SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES

Transcription

1 SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES June 1, 2016 Special Meeting 3:00 P.M. Room City Hall #1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place (400 Van Ness Avenue) City and County of San Francisco EDWIN M. LEE, MAYOR COMMISSIONERS LARRY MAZZOLA President LINDA S. CRAYTON Vice President ELEANOR JOHNS RICHARD J. GUGGENHIME PETER A. STERN JOHN L. MARTIN Airport Director SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94128

2 Minutes of the Airport Commission Special Meeting of June 1, 2016 CALENDAR AGENDA RESOLUTION SECTION ITEM TITLE NUMBER PAGE A. CALL TO ORDER: 4 B. ROLL CALL: 4 C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Regular meeting of May 17, D. ITEMS INITIATED BY COMMISSIONERS: Organization Chart 4 E. ITEMS RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE: 1. Approve Airport s $5.7 Billion 5-Year Capital Plan for FY 2016/17 to FY 2020/21 and $6.1 Billion 10-Year Capital Plan for FY 2016/17 to FY 2025/ Award Contract Design-Build Services - AirTrain Extension and Improvements Program - Skanska Constructors Award Contract Solid Waste Management Services South San Francisco Scavenger Co., Inc Submit Fiscal Feasibility Report to and Seek Finding From the Board of Supervisors that the Proposed Terminal 2 to Terminal 3 Secure Connector Project is Fiscally Feasible and Responsible Pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter Modification No. 4 to Professional Services Contract Provide Continued International Aviation Marketing Services in Overseas Locations - The San Francisco Travel Association Modification No. 3 to Professional Services Contract Provide Continued International Aviation Marketing Services in Overseas Locations - Hill+Knowlton Strategies Modification No. 2 to Contract Airport Security Consultant Services - Ross & Baruzzini Issue a RFQ/P for Professional Services Contract Project Management Support Services for the Utilities Infrastructure Master Plan Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 2

3 F. CONSENT CALENDAR OF ROUTINE ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS: 9. Modification No. 6 to Professional Services Contract Program Management Support Services for Terminal 1/Boarding Area B Redevelopment Program - T1 Partners, a JV of Parsons, The Allen Group LLC, and EPC Consultants, Inc Award Contract Construction Services for the International Terminal Media Room Project - KCK Builders, Inc Modification No. 1 to Contract Lenel OnGuard Access Control System Maintenance and Integration Services - G4S Secure Integration, LLC G. NEW BUSINESS: 14 H. CORRESPONDENCE: 14 I. CLOSED SESSION: 14 J. ADJOURNMENT: 15 Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 3

4 AIRPORT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES June 1, 2016 A. CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Airport Commission was called to order at 3:00 PM in Room 201, City Hall, San Francisco, CA. B. ROLL CALL: Present: Hon. Larry Mazzola, President Hon. Linda S. Crayton, Vice President Hon. Eleanor Johns Hon. Richard J. Guggenhime Hon. Peter A. Stern C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: The minutes of the regular meeting of May 17, 2016 were adopted unanimously. No D. ITEMS INITIATED BY COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Crayton... I have some questions on the new personnel chart that was sent out and would like a further review. Mr. John Martin, Airport Director... it should be discussed with Ivar. It s his organizational chart. Commissioner Mazzola... is he on vacation? Mr. Martin... Ivar is away on business so can we arrange a time that we can call you. Commissioner Crayton... it s basically around construction; it s not the individuals who have the jobs. Mr. Martin... I ll pass the word to him to set up a time with you.. Commissioner Crayton... I need you at the meeting, too. E. ITEMS RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE: Item No. 1 was moved by Commissioner Guggenhime and seconded by Commissioner Crayton. The vote to approve was unanimous. 1. Approval of the Airport s $5.7 Billion Five-Year Capital Plan for FY 2016/17 to FY 2020/21 and $6.1 Billion Ten-Year Capital Plan for FY 2016/17 to FY 2025/26 Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 4

5 No Resolution approving the Airport s $5.7 Billion Five- Year Capital Plan and $6.1 Billion Ten-Year Capital Plan for FY 2016/17 to FY 2025/26. Mr. Leo Fermin, Chief Business & Finance Officer... this is our annual update of the Five and Ten-Year Capital Plans. These updates include the Terminal 1 Renovation program with a total cost of $1.8 billion and the T3 Redevelopment Program at a total cost $1.2 billion. These and other projects in the terminals to address capacity demands and aging infrastructure account for 58% of the Five Year Plan. Because of capacity demands, later phases of the Terminal 1 Renovation program and other terminal projects that will originate in the out years have been moved sooner, to the Five Year Plan. Most of the nation s gateway airports are also implementing major capital programs. We studied nine of these gateway airports. We looked data published in their annual reports, rating agency analysis, and press releases about the capital programs, and financial projections in their bond statements. With this information, we forecast that five years from now we will still be competitive in our airline cost per enplanement, even with these updates to our capital program. Today our cost are in the middle of the pack, and five years from now we will be the 6 th lowest out of nine gateway airports. Chicago, Newark, Washington Dulles, JFK, and LAX will have higher airline costs per enplanement than we do. We reviewed the updated Five and Ten Year Plans with the airlines and the Airport s Financial Advisory Committee, and we will next review it with the City s Capital Planning Committee as well with the credit rating agencies, who are aware of the expected increases. We have developed an initial plan of finance for capital program with our financial advisors. Generally, we will first issue low interest rate commercial paper at project commencement and later take out the commercial paper with long term bonds. We are planning our next bond issuance this Fall for roughly $500 to $600 million to refund commercial paper, some of which was issued for this past year s Terminal 1 work, and to fund the next set of capital projects. Following this issuance we will need to go back to the Board of Supervisors for additional bond appropriations. On the handout before you I want to point out that the first four pages provide more detail on the various terminal projects, especially the Terminal 1 and Terminal 3 renovation. There are a couple of projects that are not quite descriptive, however, Page 4 provides more detail under Gate Capacity Projects. There is more detail on technology on Page 6. Item No. 2 was moved by Commissioner Guggenhime and seconded by Commissioner Crayton. The vote to approve was unanimous. 2. Award of Contract No Design-Build Services for the AirTrain Extension and Improvements Program - Skanska Constructors - $19,977,000 No Resolution awarding Contract No , Design- Build Services for the AirTrain Extension and Improvements Program, to Skanska Constructors in Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 5

6 an initial amount of $19,977,000 with an initial contract duration of 240 consecutive calendar days, and with a corresponding amount in contingency authorization. This activity is within the scope of the San Francisco International Airport Master Plan Program approved by the Airport Commission on Nov. 3, The Master Plan Final EIR prepared for the Master Plan Program including addenda thereto, adequately described this activity and its potential environmental effects for the purposes of CEQA. This item also includes activities in a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Multi-Modal Transportation Center. Mr. Geoff Neumayr, Deputy Director, Design & Construction... this item awards the Design Build Services contract for the AirTrain Extension and Improvements Program to Skanska Constructors in an initial amount of $20 million and an initial duration of 240 calendar days. The engineer for the guideway is WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff, and the architect for the AirTrain stations is Robin Chiang and Co. This contract provides for design build services for the AirTrain extension improvements program for the design and construction of the elevated guideway extension to serve the Long Term Lot DD and to provide for the design and construction of the new Airport Hotel station as well as the new station at Lot DD. The train control system portion of this contract will be provided under a separate contract with Bombardier that you have already awarded. Item No. 3 was moved by Commissioner Crayton and seconded by Commissioner Guggenhime. The vote to approve was unanimous. 3. Award of Contract No Solid Waste Management Services South San Francisco Scavenger Co., Inc. - $8,817,488 No Resolution awarding Contract No , Solid Waste Management Services, to South San Francisco Scavenger Co., Inc. in the amount of $8,817,488 with a contract duration of five years, from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021, with a oneyear option to extend the contract at the sole discretion of the Commission. Mr. Neumayr... this item awards the Solid Waste Management Services contract to So. San Francisco Scavenger Company in an initial amount of $8.8 million with a duration of five years and an option to extend the contract an additional year at the sole discretion of the Commission. The services provided under this contract will include the hauling, recycling, and proper disposal of all Airport solid waste, provide all necessary waste containers, and perform routine maintenance and as needed repairs on waste collection equipment as well as maintaining general cleanliness in waste collection areas. The Airport received two bids in response to this advertisement. The Engineer s estimate for this contract was $8.75 million Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 6

7 and the lowest responsive bid was submitted by South San Francisco Scavenger Company in an amount of $8.8 million or $57,000 higher than the Engineer s estimate. We are fairly satisfied with the bid. The Airport s staff has reviewed the bid submitted by South San Francisco Scavenger Company and has determined that the bid is responsible and responsive to the bid requirements of the contract. Commissioner Crayton... who currently holds the contract? Mr. Neumayr... South San Francisco Scavenger. Commissioner Crayton... is that the company that s in the City, or is it Recology? Mr. Neumayr... it s Recology. Commissioner Crayton... I thought the way in which they get rid of waste is a lot better. I know that So. San Francisco Scavenger Co. used to be the only one until Recology. I don t have a problem with this, but I want to make sure that I understand that they re able to use the same sort of technology to do it in a sustainable way like Recology. Mr. Neumayr... they do. The challenge before was that we wanted Recology to compete on this contract and we did get them to compete. I think it s what helped us get to our price. What made Recology s ability to be competitive was the fact that they moved their separation station closer to the Airport, which reduced their costs. But their operations are very much the same and this is great for us because we now have competition in South City. Commissioner Crayton... am I seeing a $2 million difference here? Mr. Neumayr... yes. Commissioner Johns... I want to be on the record that my understanding is that we approved something, I think at the last Commission meeting, where we re setting up this whole new environmental system within the Airport in the next five years, hopefully when this contract comes up, that will make us more competitive. Perhaps by that time we will change internal actions at the Airport that relate to recycling and moving the solid waste. Is that correct? Mr. Neumayr... correct. And we will be studying all the various aspects of this, from education programs to sortation, even exploring the idea of an on-site sortation facility to help us get there. As I mentioned, it s a journey to get there because there are alot of things involved in policy, even to educating the public globally. We will put those together and move forward, and as those things come together we ll communicate to you on what that program is going to look like. Commissioner Johns... are South City and Recology aware of this? Mr. Neumayr... definitely. Our goal is to have them just pick up without getting involved in separation. We could be a lot more efficient, starting with the general public, if they sort. This involves containers inside the Airport where we re clear Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 7

8 about education and using graphics, and how concessionaires operate, making sure that they are effective, that we consider design guidelines on how they operate their facilities within the Airport, as well as how the airlines take solid waste off the Airport. We want to make sure that it fits and that it s automatic. Similar to the way we do things at home... that it just happens, and that s what we want to do here. Item No. 4 was moved by Commissioner Crayton and seconded by Commissioner Stern. The vote to approve was unanimous. 4. Authorization to Submit Fiscal Feasibility Report to and Seek Finding From the Board of Supervisors that the Proposed Terminal 2 to Terminal 3 Secure Connector Project is Fiscally Feasible and Responsible Pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 29 No Resolution authorizing the Director to submit Fiscal Feasibility Report to and seek a finding from the Board of Supervisors that the Proposed Terminal 2 to Terminal 3 Secure Connector Project is fiscally feasible and responsible under San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 29. Mr. Neumayr... this item authorizes the Director to submit a fiscal feasibility report to seek a finding from the Board of Supervisors that the proposed Terminal 2 to Terminal 3 connector is fiscally feasible and responsible to the San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 29. The T2 to T3 secure connector project will provide both a non-secure and secure connector between T2 and T3, and it will also include 91,000 sq. ft. of office space above the connector. This project will address the need to provide post security passenger connectivity between terminals and provide office space to allow re-purposing post-security leasable space in the International Terminal for its highest and best use as airline functions, and it provides space for terminal related administrative activities in a centralized office block. Chapter 29 of the San Francisco Administrative Code requires any project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act with an estimated implementation or construction costs greater than $25 million and requiring more than $1 million in public monies is required to be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for a determination of whether the plan for undertaking and implementing the project is fiscally feasible and responsible. Staff has prepared the fiscal feasibility study for submittal to the Board of Supervisors. This report found that the proposed office space and connectors expect to generate significant non-concessions revenue, and that the secure connector may provide passengers with more opportunities for concession spending. Following a fiscal feasibility determination by the Board of Supervisors the project will be submitted to the San Francisco Planning Department for environmental review under CEQA. The total project value is estimated at $172 million and the project is included in our Five Year Capital Plan. Commissioner Guggenhime... if 21% of the people flying don t have to go through Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 8

9 security, it will alleviate most of the congestion problem at checkpoints. Having Covenant, a private security operator, obviously is very efficient, but at a lot of airports you could spend nearly two hours in security lines, and you could spend 38 or 40 minutes in pre-check. I think this makes a lot of sense. Commissioner Stern... on the feasibility report, is there a metric that they use? Is it a pass, not-pass, how do they determine if it is feasible or not? Ms. Cathy Widener, Government Affairs Manager... the budget analyst s office will take the financial report that we generated and it will compare cost to what we estimate our projected revenue may be on the project. This is probably the 8 th or 9 th fiscal feasibility report that we had to bring to them in the past eight years and they ve always approved it. It hasn t been an issue in the past. Commissioner Stern... so, it s more or less pass or not pass. Ms. Widener... yes. It s goes to Committee first and if it passes out of committee, it goes to the Board. Commissioner Mazzola... but it leaves the Commission with a recommendation to pass. Right? Ms. Widener... yes. Commissioner Mazzola... the draft says that we think it s a good project and we recommend it. Commissioner Johns... and we have the money to do it. Item Nos. 5 and 6 were called together. They were moved by Commissioner Crayton and seconded by Commissioner Johns. The vote to approve was unanimous. 5. Modification No. 4 to Professional Services Contract No Provide Continued International Aviation Marketing Services in Overseas Locations The San Francisco Travel Association - $900,000 No Resolution approving Modification No. 4 to Professional Services Contract 9239 with the San Francisco Travel Association to extend the term of the contract for one year thru June 30, 2017, and to increase the amount by $900,000 for a new total notto-exceed amount of $4,500,000 for continued International Aviation Marketing Services in Overseas Locations. 6. Modification No. 3 to Professional Services Contract Provide Continued International Aviation Marketing Services in Overseas Locations - Hill+Knowlton Strategies - $200,000 Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 9

10 No Resolution approving Modification No. 3 to Professional Services Contract 9270, with Hill+ Knowlton Strategies to extend the term of agreement for one year thru June 30, 2017, and to increase the amount by $200,000 for a new total not-to-exceed amount of $1,000,000 for continued international aviation marketing services in overseas locations. Ms. Kandace Bender, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer... we re calling these two items together because they involve modifications for two contracts from two members of our pool for international marketing services. We ve been using services from these two firms for four years, with an initial three year contract and two one year options to renew. Today we are requesting approval to exercise the final of the two one-options to extend both contracts. At the end of June 2017 we will issue an RFP for the international marketing pool. The modification amount requested for San Francisco Travel is $900,000, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $1.5 million that s over the life of the contract. For Hill+Knowlton we are requesting $200,000, for a total not-to-exceed $1 million. Both firms have provided us with valuable assistance and pro-active marketing support throughout the world. Hill+Knowlton focuses primarily on Australia and New Zealand, and San Francisco Travel works with us through our joint international marketing. Both firms have played an important support role in helping SFO to be the fastest growing airport in the United States and international traffic. Ee recommend the approval for both contract modifications. Commissioner Crayton... how long have we been working with these firms? Ms. Bender... Hill+Knowlton has been four years. We ve had a partnership with SF Travel since Commissioner Crayton... do we have an opportunity to look at other folks to see if they can do something different in terms of how the marketing is emerging? Ms. Bender... the difference in these contracts is that the work is done overseas. We have people in place in Australia, in China, in the U.K. Commissioner Crayton... is your collaboration via telephone or do you go there? Ms. Bender... we pay jointly for the overseas offices with SF Travel, so we all work together, but the work is all overseas. Commissioner Johns... so you re saying that the $4.5 million is our share to SF Travel and they expend the same amount. I m not clear on that. Ms. Bender... we do, it s the partnership that we have. The $4.5 million is for the life of the contract. We meet with them regularly and we decide jointly what projects are going to be funded overseas. We ve decided to do a campaign in Northern Italy and they put an equal amount of money into it. We have joint Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 10

11 marketing reps in 12 countries that prepare campaigns for us. Commissioner Crayton... they re actually looking out for our interest, am I understanding that correctly? Ms. Bender... some of them are very good and we are in the process of going through an RFP process in order to get new ones into those countries where we are dissatisfied. We recently came back from China where we selected a Chinese firm that we are pretty excited about, and an Australian firm that s coming out in the next RFP, so we re refreshing those as we go along. Commissioner Crayton... I would assume other airports use the same vendors or are there other choices out there. Ms. Bender... that s a challenge because a lot of organizations such as California, US Travel, local organizations use the same firms so we try to keep ourselves separate as much as we can to get fresher ideas so we re not just working on campaigns with everybody else in the State of California. But we do overlap in some of them. Commissioner Johns... how do we know that the money we give them is used for these purposes? Is there some sort of audit that happens or do they just say this is the amount we need, we think this is what it will cost? Ms. Bender... we receive a monthly invoice from them and we go through it very carefully to make sure that we re not being doubled-billed. It s very detailed. Item No. 7 was moved by Commissioner Johns and seconded by Commissioner Guggenhime The vote to approve was unanimous. 7. Modification No. 2 to Contract No Airport Security Consultant Services Ross & Baruzzini - $271,000 No Resolution approving Modification No. 2 to Contract 9263, for Airport Security Consultant Services with Ross & Baruzzini to extend the contract term for two years and increase the compensation by $271,000 for a new total contract amount not to exceed $1,052,450. Mr. Jeff Littlefield, Deputy Director, Operations & Security... we are requesting approval to exercise Modification No. 2 to Contract No. 9263, Airport Security Consultant Services with Ross & Baruzzini. This contract provides professional, technical consulting services for improved Airport security. Given the increase in threats within our industry, we are seeking additional consulting services to assist in identifying and implementing further improvements. SFO s security program continues to benefit from the expertise provided by our consultant as TSA regulatory requirements change to reflect the current environment. These additional services are also necessary to support technical projects such as our perimeter security detection system which remains underway. Other areas of Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 11

12 focus will include pre-security blast protection analysis in key areas and increased passenger throughput initiatives in our U.S. Customs arrivals area. Commissioner Crayton... where is Ross & Baruzzini located? Mr. Martin... St. Louis, a half a block from the house I grew up in. Item No. 8 was moved by Commissioner Crayton and seconded by Commissioner Guggenhime. The vote to approve was unanimous. 8. Authorization to Issue a Request for Qualifications/Proposals for Professional Services Contract No Project Management Support Services for the Utilities Infrastructure Master Plan No Resolution authorizing the Director to issue a RFQ/P for Professional Services Contract , Project Management Support Services for the Utilities Infrastructure Master Plan. Mr. Neumayr... this proposed resolution authorizes the Director to issue a Request for Qualifications/Proposals for professional services for project management services for the Utilities Infrastructure Master Plan. Much of the Airport s infrastructure used to provide power, gas, water, sewer, and data distribution throughout the Airport is nearing the end of its useful life or approaching it s maximum capacity. The Airport needs to develop a comprehensive underground Utility Master Plan that will address long term needs of the Airport for both demands, changes, resiliency in terms of eliminating single source of failure as well as natural disasters. This contract will provide for the technical project management support services such as engineering studies, field assessments, project controls, scheduling, budgeting, estimating, docking control, and progress reports. This contract will also provide technical assistance services to include computer aided design and drafting services as well as geographic systems to support our documentation digitally and to include into our virtual design and construction system. The estimated value of this contract is $8 million with a duration of 48 months. Staff will convene a selection panel to review and score the proposals in the oral interviews and will prepare a recommendation for award for your approval following the successful negotiations with the highest ranked responsive bidder. We will work with CMD to develop the local business enterprise subcontracting requirements for this contract. Commissioner Guggenhime... why were qualifications and experience only given 40 out of 500 points? Mr. Neumayr... we put a lot of value on the firm and it comes out on the people that they have. Commissioner Guggenhime... you give proposed project personnel 100 points, so basically 140 out of 500 goes to experience and qualifications, and project Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 12

13 personnel. You can have the most qualified people in the world and have a lousy interview. Mr. Neumayr... there s a value for the approach, and we do put in a lot of value on the interview in terms of the approach. Commissioner Guggenhime... is this your standard operating procedurer? Mr. Neumayr... yes. We have found that if you don t put focus on the interviews and you put the experience onto the written portion, business development, people who write it are not the actual people doing the job. What we re trying to do is put a value in the phase to phase part, so we put a lot of value on that interview process where we see the actual people. They have to respond to scenario based questions. In other words, it s not just a simple question but we give them problems and ask them to work it out in front of us and actually present it back to us to see how well they behave and interact with each other. And, in a knowledgeable way instead of just doing a powerpoint presentation. Commissioner Crayton... so, you re asking them things they don t know or aren t aware of when you get to the actual interview. Mr. Neumayr... correct. It s a typical scenario that they might have at the Airport in terms of what we might ask them to do. We want to see how they respond to a changing condition in front of us... see if they really are knowledgeable. F. CONSENT CALENDAR OF ROUTINE ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS: The Consent Calendar, Item Nos. 9 through 11, was moved by Commissioner Crayton and seconded by Commissioner Johns. The vote to approve was unanimous. 9. Modification No. 6 to Professional Services Contract No Program Management Support Services for the Terminal 1/Boarding Area B Redevelopment Program - T1 Partners, a Joint Venture of Parsons, The Allen Group LLC, and EPC Consultants, Inc. - $3,967,000 No Resolution approving Modification No. 6 to Professional Services Contract No , Program Management Support Services for the Terminal 1/Boarding Area B Redevelopment Program, with T1 Partners, a J.V. of Parsons, The Allen Group LLC, and EPC Consultants, Inc., in an amount of $3,967,000 for a new not-to-exceed contract amount of $23,727,757 for services through July 7, Award of Contract No Construction Services for the International Terminal Media Room Project - KCK Builders, Inc. - $965,000 No Resolution awarding Contract No , Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 13

14 Construction Services for the International Terminal Media Room Project, to KCK Builders, Inc. in the amount of $965,000 with a contract duration of 100 calendar days, and with a corresponding amount in contingency authorization. 11. Modification No. 1 to Contract No Lenel OnGuard Access Control System Maintenance and Integration Services - G4S Secure Integration, LLC - $750,000 No Resolution approving Modification No. 1 to Contract No. 9357, for Lenel OnGuard Access Control System Maintenance and Integration Services to G4S Secure Integration, LLC to increase the compensation by $750,000 for a new total contract amount not to exceed $1,500,000. G. NEW BUSINESS: Discussion only. This is the Public Comment section of the calendar. Individuals may address the Commission on any topic within the jurisdiction of the Airport Commission for a period of up to two (2) minutes. Please fill out a Request to Speak form located on the table next to the speaker s microphone and submit it to the Commission Secretary. There were no requests to speak. H. CORRESPONDENCE: There was no discussion by the Commission. I. CLOSED SESSION: There are no planned agenda items for a Closed Session for the current meeting. In the event of any urgent matter requiring immediate action which has come to the attention of the Airport Commission after the agenda was issued and which is an item appropriately addressed in Closed Session, the Airport Commission may discuss and vote whether to conduct a Closed Session under Brown Act (California Government Code Sections (b)(2) and ) and Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.11). If the Airport Commission enters Closed Session under such circumstances, the Airport Commission will discuss and vote whether to disclose action taken or discussions held in Closed Session under the Brown Act (California Government Code Section ) and Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.12). Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 14

15 J. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further calendared business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 3:32 PM. (Original signed by: Jean Caramatti) Jean Caramatti Commission Secretary Minutes, June 1, 2016, Page 15