ORIGINAL. Public Private Transportation Proposal USR 460. Richmond PROPOSER. September 14, 2006 TEAM MEMBERS
|
|
- Stephen Lambert
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PROPOSER 7700 Chevy Chase Dr, Building I - Suite 500-C Austin, TX Mr. F. Jeff Hetzer Program Manager Innovative Project Delivery Division Virginia Department of Transportation 1221 E. Broad Street, Fourth Floor Reception Desk, Innovative Project Delivery Division Richmond, VA Public Private Transportation Proposal USR 460 Richmond September 14, 2006 Norfolk ORIGINAL TEAM MEMBERS T&R ANALYSIS TECHNICAL DESIGN AND BUILD
2 Response to Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project CINTRA Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. Table of Contents Submittal Letter EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Certification Regarding Debarment Confidentiality Documentation Disclosure Agreement/Certification Form PROPOSAL TAB 1: QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE TAB 2: PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS TAB 3: PROJECT FINANCING TAB 4: PUBLIC SUPPORT TAB 5: PROJECT BENEFIT/COMPATIBILITY APPENDIX RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SAFETY RECORDS RATINGS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL MATERIALS SEPTEMBER 14, 2006
3
4 Response to Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project CINTRA Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. Executive Summary CINTRA, Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte S.A (Cintra) is pleased to present to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) its preliminary vision for the development of the US Route 460 Toll Road Project. This Conceptual Proposal has been developed to meet the following goals sought by VDOT: Address roadway deficiencies Improve safety Accommodate increasing freight shipments Reduce Travel Delay Provide adequate hurricane evacuation capability Improve military strategic connectivity Meet legislative mandates that identified the roadway as a high priority corridor Meet local economic development plans In this ambitious planning effort, Cintra uses innovative financial techniques to assure that development of the US Route 460 Toll Road Project will ensure the best value for the Commonwealth of Virginia. The lead organization of this team and only equity owner is Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte S.A. Cintra will make its equity contributions through Cintra US Corp a wholly owned subsidiary company organized under Delaware law, to serve as the top-tier entity through which Cintra conducts business in the United States. The Concessionaire Company (provisionally named Cintra-460 Virginia LP ) formed by Cintra US Corp and likely future US Equity Members, will ultimately enter into the Comprehensive Agreement (CA) with VDOT. Cintra has arranged a consortium (the Consortium) with Ferrovial Agroman, S.A., in which Cintra is the major equity member and Ferrovial Agroman is the nominated general contractor. The Consortium also includes technical engineering and traffic and revenue (T&R) advising services from Earth Tech and Maunsell respectively. This first class team has the proven track record and expertise to provide a feasible, practical, financially sound and sustainable project to VDOT, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and its taxpayers and motorists. Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A., is headquartered in Madrid, Spain, and listed on Madrid s Stock Exchange. It has subsidiaries in three continents, including a branch office for the development of US operations in Austin, Texas. It is one of the world s largest private-sector developers of transport infrastructure, with committed equity investments of more than $2 billion, and currently managing 19 toll highways (more than 1,000 miles) in Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Chile, Canada (407 ETR) and the US (Chicago Skyway and Indiana Toll Road). Cintra has vast experience leading and managing multidisciplinary teams. In March 2005, Cintra Zachry LP, a company led and under 85% control by Cintra, signed a Comprehensive Development Agreement (CDA) with the Texas Department of Transportation and became its strategic partner in the development of the TTC-35 High Priority Trans Texas Corridor. Recently Cintra has been awarded with the Segments 5&6 of the SH-130 in Texas. The unique management approach that Cintra brings to this project is based in a clear distribution of roles and responsibilities that takes full advantage of the capabilities of each member of the team. This approach has been proved in many successful projects across the world as specified in the attached references. SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 PAGE 1 OF 5
5 Response to Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project CINTRA Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. As previously mentioned, Cintra shall incorporate a specific legal and organizational structure in the US, the Concessionaire, that shall ultimately execute a CA with VDOT in case of award. The primary role of the Concession Company will be to secure the financing of the project through the means of equity, to be injected by the shareholders, and debt, to be funded by either commercial banks or alternative sources. The Concessionaire will enter into a fixed price, fixed term design & build agreement with Ferrovial Agroman or a Design and Build Joint Venture (DBJV) in which Ferrovial Agroman will be involved. Thus, under this standard business model the contractual responsibilities related to design and construction will be directly passed from the Concessionaire to Ferrovial Agroman, or the DBJV (if applicable), under a lump sum, back-to-back or mirror contract. However the concessionaire company will be the only responsible party before VDOT. Ferrovial Agroman will also be responsible to meet required design and construction standards. The Concessionaire will bear the responsibility to operate and maintain the facility and preserve the asset. In addition, the Concessionaire expects to perform routine inspections and reporting to the Grantor in order to ensure conformance with maintenance performance requirements and standards. As part of the operation, the Concessionaire expects to collect tolls corresponding to the Project. Roles and Responsibilities The Concession Company will hold all the liabilities derived from this project. The rest of team members will act as subcontractors of the Concession Company therefore only liable in front of such Company. In this particular project, the Proposal approach is directed towards maximizing the value to be drawn from the Project and the benefits to be perceived by VDOT, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and its taxpayers and motorists. Cintra s approach is to propose a BASE CASE and two additional alternatives, the BASE OPTIMIZED and the ENHANCED CASES. The three different scenarios that intend to: Expeditiously solve transportation needs of the area Comply with environmental procedures and approvals Satisfy and, when permissible, exceed technical requirements Eliminate or reduce the need for public funding The proposed cases are described as follows: SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 PAGE 2 OF 5
6 Response to Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project CINTRA Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. BASE CASE This case proposes the construction of the entire facility based on Corridor Build Alternative 1 (CBA 1), as described in the US Route 460 Location Study, with minor design modifications. These modifications arise from a review of the Concept Interchanges provided by VDOT and consist of improvements to the safety and functionality of the major interchanges with I-295 and US 58. The Base Case also proposes the implementation of a mixed toll system allowing both manual and electronic toll collection and a complete Intelligent Transportation System. The Base Case is to be completed during a 3-year construction schedule after a Concession Agreement is produced and ROW is acquired. Based on the current preliminary assumptions in terms of construction cost, revenues and financial structure and considering a Concession Term of 50 years, the financial analysis of this alternative shows that this project is not self-performing, therefore the Developer will require state funding to an amount of $174.5 million for this Base Case solution. In this case it is assumed that disbursements from this source will be made Pro-Rata according to the Construction Schedule. In addition to the above mentioned state funding, a Federal Government s TIFIA Loan for an amount equal to $450 million is also requested. BASE OPTIMIZED CASE This case proposes the construction of the entire facility based on CBA 1 with minor design modifications (same modification as those presented as part of the Base Case). However, at several of the very low volume crossroads (e.g., State 625, 602, 620, and 616) consideration could be given to delaying or deferring completion of the interchanges until justified by traffic growth. The Base Optimized Case also proposes the implementation of a mixed toll system allowing both manual and electronic toll collection and a complete Intelligent Transportation System. The Base Optimized Case is to be completed during a 3-year construction schedule after a Concession Agreement is produced and ROW is acquired. In terms of the financial model we have considered a 99 years Concession Term for this case. We believe that an increase in the Concession Term will enhance the robustness of the Project to overcome downturns in the economy, thus allowing the proposers to be more aggressive with their offers. Based on the above mentioned changes from the Base Case we have been able to reduce the initial subsidy needed by the Project from $174.5 M down to $16.5 M. In addition to the state subsidy, a Federal Government s TIFIA loan for an amount equal to $441 million is also necessary. ENHANCED CASE The Proposer considers the Enhanced Case as a premium alternative to the Commonwealth of Virginia and its motorists from both the Technical and Financial perspectives. The Enhanced Case proposes to improve both the US Route 460 and I-64 Corridors. Cintra proposes to develop the US Route 460 Project as stated in previous sections. In addition, Cintra proposes construction of capital improvements, operation and maintenance and collection of tolls corresponding to long-distance trips, along I-64 from approximately milepost (MP) 200, the I-295 interchange, to approximately MP264, the I-64 and I-664 interchange. SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 PAGE 3 OF 5
7 Response to Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project CINTRA Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. The Enhanced Case upgrades for the US Route 460 the previously defined Base Cases by proposing innovative solutions regarding interchanges that would substantially improve the traffic patterns of the area by 1) maintaining the functionality described by the Concept Interchanges, related to CBA 1, and 2) adding direct connectors for major movements. As part of the Capital Improvements related to the I-64, the Enhanced Case proposes to widen, within the existing median, the existing lane configuration section from approximately MP200, the I-295 interchange, to approximately MP254 where a lane configuration section begins. The toll scheme proposed as part of the I-64 Corridor, from MP200 to MP264, consists of an open toll system with one single mainlane toll plaza to charge the northbound and southbound long distance trips, mainly trucks, while letting the commuter trips between Williamsburg and Norfolk and the rest of Hampton Roads area free of charge. As part of this alternative, the Concessionaire would fully operate and maintain the US Route 460 Project and the I-64 from MP200 to MP264. This approach will mean a direct saving for VDOT of the budgeted expenses dedicated to operate and maintain this road, thus releasing those funds to be applied in other stretches of the network. The main advantage of this combined solution is that the two roads could be operated in the most efficient way to make the best profit of the two projects. A coordinated operation of the facilities could lead to consider a broad picture of the corridor with two alternative roads and allow the Concessionaire to implement measures, such as variable tolling, that could divert traffic from one road to the other if necessary for the benefit of the whole corridor. With this solution VDOT shall also take advantage of the fact that the Concessionaire Company can operate and maintain both facilities and exploit any synergies that may arise. The Base Case and the Base Case Optimized solutions analysis have proved that the US Route 460 Toll Road is a Project that cannot be sustained entirely by its users without any public money. We understand that there is no public funding available for this project at the moment, therefore the development of this Toll Road could be delayed until public funds are transferred from other projects. This scenario shows clear drawbacks. Cintra understands the strategic need of this project and has developed an alternative that would lead to an early development of the Project, an increased capacity along the roads that link Norfolk and the Hamptons with Richmond and a way for VDOT to capitalize its existing assets obtaining funds that can be invested in other projects. Under the current assumptions, described in section 3.2 apart from the full construction of the proposed new US Route 460 Toll Road with improvements in its interchanges and the completion of a third lane along the I-64 VDOT, could obtain a significant upfront payment from the Concessionaire. The only public funds to be used in this Enhanced Case consist in a subordinated Federal Government s TIFIA loan for an amount equal to $638.5 million. The analysis of the three cases has been made considering a tariff for Light Vehicles consistent with the range set in the Toll Feasibility Study for the USR-460 and a tariff for Heavy Vehicles five times higher. Same tariffs and escalation formula have been considered for the USR-460 and the I-64 projects. Cintra s innovative technical approach described above is enhanced by a highly developed financial structure that uses all the latest sources of financing in order to increase the value of this project to VDOT. In this particular case four different financial structures have been studied: Tax Exempt Bonds, a Bridge Facility plus a SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 PAGE 4 OF 5
8 Response to Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project CINTRA Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. Bond issuance, a Mini Perm Loan and the finally chosen one, a Long Term Bank Facility in addition to a TIFIA loan. This structure usually has a maturity between 22 and 25 years, and often includes grace periods of principal, and sometimes, of interest. This type of structure allows the company to sculpt the debt profile, improving financial ratios, and also simplifying the documentation process. At the same time it reduces the risk of refinancing the project, therefore is suitable to be used in conjunction with TIFIA funding. We believe this basic approach offers several potential benefits; streamline project development, accelerating completion; protect VDOT s interests, minimizing its liabilities by transferring finance, traffic, design and construction and operation risks to the private sector; maximize private sector commitment to the project through the investment of substantial private equity by the private sponsors; provide for the redistribution of state and federal transportation funding to other important non-revenue projects; provides a more flexible capital structure that better addresses start-up toll road risks and accommodates the type of long-term concession agreement envisioned by VDOT and the private sponsors. The results of the financial model for the cases analyzed are based in preliminary estimation of the costs and the revenues of the project therefore cannot be considered as a commitment from Cintra towards VDOT. A committing offer would come as a result of the detailed proposal phase and would require a deeper analysis of the project and the approval from our investment committee. The preliminary cost estimations for the three CASES studied are (in real 2006 dollars): BASE CASE BASE OPTIMIZED ENHANCED CASE CASE Roadway Construction $480,000,000 $474,000,000 $487,860,000 Bridges & Structures $250,000,000 $250,000,000 $275,290,000 Utility Relocations $55,000,000 $55,000,000 $56,000,000 Toll Facilities $50,000,000 $36,500,000 $50,000,000 Road Widening $0 $0 $253,625,000 Design $66,800,000 $65,240,000 $89,822,000 Misc. & Contingencies $98,200,000 $98,260,000 $99,900,000 Total Design &Construction $1,000,000,000 $979,000,000 $1,312,500,000 ITS & TCS $18,092,000 $13,029,000 $31,591,000 ROW Acquisition $33,056,000 $33,056,000 $33,056,000 TOTAL COST $1,051,148,000 $1,025,085,000 $1,377,147,000 Based on all the above, Cintra believes that this is a feasible project and intends, if selected by VDOT, to enter into an interim or Comprehensive Agreement with VDOT for the Project in accordance with the terms of the Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project through the Public-Private Transportation Act, addendum #3 of August 15, 2006 and the two sets of questions and answers dated March 31, 2006 and August 28, 2006, respectively. In any case the offer represented by this Conceptual Proposal will remain in full force and effect until such time as VDOT and the selected Offeror shall sign a Comprehensive Agreement. SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 PAGE 5 OF 5
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 Response to Solicitation for Proposals US Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project CINTRA Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. Confidentiality Statement Cintra Concesiones de Infraestructuras de Transportes S.A communicates to the Virginia Departrment of Transportation (VDOT) that there is no confidential information requested other than the following documents: SEPTEMBER 14, 2006
17 3. Project Financing (Conceptual Financing Plan) 3.1. Project Cost Estimate Not confidential Submit plan for development, financing and operation of the project showing the anticipated schedule on which funds will be required; and proposed sources and uses for such funds. Include a list and discussion of assumptions underlying all major elements of the plan The following section contains sensitive assumptions made by the Proposer. The information contained under this section results from Proposer negotiations with financial institutions. This information is property of the Proposer. Disclosure of this information may result in unfair advantage given to other proposer during later stages of the USR 460 Project procurement process Financial Development Plan Some information considered as confidential Discussion of assumptions underlying all major elements of the plan. Indicate the team member(s) responsible for securing financing for the project and any experience said member(s) have with similar financing mechanisms to those proposed and with similar transportation projects The following sections contain sensitive assumptions made by the Proposer. The information contained under these section results from strategy decisions and assumptions made by the Proposer. Disclosure of this information may result in unfair advantage given to other proposer during later stages of the USR 460 Project procurement process Main Assumptions Some information considered as confidential. Not confidential Responsible for securing financing and experience 3.4. Identify the proposed risk factors and methods for dealing with these factors Not confidential Proposed Total Life-Cycle Cost-Specifying Methodology and Assumptions Preliminary Cost of the Project Not confidential Description of the Proposed and Construction Methods Not confidential. SEPTEMBER 14, 2006
18 Not confidential. Not confidential Overview of the Design Concepts Preliminary Schedule of the proposed timing of construction and maintenance activities Preliminary calculation of the costs This section contains sensitive assumptions made by the Proposer. These estimates and schedules were prepared by resources owned by the Proposer, therefore, this information is property of the Proposer. Disclosure of this information may result in unfair advantage given to other proposer during later stages of the USR 460 Project procurement process Identify any local, state or federal resources Not confidential Provide: financial statement of the firm/consortia and each major partner Not confidential Toll System The following sections contain sensitive assumptions made by the Proposer. The information provided as part of this section was prepared by the Proposer s T&R advisor Maunsell. As a result, the material becomes property of the Proposer. It the Proposer s understanding that disclosure of the contents of this section would result in unfair advantage given to other proposer during later stages of the USR 460 Project procurement process Toll Collection Method Traffic and Revenue Forecasts Operational Rampup 3.9. If revenues from development opportunities ancillary to the USR460 Project are to be proposed, describe the nature of the development, its relation to the transportation facility, the coordination anticipated with the local communities and the estimated revenue used to support the project. Not confidential Describe the nature of any proposed private, quasi-private or public-private entity which may be proposed to issue debt, if applicable, to support the project Not confidential. SEPTEMBER 14, 2006
19 3.11. Describe any cost savings to be realized by the Commonwealth during the lifecycle of the project and the methodology by which said savings were calculated Not confidential. SEPTEMBER 14, 2006
20
21
22
APPENDIX D CHECKLIST FOR PROPOSALS
APPENDIX D CHECKLIST FOR PROPOSALS Is proposal content complete, clear, and concise? Proposals should include a comprehensive scope of work, and have enough detail to permit the responsible public entity
More informationOverview of the Procurement and Project Milestones
Overview of the Procurement and Project Milestones November 3, 2016 Charles A. Kilpatrick, P.E. Commissioner of Highways Virginia Department of Transportation Project Development The Path to Date Summer
More informationREQUEST FOR INFORMATION
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY GILCREASE EXPRESSWAY RFI Issue Date: January 2, 2018 RFI Response Due Date: January 31, 2018 The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority ( Authority ) is seeking
More informationPPEA Guidelines and Supporting Documents
PPEA Guidelines and Supporting Documents APPENDIX 1: DEFINITIONS "Affected jurisdiction" means any county, city or town in which all or a portion of a qualifying project is located. "Appropriating body"
More informationAugust 2007 Thomas Bohuslav Texas Department of Transportation
Public Private Partnerships Activities in Texas AASHTO SOC 2007 Summer Meeting Biloxi Mississippi August 2007 Thomas Bohuslav Texas Department of Transportation Topics The Problem (Needs) Comprehensive
More informationMassachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Route 3 South Managed Lanes Project DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Project High Level P3 Project Suitability Assessment Report September 11, 2013 Contents Proposed Project Description Project Background and Status Commonwealth
More informationNovember 4, 2013 Office of Transportation Public Private Partnerships
November 4, 2013 Office of Transportation Public Private Partnerships Dear Sirs, Via email: i66ppta@vdot.virginia.gov Re: Response of Shikun & Binui Ltd. (a member of the Arison Group) to the Request for
More informationREQUEST FOR INFORMATION
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF AND PROCUREMENT PROCESS FOR THE GRAND PARKWAY PROJECT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RFI Issuance Date: June 10, 2011 RFI Closing Date: July 6,
More informationI-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas
I-69 Corridor Segment Committee 1 and 2 Kick-off Meeting April 15 Nacogdoches, Texas 10:00 a.m. Welcome/ Introductions Mark Tomlinson Division Dir., Texas Turnpike Authority Div, TxDOT 10:15 a.m. Presentations
More informationPROJECT DELIVERY MODELS ARKANSAS PLANNING RETREAT ON P3S. J. Douglas Koelemay, Director October 7, 2015
PROJECT DELIVERY MODELS ARKANSAS PLANNING RETREAT ON P3S J. Douglas Koelemay, Director October 7, 2015 VIRGINIA LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS Virginia and California first P3 legislation in
More informationStrategic Projects Division
Strategic Projects Division DESIGN BUILD: The Texas Story 2012 AASHTO Conference May 2, 2012 Portland, Oregon Don Toner, Jr., SRWA Director Strategic Projects Right of Way Strategic Projects Division Texas
More informationNorth Carolina Turnpike Authority Joint Appropriations Committee on Transportation Beau Memory & Rodger Rochelle
North Carolina Turnpike Authority Joint Appropriations Committee on Transportation Beau Memory & Rodger Rochelle March 17, 2015 Agenda Legislation Review / Turnpike Vision Beau Memory Turnpike Authority
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. 85th ANNUAL MEETING
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 85th ANNUAL MEETING Panel on Public Private Initiatives: New Concepts in Transportation Project Delivery Recent Trends and Innovations January 23, 2006 Washington, DC GEOFFREY
More information9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs
9. Positioning Ports for Grant Funding and Government Loan Programs 9.1. Grant Funding Overview Grant funding continues to be a key factor for ports in meeting capital investment requirements. Grants can
More informationMay 22, Pamela Bailey-Campbell. Vice President - North America Infrastructure Consultancy Jacobs Engineering, Inc.
May 22, 2013 Pamela Bailey-Campbell Vice President - North America Infrastructure Consultancy Jacobs Engineering, Inc. Public Partners Arizona Department of Transportation Office of P3 Initiatives City
More informationDesign-Build Procurement Overview Manual. Alternative Project Delivery
Design-Build Procurement Overview Manual Alternative Project Delivery Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction to Design-Build Procurements... 1 1.1 Introduction... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 1.3 Acronyms... 2
More informationPUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR
29 One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.2000 l metro. net PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE MARCH 20, 2013 SUBJECT: ACTION: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR RECEIVE
More informationStaff Approve Resolution R to amend the FY TIP.
ITEM 11 Action April 19, 2017 Approval to Amend the FY 2017-2022 (TIP) to add nine New Projects to the FY 2017-2022 TIP, As Requested By the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Staff Recommendation:
More informationPartnership Financing: Improving Transportation Through Public Private Partnerships
Partnership Financing: Improving Transportation Through Public Private Partnerships Executive Summary Long-term funding sources for transportation are uncertain, and innovative alternatives for both financing
More informationState Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project Update. State Route 91 Advisory Committee June 4, 2010
State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project Update State Route 91 Advisory Committee June 4, 2010 Presentation Agenda Recent Project Milestones Project Development Schedule Environmental Permitting Design-Build
More informationTRB/AASHTO Environment & Energy Research Conference June 6-9, 2010 Session 47: Lessons Learned from P3 Public Involvement Initiatives
TRB/AASHTO Environment & Energy Research Conference June 6-9, 2010 Session 47: Lessons Learned from P3 Public Involvement Initiatives Lessons Learned from Virginia P3 Projects Dana C. Nifosi, Venable LLP
More informationConceptual Proposal for U.S. Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project Through the Public-Private Transportation Act
September 7, 2010 Volume I Submitted to: Virginia Department of Transportation Submitted by: 460 Partners, Inc. Conceptual Proposal for U.S. Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project Through the Public-Private
More informationBuild America Transportation Investment Center. Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation
Build America Transportation Investment Center Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation Background On July 17, 2014 the President announced the Build America Investment Initiative: a government-wide
More informationS E N A T E F I S C A L O F F I C E I S S U E B R I E F 2016-S RhodeWorks FEBRUARY 2, 2016
2016-S-2246 - RhodeWorks FEBRUARY 2, 2016 SUMMARY 2016-S-2246 - The Rhode Island Bridge Replacement, Reconstruction and Maintenance Fund Act of 2016, also known as RhodeWorks, does the following: Allows
More informationNCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects
NCDOT Planning Summary for NCTA Projects Page 1 Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension Wake and Johnston Counties (STIP Projects R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829) The Triangle Expressway Southeast Extension
More informationPolicies and Procedures. Unsolicited Proposals. Western Lands
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Real Estate Development Policies Policies and Procedures Regarding Unsolicited Proposals for Western Lands at Washington Dulles International Airport March 3,
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan
October 23rd, 2015 Attention: Qualified and Interested Consultants REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Posey County Long Range Transportation Plan The Posey County Economic Development Partnership, cooperatively
More informationTEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation and the Federal Government The Role of the Federal Government in State Transportation Programs U.S. Highway 290 BACKGROUND The Federal-Aid Highway Program
More informationFebruary 12, Request for Proposal Overview Pre-bid Conference
February 12, 2014 I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use Project Request for Proposal Overview Pre-bid Conference I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use Project Scope of Work Major Items Mill and overlay - Light
More informationGeneral Procurement Requirements
Effective Date: July 1, 2018 Applicability: Grant Purchasing and Procurement Policy Related Policies: Moravian College Purchasing Policy and Business Travel Policy Policy: This policy provides guidelines
More informationRoute 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor. Submitted By:
Route 58 PPTA Project Finance Plan Annual Update Hillsville to Stuart Corridor Submitted By: Robert P. Williams District Construction Engineer Salem District Virginia Department of Transportation Submitted
More informationA DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS
Exhibit A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Addenda/Addendum means supplemental additions, deletions, and modifications to the provisions of the RFP after the release date of the RFP. Adjusted Available Public
More informationInnovative Project Finance
Innovative Project Finance National Governor s Association Utah State Planning Retreat on Public-Private Partnerships Ivan Marrero, P.E. Division Administrator, FHWA Utah October 7, 2016 The Status Quo:
More informationPacifiCorp 2017S SOLAR Request for Proposals. Bidder s Conference Portland November 21, 2017
PacifiCorp 2017S SOLAR Request for Proposals Bidder s Conference Portland November 21, 2017 Workshop Date/Time November 21, 2017 Location Portland, Oregon 10:00 AM 12:00 PM Logistics PacifiCorp s Lloyd
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Local Support for a Senior Affordable Housing Development Application for low income housing tax credits from the Florida Housing Finance Corporation SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Noon, Thursday,
More informationFinancing Transit Projects with Traditional and Innovative Sources And Mechanisms
Financing Transit Projects with Traditional and Innovative Sources And Mechanisms Exploring the Potential for Bus Rapid Transit and Transit- Oriented Development in the I- 287/Tappan Zee Bridge Corridor
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Uptown Main Street/US 25 Traffic Calming Analysis. Date Issued: June 5, 2018
i REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Uptown Main Street/US 25 Traffic Calming Analysis Date Issued: June 5, 2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) INSTRUCTIONS 1.1 Project Introduction The City of Greenwood (City) desires
More informationAccounting for Government Grants
170 Accounting Standard (AS) 12 (issued 1991) Accounting for Government Grants Contents INTRODUCTION Paragraphs 1-3 Definitions 3 EXPLANATION 4-12 Accounting Treatment of Government Grants 5-11 Capital
More informationFHWA/USDOT Role in Project Finance
April 2008 Federal Tools for Project Finance Transportation Infrastructure Finance Workshop U.S. DOT/AASHTO Center for Excellence Chicago, IL Jennifer R. Mayer Federal Highway Administration Resource Center
More informationLOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF ACCOUNTING PRACTICE & FINANCIAL REPORTING SUBMISSION RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF ACCOUNTING PRACTICE & FINANCIAL REPORTING SUBMISSION RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF GRANTS, SUBSIDIES & OTHER PAYMENTS FROM GOVERNMENT 1. Introduction The NSW Code of Accounting
More informationSMALL CITY PROGRAM. ocuments/forms/allitems.
SMALL CITY PROGRAM The Small City Program provides Federal funds to small cities with populations from 5,000 to 24,999 that are NOT located within Metropolitan Planning Organizations' boundaries. Currently
More informationRequest for Qualifications # For. Architecture/Engineering Professional Services For Small Projects
Request for Qualifications #0030094 For Architecture/Engineering Professional Services For Small Projects Commodity Code: 90600 September 16, 2013 Specifications Prepared by: Virginia Tech University Planning,
More informationVIRGINIA S P3 PROGRAM
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of Transportation P3 s Tony Kinn, Director Jackie Cromwell VIRGINIA S P3 PROGRAM July 28, 2011 Office of Transportation Public-Private Partnerships OTP3 contacts: Tony Kinn,
More informationLocal Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal
Local Taxes and Highway Tolls: The New Normal Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Public-Private Partnership Program August 16, 2012 Transportation and Infrastructure Summit Michael
More informationVirginia Association of Counties
Transportation in the Commonwealth: A Local Perspective Virginia Association of Counties November 11, 2013 Supervisor Jeff McKay Chairman, Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Transportation and Legislative
More informationBeth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011
Beth Day Director, FTA Office of Project Planning RailVolution October 2011 What is a New or Small Start? New fixed guideways and extensions to existing systems Includes light rail, heavy rail, commuter
More informationWORK SESSION ITEM City Council
DATE: STAFF: October 25, 2016 Mark Jackson, PDT Deputy Director WORK SESSION ITEM City Council SUBJECT FOR DISCUSSION I-25 Northern Colorado Improvements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this item is
More informationFunding Principles. Years Passed New Revenue Credit Score Multiplier >3 years 0% % % % After Jan %
Funding Principles I. Infrastructure Incentives Initiative: encourages state, local and private investment in core infrastructure by providing incentives in the form of grants. Federal incentive funds
More informationTRANSPORTATION. The American County Platform and Resolutions
TRANSPORTATION STATEMENT OF BASIC PHILOSOPHY The National Association of Counties (NACo) believes that the nation s transportation system is a vital component in building and sustaining communities, moving
More informationExhibit A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS
Exhibit A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Addenda/Addendum means supplemental additions, deletions, and modifications to the provisions of the RFP after the release date of the RFP. Alternative Technical Concepts
More informationARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. Request for Proposals (RFP) INNOVATIVE FINANCING STUDY FOR THE INTERSTATE 69 CORRIDOR
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Request for Proposals (RFP) INNOVATIVE FINANCING STUDY FOR THE INTERSTATE 69 CORRIDOR Proposals must be submitted No later than 4:00 p.m. CDT July 30,
More informationCHAPTER House Bill No. 5013
CHAPTER 2009-89 House Bill No. 5013 An act relating to transportation; amending s. 334.044, F.S.; revising the powers and duties of the Department of Transportation to provide for certain environmental
More informationADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CATEGORY: DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING/ZONING TITLE: TRANSPORTATION PROPORTIONATE SHARE CALCULATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS CODE NUMBER: AC-13-16 ADOPTED:
More informationPARTNERSHIPS ACCELERATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & JOB CREATION. J. Douglas Koelemay, Director
PARTNERSHIPS ACCELERATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & JOB CREATION J. Douglas Koelemay, Director VIRGINIA LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS PPTA enabling legislation 1995 2001, 2005, 2008 Revisions to
More informationTexas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 19 Public Transportation. (a) Purpose. Title 49 U.S.C. 5329, authorizes the
Texas Department of Transportation Page of 0 SUBCHAPTER D. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.. Public Transit Safety Program. (a) Purpose. Title U.S.C., authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. DOT to create and implement
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v SECTION 1 BACKGROUND. 1 Coalfields Expressway.. 1 Route 460 Connector... 3 Corridor Q. 4 Project History.. 5 Current Activities.. 7 Project Implementation Schedule.
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PENSION ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS CONSULTING SERVICES
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PENSION ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS CONSULTING SERVICES Submission Deadline: 11:59 p.m. March 8, 2015 980 9 th Street Suite 1900 Sacramento, CA 95814 SacRetire@saccounty.net
More informationMontgomery Housing Authority 525 South Lawrence Street Montgomery, Alabama 36104
Montgomery Housing Authority 525 South Lawrence Street Montgomery, Alabama 36104 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) 2018-01 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MIXED-FINANCE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES DATE ISSUED:
More informationMiami-Dade County Expressway Authority. Policy For Receipt, Solicitation And Evaluation Of Public. Private Partnership Proposals
Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority Policy For Receipt, Solicitation And Evaluation Of Public Private Partnership Proposals SECTION 1. Background Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority ( MDX ) finds
More informationThe Maryland Transportation Authority has. Staff Approve Resolution R to amend the FY TIP.
ITEM 13 Action March 29, 2017 Approval to Amend the FY 2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to Add the Governor Harry W. Nice Bridge Improvement Project For the Maryland Transportation Authority
More informationMINISTÈRE DES TRANSPORTS, DE LA MOBILITÉ DURABLE ET DE L ÉLECTRIFICATION DES TRANSPORTS
MINISTÈRE DES TRANSPORTS, DE LA MOBILITÉ DURABLE ET DE L ÉLECTRIFICATION DES TRANSPORTS An Overview of the Public- Private Partnership Model in Québec June 6th, 2016 Agenda Introduction The P3 Approach
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018 DATE: July 5, 2018 SUBJECT: Approval to Submit Applications to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the 2018 SMART SCALE Program
More informationHighway and Light Rail Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S.: Protecting the Public Interest
Highway and Light Rail Public-Private Partnerships in the U.S.: Protecting the Public Interest Maureen Luna-Long U.S. Government Accountability Office 5 th Annual Meeting of Senior PPP Officials Organisation
More informationExpected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation. September 2016
Expected Roadway Project Crash Reductions for SMART SCALE Safety Factor Evaluation September 2016 SMART SCALE Safety Factors Evaluation 1. Using Crash Modification Factors for SMART SCALE Safety Evaluation
More information1 INTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES RFP
1 Price Proposal... 4 Introduction... 7 Scope of Work... 7 Expected Outcomes and Deliverables... 8 Selection Process... 8 Qualification and Evaluation of Proposals... 9 Proposer Representations... 10 Basis
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTATION. Richard L. Caywood, P.E. Robert W. Hofrichter
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTATION Richard L. Caywood, P.E. Robert W. Hofrichter Chapter 527: What is it? Passed by General Assembly in 2006 adding Section 15.2-2222.1 to Code of Virginia Directs localities
More informationAppendix 5 Freight Funding Programs
5. Chapter Heading Appendix 5 Freight Programs Table of Contents 4.1 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG);... 5-1 4.2 Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Discretionary Grant Program
More informationCONTRACTING AND PURCHASING
CONTRACTING AND PURCHASING 2017 Educational Series CONTRACTING AND PURCHASING INTRODUCTION GOODS AND SERVICES Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) contracting activities are established and controlled
More informationValue Engineering Program Administration Manual (05/16/2018)
1. Value Engineering Value Engineering Program Administration Manual (05/16/2018) Value Engineering (VE) is defined by the Society of American Value Engineers International as "the systematic application
More informationREQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR CSJ: PASS-THROUGH FINANCE PROJECT
REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES FOR FM 471 (CULEBRA ROAD) KALLISON LANE TO FM 1560 CSJ: 0849-01-046 PASS-THROUGH FINANCE PROJECT Bexar County Public
More informationA DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS
Exhibit A DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS Addenda/Addendum means supplemental additions, deletions, and modifications to the provisions of the RFP after the release date of the RFP. Adjusted Available Public
More informationPublic-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update
Public-Private Partnership Program May 2015 Transit Coalition Update Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Mark Linsenmayer Director Presentation Agenda Overview of Metro Public Private
More informationPRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE Tuesday, October 19, 2010 SOUTH CENTRAL CORRIDOR HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE Tuesday, October 19, 2010 SOUTH CENTRAL CORRIDOR HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Meeting Overview Sign-In Sheets: Be sure to sign in. Sign-In sheets will be available on
More informationBuilding Infrastructure through PPPs with the AfDB
Building Infrastructure through PPPs with the AfDB 1 Ẉho are we? AfDB: Africa s Premier Development Financial Institution AAA by all rating agencies African Development Bank (ADB) African Development Fund
More informationAASHTO PROJECT FINANCE INSTITUTE
AASHTO PROJECT FINANCE INSTITUTE AN INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT FINANCE July 7-8, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts GEOFFREY S. YAREMA NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT LLP The information contained herein
More informationCommonwealth Transportation Board Briefing
Hampton Roads Crossing Study (HRCS) (SEIS) Commonwealth Transportation Board Briefing September 20, 2016 Angel Deem VDOT, Environmental Division Director HRCS History 1991: Federal funding allocated for
More informationMassachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. POLICIES & PROCEDURES Design Build Procurement Procedures April 2016
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority POLICIES & PROCEDURES Design Build Procurement Procedures April 2016 Design Build Procurement Procedures April 2016 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
More informationLogan Square Corridor Development Initiative Final Report Appendix
Logan Square Corridor Development Initiative Final Report Appendix Appendix A: All development proposals Appendix B: Keypad and online polling Appendix C: Financial analysis assumptions Page 2 Page 11
More informationPublic-Private Private Partnership Projects (P3P) Seminar
Public-Private Private Partnership Projects (P3P) Seminar Speaker Information: Allen W. Estes, III Partner Gordon & Rees, LLP Practice Areas: Construction, Green Technology & Climate Change and Commercial
More informationScheme of the Presentation
Scheme of the Presentation Legal framework & Institutional Setup for PPP Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 (1994 amendment) Road Policy 1996 Gujarat Infrastructure Development Act, 1999 Permissible assistance
More informationCITY OF LANCASTER REVITALIZATION AND IMPROVEMENT ZONE AUTHORITY
CITY OF LANCASTER REVITALIZATION AND IMPROVEMENT ZONE AUTHORITY Guidelines for Obtaining Financing for Projects in the City of Lancaster s City Revitalization and Improvement Zone Purposes of These Guidelines
More informationClarifications III. Published on 8 February A) Eligible countries. B) Eligible sectors and technologies
5 th Call of the NAMA Facility Clarifications III Published on 8 February 2018 Contents A) Eligible countries...1 B) Eligible sectors and technologies...1 C) Eligible applicants...2 D) Eligible support
More informationEconomic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads HRTAC Overview Kevin B. Page Executive Director
HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION Economic Vitality and Quality of Life HRTAC Overview Kevin B. Page Executive Director 8/10/2018 CONGESTION/FUTURE CONNECTIVITY 2040 Population The
More informationTraffic-Calming & Pedestrian Safety Project
Traffic-Calming & Pedestrian Safety Project RFP HR17-101 Pre-Proposal Conference May 2, 2017 Hillsboro Town Hall 1 WELCOME Thank you for attending today s Pre-Proposal Conference for the Town of, Hillsboro
More informationMETHODOLOGY - Scope of Work
The scope of work for the Truckee West River Site Redevelopment Feasibility Study will be undertaken through a series of sequential steps or tasks and will comprise four major tasks as follows. TASK 1:
More informationAGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch
AGC of TEXAS Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch THOMAS L. JOHNSON, Executive Vice President Texas Transportation Commission Meeting Highlights September 18 and 24, 2014 September 18 Commissioner
More informationSpecial State Funding Programs Breakout Session #5C Funding Programs Track. October 25, 2012
Special State Funding Programs Breakout Session #5C Funding Programs Track October 25, 2012 SPECIAL STATE FUNDING PROGRAMS - REVENUE SHARING Debbi Webb-Howells Revenue Sharing Program Manager Local Assistance
More informationHB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide:
HB2 Quick Guide To view the latest version of the HB2 Policy Guide: http://virginiahb2.com/resources.html What funds are available to projects through HB2? (See Policy Guide Section 1.0 1.1 and Policy
More informationSUMMARY OF THE GROW AMERICA ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014
SUMMARY OF THE ACT As Submitted to Congress on April 29, 2014 The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) submitted the Generating Renewal, Opportunity, and Work with Accelerated Mobility, Efficiency,
More informationUNSOLICITED PROPOSALS
VI-4 UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS 1.0 Applicability. This policy and procedure applies to Unsolicited Proposals received by RTD. It is not designed to address unsolicited proposals regarding the acquisition,
More informationPage 1 of 10 Chicago Infrastructure Trust Joint Public Safety Training Academy - RFQ Clarifications - November 9, 2017
ANSWERS TO PRE-SUBMITTAL CONFERENCE QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATIONS 1 Project Budget and Project Design s 1 1.3 The City and the CIT have established a Project It is intended that all necessary
More informationVALUE ENGINEERING PROGRAM
Approved: Effective: May 17, 2017 Review: March 30, 2017 Office: Production Support Office Topic No.: 625-030-002-i Department of Transportation PURPOSE: VALUE ENGINEERING PROGRAM To provide a consistent
More informationCone Mill Master Development
Cone Mill Master Development Solicitation for Development Partner Qualifications Pineville, NC Fall 2017 Contents Executive Summary... 3 About this Solicitation... 4 Town and Market Overview... 5 Site
More informationPublic Private Partnerships and Transit Not Just for Mega Projects Karin DeMoors October 28, 2015
Public Private Partnerships and Transit Not Just for Mega Projects Karin DeMoors October 28, 2015 Presentation Overview What is a Public Private Partnership (P3)? Mega Project Focus Range of Partnerships
More informationAccounting for Government Grants
175 Accounting Standard (AS) 12 (issued 1991) Accounting for Government Grants Contents INTRODUCTION Paragraphs 1-3 Definitions 3 EXPLANATION 4-12 Accounting Treatment of Government Grants 5-11 Capital
More informationMassachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) The South Coast Rail Project DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) The High Level P3 Project Suitability Assessment Report September 11, 2013 Contents Proposed Project Description Project Background and Status Commonwealth
More informationProject Information. Application ID 2016-D06-03 Date Submitted 6/30/2016. Marion Intermodal / MAR ODOT District District 6 County Marion
Project Information Application ID 2016-D06-03 Date Submitted 6/30/2016 Project Name Marion Intermodal / MAR-309-19.59 ODOT District District 6 County Marion ODOT PID 90264 Project Mode Roadway What is
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO MANAGE, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN THE MOBILE CONVENTION CENTER IN MOBILE, ALABAMA DEADLINE: August 1, 2008 City of MOBILE Government Plaza 205 Government Street Mobile, Alabama 36602
More informationGUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION FOR LICENCE UNDER THE ICT LICENSING FRAMEWORK OF Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority
GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION FOR LICENCE UNDER THE ICT LICENSING FRAMEWORK OF 2015 Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority SEPTEMBER 2015 1 Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 Network Facilities
More informationPage 1. Date: January 24, Housing Authority of Travis County REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR LEGAL SERVICES SOLICITATION NO.
Date: January 24, 2017 Housing Authority of Travis County REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR LEGAL SERVICES SOLICITATION NO. HATC-01-2017 Issue Date: January 24, 2017 Qualifications Due Date: February 17,
More information