US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS. Michael E. Carlson, P.E. TxDOT Houston District Bridge Design. TTI Short Course TxDOT Houston District Bridge

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS. Michael E. Carlson, P.E. TxDOT Houston District Bridge Design. TTI Short Course TxDOT Houston District Bridge"

Elfrieda Cooper
6 years ago
Views:

1 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS Michael E. Carlson, P.E. TxDOT Houston District Bridge Design

2 THE US 290 CORRIDOR

3 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS $49 million* July 2014 Williams Brothers Construction Co. Table Revised: 11/6/2013 Added C-2 Details: 9/26/2014 3

4 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS US 290 INTRODUCTION & SCOPE 13 Total Segments (Approx. 38 Miles) Our Design Began Late 2009 Foresaw Compressed Letting Schedule HNTB is the Project Management Coordinator. Provided Bridge Layouts By a Variety of Consultants Layouts Were Created In-House In Later Segments ABOUT TxDOT HOUSTON DISTRICT BRIDGE Currently 23 Total Employees 14 P.Es (10 P.Es designing) 4 Cad Operators BRINSAP Personnel & Administrative 33 Employees Back in August 2006 (When J.C. Liu Retired) 2/3 the Staff, Staff is Less Experienced, & Every Job is Now a Rush Job. 14 People Involved When US 290 Design Began 4

5 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS Segment CSJ Type * # of Bridges Let Date Winning Bid (Millions) * Total Bridge Sheets Seg K (2) Recon 20 May-11 $ Seg G (6) Recon 9 Sep-12 $ Seg J1 (1) Recon 10 Oct-12 $ Seg F (7) Widen 12 Mar-13 $ Seg E (8) Recon 6 Apr-13 $ Seg H (5) Recon 16 Apr-13 $ Seg I (4) Recon 11 May-13 $ Seg J2 (3) Recon 6 Nov-13 $ Seg D (9) Widen 12 Nov-13 $ Seg C (10) Widen 5 (C1 & C2) Jul-14 (C1) $45.6 (C1) 137 (C1 & C2) Seg B (11) Widen 6 Seg A (12) Widen 14 * Includes Only Bridges Designed By & Signed & Sealed Sheets Provided By TxDOT Houston District Bridge Foundation Layout Redlines Provided By By TxDOT Houston District Bridge, However Signed & Sealed By Consultants Total of $1.1 Billion Total of 5058 Bridge Sheets 5

6 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS US 290 Corridor Compressed Schedule By Segment 100% 90% % Design Time 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Seg K Seg 6 Seg J1 Seg 7 Seg 8 Seg 5 Seg 4 Seg J2 Seg 9 Seg 10 Seg 11 Seg 12 0% Design Year (Fiscal Year) 6

7 HOW DID WE DO IT? Changing the Responsibilities & Division of Work Amongst Personnel.

8 The Traditional Way We Design Bridges District Bridge Engineer Assigns New Bridge to Team Team Leader A Project Manager Team Leader B Project Manager Team Leader C Project Manager Coordinates with other designers outside of bridge & distributes work amongst designers within bridge. Supports team personnel. Design Engineer Design Engineer or EIT Cad Operator Does majority of design, works with EITs and CAD Operators. Does drafting for majority of the bridge details. 8

9 The Mass Production Design of Bridges Steel superstructures require the most design and detailing time. A specific engineer and CAD operator is designated to this task. District Bridge Engineer BGS is created as soon as Bridge layouts are confirmed Coordination begins to create superstructure design sheets. Design Engineer BGS Cad Operator Steel Design Engineer Steel Superstructure Team Leader coordinates with PMC, assigns work loads, and offers design support. Team Leader Project Manager Design Engineer Concrete Superstructure Cad Operator Superstucture Design Engineer Support / Other Design Engineer Substructure Design Engineer Foundations Design Engineer / EIT Quantities As soon as the superstructure is laid out, substructure engineers begin coordinating with CAD operators to produce sheets. Cad Operator Substructure Foundation loading is calculated and documented for Geotech engineers. Foundations are designed and detailed. Quantities are calculated and tabulated for the entire bridge and are inserted on design sheets. 9

10 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS Mass Production Pros Encourages Standardization For Each Design Element Greatly Increases Speed of Design, Drafting, & Later Calculations Provides Consistency That Aids Contractor Later During Construction. Provides Consistency of Architectural Elements. Reduces Redesign of Similar Elements Designs Can Be Grouped and Re-Referenced A Similar Design May Already Exist on Another Bridge. Pull and Document the Previous Design. Make a Library. As the Library Grows Design Becomes Even More Efficient. 10

11 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS Mass Production Challenges Requires Complete Bridge Layouts Increased Collaboration Between Multiple Engineers / CAD Operators CAD File Ownership Concerns Increased Burnout Amongst Personnel Engineers Become Rusty on Designing Elements Outside Their Mass Production Task 11

12 STANDARDIZE Architecture, Design, & Detailing.

13 Houston Area Green Ribbon Project Developed with the Katy Freeway Reconstruction. Comprised of 4 Schemes Vertical Scheme Horizontal Scheme Wave Scheme Interchange Scheme (Similar to Horizontal Scheme with more robust structural elements) 13

Houston Area Green Ribbon Project Green Ribbon Requirements US 290 comprised of Vertical Scheme & Interchange Scheme Columns Standardizes Use of Inverted-T Caps, U-Beams, and Steel Tub Girders.

14 Houston Area Green Ribbon Project Green Ribbon Requirements US 290 comprised of Vertical Scheme & Interchange Scheme Columns Standardizes Use of Inverted-T Caps, U-Beams, and Steel Tub Girders. Architectural Details & Rustication is Defined. We Went One Step Further Encouraged standardization of engineering details through standardization of architectural elements. Standardized Inverted-T Cap Dimensions Throughout. U54 Beams Used Throughout Reconstructed Areas Unless Steel Tubs Required. Column Details Were All Standardized and a Library was Developed. Footing Details Were All Standardized and a Library was Developed. 14

Standardizing Designs Design Engineer Pros Engineer is encouraged to adapt methods of increasing design efficiency when faced with hundreds of elements to design.

15 Standardizing Designs Design Engineer Pros Engineer is encouraged to adapt methods of increasing design efficiency when faced with hundreds of elements to design. Engineer is encouraged to tabularize results or create a library of previous designs. Engineer is encouraged to pull previous designs for other similar elements. CAD Operator Pros Drafting takes a long time. Encouraged to reuse as much as possible. Using existing goby's prevents missing callouts and notes. CAD Operator becomes more familiar with details can catch dimension errors. 15

16 CHANGE PRIORITIES Changing the Priority and Order of Work.

17 Prioritize Your Work Manage Employee Work Loads Start drawing sheets before design. Some sheet may not need to be drawn to the perfect scale. As long as dimensions and callouts are correct. Minimize down time. Be Smart With Your Redlines Breakdown and simplify redlines between CAD Operator and Engineer. Make sure one element is perfect then copy to minimize having to make the same change later to multiple elements. What Really Needs to Be Shown on the Plans Eliminate repeated design information on different sheets. Can it be built with what is provided? Minimizes the locations of revisions if something changes. 17

18 WORK SMARTER Let The Computer Do The Heavy Lifting.

19 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting The Biggest Waste of Time For Engineers & CAD Operators DATA MANAGEMENT! 19

20 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Design Spreadsheet Tools Smartly Let standardization work for you. Engineer is automatically encouraged to make tools to enhance productivity while designing hundred of similar elements Design spreadsheets to require as little tampering as possible but also so they can be easily modified for different situations. One tool is not required to do everything. Simplify each tool. Improve your tools when downtime permits between jobs. When possible, design tools to work together. Design tools that require inputs only once. 20

Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Do Not 10 Key! Use Axiom importer as much as possible for all data (bar tables, etc) Design your tools around Axiom. However.

21 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Do Not 10 Key! Use Axiom importer as much as possible for all data (bar tables, etc) Design your tools around Axiom. However. This requires cooperation between Engineers and CAD Operators. Originally this was a challenge as CAD Operators were concerned of allowing others access to drawings. Everyone is happier now. 21

22 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: BGS Extractors BGS output format is very predicable. Spreadsheet Visual Basic macros developed in house. Extract bearing seat elevations, bearing taper reports, slab data, & beam data from BGS outputs. Tabulation of quantities summarized Working to be even more Axiom friendly Results in major decrease of time and reduction of errors. Factoid: Is This Really Necessary? Connector C (Located In Segment J1) Connects 2 Lanes of IH-10 Traffic to US 290 Westbound. It is 95 Spans Long (11,690ft). Would you like to copy and paste all that BGS output data to summarize you EQ sheet? 22

23 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: BGS Extractors 23

24 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Rebar Quantity Tables This Excels with standardization. Setup for direct Axiom from calculations to CAD bar table. Revised, and revised again to be easily adaptable for different bents. Easily adopt to bents with similar rebar details. Change the length, skew, bar spacing and go on Does not require re-drawing of bent that changed slightly. A disadvantage of Bentley Rebar. Resulted in a major decrease of time and reduction of errors. Factoid: No Errors! No substantial quantity errors have been found since letting using these tools. There have been very limited field change orders resulting from these techniques. 24

25 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Rebar Quantity Tables 25

26 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Column & Foundation Tables Library of columns & footings developed for Green Ribbon. Every footing and column used along the corridor has a unique name. Aka: Footing DSF-2, or Column Type A is always the same no matter what segment of US 290 you are on. Footing dimensions, quantities are looked up from the master library. Column and foundation spreadsheets are setup to require very little modification and are formatted the same to allow data to be easily migrated between each spreadsheet. Fully Axiom supported. Resulted in a major decrease of time and reduction of errors. 26

27 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Column Tables 27

28 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Foundation Tables 28

29 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Foundation Tables 29

30 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Superstructure U-Beam Design We had to design many, many, many U-Beams. How to Design U-Beams (We started this before PGSuper). Run BGS 2 Times. Compute LLDF using Bridge Division Spreadsheets. Compute your loadings due to dead loads. Create a PSTRS14 Input file Run PSTRS14 Use a spreadsheet to compute drops and slab section depths with BGS and PSTRS14 output data. Run BGS one last time...and it better all have satisfied the design requirements, otherwise start from the top again. How long should it take an engineer to perform the tasks after creating BGS for a 20 span 28 wide connector? 30

31 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Corbett Automatic Superstructure Design We can do it in less than 10 minutes. Remember the biggest waste of time is data management so let the computer do the heavy lifting. Envisioned by John F. Corbett back in Revived and improved upon back in 2009, and again in Automatically integrates BGS, LLDF, PSTRS14, and Bearing Drop data. Automatically Imports BGS LS2 Data (# of Beams, Beam Lengths, Spacing's & Skews. Provides user capable automatic calculation and distribution of dead loads such as railings, medians, sidewalks, and haunch weights. Automatically calculates LLDF using Bridge Division spreadsheets for each beam using exact BGS output data. Automatically creates and runs PSTRS14 input files Automatically imports PSTRS14 outputs such as number of strands, f ci, f c, deflections and cambers. Automatically calculates bearing drops and slab depth sections. Automatically summarizes BGS drops and slab depth sections. 31

32 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Corbett Automatic Superstructure Design 32

33 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Corbett Automatic Superstructure Design 33

34 Let the Computer Do the Heavy Lifting Example: Corbett Automatic Superstructure Design 34

35 SOFTWARE New Software Used.

36 Software Viathor VBent Uses beam element finite element modeling Allowed for a quick cap design or CAP18 check. Program includes load combinations, no need to spend hours specifying. Program includes wind loading, and breaking forces, along with dead load and HL-93 automatic calculation. Quick and easy calculation of single column foundation loadings. Basic post-tensioning capabilities. Allowed for quick special designs: irregular footings, straddle bents, eccentric Bents, & unsymmetrical bents. A model can take minutes to develop versus a week to develop a STAAD model. Very reasonable software cost to TxDOT. 36

37 Software Viathor Vbent Example: Single Column Bent Model Inputs - Deck - Cap - Reinforcing 37

38 Software Viathor Vbent Example: Single Column Bent Model Inputs - Column - Foundation - Reinforcing - Live Loads 38

39 Software Viathor Vbent Example: Single Column Bent Reports - Summary - Cap Flexure - Foundation Loads 39

40 Software Viathor Vbent Example: Single Column Ecc. Post Tensioned 40

41 Software Viathor Vbent Example: Straddle Caps 41

42 RESULTS Conclusions & Results.

43 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS US 290 Corridor Timesheet Billed Engineering Hours / Signed Bridge Sheet US 290 Corridor - Timesheet Billed Engineering Hours / Signed Bridge Sheet TxDOT Houston District Bridge Design Billed Hrs (Functions 164 & 170) Per Signed & Sealed Bridge Sheet Seg K (2) Seg G (6) 17.6 Seg J1 (1) Average 21Hrs / Sheet 11.4 Seg F (7) Seg E (8) Seg H (5) Seg I (4) Seg J2 (3) Seg D (9) US 290 Job Segment - In Order of Lettings ( ) 21.6 Seg C (10) Seg B (11) Seg A (12) Currently in Design 43

44 US 290 DOING MORE WITH LESS Segment CSJ Type * # of Bridges * Total Hrs * Total Bridge Sheets * Hrs / Sheet Seg K (2) Recon 20 22,330 1, Seg G (6) Recon 9 12, Seg J1 (1) Recon 10 16, Seg F (7) Widen 12 6, Seg E (8) Recon 6 6, Seg H (5) Recon 16 9, Seg I (4) Recon 11 8, Seg J2 (3) Recon 6 9, Seg D (9) Widen 12 3, Seg C (10) Widen 5 2, Seg B (11) Widen 6 Seg A (12) Widen 14 * Includes Only Bridges Designed By & Signed & Sealed Sheets Provided By TxDOT Houston District Bridge Foundation Layout Redlines Provided By By TxDOT Houston District Bridge, However Signed & Sealed By Consultants 44

45 QUESTIONS? THANK YOU US DOING MORE WITH LESS Michael E. Carlson, P.E TxDOT Houston District Bridge Design Michael.Carlson@txdot.gov

Request for Qualifications For

Request for Qualifications For D E L A W A R E V A L L E Y R E G I O N A L P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I ON The ACP Building, 190 N. Independence Mall West Telephone: (215) 592-1800 Philadelphia, PA 19106-1520 FAX: (215) 592-9125