Nonprofit Single Audit and Major Program Determination Worksheet

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Nonprofit Single Audit and Major Program Determination Worksheet"

Transcription

1 40 HUD 8/14 : Nonprofit Single Audit and Major Program Determination Worksheet Entity: Completed by: Statement of Financial Position Date: Date: IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT CHANGES TO THE SINGLE AUDIT PROCESS. In December 2013, OMB released final guidance on administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. The final guidance, which is in Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), supersedes and streamlines eight existing OMB Circulars into one document. Section 714 provides an overview of the new Uniform Guidance. Section 112 of PPC s Guide to Single Audits provides additional information about the Uniform Guidance. Effective Dates. The Uniform Guidance has multiple effective dates: Award recipients have to implement the new administrative requirements and the cost principles for all new Federal awards made after December 26, 2014, and for funding increments to existing awards after that date. The audit requirements become effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 26, 2014; early implementation by auditors is not permitted. Therefore, the first Single Audits performed under the new audit guidance will be those for entities with years ending December 31, Because of the delayed effective date for audit requirements, the practice aids in this Guide have not been updated for the new audit requirements. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) continues to have significant implications for Single Audits. Important considerations related to the 2014 Compliance Supplement include the following Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement provides important information about the removal of Recovery Act programs from clusters. It notes that Appendix V describes selected Recovery Act programs that were deleted from Parts 4 and 5 of the 2014 Compliance Supplement based on their completion or limited amount of funds still subject to audit. However, if an entity has federal awards expended from these programs, they would be treated consistent with any other programs not included in the 2014 Compliance Supplement or not part of a cluster of programs. For example: (1) the program would not be considered as part of a cluster for periods covered by the 2014 Compliance Supplement, as the 2014 Compliance Supplement does not include the program in a cluster; and (2) if the program was part of a cluster that was audited as a major program in a prior year, the normal OMB Circular A-133 major program selection criteria and risk-based approach would apply and the program would be considered as audited in that prior year for purposes of major program determination, including consideration of any audit findings. Numerous Recovery Act programs that are subject to an audit under OMB Circular A-133 are not included in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement. Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement lists the CFDA number, program name, and federal grantor for those excluded programs. Appendix VII also identifies fiverecoveryactprogramsthatarenotsubjecttoanombcirculara-133auditandarenotrequiredtobe included in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards or in the determination of major programs. Recovery Act Section 1512 reporting requirements were deleted from the 2014 Compliance Supplement for all programs because the federal government s Fiscal Year 2014 Omnibus Spending Bill repealed Section 1512 reporting as of February 1, Because Recovery Act expenditures are winding down, the guidance on the effect of those expenditures on the determination of major programs was removed from Appendix VII of the Compliance Supplement. The Recovery Act is discussed in section 110 of PPC s Guide to Single Audits.

2 HUD 8/14 41 Important Information about Proposed Compliance Supplement Revisions for Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement discusses changes OMB plans to make to the 2015 Compliance Supplement. Certain changes would be based on past findings and the potential impact of noncompliance for each type of compliance requirement. See section 714 for further discussion of the proposed changes. Instructions: This checklist should be completed for nonprofit entities receiving HUD assistance. HUD-CX-1.5 should be completed for for-profit HUD entities. 1. You need to be familiar with the concepts for nonprofit Single Audits in section 714 of this Guide before using this worksheet. The worksheet can be used for the following purposes. Part I Preliminary step information gathering on the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet. Part II Determining if a single or program-specific audit is required. Part III Determining if the auditee is a low-risk auditee. Part IV Determining major programs. Part V Determining which programs tests of controls and compliance tests are to be performed for. To assist auditors in determining major programs, low-risk auditee status, and appropriate compliance requirements, objectives, and audit procedures, PPC offers a software product called PPC s SMART Practice Aids Single Audit (SMART Single Audit). SMART Single Audit also prepares the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. It can be obtained by calling (800) Complete all parts if a Single Audit is being performed. If the client receives governmental financial awards but is not sure if a Single Audit is required, complete Parts I and II. 3. Section references [Sec.] throughout the form are to OMB Circular A-133 (Gov. Doc. No. 8 in PPC s Government Documents Library) unless noted otherwise. 4. Sec. 520(g) and Sec. 520(h) of the Circular state that when the major program determination is performed and documented in accordance with Sec. 520, the auditor s judgment in applying the risk-based approach shall be presumed correct. Challenges by federal and pass-through entities shall only be for clearly improper use of the guidance. The authors believe proper use of this practice aid, including reasonable explanations,will satisfy this requirement. Part I Preliminary Step Information Gathering Complete (or have the client complete) Columns 1 8 on the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet (Worksheet) by program. When completing (or reviewing) the form, be sure Recovery Act awards are reported separately in accordance with the most current OMB guidance. (This is necessary even if the Recovery Act funds were awarded for an existing program and a new CFDA number has not been assigned.) 1. If possible, group programs of the same federal agency or department consecutively; e.g., the Department of Education has a bilingual education program and a handicapped school program. Such grouping will make the information more convenient to use. 2. The CFDA No. in Column 2 is the identification number in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.(See the CFDA listings at the CFDA website at If the program is not listed in the CFDA, review the grant agreement or contact the grantor agency. If a CFDA No. is not available, see the instructions for the data collection form, discussed in section The program name in Column 3 should include the prefix ARRA- for Recovery Act awards.

3 42 HUD 8/14 4. The grant ID number in Column 5 may be found in the client s records, grant agreements or contracts, etc. 5. Columns 6 and 7 should include federal financial assistance and federal cost-reimbursement contracts. Column 6 is optional information; however, many auditors believe the first step in auditing expenditures is to determine the total award amount. They include federal awards made directly by federal awarding agencies or indirectly by recipients of federal awards or subrecipients, e.g., state or local grantor agencies. The direct recipient of federal awards is responsible for identifying the source of funds awarded to subrecipients. [Sec. 105] Federal financial assistance may be in the form of grants, loans, loan guarantees, property (including donated surplus property), cooperative agreements, interest subsidies, insurance, food commodities, direct appropriation, and other assistance received for the purpose of administering a federal program. It does not include direct federal cash assistance to individuals or procurement contracts (under grants or contracts used to buy goods or services from vendors). [Sec. 105] A discussion on determining the amount of federal awards expended is provided at section The Financial Awards Worksheet and the determination of major programs should be based on actual expenditures, and not budgeted or appropriated amounts. If interim, budgeted, or other amounts are used when initially preparing this form, recheck the form at year end and consider whether the answers are still appropriate. Also consider whether audit adjustments affect any of the conclusions reached. 7. If the audit is biennial, the worksheet would be for the two-year period. Part II Determine the Need for a Single or Program-specific Audit 1. Insert the total federal awards expended for all federal programs (i.e., the grand total of Column 7 from the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet). $ Management of an auditee that owns or operates a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) may elect to treat the FFRDC as a separate entity for determining audit requirements. [Sec. 200(e)] 2. Does the amount in Step 1 equal or exceed $500,000? [Sec. 200(b)] Go to Step 3. An audit in accordance with OMB Circular A-133 is not required. It is not necessary to complete this worksheet. 3. Are all federal awards (those listed on the Worksheet) under one federal program or a single cluster of programs? [Sec. 200(c)] Go to Step 4. A Single Audit is required. Go to Part III. 4. Do the federal program laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements require a financial statement audit? [Sec. 200(c)] A Single Audit is required. Place a checkmark in Column 11 of the Worksheet and go to Part III. It is not necessary to complete Part IV of this worksheet. However, Part V should be performed. Go to Step 5.

4 HUD 8/14 43 Since there is only one program (one CFDA number), it is considered a major program. If the program has more than one amount (for example, a loan and an expended amount), each of the amounts should be checked. While not necessary for determining that the program is a major program for single audit purposes, completion of the following steps is necessary for completing the Data Collection Form: (These steps can be completed at this time or when the Data Collection Form is being completed.) Determine if the auditee is a low-risk auditee. This can be done by completing Part III. Determine the dollar threshold that would be used to distinguish Type A and Type B programs (if such a distinction were necessary) for determining major programs. This can be done by completing Part IV, Federal Awards, steps 1 and Are the awards in Step 3 R&D awards? [Sec. 200(c)] Go to Step 6. Go to Step Are the R&D awards in Step 3 received from one federal agency or one federal agency and one pass-through entity? [Sec. 200(c)] Go to Step 7. A program-specific audit is not permitted. Place a checkmark in Column 11 of the Worksheet and go to Part III. It is not necessary to complete Part IV of this worksheet. However, Part V should be performed. 7. Has the federal agency or the pass-through entity approved in advance a program-specific audit? [Sec. 200(c)] Go to Step 8. Since a program-specific audit is not permitted without prior approval, a Single Audit is required. Place a checkmark in Column 11 of the Worksheet and go to Part III. It is not necessary to complete Part IV of this worksheet. However, Part V should be performed. 8. Has the auditee elected to have a program-specific audit? [Sec. 200(c)] The auditee has elected to have a program-specific audit. Place a checkmark in Column 11 of the Worksheet and go to Part III. It is not necessary to complete Part IV of this worksheet. However, Part V should be performed. Since the auditee has not elected to have a program-specific audit, a Single Audit is required. Place a checkmark in Column 11 of the Worksheet and go to Part III. It is not necessary to complete Part IV of this worksheet. However, Part V should be performed. Even though it meets the criteria in the preceding steps for having a program-specific audit, the auditee may elect a program-specific audit or a Single Audit. Section 714 of this Guide discusses program-specific audits.

5 44 HUD 8/14 Part III Determining If the Auditee Is a Low-risk Auditee To be eligible for a reduced threshold for testing of major programs (see Part IV, Federal Awards, Step 15), an entity must qualify as a low-risk auditee. In some instances, whether an auditee qualifies as a low risk auditee does not affect the determination of major programs because the results of Steps 1 11 under Federal Awards in Part IV identify sufficient major programs to meet the higher 50% (versus 25% for low-risk auditees) percentage of coverage rule. However, OMB representatives have indicated that for purposes of preparing the summary of auditor s results and answering the question in the Data Collection Form at Part III, Item 3, regarding whether the auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee, such a determination needs to be made in all instances, including in a program-specific audit. 1. An entity is considered a low-risk auditee if it meets ALL of the following criteria for each of the previous two years (or, in the case of biennial audits, the previous two audit periods). Once a question is answered No (and a waiver is not available), no additional questions need be answered. The answer to Step 2 is No. [Secs. 530 and 320(a); 2014 Compliance Supplement, Appendix VII] a. Single audits were performed in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133. (An entity that has biennial audits does not qualify as a low-risk entity, unless agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audit.) [Sec. 530(a)] Yes No N/A b. The auditor s opinions on the financial statements and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards were unmodified, or if either or both were modified, the cognizant or oversight agency for audit has judged that the opinion modification does not affect management of federal awards and has provided a waiver. [Sec. 530(b)] c. The auditor s Yellow Book report on internal control did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting as material weaknesses or if material weaknesses were identified, the cognizant or oversight agency for audit has judged that the material weaknesses do not affect the management of federal awards and has provided a waiver. [Sec. 530(c)] d. None of the federal programs had audit findings from any of the following in either of the preceding two years (or, in the case of biennial audits, the preceding two audit periods) in which they were classified as Type A programs: [Sec. 530(d)] (If there were no Type A programs in either year, these questions are N/A and do not need to be answered for Type B programs.) (1) Material weaknesses in internal controls over compliance. (2) Noncompliance with the provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements that have a material effect on the Type A programs.

6 HUD 8/14 45 (3) Known or likely questioned costs that exceed 5% of the total federal awards expended for a Type A program during the year of the findings. Yes No N/A e. The reporting package and data collection form for each of the two previous years were submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by the due date. [Sec. 320(a); 2014 Compliance Supplement, Appendix VII] OMB Memorandum M-10-14, Updated Guidance on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, dated March 22, 2010, states, In order for an entity to be considered a low-risk auditee in the current year, the prior two years audits must have met the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, including report submission to the FAC by the due date (OMB Circular A ). Appendix VII to the 2014 Compliance Supplement clarifies that this consideration began with audits covered by the 2010 Compliance Supplement. Audit procedures for determining whether previous submissions were made on a timely basis are provided at HUD-AP-1, Step 20. Sec. 320(a) of OMB Circular A-133 requires the reporting package and data collection form to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 days after the reports are received from the auditors or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period of time was agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audit. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse considers the submission requirement complete when it has received the electronic submission of both the data collection form and the reporting package. According to footnote 6 to Paragraph 8.27 of the GAS/A-133 AICPA Audit Guide, federal agencies are generally no longer granting extensions. However, the OMB granted an extension until March 31, 2014, for all fiscal year 2013 audit packages due on or before March 31, The OMB also granted an extension until November 30, 2014 for any 2014 audit packages due on or before November 30, The extensions were automatic and no approval was required. As this Guide went to press, the Federal Audit Clearinghouse announced it will accept submissions for fiscal periods ending in 2014 beginning on October 20, Auditors should monitor the Clearinghouse website for any changes in submission status or extensions to due dates. Although the reporting package and data collection form would be technically late if not filed within 30 days after the reports are received from the auditors, the OMB appears to focus on only the nine-month filing requirement for determining whether the auditee can be considered low risk. Based on the authors discussion with AICPA staff, the date for the 30-day filing requirement is not tracked by the Federal Audit Clearinghouse and, thus, would be difficult to test. The authors recommend that, except for data collection forms affected by the 2013 or 2014 automatic extension, when faced with a situation where an auditee has met the nine-month filing requirement but not the 30-day filing requirement (if earlier), the auditor consult with the cognizant agency about whether the auditee could be considered low-risk. 2. Does the auditee qualify as a low-risk auditee? (Indicate Yes or No. ) Part IV Determining Major Programs Completion of Part IV is not necessary if all federal awards are expended under one federal program or a single cluster of programs. (The program or cluster should have a check mark in Column 11 of the Worksheet.) Definitions. 1. Federal program means: [Sec. 105] a. All federal awards to a non-federal entity assigned a single number in the CFDA.

7 46 HUD 8/14 b. When no CFDA number is assigned, all federal awards from the same agency made for the same purpose would be combined and considered one program. c. Notwithstanding a. and b., a cluster of programs. 2. Cluster of Programs A grouping of closely related programs that share common compliance requirements. The types of clusters are research and development, student financial assistance, and other clusters as may be defined in Part 5 of the Compliance Supplement or as designatedbyastateforfederal awards the state provides to its subrecipients. Note: All programs in a cluster are evaluated together under the risk-based approach to determining major programs included in Section 520 of OMB Circular A-133. Thus, if selected as a major program, all individual programs that the entity has within the cluster are tested as a major program. The expenditures of the individual programs are totaled by cluster (Column 7 in the Worksheet) when determining Type A and Type B programs. A cluster may be either a Type A or Type B program. (See Part IV, Federal Awards, Step 3.) Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement provides important information about the removal of certain Recovery Act programs from clusters. It notes that Appendix V describes selected Recovery Act programs that were deleted from Parts 4 and 5 of the 2014 Compliance Supplement based on their completion or limited amount of funds still subject toaudit. However, if an entity has federal awards expended from these programs, they would be treated consistent with any other programs not included in the 2014 Compliance Supplement or not part of a cluster of programs. For example: (1) the program would not be considered as part of a cluster for periods covered by the 2014 Compliance Supplement, as the 2014 Compliance Supplement does not include the program in a cluster; and (2) if the program was part of a cluster that was audited as a major program in a prior year, the normal OMB Circular A-133 major program selection criteria and risk-based approach would apply and the program would be considered as audited in that prior year for purposes of major program determination, including consideration of any audit findings. Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement provides important information about the treatment of National Science Foundation (NSF) awards. Effective for proposals due on or after January14, 2013, all awards issued bythe NSFmeet the definition of Research and Development (R&D) at OMB Circular A-133, Section 105. As such, auditees should identify NSF awards as part of the R&D cluster on the SEFA and the auditor should use the R&D cluster in Part 5 when testing any of those awards. There will be a transition period (probably four years) when SEFAs will include both awards funded previous to this change in approach and awards made subsequent to it. Previously funded awards may be identified on the SEFA at the auditee s discretion, but awards resulting from proposals due on or after January 14, 2013, must be included in the SEFA as part of the R&D cluster. Federal Awards. 1. Calculate the basis for determining Type A programs. [Sec. 520] a. Insert the total federal awards expended (the total from Column 7 on the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet) $ b. Subtract large loan and loan guarantee programs (and clusters that include large loan and loan guarantee programs) included in a. [Sec. 520(b)(3)] c. Net amount $ To determine which federal programs are to be audited as major programs, the auditor should first identify federal programs as being either Type A or Type B. Federal awards expended for purposes of determining Type A and Type B programs are the amount of cash and noncash awards, after all adjustments are made, in the final current-year schedule of expenditures of federal awards. (If the prior-year schedule or preliminary current-year estimates are used to plan the audit, the auditor would recalculate the threshold for Type A programs based on the final amounts to ensure that awards are properly classified as Type A or B). OMB Circular A-133 states at Sec. 520(b)(3) that the inclusion of large loan and loan guarantees (loans) should not result in the exclusion of other programs as Type A programs. When a Federal program providing loans significantly affects the number or size of Type A programs, the auditor shall consider this Federal program as a Type A program and exclude its values in determining other Type A programs. Prior to the issuance of the 2010 Compliance Supplement, the OMB did not provide guidance on what might be considered a large loan or loan guarantee program. Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement clarifies the issue by providing a safe harbor for treatment of large loan and loan guarantee programs that auditors may consider using when determining

8 HUD 8/14 47 Type A programs. The safe harbor establishes a presumption that only changes in the number or size of Type A programs caused by excluding individual loan and loan guarantee programs that are greater than four times the largest non-loan program are significant. Thus, unless a program with loans or loan guarantees exceeds four times the largest non-loan program, (1) the program with the loans or loan guarantees is not considered large and (2) auditors do not have to subtract the program with the loans or loan guarantees (in Step 1. b.) when determining the Type A program threshold (Step 3). Thus, if a loan or loan guarantee program is part of a cluster, the entire cluster should be subtracted from total awards expended at Step 1.b. and be considered a Type A program. Appendix VII provides examples of the safe harbor computation. Auditor judgment is needed in applying a safe harbor and it is important to have a good understanding of the client s particular facts and circumstances. The authors recommend that if the auditor chooses not to subtract a program that exceeds the safe harbor computation, he or she clearly document why including the program does not result in excluding other programs as Type A programs. If the audit is biennial, the determination of Type A and Type B programs should be based upon the federal awards expended during the two-year period. [Sec. 520(b)(4)] 2. For each loan and loan guarantee program at Step 1.b., place an A in Column 9 of the Worksheet. For loan or loan guarantee programs at Step 1.b. that are part of a cluster, place an A in Column 9 of the Worksheet for all programs in the cluster. OMB Circular A-133 at Section 520(b)(3) states that all loan and loan guarantees excluded from the base (subtracted at Step 1.b.) should be considered Type A programs. The discussion in Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement regarding the safe harbor for treatment of large loan and loan guarantee programs reminds auditors that a cluster is treated as one program. Thus, if a loan or loan guarantee program is part of a cluster, the entire cluster is subtracted from total awards expended at Step 1.b. and considered to be a Type A program. Appendix VII providesexamplesofthesafe harbor computation. If a program (one CFDA number or cluster) has more than one amount listed on the Worksheet (for example, a loan and an expended amount), place an A in Column 9 for each amount. 3. Complete (and check) either step a., b., c., or d. depending on the amount at Step 1.c. [Sec. 520(b)] a. If the amount at Step 1.c. is $300,000 or less, there are no Type A programs among the programs included in the Step 1.c. amount; i.e., all are Type B programs. Place a B in Column 9 of the Worksheet for all such programs. b. If the amount at Step 1.c. is greater than $300,000 but is $10 million or less, Type A programs are the programs included in the Step 1.c. amount with total program expended funds (Column 7 of the Worksheet) that exceed $300,000. The remaining programs (included in the Step 1.c. amount) are Type B. For each of these programs, place an A or B, as appropriate, in Column 9 of the Worksheet. c. If the amount at Step 1.c. is greater than $10 million but is $100 million or less, Type A programs are those included in the Step 1.c. amount with total program expended funds (Column 7 of the Worksheet) equal to or greater than 3% (.03) of the amount at Step 1.c. ($ times.03 equals $ ). The remaining programs (included in the Step 1.c. amount) are Type B. For each of these programs, place an A or B, as appropriate, in Column 9 of the Worksheet. d. If the amount at Step 1.c. is greater than $100 million, see Section 520(b)(1) of OMB Circular A-133 and make the determination accordingly. For each program, place an A or B as appropriate, in Column 9 of the Worksheet. As defined in Part IV, Definitions, Step 2, clusters of programs are closely related programs that share common compliance requirements. While each individual program has its own CFDA number, the expenditures of these programs are totaled by cluster (Column 7 in the Worksheet) when determining Type A and Type B programs. The single audit threshold for fiscal years endingafter December 31, 2003, was increased from $300,000 to$500,000. However, the minimum Type A program threshold continues to be $300,000.

9 48 HUD 8/14 4. Based on Steps 2 or 3, is there at least one Type A program? Go to Step 5. Place a check mark in Column 10 of the Worksheet for all programs and go to Step Does the auditor have the option to waive use of the risk criteria for determining major programs? [Sec. 520(i)] Go to Step 6. Go to Step 7. An auditor has the option to waive use of the risk criteria for the first year the entity is audited pursuant to OMB Circular A-133 or for the first year after a change in auditors except the election may not be made more than once every three years. [Sec. 520(i)] 6. Does the auditor elect to waive use of the risk criteria? [Sec. 520(i)] Place a check mark in Column 10 of the Worksheet for all Type B programs, a check mark in Column 11 for all Type A programs, and go to Step 11. Go to Step 7. OMBCircularA-133providesforuseofthewaiverwhentheconditions are met, but the auditor has the option of electing or not electing the waiver. [Sec. 520(i)] 7. Has a federal agency notified the auditee (or the auditor) that one or more of the Type A programs may not be considered a low-risk program? [Sec. 520(c)(2)] Place a check mark in Column 11 on the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet indicating that the programs for which such a notification has been received must be audited as a major program. Go to Step 8. Go to Step 8. OMB may approve a federal awarding agency s request that a Type A program at certain recipients not be considered low-risk. The federal agency shall notify the recipient and, if known, the auditor at least 180 days prior to the end of the fiscal year to be audited of OMB s approval. [Sec. 520(c)(2)]

10 HUD 8/14 49 Appendix VII of the 2014 Compliance Supplement provides important information about the removal of certain Recovery Act programs from clusters. It notes that Appendix V describes selected Recovery Act programs that were deleted from Parts 4 and 5 of the 2014 Compliance Supplement based on their completion or limited amount of funds still subject toaudit. However, if an entity has federal awards expended from these programs, they would be treated consistent with any other programs not included in the 2014 Compliance Supplement or not part of a cluster of programs. For example: (1) the program would not be considered as part of a cluster for periods covered by the 2014 Compliance Supplement, as the 2014 Compliance Supplement does not include the program in a cluster; and (2) if the program was part of a cluster that was audited as a major program in a prior year, the normal OMB Circular A-133 major program selection criteria and risk-based approach would apply and the program would be considered as audited in that prior year for purposes of major program determination, including consideration of any audit findings. Previous editions of the Compliance Supplement indicated that Recovery Act awards generally could not be considered low-risk, even if they otherwise met the low-risk criteria under Sec. 520(c) of OMB Circular A-133. However, this guidance was removed from the 2014 Compliance Supplement, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 30, Are any of the remaining Type A programs (those not checked at Step 7) low-risk programs? [Sec. 520(c)(1)] The authors recommend that HUD-CX-1.7 be used as a practice aid in determining whether a program or programs can be considered low-risk. For Type A programs considered low-risk, place a check mark in Column 10 of the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet. For Type A programs not considered low-risk, place a check mark in Column 11. Go to Step 9. For each of the remaining Type A programs, place a check mark in Column 11. Go to Step Review Type B programs for high-risk programs: a. If no Type A programs were determined to be low-risk programs at Step 8, check here, place a check mark in Column 10 of the Worksheet for all Type B programs, and go to Step 11. Based on Sec. 520(e)(2), it is not necessary to test (as a major program) more Type B programs than the number of Type A programs not tested because they are determined to be low-risk. b. The auditor is required to perform risk assessments for all or selected Type B programs that exceed an amount stipulated (small program floor) in OMB Circular A-133. Based on Sec. 520(d)(2), the Type B programs that are subject to being selected for testing are those that exceed the cut-off amount computed as follows. Complete (and check) either step (1), (2), (3), or (4) depending on the amount from Step 1.a. (1) If the amount at Step 1.a. ($ ) is $33,333,333 or less, all Type B programs with awards expended that exceed $100,000. (2) If the amount at Step 1.a. ($ ) is more than $33,333,333 but is $100 million or less, all Type B programs with awards expended greater than.3% (.003) of the amount at Step 1.a. ($ times.003 equals $ ). (3) If the amount at Step 1.a. ($ ) is more than $100 million but is $1 billion or less, all Type B programs with awards expended that exceed $300,000. (4) If the amount at Step 1.a. ($ ) is more than $1 billion, all Type B programs with awards expended greater than.03% (.0003) of the amount at Step 1.a. ($ times.0003 equals ($ ).

11 50 HUD 8/14 c. Are there any Type B programs that exceed the cut-off amount (small program floor) computed at Step 9.b.? Place a check mark in Column 10 of the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet for all Type B programs that do not exceed the cut-off amount and go to Step 9.d. Place a check mark in Column 10 of the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet for all Type B programs and go to Step 11. d. From the programs that exceed the cut-off amount (small program floor) in the preceding step, determine the number of programs that have to be assessed and determine if the programs selected are high-risk. The authors recommend that the assessment(s) be made and documented by completing an HUD-CX-1.8 for each program for which an assessment is required. (1) If the auditor elects to follow Option 2 [Sec. 520(e)(2)], perform high-risk assessments for selected programs until the number of programs that have to be tested as major have been identified. Because specific guidance on assessing Type B programs with expenditures of Recovery Act awards was removed from the 2014 Compliance Supplement, there is no longer a requirement as to which Type B program(s) have to be assessed. Once the required number of high-risk Type B programs has been identified, it is not necessary to assess others. (2) If the auditor elects to follow Option 1 [Sec. 520(e)(2)], Sec. 520(d)(1) indicates that risk assessments are to performed for all of the programs identified at Step 9.b. The auditor is not required to justify the option selected. Also, the selection of an option is made annually, and no justification is required for a change in the selected option. The number of Type B programs identified at Step 9 that have to be audited as major programs may be identified under either of the following two options [Sec. 520(e)]: Option 1: At least one half of the Type B programs identified as high-risk must be audited as major programs, except that the number selected to be audited as a major program in this step need not exceed the number of low-risk Type A programs identified at Step 8. [For example, if there are four high-risk Type B programs and one low-risk Type A program, only one of the four high-risk Type B programs must be selected for audit as a major program. If there are five high-risk Type B programs and no low-risk Type A program, none of the five high-risk Type B programs must be selected for audit as a major program.] Option 2: One high-risk Type B program for each Type A program identified as low-risk at Step 8. OMB encourages using an approach that provides an opportunity for different high-risk Type B program to be audited as major over a period of time. [Sec. 520(e)(2)(ii)]. 10. Based on the assessment(s), are any of the Type B programs considered high-risk? [Sec. 520(d)] For Type B programs considered high risk, select those to be audited as major programs and place a check mark in Column 11 on the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet. For all Type B programs not to be audited as major programs, place a check mark in Column 10. Go to Step 11. For all remaining Type B programs, place a check mark in Column 10 on the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet. Go to Step 11. After Step 10, all programs should have a check mark in Column 10 or 11 (not both) of the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet.

12 HUD 8/ Has a federal agency requested the auditee to have a particular program audited as a major program that has not already been selected as a major program, confirmed that it wants the program to be audited as a major program, and agreed to pay the full incremental costs to have the program audited as a major program? [Sec. 215(c)] Place a check mark in Column 11 of the accompanying Financial Awards Worksheet (instead of Column 10) for any programs that meet this criteria. Go to Step 12. Go to Step 12. A federal agency may request to have a particular program audited as a major program in lieu of the agency conducting or arranging for additional audits (e.g., financial audits, performance audits, evaluations, inspections, or reviews). Such requests have to be made at least 180 days prior to the end of the fiscal year to be audited. The auditee, after consultation with its auditor, should promptly inform the agency whether the program would otherwise be audited as a major program using the risk-based audit approach described in Sec. 520 and, if not, the estimated incremental costs of auditing it as a major program. The federal agency is required to promptly confirm to the auditee whether it wants the program audited as a major program and agrees to pay the full incremental costs. In such circumstances, the program should be audited as a major program. [A pass-through entity may apply the provisions of Sec. 215(c) for a subrecipient.] 12. Calculate the basis for the 50% coverage rule: a. Insert the amount of total federal program awards expended; i.e., the grand total of Column 7 of the Financial Awards Worksheet. $ b. 50% of a. $ c. Total the amount of federal program awards expended for all programs with a check mark in Column 11. $ 13. Do the programs with a check mark in Column 11 equal or exceed 50% of the total federal programs awards expended (that is, does line 12.c. exceed line 12.b.)? [Sec. 520(f)] Go to Part V. Go to Step Does Part III, Step 2, indicate that the auditee qualifies as a low-risk auditee? (This Question should be answered only if the answer to Question 13 is No. ) Go to Step 15. Go to Step 18.

13 52 HUD 8/ Calculate the basis for the 25% coverage rule: a. Insert the amount from Step 12.a. $ b. Enter 25% of a. $ c. Insert the amount from Step 12.c. $ 16. Do the programs with a check mark in Column 11 of the Financial Awards Worksheet equal or exceed 25% of the total federal program awards expended (that is, does Step 15.c. exceed Step 15.b.)? Go to Part V. Go to Step Select programs with a check mark in Column 10 of the Financial Awards Worksheet and place a check mark in Column 11 until the programs with a check mark in Column 11 total at least the amount at Step 15.b. Go to Part V. [Sec. 520(f)] In selecting additional programs to meet the 25% requirement, some auditors may choose from the programs, if any, identified as high-risk at Step 9 that have not previously been selected for testing. Other auditors may choose to rotate the programs selected from year to year as suggested (but not required) by OMB. Because of the requirement that a Type A program cannot be considered low-risk if it has not been audited as a major program at least once in the two most recent audit periods, it may, in some instances, be desirable to select low-risk Type A programs, especially if they were not audited as major programs in the prior audit period and they are expected to be Type A programs next year. Other factors that the auditor may want to consider when selecting additional major programs include: The auditor s knowledge of the programs. Whether the programs are included in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement. Thesizeoftheprograms(sincelargerprogramswillprovidemorecoverageunderthepercentageofcoveragerule,butmay notbeasefficienttoaudit). Any auditee requests that particular programs be selected as major programs. 18. Select programs with a check mark in Column 10 of the Financial Awards Worksheet and place a check mark in Column 11 until the programs with a check mark in Column 11 total at least the amount at Step 12.b. Go to Part V. [Sec. 520(f)] In selecting additional programs to meet the 50% requirement, some auditors may choose from the programs, if any, identified as high-risk at Step 9 that have not previously been selected for testing. Other auditors may choose to rotate the programs selected from year to year as suggested (but not required) by OMB. Because of the requirement that a Type A program cannot be considered low-risk if it has not been audited as a major program at least once in the two most recent audit periods, it may, in some instances, be desirable to select low-risk Type A programs, especially if they were not audited as major programs in the prior audit period and they are expected to be Type A programs next year. Other factors that the auditor may want to consider when selecting additional major programs include: The auditor s knowledge of the programs. Whether the programs are included in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement. Thesizeoftheprograms(sincelargerprogramswillprovidemorecoverageunderthepercentageofcoveragerule,butmay notbeasefficienttoaudit). Any auditee requests that particular programs be selected as major programs.

14 HUD 8/14 53 Part V Tests of Controls and Compliance Tests Tests of controls (except when internal control over some or all of the compliance requirements for a major program has not been implemented or is likely to be ineffective) and compliance tests must be performed for all programs with a check mark in Column 11 (major programs) of the Financial Awards Worksheet.

APPENDIX VII OTHER AUDIT ADVISORIES

APPENDIX VII OTHER AUDIT ADVISORIES APPENDIX VII OTHER AUDIT ADVISORIES I. Effect of Changes to Generally Applicable Compliance Requirements in the 2015 Supplement In the 2015 Supplement, OMB has removed several of the compliance requirements

More information

Navigating the New Uniform Grant Guidance. Jack Reagan, Audit Partner Grant Thornton LLP. Grant Thornton. All rights reserved.

Navigating the New Uniform Grant Guidance. Jack Reagan, Audit Partner Grant Thornton LLP. Grant Thornton. All rights reserved. Navigating the New Uniform Grant Guidance Jack Reagan, Audit Partner Grant Thornton LLP Objectives What s New with OMB: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit requirements for

More information

Schedule of Expenditure

Schedule of Expenditure Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards (SEFA) TACA Fall Conference October 21, 2015 Federal Grants to State and Local Governments 1960 2017 2 Uniform Grant Guidance 2 CFR 200 December 2013, OMB released

More information

State Agencies, Independent Auditors, North Carolina Local Governments and Public Authorities, interested parties

State Agencies, Independent Auditors, North Carolina Local Governments and Public Authorities, interested parties NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE DIVISION AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION JANET COWELL TREASURER GREGORY C. GASKINS DEPUTY TREASURER Memorandum #2016-11

More information

APPENDIX N FEDERAL AUDIT CLAUSES

APPENDIX N FEDERAL AUDIT CLAUSES APPENDIX N FEDERAL AUDIT CLAUSES APPENDIX N AUDIT CLAUSE TO BE USED IN AGREEMENTS WITH SUBRECIPIENTS RECEIVING FEDERAL AWARDS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH SINGLE AUDIT REPORT REQUIREMENTS. The [NAME OF SUBRECIPIENT]

More information

PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2010

PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2010 PERALTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS JUNE 30, 2010 Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other

More information

2010 Mauldin & Jenkins Single Audits for for Auditees

2010 Mauldin & Jenkins Single Audits for for Auditees 2010 Mauldin & Jenkins Single Audits for Auditees SINGLE AUDITS FOR AUDITEES Mauldin & Jenkins July 22, 2010 Macon August 3, 2010 - Atlanta PRESENTER Hope Pendergrass Manager Macon Office hpendergrass@mjcpa.com

More information

CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS

CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS SECTION PAGE(S) SEFA Guidance Intro 1 2 Example of SEFA 1 1 3 Frequently Asked Questions with Answers 2 1 2 Notes to the SEFA (Example)

More information

Post Uniform Grant Guidance implementation from an auditor perspective

Post Uniform Grant Guidance implementation from an auditor perspective Post Uniform Grant Guidance implementation from an auditor perspective Jeff Zeichner Patrick Smith Agenda Uniform Grant Guidance review Challenges with UGG implementation SEFA Internal controls and compliance

More information

PART 3 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

PART 3 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS PART 3 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS INTRODUCTION Overview The objectives of most compliance requirements for Federal programs administered by States, local governments, Indian tribes, institutions of higher

More information

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 400

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 400 CHAPTER 98-91 Senate Bill No. 400 An act relating to state financial accountability; creating the Florida Single Audit Act; providing intent and findings; creating s. 216.3491, F.S.; providing purposes

More information

May CGHSFOA Accounting Conference Cheyenne Mountain Resort Colorado Springs May 15, Neal Christensen, CPA, CGMA Neal

May CGHSFOA Accounting Conference Cheyenne Mountain Resort Colorado Springs May 15, Neal Christensen, CPA, CGMA Neal May CGHSFOA Accounting Conference Cheyenne Mountain Resort Colorado Springs May 15, 2013 Neal Christensen, CPA, CGMA 720.468.1765 Neal CPA@Q.com Learning Objectives, you will be able to; 1. Identify a

More information

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT Montgomery County Public Schools Rockville, Maryland OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended June 30, 2010 OMB Circular A-133 Supplemental Financial Report Table of Contents Year Ended

More information

To the Board of Overseers of Harvard College:

To the Board of Overseers of Harvard College: Independent Auditor s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing

More information

Financial Grants Management. Session Outline. Grants Management Roles 4/19/10

Financial Grants Management. Session Outline. Grants Management Roles 4/19/10 Financial Grants Management Presented by: Donna Teague Grant Accounting Supervisor El Paso County Auditor s Office Small Counties Large Counties Grants Management Records Session Outline New Application

More information

Single Audit Reporting Package

Single Audit Reporting Package Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority Phoenix, AZ valleymetro.org Single Audit Reporting Package FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 VALLEY METRO REGIONAL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SINGLE

More information

Government Auditing Standards Report

Government Auditing Standards Report Government Auditing Standards Report 197 198 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED

More information

Federal Grant Guidance Compliance

Federal Grant Guidance Compliance Federal Grant Guidance Compliance SPEAKER Melisa F. Galasso, CPA mgalasso@cbh.com Cherry Bekaert LLP Learning Objectives Describe the changes in the Uniform Grant Guidance List ways to implement changes

More information

GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (FINANCIAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT)

GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (FINANCIAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT) GRANTS AND CONTRACTS (FINANCIAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT) Policies & Procedures UPDATED: February 25, 2015 (04/21/16) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Definitions... 3-7 DRFR 8.00 Policy Statement... 8 DRFR 8.02 Employee

More information

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS Government Auditing Standards Report 197 198 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT

More information

PREPARATION GUIDE. for. North Carolina State COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT. for the Year 2018

PREPARATION GUIDE. for. North Carolina State COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT. for the Year 2018 PREPARATION GUIDE for North Carolina State COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT for the Year 2018 Prepared by the N. C. Department of State Treasurer State and Local Government Finance Division Appendices TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE. Payments to Local Governments and Other Subrecipients

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE. Payments to Local Governments and Other Subrecipients MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE Subject: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE Payments to Local Governments and Other Subrecipients 305.21 Amended Number By Direction Of: Michael J. Masch, Secretary of

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM Number 50 Issue 1 Page 1 of 7 Date 1/09/04 ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER General SUBJECT: Sponsored Agreements Subrecipient Audits and Monitoring Requirements OMB Circular A-133:

More information

Texas Association of County Auditors

Texas Association of County Auditors Presentation to Texas Association of County Auditors New Uniform Grant Guidance and Update on 2014 OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement by www.padgett-cpa.com Presenters Joel Perez, Jr., Partner Leader

More information

CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS

CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS CHAPTER XI: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (SEFA) CONTENTS SECTION PAGE(S) SEFA Guidance Intro 1 2 Instructions for Preparing the SEFA 1 1 4 Frequently Asked Questions with Answers 2 1 4 Notes

More information

Felipe Lopez, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP

Felipe Lopez, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP San Luis Obispo County Community College District & San Luis Obispo County Office of Education 2012 F d l C li T i i 2012 Federal Compliance Training Felipe Lopez, Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP Objectives

More information

Understanding and Complying with Government Grants

Understanding and Complying with Government Grants Presents... Understanding and Complying with Objectives Obtain information to determine if applying for governmental grants is appropriate for your organization Obtain understanding of internal controls

More information

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND Carroll County, Maryland. REPORT ON SINGLE AUDIT June 30, 2008

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND Carroll County, Maryland. REPORT ON SINGLE AUDIT June 30, 2008 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND Carroll County, Maryland REPORT ON SINGLE AUDIT June 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORTS Independent Auditor s Report on Internal

More information

Circular A-133 Audits for Non-Profits Receiving Grants Preparing for Audits and Protecting Grant Eligibility Given Current Government Priorities

Circular A-133 Audits for Non-Profits Receiving Grants Preparing for Audits and Protecting Grant Eligibility Given Current Government Priorities Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Circular A-133 Audits for Non-Profits Receiving Grants Preparing for Audits and Protecting Grant Eligibility Given Current Government Priorities

More information

Implementing the OMB s Super Circular (aka UGG) Presented by: Anne Fritz, Finance Director, City of St. Petersburg, Florida

Implementing the OMB s Super Circular (aka UGG) Presented by: Anne Fritz, Finance Director, City of St. Petersburg, Florida Implementing the OMB s Super Circular (aka UGG) Presented by: Anne Fritz, Finance Director, City of St. Petersburg, Florida Acknowledgement to Heather Acker, Partner, Baker Tilly, Virchow Krause, LLP for

More information

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTS ON INTERNAL CONTROL AND ON COMPLIANCE

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTS ON INTERNAL CONTROL AND ON COMPLIANCE (A GOVERNMENTAL FUND OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS) INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTS ON INTERNAL CONTROL AND ON COMPLIANCE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 Deloitte & Touche LLP 361 South Marine Corps

More information

Engagements under Government Auditing Standards

Engagements under Government Auditing Standards Engagements under Government Auditing Standards Diane Edelstein, CPA Flo Ostrum, CPA Presenter Diane Edelstein, CPA Diane is a partner at Maher Duessel, CPAs in Pittsburgh, PA. She is a graduate of George

More information

FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT June 30, 2012

FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT June 30, 2012 FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT REPORT June 30, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal Award Program Information: Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Summary

More information

Something for Everyone: Adjusting to the OMB s Super Circular May 25, :30 10:10 am 2 CPE

Something for Everyone: Adjusting to the OMB s Super Circular May 25, :30 10:10 am 2 CPE Something for Everyone: Adjusting to the OMB s Super Circular May 25, 2016 8:30 10:10 am 2 CPE Heather Acker, Partner, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Anne Fritz, Finance Director, City of St. Petersburg,

More information

Grants - Uniform Guidance/Tracking & Reporting. Presented by: Marc Grace, CPA, Partner Stephen Emery, CPA, Manager

Grants - Uniform Guidance/Tracking & Reporting. Presented by: Marc Grace, CPA, Partner Stephen Emery, CPA, Manager Grants - Uniform Guidance/Tracking & Reporting Presented by: Marc Grace, CPA, Partner Stephen Emery, CPA, Manager Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Major program determination Internal control

More information

Harvard University Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2015

Harvard University Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs Year Ended June 30, 2015 Part III Findings Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs I. Summary of Auditor s Results Financial Statements Type of auditor s report issued Unmodified Internal control over financial reporting Material

More information

Subject: Financial Management Policy for Workforce Investment Act Funds

Subject: Financial Management Policy for Workforce Investment Act Funds NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DWS POLICY STATEMENT NUMBER: PS 19-2013 Date: October 14, 2013 Subject: Financial Management Policy for Workforce Investment Act Funds

More information

Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher

Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher Single Audit Entrance Conference Uniform Guidance Refresher MGO Audit Partner Annie Louie 31 Uniform Guidance Effective Date Federal Agencies Implement policies and procedures by promulgating regulations

More information

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), 49 U.S.C.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), 49 U.S.C. APRIL 2011 20.516 JOB ACCESS REVERSE COMMUTE State Project/Program: JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM (JARC) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Authorization: Safe, Accountable, Flexible,

More information

HENDERSHOT, BURKHARDT & ASSOCIATES CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

HENDERSHOT, BURKHARDT & ASSOCIATES CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Young Marines of the Marine Corps League Financial Statements for the Year Ended September 30, 2016 and Independent Auditors Report Dated March 8, 2017 HENDERSHOT, BURKHARDT & ASSOCIATES CERTIFIED PUBLIC

More information

CITY OF SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK SINGLE AUDIT DECEMBER 31, 2017

CITY OF SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK SINGLE AUDIT DECEMBER 31, 2017 SINGLE AUDIT DECEMBER 31, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECEMBER 31, 2017 Page Independent Auditor s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of

More information

Single Audit Report. State of North Carolina. For the Year Ended June 30, Office of the State Auditor Beth A. Wood, CPA State Auditor

Single Audit Report. State of North Carolina. For the Year Ended June 30, Office of the State Auditor Beth A. Wood, CPA State Auditor Single Audit Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2011 Office of the State Auditor Beth A. Wood, CPA State Auditor State of North Carolina STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SINGLE AUDIT REPORT 2 0 1 1 OFFICE OF THE

More information

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Years Ended August 31, 2014 and 2013 Alamo Community College District San Antonio, Texas Dare to Dream. Prepare to Lead. Northeast Lakeview College Northwest

More information

2012 OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement

2012 OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement 2012 OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement An Interactive Webinar July 24, 2012 Presented by Presented by: Stephen W. Blann, CPA, CGFM Director of Governmental Audit Quality Principal, Government/Nonprofit

More information

30. GRANTS AND FUNDING ASSISTANCE POLICY

30. GRANTS AND FUNDING ASSISTANCE POLICY 30. GRANTS AND FUNDING ASSISTANCE POLICY POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to account for, and file all appropriate documentation in relation to, any grants or other funding that the county applies

More information

Uniform Guidance Year Two of the Audit Requirements Now What? CACUBO

Uniform Guidance Year Two of the Audit Requirements Now What? CACUBO Uniform Guidance Year Two of the Audit Requirements Now What? CACUBO Lealan Miller, CPA, CGFM, Partner lmiller@eidebailly.com 208.383.4756 Organization of the Super-Circular, 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance

More information

Indirect Cost Information, Guidance, and Maximum Indirect Costs Worksheet

Indirect Cost Information, Guidance, and Maximum Indirect Costs Worksheet Indirect Cost Information, Guidance, and Maximum Indirect Costs Worksheet This document provides information and guidance on indirect costs as well as a worksheet for calculating the maximum in indirect

More information

FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS CAPITAL PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Transportation

FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS CAPITAL PROGRAM. U. S. Department of Transportation APRIL 2011 20.500 FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS State Project/Program: FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA) CAPITAL PROGRAM U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Authorization: Safe,

More information

HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION RAILROAD STATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. N. C. Department of Transportation Rail Division

HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION RAILROAD STATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. N. C. Department of Transportation Rail Division APRIL 2011 20. 205 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION RAILROAD STATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM State Project/Program: SAFE, ACCOUNTABLE, FLEXIBLE, EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT: A LEGACY FOR USERS (SAFETEA-LU)

More information

Presenter. Changes to Federal Programs & Single Audits (A-87, A-21, A-122, A-102, A-110, A-89, A-133 & A-50) The New OMB Uniform Guidance

Presenter. Changes to Federal Programs & Single Audits (A-87, A-21, A-122, A-102, A-110, A-89, A-133 & A-50) The New OMB Uniform Guidance Changes to Federal Programs & Single Audits (A-87, A-21, A-122, A-102, A-110, A-89, A-133 & A-50) The New OMB Uniform Guidance Presenter Richard Cunningham Quality Assurance & Technical Specialist Center

More information

Deloitte & Touche LLP 2200 Ross Ave. Suite 1600 Dallas, TX 75201 USA INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Tel: +1 214 840 7000 Fax: +1 214 840 7050 www.deloitte.com Members of the Board of Trustees Dallas Independent

More information

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT. Year Ended June 30, 2012

OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT. Year Ended June 30, 2012 OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended June 30, 2012 OMB Circular A-133 Supplemental Financial Report Table of Contents Year Ended June 30, 2012 Page Independent Auditor s Report on

More information

OMB Circular A-133 Reporting Package. Saginaw Valley State University. Year ended June 30, 2009

OMB Circular A-133 Reporting Package. Saginaw Valley State University. Year ended June 30, 2009 OMB Circular A-133 Reporting Package Saginaw Valley State University Year ended June 30, 2009 Saginaw Valley State University OMB Circular A-133 Reporting Package Year ended June 30, 2009 Audited Financial

More information

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Internal Control Pilot Project. State of Colorado. Financial Audit Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Internal Control Pilot Project. State of Colorado. Financial Audit Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Internal Control Pilot Project State of Colorado Financial Audit Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE 2009

More information

The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management

The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management This image cannot currently be displayed. The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 A Guide to Risk-Based Grants Management 2015 This image cannot currently be displayed. Increase in Federal Grants Activity The Catalog

More information

Uniform Guidance - Lessons Learned And To Be Learned

Uniform Guidance - Lessons Learned And To Be Learned DAY MAY 23, 2017 3:35-4:50PM Uniform Guidance - Lessons Learned And To Be Learned MODERATOR Jerry E. Durham Assistant Director for Research and Compliance, Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury SPEAKERS

More information

2018 Compliance Supplement and Single Audit Update. Diane E Edelstein, CPA

2018 Compliance Supplement and Single Audit Update. Diane E Edelstein, CPA 2018 Compliance Supplement and Single Audit Update Diane E Edelstein, CPA July 19, 2018 What We Will Cover Key changes made in the 2018 OMB Compliance Supplement (Supplement); Using the 2017 and 2018 Supplements

More information

SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS S A F E T Y, S E R V I C E A N D F I N A N C I A L R E SPO N S I B I LIT Y SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 Single Audit Reports issued in Accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code

More information

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK REPORTS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS DECEMBER 31, 2016 COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON

More information

University Enterprises, Inc. Sacramento, California SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

University Enterprises, Inc. Sacramento, California SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS Sacramento, California SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS June 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS June 30, 2017 Page Number Independent Auditors Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other

More information

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Grant Guidance 2 CFR 200

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Grant Guidance 2 CFR 200 Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Grant Guidance 2 CFR 200 Increase in Federal Grants Activity The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance lists over 2,000 Federal grant programs $600B $200B $7B $24B

More information

OVERVIEW OF OMB SUPERCIRCULAR... 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE REFORM... 1 OMB A-21 (COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS) TO 2 CFR 200 (UNIFORM ADMIN

OVERVIEW OF OMB SUPERCIRCULAR... 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE REFORM... 1 OMB A-21 (COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS) TO 2 CFR 200 (UNIFORM ADMIN Table of Contents OVERVIEW OF OMB SUPERCIRCULAR... 1 OBJECTIVES OF THE REFORM... 1 OMB A-21 (COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS) TO 2 CFR 200 (UNIFORM ADMIN REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND

More information

COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA. Single Audit Report December 31, 2016

COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA. Single Audit Report December 31, 2016 COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA Single Audit Report December 31, 2016 County of Berks Table of Contents December 31, 2016 Page Report Distribution List 1 Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

More information

December 26, 2014 NEW ADDITIONAL December 26, 2014 beginning December 26, /31/15, 6/30/16 Contents Reference Origin Appendix

December 26, 2014 NEW ADDITIONAL December 26, 2014 beginning December 26, /31/15, 6/30/16 Contents Reference Origin Appendix New Uniform Guidance September 11, 2014 Information from GAQC, NPO Conference, COFAR and a prior presentation by Diane Edelstein OMB Grant Reform December 26, 2013 OMB issued Final Grant Reform Rules -

More information

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK

COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK REPORTS REQUIRED BY THE SINGLE AUDIT ACT AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS DECEMBER 31, 2014 COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, NEW YORK TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON

More information

2 CFR Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards For Auditees

2 CFR Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards For Auditees 2 CFR Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards For Auditees SHERYL L. STEPHENS BURKE, CPA, MST Nashua Office 102 Perimeter Road

More information

GUIDANCE. Funds for Title I, Part B of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. Made Available Under

GUIDANCE. Funds for Title I, Part B of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. Made Available Under GUIDANCE Funds for Title I, Part B of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended Made Available Under The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education

More information

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200

Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 Are You Ready for This? The New Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 Increase in Federal Grants Activity The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance lists over 2,000 Federal grant programs $600B $200B $7B $24B $91B

More information

OFFICE OF AUDIT REGION 9 f LOS ANGELES, CA. Office of Native American Programs, Washington, DC

OFFICE OF AUDIT REGION 9 f LOS ANGELES, CA. Office of Native American Programs, Washington, DC OFFICE OF AUDIT REGION 9 f LOS ANGELES, CA Office of Native American Programs, Washington, DC 2012-LA-0005 SEPTEMBER 28, 2012 Issue Date: September 28, 2012 Audit Report Number: 2012-LA-0005 TO: Rodger

More information

CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon)

CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. June 30, (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) Single Audit Reports June 30, 2017 (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) Table of Contents Independent Auditors Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters

More information

Section IV. Findings

Section IV. Findings Section IV Findings Independent Auditor s Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs SECTION I SUMMARY OF AUDITOR S RESULTS Financial Statements Type of auditor s report issued: Unmodified Internal control

More information

EXHIBIT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS

EXHIBIT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS EXHIBIT A SPECIAL PROVISIONS The following provisions supplement or modify the provisions of Items 1 through 9 of the Integrated Standard Contract, as provided herein: A-1. ENGAGEMENT, TERM AND CONTRACT

More information

U.S. Department Of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation

U.S. Department Of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation APRIL 2011 20.219 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM State Project/Program: RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM U.S. Department Of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Federal Authorization: Transportation

More information

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Year ended June 30, 2013

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133. Year ended June 30, 2013 Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with OMB Circular A-133 Year ended June 30, 2013 (With Independent Auditors Report Thereon) OMB Circular A-133 Report Table of Contents Independent Auditors Report

More information

Preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Washington Association of School Business Officials Small Schools Committee

Preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Washington Association of School Business Officials Small Schools Committee Preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Washington Association of School Business Officials Small Schools Committee October 8, 2008 Ann Strand Assistant Audit Manager Team Yakima Topics

More information

University of San Francisco Office of Contracts and Grants Subaward Policy and Procedures

University of San Francisco Office of Contracts and Grants Subaward Policy and Procedures Summary 1. Subaward Definitions A. Subaward B. Subrecipient University of San Francisco Office of Contracts and Grants Subaward Policy and Procedures C. Office of Contracts and Grants (OCG) 2. Distinguishing

More information

Grant Review and Pre-Award Process Elisa Gleeson Senior Grants Management Specialist

Grant Review and Pre-Award Process Elisa Gleeson Senior Grants Management Specialist Grant Review and Pre-Award Process Elisa Gleeson Senior Grants Management Specialist 1 Learning Objectives Participants will gain an understanding of the elements of preaward and how to think through required

More information

AUDITOR GENERAL DAVID W. MARTIN, CPA

AUDITOR GENERAL DAVID W. MARTIN, CPA AUDITOR GENERAL DAVID W. MARTIN, CPA STATE OF FLORIDA COMPLIANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND FEDERAL AWARDS In Accordance With OMB Circular A-133 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,

More information

This page intentionally left blank

This page intentionally left blank COMPLIANCE SECTION This page intentionally left blank CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA Schedule T-1 SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Period Ended June 30, 2011 Federal Federal Granting Agency/Recipient

More information

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA REPORT ON SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AND STATE AWARDS For the Year Ended June 30, 2013 And Reports on Compliance and Internal Control TABLE OF CONTENTS Report

More information

CONTENTS. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards... 13

CONTENTS. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Note to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards... 13 CONTENTS Independent Auditors Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing

More information

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards

THE REED INSTITUTE. Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards Independent Auditors Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance for Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2017 Table of Contents Independent Auditors Report on Compliance for Each Major Program; Report

More information

RACE TO THE TOP EARLY LEARNING CHALLENGE

RACE TO THE TOP EARLY LEARNING CHALLENGE APRIL 2015 84.412 RACE TO THE TOP EARLY LEARNING CHALLENGE State Project/Program: Federal Authorization: State Authorization: RACE TO THE TOP EARLY LEARNING CHALLENGE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PL 111-5

More information

2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)

2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Understanding Compliance and Reporting Requirements Associated with ARRA Stimulus Funds November 19, 2009 2009 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Today

More information

Pinal County Community College District (Central Arizona College)

Pinal County Community College District (Central Arizona College) Pinal County Community College District (Central Arizona College) Single Audit Report Year Ended June 30, 2016 A Report to the Arizona Legislature Debra K. Davenport Auditor General The Auditor General

More information

Auditor General s Role in the Florida Single Audit Act August 12, 2016

Auditor General s Role in the Florida Single Audit Act August 12, 2016 Auditor General s Role in the Florida Single Audit Act August 12, 2016 Florida Single Audit Act Statutory Requirements Adopt rules Provide technical advice Review reporting packages Auditor General s Web

More information

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules

STATUTORY REPORT SECTION. Single Audit Reports and Schedules STATUTORY REPORT SECTION Single Audit Reports and Schedules Garfield County, Colorado Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 Part I: Financial Statements Type

More information

SINGLE AUDIT SECTION

SINGLE AUDIT SECTION SINGLE AUDIT SECTION CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For the Year Ended June 30, 2014 FEDERAL TOTAL FEDERAL GRANTOR, PROGRAM TITLE, PROGRAM EXPENDITURES PROJECT/GRANT

More information

U. S. Housing and Urban Development

U. S. Housing and Urban Development APRIL 2018 CFDA 14.228 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE'S PROGRAM AND NON-ENTITLEMENT GRANTS IN HAWAII (State-Administered Small Cities Program) STATE PROJECT/PROGRAM: NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES

More information

Changes to the SFA Audit as a Result of the OMB Uniform Grant Guidance and Compliance Supplement

Changes to the SFA Audit as a Result of the OMB Uniform Grant Guidance and Compliance Supplement Changes to the SFA Audit as a Result of the OMB Uniform Grant Guidance and Compliance Supplement TASFAA 2016 EMBASSY SUITES FRISCO, TX OCTOBER 5-7, 2016 1 Instructor Kenneth P. Wood, C.P.A., M.B.A. Audit

More information

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES STATEWIDE FEDERAL COMPLIANCE AUDIT PROCEDURES FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA STATE

More information

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA. Single Audit Reports. For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010 Single Audit Reports SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS Table of Contents Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards... 1-4 Page(s) Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards... 5-8 Independent Auditor's

More information

SUBCHAPTER 03M UNIFORM ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AWARDS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SECTION ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION

SUBCHAPTER 03M UNIFORM ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AWARDS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SECTION ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION SUBCHAPTER 03M UNIFORM ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AWARDS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SECTION.0100 - ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION 09 NCAC 03M.0101 PURPOSE Pursuant to G.S. 143C-6-23, the rules in this Subchapter

More information

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2009

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2009 SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 SINGLE AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2009 Contents Page Independent Auditors Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting And On Compliance And Other

More information

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

APRIL 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM APRIL 2009 14.228 State Project/Program: Federal Authorization: State Authorization: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/STATE S PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA SMALL CITIES CDBG AND NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

More information

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE STATEWIDE FEDERAL COMPLIANCE AUDIT PROCEDURES FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR BETH A. WOOD, CPA STATE AUDITOR

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor Rebecca Otto State Auditor MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE REPORT CITY OF DULUTH DULUTH, MINNESOTA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 Description of the Office of the

More information

Federal Rules for Sponsored Programs. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 CFR 200

Federal Rules for Sponsored Programs. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 CFR 200 Federal Rules for Sponsored Programs Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance (UG) The Basics Presented by Dan Evon Director

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor Rebecca Otto State Auditor MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE REPORT PREPARED AS A RESULT OF THE AUDIT OF ANOKA COUNTY ANOKA, MINNESOTA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER

More information

STATE AID TO AIRPORTS PROGRAM NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AVIATION

STATE AID TO AIRPORTS PROGRAM NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AVIATION APRIL 2018 STATE AID TO AIRPORTS PROGRAM State Authorization: N.C.G.S. 63 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AVIATION Agency Contact Person Program and Financial Betsy Beam, Grants Administrator

More information