Dunlop/Member Mike Van Winkle), and a unanimous vote, the Policy Board approved the SR 132 West Cooperative Agreement with the City of Modesto. 8. INFORMATION ITEMS The following items were provided for information only A. Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) Overview B. Measure L Funds Received C Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Monthly Project Status Report FFY 2016/17 D. Executive Committee Minutes of 8/7/17 and 9/11/17 E. Management and Finance Committee Minutes of 8/2/17 and 9/6/17 F. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Minutes of 8/2/17 and 9/6/17 G. Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) Minutes of 8/1/17 and 9/5/17 H. Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Minutes of 8/2/17 I. Valley Vision Stanislaus (VVS) Steering Committee Minutes of 7/20/17, 8/1/17 and 9/5/17 9. CALTRANS REPORT Tom Dumas provided copies of the latest issue of the Milemarker. He also said that Planning grants were due October 20 th. 10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT NONE Page 4 of 5

9 11. MEMBER REPORTS Member Richard O'Brien reported that the CEO of Lyft said at the League of California Cities Conference that he attended that a high amount of electric self-driving vehicles would be in use by ADJOURNMENT Chair Bill Zoslocki adjourned the meeting at 8:05 pm. Next Regularlv Scheduled PoliC!' Board Meeting: October 11, :00 J>m StanCOG Boat d Room 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA Minutes Prepared By: Page 5 of5

10 TO: Policy Board Staff Report Resolution FROM: Karen Kincy, Senior Financial Services Specialist DATE: September 26, 2017 SUBJECT: FY 2016/17 Local Transportation Fund Allocations for Other Purposes: City of Patterson Recommendation By Motion: Approve by Resolution the FY 2016/17 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Allocations for Other Purposes: City of Patterson. Background On June 15, 2016, the StanCOG Policy Board adopted LTF apportionments for FY 2016/17 nonmotorized and Other purposes. On November 16, 2016 the StanCOG Policy Board adopted an LTF supplemental apportionment for FY 2015/16. The City of Patterson has submitted a claim for those funds, as follows: City of Patterson: 2016/17 Purpose Source Claim Nonmotorized LTF $ 15,563 Streets LTF-99400a 67,119 $ 82,682 The claim has been reviewed and determined to be complete. The claimant has submitted all required audits and reports. The audits for FY 2015/16 contain no audit findings. The rules governing the LTF require the adopting resolution to contain specific findings prior to any LTF allocations. The findings are as follows:

11 Required Findings (1) The claimant's proposed expenditures are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan. (2) The sum of the claimant's allocations from the Local Transportation Fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year. (3) There are no unmet transit needs which are reasonable to meet within the jurisdiction. Advisory Committee Action This item was presented at the Management and Finance Committee at their October meeting. The motion was approved. Should you have any questions regarding this staff report, please contact Rosa De León Park, Executive Director, at or via at Attachment: 1. Resolution 17-06

12 STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION APPROVING FY 2016/17 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND ALLOCATIONS FOR OTHER PURPOSES: CITY OF PATTERSON WHEREAS, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and a Metropolitan Planning Organization, pursuant to State and Federal designation; and WHEREAS, StanCOG has been designated as the Transportation Planning Agency with the responsibility to administer the Transportation Development Act; and WHEREAS, the City of Patterson has submitted transportation claims in conformance with all applicable rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, StanCOG has adopted a Regional Transportation Plan which identifies transit needs which are reasonable to be met, with consideration to the size and location of identifiable groups likely to be dependent upon transit, the adequacy of both private and public services and potential alternatives; and WHEREAS, StanCOG upon proper review has determined that there are no unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet within the jurisdiction of the City of Patterson. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based on the staff report and the evidence presented, the Policy Board finds: (1) The claimant's proposed expenditures are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan. (2) The sum of the claimant's allocations from the Local Transportation Fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year. (3) There are no unmet transit needs which are reasonable to meet within the jurisdiction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Patterson transportation allocations are hereby approved for the following purposes and amounts: City of Patterson: 2016/17 Purpose Source Claim Nonmotorized LTF $ 15,563 Streets LTF-99400a 67,119 $ 82,682 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Executive Director, or her designee, is authorized to issue an allocation instruction to the County Auditor and issue disbursement instructions to honor claimant invoices as funds become available.

13 The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Stanislaus Council of Governments on the 11th day of October, A motion was made and seconded to adopt the foregoing Resolution. Motion carried and the Resolution was adopted. MEETING DATE: October 11, 2017 ATTEST: BILL ZOSLOCKI, CHAIR ROSA DE LEÓN PARK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

14 TO: Policy Board Staff Report Resolution FROM: Elisabeth Hahn, Principal Planner Debbie Trujillo, Planning Technician DATE: September 29, 2017 SUBJECT: Recommendation By Motion: 2017 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation MPO Call for Projects for FY 2017/18 and 2018/19 Approve by Resolution 17-07, the recommended projects for the 2017 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation MPO Call for Projects for FY 2017/18 and 2018/19. Background The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, Senate Bill 1 (SB1), which was signed by the Governor on April 28, 2017, appropriated new funding for the Active Transportation Program (ATP) providing an additional $100 million annually from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) to the ATP starting in FY 2017/18. The California Transportation Commission (CTC), which is responsible for administering the ATP, has adopted guidelines for the augmentation covering fiscal years 2017/18 and 2018/19 with $96 million available statewide. The funds for FY 2017/18 and 2018/19 will augment the funding for the previously completed Cycle 3 of the ATP program. The funds available are state funds only, therefore, projects funded in the 2017 ATP Augmentation do not need to be federal-aid eligible. Discussion On June 30, 2017, the CTC announced a statewide call for projects for FY s 2017/18 and 2018/19. The adopted program guidelines state that projects will be evaluated based on their 2017 ATP Cycle 3 scores (state or MPO) and project deliverability according to the following priority order: 1) Projects that can deliver all components in 2017/18 and 2018/19; 2) Projects that can deliver one or more but not all of their components in 2017/18 and 2018/19;

15 3) Projects that applied in 2017 ATP Cycle 3 but were not awarded funding. Through the Statewide component, the City of Patterson s Ninth Street Improvement project, in the amount of $907,000, will be recommended by CTC staff for approval at the October 18 19, 2017 CTC meeting. Following the California Transportation Commission s Statewide 2017 ATP Augmentation call, StanCOG held its regional call for projects for funds in the amount of $1,158,000 to be programmed in FY s 2017/18 and 2018/19. The following additional policies applied only to the MPO Component of the 2017 ATP Augmentation: CTC will allow the supplanting of funds at the MPO s discretion. The supplanting of funds only applies to projects that received less ATP funding than requested in the 2017 ATP Cycle 3. Projects that applied for funding through construction in the 2017 ATP Cycle 3 Statewide Component and were not awarded, but which received only preconstruction funding through the 2017 MPO Cycle 3 Component may apply for funding through construction (the unfunded phases) in the Statewide Component. The following projects from the Stanislaus Region were eligible to apply for the 2017 ATP Augmentation MPO component: 2017 ATP Augmentation MPO Component Eligible Projects Applicant Project Title Final Score StanCOG* Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety and Education Campaign 84 Turlock** SRTS ADA Pedestrian Improvement 80 Waterford** City of Waterford SRTS Crosswalk Safety Project 74 Ceres Safe Route to School Morgan Road Corridor Improvement 65 Riverbank Eastern Stanislaus Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Path Project 63 Riverbank Patterson Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Connectivity Project 59 Riverbank Riverbank Active Transportation Plan 52 *Awarded funding through ATP Cycle 3 MPO Component ** Partially awarded through ATP Cycle 3 MPO Component The above mentioned projects were reviewed by an evaluation committee during the original Cycle 3 MPO component and were comprised of 1 representative from each of the following categories: Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee Member StanCOG Staff Representative Large Local Agency Representative Small/Medium Local Agency Representative

16 Transit Operator In response to the call for projects for the ATP Augmentation MPO component, StanCOG received applications from the City of Ceres, City of Riverbank, and City of Turlock. Staff reviewed the requests received, and based on the original scores and guidelines of the 2017 ATP Augmentation, recommends the projects listed in the table below. Applicant 2017 ATP Augmentation MPO Recommendations Project Title Final Score Funds Requested Funds Recommended Turlock* SRTS ADA Pedestrian Improvement 80 $ 413,000 $ 413,000 Ceres Safe Route to School Morgan Road Corridor Improvement *Awarded funding through ATP Cycle 3 MPO Component 65 $ 753,000 $ 745,000 Through the 2017 ATP Cycle 3 call for projects, the City of Turlock received a partial award of $1,108,000. Through the ATP Augmentation MPO component, Turlock requests $413,000 to supplant local funds used to fully fund the project awarded during the Cycle 3 call. The City of Ceres is being recommended to receive the remaining augmentation funds based on their score. Advisory Committee Action: This staff report was presented to the Technical Advisory Committee and the Management and Finance Committee. No comments were made. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Rosa De León Park, Executive Director, at or via at rpark@stancog.org. Attachments: ATP Augmentation Guidelines ATP Augmentation StanCOG Regional Component Recommendations 3. Resolution 17-07

17 Final 2017 Active Transportation Program Augmentation Guidelines These guidelines are the policies and procedures specific to the use of and fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account for the Active Transportation Program (ATP) hereby known as the 2017 ATP Augmentation. The California Transportation Commission (Commission) is statutorily required to adopt the guidelines and selection criteria for and define the types of projects eligible to be funded through the ATP. I. Authority and Purpose Senate Bill (SB) 1, signed by the Governor on April 28, 2017, directs $100 million annually from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to the ATP beginning in the fiscal year. The following policies and procedures address the use of and fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account for the ATP. Unless otherwise expressly modified by statute or these guidelines, the Commission will follow the 2017 ATP Guidelines at II. Funding and Programming Years The 2017 ATP Augmentation is funded from the approximately $200 million allocated from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to the ATP in fiscal years and The Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds are state funds. Therefore, projects funded in the 2017 ATP Augmentation do not need to be federal-aid eligible. The initial programming capacity for the 2017 ATP Augmentation program is in fiscal years and Some fiscal year and programming capacity may become available as previously programmed projects request advancement into fiscal years and III. Distribution The funding available for the 2017 ATP Augmentation will be distributed into the Statewide Component, the Small Urban & Rural Component, and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Component, in the same manner as specified in Section II (5) of the 2017 ATP Guidelines. The 2017 ATP Augmentation Fund Estimate must indicate the funds available for each of the program components. The Budget Act of 2017 appropriates no less than $4 million a year to the Commission for allocation to the California Conservation Corps for active transportation projects to be developed and implemented by the California Conservation Corps and certified community conservation corps. Commission staff is consulting with the California Conservation Corps to develop specific provisions for the use of these funds. Once these provisions have been developed, they will be incorporated into these guidelines by addendum and adopted by the Commission. IV. Schedule The following schedule lists the major milestones for the development and adoption of the 2017 ATP Augmentation: Guidelines Development Workshop June 9, ATP Augmentation Guidelines presented to Commission June 28, 2017 Commission hearing and adoption of 2017 ATP Augmentation Guidelines June 28, 2017 Call for Projects June 30, 2017 Project submittals to Commission (postmark date) August 1, 2017 Staff recommendation for Statewide and Small Urban & Rural Components posted August 31, 2017 MPO project programming recommendations to Commission October 19, 2017 June 29, 2017 Page 1 of 4

18 Commission adopts 2017 ATP Augmentation - Statewide and Small Urban & Rural October 18-19, 2017 Components Commission adopts 2017 ATP Augmentation - MPO Component December 6-7, 2017 V. Project Eligibility Funding for the 2017 ATP Augmentation will only be available to: Projects programmed in the adopted 2017 ATP that can be delivered earlier than currently programmed Projects that applied for funding in the 2017 ATP but were not selected for funding Projects that were awarded funds in 2017 ATP will remain in the component from which they were originally funded. In other words, a 2017 ATP project awarded funding from the Small Urban & Rural Component will remain in that component and a 2017 ATP project awarded funding from the MPO Component will remain in that component. The only exceptions to this policy will apply to projects that received funding for only one of the phases that were originally requested due to insufficient funds in the MPO Component of the program, an applicant may request funding for the other phases in the Statewide Component. Applicants may not request more ATP funding than was requested in the original application, however, applicants may shift requested funding amounts between components as long as there is no net increase in requested funds. Applicants may request less than their original funding request if the full scope of the project will still be delivered. In other words, some project elements may have been funded from other sources. Applicants may add scope to their original project if no increase in ATP funds is requested for the scope increase. Projects must deliver the same or greater benefits than what was proposed in the original application. A. Statewide and Small Urban & Rural Components 1) Projects that were awarded funds in the 2017 ATP Statewide and Small Urban & Rural Components may apply to advance one or more of their project components into the and/or programming years. 2) Projects that applied for funding in the 2017 ATP but were not selected for funding. Scores can be found at the following link: _rev.pdf. In the Statewide and Small Urban & Rural Components, the 2017 ATP Augmentation funds will not be used to supplant already committed project funding. In the event Commission staff determines that there are not enough viable projects submitted in the 2017 ATP to fully utilize the funds available in the Statewide and/or Small Urban & Rural Components of the 2017 ATP Augmentation, the Commission may elect to hold a 2017 ATP Augmentation supplemental call for projects. June 29, 2017 Page 2 of 4

19 MPO Component 1) Projects that were awarded funds in the 2017 ATP MPO Component may apply to advance one or more of their project components into the and/or programming years. 2) Projects on the MPO 2017 ATP contingency list. The following policies will apply only for the MPO Component: For the 2017 ATP Augmentation MPO Component, the Commission will allow the supplanting of funds at the MPO s discretion. The supplanting of funds only applies to projects that received less ATP funding than requested in the 2017 ATP. Projects that applied for funding through construction in the Statewide Component but which received only preconstruction funding through the MPO Component may apply for funding through construction (the unfunded phases) in the Statewide Component. The funds distributed to the Lake Tahoe MPO in the MPO Component can only be used to fund projects located entirely within California. In the event an MPO determines that there are not enough viable projects from their 2017 ATP MPO contingency list to fully utilize the funds available in their 2017 ATP Augmentation component, the MPO may hold a 2017 ATP Augmentation supplemental call for projects. An MPO making such a determination must, by August 31, 2017 submit a letter signed by the Chief Executive Officer explaining the basis for the determination. A supplemental MPO call for projects must utilize the MPO s 2017 ATP guidelines. Recommendations for funding, along with copies of all applications received, must be submitted to the Commission by October19, VI. Project Selection Process All projects applying for funding in the 2017 ATP Augmentation, including projects with no change to the schedule or funding plan, must submit the following supplemental application material. A. Supplemental Application Material 1) Updated Schedule and Funding Plan Each applicant must submit a Project Programming Request Form. A template of this form in Excel may be found at The Project Programming Request Form must list Federal, State, and local funding categories by fiscal year, and must include an updated schedule (project milestones) and updated cost information if necessary. The applicant must also include documentation that the availability of all other funds committed to the project are consistent with the updated schedule, i.e. the project must still be fully funded. 2) Authorization Letter Each applicant must submit a letter, signed by the Chief Executive Officer or other officer authorized by the applicant s governing board, confirming that the project can be delivered in the time frame proposed in the updated Project Programming Request and that the project is still fully funded. In addition to the two required documents above, applicants may submit a one-page application update that explains any significant changes to the project since the original application submittal. This updated information will be used for project scope clarifications only and not June 29, 2017 Page 3 of 4

20 result in a revised score. Project must deliver the same or greater benefits than proposed in the original application. B. Criteria and Evaluation 1) Projects will be selected for the 2017 ATP Augmentation based on the project s 2017 ATP score and project deliverability according to the following priority order. a. Projects that can deliver all components in and b. Projects that can deliver one or more but not all of their components in and The capacity to program all components of these projects will depend on fiscal year and programming capacity becoming available as previously programmed projects are advanced. c. Some fiscal year and programming capacity may become available as previously programmed projects request advancement into fiscal years and Therefore, other projects that applied for funding in the 2017 ATP (those that cannot deliver one or more of their project components in the or programming years) may compete for funding in the 2017 Augmentation. 2) As potential applicants review their projects schedules when they consider applying for the 2017 ATP Augmentation they should keep in mind that most of the available funding will be in fiscal years and Therefore, projects that can be delivered using these earlier year funds are more likely to be successful in the 2017 ATP Augmentation. C. Submittal of Supplemental Application Material Supplemental application material must include the signature of the Chief Executive Officer or other officer authorized by the applicant s governing board. Project applications should be addressed or delivered to: Susan Bransen, Executive Director California Transportation Commission 1120 N Street, Mail Station 52 Sacramento, CA The Commission will consider only projects for which five hard copies and one electronic copy of the aforementioned supplemental material are submitted postmarked by the appropriate deadline. Applicants are encouraged to submit a hard copy of their original application. By the same date, an additional copy must also be sent to the Regional Transportation Planning Agency or County Transportation Commission within which the project is located and to the Metropolitan Planning Organization (a contact list can be found at VII. SB 1 Accountability Implementing agencies receiving ATP funds through the RMRA must follow the project reporting requirements detailed in Section 24 of the 2017 ATP Guidelines. In addition, implementing agencies must include project information signage stating that the project was made possible by SB 1 The Road Repair and Accountability Act of June 29, 2017 Page 4 of 4

21 2017 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation Regional Component FY 2017/18 and 2018/19 Applicant Project Title Total Project Cost ATP Fund Request FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Recommended Projects Turlock Safe Routes to School ADA Pedestrian Improvements, Various Locations $1,760,000 $0 $413,000 Ceres Safe Routes to School Morgan Road Corridor Improvement $979,000 $71,000 $674,000 Other Projects Evaluated Riverbank 1 Eastern Stanislaus Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Path Project $1,914,000 $1,876,000 Riverbank 3 Riverbank Active Transportation Plan $120,000 $100,000 $0 Riverbank 2 Patterson Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Connectivity Project $1,405,000 $1,377,000 $0 *Projects in green are being recommended for award as part of StanCOG's Regional Call for Projects

22 STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2017 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP) AUGMENTATION MPO CALL FOR PROJECTS FOR FY 2017/18 & 2018/19 WHEREAS, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and a Metropolitan Planning Organization, pursuant to State and Federal designation; and WHEREAS, the 2017 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation is a two-year program covering Fiscal Years 2017/18 and 2018/19; and WHEREAS, the 2017 ATP Augmentation Fund Estimate identifies $1.158 million available in ATP funds for the Stanislaus Region; and WHEREAS, StanCOG has developed the ATP Augmentation programming in accordance with the California Transportation Commission s adopted 2017 ATP Augmentation Guidelines; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following 2017 ATP Augmentation funding recommendations for FY 2017/18 and 2018/19 are hereby adopted as shown in Exhibit A; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized to make administrative changes as needed, to ensure that the program is implemented in the most efficient and cost effective manner possible. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was introduced at a regular meeting of the Stanislaus Council of Governments, on the 11th day of October A motion was made and seconded to adopt the foregoing Resolution. Motion carried and the Resolution was adopted. MEETING DATE: October 11, 2017 BILL ZOSLOCKI, CHAIR ATTEST: ROSA DE LEÓN PARK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

23 2017 Active Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation Regional Component FY 2017/18 and 2018/19 Applicant Project Title Total Project Cost ATP Fund Request FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Recommended Projects Turlock Safe Routes to School ADA Pedestrian Improvements, Various Locations $1,760,000 $0 $413,000 Ceres Safe Routes to School Morgan Road Corridor Improvement $979,000 $71,000 $674,000 Other Projects Evaluated Riverbank 1 Eastern Stanislaus Regional Bicycle/Pedestrian Path Project $1,914,000 $1,876,000 Riverbank 3 Riverbank Active Transportation Plan $120,000 $100,000 $0 Riverbank 2 Patterson Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Connectivity Project $1,405,000 $1,377,000 $0 *Projects in green are being recommended for award as part of StanCOG's Regional Call for Projects

24 TO: Policy Board Staff Report Resolution FROM: Rosa De León Park, Executive Director DATE: October 4, 2017 SUBJECT: Contract for State Lobbying Services By Motion: Adopt Resolution to authorize the Executive Director to negotiate and execute a contract with Khouri Consulting for state lobbying services. Background On September 15, 2017, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to provide state lobbying services for StanCOG was released. Three proposals were received. An evaluation committee comprised of members of the Policy Board reviewed and carefully evaluated the proposals. Discussion The Evaluation Committee has made a selection by consensus based on the qualifications, professional experience and overall response to the RFQ by the consultant. Table 1 below displays the three respondents for the State Lobbying Services and evaluation results. Table 1: Respondents Evaluation Results Firm Average Score 1. Khouri Consulting Shaw/Yoder Antwih, Inc Smith,Watts & Hartmann 77 The evaluation committee selected Khouri Consulting for State Lobbying Services. Khouri Consulting is a sole proprietorship, certified with the State of California as a small business enterprise. Khouri Consulting provides comprehensive, high-caliber legislative advocacy and consulting services to a broad range of clients, with a particular specialization in the transportation arena. It specializes in lobbying for regional transportation planning agencies, public transit districts, which includes securing infrastructure funding, and general local government issues. Its principal, Gus Khouri, has over 20 years of experience in this field. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Rosa Park, Executive Director at or via at rpark@stancog.org. Attachment: 1. Resolution 17-08

25 STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE STANCOG EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH KHOURI CONSULTING FOR STATE LOBBYING SERVICES WHEREAS, the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency, a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and designated Council of Governments for Stanislaus County; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 2017, StanCOG staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to solicit the services of a qualified consultant to provide state lobbying services; and WHEREAS, Khouri Consulting was selected by consensus by the selection committee based on their qualifications, professional experience and overall response to the RFQ; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Stanislaus Council of Governments authorizes the Executive Director to negotiate and execute a contract with Khouri Consulting for an amount not-to-exceed $60,000, for state lobbying services. Now, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized to make any administrative changes to the executed contracts scope or budget, as needed, to ensure that the project is implemented in the most time efficient and cost effective manner possible. The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the Policy Board of the Stanislaus Council of Governments, on the 11 th day of October A motion was made and seconded to adopt the foregoing Resolution. Motion carried and the Resolution was adopted. MEETING DATE: October 11, 2017 ATTEST: ROSA DE LEÓN PARK, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BILL ZOSLOCKI, CHAIR

26 PUBLIC HEARING

27 TO: Policy Board Staff Report Public Hearing FROM: Elisabeth Hahn, Principal Planner Lakshmi Rajagopalan, Associate Planner DATE: September 29, 2017 SUBJECT: StanCOG Draft 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) 30-Day Public Comment Period and Public Hearing Background A 30-day public review and comment period commenced on October 01, 2017, and concludes on October 30, 2017, to elicit comments on the Stanislaus Council of Governments 2018 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). The StanCOG Draft 2018 RTIP document may be accessed via the agency s public website at or by visiting the StanCOG office, located at 1111 I Street, Suite 308, Modesto, California. Written comments regarding this document must be received no later than 3:00 p.m. on October 30, 2017 to be included as a part of the record. In addition, a public hearing will be held at the October 11, 2017 Policy Board Meeting to solicit public comments on the StanCOG Draft 2018 RTIP document. Discussion The 2018 STIP Fund Estimate (FE) was adopted by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on August 16, According to the adopted Fund Estimate, the Stanislaus region has $ million in additional programming capacity in the 2018 STIP. These funds are available to the Stanislaus region for the 4th and 5th year of the 2018 STIP cycle, in Fiscal Years 2021/22 through 2022/23. StanCOG s STIP county share available for programming is $17,224,000. Of this amount, $16,464,000 is available for our Regional Improvement Program (RIP) projects and $760,000 is designated by the State to StanCOG for Planning, Programming, and Monitoring (PPM). Projects prioritized in the 2018 RTIP reflect funding due to the amended 2016 STIP Fund Estimate (FE) in response to a decrease in the price-based excise tax in The 2018 RTIP proposes programming the total of $ million in RIP shares available to the Stanislaus region. In addition, a total of $ million will be carried over from the 2016 STIP cycle into the 2018 RTIP.

28 The table below lists projects that are proposed to be programmed with the new Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds into the 2018 StanCOG RTIP. Projects Programmed with New RIP Funding Project Title Program Year RIP Total McHenry Avenue Widening FY 19/20 $4,100,000 from Ladd Rd/Patterson Rd (State Route 108) to Stanislaus River Bridge State Route 132 West FY 19/20 $12,364,000 Freeway/Expressway Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) FY 19/20 FY 21/22 $760,000 Total for Projects Programmed with New RIP Funding $17,224,000 As Stanislaus County s Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), StanCOG is required to prepare and submit the 2018 RTIP to the CTC by December 15, Staff have completed the draft 2018 RTIP, and circulated for a 30-day public review and comment period, in accordance with the CTC adopted 2018 STIP Guidelines. It is anticipated that the StanCOG 2018 RTIP will be adopted by the StanCOG Policy Board on November 15, The STIP programming schedule is as follows: STIP PROGRAMMING SCHEDULE September 5, 2017 October 1, 2017 StanCOG develops STIP Programming and circulates through Committees and Board for input October 1, 2017 StanCOG prepares RTIP October 1, 2017 October 30, day Public Notice & Comment Period October 11, 2017 RTIP Public Hearing November 15, 2017 StanCOG Policy Board adopts RTIP December 15, 2017 RTIP is submitted to Caltrans February 1, 2018 CTC STIP hearing for Northern California February 28, 2018 CTC publishes staff recommendation March 21-22, 2018 CTC adopts 2018 STIP Advisory Committee Action: This staff report was presented to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Management and Finance Committee (MFC). Questions regarding the scope of the State Route 132 West Freeway/Expressway - Phase 1 were asked at the MFC meeting and clarifications provided. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Rosa De León Park, Executive Director, at or via at rpark@stancog.org.

29 DISCUSSION & ACTION ITEMS

30 TO: Policy Board Staff Report Discussion FROM: Karen Kincy, Senior Financial Services Specialist DATE: September 27, 2017 SUBJECT: Measure L Funds Received Recommendation Consider information presented. Background The FY 2017/18 Measure L projections are $38,000,000. The attached schedule shows the status of the Measure L receipts as of September 15, Monthly estimated allocations are made by the Board of Equalization (BOE) using methodologies to estimate sales tax revenues based on past reports for the region. The actual amount for sales tax revenues are calculated in the month following the end of each quarter, at which time the BOE will deduct their administrative fees for the quarter and issue a final quarterly payment for the net amount based on the actual quarterly revenue received. Discussion Measure L funds are received monthly from the State Board of Equalization. The twelve months of the fiscal year are listed across the top of the attached schedule. The first month StanCOG received funds for FY was in June Distributions made to jurisdictions for FY will be based on receipts from June 2017-May There are three Measure L schedules attached. The first table presents the total monthly allocation to date as compared to the total estimated for the Fiscal Year. The second schedule represents the allocation of Measure L funds by category and jurisdiction. The third schedule shows the total breakdown by jurisdiction and/or project. As shown in the attached table, as of September 15, 2017 StanCOG received $12,533,817.

31 Should you have any questions regarding this staff report, please contact Rosa De León Park, Executive Director, at or via at Advisory Committee Action This item was provided to the Management and Finance Committee and to the Executive Committee as an informational item. Attachments: 1. Measure L Funds Received 2. Measure L Allocations Year to Date 3. Measure L Jurisdiction Allocations

32 ATTACHMENT 1 STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEASURE L FUNDS RECEIVED FY 2016/17 - FY 2017/18 Fiscal Year Measure L Estimate *Advance April Jun** *Advance May Jul *Advance June Aug *Advance July Sept** MEASURE L SALES TAX RECEIVED BY FISCAL YEAR *Advance Aug Oct *Advance Sept Nov *Advance Oct Dec** *Advance Nov Jan *Advance Dec Feb *Advance Jan Mar** *Advance Feb Apr *Advance Mar May Total Received Balance of Estimate 2017/18 $38,000,000 2,326,549 2,310,300 3,080,400 4,816,568 $12,533,817 25,466,183 Total 38,000,000 2,326,549 2,310,300 3,080,400 4,816, ,533,817 25,466,183 ** One advance payment is made each month, and the quarterly reconciliation and payment (cleanup) is distributed in conjunction with the first advance for the subsequent quarter. NOTE: No clean-up was done for June 2017 Deposit; Program did not start until April 2017

33 ATTACHMENT 2 STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEASURE L ALLOCATIONS FY Year To Date September 22, 2017 Total Allocation from BOE 12,533, Less StanCOG Adminstration 1% 125, Remaining Allocations 12,408, Expenditure Plan Categories/Funds Local Streets and Roads - 50% Traffic Management - 10% Bike and Pedestrian - 5% Regional Projects - 28% Allocation Percentages Jurisdiction Categories/Funds TOTAL CATEGORY TOTAL JURISDICITON 6,204, % Ceres - Local Streets & Roads 394, % Hughson - Local Streets & Roads 78, % Modesto - Local Streets & Roads 2,220, % Newman - Local Streets & Roads 78, % Oakdale - Local Streets & Roads 239, % Patterson - Local Streets & Roads 282, % Riverbank - Local Streets & Roads 212, % Turlock - Local Streets & Roads 946, % Waterford - Local Streets & Roads 78, % Stanislaus County - Local Streets & Roads 1,673, % 6,204, ,240, % Ceres - Traffic Management 78, % Hughson - Traffic Management 15, % Modesto - Traffic Management 444, % Newman - Traffic Management 15, % Oakdale - Traffic Management 47, % Patterson - Traffic Management 56, % Riverbank - Traffic Management 42, % Turlock - Traffic Management 189, % Waterford -Traffic Management 15, % Stanislaus County - Traffic Management 334, % 1,240, , % Ceres - Bike and Pedestrian 39, % Hughson - Bike and Pedestrian 7, % Modesto - Bike and Pedestrian 222, % Newman - Bike and Pedestrian 7, % Oakdale - Bike and Pedestrian 23, % Patterson - Bike and Pedestrian 28, % Riverbank - Bike and Pedestrian 21, % Turlock - Bike and Pedestrian 94, % Waterford - Bike and Pedestrian 7, % Stanislaus County - Bike and Pedestrian 167, % 620, Distribution By Project 3,474, StanCOG Undistributed - Regional Projects 3,474, Total Measure L - Monthly Report to Jurisidictions Page 2 of 5 9/28/2017

34 ATTACHMENT 2 MEASURE L ALLOCATIONS FY Year To Date September 22, 2017 Total Allocation from BOE 12,533, Less StanCOG Adminstration 1% 125, Remaining Allocations 12,408, Expenditure Plan Categories/Funds Allocation Percentages Jurisdiction Categories/Funds TOTAL CATEGORY TOTAL JURISDICITON Transit Providers - Other Transportation Programs and Services - 7% 868, Point-To-Point Services for Seniors, Veterans and Persons With Disabilities - 30% StanCOG Undistributed - Point-to-Point Services % Move 260, Community Connections - 30% Distribution By Project StanCOG Undistributed - Community Connections 260, Ceres - Community Connections Hughson - Community Connections Modesto - Community Connections Newman - Community Connections Oakdale - Community Connections Patterson - Community Connections Riverbank - Community Connections Turlock - Community Connections Waterford - Community Connections Stanislaus County - Community Connections Transit Services - 20% 173, StanCOG Undistributed -Transit Services 7.00% Ceres - Transit Services 12, % Modesto - Transit Services 90, % Turlock - Transit Services 13, % Stanislaus County - Transit Services 57, % 173, Rail Services - 20% Distribution By Project StanCOG Undistributed -Rail Services 173, , Total Allocations 12,533, ,533, Total Measure L - Monthly Report to Jurisidictions Page 3 of 5 9/28/2017

35 ATTACHMENT 3 STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEASURE L JURISDICTION ALLOCATIONS FY YEAR TO DATE AS OF SEPTEMBER 2017 Jurisdiction Category Amount StanCOG Adminstrative Fees 125, Ceres Local Streets & Roads 394, Ceres Traffic Management 78, Ceres Bike & Pedestrian 39, Ceres Transit Services 12, Total Ceres 525, Hughson Local Streets & Roads 78, Hughson Traffic Management 15, Hughson Bike & Pedestrian 7, Total Hughson 101, Modesto Local Streets & Roads 2,220, Modesto Traffic Management 444, Modesto Bike & Pedestrian 222, Modesto Transit Services 90, Total Modesto 2,976, Newman Local Streets & Roads 78, Newman Traffic Management 15, Newman Bike & Pedestrian 7, Total Newman 101, Oakdale Local Streets & Roads 239, Oakdale Traffic Management 47, Oakdale Bike & Pedestrian 23, Total Oakdale 311, Patterson Local Streets & Roads 282, Patterson Traffic Management 56, Patterson Bike & Pedestrian 28, Total Patterson 366, Riverbank Local Streets & Roads 212, Riverbank Traffic Management 42, Riverbank Bike & Pedestrian 21, Total Riverbank 275, Stanislaus County Local Streets & Roads 1,673, Stanislaus County Traffic Management 334, Stanislaus County Bike & Pedestrian 167, Stanislaus County Transit Services 57, Total Stansilaus County 2,233, Turlock Local Streets & Roads 946, Turlock Traffic Management 189, Turlock Bike & Pedestrian 94, Turlock Transit Services 13, Total Turlock 1,244, Waterford Local Streets & Roads 78, Waterford Traffic Management 15, Waterford Bike & Pedestrian 7, Total Waterford 101,625.44

36 ATTACHMENT 3 STANISLAUS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEASURE L JURISDICTION ALLOCATIONS FY YEAR TO DATE AS OF SEPTEMBER 2017 Jurisdiction Category Amount MOVE Point to Point Connections 260, Undistributed Community Connections Project Based 260, Undistributed Regional Projects -Project Based 3,474, Undistributed Rail Services 173, Total Undistributed Funds 3,908, Total Year-To-Date 12,533,816.76

37 INFORMATION ITEMS

38 TO: Policy Board Staff Report Information FROM: Elisabeth Hahn, Principal Planner Debbie Trujillo, Planning Technician DATE: September 29, 2017 SUBJECT: Background 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Monthly Project Status Report FFY 17/18 As the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Stanislaus Region, StanCOG programs federal and state transportation funding and ensures that those funds are being secured efficiently. Failing to meet project delivery dates for any phase of a project may jeopardize federal funding to the region. The 2017 FTIP programmed the region's projects over a period of four federal fiscal years (FFY 16/17, 17/18, 18/19, 19/20) and is a comprehensive list of transportation projects that receive federal funds, require a federal action, or are regionally significant. StanCOG closely monitors the status of all projects programmed in the FTIP through close communication with the local jurisdictions. Discussion The new Federal Fiscal Year 2017/18 begins October 1, The attached 2017 FTIP Monthly Project Status Report for FFY 2017/18 provides the projects programmed for the new year. Advisory Committee Action: This staff report was presented to the Technical Advisory Committee and the Management and Finance Committee. No comments were made. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Rosa De León Park, Executive Director, at or via at rpark@stancog.org. Attachment: FTIP Monthly Project Status Report for FFY 2017/18 (Dated: 09/18/17)

39 September 18, Federal Transportation Improvement Program Monthly Project Status Report for FFY 2017/18 Agency Total Funds Obligated (/Local) Total Amount in FTIP Percentage Obligated from Total Amount in FTIP % Obligated from Total Amount Agency was Apportioned in FTIP Ceres $0 $2,398, % 0.00% Hughson $0 $360, % 0.00% Modesto $0 $5,344, % 0.00% Newman $0 $663, % 0.00% Oakdale $0 $268, % 0.00% Patterson $0 $249, % 0.00% Riverbank $0 $1,207, % 0.00% Turlock $0 $3,155, % 0.00% Waterford $0 $375, % 0.00% Stanislaus County $0 $6,213, % 0.00% StanCOG $0 $607, % 0.00% $0 $20,843, % Monthly Project Status Report 1 of 5