Evaluation of the Higher Education Support Programme
|
|
- Ginger Hopkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Evaluation of the Higher Education Support Programme Final Report: part 1, building HEI capacity EXECUTIVE SUMMARY August 2013 Social Enterprise University Enterprise Network Research and Innovation, Plymouth University, Tamar Science Park, 9 Research Way, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BT T: E: info@plymouthsocialenterpriseuen.co.uk W:
2 Evaluation of the Higher Education Support Programme A Plymouth University Centre of Expertise Research and Innovation Tamar Science Park 9 Research Way Derriford Plymouth PL6 8BT t: f: e: serio@plymouth.ac.uk The University of Northampton Avenue Campus St George's Avenue Northampton NN2 6JD t: f: c/o Countrywide House 166 Fore Street Saltash PL12 6JR t e. Rebekah@southernhorizons.co.uk
3 Executive Summary Introduction The Higher Education Support Programme (HESP) is the second partnership between UnLtd and the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), and aims to embed social entrepreneurship within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in England. The evaluation has been undertaken by the Social Enterprise University Enterprise Network (SE-UEN), drawing on the expertise of staff from SERIO, an applied research unit based at Plymouth University, and the University of Northampton, together with SE-UEN research partner, Southern Horizons (UK) Ltd. This report is the first of a series of three, with two following reports due in January 2014 following completion of both UnLtd monitoring activities and follow-up fieldwork. The purpose of this report is to both comply with the HESP funding requirements and to ensure that learning from the HESP can be drawn upon in future rounds. Its focus, reflecting the availability of evaluation and monitoring data at this stage, is upon the experience of the HEIs participating in the HESP and the impact that this has had upon both the institution and the wider higher education sector. Context and Background to the HESP The HESP follows on from the success of the 1m Higher Education Social Entrepreneurship Awards (HESEA), which enabled 200 staff and students across 70 HEIs to set up social ventures (Ramsey, 2011). Funded by a Higher Education Innovation Fund (HEIF) underspend, this programme was initially seen as a one-off but UnLtd and HEFCE applied for additional funding following the tangible benefits generated by HESEA. The 2m HESP was launched in 2012 and was designed to support both nascent and existing social entrepreneurs who were employed, enrolled or recently graduated from universities. A key focus of the HESP was on developing enterprise support structures within the participating HEIs to embed social entrepreneurship into their organisation. Following an application process, 56 HEIs were selected to participate within the HESP and in doing so, received an awards pot of up to 25,000, and tailored support to embed social entrepreneurship within their institution. This awards pot was to be used by HEIs to allocate grant funding directly to its staff, students or recent graduates. Three levels of grants were available ( ,000) to reflect the stage the entrepreneur and their venture. The HEI support package delivered by UnLtd included: one-to-one support from a dedicated Partnership Support Manager (PSM); pro-bono and mentoring support to facilitate learning from corporates and successful social entrepreneurs; networking and training events; and an online learning platform (Social Entrepreneurs in Higher Education Learning Network (SEHELN)). Three different programme delivery models were offered to participating HEIs, which reflected the various stages of development of institutions social entrepreneurship provision. In all three models, HEIs were to act as talent scouts and find potential social entrepreneurships to be supported through the programme. Upon finding these individuals, the awards funding was administered by either the HEI (the find and fund model) or by UnLtd (the find model). HEIs could also choose whether they or UnLtd supported the funded award winners (with HEI support provision representing the find, fund and support delivery model). Regardless of the model chosen, HEIs were expected to deliver the programme as appropriate to their local circumstances but also within the context of UnLtd s core values. SE-UEN 1
4 The Evaluation Approach The evaluation has followed the lifetime of the HESP and will extend beyond this timeframe to capture post-project monitoring data up until December Core evaluation components include: Eight HEI case studies; Observations of learning and development events; Interviews with HESP programme staff; and Analysis of UnLtd monitoring data (including a survey of HEIs, termly reports 1, and postevent feedback surveys). Programme Performance UnLtd s monitoring data has captured the HESP s key outputs, including the number of HEIs supported and awards made. Although the collection of the monitoring data was on-going at the time of writing (and therefore the number and value of awards will be higher than that reported here), the available data still provides a useful indication of the size and scale of the HESP s investment on social entrepreneurship in the HE sector. Key statistics include: A total of 56 HEIs participated within the programme and represented a diversity of institutional types but with a higher proportion of post 1992 universities; To date, 702 awards are known to have been made with a total value of 1.3m; and The largest proportion of award winners were undergraduate students, followed by postgraduates and academic staff. A more comprehensive analysis of the HESP s outputs will be conducted following the completion of all monitoring processes. The Institutional Experience The evaluation and monitoring methods captured data on HEIs experience of participating in the programme. The majority of HEIs participated to develop their social entrepreneurship support provision, with others citing a strategic fit and the availability of grant funding as reasons for their participation. The majority of HEIs completing a survey stated that the partnership with UnLtd met their expectations well (44.4%, 20) or very well (35.6%, 16), with two stating that it had not met their expectations and seven providing a neutral response. The reasons given for the less positive or neutral responses primarily related to the resource implications of the HESP. All but one HEI completing the survey reported benefitting from the partnership, where benefits commonly included staff development, an increased social entrepreneurship profile, and networking opportunities. Furthermore, 35.5% (16) of HEIs felt that the HESP had impacted 1 HEIs completed a monitoring report at the end of each term to capture the type and value of awards made in that reporting period, as well the more qualitative experiences of the programme. SE-UEN 2
5 positively upon the employability of the student award winners, a finding which will be explored in more depth following the completion of an award winner survey. Less positively, a third (31.1%, 14) of HEI survey respondents reported experiencing negative effects as a result of the partnership, with time and administrative requirements again being cited. A review of the qualitative responses provided by HEIs in the termly reports (completion of which is one of the UnLtd s monitoring requirements) indicates that it is the frequency and volume of monitoring data required that has created issues. In addition, resourcing the HESP was identified by 82.2% (37) of HEIs completing the survey as a challenge to their delivery. This is an important finding, especially given that UnLtd perceives the HESP to be based on a partnership between them and each of the participating HEIs. The resource implications of the programme appear however to have shifted the balance of this partnership for some of the HEIs. Other factors reported to be a challenge included finding quality applications and establishing the systems and/or infrastructure for social entrepreneurship support. In relation to finding quality applications, although 64.4% (29) felt that the awards criteria enabled them to support everyone they wanted to, 35.6% (16) said that it did not. In addition, the timeframe of the HESP was perceived to be too short by 80% (36) of HEIs completing the survey. It also emerged during discussions at the learning and development events and through case study interviews, that the timeframe was perceived to be a misalignment with the academic year. A key challenge relating to the academic year appeared to be the scheduling of the induction during term time. As such, HEIs were unable to prepare for the programme s delivery in advance of the new academic year, which in turn placed pressure on ensuring delivery within the constraints of the exam timetable. For UnLtd, a key part of the HESP was supporting HEIs to develop and deliver structures for social entrepreneurial support that reflected their own processes but were also reflective of UnLtd s values. All but two of the HEIs completing the survey perceived that UnLtd had communicated its mission and values either well (51.1%, 23) or very well (44.4%, 20). The other two HEIs provided a neutral response. Supporting this perception, PSMs believed, for the most part, that values were understood by the HEIs. Further, many commented that whilst some HEIs have embraced the values more fully than others, there tends to be a natural alignment. This alignment was also reflected in the case study interviews. In fact some case study participants reported that it was UnLtd s values base that encouraged them to enter into the partnership in the first place. HEIs satisfaction with the UnLtd support package was explored through a survey, case studies, termly reports and post-event feedback. Overall, 82.2% (37) rated the HESP as good or very good; with only three people rating it as poor (6.7%). More specifically: 84.4% (38) of survey respondents rated the one-to-one support provided by PSMs as good or very good. Similarly, case study HEI staff most often identified the one-to-one support provided by PSMs as the most useful element of the UnLtd offer, primarily because of its availability and accessibility. Indeed, PSMs reported providing support as and when it was required in response to HEIs expressed needs. Although PSMs felt that their relationships with HEIs were a key success of the HESP, they acknowledged that their approach led to some inconsistencies in the level of support provided, with those engaged and communicating with the PSM receiving the required support. There was some uncertainty however regarding the effectiveness of the support received by those HEIs were less engaged. Over three quarters of HEIs completing the survey (77.8%, 35) rated the induction the first of the programme s events - as good or very good. The wider programme of learning and SE-UEN 3
6 development events was rated as good or very good by a slightly smaller number of HEIs (66.7%, 30). The opportunities for knowledge exchange and networking provided by these events was considered to be their most valuable element. Despite this, some HEIs reported that time constraints and/or geography prevented them from attending all of the events. PSMs too reflected on their effectiveness and suggested changes that could be made including, reducing their frequency, using HEI-led events, and a move to more regionally based events. As set out in the programme s prospectus, UnLtd Connect provided pro-bono and mentoring support to learn from corporates and successful social entrepreneurs. For those institutions delivering a Find, or Find and Fund model, social entrepreneurs were matched to a mentor where there was an identified need for such support and an appropriate mentor was available to meet the identified need. Support was available to all HEIs, regardless of their model, to learn from Connect and develop their own networks of support. In addition, a Corporate Week was introduced part way through the programme to meet the need for support of this type. However, there was some confusion amongst the HEI partners about the Connect offer. Not all HEIs engaged with Connect, and this was reflected in the survey with 28.9% (13) stating that they had not received this form of support. Amongst the 32 who had, 62.5% (20) rated it as good or very good (44.4% of all respondents). The online platform, SEHELN was viewed less positively by both survey respondents (15.5% (7) rated it as good or very good) and case study participants. The effectiveness of SEHELN has been limited by institutional log-ins and its launch in the latter half of the programme. Change at the HEI Level Using the survey of HEIs, case studies and available monitoring data (e.g. termly reports, postevent feedback), the evaluation assessed the evidence of change within partner institutions. A key finding emerging from the survey, was that three quarters (77.8%, 35) of HEIs reported making some changes to the way in which they supported social entrepreneurs as a result of their partnership with UnLtd. The changes made ranged from strengthening or tailoring their social entrepreneurship support offer, with some providing specialist support for the first time, to increasing awareness of social entrepreneurship and curriculum development. However, a key aim of the HESP was for structures, processes and partnerships for social entrepreneur support to be both developed and embedded within the institution. Although evidence that the changes have been made will emerge over a longer time period than that of the evaluation, the survey found that the majority of those making changes expected them to continue after the HESP. Over three quarters of survey respondents (77.1%, 27) said that the reported changes would continue and the remainder didn t know (22.8%, 8). Reasons for uncertainty unsurprisingly included funding constraints and an on-going review processes. Furthermore, all but one survey respondent said that it was either likely (28.9%, 13) or extremely likely (68.9%, 31) that they would be working with social entrepreneurs in 12 months time. For 91.1% (41) of respondents, this could be attributed, at least in part, to UnLtd. Where respondents (6.7% 3) stated that it was not at all attributable to UnLtd, this was generally because they already had a strong commitment to this area of work. The evaluation also sought to identify evidence of wider institutional change; over half (24, 53.3%) reported that knowledge of social entrepreneurship had been developed a lot and 51.1% (23) that their interest in working with social entrepreneurs had developed a lot. A programme aim was for partner HEIs to adopt a culture capable of nurturing social entrepreneurship support and recognition. It is likely that such a culture is a key component in SE-UEN 4
7 achieving social entrepreneurship support that is embedded within an institution. Reflecting this, the evaluation sought to advance understanding of what a social entrepreneurship culture means in the context of the HE sector. The definitions and interpretations of culture used by both programme staff and HEI case studies were varied and little consensus emerged. The following points were described by participants as representing a culture capable of nurturing social entrepreneurship: The provision of accessible and visible social entrepreneurship support that was responsive to the different stages of the entrepreneurial journey and delivered by knowledgeable staff; A support infrastructure that is institution-wide rather than embedded within the role of one individual; Awareness and recognition of social entrepreneurship as a viable alternative to other forms of entrepreneurship; and Senior level buy-in. As culture means different things to different people, cultural change is difficult to evaluate. Nevertheless, perceived changes in relation to each of the above descriptions did emerge in wider discussions of the HESP s impact in both the HEI survey and case studies. HEIs report that changes have been made and that they are expected to remain in place, at least for the majority, beyond the lifetime of the programme. This therefore lays the foundation for the development of accessible and visible social entrepreneurship support. Furthermore, awareness and recognition of social entrepreneurship is reported to have increased amongst both staff and students and the support offer strengthened, in some cases through rationalising the existing internal offer. In assessing what this means in terms of culture however, it is important to acknowledge that some of those HEIs participating within the HESP will have had a culture capable of nurturing social entrepreneurship prior to the programme and therefore such change was not necessary. For others, social entrepreneurship support was in its infancy or a developing offer. In these instances, the HESP appears to have strengthened the support offer and increased awareness of social entrepreneurship, and in doing so, provides a starting point for cultural change. The achievement of this change is likely to be dependent upon senior leaders however, which if driven by a bottom-up process of cascading awareness throughout the institution, will take time. Achieving senior level buy-in featured strongly in discussions on cultural change at the final conference but evidence on the extent to which such buy-in had been achieved was more limited. Universities were described as super-tankers by conference delegates, with their size and structure meaning that strategic change took time. Conference delegates emphasised the importance of demonstrating the impact of social entrepreneurship to achieve senior management buy-in. Sector Wide Change One of the key aims of the HESP was to help develop the ecosystem for social entrepreneur support. As such there has been a strong emphasis throughout the programme on facilitating cross-institutional collaboration and knowledge sharing as a key indicator of social entrepreneur support being developed and promoted at a sector level. The survey explored whether and how HEIs were working with other organisations to find and/or support social entrepreneurs. The majority of HEIs completing the survey stated that they were doing so. This most frequently took the form of another local organisation (68.9%, 31), but almost half (48.9%, 22) of respondents reported working with another HEI to find or SE-UEN 5
8 support social entrepreneurs. Student Hubs is an example of the type of organisation with which HEIs collaborated, and indeed, the value of partnering with Student Hubs emerged as a recurring theme across the different evaluation strands. The Hubs provided a mechanism through with HEIs could access student societies and therefore broaden the programme s reach, as well as supporting, and in some cases leading, the delivery of workshops and events. The interaction between private and public sector partners offered by Hubs therefore provides an effective way of drawing upon a range of expertise and networks. Although knowledge exchange and networking were commonly reported between HEIs, fewer tangible collaborations were reported. Further details on the types of collaboration formed were given in the learning and development event feedback surveys, which asked if an opportunity to collaborate had been identified as a result of the event. Reported examples of collaborative opportunities included running shared award winner events, increased dialogue and the sharing of good practice. However, the most commonly reported collaboration was participation in the UniPopshop competition led by the University of Bath. This competition invited social ventures from across all HEIs participating in the HESP to run a stall in Spitalfields market. The programme s success in developing a mechanism for shared learning and knowledge exchange that HEIs were willing and eager to engage with is apparent. Despite this, fewer tangible collaborations have formed as a direct result of the events than might be desired. Although there was a reported willingness for collaboration, the available evidence suggests that geography, time frame and the practicalities of aligning programme delivery restricted HEIs ability to do this. In terms of the perceived wider changes in the HE sector, the majority of survey respondents felt that there was more support and interest in relation to social entrepreneurship, perceptions which were supported by programme staff. Reflecting this, there was a general feeling of optimism about the future of social entrepreneurship in the sector. A key challenge for the second round of the HESP will be to maintain the momentum generated by the 2012/2013 programme and ensure that support continues to develop throughout the sector. Conclusions The HESP sought to form partnerships between UnLtd and each of the 56 HEIs selected to participate in the programme, and develop social entrepreneurship support within these institutions. As a result of these partnerships, 702 awards with a value of 1.3m has been made to staff, students and recent graduates to date (these totals will increase as HEIs submit their outstanding monitoring data). The programme therefore represents a substantial investment in social entrepreneurialism in the HE sector. Overall, the experience of working in partnership with UnLtd was perceived as a positive one by HEIs, with the majority stating that it had met their expectations and that their relationship with UnLtd had the right level of flexibility. From UnLtd s perspective, the HEIs generally delivered the HESP in a way that aligned with their values and aspirations, indicating that it has been a good partnership arrangement. There were also some negative effects reported, in terms of programme delivery itself, particularly around the time and administrative burden which should be taken into consideration for any future activities. Likewise, the length of the programme was felt by many to be too short. It is evident that some cross-institutional working and knowledge sharing is taking place. This is an important evaluation finding: the programme aimed to see increased cross-institutional collaboration and knowledge sharing for the promotion and development of social entrepreneur support at a sector level. The available evidence suggests that the learning and development SE-UEN 6
9 events were an important mechanism in facilitating this, there is however more work to be done. For example, although some institutions delivered shared events, the most common form of cross-institutional working reported was knowledge exchange. Nevertheless, most participants could see wider changes occurring both within their institution and across the sector in support for social entrepreneur development. Although evidence on the extent to which these changes have been embedded in institutions will emerge in the longer term, the majority expected their changed approach to continue after the programme ends. It is likely that a culture of social entrepreneurship is needed before such embeddedness can take place. Like its interpretations, the evidence that the HESP has brought about a change in culture is mixed. Achieving change will take time in some instances, with the size and structure of HEIs leading to them being described as super-tankers. The available evidence does however suggest that the foundations for achieving a culture of social entrepreneurship have been laid. Overall, the HESP can be considered a success on a range of criteria, most notably the changes generated in the approach to social entrepreneurship support. The key challenge for the future however will be to ensure that these changes are embedded within institutions and are sustained beyond the lifetime of the HESP programme. It is unlikely however that the programme can achieve this in the absence of senior level buy-in. UnLtd can however contribute to this by continuing to demonstrate the impact of social entrepreneurship and its potential to contribute to HE sector policy agendas, such as student employability. This report represents the first of a series of reports to emerge from the evaluation of the 2012/2013 HESP. Future reports will draw upon evidence of the impact of the programme on award winners themselves and therefore contribute to the developing understanding of the value of social entrepreneurship. As with any programme however, there are elements which UnLtd may like to consider revising to ensure that the impact opportunities of future rounds are maximised. To summarise, these include: Reducing the frequency and duration of learning and development events, and run more regionally based events where possible to ensure that HEI resources are used most effectively; Similarly, streamlining the monitoring requirements will help to realign the balance of the partnership between HEIs and UnLtd. An in-depth discussion between HEIs and UnLtd ahead of the second round of the HESP may be useful in achieving this balance; The provision of support to identify tangible collaborative opportunities, for example: UnLtd could adopt a buddying or matching role to assist HEIs to identify other institutions with which a collaboration could be practically possible; and SEHELN could be utilised to further promote collaborative opportunities in the future through the publication of institutional profiles. SE-UEN 7
10 References Ramsey, N., (2011), Unlocking the Potential of Social Entrepreneurship in Higher Education, Report for UnLtd & HEFCE, June SE-UEN 8
11 A Plymouth University Centre of Expertise Research and Innovation Tamar Science Park 9 Research Way Derriford Plymouth PL6 8BT t f e serio@plymouth.ac.uk The University of Northampton Avenue Campus St George's Avenue Northampton NN2 6JD t: f: Social Enterprise University Enterprise Network c/o Countrywide House, 166 Fore St Saltash PL12 6JR t e. Rebekah@southernhorizons.co.uk Research and Innovation, Plymouth University, Tamar Science Park, 9 Research Way, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BT T: E: info@plymouthsocialenterpriseuen.co.uk W: 9
SUPPORTING SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR: SUMMARY
SUPPORTING SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR: SUMMARY WHY SHOULD HEIS SUPPORT SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS HEIs have had to become more responsive to student needs as a result of a series
More informationReview of Knowledge Transfer Grant
SFC/15/66 Agenda item 7 18 December 2015 Review of Knowledge Transfer Grant This paper invites the Council s Board to agree proposed changes to the Knowledge Transfer Grant (KTG). Recommendations To agree
More informationModels of Support in the Teacher Induction Scheme in Scotland: The Views of Head Teachers and Supporters
Models of Support in the Teacher Induction Scheme in Scotland: The Views of Head Teachers and Supporters Ron Clarke, Ian Matheson and Patricia Morris The General Teaching Council for Scotland, U.K. Dean
More informationSocial Enterprise in a Global Context: The Role of Higher Education Institutions. Country Brief: Pakistan
Social Enterprise in a Global Context: The Role of Higher Education Institutions Country Brief: Pakistan August 2016 Contents Using this report 1 Introduction 2 The landscape for social enterprise 4 Overview
More informationSOLUTIONS FOR AN AGEING SOCIETY
SOLUTIONS FOR AN AGEING SOCIETY UnLtd Partnership Prospectus UnLtd has come together with the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation to partner with agencies across England who have a strong interest and commitment
More informationNational review of domiciliary care in Wales. Wrexham County Borough Council
National review of domiciliary care in Wales Wrexham County Borough Council July 2016 Mae r ddogfen yma hefyd ar gael yn Gymraeg. This document is also available in Welsh. Crown copyright 2016 WG29253
More informationSocial Enterprise in a Global Context: The Role of Higher Education Institutions. Country Brief: Hong Kong
Social Enterprise in a Global Context: The Role of Higher Education Institutions Country Brief: Hong Kong August 2016 Contents Using this report 1 Introduction 2 The landscape for social enterprise 4 Overview
More informationENCOURAGING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: EVALUATION OF THE ENTREPRENEURSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAMME EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
www.hie.co.uk ENCOURAGING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: EVALUATION OF THE ENTREPRENEURSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAMME 2013-2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY March 2016 Executive Summary The Entrepreneurship Support Programme 2013-16
More informationUNLTD. An Introduction, Ashley Raywood Award Manager (North East, Yorkshire and Humber) January 2015
1 UNLTD An Introduction, 2003-2014 Ashley Raywood Award Manager (North East, Yorkshire and Humber) January 2015 INTRODUCTION 2 About is the Foundation for Social Entrepreneurs. We were established in 2002
More informationFinal Report ALL IRELAND. Palliative Care Senior Nurses Network
Final Report ALL IRELAND Palliative Care Senior Nurses Network May 2016 FINAL REPORT Phase II All Ireland Palliative Care Senior Nurse Network Nursing Leadership Impacting Policy and Practice 1 Rationale
More informationHigher Education Innovation Fund
February 2006 Higher Education Innovation Fund Summary evaluation of the first round (2001-05) HEFCE 2006 Higher Education Innovation Fund Summary evaluation of the first round (2001-05) Executive summary
More informationEntrEprEnEurship strategy
Entrepreneurship Strategy 2017-2020 INSPIRE, SUPPORT, EDUCATE, & research Cork Institute of Technology (CIT) has been closely connected to the business and industry community since its origins in 1912
More informationWorkshops to cultivate Interdisciplinary Research in Ireland: Call for Proposals from Research-Performing Organisations
Workshops to cultivate Interdisciplinary Research in Ireland: Call for Proposals from Research-Performing Organisations Irish Research Council Brooklawn House, Crampton Avenue, Shelbourne Road, Dublin
More informationDeveloping professional expertise for working age health
7 Developing professional expertise for working age health 93 Chapter 7 Developing professional expertise for working age health The previous chapters have laid the foundations for a new approach to promoting
More informationRātā Foundation Grant Applicant Survey
Rātā Foundation Grant Applicant Survey Report for Rātā Foundation (formerly The Canterbury Community Trust) Prepared by Adrian Field PhD, Rachael Butler & Grant Hanham 29 June 2015 Contents Contents...
More informationCommittee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)
E CDIP/21/12 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: MARCH 19, 2018 Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) Twenty-First Session Geneva, May 14 to 18, 2018 PROJECT PROPOSAL FROM THE DELEGATIONS OF CANADA,
More informationKnowledge and Skills for. Government response to the Consultation on the Knowledge and Skills Statement for. Social Workers in Adult Services
Knowledge and Skills for Social Workers in Adult Services Government response to the Consultation on the Knowledge and Skills Statement for Social Workers in Adult Services March 2015 Title: Government
More informationUniversities Innovation Fund National Priorities University of Edinburgh response, January 2017 Update for the Period
Universities Innovation Fund National Priorities University of Edinburgh response, January 2017 Update for the Period 2017-2018 The national outcomes for the UIF have been provided for the period AY 2017-20.
More informationRegistrant Survey 2013 initial analysis
Registrant Survey 2013 initial analysis April 2014 Registrant Survey 2013 initial analysis Background and introduction In autumn 2013 the GPhC commissioned NatCen Social Research to carry out a survey
More informationLondon Councils: Diabetes Integrated Care Research
London Councils: Diabetes Integrated Care Research SUMMARY REPORT Date: 13 th September 2011 In partnership with Contents 1 Introduction... 4 2 Opportunities within the context of health & social care
More informationSocial entrepreneurship and other models to secure employment for those most in need (Croatia, October 2013)
Social entrepreneurship and other models to secure employment for those most in need (Croatia, 29-30 October 2013) United Kingdom 1 Stephen Meredith Department for Work and Pensions Krisztina Tora UnLtd
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE Health and Social Care Directorate Quality standards Process guide December 2014 Quality standards process guide Page 1 of 44 About this guide This guide
More informationOur response focuses on the following questions that we have asked of NHS employing organisations:
2 Brewery Wharf Kendell Street Leeds LS10 1JR Tel 0113 306 3000 www.nhsemployers.org Apprenticeship Targets for Public Sector Bodies Consultation Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Bay C, Level
More informationOnline Consultation on the Future of the Erasmus Mundus Programme. Summary of Results
Online Consultation on the Future of the Erasmus Mundus Programme Summary of Results This is a summary of the results of the open public online consultation which took place in the initial months of 2007
More informationThe views of public health teams working in local authorities Year 1. February 2014
The views of public health teams working in local authorities Year 1 February 2014 Foreword One of the Royal Society for Public Health s key priorities is to support the public health workforce in its
More informationSustainability Strategy
Sustainability Strategy 2016 2020 anglia.ac.uk/sustainability Sustainability Strategy 2016 2020 Our Mission Our mission, under our commitment to sustainability, is that we will always ask about the long
More informationThe University of British Columbia
The following information is an excerpt from the Letter of Intent submitted to the J.W. McConnell Family Foundation in response to the RECODE Request for Proposals of Spring 2014. The University of British
More informationNEWTON FUND PROGRAMME DESCRIPTIONS
NEWTON FUND PROGRAMME DESCRIPTIONS PEOPLE Page Newton PhD Programme 2 Researcher Mobility Programme Newton Researcher Links Programme 4 International Collaboration Programme 6 Newton Advanced Fellowships
More informationKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCES WHAT ARE THE AIMS AND PRIORITIES OF A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE? WHAT IS A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE?
KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCES WHAT ARE THE AIMS AND PRIORITIES OF A KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE? Knowledge Alliances aim at strengthening Europe's innovation capacity and at fostering innovation in higher education, business
More informationREGIONAL UNIVERSITIES NETWORK (RUN) SUBMISSION ON INNOVATION AND SCIENCE AUSTRALIA 2030 STRATEGIC PLAN
REGIONAL UNIVERSITIES NETWORK (RUN) SUBMISSION ON INNOVATION AND SCIENCE AUSTRALIA 2030 STRATEGIC PLAN Introductory comments The 2030 Innovation and Science Strategic plan must articulate a vision which
More informationThis will activate and empower people to become more confident to manage their own health.
Mid Nottinghamshire Self Care Strategy 2014-2019 Forward The Mid Nottinghamshire Self Care Strategy will be the vehicle which underpins our vision to deliver an increased understanding of and knowledge
More informationDiscussion paper on the Voluntary Sector Investment Programme
Discussion paper on the Voluntary Sector Investment Programme Overview As important partners in addressing health inequalities and improving health and well-being outcomes, the Department of Health, Public
More informationKnowledge for healthcare: A briefing on the development framework
Developing people for health and healthcare Knowledge for healthcare: A briefing on the development framework for NHS library and knowledge services in England 2015-2020 Library and Knowledge Services
More informationLibrary and Knowledge Services Annual Report
Library and Knowledge Services Annual Report 2016-2017 West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust Katherine Teal Annual Report 2016-2017 Foreword This year has seen significant changes in the Library and Knowledge
More informationThe hallmarks of the Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund (GCERF) Core Funding Mechanism (CFM) are:
(CFM) 1. Guiding Principles The hallmarks of the Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund (GCERF) Core Funding Mechanism (CFM) are: (a) Impact: Demonstrably strengthen resilience against violent
More informationAn Evaluation of Extended Formulary Independent Nurse Prescribing. Executive Summary of Final Report
An Evaluation of Extended Formulary Independent Nurse Prescribing Executive Summary of Final Report Policy Research Programme at the Department of Health School of Nursing & Midwifery Sue Latter Jill Maben
More informationConsultant Radiographers Education and CPD 2013
Consultant Radiographers Education and CPD 2013 Consultant Radiographers Education and Continuing Professional Development Background Although consultant radiographer posts are relatively new to the National
More informationHigher Education Innovation Funding: Connecting Capability Fund
Invitation to bid for funds April 2017/03 Higher Education Innovation Funding: Connecting Capability Fund This document describes the policies and methods of allocation for the Higher Education Innovation
More informationOECD LEED Local Entrepreneurship Review, East Germany : Action Plan Districts Mittweida (Saxony) and Altenburger Land (Thuringia)
This "ActionPlan" builds on recommendations given in the draft summary report on the districts Mittweida (Saxony) und Altenburger Land (Thuringia), March 2006, presented at a regional workshop on 20 March
More informationGEM UK: Northern Ireland Summary 2008
1 GEM : Northern Ireland Summary 2008 Professor Mark Hart Economics and Strategy Group Aston Business School Aston University Aston Triangle Birmingham B4 7ET e-mail: mark.hart@aston.ac.uk 2 The Global
More informationNorth School of Pharmacy and Medicines Optimisation Strategic Plan
North School of Pharmacy and Medicines Optimisation Strategic Plan 2018-2021 Published 9 February 2018 Professor Christopher Cutts Pharmacy Dean christopher.cutts@hee.nhs.uk HEE North School of Pharmacy
More informationCommunity Energy: A Local Authority Perspective
Community Energy: A Local Authority Perspective State of The Sector Report Addendum Photo credit: Bristol Energy Cooperative Table of Contents 1. Introduction Page 2 2. Methodology Page 2 3. Survey Theme
More information2015 Lasting Change. Organizational Effectiveness Program. Outcomes and impact of organizational effectiveness grants one year after completion
Organizational Effectiveness Program 2015 Lasting Change Written by: Outcomes and impact of organizational effectiveness grants one year after completion Jeff Jackson Maurice Monette Scott Rosenblum June
More informationEducation in Shifting the Balance
Item 07 Council 1 February 2018 Education in Shifting the Balance Purpose of paper Status Action Corporate Strategy 2016-19 Business Plan 2018 This paper sets out a proposed consultation on the education
More informationDundalk Institute of Technology (DKIT)
Dundalk Institute of Technology (DKIT) Strategic Dialogue Cycle 2 Bilateral Meeting 21st September 2015 The HEA welcomed Dundalk Institute of Technology (DKIT) to the meeting and gave an overview of the
More informationDeveloping a New Strategy for the Visitor Economy
Appendix 1 to Agenda Item 12 Project Documentation PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENT (PID) Developing a New Strategy for the Visitor Economy Release: Version 1 Date: 4-6-15 Author: Approved by: Jane Hotchkiss
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 5.11.2008 COM(2008) 652 final/2 CORRIGENDUM Annule et remplace le document COM(2008)652 final du 17.10.2008 Titre incomplet: concerne toutes langues.
More informationCambridge Judge Business School Entrepreneurship Centre. ETECH Projects 2017 INVENTORS MANUAL
Cambridge Judge Business School Entrepreneurship Centre ETECH Projects 2017 INVENTORS MANUAL Welcome ETECH Projects accelerates entrepreneurship and diffusion of innovations based on early stage and potentially
More informationThe Commissioning of Hospice Care in England in 2014/15 July 2014
The Commissioning of Hospice Care in England in 2014/15 July 2014 Help the Hospices. Company limited by guarantee. Registered in England & Wales No. 2751549. Registered Charity in England and Wales No.
More informationICAEW AND CHARITY COMMISSION REVIEW PROJECT
ICAEW AND CHARITY COMMISSION REVIEW PROJECT FINDINGS FROM THE ICAEW AND CHARITY COMMISSION REVIEW PROJECT ON STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW SETTING THE SCENE Following the successful review
More informationSustaining and managing the delivery of student nurse mentorship: Roles, resources, standards and debates Executive summary
Sustaining and managing the delivery of student nurse mentorship: Roles, resources, standards and debates Executive summary Sarah Robinson 1, Jocelyn Cornish 2, Christine Driscoll 1, Susan Knutton 2, Veronica
More informationThis Statement has been produced for DHSSPS by NIPEC in partnership with the RCN. The Department would like to acknowledge the contribution of the
IMPROVING the Patient & Client experience This Statement has been produced for DHSSPS by NIPEC in partnership with the RCN. The Department would like to acknowledge the contribution of the stakeholder
More informationImplementing a Model of Clinical Supervision Final Report 1999
Implementing a Model of Clinical Supervision Final Report 1999 Project team: Sheila McKinley, Assistant Director of Nursing, Education & Clinical Practice, West Middlesex University Hospital Anne Pegram,
More informationPractice nurses in 2009
Practice nurses in 2009 Results from the RCN annual employment surveys 2009 and 2003 Jane Ball Geoff Pike Employment Research Ltd Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Royal College of Nursing
More informationInternal Audit. Health and Safety Governance. November Report Assessment
November 2015 Report Assessment G G G A G This report has been prepared solely for internal use as part of NHS Lothian s internal audit service. No part of this report should be made available, quoted
More informationEvaluation of the WHO Patient Safety Solutions Aides Memoir
Evaluation of the WHO Patient Safety Solutions Aides Memoir Executive Summary Prepared for the Patient Safety Programme of the World Health Organization Donna O. Farley, PhD, MPH Evaluation Consultant
More informationInterim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus II ( ) Executive summary
Interim Evaluation of Erasmus Mundus II (2009-2013) Executive summary Introduction Programme description The 2009-2013 Erasmus Mundus programme was established by Decision (No 1298/2008/EC) of the European
More informationEPSRC Impact Acceleration Account (IAA) Maximising Translational Groups, Centres & Facilities, September 2018 GUIDANCE NOTES
EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account (IAA) Maximising Translational Groups, Centres & Facilities, September 2018 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW GUIDANCE NOTES 1.1 Source of fund: EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account (IAA)
More informationSocial Work & Social Care Supervision and Consultation Policy, Standards and Criteria
Social Work & Social Care Supervision and Consultation Policy, Standards and Criteria Supporting Systemic Practice Gavin Swann Safeguarding & Quality Assurance December 2016 Version 8 Page 1 Executive
More informationUKRI Strength in Places (SIPF) Programme Overview
UKRI Strength in Places (SIPF) Programme Overview Contents: Executive Summary Purpose Objectives of the Fund Part 1: Guidance on preparing a bid o Who can apply to SIPF? o What constitutes a place or an
More informationThird Party Grant Research Executive Summary
Third Party Grant Research Executive Summary Research report for HLF produced by Icarus, November 2016 Research purpose This paper summarises research commissioned by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) to
More informationTHE CHANGING NATURE OF REGULATION IN THE NHS
THE CHANGING NATURE APRIL 2018 CONTENTS Key points 4 1 Introduction 6 2 Overall regulatory framework 8 3 Oversight and regulation of systems and new organisational forms 17 4 NHS Improvement oversight
More informationINDEPENDENT THINKING SHARED AMBITION
INDEPENDENT THINKING SHARED AMBITION STRATEGIC PLAN 2017 2022 www.ucc.ie OUR VISION To be a leading university of independent thinkers OUR MISSION Creating, understanding and sharing knowledge and applying
More informationCLINICAL STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION - HEALTH IN YOUR HANDS
CLINICAL STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION - HEALTH IN YOUR HANDS Background People across the UK are living longer and life expectancy in the Borders is the longest in Scotland. The fact of having an increasing
More informationNHS Governance Clinical Governance General Medical Council
NHS Governance Clinical Governance General Medical Council Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this call for evidence. The GMC has a particular role in clinical governance, as outlined below, and
More informationTIER 1 (GRADUATE ENTREPRENUR) SCHEME STUDENT GUIDE
TIER 1 (GRADUATE ENTREPRENUR) SCHEME STUDENT GUIDE What is the Graduate Entrepreneur Scheme? In April 2012 the UK Visas and Immigration (part of the UK Home Office) introduced the Tier 1 Graduate Entrepreneur
More informationCan shifting sands be a solid foundation for growth?
EY Growth Barometer 2017 Hong Kong highlights Can shifting sands be a solid foundation for growth? How Hong Kong businesses are driving their growth agenda 2 EY Growth Barometer Hong Kong. Can shifting
More informationEducation and Training Interventions to Improve Patient Safety
Health Education England Education and Training Interventions to Improve Patient Safety Health Education England Implementation Plan 2016 2018 Developing people for health and healthcare www.hee.nhs.uk
More informationEST briefing document on DECC s proposed changes to pre-accreditation under the Feed in Tariff
13 Aug 2015 EST briefing document on DECC s proposed changes to pre-accreditation under the Feed in Tariff In light of the government s consultation on removing pre-accreditation under the feed-in tariff
More informationEnterprise Fellowships:
Enterprise Fellowships: Training and support for founders Applicant guidance notes 2018 Stage 1 deadline: 1 September 2018 Stage 2 deadline: 1 October 2018 Introduction Enterprise Fellowships Our Enterprise
More informationPATIENT AND SERVICE USER EXPERIENCE STRATEGY
PATIENT AND SERVICE USER EXPERIENCE STRATEGY APRIL 2017 TO MARCH 2020 Date 24 March 2017 Version Final Version Previously considered by The Patient Experience Group version 0.1 draft The Executive Management
More informationESRC Postdoctoral Fellowships Call specification
Summary ESRC Postdoctoral Fellowships Call specification The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is pleased to announce the introduction of a Postdoctoral Fellowship (PDF) scheme aimed at providing
More informationSetting the Scene for a Future Singapore. KPMG Pre-Budget 2016 Report
Setting the Scene for a Future Singapore KPMG Pre-Budget 2016 Report Foreword Setting the Scene for a Future Singapore represents the need for measures to remake Singapore while transforming our economy
More informationIndustry Academia Partnership Programme (IAPP) - Colombia. Request for Proposal
Industry Academia Partnership Programme (IAPP) - Colombia Request for Proposal Contents 1. Background... 4 2. Rationale and Objectives... 4 3. Types of funding, budget, duration and timing of application...
More informationSchwartz Rounds information pack for smaller organisations
Schwartz Rounds information pack for smaller organisations Contents What is a Schwartz Round?... 2 Origins of Schwartz Rounds... 2 Format of Rounds... 3 Benefits of Rounds... 4 Staff benefits... 4 Patient
More informationQUASER The Hospital Guide. A research-based tool to reflect on and develop your quality improvement strategies Version 2 (October 2014)
QUASER The Hospital Guide A research-based tool to reflect on and develop your quality improvement strategies Version 2 (October 2014) Funding The research leading to these results has received funding
More information2017 Executive Summary
Perception of preparedness of chiropractic graduates for practice Perceptions of preparedness of chiropractic graduates for practice 2017 Executive Summary The General Chiropractic Council (GCC) commissioned
More informationSt George s Healthcare NHS Trust: the next decade. Research Strategy
the next decade Research Strategy 2013 2018 July 2013 Page intentionally left blank Contents Introduction The drivers for change 4 5 Where we are currently with research Where we want research to be Components
More informationIgnite Northern Ireland: Supporting social entrepreneurs in later life
Ignite Northern Ireland: Supporting social entrepreneurs in later life Final evaluation report Authored by Hannah McDowall with Data collected by Tommy Stewart September 2013 Page 0 1.0 Contents 2.0 Executive
More informationSUMMARY REPORT TRUST BOARD IN PUBLIC 3 May 2018 Agenda Number: 9
SUMMARY REPORT TRUST BOARD IN PUBLIC 3 May 2018 Agenda Number: 9 Title of Report Accountable Officer Author(s) Purpose of Report Recommendation Consultation Undertaken to Date Signed off by Executive Owner
More informationPharmacy Schools Council. Strategic Plan November PhSC. Pharmacy Schools Council
Pharmacy Schools Council Strategic Plan 2017 2021 November 2017 PhSC Pharmacy Schools Council Executive summary The Pharmacy Schools Council is seeking to engage with all stakeholders to support and enhance
More information1st Class Care Solutions Limited Support Service Care at Home Argyll House Quarrywood Court Livingston EH54 6AX Telephone:
1st Class Care Solutions Limited Support Service Care at Home Argyll House Quarrywood Court Livingston EH54 6AX Telephone: 01506 412698 Type of inspection: Unannounced Inspection completed on: 13 March
More informationReady for life and work
Careers and Employability Annual Report 2015 Ready for life and work Melbourne and Vietnam Students Group l Careers and Employability l Melbourne Operations and Engagement l Career and Employment Services
More informationSurveyors Ombudsman Service. Customer Satisfaction 2010
Surveyors Ombudsman Service Customer Satisfaction 00 A Research Report For Prepared By DJS Research Ltd July 00 Prepared by: James Hinde, Research Director T: 066 7 7; E: jhinde@djsresearch.com http://www.djsresearch.com/
More informationInsourcing. Why customers take contracts back in house and how to avoid it
Why customers take contracts back in house and how to avoid it 2 Insourcing Why customers take contracts back in house and how to avoid it Introduction Whilst the outsourcing market continues to grow,
More informationExploring the research process through the innovation journey of tourism entrepreneurs case study
Exploring the research process through the innovation journey of tourism entrepreneurs case study I INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY RESEARCH 18th April, Alicante Dr Isabel Rodríguez Institute
More informationPutting patients at the heart of everything we do
Putting patients at the heart of everything we do Nursing, Midwifery, Allied Health Professionals (NMAHP) Research Strategy Tomorrow s health is in our hands today 2015-2020 Introduction The Trust s vision
More informationFinancial Instruments in Tourism Development
Financial Instruments in Tourism Development Neil MacCallum Senior Expert Advisor OECD LEED Centre Trento Overview Agenda Overview Coverage Strategies for development Private sector involvement Instruments
More informationCESAER Position on ERASMUS for All June Erasmus for All. The position of CESAER June 2012
Erasmus for All The position of CESAER June 2012 Contents: Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Branding 3 3. General and specific objectives 4 4. Budget 5 5. New forms of financial provisions 5 6. The different
More informationCourageous about Equality and Bold about Inclusion Equality and Inclusion Strategy: CORPORATE
Courageous about Equality and Bold about Inclusion Equality and Inclusion Strategy: 2017-2020 CORPORATE To provide feedback on the contents or on your experience of using the publication, please email
More informationGreater Norwich Growth Board Meeting Minutes
Growth Board Meeting Minutes Date: Thursday 23 March 2017 Time: 11.30 am Venue: Broadland District Council, Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road,, NR7 0DU Present: Board Members: Officers: Broadland District
More informationThe AHRC-Smithsonian Fellowships in Digital Scholarship Call Document
The AHRC-Smithsonian Fellowships in Digital Scholarship Call Document Introduction Building on a successful history of collaboration, the Arts and Humanities Research Council of the United Kingdom (AHRC)
More informationHEALTH EDUCATION NORTH WEST ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT
Health Education North West HEALTH EDUCATION NORTH WEST ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT VISITORS:- Postgraduate Dean: Professor David Graham PUBLIC HEALTH ith 9" October 2013 Associate Director of Postgraduate
More informationDCF Special Policy Dialogue THE ROLE OF PHILANTHROPIC ORGANIZATIONS IN THE POST-2015 SETTING. Background Note
DCF Special Policy Dialogue THE ROLE OF PHILANTHROPIC ORGANIZATIONS IN THE POST-2015 SETTING 23 April 2013, UN HQ New York, Conference Room 3, North Lawn Building Introduction Background Note The philanthropic
More informationVisit report on Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust
South West Regional Review 2016 Visit report on Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust This visit is part of the South West regional review to ensure organisations are complying with the standards and requirements
More informationCharlotte Banks Staff Involvement Lead. Stage 1 only (no negative impacts identified) Stage 2 recommended (negative impacts identified)
Paper Recommendation DECISION NOTE Reporting to: Trust Board are asked to note the contents of the Trusts NHS Staff Survey 2017/18 Results and support. Trust Board Date 29 March 2018 Paper Title NHS Staff
More informationCare home services for older people
Care home services for older people Procurement strategy - engagement report September 2017 1 CONTENTS: 1. Introduction.... 3 2. Language... 3 3. Survey analysis... 4 a) People living in care homes....
More informationUKMi and Medicines Optimisation in England A Consultation
UKMi and Medicines Optimisation in England A Consultation Executive Summary Medicines optimisation is an approach that seeks to maximise the beneficial clinical outcomes for patients from medicines with
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH CONCORDAT TO SUPPORT RESEARCH INTEGRITY ANNUAL ASSURANCE STATEMENT TO HEFCE
G954 TO: BOARD OF GOVERNORS, 28 th JUNE 2017 FROM: PREPARED BY: VICE-PROVOST (RESEARCH & ENTERPRISE) VICE-PROVOST (RESEARCH & ENTERPRISE) DATE: 24 th MAY 2017 APPROVED BY VICE-CHANCELLOR: SUBJECT: COMPLIANCE
More informationLocal Energy Challenge Fund
Guidance for applicants to the Local Energy Challenge Fund Managed by Local Energy Scotland as part of the Scottish Government s CARES programme Version 1 15th August 2014 Local Energy Challenge Fund Guidance
More information