The IDEAS Work Programme

Transcription

1 The IDEAS Work Programme EUROPEAN RESEARCH COUNCIL WORK PROGRAMME 2013 Established by the ERC Scientific Council and transmitted to the Commission for adoption on 12 of March 2012 Unless stated otherwise, the activities of this Work programme will be implemented by the Dedicated Implementation Structure of the ERC which the Commission has established in the legal form of an Executive Agency (2008/37/EC, ). The implementation will be delegated to the latter according to the Commission Decision delegating powers to the European Research Council Executive Agency with a view to performance of tasks linked to implementation of the specific programme Ideas in the field of research comprising in particular implementation of appropriations entered in the Union budget (C(2008) 5694, ). (European Commission C(2012) 4562 of 09 July 2012) How to use the Work Programme (WP) The WP is to be read in association with the relevant guidance for applicants. The most current guidance is available at the ERC website: Parts 1 and 2 describe the background to the WP, the broad policy objectives and the underlying principles of ERC funding. Part 3 explains the common features and requirements for ERC frontier research grants. Parts 4-7 give details of the individual ERC frontier research grant schemes. Part 8 sets out the proposal submission and evaluation procedure for ERC frontier research grants. Part 9 covers Proof of Concept Grants for holders of ERC frontier research grants, while Part 10 lists other activities to allow the Scientific Council of the ERC to carry out its duties. Part 11 gives a breakdown of the budget by activity. The Annexes give information on the relevant calls in overview form, and other useful information.

2 Table of Contents 1. Background and objectives Background Objectives Underlying principles of ERC funding Open to all fields of research Scientific excellence is the sole evaluation criterion Open to all researchers from any country in the world Attractive long-term funding at all independent career stages Principal Investigators and their research teams are supported The role of the Host Institution Common features and requirements for ERC frontier research grants Available funding and grant assessment Ethical Principles Eligibility Criteria ERC Starting Grant Background Objectives Size of ERC Starting Grants Profile of the ERC Starting Grant Principal Investigator ERC Consolidator Grant Background Objectives Size of ERC Consolidator Grants Profile of the ERC Consolidator Grant Principal Investigator ERC Advanced Grant Background Objectives Size of ERC Advanced Grants Profile of the ERC Advanced Grant Principal Investigator ERC Synergy Grant Background Objectives Size of ERC Synergy Grants Profile of the ERC Synergy Grant Principal Investigators Proposal submission and evaluation for ERC frontier research grants ERC frontier research grant proposal submission procedure and proposal description ERC Starting, Consolidator and Advanced Grant peer review evaluation ERC Synergy Grant peer review evaluation Evaluation criteria Outcome of evaluation Proof of Concept Grant for holders of ERC frontier research grants Background Objectives

3 9.3 Ethical Principles Eligibility Criteria Size of ERC Proof of Concept Grant ERC Proof of Concept Grant proposal submission procedure and proposal description ERC Proof of Concept Grant evaluation Evaluation criteria Outcome of evaluation Other activities Support to monitoring and evaluation strategy Support to Open Access Support to the ERC Scientific Council CSA Evaluation Indicative budget for the Ideas Work Programme Annex 1 Primary panels structure and description Annex 2 Starting Grants Call for Proposals Annex 3 Consolidator Grants Call for Proposals Annex 4 Advanced Grant Call for Proposals Annex 5 ERC Synergy Grant Call for Proposals Annex 6 Proof of Concept Grant Call for Proposals Annex 7 ERC proposal submission, peer review and gender mainstreaming - CSA Call for Proposals Annex 8 Acquisition of data sets to benchmark ERC performance - CSA Call for Tenders information Annex 9 PhD and Equivalent Doctoral Degrees: The ERC Policy Annex 10 Evaluation procedure for ERC frontier research grants

4 1. Background and objectives 4

5 1.1 Background The European Research Council (ERC) has a unique position in European research funding. It is a science-led funding body, supporting research at the highest level of excellence, operating to world class standards. The ERC consists of an independent Scientific Council, responsible for scientific strategy and an administrative arm, the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA). The Commission is responsible for assuring the "ERC's full autonomy and integrity" 1. The Scientific Council is composed of 22 members who collectively represent Europe's scientific community. As well as establishing the ERC's strategy, it has full authority over decisions on the type of research to be funded and acts as guarantor of the quality of the activity from the scientific perspective. It establishes the annual work programme that shall be adopted by the Commission with the assistance of the Programme Committee, establishes the peer review structure and process, monitors the quality of the programme s implementation from the scientific perspective, and develops the ERC's international strategy. The Scientific Council is supported by the autonomous ERCEA 2, which is responsible for all aspects of administrative implementation and programme execution. The Executive Agency implements in particular, the evaluation procedures, peer review and selection process according to the principles established by the Scientific Council and will ensure the financial and scientific management of the grants. The work programme provides information on the research activities for 2013 which will be implemented through calls for proposals in the latter half of 2012, as well as on other types of activities not implemented through calls for proposals to allow the Scientific Council to carry out its duties and mandate. 1.2 Objectives The objectives of the ERC are to reinforce excellence, dynamism and creativity in European research and improve the attractiveness of Europe for the best researchers from across the world, as well as for industrial research investment. In order to fulfil these objectives the ERC funds research of the very highest quality at the frontiers of knowledge thus feeding into the innovation chain and supporting the EU's Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and the EU's flagship Innovation Union initiative. The ERC complements existing research funding streams at the national and European levels. By establishing world class benchmarks of excellence in its evaluation and in the research it funds, and increasing competition to provide attractive conditions for excellent researchers the ERC will raise the status, visibility and attractiveness of European frontier research and provide a powerful dynamic for driving up the quality of the overall European research 1 In accordance with the Specific Programme Ideas, Council Decision 2006/972/EC of 19 December Its tasks are described in the Delegation Act, Commission Decision C(2008)5694 of 8 October

6 system. In this way the ERC supports research excellence across the whole of the European Union and Associated Countries. 6

7 2. Underlying principles of ERC funding 7

8 2.1 Open to all fields of research The ERC's frontier research grantss operate on a 'bottom-up' basis without predetermined priorities. Applications can be made in any field of research with particular emphasis on the frontiers of science, scholarship and engineering. In particular, proposals of an interdisciplinary nature which cross the boundaries between different fields of research, pioneering proposals addressing new and emerging fields of research or proposals introducing unconventional, innovative approaches and scientific inventions are encouraged. 2.2 Scientific excellence is the sole evaluation criterion Scientific excellence is the sole criterion on the basis of which ERC frontier research grants are awarded. The ERC's peer review evaluation process has been carefully designed to identify scientific excellence irrespective of gender, and to take career breaks as well as unconventional research career paths into account. The evaluations are monitored to identify potential biases (e.g. in terms of gender, age, nationality), to guarantee transparency, fairness and impartiality in the treatment of proposals. The evaluation of ERC grant applications is conducted by peer review panels composed of renowned scientists and scholars selected by the ERC Scientific Council. The panels may be assisted by remote referees. 2.3 Open to all researchers from any country in the world Principal Investigators from anywhere in the world can apply for an ERC grant provided their host institution is established in a Member State or an Associated Country. It may also be an International European Interest Organisation (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC), or an entity created under EU law. It is therefore expected that the research project will be carried out within the territory of a Member State or an Associated Country but in certain conditions contributions from elsewhere may be funded (see section 3.3.3). The ERC is particularly keen to encourage excellent proposals from Principal Investigators based outside Europe that wish to carry out a project with a host institution in the EU or the Associated Countries. Principal Investigators do not have to be based full-time in Europe but will be expected to spend at least 50% of their total working time over the lifetime of the grant in an EU Member State or Associated Country (see Starting Grant section 4.4, Consolidator Grant section 5.4, Advanced Grant section 6.4 and Synergy Grant section 7.4). Principal Investigators that move to a Member State or an Associated Country to take up an ERC grant may request additional funding (see Starting Grant section 4.3, Consolidator Grant section 5.3 and Advanced Grant section 6.3) to provide assistance to cover eligible "start-up" costs, which may include the purchase of major equipment. In addition, the constitution of the Principal Investigators' research teams is flexible. Depending on the nature of a project the research team may involve team members from other research organisations situated in the same or a different country, including countries outside the EU Member States or Associated Countries (see section 3.3.3). 8

9 2.4 Attractive long-term funding at all independent career stages Independent researchers of any age and career stage can apply (see section 3.3.2). The two streams of what was previously known as the ERC Starting Grant will now be separated into two separate calls. Therefore four ERC frontier research grants will be available in 2013: Starting; Consolidator; Advanced; and Synergy Grants as described in parts 4-7. The Synergy Grant will remain available in 2013 on a pilot basis for exceptional proposals 3. Existing ERC Principal Investigators can also apply for an additional Proof of Concept Grant as described in part 9. The ERC awards generous, long-term funding for a period of up to five years for the Starting, Consolidator and Advanced Grants, and up to six years for Synergy Grants. The maximum grant varies by grant type. See sections 4.3, 5.3, 6.3 and 7.3. An ERC grant can cover up to 100% of the total eligible direct costs of the research plus a contribution towards indirect costs. ERC grants are portable as described in the ERC Model Grant Agreement. The ERC grants are open to researchers from both public and private institutions. ERC awards are made and grants operated according to simple procedures that maintain the focus on excellence, encourage initiative and combine flexibility with accountability. The ERC is continuously looking for further ways to simplify and improve its procedures in order to ensure that these principles are met. 2.5 Principal Investigators and their research teams are supported The ERC's frontier research grants aim to empower individual researchers and provide the best settings to foster their creativity. The Starting, Consolidator and Advanced Grants will support projects carried out by individual teams which are headed by a single Principal Investigator and, as necessary, include additional team-members. The constitution of the research teams is flexible. Depending on the nature of a project the research team may involve team members from other research organisations situated in the same or a different country (see section 3.3.3). ERC Synergy Grants will support small groups of 2 4 Principal Investigators (with a designated Corresponding Principal Investigator 4 ) and their teams. Depending on the nature of a project the group may involve Principal Investigators and team members from other research organisations situated in the same or a different country (see section 3.3.3). 3 Because of the introduction of the ERC Synergy Grants, Co-Investigator projects will no longer be supported under the Advanced Grant scheme. 4 When the term "Lead Principal Investigator" is used in relation to the Synergy Grant following the terminology of the Ideas Work Programme 2012 (for example in the ERC Grant Agreement) it should be understood to mean Corresponding Principal Investigator under the Ideas Work Programme

10 With the focus on the Principal Investigators, the concepts of the individual team or ERC Synergy Group are fundamentally different from that of a network or consortium of undertakings, universities, research centres or other legal entities. Proposals of the latter type should not be submitted to the ERC. 2.6 The role of the Host Institution An ERC grant is awarded to the institution (Applicant Legal Entity 5 ) that engages and hosts the Principal Investigator. The Principal Investigator will be employed by the host institution 6. Grants are awarded to the host institution with the explicit commitment that this institution offers appropriate conditions for the Principal Investigator independently to direct the research and manage its funding for the duration of the project. These conditions, including the 'portability' of the project 7, are the subject of a supplementary agreement between the Principal Investigator and the host institution 8 and must ensure that the Principal Investigator is able to: 5 Prior Information of Principal Investigators, Candidates, Tenderers and Grant Applicants - registration of legal entities in the Commission's Early Warning System (EWS) and Central Exclusion Database (CED) The Commission uses an internal information tool (EWS), as well as a database available to public authorities implementing EU funds (CED) to flag identified risks related to beneficiaries of centrally managed contracts and grants with a view to protecting the EU's financial interests. Principal Investigators, candidates, tenderers, grant applicants and, if they are legal entities, persons who have powers of representation, decision-making or control over them, are informed that, should they be in one of the situations mentioned in: - Commission Decision of on the Early Warning System (EWS) for the use of authorising officers of the Commission and the executive agencies (OJ L 344, , p. 125); or - Commission Regulation of on the Central Exclusion Database CED (OJ L 344, , p. 12); their personal details (name, given name if natural person, address, legal form and name and given name of the persons with powers of representation, decision-making or control, if legal person) may be registered in the EWS only or both in the EWS and CED, and communicated to the persons and entities listed in the above-mentioned Decision and Regulation, in relation to the award or the execution of a procurement contract or a grant agreement or decision. 6 Cases where, for duly justified reasons, the Principal Investigator's employer cannot become the host institution, or where the Principal Investigator is self employed, can be accommodated. The specific conditions of engagement will be subject to clarification and approval during the granting procedure or during the amendment procedure for a change of host institution. 7 A special clause may be included in new ERC grant agreements with regard to equipment which is critical for the implementation of the project, which are used exclusively for the project, and which are fully charged to the project's budget. In case of portability of the ERC grant, and upon request of the Principal Investigator to the host institution and approval of the ERCEA, such equipment shall be transferred at their residual value to the new host institution (residual value is the difference between purchase price and depreciation costs already accepted by ERCEA). 8 This is supplementary to the ERC Grant Agreement and is described in the ERC Model Grant Agreement C(2007)

11 apply for funding independently manage the research and the funding for the project and make appropriate resource allocation decisions publish independently as senior author and include as co-authors only those who have contributed substantially to the reported work supervise team members, including research students, doctoral students or others have access to appropriate space and facilities for conducting the research These conditions are consistent with the 'The European Charter for Researchers and The Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers'. In the case of Synergy Grants, where the different Principal Investigators may be hosted by more than one host institution, each of the host institutions shall offer the commitments above subject to a supplementary agreement between the Principal Investigator or Principal Investigators and the host institution. Any type of legal entity, public or private, including universities, research organisations and undertakings can host the Principal Investigator or Corresponding Principal Investigator and his/her team as long as the principles indicated above are respected and the Principal Investigator or Corresponding Principal Investigator and his/her activity are not constrained by the research strategy of the entity. The ERC welcomes applications from Principal Investigators or Corresponding Principal Investigators hosted by private commercial research centres, including industrial laboratories. Host institutions are expected to make all appropriate efforts to provide the conditions to attract and retain scientists and scholars of the calibre to be awarded an ERC grant, within the framework provided by the ERC Model Grant Agreement and any other available administrative and legal possibilities. 11

12 3. Common features and requirements for ERC frontier research grants 12

13 This section sets out the common features and requirements for the four ERC frontier research grants. The specific features and requirements of these grants are set out in the subsequent individual parts. 3.1 Available funding and grant assessment Maximum size of grant The maximum grant varies by grant type. See sections 4.3, 5.3, 6.3 and Grant assessment The overall level of the grant offered will be assessed during the peer review evaluation. Evaluation panels will judge the funding requested by the applicant against the needs of the project before making an award. The funding requested must be fully justified by an estimation of the real project cost. The panels may suggest modifications to the indicative budgetary breakdown in the application, particularly where they consider funding requests to be not properly justified, but in such cases shall explain in writing any such modification. The Principal Investigator or Corresponding Principal Investigator will have the freedom to modify the budgetary breakdown during the course of the project upon notification of the ERCEA Union Contribution The Union financial contribution will take the form of the reimbursement of up to 100% of the total eligible and approved direct costs and of flat-rate financing of indirect costs on the basis of 20% of the total eligible direct costs 9. The level of the awarded grant represents a maximum overall figure the final amount to be paid must be justified on the basis of the costs actually incurred for the project Call budgets For the Starting, Consolidator and Advanced Grant calls the ERC Scientific Council has established the following indicative percentage budgets for each of the three main research domains: Physical Sciences & Engineering: 44% Life Sciences: 39% Social Sciences & Humanities: 17% An indicative budget is then allocated to each panel within each domain, in proportion to the budgetary demand of its assigned proposals. There is no indicative breakdown by domain for the ERC Synergy Grants call. Research proposals of a multi and inter disciplinary nature are strongly encouraged by the ERC. Proposals of this type are evaluated by the ERC's regular panels with the appropriate external expertise (see section 8.2). Given this, it is no longer considered 9 Excluding the direct costs for subcontracting and the costs of resources made available by third parties which are not used on the premises of the host institution. 10 Commission Decision C(2009)1942 of 23 March 2009 on the use of flat rates to cover subsistence costs incurred by beneficiaries during travel carried out within grants for indirect actions shall apply to grants awarded under this work programme. 13

14 necessary to establish an indicative percentage budget to fund proposals of a cross-panel and/or cross-domain nature as was the case in previous work programmes. Funding for such proposals will come from the regular panels which perform the evaluation. 3.2 Ethical Principles All proposals will be subject to ethical clearance. The proposed research activities shall respect and shall be implemented in line with fundamental ethical principles including the rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union 11. The opinions of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies and Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which recognises animals as sentient beings will also be taken into account. Other issues addressed include data protection and/or dual or military use of applications. Funding of human embryonic stem cell research is possible within the ethical framework defined in the EU Seventh Framework Programme and the Ideas Specific Programme 12. Cases of scientific misconduct such as plagiarism and fabrication or misrepresentation of data will be considered as breaches of fundamental ethical principles and the proposals concerned may be excluded in accordance with Article 15.2 of the FP7 Rules for participation Eligibility Criteria All proposals must be complete and be submitted before the relevant call deadline. A complete proposal entails all parts or sections. Incomplete proposals may be declared ineligible 14. For applications for Starting Grants, Consolidator Grants, Advanced Grants and Synergy Grants the required elements are set out in part 8. Where there is a doubt on the eligibility of a proposal, the peer review evaluation may proceed pending a decision by an eligibility review committee. If it becomes clear before, during or after the peer review evaluation phase, that one or more of the eligibility criteria has not been met, the proposal will be declared ineligible and not considered any further Eligible Scientific Fields Applications may be made in any field of research OJ C 303/7, , p.1. See also Strategy for the effective implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by the European Union, COM(2010) 573 final, See also Commission statement, OJ L 412 of , p Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of 18 December See also 'eligibility check' in ERC rules for the submission of proposals and the related evaluation, selection and award procedures for indirect actions under the Ideas Specific Programme of the Seventh Framework Programme C(2010)8695 of 9 December Research proposals within the scope of Annex I to the Euratom Treaty, namely those directed towards nuclear energy applications, shall be submitted to relevant calls under the Euratom 7th Framework Programme. 14

15 3.3.2 Eligible Principal Investigator The ERC actions are open to researchers of any nationality who intend to conduct their research activity in any Member State or Associated Country. Principal Investigators may be of any age and nationality and may reside in any country in the world at the time of the application. Advanced and ERC Synergy Grants No specific eligibility criteria are foreseen for Principal Investigators applying for the ERC Advanced and ERC Synergy Grants but only exceptional proposals are likely to be funded in what are expected to be extremely competitive calls (see profiles of the ERC Advanced Grant applicant in 6.4 and ERC Synergy Grant applicants in 7.4). Groups applying for the ERC Synergy Grant must be made up of a minimum of two and a maximum of four Principal Investigators and, as necessary, their teams. One of the Principal Investigators must be designated as the Corresponding Principal Investigator. Starting and Consolidator Grants Special requirements apply to Principal Investigators applying to the Starting and Consolidator Grants based on the date of award of his/her first PhD (or equivalent doctoral degree 16 ). For the Starting Grant the Principal Investigator shall have been awarded his/her first PhD at least 2 and up to 7 years prior to the publication date of the call for proposals of the ERC Starting Grant. For the Consolidator Grant the Principal Investigator shall have been awarded his/her first PhD over 7 and up to 12 years prior to the publication date of the call for proposals of the ERC Consolidator Grant. The reference date towards the calculation of the eligibility period should be the date of the actual award according to the national rules in the country that the degree was awarded. However, the effective elapsed time since the award of the first PhD can be reduced in the following properly documented circumstances. For maternity, the effective elapsed time since the award of the first PhD will be considered reduced by 18 months for each child born before or after the PhD award. For paternity, the effective elapsed time since the award of the first PhD will be considered reduced by the actual amount of paternity leave taken for each child born before or after the PhD award. For long-term illness 17, clinical training or national service the effective elapsed time since the award of the first PhD will be considered reduced by the actual amount of leave taken for each incident which occurred after the PhD award. 16 See ERC Scientific Council's note on 'PhD and Equivalent Doctoral Degrees' at Annex 9, including specific provisions for holders of medical degrees. 17 Over ninety days. 15

16 The elapsed time since the award of the first PhD should not in any case surpass 11 years and six months for applicants to the Starting Grant and 16 years and six months for applicants to the Consolidator Grant Eligible Host Institution (Applicant Legal Entity) The host institution must engage the Principal Investigator or the Corresponding Principal Investigator (for the Synergy Grant) for at least the duration of the grant. It must either be established in a Member State or an Associated Country as a legal entity created under national law, or it may be an International European Interest Organisation 18 (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) or an entity created under EU law. Any type of legal entity, public or private, including universities, research organisations and undertakings can host Principal Investigators and their teams. It is expected that the research project will be implemented within the territory of a Member State or an Associated Country. This does not exclude field work or other research activities in cases where these must necessarily be conducted outside the EU or the Associated Countries in order to achieve the scientific objectives of the project/activity. It is also expected that the host institution will be the only participating legal entity. However, where they bring scientific added value to the project, additional team members may be hosted by additional legal entities which will be eligible for funding, and which may be legal entities established anywhere including outside the European Union or Associated Countries, or international organisations 19. Additional Principal Investigators participating in an ERC Synergy group may also be hosted by additional legal entities which will be eligible for funding, but these must be established in a Member State or an Associated Country or be an International European Interest Organisation or the European Commission's Joint Research Centre Further restrictions on submission of proposals The current restrictions are set out below. These apply to the Starting, Consolidator, Advanced and ERC Synergy Grants 20. They may be modified in subsequent years by the Scientific Council in light of experience. A Principal Investigator may submit only one proposal to the ERC for ERC frontier research grant calls made under the same Work Programme 21 ; A Principal Investigator who has submitted an eligible proposal to a 2012 ERC call may not apply to a 2013 ERC call for any ERC frontier research grant if the proposal 18 As defined by Article 2.11 of the FP7 Rules for participation Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of 18 December In accordance with Article 29.2(a) of the FP7 rules for participation Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of 18 December Principal Investigators can apply for an additional Proof of Concept Grant while holding an ERC frontier research grant see part Ineligible or withdrawn proposals do not count against this limit. 16

17 was evaluated as of insufficient quality to pass to step 2 of the evaluation (category C see section 8.5). As an exception to this rule, a Principal Investigator who has submitted an eligible proposal to the 2012 Synergy Grant call may apply to the 2013 Starting, Consolidator or Advanced Grant calls (but not Synergy Grant) even if the proposal was evaluated as of insufficient quality to pass to step 2 of the evaluation (category C see section 8.5); A Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator 22 may hold only one frontier research grant from the ERC at any one time; A Principal Investigator who holds an ERC frontier research grant cannot submit a proposal for another ERC Grant unless the existing grant expires no more than two years after the call deadline; A Principal Investigator who is a serving Panel Member for a 2013 ERC call or who served as a Panel Member for a 2011 ERC call may not apply to a 2013 ERC call for the same type of grant. The year of an ERC call refers to the Ideas Work Programme under which the call was made and can be established by its call identifier. A 2012 ERC call is therefore one that was made under the Ideas Work Programme 2012 and will have 2012 in the call identifier (for example ERC-2012-StG). 22 Co-Investigator projects were supported under the Advanced Grant in Ideas Work Programmes from

18 4. ERC Starting Grant 18

19 4.1 Background It is widely recognised that Europe offers insufficient opportunities for young investigators to develop independent careers and make the transition from working under a supervisor to being independent research leaders in their own right. This structural problem leads to a dramatic waste of research talent in Europe. It limits or delays the emergence of the nextgeneration of researchers, who bring new ideas and energy, and it encourages highly talented researchers at an early stage of their career to seek advancement elsewhere, either in other professions or as researchers outside Europe. The ERC is committed to making a sustained investment on the scale necessary to have a real impact on European science and scholarship. Since 2010, the Starting Grant has been "streamed" allowing applicants to be compared with researchers of a similar level. Broadly speaking, Starters are usually still in the process of setting up their own research group, while Consolidators are very often already working with their own group, but need to consolidate it. As a development from this practice, under this Work Programme the two streams of what was the ERC Starting Grant will be separated into two separate calls in response to the rapidly rising number of applications (see also Part 5 ERC Consolidator Grant). 4.2 Objectives ERC Starting Grants are designed to support researchers (Principal Investigators) at the stage at which they are starting their own independent research team or programme. The scheme will support independent and excellent new individual research teams. The evaluation panels will evaluate whether the grant and the conditions specified by the host institution will allow the Principal Investigator to make the transition to independence. 4.3 Size of ERC Starting Grants Starting Grants can be up to a maximum of EUR for a period of 5 years (pro rata for projects of shorter duration). However, up to an additional EUR can be made available to cover (a) eligible "start-up" costs for Principal Investigators moving from a another country to the EU or an Associated Country as a consequence of receiving the ERC grant and/or (b) the purchase of major equipment and/or (c) access to large facilities Profile of the ERC Starting Grant Principal Investigator The Principal Investigator shall have been awarded their first PhD at least 2 and up to 7 years prior to the publication date of the call for proposals of the ERC Starting Grant. The effective elapsed time since the award of the first PhD can be reduced in certain properly documented circumstances (see sections 3.3.2). A competitive Starting Grant Principal Investigator must have already shown the potential for research independence and evidence of maturity. For example, it is expected that applicants will have produced at least one important publication without the participation of their 23 As any additional funding is to cover major one-off costs it is not subject to pro-rata reduction for projects of shorter duration. All funding requested is assessed during evaluation. 19

20 PhD supervisor. Applicants should also be able to demonstrate a promising track-record of early achievements appropriate to their research field and career stage, including significant publications (as main author) in major international peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journals, or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals of their respective field. They may also demonstrate a record of invited presentations in well-established international conferences, granted patents, awards, prizes etc. Early achievements track-record: In the proposal (see section 8.1.2) the applicant should list: 1. Publications in major international peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary scientific journals and/or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals, peer-reviewed conferences proceedings and/or monographs of their respective research fields, highlighting five representative publications, those without the presence as co-author of their PhD supervisor, and the number of citations (excluding self-citations) they have attracted (if applicable). 2. Granted patent(s) (if applicable). 3. Invited presentations to peer-reviewed, internationally established conferences and/or international advanced schools (if applicable). 4. Prizes and Awards (if applicable). Principal Investigators funded through the ERC Starting Grants will be expected to spend a minimum 50% of their total working time on the ERC project and a minimum of 50% of their total working time in an EU Member State or Associated Country. 20

21 5. ERC Consolidator Grant 21

22 5.1 Background The Consolidator Grant is a development of the previous Starting Grant which addresses the insufficient opportunities for young investigators in Europe to develop independent careers and make the transition from working under a supervisor to being independent research leaders in their own right. Since 2010, the Starting Grant has been "streamed" allowing applicants to be compared with researchers of a similar level. Broadly speaking, Starters are usually still in the process of setting up their own research group, while Consolidators are very often already working with their own group, but need to consolidate it. As a development from this practice, under this Work Programme the two streams of what was the ERC Starting Grant will be separated into two separate calls in response to the rapidly rising number of applications (see also Part 4 ERC Starting Grant). 5.2 Objectives ERC Consolidator Grants are designed to support researchers (Principal Investigators) at the stage at which they are consolidating their own independent research team or programme. The scheme will strengthen independent and excellent new individual research teams that have been recently created. The evaluation panels will evaluate whether the grant and the conditions specified by the host institution will allow the Principal Investigator to consolidate the transition to independence. 5.3 Size of ERC Consolidator Grants Consolidator Grants can be up to a maximum of EUR for a period of 5 years (pro rata for projects of shorter duration). However, up to an additional EUR can be made available to cover (a) eligible "start-up" costs for Principal Investigators moving from a another country to the EU or an Associated Country as a consequence of receiving the ERC grant and/or (b) the purchase of major equipment and/or (c) access to large facilities Profile of the ERC Consolidator Grant Principal Investigator The Principal Investigator shall have been awarded their first PhD over 7 and up to 12 years prior to the publication date of the call for proposals of the ERC Consolidator Grant. The effective elapsed time since the award of the first PhD can be reduced in certain properly documented circumstances (see sections 3.3.2). A competitive Consolidator Grant Principal Investigator must have already shown research independence and evidence of maturity. For example, it is expected that applicants will have produced several important publications without the participation of their PhD supervisor. Applicants should also be able to demonstrate a promising track-record of early achievements appropriate to their research field and career stage, including significant publications (as main author) in major international peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journals, or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals of their respective field. They 24 As any additional funding is to cover major one-off costs it is not subject to pro-rata reduction for projects of shorter duration. All funding requested is assessed during evaluation. 22

23 may also demonstrate a record of invited presentations in well-established international conferences, granted patents, awards, prizes etc. Early achievements track-record: In the proposal (see section 8.1.2) the applicant should list: 1. Publications in major international peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary scientific journals and/or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals, peer-reviewed conferences proceedings and/or monographs of their respective research fields, highlighting ten representative publications, those without the presence as co-author of their PhD supervisor, and the number of citations (excluding self-citations) they have attracted (if applicable). 2. Granted patent(s) (if applicable). 3. Invited presentations to peer-reviewed, internationally established conferences and/or international advanced schools (if applicable). 4. Prizes and Awards (if applicable). Principal Investigators funded through the ERC Consolidator Grants will be expected to spend a minimum 50% of their total working time on the ERC project and a minimum of 50% of their total working time in an EU Member State or Associated Country. 23

24 6. ERC Advanced Grant 24

25 6.1 Background ERC Advanced Grants provide an opportunity to established, innovative and active scientists and scholars to pursue ground-breaking, high-risk research that opens new directions in any field of their choice regardless of nationality, age or current location. By awarding grants on a competitive basis solely on the criterion of excellence the ERC will establish clear benchmarks for quality which will help to raise the level of all European research. In these ways the grants will complement and add value to existing research funding streams and investments at the national and European levels. 6.2 Objectives Advanced Grants are intended to promote substantial advances in the frontiers of knowledge, and to encourage new productive lines of enquiry and new methods and techniques, including unconventional approaches and investigations at the interface between established disciplines. The peer review evaluation of proposals will therefore give emphasis to these aspects, in full understanding that such research has a high-gain/high-risk profile, i.e. if successful the payoffs will be very significant, but there is a higher-than-normal risk that the research project does not entirely fulfil its aims. Applicants must have a recognised track record of research achievements, assessment of which will be a significant component of the evaluation. 6.3 Size of ERC Advanced Grants Advanced Grants can be up to a maximum of EUR for a period of 5 years (pro rata for projects of shorter duration). However, up to an additional EUR can be made available to cover (a) eligible "start-up" costs for Principal Investigators moving from a another country to the EU or an Associated Country as a consequence of receiving the ERC grant, and/or (b) the purchase of major equipment and/or (c) access to large facilities Profile of the ERC Advanced Grant Principal Investigator Principal Investigators for the prestigious ERC Advanced Grant are expected to be active researchers and to have a track-record of significant research achievements in the last 10 years which must be presented in the application. There is little prospect of an application succeeding in the absence of such a record, which identifies investigators as exceptional leaders in terms of originality and significance of their research contributions. Thus, in most fields, Principal Investigators of Advanced Grant proposals will be expected to demonstrate a record of achievements appropriate to the field and at least matching one or more of the following benchmarks: 10 publications as senior author (or in those fields where alphabetic order of authorship is the norm, joint author) in major international peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journals, and/or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals and peer-reviewed conferences proceedings of their respective field; 25 As any additional funding is to cover major one-off costs it is not subject to pro-rata reduction for projects of shorter duration. All funding requested is assessed during evaluation. 25

26 3 major research monographs, of which at least one is translated into another language. This benchmark is relevant to research fields where publication of monographs is the norm (e.g. humanities and social sciences). Other alternative benchmarks that may be considered (individually or in combination) as indicative of an exceptional record and recognition in the last 10 years: 5 granted patents; 10 invited presentations in well-established internationally organised conferences and advanced schools; 3 research expeditions led by the applicant; 3 well-established international conferences or congresses where the applicant was involved in their organisation as a member of the steering and/or organising committee; International recognition through scientific prizes/awards or membership in wellregarded Academies or artefact with documented use (for example, architectural or engineering design, methods or tools); Major contributions to launching the careers of outstanding researchers; Recognised leadership in industrial innovation. Ten-year track-record: In the proposal (see section 8.1.2) the applicant should list his/her activity over the past 10 years as regards: 1. Highlight ten representative publications, as senior author (or in those fields where alphabetic order of authorship is the norm, joint author) in major international peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary scientific journals and/or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals and peer-reviewed conferences proceedings of their respective research fields, also indicating the number of citations (excluding self-citations) they have attracted (if applicable). 2. Research monographs and any translations thereof (if applicable). 3. Granted patents (if applicable). 4. Invited presentations to peer-reviewed, internationally established conferences and/or international advanced schools (if applicable). 5. Research expeditions that the applicant has led (if applicable). 6. Organisation of international conferences in the field of the applicant (membership in the steering and/or organising committee) (if applicable). 7. International Prizes/ Awards/ Academy memberships (if applicable). 26

27 8. Major contributions to the early careers of excellent researchers (if applicable). 9. Examples of leadership in industrial innovation or design (if applicable). If a Principal Investigator so chooses, their achievements over a longer period than the past ten years can be considered in the following circumstances which should be highlighted in the CV. For maternity, the track record considered can be extended by 18 months for each child born before or during the last ten years. For paternity, the track record considered can be extended by the actual amount of paternity leave taken for each child born before or during the last ten years. For long-term illness, clinical qualification or national service the track record considered can be extended by the amount of leave taken for each incident which occurred during the last ten years. The track record considered should not in any case surpass 14 years and six months. Principal Investigators funded through the ERC Advanced Grants will be expected to spend a minimum 30% of their total working time on the ERC project and a minimum of 50% of their total working time in an EU Member State or Associated Country. 27

28 7. ERC Synergy Grant 28

29 7.1 Background It is increasingly recognised that for complex scientific problems, collaboration between different researchers and their teams, often on an interdisciplinary basis and using shared facilities, can lead to outstanding new ideas and discoveries. Building on of its support to individual researchers, the ERC extends its portfolio of instruments to cover such collaborative research projects to push forward the frontiers of knowledge. 7.2 Objectives ERC Synergy Grants are intended to enable a small group of Principal Investigators and their teams to bring together complementary skills, knowledge, and resources in new ways, in order to jointly address research problems. The aim is to promote substantial advances at the frontiers of knowledge, and to encourage new productive lines of enquiry and new methods and techniques, including unconventional approaches and investigations at the interface between established disciplines. The peer review evaluation will therefore look for proposals that demonstrate the synergies, complementarities and added value that could lead to breakthroughs that would not be possible by the individual Principal Investigators working alone. 7.3 Size of ERC Synergy Grants The maximum grant can be up to a maximum of EUR for a period up to six years (pro rata for projects of shorter duration). 7.4 Profile of the ERC Synergy Grant Principal Investigators Groups applying for the ERC Synergy Grant must be made up of a minimum of two and a maximum of four Principal Investigators and, as necessary, their teams. One of the Principal Investigators must be designated as the Corresponding Principal Investigator. Applications are expected from a group of innovative and active Principal Investigators. ERC Synergy Grants are designed to foster research at the intellectual frontiers. New types of joint effort may be needed that allow for new combinations of skills and disciplines, or the bringing together of researchers from different institutions, sectors or countries. It is therefore expected that the organization of such activities will vary widely, depending on the particular needs of the research. It is expected that in most cases ERC Synergy groups will be interdisciplinary, often using multidisciplinary approaches. Principal Investigators funded through the ERC Synergy Grants will be expected to spend a minimum 30% of their total working time on the ERC project and a minimum of 50% of their total working time in an EU Member State or Associated Country. They will also have to demonstrate novel working arrangements to ensure face to face contact for significant periods of core time in the same place over the course of the project. With the focus on the Principal Investigators, the concept of an ERC Synergy group is fundamentally different from that of a network or consortium of undertakings, universities, 29